alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             JAN-01-1995
<CASH>                                      21,886,219              17,517,743
<SECURITIES>                                 8,448,306                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,088,046               5,741,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,879,394              23,374,531
<PP&E>                                       4,102,709               2,926,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,929,316              26,802,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,931,216              13,505,284
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0              23,999,013
<PREFERRED>                                          0                   6,113
<COMMON>                                       144,140                  18,706
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,443,335            (21,712,349)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,929,316              26,802,505
<SALES>                                     24,144,780              16,732,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                       11,866,768               7,782,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               63,177,221              15,181,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             861,610                 441,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (51,017,359)             (6,442,808)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (51,017,359)             (6,442,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.03)                   (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0151 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RICHARD HAROLD VIERECK,

Defendant and Appellant.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 20, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 12 2022

12/12/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0151
Case: 2:17-cv-00777-MHW-CMV Doc #: 4 Filed: 11/13/17 Page: 1 of 8  PAGEID #: 10

Case: 2:17-cv-00777-MHW-CMV Doc #: 4 Filed: 11/13/17 Page: 2 of 8  PAGEID #: 11

Case: 2:17-cv-00777-MHW-CMV Doc #: 4 Filed: 11/13/17 Page: 3 of 8  PAGEID #: 12

Case: 2:17-cv-00777-MHW-CMV Doc #: 4 Filed: 11/13/17 Page: 4 of 8  PAGEID #: 13

Case: 2:17-cv-00777-MHW-CMV Doc #: 4 Filed: 11/13/17 Page: 5 of 8  PAGEID #: 14

Case: 2:17-cv-00777-MHW-CMV Doc #: 4 Filed: 11/13/17 Page: 6 of 8  PAGEID #: 15

Case: 2:17-cv-00777-MHW-CMV Doc #: 4 Filed: 11/13/17 Page: 7 of 8  PAGEID #: 16

Case: 2:17-cv-00777-MHW-CMV Doc #: 4 Filed: 11/13/17 Page: 8 of 8  PAGEID #: 17
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Carlos A. Cabrera, Executive Chairman of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (a) | the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*     *     *



|                     |  |                      
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By:                  |  | /s/ Carlos A. Cabrera
|                     |  | Carlos A. Cabrera    
|                     |  | Executive Chairman   
|                    
|Date: August 8, 2013
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

|Dated: February 29, 2008 |  | /s/DEBORAH DUNSIREDeborah Dunsire
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Millennium
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR
THE PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1999
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,987,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  513,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,501,147
<PP&E>                                      26,618,929
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,542,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,627,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,627,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,627,945
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,661,170
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,743,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,014,965
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Faraj Aalaei, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|Date: May 12, 2008 | Faraj Aalaei Chief Executive Officer
|------------------ | ------------------------------------

---
#### Leona Fleur, Appellant, v Jason Croy et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 29, 1988

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Finkelstein, Borah, Schwartz, Altschuler & Goldstein, P. C. (Jeffrey R. Metz*and *Mitchell G. Bernstein*of counsel), for appellant. *Hartman, Ule, Rose & Ratner (Rose Ann Magaldi*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered November 13, 1987 affirmed, with $10 costs *(see, McAllister v Winters,*NYLJ, Mar. 13, 1987, at 12, col 1 [App Term, 1st Dept]).

Ostrau, P. J., Parness and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1
                     Certification Pursuant to Section 302
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Yao De Rong, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of New Fiber Cloth
   Technology, Inc. (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
   make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
   this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
   material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
   flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
   report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and  I  are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be  designed under our
      supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
      Registrant is made known to us, particularly during the period in which
      this quarterly report is being prepared. The Registrant has no
      consolidated or unconsolidated subsidiaries;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most
      recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
   the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board
   of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to
      record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.

/s/ YAO DE RONG                             November 14, 2006
---------------------------------------
Yao De Rong, Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,853
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                       152
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,446
<PP&E>                                           1,705
<DEPRECIATION>                                     444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,754
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              254
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,773
<SALES>                                          5,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,883
<CGS>                                              109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,457)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,177
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,489)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,902)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-21005 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICARDO ZUNIGA-RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-492-1

-------------------- August 21, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ricardo Zuniga-Ruiz (Zuniga) appeals the 21-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment. Zuniga acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue forNo. 00-21005 -2- Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001) . Zuniga’s argument is foreclosed. Zuniga also contends that the indictment is fatally defective, as a matter of constitutional law, for failing to allege general intent. This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Berrios-Centeno , 250 F.3d 294, 298-300 (5th Cir. 2001). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### 03APR1992

James

### D. Boyd Executive Officer CaliforniaAirResources Board 1102 

### “Q” Street Post Office Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812 DearMr. Boyd; On January 28, 1992, you submitted revisions to the Califor nia State Implementation Plan (SIP) for achieving and maintaining the National AmbientAir Quality Standards. These revisions in clude new and amended rules and regulations for seven districts in California. We have reviewed these rules for completeness and found that most ofthem conformto the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, AppendixV and the amendments published in the Federal Register on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216). We are now in the process ofreviewing these rules. Once reviewed, we will prepare rulemaking notices for submittal to ourHeadquarters office for publication in the Federal Register. The following rules were found to be indomplete: Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

— Rules 26 and 29. For your information, we have enclosed a copy ofour completeness checklist indicating which items were found to be incomplete. We cannot process the incomplete rules as revisions to the SIP at this time because the necessary documentationwas not sub mitted with the rules. We are returning all copies ofthe incom plete rules foryouruse in a future submittal. We did not perform a completeness review on the Kern County Air Pollution Control District (KCAPCD) Rules 202, 210.1, and 210.6. MattHaber, Chief, New Source Section, has spoken with the KCAPCD to request that they withdraw these rules because the Districtwhich adopted the rules does not exist any longer due to the unification ofthe San Joaquin Valley counties into one

# /

District. New rules will need to be adopted by the successor Districts (Kern County, Southeast Desertportion and San Joaquin Valley Unified portion). Ifyou have any questions regarding our review, please call Julie Rose ofthe Northern California, Nevada, and Hawaii Rulemaking Section in the Air and Toxics Division at 415—744— 1184. Sincerely, 

# ORIGINALs;GNEJBY: 

# DAVIDP.HOWEKAWW Daniel W. McGovern Regional Administrator Enclosures

*
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates II L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|February 14, 2011 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### NORTH CAROLINA FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Respondent v. TWIN STATES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Richard Craig, Sue S. Tadlock, Michael J. Turner, Vickie C. Turner, Cecil J. Hawes, South Carolina Employment Security Commission, C. L. Benton & Sons, Inc., Cleon Worley General Contractors, Inc., Hercules Steel Company, Inc., C. E. Edge Plumbing, Inc., Truss Builders, Inc., Truss Builders of Holly Ridge, Inc., Lowes of Myrtle Beach, of whom, C. E. Edge Plumbing, Inc., is Appellant. Appeal of C. E. EDGE PLUMBING, INC.

(347 S. E. (2d) 97)

Supreme Court

*481May 8, 1986.

ORDER

This is an appeal from an order of reference in a mortgage foreclosure action. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal, on the ground the order is not subject to immediate appeal. We grant the motion to dismiss. *See Williford v. Downs,*265 S. C. 319, 218, S. E. (2d) 242 (1975); *Collier v. Green,*244 S. C. 367, 137 S. E. (2d) 277 (1964).

In support of its motion, respondent argues that Rule 72, SCRCP, does not authorize immediate appeal of the trial court’s order.

Rule 72 reads: “Appeal may be taken, *as provided by law,*from any final judgment or order dismissing an action under these rules” (emphasis supplied).

The right of appeal arises from and is controlled by statutory law. The jurisdiction of appellate courts is prescribed by S. C. Code Ann. § 14-3-330 (1976) and is defined in numerous decisions of this Court and the Court of Appeals. Rule 82(a), SCRCP, specifically provides that “These rules shall not be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of any court of this state ...”

The jurisdictional rights of appeal continue to be controlled by S. C. Code §14-3-330.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT
CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, E. Leon Daniel, Chief Executive Officer, of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that:

(a)     the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2003 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related
interpretations; and

(b)     the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

* * *

Chief Executive Officer

|    |  |                   
|--- |  | ------------------
|By: |  | /s/ E. Leon Daniel
|    |  |                   
|    |  | E. Leon Daniel    

August 5, 2003