**Exhibit 34.2**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors: 

The Bank of New York Mellon 

BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware 

The Bank of New York Mellon TrustCompany, N.A.: 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance with ApplicableServicing Criteria, that The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware (formerly BNYM (Delaware)) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly The Bank of New York Trust, Company, N.A.),(collectively, the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the publicly issued (i.e.,transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) asset-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006and like-kind transactions issued prior to January 1, 2006 that are subject to Regulation AB for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, paying agent services, or custodialservices, as defined and to the extent applicable in the transaction agreements, other than residential mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-relatedasset-backed securities (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi),1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. With respect toapplicable servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(vii), the Company has determined that there were no activities performed during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 with respect to the Platform, because there were nooccurrences of events that would require the Company to perform such activities. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertionabout the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the attestation standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and the attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with theservicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors mayhave occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. Webelieve that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

As described in the accompanying Company’s Assertion of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, forservicing criterion 1122(d)(2)(vi), the Company has engaged a vendor to perform the activities required by this servicing criterion. The Company has determined that this vendor is not considered a “servicer” as defined in Item 1101(j)of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criterion applicable to this vendor as permitted by the SEC’s *Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation (“C&DI”)200.06, Vendors Engaged by Servicers* (C&DI 200.06) (formerly SEC Manual Telephone Interpretation 17.06). As permitted by C&DI 200.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonableassurance that the vendor’s activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criterion applicable to the vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply C&DI 200.06 for thevendor and related criterion as described in its Assertion of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company’s eligibility to apply C&DI 200.06. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criterion 1122(d)(2)(vi)for which compliance is determined based on C&DI 200.06 as described above, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

February 26, 2016 

 
2