alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB693]


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of webconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Bering 
Sea Fishery Ecosystem Plan Climate Change Taskforce will meet January 
18, 2022 through January 20, 2022.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 18, 2022, through 
Thursday, January 20, 2022, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Alaska Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be a webconference. Join online through the 
link at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2734.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 1007 W 
3rd Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501-2252; telephone: (907) 271-2809. 
Instructions for attending the meeting are given under SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION, below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Diana Stram, Council staff; phone: 
(907) 271-2809 and email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a4e434b444b04595e584b476a44454b4b044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="73171a121d125d000701121e331d1c12125d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>. For technical support, 
please contact our administrative staff; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7d9c7d1dad499d6d3daded9f7d9d8d6d699d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="442a342229276a2520292d2a042a2b25256a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

Tuesday, January 18, 2022 Through Thursday, January 20, 2022

    The agenda will include: (a) Key risks; (b) adaptation tools--
feasibility and effectiveness evaluation; (c) conceptual model update; 
(d) continued indicator development; (e) status and development of 
climate ready-assessment; and (f) other business. The agenda is subject 
to change, and the latest version will be posted at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2734 prior to the meeting, along 
with meeting materials.

Connection Information

    You can attend the meeting online using a computer, tablet, or 
smart phone; or by phone only. Connection information will be posted 
online at: https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2734.

Public Comment

    Public comment letters will be accepted and should be submitted 
electronically to https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2734.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 30, 2021.
Diane M. DeJames-Daly,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-28593 Filed 1-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CO\5654802.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Bonnie J. Rueber, :

Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:17-cv-00822

v. :

Pilot Dogs, Inc., et al., :

Defendants. :

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for 

Plaintiff Bonnie J. Rueber and Defendants Pilot Dogs, Inc. and John J. Gray that the aboveentitled action be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Ohio Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(A)(1)(b), without attorneys’ fees or costs to any party, and waiving all rights of 

appeal.

Dated: October 16, 2017

/s/ Jason E. Dawicke

Dawicke Law, LLC

P.O. Box 21354

Columbus, Ohio 43221

Telephone: (614) 477-7301

Facsimile: 888-858-3063

Email: jdawicke@dawickelaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiff Bonnie E. Rueber

/s/ Angela M. Courtwright

Angela M. Courtwright (0077785)

ICE MILLER LLP

250 West Street

Columbus, Ohio 43215

Telephone: (614) 462-1084

Facsimile: (614) 221-3218

Email: angela.courtwright@icemiller.com

Counsel for Defendants Pilot Dogs, Inc. and John J. 

Gray 

Case: 2:17-cv-00822-GCS-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 10/16/17 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 13
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph W. Kaufmann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 13, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JOSEPH W.
KAUFMANN
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  | Joseph W. Kaufmann     
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  | Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50308 Conference Calendar

BASIL UZOMA ONYIDO, Petitioner-Appellant, versus LUIS GARCIA, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-97-CV-402-H

- - - - - - - - - - August 18, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Basil Uzoma Onyido appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his habeas petition. Onyido challenges his detention order and also, for the first time on appeal, challenges his deportation order. The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Under the Immigration and Naturalization Act, a federal court may not review an order of deportation until the alien has exhausted all applicable administrative remedies. 8 U.S.C.No. 98-50308 -2- § 1105a(c). The exhaustion requirement is statutorily mandated, and is jurisdictional. Townsend v. United States Dep't of Justice INS , 799 F.2d 179, 181 (5th Cir. 1986). Because Onyido has not exhausted his administrative remedies with regard to the challenge to his deportation order, this court lacks jurisdiction to review this issue. The amendments to the immigration laws, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009., have significantly curtailed this court’s jurisdiction over immigration cases. See Witter v. INS , 113 F.3d 549, 552 n.4 (5th Cir. 1997). 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e), as amended by IIRIRA, precludes federal-court jurisdiction to review the Attorney General’s discretionary determinations over an alien’s custody status. The effective date of IIRIRA is April 1,
1997. See IIRIRA § 303(b)(1), 309(a). AEDPA provisions relating to immigration are retroactive. See Okoro v. INS , 125 F.3d 920, 923-24 (5th Cir. 1997); Mendez-Rosas v. INS , 87 F.3d 672, 676 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 694 (1997). Onyido filed his habeas petition on September 30, 1997 -- after the effective date of § 1226(e). Thus, the district court did not err in finding that it lacked jurisdiction over Onyido’s detention order. Likewise, this court lacks jurisdiction to review this issue. Onyido has also filed a motion for an emergency injunctive release order, a motion for oral argument, a motion for expeditedNo. 98-50308 -3- ruling, a motion to file a supplemental brief, and a motion for a conference. In light of the dismissal of Onyido’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction, his motions are DENIED. The appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED.

APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Faraj Aalaei, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|Date: November 8, 2006 | Faraj Aalaei Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------

---
TYPE:  EX-23.2

BUSINESS TRANSLATION SERVICES, INC.

EXHIBIT 23.2 Consent of Experts and Counsel

G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
330 E. Warm Springs
Las Vegas, NV 89119
702.528.1984
425.928.2877 (efax)


August 1, 2000


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report of
August 1, 2000, on the Financial Statements of Business Translation Services,
Inc. for the six months ending June 30, 2000, in any filings which are
necessary now or in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and
Exchange Commission.

Signed,

/s/ G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
--------------------------
Nevada License #2701

<PAGE>
Exhibit
10.13

    


    Amendment
No. 4 To Employment Agreement

    


    Amendment No. 4, dated as of November
10, 2009, by and between The Berkshire Bank, a New York banking corporation
("Employer"), and Moses Krausz ("Employee"), to the Agreement, dated as of May
1, 1999, between Employer and Employee
(the "Employment Agreement").

    


    WITNESSETH:

    


    WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered
into the Employment Agreement; and

    


    WHEREAS, Employer and Employee wish the
amend the terms of the Employment Agreement with respect to the term
thereof.

    


    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
covenants herein contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows:

    


    1.           Paragraph
3 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              "3.

            	
              Term
      of Employment.  The employment by Employer of Employee pursuant
      hereto shall commence as of the date hereof and, subject to the provisions
      of paragraph 4 hereof, shall terminate on April 30, 2012; provided,
      however, that Employee's employment hereunder shall be automatically
      renewed for up to three additional periods of one year each unless
      Employee or Employer notifies the other, not less than 60 days nor more
      than 90 days prior to the expiration of Employee's then current employment
      period, that he or it elects not to extend Employee's employment hereunder
      beyond the expiration date of the then current employment
      period."

            


    

    


    2. The increases in Employee's base
salary set forth in Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be applicable
for the periods of employment May 1, 2010 to April 30, 2011 and May 1, 2011 to
April 30, 2012, respectively, and, if the Employee's employment is extended
beyond April 30, 2012 as set forth in the amended Paragraph 3, for each year
thereafter.

    


    3. Except as otherwise amended hereby,
the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect unamended from
and after the date hereof.

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No.
4 has been executed and delivered by the parties hereto as of the date first
above written.

    


    
      
        	 
      	
                THE
      BERKSHIRE BANK

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                By:

              	
                /s/ Moses Marx

              
	 
      	 
      	
                Moses
      Marx

              
	 
      	 
      	
                Chairman
      of the Board

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                /s/ Moses Krausz

              
	 
      	 
      	
                MOSES
      KRAUSZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-cv-722 (WOB-KLL)

DANIEL BRONSON PETITIONER

VS. JUDGMENT

WARDEN, WARREN CORRECTIONAL

NSTITUTION RESPONDENT

This matter is before the Court on the Report and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 2), 

and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by 

Petitioner (Doc. 3), and the Court being sufficiently advised, 

IT IS ORDERED that the objections (Doc. 3) to the Report 

and Recommendation (Doc. 2) be, and hereby are, overruled. That

the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 2)

be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and 

conclusions of law of this Court; that petitioner’s Petition for 

a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 2),

is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability 

shall not issue with respect to the claims alleged in the 

petition. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any application by 
petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis would be not 

be taken in “good faith.” 

This 22nd day of January, 2018.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00554

- CR

Tywron Pierre Thomas a/k/a Tyrone

Pierre Thomas

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 4

o f Tarrant County (1195093D )

March 26, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(p)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

t he trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot

______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
Ja\ SED STq TFS UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY



### ~ ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 z =

0 q< PfiOS

~ G

~

\



### SEP 15 2'Ut O
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Donald C. Gadbury Director, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221
Dear Mr. Gadbllry:
We received your letter dated September 14, 2010, requesting the U.S. Environmental I'rotection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft re-certification memo the Carlsbad Fielci Office (CBFO) plans to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E). We concur with CBFO's draft re-certification memo allowing ANL-E CCP to add to the previously-certified AERHDM waste stream approximately 30 55-gallon containers of remote-handled (RH) debris waste from K-Wing in Building 205 at ANL-E.
In accordance with EPA regulations at 40 CFR 194.8 (69 FR 42571-42583), on January 16, 2007, EPA approved the RH TRU waste characterization program at ANI! E(See F.PA Air pocket No. A-98-49, II-A4-73).
The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of CH TRU waste are appropriately included in Attachment 4 of the draft re-certification memo. The waste characterization equipment, procedures and processes included in the ANL draft re-certification meino are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site.
Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft re-certification memo for ANL-E CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 202-343-9462.
Sincerely, 

# `-

~ 

# hvRajani Joglekar Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable . Printed wfth Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minirnurn 30% Postconsumer)cc: (Electronic Distribution)

Christine Gelles, DOE HQ Alton Harris, DOE HQ David Moody, CBFO Ed Ziemianski, CBFO Bill Mackie, CBFO Ava Holland, CBFO QA J.R. Stroble, CBFO NTP Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP Court Fesmire, CBFO NTP Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA Jonathan Edwards, EPA Tom Peake, EPA Raymond Lee, EPA Steve Zappe, NMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURUSANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2010 (the Report), I, Greg Wujek, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)       The Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.





PHYTOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:January 27, 2010
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Greg WujekGreg Wujek
President and Chief Executive Officer




This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





---
Case: 1:17-cv-00754-DRC Doc #: 74 Filed: 02/11/20 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: 1039

Case: 1:17-cv-00754-DRC Doc #: 74 Filed: 02/11/20 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: 1040

Case: 1:17-cv-00754-DRC Doc #: 74 Filed: 02/11/20 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: 1041
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6148

THADDEUS A. ELEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN B. TAYLOR,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-01-1503-AM)

Submitted: June 27, 2003 Decided: July 14, 2003

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Bernard Hargett, HARGETT & WATSON, P.L.C., Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellant. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Thaddeus A. Eley, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are

debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683

(4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Eley has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|/s/ Stephen Wong                                  
|Stephen Wong President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: January 18, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Zoran Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karl Schneider, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    KARL
SCHNEIDER             
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Karl Schneider                    
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and
|Dated: March 1, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer