21794 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 75 / Monday, April 20, 2015 / Notices 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE 

[Dispute No. WTO/DS491/Docket No. USTR– 

2015–0005] 

WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding 

Regarding United States—AntiDumping and Countervailing Measures 

on Certain Coated Paper From 

Indonesia 

AGENCY: Office of the United States 

Trade Representative. 

ACTION: Notice; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The Office of the United 

States Trade Representative (‘‘USTR’’) is 

providing notice that on March 13, 

2015, the Republic of Indonesia 

requested consultations with the United 

States under the Marrakesh Agreement 

Establishing the World Trade 

Organization (‘‘WTO Agreement’’) 

concerning antidumping (‘‘AD’’) and 

countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) measures 

pertaining to certain coated paper 

suitable for high-quality print graphics 

using sheet-fed presses from Indonesia. 

That request may be found at 

www.wto.org contained in a document 

designated as WT/DS491/1. USTR 

invites written comments from the 

public concerning the issues raised in 

this dispute. 

DATES: Although USTR will accept any 

comments received during the course of 

the dispute settlement proceedings, 

comments should be submitted on or 

before May 11, 2015, to be assured of 

timely consideration by USTR. 

ADDRESSES: Public comments should be 

submitted electronically to 

www.regulations.gov, docket number 

USTR–2015–0005. If you are unable to 

provide submissions by 

www.regulations.gov, please contact 

Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to 

arrange for an alternative method of 

transmission. 

If (as explained below) the comment 

contains confidential information, then 

the comment should be submitted by 

fax only to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 

395–3640. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Micah Myers, Associate General 

Counsel, or Juli Schwartz, Assistant 

General Counsel, Office of the United 

States Trade Representative, 600 17th 

Street NW., Washington, DC 20508, 

(202) 395–3150. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is 

providing notice that consultations have 

been requested pursuant to the WTO 

Understanding on Rules and Procedures 

Governing the Settlement of Disputes 

(‘‘DSU’’). If such consultations should 

fail to resolve the matter, Indonesia 

could request the establishment of a 

dispute settlement panel. 

Major Issues Raised by Indonesia 

On March 13, 2015, Indonesia 

requested consultations concerning AD 

and CVD measures pertaining to certain 

coated paper suitable for high-quality 

print graphics using sheet-fed presses. 

The specific U.S. legal instruments 

referenced in Indonesia’s consultations 

request are: (1) Section 771(11)(B) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, codified 

at 19 U.S.C. 1677(11)(B); (2) Certain 

Coated Paper from Indonesia: Initiation 

of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 74 

FR 53707 (Oct. 20, 2009); (3) Certain 

Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality 

Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses 

from Indonesia and the People’s 

Republic of China: Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty Investigations, 74 FR 

53710 (Oct. 20, 2009); (4) Certain 

Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality 

Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses 

from China and Indonesia, 74 FR 50243 

(Sept. 30, 2009); (5) Certain Coated 

Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print 

Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from 

China and Indonesia, 74 FR 61174 (Nov. 

23, 2009); (6) Certain Coated Paper 

Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics 

Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: 

Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing 

Duty Determination and Alignment of 

Final Countervailing Duty 

Determination with Final Antidumping 

Duty Determination, 75 FR 10761 (Mar. 

9, 2010); (7) Certain Coated Paper 

Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics 

Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: 

Preliminary Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value and Postponement 

of Final Determination, 75 FR 24885 

(May 6, 2010); (8) Certain Coated Paper 

Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics 

Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: 

Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination, 75 FR 59209 (Sept. 27, 

2010); (9) Certain Coated Paper Suitable 

for High-Quality Print Graphics Using 

Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 75 FR 59223 (Sept. 27, 

2010); (10) Certain Coated Paper 

Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics 

Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and 

Indonesia, 75 FR 70289 (Nov. 17, 2010); 

(11) Certain Coated Paper Suitable for 

High-Quality Print Graphics Using 

Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: 

Countervailing Duty Order, 75 FR 70206 

(Nov. 17, 2010); and (12) Certain Coated 

Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print 

Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from 

Indonesia: Antidumping Duty Order, 75 

FR 70205 (Nov. 17, 2010). 

With respect to the CVD measures, 

Indonesia challenges the U.S. 

Department of Commerce’s (‘‘DOC’’) 

determination that Indonesia provided 

standing timber for less than adequate 

remuneration, describing it in the 

consultation request as a ‘‘per se 

determination of price distortion’’ 

without a (corresponding) 

determination of ‘‘the adequacy of 

remuneration ‘in relation to prevailing 

market conditions.’ ’’ Indonesia also 

states that DOC failed to ‘‘examine 

whether there was a plan or scheme in 

place sufficient to constitute a ‘subsidy 

programme.’ ’’ Indonesia further claims 

DOC ‘‘did not identify whether the 

entity providing the purported subsidy 

was the national, regional, or local 

government and . . . thus . . . whether 

the subsidy was ‘specific to an 

enterprise . . . within the jurisdiction of 

the granting authority’ ’’ (third ellipsis 

in original). In addition, Indonesia 

challenges DOC’s facts available 

analysis in which it concluded that the 

Government of Indonesia forgave debt. 

With respect to both the AD and CVD 

measures, Indonesia alleges that the 

U.S. International Trade Commission’s 

(‘‘ITC’’) threat of injury determination 

‘‘relied on ‘allegation, conjecture [and] 

remote possibility,’ ’’ was not based ‘‘on 

a change in circumstances that was 

‘clearly foreseen and imminent,’ ’’ and 

showed no ‘‘causal relationship between 

the [subject] imports and the . . . threat 

of injury to the domestic industry.’’ 

With respect to 19 U.S.C. 1677(11)(B), 

Indonesia contends that ‘‘the law does 

not consider or exercise ‘special care’ ’’ 

as a result of the ‘‘requirement that a tie 

vote in a threat of injury determination 

must be treated as an affirmative . . . 

[ITC] determination.’’ 

Indonesia alleges inconsistencies with 

Article VI of the General Agreement on 

Tariffs and Trade 1994, Articles 1, 3.5, 

3.7 and 3.8 of the Agreement on 

Implementation of Article VI of the 

General Agreement on Tariffs And 

Trade 1994 and Articles 2.1, 12.7, 10, 

14(d), 15.5, 15.7 and 15.8 of the 

Agreement on Subsidies and 

Countervailing Measures. 

Public Comment: Requirements for 

Submissions 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments concerning 

the issues raised in this dispute. Persons 

may submit public comments 

electronically to www.regulations.gov 

docket number USTR–2015–0005. If you 

are unable to provide submissions by 

www.regulations.gov, please contact 

Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to 

arrange for an alternative method of 

transmission. 

To submit comments via 

www.regulations.gov, enter docket 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 75 / Monday, April 20, 2015 / Notices 21795 

number USTR–2015–0005 on the home 

page and click ‘‘Search.’’ The site will 

provide a search-results page listing all 

documents associated with this docket. 

Find a reference to this notice by 

selecting ‘‘Notice’’ under ‘‘Document 

Type’’ on the left side of the searchresults page, and click on the link 

entitled ‘‘Comment Now!’’ (For further 

information on using the 

www.regulations.gov Web site, please 

consult the resources provided on the 

Web site by clicking on ‘‘How to Use 

This Site’’ on the left side of the home 

page.) 

The www.regulations.gov Web site 

allows users to provide comments by 

filling in a ‘‘Type Comments’’ field, or 

by attaching a document using an 

‘‘Upload File’’ field. It is expected that 

most comments will be provided in an 

attached document. If a document is 

attached, it is sufficient to type ‘‘See 

attached’’ in the ‘‘Type Comments’’ 

field. 

A person requesting that information 

contained in a comment that he/she 

submitted, be treated as confidential 

business information must certify that 

such information is business 

confidential and would not customarily 

be released to the public by the 

submitter. Confidential business 

information must be clearly designated 

as such and the submission must be 

marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ 

at the top and bottom of the cover page 

and each succeeding page. Any 

comment containing business 

confidential information must be 

submitted by fax to Sandy McKinzy at 

(202) 395–3640. A non-confidential 

summary of the confidential 

information must be submitted to 

www.regulations.gov. The nonconfidential summary will be placed in 

the docket and will be open to public 

inspection. 

USTR may determine that information 

or advice contained in a comment 

submitted, other than business 

confidential information, is confidential 

in accordance with Section 135(g)(2) of 

the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that 

information or advice may qualify as 

such, the submitter: 

(1) Must clearly so designate the 

information or advice; 

(2) Must clearly mark the material as 

‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the 

top and bottom of the cover page and 

each succeeding page; and 

(3) Must provide a non-confidential 

summary of the information or advice. 

Any comment containing confidential 

information must be submitted by fax. A 

non-confidential summary of the 

confidential information must be 

submitted to www.regulations.gov. The 

non-confidential summary will be 

placed in the docket and will be open 

to public inspection. 

Pursuant to section 127(e) of the 

Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 

U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR will maintain a 

docket on this dispute settlement 

proceeding, docket number USTR– 

2015–0005, accessible to the public at 

www.regulations.gov. The public file 

will include non-confidential comments 

received by USTR from the public 

regarding the dispute. If a dispute 

settlement panel is convened, or in the 

event of an appeal from such a panel, 

the following documents will be made 

available to the public at www.ustr.gov: 

The United States’ submissions, any 

non-confidential submissions received 

from other participants in the dispute, 

and any non-confidential summaries of 

submissions received from other 

participants in the dispute. In the event 

that a dispute settlement panel is 

convened, or in the event of an appeal 

from such a panel, the report of the 

panel, and, if applicable, the report of 

the Appellate Body, will also be 

available on the Web site of the World 

Trade Organization, at www.wto.org. 

Comments open to public inspection 

may be viewed at www.regulations.gov. 

Juan Millan, 

Assistant United States Trade Representative 

for Monitoring and Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2015–09026 Filed 4–17–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3290–F5–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Railroad Administration 

[Docket No. FRA–2015–0007–N–6] 

Proposed Agency Information 

Collection Activities; Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Federal Railroad 

Administration (FRA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 

notice announces that the renewal 

Information Collection Requests (ICRs) 

abstracted below are being forwarded to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and comment. The 

ICRs describes the nature of the 

information collection and its expected 

burden. The Federal Register notice 

with a 60-day comment period soliciting 

comments on the following collections 

of information was published on 

February 9, 2015. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before May 20, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and 

Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal 

Railroad Administration, 1200 New 

Jersey Ave. SE., Mail Stop 25, 

Washington, DC 20590 (Telephone: 

(202) 493–6292), or Ms. Kimberly 

Toone, Office of Information 

Technology, RAD–20, Federal Railroad 

Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. 

SE., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC 

20590 (Telephone: (202) 493–6132). 

(These telephone numbers are not tollfree.) 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), Public Law 104–13, sec. 2, 109 

Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised at 

44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), and its 

implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 

1320, require Federal agencies to issue 

two notices seeking public comment on 

information collection activities before 

OMB may approve paperwork packages. 

44 U.S.C. 3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.5, 

1320.8(d)(1), and 1320.12. On February 

9, 2015, FRA published a 60-day notice 

in the Federal Register soliciting 

comment on ICR that the agency is 

seeking OMB approval. See 80 FR 7072. 

FRA received no comments in response 

to this notice. 

Before OMB decides whether to 

approve these proposed collections of 

information, it must provide 30 days for 

public comment. 44 U.S.C. 3507(b); 5 

CFR 1320.12(d). Federal law requires 

OMB to approve or disapprove 

paperwork packages between 30 and 60 

days after the 30 day notice is 

published. 44 U.S.C. 3507 (b)–(c); 5 CFR 

1320.12(d); see also 60 FR 44978, 44983, 

Aug. 29, 1995. OMB believes that the 30 

day notice informs the regulated 

community to file relevant comments 

and affords the agency adequate time to 

digest public comments before it 

renders a decision. 60 FR 44983, Aug. 

29, 1995. Therefore, respondents should 

submit their respective comments to 

OMB within 30 days of publication to 

best ensure having their full effect. 5 

CFR 1320.12(c); see also 60 FR 44983, 

Aug. 29, 1995. 

The summary below describes the 

nature of the information collection 

requests (ICRs) and the expected 

burden. The revised request is being 

submitted for clearance by OMB as 

required by the PRA. 

Title: Inspection and Maintenance of 

Steam Locomotives (Formerly Steam 

Locomotive Inspection). 

OMB Control Number: 2130–0505. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES