alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4236 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4236

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a temporary 
exclusion of 100 percent of the gain on the sale or exchange of certain 
                         small business stock.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2009

  Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a temporary 
exclusion of 100 percent of the gain on the sale or exchange of certain 
                         small business stock.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY EXCLUSION OF 100 PERCENT OF GAIN ON CERTAIN SMALL 
              BUSINESS STOCK.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 1202 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating partial exclusion for gain from certain 
small business stock) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(4) 100 exclusion for stock acquired during 2010.--In the 
        case of qualified small business stock acquired during 2010--
                    ``(A) paragraph (1) shall be applied by 
                substituting `100 percent' for `50 percent',
                    ``(B) paragraph (2) shall not apply, and
                    ``(C) paragraph (7) of section 57(a) shall not 
                apply.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (3) of section 1202 (a) of 
such Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and 2010'' in the heading, and
            (2) by striking ``January 1, 2011'' and inserting ``January 
        1, 2010''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to stock acquired after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.0
 Section 1350 CERTIFICATION
   (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibChief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Brendan J. McGillBrendan J. McGillSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer  Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to
Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation and will be retained by Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0534

_________________

ESTATE OF MARILYN SCHEIDECKER,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 v.

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Michael F. McMahon, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 14 2021

04/14/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0534
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed December 8, 2017.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-01037-CR

CHARLES EUGENE HUTCHINSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-54502-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Stoddart

 Charles Eugene Hutchinson appeals the trial court’s judgment convicting him of 

attempted possession of cocaine in an amount less than one gram. The trial court has filed a 

certification showing appellant (1) entered into a plea bargain and he has no right to appeal; and 

(2) he waived the right to appeal. Concluding the record supports the trial court’s certification, 

we dismiss the appeal. 

Appellant and the State entered into a written agreement in which appellant agreed to 

plead guilty and waive his right to appeal in exchange for a 365 day sentence. To effectuate the 

plea agreement, the State filed a motion to drop two enhancement paragraphs from the charge 

and also filed a motion to reduce the offense from a state jail felony to a Class A misdemeanor. 
–2–

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.44(b) (West 2011). The trial court granted the State’s motions 

and assessed the agreed punishment of 365 days in county jail. 

When a defendant waives the right to appeal in exchange for valuable consideration from 

the State, the waiver is enforceable provided it is made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently. 

See Jones v. State, 488 S.W.3d 801, 807–08 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016); Ex parte Broadway, 301 

S.W.3d 694, 697–99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). Because the record showed appellant waived his 

right to appeal in writing, the Court requested letter briefs from the parties to address the 

question of whether the Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. Neither party chose to file a letter 

brief.

We conclude appellant’s waiver of the right to appeal is enforceable. See Jones, 488 

S.W.3d at 807–08; Broadway, 301 S.W.3d at 699; Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 220 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2000). Lacking jurisdiction over the appeal, we are required to dismiss the appeal 

without further action. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2006).

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

171037F.U05

/Craig Stoddart/

CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CHARLES EUGENE HUTCHINSON, 

Appellant

No. 05-17-01037-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-54502-M.

Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Fillmore 

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered this 8th day of December, 2017.
### NUMBER 13

- 15

- 00 259

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JACOB THOMAS LAYTON

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 105 th District Court

of Kleberg County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jacob Thomas Layton, perfected an appeal from his judgment of

conviction for the offense of burglary of a habitation committing a theft. Appellant, acting

by and through his attorne y, has now filed a motion to dismiss his appeal because he no

longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a). Without passing on the

merits of the case, we GRANT the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate2

Procedure 42.2(a) and DISMISS the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

16th day of July, 2015

.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Anton J. Drescher, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of USA Video Interactive Corp;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entitles, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

---



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





By: /s/ Anton J. Drescher

------------------------------------

Name: Anton J. Drescher

Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 8th, 2006
OFFICE OF TNE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUenN 

Hononble Charlry Lookhart 

Attentlonr 
RaAorabLb Charley Lookhati, FU@ S? 

should be anewered in the negative. 

roux-t3 very truly 

ATTCBHEY0EXElUL OFTEXAS 

Glenn 8. LewlA 

Arslrtant 

EXCL OSURE 

APPROVEOBOV 22, 19% 

L3hA-d 

ATTORt?EY GFXERAL OF TEUB
Baker Aircraft ; vr 

-!/: 

October 26, 2011 

43769 Hdlner Drive 

Baker City, Oregon 97814 

Phone 541-523-5663 

Fax:541-523-6007 

E-mail: 

hctp://www.bakerdtxairport.com 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Petition for Exemption in Accordance with FAA's requirements under 14CFR 11.61,11.101 

Please accept this letter as our formal petition fpr exemption in accordance with the FAA's requirements established under 14 CFR M.61.11.101. I 

Elkhom Aviation, Inc. is see 

ized for air tour operations-defined 

135 certificate No. K2ZA350L. We oi 

operations. 

Granting an exemption wo 

135 certificate and is subje 

The aircraft is o: 

Our company con 

Elkhom AviationJ 

43769 Heihier Road 

Baker City, OR 97814 

Telephone (541) 523-5663 

Fax (541) 523-6007 

Email: Genevieve@B 

Please let me know if you have any additional questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Genevieve Woydziak 

Secretary Treasurer 

eyempuon^^ause of the limited number of aircraft that are util91.147. |!nie majority of our aircraft are operated under our 

aircraft that would provide very limited air tour 

safety because the aircraft is operating under our 

am rules and regulations at all times.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Philip K. Woodlief, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Doane Pet Care Company, herebycertify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Doane Pet Care Company; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.
Date: April 1, 2005                                                       /s/ PHILIP K. WOODLIEF   Philip K. Woodlief   Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDoane Pet Care Company
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

JOHN FASTRICH and UNIVERSAL 

INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and 

REGINALD J. GOOD D/B/A REGINALD J. 

GOOD AGENCY,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CONTINENTAL GENERAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, GREAT AMERICAN 

FINANCIAL RESOURCE, INC., 

AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., 

LOYAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, and AMERICAN 

RETIREMENT LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendants

CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00615-MRB

JUDGE MICHAEL R. BARRETT

FINAL JUDGMENT

This matter was heard on September 17, 2019 and October 2, 2019, before the Court, 

pursuant to the Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement, Approving Notice to Class Members, 

and Scheduling Settlement Fairness Hearing (the “Preliminary Approval Order”) entered on April 

2, 2019, Docket # 38, as modified by the Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Approval of 

Documents to Be Sent to Class Members and New Deadlines Pertaining to the Class Action 

Settlement and to Set Date for Final Fairness Hearing (the “Scheduling Order”) entered on July 

19, 2019, Docket #46, for the purpose of determining: (i) whether the settlement of this action, on 

the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement between 

Plaintiffs and Defendants (the “Settlement Agreement”) should be finally approved as fair, 

reasonable, and adequate and in the best interests of the Class; (ii) whether the Settlement Class 

should be certified pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (iii) whether and 

in what amount attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses should be awarded to Class Counsel, as 

Case: 1:17-cv-00615-MRB Doc #: 55 Filed: 10/25/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 763
2

provided in the Settlement; (iv) whether judgment should be entered dismissing the Complaint on 

the merits and with prejudice in favor of the Defendants as against all persons or entities who are 

members of the Class herein who have not requested exclusion therefrom; (v) whether to approve 

the Allocation Plan as a fair and reasonable method to allocate the settlement proceeds among the 

members of the Class; and (vi) whether the Final Judgment should be entered. 

Having considered the record in this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, 

AND DECREED as follows:

The Court hereby enters final judgment approving the Settlement, as set forth in the 

Settlement Agreement. Having granted Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class 

Action Settlement and Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Expenses, and Class 

Representative Award, and in accordance with the Settlement Agreement and this Final Judgment, 

the Court hereby enters judgment fully and finally terminating all claims of Plaintiffs and the 

Settlement Class, on the merits, with prejudice, and without leave to amend against Defendants. 

_______/s/ Michael R. Barrett________

MICHAEL R. BARRETT, JUDGE

Case: 1:17-cv-00615-MRB Doc #: 55 Filed: 10/25/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 764
Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

Friday, October 18, 2013 4:03 PM 

'cityofportalexander@yahoo.com' 

Faulk, Scott (OST) 

Update on EAS at Port Alexander 

Harris Aircraft Service, Inc.pdf 

Dear Mayor Gifford and the City Council of Port Alexander: 

' '_ ' i .. · .. :·... · • :.·. :. .· ·,! ; ~ ; ; 

-- . l -~- ·---·-' 

:_:._. '_; 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service ("EAS") situation at Port Alexander, and give you an 

opportunity to submit any comments if you wish. As you may know, the Department of Transportation issued 

Order 2013-9-6, on September 9, 2013, to solicit proposals from all interested air carriers to provide EAS at 

Port Alexander for a new contract, beginning March 1, 2014. Those proposals were due no later than October 

15,2013. 

At this stage, we would normally ask for your preferences for various air carriers and service 

options. However, in response to the Department's request for proposals, Harris Aircraft Service, Inc. ("Harris 

Air"), the incumbent, was the only air carrier to submit a proposal. Nonetheless, we want to give you an 

opportunity to submit any final comments for the record that you may have. A copy of Harris Air's proposal is 

attached and may also be accessed online via the Federal Docket Management System at: 

http://www .regulations.gov/#! documentDetail;D=DOT -OST -1999-6244-0040 

I want to give you an opportunity to submit any formal comments for the record before submitting a 

recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. We request that you submit 

any comments you may have as soon as possible, but in any case no later than November 15, 2013. We will 

carefully consider your comments before submitting a recommendation for a decision. If you have any 

questions or if you find that you need additional time to draft your comments, please let me know. 

Please send your comments Scott Faulk at the following email address: scott.faulk@dot.gov or by fax to (202) 

366-7638. If you have any questions, please feel free. to contact him directly at (202) 366-9967. 

Sincerely, 

Kevin D. Schlemmer 

Chief, Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

(202) 366-3176 phone 

(202) 366-7638 fax 

1