### 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:

NATHAN BERGEY

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION
OF DJI Phantom 1 AND DJI I nspire UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012

(PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95)

Submitted on January 2, 201 6

Na than Bergey 2200 Berg ey Rd, Hatfield, PA 19440

2 67

- 566

- 7508

bergeynathan@gmail.com

### 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS



### ................................ ................................ ................... ...... 3

SUMMARY



### ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ ... 4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER



### ................................ .................... ....... 4

BACKGROUND.......................................................................................

...... ............ .............. 4

BASIS FOR PETITION.......................................................................................................

..... 5

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER.......................................

.................. ...................... 6

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS O F 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH NATHAN BERGEY SEEKS EXEMPTIO N.

.............. .................................. ....... 7

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF NATHAN BERGEY SEEKS AND THE REASON NATHAN BERGEY

, SEE KS THE RELIEF...........

...................................................... .... ...................................... ..........1 0

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING NA THAN BERGEY ’ S REQUEST WOULD BE IN

THE PUBLIC INTEREST ..............................

.. .......... .. ..1 3

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY..............................................................................................

. ........16

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER.... .............3 0
ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE TO

SUPPORT NATHAN BERGEYS REQUEST

.. .......................................... ......3 0

CONCLUSION.................................................................................

..................... ...... .. . ......... 3 1

APPENDICES...............................................................

............... .........................3 2

### 3 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest
ATC Air Traffic Control
ATO Air Traffic Organization
AV Aerial Vehicle
CFR Code of Federal Regulations

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration
FAR Federal Aviation Regulation

GCS Ground Con trol Station

GPS Global Positioning System

LOL Loss of Link

NAS National Airspace System

NOTAM Notice to Airman

PIC Pilot In Command

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section

333

SO Safety Observer

SOP Standard Operating Procedures

UA Unmanned Aircraft

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line of Site

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing

### 4 SUMMARY

NATHAN BERGEY seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA
Modernization and Reform Act o f 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit NATHAN
BERGEY to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of real estate, commercial properties, weddings, and landscap e over certain areas of the United States.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

NATHAN BERGEY provides his clients with photography and video services of properties and buildings for the purpose of advertising and promoti on. The objective of NATHAN
BERGEY and his aerial operations is to provide high quality imaging for a variety of commercial, publi c, and residential uses, specifically targeting:

• Real

- estate marketing



### • Business marketing

• Action Spor ts

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 1 , DJI Inspire UASs

NATHAN BERGEY seeks an exemption to operate DJI systems for compensation or hire within

the NAS. The DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire are vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or sm art phone systems. The DJI Phantom 1 has a maximum gross weight of approximately 2 pounds 11 ounces, while having a length of 1 4 inches width of 1 4 inches, height of 7 inches, and a maximum speed of approximately 19.4 knots. The DJI Inspire has a maximum g ross weight of 6 pounds 7.5 ounces, a length of 17. 2 inches, width of 17.7 inches, height of 11.8 inches, and a maximum speed of approxima tely 42 knots. The DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs are equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer ba ttery powered electric

motors.

### 5 BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, NATHAN BERGEY , pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, S pecial Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems , hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113( a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).
In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, NATHAN BERGEY ’ s operation of DJI Phantom 1 and
DJI Inspire UASs meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.
Accordingly, NATHAN BERGEY requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate.

NATHAN BERGEY submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will be ensured. NATHAN BERGEY will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive mainte nance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire Instruction Manual). Furthermore,
NATHAN BERGEY will document a nd maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom

1 and DJI Inspire UASs.

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command , is requested by NATHAN BERGEY to the extent necessary to allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an airman medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the
DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structure

. Nathan Bergey has knowledge of classes of airspace, visual flight rules VFR and all other knowledge need to operate in uncontrolled airspace.

### 6

NATHAN BERGEY seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness

, because the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, NATHAN BERGEY submits that
he wi ll ensure that the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs are in an airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UASs are in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phant om 1 and DJI Inspire Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft are in a condition for safe flight. He will utilize the preflight instructions provided by DJI to ensure airworthiness checks prior to each flight.

NATHAN BERGEY als o seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121,
entitled Altimeter Settings , as the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAs will not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. However, altitude information of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UA S s will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GP S for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined with NATHAN
BERGEY ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121.
Additionally

, NATHAN BERGEY seek s an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions

. NATHAN BERGEY submits that safety will not be affected by operation of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire
UA S s durin g daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of approximately 14.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to f ly
after that for at least 4.5 minutes.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, NATHAN BERGEY provides the following information in support of its petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

NATHAN BERGEY 2200 Bergey Rd, Hatfield, PA, 19440 267

- 566

- 7508

bergeynathan @gmail.com

B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which NATHAN BERGEY Seeks
Exemption.

1. NATHAN BERGEY Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a)

### 7

And (b).
Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileg es and limitations: Pilot in command

, subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:
(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for

compens ation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as
PIC of an aircraft.
(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in
connection with any business or employment if

— (1) The flight is only incidental to that busi ness or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. NATHAN BERGEY Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a).

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness

, subsection (a), states the
following:
(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

3. NATHAN BERGEY Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121.

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter sett ings, subsection (a), states the following, in

part:
(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating

-- (1) Below 18, 000 feet MSL, to

--

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and

within 100 nautical miles of the aircraft;
(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate
available station; or
(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.

4. NATHAN BERGEY Seeks E xemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions , subsection

### 8

(b), states the following:

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considerin g wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly
after that for at least 20 minutes.

5. NATHAN BERGEY Seeks Exemption From The R equirement Of Section 91.405(a).

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required , subsection (a), states the following:
Each owner or operator of an aircraft

— (a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and

shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]

6. NATHAN BERGEY Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section
91.407(a)(1)

Sec tion 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance,
rebuilding, or alteration , subsection (a)(1), states the following:
(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance,
preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or al teration unless

-- (1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under §
43.7 of this chapter[.]

7. NATHAN BERGEY Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections
91.409(a)(1) And 91.409(a)(2).

Section 91.4 09, entitled Inspections , subsection (a), states the following:

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an
aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had

-- (1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or
(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in
accordance with part 21 of this chapter.

### 9

8. NATHAN BERGEY Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections
91.417(a) And 91.417(b).

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records , subsections (a) and (b), state the
following:
(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91. 413, each registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section:
(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration
and records of the 100

- hour, annual, progressive, an d other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft.
The records must include

-- (i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administ rator) of
the work performed; and
(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the

aircraft for return to service.
(2) Records containing the following information:

(i) The total time in servic e of the airframe, each engine, each propeller,

and each rotor.
(ii) The current status of life

- limited parts of each airframe, engine,
propeller, rotor, and appliance.
(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft
which are required to b e overhauled on a specified time basis.
(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained.
(v) The current status of appli cable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required.
(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors,

### 10 propellers, and appliances.
(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods
prescribed:
(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed.
(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be

retained and transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold.
(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for retu rn to service.

C. The Extent Of Relief NATHAN BERGEY Seeks And The Reason NATHAN

BERGEY Seeks The Relief.

1. Extent Of Relief NATHAN BERGEY Seeks And The Reason NATHAN BERGEY
Seeks Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b).
Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in
command

, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or higher l evel certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flight

- hour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire.
This relief is requested since the limitati ons set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) The a ircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or

hire.
As set forth more fully below, NATHAN BERGEY submits that an equivalent level of safety will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Ph antom 1 UAS or DJI Inspire UAS unless that PIC has met certain flight

- hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to safely operate either the DJI Phantom 1 or DJI Inspire UAS in a manner consistent with the operations specificat ions as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Further, NATHAN BERGEY submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs, conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to

### 11

NATHAN BERGEY ’ s business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. Extent O f Relief NATHAN BERGEY Seeks And The Reason NATHAN BERGEY
Seeks Relief From Section 91.7(a).
Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , is requested to the extent required to allow NATHAN BERGEY to determine that the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs are in airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., the NATHAN BERGEY Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire Instruction Manual).

NATHAN BERGEY seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs do not require an airworth iness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, NATHAN BERGEY will ensure that the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs are in airworthy condition based upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated
in the conditions and limitations below.

3. Extent Of Reli ef NATHAN BERGEY Seeks and the Reason NATHAN BERGEY

Seeks Relief From Section 91.121.
Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight operations

of the DJI Phantom 1 a nd DJI Inspire , which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any al titude information concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), NATHAN BERGEY seeks the requested relief because the DJI

Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UA’s altimeter may be set o n the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight.
Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to the extent necessary to comply with the app licable conditions and limitations stated below. As more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since
the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAs are equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which automati cally ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and provides the PIC with altitude information of the UA on
the heads

- up display of the GCS.

### 12

4. Extent Of Relief NATHAN BERGEY Seeks and the Reason NATHAN BERGEY

Seeks Relief from Section 91.151(b).

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI P hantom 1 and
DJI Inspire UAs during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 14.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after t hat for at least 4.5 minutes. NATHAN
BERGEY seeks the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAs will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video or still photo flight operations that
NATHAN BERGEY proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition.
Significantly, as set forth below, the technical spe cifications of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs, the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inpsire operating documents, and NATHAN
BERGEY ’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that NATHAN BERGEY will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 1 and D JI Inspire UAs during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 14.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising sp eed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes.

5. Extent Of Relief NATHAN BERGEY ’S Seeks And The Reason NATHAN BERGEY Seeks Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply
to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, NATHAN BERGEY ’S requests relief from these

Sections because the DJI Phantom 1 and DJ I Inspire UASs do not require airworthiness certificates. As set forth more fully below, the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness certificate.
Accordingly, NATHAN BERGEY will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and
practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the NATHAN BERGEY Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire Instruction
Manual). Furthermore, NATHAN BERGEY will document and maintain all maintenance

records for the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAS s.

### 13

D. The Reasons Why Granting NATHAN BERGEY ’ s Request Would Be In The Public
Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.
Granting the present p etition will further the public interest by allowing NATHAN BE RGEY to safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of real estate, people, and landscape over certain areas of the United States.
Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits
of NATHAN BERGEY proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs will be realized without implicating any privacy issues.

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAs are battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use of a DJI Phantom 1 or DJI Inspire UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollut ion, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground.
Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The D JI Phantom 1
and DJI Inspire UAs do not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations.

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 1

and DJI Inspire UASs.
Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs, instead of
manned aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air
and noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery power and electric motors, t he DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs produce no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial video and photography , while burning approximately 20

- 30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAs, while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAs are propelled by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine.

### 14

By using the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated
with traditio nal manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI
Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAs (weighing approximately 2 pounds 11 ounces and 6 pounds 7.5 ounces respectively, at their maximum gross weights with lengths of 14 inches and 17.3 inches respectively, widths of 14 inches and 17.7 inches respectively, and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations (weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 1

and DJI Inspire UASs Will Benefit The Economy.
In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs are also an economical alternative to using man ned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs will allow United States based companies, like NATHAN BERGEY , to remain competitive and contribute to growth of the
U. S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology in order to re main competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs is one such technology that not only allows companies greater operational flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operation al cost of a traditional
manned aircraft.
By operating the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs, companies such as NATHAN
BERGEY , can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. companies, through com mercial use of the DJI
Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs, provides a stable workforce that increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United States and
abroad.

4. There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition fl ight operations that have been conducted for many

years , NATHAN BERGEY ’ s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs will not implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs wi ll be operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., the NATHAN BERGEY Aerial

### 15

Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire Instruction Manual) which requires property owner involvement and permission to videotape/photograph as well as local law enforcement notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption W ould Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The Rule From Which NATHAN BERGEY Seeks Exemption.

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAs Mee t The Conditions Of The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333. In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, NATHAN BERGEY ’s op eration of the DJI Phantom 1
and DJI Inspire UASs meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.
Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without air worthiness certification and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part:

(a) In Ge neral.

-- Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national air space system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by
section 334 of this Act.
(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

-- In making the determination under
subsection (a), the Secretary sh all determine, at a minimum

-- (1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a
hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national security; and

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1).

### 16 (c) Requirements for Safe Operation.

-- If the Secretary determines under this section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, th e Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, NATHAN BERGEY submits that the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs can operate s afely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a)
the characteristics of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phan tom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs Demonstrate Its

Safe Characteristics.

The DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed,

and operational capability.

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs.

The technical spe cifications of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs are set forth by the

DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire User Manuals, uploaded alongside this document

.

ii. The DJI Phantom 1 and DJI I nspire UAS Autonomous Flight And Navigation Modes Enable The UASs To Remain Within A Defined Operational Area.

The D JI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire U AS may be operated in both manual and fully

auton omous flight modes (the DJI Phantom 1 has the ability to hover in place autonomously) . A complete description of t h e flight and navigational mode of the DJI
Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs is provided at pages 8 and 46

- 48 respectively of the
attached User Manual s , uploaded alongside this document

.

iii. The DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs Are Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation.

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAs will rema in stationary, in flight, for 3 seconds or more. If, af ter 3 secon ds, the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAs

### 17

do not reacquire control link data from the GCS, the UAs will assume that the Control Link is lost and the UAs will return to the home position (i .e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and shutdown.
A complete description of the Failsaf e Functions of the DJI Phantom 1 UAS are set forth at page 14 and for the DJI Inspire at pages 13 of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire User

Manuals

, uploaded alongside this document

.

iv. The DJI Inspire GCS And Its Operation.

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Inspire GCS and flig ht control software is provided in the attached DJI Inspire User Manual

. The DJI Inspire User
Manual is uploaded alongside this document

.

b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs Are Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A Certificated Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer.

NATHAN BERGEY will be the only person to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the DJI

Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs. Addit ionally, a safety observer will assist in flights.

c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs Will Be Conducted
Pursuant To Specific Operating Limitations.
In seeking this exemption, NATHAN BERGEY proposes to commercially o perate DJI

Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of United States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations:

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UASs weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will req uire a new petition or a petition to amend this grant.

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for
the purpose of aerial video and photography.

3. The UAs may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

### 18 4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 500 feet above ground level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to
ATC mu st be in feet AGL.

5. The UAs must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman

m edical certificate.

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not
permitted.

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to
satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS
capability. The SO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation
for the duratio n of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating documents.

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacle s/ obstructions
and is not permitted to operate the camera or other instruments.

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists bet ween the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon r equest. The operator must also present updated

### 19 and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemptio n, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating
documents.

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must in spect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft
records.

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alter ations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records.

12. T he pre

- fl ight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the operating documents.

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component,

ma intenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and st atus of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS to
service.

15. Each UASs operated under this exemption must comply with all

### 20

manufacturer Safety Bulletins.

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the
corrective action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections.

17. The PIC must possess at least a private p ilot certificate and at least a

current third

- class medical certificate.



### 18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the

UAS in a manner consist ent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and exp erience

building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

19. UAS operations may not be cond ucted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed area of operations. Fligh ts under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not
authorized.

20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point
as denoted on a current FAA

- published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s managem ent is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon request.

### 21

21. The UA may not be operated less th an 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a

pre

- determined location within the planned oper ating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating documents.

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or
emergencies in accordance with the operating documents.

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining.

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) iss ued Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours pr ior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential transponder requirements.

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exempt ion must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N

- Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

27. Before conducting operations , the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements.

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.20 3 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

### 22

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation
operations and activities at all times.

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons),
vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating
persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an
accident. The operator mus t ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or;

b. The aircraft is operated n ear vessels, vehicles or structures where the owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and;

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a).

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

- access property with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

### 23 33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral o r vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions con tained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section
61.113(a) And (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

N A THAN BERGEY submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI
Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely opera te the DJI
Phantom 1 or DJI Inspire UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels,
vehicles and structures. Considering NATHAN BERGEY ’s proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations
set forth

- above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship
skills nece ssary to safely operate the DJI Phantom 1 or DJI Inspire UAS, NATHAN
BERGEY submits that the additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for NATHAN
BERGEY ’s specific proposed flight operations.
The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

NATHAN BERGEY will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 1 or DJI Inspire UAS
unl ess that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour requirements or the DJI
Phantom 1 or DJI Inspire UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 1 or DJI Inspire UAS in a manner consistent wi th this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.
Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5

### 24

hours of those hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes).
As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during NATHAN BERGEY ’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as follows:
In Exempti on No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of
total time as a UAS rot orcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot
with a multi

- rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating
the same make and model of UA S to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10
hours of multi

- rotor time and the 10 hour s may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight

- hour require ments in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with a pplicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building fl ights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119.

Exemption No. 11138 at page 15.

Accordingly, NATHAN BERGEY will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 1 or DJI Inspire UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 1 or DJI Inspire UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption,
inc luding evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a)

### 25 Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to every flight, NATHAN BERGEY will ensure that the DJI Phantom 1 or DJI Inspire UAS is in an airworthy condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its oper ating documents and

as stated in the conditions and limitations herein.
Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121
Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

Th e equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the

altitude information of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAs will be provided to the PIC
via GPS equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which do wnlinks from
the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This altitude

information, combined with NATHAN BERGEY ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI
Inspire UAs within visual line of sight, at or b elow 500 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety
equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be generated by GPS equipment
installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is
automatically established b y the UASs at ground level.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 1110 9, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section
91.151(b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safe ty established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs; (2) the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the

### 26

location of the proposed flight operations. Accord ingly, NATHAN BERGEY will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UAs during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power t o fly for a total duration of 14. 5 minutes

to t he first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for
at least 4.5 minutes.
Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs; the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, sa fety will be ensured as the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs provide audible and visual warnings to the PIC at the GCS when the UAs experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI Pha ntom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs will descend and land automatically.
Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limit ations of the UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91 .151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos.
8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153,

11156, 11157, 111 58, 11159, 11160, 11161).

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

In seeking this exemption, NATH AN BERGEY submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met
because NATHAN BERGEY will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., the NATHAN BERGEY Aerial
O perations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire Instruction Manual). Furthermore, NATHAN BERGEY will document and maintain all
maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs.

Since t he DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, NATHAN BERGEY will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI
Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire User Manuals are uploaded alongside this document

.

### 27

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safe ty because NATHAN BERGEY will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating

documents.

Furthermore, the exe mption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom

1 and DJI Inspire UASs will be performed by trained technicians. Maintenance will be

documented and maintained utilizing the monthly maintenance log.
Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely
affected when the t echnical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are

considered.

In consideration of NATHAN BERGEY ’s proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and the technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs, NATHAN
BERGEY submits that safety will not be adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067,
11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, NATHAN BERGEY requests th at the FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs, which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C .F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special conditions will permit safe operation of the UAs for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the NAS.

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, fo r operation of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs, since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety

### 28

standards, due to the novel or un usual design features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following:
If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircra ft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of thi s chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations.

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16.

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe special conditions for Leading Edge’s intended operation of the DJI Phantom 1
and DJI Inspire UASs, which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a le vel of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b),
91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

• A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: The Rules

From Which NATHAN BERGEY Seeks Exemption:

NATHAN BERGEY seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption NATHAN BERGEY

Seeks:

This exemption will permit NATHAN BERGEY to commercially operate an

Unman ned Aircraft System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States.

### 29

• Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support NATHAN

BERGEY ’s Request.

This P etition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

(FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may operate safely in the NAS. As such, NATHAN BERGEY ’s request for exemption may be granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as
set forth above.
FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or oth erwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification.

As discussed in detail above, NATHAN BERGEY will operate the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs safely in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security.

### 30 CONCLUSION

As set forth herein, NATHAN BERGEY seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.6 1 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation of the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video an d photography over certain areas of the United States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by allow ing NATHAN BERGEY to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Phantom 1 and DJI Inspi re UASs commercially
within the NAS.

WHEREFORE , in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA
Modernization and R eform Act of 2012, Section 333, NATHAN BERGEY respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.40 7(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Leading E dge to operate the DJI
Phantom 1 and DJI Inspire UASs commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States.

Resp ectfully submitted on January 2

, 201 6

Nathan Bergey

2200 Bergey Road, Hatfield, PA 19440

267

- 566

- 7508

bergeynathan @gmail.com

### 31