alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 27, 2016

No. 04-16-00675-CV

Tom RETZLAFF,

Appellant

v.

Philip R. KLEIN, Klein Investigations & Consulting and James W. Landess,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-17145

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 25, 2016, appellant filed an affidavit accompanied by a proposed clerk’s 

record and reporter’s record. Appellant cites Rule 28.1(e) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure which permits the appellate court to “hear an accelerated appeal on the original papers 

forwarded by the trial court or on sworn and uncontroverted copies of those papers.” TEX. R.

APP. P. 28.1(e). Rule 28.1(e), however, only addresses the use of such papers “in lieu of the 

clerk’s record.” Id. In addition, although the appellant has sworn to the copies provided, it is 

unclear whether the appellee will controvert the copies provided. It is therefore ORDERED that 

appellee file a written response to the proposed clerk’s record filed by appellant no later than ten 

days from the date of this order. Because Rule 28.1(e) does not authorize the use of sworn 

copies of a reporter’s record, the proposed reporter’s record is STRICKEN. The current deadline 

for the court reporter’s to file the reporter’s record’s is October 27, 2016.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of October, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 1062.

#### Blakeley & Copeland *v.*Frazier.

April Term, 1881.

July 30th, 1881.

*J. P. Carroll,*for appellants. *L. F. Youmans,*attorney-general, *A. J. Norris,*contra.

This case was before this court on appeal at November Term, 1877, and may be found reported in 11 *S. G.*122. Upon its second trial, the Circuit judge ruled that no additional testimony having been offered, he felt constrained by the opinion of this court to grant a non-suit. On appeal from that order, it was held that the order of non-suit upon the ground on which it was based, was erroneous; that this court did not intend, in its former opinion, to adjudicate upon the sufficiency of the .testimony, but only to decide that the plaintiffs must prove that the amount paid by them had been overdrawn by Frazier, and that the award, legally construed, did not fix the amount.

The appellant moved for leave to amend his “ case ” by noting exceptions to rulings which he had overlooked until after the proper time had expired. The appeal was perfected prior to the act of December 24th, 1880, (17 *Stat.*368.) *Held,*that this act did not reinstate rights which were lost before its passage, and that, under the act of December 19th, 1878, (16 *Stat.*698), the motion must be refused. Opinion by

Simpson, C. J.,
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
       (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  May 13, 2011
    /s/ Brendan J. McGillBrendan J. McGillExecutive Vice President and
Chief Operating and Financial
Officer
FAA Section 333 Petition

Jan. 4, 2016

John Barin von Foregger

236 John Martin Drive

Brandon, MS 39047

601.506.7867

BvForegger@gmail.com 

I am applying for Section 333 Petition for use with an UAS unit.

The unit will be used in low-populated areas for low-level aerial video (< 200 

feet). The unit will not be flown more than five (5) miles per hour. We will 

be using this footage for educational purposes only.

We are flying a Yuneec Typhoon G Q500 Aircraft. The dimensions are 9.45 

inches by 16.54 inches. Maximum weight with camera is 60 ounces.

The serial number of the unit is: YU15320112B06B01

The firmware version is 1.05.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**STATEMENTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, the undersigned certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

|                           |   | /s/ MARSHA H.  FANUCCI          |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
| Dated: March 8, 2006 |   | Marsha H. Fanucci               |
|                      |   | *Senior Vice President and*     |
|                      |   | *Chief Financial Officer*       |
|                      |   | *(Principal financial officer)* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.and will be retained by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or
her capacity as an officer of First Shares Bancorp, Inc. (First Shares),
that, to his or her knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report of First Shares on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First
Shares Bancorp, Inc. Dated: May 17, 2004 /s/ Kimberly B. KlingKimberly B. KlingSecretary, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :

Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:17-CR-146-2

-vs- : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

CHASTITY GILLENWATER, :

Defendant. :

 ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL UNDER THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

This case is before the Court upon Defendant’s application for appointment of counsel

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3006A. Upon the Court’s Sua Sponte Order for Appointment of Counsel,

the Court appointed a member of the Criminal Justice Act Panel.

IT IS ACCORDINGLY ORDERED that Jeffrey R. McQuiston, of the CJA Panel for the

Southern District of Ohio, is appointed as counsel to represent the Defendant in this case.

September 20, 2017 s/Sharon L. Ovington 

 Sharon L. Ovington

 United States Magistrate Judge
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: 

 Project No.: 0172.08.005.607 Page 1 of 2 

 Project Name: 2011 Prelim Cat Rev CBI? 

 Yes 

 No 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

 Incoming 

 Outgoing 

Date: 08/03/2011 Time: 845 am 

 pm 

Company Name: Eastman Kodak ERG Staff Name: Elizabeth Sabol 

Contact Name: Mary Lee Bishopp Contact Phone Number: 585-477-8495 

General Subject: 2009 DMR Flows 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

I called Mr. Veronda on Wednesday, August 3, 2011, at 8:45 am to discuss flows for outfall 001 in the 2009 

DMR database. I left a message for Mr. Veronda asking him to return my call or forward my information on the 

appropriate person. 

Mary Lee Bishopp returned by call on August 16, 2011 confirming the data that I was requesting. She stated 

that the monthly average flow for outfall 001 was approximately 17 MGD, similar to the 2009 DMR data. Ms. 

Bishopp stated that she would e-mail the monthly flow data for the Eastman Kodak facility for outfall 001. 

Please see the attached e-mail and data. 
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: 

From: <marylee.bishopp@kodak.com> 

To: <elizabeth.sabol@erg.com> 

CC: <thomas.smithgall@kodak.com> 

Date: 8/16/2011 1:25 PM 

Subject: Eastman Kodak Flows - 2009 

Attachments: Outfall 001 Monthly Avg and Max flows from 2009 DMRs.xls 

Hi Elizabeth, 

Here is a table of the average and maximum flows for Outfall 001, as 

reported in our 2009 DMRs. The units are in mgd (million gallons per 

day). 

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any further 

information. 

Mary Lee Bishopp HSE US ROCHESTER HSE SERVICES 

Eastman Kodak Company 

1669 Lake Ave, Bldg. 95 

Rochester, NY 14652-4002 

marylee.bishopp@kodak.com 

Office: 585 477-8495 

Pager: 585-975-2205 

email text message to pager: 5859752205@airmessage.net 

Fax: 585-477-7656 

www.kodak.com 

Attachment: Outfall 001 Monthly Avg and Max flows from 2009 DMRs_1.xls 

Eastman Kodak Company NY 0001643 

Outfall 001 Flows, as Reported on the 2009 DMR Forms 

 

 Average Flow, mgd 

Maximum Flow, 

mgd 

Jan, 2009 17 20 

Feb, 2009 18 21 

Mar, 2009 17 21 

Apr, 2009 17 19 

May, 2009 16 23 

Jun, 2009 15 17 

Jul, 2009 15 18 

Aug, 2009 18 20 

Sep, 2009 14 18 

Oct, 2009 14 18 

Nov, 2009 15 19 

Dec, 2009 16 19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

RANDY APPLE : CASE NO. 3:17¢v284
Plaintiff,
JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
Vv.

AGRIUM USS., INC., et al.

Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been
settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties,
provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if
settlement is not consummated.

Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be
aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate
appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if
necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (the Company ) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), I, Stephen Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Stephen Wong                     
|    |  | Stephen Wong                         
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | Date: January 18, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001002506
<NAME> CASTLE & COOKE, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,530
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         619,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                 158,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,024,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       511,616
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,024,018
<SALES>                                        241,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,163
<CGS>                                          223,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,207
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,873
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,873
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1
 DENDREON CORPORATION
2009 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
(NONSTATUTORY STOCK OPTIONS)
   1. Vesting
 2. Number of Shares and Exercise Price
 3. Type of Option
 4. Method of Payment
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)




---



##### 



(d)
 5. Whole Shares
 6. Securities Law Compliance
 7. Term earliest
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 (f) th
  8. Exercise
 (a)
 - 2 -




---



##### 



(b)
 9. Transferability
 (a)
 (b)
 10. Adjustments
 11. No Employment Rights
 - 3 -




---



##### 



12. No Stockholder Rights
 13. Withholding Obligations
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 14. Notices
 15. Governing Plan Document
 - 4 -




---



##### 



16. Compliance with Section 409A of the Code
 17. Data Protection e.g.
   - 5 -
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3047

JAIME NAZARIO,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in

consolidated case nos. DC0752080002-B-1 and DC0752080425-I-1.

ON MOTION

Before DYK Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Jaime Nazario moves the court to accept his untimely brief and moves to "file

evidence."

Nazario states that he wishes to include in the appendix a transcript of a

recording of a May 8, 2008 teleconference. The court notes that the transcript

submitted by Nazario does not appear to be an official Merit Systems Protection Board

transcript. The court grants Nazario's motions; however, the merits panel is, of course,

free to strike or disregard the transcript and any references to the transcript in Nazario's

brief.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1)	Nazario's motion to include the transcript in the appendix is granted.
Nazario's motion for the court to accept his untimely brief is granted.

The Department of Justice should calculate the due date for its brief from

the date of filing of this order.

(4)	A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to

decide this case.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly FILED Clerk	U.S. COURT OF APPEALS F

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT °I3

FEB 2 4 2009

HORBALY

CLERK

FEB 2 4 2009

Date

cc:	Jaime Nazario

Richard P. Schroeder, Esq.

s17

2009-3047	2
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0270

SAT Date: 2/21/2014

Print Date: 3/4/2014

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 12

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: MUTA; SENS-S; L; REPRO; DEV; IRR S, MM; ONCO

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-14-0270

FATE: 

S = 0.13 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate - strong

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes as the neat material, poor

absorption all routes of the low molecular weight fraction if in solution (pchem). Compound is 

expected to be . Concern for skin, mucous membrane irritation and/or 

sensitization (especially with repeated contact), developmental, reproductive toxicity, and 

oncogenicity by the inhalation route based on epoxides; concern for mutagenisity based on data 

submitted with (-) Ames assay but (+) chromosome aberration assay in CHL with and 

without activation. Low moderate concern.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 0.303 epoxides, mono

fish _ chronic value 0.006

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.03

algal _ chronic 

value

0.076 epoxides, mono

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for epoxides SAR chemical 

class = epoxides, with unknown MP 

(P); S = 0.131 mg/L at 25 C (M); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

high concern for toxicity;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs Epoxides

SAR Class Epoxides

Ecotox Category Epoxides

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
 SAT Chair: Viktor Morozov

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28407]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0682]


Agency Information Collection Activity: Advertising, Sales, 
Enrollment Materials, and Candidate Handbooks; Withdrawn

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 16, 2021, the Veterans Benefits Administration 
(VA), published a notice in the Federal Register announcing an 
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection 
``Advertising, Sales, Enrollment Materials, and Candidate Handbooks'' 
OMB #2900-0682. This notice was published in error; therefore, this 
document corrects that error by withdrawing this FR notice, document 
number 2021-27255.

DATES: As of December 27, 2021, the FR notice published at 86 FR 27255 
on Thursday, December 17, 2021, is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maribel Aponte, Office of Enterprise 
and Integration, Data Governance Analytics (008), 1717 H Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20006, (202) 266-4688 or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#452824372c2720296b24352a2b31200533246b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a373b2833383f36743b2a35342e3f1a2c3b743d352c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FR Doc. 2021-27255, published on December 
17, 2021 (86 FR 27255), is withdrawn by this notice.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Maribel Aponte,
VA PRA Clearance Officer, Office of Enterprise and Integration/Data 
Governance Analytics, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2021-28407 Filed 12-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
H. R. 3961 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 and Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 

until February 28, 2011. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SUNSETS. 

(a) USA PATRIOT IMPROVEMENT AND REAUTHORIZATION ACT

OF 2005.—Section 102(b)(1) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement 

and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–177; 50 U.S.C. 

1805 note, 50 U.S.C. 1861 note, and 50 U.S.C. 1862 note) is amended 

by striking ‘‘February 28, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘February 28, 2011’’. 

(b) INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM PREVENTION ACT

OF 2004.—Section 6001(b)(1) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–458; 118 Stat. 

3742; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) is amended by striking ‘‘February 28, 

2010’’ and inserting ‘‘February 28, 2011’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.