alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-10-187-E March 22, 2010 Exemption No. 9705A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2008-0479

Mr. Edwin A. Schnepf

Executive Director

American Aeronautical Foundation 8501 Idyllwild Street Ventura, CA 93004

Dear Mr. Schnepf:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9705. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter posted March 4, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of American Aeronautical Foundation ( AAF) for an extension of Exemption No. 9705. That exemption from §§ 91.315, 119.5(g), and 119.21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows AAF to operate its B-25J Mitchell Bomber (B-25) (registration No. N30801 and serial No. 4430801) for the purpose of carrying passengers for compensation or hire on local flights for educational and historical purposes.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to AAF.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9705 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the2

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9705 to June 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9705 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9705.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
Exhibit 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of RDC  International,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, John Harkola,  Chief Executive Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.




/s/ John Harkola
-------------------------
John Harkola
Chief Executive Officer
May 24, 2004
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A - 14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 AND AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spear & Jackson, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Fletcher,
acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ William Fletcher
------------------------------

William Fletcher
Acting Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

September 24, 2004
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 06, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 06, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0086. STATE OF GEORGIA, EX REL RALPH T. HUDGENS, COMMISSIONER 

OF INSURANCE FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA v. SUN STATES INSURANCE 

GROUP, INC. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2001CV32953
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of WESTERGAARD.COM, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  The undersigned, in his/her capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.   Date:  February 22, 2008  /s/  Anne Straton Anne Straton, President and Treasurer  And  /s/  Louis Taubman Louis Taubman, Vice President
Dismissed and Opinion Filed March 1, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-00243-CV

FIFTEENFORTYSEVEN CRITICAL SYSTEMS REALTY, LLC AND 

COREY WELP, Appellants

V.

ARISTA INVESTMENTS, LLC; ARISTA INVESTMENTS 401K TRUST; F. 

AARON EDWARD; J. MARK EARLEY; AND BRIAN FOX, Appellees

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-19316

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III

Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to 

settlement. The parties request that we dismiss the appeal with prejudice and that 

each party bear its own costs of appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

230243f.p05

/Bill Pedersen, III//

BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

FIFTEENFORTYSEVEN 

CRITICAL SYSTEMS REALTY, 

LLC AND COREY WELP, 

Appellants

No. 05-23-00243-CV V.

ARISTA INVESTMENTS, LLC; 

ARISTA INVESTMENTS 401K 

TRUST; F. AARON EDWARD; J. 

MARK EARLEY; AND BRIAN 

FOX, Appellees

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-19316.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Pedersen, III. Justices Molberg and 

Nowell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 1

st day of March, 2024.
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATIONS
UNDER SECTION 906




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Orchid Cellmark Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  October
      30, 2009
                  /S/    THOMAS
      A. BOLOGNAThomas
      A. Bologna
                    President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                    (Principal
      Executive Officer)Dated:   October
      30, 2009
                  /S/    JAMESF.
      SMITHJames
      F. Smith
                    Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer
                    (Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22255-22256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #14278 and #14279]


Massachusetts Disaster #MA-00063

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of 
Massachusetts (FEMA-4214-DR), dated 04/13/2015.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storm, Snowstorm, and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 01/26/2015 through 01/28/2015.
    Effective Date: 04/13/2015.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/12/2015.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/13/2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 04/13/2015, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Barnstable, Bristol, Dukes, Essex, Middlesex, Nantucket, Norfolk, 
Plymouth, Suffolk, Worcester.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:

[[Page 22256]]

 
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14278B and
  for economic injury is 14279B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Joseph P. Loddo,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015-09104 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SETION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Producers, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregg Fryett, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 9, 2004





/s/ Gregg Fryett

Gregg Fryett

Chief Executive Officer
##### 



FIRST SHARES BANCORP, INC.

Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or
her capacity as an officer of First Shares Bancorp, Inc. (First Shares),
that, to his or her knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report of First Shares on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First
Shares Bancorp, Inc.                                

Dated: May 15, 2003



| | /s/ Kimberly B. Kling
Kimberly B. Kling
Secretary, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First Shares Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by First Shares
Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
List of Appendices 

Figures Questions 2, 4, 11 and 13

Appendix A 2005 NPDES Permit Renewal Application 

Questions 3 and 9 

Appendix B 2010 NPDES Permit Renewal Application 

Questions 3 and 9 

Appendix C Ash Pond Storage Volume Documents

Question 3 

Appendix D Waste Streams Flow Diagrams 

Question 7 

Appendix E Discharge Monitoring Reports for 2005 – May 2010 

Questions 7 and 9 

Appendix F Coal Ash Analyses 

Questions 7 and 8 

Appendix G FGD WWT Filter Cake Analyses 

Questions 7 and 8 

Appendix H Gypsum Analyses 

 Questions 7 and 8 

Appendix I Asheville Constructed Wetlands Treatment System- O&M Manual 

Question 9 

Appendix J NPDES Permit No. NC0000396 

Question 9 

Appendix K Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 

Question 10

Appendix L Groundwater Analytical Data and Well Construction Records 

Question 11 

Appendix M Seepage Flow Measurements 2005-2010 

Question 13 

Appendix N Subsurface Investigation and Slope Stability Analysis of 1964 Ash 

Basin Dike 

Question 13 

Appendix O Slope Stability Models 

Question 17 

Appendix P Inundation Maps 

Question 17 

Appendix Q Waste Manifests 

Table 3 and Question 17 

Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Asheville Plant Attachements Page 1
Figures 

Questions 2, 4, 11 and 13 

Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Asheville Plant Attachements Page 2
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Asheville Plant Attachements Page 3
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Asheville Plant Attachements Page 4
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Asheville Plant Attachements Page 5
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Asheville Plant Attachements Page 6
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Asheville Plant Attachements Page 7
No. 1033.

#### Car Hire Case. *Ex parte John H. Fisher, Receiver of the South Carolina Railroad Company. In re Gibbes*v. *Greenville and Columbia Railroad Company, and State, ex relatione the Attorney-General,*v. *The Same.*

November Term, 1880.

April 25th, 1881.

*D. T. Corbin,*for appellant. *James Conner, A. G. Magrath,*contra.

Where the cars of one railroad company were used by another with the mutual understanding at first that there was to be no charge for car service because of other advantages enjoyed by the owner of these cars from the connection between the two companies, then regarded a sufficient compensation, such owner must show when and how this understanding was changed before an implied contract to pay for the continued use of these cars will be raised, or remuneration for their use awarded to the car-owners. Opinion by

MoIyer, A. J.,
No. 2946.

#### Archer *v.*Long.

April Term, 1892.

This was a motion, the nature of which appears from the ruling of the court thereon, which was as follows :

At the last term of this court appellants moved for a suspension of their appeal, with leave to them to apply to the Circuit Court for a new trial on the ground of after-discovered evidence. This motion was granted. 35 S. C., 588. Afterwards, and ■before the next term of the Court of Common Pleas for Union County, counsel for appellant sought an arrangement with counsel for respondent by which a time for the hearing of the motion in the Circuit Court would be fixed by agreement. This proposition having been promptly refused, it was the duty of appellant’s counsel to have given notice at once of a time when he would urge his motion in the Circuit Court of Union. In failing to do this, he was in default, for it appears that if the notice had then been given of a motion to be made during the first week of the term, the motion would have been reached and heard. No notice of the motion, however, was given until March 12th, the last day of the first week of the term ; and the result was that the motion was not reached until two hours before the final adjournment of the court, and therefore was not heard.

But while appellants were in default, respondent was in default too, for on failure of appellant’s counsel to bring his motion to a hearing at that term, counsel for respondent should have moved on Circuit for an order directing the case to be certified back to this court, and then this court would have had official information of tv hat had occurred on Circuit. Both parties, therefore, were in default, not in the sense of anything improper, but in legal default.

The motion now before us is to have this cause restored to the docket of this court, and to rescind the former order of this court suspending the appeal and giving leave to appellants to make their motion on Circuit. The cause has been improperly dropped from this docket, as the appeal having been only suspended, it should remain on the docket of this court. We can*603not now rescind our former order in this case, for the Circuit motion has been noticed and docketed in the Circuit Court, and, therefore, the motion now before us must be refused at this time. But we will grant an order that unless the motion heretofore authorized to be made on Circuit .shall have been made before the Circuit Court, and there heard before the next term of this court, the former order of this court will be rescinded and the pending appeal will then be heard. Let counsel prepare such an order.

*D. E.*Hydride, for the motion. *W. W. Thomson,*contra.

A formal order carrying out these directions was thereupon prepared and signed April 30, 1892.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7760

WILLIAM DUNCAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PENNY ALLEN; H. L. JACKSON; DUNCAN DAVIS; DONALD CLELLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00390-GCM)

Submitted: April 2, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Duncan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William Duncan appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Duncan v. Clelland, No. 3:07-cv-00390-GCM

(W.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2007). We grant Duncan’s motion to file a

supplemental brief. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Faulk, Scott (OSn 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Hi Michael, 

Daniel Helland <daniel@boutiqueair.com> 

Monday, April 14, 2014 1:22 PM 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

Faulk, Scott (OST); Shawn Simpson 

Re: Order Requesting Proposals for Essential Air Service for Victoria, Texas- Due Date: 

April 16, 2014 

Boutique Air would like to request a one week extension on the due date for proposals at Victoria, TX. Please 

let me know if you need anything else from us. 

Thanks, 

Daniel Helland 

Boutique Air 

daniel@boutigueair.com 

office + 1-415-449-0505 ext. 8103 

cell + 1-952-649-0324 

On Tue, Mar 11,2014 at 2:12PM, <Michael.F.Martin@dot.gov> w~ote: 

Everyone: 

I have attached the Order requesting proposals for Essential Air Service at Victoria, Texas. Proposals are due 

by 11 :59PM on April16, 2014, and should bee-mailed directly to me at michael.f.martin@dot.gov. The Order 

will be available online tomorrow at www.regulations.gov under Victoria's docket number, DOT-OST-2005-

20454. Please forward this notice to all relevant parties. 

Feel free to contact me if you have questions. 

Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

1 
Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494 

2
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITIONAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from to
 Commission File No.: 0-27338
 ATARI, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    13-3689915(State or Other Jurisdiction of
    
    (I.R.S. EmployerIncorporation or Organization)
    
    Identification No.)
 417 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016
  Registrants telephone number, including area code: (212) 726-6500
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value
 þ o
 o
 þ o
  o o
 Documents Incorporated by Reference




---



##### Table of Contents



EXPLANATORY NOTE




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  SIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEX-23.1: CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPEX-31.1: CERTIFICATIONEX-31.2: CERTIFICATIONEX-32.1: CERTIFICATIONEX-32.2: CERTIFICATION    Table of Contents  
 SIGNATURES
  ATARI, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Bruno BonnellName: Bruno BonnellTitle: Chief Executive Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
  23.1
    
    Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.31.1
    
    Chief Executive Officer
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
    
    Chief Financial Officer
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1
    
    Certification by the Chief
Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.32.2
    
    Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.