alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES, Appellee

v. Larry D. CRAIG Jr., Boatswain’s Mate Second Class U.S. Navy, Appellant

No. 09-0759 Crim. App. No. 200800716 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 9, 2010

PER CURIAM

Counsel

For Appellant: Lieutenant Brian D. Korn , JAGC, USN (on brief).

For Appellee: Captain Mark V. Balfantz , USMC (on brief); Colonel Louis J. Puleo , USMC.

Military Judge: Kevin O’Neil

**THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO REVISION BEFORE FINAL PUBLICATION .** United States v. Craig , No. 09-0759/NA

2 PER CURIAM: Consistent with his pleas, Appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial of receipt, distribution, and possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (2006), as incorporated by Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2006). The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for eighteen months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) disapproved the distribution specification but otherwise affirmed the findings and sentence. United States v. Craig , 67 M.J. 742, 747 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 2009). We granted review to consider whether the military judge committed plain error by not sua sponte declaring that the offenses of receiving and possessing the same child pornography were multiplicious. At trial, Appellant pled guilty unconditionally to the charge and all specifications and agreed to a pretrial agreement, stating he would “waive all motions except those that are otherwise non-waivable pursuant to [Rule for Courts-Martial] 705(c)(1)(B).” In a stipulation of fact and during the providence inquiry, Appellant admitted he knowingly received and possessed child pornography. Specifically, Appellant admitted he (1) downloaded sixty-eight images and twenty-four movie filesUnited States v. Craig , No. 09-0759/NA

3 of child pornography using peer-to-peer software; (2) kept the files in his “share” folder, allowing others to download them; and (3) copied the files to “disks [sic].” The CCA held that Appellant’s unconditional guilty pleas waived the issue of whether the receipt and possession specifications were multiplicious because these offenses were not facially duplicative, since they involved files on different media (compact discs, as opposed to a hard drive). Craig , 67

M.J. at 746-47. The CCA’s reasoning comports with our holding in United States v. Campbell , 68 M.J. 217 (C.A.A.F. 2009), decided after the CCA handed down its decision. In Campbell , we held that an unconditional guilty plea waived multiplicity claims when the offenses were not facially duplicative. 68 M.J. at 220. Here, Appellant pled guilty unconditionally to the charge and all specifications. The CCA correctly held that the receipt and possession offenses were not facially duplicative because Appellant received the files on one medium and stored them on another. Craig , 67 M.J. at 746-47; see Campbell , 68 M.J. at

220. The judgment of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Omnipoint Corporation on Form S-1 (File Nos. 33-98360 and 33-03739), Form
S-4 (File Nos. 333-19895 and 333-13961), Form S-3 (File No. 333-58155) and
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-30681, 333-07345 and 333-03945) of our reports dated
March 31, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Omnipoint Corporation as of December 31, 1998
and 1997, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1998, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
April 5, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                        MATZEL & MUMFORD AT PHILIPSBURG, LLC
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,691
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,314,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,320,431
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,320,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,320,431
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,320,431
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
                                                     
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     of the

                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       of

                            ORCHID BIOSCIENCES, INC.

It is hereby certified that:

FIRST:      The name of the corporation is Orchid BioSciences, Inc. (the
            "Corporation").

SECOND:     The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is
            hereby amended by striking out the first paragraph of Article Fourth
            in its entirety and by substituting in lieu of the following:

            "FOURTH:

            A. Designation and Number of Shares.

            The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the
            Corporation shall have authority to issue is 155,000,000 shares,
            consisting of 150,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $.001 par value
            per share (the "Common Stock") and 5,000,000 shares of Preferred
            Stock, $.001 par value per share (the "Preferred Stock")."

THIRD:      The amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein certified
            has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section
            228 and Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
            Delaware.

            EXECUTED, effective as of this 14th day of June, 2002.

                                                 ORCHID BIOSCIENCES, INC.

                                                 By: /s/ Donald R. Marvin
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                 NAME: DONALD R. MARVIN
                                                 TITLE: SENIOR VP, CFO & COO
Exhibit 32.1
Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)
Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  President  and Chief
Executive  Officer  and Sr.  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of
Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation, (the "Company"), herby certify that to the best
of my knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the  financial  condition  and results of  operation  of the  Company.  A signed
original of this written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to
the  registrant  and will be retained by it and furnished to the  Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: April 1, 2005.             /s/ Michael Ward           /s/ James B. Smith
                                 --------------------       --------------------
                                 President and CEO          Sr. V.P. and CFO
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 21719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9925-41-OEI]


Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) responses to Agency Clearance requests, in compliance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). An agency may not 
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations are listed 
in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Courtney Kerwin (202) 566-1669, or 
email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcb7b9aeabb5b2f2bfb3a9aea8b2b9a59cb9acbdf2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e252b3c392720602d213b3c3a202b370e2b3e2f60292138">[email protected]</span></a> and please refer to the appropriate 
EPA Information Collection Request (ICR) Number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Responses to Agency Clearance Requests

OMB Approvals

    EPA ICR Number 2260.05; Confidential Financial Disclosure Form for 
Special Government Employees Serving on Federal Advisory Committees at 
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Renewal); 5 CFR part 2634; 
was approved with change on 2/25/2015; OMB Number 2090-0029; expires on 
2/28/2018.
    EPA ICR Number 0559.12; Application for Reference and Equivalent 
Method Determination (Renewal); 40 CFR parts 53.4, 53.14, 53.15, 
53.9(f), (h), (i), and 53.16(a)-(d), (f); was approved without change 
on 2/25/2015; OMB Number 2080-0005; expires on 2/28/2018.

Comment Filed

    EPA ICR Number 2347.01; Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient 
Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements 
(Proposed Rule); 40 CFR part 51; OMB filed comment on 2/12/2015.

Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collections Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-08984 Filed 4-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 21





A.P. Woodson CompanyDistrict of Columbia


Marex CorporationMaryland


Maxwhale
Corp.Minnesota


Meenan Oil Co., Inc.Delaware


Meenan Oil Co., L.P.Delaware


Ohio Gas & Appliance CompanyOhio


Ortep of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut


Ortep of Pennsylvania, Inc.Pennsylvania


Petro Holdings, Inc.Minnesota


Petro Plumbing CorporationNew Jersey


Petro, Inc.Delaware


Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc.Minnesota


Region Oil Plumbing, Heating and Cooling Co., Inc.New Jersey


Star Gas CorporationDelaware


Star Gas Propane, L.P.Delaware


Star/Petro, Inc.Minnesota


Stellar Propane Service Corp.New York


SyLuba,
Inc.New York


TG&E Service Company, Inc.Florida


Total Gas & Electric,
Inc.Florida


Total Gas & Electricity (PA), Inc.Florida
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0270 SAT Date: 2/21/2014 Print Date: 3/4/2014

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 12

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: MUTA; SENS-S; L; REPRO; DEV; IRR S, MM; ONCO
Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0270 FATE:
S = 0.13 mg/L at 25 C (E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate - strongPBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes as the neat material, p oo r absorption all routes of the low molecular weight fraction if in solution ( p che m ). Compound is expected to be . Concern for skin, mucous membrane irritation and/or sensitization (especially with repeated contact), developmental, reproductive toxicity, and oncogenicity by the inhalation route based on epoxides; concern for mutagenisity based on data submitted with (-) Ames assay but (+) chromosome aberration assay in CHL with and without activation. Low moderate concern.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 0.303 epoxides, mono fish

_ chronic value 0.006 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.03
algal

_ chronic value 0.076 epoxides, mono
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for epoxides SAR chemical class = epoxides, with unknown MP (P); S = 0.131 mg/L at 25 C (M); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; high concern for toxicity;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs Epoxides SAR Class Epoxides Ecotox Category Epoxides

Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: Viktor Morozov
Ex. 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
        PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  for the purposes of section 1350
of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United  States  Code,  as adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of
EduLink, Inc. ("EduLink"),  that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of EduLink
on Form 10-K for the period ended  December 31, 2005,  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the  information  contained  in such report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operation of EduLink.  This
written  statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
as an exhibit to such Form 10-K. A signed  original of this  statement  has been
provided  to EduLink  and will be  retained  by  EduLink  and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


   Date: November 1, 2006                      By: /s/ Aleksandr Shvarts
                                               --------------------------

                                               ALEKSANDR SHVARTS
                                               Chief Executive Officer

   Date: November 1, 2006                      By: /s/ Gennady Pomeranets
                                               ---------------------------

                                               GNNADY POMERANETS, CPA

                                               Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit      32**

|   | 1. | I                am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Chanticleer                Holdings, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Attached                to this certification is Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,                2008, a                periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with the                Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the                Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which contains                financial statements. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | I                hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant                to                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,                that |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The                periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies                with                the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,                and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The                information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                issuer                for the periods presented. |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August                11, 2008 |   | /s/                Michael D. Pruitt       |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                           |   | Michael                D. Pruitt           |
|                           |   | Chief                Executive Officer and |
|                           |   | Chief                Financial Officer     |
|                           |   |                                       |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4095 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4095

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 9727 Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, as the ``Congresswoman 
                   Jan Meyers Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2009

Mr. Moore of Kansas (for himself, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. Moran of Kansas, and 
 Ms. Jenkins) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 9727 Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, as the ``Congresswoman 
                   Jan Meyers Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSWOMAN JAN MEYERS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9727 Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Congresswoman Jan Meyers Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Congresswoman Jan Meyers Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
Exhibit E-6

24 August 2001

EIDOS PLC
NOTIFICATION OF AGM AND FIRST QUARTER RESULTS

Eidos plc will be holding its Annual General Meeting (AGM) on Thursday 20th
September 2001, together with the announcement of first quarter results for
the three months ended 30th June 2001.

The AGM will take place at Wimbledon Bridge House, 1 Hartfield Road,
Wimbledon, London, SW19 3RU at 10.30am.

- Ends -

Enquiries:

Eidos 020 8636 3000
Charlotte Eastwood

Brunswick 020 7404 5959
Jonathan Glass
James Crampton

                                      E6-1
*Present*— Chancellors Rutledge, Hutson, and Mathews.

#### Bourke *vs.*Bocquet.

MARCH. *1786.*

case xxxvi.

r. b. p. 96.

fcuinance^de" creed, on within*a li-noted time.

This was a bill for the specific performance of a contract for a tract of land.

It was decreed, that it be referred to the master to sfofo aml report, what is the balance due on the contract jn the bill mentioned*. And that on payment thereof with interest, and of the costs of suit, *within one month from this*day, the defendant execute title to the complainant in bill mentioned.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-50502

Summary Calendar

GLINDA HOSKINS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

WASHINGTON COUNTY, TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(A-96-CV-614)

December 5, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DEMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff Glinda Hoskins, an African-American female, was

employed by the Washington County Sheriff’s Department from March

1990 to November 1994. She alleges discrimination based on race

and sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

as amended 42 U.S.C. §2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The
district court granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment

reasoning Plaintiff had failed to exhaust her administrative

remedies with respect to the sex discrimination claim and did not

produce evidence proving her discharge was racially motivated with

respect to the race discrimination claim.

After carefully reviewing the briefs, record excerpts, and

relevant portions of the record itself, we find no reversible

error. We affirm essentially for the reasons stated by the

district court in its order dated May 22, 1997.