alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: FEBRUARY 24, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF HOTTON ENTERPRISES, INC.

dfb/a PREMIER AVIATION FAADOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-1081
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012WP070156) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, andthe other persons on the attached Service List.

# ~~~·~ Ronnie A. Yoder Chief**Administrativ~Law** Ju e Attachment

- Service List

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY



### Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1 ONE COPY 

### AshokVij, President/CEO 

### Horton Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a/ 

### Premier Aviation, Respondent 

### 1951 East Airport Drive Tucson, AZ

### 85756 TEL: 520-907-8926 FAX: NOT PROVIDED Adam Runkel, Complainant's Counsel 

### FDMS No. FAA-2013-1081 (Civil Penalty Action)

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Western-Pacific Region, APW-7.12 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 425-227-2914 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2.,..-
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- ;Jo;;l- Ofyt';l Directorate Identifier: 

f( V0/.1 make changes 10 the \'Ofuc•s in the table he/ow. you 111//S/ ellS/II"e the totals update according ly. u· 

they c/o not, click (or TahJ into 011(1 then out olthc chan;.;ccl cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Remove & replace 4.0 '· ·: ,j II i ill $8,900 () l) .• tJ '"J 83 '-::(,(,<I'( I 1)11 

PT Disk 

'· (1 tJI) '· ) I) fill ', ()(I( I 

.... 1)11() .... {I lfP '\ '• I) (I() 

', (j til) ill)() ' !! (!\I 

' ' 0 d(! II IlL \ (I II() 

' II.{!( I ., i) ()() ,, <, (J.(J() 

.. , 1•11(1 ll,fjl) \ 0 II\ I 

i• '• 1)111! ·" > II (itl .. 

" O.(JO 

·,. ', {!.iJII ':· \ 11.!111 •, tl. (I(! 

.., (j .!:II , !l I lll .,~,! .... (). f)(l 

' ' ~ J • ( ~ I I !)ill) " () I II I 

" r 1.! 'II f! ill) \ I 1.00 

'· p ij{l '-. I!IJ!i \ O.t!O 

-. {I q(l \ t! 1.111 \ () ( 10 

... I J flll i' \1,1 ' (). ()() ·' li.lhl /} ()!} \ fl. {I{ J 

·,. \ () II(! ., !I (Iii II.()() 

<I '·~ (ill(\ \ (I t J\ l ·,. '• il,(J() 

: '· () iii I " iJ I 11! \ (J (l(l 

\ ( l i li} ' I ).Ill) 'i 1).(1(1 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $766,920 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

II f:! i .... ' '· l)_llii 

ti 1/i! ' (j ()I i 

\ \) I ,I I \ u 1!1) 

iiI:! \ iJ I) I) 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): Note: The actual 

disk cost is $27,000.00. Tke disk life h as been reduced by 33%. Therefore the cost per engine is 

$27,000 X 0.33 = $8,900.00. 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* 0 NO i:ZJ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* 0 NO i:ZJ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. i. · 

YES 0 NO i:ZJ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* 0 NO i:ZJ 

*Explanation:
From: "Allain, Ryan CDR" <Ryan.D.Allain@uscg.mil>

To: Ryan Albert/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Mehaffey, Jennifer" <Jennifer.A.Mehaffey@uscg.mil>

Date: 03/09/2012 01:51 PM

Subject: CG ESTIMATE OF ISSUING AMS DETERMINATION

Sent by: Ryan.D.Allain@uscg.mil

Ryan,

Based on some in-house discussions we've come-up with an estimate for when we 

believe we'll be able to being issuing AMS Determinations. Our actions will 

be contingent upon the sufficiency and thoroughness of each individual AMS 

determination request. If we receive enough information in an AMS 

determination request from a ballast water treatment system vendor, we 

anticipate that we will begin issuing AMS determination sometime beginning 

after March 1, 2013.

CDR Ryan Allain

U.S. Coast Guard

Chief, Environmental Standards Division

Coast Guard Headquarters, CG-5224

(202) 372-1430
<PAGE>   1








                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                 GT INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    FOR THE YEAR
                                                                       ENDED
                                                                    DECEMBER 31,
                                                                       1995
                                                                    -----------
<S>                                                                  <C>
Pro forma net income                                                 $18,628
                                                                     =======

Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding:
    Actual                                                            59,305
    Dilutive impact of shares issued during the period and treated
    as being outstanding throughout the periods presented              1,777
                                                                     -------
                                                                      61,082
                                                                     -------

Pro forma net income per share                                       $  0.30
                                                                     =======
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Cory Colvin, Director of Enviro-Energy Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  November 19, 2003



/s/Cory Colvin

Cory Colvin

CEO
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),
each of the undersigned officers of Orchid Cellmark Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 9, 2005



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul J. Kelly, MD        
|Paul J. Kelly, MD            
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)



Dated: November 9, 2005



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Raymond J. Land                         
|Raymond J. Land                             
|SVP and Chief Financial Officer             
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Immuno Therapeutics.
    Date: April 14, 2015.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Careen K Tang-Toth, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6214, MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-3504, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afdbc0dbc7ccdbefccdcdd81c1c6c781c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="61150e15090215210212134f0f08094f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 15, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-09059 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
HEARD NOVEMBER TERM, 1878.

#### Potts *vs. Bonds.*

*An*order granting a new trial, on the ground that the verdict is unsupported by or - contrary to the evidence, cannot bo reversed on an allegation that such conclusion was erroneous.

Bepoee MACKEY, J., at Lancaster, August Term, 1877.

Two actions by Louisa A. Potts against William Bonds on two sealed notes.

The defendant pleaded in each case a receipt in full and also a counter claim. The jury found for the plaintiff in both eases, and the defendant moved for a new trial, and, in support of the motion, relied upon affidavits of newly-discovered evidence.

*499His Honor made an order that the motion be granted and that the verdict of the jury be set aside.

The plaintiff appealed, on the ground that the affidavits upon which the order was granted disclosed no sufficient ground to entitle the defendant to a new trial.

*DePass & Jones,*for appellant.

*Ciarle, Allison & Connors,*contra.

February 20, 1879.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Willard, C. J.

The order appealed from granted a new trial. We cannot assume from the statements of the brief, or the terms of the order, that the decision of the Circuit Court was based upon the affidavits relating to newly-discovered evidence alone. It was competent for the Circuit Judge to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict was unsupported by the evidence or clearly contrary to it. Looking at the evidence, we see ground sufficient to exclude from our minds the conclusion that the Circuit Judge confined his attention exclusively to the question of granting a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. As the Circuit Judge had fully 'before him the question whether the verdict was consistent with the evidence, and as his order granting a new trial was general, we cannot say that he necessarily erred, even if allowing a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence upon the affidavits before him would have been erroneous. An order granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict is unsupported by or contrary to the evidence cannot be reversed in this Court in an allegation that such conclusion was erroneous. Had anew trial been refused on such grounds we could not review such refusal, as we have frequently said, because such a question does not properly involve error of law. The nature of the question is unchanged where it comes up on an appeal from an order granting a new trial. We are equally excluded in both cases from determining the convincing force of the evidence. The motion must be denied and judgment absolute given for the defendants under the stipulation to that effect in the notice of appeal.

*Melver,*A. J., and *JETashell,*A. J., concurred.
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 12,
2013 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2013-3 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.
The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 30, 2015
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, James Crigler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of American Pallet Leasing, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of American
Pallet Leasing, Inc.



         By:  /s/ James Crigler
              ---------------------------------------
              James Crigler, Chief Executive Officer
              Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE> 46

      CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                    (After Issuance of Stock)

                 FIRST AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC CORP.

          We the undersigned, Jack Lovelock, President and Robert
Dinning, Secretary, of FIRST AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC CORP. do hereby
certify:

          That the Board of Directors of said corporation at a
meeting duly convened, held on the 18th day of May, 1998, adopted
resolutions to amend the original articles as follows:

          Article VI is hereby amended to read as follows:

          The total authorized capitalization of this
          Corporation shall be and is the sum of
          100,000,000 shares of Common stock at $0.001
          par value, said stock to carry full voting
          power and the said shares shall be issued
          fully paid at such time as the Board of
          Directors may designate in exchange for cash,
          property, services, the stock of other
          corporations or other values, rights, or
          things, and the judgment of the Board of
          Directors as to the value thereof shall be
          conclusive.

          The number of shares of the corporation outstanding and
entitled to vote on an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
is 49,326,018; that the said change and amendment have been
consented to and approved by a majority of the stockholders
holding at least a majority of each class of stock outstanding
and entitled to vote thereon.

          Dated this 20th day of August, 1998.

                                   /s/ Jack Lovelock, President

                                   /s/ Robert Dinning, Secretary 












<PAGE> 47

     On August 20, 1998, personally appeared before me, a Notary
Public, Jack Lovelock, President, and Robert Dinning, Secretary,
who acknowledged that they executed the above instrument.

                         /s/ John P.  Lakes                       
                         Barrister, Solicitor and Notary Public,
                         residing in the Municipality of West
                         Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

My Commission Expires:

Lifetime in British Columbia
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
January 13, 2015 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2015-1 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and
the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the
same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 13, 2015 through December 31, 2015, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 25, 2016
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |