alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





________________________________________


FORM 8-K





________________________________________


CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


October 27, 2016


Date of report (date of earliest event reported)





_________________________________________


Digi International Inc.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





_________________________________________





Delaware1-3403341-1532464(State of Incorporation)(Commission file number)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)11001 Bren Road East, Minnetonka, Minnesota55343(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)


(952) 912-3444


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





___________________________________________


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


 ̈Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


 ̈Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---










Item 2.02Results of Operations and Financial Condition.


On October 27, 2016 , Digi International Inc. (“Digi”) issued a press release regarding Digi’s financial results for its fourth fiscal quarter and full year ended September 30, 2016 .  A copy of Digi’s press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.


The information contained in this Current Report shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.





Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits.


The following exhibit is furnished herewith:


99.1Press Release dated October 27, 2016, announcing financial results for the fourth fiscal quarter and full year ended September 30, 2016.








---







SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized.


Date: October 27, 2016





DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.By:/s/ Michael C. GoergenMichael C. GoergenSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer








---







EXHIBIT INDEX





No.ExhibitManner of Filing99.1Press Release dated October 27, 2016, announcing financial results for the fourth fiscal quarter and full year ended September 30, 2016.FurnishedElectronically
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of RDC  International,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, John Harkola,  Chief Executive Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-  Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to the  best  of my
knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ John Harkola
----------------------------
John Harkola
Chief Executive Officer
February 17, 2004
From: "Allain, Ryan CDR" < Ryan.D.Allain@uscg.mil >

To: Ryan Albert/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Mehaffey, Jennifer" < Jennifer.A.Mehaffey@uscg.mil > Date: 03/09/2012 01:51 PM Subject: CG ESTIMATE OF ISSUING AMS DETERMINATION Sent by: Ryan.D.Allain@uscg.mil

Ryan,

Based on some in

- house discussions we've come

- up with an estimate for when we believe we'll be able to being issuing AMS Determinations. Our actions will be contingent upon the sufficiency and thoroughness of each individual AMS determination request. If we receive enough information in an AMS determination request from a ballast water treatment system vendor, we anticipate that we will begin issuing AMS determination sometime beginning after March 1, 2013.

CDR Ryan Allain

U.S. Coast Guard Chief, Environmental Standards Division Coast Guard Headquarters, CG

- 5224 (202) 372

- 1430
22572

#### Pauline H. KNIGHT, Respondent v. William W. KELLY, Executor of the Estate of A. Wilkes Knight, deceased, and American Insurance Company, of whom William W. Kelly is Appellant. Appeal of William W. KELLY.

(345 S. E. (2d) 490)

Supreme Court

*319*Thomas B. Bryant, III*of *Bryant, Fanning & Yarborough,*Orangeburg, *for appellant.*

*Charles H. Williams*of *Williams & Williams,*Orangeburg, and *Richard B. Ness*of *Early, Kemp & Ness,*Bamberg, *for respondent.*

Heard May 20, 1986.

Decided June 16, 1986.

*Per Curiam:*

Appellant contends that the circuit court erred in failing to afford him a jury trial, a trial *de novo,*or the opportunity to introduce further evidence in his appeal from the probate court.

This Court adopts the opinion issued by the Court of Appeals in *Martin v. Skinner,*286 S. C. 527, 335 S. E. (2d) 252 (Ct. App. 1985) *in toto.*That case is dis-positive of the issues raised on this appeal.

Affirmed.

Ness, C. J., not participating.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Forms 10-K and 10-K/A of Open Text Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Barrenechea, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    MARKBARRENECHEAMark BarrenecheaPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: January 25, 2013
Southwest Region Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas Airplane Certification Office, ASW - 150 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137 May 18 , 2015 Mr. Bob Frizzell M7 Aerospace L LC 10823 N.E. Entrance Road San Antonio, TX 78216 Dear Mr. Frizzell : Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) to Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014 - 15 - 01 ; Amendment 39 - 17903 The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has received your letter M - 5786 , dated April 15, 2015 , requesting FAA approval of Service Bulletin (SB) 227 - 53 - 012 for M7 Aerospace LLC (M7) SA227 - AT / - AC/ - BC model airplanes serial numbers (S/N) AT602 - 631 & 695, AC607 - 788 and BC762, 764, 766, & 770 - 78 9 except 784, and SB CC7 - 53 - 008 for SA227 - CC/ - DC model airplanes S/N CC827, 829, & 840 - 844 and DC784, 790 - 826, 828, 830 - 839, & 845 - 904 , both i ssued April 3, 2015, as an AMOC to paragraph s (h)(1), (h)(2) and (i) of AD 2014 - 15 - 01. AD 2014 - 15 - 01 requires inspection and repair of the passenger door surround structure. P aragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) repair cracks and repetitively inspect, and par agraph (i) extends repetitive inspections in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section of M7 Aerospace SB 22 7 - 5 3 - 00 9 and CC7 - 53 - 005 , both i ssued: November 15, 2013 . Your proposal provides an acceptable level of safety since the new SB 227 - 553 - 012 and CC7 - 53 - 008 information provides for installation of alternate doubler part number 27K24191 - 009 , which is equivalent in strength to the existing part number 27K24191 - 001 doubler required by paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2) and (i) of the AD . The al ternate doubler maintains the same inspection threshold, intervals and methods , while eliminating possible interference with existing antenna installations on some of the affected airplanes. The Fort Worth Aircraft Certification Office (FW ACO) approves y our AMOC proposal to paragraph s ( h)(1), (h)(2) and (i) of AD 2014 - 15 - 01 to install alternate doubler part number 27K24191 - 009 in place of existing part number 27K24191 - 001 doubler using the procedures in SB 227 - 553 - 012 and CC7 - 53 - 008 , both issued April 3, 2015 . All provisions of AD 2014 - 15 - 01 that are not specifically referenced above remain fully applicable and must be complied with accordingly.
Home Publications Forms Publications Basin Plan

Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin (Basin Plan)

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin (Basin Plan) is the Board's master water quality control planning

document. It designates beneficial uses and water quality objectives for waters of the State, including surface waters and

groundwater. It also includes programs of implementation to achieve water quality objectives. 

Basin Plan

The current Basin Plan consists of the 2016 Basin Plan edition and all amendments fully-approved after October 2014 as listed

below:

Basin Plan 2016

Notes about the 2016 Basin Plan edition

Basin Plan 2016 (without Appendix)

Basin Plan 2016 (strikeout/underline showing changes since 2011)

Basin Plan amendments approved and in effect (approved by Office of Administrative Law) since October 2014:

None at this time.

Adopted Amendments Pending Further Approval

Basin Plan amendments do not become effective until sequentially adopted by the Regional Water Board, and approved by the

State Water Board and the California Office of Administrative Law. Amendments containing new or revised water quality

standards also require the approval of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Basin Plan Amendments Approved by the Central Coast Regional Water Board:

Resolution No. R3-2015-0004. Total maximum daily loads for nutrients in the Pajaro River basin. 7/30/2015.

Amendments Under Development

Amendment to revise Beneficial Use Designations and to make Editorial Changes.

Scoping Meeting Notice - April 18, 2016 at the Central Coast Water Board Hearing Room.

Triennial Review

The California Water Code and the Clean Water Act and require Basin Plans to be reviewed and updated periodically (at a

minimum every three years).

Go to the Central Coast Basin Plan Triennial Review Process page.

Previous Editions of the Basin Plan

1971 (interim)

1975

1989

1994

Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralcoast/publications_forms/publicat...

1 of 2 4/21/2016 11:42 AM
2011

Information Tools and Links

Basin Plan Information Tools

Glossary | Acronyms

Basin Plan Links

California Code of Regulations (CCR) | California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines | California Water

Code | Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) | Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) | Office of Administrative Law | PorterCologne | Water Quality Protection Program for Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary | Central Coast Regional

TMDL Projects

Conditions of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2016 State of California

The California Water Boards include the State Water Resources Control Board and nine Regional Boards

The State Water Board is one of five environmental entities operating under

the authority of the California Environmental Protection Agency

Cal/EPA | ARB | CalRecycle | DPR | DTSC | OEHHA | SWRCB

Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralcoast/publications_forms/publicat...

2 of 2 4/21/2016 11:42 AM
#### Jason Lara, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian Eugene Lara, et al., Plaintiffs, v West 109th Street Realty Corp. et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, New York County,

October 7, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Zimmerman & Zimmerman*for plaintiffs. *Sheft, Wright & Sweeney*for defendants.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward J. Greenfield, J.

The infant plaintiff fell out of a window and this action was commenced against the defendant landlords. Plaintiffs allege a statutory violation due to the landlords’ failure to erect a window guard. Section 131.15 of the New York City Health Code requires that such window guards be installed in each apartment where a child under the age of 10 resides.

In the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the infant visited the apartment in question (where his father lived) with frequency and spent hours there, but the infant lived with his mother at a different address at the time of the accident. The statute does not require landlords to install window guards in *187apartments where children visit, even with frequency, only where they reside.

Plaintiffs also allege common-law negligence, but neither the bill of particulars nor in opposition to the motion do plaintiffs allege any other negligent act or omission but the statutory failure to install window guards.

Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint is granted.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VILMA LETICIA SANTOS DIAZ,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 73452

Agency No. A200

- 824

- 042

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 16, 2018 **

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Vilma Leticia Santos Diaz , a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for withholding of

removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and administrative

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 73452

closure. Our jurisdic tion is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d

1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008) . We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for

review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Santos Diaz ’s challenge to the agency’s

denial of administrative closure. See Diaz

- Covarrubias v. Mukase y, 551 F.3d

1114, 1118

- 20 (9th Cir. 2009).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Santos Diaz

failed to demonstrate a nexus between the harm she fears and a protected ground.

S ee Barajas

- Romero v. Lynch , 846 F.3d 351 , 357 (9th Cir. 2017) (applicant

seeking withholding of removal must prove that a protected ground was a reason

for persecution) ; Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010)

( applicant’s “ desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or

random violence by gang members has no nexus to a protected ground ” ). Thus,

Santos Diaz’s withholding of removal claim fails.

Substantia l evidence also supports the agency ’s denial of CAT relief because

Santos Diaz failed to show it is more likely than not that s he would be tortured by

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Guatemala. See Aden v.3 15

- 73452

Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 ( 9th Cir. 2009)

.

We reject Santos Diaz’s contention that the BIA violated due process by

failing to rule on her “ motion to remand ” as raised in her ap peal brief to the BIA

.

See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and

substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process claim)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part

.
# Eiropas Savienības C 212A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 212A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 62. gadagājums2019. gada 24. jūnijs |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 212A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

62. gadagājums2019. gada 24. jūnijs

---

| Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- |
| | Labojumi |
| 2019/C 212 A/01 | Labojums paziņojumā par Eiropas Zāļu aģentūras (EMA) izpilddirektora vakanci – Amsterdama (pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe) – COM/2019/20037 ( OVC 165 A, 14.5.2019. ) | 1 |

Saturs

Lappuse

Labojumi

2019/C 212 A/01

Labojums paziņojumā par Eiropas Zāļu aģentūras (EMA) izpilddirektora vakanci – Amsterdama (pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe) – COM/2019/20037 ( OVC 165 A, 14.5.2019. )

EMA

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

Labojumi

| 24.6.2019 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 212/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2019

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 212/1

---

Labojums paziņojumā par Eiropas Zāļu aģentūras (EMA) izpilddirektora vakanci – Amsterdama (pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe) – COM/2019/20037

(
  “Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis”C 165 A, 2019. gada 14. maijs
  )

(2019/C 212 A/01)

6. lappusē iedaļā “Pieteikšanās termiņš”:

tekstu:

“Reģistrācijas beigu termiņš ir 2019. gada 13. jūnijā plkst. 12.00 (dienā) pēc Briseles laika, un pēc tā reģistrācija vairs nebūs iespējama.”

lasīt šādi:

lasīt šādi

“Reģistrācijas beigu termiņš ir 2019. gada 4. jūlijā plkst. 12.00 (dienā) pēc Briseles laika, un pēc tā reģistrācija vairs nebūs iespējama.”

---
Annual Bonus Plan, as amended



 Exhibit 10.56 

The Gymboree Corporation 

Annual Bonus Plan 

As amended on February 1, 2010 

The annual bonus plan is based on our quarterly and annual financial performance and provides our named executive officers the opportunity to earn cash
bonuses at specified target payout amounts calculated as a percentage of the named executive officer’s base salary. 
 At the end of each
fiscal quarter and the fiscal year, we calculate each named executive officer’s bonus by multiplying his or her target payout amount (annual or quarterly) by the bonus percent associated with the actual financial performance achieved.

  

	 	•	 	 For the first quarter we will pay bonuses up to 100% of the quarterly target payout amount. 



 

	 	•	 	 For the second quarter we will pay bonuses up to 100% of the quarterly target payout amount based on second quarter actual financial performance
achieved. In addition, we will pay bonuses in excess of 100% for both the first and second quarters based on the actual first six months’ financial performance achieved. 



 

	 	•	 	 For the third and fourth quarters, we will pay quarterly bonuses based on the actual financial performance achieved for each individual period.



  

	 	•	 	 If we fail to meet one or more quarterly performance targets, but meet the annual performance targets, each named executive officer is eligible to
receive a “catch-up” bonus, which allows the total bonus paid for the year to equal up to the maximum (300%) of the annual target payout amount.
# •

• TABLE 

# OF CONTENTS

State of Oregon

. Department of Environmental Quality


# JANUARY 2002

# •

•

• I. II. III.

IV. V. TABLE 

### OF CONTENTS Introduction Program Description Attorney General's Statement Memorandum ofAgreement Appendices

A. Oregon Administrative Rule Chapter 340, Divisions 100 through 106, 108, 109, 110, 120, and 12 B. Oregon Hazardous Waste Statutes (ORS 466 and 468) C. Web Site Information

StateofOregon Department of Environmental Quality 

### JANUARY 2002
EXHIBIT 23.5

DeGOLYER and
MacNAUGHTON4925 Greenville Avenue, Suite 400One Energy SquareDallas, Texas  75206

October 27, 2003

Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.600 East Las Colinas BoulevardSuite 1100Irving, Texas   75039

Gentlemen:

In
connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-109188), of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.
(the Company) to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we hereby consent to the
references to our firm in said Registration Statement found under the headings Experts
in the Basic Prospectus and under the headings Experts in the
Sales Agreement Prospectus.  We further consent to the references to our firm and estimates of
reserves and revenues that were taken from
our Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2002 on Certain Properties owned by Magnum Hunter Production, Inc.
SEC Case,
Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2001 on Certain Properties owned by Magnum Hunter Production, Inc.
SEC Case, and Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2000 on
Reserves owned by Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. in Certain Properties Offshore Louisiana, (our Reports)
in the section Oil and Gas Reserves of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, which is incorporated by reference in
the Registration Statement.  However, since the oil, condensate,
natural gas liquids, and natural gas reserves and revenue estimates, as of December 31, 2002, December
31, 2001, and December 31, 2000, set forth in our Reports
have been combined with reserves and revenue estimates of other petroleum consultants, we are necessarily
unable to verify the accuracy of the reserves and revenue values
contained in the aforementioned Annual Report.

| | Very truly yours,                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ DeGoyler and MacNaughtonDeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON