alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


 


December 8, 2008


 


Mr. Richard F. Wallman


124 Deer Estates Lane


Ponte Verde Beach, FL 32082


 


Dear Richard:


 


I am please to invite you to join the
Supervisory Board of Tornier B.V. (“Tornier”), as well as join Tornier’s Audit
Committee as Chairman, effective as of December 17, 2008.  We believe that Tornier is positioned to
become the leading company worldwide focused on orthopaedic extremities, and
are excited to benefit from your strategic vision and financial expertise to
help Tornier achieve its objectives.


 


If you accept this invitation, upon being
appointed to the Supervisory Board, you will receive, in lieu of any annual or
per-meeting fees, a one-time grant of options to purchase 150,000 shares of
Tornier BV common stock, which represents 0.164% of the fully-diluted shares
outstanding.  The options will be granted
to your with an exercise price equal to the fair value of a share of Tornier BV
common stock, which is currently $5.66 per share.  The options are subject to a four-year
vesting schedule, with 25% vesting after one year, and the remaining 75%
vesting pro rata each quarter over the subsequent three years, subject to your
continued service on the Supervisory Board. 
Naturally, Tornier will also reimburse your for all expenses you incur
in connection with your service as a Board member.


 


In order to provide you with an additional
opportunity to participate in the company’s future, you will be granted a
one-time co-investment right in Tornier, with such investment to close in
conjunction with Tornier’s next round of financing, which is expected to occur
in the first quarter of 2009.


 


We are very excited about the future of Tornier
and would be honored to have you as a member of our team.  Please do not hesitate to call me with any
concerns or questions.


 

















 


If you are in agreement with the foregoing,
please sign below and fax to me at 952-426-7601.


 


 


Sincerely,


 


	
  /s/ Douglas
  W. Kohrs

  	
   

  
	
  Douglas W. Kohrs

  	
   

  
	
  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  
	
  Tornier

  	
   

  



 


Accepted and agreed


 


December 11, 2008


 


 


	
  /s/ Richard F. Wallman

  	
   

  
	
  Richard F. Wallman
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 
 GLOBAL AMENDMENT TO NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR RSU AGREEMENTS UNDER 
 THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 2008 DIRECTORS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

This Amendment (“Amendment”), with respect to restricted stock units previously granted by L-3 Communications Holdings,
Inc. (“L-3”) to non-employee directors of L-3 (“Participants”) under L-3’s Amended and Restated 2008 Directors Stock Incentive Plan (the “2008 Directors Plan”), is dated as of April 30,
2013. 
 WHEREAS, prior to April 30, 2013, L-3 granted restricted stock units to Participants the terms of which are
governed by one or more award agreements (“Award Agreements”) under the 2008 Directors Plan, and pursuant to such Award Agreements, the Participants are entitled to receive dividend equivalents from time to time in the form of
additional restricted stock units (“Dividend RSUs”) that may ultimately be settled in shares of common stock of L-3, par value $0.01; 
 WHEREAS, on April 30, 2013, L-3’s stockholders approved certain amendments to L-3’s Amended and Restated 2008 Long Term Performance Plan (as so amended, the “LTPP”).

 WHEREAS, the amendments contemplated that future equity grants to non-employee directors of L-3 would be made under the LTPP
instead of under the 2008 Directors Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, L-3 wishes to amend the outstanding Award Agreements to provide that
any Dividend RSUs to be issued thereunder from and after April 30, 2013 will be granted under the LTPP. 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
L-3 has caused each of the Award Agreements outstanding as of April 30, 2013 to be amended as follows: 
 1. Dividend
RSUs. Any Dividend RSUs to be issued from and after April 30, 2013 pursuant to the terms of any Award Agreement will be granted under the LTPP (rather than under the 2008 Directors Plan), and the terms and conditions of such Dividend RSUs
will continue to be governed by the applicable Award Agreement in all respects, except that the plan governing such Dividend RSUs shall be the LTPP (in lieu of the 2008 Directors Plan). 

2. Continuation of Award Agreements. Except as stated herein, the terms of each Award Agreement shall continue in full force and
effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, L-3 has duly executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above. 

 

			
	L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
	
	




	By:	 	Steven M. Post
		 	 Senior, Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
To: Jerry Wamsley/R9/USEPA/US@EPA From: Emily Schrepf <eschrepf@npca.org> Date: 04/05/2011 12:59PM Subject: Extension Request on EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0131

Mr. Wamsley,

I am writing on behalf of the National Parks C onservation Association an d the Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment to respectfully re quest an additional 60 days (beginning on April 14, 2001) to comment on Docket # EPA-R09- OAR-2011—0131, the proposed approval of the haze plan portion of the California SIP. 30 days from the announcement is not sufficient time to examine the proposed plan and these organizations would like the time needed to examine the Plan and provide sufficient commentary.

Thank You,

Emily

Emily Schrepf

Central Valley Program Manager

National Parks Conservation Association

1401 Fulton St ste 916

Fresno, CA 93721

Office 559.229.9343

Cell 559.960.7056
eschrepf@npca.org
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-3 (No.333-100), on Form S-3 (No. 333-21625), on Form S-3
(No.333-32345), on Form S-8 (No.333-10255), on Form S-8 (No.333-25639), and on
Form S-8 (No.333-43427) of Extended Stay America, Inc. of our report dated
January 25, 2002, relating to the financial statements, which appears in this
Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Spartanburg, South Carolina
March 4, 2002
10330

#### COKER v. DUNCAN.

(102 S. E. 18.)

Appeal and Error — -Failure to Comply With Court Rule by Filing Points and Authorities Justifies Dismissal. — Where appellant has failed to file points and authorities as required by Court rules, but states in the record that “submitted without argument,” the appeal must be dismissed.

Before Whaeey, County Judge, Richland.

Appeal dismissed.

Action by W. M. Coker against J. T. Duncan. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

*John T.*Duncan, for appellant.

*Paul A.*Cooper, for respondent.

January 26, 1920.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

The appellant having failed to file points and authorities, as required by the rules of the Court, but states in the record that “submitted without argument,” the appeal must be dismissed; but, even without this, under the recent case of *Lena Robison v. G. M. Barton,*102 S. E. 16, opinion of Chief Justice, and authorities cited by him therein, on the merits, the appeal would be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2




Certification
by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on the Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Raymond Krauss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(i)    
     the Report filed by the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





(ii)         The
information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
and for the periods presented therein.





PHYTOMEDICAL
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:  March 19,
    2009
                  By:
                  /s/ Raymond KraussRaymond
      KraussChief
      Financial Officer





This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
• 

• 

• 

FACILITY DESCRIPTION: 

Air Emission Permit No. 13700011- 001 

Page4 

Taconite is mined from the North and South Thunderbird Mine. The mining operations include 

the removal of overburden material, removal of waste rock material, and mining of taconite ore. 

The taconite is then loaded onto trucks and hauled to either the North or South Crushers. The 

emission units at the North and South Crusher areas include primary and secondary crushing, 

crushed ore storage, and rail car loading operations. Crushed rock is conveyed to a domed 

storage facility and then loaded onto rail cars and is transported off-site. Intermediate products 

and byproducts including but not limited to rock, railroad ballast, blast furnace trim and 

aggregate are sold by EVT AC. 

Mined ore truck dumping, primary and secondary crushing, and rail car loading dust emissions 

are controlled by baghouses .
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 11/04/2011 05:05 PM Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule

Hi all, Attached are the handouts from the EO 12866 meeting yesterday.

Regards,
Cortney

-----Original Appointment----- From: Echols, Mabel E. Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule When: Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:00 AM-10:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Room 9104 New Executive Office Building

Theresa Pugh, APPA has requested this meeting.

2060AR31_2011_11_3_appa_Handout1.pdf

2060AR31_2011_11_3_appa_Handout2.pdf

EGU MACT Comment Excerpt.pdf
Exhibit 31.2

I, Anthony Cella, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of RDC  International,
Inc.

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:

     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "evaluation date"); and
     C)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 14, 2003

/s/ Anthony Cella
Anthony Cella
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent)
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                 Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

                        Calculation of Earnings Per Share

              For the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1996, and 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                      December 31,
                                                                  ------------------------------------------------
                                                                     1995                1996             1997

<S>                                                               <C>                  <C>              <C>       
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       $2,521,827           $5,596,623       $6,883,148
                                                                  ==========           ==========       ==========


Common and common equivalent shares:
    Weighted average number of common
        shares outstanding during the period  . . . . . . .         4,227,648           5,500,884        5,686,182


    Common shares issuable upon exercise
        of outstanding stock options
        Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           276,064             438,778          275,358
                                                                     --------             -------          -------
    Common and common equivalent
        shares outstanding during the period
        Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         4,503,712           5,939,662        5,961,540
                                                                   ----------           ---------       ----------

Earnings per share data:
    Net income per common and common
        equivalent shares
        Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       $       .60          $     1.02       $     1.21
        Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       $       .56          $      .94       $     1.15
</TABLE>


                                       35
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated January 20, 2000, relating to the financial statement schedules of Exabyte Corporation, which appears on page 45 in Exabyte Corporation'sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2000.

 

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Denver, Colorado

June 16 2000
jfourtf) Court of

Antonio,

May 17,2013

No. 04-13-00071-CR

Jose Santos Acosta ISIDRO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 22nd District Court, Comal County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR2001-98

Mr. Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The State's brief was originally due to be filed with this court on April 10, 2013. This

court granted the State's first motion for an extension of time to file the brief until May 10,2013.

On May 15,2013, the State filed its second motion for an extension of time to file its brief until

May 31,2013, for total extension of fifty-one days.

The State's motion is GRANTED. The State's brief must be filed with this court not

later than May 31,2013.

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

F, have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

$13.

Kei

Clerk of Court
**ATTACHMENT C OMB CONTROL NO. 2070**  **- 0027**  **Display Related to OMB Control #2070 -**  **0027 -**  **Listings of**

**Related Regulations in 40 CFR 9.1** As of May

10, 1993, the OMB approval numbers for EPA regulations in Chapter I of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) appear in a listing in 40 CFR 9.1 (58 FR 27472). This listing fulfills the display requirements in section 3507(f) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) for EPA regulations. The listing at 40 CFR 9.1 display s this OMB Control number for the following regulations: Program Title 40 CFR citation Statements of Enforcement Policies and I nterpretations ...............................

.................... 168.65

. .................................................. 168.75

... .............. .................................. 168.85
U.S. Department of Transportation Office ofthe Secretary ofTransportation

Sam Azad CityManager, The City ofPueblo Pueblo Memorial Airport 31201 Bryan Circle, Ste. 200 Pueblo, Colorado 81001 DearMr. Azad: Assistant Secretary 

## MAY 1

## B2015 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Thank you for your most recent letter dated April 28, 2015, regarding Essential Air Service ("EAS") at Pueblo. As youknow, the Consolidated and Further Appropriations Act, 2015, Public Law No. 113-235 states, "[T]hat none ofthe funds in this Act or any other Act shall be used to enter into a new contract with a community located less than 40 miles from the nearest small hub airport before the Secretary has negotiated with the community over a local cost share." As Pueblo is located less than 40 miles from Colorado Springs Airport (COS), a small hub, the Department is requiredto negotiate a local cost share with the community ofPueblo before entering into a new EAS contract. In your original letter dated March 23, 2015, the City ofPueblo proposed a 2.5 percent local cost share for the upcoming EAS contract award. The Department subsequently proposed a counter offer of7.5 percent for Pueblo's local share for a newtwo-yearterm contract. In your April28 letter, the City ofPueblo proposed a counter offer of5 percent for the local cost share. The Department has accepted Pueblo's offer and will require a 5percent contribution ofthe annual subsidy amount for EAS providedby Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., ($1,776,448) or $88,822, from the City ofPueblo. Concurrent with Department practice, subsidy is paid to carriers on a monthly basis, in arrears, and the Department will require proofofthe City'spaymentto Great Lakes prior to the Departmentreimbursing Great Lakes. The Department wishes to remind the community that only non-airport revenue maybe used in conjunction with a subsidyto an air carrier. Airport revenue must be us'ed for the operational and capital costs ofthe airport, the local airport system, or other facilities owned or operatedby the airport owner or operator and directly and substantiallyrelated to the air transportation of passengers orproperty. The Federal Aviation Administration's Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use ofAirport Revenue, 64 Fed. Reg. 7696 (Feb. 16, 1999), provides further details, and lists "directly subsidizing air carriers" as one example ofunlawful revenue diversion.Mr. Sam Azad Page 2 As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy ofyour letter and myresponse in Docket 

### DOT-OST-1999-6589.

Cc: Mark Lovin, Director ofAviation Sincerely,

BrandonM. Belford Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

 
| Chemical  Design Holdings plc             |   | (United  Kingdom) |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|
| Chemical  Design SARL                     |   | (France)          |
| Pharmacopeia  Drug Discovery, Inc.        |   | (Delaware)        |
| Accelrys  GmbH                            |   | (Germany)         |
| Accelrys  Incorporated                    |   | (Delaware)        |
| Accelrys  Limited                         |   | (United  Kingdom) |
| Accelrys  SARL                            |   | (France)          |
| Accelrys kk                               |   | (Japan)           |
| Oxford  Molecular Limited                 |   | (United  Kingdom) |
| Oxford  Molecular SA                      |   | (France)          |
| Synopsys  Scientific Systems Limited      |   | (United  Kingdom) |
| Synopsys  Scientific Systems Incorporated |   | (New Jersey)      |
| Synomics Limited                          |   | (United  Kingdom) |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS IS THE LEGEND
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                        1722
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2222
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1493)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1493)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1493)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>