Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 19703 

3. Request an Office of the Inspector 

General (OIG) inspection on why different 

NRC regions have different analysis criteria 

for similar PCP events. 

4. Request a $10 million fine over these 

events. 

5. Request for PNP to return to yellow or 

red status and for the NRC to intensify its 

monitoring of PNP. 

The NRC sent a copy of the proposed 

director’s decision to the petitioner and 

the licensee for comment on January 23, 

2015 (ADAMS Accession Nos. 

ML14338A435 and ML14338A431). The 

petitioner and the licensee were asked 

to provide comments within 15 days on 

any part of the proposed director’s 

decision that was considered to be 

erroneous or any issues in the petition 

that were not addressed. Comments 

were received from the petitioner and 

are addressed in an attachment to the 

final director’s decision. 

The Deputy Director of the Office of 

Nuclear Reactor Regulation denied the 

petitioner’s requests for the following 

actions: 

1. Request for PNP to open every PCP for 

inspection and clear up all flaws. 

2. Request for PNP to replace the PCPs 

with others designed for their intended duty. 

3. Request a $10 million fine over these 

events. 

4. Request for PNP to return to yellow or 

red status and for the NRC to intensify its 

monitoring of PNP. 

The reasons for this decision are 

explained in the final director’s decision 

DD–15–03, under 10 CFR 2.206 of the 

Commission’s regulations. The 

petitioner’s request for an OIG 

inspection on why different NRC 

regions have different analysis criteria 

for similar PCP events has been 

forwarded to the OIG. The NRC found 

no basis for taking the requested 

enforcement-related actions against 

PNP; thus, the NRC denies the petition. 

NRC staff did not find that the 

continued operation of PNP would 

adversely affect public health and 

safety. The NRC determined that the 

licensee’s actions to date are adequate 

and there is reasonable assurance that 

the operation of the PNP will not 

endanger the health and safety of the 

public. For the performance deficiencies 

and inspection findings that the NRC 

has identified at PNP, the agency will 

continue to monitor the progress of the 

licensee’s completion of corrective 

actions through planned inspections 

consistent with the NRC’s ongoing 

reactor oversight process. 

Consistent with 10 CFR 2.206(c), the 

NRC staff will file a copy of this final 

director’s decision with the Secretary of 

the Commission for the Commission to 

review. As provided for in 10 CFR 

2.206(c)(1), the final director’s decision 

will constitute the Commission’s final 

action within 25 days of the date of the 

decision unless the Commission, on its 

own motion, chooses to review the 

decision within that time. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 6th day 

of April 2015. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Jennifer Uhle, 

Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08409 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2014–0245] 

Information Collection: Standards for 

Protection Against Radiation 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of submission to the 

Office of Management and Budget; 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) has recently 

submitted a request for renewal of an 

existing collection of information to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review. The information 

collection is entitled, ‘‘Standards for 

Protection Against Radiation.’’ 

DATES: Submit comments by May 13, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments directly 

to the OMB reviewer at: Vlad Dorjets, 

Desk Officer, Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (3150–0014), NEOB– 

10202, Office of Management and 

Budget, Washington, DC 20503; 

telephone: 202–395–1741, email: 

Vladik_Dorjets@omb.eop.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tremaine Donnell, NRC Clearance 

Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 

0001; telephone: (301) 415–6258; email: 

INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Obtaining Information and 

Submitting Comments 

A. Obtaining Information 

Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2014– 

0245 when contacting the NRC about 

the availability of information for this 

action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this 

action by any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2014–0245. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then 

select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS 

Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, 

please contact the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209, (301) 415–4737, or by 

email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 

supporting statement is available in 

ADAMS under Accession No. 

ML15036A316. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents at 

the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. 

• NRC’s Clearance Officer: A copy of 

the collection of information and related 

instructions may be obtained without 

charge by contacting the NRC’s 

Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell, 

Office of Information Services, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 

(301) 415–6258; email: 

INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV. 

B. Submitting Comments 

The NRC cautions you not to include 

identifying or contact information in 

comment submissions that you do not 

want to be publicly disclosed in your 

comment submission. All comment 

submissions are posted at http://

www.regulations.gov and entered into 

ADAMS. Comment submissions are not 

routinely edited to remove identifying 

or contact information. 

If you are requesting or aggregating 

comments from other persons for 

submission to the OMB, then you 

should inform those persons not to 

include identifying or contact 

information that they do not want to be 

publicly disclosed in their comment 

submission. Your request should state 

that comment submissions are not 

routinely edited to remove such 

information before making the comment 

submissions available to the public or 

entering the comment into ADAMS. 

II. Background 

Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35), the NRC recently 

submitted a request for renewal of an 

existing collection of information to 

OMB for review entitled, ‘‘Standards for 

Protection Against Radiation.’’ The NRC 

hereby informs potential respondents 

that an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and that a person is not 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

19704 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 

required to respond to, a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

The NRC published a Federal 

Register notice with a 60-day comment 

period on this information collection on 

December 2, 2014, (79 FR 71450). 

1. The title of the information 

collection: 10 CFR part 20, ‘‘Standards 

for Protection Against Radiation.’’ 

2. OMB approval number: 3150–0014. 

3. Type of submission: Revision. 

4. The form number if applicable: Not 

applicable. 

5. How often the collection is required 

or requested: Annually for most reports 

and at license termination for reports 

dealing with decommissioning. 

6. Who will be required or asked to 

respond: NRC licensees and Agreement 

State licensees, including those 

requesting license terminations. Types 

of licensees include civilian 

commercial, industrial, academic, and 

medical users of nuclear materials. 

Licenses are issued for, among other 

things, the possession, use, processing, 

handling, and importing and exporting 

of nuclear materials, and for the 

operation of nuclear reactors. 

7. The estimated number of annual 

responses: 43,530 (11,739 for reporting 

[1,677 NRC licensees and 10,062 

Agreement State licensees], 21,018 for 

recordkeeping [3,003 NRC licensees and 

18,015 Agreement State Licensees], and 

10,773 for third-party disclosures [1,539 

NRC licensees and 9,234 Agreement 

State licensees]). 

8. The estimated number of annual 

respondents: 21,018 (3,003 NRC 

licensees and 18,015 Agreement State 

licensees). 

9. An estimate of the total number of 

hours needed annually to comply with 

the information collection requirement 

or request: 640,776 hours (91,545 hours 

for NRC licensees and 549,231 hours for 

Agreement State licensees). 

10. Abstract: 10 CFR part 20 

establishes standards for protection 

against ionizing radiation resulting from 

activities conducted under licenses 

issued by the NRC and by Agreement 

States. These standards require the 

establishment of radiation protection 

programs, maintenance of radiation 

protection programs, maintenance of 

radiation records recording of radiation 

received by workers, reporting of 

incidents which could cause exposure 

to radiation, submittal of an annual 

report to NRC and to Agreement States 

of the results of individual monitoring, 

and submittal of license termination 

information. These mandatory 

requirements are needed to protect 

occupationally exposed individuals 

from undue risks of excessive exposure 

to ionizing radiation and to protect the 

health and safety of the public. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day 

of April, 2015. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Tremaine Donnell, 

NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information 

Services. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08380 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 50–285; NRC–2014–0159] 

Omaha Public Power District; Fort 

Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: License amendment application; 

withdrawal by applicant. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) has granted the 

request of Omaha Public Power District 

to withdraw its application dated April 

25, 2014, as supplemented by letter 

dated February 13, 2015, for a proposed 

amendment to Renewed Facility 

Operating License No. DPR–40. The 

proposed amendment would have 

revised Section 5.11, ‘‘Structures Other 

Than Containment,’’ and Appendix F, 

‘‘Classification of Structures and 

Equipment and Seismic Criteria,’’ of the 

Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1, 

Updated Safety Analysis Report. 

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID 

NRC–2014–0159 when contacting the 

NRC about the availability of 

information regarding this document. 

You may obtain publicly-available 

information related to this document 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2014–0159. Address 

questions about NRC dockets to Carol 

Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; 

email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For 

technical questions, contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

document. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly 

available documents online in the 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then 

select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS 

Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, 

please contact the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by 

email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 

ADAMS accession number for each 

document referenced in this document 

(if that document is available in 

ADAMS) is provided the first time that 

a document is referenced. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents at 

the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Lyon, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 

0001; telephone: 301–415–2296 email: 

Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NRC 

has granted the request of Omaha Public 

Power District (the licensee) to 

withdraw its application dated April 25, 

2014, as supplemented by letter dated 

February 13, 2015 (ADAMS Accession 

Nos. ML14118A435 and ML15050A257, 

respectively), for a proposed 

amendment to Renewed Facility 

Operating License No. DPR–40 for the 

Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1, 

located in Washington County, 

Nebraska. 

The proposed amendment would 

have revised Section 5.11, ‘‘Structures 

Other Than Containment,’’ and 

Appendix F, ‘‘Classification of 

Structures and Equipment and Seismic 

Criteria,’’ of the Updated Safety 

Analysis Report to clarify the licensing 

and design basis to permit the use of 

seismic floor response spectra in 

analysis and design of seismic Class I 

structures and structural elements 

attached to structures. 

The Commission had previously 

issued a Notice of Consideration of 

Issuance of Amendment published in 

the Federal Register on July 8, 2014 (79 

FR 38593). However, by letter dated 

April 1, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. 

ML15090A743), the licensee withdrew 

the proposed change. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day 

of April 2015. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Carl F. Lyon, 

Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV– 

1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, 

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08393 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES