1 Th e ca s e wa s di s m i s s e d at t h e conc l u s i on of M r . Br a num

' s pr oof . 

# FILED January 6, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. App ellate C ou rt Clerk I N THECOUR

TOFAPPEALS OFTENNES S EE EA S TER N S EC TI O N

H ERBERTCA

RS O N BRA N U M ) UNI ON C OUNTY ) 03A 01- 9604- C

H - 00127 Pl a i n tif f - A

p p e lla n t )

) ) v. ) HON. BI LLY J OEW HI TE, ) C HANC ELLOR ) C I TY OFM

AYNAR DVI LLE, PAUL ) BOW M AN, BI LLP . GR

AVES , ) R U S S ELL G

I LLEN W A TER , LEN ) PADGETTa n d H. E. R I C HAR DS ON )

) D e f e n d a n t s - A

p p e l l ees ) AFFI R M ED AND R

EM ANDED

BYR ON D. BR

YANTOFKNOXVI LLEFOR APPELLANT J ON G. R

OAC H OFKNOXVI LLEFOR APPELLEES

O PI N I O N

G odda r d, P . J .
Pl a i nt i f f H

e r be r t Ca r s on Br a num a ppe a l s di s m

i s s a l of h i s su i t 1a ga i ns t t he C i t y of M

a yna r dvi l l e a nd i t s C om m i s s i one r s , s e e ki ng r e i ns t a t e m e nt t o hi s pos i t i on a s W a t e r C om m i s s i one r a nd2 T . C . A. 29- 20- 307 as per t i n e n t t o t h i s appe a l pr ovi d e s t h e

f o llo w i n g : 29- 20- 307. Ex c l u s i v e j u r i s d i c t i o n - - N o j u r y . - - Th e c i r c u i t cour t s s h a l l have exc l u s i v e or i g i n a l j u r i s d i c t i on over any act i o n b r o u g h t u n d e r t h i s chap t e r an d shal l h ear an d d eci d e such s u i t s w

i t h o u t t h e in t e r v e n t i o n o f a ju r y , . . . 2 da m a ge s f or hi s w

r ongf ul di s c ha r ge , bot h c om pe ns a t or y a nd e xe m pl a r y. H

e a l s o s e e ks a n or de r e nj oi ni ng t he D e f e nda nt s " f r om a ny f ur t he r u ltr a vi r e s act s ag a i n s t t h e Pl a i n t i f f " based u p o n hi s c ont e nt i on t ha t t he y ha d vi ol a t e d c e r t a i n of our S t a t e S t a t u t e s .The c om pl a i nt i n m

aj or pa r t s e e ks r e l i e f unde r t he Te nne s s e e G

ove r nm e nt a l Tor t Li a bi l i t y A c t f or w

hi c h t he C

i r c ui t C o u r t o f thi s S t a t e h a s e x c l u s i v e jur i s d i c t i o n . T. C. A . 2 9 - 2 0 - 307. 2I n l i ght of t hi s a nd t he f a c t t he s ui t w a s br ought i n t he C h a n c e r y C

o u r t, it is n e c e s s a r y th a t w e a f f i r m

d i s m i s s a l o f th e c a s e , not on t he m e r i t s but be c a us e t he C ha nc e r y C

our t l a c ks j u r i s d i c tio n to h e a r it.

I n c onc l us i on, w

e r e c ogni z e t ha t s om e of t he r e l i e f s ought , s uc h a s a n i nj unc t i on a ga i ns t t he C i t y C om m i s s i one r s , m i ght pr ope r l y be m a i nt a i ne d i n C

ha nc e r y C

our t . H

ow e ve r , w

e b e lie v e in th e in t e r e s t o f ju s tic e to b o t h p a r tie s , it is a p p r o p r i a t e th a t a ll is s u e s b e tr i e d to g e t h e r r a t h e r th a n bi f ur c a t e d, w

hi c h pr om

pt e d t he de t e r m

i na t i on w

hi c h w e ha ve r each e d .3 For t he f or e goi ng r e a s ons t he j udgm e nt of t he Tr i a l C our t , but not i t s r e a s oni ng, i s a f f i r m e d a nd t he c a us e r e m a nde d f o r co l l ect i o n o f co s t s b e l o w , w h i c h ar e , as ar e co s t s o f ap p eal , a dj udge d one - ha l f a ga i ns t M r . Br a num

a nd one - ha l f a ga i ns t t he D e f e n d a n t s .

_______________________________ H ous t on M

. G odda r d, P . J .4

CONC UR:

________________________________ H e r s c h e l P . Fr a n k s , J .

________________________________ D on T. M

c M ur r a y, J .