alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = EWR

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 07/01/2011 (Current & Future) 11/16/2011 01:32:31



### Query Parameters:

### 11/16/2011 01:32:31

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Operators)

Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2011 (Current & Future)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 28

ACA AIR CANADA 16

AEU ASTRAEUS AIRLINES 2

AIC AIR INDIA 2

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4

ASH MESA AIRLINES 4

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 6

CAA ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES (code 15

CHQ CHAUTAUQUA 1

CKS KALITTA FLYING SERVICES (AMERICAN INT'L 2

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 890

COM COMAIR AIRLINES 4

CPZ COMPASS AIRLINES 3

CSQ 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 41

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 8

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 8

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 1

FDX FED EX 8

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 30

JZA AIR CANADA JAZZ 6

MES MESABA AVIATION 2

PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 8

POE PORTER AIRLINES 22

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINES 4

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 5

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2

SWA SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 34

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 2

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 22

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3

USA US AIRWAYS 19

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 4

WJA WESTJET 2

Page 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT Case No. 1:17-cv-00563-TSB
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Judge Black
Plaintiff, Magistrate Litkovitz

vs.
ERIN L. MORTLOCK, ET AL.,
Defendants.
AGREED ENTRY OF DISMISSAL

WITH ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION
OF REMAINING FUNDS ON DEPOST

Now come Defendant Erin L. Mortlock (“Mortlock”) and Defendant Estate of
Douglas R. Harvey (“Harvey”), by and through counsel, and hereby represent to the
Court that they have settled all their disputes.

Harvey dismisses, with prejudice, its Cross-Claim against Mortlock, and releases
all claims it has or may have against Mortlock. Harvey further releases any and all
claims to the decedent’s pension from Children’s Hospital Medical Center and
acknowledges the beneficiary of said pension is Erin L. Mortlock. Harvey grants
permission to Mortlock to reside, without paying rent, at the real estate commonly
known as 2913 E. 15th Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99223, until 45 days after
Mortlock or her attorney have received the proceeds from the Clerk of the Court as
ordered below, and payment from the Children’s Hospital Medical Center pension, but

not later than June 30, 2018.


Mortlock releases all claims she has or may have against the Estate of Douglas R.
Harvey.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that this case is
dismissed, with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall distribute from
funds on deposit the sum of $20,000.00, payable to the Estate of Douglas R. Harvey, to
be forwarded to Kevin L. Swick, 425 Walnut Street, Suite 2200, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall distribute the
balance of funds on deposit, payable to Erin L. Mortlock, to be forwarded to Michael J.
Honerlaw, 7770 West Chester Road, Suite 200, West Chester, Ohio 45069.

IT ISSO ORDERED.

Date_Y//@//8 Chuin_2¢ thoi

Karen L. Litkovitz
United States Magistrate tiles

AGREED:

s/ Kevin L. Swick s/ Michael J. Honerlaw
Kevin L. Swick 0023149 Michael J. Honerlaw 0034469
Aronoff, Rosen & Hunt Honerlaw Law Office LLC

425 Walnut St Ste 2200
Cincinnati OH 45202
Klswick@arh-law.com

(513) 241-0400

(513) 241-2877 (fax)
Attorney for Defendant
Estate of Douglas R. Harvey

7770 West Chester Rd Ste 200
West Chester OH 45069
mike@honerlaw.com

(513) 847-6060

(513) 847-6059 (fax)

Attorney for Defendant

Erin L. Mortlock
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, Mitchell H. Gold, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Dendreon Corporation (the
Company), and Michelle Burris, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his and her knowledge, respectively:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the
Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 8, 2005



|                                               |  |  |  |                                                                            
|---------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                               |  | 
|/s/    MITCHELL H. GOLD, M.D.                  |  |  |  | /s/    MICHELLE BURRIS                                                     
|Mitchell H. Gold, M.D. Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Michelle Burris Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 6,
2012 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2012-3 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.
The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive
Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                 |  | 
|                                     |  |                                 | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey               |  |  |  | Dated: March 28, 2014
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                   |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
PARTIES TO NEW FORM OF CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

Philip R. Crimmins, Sr.
John C. Cywinski
Randolph P. Davis
Tamy T. Duplantis
Beverly O. Elving
David. L. Goebel
Kurt Hankins
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: April 1, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Ray Saracino, EPA Region 9

SUBJECT: April 1, 2015 Telephone Conversation with ARB Regarding Proposed Clean

Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A telephone conversation was held between EPA and the California Air Resources Board 

(ARB) on April 1, 2015 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan’s description of affected 

electric generating units. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 

2, 2014 and published in the Federal Register on June 18, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Chris Gallenstein, ARB

Ray Saracino, EPA
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3130 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3130

 To expand the transactions for which declarations may be required by 
  the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to include 
   investments in United States businesses that maintain or collect 
                        sensitive personal data.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2021

Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Warnock) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the transactions for which declarations may be required by 
  the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to include 
   investments in United States businesses that maintain or collect 
                        sensitive personal data.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Sensitive Personal Data 
Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF DECLARATIONS REQUIRED BY THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN 
              INVESTMENT IN THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 721(b)(1)(C)(v)(IV)(cc) of the Defense Production Act of 
1950 (50 U.S.C. 4565(b)(1)(C)(v)(IV)(cc)) is amended by striking 
``subsection (a)(4)(B)(iii)(II)'' and inserting ``subclause (II) or 
(III) of subsection (a)(4)(B)(iii)''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Omnipoint Corporation on Form S-1 (File Nos. 33-98360 and 33-03739), Form S-4
(File Nos. 333-19895 and 333-13961 and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-07345 and
333-03945) of our reports dated January 31, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Omnipoint
Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1996 which reports are included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.



                                              COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 1997
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Ami Trauber, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. By: STAR GAS LLC (General Partner)December 23, 2002



By:

/s/ Ami TrauberAmi Trauber Chief Financial
Officer
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Roger Martin Bradford, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00192

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 71st District Court of Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 15

- 0152X ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess , participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment

of the court below. Therefore, we modi fy the trial court’s judgment by deleting the fees for

appellant’s court

- appointed attorney

. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Roger Martin Bradford, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 2, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Dennis R. Alexander,  Principal Executive Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 13, 2007



/s/ Dennis R. Alexander

Dennis R. Alexander

Principal Executive Office and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q of American Community Bancshares, Inc.
(the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dan R. Ellis, Jr.                            
|                       |  |     |  | Dan R. Ellis, Jr.                                
|                       |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
FIRST SHARES BANCORP, INC.
Exhibit 31.2
I, Kimberly B. Kling, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First SharesBancorp, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuerand we have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 14, 2003
/s/ Kimberly B. KlingKimberly B. KlingSecretary, Treasurer andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
20
NO. 12-10-00245-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

'

IN RE: JIMMIE JAMES HANES, ' ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATOR

'

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Relator Jimmie James Hanes complains that he was sentenced to a term of 

imprisonment that exceeds the statutory maximum. Therefore, he asserts that his 

sentence is illegal and requests a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to correct it.

The court of criminal appeals has exclusive authority to grant postconviction 

relief from a final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 

241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). But an illegal sentence in a felony case may be raised 

for the first time in an application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 

508, 513 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 

prescribes the procedure for filing a postconviction habeas application to seek relief from 

a final felony conviction in a Texas court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. § 11.07 

(Vernon 2005).

Because the court of criminal appeals has exclusive authority to grant 

postconviction relief from a final felony conviction, we are without jurisdiction to 

consider Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, his petition is dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered August 11, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2323

MICHAEL A. FOWLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF RALEIGH PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT; GENE TOMLINSON; DANNY F. MORGAN; STANLEY

K. MARSHBURN; JERRY M. HOBBY; ALLEN B. HALL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-351-5-BR)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 30, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Fowler, Appellant Pro Se. Dorothy K. Woodward, CITY OF

RALEIGH, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Fowler appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Fowler v. City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department, No. CA-98-351-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TIMOTHY FONSECA

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00227-CR

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20180D02567)

ORDER 

The Court has received a supplemental clerk's record containing the trial court's 

certification of the defendant's right to appeal. The certification form contains two options that 

have both been check marked. The first check marked option states that the case "is not a pleabargain case, and the defendant has the right of appeal." The second check marked option states 

that the case "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." (emphasis in 

original)

It appears the trial court may have inadvertently check marked two separate contradictory 

boxes on the certification form. Even though the mark may have been an inadvertent one, the 

certificate is defective because it is ambiguous. Accordingly, the trial court is ordered to execute a 

new certification reflecting Appellant's right to appeal. It is not necessary for Appellant to sign the 

new certification. The trial court clerk shall prepare a supplemental clerk's record containing the 

certification and file it with this Court no later than 14 days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of October, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.