alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Shahbazian, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|/s/ Michael Shahbazian                                                                 
|Michael Shahbazian Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer Date: May 10, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 429 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 429

         To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2009

 Mr. Poe of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 28.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting at the end the following:
``Sec. 678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings
    ``The Supreme Court shall permit television coverage of all open 
sessions of the Court unless the Court decides, by a vote of the 
majority of justices, that allowing such coverage in a particular case 
would constitute a violation of the due process rights of 1 or more of 
the parties before the Court.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The chapter analysis for chapter 45 of 
title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the 
following:

``678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

# AGENCY:

National Institutes of Health, HHS.

      ( print page 107)    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) will host a public online forum to enable public discussion of the Center's proposals to reorganize its Office of Rare Diseases Research and Office of Grants Management and Scientific Review to the Division of Rare Diseases Innovation and the Division of Extramural Activities, respectively. The proposals seek to recognize the importance of rare diseases research to the Center and to align its extramural activities with those of other Institutes and Centers at the National Institutes of Health. The online forum will allow members of the public to review the reorganization proposals and submit comments.

# DATES:

The public online forum will become available on January 24, 2022 and will remain open for five calendar days, through January 29, 2022.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The public forum will be held online, at                         *https://ncats.nih.gov/​about/​center/​proposed-reorganization*                         for the period of time listed above.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Christopher Maurer, Management Analyst, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH,                         *christopher.maurer2@nih.gov*                         or 301-827-7280.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The NIH Reform Act of 2006 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 281(d)(4)) requires public notice of proposed reorganization plans. This announcement and the public forum serve as that notice.

Keith R. Lamirande,

Executive Officer, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.

[FR Doc. 2021-28415 Filed 12-30-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-12-00532-CR

NO. 09-12-00533-CR

____________________

WILBUR BRANDON NIXON a/k/a WILBUR NIXON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 11-12114 and 11-13031

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

On January 11, 2013, appellant’s appointed counsel filed motions to 

withdraw and briefs which urge this Court to review these appeals pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). See In 

re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408-09 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Counsel certified 

service of the motions to withdraw and the briefs on the appellant. Counsel states 
2

that he provided appellant with a copy of the reporter’s records and notified 

appellant of his right to review the records and file pro se briefs. 

It is, therefore, ORDERED that appellant, Wilbur Brandon Nixon a/k/a 

Wilbur Nixon, be given 60 days from the date hereof to file pro se briefs. It is, 

further, ORDERED that the State may file reply briefs, due 30 days from the date 

appellant files his briefs, or if no briefs are filed by appellant, 70 days from the 

date hereof.

It is further ORDERED that counsel for appellant advise appellant of his 

right to seek discretionary review under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 68. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 48.4; see also Tex. R. App. P. 68.

ORDER ENTERED February 7, 2013. 

PER CURIAM

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
# Journal officiel C 250/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 250 |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 62e année25 juillet 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 250

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

62e année25 juillet 2019

---

| Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informations |
| | INFORMATIONS PROVENANT DES INSTITUTIONS, ORGANES ET ORGANISMES DE L'UNION EUROPÉENNE |
| | Parlement européenConseil |
| 2019/C 250/01 | Déclaration commune du Parlement, du Conseil et de la Commission relative au règlement (UE) 2019/1243 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 20 juin 2019 adaptant aux articles 290 et 291 du traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne une série d’actes juridiques prévoyant le recours à la procédure de réglementation avec contrôle | 1 |

Sommaire

page

IV   Informations

INFORMATIONS PROVENANT DES INSTITUTIONS, ORGANES ET ORGANISMES DE L'UNION EUROPÉENNE

Parlement européenConseil

2019/C 250/01

Déclaration commune du Parlement, du Conseil et de la Commission relative au règlement (UE) 2019/1243 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 20 juin 2019 adaptant aux articles 290 et 291 du traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne une série d’actes juridiques prévoyant le recours à la procédure de réglementation avec contrôle

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

IV Informations

INFORMATIONS PROVENANT DES INSTITUTIONS, ORGANES ET ORGANISMES DE L'UNION EUROPÉENNE

Parlement européen Conseil

| 25.7.2019 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | C 250/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2019

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

C 250/1

---

Déclaration commune du Parlement, du Conseil et de la Commission relative au règlement (UE) 2019/1243 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 20 juin 2019 adaptant aux articles 290 et 291 du traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne une série d’actes juridiques prévoyant le recours à la procédure de réglementation avec contrôle (1)

(2019/C 250/01)

Au point 27 de l’accord interinstitutionnel «Mieux légiférer», les trois institutions reconnaissent qu’il est nécessaire d’aligner toute la législation existante sur le cadre juridique introduit par le traité de Lisbonne, et en particulier d’accorder un niveau de priorité élevé à l’alignement rapide de tous les actes de base qui se réfèrent encore à la procédure de réglementation avec contrôle. À la suite de la proposition présentée à cette fin par la Commission, le règlement répond à cette nécessité en prévoyant l’alignement de la procédure de réglementation avec contrôle dans un grand nombre d’actes figurant dans ladite proposition. Les trois institutions continueront d’œuvrer à l’alignement des autres actes visés dans cette proposition.

---

(1)  JO L 198 du 25.7.2019, p. 241.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Brendan J. McGill, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

(1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d); and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

                                          By:  /s/ Brendan J. McGill
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Brendan J. McGill
                                               Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 11, 2004

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Harleysville Savings Financial
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.


                                    page -20-
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Faraj Aalaei, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 6, 2004/s/    FARAJ AALAEIFaraj Aalaei Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CASE NO. 3:17crl55
Plaintiff,
JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
vs.

WILLIAM SPARKS

Defendant.

ENTRY REFERRING DEFENDANT TO THE FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY
CENTER FOR WESTERN OHIO FOR PURPOSES OF A MENTAL STATUS
EVALUATION, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §3552(c); PROCEDURES
ORDERED OF COUNSEL

This Court, upon its own motion, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3552(c), refers Defendant
herein to the Forensic Psychiatry Center for Western Ohio, for the purposes of a mental status
evaluation.

Accordingly, it is the request of this Court that counsel for the Defendant and the
government furnish the Forensic Psychiatry Center for Western Ohio with any materials and/or
statements they wish within seven days from date of this Entry. For its part, the Court will
furnish the Pre-Sentence Investigation Report and the memoranda of counsel. The Forensic
Psychiatry Center for Western Ohio should delay any evaluation until expiration of the seven day
period.

The Forensic Psychiatry Center for Western Ohio is to establish an appointment time

with the Butler County Jail to evaluate the Defendant.


The officials at the Butler County Jail are to do all within their power to facilitate this

evaluation.

Laenbo

February 2, 2018 WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of record
United States Marshal
Butler County Jail
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 2,
2011 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2011-3 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.
The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey_                      |  | Dated: March 30, 2015
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ETHANOL BOOSTING SYS TEMS, LLC, MASSACHUSETTS INSTIT UTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiffs

- Appellants

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2020

- 1472

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:19

- cv

- 00196

- CFC

- SRF, Judge Colm F. Connolly.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

A NDRES H EALY , Susman Godfrey LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for plaintiffs

- appellants. Also represented by
M ATTHEW R OBERT B ERRY
, S TEVEN M. S EIGEL ; W ILLIAM D ANIEL O'C ONNELL , New York, NY.

M ICHAEL S. C ONNOR , Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by
K IRK T. B RADLEY ; N ATALIE C HRISTINE C LAYTON
, A NDREW J AMES L IGOTTI , New York, NY; B RIAN D AVID H ILL , Lerner, Case: 20-1472 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 12/11/2020David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik LLP, Westfield, NJ.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK
, C LEVENGER
, and O’M ALLEY
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 11, 2020 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 20-1472 Document: 43 Page: 2 Filed: 12/11/2020
#### Russell SIMS v. PRESCOTT FEED MILLS, INC.

84-287

688 S.W.2d 743

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered May 6, 1985

*23*Wilson, Walker & Short, P.A.,*by: *Charles M. Walker,*for appellant.

*Pedigo & Jontz, P.A.,*by: *Jim Pedigo,*for appellee.

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The single issue in this case involves service of process. The defendant and his brother lived in the same dwelling. A deputy sheriff attempted to complete service of process by handing a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the defendant’s brother, not at their dwelling, but at the law offices of the plaintiff’s attorney. The trial court held that the purported substituted service of process was valid. We reverse. Jurisdiction to interpret the rules of civil procedure is in this Court. Rule 29(l)(c).

ARCP Rule 4(d)(1) provides, among other things, that one form of substituted service may be had by leaving a copy of the summons and of the complaint at the defendant’s “dwelling house or usual place of abode with some person residing therein who is at least fourteen years of age. . . .” Substituted service is a departure from the common law, and rules or statutes providing for it are mandatory and to be complied with exactly. *Edmonson*v. *Farris,*263 Ark. 505, 565 S.W.2d 617 (1978). The undisputed proof shows the purported service was attempted at an attorney’s office and not at the defendant’s dwelling. The rule providing for substituted service was not complied with, and the service is void.

This construction of our substituted service rule is not arbitrary. All rules are framed and construed with a view to their general operation. Our rule was framed and is now construed as being the most certain mode of conveying actual notice to an *24absent defendant. Under our construction the general operation will be for the other resident to leave the suit papers at the dwelling for the defendant. The opposite would be true if service would be allowed at some other place. This case provides a good example, for here, the papers were left at the plaintiffs attorney’s office, and the defendant never saw them.

Reversed and remanded for entry of orders consistent with this opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 21, 2005 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.