alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.16
October 8, 1997

Mr. Terry Kremian
1604 145th Place S.E.
Millcreek, WA 58012

Dear Terry:

It is a pleasure to offer you the position of Vice President-Sales and Marketing
for  Illuminet  beginning no later than December 1, 1997.  Your starting  salary
will be $145,000  and you will be eligible  for an annual  bonus of up to 40% of
your  salary  depending  upon  attainment  of a  combination  of  corporate  and
individual  performance  objectives.  A copy  of the  short-term  bonus  plan is
attached.

You will receive a bonus of $25,000 upon joining the company and, it approved by
the Board of Directors,  will be eligible for a long-term  stock option  program
for officers and  directors.  This program will be presented for approval by the
Board of  Directors  in late  October.  I  anticipate  the  initial  grant to be
approximately 20,000 shares.

The  company  will  provide  up to $800.00  per month for a 1 bedroom  furnished
apartment in Olympia to assist you in your  relocation.  The  apartment  will be
provided for up to 9 months.  The company will also reimburse you for reasonable
relocation  expenses to cover the sale of your home,  the purchase of a new home
and transportation of household goods. As we discussed,  your relocation package
will not include reimbursement for any loss on the sale of your existing home.

If you are terminated, except for cause, within a two year period from your date
of hire,  you will be given a separation  payment equal to 6 months of your base
salary.

I'm looking  forward to working with you and to your  contribution to the growth
of Illuminet.

Please  acknowledge  the  acceptance  of this offer by signing and returning one
copy of this letter to me.

Sincerely,
/s/ Roger H. Moore
Roger H. Moore
President & CEO

RHM:cm
Enclosures

I acknowledge and accept this offer.
                                                 /s/ F. Terry Kremian
                                                        Terry Kremian
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Richard Spires, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Learning Tree International, Inc.



January 30, 2017



| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | By:    | /s/ Richard Spires     
| | Name:  | Richard Spires         
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Learning Tree International, Inc. and will be retained by Learning Tree International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 66 (Tuesday, April 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07869]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

[OCC Charter Number 706591]


Commonwealth Bank, F.S.B., Mt. Sterling, Kentucky; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on March 31, 2015, the Office of the 
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) approved the application of 
Commonwealth Bank, F.S.B., Mt. Sterling, Kentucky, to convert to the 
stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for 
inspection on the OCC Web site at the FOIA Electronic Reading Room 
https://foia-pal.occ.gov/palMain.aspx. If you have any questions, 
please call OCC Licensing Activities at (202) 649-6260.

    Dated: March 31, 2015.

    By the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Stephen A. Lybarger,
Deputy Comptroller for Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2015-07869 Filed 4-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 4810-33-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6764

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD DEAN MEARS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 00-6765

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD DEAN MEARS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District

Judge; Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-84-218, CA-99-

288-1, CR-84-194, CA-99-269-1)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 6, 2000
2

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Dean Mears, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Richard Mears seeks to appeal the

district court’s orders denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the records and the

district court’s opinions accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Mears, Nos. CR84-218; CA-99-288-1; CR-84-194; CA-99-269-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 29,

2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : 

 : Case No. 2:17-cr-00186

 Plaintiff, : 

 : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 v. : 

 : 

MYRON E. COLVIN, : 

 : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Myron E. Colvin’s Motion to Dismiss the 

Petition for Warrant Relating to Alleged Violations of his Supervised Release. Doc. 15. Neither 

the Government nor the United States Probation Office has any opposition to the relief requested. 

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion [#15]. The Petition for Warrant relating to 

alleged violations of Defendant’s supervised release is hereby DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 __ 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATED: September 8, 2020

Case: 2:17-cr-00186-ALM Doc #: 16 Filed: 09/08/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 33
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
(the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related
interpretations; and
 (b)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ Gerald D. Schiefelbein

Gerald D. SchiefelbeinChief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    August 9, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         4880657
<SECURITIES>                                   1011677
<RECEIVABLES>                                    93708
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5991194
<PP&E>                                        41251974
<DEPRECIATION>                                   13833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                47229335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           279201
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    46950134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  47229335
<SALES>                                        1046617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1380834
<CGS>                                           593901
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   116769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                823488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 440577
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             440577
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    440577
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.78
        

</TABLE>
p. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 59 ) IV-C-2

5 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:54

AM Sheet 59 of 232P.7L


## J M 

## I 9 1988 

# 01 -#7J j

Honorabl a J

* Jame s Bxo

n Unite dState s Sonat a Washington , D . C . 2051 0 Daar Sanato r Sxo m Than k yo u fo r passin

g alon g Ch a constat s o f \tr. Care n Hamilton , President , Hamilto nChevrole t Cadillac , concernin g EPA' s proposa l t o requir e onboar drefuelin

g emissio

ncontrols . B a assure

d that thes e comment s wil l b a oonaidere

d i nth a nex t phas e of ou

r rulemakin

g process . W

a wil l als o b

a placin

g the m i nth e publi c docke t fo r th e rulemaking . Than k yo u agai nfor you

r concer

ni nthi s matter . Sincerel y

yours , ORIGINA L SIGNE D B Y RICHAR D D . WILSO N Richar d D . Wilson Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s cc i Docke t A-87-11 / Prepare d by:PCarlson:ECTD:8-374-8270:AL-80058:1/13/8 8 bcc : Regio

n7 Congressiona l Liaiso n

,

a*-*-
-
exhibit10-2.htm



	 	 Exhibit 10.2	 
	 	 	 
	 	 Employment Agreement Extension	 
	 	 	 
	 	

Effective Date:                                           May 30, 2010


 



Agreement made among Reis Services, LLC, Reis, Inc. (collectively, the “Employers”) and Lloyd Lynford (“Employee”) to extend a certain Employment Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2006, as amended by the First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of May 17, 2007, and that certain Memo regarding Revision to Bonus Payout Schedule from Bill Sander, dated December 14, 2007, by and between the parties (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”).


 


Revised Term


The term of the Employment Agreement expires on May 30, 2010. The parties are in the process of negotiating a new agreement (the “New Employment Agreement”) relating to Employee’s employment with Employer (although no such agreement is assured). In the interim, the parties wish to continue and extend the Employment Agreement. Therefore, Employers and Employee agree that the Employment Agreement shall be binding for an additional period of time, beginning with the expiration of the original term on May 30, 2010 and continuing through the earlier of June 30, 2010 or a date on which a New Employment Agreement is executed.


 


Revised Conditions


This extension shall be on the same terms and conditions as provided in the Employment Agreement and as if set forth in this Agreement, with the exception of:





	 





 


 



	 	 ●	


All Annual Bonus obligations under the Employment Agreement (except for payment of any accrued but unpaid amounts) shall terminate as of May 30, 2010; and,





	 
	 	 ●	


The pro-rata portion (five-twelfths) of the 2009 Minimum Annual Bonus shall be paid to the Employee as soon as administratively possible following May 30, 2010.





	 





 



	 	
Acknowledgement and Agreement




We have carefully reviewed this Agreement and acknowledge, agree to and accept all of its terms and conditions. We are executing this Agreement as of the Effective Date above.





	 





 



	 	Employers:   	 	 Employee:	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	REIS SERVICES, LLC	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Mark P. Cantaluppi	 	/s/ Lloyd Lynford	 
	 	Name:  Mark P. Cantaluppi	 	Lloyd Lynford	 
	 	Title:  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	REIS, INC.	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Mark P. Cantaluppi	 	 	 
	 	Name:  Mark P. Cantaluppi	 	 	 
	 	
Title:  Vice President, Chief Financial Offier
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report on the financial statements of Molecular Simulations
Inc. dated February 4, 1998 included in this Form 10-K into Pharmacopeia, Inc.'s
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No.'s 33-80431, 333-
20883, 333-56883) pertaining to the 1994 Incentive Stock Plan of Pharmacopeia,
Inc., the 1995 Director Option Plan of Pharmacopeia, Inc. and the 1995 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of Pharmacopeia, Inc. in the Registration Statement
pertaining to the 1994 Incentive Stock Plan of Pharmacopeia, Inc. and in the
Registration Statement pertaining to the Pharmacopeia, Inc. 1994 Incentive Stock
Plan, the Molecular Simulations Incorporated 1988 Stock Option and Purchase
Plan, the Molecular Simulations Incorporated 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, the
Polygen Corporation 1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Polygen Corporation
1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan (California), the Polygen Corporation 1986
Supplemental Stock Option Plan and the Polygen Corporation 1986 Supplemental
Stock Option Plan (California). It should be noted that we have not audited any
financial statements of Molecular Simulations Inc. subsequent to December 31,
1997 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

                                        Arthur Andersen LLP
                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


San Diego, California
March 29, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          17,157
<SECURITIES>                                    51,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (624)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,119
<PP&E>                                          30,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,964)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,259
<SALES>                                          8,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,959
<CGS>                                            7,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,122
<INCOME-TAX>                                       500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,771
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,771
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned hereby certifies, in her capacity as Chief Executive Officer of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her knowledge:





(1)  The Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  March 15, 2011





/s/ Zhilin Li


--------------------------------


Name: Zhilin Li


President and Chief Executive Officer


(principal executive officer)








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 12
 Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.
Exhibit 12  Statement Re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  (In thousands)
 Reorganized Company
    
    
    
    Predecessor CompanyYear
    
    
    Year
    
    
    Six Months
    
    
    
    Six MonthsEnded
    
    
    Ended
    
    
    Ended
    
    
    
    EndedJune 30,
    
    
    June 30,
    
    
    June 30,
    
    
    
    December 31,
    
    
    Year Ended June 30,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Consolidated pretax income
(loss) from operations
    
    $
    (3,162
    )
    
    $
    8,015
    
    
    $
    1,006
    
    
    
    $
    (13,235
    )
    
    $
    (27,627
    )
    
    $
    (29,355
    )Interest expense
    
    
    14,488
    
    
    
    13,864
    
    
    
    6,852
    
    
    
    
    7,459
    
    
    
    11,608
    
    
    
    12,121Interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    662
    
    
    
    662
    
    
    
    321
    
    
    
    
    369
    
    
    
    818
    
    
    
    819Earnings (Loss)
    
    $
    11,988
    
    
    $
    22,541
    
    
    $
    8,179
    
    
    
    $
    (5,407
    )
    
    $
    (15,201
    )
    
    $
    (16,415
    )Interest expense
    
    $
    14,488
    
    
    $
    13,864
    
    
    $
    6,852
    
    
    
    $
    7,459
    
    
    $
    11,608
    
    
    $
    12,121Interest capitalized
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    
    37
    
    
    
    370
    
    
    
    900Interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    662
    
    
    
    662
    
    
    
    321
    
    
    
    
    369
    
    
    
    818
    
    
    
    819Preferred share accretion
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,098
    
    
    
    2,736Fixed charges
    
    $
    15,150
    
    
    $
    14,526
    
    
    $
    7,181
    
    
    
    $
    7,865
    
    
    $
    14,894
    
    
    $
    16,576Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    0.8
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    1.1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 19 - 00009 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF C .R. , A.R. , AND I.R. , CHILDREN On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 1

Randall County , Texas Trial Court No. 6985 - L1 , Honorable Jack M. Graham , Presiding



### April 16 , 2019 CONCURRING OPINION Before QUINN , C.J. , and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE , JJ. I concur in the opinion and judgment of the majority and write to explain why I believe the “ fluid ” order referenced by the majority should be condemned for reasons unrelated to the effects of an adhesion contract. First , statute imposes upon the trial co urt a duty to conduct status hearings to review both the child ’ s status and the service plan developed for the child. T EX . F AM . C O D E A NN . § 263.201(a) (West 2014). During that hearing the trial court must “ review the service plan that the department file d
. . . for reasonableness , accuracy , and compliance with requirements of court orders
. ” Id. § 263.202(b) (West Supp. 2018) . This connotes a legislative intent to have the trial court remain involved with the obligations imposed on a parent by a service plan ; a court does2

not abide by that intent by simply issuing an order directing a parent to comply with whatever hurdle the Department may opt to impose. Requiring the specific provisions violated by a parent to be expressed within a court order assures that the trial court remains involved and comports with legislative intent. It would seem to border on an impermissible relinquishment of duty to simply tell a parent to abide by whatever terms the Department may impose now or in the future and then termi nate parental rights due to noncompliance with those judicially unapproved terms. Second , a sister court has held that “ [t] o terminate parental rights under subsection (O) after the failure to give the parents such express notice of ‘ any other term or con dition that [ the Department] determines to be necessary ’ to the success of the service plan and the failure to embody that term or condition in the court order is violative of the due process required by our standard of review
. ” In re G.C. , No. 02 - 17 - 0025 9 - CV , 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 750 , at *50
– 52 (Tex. App.
— Fort Worth Jan. 25 , 2018 , no pet. ) (mem. op.) (emphasis added). I read this as illustrating that the omission of the provisions a parent must follow from a court order strikes at the constitutionally mandated due process that a parent must receive. In short , a “ fluid ” order may liken to an adhesion contract in that one party to the arrangement has no choice . Yet , it also transgresses legislative intent and due process. Including within a court order the specific hurdles a parent must clear assures both due process and independent revie w by a judge of their reasonableness. Brian Quinn Chief Justice