alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Interim Decision #3345

In re E-L-H- et al., Respondents

Decided January 30, 1998

U.S. Department of Justice

Executive Office for Immigration Review

Board of Immigration Appeals

Precedent decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals which have been certified to the Attorney General for review are binding on the Immigration and Naturalization

Service and the Immigration Judges and continue to serve as precedent in all proceedings

involving the same issue or issues unless or until they are modified or overruled by the Board

or the Attorney General. 

Pro se

Scott M. Rosen, Appellate Counsel, for the Immigration and Naturalization Service

Before: Board Panel: DUNNE, Vice Chairman; VACCA and VILLAGELIU, Board

Members.

DUNNE, Vice Chairman:

The Immigration and Naturalization Service has filed a motion to

reconsider our ruling of August 29, 1997, which reversed the Immigration

Judge’s decision to deny the respondents asylum and withholding of deportation under sections 208 and 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality

Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 and 1253(h)(1994). We have jurisdiction over this

matter pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(a)(1997). The motion will be denied.

The Service argued in its motion that the Board’s reliance on Matter of

C-Y-Z-, 21 I&N Dec. 915 (BIA 1997), in our August 29, 1997, decision was

improper. It contends that because Matter of C-Y-Z- has been certified to the

Attorney General, the Board should not have relied on it as a precedent in

deciding the instant case. The Service cited Matter of Farias, 21 I&N Dec.

269 (BIA 1996, 1997; A.G. 1997), for the proposition that a decision of the

Board is not final while it is under Attorney General review.

We have carefully considered the arguments and authority cited by the

Service. We agree with the Service that Board decisions are final except in

those cases reviewed by the Attorney General. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 3.1(d)(2),

(h)(1997), However, “[e]xcept as they may be modified or overruled by the

Board or the Attorney General, decisions of the Board shall be binding on

all officers and employees of the Service or Immigration Judges in the

administration of the Act, and selected decisions designated by the Board

shall serve as precedents in all proceedings involving the same issue or

issues.” 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(g).

21
Interim Decision #3345

We find that although Matter of C-Y-Z-, supra, has been certified to the

Attorney General for review, the decision remains binding unless or until it

is modified or overruled by the Board or the Attorney General. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 3.1(g), We therefore conclude that our reliance on Matter of C-Y-Z- was

proper.

Accordingly, the Service’s motion will be denied.

ORDER: The motion to reconsider is denied.

22
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel; R25 Review.                    

*Date:*                         January 24, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Eliane Lazar-Wesley, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 8339, MSC 9670, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, 301-496-8683,                         *el6r@nih.gov.*

Any interested person may file written comments with the committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 29, 2021. 

David W. Freeman, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-28480 Filed 1-3-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

CLIFFORD BAILEY, et al.,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:17-cv-332

vs.

VERSO CORPORATION, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent Case)

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL 

TIME (DOC. 61); (2) TERMINATING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION (DOC. 60) ON THE 

COURT’S DOCKET WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING; AND (3) SETTING THIS 

CASE FOR A STATUS CONFERENCE ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2020

______________________________________________________________________________

This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for, inter alia, class certification 

and approval of a class action settlement between the parties. Doc. 60. Defendant filed a 

memorandum in response to Plaintiffs’ motion. Doc. 61. In its memorandum, Defendant agrees 

that the parties have agreed to settle this case and that the matter should proceed to class 

certification, the circulation of class notices, and the scheduling of a fairness hearing. Id. 

However, Defendant requests additional time to confirm the identity of individuals who should be 

part of the proposed class settlement before such action be undertaken by the Court. Id. In a reply 

memorandum, Plaintiffs do not object to Defendant’s request for additional time, but request that 

the Court set a status conference in the case.

Based on the foregoing, the Court: (1) GRANTS Defendant’s request for additional time 

(doc. 61); and (2) TERMINATES Plaintiffs’ motion (doc. 60) on the Court’s docket WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE to refile. The Court sets this case for a status conference by telephone on 

September 15, 2020 at 2:00 pm to discuss, inter alia, when Plaintiffs’ motion can be refiled for 

Case: 3:17-cv-00332-MJN Doc #: 63 Filed: 08/27/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1700
2

the Court’s consideration. Counsel shall call: 1-888-278-0296, enter access code 2725365, 

security code 123456, and wait for the Court to join the conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: August 27, 2020 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 3:17-cv-00332-MJN Doc #: 63 Filed: 08/27/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1701
#### Kirby A. GEAN, Respondent v. Jean I. GEAN, Appellant.

(346 S. E. (2d) 705)

Supreme Court

Jan. 6, 1986.

ORDER

This case comes before the Court on appellant’s motion to disallow an award of attorney’s fees on appeal. The Clerk of Court issued a certificate of no return before the transcript in this appeal was docketed and the remittitur was issued to the court below.

Supreme Court Rule 38, § 1, allows costs to a respondent when an appeal is dismissed unless otherwise agreed by the parties or ordered by this Court. Section 3 of Rule 38 allows this Court to determine costs even after the remittitur has been issued. Costs include an attorney’s fee of $750.00. Supreme Court Rule 38, § 4.

Appellant’s motion to disallow the attorney’s fee in this case is granted. The cost of obtaining the reporter’s transcript shall be allowed.

It is so ordered.
### Faulk, Scott (OST)

From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject:



## Pamela M. Garza

Office Administrator Island Family Christian Church 3375 Salt Lake Blvd Honolulu, HI 96818 Ph: 808-422-7811 Fax: 808-422-8788 IFCCadmin <admin@islandfamily.org> Wednesday, October 30, 2013 3:44 PM 

### EAS (OSD EAS (OSD Makani Kai



### PamelaM. Garza

1**~** t. i'"'"- q.**~:5**
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 5, 2014 

# Order

August 5, 2014

149178 & ( 84 )

__________________________________________

In re RICHARD T. GORDON REVOCABLE

TRUST AGREEMENT.

__________________________________________

HUNTINGTON BANK, JUSTIN A. GORDON,

KATHLEEN L. BEATTY

- GORDON, LAUREEN

M. GORDON, KELSEY A. GORDON, and

J. RUSSELL LABARGE, JR.,

Appellees,

v

MICHAEL G. GORDON,

Appellant. SC: 149178

COA: 312884

Macomb PC: 2012

- 205162

- TV

________________________________________ _ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation to dismiss the application for leave to

appeal is GRANTED. The dismissal is with prejudice and without costs to any party.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 19, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 19, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A25I0029. DARLENE BEARDEN et al v. RIVER BEARDEN, A MINOR, BY AND 

THROUGH HIS PARENT AND LEGAL GUARDIAN STEPHANIE BEARDEN, 

INDIVIDUALLY.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

23STCV130
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

FLOYD KEMP, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

UNPUBLISHED 

June 6, 2017 

v No. 330968 

Osceola Circuit Court 

TRACY ALLEN, doing business as QUALITY 

PAINTING & POWER WASHING, 

LC No. 15-014208-CK 

 Defendant, 

and 

PIONEER STATE MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Before: BECKERING, P.J., and MARKEY and SHAPIRO, JJ. 

MARKEY, J. (concurring). 

 I concur in result only. 

/s/ Jane E. Markey
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2199

ANDREA G. BRIGGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

HAROLD M. KOENIG, VADM, Surgeon General;

DONALD F. HAGAN, VADM; RONALD I. RIDENOUR,

RADM, Commander; THOMAS K. BURKHARD, Captain,

Deputy Commander; DAVID GERVAIS, Captain; CAPTAIN MCCLERKLIN; PETER GARMS; MARK W. MATTINGLEY, CDR; DIANE M. LACKEY, LT; CHARLES A.

PHILLIPS, JR.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA95-3064-CCB)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 13, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrea G. Briggs, Appellant Pro Se. Donna Carol Sanger, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting summary

judgment to the Defendants on her employment discrimination action

brought pursuant to the Civil Service Reform Act, 5 U.S.C. § 1221

(1994), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.

§ 2000e (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Briggs v. Dalton,

No. CA-95-3064-CCB (D. Md. Apr. 15 and July 8, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4030 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Triethylenediamine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2009 

Mr. DENT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Triethylenediamine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIETHYLENEDIAMINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Triethylenediamine (CAS No. 

280–57–9) (provided for in 

subheading 2933.59.70) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4030 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
1

Whalen, Marilyn

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 7:27 PM

To: Richard Takaba (richard.takaba@doh.hawaii.gov); roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov

Cc: stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov; Christiansen, Steven H CIV NAVFAC HI, PRP41; Kishaba, 

Raelynn I CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Shimabuku, June T. CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Tsutsui, Bruce 

O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3; Lovgren, Andrew C LT NAVSUP, 700; Linder, Steven; Pallarino, 

Bob; Tsutsui, Bruce O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3; Nakamura, Peter M CIV NAVFAC HI, EV1; 

Mizuno, Arleen M CIV NAVFAC HI, PRJ412

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - JULY 22, 2014

Importance: High

Hi Richard/Roxanne:

I apologize for the lateness of this week's report.   

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of July 22, 2014.  In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will be

annotated.

1. Preliminary Work Plan  

a. Item 1‐ Models to estimate downward vertical migration of free product.

b. Item 2 ‐ Methods or options for non‐invasive scanning of basalt to determine area and volume of contaminant

mass prior to any drilling investigation.

c. Item 3 ‐ Methods and locations for borings to most efficiently characterize the extent of contamination.

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable)

a. Action 1 ‐ Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation

of release point(s) within Tank 5.

b. Action 2 ‐ The rate of vertical migration for the released JP‐8 free product is unknown.  Information from the

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration.  This information is necessary to

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination.  Prepare models for petroleum JP‐8 releases of 10,000,

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5.  Progress in developing

these models should be included in the preliminary work plan.

c. Action 3 ‐ Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of

the released JP‐8 free product.  Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased

monitoring are required to address this plume.

d. Action 4 ‐ Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future

releases from the USTs within the Complex.  This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete.  

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical.

The Navy participated in the public informational meeting at Radford High School on 15 July 2014.

The Draft Work Plan for Installation of Two Sentinel Wells was submitted to the DOH on 16 July 2014.   
2

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Vr,

Aaron
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3673 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain liquid-filled glass 

bulbs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2009 

Ms. SCHWARTZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

liquid-filled glass bulbs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LIQUID-FILLED GLASS BULBS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.26 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain liquid-filled glass bulbs) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2012’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3673 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
& b 8

6 œ

>

œ

>

œ

> œ.>

Allegro

f

œ œ

>

œ

>

œ.

> œ œ>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

For ceremonial version,

jump to m.100, 2nd beat

j fi œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ. 5 8 13 8 21 8 29 8

& b Œ j

œ

.

œ

. œ

. œ.

37

F

Str. Mute

 ̇. Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ

.  ̇.

4

Œ j

œ

.

œ

. œ

. œ.

45

F  ̇. Œ j

œ

. œ. œ

. œ

. j

œ

.

‰ ‰ Œ.

& b ‰ œ

. œ. œ. Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ

.  ̇. j

œ

‰ ‰ Œ. 3 53

œ

.

œ

. œ. œ. ‰

œ

. œ. œ. œ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇.

& b j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. !

61

‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ! ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. ‰

œ

. œ. œ. ‰ œ

. œ. œ j

œ

.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ.

& b Œ j

œ

.

œ

. œ

. œ.

69 Open

p  ̇. Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ

.  ̇.

4

Œ j

œ

.

œ

. œ

. œ.

77

p  ̇. Œ j

œ

. œ. œ

. œ

. j

œ

.

‰ ‰ Œ.

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Official Song of the National Guard Bureau

3rd Bb Trumpet Words and Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

40th Army Band

& b ‰ œ

. œ. œ. Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ

.  ̇. j

œ

‰ ‰ Œ. 85 3

œ

.

œ

. œ. œ. ‰

œ

. œ. œ. œ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ.

& b  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. !

93

‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ! ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. ‰ œ

. œ. œ. ‰ œ

. œ. œ j

œ

.  ̇.

& b

fi

j

œ ‰ ‰

œ.

>

Ceremonial version,

from m.4

f

 ̇.

>

101

œ. œ.

>  ̇.

>

j

œ ‰ ‰ œ

- œ œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>

& b  ̇.

>

109

œ. œ

- œ œ œ. œ. œ ‰ œ

- œ- j

œ

- œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>  ̇.

>

117

& b œ j

œ

> œ

>

j

œ

>  ̇.> œ ‰ œ

- œ- j

œ

- œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>  ̇.>

125

œ œ

> œ>

œ

> œ

> œ>

& b  ̇.

>

j

œ ‰ ‰ œ

>

j

œ

- œ.

> œ.> œ.

> œ.> œ.

>

œ

> œ>

ƒ 2

œ.

>

œ

> œ>

2

œ

> j

œ

> œ

> œ

>

2

j

œ

v

‰ ‰ Œ.

2 ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

-3rd Bb Trumpet-
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3645 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3645

    To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to 
 reauthorize a provision relating to additional contract authority for 
                    States with Indian reservations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2009

Mrs. Kirkpatrick of Arizona (for herself, Mr. Matheson, and Mr. Lujan) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to 
 reauthorize a provision relating to additional contract authority for 
                    States with Indian reservations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Indian School Bus Route Safety 
Reauthorization Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL CONTRACT AUTHORITY FOR STATES 
              WITH INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

    Section 1214(d)(5)(A) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st 
Century (23 U.S.C. 202 note; 112 Stat. 206; 119 Stat. 1460) is amended 
by striking ``$1,800,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009'' 
and inserting ``$2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 
2015''.
                                 <all>
```