alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Faraj Aalaei, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|Date: August 7, 2006 | /s/ Faraj Aalaei
                       Faraj Aalaei Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
FORM 8-K



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549



CURRENT REPORT



Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934



October 26, 2005

AJAY SPORTS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware                                    018204                             39-1644025

(State or other jurisdiction                  (Commission file number)               (I.R.S. Employer

of incorporation, or organization))                                                  or Identification Number)



37735 Enterprise Court, Suite 600

Farmington Hills, MI 48331



(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (248) 994-0553

Former name or former address, if changed from last report



32751 Middlebelt Road

Farmington Hills, MI 48334



Item 8.01:   Other Events



On June 29, 2005, the Board of Directors of Ajay Sports, Inc. (the Registrant) extended the expiration date of the Registrants publicly traded common stock warrants until June 30, 2006.



The warrants were set to expire on June 30, 2005 and are being extended for another year period.  The exercise of six warrants allows the holder to purchase one share of the common stock of the Registrant for $6.00 per share. The warrants are traded under the symbol AJAYW.



SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.





AJAY SPORTS, INC.





By \s\ Thomas W. Itin



Thomas W. Itin

Chief Executive Officer



Date:   October 26, 2005
CBIC Control Numfc&r1 

355107 

RECEIVED 

OPPT CBIC 

2013 JUL ! 1 AH 6*12 

July 8th, 2013 

Attn: TSCA Section 4 f ^ 

[Docket ID EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112] £ « 

[40 CFR 799.5089] . ^ 5 

Document Control Office (7407M) | g 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics *° 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460-0001 

Re: Tiarco Chemical: Submittal of Test Reports under 40 CFR 799.5089 for the 

Production of Reservol (CAS 127-68-4) 

TSCA Section 4: 

At this time, Tiarco is submitting a final test report for each of the tests cited below. 

Tiarco is submitting 1 paper copy and 1 copy on electronic media of each test report. 

Identification of test rule: 40 CFR 799.5089 

Name, address, and telephone number for Tiarco: 

Tiarco Chemical 

315 Echelon Road 

Greenville, South Carolina 29605 

864/299-2800 

Tests required by 40 CFR 799.5089: 

Vapor pressure: ASTM E 1782-08 (thermal analysis) [test A3 on Table 3 

of the rule] 

Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test at 40 CFR 

799.9355 [testF2 on Table 3 of the rule] 

Being transmitted with this letter are the following documents, in both paper form, and 

digitally (on a CD-ROM): 

1. Vapour Pressure of Sodium 3-Nitrobenzene Sulfonate; JRF Study Number : 207-

2-11-4305 (Final Report) 
p. 2 

TSCA Section 4, EPA -2- July 8, 2013 

2. Characterization of Sodium 3-Nitrobenzene Sulfonate; JRF Study Number : 240-

2-11-5551 (Final Report) 

3. Validation of Analytical Method for Determination of Sodium 3-Nitrobenzene 

Sulfonate Active Ingredient Concentration in Dose Formulation; JRF Study 

Number : 228-2-13-5312 (Final Report) 

4. Acute Oral Toxicity Study of Sodium 3-Nitrobenzene Sulfonate in Rats; JRF 

Study Number : 401-1-04-5131 (Final Report) 

5. Repeat Dose 14-day Oral Toxicity Study of Sodium 3-Nitrobenzenesulfonate in 

Wistar Rats (Dose Range Finding Study); JRF Study Number : 410-1-04-5132 

(Final Report) 

6. Reproduction/Developmental Oral Toxicity Screening Test of Sodium 3-

Nitrobenzene Sulfonate (CAS # 127-68-4; US EPA HPV 3) in Wistar Rats; JRF 

Study Number : 496-1-04-4306 (Final Report) 

If there are any questions with regard to this matter or if you feel that any more 

information is required, please contact me as soon as possible at 706/277-1300. 

Je#f Vanderlip 

Technical Director, Tiarco Chemicals 

cc: Bennett King, Environmental Engineer & Consultant 

Danny Welch, TRCC EH&S Manager 

File: Reservol coverletter rev 1 
p. 3 

From: (706)277-1300 

JEFF VANDERLIP 

TIARCO CHEMICAL 

1300 TIARCO DR. 

DAL TON, 6A 30721 

Origin ID: DNNA FecG^. 

Express 

J13111302120326 

SHIP TO: (202)566-0799 BILL SENDER 

DOCUMENT CONTROL OFFICE (7407M) 

OFFICE OF POLLUTION PREVENTION & TO 

1200 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW 

TSCA SECTION 4 EPA 

WASHINGTON, DC 20460 

Ship Date: C8JUL13 * 

**

•n • 

ActWgt 5.0 LB * 

CAD: 4295900/INET3370 

. Delivery Address BfitCode 

Ref# DOCUMENTS 

Invoice # * 

PO# 

Dept# 

TM<# 7961 7199 4823 

I 0201 ! 

TG RDVA 

WED-10 JUL AA 

**2DAY** 

20460 

DC-US 

DCA 

'518G1/AA04/93AB
0374

#### The TOWN OF RIDGELAND, Appellant, v. H. E. CLELAND, Respondent.

(325 S. E. (2d) 587)

Court of Appeals

*278
      *R. Thayer Rivers, Jr.,*Ridgeland, *for appellant.*

*Frederick M. Corley,*Beaufort, *for respondent.*

Heard Dec. 17, 1984.

Decided Jan. 22, 1985.

*Per Curiam:*

The Town of Ridgeland appeals the circuit court’s denial of its motion to set aside a default judgment. Our review discloses, however, that the Transcript of Record does not contain any exceptions to the order from which appeal is taken.

Appeals are brought before this Court on exceptions which must raise the issues to be decided. Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court of South Carolina, Rule 4, sections 1 and 6. In the absence of any exception, as here, there is nothing for us to decide. *Evans v. Bruce,*245 S. C. 42, 138 S. E. (2d) 643 (1964). Accordingly, the Town of Ridgeland’s appeal is

Dismissed.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4017 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 43 Maple Avenue in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4017 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. ANN MARIE BLUTE POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 43 Maple Avenue in Shrewsbury, 

4 Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Form of Convertible Promissory Note



 Exhibit 4.2 

 

 

 3405 WEST DR MARTIN LUTHER KING
JR BLVD 
 SUITE 101 

TAMPA, FL 33607 

PH: (813) 288-4808 

FAX: (813) 288-6939 

CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE 

FACE VALUE $2,000,000 

COUPON 24% 

ISSUE DATE JUNE 4, 2010 

June 4, 2010 
 Mr. Howard Jenkins:

 This confirms that you have loaned Comprehensive Care Corporation (the “Company”) $2,000,000.00 (“Face Value”), which
shall accrue interest at the rate of 24 percent (24%) per annum payable quarterly in arrears. This Note will mature one year after the Issue Date. At maturity, the principal plus any accrued interest will be repaid to you by the Company. At
anytime prior to maturity, you may elect to convert the outstanding balance of the Note plus any accrued interest thereon calculated through the date of redemption, into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.25 per
share. The Company has the right to prepay all or part of this note after thirty days from the Issue Date upon providing you with five days written notice during which time you may exercise all, or any portion of, your conversion rights described
above. In addition to this Note, you will receive a five year Warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	  

	Giuseppe Crisafi
	Chief Financial Officer
	Comprehensive Care Corporation
#### WALTER L. TAYLOR *vs.*CHARLOTTE *J.*GORMAN.

*Decided April 10th, 1924.*

Appeal from tbe Superior Court of Baltimore City (SteiN, J.).

Action by Charlotte J. Gorman against Walter L. Taylor,, in wliich a judgment by confession was entered in favor of plaintiff. From orders granting his motion to strike out the judgment, but on certain terms named, defendant appeals.

Reversed.

The cause was argued, together with that next preceding, before Thomas, BattisoN, IIehecr, AkkiNS, Oeeutt, and Digges, JJ.

*Herbert B. Btimpsor,*and *Waller L. Taylor, -Jr.,*for the appellant.

*Joseph. S. Goldsmith,*for the appellee.

Thomas, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

By agreement of counsel this case and No-. 32 Appeals of this Term were tried together in the lower court, and, as in No. 32 Appeals, this appeal is by the defendant from the orders of the court below, striking out a judgment by confession entered against, him in favor of the appellee in the Superior Court of Baltimore City.

The note upon which the judgment was entered was for $6,250, and contained the same agreements on the part of the maker and endorsers as the notes referred to in No. 32 Appeals. The motion to strike out the judgment, the answer of the plaintiff, and the evidence in the case are the same as set out in the record in No. 32 Appeals.

*220The order passed in this case on -July 27th, 1923, striking out the judgment, required the defendant to file a bond in the sum of $8,000, and the order of December 15th, 1923, required him, as the condition upon which the judgment should be stricken out, to file a bond in the penalty of $8,500, “if corporate surety is given, or thirteen thousand dollars if individual surety or sureties are given.”

The evidence in the case shows that the note upon which the judgment was entered was a renewal of a note to the plaintiff for a like amount, but it does not appear from the evidence that the defendant was an endorser of the original note.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in No. 32 Appeals, we think the court below should have required the defendant, as the condition upon which the judgment should be stricken out, to enter an appearance in the case, and that the lien of said judgment should be preserved and retained, to secure the plaintiff from loss, should she recover at the trial of the case.

The orders appealed from in this case must, therefore, be reversed and cause remanded, in order that an order may be passed in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

*Orders reversed, with*costs, *and case remanded in order that an order may he passed in accordance with the opinion of this Court.*
Exhibit
10.14

    


    Amendment
No. 4 To Employment Agreement

    


    Amendment No. 4, dated as of November
2, 2009, by and between The Berkshire Bank, a New York banking corporation
("Employer"), and David Lukens ("Employee"), to the Agreement, dated as of
January 1, 2001, between Employer and Employee
(the "Employment Agreement").

    


    WITNESSETH:

    


    WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered
into the Employment Agreement; and

    


    WHEREAS, Employer and Employee wish the
amend the terms of the Employment Agreement with respect to the term
thereof.

    


    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
covenants herein contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows:

    


    1.           Paragraph
3 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

    


    
      	
              "3.

            	
              Term
      of Employment.  The employment by Employer of Employee pursuant
      hereto shall commence as of the date hereof and, subject to the provisions
      of paragraph 4 hereof, shall terminate on June 30, 2012; provided,
      however, that Employee's employment hereunder shall be automatically
      renewed for up to three additional periods of one year each unless
      Employee or Employer notifies the other, not less than 60 days nor more
      than 90 days prior to the expiration of Employee's then current employment
      period, that he or it elects not to extend Employee's employment hereunder
      beyond the expiration date of the then current employment
      period."

            


    

    


    2. Except as otherwise amended hereby,
the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect unamended from
and after the date hereof.

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No.
4 has been executed and delivered by the parties hereto as of the date first
above written.

    


    
      
        	 
      	
                THE
      BERKSHIRE BANK

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                By:

              	
                /s/ Moses Krausz

              
	 
      	 
      	
                President
      and CEO

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                /s/ David
Lukens
# BA NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Beverly Eaves Perdue Governor
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator USEPA, Region 4 Sam Nunn Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

### Division of Air Quality Sheila C
. Holman Directo r November 30 , 2012 Dee Freeman Secretary

Subject: Withdrawal of Request for Approval of Certain Rule Amendments Dear Ms. Fleming: On September 18, 2009 and November 9 , 2010 , the North Carolina Division of Air Quality submitted amendments to 15A NCAC 02D .0952, Petition for Alternative Controls for RACT, to clarify language (part of NC-141) and update cross references (part of NC-154), respectively
. Based on discussions with your staff, North Carolina is withdrawing its request for approval of these amendments to these rules at this time. Please contact Joelle Burle son of my staff at (919) 707-8720 if you have any questions regarding this matter.

Enclosures SCH/jbb
c: Beverly Banister Scott Davis Lynorae Benjamin Nacosta Ward (hardcopy and CD) Michael Abraczinskas Sushma Masemore

1641 Ma i l Service Cen ter , Rale igh , N ort h Carol ina 27699 - 164 1 217 West Jones Street , Raleigh , NC 27603 Ph one: 919-707-8401 I FAX 919 -715-0718 I I nternet : www .nca i r. org An Equ a l Opportun ity / Aff i rmat ive A c tion Empl o yer Sincerely,

Sheila C. Holman

# N~rthCarolina 

# /Vaturall!f
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Financial
Federal Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended April 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exhange Commission (the
"Report"), Paul R. Sinsheimer, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company

     A signed original of this written statement required by section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



June 5, 2008                     /s/ Paul R. Sinsheimer
------------                     -------------------------------------
Date                             Paul R. Sinsheimer
                                 Chief Executive Officer and President
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

May 3, 2022 

Before

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Circuit Judge

CANDACE JACKSON-AKIWUMI, Circuit 

Judge

No. 21-1804 

OLAWOLE OLUWAJANA,

 Petitioner, 

v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, 

Attorney General of the United States, 

 Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals. 

No. A061-591-186 

O R D E R

Respondent filed an unopposed construed petition for panel rehearing on April 

11, 2022. All members of the original panel have voted to deny rehearing and to issue an 

amended opinion. The court’s opinion dated March 9, 2022, is amended by the attached 

opinion, which includes changes to pages 5 through 7. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.
<PAGE>


                                                               EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-28239, 333-90399, 333-31344, 333-33770, and 333-42770) and
Form S-4 (Nos. 333-33912 and 333-42778) and in the related Prospectuses and in
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-15355, 333-15353, 333-29321, 333-15349, 333-15357, 333-29319,
333-84381, 333-84373, 333-84377, 333-93397, 333-93249, 333-35896, and 333-38472)
of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated January 22, 2001, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Millennium Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2000.



                                                    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG


Boston, Massachusetts
March 13, 2001
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Edwin Molina, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of USA Video Interactive Corp;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entitles, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the  date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and  6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.   By: /s/ Edwin Molina ----------------------------------- Name: Edwin Molina Title: President and Chief Executive Officer  Date:May 11, 2009
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted March 10, 2016

Decided May 20, 2016

Before

DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 15-3090

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ADAM BRENT HILL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

No. 14-CR-30207-NJR-1

Nancy J. Rosenstengel,

Judge.

O R D E R

The defendant pleaded guilty to receiving child pornography, see 18 U.S.C. 

§ 2252A(a)(2)(B), and was sentenced to 10 years in prison plus a fine and restitution and 

5 years of supervised release. He filed a notice of appeal, but his lawyer asserts that the 

appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744

(1967). We remanded the case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining 

whether the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived any challenge to the 

conditions of his supervised release. See United States v. Hill, No. 15-3090, 2016 WL 

1381248 (7th Cir. 2016). Counsel informs us that the district court subsequently held a 

hearing and found the waiver to be knowing and voluntary. Finding no other potentially 

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 15-3090 Page 2

meritorious issues, we conclude that the appeal is frivolous. Thus, we GRANT counsel’s 

motion to withdraw and DISMISS the appeal.