alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# National Guard aids victims of holiday winter storm

/ Published Dec. 21, 2006

ARLINGTON, Va - The first day of winter hammered the Midwest, and the National Guard helped to soften the blow.

More than 60 Colorado National Guard members and their equipment jumped into action Dec. 20-21, Guard officials said, as travelers became trapped by a blizzard that blanketed north-central and northeast Colorado five days before Christmas.

Responding to the blizzard was just one more example of how Guard members respond to emergencies in their state and in the country.

Officials said Colorado Gov. Bill Owens declared a statewide disaster emergency which activated the National Guard to assist in road safety efforts. Guard equipment was pre-positioned throughout the state in anticipation of the storm.

Guard Soldiers deployed with Humvees to downtown Denver to provide emergency transportation, the National Guard Bureau reported. They also assisted the Colorado Department of Transportation and the Colorado State Patrol by rescuing trapped motorists, and they cleared abandoned vehicles from blocked highways.

Soldiers transported and distributed drinking water and baby formula to families among the more than 4,000 travelers marooned at the Denver International Airport.

The Guard members helped re-supply Red Cross shelters. And Colorado Guard vehicles delivered donated blankets to an emergency shelter in Pueblo.

The state's joint operations center also coordinated and prepared response plans and was open 24 hours a day for as long as needed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Smart Modular Technologies, Inc.
Fremont, California


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-99822) of our report dated September
8, 1995, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Apex Data, Inc.
and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 1994, and appearing in the
Annual Report of SMART Modular Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year
ended October 31, 1996.


                                            /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

                                            BDO Seidman, LLP

San Francisco, California
January 27, 1997
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3989 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 

study to determine the suitability and feasibility of adding the Heart 

Mountain Relocation Center, in the State of Wyoming, as a unit of 

the National Park System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2009 

Mrs. LUMMIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study to determine the suitability and 

feasibility of adding the Heart Mountain Relocation Center, in the State of Wyoming, as a unit of the National 

Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Heart Mountain Relo5 cation Center Study Act of 2009’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3989 IH

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

2 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall con3 duct a special resource study of the Heart Mountain Relo4 cation Center, in Park County, Wyoming. 

5 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub6 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

7 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

8 Heart Mountain Relocation Center and surrounding 

9 area; 

10 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

11 designating the Heart Mountain Relocation Center 

12 as a unit of the National Park System; 

13 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

14 protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, 

15 State, or local governmental entities, or private and 

16 nonprofit organizations; 

17 (4) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac18 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

19 maintenance associated with the alternatives; 

20 (5) identify any potential impacts of designation 

21 of the site as a unit of the National Park System 

22 on private landowners; and 

23 (6) consult with interested Federal, State, or 

24 local governmental entities, federally recognized In25 dian tribes, private and nonprofit organizations, 

26 owners of private property that may be affected by 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3989 IH

1 any such designation, or any other interested indi2 viduals. 

3 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

4 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec5 tion 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5). 

6 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

7 on which funds are first made available for the study 

8 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

9 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep10 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

11 Resources of the Senate a report containing the results 

12 of the study and any conclusions and recommendations of 

13 the Secretary. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7052

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

CHARLES JEROME ADAMS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Patrick Michael Duffy, District 

Judge. (1:91-cr-00291-PMD-2) 

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 23, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Charles Jerome Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Charles Jerome Adams appeals the district court’s 

orders denying his petition for a writ of audita querela and his 

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Adams, 

No. 1:91-cr-00291-PMD-2 (D.S.C. May 26, 2009). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 73
          - [Docket No. FDA-2015-C-1154]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of petition.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing that we have filed a petition, submitted by E. & J. Gallo Winery, proposing that the color additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of mica-based pearlescent pigments as color additives in certain distilled spirits.

# DATES:

The color additive petition was filed on March 19, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Salome Bhagan, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 240-402-3041.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 721(d)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379e(d)(1)), we are giving notice that we have filed a color additive petition (CAP 5C0302), submitted by E. & J. Gallo Winery, c/o Keller and Heckman LLP, Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1420, San Francisco, CA 94111. The petition proposes to amend the color additive regulations in § 73.350                     *Mica-based pearlescent pigments*                     (21 CFR 73.350) to provide for the safe use of mica-based pearlescent pigments at a level of up to 0.07 percent by weight in distilled spirits containing not less than 18 percent and not more than 25 percent alcohol by volume, and to remove the current exclusion for distilled spirit mixtures containing more than 5 percent wine on a proof gallon basis.                

We have determined under 21 CFR 25.32(k) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

Dated: April 15, 2015.

Dennis M. Keefe,

Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

[FR Doc. 2015-09248 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anton J. Drescher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1.

this report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or  15(d) of the 1934 Act, and



2.

the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the registrant's financial condition and results of  operations of the registrant.



By: /s/ Anton J. Drescher

------------------------------------

Name: Anton J. Drescher

Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

Date:November 8th, 2006
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 4,
2011 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2011-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.
The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  |  |  | Dated: March 30, 2015
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |  |  |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22118-22119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09052]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 11

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0168]


Policy for Evaluating Sea Service Aboard Liftboats

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces the availability of Office of 
Commercial Vessel Compliance (CVC) Policy Letter 14-03, Evaluating Sea 
Service Aboard Liftboats. This policy letter will provide guidance to 
mariners concerning endorsements to Merchant Mariner Credentials (MMC) 
for service on liftboats.

DATES: This policy letter is effective on April 6, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
notice of availability, call or email Luke B. Harden, Mariner 
Credentialing Program Policy Division (CG-CVC-4), U.S. Coast Guard; 
telephone 202-372-2357, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ed3d3ddcef1f2f7fde7deebedfdf9b0f3f7f2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bcf1f1ffecd3d0d5dfc5fcc9cfdfdb92d1d5d0">[email protected]</span></a>. If you have questions on 
viewing material in the

[[Page 22119]]

docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, 
telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Viewing Documents

    The policy letter discussed below is available and can be viewed by 
going to http://www.uscg.mil/nmc and clicking on ``Regulations & 
Policy,'' then click on ``Policy Letters.''

Discussion

    Liftboats spend significant periods elevated at work sites and are 
not underway at those times. The time a liftboat spends underway is 
generally limited to travelling to and from a job site, and may be a 
relatively small portion of the total time the liftboat is in 
operation. Because of these specialized operations, the Coast Guard 
considers liftboats to be unique vessels and has evaluated sea service 
on liftboats to determine its equivalency to traditional service.
    This policy letter describes policy for the Coast Guards' 
evaluation of service obtained on liftboats used to qualify for 
national officer endorsements to an MMC.

Authority

    This notice of availability is issued under the authority of 5 
U.S.C. 552(a).

    Dated: April 2, 2015.
J.C. Burton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Director, Inspection & Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-09052 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

IN THE MATTER OF 

 RICHARD M. CORCORAN 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 1624 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

No. 74 DB 2009 

Attorney Registration No. 75280

(Cambria County) 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

 AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Reinstatement is 

granted. Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the 

investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
    period ended March 31,2005 (the Quarterly
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934 as amended; and
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.                                                                            



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Michael L. Chasen  
| |                        
| | Michael L. Chasen      
| | Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 23

- 00465

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF I.M. , a Child From the 57th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021

- PA

- 00828 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Beth Watkins , Justice Delivered and Filed: June 28, 2023
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant Roselynn Salazar Ojeda filed a notice of appeal on April 27, 2023. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure require a party to s tate the date of the judgment or order appealed from in the notice of appeal

. T EX . R. A PP
. P. 25.1(d)(2). Appellant’s notice of appeal does not state any date of the judgment or order from which she wishes to appeal or otherwise identify any judgment or or der whatsoever . The clerk’s record shows her parental rights were terminated on March 23, 2022. Assuming appellant seeks to appeal that order, t he notice of appeal was due April 12, 2022, T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.1(b), or a motion for an extension of time was du e April 27, 2022.
T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3. Appellant’s April 27, 2023 notice of appeal is therefore untimely. Because the notice of appeal is untimely, we ordered Appellant to show cause by May 26, 2023 why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of juri sdiction. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(a). We04

- 23

- 00465

- CV

- 2

- admonished Appellant that if she fail ed to show cause or respond as ordered, this appeal would be dismissed without further notice. See id. Appellant has not filed a response. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 21, 2012

t0514 

# Order

May 21, 2012

144439

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144439 COA: 299498 Oakland CC: 2009-229756-FC KNIQUE DJON LAWRENCE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 22, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
0248

#### B. G. LIVINGSTON, Respondent, v. CAROLINA TIMBER COMPANY, et al., Appellants.

(320 S. E. *(2d)*474)

Court of Appeals

*William W. Watkins,*of *Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney,*Columbia, *for appellants.*

*B. G. Livingston, pro se.*

Heard June 28, 1984.

Decided Sept. 4, 1984.

Gardner, Judge:

This is an action for payments due under a road construction contract; the jury found for the defendant; the trial judge granted a new trial for reasons not disclosed by the record. We remand.

In the case of *South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation v. Mooneyham, et al.,*275 S. C. 205, 269 S. E. (2d) 329 (1980), the court reviewed its decisions about new trials granted by a trial judge and concluded that a decision of a trial judge granting a new trial will not be disturbed on appeal unless his finding is wholly unsupported by evidence, or the conclusion reached has been controlled by an error of law.

*597The trial judge gave no reason(s) for granting the new trial. The record does not disclose whether his decision was supported by evidence or was the result of an erroneous conclusion of law. The case is, therefore, remanded with instruction that the trial court issue its order setting forth the reason(s) for the granting of a new trial.

Remanded.

Sanders, C. J., and Goolsby, J., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Scott Kamsler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                  Date: November 5, 2004

                                                         /s/ J. SCOTT KAMSLER
                                                       -------------------------
                                                           J. Scott Kamsler
                                                       Vice President and Chief
                                                       Financial Officer