alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Vertical Optics LLC 

Jerry Gallegos

1531 NE 7th St. 

Redmond OR 97756 

559.232.8041 

JerryG0612@gmail.com

March 9, 2016

U.S. Department of 

Transportation Docket 

Management System 1200 New 

Jersey Ave., SE Washington, 

D.C. 20590

Re: Docket FAA 2015-5333, Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 14521 

Dear Sir/Madam,

Vertical Optics LLC, received FAA Exemption No. 14521 on January 28, 2016 authorizing Vertical Optics LLC under

section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to operate its unmanned aircraft system 

(UAS), the 3DR SOLO, for various commercial purposes. In this petition for an amendment to Exemption 

No. 14521, Vertical Optics LLC requests to operate multiple additional UAS’s for the same purposes. 

The UAS’s are: 

1. DJI Spread Wings 900 (S900)

2. DJI Spread Wings 1000 (S1000) 

3. DJI Inspire 1 

4. DJI Phantom 3 

5. DJI Phantom 4

These drones operate at or beyond the safety operational parameters of our current UAS, the 3DR Solo.

These drones offer exceptional flight safety characteristics and will be operated utilizing the same 

safety procedures that Vertical Optics LLC currently performs when operating the 3DR Solo.

Vertical Optics LLC will comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed in Exemption 14521 except that

condition/limitation will need to be revised to include the UAS's listed above. The list of “operating documents” will also 

need to be revised to include operating manuals for all of these UAS’s. Due to file sizes, these documents can be 

provided separately or by hyperlink if requested by the FAA. Other than these revisions, there will be no change in the 

conditions and reasons relative to public safety that were the basis for the initial grant of exemption.

Because the requested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise any new issues, and all UAS's listed 

above have been approved in other/prior exceptions, Vertical Optics LLC respectfully requests the FAA to determine that 

good cause exists to grant the requested amendment by summary means.

Sincerely,

Jerry Galegos (Owner)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gordon Quick, President and Chief Executive Officer of Daleen Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1)  the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
     "Form 10-K"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 28, 2003


/s/ GORDON QUICK
--------------------------
Gordon Quick
President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Daleen Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Daleen
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, J. Scott Kamsler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 5, 2004/s/ J. SCOTT KAMSLERJ. Scott Kamsler Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3884 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3884

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 9, 10-Anthracenedione, 1-amino-4-
                          hydroxy-2-phenoxy-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 9, 10-Anthracenedione, 1-amino-4-
                          hydroxy-2-phenoxy-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 9, 10-ANTHRACENEDIONE, 1-AMINO-4-HYDROXY-2-PHENOXY-.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      9, 10-              Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Anthracenedione,                                                   31/2011.......
                        1-amino-4-hydroxy-
                        2-phenoxy-(CAS
                        No. 17418-58-5)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2921.59.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                  18 USC, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
             Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tekron, Inc.(Company) on Form
10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (Report), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date hereof, I, Luigi Brun, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 USC 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 and promulgated as 18 USC 1350 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report referenced above has been read and reviewed by the undersigned.

2)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

3)   The Report referenced above does not contain any untrue statement of a
     material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to makes
     the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading.

4)   I acknowledge that the management of the Company is solely responsible for
     the fair presentation in the financial statements of the financial
     position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company in conformity
     with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
     America.

     Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other such financial
     information included in the report, fairly present the financial condition
     and results of operations of Tekron, Inc. as of and for the period ended
     June 30, 2002.

     In my opinion, the accompanying interim financial statements, prepared in
     accordance with the instructions for Form 10-QSB, are unaudited and contain
     all material adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments
     necessary to present fairly the financial condition, results of operations
     and cash flows of the Company for the respective interim periods presented.
     The current period results of operations are not necessarily indicative of
     results which ultimately will be reported for the full fiscal year ending
     March 31, 2003.

     Additionally, I acknowledge that the Company's Board of Directors and
     Management are solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices,
     establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and
     preventing and detecting fraud. The Company's system of internal accounting
     control is designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded
     transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3)
     transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to
     produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition,
     results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective
     periods being presented.


/s/ Luigi Brun
--------------
Luigi Brun
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 22, 2002
#### Frederick Schroeder, Appl’t, *v.*Theresa Ennis, Resp’t.

*(City Court of Brooklyn, General Term,*

*Filed December 27,*1886.)

Practice — Jurisdiction — When court of equity will retain an action.

The mere allegation in the complaint of grounds of equitable jurisdiction is not sufficient to call upon the court to exercise its equity jurisdiction. There must be facts shown sufficient to make out a case for equitable cognizance before the court will retain the case, and before jurisdiction attaches for the purpose of giving complete relief.

Appeal from a judgment entered at special term in favor of defendant.

*Edward P. Wilder,*for appl’t; *William E. Shields,*for resp’t.

Reynolds, J.

The plaintiff invokes the equity jurisprudence of this court, to compel the specific performance of an alleged agreement to execute a lease of certain premises, and to enjoin the defendant from taking summary proceedings to remove him from the premises, as holding over after the expiration of his tenancy.

The testimony is contradictory as to the making of any such agreement as the plaintiff sets up, and the court has found against the plaintiff. The trial judge had the best opportunity of determining the disputed question of fact, and we cannot well interfere with his finding.

This disposes of all ground of equitable relief, and leads to a dismissal of the complaint.

The plaintiff contends, however, that the defendant, by accepting the rent for the month of May, 1886, virtually renewed the lease for another year, and that the plaintiff was entitled to remain on that ground, The court has found that the letting was by the month, but if the plaintiff’s position be conceded, it would have been available as á defense in the summary proceeding, and therefore presents no ground for the interposition of this court. It was argued that the court having once obtained equitable jurisdiction of the case, should retain it for the purpose of deciding all the questions and doing justice between the parties. If this be so, all that a party need do, to transfer his litigation to a court of equity, is to *allege*grounds of equitable jurisdiction, and upon the trial come in with a purely legal cause of action or defense. It must be the *facts*and not the *allegations*which. *882call upon tbe court to exercise its equity jurisdiction. It is true, that if the facts make out a case for equitable cognizance, the court may retain the case, so that jurisdiction rightfully attaches- for the purpose of giving complete relief, even though some part of such relief might have .been obtained in a court of law. According to the finding in the case, however, the plaintiff never had a case for submission to a court of equity, and as to his alleged legal defense to the action of his landlord, he had his opportunity before the appropriate tribunal.

We think the judgment should be affirmed, with costs of appeal.

CLEMENT, J., concurs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                             3,420
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                     21,654
<ALLOWANCES>                        (166)
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  26,980
<PP&E>                           355,597
<DEPRECIATION>                  (119,248)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   286,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             24,877
<BONDS>                          209,409
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            1
<COMMON>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                        51,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     286,046
<SALES>                           83,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  84,368
<CGS>                             31,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     52,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    (756)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                17,139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   15,847
<INCOME-TAX>                       5,865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       9,982
<EPS-BASIC>                         0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.31


</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

d1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

139308

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139308 COA: 285140 Oakland CC: 2007-218133-FC CHERYL BEAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 26, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 23.0 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS






We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses 
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-33414 
and 33-42182) of Exabyte Corporation of our report dated January 16, 1997 
appearing on page 38 of this Form 10-K.




/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
------------------------
PRICE WATERHOUSE	LLP


Boulder, Colorado
March 20, 1997
# lnventoryExpertService A division o f the American Chemical Society Pho ne: 800-631-1884, 6 14- 447-3870 Fax: 614-447-3747 E- mail: answe rs@cas.o rg Web : www. cas.org/products/othe r-cas-products/cl ient-services/

CAS 

### INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT IES-ORDER NUMBER: 142505 REGISTRY NUMBER : 1160164-88-4 CA INDEX NAME Alcohols, C18-22' distn. residues DEFINITION The residuum from the disti l lation of the products from the catalytic hydrogenation of rape oil fatty acids . It consists of predominantly of C22 through C24 alcohols and C32 through C45 esters. It boils in the range of greater than 220oc (428°F) at 3.75 mm Hg.

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

# 0 If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order . Please make the same correction(s) to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.

2540 O l e ntangy Riv e r Road P.O . Box 33 43 Co lu m b u s, OH 4 32 1 0 - 0334 US A
Exhibit 32.2


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael A. Knox, the Chief Financial Officer of Resolve  Staffing,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A  of the  Company  for the  fiscal
      quarter  ended  March 31,  2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
      requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.



Dated: August 16, 2004



                                        /s/ Michael A. Knox
                                        Name: Michael A. Knox
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Westergaard.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2009,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Anne H. Straton, President
and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.








Date:
March 13, 2009





/s/  Anne H.
Straton


Anne H. Straton,


President
and


Principal
Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spear & Jackson, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Dated:   February  7 2003                /s/ Dennis Crowley
                                            -----------------------
                                            Dennis Crowley
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Dated:   February  7 2003                /s/William Fletcher
                                            -----------------------
                                            William Fletcher
                                            Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

 

Keron D. Simpson, 

Petitioner, 

 Case No. 3:17-cv-299 

v. Judge Thomas M. Rose 

 Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

Warren Lebanon Correctional Institution, 

Respondent. 

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

MERZ (ECF 21), OVERRULING PETITIONER=S OBJECTIONS (ECF 19, 

24) TO MAGISTRATE=S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND 

DISMISSING THE PETITION WITH PREJUDICE. (ECF 1). 

On March 13, 2018, Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz filed a Report and 

Recommendation, (ECF 18), suggesting that the Court dismiss Petitioner Keron D. Simpson’s 

Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ECF 1). On March 20, 2018, Petitioner filed Objection to 

the Magistrate=s Report and Recommendations. (ECF 19). The matter was recommitted to the 

Magistrate Judge for further review. (ECF 20). On March 28, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued 

a supplemental report and recommendation, that reaches the same conclusion as before. (ECF 21). 

Petitioner again objects. (ECF 24). 

As required by 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court 

has made a de novo review of the record in this case, taking into consideration both of Petitioner’s 

objections. Upon said review, the Court finds that Plaintiff=s Objections, (ECF 19, 24), to the 
2 

Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendations, (ECF 18, 21), are not well taken and is hereby 

OVERRULED. Wherefore, the Court ADOPTS IN FULL the Magistrate Judge=s Reports and 

Recommendations. (ECF 18, 21). The Petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. Because 

reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner is denied a certificate of 

appealability and the Court CERTIFIES to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively 

frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. 

DONE and ORDERED this Wednesday, June 13, 2018. 

s/Thomas M. Rose 

 ________________________________ 

THOMAS M. ROSE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4200 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4200

To prepare a feasibility study and implement demonstration projects to 
         restore the San Gabriel River Watershed in California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 3, 2009

 Ms. Chu (for herself, Mr. Schiff, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, 
Ms. Roybal-Allard, and Mrs. Napolitano) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prepare a feasibility study and implement demonstration projects to 
         restore the San Gabriel River Watershed in California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``San Gabriel Watershed Restoration 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED RESTORATION, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the County of 
Los Angeles, shall--
            (1) prepare a feasibility study for environmental ecosystem 
        restoration, flood control, water quality control, water supply 
        storage, outdoor recreation enhancements, and other aspects of 
        the San Gabriel River Watershed revitalization that is 
        consistent with the goals of the San Gabriel River master plan 
        published by the County of Los Angeles; and
            (2) identify demonstration projects for construction and 
        restoration of the San Gabriel River Watershed.
    (b) Demonstration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to construct 
        demonstration projects in order to provide information to 
        develop the study under subsection (a)(1).
            (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of any 
        project under this subsection shall be not more than 65 
        percent.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $50,000,000.
                                 <all>
```