alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4041

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRYANT KEITH HORTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (2:99-cr-00170)

Submitted: May 25, 2007 Decided: June 26, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael S. Nachmanoff, Acting Federal Public Defender, Gretchen L.

Taylor, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellant. Darryl James Mitchell, Special Assistant United States

Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Bryant Keith Horton appeals the district court’s order

revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to eighteen

months of imprisonment. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are

no meritorious issues for appeal but suggesting that the sentence

is plainly unreasonable because it is longer than necessary to

punish adequately Horton’s violation of the conditions of his

supervised release. Horton was advised of his right to file a pro

se supplemental brief, but he has not done so. We affirm.

Counsel suggests that Horton’s sentence is plainly

unreasonable because the violations were technical in nature. We

note that, while the sentence Horton received is four months above

the advisory sentencing guideline range of eight to fourteen

months, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a) (2006), it

is within the applicable statutory maximum sentence. Moreover, our

review of the record leads us to conclude that the district court

sufficiently considered the statutory factors and explained its

reasons for imposing a sentence above the advisory guideline range.

We therefore find that the sentence imposed upon revocation of

supervised release is not plainly unreasonable. See United

States v. Crudup, 461 F.3d 433 (4th Cir. 2006) (providing

standard), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 1813 (2007). 
- 3 -

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for

appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s order revoking

Horton’s supervised release and imposing an eighteen-month

sentence. This court requires that counsel inform the client, in

writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United

States for further review. If the client requests that a petition

be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be

frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to

withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a

copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.10

Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.40 Landsdowne Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
617.679.7000
www.millennium.com

Confidential
Materials omitted and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote such omissions.

September
17, 2004

Paul
Feirstein
ACS Sales and Marketing
Schering Corporation
2000 Galloping Hill Road
Kenilworth, NJ 07033



Dear
Paul:

Schering
and Millennium are parties to the Addendum to the Collaboration Agreement among Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Schering Corporation and Schering-Plough, Ltd., effective June
1, 2003 ("Additional Field Force Agreement"). Any defined terms used herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Additional Field Force Agreement. Pursuant to a discussion at the quarterly JSC
meeting on September 10, the JSC agreed to the following amendments to the Additional Field Force
Agreement in connection with the deadline to renew joint funding obligations for 2005 pursuant to Sections 4.1 and 2.4 of the Additional Field Force Agreement:



All
other terms and conditions of the Additional Field Force Agreement will remain in full force and effect.

Please
indicate your agreement to this Amendment by signing below and returning one fully executed original to my attention.

Regards,

|/s/ Grant BogleGrant Bogle
VP, Sales & Marketingds |  |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 

AGREED:

Schering
Corporation
    (for itself and on behalf of Schering-Plough Ltd.)

|By:          | /s/ Paul Feirstein                    | 
|------------ | ------------------------------------- | 
|Name(print): | Paul Feirstein                        | 
|Title:       | Vice President, ACS Sales & Marketing | 
|Date:        | 9/24/04                               | 

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-50502 Summary Calendar

GLINDA HOSKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

WASHINGTON COUNTY, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas

(A-96-CV-614) December 5, 1997
Before DUHÉ, DEMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Plaintiff Glinda Hoskins, an African-American female, was employed by the Washington County Sheriff’s Department from March
1990 to November 1994. She alleges discrimination based on race
and sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

as amended 42 U.S.C. §2000 e et seq. , and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Thedistrict court gran ted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment

reasoning Plaintiff had f ailed to exhaust her administrative remedies with respect to the sex discrimination claim and did not produce evidence proving her discharge was racially motivated with respect to the race discrimination claim.
After car efully reviewing the briefs, record excerpts, and
relevant portions of the record itself, we find no reve rsible

error. We affirm essentially for the reasons stated by the district court in its order dated May 22, 1997.
Case: 3:17-mj-00451-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 3:17-mj-00451-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 2 of 9 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 3:17-mj-00451-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 3 of 9 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 3:17-mj-00451-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 4 of 9 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 3:17-mj-00451-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 5 of 9 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 3:17-mj-00451-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 6 of 9 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 3:17-mj-00451-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 7 of 9 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 3:17-mj-00451-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 8 of 9 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 3:17-mj-00451-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 9 of 9 PAGEID #: 9
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00048]



[[Page 803]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Pricing for the 2022 Negro Leagues Baseball and Purple Heart Hall 
of Honor Commemorative Coin Programs

AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Mint is announcing pricing for the 2022 
Negro Leagues Baseball and Purple Heart Hall of Honor Commemorative 
Coin Programs as shown below in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Bailey; Sr. Program Manager for 
Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW, Washington, 
DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Introductory
                  Coin                         price       Regular price
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Silver Proof (both programs)............          $74.00          $79.00
Silver Uncirculated (both programs).....           69.00           74.00
Clad Proof (both programs)..............           35.00           40.00
Clad Uncirculated (both programs).......           33.00           38.00
Negro Leagues Baseball Silver Dollar                 N/A           85.00
 with Privy Mark........................
Negro Leagues Baseball Silver Dollar                 N/A          135.00
 with Jackie Robinson Silver Medal......
Purple Heart Hall of Honor Colorized                 N/A           95.00
 Silver Dollar..........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Products containing gold coins will be priced according to the 
Pricing of Numismatic and Commemorative Gold and Platinum Products Grid 
posted at www.usmint.gov.
    Authority: Public Laws 116-209 & 116-247.

Eric Anderson,
Executive Secretary, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 2022-00048 Filed 1-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-101, OMB Control No. 3235-0082]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Form 11-K

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form 11-K (17 CFR 249.311) is the annual report designed for use by 
employee stock purchase, savings and similar plans to comply with the 
reporting requirements under Section 15(d) of the Securities and 
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Exchange Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)). Section 
15(d) establishes a periodic reporting obligation for every issuer of 
securities registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the 
``Securities Act'') (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.). Form 11-K provides 
employees of an issuer with financial information so that they can 
assess the performance of the stock plan or investment vehicle. The 
information collected must be filed with the Commission and is publicly 
available. Form 11-K takes approximately 30 hours per response and is 
filed by 1,302 respondents for total of 39,060 burden hours (30 hours 
per response x 1,302 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom, 
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, 
c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by sending 
an email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#712123302e3c10181d131e09310214125f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a1a180b15072b23262825320a392f29642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 28, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-28436 Filed 12-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Chemical Design Holdings plc

(United Kingdom)Chemical Design SARL

(France)Accelrys GmbH

(Germany)Accelrys Software Incorporated

(Delaware)Accelrys Limited

(United Kingdom)Accelrys SARL

(France)Accelrys kk

(Japan)Oxford Molecular Limited

(United Kingdom)Oxford Molecular SA

(France)SciTegic, Inc.

(United States)Synopsys Scientific Systems Limited

(United Kingdom)Synopsys Scientific Systems Incorporated

(New Jersey)Synomics Limited

(United Kingdom)


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Quintek  Technologies,  Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Robert  Steele,  Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Quintek  Technologies,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Quintek
Technologies,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.





Date:  May 22, 2006


/S/ ROBERT STEELE
-------------------------------
Robert Steele,
Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

TERRI LONG,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-cv-336

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent case)

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING THE JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND 

(DOC. 13); (2) REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE 

FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; AND 

(3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S DOCKET

______________________________________________________________________________

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is presently before the Court on the parties’ 

joint motion to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings 

pursuant to the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 13. Based upon the stipulation of 

the parties, and for good cause shown, the ALJ’s non-disability finding is REVERSED as

unsupported by substantial evidence and the parties’ joint motion for a Sentence Four remand 

(doc. 13) is GRANTED. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth 

Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. The Clerk is ORDERED to enter 

judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to TERMINATE this case on the Court’s docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: March 28, 2018 s/ Michael J. Newman 

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Click Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael W. Nelson,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

| Date: May 8, 2006 |     | /s/ MICHAEL W.  NELSON              |
|------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------|
| * *               |     | Michael W. Nelson                        |
| * *               | * * | *Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Click Commerce, Inc. andwill be retained by Click Commerce, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Amber Triplett,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:17cv618

Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed 

by the Magistrate Judge on August 10, 2021 (Doc. 27). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file 

objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th 

Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 27) have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 27) of the Magistrate Judge is 

hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge,

Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. 18) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge

United States District Court

Case: 1:17-cv-00618-MRB-KLL Doc #: 28 Filed: 08/25/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 1007
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4263 

To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to extend 

for 1 year the period of temporary increase in the Medicaid FMAP. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2009 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Ms. DEGETTE, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. 

PINGREE of Maine, and Mr. PIERLUISI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 

of 2009 to extend for 1 year the period of temporary 

increase in the Medicaid FMAP. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Medicaid Assist5 ance Extension Act of 2009’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4263 IH

1 SEC. 2. 1-YEAR EXTENSION OF ARRA INCREASE IN MED2 ICAID FMAP. 

3 Section 5001 of division B of the American Recovery 

4 and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–5) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para8 graph (2); 

9 (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘, but 

10 only for the first calendar quarter of fiscal year 

11 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(4) fiscal year 2012 is less than the FMAP as 

15 so determined for fiscal year 2008, fiscal year 2009 

16 (after the application of paragraph (1)), fiscal year 

17 2010 (after the application of paragraph (2)), or fis18 cal year 2011 (after the application of paragraph 

19 (3)), the greatest of such FMAP for the State for 

20 fiscal year 2008, fiscal year 2009, fiscal year 2010, 

21 or fiscal year 2011 shall be substituted for the 

22 State’s FMAP for fiscal year 2012, before the appli23 cation of this section, but only for the first calendar 

24 quarter in fiscal year 2012.’’; 

25 (2) in subsection (c)(4)(C)(ii), by striking ‘‘De26 cember 2009’’ and ‘‘January 2010’’ and inserting 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4263 IH

1 ‘‘December 2010’’ and ‘‘January 2011’’, respec2 tively; 

3 (3) in subsection (g)(1), by striking ‘‘September 

4 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2012’’; and 

5 (4) in subsection (h)(3), by striking ‘‘December 

6 31, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2011’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
No. 1076.

#### Talbott *&*Sons *v.*Parker & Co.

April Term, 1881.

September 12th, 1881.

*J. H. Earle,*for appellant. *J. E. Kennedy,*contra.

Plaintiffs sold a steam-engine, corn-mill, &e., to one S., taking his notes, and a written agreement which the Circuit Court construed to be a chattel mortgage. Afterwards defendants recovered a judgment against S., and had this property levied upon as his property. Plaintiffs then brought action against the defendants and the sheriff, and obtained a verdict— the condition of the mortgage having been broken before action brought. The plaintiffs appealed, raising two points only, upon which this court held—

1. That it was not necessary for the plaintiffs to produce their notes to entitle them to recover, as the action was brought by the legal owners to recover the property, and their title was shown by the agreement, which was proved, and which showed the debt, whose existence was not, in terms, denied by the defendants.

2. That there was no error in the charge of the Circuit judge that *“*the production by the plaintiff of the mortgage was sufficient *prima facie*to prove that the debt secured thereby was unpaid,” there being no allegation by defendants of payment. If such allegation had been made, it was incumbent upon the defendants to prove it. Opinion by

McGowan, A. J.,
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Extended Stay America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer and Vice
PresidentFinance of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: February 28, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ GREGORY R. MOXLEY
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|                        
|                         |  |  |  |                      
|                        
|                         |  |  |  |                      



1