alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 60635 Summary Calendar

RICARDO BRYAN NEWSOME , Plaintiff

− Appellant ,

v ersus STATE OF MISSISSIPPI; HARRISON COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER; HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; GULFPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOEL SMITH; et al

. , Defendant s − Appellee s

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi No. 1:18

- CV

- 178

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

Ricardo Newsome, Mississippi prisoner # 123359 , appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § § 1983 and 1985 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 24, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-60635 Document: 00515248309 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/24/2019No. 18

- 60635

2 a claim upo n which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B) . The
district court reasoned that Newsome’s claims challenging his state conviction
and sentence were barred by Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486

− 87 (1994). The court further reasoned that Newsome’s habeas corpus claim requesting his
immediate release was unexhausted and therefore was subject to dismissal without prejudice. On appeal, Newsome re
- urges his contentions that the state trial court’s alleged errors resulted in a vo id conviction and ille gal sentence. Newsome does not address the district court’s ruling that his suit was
Heck

- barred or that his habeas claim was unexhausted . Although this court liberally construes pro se filings, a pro se party “must still brief t he issues and reasonably comply with the standards of [Federal Rule of Appellate Proce

dure 28].” Grant v. Cuellar , 59 F.3d 523, 524 (5th Cir. 1995). When an appel

lant fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis, it is the same as thoug h he had not appealed that issue. Brinkmann v. Dall

. Cty. Deputy Sheriff
Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Newsome’s brief does not
address the bases of the district court’s ruling, h e has abandoned any challenge
to the dismissal. See id

. The appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) ; 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous and the district court’s dismissal of the

com plaint in part as frivolous and for failure to state a claim each count as a strike for purposes of § 1915(g). See Coleman v. Tollefson , 135 S. Ct. 1759,
1761

− 64 (2015)

. Newsome i s hereby warned that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in form a pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). Case: 18-60635 Document: 00515248309 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/24/2019
Case: 3:17-cv-00334-TMR Doc #: 14-14 Filed: 04/16/19 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 295
Case: 3:17-cv-00334-TMR Doc #: 14-14 Filed: 04/16/19 Page: 2 of 4 PAGEID #: 296
Case: 3:17-cv-00334-TMR Doc #: 14-14 Filed: 04/16/19 Page: 3 of 4 PAGEID #: 297
Case: 3:17-cv-00334-TMR Doc #: 14-14 Filed: 04/16/19 Page: 4 of 4 PAGEID #: 298
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4050 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4050

      To extend temporarily the duty suspension on Diaminodecane.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 2009

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend temporarily the duty suspension on Diaminodecane.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIAMINODECANE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.02 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Diaminodecane) is amended, 
in the effective period column, by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2012''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
FW: Questions on OG&E's cost estimates Benham, Ford to: Joe Kordzi 02/11/2010 04:18 PM

Cc: "Warden, Lee", "Shoop, Kimber", "Charles T. Wehland", Kristin Parker History: This message has been forwarded.

Mr. Kordzi,

Please find the attached email containing answers to the your questions posed to Cheryl Bradley. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,



## Ford Benham
Air Quality Supervisor 

### OG&E Power Supply Services Phone: (405)553-3221 Email: benhamrf @ oge

. com

From: Kordzi.Joe@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Kordzi.Joe@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:48 PM To: Bradley, Cheryl Cc: Donaldson.Guy@epamail.epa.gov ; Snyder.Erik@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Questions on OG&E's cost estimates

Hi Cheryl,

We have completed a preliminary review of the OG&E cost estimate. Would you please address the following questions as soon as you can?

The depreciable life of 20 years seems too short for dry FGD scrubbers along with SDA and FF. Why is this not higher?

What is the basis for assuming a 2.5% inflation rate? Also, why is there an inflation rate included in the capital cost estimates, but the levelized capital charges are defined as real?

Why are the debt and equity return included as part of the total capital charge estimate? The capital recovery is only half of the total capital charge (Table B-5 in report). Are the debt and equity returns based on real rates? What is the basis for these return estimates? What is the formula for estimating these returns and the total capital charge as used in Table B-5?

It appears the discount rate is high. What are the bases for the nominal and real discount rates?

What is the basis for the escalation costs?

Please provide the details on how the annual emissions reductions were calculated in Tables 5, 5a, and 5b.Please explain why a contingency cost of 13.970% is necessary for a project with an established technology and a record of other similar and successful installations?

Why is allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) included in the capital cost estimate, since it is not consistent with the EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual’s methodology?

Is there a property tax exemption for pollution control investments under Oklahoma law? If so, this should be mentioned as part of the cost analysis and the property taxes included in the cost estimates should be adjusted accordingly.

Why is the lime reagent cost for the Sooner units 12% higher than those at Muskogee ($118.80/ton v. $105.53/ton)?

Thanks.

Joe

" ... and miles to go before I sleep." -- Robert Frost
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-54-10

Joshua O. Saunders 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 407) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the superseding

indictment, and he is hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The

court will defer the decision of whether to accept the plea

agreement until the sentencing hearing.

Date: January 24, 2019 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
March 13, 2014 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2014-1 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the
closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the
same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 25, 2016
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4312 

To permit the District of Columbia to use Federal funds to provide scholarships for enrollment in participating schools under the DC School Choice 

Incentive Act of 2003 to students who did not receive such scholarships 

in the 2009–2010 school year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 15, 2009 

Mr. BURGESS (for himself, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. KLINE of Minnesota, Mr. 

FRELINGHUYSEN, and Mr. ISSA) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To permit the District of Columbia to use Federal funds 

to provide scholarships for enrollment in participating 

schools under the DC School Choice Incentive Act of 

2003 to students who did not receive such scholarships 

in the 2009–2010 school year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMITTING PROVISION OF SCHOLARSHIPS 

4 UNDER DC SCHOOL CHOICE INCENTIVE ACT 

5 OF 2003 TO ADDITIONAL STUDENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The District of Columbia Appro7 priations Act, 2010, is amended in the item relating to 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4312 IH

1 ‘‘Federal Funds’’, ‘‘Federal Payment for School Improve2 ment’’, by striking ‘‘That notwithstanding the second pro3 viso’’ and all that follows through ‘‘only for scholarships 

4 to students who received scholarships in the 2009–2010 

5 school year: Provided further,’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact8 ment of the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 

9 2010. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)
Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  President  and Chief
Executive  Officer  and Sr.  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of
Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation, (the "Company"), herby certify that to the best
of my  knowledge,  the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of the Company for the
period  ended  September  30,  2004  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the financial  condition  and results of operation of the Company.  A
signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  registrant  and will be retained  by it and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: May 13, 2005.              /s/ Michael Ward            /s/ James B. Smith
                                 --------------------        -------------------
                                 President and CEO           Sr. V.P. and CFO
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

 

ZORAN CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endedDecember 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Karl Schneider, Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ZoranCorporation and will be retained by Zoran Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:  March 31, 2003 |                         |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------|
|                        |                         |
|                        | /s/ Karl  Schneider          |   |
|                        | Karl  Schneider              |
|                        | Vice  President, Finance and |
|                        | Chief  Financial Officer     |

 

----
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

August 29, 2011

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division George Wellington Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta and Air Europa

For Statements of Authorization

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0160

Dear Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Wellington:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Aaron A. Goerlich, Counsel to Air Europa Erin M. Tallardy, Counsel to Air Europa
info@airlineinfo.com
ex10-2.htm











 






 









Stoecklein Law Group, a Professional Corporation




Practice Limited to Federal Securities













	
Emerald Plaza

	
Telephone:  (619) 704-1310


	
402 West Broadway

	
Facsimile:  (619) 704-1325


	
Suite 690

	
email:  djs@slgseclaw.com


	
San Diego, California  92101

	
web:  www.slgseclaw.com


	  














 


 


April 16, 2010


 


 


Molly Country


President


Subprime Advantage Inc.


501 W. Broadway, Suite A-323


San Diego, CA 92101


 


 


    Re: Offering on a Best Efforts All or None Basis- Waiver of Rights as a Creditor


 


 


Dear Ms. Country:


 


 


    We understand that you are filing Form S-1 Registration and plan on raising money on an best efforts, all or none basis. The money raised from this offering will be put into an account that will not bar attachment from creditors. We know we may be one of those creditors and we agree to waive any rights and claims we have to funds in that account, other than any amount you pay us voluntarily pursuant to our agreement.


 


 


Sincerely


 


 


/s/Donald Stoecklein
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No’s.333-101828, 333-74610, 333-59843, 333-37111, 333-49350, 333-52598) of ZoranCorporation of our report dated January 24, 2003 relating to the financialstatements, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 
| /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| San Jose,  California           |
|                            |
| March 28,  2003                 |

 

----
Exhibit
      23





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





Cash
      Technologies, Inc.


Los
      Angeles, California





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
      333-413536 on Form S-3, the registration statements (No. 333-117252 and
      333-90680) on Form SB-2 and the registration statements (333-114789, Nos.
      333-90664, 333-125630, 333-131070, 333-132892, and 333-72654) and on Form S-8
      of
      our report dated September 13, 2007 (except for notes 15 & 16 as to which
      the date is October 10, 2007) relating to the consolidated financial
      statements of Cash Technologies, Inc. as of May 31, 2005 and for the year then
      ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A. Our
      report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding Cash Technologies Inc's
      ability to continue as a going concern.





Los
      Angeles, California


October
      22, 2007
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ETHANOL BOOSTING SYSTEMS, LLC, 

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2020-1472

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:19-cv-00196-CFC-SRF, Judge 

Colm F. Connolly.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

ANDRES HEALY, Susman Godfrey LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by

MATTHEW ROBERT BERRY, STEVEN M. SEIGEL; WILLIAM 

DANIEL O'CONNELL, New York, NY. 

 MICHAEL S. CONNOR, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, 

NC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by 

KIRK T. BRADLEY; NATALIE CHRISTINE CLAYTON, ANDREW 

JAMES LIGOTTI, New York, NY; BRIAN DAVID HILL, Lerner, 

Case: 20-1472 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 12/11/2020
David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik LLP, Westfield, 

NJ. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

December 11, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1472 Document: 43 Page: 2 Filed: 12/11/2020
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, E. Leon Daniel, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ivanhoe Energy
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a.)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b.)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; andc.)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors:  a.)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. * * * Date November 2, 2004 Chief Executive Officer By:     /s/ E. Leon Daniel
      
    E. Leon Daniel
!:> e?ft- /y)h Z)€,^^f^ f. 

fr* J 

•^s" ife-/ h^c-^\^f*t^ Afe^ ^ fv\A:it 7^ ^»^J. ^in^^ ^ /J-^A-fu JUJi*. 

l/l d 8e9i99eMC « S82i9Z8Z06l GW0D10H 3nViVN 90:il S0-1?0-0102