alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Everyday   Assembly
Productions, Inc., on Form 10- QSB for the period ending March 31, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  B. Stephen  Bailey,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 60516 Summary Calendar

ALEX NOE VERGARA

- MALDONADO , Petitioner

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A072 672 029

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Alex Noe Vergara

- Maldonado, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions this court for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily affirming the denial of his application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The immigration judge (IJ) determined that Vergara

- Maldonado was subject to removal based upon convictions for a controlled substance offense and an

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 12, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-60516 Document: 00512662139 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/12/2014N o. 13

- 60516

aggravated felony offens e. The IJ further determined that the testimonial and documentary evidence presented by Vergara

- Maldonado was insufficient to establish his eligibility for withholding of removal and CAT relief. In his petition for review, Vergara

- Maldonado does not challenge the basis for the underlying removal order. Rather, he argues that the IJ’s decision denying him relief was erroneous and that the BIA erroneously applied the summary affirmance procedures set forth in 8 C.F .R. § 1003.1(e)(4)

. An alien’s eligibi lity for withholding of removal and CAT relief is a factual conclusion that is ordinarily reviewed for substantial evidence. Zhang v. Gonzales , 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). Because Vergara

- Maldonado is removable due to convictions for an aggravated felony and a controlled substance offense, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider whether substantial evidence supported his withholding of removal and CAT claims. See
8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C); Escudero

- Arciniega v. Holder , 70 2 F.3d 781, 785 (5th Cir. 2012). With respect to Vergara

- Maldonado’s argument that his case should not have been summarily affirmed because it did not meet the regulatory requirements set forth in § 1003.1(e)(4), we decline review pursuant

to Garcia

- Melendez v. Ashcroft , 351 F.3d 657, 662 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the petition for review is DISMISSED in part for lack of jurisdiction and DENIED in part.

2 Case: 13-60516 Document: 00512662139 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/12/2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-cv-561 (WOB-MRM)

ROBERT C. COOK PETITIONER

VS. JUDGMENT

WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION RESPONDENT

This matter is before the Court on the Report and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 9), 

and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by 

Petitioner (Doc. 10), and the Court being sufficiently advised, 

IT IS ORDERED that the objections (Doc. 10) to the Report 

and Recommendation be, and hereby are, overruled. That the 

Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 9) be, 

and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and 

conclusions of law of this Court; and therefore respondent’s 

motion to dismiss (Doc.6) be, and hereby is, GRANTED. That 

petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 2), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A 

certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to the 

claims alleged in the petition. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 
1915(a)(3), any application by petitioner to proceed on appeal 

in forma pauperis would be not be taken in “good faith.” 

This 6th day of September, 2018.
Exhibit 10.2






Exhibit 10.2




Schedule of Participating Directors and Officers to Form Indemnification Agreement




Armstrong World Industries, Inc. entered into indemnification agreements with its directors, Stan
A. Askren, David Bonderman, Jon A. Boscia, Kevin R. Burns, James J. Gaffney, Judith R. Haberkorn,
James C. Melville, James J. O’Connor, John J. Roberts and Edward E. Steiner and certain of its
officers including Thomas B. Mangas, Stephen F. McNamara, Jeffrey D. Nickel and Frank J. Ready.
Exhibit 32.2

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Financial
Federal Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended April 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exhange Commission (the
"Report"), Steven F. Groth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
his knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company

     A signed original of this written statement required by section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



June 7, 2006                      /s/ Steven F. Groth
------------                      ----------------------------------
Date                              Steven F. Groth
                                  Chief Financial Officer and Senior
                                  Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|February 21, 2006 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

I,Michael W. Ferro, Jr., certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Click Commerce, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period of this reportbased on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
| Date: May 16, 2005 | /s/ MICHAEL W. FERRO, JR.                 |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| * *                | Michael W.  Ferro, Jr.                    |
| * *                | *Chief  Executive Officer and Chairman of the* |
| * *                | *Board  of Directors*                          |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 203 (Thursday, October 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 65318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27206]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE DEPARTMENT

[Public Notice 7605]

Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice; Closed 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State 
Department--Overseas Security Advisory Council on November 15, 16, and 
17. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. Appendix), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(7)(E), it 
has been determined that the meeting will be closed to the public. The 
meeting will focus on an examination of corporate security policies and 
procedures and will involve extensive discussion of trade secrets and 
proprietary commercial information that is privileged and confidential, 
and will discuss law enforcement investigative techniques and 
procedures. The agenda will include updated committee reports, a global 
threat overview, and other matters relating to private sector security 
policies and protective programs and the protection of U.S. business 
information overseas.
    For more information, contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, 
phone: 571-345-2214.

    Dated:October 11, 2011.
Justine M. Sincavage,
Director of the Diplomatic, Security Service, Acting, U.S. Department 
of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-27206 Filed 10-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
Unassociated Document


    
      	
              To
      :

            	
              Board
      of Directors

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              Infosmart
      Group, Inc.

            


    

    


    


    


    Date : 27
May 2010

    


    RESIGNATION

    


    This
letter serves to inform all of you that with immediate effective, I resign my
position as a director of Infosmart Group, Inc. due to my personal
reasons.

    


    I
appreciate very much to work with all of you in the past year and I wish the
company a healthy and growing future by your valuable & continuous
contribution.

    


    Thank you
very much

    


    


    Yours
sincerely,

    


    


    


    /s/ Lam Chi
Man        

    Lam Chi
Man
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia
ATLA NTA,

_________________ _ The Court of

Appeals hereby passes

the followi

ng order: A14D0472 . ANTOINETTE EVANS v. IH4 PROPERT Y GEORGIA, LP. Antoinette

Evans seek s disc retionar y revi ew of an order ent ered by the Magistrate Court of

Gwinnet t County in this disposs essory

action. “The

only avenue of appeal av ailable f

rom [ a] magistrate

court ju dgment

is provided by OC GA § 15-1 0- 41 (b) (1), which a llows for a de n ovo appeal to the state or superior court.” Handler v. Hulsey , 199 Ga. App. 751 ( 406 SE2d 225 ) (1991). In o ther word s, a par ty aggrievedby

a magistrate court

ruling m ust first s eek review in the st ate or superior court. The Georgia

Constitution

requires that “ [a]ny

court shall transfer

to the appropria te court in the

state any civil case in w

hich it determine s that jur isdiction or venue lies else where. ” 1983 Ga. Const., Art. 6, Sec. 1, Para . 8; Bosma v. Gunter , 258 Ga. 664 (373 SE2d 368) (1988). Accordingl y, this case is h ereby TRANSFERRED to the Stat e Court of

Gwinnet t County for disposi tion.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Offi

ce, Atlant a,_______________

___ I certify t hat the abo ve is a tru e extra ct from the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my signature a nd the seal of sai d court hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 08/27/2014 August 27, 2014
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1460

DANIEL S. O’SHEA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LOCAL UNION NO. 639, International Brotherhood

of Teamsters; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE,

INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. 

(8:05-cv-00937-JFM)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 18, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel S. O’Shea, Appellant Pro Se. Mark J. Murphy, MOONEY, GREEN,

BAKER & SAINDON, Washington, D.C.; Richard J. Hafets, DLA PIPER

RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Daniel S. O’Shea appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. O’Shea v. Local Union No. 639, No. 8:05-cv-00937-JFM (D.

Md. Aug. 4, 2006) We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
May 14, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11189 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act 

and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations\

Dear Sir or Madam;

Video Solutions LLC was issued an Exemption numbered 11189 (hereinafter the 

Exemption) for the purpose of conducting scripted, closed-set filming for the motion picture and 

television industry. Video Solutions LLC hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption to 

allow two additional type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the 

conditions of the Exemption. 

Video Solutions LLC wishes to operate a DJI Inspire 1 and DJI S1000 aircraft under the 

same terms and conditions contained in the Exemption. Attached hereto, and submitted as a 

confidential document, is the Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) suggested by 

the manufacturer for the additional UAS. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full 

compliance with the terms of the Exemption.

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of another 

type of unmanned aerial vehicle, Video Solutions LLC respectfully submits that good cause 

exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested 

amendment.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for 

an amendment to the Exemption.

Sincerely yours, 

/S

Anton A. Ewing, JD

619-719-9640

anton@antonewing.com

3077 Clairemont Drive #372

San Diego, CA 92117

cc:

Radley Angelo
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 8, 2016

NO. 03-14-00716-CV

Janos Farkas, Appellant

v.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; and Brice, Vander Linden & Wernick, P.C., 

n/k/a Buckley Madole, P.C., Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, FIELD, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 13, 2014. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
       (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  May 14, 2009
    /s/ Brendan J. McGillBrendan J. McGillSenior Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00026-CV

Marcia Morrison and Charles J. 

Morrison

v.

Marsha Gage

§

§

§

§

From the 271st District Court

of Wise County (CV14-10-797)

July 2, 2015

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court.

It is further ordered that appellee Marsha Gage shall pay all of the costs of 

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_______________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth
askeexhibit107.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing


 






1






 






2






 






3






 






4






 






5






 






6






 






7






 






8






 






9






 






10






 






11






 






12






 






13






 






14






 






15






 






16






 






17






 






18






 






19






 






20






 






21
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

|   | **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER** |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|

 

I, Derek Jones, Chief Executive Officer of Quantum Companies, Inc. (the (Registrant(), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

1.            This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the (Report() fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

| Date: | November 13, 2006 | By: /s/ Derek Jones |
|-------|-------------------|---------------------|

Derek Jones

Chief Executive Officer