alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28549]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-1273]


Certain Residential Premises Security Monitoring and Automation 
Control Panels, and Components Thereof; Correction Notice of 
Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Correction of notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Correction is made to notice 82 FR 42879, which was published on 
August 5, 2021. The notice erroneously does not state that the Office 
of Unfair Import Investigations is a party to the investigation. The 
notice should read:
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served: . . . (c) The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and . . .

    Issued: December 30, 2021.
William Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-28549 Filed 1-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

John E. Amos,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:17-cv-819

John M. Solovan, II, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This is an action under 42 U.S.C. §1985(2) filed by John E.

Amos, an Ohio pro se inmate, against John M. Solovan, II, the

retired Ohio common pleas court judge who presided over plaintiff’s

2007 criminal trial in Belmont County, Dan Fry (also spelled

“Frye”), and James L. Nichelson, the attorney who represented

plaintiff in the criminal proceedings. Plaintiff alleges that

defendants Solovan and Fry conspired to illegally indict plaintiff,

and that defendant Nichelson joined the conspiracy when he

represented plaintiff in the criminal case.

On September 19, 2017, the magistrate judge filed a report and

recommendation on the initial screen of plaintiff’s complaint

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A, which requires the court, “in a civil

action in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity

or officer or employee of a governmental entity,” to dismiss a

complaint that fails to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted. 28 U.S.C. §1915A(a)-(b)(1). The magistrate judge noted

that the statute of limitations applicable to §1985 claims in Ohio

is two years. The magistrate judge concluded that because the

events alleged in the complaint preceded the May 4, 2007,

imposition of sentence in plaintiff’s state criminal case, the
instant complaint is barred by the statute of limitations.

The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties

that objections to the report and recommendation were due within

fourteen days, and that the failure to object to the report and

recommendation would result in a waiver of the right to de novo

review by the district judge and a waiver of the right to appeal

the judgment of the District Court. Doc. 2, p. 5. The time period

for filing objections to the report and recommendation has expired,

and no objections to the report and recommendation have been filed.

The court agrees with the report and recommendation (Doc. 2),

and it is hereby adopted. This action is hereby dismissed pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) because plaintiff’s complaint fails

to state a claim for which relief may be granted. The clerk shall

enter judgement dismissing this case.

Date: October 12, 2017 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Linda C. Reddick, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|Date: August 7, 2008 | Linda C. Reddick Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------

---
Case: 3:17-mj-00459-SLO Doc #: 4 Filed: 09/29/17 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 20
Case: 3:17-mj-00459-SLO Doc #: 4 Filed: 09/29/17 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 21
Amendment No. 3 to 2005 Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.10.3 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 

TO 
 GRAFTECH
INTERNATIONAL LTD. 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the GrafTech International Ltd. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) was adopted, effective May 25, 2005; and 
 WHEREAS, GrafTech International Ltd. wishes to amend the Plan
as permitted therein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2009, as follows: 

1. The first sentence of the paragraph at the end the definition of “Change in Control” in Section 2(f) of the Plan is
hereby amended to read as follows: 
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control shall not be deemed to occur
(i) pursuant to clause (d)(i) or (d)(ii) above, solely because 15% or more of the then outstanding Common Stock or 15% or more of the then outstanding voting securities of the Corporation is or becomes beneficially owned or is directly or
indirectly held or acquired by one or more employee benefit plans (or related trusts) maintained by the Company and (ii) only for purposes of determining the timing of a distribution, or delivery of Shares as the case may be, with respect to
any Award that is a “deferral of compensation” under Section 409A of the Code, unless the event or circumstance also constitutes a “change in the ownership or effective control” of the Corporation or a “change in the
ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” of the Corporation, in each case, within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and the regulations thereunder (a “409A Change in Control”); provided, however, that such an Award
shall still vest upon a Change in Control as defined in the Plan without giving effect to this clause (ii) to the extent an Award Agreement provides for vesting upon a Change in Control as defined in the Plan.” 

Approved on behalf of 
  

 

			
	 GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD.

and its Subsidiaries

		
	By:	 	/S/    MARK R. WIDMAR
	Name:	 	 Mark R. Widmar

Chief Financial Officer and Vice President

	Title:	 
		
	Date:	 	April 27, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                                 
<ARTICLE>                                9
                                                                    
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          Jul-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                    5,638,065
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                    1,463,940
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               4,664,119
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   17,828,911
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     18,217,425
<LOANS>                                 310,096,728
<ALLOWANCE>                               1,785,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          357,280,634
<DEPOSITS>                              264,197,524
<SHORT-TERM>                             39,774,858
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                       3,183,890
<LONG-TERM>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  4,196,569
<OTHER-SE>                               45,110,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          357,280,634
<INTEREST-LOAN>                           6,508,349
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           444,401
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          6,952,750
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                        2,973,028
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        3,483,592
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                     3,469,158
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               200,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          322,927
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                           3,693,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             442,761
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  442,761
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                287,111
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 8.23
<LOANS-NON>                                       0
<LOANS-PAST>                              1,459,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                           2,247,520
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                          1,613,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                28,000
<RECOVERIES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                         1,785,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                   1,785,000
                                                                

</TABLE>
Michael Martin 

CITY OF RUTLAND 

P.O. BOX969 

RUTLAND, VERMONT 05702 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) 

Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

Re: Cape Air EAS Proposal 

July, 5 2013 

Mr. Martin, 

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 

CHRISTOPHER C. LOURAS 

(802) 773·1800 

FAX (802) 773·1827 

! ..... 

:'""'! 

The City of Rutland, Vt would like to express its excitement and unqualified supp01t for Cape ~Ii~'s Essential 

Air Service (EAS) proposal (Option B) to provide critically needed aviation service for the entire southern 

Vermont region (Docket number DOT-OST-2012-21681). 

The greater Rutland area, from a more global perspective, historically has been and is currently challenged 

with respect to enjoying a functional and advantageous transportation infrastructure. The region has no 

interstate highway system access, no commercial bus service, and is served by a degraded rail network along 

the State's westem corridor while the eastem half of Vermont received upgraded high-speed rail to the 

Amtrak "Vermonter Line." Therefore air service as provided by Cape Air has been the most direct, timely, 

and consistent transportation alternative afforded to residents, businesspeople, and visitors to the southern 

Vermont region. The City (to use admittedly strong language) is insistent that DOT give due consideration to 

Rutland's needs and award Cape Air the 4-year EAS contract with proposed Option B, providing not only 

three daily flights to Boston's Logan Airpott, but an additional daily flight serving White Plains, NY and 

New York City (using the successful Lebanon, NH air service model). 

The City is confident that Cape Air will not only continue to provide the heightened level of service that the 

Rutland area has come to expect, but given the additional transportation alternatives provided by Option B 

the region will be further served by the EAS mission as yet another void will be filled in our dysfunctional 

interstate transpo1tation network. 

Cc: U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy 

U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders 

U.S. Congressman Rep. Peter Welch
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

p0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138773 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138773 

 COA: 283450 

Wayne CC: 07-014660-FH 

DAMON KEITH PERREO, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
August 19, 2014 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2014-3 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and
the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the
same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                         |  | 
|                                     |  |                                         | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 25, 2016
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

MADELEINE ENTINE,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action 2:17-cv-946

v. Judge Algenon L. Marbley

Magistrate Judge Jolson

SCOTT LISSNER,

Defendants.

ORDER

This case has been reported settled. A telephonic status conference will be held on April 26, 

2018 at 10:00 a.m., unless the dismissal entry is received prior to that time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: March 23, 2018 /s/ Kimberly A. Jolson

KIMBERLY A. JOLSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case: 2:17-cv-00946-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 34 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 362
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Blair Vago, Chief Financial Officer
of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (a) | the Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014
(the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (b) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



* * *



|By:   | /s/ Blair Vago                                    | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------------- | 
|      | Blair Vago                                        | 
|      | Acting Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 
|      |                                                   | 
|Date: | October 30, 2014                                  |
**Exhibit 21**

 

A.P. Woodson Company—District of Columbia 

 

Columbia Petroleum Transportation, LLC—Delaware 

 

Marex Corporation—Maryland 

 

Maxwhale Corp.—Minnesota 

 

Meenan Holdings of New York, Inc.—New York 

 

Meenan Oil Co., Inc.—Delaware 

 

Meenan Oil Co., L.P.—Delaware 

 

Ortep of Pennsylvania, Inc.—Pennsylvania 

 

Petro Holdings, Inc.—Minnesota 

 

Petro Plumbing Corporation—New Jersey 

 

Petro, Inc.—Delaware 

 

Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc.—Minnesota

 

RegionOil Plumbing, Heating and Cooling Co.,Inc.—New Jersey 

 

Richland Partners,LLC—Pennsylvania 

 

Star Gas FinanceCompany—Delaware 

 

Star/Petro,Inc.—Minnesota 

 

TG&E ServiceCompany, Inc.—Florida
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Injet Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  August 12, 2003
No. 1050.

#### Voight *v.*Britton.

April Term, 1881.

The only point involved in this appeal is, ¡whether a registration of voters was required for the municipal election held in the city of Charleston on October 6th, 1875. The commissioners of elec*615tion decided that there was no law upon the statute book requiring such registration, and that therefore the commissioners of election could not direct it — that the act of September 25th, 1868, (14 *Stat.*108), in so far as it relates to elections in the city of Charleston, was repealed by the act of February 26th, 1873, (15 *Stat.*403.) On appeal taken directly to this court, it was held that there was no error of law in the decision of the commissioners. OPINION by

July 8th, 1881.

*li. S. Tharin,*for appellant. *E. B. Seabrooh,*contra.

McGowan, A. J.,
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A - 14(b) OF THE SECURITIES
           EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
               OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spear & Jackson, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Fletcher,
acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ William Fletcher
--------------------
William Fletcher
Acting Chief Executive Officer

February 14, 2006