alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark J. Emkjer, President and Chief Executive Officer of Accelrys, Inc. (the
Company) and I, Rick E. Russo, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2008, (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by this Report.



/s/    MARK J. EMKJERMark J. Emkjer President and Chief Executive Officer  Date: May 30,
2008




/s/    RICK E. RUSSORick E. Russo Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date: June 5, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date
of the Report and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





________________________________________


FORM 8-K





________________________________________


CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


January 26, 2017


Date of report (date of earliest event reported)





_________________________________________


Digi International Inc.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





_________________________________________





Delaware1-3403341-1532464(State of Incorporation)(Commission file number)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)11001 Bren Road East, Minnetonka, Minnesota55343(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)


(952) 912-3444


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





___________________________________________


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


 ̈Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


 ̈Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---










Item 2.02Results of Operations and Financial Condition.


On January 26, 2017 , Digi International Inc. (“Digi”) issued a press release regarding Digi’s financial results for its first fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2016 .  A copy of Digi’s press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.


The information contained in this Current Report shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.





Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits.


The following exhibit is furnished herewith:


99.1Press Release dated January 26, 2017, announcing financial results for the first fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2016.








---







SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized.


Date: January 26, 2017





DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.By:/s/ Michael C. GoergenMichael C. GoergenSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer








---







EXHIBIT INDEX





No.ExhibitManner of Filing99.1Press Release dated January 26, 2017, announcing financial results for the first fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2016.FurnishedElectronically
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                      ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

               Subsidiaries of the Registrant as of June 30, 2002

         The following list of subsidiaries of Advanced Lighting Technologies,
Inc. indicates the jurisdiction of organization except for entities incorporated
in the State of Ohio:

ADLT Realty Corp. I, Inc.
Advanced Lighting Technologies Australia, Inc.
Deposition Sciences, Inc.
Lighting Resources International, Inc.
Microsun Technologies, Inc.
Venture Lighting International, Inc.


Advanced Lighting Technologies Canada, Inc., organized in Ontario
Advanced Lighting Technologies Europe Limited, organized in the United Kingdom
Advanced Lighting Technologies (NZ) Ltd., organized in New Zealand
APL Engineered Materials, Inc., an Illinois corporation
APL Japan Company, Ltd., organized in Japan
Ballastronix, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Lighting Resources Holdings Limited, organized in Mauritius
Lighting Resources Private Limited, organized in India
Parry Power Systems Limited, organized in the United Kingdom
Venture Lighting Europe, Ltd., organized in the United Kingdom
Venture Lighting India Limited, organized in India
Venture Lighting International, FZE, organized in Abu Dubai
Venture Lighting International, SA Pty, organized in South Africa
Venture Lighting Power Systems - North America, Inc., organized in Nova Scotia
Venture Lighting South East Asia Pty, Ltd., organized in Singapore
Venture Power Systems Private Ltd., organized in India
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q of American Community Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                       |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 6, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Randy P. Helton                  
|                       |  |     |  | Randy P. Helton                      
|                       |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
# Dan Jaffe, University of Washington

February 2 5 , 2016

Comments on US Background

(5 pages)Comments on US BackgroundDan Jaffe, University of Washington1. USBestimatedfrommodelsandtherearesignificantbiasesanduncertainties(10%biaslowinWesternUS)basedoncomparisonswith2007data.ThereisstrongevidencethatUSBhaschangedoverthepastdecade(Cooperetal2012;Gratz et2014).Recommendation:TheEPAshouldconsiderupdatingtheUSBanalysisandevaluatingthesemodelswithnotonlyO3observationsfromAQSandCASTNET,butalsohighqualityresearchobservationsofO3,suchasverticalprofiles,anddetailedchemicalmeasurementsfromhighelevationresearchsitessuchastheMt.Bachelor ObservatoryandtheStormPeakObservatoryinColorado.2. WildfiresareasignificantcontributortoPMandO3,especiallyinthewesternUS,andtheprevalenceofwildfiresappearstobeincreasing.HowevertheircontributiontoO3ishighlyvariableandnoteasytodiscernwithmodels(Jaffeetal2008;2013).Recommendation:TheEPAshouldconsiderconductingresearchtounderstandO3andPMformationfromwildfires,aswellasthehealthimpactsThisisespeciallyimportantinurbanareasthatareimpactedbysmoke.3.Theexceptionaleventruleremainsacomplexprocessforstatestonavigate.Thestateshavebeengivenverytighttimelinesformakingexceptionaleventdesignations.Recommendation:TheEPAshouldcontinuetoworkwithstatestosimplifytheexceptionaleventprocess.TheEPAshouldcontinuetoprovidetools,suchasthoseontheAirnowtechsite,butthesemustbecurrentandconsistentwiththeregulatorydeadlines.Mt. Bachelor, Oregon, (MBO) 2.8 km aslThe only high elevation/free trop research site on west coast of U.S.Continuous observations of CO, O3, aerosols and Hg since 2004;Frequent detection of Asian pollution and biomass burning plumes;More than 2 dozen papers since 2004 on O3, PM. Hg, LRT, wildfires, etc.Key goal: Identify importance of global sources on US air quality.95thpercentile50thpercentile5thpercentile2015FiresinWashingtonStatePlotfromAIRNOWTECHModelstendtoover‐predictO3nearthesourceandunder‐predictatdistanceEularian modeling vs Statistical modelingEularian modeling:Gridded emissions, meteorology, solar fluxes (J values).Use known photochemistry and transport to model mixing ratios.For wildfires significant challenges withemissions, plume rise, aerosols and thechemistry, which can be very different from typical urban photochemistry.Modeled concentrations may differ significantly from observations makingquantitative attribution difficult.Statistical modeling:Examines the relationship between the observed mixing ratios and other factors.Possible factors to include are temp, wind speed, RH, solar flux, etc.Outliers (high residuals) represent an additional O3source and are candidates forfurther investigation.O3= A*temp + B*winds + C*DOY... + residual(Jaffe et al 2004; 2013; Camalier et al 2007; CARB 2011;EPA 2015)AirNow MetDataThisisanexcellentsetoftoolsthatcansupportstatisticalmodelingandexceptionaleventdocumentation.Butitneedstobekeptcurrent.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 09, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 09, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0159. CRS CAPITAL, INC. et al. v. RREF II PB ACQUISITIONS, LLC et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2016V115095
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

HENRY LUCAS, JR. :

Plaintiffs, : Case No. 3:17cv275

-vs- : District Judge Walter H. Rice

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. :

Defendant. :

ORDER OF REFERENCE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C), and §636(b)(3), the above-captioned

action is hereby referred to United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, ADR Coordinator,

for purposes of conducting a mediation. The Mediation should be scheduled as soon as possible,

as this matter is set for Trial on June 14, 2021.

Dated: May 13, 2021

 Walter H. Rice

 United States District Judge

(tp - per Judge Rice authorization after his 

review)
In the Matter of 

SERVED JUNE 6, 2012 

U.S. DEP ARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2010-0620 

DIAMOND AIR CHARTER, INC. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

(CP10EA0004) 

Respondent 

ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE 

OF FIFTH LITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

On May 1, 2012 an Order Granting Continuance and Setting Fifth Litigation Scheduling 

Conference was filed. 

On June 1, 2012 the FAA filed a Motion for Postponement of the Fifth Litigation 

Scheduling Conference set for June 7, 2012 at 9:30am Eastern standard time (EST). The FAA 

cited multiple grounds for the Motion, and noted that the Respondent had no objection to the 

Motion. From June 1, 2012 through June 5, 2012 the Office ofHearings (OH) clerical staff 

made multiple telephone calls to both parties to determine what three dates/times the parties were 

recommending for a rescheduled conference. On June 5, 2012 the parties recommended July 9, 

2012 at 1:30pm EST. The OH clerical staff consulted with the undersigned, and then orally 

confirmed with the parties that July 9, 2012 at 1:30pm EST was an acceptable date. 

After reviewing all relevant pleadings, motions, caselaw, regulation, statutory authority, 

and being fully advised; 

It Is Hereby Ordered: 

1. The FAA's Motion''for Postponement ofthe Fifth Litigation Scheduling Conference 

is granted. 

2. The Fifth Litigation Scheduling Conference is continued from June 7, 2012 at 9:30am 

EST to July 9, 2012 at 1:30pm. The Office of Hearings shall initiate the conference 

call. 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10EA0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC:-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

Aviation Law Experts 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel, EAL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable J .E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Rhodes 
Technologies

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 
1301.34(a) on or before May 22, 2015. Such persons may also file a 
written request for a hearing on the application pursuant to 21 CFR 
1301.43 on or before May 22, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODXL, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for 
hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: 
Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. 
Comments and request for hearings on applications to import narcotic 
raw material are not appropriate. 72 FR 3417 (January 25, 2007).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion 
Control (``Deputy Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 
28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on March 
10, 2015, Rhodes Technologies, 498 Washington Street, Coventry, Rhode 
Island 02816 applied to be registered as an importer of the following 
basic classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Controlled Substance                       Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Opium, raw (9600)..........................  II
Poppy Straw Concentrate (9670).............  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import the listed controlled substances in 
order to bulk manufacture controlled substances in Active 
Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) form. The company distributes the 
manufactured APIs in bulk to its customers.

    Dated: April 14, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-09338 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3876 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 100 percent cotton narrow woven fabric. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2009 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 100 percent cotton 

narrow woven fabric. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 100 PERCENT COTTON NARROW WOVEN FAB4 RIC. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 100 percent cotton narrow 

woven fabric, 2 in.(w) x 8 

in.(1) (provided for in subheading 5806.31.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3876 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>



March 27, 2000



Board of Directors
Schlotzsky's, Inc.


As stated in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements of Schlotzsky's,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 1999,
the company changed its accounting policy for recognition of developer fees
from recognizing such fees at inception of the contract to recognizing fees
on a straight-line basis over the term of the actual or expected development
schedule within developer contracts. Management believes the newly adopted
accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because the new
revenue recognition policy results in a better matching of revenues and
obligations related to such revenues. At your request, we have reviewed and
discussed with management the circumstances, business judgment, and planning
that formed the basis for making this change in accounting principle.

It should be recognized that professional standards have not been established
for selecting among alternative principles that exist in this area or for
evaluating the preferability of alternative accounting principles.
Accordingly, we are furnishing this letter solely for purposes of the
Company's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
commission, and it should not be used or relied on for any other purpose.

Based on our review and discussion, we concur with management's judgement
that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the
circumstances. In formulating this position, we are relying on management's
business planning and judgment, which we do not find unreasonable.


Very truly yours,


Grant Thornton, LLP
Order entered June 1 6 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00486 - CV IN RE BARBARA JOHNSON On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 10 - 14794

O RDER Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, and Goldstein Before the Court is relator’s May 23, 202 2 petition for writ of mandamus in which relator complains of the trial court’s order dismissing her appeal from the Associ ate Judge’s April 26, 2021 report. We request a response, if any, from real part y in interest and respondent by J uly 6 , 202 2

. /s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
ex10-26.htm



Exhibit 10.26


 








Purchasing agreement







Buyer: Taiyuan Hongxing Carbon Black Co. Ltd


Seller: Taiyuan Gengyang Group Ltd.







The buyer and the seller have agreed upon the following terms:







1. Product Name: high temperature coal tar







2. Quantity: 1,000 ton/month, determined upon delivery by the seller







3. Price per unit: 1,700 RMB/ton as of now. However, the price per unit shall reflect the market conditions upon delivery







4. Quality control:


                High temperature coal tar: moisture ≤ 4%, coal dust ≤ 0.15%, density ≤ 1.198g/cm3


                Mid temperature coal tar: moisture ≤ 3%, coal dust ≤ 0.13%, density ≤ 1.198g/cm3 at 20 ̊Cg/cm3


 


5. Seller shall deliver the product







6. Payment shall be made either via cash or Bill of Exchange which will be cashed upon within 30 days







7. The Agreement shall be executed in accordance with the Law of Contract of PRC







8. The seller and the buyer shall discuss any disagreement to dissolve any disputes







9. The agreement shall be made in 2 copies and the seller and the buy shall each obtain one copy of the agreement for record keeping







The agreement is deemed effective from January 1st 2009 to December 31st 2009













	
Buyer (Seal):

	
Seller (Seal):


	
Legal Representative:

	
Legal Representative:


	
Entrusted  agent :

	
Entrusted  agent :


	
Telephone:

	
Telephone:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
       (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2009
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibChief Executive Officer