alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Margaret Kenneally, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

April 29, 1988

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gallagher & Gosseen*for petitioners.

OPINION OF THE COURT

C. Raymond Radican, J.

In this probate proceeding, the issue before the court is whether a purported codicil dated August 10, 1975, satisfies the statutory requirements of EPTL 3-2.1 (a) (1). No objections have been interposed to the probate of the will or codicil.

The codicil is in the form of á letter written in the decedent’s hand which closes with the words "Love Mother”.

The informality of a paper does not prevent it from being given testamentary effect. A letter may be valid as a will *(Matter of Krup,*173 Misc 632; *Matter of Hansen,*72 Misc 610; *199
      *Morrell v Dickey,*1 Johns Ch 152). Here, the decedent states in the instrument that it is a codicil to her will. All other statutory requirements clearly having been met, the remaining question is whether the codicil was "signed” in accordance with the statute.

A will can be signed with initials, the testator’s mark *(Jackson v Jackson,*39 NY 153; *Matter of Irving,*153 App Div 728, *affd*207 NY 765) or any lines visible on paper *(Matter of Golicki,*116 Misc 100).

It follows that where a codicil ends with a word which indicates the testatrix’ relationship to the beneficiaries, rather than with a name, the statutory requirement is satisfied if the testatrix intended it to be her signature *(In re Kimmel’s Estate,*278 Pa 435, 123 A 405; *Wells v Lewis,*190 Ky 626, 228 SW 3). The court accepts "Love Mother” as the decedent’s valid signature for purposes of executing her codicil as required by statute.

Accordingly, the petition to admit the will dated November 26, 1974 and codicil dated August 10, 1975, to probate is granted.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spear & Jackson, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
         the Company.


Dated:            May 23 2003               Mr. Dennis Crowley
                                            --------------------------

                                            Dennis Crowley
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Dated:            May 23 2003               Mr. William Fletcher
                                            --------------------------

                                            William Fletcher
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Zoran Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karl Schneider, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                                   
|------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    KARL SCHNEIDER             
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Karl Schneider                    
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and
|Dated: February 26, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 1

Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 18
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 2 of 13 PAGEID #: 19
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 3 of 13 PAGEID #: 20
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 4 of 13 PAGEID #: 21
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 5 of 13 PAGEID #: 22
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 6 of 13 PAGEID #: 23
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 7 of 13 PAGEID #: 24
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 8 of 13 PAGEID #: 25
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 9 of 13 PAGEID #: 26
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 10 of 13 PAGEID #: 27
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 11 of 13 PAGEID #: 28
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 12 of 13 PAGEID #: 29
Case: 2:17-cv-00814-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 13 of 13 PAGEID #: 30
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________ No. 13

- 1438

____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. DIRK LANIEL BARFIELD, JR.,

a/k/a Little D Dirk Laniel Barfield, Jr.,

Appellant

____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 09

- cr - 00093

- 001 ) District Judge: Honorable Nora B. Fischer

____________ Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

November 14, 20 13 Before: HARDIMAN, SHWARTZ and SCIRICA , Circuit Judges

.

(Filed: November 18, 2013)

____________ OPINION

____________ HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge

. Dirk Barfield , Jr. , appeals an order of the District Court denying his motion for a2

sentence reduction pur suant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B). We will affirm for the reasons

ex plained by the District Court.

I
Simply stated, the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA) does not apply to those whose offense conduct, conviction, and sentence predate its enactment. As the District Court rightly not ed: “the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit have made clear that the Fair Sentencing Act

. . . does not apply to defendants such as Barfield who were sentenced before its effective date.” App. 11. In s upport of its decision the District Court cited Dorsey v. United States , 132 S. Ct. 2321 (2012) , and United States v. Turlington , 696 F.3d 425 (3d Cir. 2012). Despite the fact that Dorsey involved a defendant who was sentenced after the effective date of the FSA, Barfield argues that he is entitled to relief under that case. But Barfield fails to address our decision in Turlington , in which we stated that Dorsey “does not address, or disturb, the basic principle that the FSA does not apply to those defend ants who were both convicted and sentenced prior to the effective date of the FSA.” 696 F.3d at 428. Indeed, Turlington reaffirmed our prior holding in United States v. Reevey , 631 F.3d 110 (3d Cir. 2010), that the FSA does not provide “that those senten ced befor e the FSA’s effective date are to be

re - sentence d.” Id . at 115 ; see Turlington , 696 F.3d at 428.3 II

Like the defendant in Turlington , Barfield was both convicted and sentenced prior
to the enactment of the Fair Sentencing Act on August 3, 2010. Accordingly, t he FSA is unavailing to Barfield and we will affirm the order of the District Court.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

FS Management Company, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 1:17cv549

Union Township Clermont

County CIC, Inc., et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the 

Magistrate Judge on March 1, 2018 (Doc. 43). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections 

to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 

F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and 

Recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 43) of 

the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Defendant Union Township’s Motion for 

Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 40) is GRANTED and Union Township is DISMISSED

as a party from this case consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett

United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 783-784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Research Topic No. 051 
Inhaled Delivery of Clofazimine (CFZ)--An Important Anti-
Tuberculosis Drug Phase

[[Page 784]]

II Proposal Title: Optimized Dry Powder Formulation and Delivery for 
Inhaled Clofazimine (N01).
    Date: January 27, 2022.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G31, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Cynthia L. De La Fuente, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G31, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-2740, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5034353c313625353e2435333c103e393139347e3e39387e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f094959c919685959e8495939cb09e99919994de9e9998de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 30, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-00008 Filed 1-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
AO 456s (Rev. 8/01) Notice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

John Fastrich, et al.,

Case Number: 1:17cv615

V.

Great American Financial Resources, Inc., Judge Susan J. Dlott

NOTICE

TAKE NOTICE that the PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE in this case has been set for

the place, date, and time set forth below:

PLACE ROOM NO.

Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouse Room 227

100 East Fifth Street DATE AND TIME

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 March 15, 2018 at 10:30 AM

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Discovery Conference to be held and written settlement demand to be made no later than February 15, 2018.

2. Filing of Discovery Plan and written response to the settlement demand due no later than March 1, 2018.

3. Ex Parte status and or settlement letters (as more fully set forth in Judge Dlott’s Standing Order) are to be submitted to

dlott_chambers@ohsd.uscourts.gov three (3) business days prior to the preliminary pretrial conference.

Richard Nagel, Clerk

___s/Vicki Penley_______________

Vicki Penley

Administrative Assistant

(513) 564-7630

Case: 1:17-cv-00615-SJD Doc #: 16 Filed: 01/31/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 74
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4200 

To prepare a feasibility study and implement demonstration projects to restore 

the San Gabriel River Watershed in California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 3, 2009 

Ms. CHU (for herself, Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Ms. 

ROYBAL-ALLARD, and Mrs. NAPOLITANO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prepare a feasibility study and implement demonstration 

projects to restore the San Gabriel River Watershed in 

California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘San Gabriel Watershed 

5 Restoration Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED RESTORATION, 

7 CALIFORNIA. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in coordination 

9 with the County of Los Angeles, shall— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4200 IH

1 (1) prepare a feasibility study for environmental 

2 ecosystem restoration, flood control, water quality 

3 control, water supply storage, outdoor recreation en4 hancements, and other aspects of the San Gabriel 

5 River Watershed revitalization that is consistent 

6 with the goals of the San Gabriel River master plan 

7 published by the County of Los Angeles; and 

8 (2) identify demonstration projects for con9 struction and restoration of the San Gabriel River 

10 Watershed. 

11 (b) DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS.— 

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized 

13 to construct demonstration projects in order to pro14 vide information to develop the study under sub15 section (a)(1). 

16 (2) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of 

17 the cost of any project under this subsection shall be 

18 not more than 65 percent. 

19 (3) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

20 There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

21 this subsection $50,000,000. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                        HIGHLANDS INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
 
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Jurisdiction
                                                     of
                                               Incorporation
                                                     or
Name                                            Organization
----                                           --------------
<S>                                            <C>
Aberdeen Insurance Company                     Texas
American Professionals Insurance Company       Indiana
American Reliance, Inc.                        Indiana
American Reliance Realty, Inc.                 Delaware
Certified Finance Corporation                  Texas
Highlands Limited                              Bermuda
Highlands Insurance Company (U.K.) Limited     United Kingdom
Highlands Claims and Safety Services, Inc.     Texas
Highlands Underwriters Insurance Company       Texas
Highlands Holdings (UK), Ltd.                  United Kingdom
Highlands Underwriting Agents, Limited         United Kingdom
Highlands Insurance Company                    Texas
Highlands Casualty Company                     Texas
Highlands Overseas Limited                     Panama
Highlands Lloyds                               Texas
Highlands Underwriters Insurance Agency, Inc.  Texas
Insurance Management Corporation               Texas
Interstate Business Services, Inc.             Ohio
Interstate Insurance Agency, Inc. (Ohio)       Ohio
LMI Insurance Company                          Ohio
Lumbermens Financial Corporation               Ohio
NN Insurance Company                           Wisconsin
Northwestern National Casualty Company         Wisconsin
Northwestern National Holding Company, Inc.    Delaware
Pacific Automobile Insurance Company           California
Pacific National Insurance Company             California
SICO, Inc.                                     Indiana
State Capital Insurance Company                North Carolina
Statesman Insurance Company                    Indiana
Timeco, Inc.                                   Indiana
Underwriters Special Risks, Inc.               Texas
Underwriters Special Risks of La., Inc.        Louisiana
</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                 *Jonathan                Lewis*                                                            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jonathan                Lewis, M.D., Ph.D.Principal                Executive OfficerOctober                30, 2008 |

 

----
#### Cook, Commissioner of Revenues, *v.*Wilson.

4-7527

193 S. W. 2d 818

Opinion delivered April 22, 1946.

*Herrn Northcutt,*for appellant.

*Murphy*& *Wood,*for appellee.

*22Ed. P. McFaddin, Justice.

This is the same case as *Cook, Commissioner of Revenues,*v. *Wilson, et al.,*208 Ark. 459, 187 S. W. 2d 7.

In the former opinion we allowed the state a partial recovery, but we held:

“That the appellees are not liable to the State for ■severance tax on timber severed by them from lands held by the United States as original owner (U.S.C.A. Title 16, § 471); and to that extent the decree of the chancery court is affirmed.”

The Supreme Court of the United States granted cer-tiorari, and held that the appellees were not entitled to immunity from severance tax merely because the timber severed by them was from lands held by the United States as original owner (U.S.C.A. Title 16, § 471). See *Wilson*v. *Cook,*326 U. S. 685, 66 S. Ct. 663, 90 L. Ed. 402.

The mandate of the U. S. Supreme Court has now been filed in this court. By reason of that mandate we now recall so much of our former opinion as is in conflict with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court; and we now reverse in full the decree of the Garland chancery court rendered in this case on June 27, 1944; and we remand this cause to the Garland chancery court, with directions to render judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Revenues of the State of Arkansas, and against the ap-pellees, not only for the $276.35 and interest as stated in our former opinion, but also for the additional tax, penalty and interest sued for and due, plus all costs of all courts, including the amount certified in the mandate of the United States Supreme Court.
17450

#### Jack JAMES, Otis James, Geneva James McCutchen, Hester Butler, Carey Orrie, Sylvester James, Geneva James Brunson, and Eighty Other Named Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. George HYMAN, Respondent

(104 S. E. (2d) 353)

*Henry E. Davis, Esq.,*of Florence, *for Appellants,*

*284
      *Messrs. McEachin, Townsend & Zeigler,*of Florence, *for Respondent,*

*Henry E. Davis, Esq.,*of Florence, *for Appellants,*

*291July 16, 1958.

PER CURIAM.

The exceptions of appellants to the decree of the circuit court have been carefully considered in the light of the record and we conclude that the decree correctly decided the controversy. The following will be stricken from it and with those deletions it will be published as the judgment of this court: “Mr. Hyman has been paying taxes on the disputed area since he owned the place (Tr. p. 30)”; and “Further no such issue is alleged in the complaint.” (Printed transcript of record, ff. 861, 2.)

Title by adverse possession was not alleged in the complaint in this action in equity to determine the boundary between the adjoining farms of the parties, *292and it was not an issue; indeed, it would not have been a proper issue in this case. *McRae v. Hamer,*148 S. C. 403, 146 S. E. 243. Incidentally, the disputed area is relatively small — about twelve acres, which is only partly cultivatable.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karl Schneider,Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ZoranCorporation and will be retained by Zoran Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|                            |   | /s/ Karl Schneider                                                              |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: April 19, 2007 |   | Karl Schneider  Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----