alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  August 22, 2005 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                     
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                       | Marc N. Teal, Chief
Financial Officer



69
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.5

               CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

CERTIFICATIONS


I, Lori Bondar, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Acetex Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
          over financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2005


"Lori Bondar"
-----------------------
Lori Bondar
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:17-cr-198

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

JOHN J. KERIN, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On September 29, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to an

Information charging him with being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§

922(g), 924. (Doc. 23). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter

before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion,

and had a basis in fact. A psychological evaluation was also performed at the request of defense

counsel to evaluate competency. The competency hearing was held on September 29, 2017 and

Defendant was found competent to enter a guilty plea. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of being a felon

in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-
**EXHIBIT 32.2** **Certification    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of    2002.**     I, Michael J. Beach, Chief Financial Officer of Blackboard Inc.    (the “Company”), do hereby certify, under the    standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my    knowledge that:     1. The Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the    “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and     2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company. /s/  Michael    J. Beach    Michael J. Beach    Chief Financial Officer     Dated: August 7, 2007
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of World Am, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J.
      Barnes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                August 14, 2007
            
            /s/
                David J. BarnesBy:
                David J. BarnesIts:
                Chief Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      World Am, Inc. and will be retained by World Am, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00241]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at the Saline County Regional Airport, Benton, Arkansas

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the 
release of land at the Saline County Regional Airport under the 
provisions of Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment 
Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before (from 30 days of the 
posting of this Federal Register Notice).

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Glenn A. Boles, Manager, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, Arkansas/
Oklahoma Airports Development Office, ASW-630, Fort Worth, Texas 76177.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Judge Jeff Arey, Saline County Judge, at the 
following address: 200 North Main Street, RM117, Benton, AR 72015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. Sara K. Fields-Pack, Program 
Manager, Federal Aviation Administration, Arkansas/Oklahoma Airports 
Development Office, ASW-630, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 
76177, Telephone: (817) 222-4101, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d6e7c6f7c3376337b747871796e306d7c7e765d7b7c7c337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c9baa8bba8e7a2e7afa0aca5adbae4b9a8aaa289afa8a8e7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the Saline County Regional Airport under 
the provisions of the AIR 21.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    Saline County requests the release of 28.97 acres of excess 
aeronautical land. The property will be sold for non-aeronautical land 
use purposes.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, 
notice and other documents relevant to the application in person at the 
Saline County Attorney, telephone number (501) 303-1555.

Ignacio Flores,
Director, Office of Airports Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2022-00241 Filed 1-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: Project No.: 0172.08.005.607 Page 1 of 2

Project Name: 2011 Prelim Cat Rev 

### CBI? Yes No TELEPHONE CALL RECORD Incoming Outgoing Date: 08/03/2011 Time: 845 am pm

Company Name: Eastman Kodak ERG Staff Name: Elizabeth Sabol

Contact Name: Mary Lee Bishopp Contact Phone Number: 585-477-8495 General Subject: 2009 DMR Flows



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I called Mr. Veronda on Wednesday, August 3, 2011, at 8:45 am to discuss flows for outfall 001 in the 2009 DMR database. I left a message for Mr . Veronda asking him to return my call or forward my information on the appropriate person.

Mary Lee Bishopp returned by call on August 16, 2011 c onfirming the data that I wa s requesting. She stated that the monthly average flow for outfall 001 was appr oximately 17 MGD, similar to the 2009 DMR data. Ms. Bishopp stated that she would e-mail the monthly flow data for the Eastman Kodak facility for outfall 001. Please see the attached e-mail and data.Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: From: <marylee.bishopp@kodak.com> To: <elizabeth.sabol@erg.com> CC: <thomas.smithgall@kodak.com> Date: 8/16/2011 1:25 PM Subject: Eastman Kodak Flows - 2009 Attachments: Outfall 001 Monthly Avg and Max flows from 2009 DMRs.xls

Hi Elizabeth, Here is a table of the average and maximum flows for Outfall 001, as reported in our 2009 DMRs. The units are in mgd (million gallons per day).

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any further information.

Mary Lee Bishopp HSE US RO CHESTER HSE SERVICES

Eastman Kodak Company 1669 Lake Ave, Bldg. 95 Rochester, NY 14652-4002 marylee.bishopp@kodak.com Office: 585 477-8495 Pager: 585-975-2205 email text message to pa ger: 5859752205@airmessage.net Fax: 585-477-7656 www.kodak.com

Attachment: Outfall 001 Monthly Avg and Max flows from 2009 DMRs_1.xls

Eastman Kodak Company NY 0001643

Outfall 001 Flows, as Reported on the 2009 DMR Forms

Average Flow, mgd Maximum Flow, mgd Jan, 2009 17 20 Feb, 2009 18 21 Mar, 2009 17 21 Apr, 2009 17 19 May, 2009 16 23 Jun, 2009 15 17 Jul, 2009 15 18 Aug, 2009 18 20 Sep, 2009 14 18 Oct, 2009 14 18 Nov, 2009 15 19 Dec, 2009 16 19
gss_ex10-14.htm













 


NSF/ANSI STANDARD 18


Manual Food and Beverage Dispensing Equipment


 














K-TEC







1206 SOUTH 1680 WEST


OREM, UT 84058


801-222-0888







Facility : OREM, UT







COMPONENTS:







Flow Sensor for Blender Dispenser


    S01-307







"Megablender" Automatic Blender


    MB1


    MB2







Automatic Dispenser


    D-4


    D-8







Self-Serve Blender-Dispenser


    S01A
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Open Text Corporation (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan Hoverd, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as
adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                            /s/ Alan Hoverd
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Alan Hoverd
                                            Chief Financial Officer

Dated: September 25, 2002
NEBRASKA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (NEARNG) DRINKING 

WATER PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Greenlief Training Site does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army 

National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water 

Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the 

American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to 

ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: February 2020

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory’s ability to detect

Future Testing Event: February 2023

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Nebraska National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 402-309-8390

Office E-mail Address: ng.ne.neang.mbx.pao-public@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Orchid Cellmark Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers
knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 3, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ THOMAS A. BOLOGNA                                            
|                   |  |  |  | Thomas A. Bologna                                                
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)            
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 3, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN C. DEIGHAN                                              
|                   |  |  |  | John C. Deighan                                                  
|                   |  |  |  | Corporate Controller (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
22247

#### In re WILLIE H., a minor under the age of seventeen years, Appellant.

(327 S. E. (2d) 76)

Supreme Court

*Asst. Appellate Defender Elizabeth C. Fullwood,*of *S. C. Office of Appellate Defense,*Columbia, *for appellant.*

*437
      *Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Atty. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr.,*and *staff Atty. Carlisle Roberts, Jr.,*Columbia, and *Sol. John R. Justice,*Chester, *for respondent.*

Heard Feb. 4, 1985.

Decided Feb. 22, 1985.

Chandler, Justice:

Appellant was adjudicated a delinquent for the offense of burglary. He was placed on probation subject to special conditions. We reverse.

During trial, the State introduced a statement made by appellant’s brother Obie which implicated appellant in the burglary. Obie did not testify. The statement was hearsay and should not have been admitted since it did not fall within any of the hearsay exceptions. *See, State v. Sullivans,*277 S. C. 35, 282 S. E. (2d) 838 (1981).

The State concedes error in the lower court, but argues that this Court should not reach the issue because the case is moot. This Court has stated that when a juvenile has been released from custody and is on probation his appeal is normally moot. *In re Darlene C.,*278 S. C. 664, 301 S. E. (2d) 136 (1983). South Carolina is not alone in holding that a juvenile’s appeal is moot unless he remains in confinement. However, several states have refused to foreclose appeal on this basis when the juvenile may be subject to adverse collateral consequences stemming from the adjudication. 43 C. J. S. *Infants*§ 90.

In some instances, a juvenile adjudication may be used to impeach a witness in a subsequent legal proceeding. *State v. Mallory,*270 S. C. 519, 242 S. E. (2d) 693 (1978). Recently, this Court has authorized a sentencing judge to consider an adult defendant’s juvenile record in imposing a sentence. *Hayden v. State,*S. C., 322 S. E. (2d) 14 (1984). An adjudication of delinquency may adversely affect the juvenile long after he has been released from custody. The existence of these collateral consequences prevents a case from becoming moot even though custody has terminated. We hold that where adverse collateral consequences may arise from the adjudication, a juvenile may not be foreclosed from appeal simply because he is no longer in custody.

*438The State also argues that the error in admitting Obie’s statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, since it was cumulative to other overwhelming evidence of appellant’s guilt. We disagree. Obie’s statement was the only evidence tending to establish appellant’s guilt. Appellant’s adjudication of delinquency is

Reversed.

Littlejohn, C. J., and Ness, Gregory and Harwell, JJ., concur.