alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 1063.

#### Jones *v.*Massey.

April Term, 1881.

After the decision of this court, reported in 14 *8. O.*292, Judge Mackey passed an order restraining the sheriff of Lancaster county from putting James B,. Massey into possession of the lands which he had elected to take under his mother’s will. From that order this appeal was taken. *Held,*that Judge Mackey had misconstrued the opinion of this court, iii regarding the possession of *616this land as part of the *statu quo*intended to be preserved; that Massey’s right to the land was not questioned, nor was that portion of the Circuit decree which ordered the possession to be restored to him interfered *with;*that Massey’s right to the possession of this land has been fully adjudicated, and he should no longer be deprived of its enjoyment. OPINION by

July 21st, 1881.

*Ernest Moore,*for appellant. *R. E. Allison,*contra.

Simpson, C. J.,
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 201O-NM-075-AD

Executive Order 

### J2866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Pmcedures: Isthe AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have asignificant economic impact on asubstantial number of small entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is

### it appropriate to mclude specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska, where avi~tion might be the only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)
Michael Charles Lewis

Photographer – Licensed Insurance Agent West Virginia

5336 Westbrook Drive

Cross Lanes WV, 25313

Specific Sections in which Michael Lewis is seeking an exemption:

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF: Michael Lewis - Photographer

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE 

OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b),

91.405(a),91.103, 91.119, 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) 

CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 

(PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Extent of relief and my reason for seeking relief:

In order to use Unmanned Aircraft Systems for commercial use. I am seeking this 

exemption in order to legally conduct business and comply with all Federal regulations 

and standards put forth by the FAA while operating our Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

How my request would benefit the public as a whole:

Granting the petition for Michael Lewis would allow for me to be able to efficiently, 

legally, economically, and safely perform aerial video and photography of special 

events, sporting events, land surveillance, heating/cooling thermal imaging 

inspections, real estate, search and rescue(volunteer), commercial inspections, and 

commercial maintenance over certain areas of these United States. Using Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems such as drone technology would greatly reduce negative impacts on the 

environment and also provide a safer alternative for businesses to conduct land and 

equipment inspections.

Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rule:

By adhering to guidelines set forth by the FAA I would not be going above the 

recommended altitude nor flying at night therefore avoiding any hazardous

accidents such as colliding with a manned aircraft. I, Michael Lewis, will be giving 

notification to the FAA 72 hours prior to any commercial use. Also we will be 

regularly test flying and doing daily maintenance logs to ensure the quads are in 

proper working order for each job or event as to prevent damage or bodily injury.

Summary to publish in the Federal Register stating --

1. SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 

91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b),91.405(a),91.103, 91.119, 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), 

and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 3 UNMANNED 

AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND REFORM 

ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

2. We are seeking exemption in order to use our UAS for commercial use.

Submitted on October 15th, 2015 by:

Michael Charles Lewis

Photographer – Licensed Insurance Agent West Virginia

5336 Westbrook Drive

Cross Lanes WV 25313

Emitsem1@gmail.com
Exhibit 10.34
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
 Corporation Executive Agreement
     (e)
    
    If any payment or payments due the Executive pursuant to this Agreement
and those which are otherwise payable or distributable to or for the benefit of
the Executive in connection with a change of control of the Corporation,
including a Change-in-Control (whether paid or payable or distributed or
distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise, including
without limitation (i) payments, benefits and distributions pursuant to this
Agreement and (ii) deemed amounts under the United States Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the Code), resulting from the acceleration of
the vesting of any stock options or other equity-based incentive award) (all
such payments, benefits and distributions being referred to herein as
Contract Payments), result in an excise tax being imposed on the
Executive pursuant to Section 4999 of the Code, or any successor federal taxing
provision to such Section 4999 (Excise Tax), then the Corporation
shall pay to the Executive at the time when each Contract Payment is made,
subject to Section 4(h) and the following sentence, an amount (a Gross-Up
Payment) such that after payment by the Executive of all taxes (including
any interest or penalties imposed with respect to such taxes), including,
without limitation, any income taxes and Excise Tax imposed upon the Gross-Up
Payment, the Executive retains an amount of the Gross-Up Payment equal to the
Excise Tax imposed upon the Contract Payments. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
all such amounts payable by the Corporation pursuant to this Section 4(e) shall
be paid by the end of the Executives taxable year next following the
Executives taxable year in




---



##### 



which the Executive remits the related taxes. The Corporation shall be
obligated to pay the Gross-Up Payment to the Executive without regard to
whether his employment with the Corporation is terminated in connection with
a change of control of the Corporation, including a Change-in-Control.
  - 2 -




---



##### 



TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.By:

/s/ Joseph OBrienName:

Joseph
G. OBrienTitle:
    VP,
Human Resources Date Signed:
    2/20/11EXECUTIVE/s/
Gregory M. NultyGregory M. NultyDate Signed:
    2/20/11 - 3 -
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Alan Hoverd, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Open Text Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(f) and 15d—15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986.] 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 10, 2004
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Click Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael W. Ferro, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

| Date: November 14, 2005 | /s/ MICHAEL W.  FERRO, JR.                                    |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Michael W.  Ferro, Jr.                                        |
| * *                     | *Chief  Executive Officer and  Chairman of the Board of Directors* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Click Commerce, Inc. and will beretained by Click Commerce, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors
                        -------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-80341) pertaining to the 1994 Incentive Stock Plan of Pharmacopeia, 
Inc., the 1995 Director Option Plan of Pharmacopeia, Inc. and the 1995 Employee 
Stock Purchase Plan of Pharmacopeia, Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form 
S-8 No. 333-20883) pertaining to the 1994 Incentive Stock Plan of Pharmacopeia, 
Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-56883) pertaining to 
the Pharmacopeia, Inc. 1994 Incentive Stock Plan, the Molecular Simulations 
Incorporated 1998 Stock Option and Purchase Plan, the Molecular Simulations
Incorporated 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, the Polygen Corporation 1986 Incentive 
Stock Option Plan, the Polygen Corporation 1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan 
(California), the Polygen Corporation 1986 Supplemental Stock Option Plan and 
the Polygen Corporation 1986 Supplemental Stock Option Plan (California), of our
report dated January 28, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial 
statements of Pharmacopeia, Inc. included in Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report (Form 10-K/A-1) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Princeton, New Jersey
April 1, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-71, OMB Control No. 3235-0058]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Form 12b-
25

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    The purpose of Form 12b-25 (17 CFR 240.12b-25) is to provide notice 
to the Commission and the marketplace that a registrant will be unable 
to timely file a required periodic or transition report pursuant to the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) or the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a et seq.). If all the 
filing conditions of the form are satisfied, the registrant is granted 
an automatic filing extension. The information required is filed on 
occasion and is mandatory. All information is available to the public 
for review. Approximately 3,432 registrants file Form 12b-25 and it 
takes approximately 2.5 hours per response for a total of 8,580 burden 
hours (2.5 hours per response x 3,432 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom, 
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, 
c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by sending 
an email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbebe9fae4f6dad2d7d9d4c3fbc8ded895dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e6e6c7f61735f57525c51467e4d5b5d10595148">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 28, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-28437 Filed 12-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2180

CX REINSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, formerly known as CNA 

Reinsurance Company Limited,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRAYON J. LOYAL,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

STEWART J. LEVITAS,

Defendant.

No. 16-2228

CX REINSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, formerly known as CNA 

Reinsurance Company Limited,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRAYON J. LOYAL,

Defendant - Appellee,

and
2

STEWART J. LEVITAS,

Defendant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:15-cv-02174-JKB)

Submitted: May 31, 2017 Decided: June 6, 2017

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

No. 16-2180 affirmed; No. 16-2228 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Amato, IV, GOODMAN, MEAGHER & ENOCH, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Stuart M.G. Seraina, Louis P. Malick, KRAMON & 

GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Brayon J. Loyal appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for summary 

judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of CX Reinsurance Company Ltd. 

(“CX Reinsurance”). CX Reinsurance cross-appeals from the same order by the district 

court denying its motion to dismiss the action. 

With respect to Loyal’s appeal, we have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record 

and, although we grant Loyal’s motion to file the additional materials submitted with her 

opening brief, we find no reversible error in the portion of the district court’s order 

granting summary judgment to CX Reinsurance. Accordingly, for the reasons stated by 

the district court, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment. Loyal 

v. CX Reinsurance Co., No. 1:15-cv-02174-JKB (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2016). Because we 

affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in CX Reinsurance’s favor, we 

dismiss as moot CX Reinsurance’s cross-appeal of the denial of its motion to dismiss. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

No. 16-2180 AFFIRMED

No. 16-2228 DISMISSED
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.2

I, Richard Okumoto, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
            of Photon Dynamics, Inc.; and

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
            statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this report.

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
            information included in this 3 report, fairly present in all
            material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
            cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
            in this report.

Date: December 22, 2004

/s/    Richard Okumoto
-----------------------------------------
RICHARD OKUMOTO
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND SECRETARY
Exhibit
32.1 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Annual Report of Speedus Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shant S. Hovnanian,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  Date:

March 31, 2008By:

/s/ Shant S. HovnanianName:

Shant S. HovnanianTitle:

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
  Officer 4
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Shahbazian, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    MICHAEL SHAHBAZIANMichael Shahbazian Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial OfficerDate:

May 23, 2007
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00210**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 

### 00210\00210_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00210\00210_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00210\00210_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00210\00210_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00210\00210_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 00210\Supplemental Documents\00210_Midwest Generation ICR Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 00210\Supplemental Documents\00210_MWG - Crawford - Aerial Plan - 091610.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00210\Supplemental Documents\00210_MWG-Crawford Block Diagram #1 - WWT-1 - 101210.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00210\Supplemental Documents\00210_MWG-Crawford Water Balance-101210.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00210\Supplemental Documents\00210_questionnairefinal.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00210\00210_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00210\00210_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.