alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg Wujek, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  PHYTOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:  March 30, 2007By:/s/ Greg WujekGreg Wujek
President and Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1
Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, Michael Ward,  the  undersigned  Chief
Executive  Officer of Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation,  (the "Company"),  hereby
certify that, to the best of my knowledge,  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB
of the Company for the period  ended  September  30, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934  and  that  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operation of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement  required
by Section 906 has been  provided to the  registrant  and will be retained by it
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.


Dated November 12, 2003.                              /s/ Michael Ward
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     Michael Ward
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard F. Ambury, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Star Gas Partners, L.P. and will be retained by Star Gas Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|               |  |                                                                                     |  |                                                                                           
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY By: STAR GAS LLC (General Partner)
|               |  |                                                                                    
|March 15, 2006 |  | By:                                                                                 |  | /s/    RICHARD F.
AMBURY                                                                  
|               |  |                                                                                     |  | Richard F. Ambury Chief Financial Officer Star Gas Partners, L.P. Star Gas Finance Company
EXHIBIT 99.3


                           TREASURY INTERNATIONAL INC.
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In Connection with the Annual report of Treasury International, Inc.(the
"Company") on Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January
31,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Dale Doner, President of the Company, certify, to the best of
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Dale Doner                                             July 29, 2003
-----------------------                                    ------------------
Dale Doner                                                 Date
President
Treasury International, Inc.
Consent of Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers

     As independent petroleum engineers, Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers
hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
on Form S-8 of Magnum Hunter  Resources,  Inc. (the "Company") of all references
to our reports and our firm  included  in or made part of the  Company's  Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.

/s/ Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers
--------------------------------------------
Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers


Houston, Texas
August 17, 2000
10345

#### ALLEN v. ORR.

(101 S. E. 817.)

1. Landlord Am Tenant — Landlord May Recover Only Amount Expended in Cultivating Crops. — In action for accounting and settlement brought by laborer against a landlord, an instruction that the landlord should be credited only with the amount he had expended in helping to plant, cultivate, and gather the crops on land which was to have been cultivated by plaintiff and another, *held*proper.

2. Contracts — Effect of Written Contracts With Disputed Terms for Jury. — Where a written contract was not produced at the trial and the evidence conflicted as to its terms, the effect of the contract presented a jury question.

Before Shipp, J., Anderson, Spring term, 1919.

Affirmed.

Action by C. H. Allen against J. L. Orr. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

*Messrs. Bonham & Allen,*for appellant,

submit: *It was the duty and province of the Circuit Judge to construe the written contract:*81 S. C. 226; 66 S. C. 22.

*Mr. A. H. Dagnall,*for respondent

(no citations).

January 26, 1920.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This action is for accounting and settlement between landlord and laborer brought by laborer, and was heard at March *349term of Court, 1919, for Anderson county, before Judge Shipp and a jury, by agreement of counsel, the issues submitted to the jury, counsel agreeing that the jury should find a verdict in the following form: We find for the plaintiff so many dollars, or we find for the defendant so many dollars. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff for $134.20.

1, 2 After entry of judgment defendant appeals. His exceptions, eight in number, present two questions for determination. First, it is assigned as error that his Honor held and charged the jury that the appellant, Orr, could only recover the amount he had expended in helping to plant, cultivate, and gather the crops on the land,' which was to have been cultivated by Allen and Gunter.

We see no error on the part of his Honor either in his ruling or charge to the jury, and these exceptions are overruled. Second question made is that it was error for the Judge to leave it to the jury to determine from the contract the relation of the parties. It was the duty and province of the Judge to construe the contract which was in writing.

This exception must be overruled. The Judge could not construe the contract in its absence even if it was in writing, because there was a conflict of evidence as to what the contract was, and, that being so, it was properly submitted to the jury.

All exceptions are overruled.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raj Sabhlok, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

| By:    | /s/ RAJ SABHLOK                                                                             |   |   |
|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|        |                                                                                             |   |   |
|        | **Raj Sabhlok*Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Corporate Development*** |   |   |
| Date:  | **November 8, 2002**                                                                        |   |   |
No. 1892.

#### Covar *v.*Sallat.

April Term, 1886.

Filed June 2, 1886.

This was a consent order settling matters of controversy involved in the appeal.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09301]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 1 and 16

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0365]


Administrative Detention of Drugs Intended for Human or Animal 
Use; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final 
rule entitled ``Administrative Detention of Drugs Intended for Human or 
Animal Use'' that appeared in the Federal Register of May 29, 2014 (79 
FR 30716). The rule sets forth the procedures for detention of drugs 
believed to be adulterated or misbranded and amends the scope of FDA's 
part 16 regulatory hearing procedures to include the administrative 
detention of drugs. The rule published with incorrect statements 
regarding the impact of the final rule on small entities. This document 
corrects those errors.

DATES: Effective April 22, 2015 and applicable beginning June 30, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Leongini, Office of Regulatory 
Affairs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 
32, Rm. 4339, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5300, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#07414346544e464e6a776b626a62697366736e686948554647616366296f6f7429606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d6b696c7e646c64405d4148404843594c59444243627f6c6d4b494c0345455e034a425b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of May 29, 2014, in 
FR Doc. 2014-12458, the following corrections are made:
    1. On page 30718, in the third column, under ``Analysis of Impacts 
(Summary of the Regulatory Impact Analysis),'' the last sentence of the 
second paragraph is corrected to read: ``FDA certifies that this final 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities.''
    2. On page 30719, in the first column, the third sentence of the 
last full paragraph is corrected to read: ``We certify that this final 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities.''

    Dated: April 16, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-09301 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1760
VIVIAN M. KELLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND, School of Continuing Studies, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00203-JRS) Submitted: November 30, 2006 Decided: December 27, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vivian M. Kelley, Appellant Pro Se. Gilbert Everett Schill, Jr., Stephanie Ploszay Karn, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Vivian M. Kelley appeals the district court’s order granting the University of Richmond’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss her complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kelley v. Univ. of Richmond , No. 3:06- cv-00203-JRS (E.D. Va. June 2, 2006). We further deny Kelley’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 20469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1973]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 263 Under Alternative Site 
Framework Lewiston-Auburn, Maine

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of 
zones;
    Whereas, the Lewiston-Auburn Economic Growth Council, grantee of 
FTZ 263, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-64-2014, 
docketed 09-11-2014) for authority to reorganize under the ASF with a 
service area of the Counties of Androscoggin, Cumberland, and 
Sagadahoc, Maine, within and adjacent to the Portland Customs and 
Border Protection port of entry, and FTZ 263's existing Sites 1 and 2 
would be categorized as magnet sites;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (79 FR 56057, 09-18-2014) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 263 under the ASF is approved, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.13, to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the 
zone, and to an ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would 
terminate authority for Site 2 if not activated within five years from 
the month of approval.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of April 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-08764 Filed 4-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

CHERYL HARRIS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY, 

Defendant.

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 3:17CV0317 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVINGTON

ORDER

This cause coming before the Court on the joint motion of the parties, due notice having 

been given, and the Court being fully advised, 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. The Parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to

Justice Act (Doc. #18) is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney fees

in the amount of $4,600.00 and costs in the amount of $0.00, for a total of $4,600.00;

2. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the

United States subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If

no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to

Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff; and

3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: April 3, 2020 s/Sharon L. Ovington _ 

Sharon L. Ovington

United States Magistrate Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          44,648
<SECURITIES>                                   116,321
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (323)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,642
<PP&E>                                           7,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,590)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       187,308
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,504)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,463
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,227
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,906
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         317,194
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  389,846
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,736,830
<PP&E>                                         580,256
<DEPRECIATION>                                 540,457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,739,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,127,241
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,630
<OTHER-SE>                                     550,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,739,109
<SALES>                                        115,852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,852
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,360
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,850
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,510
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,510
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>