alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Tyrone Franklin, :

:

Plaintiff(s), :

: Case Number: 1:17cv589

vs. :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

Police Officer Timothy Lanter, et al., :

:

Defendant(s). :

ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States

District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge

Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and

filed with this Court on September 29, 2017 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). Subsequently,

the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de

novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that

such Recommendation should be adopted..

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state

a claim for relief. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a) that an appeal of any Order

adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith. Therefore, plaintiff is

DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________

Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WESTERN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., An 

Arizona Corporation,

 Appellant,

v.

OMNIVATIONS II, L.L.C., A Texas 

Limited Liability Company,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-17-00232-CV

Appeal from the

448th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2017DCV2600)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
1

Kordzi, Joe

From: Carl Weilert <cweilert@aol.com>

Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 4:52 PM

To: Kordzi, Joe

Subject: Per your request

Attachments: removed.txt; Survey for Article.pdf

Joe: 

 

Here (attached) is the Power Engineering Article and the Survey that was linked to it. 

 

Carl Weilert
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 1 of 14 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 2 of 14 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 3 of 14 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 4 of 14 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 5 of 14 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 6 of 14 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 7 of 14 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 8 of 14 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 9 of 14 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 10 of 14 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 11 of 14 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 12 of 14 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 13 of 14 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 1:17-mj-00632-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 14 of 14 PAGEID #: 14
Unassociated Document


     

    Exhibit
10.26

    


    Project
of Jinjiang Technological Plan Contract

    


    
      
        	
                Date:

              	 
      	
                January
      4, 2007

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                Parties:

              	 
      	
                The
      Science and Technology Bureau of Jinjiang City

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                Guanke
      (Fujian) Electron Technological Industry Co. Ltd.

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                Term:

              	 
      	
                From
      January 2006 to January 2011

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                Guanke’s
      Obligations:

              	 
      	
                -  Guanke
      shall develop certain LCD related technologies and products each
      year;

                -  Guanke
      shall use the subsidies only for researching and developing
      purpose;
-  the Science and Technology Bureau of Jinjiang City has
      right to inspect the due performance of the Contract, the proper use
      
    of the subsidies, and to review and accept the
      technologies and products;

                -  technologies
      developed under this Contract will be deemed as state-owned assets;
      provided, however, Guanke shall the perpetual right to use and license
      them.

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                Subsidies:

              	 
      	
                As
      consideration, Guanke shall receive from the Science and Technology Bureau
      of Jinjiang City subsidies in the total amount of RMB100 million in annual
      installments.

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                Inspection
      and renewal:

              	 
      	
                The
      Science and Technology Bureau of Jinjiang City will conduct annual
      inspection on Guanke’s performance of the Contract.

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                Dispute
      resolution:

              	 
      	
                Disputes
      shall be submitted to a mutually agreed arbitration
    tribunal.

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                Governing
      law:

              	 
      	
                Laws
      of the People’s Republic of
China.
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Bo
      Huang, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
      30, 2006, of Sinoenergy Corporation;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:
              November
              14, 2006
            
            /s/ Bo
              HuangBo
                Huang
              Chief
                Executive Officer
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 6,
2012 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2012-3 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.
The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 30, 2015
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

KEVIN A. TOLLIVER, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 2:17-cv-806 

 JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH 

 Magistrate Judge Jolson 

REGIONAL DIRECTOR 

ROBERT JEFFRIES, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 ORDER 

On January 24, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation recommending that this case be stayed pending resolution of Plaintiff’s appeal of 

Tolliver v. Noble, et al., No. 2:16-cv-1020. (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 9). The parties 

were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of 

their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation. 

 The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This case is 

hereby STAYED pending resolution of Plaintiff’s appeal of Tolliver v. Noble, et al., No. 2:16-cv1020. 

The Clerk shall remove Document 9 from the Court’s pending motions list and enter a stay 

in this case. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ George C. Smith__________________ 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60191 Conference Calendar

__________________
ROGER L. MAYBERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHARLIE WATKINS, Chief of Police; UNDERWRITERS, Defendants, and BILLY TURNER, Police Officer, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:93-CV-26-S-D

- - - - - - - - - - December 19, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Roger Mayberry appeals the jury's verdict in favor of the defendant in his excessive-force civil rights suit. Because Mayberry failed to move for a judgment as a matter of law at the conclusion of the trial, appellate inquiry isNo. 95-60191 -2- limited to whether there was any evidence to support the jury's verdict or whether the verdict amounted to a manifest miscarriage of justice. Coughlin v. Capitol Cement Co. , 571 F.2d 290, 297 (5th Cir. 1978). We find that the record contains sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict and that the verdict does not amount to a miscarriage of justice. Mayberry also challenges defense counsel's opening and closing remarks; however, because Mayberry has not identified any remarks by counsel which were improper, this argument is without merit. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7687

WILMER KNIGHT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

L. JARVIS, Assistant Warden; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GEE; LIEUTENANT COTTRELL, Investigator;

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARKSDALE; SERGEANT

JAMES, Correctional Officer; F. MCCOY; PONTON,

Assistant Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-95-91-3)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilmer Knight, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to disposition by a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.* We have reviewed

the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Knight v. Jarvis, No. CA-95-91-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 20,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.2

   FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION DECLARES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND


NEW YORK, NY:  June 4, 2008 - Financial Federal Corporation (NYSE:
FIF) today announced its Board of Directors declared a $0.15 per
share quarterly dividend on its common stock.  The dividend is
payable July 10, 2008 to stockholders of record at the close of
business on June 20, 2008.  The dividend rate is the same as the
prior quarter.


Financial Federal Corporation is an independent financial services
company specializing in financing construction, road transportation
and refuse equipment through installment sales and leasing programs
for dealers, manufacturers and end users nationwide.  Please visit
www.financialfederal.com for more information.


CONTACT:  Steven F. Groth
          Chief Financial Officer
          (212) 599-8000
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
4.2

    


    June 11,
2010

    


    Wegener
Communications, Inc.

    11350
Technology Circle

    Johns
Creek, Georgia  30097

    


    Promissory Note
Amendment

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    Wegener Communications, Inc.,
a Georgia corporation ("Borrower") and David E. Chymiak (“Lender”)
have entered into an unsecured Promissory Note, dated October 1, 2009
(“Promissory Note”), as
amended, in the amount of two hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) with
a maturity date of October 31, 2009, bearing interest at an annual rate of
8.0%.

    


    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing recitals, the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Borrower and the Lender hereby agree to amend the
Promissory Note as follows:

    


    The
maturity date of the Promissory Note is hereby extended to September 10,
2010.

    


    


    


    By:  /s/ David E.
Chymiak

    Name:  David E. Chymiak

    Accepted
and agreed to this

    11th day
of June, 2010.

    


    


    


    WEGENER
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

     

     

    By:  /s/
James
Traicoff

    Name:   James Traicoff

    Title:
Treasurer and CFO

    Accepted
and agreed to this

    11th day
of June, 2010
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, J. Brian Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 30th day of September, 2009








J. BRIAN NICHOLSJ. Brian NicholsChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT E

Case: 2:17-cv-00720-EAS-EPD Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/16/17 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 63
Page 1

Doc ID --> 201700502616 Case: 2:17-cv-00720-EAS-EPD Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/16/17 Page: 2 of 4 PAGEID #: 64
Page 2

Doc ID --> 201700502616 Case: 2:17-cv-00720-EAS-EPD Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/16/17 Page: 3 of 4 PAGEID #: 65
Page 3

Doc ID --> 201700502616 Case: 2:17-cv-00720-EAS-EPD Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/16/17 Page: 4 of 4 PAGEID #: 66
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Larry B. Prescott, certify that:

 

1.      I have reviewedthis Annual report on Form 10-K of T.J.T., Inc.;

 

2.      Based on myknowledge, this Annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual report;

 

3.     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this Annual report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)             designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisAnnual report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual report (the EvaluationDate); and

 

c)             presented inthis Annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)             all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)            any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

45

----

 

6.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this Annualreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| /s/Larry B. Prescott    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Larry B. Prescott       |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| December 29, 2004  |

 

46

----