alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


[GT Solar International, Inc.
Letterhead]


 


[Date]


[Executive Officer Name]


GT Solar International, Inc.


243 Daniel Webster Highway


Merrimack, NH 
03054


 


Dear [                          ]:


 


We are providing this letter
to you to confirm your rights under Article Eight of the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of GT Solar International, Inc. (the “Company”)
as in effect as of the date hereof (the “Company Indemnity Provisions”).  In consideration of your prior and continuing
service to the Company, the Company agrees that your rights under the Company
Indemnity Provisions to be indemnified to the full extent authorized by law and
to advancement of expenses are contract rights that shall be incorporated into
this letter agreement.  The Company
further confirms that your rights under the Company Indemnity Provisions shall continue
after you cease to be an officer of the Company.  Any repeal or modification of the Company
Indemnity Provisions shall be prospective only and shall not in any way
diminish your rights or the Company’s obligations under the Company Indemnity
Provisions with respect to any proceeding arising out of, or relating to, any
actions, transactions or facts occurring prior to the final adoption of such
repeal or modification.  This letter
agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware and may not be
amended or modified except by an instrument in writing signed by both parties
hereto.


 


If you agree with the
foregoing, please acknowledge by executing a copy of this letter and returning
it to the Company.


 


	
   

  	
  Very
  truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  GT
  SOLAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title;

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted
  and Agreed to:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09202]



[[Page 22116]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for 
Source Categories

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 63, Sec. Sec.  
63.1 to 63.599, revised as of July 1, 2014, on page 478, in Sec.  
63.343, paragraph (c)(5)(ii) is correctly revised to read as follows:


Sec.  63.343  Compliance provisions. [Corrected]

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (5) * * *
    (ii) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is 
required to be completed under Sec.  63.7, the owner or operator of an 
affected source shall monitor the surface tension of the electroplating 
or anodizing bath. Operation of the affected source at a surface 
tension greater than the value established during the performance test, 
or greater than 40 dynes/cm, as measured by a stalagmometer, or 33 
dynes/cm, as measured by a tensiometer, if the owner or operator is 
using this value in accordance with paragraph (c)(5)(i) of this 
section, shall constitute noncompliance with the standards. The surface 
tension shall be monitored according to the following schedule:
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-09202 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-P
**Docket No. F AA**  **- 2013**  **- 0543**
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT


TO


2003 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN


 (AS AMENDED IN 2006 WITH THE
ADOPTION OF THE 2006 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN)


OF


CHEROKEE INC.


a Delaware corporation


 


The
undersigned, Russell J. Riopelle, hereby certifies that:


 


1.             He is the duly
elected and acting Chief Financial Officer of Cherokee Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”).


 


2.             Section 12.2(d) of the Company’s
2003 Incentive Award Plan (as amended in 2006 with the adoption of the
Company’s 2006 Incentive Award Plan) (the “Plan”) is amended
and restated to read in its entirety as follows:


 


“(d) Notwithstanding any provision in this
Plan to the contrary but except as otherwise permitted by Section 12.3 of
the Plan, the following actions shall require stockholder approval: (i) the
reduction of the exercise price of any Option or Stock Appreciation Right
granted under the Plan or (ii) the cancellation of an Option or Stock
Appreciation Right at a time when its exercise price exceeds the Fair Market
Value of the underlying shares of Common Stock, in exchange for another Option,
Stock Appreciation Right, other Award or cash payment.  Notwithstanding
the foregoing, canceling an Option or Stock Appreciation Right in exchange for
another Option, Stock Appreciation Right or other Award with an exercise price
or purchase price that is equal to or greater than the exercise price of the
original Option shall not be subject to stockholder approval.”


 


3.             Except as set
forth herein, the 2003 Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


Dated:
June 4, 2010


 


 


	
   

  	
  /s/
  Russell J. Riopelle

  
	
   

  	
  Russell
  J. Riopelle, Chief Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4157 

To repeal the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to extend the 

Troubled Asset Relief Program and return all unobligated funds to 

reduce the public debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2009 

Mr. TIAHRT (for himself, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. INGLIS, and Mr. 

SOUDER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To repeal the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury 

to extend the Troubled Asset Relief Program and return 

all unobligated funds to reduce the public debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensure TARP Expires 

5 Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TARP EXTENSION AUTHORITY. 

7 Section 120 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization 

8 Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5230) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) TERMINATION.—’’; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4157 IH

1 (2) by striking subsection (b); and 

2 (3) in title I, by adding at the end the following 

3 new section: 

4 ‘‘SEC. 137. REMAINING UNOBLIGATED FUNDS TO BE USED 

5 TO REDUCE PUBLIC DEBT. 

6 ‘‘The Secretary shall transfer all unobligated funds 

7 under section 120 of the Emergency Economic Stabiliza8 tion Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5230) to reduce the public 

9 debt.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### Williman *vs.*Petrie.

1785.

CASE XXII.

B, B. p. *79.*

Master to en-quire and report what property was wasted after judgment at law.

Security bond to stand'*'’ as a pledge for the sux\ wasted.

On motion of Mr. Edward Rutledge, and after hearing arguments on both sides ordered, that it be referred to the master to enquire and report what property, bound by the execution obtained by complainant Williman at law, against the estate of the said Edmund Petrie, has been made away with, between the time of the granting and the dissolution of the injunction, in this case; and that the bond given by Dr. James Clitherall do stand as a security for the payment of the value of such property, and the costs of suit in this court; and that on payment thereof in January next, the said bond be delivered up to said James Clitherall, to be cancelled.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

David H. Brown, Chief Executive Officer and Joseph E. Riordan, Chief Financial
Officer of Valley Community Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), each certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1.   the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
     (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.   the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 4, 2003

                                                           By /s/ David H. Brown
                                                              ------------------
                                                                  David H. Brown
                                                                   President and
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                                        By /s/ Joseph E. Riordan
                                                           ---------------------
                                                               Joseph E. Riordan
                                                    Executive Vice President and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                      -27-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

d0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

137434(20) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137434 

 COA: 286317 

Wayne CC: 93-000581-FC 

LEWIS AARON NIXON, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 23, 

2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4238 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4238

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  930 39th Avenue in Greeley, Colorado, as the ``W.D. Farr Post Office 
                               Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. W.D. FARR POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 930 39th Avenue in Greeley, Colorado, shall be known and 
designated as the ``W.D. Farr Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``W.D. Farr 
Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT A

Case: 1:17-cv-00754-DRC Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 11/08/17 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 92
Case: 1:17-cv-00754-DRC Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 11/08/17 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 93
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3975 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3975

    To require the National Transportation Safety Board to include 
 affordable alternative recommendations and corrective actions in its 
                                reports.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2009

 Ms. Norton (for herself, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Moran of Virginia, 
Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Edwards of Maryland, and Mr. Connolly of Virginia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the National Transportation Safety Board to include 
 affordable alternative recommendations and corrective actions in its 
                                reports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AFFORDABLE INTERIM RECOMMENDATIONS.

    Section 1116 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(c) Affordable Interim Recommendations.--In the reports submitted 
pursuant to subsections (a) and (b), if the Board recommends 
replacement of major equipment or operating systems that require 
significant funding or time, the Board shall also include, if 
available, safe interim recommendations and corrective actions that a 
State or local governmental authority is able to afford and implement 
in a timely manner.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

JOHN FASTRICH, et al., 

 

Plaintiffs, 

-vGREAT AMERICAN FINANCIAL 

RESOURCES, INC., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 1:17-cv-615 

Judge Susan J. Dlott 

MEDIATION STATUS REPORT 

Pursuant to the Court’s November 30, 2017 Order, the undersigned reports that the 

parties participated in a mediation on January 26, 2017. A resolution of this case was not 

reached. 

Plaintiffs’ counsel has seen and concurs with the content of this filing. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Brian P. Muething 

James R. Matthews (0043979) 

Brian P. Muething (0076315) 

Jacob D. Rhode (0089636) 

KEATING MUETHING & KLEKAMP, PLL 

One E. 4th Street, Suite 1400 

Cincinnati, OH 45202 

Phone: (513) 579-6400 

Fax: (513) 579-6457 

jmatthews@kmklaw.com 

bmuething@kmklaw.com 

jrhode@kmklaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Great American 

Financial Resources, Inc.

Case: 1:17-cv-00615-SJD Doc #: 15 Filed: 01/30/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 72
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on January 30, 2018, I caused true and correct copies of the foregoing to be 

filed electronically using the Court’s CM/ECF system and to therefore be served upon all 

registered participants identified in the Notice of Electronic Filing in this matter on this date. 

This document is available for viewing and downloading on the CM/ECF system. 

 /s/ Brian P. Muething 

 Brian P. Muething 

8169749.1 

Case: 1:17-cv-00615-SJD Doc #: 15 Filed: 01/30/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 73
##### 



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from to
 Commission File No.: 0-27338
 ATARI, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    13-3689915(State or Other Jurisdiction of
    
    (I.R.S. EmployerIncorporation or Organization)
    
    Identification No.)
 417 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016
  Registrants telephone number, including area code: (212) 726-6500
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value
 o þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o
  o þ o
  o þ




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE
  SIGNATURE
  ATARI, INC.By:
    
    /s/ David R. PierceName: David R. PierceTitle:   Chief Executive OfficerDate:   March 20, 2007




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 31.1
    
    Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1
    
    Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
AO 456s (Rev. 8/01) Notice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

United States of America,

Case Number: 1:17cr104-1

V.

Judge Susan J. Dlott

Amit Patel

NOTICE

TAKE NOTICE that the SENTENCING in this case has been SET for the place, date, and time set

forth below:

PLACE ROOM NO.

Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouse Courtroom #7 (Room 117)

100 East Fifth Street DATE AND TIME

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 February 7, 2019 at 9:30 a.m.

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Any sentencing memorandum may be filed no later than 28 days prior to sentencing;

2. If such memorandum is filed, the opposing side may file a memorandum in opposition no later than 21 days 

 prior to sentencing;

3. Motions under U.S.S.C. § 3553(e) or U.S.S.C. §5K1.1 must be filed at least 14 days prior to sentencing.

RICH NAGEL, CLERK

___s/William Miller_______________

William Miller

Case Manager

(513) 564-7630

You can obtain all the pretrial procedures and forms used by the Judge by visiting our website at

www.ohsd.uscourts.gov

Click on Judges and then on Procedures and Forms beside the Judge’s address.

If you do not have the ability to access the Website for the Judge’s procedures and forms, please contact me.

Case: 1:17-cr-00104-SJD Doc #: 116 Filed: 10/01/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 322
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Docket No. 3:17CR182-001

)
)
)
vs. )
Christopher Paul Murphy

)

AMENDED ORDER EXTENDING THE FINAL DISCLOSURE OF THE

PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT

The date for submission of the Final Presentence Report is February 20, 2018.

2-14.19 LP

Date The Honorable Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
Exhibit
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Paul S. Lipschutz, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(4)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and will be retained by Collectible Concepts
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.





Date:
                February 22, 2008
            By:*/s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ*Paul
                S. LipschutzPrincipal
                Financial Officer
9/26/2017

Case: 2:17-cv-00841-EAS-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/26/17 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: 29

Case: 2:17-cv-00841-EAS-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/26/17 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: 30
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.

|    |                                       | 
|--- | ------------------------------------- | 
|By: | /s/ STEPHEN WONG                      | 
|    |                                       | 
|    | Stephen Wong                          | 
|    | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | Date: August 11, 2003                 |
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 08**  **- 7860** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. TRONE LAMON DONELL FRANCIS , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville
. Lacy H. Thornburg , District Judge. ( 1:99

- cr - 00114

- LHT

- 1 )

Submitted : March 3, 2011 Decided: April 1, 2011

Before MOTZ and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Trone Lamon Donell Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Tr one Lamon Donell Francis appeals the district
court ’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Se e United States v. Legree , 205 F.3d 724, 728

- 29 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v. Francis , No. 1:99

- cr - 00114

- LHT

- 1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials b efore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED