UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-Q




xQUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011





oTRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT





For the transition period from ____________ to____________





Commission File No. 000-32507





EGPI FIRECREEK, INC.


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





Nevada
88-0345961(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)





6564 Smoke Tree Lane


Scottsdale, Arizona 85253


(Address of Principal Executive Offices)





(480) 948-6581


(Registrant’s Telephone Number)





N/A


(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,


if changed since last report)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesxNo£





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes£No£





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:


Large Accelerated Filer  £

Accelerated Filer  £Non-Accelerated Filer    £

Smaller Reporting Company  T


(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes£ NoT





State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.





As of August 12, 2011, the registrant had 6,607,345 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding. There are no shares of Series A and B preferred stock, and 87,143 shares of Series C, and 2,500 share of its Series D preferred stock issued and outstanding, at $0.001 par value for each of the Series of Preferred, and no shares of non-voting common stock issued and outstanding.





EGPI FIRECREEK, INC


f/k/a Energy Producers, Inc.


10-Q


June 30, 2011





TABLE OF CONTENTS





PAGEPART 1:

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

3Item 1.

Financial Statements - Unaudited

3Consolidated Balance Sheets

3Consolidated Statements of Operations

4Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

5Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

6Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

7Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

29Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

36Item 4(T)

Controls and Procedures

36PART II:

OTHER INFORMATION

36Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

36Item 1A.

Risk Factors

37Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

37Item 3.

Defaults upon Senior Securities

40Item 4.

Removed and Reserved

40Item 5.

Other Information

40Item 6.

Exhibits

41CertificationsSignature

42


2


PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION





ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


EGPI FIRECREEK, INC.


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


AS OF JUNE 30, 2011 AND DECEMBER 31, 2010





Unaudited


Audited6/30/2011


12/31/2010ASSETSCurrent assets:Cash

$
58,323


$
9,272Accounts receivable


63,998



14,835Inventory


19,134



-Prepaid expenses


5,500



5,900Notes  receivables


100,000



-Current assets related to discontinued operationsCash


-



658Accounts receivable


-



111,568Inventory


-



-Prepaid expenses


-



3,165Total current assets related to discontinued operations


-



115,391Total current assets


246,955



145,398Other assets:Investment in  Terra Telecom, Inc.


-



18,000Goodwill


22,119



-Intangible assets – net


350,036



-Fixed assets – net


633,696



568,560Oil and natural gas properties – proved reserves - net


3,891,875



163,500Other assets related to discontinued operationsIntangible assets – net


-



743,420Goodwill


-



2,001,840Fixed assets – net


-



21,469Total other assets related to discontinued operations


-



2,766,729Total other assets


4,897,726



3,516,789Total assets

$
5,144,681


$
3,662,187LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICITCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable & accrued expenses

$
765,646


$
558,489Notes payable


3,092,178



3,307,224Convertible notes, net of discount


266,315



44,490Capital lease obligation


56,872



56,872Advances & notes payable - related parties


484,895



188,718Derivative Liabilities


318,958



823,846Asset retirement obligation


14,398



5,368Current liabilities related to discontinued operationsAccounts payable & accrued expenses


-



2,209,128Total current liabilities


4,999,262



7,194,135Commitment and contingencies:Series D preferred stock, 2.5 million authorized, par value $0.001, convertible into common shares.  2,500 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively


3,736,387



-Shareholders' deficit:Series A preferred stock, 20 million authorized, par value $0.001,one share convertible to one common share, no stated dividend, none outstanding


-



-Series B preferred stock, 20 million authorized, par value $0.001,one share convertible to one common share, no stated dividend, none outstanding


-



-Series C preferred stock, 20 million authorized, par value $.001, each share has 21, 200 votes per share, are not convertible, have no stated dividend; 87,142 and 14,286 shares outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively.


87



14Common stock- $0.001 par value, authorized 3,000,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding, 5,121,530 at June 30, 2011 and 103,831 at December 31, 2010, respectively


5,122



104Additional paid in capital


28,380,156



25,951,275Other comprehensive income


117,609



219,209Common stock subscribed


1,410,474



1,448,250Contingent holdback


2,000



2,000Accumulated deficit


(33,506,416
)


(31,152,800
)Total shareholders' deficit


(3,590,968
)


(3,531,948
)Total liabilities & shareholders' deficit

$
5,144,681


$
3,662,187





See the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.


3


EGPI FIRECREEK, INC.


UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND JUNE 30, 2010


(Unaudited)





For the six

months ended


For the six

months ended


For the three

months ended


For the three

months ended6/30/2011


6/30/2010


6/30/2011


6/30/2010RevenuesGross revenue from sales

$
47,362


$
-


$
22,220


$
-Gross revenues from oil and gas sales


107,649



-



72,532



-Cost of sales


(80,961
)


-



(42,059
)


-Well operation costs


(86,971
)


-



(43,862
)


-Gross Margin


(12,921
)


-



8,831



-General and administrative expenses:General administration


(782,758
)


(1,477,977
)


(1,084,958
)


(1,081,071
)Total general & administrative expenses


(782,758
)


(1,477,977
)


(1,084,958
)


(1,081,071
)Net loss from operations


(795,679
)


(1,477,977
)


(1,076,127
)


(1,081,071
)Other revenues and expenses:Interest expense


(297,472
)


(198,219
)


(178,311
)


(85,668
)Gain (Loss) on settlement or

conversion of debt


(1,011,209
)


(610,805
)


(344,572
)


(335,976
)Gain (Loss) on asset disposal


31,970



1,673



-



-Gain (Loss) on derivatives


321,659



28,085



533,331



(40,716
)Net loss before provision for income taxes


(1,750,731
)


(2,257,243
)


(1,065,679
)


(1,543,451
)Provision for income taxes


-



-



-



-Loss from continuing operations


(1,750,731
)


(2,257,243
)


(1,065,679
)


(1,543,451
)Loss from discontinued operations net of tax


(602,885
)


(774,211
)


-



(357,492
)Net loss

$
(2,353,616
)

$
(3,030,454
)

$
(1,065,679
)

$
(1,900,923
)Foreign currency translation


117,609



421,476



24,741



354,197Net comprehensive loss


(2,198,148
)


(2,609,978
)


(1,120,846
)


(1,546,726
)Basic and diluted net loss per common share:Basic and diluted loss per common share from continuing operations

$
(1.11
)

$
(9.74
)

$
(0.38
)

$
(4.60
)Basic and diluted loss per common share from discontinued operations

$
(0.38
)

$
(3.34
)

$
(0.00
)

$
(1.06
)Basic and diluted net loss per common share

$
(1.49
)

$
(13.08
)

$
(0.38
)

$
(5.66
)Weighted average of common shares outstanding:Basic and fully diluted


1,581,675



231,691



2,803,839



335,709





See the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.


4


EGPI FIRECREEK, INC.


UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND JUNE 30, 2010





For the six months

Ended


For the six

months ended6/30/2011


6/30/2010Operating Activities:Net income (loss)

$
(2,353,616
)

$
(2,609,978
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss items not requiring the use of cash:Gain on disposal of fixed assets


-



(1,673
)Accretion of asset retirement obligation


979



-Preferred shares issued for services


75,000



-Common shares issued for services


20,148



686,063Promissory notes issued for services


150,000



-Loss on disposition of SATCO


586,924



-Gain on issuance of common shares to shareholders of Terra Telecom, Inc.


(31,970
)


-Bad debt expense


100,000



-Gain on change in derivative


(321,659
)


110,774Loss on settlement of debt


983,418



859,204Loss on conversion of debt


27,793



-Depletion


73,268



-Depreciation


43,157



12,813Amortization of intangibles


48,878



34,770Amortization of debt discount


406,882



-Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:Accounts receivable


93,723



284,737Inventory


11,493



624,996Accounts payable and accrued expenses


(98,276
)


361,158Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party


42,670



-Prepaid expenses


336



(18,994
)Net cash used by operations


(140,853
)


(218,630Investing Activities:Cash paid for development costs of oil and gas properties


(165,162
)


-Cash acquired in purchase of Arctic Solar Engineering


538



-Net cash used by investing activities


(165,700
)


-Financing Activities:Proceeds  from the sale of stock


-



61,004Principal payments on debt – related parties


(5,823
)


-Principal payments on debt


-



(1,012,433
)Borrowings on debt – related parties


210,000



-Borrowings on debt


251,292



1,618,204Net cash provided by financing activities


455,469



666,775Foreign currency translation


(101,600
)


421,476Net increase (decrease) in cash during the period

$
48,393


$
26,669Cash balance at January 1st


9,930



17,625Cash balance at  June 30

$
58,323


$
44,294Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:Interest paid during the year

$
12,450


$
-Income taxes paid during the year


-



-Non-cash activities:Common stock issued for:Debt conversion


133,817



1,634,431Redquartz acquisition


30,876



4,464,400Chanwest acquisition


-



268,276Debt settlement


2,117,430



-Preferred shares subscribed to acquire oil and gas lease


3,736,387



-Accounts payable converted to promissory notes


385,581



-Adjustment to asset retirement obligation


8,051



-Beneficial conversion feature


350,864



-





See the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.


5


EGPI FIRECREEK, INC.


UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT


FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011





Other


CommonPreferred


Preferred


Common


Common


Paid in


Accumulated


Comprehensive


StockShares


Value


Shares


Value


Capital


Deficit


Loss


Subscribed


Other


TotalBalance at December 31,2010


14,286



14



103,831



104



25,951,275



(31,152,800)



219,209



1,448,250



2,000



(3,531,948)Issued common shares for services










5,857



6



25,716











(10,626)







15,096Issued common shares for settlement of debt










4,184,205



4,184



2,108,896











4,350







2,117,430Issued common shares for conversion of debt










813,194



813



146,504











(13,500)







133,817Common shares issued to shareholders of Terra Telecom,Inc.










2,443



2



23,050











(18,000)







5,052Acquisition of  Arctic Solar Engineering, Inc.










12,000



12



49,788



















49,800Preferred shares issued for services


72,856



73











74,927



















75,000Other comprehensive loss


























(101,600)











(101,600)Net loss for the six months ended June 30,2011






















(2,353,616)















(2,353,616)Balance at June 30, 2011


87,142



87



5,121,530



5,122



28,380,156



(33,506,416)



117,609



1,410,474



2,000



(3,590,968)


6


EGPI FIRECREEK, INC.


NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND JUNE 30, 2010





1. Organization of the Company and Significant Accounting Principles





The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada October 1995. Effective October 13, 2004 the Company, previously known as Energy Producers Inc., changed its name to EGPI Firecreek, Inc.





Prior to December 2008, the Company held interests in various gas & oil wells located in the Wyoming and Texas area. In December 2008, the Company’s major creditor, Dutchess Private Equities Ltd. (Dutchess), foreclosed on the assets of the Company.  As a result, all of the Company’s oil and gas properties were transferred to Dutchess in satisfaction of debt owed.





In October 2008, the Company effected a 1 share for 200 shares reverse split of its common stock and all amounts have been retroactively adjusted.





In May 2009 the Company acquired M3 Lighting, Inc. (“M3”) as a wholly owned subsidiary via reverse triangular merger. The Company was determined to be the acquirer in the transaction for accounting purposes. M3 is a distributor of commercial and decorative lighting to the trade and direct to retailers.  As part of the Merger the Company effected a name change for its wholly owned subsidiary Malibu Holding, Inc. to Energy Producers, Inc. (“EPI”) as a conduit for its oil and gas activities.





In November 2009 the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of South Atlantic Traffic Corporation, a Florida corporation (“SATCO”). SATCO has been in business since 2001 and has several offices throughout the Southeast United States. SATCO carries a variety of products and inventory geared primarily towards the transportation industry.  SATCO offers transportation products ranging from loop sealant, traffic signal equipment, traffic and light poles, data/video systems and Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS) surveillance systems. SATCO works closely with Department of Transportation (DOT) agencies, local traffic engineers, contractors, and consultants to customize high quality traffic control systems.





In December 2009, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Energy Producers, Inc. acquired 50% working interests and corresponding 32% net revenue interests in oil and gas leases, reserves, and equipment located in West Central Texas. The Company entered into a turnkey work program included for three wells located on the leases.





On March 3, 2010, the Company executed a Stock Purchase Agreement with the stockholders of Redquartz LTD (“Sellers” or “RQTZ”), a company formed and existing under the laws of the country of Ireland, whereas the Company agreed to issue 100,000 shares of its restricted common stock valued at USD $2,500 in exchange for 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of RQTZ. All assets and liabilities, other than the Shareholder Notes Payable, of the RQTZ were transferred to the prior owners of Redquartz. The Notes Payable represent a debt burden to RQTZ of USD $4,464,262. This obligation is based in Euros and converted to our functional currency the dollar. Redquartz LTD was inactive in the first and second quarter of 2010 and had no income and expense that would affect the financial statements of the Company and therefore no pro-forma is necessary.





On June 11, 2010, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Chanwest Resources, Inc., (“Chanwest or CWR”) a Texas corporation. In the course of this acquisition, Chanwest stockholders exchanged all outstanding common shares for the Company’s common shares and other provisions. Chanwest Resources, Inc. was formed in 2009 and has been engaged in ramping up operations including acquiring assets related to the servicing and construction, and activities related to the acquisition, production and development for oil and gas. Chanwest has formed strategic alliances and brought key management with over 40 years experience in all facets of the oil and gas industry, to be implemented on day one of our acquisition thereof. Chanwests’ first phase of operations include Construction and Trucking, services for drill site preparation to clear and lay pipeline (gathering systems) for operators. Chanwest operations can provide for services to maintain lease roads, set power poles and clean up oilfield spills. Chanwest works with operators or lease owners by purchase order or contract with major oil fields.





On October 1, 2010 EGPI Firecreek, Inc. the Company entered into a Definitive Securities Purchase/Exchange Agreement with Terra Telecom, LLC. (“Terra"). Terra is considered recognized as a leading provider of state-of-the-art communication technologies and a premier Alcatel-Lucent partner. They currently serve various sized companies and organizations that use and deploy communications systems, sales, service, and training while consolidating and optimizing the end user experience. Its goal is to provide customers value and integrity in each of these opportunities. Since 1980, Terra has focused on delivering enterprise solutions while leading with voice services and offering full turn-key solutions that consist of voice, data, video and associated applications.  As of December 31, 2010, the Company has not assumed control of this acquisition.  As a result, this company is not consolidated in the financial statements as of December 31, 2010.  On March 14, 2011, the Company sold its interest in Terra to Distressed Asset Acquisitions, Inc.





On October 18, 2010, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation, increasing its authorized common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to 3,000,000,000 from 1,300,000,000 and is authorized to issue 60,000,000 shares of preferred stock that has a par value of $0.001 per share.


7


On November 9, 2010, the Company affected a 1 share for 50 shares reverse split of its common stock and all amounts have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented.





On February 4, 2011, the Company entered into an Agreement to acquire all 100% of Arctic Solar Engineering LLC, a Missouri limited liability company located at PO Box 4391, Chesterfield, MO 63006 and the owners of Membership Interests of the Arctic Solar Engineering LLC; The FATM Partnership, a Missouri Partnership, The Frederic Sussman Living Trust. Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC, is an integrator of Solar Thermal Energy technology. For further information please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2011, and in the section on “The Business”, and “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections, and elsewhere listed in this document.





On March 2, 2011 the Company obtained a consent from the majority shareholders of the Company to amend the Articles of Incorporation to i) authorize the issuance of 2,500 shares of a new D Series Preferred Stock, and ii) for the Board of Directors to be able to authorize any and all capitalization of the Company going forward without the need for shareholder approval, and further authorized for the Board of Directors to set all rights, preferences, and designations, for and in behalf of any class of the Company’s common of preferred stock, and as may be required or as necessary in the best interest of the Company.





On March 14, 2011, the Company entered into and completed the closing of a Stock Purchase Agreement involving the sale of South Atlantic Traffic Corporation to Distressed Asset Acquisitions, Inc. For further information please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2011 and in the section on “The Business”, and “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections, and elsewhere listed in this document.





On March 14, 2011, the Company entered into and completed the closing of a Stock Purchase Agreement involving the sale of Oklahoma Telecom Holdings, Inc. an Oklahoma corporation, formerly known as Terra Telecom, LLC., an Oklahoma limited liability company, to Distressed Asset Acquisitions, Inc. For further information please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2011 and in the section on “The Business”, and “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections, and elsewhere listed in this document.





On March 14, 2011, the Company entered into and completed the closing of a Stock Purchase Agreement involving the sale of Terra Telecom, Inc. (“TTI”), to Distressed Asset Acquisitions, Inc. For further information please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2011 and in the section on “The Business”, and “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections, and elsewhere listed in this document.





On July 7, 2011, the Company affected a 1 share for 500 shares reverse split of its common stock and all amounts have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented.





Consolidation - the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries.  All significant inter-company balances have been eliminated.





The financial information included in this quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.





Use of Estimates- The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses at the date of the consolidated financial statements and for the period they include.  Actual results may differ from these estimates.





Revenue and Cost Recognition-


-
Oil and gas:  Revenue is recognized from oil and gas sales in the period of delivery.  Settlement on sales occurs anywhere from two weeks to two months after the delivery date.  The Company recognizes revenue when an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.


-
Oilfield services:  Revenue from services is recognized when an arrangement exists, the services are rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.





The Company records commission revenue, usually 3% of the amount invoiced, based on contracts with suppliers, once the purchase order is placed with the supplier and the customer is invoiced.  The Company, in turn, sends an invoice to the supplier for 3% of the total order amount.  Commission sales are specialty orders drop-shipped from the manufacturer.  Accordingly, all sales are final upon delivery to the customer under the terms of the sales order.





Cash Equivalents -The Company considers all highly liquid investments with the original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.





Accounts Receivable -The Company extends credit to its customers in the normal course of business and performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers, maintaining allowances for potential credit losses which, when realized, have been within management's expectations. The allowance method is used to account for uncollectible amounts. The evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. Allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 at June 30, 2011 and $207,983 at December 31, 2010.


8


Inventory -Inventories consist of merchandise purchased for resale and are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.





Prepaid Expenses -Prepaid expenses are recorded at cost for payments for goods and services purchased during an accounting period but not used or consumed during that accounting period. The costs are amortized over time as the benefit is received onto the income statement.





Oil and Gas Activities - The Company uses the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas producing activities. Under this method, acquisition costs for proved and unproved properties are capitalized when incurred. Exploration costs, including geological and geophysical costs, the costs of carrying and retaining unproved properties and exploratory dry hole drilling costs, are expensed. Development costs, including the costs to drill and equip development wells, and successful exploratory drilling costs to locate proved reserves are capitalized.





Exploratory drilling costs are capitalized when incurred pending the determination of whether a well has found proved reserves. A determination of whether a well has found proved reserves is made shortly after drilling is completed. The determination is based on a process which relies on interpretations of available geologic, geophysic, and engineering data. If a well is determined to be successful, the capitalized drilling costs will be reclassified as part of the cost of the well. If a well is determined to be unsuccessful, the capitalized drilling costs will be charged to expense in the period the determination is made. If an exploratory well requires a major capital expenditure before production can begin, the cost of drilling the exploratory well will continue to be carried as an asset pending determination of whether proved reserves have been found only as long as: i) the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well if the required capital expenditure is made and ii) drilling of the additional exploratory wells is under way or firmly planned for the near future. If drilling in the area is not under way or firmly planned, or if the well has not found a commercially producible quantity of reserves, the exploratory well is assumed to be impaired, and its costs are charged to expense.





In the absence of a determination as to whether the reserves that have been found can be classified as proved, the costs of drilling such an exploratory well is not carried as an asset for more than one year following completion of drilling. If, after that year has passed, a determination that proved reserves exist cannot be made, the well is assumed to be impaired, and its costs are charged to expense. Its costs can, however, continue to be capitalized if a sufficient quantity of reserves is discovered in the well to justify its completion as a producing well and sufficient progress is made in assessing the reserves and the well’s economic and operating feasibility.





The impairment of unamortized capital costs is measured at a lease level and is reduced to fair value if it is determined that the sum of expected future net cash flows is less than the net book value. The Company determines if impairment has occurred through either adverse changes or as a result of the annual review of all fields. During 2010 after conducting an impairment analysis, the Company did not record impairment as the fair value of our reserves exceeded our net book value.





Asset Retirement Obligations (“ARO”).  The estimated costs of restoration and removal of facilities are accrued. The fair value of a liability for an asset's retirement obligation is recorded in the period in which it is incurred and the corresponding cost capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its then present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated with the related long-lived asset. If the liability is settled for an amount other than the recorded amount, a gain or loss is recognized. For all periods presented, estimated future costs of abandonment and dismantlement are included in the full cost amortization base and are amortized as a component of depletion expense. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the ARO of $14,398 and $5,368 is included in liabilities and fixed assets.





Development costs of proved oil and gas properties, including estimated dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs and acquisition costs, are depreciated and depleted on a field basis by the units-of-production method using proved developed and proved reserves, respectively. The costs of unproved oil and gas properties are generally combined and impaired over a period that is based on the average holding period for such properties and the Company's experience of successful drilling.





Costs of retired, sold or abandoned properties that make up a part of an amortization base (partial field) are charged to accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization if the units-of-production rate is not significantly affected. Accordingly, a gain or loss, if any, is recognized only when a group of proved properties (entire field) that make up the amortization base has been retired, abandoned or sold.





Stock-Based Compensation -The Company estimates the fair value of share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, restricted stock and employee stock purchases related to employee stock purchase plans, on the date of grant using an option-pricing model.  The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense ratably over the requisite service periods.  We estimate the fair value of each share-based award using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model is highly complex and dependent on key estimates by management. The estimates with the greatest degree of subjective judgment are the estimated lives of the stock-based awards and the estimated volatility of our stock price. The Black-Scholes model is also used for our valuation of warrants.


9


Earnings Per Common Share -Basic earnings per common share is calculated based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents (convertible notes and interest on the notes, stock awards and stock options) outstanding during the period. Dilutive earnings per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if options to purchase common stock were exercised for shares of common stock.  Basic and diluted EPS are the same as the effect of our potential common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive.





Fair Value Measurements -On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework for using fair value to measure financial assets and liabilities on a recurring basis, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Beginning on January 1, 2009, the Company also applied the guidance to non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, which includes goodwill and intangible assets. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:





Level 1 - Valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access.





Level 2 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; or valuations based on models where the significant inputs are observable in the market.





Level 3 - Valuation is based on models where significant inputs are not observable. The unobservable inputs reflect the Company's own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use.





The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value as of June 30, 2011 on a recurring and non-recurring basis:





GainsDescription

Level 1


Level 2


Level 3


(Losses)Intangibles (non-recurring)

$
-


$
-


$
350,036


$
-Goodwill (non-recurring)

$
-


$
-


$
22,119


$
-Derivatives (recurring)

$
-


$
-


$
318,958


$
-





The Company has goodwill and intangible assets as a result of the 2011 business combinations discussed throughout this form 10-Q. These assets were valued with the assistance of a valuation consultant and consisted of level 3 valuation techniques.





The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value as of December 31, 2010 on a recurring and non-recurring basis:





GainsDescription

Level 1


Level 2


Level 3


(Losses)Intangibles (non-recurring)

$
-


$
-


$
824,000


$
-Goodwill (non-recurring)

$
-


$
-


$
2,001,840


$
-Derivatives (recurring)

$
-


$
-


$
823,846


$
-





The Company has derivative liabilities as a result of 2010 convertible promissory notes that include embedded derivatives.  These liabilities were valued with the assistance of a valuation consultant and consisted of level 3 valuation techniques.





The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and long-term debt. The estimated fair value of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of long-term debt also approximates fair value since their terms are similar to those in the lending market for comparable loans with comparable risks. None of these instruments are held for trading purposes.





Fixed Assets- Fixed assets are stated at cost. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset. The following is a summary of the estimated useful lives used in computing depreciation expense:


Office equipment

3 yearsComputer hardware & software

3 yearsImprovements & furniture

5 yearsWell equipment

7 years


10




Expenditures for major repairs and renewals that extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized.  Minor repair expenditures are charged to expense as incurred.





Impairment of Long-Lived Assets -The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment ("ASC 360-10"). ASC 360-10 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment annually or more often if events and circumstances warrant. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undiscounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. ASC 360-10 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.





Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets-The Company periodically reviews the carrying value of intangible assets not subject to amortization, including goodwill, to determine whether impairment may exist. Goodwill and certain intangible assets are assessed annually, or when certain triggering events occur, for impairment using fair value measurement techniques. These events could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, a decline in operating performance, competition, sale or disposition of a significant portion of the business, or other factors.  Specifically, goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company uses level 3 inputs and a discounted cash flow methodology to estimate the fair value of a reporting unit. A discounted cash flow analysis requires one to make various judgmental assumptions including assumptions about future cash flows, growth rates, and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on the Company’s budget and long-term plans. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the respective reporting units. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. That is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit.





As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, amortizable intangible assets consist of trade names, customer contracts, patents and Non-compete clause. These intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 3-5 years.  For the six months ending June 30, 2011 the Company recorded amortization of our intangibles of $ 48,878, and amortization of $34,770 for the six months ending June 30, 2010.  For the three months ending June 30, 2011 the Company recorded amortization of our intangibles of $29,249, and amortization of $28,525 for the three months ending June 30, 2010.  Note 15 includes the balances of all intangibles as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.  The useful lives pertaining to the intangible assets amortized are as follows:





Intangibles acquired in acquisition of Arctic Solar Engineering, Inc.Useful lifePatents

5Customer Base

5Trademarks

5Non-Compete

3Intangibles disposed of pertaining to SATCOUseful lifeTradename

12Customer Relationships

10





Foreign Currency Translation and Transaction and translation - The financial position at present for the Company’s foreign subsidiary Redquartz, LLC, established under the laws of the Country of Ireland are determined using (U.S. dollars) reporting currency as the functional currency. All exchange gains and losses from remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities that are not denominated in U.S. dollars are recognized currently in other comprehensive income. All transactional gains and losses are part of income or loss from operations (if and when incurred) will be pursuant to current accounting literature. The Company’s functional currency is the U.S dollar. We have an obligation related to our acquisition of Redquartz as discussed in Note 7 which is denominated in Euro’s. The change in currency valuation from our reporting this obligation in U.S dollars is reported as a component of other comprehensive income consistent with the relevant accounting literature.


11


Income taxes - The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the establishment of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.  A valuation allowance is provided to the extent deferred tax assets may not be recoverable after consideration of the future reversal of deferred tax liabilities, tax planning strategies, and projected future taxable income.





The Company uses a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The guidance requires the Company to recognize tax benefits only for tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities.  The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement.  A liability for “unrecognized tax benefits” is recorded for any tax benefits claimed in our tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards.





Derivative Financial Instruments -The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. Derivative financial instruments are initially measured at their fair value. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re−valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income. For option−based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black−Scholes model to value the derivative instruments. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non−current based on whether or not net−cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.





Recently Adopted and Recently Enacted Accounting Pronouncements





In January 2010, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” which is now codified under FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” This ASU will require additional disclosures regarding transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as well as a reconciliation of activity in Level 3 on a gross basis (rather than as one net number). The ASU also provides clarification on disclosures about the level of disaggregation for each class of assets and liabilities and on disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. FASB ASU No. 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures requiring a reconciliation of activity in Level 3. Those disclosures will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of the portion of this ASU effective after December 15, 2009, as well as the portion of the ASU effective after December 15, 2010, did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.





In April 2010, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2010-17, “Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition,” which is now codified under FASB ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition.” This ASU provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and development transactions. Consideration which is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety can be recognized as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone meets all criteria to be considered substantive. A milestone should be considered substantive in its entirety, and an individual milestone may not be bifurcated. An arrangement may include more than one milestone, and each milestone should be evaluated individually to determine if it is substantive. FASB ASU No. 2010-17 was effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years (and interim periods within those years) beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted.





If an entity elects early adoption, and the period of adoption is not the beginning of its fiscal year, the entity should apply this ASU retrospectively from the beginning of the year of adoption. This ASU did not have any effect on the timing of revenue recognition and our consolidated results of operations or cash flows.





In December 2010, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2010-28, “When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts,” which is now codified under FASB ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other.” This ASU provides amendments to Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not a goodwill impairment exists. When determining whether it is more likely than not an impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors, such as a significant deterioration in market conditions, indicating an impairment may exist. FASB ASU No. 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years (and interim periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. Upon adoption of the amendments, an entity with reporting units having carrying amounts which are zero or negative is required to assess whether is it more likely than not the reporting units’ goodwill is impaired. If the entity determines impairment exists, the entity must perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for that reporting unit or units. Step 2 involves allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to each asset and liability, with the excess being implied goodwill. An impairment loss results if the amount of recorded goodwill exceeds the implied goodwill. Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption. This ASU is did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


12


2. Going Concern





The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis of accounting, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets and liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.  The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not reflect any adjustments that might result if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.  The Company has experienced substantial losses, maintains a negative working capital and capital deficits, which raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.





The Company is working to manage its current liabilities while it continues to make changes in operations to improve its cash flow and liquidity position. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern and appropriateness of using the going concern basis is dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate revenue from the sale of its services and the cooperation of the Company’s note holders to assist with obtaining working capital to meet operating costs in addition to our ability to raise funds.





3. Common and Preferred Stock Transactions





During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 5,857 shares of common stock for services that were expensed in the current year in the amount of $20,148.  The value of the shares expensed in the prior year reduced the amount of common stock subscribed by $10,626 the current period.  All shares issued were valued based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant.





During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 4,184,205 shares of common stock valued at $2,113,080 and recorded a common stock subscription in the amount of $4,350 to extinguish debt of $1,134,012 resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $983,418 based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock at the grant date less the carrying value of the debt that was exchanged.





During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 813,194 shares of common stock valued at $147,317 and recorded a reduction to common stock  subscribed in the amount of $13,500 to convert debt of $106,026 resulting in a loss on conversion of $27,793.  The stock was valued based upon the conversion terms in the convertible promissory notes.





During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company granted 12,000 shares of common stock as payment to acquire Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC.  The fair value of these shares was recorded based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of closing, resulting in a value of $49,800 and included in common stock subscribed as of March 31, 2011.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, these shares have been issued.





During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 2,443 shares of common stock valued at $23,052.  A portion of these shares, 6,000,000, was granted in the prior period and recorded in common stock subscribed in the amount of $18,000.  The remaining portion was granted in the six months ended June 31, 2011.  The stock was valued based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock at the grant date.





4. Preferred Stock Series





Series A preferred stock: Series A preferred stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and no stated dividend preference.  The Series A is convertible into common stock at a conversion ratio of one preferred share for one common share.   Preferred A has liquidation preference over Preferred B stock and common stock.





Series B preferred stock: Series B preferred stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and no stated dividend preference.  The Series B is convertible into common stock at a conversion ratio of one preferred share for one common share.  The Series B has liquidation preference over Preferred C stock and common stock.





Series C preferred stock: The Preferred C stock has a stated value of $.001 and no stated dividend rate and is non-participatory.   The Series C has liquidation preference over common stock. Effective May 20, 2009 i) Voting Rights for each share of Series C Preferred Stock shall have 21,200 votes on the election of directors of the Company and for all other purposes, and, ii) regarding Conversion to Common Shares, Series C have no right to convert to common or any other series of authorized shares of the Company.





During the six months ended June 30, 2011, 72,856 shares of Series C preferred stock were issued for services rendered.  The preferred stock was valued at $75,000 based on an estimate of fair market value on the date of grant.  The holders of Series C preferred stock represent a controlling voting interest in the Company.  As a result, a determination of the control premium was determined to estimate the value of the shares.  The control premium is based on publicly traded companies or comparable entities which have been recently acquired in arm’s length transactions.  The Company performed the valuation with the assistance of a valuations expert.


13


Series D preferred stock: Effective March 2, 2011 EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the “Company”) obtained consent from the majority shareholders of the Company to amend the Articles of Incorporation to i) authorize the issuance of 2,500 shares of a new D Series Preferred Stock. The are 2.5 million Series D preferred stock authorized for issuance, par value $.001, and each share of Series D Preferred Stock is convertible into common shares, where such number of shares shall be equal to the greater of the number calculated by dividing the Purchase Commitment per share ($1,000) by 1) $0.003 per share, or 2) one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the lowest VWAP for the three (3) days immediately preceding a Conversion Date.  The 2,500 shares authorized have been issued to purchase an interest in a producing oil and gas property.  The preferred stock was valued at fair value based on the use of a multinomial lattice model with computed the following assumptions: annual volatility at 238%, 20% of default at maturity, and the holder would convert at 1.5 times the conversion price decreasing as it approaches maturity.  The total fair value of these preferred shares was computed to be $3,736,387.  The shares were issued in the 2nd quarter of 2011.





5. Fixed Assets





The following is a detailed list of fixed assets:


30-Jun-11


31-Dec-10Property and Equipment


715,132


$
606,838Accumulated depreciation


(81, 436
)


(38,278
)Fixed assets- net

$
633,696


$
568,560





6.  Options & Warrants Outstanding





All options and warrants granted are recorded at fair value using a Black-Scholes model at the date of the grant.   There is no formal stock option plan for employees.





A listing of options and warrants outstanding at June 30, 2011 is as follows.  Option and warrants outstanding and their attendant exercise prices have been adjusted for the 1 for 200 reverse split and the 1 for 50 reverse split of the common stock discussed in Note 1.





Amount


Weighted Average

Exercise Price


Weighted Average

Years to MaturityOutstanding at December 31, 2010


649,262


$
11.197329



1.87Issued


4,308,856ExercisedExpired or cancelled


(4,828,118
)Outstanding at June 30, 2011


130,000



1.466282



1.914





The changes in the number of warrants issued above is due to two identical consulting contracts.  Each agreement allows the Holder of the warrant to be able to purchase .5% of the Company’s common stock.  The number of warrants to be issued under this agreement is increased each period and included in the derivative liability due to the fact that the derivative is caused by an indeterminate number of shares issuable upon conversion of certain convertible promissory notes.  There was an increase of 4,308,856 in shares to be issued under this warrant during the six months ended June 30, 2011.  As of December 31, 2010, 519,262 shares were issuable under these warrant contracts.  The warrants expire two and one half (2.5) years from the date of vesting.  The agreements also cap the total of the fair market value of the shares to be given at $150,000 per consulting firm, for a total cap of $300,000.  The value of these warrants are included in the derivative liability at December 31, 2010.  These warrants were cancelled by the warrant holders during the six months ended June 30, 2011.





7. Arctic Solar Engineering LLC (ASE)





2011


i)
On February 4, 2011, the Company entered into a stock exchange and purchase agreement between Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC, FATM Partnership, and Fredrick Sussman Living Trust, (the “Sellers”) and EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the “Purchaser”).  The Sellers exchanged 100 % of their ownership interests in the three (3) selling entities for 12,000 shares of our restricted common stock.  In addition, the Purchase Agreement  contains   an “Earn-out Provision “  which requires cash and/or stock payments based on financial performance over a period of 36 months. In each twelve (12) month period, the Sellers are entitled to 50% of the Company’s audited net income after taxes; payable in 50% cash and 50% restricted common stock, ten (10) days after the filing of the annual audited report.  This stock Earn-out consideration will be valued at 90 % of the last trade price on the filing date for the calendar year of operations.


14


The Agreement calls for the following material terms:





In addition to the Purchase Price, the Sellers shall, for a period of thirty-six (36) months following the Closing Date (the "EARN-OUT TERM"), be entitled to receive payment in the form of cash and additional shares of Restricted Common Stock (the “Earn-out Provision” or “Earn-out”) based upon the financial performance of the Company set forth below:




(a)
The Earn-out Provision will be based on the audited Net Income After Tax of the Company.




(b)
For each twelve month period during the Earn-out Term, the Sellers will be entitled to Fifty Percent (“50%”) of the Company’s Net Income After Tax payable half in Cash (the “Cash Earn-out Consideration”) and half in Restricted Common Stock of the Purchaser (the “Stock Earn-out Consideration”) Ten (“10”) Days after the filing date of the Purchaser’s audited annual report.







A breakdown of the purchase price for Arctic Solar Engineering, Inc. is as follows:





Common stock subscribed

$
49,800Final Purchase Price Allocation:Cash

$
538Accounts receivable


131,660Inventory


30,627Fixed assets - net


337Other assets


3Patents/IP/Technology


135,000Customer base


76,000Trade-name/Marks


151,000Non-compete


19,000Goodwill


22,119Liabilities assumed


(516,484
)$
49,800




15




The following pro-forma assumes the acquisition of Arctic Solar Engineering, Inc. occurred as of the beginning of the period presented as if it would have been reported for the period below.





Historic


Pro FormaEGPI Firecreek, Inc.

December 31, 2010


Arctic Solar

Engineering

December 31, 2010


Adjustments




CombinedASSETSCurrent assetsCash and cash equivalents

$
9,272


$
988








$
10,260Accounts receivable, net


14,835



131,660









146,495Prepaid expenses


5,900



-









5,900Other receivables


-



-









-Inventory






30,627









30,627Current assets held for saleCash


658



-









658Accounts receivable


111,568



-









111,568Inventory


-



-









-Prepaid expenses


3,165



-









3,165Total current assets held for sale


115,391



-



-





115,391Total current assets


145,398



163,275



-





252,868Other assets:Investment in Terra Telecom, Inc.


18,000



-









18,000Fixed assets – net


568,560



337









568,897Oil and natural gas properties – proved reserves


163,500



-









163,500Other assets held for saleIntangible Assets – net of amortization


743,420



-









743,420Goodwill


2,001,840



-



380,221

A



2,382,061Fixed assets – net


21,469



-









21,469Total other assets


3,516,789



337



380,221





3,897,347TOTAL ASSETS

$
3,662,187


$
163,612


$
380,221




$
4,206,020LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICITCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable & accrued expenses

$
558,489


$
269,033








$
827,522Notes payable


3,307,224



-









3,307,224Line of credit


-



36,000









36,000Convertible notes, net of discount


44,490



-









44,490Capital lease obligation


56,872



-









56,872Advances & notes payable - related parties


188,718



-









188,718Derivative Liabilities


823,846



-









823,846Asset retirement obligation


5,368



-









5,368Current liabilities associated with assets held for sale
















-Accounts payable & accrued expenses


2,209,128



-









2,209,128Advances & notes payable - related parties


-



-









-Total current liabilities


7,194,135



305,033



-





7,499,168Long-term liabilities:Notes payable


-



189,000









189,000Total long-term liabilities


-



189,000



-





189,000Shareholders equitySeries A preferred stock, 20 million authorized, par value $0.001,one share convertible to one common share, no stated dividend, none outstanding


-













-Series B preferred stock, 20 million authorized, par value $0.001,one share convertible to one common share, no stated dividend, none outstanding


-













-Series C preferred stock, 20 million authorized, par value $.001, each share has 21, 200 votes per share, are not convertible, have no stated dividend; 14,286 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010


14













14Common stock - $0.001 par value, authorized 3,000,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding, 51,915,345 at December 31, 2010


51,915



1,000



5,300

A,B,C



58,215Additional paid in capital


25,899,464



105,003



(59,013
)
A,B,C



25,945,454Other comprehensive income


219,209













219,209Common stock subscribed


1,448,250













1,448,250Contingent holdback


2,000













2,000Accumulated deficit


(31,152,800
)


(436,424
)


433,934

B,C



(31,155,290
)Total shareholders' deficit


(3,531,948
)


(330,421
)


380,221





(3,482,148
)Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Deficit

$
3,662,187


$
163,612



$380,221




$
4,206,020


16


Pro Forma Adjustments:





A:  Represents the 12,000 shares of restricted common stock (par value $0.001; market value at acquisition date of $0.0083) issued for the acquisition of Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC pursuant to security exchange and purchase agreement.





B:  Represents elimination entry of acquired subsidiary's equity accounts during consolidation





C:  Represents 5% fee of the 12,000 shares of restricted common stock issued pursuant to security exchange and purchase agreement owed to Source Capital Group, Inc. (600 shares with par value of $0.001 and market value at acquisition date of $0.0083)





Historic


Pro FormaEGPI Firecreek, Inc.

Six Months

Ending

June 30, 2011


Arctic Solar

Engineering

Six Months

Ending

June 30, 2011


Adjustments


CombinedRevenuesGross revenues from sales


107,649



47,362







155,011Costs of goods sold


86,971



81,656







168,627Total revenue from services rendered


20,678



(34,294
)






(13,616
)General and administrative expenses:General administration


729,608



112,382







841,990Total general & administrative expenses


729,608



112,382







841,990Net loss from operations


(708,930
)


(146,676
)






(855,606
)Other revenues and expenses:Gain (loss) on asset disposal


31,970



0







31,970Interest expense


(297,472
)


(3,245
)






(300,717
)Gain (Loss) on settlement of debt


(1,011,209
)


0







(1,011,209
)Gain (loss) on derivatives


321,659



0







321,659Net income (loss) before provision for income taxes


(1,663,982
)


(149,921
)






(1,813,903
)Provision for income taxes


0



0







0Loss from continuing operations


(1,663982
)


(149,921
)






(1,813,903
)Loss from discontinued operations net of tax


(602,885
)


0







(602,885
)Net Loss


(2,266,867
)


(149,921
)






(2416,788
)Other comprehensive income (loss)Gain (loss) from Foreign exchange translation


117,609



0







117,609Total comprehensive income (loss)


(2,095,438
)


(149,921
)






(2,245,359
)Basic income (loss) per share- continuing operations

$
(1.40
)









$
(1.40
)Basic income (loss) per share- discontinued operations

$
(0.00
)









$
(0.00
)Basic income (loss) per share

$
(1.40
)









$
(1.40
)Weighted average of common shares outstanding:Basic and diluted


1,581,675











1,581,675


17


Per Share Information:


Basic and diluted net loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were computed using the historic weighted average shares of the Company's outstanding common stock, in addition to 12,000 shares issued for the former ASE owners as the result of the security exchange and purchase agreement between the Company and ASE.





Historic


Pro FormaEGPI Firecreek,

Inc.

Six Months

Ending

June 30, 2010


Arctic Solar

Engineering

Six Months

Ending

June 30, 2010


Adjustments


CombinedRevenuesGross revenues from sales






242,001







242,001Costs of goods sold






267,571







267,571Total revenue from services rendered






(25,570
)






(25,570
)General and administrative expenses:General administration


1,081,071



91,460







1,172,531Total general & administrative expenses


1,081,071



91,460







1,172,531Net loss from operations


(1,081,071
)


(117,030
)






(1,198,101
)Other revenues and expenses:Gain (loss) on asset disposal


0



0Interest expense


(85,668
)


(31,652
)






(117,320
)Impairment of assetsGain (loss) on settlement of debt


(335,996
)


0







(335,996
)Gain (loss) on derivatives


(40,716
)


0







0Net income (loss) before provision for income taxes


(1,543,451
)


(148,682
)






(1,692,133
)Provision for income taxes


0



0







0Loss from continuing operations


(1,543,451
)


(148,682
)






(1,692,133
)Loss from discontinued operations net of tax


(357,492
)










(357,492
)Net Loss


(1,900,943
)


(148,682
)






(2,049,625
)Other comprehensive income (loss)Gain (loss) from Foreign exchange translation


(354,197
)


0







(354,197
)Total comprehensive income (loss)


(2,255,140
)


(148,689
)






(2,403,829
)Basic & fully diluted net income (loss) per common share:Basic income (loss) per share- continuing operations

$
(4.60
)









$
(5.04
)Basic income (loss) per share- discontinued operations

$
(1.06
)









$
(1.06
)Basic income (loss) per share

$
(5.66
)









$
(6.11
)Weighted average of common shares outstanding:Basic and diluted


335,709











335,709


18


Per Share Information:


Basic and diluted net loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were computed using the historic weighted average shares of the Company's outstanding common stock, in addition to 6,000,000 shares issued for the former ASE owners as the result of the security exchange and purchase agreement between the Company and ASE.





8. Acquisition of interest in oil and gas property





I. Acquisition of 75% Oil and Gas Working Interests in the J.B. Tubb Leasehold Estate/Amoco Crawar Field, Ward County, Texas





On March 1, 2011 the Company’s through its wholly owned subsidiary Energy Producers, Inc. (“EPI”) acquired all assets of Ginzoil Inc., (“GZI”) a wholly owned subsidiary of Dutchess Private Equities Fund, Ltd., (Investors”) as described in the preliminary Assignment and Bill of Sale and summarily as follows: Under the terms of the agreement, which shall be effective March 1, 2011, EPI acquired a majority 75% Working Interest and 56.25% corresponding Net Revenue Interest in the North 40 acres of the J.B. Tubb Leasehold Estate/Amoco Crawar field and oil and gas interests, including all related assets, fixtures, equipment, three well heads, three well bores, and pro rata oil & gas revenue and reserves for all depths below the surface to 8500 ft. The field is located in the Permian Basin and the Crawar Field in Ward County, Texas (12 miles west of Monahans & 30 miles west of Odessa in West Texas). Included in the transaction, EPI will also acquire 75% Working Interest and 56.25% corresponding Net Revenue Interest in the Highland Production Company No. 2 well-bore located in the South 40 acres of the J.B. Tubb Leasehold Estate/Amoco Crawar field, oil and gas interests, pro rata oil & gas revenues and reserves with depth of ownership 4700 ft. to 4900 ft.As consideration for the transaction the Company agreed to authorize and issue and sell to Investors 2,500 shares of a new, to be authorized, Series D preferred stock to Investors for one thousand dollars ($1,000) per share, or a total in the aggregate stated value of two million five hundred thousand ($2,500,000) dollars. The acquired leases and the property to which they relate are identified below:





North 40 acres: J.B. TUBB “18-1”, being the W1/2 of the NW1/4 of Section 18, Block B-20, Public School Lands, Ward County, Texas, containing Forty (North 40) acres only (also listed as Exhibit “A” to Exhibit 10.1 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 7, 2011, incorporated herein by reference.





Well-bore loated on South 40 acres: The Highland Production Company (Crawar) #2 well-bore, API No. 42-475-33611, located on the J.B. Tubb Lease in W 1⁄2 of the NW 1⁄4 of Sec. 18, Block B-20, Public School Lands, Ward County, Texas at 1787 FNL and 853 FWL being on the South Forty (40) acres of the J. B. Tubb Lease, Ward County, Texas.





The following wells are located on the leases identified, above:





1.
Crawar #1


2.
Tubb #18-1


3.
Highland Production Company(Crawar) #2 well-bore only, with depth of ownership 4700’ to 4900’ft. in well bore, described as: The Highland Production Company (Crawar) #2 well-bore, API No. 42-475-33611, located on the J.B. Tubb Lease in W 1⁄2 of the NW 1⁄4 of Sec. 18, Block B-20, Public School Lands, Ward County, Texas at 1787 FNL and 853 FWL being on the South Forty (40) acres of the J. B. Tubb Lease, Ward County, Texas.





Pursuant to the SPA each share of Series D Preferred Stock shall be convertible, at the sole option of the Investor or holder thereof, into share(s) of the Corporation’s Common Stock (“Conversion Shares”). The Conversion Formula at the time of any noticed and converted shall mean that the number of Conversion Shares (common stock) to be received by the holder of Series D Preferred Stock in exchange for each share of Series D Preferred Stock that such holder intends to convert pursuant to this provision, where such number of Conversion Shares shall be equal to the greater of the number calculated by dividing the Purchase Commitment per share ($1000) by i) .003 per share, ii) one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the lowest VWAP for the three (3) days immediately preceding a Conversion Date. The Company has agreed to keep a sufficient number of its common shares on hand for future conversions as listed in Section 1 of the SPA.  The preferred stock was valued at fair value based on the use of a multinomial lattice model with computed the following assumptions: annual volatility at 238%, 20% of default at maturity, and the holder would convert at 1.5 times the conversion price decreasing as it approaches maturity.  The total fair value of these preferred shares was computed to be $3,736,377.


19


Listing for the Equipment items related to the wells on the leases on the J.B. Tubb Leasehold Estate (RRC #33611) Amoco/ Crawar field are as follows:





The following is the current & present equipment list that Energy Producers Inc. will acquire 75%ownership rights, on the J.B. Tubb property: 2 (Two) 500 barrels metal tanks, 1(One) 500 barrel cement salt water tank- (open top), 1 (One) heater treater/oil & gas separator, all flow lines, on the north forty acres, well-heads, 2 (two) Christmas tree valve systems on well-heads, 3 (Three) well heads, three wells (well-bores). Model 320D Pumpjack Serial No. E98371M/456604, One (1) Fiberglass lined heater-treater,  One (1) Test pot,  Tubing string Rods and down hole pump.





*Success Oil Co., Inc. of California, and Texas Operator, visually inspected the equipment on the J.B. Tubb property RRC #33611 for the 75% Working Interests held by Energy Producers, Inc., wholly owned subsidiary of EGPI Firecreek, Inc. Based on Success Oil Co.s determination of market value we determined the following allocations of the $2,500,000 purchase price paid based on our corresponding 75% working interests held by Energy Producers, Inc.,




Allocation of Purchase Price for J.B. Tubb Leasehold Estate Working and Corresponding Net Revenue

Interests, Amoco/Crawar Field, Ward County, Texas.


30-Jun-11Well leases

$
3,623,062Well property and equipment


113,325$
3,736,387





Oil and Gas Properties:

30-Jun-11


31-Dec-10Oil and gas properties – proved reserves


3,964,283



163,500Accumulated depletion


(72,808
)


-Oil and gas properties - net

$
3,891,475


$
163,500





9.  Note Receivable





On March 14, 2011, the company received a promissory note from the sale of its interest in Terra to a third party.  The value of this promissory note is $50,000 and is due 1 year from the date of issuance, along with accrued interest at the rate of 9%.  The note includes an optional provision to extend for one additional twelve month period.





On March 14, 2011, the company received a promissory note from the sale of a subsidiary, SATCO, to a third party.  The value of this promissory note is $50,000 and is due 1 year from the date of issuance, along with accrued interest at the rate of 9%.  The note includes an optional provision to extend for one additional twelve month period.





10. Income Tax Provision





Deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the following at June 30, 2011:


Deferred Tax asset

$
391,254Valuation allowance


(391,254
)Net deferred tax assets


0





The Company estimates that it has an NOL carryfoward of approximately $8,587,063 that begins to expire in 2027.





After evaluating any potential tax consequence from our former subsidiary and our own potential tax uncertainties, the Company has determined that there are no material uncertain tax positions that have a greater than 50% likelihood of reversal if the Company were to be audited. The Company believes that it is current with all payroll and other statutory taxes. Our tax return for the years ended December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2010 may be subject to IRS audit.





11.  Related Party Transactions





Through May 31, 2009 the Secretary of EGPI Firecreek, Inc provided office space for the Company’s Scottsdale office free of charge.  June 1, 2009 Energy Producers, Inc, a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a month to month lease for the same office space at a rate of $1,400 per month.  There remains an unpaid balance of $ 2,800 at June 30, 2011.


20


In addition Energy Producers Inc. also has an Administrative Service Agreement with Melvena Alexander, CPA , which is 100% owned by Melvena Alexander, officer and shareholder of the Company, to provide services to the Company.  The agreement is an open-ended, annually renewable contract for payments of $4,600 per month.  The contract is currently in force with a balance due of $ 30,270 at June 30, 2011.





The Company had a Service Agreement with Global Media Network USA, Inc. a company 100% owned By Dennis Alexander, to provide the services of Dennis Alexander to the Company.  The contract terminated May 31, 2009 and there is an outstanding balance of $0 at June 30, 2011.





The above referenced contract was superseded by a month-to-month contract between Energy Producers, Inc., a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company, and Dennis Alexander, an officer and director of the Company, at a monthly payment of $15,000.  There was a balance due on this contract of $239,700 at June 30, 2011.





The Company had a Service Agreement with Tirion Group, Inc., which was owned by Rupert C. Johnson, a former director of the Company.  The contract was terminated in 2007 and Mr. Johnson severed his connection to the Company in 2008.  However, there is unpaid balance of $43,000 remaining at June 30, 2011.





During 2010, Robert Miller, a director of the Company, made unsecured, non-interest bearing advances to M3 Lighting, Inc. a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company, for working capital of $1,500 which remains unpaid at June 30, 2011.





During 2010, unsecured, non-interest bearing advances for working capital were made to South Atlantic Traffic Corporation, a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company, by some of its officers and directors. These advances have not yet been repaid and at June 30, 2011 the following were owed:  Michael Kocan - $150,685;   Robert Miller - $10,000.





South Atlantic Traffic Corporation also paid monthly car allowances of $1,200 to its officers in 2010. Balances still owing at June 30, 2011 are $21,752 to Stewart Hall, Vice President and $31,123 to Bob Joyner, Chairman.





April 1, 2010 the Company signed a 9% unsecured note with Bob Joyner an officer and shareholder, for $27,000.  The note matures June 30, 2011, and the unpaid balance at June 30, 2011 was $21,700.





Chanwest Resourses, Inc, a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company billed Petrolind Drilling, Inc a company in which David Taylor, a director and share holder of the Company, has a substantial interest.  The invoice of $12,635 was outstanding at June 30, 2011. Willoil Consulting, LLC also gave unsecured non-interest bearing advances to Chanwest Resourses, Inc. of $15,092.  Willoil Consulting, LLC is a company in which David Taylor is a managing member with 80% control. The funds have not been repaid as of June 30, 2011.  The Company has accrued $8,680 due to Willoil Consulting, LLC as of June 30, 2011.





Relative to the May 21, 2009 acquisition of M3 Lighting, Inc. the Company approved an Administrative Services Agreement (ASA), and amended terms thereof, with Strategic Partners Consulting, LLC (SPC).Two of the Company’s officers, directors and shareholders, David H. Ray, Director and Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the Company since May 21, 2009 and Brandon D. Ray Director and Executive Vice President of Finance of the Company, are also owners and managers of SPC. Information is listed in Exhibit 10.1 to a Current Report on form 8-K, Amendment No. 1, filed on June 23, 3009. The ASA initiated on November 4, 2009, in accordance with its terms thereof, and was billed at the rate of $20,833.33 per month. The ASA contract was canceled June 8, 2010. During the three months ending June 30, 2011, no payments were made to SPC, with a balance payable due in the amount of approximately $ 73,458.





During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company acquired Arctic Solar Engineering, Inc. and a $5,000 promissory note due to Fred Sussman, who remains an officer of Arctic Solar Engineering, Inc. after the acquisition.  The balance owing remains $5,000 at June 30, 2011.





During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company acquired Arctic Solar Engineering, Inc. and a $22,409 accounts payable due to Makaritos that is still outstanding at June 30, 2011.





During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company entered into a Promissory Note in the amount of $210,000 with TWL Investments, a LLC (“TWL”) of which Larry W. Trapp, a director of the Company, is a principal owner of TWL.  The terms of the note are for 14% interest, with principal and interest all due on or before May 9, 2013. During the 2nd quarter of 2011, principal payments of $4,375 were made, leaving a balance of $205,625.


21


12. Notes Payable





At June 30, 2011, the Company was liable on the following Promissory notes:





(see notes to the accompanying table)





Date of




Date Obligation


Interest


Balance DueObligation

Notes


Matures


Rate (%)


6/30/11 ($)9/17/2009


4


9/17/2010



12



11,3505/29/2009


4


9/17/2010



12
*


29,3249/17/2009


4


9/17/2010



18
*


3,50511/4/2009


11


11/4/2012



9



98,39111/4/2009


11


11/4/2012



9



98,39111/4/2009


11


11/4/2012



9



98,3915/30/2010


2


12/31/2011



8



627,2993/1/2010


9


See footnote 10



0



237,3334/1/2010


3


6/30/2011



9



21,7007/26/2010


5


7/26/2012



10



118,9748/10/2010


6


8/10/2012



10



35,0001/20/2011


7


10/24/2011



8



32,50012/1/2010


8


9/3/2011



8



32,0007/1/2011


1


71/2013



18



202,0002/18/2010


3


12/1/2010



4



132,5362/15/2010


3


2/15/2010



8



201,5003/3/2010


10


3/31/12



10



1,000,8213/4/2011


12


9/8/2011



14



141,5813/4/2011


12


9/22/2011



14



100,0008/1/2010


13


12/3/2020



2



137,0003/24/2010


13


12/31/2020



2



42,0008/1/2010


13


12/31/2020



2



5,0008/1/2010


13


12/31/2020



2



5,0005/31/2011


14


5/31/2013



8



104,0006/9/2011


15


5/9/2011



14



205,6256/1/2011


16


12/1/2011



8



39,000Unamortized Discount













(189,492
)Total













3,570,729


* Compounded





Notes:





Other than as described at Notes 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8 none of the other notes had conversion options.





Note 1: On January 15, 2010, the Company issued an $86,000 Convertible Promissory Note (“Convertible Note”) and a registration rights agreement (“RRA”) to an investor for making a $1,000,000 cash loan.  The Convertible Note has no specified interest rate and was scheduled to mature six months from the closing date.  At the investor’s option, the outstanding principal amount, including all accrued and unpaid interest and fees, may be converted into shares of common stock at the conversion price, which is 75% of the lower of (a) $0.08 per share; or (b) the lowest three-day common stock volume weighted average price during the prior twenty business days. In addition, if the Company sells common shares or securities convertible into common shares, the Conversion Price shall become the lower of: (a) the conversion price in effect immediately prior to the sale of securities; or (b) the conversion price of the securities sold.





The RRA provides both mandatory and piggyback registration rights.  The Company was obligated to (a) file a registration statement for 40,000 common shares (subject to adjustment) no later than 14 days after the closing date, and (b) have it declared effective no later than the earlier of (i) five days after the SEC notifies the Company that it may be declared effective or (ii) 90 days from the closing date.  The Company was obligated to pay the investor a penalty of $100 for each day that it is late in meeting these obligations. The Company’s registration statement was filed late and on March 18, 2010 it was withdrawn.





Upon occurrence of an Event of Default (various specified events), the Lender may (a) declare the unpaid principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon immediately due and payable; (b) at anytime after January 31, 2010, immediately draw on the LOC to satisfy EGPI’s obligations; and (c) interest will accrue at the rate of 18%.





Upon occurrence of a Trigger event: (a) the outstanding principal amount will increase by 25%; and (b) interest will accrue at the rate of 18%. The Trigger Event effects shall not be applied more than two times. There are various Trigger Events, including (a) the five-day common stock VWAP declines below $0.04; (b) the ten-day average daily trading volume declines below $5,000; (c) a judgment against EGPI in excess of $100,000; (d) failure to file a registration statement on time; (e) failure to cause a registration statement to become effective on time; (f) events of default; and (g) insufficient authorized common shares.





During the first quarter of 2010, the Company tripped two trigger events and incurred resulting penalties and incremental debt obligation. These events increased the outstanding principal amount of the Convertible Note by approximately $22,000 and $27,000 of trigger penalties.


22


It was determined that the Convertible Note’s conversion option, plus other existing equity instruments (warrants outstanding; see Notes 2 and 7 below) of the Company, were required to be (re)classified as derivative liabilities as of January 15, 2010, because (a) the Convertible Note provides conversion price protection; and (b) the quantity of shares issuable pursuant to the conversion option is indeterminate.  The conversion option and the related instruments were initially valued at $63,080 (expected term of 0.5 years; risk-free rate of 0.15%; and volatility of 95%) and this amount was recorded as a note discount and derivative liability. The derivative liabilities were then marked to the market to an aggregate value of $16,158 (expected term of 0.3 years; risk-free rate of 0.16%; and volatility of 95%) at December 31, 2010.





On May 12, 2010, the parties to the Convertible Note executed a Waiver of Trigger Event, which stipulated: (1) the principal outstanding on the Convertible Note was fixed at $147,500 as of May 12, 2010; (2) the remaining impact of the trigger events and failure to register the shares was waived; (3) the interest rate was reset at 9%; (4) the number of shares issuable under the conversion option was capped at 150 million shares; (5) the repricing provision of the conversion option was eliminated; and (6) the maturity date of the note was revised to August 15, 2010.  In addition, if the market price of the Company’s common stock declines such that the conversion option would be capped at the agreed 150 million shares, the repayment date is accelerated and the outstanding balance on the note is immediately due and payable.  As a result of the above, the conversion option and related instruments were revalued as of May 12, 2010 and were reclassified to paid-in-capital (equity) in the amount of $50,303 (expected term of 0.3 years; risk-free rate of 0.16%; and volatility of 95%).





Effective August 3, 2010 the Company entered into a Promissory Note in the amount of $153,046 with an entity that had acquired and then exchanged the Debt described above. The terms of the Promissory Note are for 8% interest, with principal and interest all due on or before August 3, 2012.  In July 2011 a judgment  was issued  for $202,000 to be paid over two years with no interest, except  if there is a default, then interest of 18% will  accrue.





Note 2: For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we have received cash proceeds for these debt obligations of $75,792, settled $283,292 in debt for common stock, yielding a balance of $627,299 at the period end.





Note 3: For the six months ended June 30, 2011 the Company has an additional debt obligation of $21,700 for which no payments were made during the period.   The company also had a promissory note of $201,500 for which no payments were made during the period.  The company also had a promissory note of $131,256 for which no payments were made during the period and included $2,928 in accrued interest added to the principal value of the note.





Note 4:  During 2009 we received cash proceeds for the aggregate amount of $44,179, which is payable in principal and interest with rates ranging from 12-18%.





Note 5: On July 26, 2010, we issued a $165,000 secured convertible promissory note that is convertible at the election of the holder any time after issuance, or upon an Event of Default, or when due in 24 months on July 26, 2012. While the notes have not yet become due or repaid, there was no Event of Default as of June 30, 2011, or thereafter. The Company evaluated the note and determined that the shares issuable pursuant to the conversion option were indeterminate and therefore this conversion option and all other dilutive securities would be classified as a derivative liability as of July 26, 2010. This note also contains conversion price reset provisions which also factor into the derivative value.  The July 26, 2010 value of the conversion option (expected term of 2.0 years; risk-free rate of 0.62%; and volatility of 95%) of $165,000 was recorded as a note discount, to be amortized over the life of the note, and derivative liability.  For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized note discount amortization of $7,245.  The discount is amortized using the effective interest method. During the 2nd quarter, the Company  made payments of $12,100 on the principal.





Note 6: On August 10, 2010, we issued a $35,000 convertible promissory note that is convertible at the election of the holder any time after issuance, or upon an Event of Default, or when due in 24 months on August 10, 2012. While the notes have not yet become due or repaid, there was no Event of Default as of March 31, 2011, or thereafter. The Company evaluated the note and determined that, because the shares issuable pursuant to the July 26, 2010 convertible note are indeterminate, the conversion option associated with this note is deemed to be a derivative liability.  This note also contains conversion price reset provisions which also factor into the derivative value.  The August 10, 2010 value of the note of $35,000 (expected term of 2.0 years; risk-free rate of 0.52%; and volatility of 95%) was recorded as a note discount, to be amortized over the life of the note, and derivative liability.  For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized note discount amortization of $1,271.  The discount is amortized using the effective interest method.





Note 7: On January 20, 2011, we issued a $32,500 convertible promissory note that is convertible at the election of the holder any time after issuance, or upon an Event of Default, or when due in 9 months on October 24, 2011. While the notes have not yet become due or repaid, there was no Event of Default as of March 31, 2011, or thereafter.  The Company evaluated the note and determined that, because the shares issuable pursuant to the July 26, 2010 convertible note are indeterminate, the conversion option associated with this note is deemed to be a derivative liability. This note also contains conversion price reset provisions which also factor into the derivative value.  The January 20, 2011 value of the note of $32,500 was recorded as a note discount, to be amortized over the life of the note, and derivative liability. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized note discount amortization of $6,295.  The discount is amortized using the effective interest method.


23


Note 8: On December 1, 2010, we issued a $40,000 convertible promissory note that is convertible at the election of the holder any time after issuance, or upon an Event of Default, or when due in 9 months on September 3, 2011. While the notes have not yet become due or repaid, there was no Event of Default as of March 31, 2011, or thereafter.  The Company evaluated the note and determined that, because the shares issuable pursuant to the July 26, 2010 convertible note are indeterminate, the conversion option associated with this note is deemed to be a derivative liability. This note also contains conversion price reset provisions which also factor into the derivative value.  The December 1, 2010 value of the note of $40,000 was recorded as a note discount, to be amortized over the life of the note, and derivative liability.  For the six months ended  June 30, 2011, the Company recognized note discount amortization of $11,737.  The discount is amortized using the effective interest method. During the 2nd quarter the Company converted $8,000 of the principal into common stock within the terms of the promissory note.  No gain or loss resulted upon conversion.





Note 9:  On March 1, 2010, we issued non-interest bearing, convertible notes for services, renewable annually until paid through conversions.  The total debt owing under these agreements is $180,000, which is composed of two $90,000 debts owed to two professional service firms.  During the six months ended June 30, 2011, an additional $150,000 in promissory notes were issued to these firms for services provided.  These notes can be converted at 50% of the closing price of the stock on the day preceding the conversion date.  The Company evaluated the note and determined that, because the shares issuable pursuant to the July 26, 2010 convertible note are indeterminate, the conversion option associated with this note is deemed to be a derivative liability.  During the six months ended June 30, 2011, $92,667 of these notes were settled by the issuance of common stock.





Note 10:  For the period ended March 31, 2011 we have additional balance on debt obligations owed totaling $1,000,821, related to the acquisition of a subsidiary in March 2010.  A total of $733,053 of this debt was settled by the issuance of stock during the six months ended June 30, 2011.





Note 11:  Promissory notes totaling $295,173, which were issued in conjunction with the acquisition of SATCO.





Note 12:  Accounts Payable of $141,581 due to Contegra Construction by Energy Ventures One, Inc, a Company subsidiary was converted to a Note Payable in March 2011.  Energy Ventures One also has a Line of Credit with Masters Equipment, Inc. with a balance due of $100,000 at June 30, 2011.





Note 13:  The Company’s subsidiary Arctic Solar Engineers issued promissory notes to various individuals for working capital, all maturing in 2020 at an interest rate of 2%.  Additional interest expense was not imputed on these balances due to materiality.





Note 14:  For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we have received cash proceeds for these debt obligations of $104,000 and that is the balance owing at June 30, 2011.





Note 15:  Effective May 9, 2011 the Company entered into a Promissory Note in the amount of $210,000.  The terms of the note are for 14% interest, with principal and interest all due on or before May 9, 2013. During the 2nd quarter of 2011, principal payments of $4,375 were made, leaving a balance of $205,625.





Note 16: Effective June 1, 2011 the Company entered into a Promissory Note in the amount of $39,000. The terms of the note are for 8% interest only, with principal and interest all due on or before December 1, 2011.





Although a portion of our debt is not due within 12 months, given our working capital deficit and cash positions and our ability to service the debt on a long term basis is questionable, the notes are all effectively in default and treated as current liabilities.





13.  Capital Lease Obligation





During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company entered into a lease for equipment which included the promise to make monthly payments of $5,000 for 12 months with a bargain purchase option at the end of the lease.  This lease is accounted for as a capital lease in which the present value of the future payments is recorded as a liability of $56,872.  The discount rate is 10%.  As of June 30, 2011, there were no payments made on this lease and the entire balance is classified as a current liability.





14. Derivative Liability





The Company evaluated the conversion feature embedded in the convertible notes to determine if such conversion feature should be bifurcated from its host instrument and accounted for as a freestanding derivative.  Due to the note not meeting the definition of a conventional debt instrument because it contained a diluted issuance provision, the convertible notes were accounted for in accordance with ASC 815.  According to ASC 815, the derivatives associated with the convertible notes were recognized as a discount to the debt instrument, and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note and any excess of the derivative value over the note payable value is recognized as additional interest expense at issuance date.





Further, and in accordance with ASC 815, the embedded derivatives are revalued at each balance sheet date and marked to fair value with the corresponding adjustment as a “gain or loss on change in fair value of derivatives” in the consolidated statement of operations.  As of June 30, 2011, the fair value of the embedded derivatives included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet was $318,958.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized a gain on change in fair value of derivative liability totaling $533,331 and $321,659, respectively.  Key assumptions used in the valuation of derivative liabilities associated with the convertible notes at June 30, 2011 were as follows:


24


·
The stock price would fluctuate with an annual volatility ranging from 233% to 534% based on the historical volatility for the company.
 ·
An event of default would occur 5% of the time, increasing 0.10% per quarter.
 ·
Alternative financing for the convertible notes would be initially available to redeem the note 0% of the time and increase quarterly by 1% to a maximum of 20%.
 ·
The trading volume would average $291,990 to $383,762 and would increase at 1% per quarter.
 ·
The holder would automatically convert the notes at a stock price of the greater of the initial exercise price multiplied by two and the market price for the convertible notes if the registration was effective and the company was not in default.





The Company classifies the fair value of these securities under level three of the fair value hierarchy of financial instruments. The fair value of the derivative liability was calculated using a lattice model that values the compound embedded derivatives based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model. This model is based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The embedded derivatives that were analyzed and incorporated into the model included the conversion feature with the full ratchet reset, and the redemption options.





The components of the derivative liability on the Company’s balance sheet at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:





6/302011


12/31/2010Embedded conversion features - convertible promissory notes


318,957



820,400Common stock warrants


1



3,426318,958



823,846





15.  Intangible Assets





The company had the following intangible assets recorded as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.  The useful lives for these assets are contained within the accounting policies in Note 1.





Balance











Balance12/31/2010


Additions


Deletions


Impairment


6/30/2011SATCOTrade name


661,000






(661,000
)






0Customer Relationships


163,000






(163,000
)






0Accum. Amort. - Intangibles


(80,580
)





80,580







0Arctic Solar EngineeringPatents






135,000











135,000Customer Base






76,000











76,000Trademark






151,000











151,000Non-Compete






19,000











19,000Accum. Amort. –Intangibles






(30,964
)










(30,964
)743,420



350,036



(743,420
)






350,036





16.  Asset Retirement Obligation (ARO)





The ARO is recorded at fair value and accretion expense is recognized as the discounted liability is accreted to its expected settlement value. The fair value of the ARO liability is measured by using expected future cash outflows discounted at the Company’s credit adjusted risk free interest rate.





Amounts incurred to settle plugging and abandonment obligations that are either less than or greater than amounts accrued are recorded as a gain or loss in current operations.  Revisions to previous estimates, such as the estimated cost to plug a well or the estimated future economic life of a well, may require adjustments to the ARO and are capitalized as part of the costs of proved oil and natural gas property.


25





The following table is a reconciliation of the ARO liability for continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:





6/30/2011


12/31/2010Asset retirement obligation at the beginning of period


5,368



4,337Liabilities incurred


8,051Revisions to previous estimates






1,031DispositionsAccretion expense


979Asset retirement obligation at the end of period


14,398



5,368





17.  Discontinued Operations





On March 14, 2011, the Company entered into and completed a definitive Stock Purchase Agreement whereby EGPI Firecreek, Inc. would sell 100% of the common shares of SATCO to Distressed Asset Acquisitions, Inc.





The consideration being paid by Distressed Asset Acquisitions, Inc. consists of a $50,000 in the form of a promissory note (the “Purchase Price”).  The promissory note is to be paid to the Company on or before March 14, 2012 in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds the principal sum of $50,000, together with interest on the unpaid principal of this Note from the date hereof at the interest rate of Nine Percent (9%). The Note can be extended for one additional twelve month period.  The loss on disposal is $586,924 and is recognized in the financial statements on the disposal date.





Please refer to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2011.





The results of discontinued operations is a net loss of $602,885 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $357,492 for 2010.





All assets and liabilities of SATCO are segregated in the balance sheet and appropriately labeled as held for sale in 2010.





18.  Professional Service Agreements





On March 1, 2010, the Company entered into two professional service agreements (the “Agreements”) which are intended to be automatically renewable annually.  Aggregate fees pursuant to the Agreements are comprised of (a) $20,000 in cash per month which has been accrued through the period ended March 31, 2011; (b) a one-time issuance of 120,000 shares of restricted common stock; and (c) three-year warrants, which vest six months from the grant date, to purchase for $20,000 the lower of (i)  shares of common stock representing 1% of the Company’s outstanding common stock; or (ii) shares of common stock representing a fair market value of $150,000.  In addition, the vendors are entitled to convert any unpaid cash fees into common stock at a 50% discount to the fair market value of the stock on the date of conversion.  On April 1, 2011 the contracts were renewed with aggregate fees of $30,000 per month which have been accrued through the period ended June 30, 2011.  In this renewal, the conversion provision was eliminated and the amounts owed are no longer convertible.





19. Concentrations and Risk




Customers




During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, revenue generated under the top five customers accounted for 87% and 100%, respectively, of the Company’s total revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2010, three customers accounted for 72% of the total outstanding accounts receivable. Regarding oil and gas sales at this time, there is only one field supplying revenues. Concentration with a single or a few customers may expose the Company to the risk of substantial losses if a single dominant customer stops conducting business with the Company.  Moreover, the Company may be subject to the risks faced by these major customers to the extent that such risks impede such customers’ ability to stay in business and make timely payments.




20. Contingencies




The Company is subject to various claims and legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities. Management believes that any liability that may ultimately result from the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.




In October 2010 we received notice of a lawsuit filed against the Company by St. George Investments LLC relating to certain Agreements entered on January 15th, 2010 by EGPI Firecreek Inc. and St. George Investments LLC which include: i) Note Purchase Agreement, ii) Convertible Promissory Note, iii) Judgment by Confession and iv) Registration Rights Agreement. St. George Investments LLC believes that EGPI Firecreek is in breach of terms agreed upon pursuant to the aforementioned agreements and is seeking damages totaling $262,585 (includes principal, interest and all penalties/fees pursuant to plaintiff's initial disclosures dated 3/28/11). In July 2011, the Company and St. George Investments LLC entered into a settlement agreement whereas the Company agreed to pay $202,000 the final settlement with various payment terms beginning with $10,000 on signing of settlement followed byfive payments beginning August through December 2011. Thereafter payments for 18 months in the amount of $6,158 are scheduled per the settlement. As of August 2011, the Company has not initiated payment toward the settlement but is negotiating potential for new scheduling.


26





In November 2010, EGPI Firecreek Inc and South Atlantic Traffic Corp., a former wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, received a lawsuit notice from two of the former owners of SATCO, Mr. Jesse Joyner and Mr. James Stewart Hall. Mr. Joyner and Mr. Hall have subsequently resigned from their positions with the company. On December 17, 2010, EGPI Firecreek Inc. filed its answer to the claim and filed a counterclaim against Mr. Joyner and Mr. Hall. As of August 2011, the Company is in settlement negotiations now post mediation hearings, and continuing final discussions.





As noted in our business combination footnote our SATCO acquisition contained certain make whole provisions that may impact us in the future.  In accordance with the make whole provision of the acquisition agreement pertaining to SATCO, $988,720 has been recorded in common stock subscribed for additional contingent consideration that is owed as of December 31, 2009.  The make whole provision provided that the owners of SATCO would be protected from decreases in the stock price of the Company for 1 year subsequent to the acquisition date.  The one year anniversary of the acquisition is November 4, 2010.  As of this date, the total fair value of the amount of contingent consideration owed in common shares is $1,119,580.  In accordance with ASC 805-30-35 pertaining to subsequent measurement of contingent consideration pursuant to a business combination, the additional $130,860 is not recorded due to the fact that this consideration is recorded in equity.  This amount will be recognized upon issuance of the shares in settlement of the amount owed.





In May 2011 the Company received a lawsuit notice Edelweiss Enterprises Inc. dba The Small Business Money Store (“SMBS”) is seeking a judgment to collect amounts owed it relating to the account receivable factoring agreement, initiated by the former subsidiary SATCO, in the total aggregate amount of $48,032. The Company believes that it is not liable, and intends to file for an appeal to remove it from the motion for judgment, and the Company will vigorously defend its position.





As noted in our debt footnote above, we have certain notes that may become convertible in the future and potential result in further dilution to our common shareholders.





In July 2010 our Chanwest Resources, Inc. subsidiary operation (“CWR”) entered into a purchase lease agreement with Circle D Trucking of Texas which includes a right to purchase the leased equipment valued at $164,500.





21. Subsequent Events





In July 2011, the Company issued 277,143 shares of common stock to reduce debt owed to a debt holder.





In July 2011, the Company issued 348,063 shares to reduce debt on convertible promissory notes.





In August 2011, the Company issued 166,667 shares to various consultants for services rendered.





In August 2011, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to reduce debt owed to a debt holder.





In August 2011, the Company issued 443,942 shares to reduce debt on convertible promissory notes.





In July, 2011, the Company affected a 1 share for 500 shares reverse split of its common stock and all amounts have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented.





In July, the Company entered into a linear short form of Securities Exchange Agreement with the principal shareholders owning 67% of Caddo International, Inc., (“CADDO”) a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Nevada with its principal place of business located at PO Box 608, Oil City, Louisiana 70161. The Caddo acquisition is subject to completion of all required SEC filings and shall be structured as a share exchange based on independent third party valuations of the two entities and will include the requirement for audited financials of Caddo to be completed prior to the formal closing announcement.  The expected time for these processes is 90 days. Currently, the acquisition has 67% support of the existing shareholders of Caddo. The Company and Caddo principal shareholders are presently working on the conditions for the expanded final long form Agreement which is expected and agreed to be fully completed by approximately August 22, 2011, with information to be subsequently furnished in a Current Report on Form 8-K.





In August, the Company issued convertible promissory notes to certain institutional or accredited investors in the amount of $50,000 and $15,000 all due nine (6) months and six (9) months from the date of issuance, respectively, unless otherwise mutually agreed for extension. The proceeds are to be used in behalf of accounting fees and general working capital in the normal course of business.





22.  Segment Reporting





We classify our operations into two main business lines: (1) Solar Thermal Energy, and (2) Oil and Gas. This segmentation best describes our business activities and how we assess our performance. Information about the nature of these segment services, geographic operating areas and customers is described in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report. Summarized financial information by business segment for the three and six months ending June 30, 2011 is presented below. All segment revenues were derived from external customers. As more fully disclosed in the Company’s fiscal year 2010 Annual Report, we had no operations in these business segments until our acquisitions of Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC on February 4, 2011 (Solar Thermal Energy), and the beginning operations of Energy Producers, Inc. (Oil and Gas).


27





For the six months ending June 30, 2011,





Solar

Thermal

Energy


Oil &

Gas


All Other (a)


TotalsNet revenues


(33,599
)


20,678



0



(12,921
)Depreciation & amortization


0



43,157



48,349



91,506Income (loss) from operations


(140,622
)


(148,347
)


(506,710
)


(795,679
)Interest expense


3,245



0



294,227



297,472Segment assets


240,225



3,901,684



1,002,772



5,144,681





For the three months ending June 30, 2011,





Solar

Thermal

Energy


Oil &

Gas


All Other (a)


TotalsNet revenues


(19,839
)


28,670



0



8,831Depreciation & amortization


0



41,268



30,555



71,823Income (loss) from operations


(20,622
)


(58,025
)


(997,480
)


(1,076,127
)Interest expense


511



0



177,800



178,311Segment assets


240,225



3,901,684



1,002,272



5,144,681





The following are reconciliations of reportable segment revenues, results of operations, assets and other significant items to the Company’s consolidated totals (amounts stated in thousands):





Three Months Ended June

30, 2011


Six Months Ended June

30, 2011Net revenues:Total for reportable segments


8,831



(12,921
)Corporate


-



-8,831



(12,921
)Depreciation and amortization:Total for reportable segments


41,268



43,157Corporate


30,555



48,34971,823



91,506Income (loss) from operations:Total for reportable segments


(78,647
)


(288,969
)Corporate


(997,480
)


(506,710
)(1,076,127
)


(795,679
)Interest expense:Total for reportable segments


511



3,245Corporate


177,800



296,961178,311



297,472Segment assets:Total for reportable segments


4,141,909



4,141,909Corporate


1,002,772



1,002,7725,144,681



5,144,681


28


ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.





You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements in Form 10-K, as amended, and the other financial data appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q Report.





The information set forth in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, among others (i) expected changes in the Company’s revenues and profitability, (ii) prospective business opportunities and (iii) the Company’s strategy for financing its business. Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical information or statements of current condition. Some forward-looking statements may be identified by use of terms such as “believes”, “anticipates”, “intends” or “expects”. These forward-looking statements relate to the plans, objectives and expectations of the Company for future operations. Although the Company believes that its expectations with respect to the forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge of its business and operations, in light of the risks and uncertainties inherent in all future projections, the inclusion of forward-looking statements in this report should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the objectives or plans of the Company will be achieved. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements of the Company will not differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive. The Company undertakes no obligation to release publicly the results of any future revisions it may make to forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.





The Company has been focused on oil and gas activities for development of interests held that were acquired in Texas and Wyoming for the production of oil and natural gas through December 2, 2008.  The Company throughout 2008 was seeking to continue expansion and growth for oil and gas development in its core projects. EGPI Firecreek Inc. was formerly known as Energy Producers, Inc., an oil and gas production company focusing on the recovery and development of oil and natural gas. This strategy is centered on rehabilitation and production enhancement techniques, utilizing modern management and technology applications in upgrading certain proven reserves. Historically in its 2005 fiscal year, the Company initiated a program to review domestic oil and gas prospects and targets.  As a result, EGPI acquired non-operating oil and gas interests in a project titled Ten Mile Draw (“TMD”) located in Sweetwater County, Wyoming USA for the development and production of natural gas. In July, 2007, the Company acquired and began production of oil at the 2,000 plus acre Fant Ranch Unit in Knox County, Texas. This was followed by the acquisition and commencement in March, 2008 of oil and gas production at the J.B. Tubb Leasehold Estate located in the Amoco Crawar Field in Ward County, Texas. The Company as a result, successfully increased oil and gas production and revenues derived from its properties. and in late 2008, the Company was able to retire over 90% of its debt through the disposition of those improved properties.





In early 2009, based on the economic downturn, struggling financial markets and the implementation of the federal stimulus package for infrastructure projects, the Company embarked on a transition from an emphasis on the oil and gas focused business to that of an acquisition strategy focused on the transportation industry serving federal DOT and state/local DOT agencies. In addition, the acquisition targets being reviewed by the Company also had a presence in the telecommunications and general construction industries. The acquisition strategy focuses on vertically integrating manufacturing entities, distributors and construction groups. In May 2009, the Company acquired M3 Lighting Inc. (M3) as the flagship subsidiary with key additional management team to begin this process, and as a result on November 4, 2009, the Company acquired all of the capital stock of South Atlantic Traffic Corporation, a Florida corporation, which distributes a variety of products geared primarily towards the transportation industry where it derives its revenues.





Through 2009 and in addition to activities discussed above, we continued our previous decisions to limit and wind down the historical pursuit of our oil and gas projects overseas in Central Asian and European countries and sold off our then oil and gas subsidiary unit Firecreek Petroleum, Inc., but did retain certain first right of refusal to overseas projects (see discussion further in this report). In late 2009 and in 2010, the Company began pursuing a reentry to the oil and gas industry on a domestic basis as the Company’s second line of business and which was part of our ongoing strategic plans. The Company became a party to a pending agreement to acquire an entity that owns approximately 2,100 miles of a pipeline system initially used as a crude oil transportation system by Koch Industries, As of December 31, 2010 we have not concluded this transaction and have not received notice of termination or other correspondence. In addition, on December 31, 2009, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Energy Producers, Inc., effectively acquired a 50% working interest and corresponding 32% revenue interest in certain oil and gas leases, reserves and equipment located in West Central Texas. As of December 31, 2010 we have not yet produced commercial oil or gas through these non operated interests. The turnkey manager, partner, and project operator encountered an abundance of weather related and non reported down hole maintenance issues in its attempts in 2010 to bring one or more wells on line. For 2011 both the operator and Company are in agreement and are currently moving forward for the recompletion of the McWhorter and Boyette proven zones in their respective wells. Additionally, plans are to have the Young #1 well, which adjoins the McWhorter, convert into a salt water disposal well to support the McWhorter production operations and economics. We are planning in-depth technical evaluations to be conducted on the two undeveloped Barnett Shale locations situated on the Boyette lease at the 5,500 ft. depth.  Recent successes in the local Barnett wells have encouraged both management and its operator, to advance the timing on the Barnett evaluation.





Moving forward, in early 2010 again as a part of our business strategy for a line of business focusing on the transportation industry serving federal DOT and state/local DOT agencies the Company entered into a pending agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Southwest Signal, Inc., a Florida corporation. Southwest Signal, Inc. was established in 2000 and is engaged in all facets of the United States Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS) / Department of Transportation (DOT) Industry activities. Ultimately this acquisition was never consummated due to a failed financial arrangement. In addition, working side by side at the time of SWSC to implement our strategy for SATCO and pair the activities of the two units due the similar nature of business, on March 3, 2010, the Company executed a Stock Purchase Agreement with the stockholders of Redquartz LTD, a company formed and existing under the laws of the country of Ireland.  Redquartz LTD business had been active for 45 years, is known internationally and we sought this acquisition as our entrance into the European markets with respect to Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS) and the transportation industry as well as expanding our relationship recently established with an overseas entity business relationship with the principals of Redquartz, known as Cordil, Inc., to assist for the products sold by South Atlantic Traffic Corporation (SATCO), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. For further information please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2010,  and as provided elsewhere in this document. The Redquartz LTD business unit purchased by the Company had no assets and resulted in additional debt burden to the Company.


29





Toward further development of our oil and gas line of business, in June 2010, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Chanwest Resources, Inc., (“Chanwest or CWR”) a Texas corporation. In the course of this acquisition, Chanwest stockholders exchanged all outstanding common shares for the Company’s common shares. Chanwest will provide services for drill site preparation to clear and lay pipeline (gathering systems) for operators. Chanwest operations can provide for services to maintain lease roads, set power poles and clean up oilfield spills. Chanwest works with operators or lease owners by purchase order or contract with major oil fields. The Company will continue to work with Chanwest to develop its plans for new growth for 2011. For further information please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2010, and information contained in our Form 10-Q filed November 22, 2010.





Later in July 2010 the Company toward addressing growth possibilities for the ITS/DOT line of business entered into a Definitive Stock Purchase Agreement with E-Views Safety Systems, Inc. ("E-Views") to be operated through its new subsidiary unit EGPI Firecreek Acquisition Company, Inc. Initially the Company has a “Dealer Agreement” with rights to acquire up to 51% of E-Views (see Exhibit 10.1 and 10.2 to our Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 filed on August 20, 2010, incorporated herein by reference). The Stock Purchase Agreement provides for up to a 51% interest in E-Views and exclusive distribution and sales rights in various states. The Company has initially solidified rights for the states of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana and North Carolina. They have also obtained international rights in the countries of Ireland and the United Kingdom. These states were initially chosen because of our subsidiary Southern Atlantic Traffic Corporation's, established clientele, and therefore potential abilities to penetrate these markets with E-Views patented technology and state-of-the-art products. Althouh there is still potential for this transaction; we were not able to implement the strategic plan to incrementally acquire E-Views stock interests.





In October 2010, the Company (“Purchaser”) executed a Securities Purchase / Exchange Agreement (“SPA”) with the owners (“Sellers”) of Terra Telecom, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company, located at 4510 South 86th East Ave, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74145 ( “Terra”) to acquire all of the outstanding stock of Terra, and 100% of the total LLC membership units existing thereof. For more information on Terra, please see our Current Report on Form 8-K and Exhibit 10.1 thereto filed on August 7, 2010, as amended.





Terra Telecom was considered recognized as a leading provider of state-of-the-art communication technologies and a premier Alcatel-Lucent partner. They served various sized companies and organizations that use and deploy communications systems, sales, service, and training while consolidating and optimizing the end user experience. In 2006 Terra relocated its company headquarters to a 25,000 square foot facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma. This facility provides Terra the space to continue growth and the ability to manage operations throughout the nation. Terra Telecom worked with the United Nations delivering Alcatel voice products to several countries and the Texas Dept. of Transportation, which will bring opportunities to the Company’s SATCO and M3 units and other current or future planned ITS/DOT related activities. Terra’s various ITS/DOT opportunities in place with Alcatel products. Terra employed approximately 50.  The acquisition of Terra ultimately failed due to lack of a completed funding which was to be concluded on or about February 24th, 2011. The funding that was in process for its initial order was stopped due to the actions of IRS seizure of escrow deposit funds in transit from the former Principals of Terra to the deposit account of the lender which was the requirements for the initial funding to begin. Because the funding did not begin, Terra was not able to maintain its dealership guarantees for product delivery which were pulled from clients’ orders.





Further regarding Terra, the Company from the time of execution of the Agreement did not have or assume control of the Terra entity’s assets, including bank accounts, nor did it establish or have effective or permanent management control of the entity. Since the economic downturn lenders have become intensely difficult to satisfy which in many cases can jeopardize transaction completions, due the time loss of substantial and excessive due diligence processes, including backing out of signed closing processes.





Overall due to economic factors we entered extreme financial turbulence in the latter half to end of Q4 2010 for our new business strategy. Some of these economic factors included our subsidiary operations for SATCO being on hold numerous times (unable to complete or take on new sales) with the inability to make some or all product deliveries and installations (jobs), not being able to pay suppliers for order deliveries, and other obstacles including some suppliers backing down on agreements negotiated with negotiated terms being met by SATCO. These issues over time eventually generated an unstable environment for both South Atlantic Traffic Corporation and all entities or pending acquisitions or activities related to Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS) / Department of Transportation (DOT) Industry serving federal DOT and state/local DOT agencies, and telecommunications industries for deployment of communications systems, sales, and/or service. The Company management and advisors reached the conclusion in late February 2011, that it was unlikely that SATCO or Terra would be able to continue operations and on March 14, 2011 sold its interests in both entities to Distressed Asset Acquisitions, Inc. We believe that if the financing established for Terra would have closed, it would have improved the cash flow status of the Company that could also have also directly and indirectly assisted our SATCO unit to rebuild and quickly re-structure and solve many of its problems and renewed growth potential. As delays were incurred time and time again from potential lenders and financial entities, realizing the potential of SATCO became less and less of a possibility. For more information please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2011.


30





In an effort to establish an alternative energy division, in February 2011, the Company entered into an Agreement to acquire all 100%  of Arctic Solar Engineering LLC, a Missouri limited liability company located at PO Box 4391, Chesterfield, MO 63006 (the “Company”), and the owners of Membership Interests of the Arctic Solar Engineering LLC; The FATM Partnership, a Missouri Partnership, The Frederic Sussman Living Trust. Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC, is an integrator of Solar Thermal Energy technology. Solar Thermal Energy (“STE”) is believed to be the most efficient and economical method of capturing and using renewable thermal energy created by the sun every day of the year. The solar collectors that are used capture all visible and non-visible wave lengths of sun light and covert the light into energy at a 90% efficiency. Energy created by ASE’s STE Systems store that energy in water (or other similarly inexpensive storage mediums) and then use that energy in its direct form to heat water, heat space and cool spaces. According to the US Department of Energy, this accounts for 70% of all energy used in commercial and residential structures in the United States.





In September 2010 the Company entered into a term sheet and subsequently later in March of 2011, entered into a Series D Stock Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with Dutchess Private Equities Fund, Ltd. (“Investors”) pursuant to which the Investors and its wholly-owned subsidiary Ginzoil, Inc, (GZI) agreed to sell to the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary unit Energy Producers, Inc. (“EPI”) a majority 75% Working Interest and 56.25% corresponding Net Revenue Interest in the North 40 acres of the J.B. Tubb Leasehold Estate/Amoco Crawar field and oil and gas interests, including all related assets, fixtures, equipment, three well heads, three well bores, and pro rata oil & gas revenue and reserves for all depths below the surface to 8,500 ft. The field is located in the Permian Basin and the Crawar Field in Ward County, Texas (12 miles west of Monahans & 30 miles west of Odessa in West Texas). Included in the transaction, EPI will also acquire 75% Working Interest and 56.25% corresponding Net Revenue Interest in the Highland Production Company No. 2 well-bore located in the South 40 acres of the J.B. Tubb Leasehold Estate/Amoco Crawar field, oil and gas interests, pro rata oil & gas revenues and reserves with depth of ownership 4700 ft. to 4900 ft.





The Company has been making presentations to asset-based lenders and other financial institutions for the purpose of (i) expanding and supporting our growth potential by i) to a lesser extent rebuilding for the time being, the development of its line of business operations similar to it former activities related to ITS/DOT and telecommunications industries, and (ii) building new infrastructure for its oil and gas operations in 2011. The Company throughout its first quarter of operations for 2011 has been pursuing projects for acquisition and development of select targeted oil and gas proved producing properties with revenues, having upside potential and prospects for enhancement, rehabilitation, and future development. These prospects are primarily located in Eastern Texas, and in other core areas of the Permian Basin.





The Company’s goal is to rebuild our revenue base and cash flow; however, the Company makes no guarantees and can provide no assurances that it will be successful in these endeavors.





One of the ways our plans for growth could be altered if current opportunities now available become unavailable:





The Company would need to identify, locate, or address replacing current potential acquisitions or strategic alliances with new prospects or initiate other existing available projects that may have been planned for later stages of growth and the Company may therefore not be ready to activate. This process can place a strain on the Company. New acquisitions, business opportunities, and alliances, take time for review, analysis, inspections and negotiations. The time taken in the review activities is an unknown factor, including the business structuring of the project and related specific due diligence factors.





General





The Company historically derived its revenues primarily from retail sales of oil and gas field inventory equipment, service, and supply items primarily in the southern Arkansas area, and from acquired interests owned in revenue producing oil wells, leases, and equipment located in Olney, Young County, Texas. The Company disposed of these two segments of operations in 2003. The Company acquired a marine vessel sales brokerage and charter business, International Yacht Sales Group, Ltd. of Great Britain in December 2003 later disposing of its operations in late 2005. The Company focused on oil and gas activities for development of interests held that were acquired in Wyoming (the Ten Mile Draw (TMD) prospect) and two programs in Texas, (the Fant Ranch unit, and J.B. Tubb Leasehold Estate) for the production of oil and natural gas through October 30 and December 2, 2008 the dates of disposal respectively. In 2009 we disposed of our wholly owned subsidiary Firecreek Petroleum, Inc. (see further information in this report and in our current Report on Form 8-K filed May 20, 2009, incorporated herein by reference). We account for or have accounted for these segments as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for the related fiscal year.





Sale/Assignment of 100% Stock of FPI Subsidiary





Having disposed of all of the assets of FPI, on May 18, 2009, the Company and Firecreek Global, Inc., entered into a Stock Acquisition Agreement effective the 18th day of May, 2009, relating to the Assignee’s acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of Firecreek Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Moreover, included and inherent in the Assignment was all of the Company’s debt held in the FPI subsidiary. In addition, the Company, and Assignee executed a right of first refusal agreement attached as Exhibit to the Agreement, granting to the Company the right of first refusal, for a period of two (2) years after Closing, to participate in certain overseas projects in which Assignee may have or obtain rights related to Assignors’ previous activities in certain areas of the world. For further information please see our current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2009, incorporated herein by reference.


31





2009 Merger Acquisition with M3 Lighting, Inc.





On May 21, 2009, EGPI Firecreek, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company” or “Registrant”), Asian Ventures Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Subsidiary”), M3 Lighting, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“M3”), and Strategic Partners Consulting, L.L.C., a Georgia limited liability company (“Strategic Partners”) executed and closed a Plan and Agreement of Triangular Merger (the “Plan of Merger”), whereby M3 merged into the Subsidiary, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant (the “Merger”).  Further information can be found along with copy of the Plan of Merger attached as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on May 27, 2009, as amended. Amendment No. 1 and No. 2 to the May 27, 2009 current Report on Form 8-K were filed on June 24 and August 4, 2009, respectively, and additional information can be found in our Form 10-K annual report filed on April 15, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.





Completion of South Atlantic Traffic Corporation (SATCO) Acquisition





Effective as of November 4, 2009, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of South Atlantic Traffic Corporation, a Florida corporation (“SATCO”). In the course of this acquisition, SATCO stockholders exchanged all outstanding common shares for cash consideration, the Company’s common shares and sellers’ notes. SATCO has been in business since 2001 and has several offices throughout the Southeast United States. Please see further discussion and information listed in “The Business”, “Description of Properties”, and “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections, and elsewhere in this document.





Completion of Acquisition of 50% Oil and Gas Working Interests, Callahan, Stephens, and Shakelford Counties, Texas, Three Well Program





Effective December 31, 2009, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiary Energy Producers, Inc. closed an Acquisition Agreement including an Assignment of Interests in Oil and Gas Leases (the “Assignment”), with Whitt Oil & Gas, Inc., (“Whitt”) a Texas corporation acquiring 50% working interests and corresponding 32% net revenue interests in oil and gas leases representing the aggregate total of 240 acre leases, reserves, three wells, and equipment located in Callahan, Stephens, and Shakelford Counties, West Central Texas. Please see further discussion and information listed in “The Business” and “Description of Properties” and the “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections of this report.





Completion of Redquartz LTD Acquisition





On March 3, 2010, the Company acquired Redquartz LTD, a company formed and existing under the laws of the country of Ireland.  Redquartz LTD has been in business for 45 years, is known internationally and is our entrance into the European markets with respect to Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS) and the transportation industry as well as expanding our relationship recently established with Cordil, Inc. for the products sold by South Atlantic Traffic Corporation (SATCO), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. For further information please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2010,  and in the section on “The Business”, and “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections, and elsewhere listed in this document.





Completion of Chanwest Resources, Inc. Acquisition





On June 11, 2010, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Chanwest Resources, Inc., (“Chanwest or CWR”) a Texas corporation. Chanwest Resources, Inc. was formed in 2009 and has been engaged in ramping up operations including acquiring assets related to the servicing, construction, production and development for oil and gas. For further information please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2010, and in the section on “The Business”, and “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections, and elsewhere listed in this document.





Completion and Entry into a Definitive Agreement with E-Views Safety Systems, Inc.





On July 22, 2010 the Company entered into a Definitive Stock Purchase Agreement with E-Views Safety Systems, Inc. ("E-Views") to be operated through its new subsidiary unit EGPI Firecreek Acquisition Company, Inc. Initially the Company has a “Dealer Agreement” with rights to acquire up to 51% of E-Views. For further information please see Exhibit 10.1 and 10.2 to our Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 filed on August 20, 2010, and in the section on “The Business”, and “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections, and elsewhere listed in this document.





Completion and Entry into a Definitive Agreement with Terra Telecom, LLC.





On October 1, 2010, EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (“Purchaser”) executed a Securities Purchase / Exchange Agreement (“SPA”) with the owners (“Sellers”) of Terra Telecom, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company, located at 4510 South 86th East Ave, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74145 ( “Terra”) to acquire all of the outstanding stock of Terra, and 100% of the total LLC membership units existing thereof. All assets and liabilities of Terra, other than information listed in the SPA are considered to be transferred to the Purchaser. For more information on Terra, please see our Current Report on Form 8-K, Form 8-K/A (amendment no. 1), and Form 8-K/A (amendment no. 2) filed on October 7, 2010, December 7, 2010, and March 22, 2011, respectively, and in the section on “The Business”, and “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections, and elsewhere listed in this document.  On March 14, 2011, the Company’s interest in Terra was sold.


32





Completion and Entry into a Definitive Agreement with Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC.





On February 4, 2011, the Company entered into an Agreement to acquire all 100%  of Arctic Solar Engineering LLC, a Missouri limited liability company located at PO Box 4391, Chesterfield, MO 63006 (the “Company”), and the owners of Membership Interests of the Arctic Solar Engineering LLC; The FATM Partnership, a Missouri Partnership, The Frederic Sussman Living Trust. Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC, is an integrator of Solar Thermal Energy technology. For further information please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2011, and in the section on “The Business”, and “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections, and elsewhere listed in this document.





Completion and Entry into a Definitive Agreement with with Dutchess Private Equities Fund, Ltd..





On March 1, 2011, the Company entered into a Series D Stock Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with Dutchess Private Equities Fund, Ltd. (“Investors”) pursuant to which the Investors and its wholly-owned subsidiary Ginzoil, Inc, (GZI) agreed to sell to the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary unit Energy Producers, Inc. (“EPI”), a majority 75% Working Interest and 56.25% corresponding Net Revenue Interest in the North 40 acres of the J.B. Tubb Leasehold Estate/Amoco Crawar field and oil and gas interests, including all related assets, fixtures, equipment. For further information please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 7, 2011, and in the section on “The Business”, and “Overview” to the Management Discussion and Analysis sections, and elsewhere listed in this document.





The Company expects to incur an increase in operating expenses during the next year from commencing activities related to its plans for the Company’s oil and gas business through EPI, oil and gas services business through CWR, alternative energy business division through Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC, and including any new or pending acquisitions discussed herein, and those business activities and developments whether ongoing or to be concluded, as related to our M3, SATCO, and Terra strategy and operations, and ongoing potential acquisitions, including new or pending acquisitions related to signalization and lighting geared to the transportation industry. The amount of net losses and the time required for the Company to reach and maintain profitability are uncertain at this time. There is a likelihood that the Company will encounter difficulties and delays encountered with business subsidiary operations, including, but not limited to uncertainty as to development and the time and timing required for the Company’s plans to be fully implemented, governmental regulatory responses to the Company’s plans, fluctuating markets and corresponding spikes, or dips in our products demand, currency exchange rates between countries, acquisition and development pricing, related costs, expenses, offsets, increases, and adjustments. There can be no assurance that the Company will ever generate significant revenues or achieve profitability at all or on any substantial basis.





General Statement:  Factors that may affect future results:





With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation contain forward looking statements under the 1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act that involve various risks and uncertainties.  Typically, these statements are indicated by words such as “anticipates”, “expects”, “believes”, “plans”, “could”, and similar words and phrases.  Factors that could cause the company’s actual results to differ materially from management’s projections, forecasts, estimates and expectations include but are not limited to the following:





– Inability of the company to secure additional financing.


– Unexpected economic changes in the United States.


– The imposition of new restrictions or regulations by government agencies that affect the Company’s business activities.





To the extent possible, the following discussion will highlight the Company’s business activities for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010.





Results of Operations





Six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010.





Total revenue for the sales attributable to lighting and signalization business for the six months ending June, 2011 was $0 compared to $ 916,298 of revenue for the six months ending June 30, 2010.  The SATCO subsidiary was disposed of in the first quarter of 2011.





Total revenues from oil and gas sales were $107,649 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to no revenue from oil and gas sales for the six months ended June 30, 2010.





Total revenues from other business activities were $47,362 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.





General administrative expenses were $782,758 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1,477,977 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  The decrease in these expenses is due to the disposition of subsidiaries and the overall decrease in those businesses disposed.


33





Following is a breakdown of general and administrative costs for this period versus a year ago:





Detail of general & administrative expenses:





30-Jun-11


30-Jun-10Advertising & promotion

$
12,723


$
9,019Administration


139,780



41,142Consulting


122,797



592,679Depreciation/Amortization


83,951



0Investor Incentives






201,212Professional fees


414,817



633,925Rent/Utilities


8,690SalariesMiscellaneousTotal

$
782,758


$
1,477,977





For the six months ended June 30, 2011, promotional fees of $12,723 were incurred in stock promotional activities as compared to $9,019 six months ended June 30, 2010.





For the six months ended June 30, 2011, consulting fees of $122,797 incurred for business advisory services as compared to $592,679 six months ended June 30, 2010.





For the six months ended June 30, 2011, professional fees of $414,817 incurred in regards to management advisory, legal costs, and accounting, for new subsidiaries as compared to $633,925 six months ended June 30, 2010.





No investor incentive fees were incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2011 in regards to funding activities as compared to $201,212 six months ended June 30, 2010.





After deducting general and administrative expenses, the Company experienced a loss from operations of $795,679 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to a loss of $1,477,977 same period last year.





Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $297,472 as compared with $198,219 same period last year.





The Company incurred a net loss of $2,353,616 first six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to a loss of $3,030,454 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.





Fully diluted income (loss) per share was $1.49 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, for continuing operations, compared to a loss of $13.08 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.





Professional fees decreased approximately $219,108 to $414,817 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $633,925 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.





Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2011, on continuing operations was $ (1.11) per share compared to a loss of $(9.74).





Three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010.





Total revenue for the sales attributable to lighting and signalization business for the three months ending June 30, 2011 was $0 compared to $407,638 of revenue for the three months ending June 30, 2010.   The SATCO subsidiary was disposed of in the first quarter of 2011 and all revenues are included in discontinued operations.





Total revenues from oil and gas sales for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $72, 532 as compared to no revenue from oil and gas sales in the three months ended June 30, 2010.





Total revenues from other business activities were $22,220 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.





General administrative expenses were $92,230 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $40,594 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in these expenses is due to the disposal of subsidiaries.





Following is a breakdown of general and administrative costs for this period versus a year ago:


34





Detail of general & administrative expenses:





30-Jun-11


30-Jun -10Advertising & promotion

$
1,396


$
8,153Administration


167,735



121,373Consulting


60,875



436,832Depreciation/Amortization


36,901Investor incentives/commissions






1,126Professional fees


341,303



513,587Rent/Utilities


40,827Salaries


434,155Travel


1,466Total

$
1,084,958


$
1,081,071





For the three months ended June 30, 2011, promotional fees of $1,696 were incurred in stock promotional activities as compared to $8,153 three months ended June 30, 2010.





For the three months ended June 30, 2011, consulting fees of $60,875 incurred for business advisory services as compared to $436,832 three months ended June 30, 2010.





For the three months ended June 30, 2011, professional fees of $341,303 incurred in regards to management advisory, legal costs, and accounting, for new subsidiaries as compared to $513,587 three months ended June 30, 2010.





No investor incentive fees were incurred for the three months ended June 30, 2011 in regards to funding activities as compared to $1,126 in the three months ended June 30, 2010.





After deducting general and administrative expenses, the Company experienced a loss from operations of $1,084,958 in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to a loss of $ 1,081,071 in the same period last year.





Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $178,311 as compared with $85,668 same period last year.





The Company incurred a net loss of $ 1,065,679 three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to a loss of $1,900,923 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.





Fully diluted income (loss) per share was  $ (0.38)  for the three months ended June 30, 2011, for continuing operations, compared to a loss of  $ (4.60)  for the three months ended June 30, 2010.





Professional fees decreased approximately $341,303 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $513,587 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.





Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2011, on continuing operations was $1,065,679 or  $ (0.38) per share compared to a loss of $1,546,726 or  $ (4.60) per share for the three months ended June 30, 2010.





Discussion of Financial Condition:  Liquidity and Capital Resources





Cash on hand at June 30, 2011 was $58,323 compared to $9,272 at December 31, 2010. The Company had working capital deficit of $4,714,448 at June 30, 2011 compared to a working capital deficit of $7,048,737 at December 31, 2010.


.


The Company received new loans in the first half of fiscal year 2011 of $461,292 compared to $2,417,562 in the same period of fiscal year 2010 by issuing promissory notes.





Total assets increased to $5,144,681 at June 30, 2011 compared to $3,662,187 at December 31, 2010 mainly as a result of the disposal of the SATCO subsidiary and the acquisition of Arctic Solar Engineering, Inc. and the Tubb oil and gas leases.





Shareholders’ deficit increased to $3,590,968 at June 30, 2011 from a deficit of $3,531,948 at December 31, 2010.





The Company must generally undertake certain ongoing expenditures in connection with rebuilding, expanding and developing its oil and gas business and related acquisition activity and its business acquisition activities, and for various past and present legal, accounting, consulting, and technical review, and to perform due diligence for the acquisition and development programs for both lines of business; furthering research for new and ongoing business prospects, and in pursuing capital financing for its existing available rights and proposed operations.





Management has estimated that cost for initially paying down certain of the Company’s recent debt, providing necessary working capital, and activating development of its current plans for domestic oil and gas segment operations, alternative energy division, acquisition and development, and its acquisition and developments, will initially require a very minimum of $3,500,000 to $7,500,000 to a maximum of $8,000,000 to $10 million during the next six to twelve months.


35





Financing our full expansion and development plans for our oil and gas operations could require up to $50,000,000 or more. The Company may elect to reduce or increase its requirement as circumstances dictate. We may elect to revise these plans and requirements for funds depending on factors including; changes in acquisition and development estimates; interim corporate and project finance requirements; unexpected timing of markets as to cyclical aspects as a whole; currency and exchange rates; project availability with respect to interest and timing factors indicated from parties representing potential sources of capital; structure and status of our strategic alliances, potential joint venture partners, and or our targeted acquisitions and or interests.





The Company cannot predict that it will be successful in obtaining funding for its plans or that it will achieve profitability in fiscal 2011.





Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Market Risks





There are no material changes in the market risks faced by us from those reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.





ITEM 4(T) – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES





(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure and Procedures





Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of June 30, 2011. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded that there are material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures and they were not effective for the following reasons:





·
In connection with the preparation of the Original Report, we identified a deficiency in our disclosure controls and procedures related to communication with the appropriate personnel involved with our 2010 audit.  We are utilizing additional accounting consultants to assist us in improving our controls and procedures. We believe these measures will benefit us by reducing the likelihood of a similar event occurring in the future.


·
Due to our relatively small size and not having present operations, we do not have segregation of duties which is a deficiency in our disclosure controls. We do not presently have the resources to cure this deficiency.





Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.





All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial reporting reliability and financial statement preparation and presentation. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls become inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.





(b)
Changes in Internal Controls over financial reporting





There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during our last fiscal quarter, which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.





PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION





ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





In the ordinary course of our business we may become subject to litigation regarding our products or our compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations.





In August 2010 the Company received a lawsuit notice on behalf of our former SATCO subsidiary whereas Bison Profab, Inc. (“BPI”) is seeking a judgment to collect amounts owed it from SATCO. On October 12, 2010 BPI filed a motion for a No-Answer Default Judgment on SATCO and the Company for failure to answer in the amount of approximately $27,710. On November 29, 2010 EGPI Firecreek, Inc., along with its former wholly-owned subsidiary South Atlantic Traffic Corp., engaged legal counsel located in Texas to begin negotiations for a settlement in this matter. In January 2011, a settlement was reached between the parties whereas monthly payments of $3,333 are to be made to BPI to payoff the remaining balance owed. The remaining balance of $10,000 is due in full on August 17, 2011, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.


36





In October 2010 we received notice of a lawsuit filed against the Company by St. George Investments LLC relating to certain Agreements entered on January 15th, 2010 by EGPI Firecreek Inc. and St. George Investments LLC which include: i) Note Purchase Agreement, ii) Convertible Promissory Note, iii) Judgment by Confession and iv) Registration Rights Agreement. St. George Investments LLC believes that EGPI Firecreek is in breach of terms agreed upon pursuant to the aforementioned agreements and is seeking damages totaling $262,585 (includes principal, interest and all penalties/fees pursuant to plaintiff's initial disclosures dated 3/28/11). In July 2011, the Company and St. George Investments LLC entered into a settlement agreement whereas the Company agreed to pay $202,000 the final settlement with various payment terms beginning with $10,000 on signing of settlement followed byfive payments beginning August through December 2011. Thereafter payments for 18 months in the amount of $6,158 are scheduled per the settlement. As of August 2011, the Company has not initiated payment toward the settlement but is negotiating potential for new scheduling.





In November 2010, EGPI Firecreek Inc and South Atlantic Traffic Corp., a former wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, received a lawsuit notice from two of the former owners of SATCO, Mr. Jesse Joyner and Mr. James Stewart Hall. Mr. Joyner and Mr. Hall have subsequently resigned from their positions with the company. On December 17, 2010, EGPI Firecreek Inc. filed its answer to the claim and filed a counterclaim against Mr. Joyner and Mr. Hall. As of August 2011, the Company is in settlement negotiations now post mediation hearings, and continuing final discussions.





In December 2010 the Company received a lawsuit notice on behalf of our former Terra Telecom (“Terra”) subsidiary whereas Source Capital Group Inc (“Source”) is seeking a judgment to collect amounts owed it from Terra in the total aggregate amount of $81,492 plus pre and post judgment interest as provided by law. In June 2011, the Company filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Additionally, the Company also filed a motion to dismiss for Sources’ failure to state a claim. In response to that motion, Source has now, as of July, 2011, dropped its assumption argument in the case. Therefore there is now no pending motion for judgment which went away when early on the Company obtained a set aside for Default. The Company is now awaiting rulings on our two pending motions to dismiss.





In February 2011 the Company received a lawsuit notice on behalf of our Terra Telecom (“Terra”) subsidiary whereas Nu-Horizons Electronics (“Nu-Horizons”) is seeking a judgment to collect amounts owed it from Terra in the total aggregate amount of $196,620. The Company believes that it is not liable, and intends to file for an appeal to remove it from the motion for judgment, and the Company will vigorously defend its position.





In March 2011 the Company received a lawsuit notice on behalf of our former Terra Telecom (“Terra”) subsidiary whereas Thermo Credit LLC (“Thermo”) is seeking a judgment to collect amounts owed it from Terra in the total aggregate amount of $2,915,404. During March 2011 Thermo initiated litigation to effectively put a freeze on all assets of Terra including accounting and financial records which they claimed were also assets, and further blocked all entrance to any material records and data files upon the appointment of a receiver over the process. In July 2011, the Company filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and on August 3, 2011 Thermo dismissed the lawsuit against the Company.





In May 2011 the Company received a lawsuit notice Edelweiss Enterprises Inc. dba The Small Business Money Store (“SMBS”) is seeking a judgment to collect amounts owed it relating to the account receivable factoring agreement, initiated by the former subsidiary SATCO, in the total aggregate amount of $48,032. The Company believes that it is not liable, and intends to file for an appeal to remove it from the motion for judgment, and the Company will vigorously defend its position.





In late July 2011, the Company received a Default Notice on behalf of our wholly owned subsidiary Energy Ventures One Inc whereas Contegra Construction Company LLC (“CCC”) is threatening litigation if the amounts owed it, in the amount of $157,767, are not received. The Company is prepared to vigorously defend its position against any potential lawsuit relating to this matter.





ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.





There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as updated by our subsequent filings on Form 10-Q (and otherwise) with the SEC.





ITEM 2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS





Required information has been furnished in current Report(s) on Form 8-K filings and other reports, as amended, during the period covered by this Report and additionally as listed and following:





Please see additional information listed in the Part II, Item 5, under the sub heading Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities, contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on April 28, 2011, incorporated herein by reference.





(*)(**) On February 4, 2011, by majority consent of the Board of Directors, the Registrant approved the following issuances of its restricted common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to the following persons for and behalf of consideration for the Acquisition of Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC membership interests.


37





Name

Date

Share Amount

Type of Consideration

Fair Market Value of

ConsiderationDaniel Mark O’Neal (***)/(1) 15316 Chesterfield Pines Lane Chesterfield, MO 63017

2/4/11


2,870,400

In consideration of Acquisition of Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC Membership Interests

$
14,064Alvie M. Smith (***)/(2) 15316 Chesterfield Pines Lane Chesterfield, MO 63017

2/4/11


1,435,200

In consideration of Acquisition of Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC Membership Interests

$
23,824The Frederic Sussman Living Trust (***)/() Frederic Sussman, Trustee 15316 Chesterfield Pines Lane Chesterfield, MO 63017

2/4/11


1,694,400

In consideration of Acquisition of Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC Membership Interests

$
11.912





(*) Issuances are approved, subject to such persons agreeing in writing to i) comply with applicable securities laws and regulations and make required disclosures; and ii) be solely and entirely responsible for their own personal, Federal, State, and or relevant single or multi jurisdictional income taxes, as applicable.





(**) $49,800 worth of common stock in the immediately preceding table was used primarily in consideration of Acquisition of Sierra Pipeline, LLC Membership Interests.





(1)
Daniel Mark O’Neal is a shareholder, and not currently an affiliate, director, or officer of the Registrant. He provides business and consulting services to Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC.





(2)
Alvie M. Smith is a shareholder, and not currently an affiliate, director, or officer of the Registrant. He provides business and consulting services to Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC.





(3)
The Frederic Sussman Living Trust, Frederic Sussman, Trustee is a shareholder, and not currently an affiliate, director, or officer of the Registrant. Frederic Sussman manages day to day operations for Arctic Solar Engineering, LLC.





(***) The shares of common stock were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration as provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”). All such certificates representing the shares issued by the Company shall bear the standard 1933 Act restrictive legend restricting resale.





(*)(**) On May 10, 2010, by majority consent of the Board of Directors, the Company approved the following issuances of its restricted common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to the following person for and behalf of consideration as follows:





Type of

Fair Market Value ofName and Address (***)

Date

Share Amount

Consideration

ConsiderationAlan Carlquist (1)

1/28/2010


1,000,000

Working Capital

$
20,000.001110 Allgood Industrial Center






M3 SubsidiaryMarietta, GA 30066





(*) Issuances when approved, will be subject to such persons agreeing in writing to i) comply with applicable securities laws and regulations and make required disclosures; and ii) be solely and entirely responsible for their own personal, Federal, State, and or relevant single or multi jurisdictional income taxes, as applicable.





(**) $20,000 worth of common stock in the immediately preceding table used primarily in consideration of advances made for working capital requirements for the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary M3 Lighting, Inc.





(1) The above named individual is not an affiliate, director, or officer of the Registrant.





(***) The shares of common stock are to be issued pursuant to an exemption from registration as provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”). All such certificates representing the shares issued by the Company shall bear the standard 1933 Act restrictive legend restricting resale.


38





I.           (*) (**) On April 30, 2010, by majority consent of the Board of Directors, the Company approved the following issuances of its restricted common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to the following persons or entities for legal and advisory and general consulting and advisory services.





Name and Address (***)

Date

Share Amount(***)

Type of Consideration

Fair Market Value of

ConsiderationVincent & Rees, L.C. (1)

3/1/2010


1,500,000

Legal and Advisory Services

$
41,250175 S. Main Street, 15th FloorSalt Lake City, UT 84111Callie Jones (2)

3/1/2010


300,000

Legal and Advisory Services

$
8,250175 S. Main Street, 15th FloorSalt Lake City, UT 84111Chase Chandler (3)

3/1/2010


600,000

Legal and Advisory Services

$
16,500175 S. Main Street, 15th FloorSalt Lake City, UT 84111Lisa Demmons (4)

3/1/2010


600,000

Legal and Advisory Services

$
16,500175 S. Main Street, 15th FloorSalt Lake City, UT 84111Chienn Consulting Company LLC (5)

3/1/2010


3,000,000

General Consulting and

$
82,500175 S. Main Street, 15th Floor






Advisory ServicesSalt Lake City, UT 84111








(*) Issuances are approved, subject to such person being entirely responsible for his own personal, Federal, State, and or relevant single or multi jurisdictional income taxes, as applicable.





(**) $165,000 of the financing proceeds in the immediately preceding table was used primarily for legal and advisory services, and exchange for cancellation of debt owed, respectively.





(1)
Vincent & Rees L.P. is a shareholder, and provides legal and advisory services to the Company. Vincent and Rees L.P. is not an affiliate of the Company.





(2)
Callie Jones is with the firm Vincent & Rees L.P. and provides legal and advisory services to the Company. Mrs. Jones is a shareholder, and is not an affiliate, officer, or director of the Company.





(3)
Chase Chandler is with the firm Vincent & Rees L.P. and provides legal and advisory services to the Company. Mr. Chandler is a shareholder and is not an affiliate, officer, or director of the Company.





(4)
Lisa Demmons is with the firm Vincent & Rees L.P. and provides legal and advisory services to the Company. Mrs. Demmons is a shareholder, and is not an affiliate, officer, or director of the Company.





(5)
Chienn Consulting Company, LLC is a shareholder, and is not an affiliate, officer, or director of the Company.





(***) The shares of common stock were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration as provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”). All such certificates representing the shares issued by the Company shall bear the standard 1933 Act restrictive legend restricting resale.





II.           Pursuant to an Engagement Letter Agreement with Vincent & Rees L.P. and a General Consulting Agreement with Chienn Consulting Company, LLC the Company granted to each entity, a cashless option to purchase 0.5% of the Company’s common stock for $10,000 (“the Option”). Terms for the option: The option will vest on September 1, 2010 and shall expire three (2.5) years from the date thereof. The cap for the option shall be $150,000.





The Company claims an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) for the private placement of these securities pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, the transaction does not involve a public offering, the Investor is an “accredited investor” and/or qualified institutional buyer, the Investor has access to information about the Company and its investment, the Investor will take the securities for investment and not resale, and the Company is taking appropriate measures to restrict the transfer of the securities.


39





ITEM 3 – DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES





None





ITEM 4 – (Removed and Reserved)





ITEM 5 – OTHER INFORMATION





Effective March 2, 2011 EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the “Company”) obtained a consent from the majority shareholders of the Company to amend the Articles of Incorporation to i) authorize the issuance of 2,500 shares of a new D Series Preferred Stock, and ii) for the Board of Directors to be able to authorize any and all capitalization of the Company going forward without the need for shareholder approval, and further authorized for the Board of Directors to set all rights, preferences, and designations, for and in behalf of any class of the Company’s common of preferred stock, and as may be required or as necessary in the best interest of the Company.





On May 9, 2011 the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary Energy Producers, Inc. (“EPI”) issued to TWL Investments  a LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (“TWL”) a promissory note in the face amount of $210,000 (the “Note”). The Note bears interest at 14% per annum and matures on May 9, 2013 (“Maturity Date”). Pursuant to the Note, the Company shall make payments beginning June 9, 2011 until all amounts payable under this Note are paid in full.  The Companies shall make Payments of principal each month in the amount of (a) [$4,375.00] on the first Payment Date and (b) for each month thereafter until this Note is paid in full an amount equal to the then current outstanding principal balance of the Note divided by the number of Payment Dates remaining, including the Maturity Date.  Concurrently with each Payment of principal, on each Payment Date the Companies shall pay all accrued and outstanding interest on the outstanding principal amount at the rate of 14% per annum compounded monthly (computed on the actual number of days elapsed over a year of 360 days). The Company may repay in full the face amount of the Note without penalty. Both the Agreement and Promissory Note is listed on Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 13, 2011. Further, the Company and EPI agreed to issue to Holder certain Collateral which is limited to all rights, title and interest to the oil, gas and mineral leases and equipment on the A.J. Tubb Leasehold Estate Amoco/Crawar Field, Ward County Texas listed on Exhibit “A” therein. The Company further granted TWL i) a security interest in and lien on all personal property of Debtor, to the extent such property relates to, is used in connection with or is located on the Pledged Property (see “Security Agreement” listed on Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 13, 2011), and ii) granted to TWL a “Collateral Assignment” listed on Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 13, 201, and an “Exclusive Option to Purchase” listed on Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 13, 2011, both which may be exercised in the event of an instance of Default, one or more, and or at the election of TWL as described therein.





On May 10, 2011 and further in connection with the issuance of a Promissory Note herein listed above, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiary EPI entered into a “Turnkey Rework Agreement” with Success Oil Co., Inc. (“Success”) of Beverly Hills CA, also a licensed Texas operator,  to perform such work programs on the interests owned by the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary in the A.J. Tubb Leasehold Estate, Amoco/Crawar field, Ward County, Texas (see Current Report on Form 8-k filed on  March 7, 2011).





The material terms of the Turnkey Rework Agreement are as follows:





1.
Success shall do certain reworking procedures described below on the Crawar #1 Well and the J.B. Tubb # 18-1 Well and thereafter be the Operator of said wells. Further in consideration for the payment of $165,162.36 to Success by EPI or its agents via “Escrow Agreement”, the parties agreed as follows:





A.  Crawar #1 Well: Success shall drill out the cement plug and cast iron bridge plug located at approximately 5,000 feet, and shall perforate the Glorieta payzone at intervals ranging from 3,800 feet to 4,000 feet, acidize and swab.





B.  J. B. Tubb #18-1 Well. Success shall re-perforate existing Tubb pay-zone at interval 4,510 feet to 4,560 feet (plus or minus) to increase perforations to 6 shots per foot and then frac with gas gun.





C.  It is agreed and understood that if the above described reworking costs exceed $165,162.36, Success shall solely be responsible for such excess costs.





A copy of the Turnkey Rework Agreement and Escrow Agreement are filed as exhibits 10.5, and 10.6 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 13, 2011.





On July 19, 2011, the Company entered into a linear short form of Securities Exchange Agreement with the principal shareholders owning 67% of Caddo International, Inc., (“CADDO”) a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Nevada with its principal place of business located at PO Box 608, Oil City, Louisiana 70161. The Caddo acquisition is subject to completion of all required SEC filings and shall be structured as a share exchange based on independent third party valuations of the two entities and will include the requirement for audited financials of Caddo to be completed prior to the formal closing announcement.  The expected time for these processes is 90 days. Currently, the acquisition has 67% support of the existing shareholders of Caddo. The Company and Caddo principal shareholders are presently working on the conditions for the expanded final long form Agreement which is expected and agreed to be fully completed by approximately August 22, 2011, with information to be subsequently furnished in a Current Report on Form 8-K.


40





Caddo International has been in business for over 40 years as an oil production and service company, utilizing their own equipment and pulling units, in order to provide oilfield services. Caddo is expected to be able to produce initially revenues of approximately $1,400,000 to $2,400,000 per year on its unaudited and estimated $6,000,000 in assets. Caddo also provides oil field services to several oil and gas company operators including several hundred wells in the Caddo Pine Island field, the Haynesville field and the Desoto Parish known as the Spyder field.





The Company and its Firecreek unit are presently in different stages of review and discussion, gathering data and information, and any available reports on other potential acquisitions in Texas, and other productive regions and areas in the U.S.





From time to time Management will examine oil and gas operations in other geographical areas for potential acquisition and joint venture development.





ITEM 6 – EXHIBITS





Exhibit No.

Description31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (3)32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (3)


41





SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.





Date:  August 17, 2011





EGPI FIRECREEK, INC.By:
/s/ Dennis AlexanderName Dennis AlexanderTitle: Chairman, CEO, President, and CFO




42