T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. C ON R AD O T OR R E S - GA YT AN , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 50653 D . C . N o. 3: 09 -c r- 01 12 5-M M A -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M i c ha e l M . A ne l l o, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an d T H O M A S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C onr a do T orr e s - G a y t a n appe a l s hi s 120- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l typl e af

ori m port i ng appr oxi m a t e l y53 pounds of c oc a i ne i n vi ol a t i on of

21 U . S . C . §§ 952 a nd 960. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s ua ntt o 18 U . S . C . § 3742( a ) a nd 

# FI LED DE C 27 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . U

n ite d S ta te s v . J

a c o b o Ca s tillo , 49 6 F . 3d 94 7, 95 7 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ) ( e n b a n c ) . W e d is m is s th e ap p e a l. T h e r e c o r d s h o w s th a t T o rr e s k n o w in g lya n d v o lu n ta r ilyw a iv e d h is r ig h t to ap p e a l th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s im p o s itio n o f th e m a n d a to rym in im u m 1 2 0 - m o n th s e n te n c e u n d e r2 1 U .S .C . § 9 6 0 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( B ) ( i) . See U ni ted States v. Cha rles , 581 F . 3d 9 2 7 , 9 3 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ( h o ld in g th a t ap p e a l w a iv e rr e q u ir e s d is m is s a l if it e nc om pa s s e s the r i ghtt o appe a l on the gr ounds r a i s e d a nd the w a i ve ri s know i ng a n d v o lu n ta ry ) ; Un i te d

S ta te s v . J

e r o n i mo , 398 F . 3d 1149, 1153 ( 9th C i r . 2005) ( f i ndi ng tha tac ourt“ w i l l ge ne r a l l ye nf or c e the pl a i n l a ngua ge of apl e aa gr e e m e nt i f i ti s c l e a ra nd una m bi guous on i t s f a c e ” ) . T he pl a i n t e rm s of the pl e aa gr e e m e nt p ro v i d e th atT o rres m ay n o tap p eal h i s sen t en ce u n l ess “ th e C o u rti m p o ses a c u s to d ia l s e n te n c e ab o v e th e . . . s ta tu to rym a n d a to rym in im u m , if ap p lic ab le .” See U n ite d S ta te s v . Sm ith , 3 8 9 F .3 d 9 4 4 , 9 5 3 (9 thC ir. 2 0 0 4 ) ( h o ld in g th at d ef en d an t’ s cl ai m thatdi stri ctcourterre d i n cal cul at i ng se nt ence w as prec l ud ed by appeal w a i ve rtha tappl i e d t o a nys e nt e nc e w i thi n gui de l i ne r a nge ) . M or e ove r , the m a g is tr a te ju d g e w h o to o kth e p le aa d h e r e d to th e r e q u ir e m e n ts o f R u le 1 1 . See F ed. R . C ri m . P . 11 (b); U ni te d State s v . W

at s on , 5 8 2 F .3 d 9 7 4 , 9 8 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . T he di stri ctcourtj ud ge’ s f ai l ure t o d et erm i ne the sc op e of the appeal w ai ver a t s e nt e nc i ng doe s notm a ke the appe a l w a i ve rune nf or c e abl e ; he di d nott e l l the3

d e f e n d a n t th a t h e c o u ldap p e a l. Se e id . T here fore , w e w i l l enforce the val i d app ea l w a iv e ra n d d is m is s th is ap p e a l. D I SM I SSED .