alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ford Motor Company and 

Marco 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 19, 2014

No. 04-14-00562-CV

Jesus DE LOS SANTOS, Jr., Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Jesus Francisco 

De Los Santos, Deceased, and Juan De Los Santos, Individually,

Appellants

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Marco Anthony Soliz, Jr.,

Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-08-50394-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On September 15, 2014, Court Reporter Sonia Trevino filed a notice of late reporter’s 

record requesting an extension until October 15, 2014. The request is GRANTED. The 

reporter’s record is due to be filed in this court no later than October 15, 2014.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4185 

To amend the Social Security Act and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

to exempt certain employment as a member of a local governing board, 

commission, or committee from Social Security tax coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. POMEROY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Social Security Act and the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986 to exempt certain employment as a member of a local governing board, commission, or committee 

from Social Security tax coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Officials Tax 

5 Relief Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4185 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN LOCAL GOVERNING 

2 BOARD EMPLOYMENT FROM SOCIAL SECU3 RITY TAX COVERAGE. 

4 (a) AMENDMENTS TO SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.—Sec5 tion 210(a)(7)(F) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 410(a)(7)(F)) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of 

7 clause (iv), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (v), and 

8 by inserting after clause (v) the following new clause: 

9 ‘‘(vi) by any elected or appointed 

10 member of a general governing board, com11 mission, or committee of any political sub12 division of a State if the remuneration paid 

13 in a calendar year for such service is not 

14 more than— 

15 ‘‘(I) $1,300, with respect to serv16 ice performed during any calendar 

17 year commencing on or after January 

18 1, 2009; and 

19 ‘‘(II) the adjusted amount deter20 mined under section 218(c)(8)(B) for 

21 any calendar year commencing on or 

22 after January 1, 2011, with respect to 

23 service performed during such cal24 endar year;’’. 

25 (b) AMENDMENTS TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF

26 1986.—Section 3121(b)(7)(F) of the Internal Revenue 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4185 IH

1 Code of 1986 (defining employment) is amended by strik2 ing ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (iv), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the 

3 end of clause (v), and by inserting after clause (v) the 

4 following new clause: 

5 ‘‘(vi) by any elected or appointed 

6 member of a general governing board, com7 mission, or committee of any political sub8 division of a State if the remuneration paid 

9 in a calendar year for such service is not 

10 more than— 

11 ‘‘(I) $1,300 with respect to serv12 ice performed during any calendar 

13 year commencing on or after January 

14 1, 2009, and 

15 ‘‘(II) the adjusted amount deter16 mined under section 218(c)(8)(B) of 

17 the Social Security Act for any cal18 endar year commencing on or after 

19 January 1, 2011, with respect to serv20 ice performed during such calendar 

21 year;’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply with respect to service performed 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 4185 IH

1 during calendar years commencing on or after January 

2 1, 2009. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
ab/dB/2011 11:31 4252271067 ANM7 PAGE 02/03 

_ ,.._.,..__j^fn:^^..:' _ V( .^ W_Zi^.<^ 

Regional Counsel 

AUG2 5.Z011 

ANM-7 

A-A/pj .~77i.<^..J:t^r)cLn;^ 

^•:^uj::^_:z::r^ :_ :iz: 

. 'IJDn.^jA-- lLej^^<^>n iLU ~fhr- _ 

X^^>lJ:_,s5.^./^y?_<:./jrL>^ 

.-is -^joe. ik.es.p.Ci\dS-k^J:^ . ^c^-rcy^Z ^ 

• . > -1. _ 

ktsJcA. ^ ^__ 

:;"CD 

/ 

t/n.^=^i6 wckJaJ.e. <irO J Cain Q-T c^f^rc}_ 

- ^ S-cA^'t ./V.O._rLCUi Kc>> (lC^n-ii^c4 

2 ^ S^i^£L_j2^^__y^.^.:^^ UJ^r k S^hUr t 

^^__h^_<d._'i^. ..7^^ 3 g^-cT^v't/i^ ^ZHd^ 

..^r]h<Kfi v^ I ^^j ^ 
08/30/2011 11:31 4252271007 ANM7 PAGE 03/03 

BILL FOR COLLECTIONINTEREST, PENALTY ANO ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES WILL BE AS:5.P'.$SH[) ON 

DELIMQUENT ACCOUNTS. 

DEPARTMENT,ESTABLISHMEWT, T3aREAU,OR OFFICE 

FEDEPAl, AVIATION ADMIN 

APM- 1 

FEDERAL AVTATION ADMINISTRATION 

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW 

WAfT^'fl ING70N, DC 20591 

PLJiA.'^'t: rOMTACT; DE WILLIAMS 

BILL TO. 

LIS A CJAMACHE-WORTMAN 

PO BOX 1 2 7 9 2 

OLVMPIA, WA 9850 9 

DEOC OFCMARGES : ^,,^^,^., ^,^^^^ ^ 

AGREEMENT NO.: 

DATE OF BILL: 08/02/2011 

BILL MUM5ER: 

3009AL70CiO3 

CTJSTOMEH MO. : 

NM-GAMACHE-WORTMAH, LISA 

ARTICLE OR SERVICES 

CrvrL PKNALTY 

I DATE PAYMENT DUfe; D^/::i3/2Qll 

QTY 

3. 

m^IT COST UOM 

2 , f>QO.O0 

TOTAT^ 

AMOUNT 

$2,500.00 

S;>,500.00 

MAivE CHECK ^AVAUl.e. TO: FEDERAL AVIATION APMTNSTRATION 

F.AA- MIK2 MONRONpY AERO. CENTER, AMZ-35n 

P.O. rev 25770 

Of-li^^^OKj^ CITY, OK 731?S 491b 

FOR PA'i'MENT VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSFER: 

Federal Reserve Wire (FEDWIRE) 

Receiver- ABA Number: 021030004 

HsaK ^ Account Number: TREAS NYC/CTR/BNF/69001104 

'••?!.^a?-?- includs Customer Name, Invoice Number & CustofTin;:: Nun^iier 

** RETUPN ONE COPY OF THLS BILL WTTH RP:MT.TTANC3 TO ABOVE ADDPES3 **
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

March 12, 2010

Mr. Christopher Bradshaw-Hull

Attorney at Law

4200 Montrose Blvd., Suite 570

Houston, TX 77006

Ms. Diana L. Faust

Cooper & Scully, P.C.

900 Jackson Street, Suite 100

Dallas, TX 75202

Mr. Richard Sheehy

Sheehy Serpe & Ware, P.C.

909 Fannin, Suite 2500

Houston, TX 77010

RE:Case Number:  08-0169

Court of Appeals Number:  01-06-01068-CV

Trial Court Number:  2005-54075

Style:TANGIE WALTERS

v.

CLEVELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, SHIRLEY KIEFER, AND KEITH SPOONER, M.D.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion and enclosed judgment in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@courts.state.tx.us or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 08-0169Page 2**
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6635

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DONALD JEROME FIELDS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-00-405) Submitted: September 14, 2005 Decided: October 4, 2005 Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Jerome Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Donald Jerome Fields, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Fields’s motion requesting transcripts and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Fields , No. CR-00-405 (M.D.N.C. April 8, 2005). We grant Fields leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Auditors 

 

The Partners of 

Star Gas Partners, L.P.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference inthe registration statements No. 333-100976 on Form S-3, Nos. 333-49751 and 333-103873 on Form S-4 and Nos. 333-40138, 333-46714 and 333-53716 on Form S-8 of Star Gas Partners, L.P. of our report dated December 4, 2003, relating to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Star Gas Partners, L.P. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2002 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), partners’ capital and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended September 30, 2003 and related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the September 30, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Star Gas Partners, L.P. Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standards No. 142. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut 

December 22, 2003
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-43716, 333-50579, 333-50581,333-50585, 333-53331, 333-62884, 333-65405, 333-104222, 333-10614, 333-121053)of Trammell Crow Company and Subsidiaries pertaining to the Restricted Stockand Nonstatutory Stock Option Awards to Certain Employees, the Trammell CrowCompany Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, the Trammell Crow Company1997 Stock Option Plan, the Trammell Crow Company Long-Term Incentive Plan, asamended, the Trammell Crow Company Retirement Savings Plan, and RestrictedStock to Certain Employees of our report dated March 13, 2006, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule listedin the index at Item 15(a) of Trammell Crow Company and subsidiaries, TrammellCrow Company and subsidiaries’ management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Trammell Crow Company and subsidiaries, includedin the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 
| /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |
|                      |
| Dallas, TX                |
| March 13, 2006            |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22556-22557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09333]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Almac Clinical 
Services Inc. (ACSI)

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 
1301.34(a) on or before May 22, 2015. Such persons may also file a 
written request for a hearing on the application pursuant to 21 CFR 
1301.43 on or before May 22, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODXL, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for 
hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: 
Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion 
Control (``Deputy Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 
28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on March

[[Page 22557]]

5, 2015, Almac Clinical Services Inc., (ACSI), 25 Fretz Road, 
Souderton, Pennsylvania 18964 applied to be registered as an importer 
of the following basic classes of controlled substances:

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Controlled substance                       Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Tapentadol (9780)..........................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import small quantities of the listed 
controlled substances in dosage form to conduct clinical trials.

    Dated: April 14, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-09333 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-034-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
MAINE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (MEARNG) DRINKING WATER 

PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Bangor Training Site does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army 

National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water 

Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the 

American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to 

ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: May 2021

PFOA + PFOS Results: 16.3 ppt

Future Testing Event: May 2023

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Maine National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 207-430-5759

Office E-mail Address: ng.me.mearng.list.public-affairs@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Prasad Shrmanjadun Bhim,

Petitioner,

V.

Jefferson B. Sessions, Ml, et al.,

Respondents.

Case No. 2:17-cv-765

Judge Michael H. Watson

Magistrate Judge Cheisey Vascura

ORDER

On April 10, 2018, Magistrate Judge Vascura issued a report and

recommendation ("R&R") recommending that Respondent's motion to dismiss,

EOF No. 9, and supplemental motion to dismiss, EOF No. 12, be granted and

that this action be dismissed. EOF No. 14.

Magistrate Judge Vascura notified the parties of their right to file objections

to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Id. at 2. She also specificaiiy

advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days

would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the District Judge

and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id. at

2-3.

The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were

filed. Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. Respondent's

motion to dismiss, EOF No. 9, and supplemental motion to dismiss, EOF No. 12,

are GRANTED consistent with Magistrate Judge Vascura's recommendation in
the R&R. This action Is DISMISSED as moot. The Clerk of Court shall

TERMINATE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case No. 2:17-cv-765 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Orchid Cellmark Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                                                       
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2010 |  | /S/    THOMAS A.
BOLOGNA                                                                              
|                      |  | Thomas A. Bologna
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                 
|                      | 
|Dated: August 6, 2010 |  | /S/    JAMES F.
SMITH                                                                                 
|                      |  | James F. Smith
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION (DAYTON)

MICHAEL PENNESSI, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 3:17-cv-286

District Judge Walter H. Rice

v.

HANGER PROSTHETICS AND

ORTHOTICS, INC.,

Defendant.

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REFERRAL TO MEDIATION

1. Now come Plaintiffs and respectfully request this Court to refer this matter to

mediation

2. Pursuant to the Parties’ joint RULE 26(f) REPORT OF THE PARTIES, Para. 9:

“Suggestions as to type and timing of efforts at Alternative Dispute Resolution:

The Parties believe that mediation may be beneficial, but they would like to

conduct some discovery first. They believe the case would likely be ready for

mediation sometime in early 2018. Plaintiffs suggested possible arbitration by

June 2018. Defendant is not willing to agree to arbitration at this time, but the

Parties may revisit it later in the case.”

3. Plaintiff Michael Pennessi is currently unemployed and submits to this Court that

mediation sooner rather than later in the litigation process, especially versus the

multi-billion dollar corporate Defendant, may be beneficial in resolving the

litigation. Plaintiffs request referral by the Court to mediation pursuant to the

Pennessi v. Hanger, Case No. 3:17-cv-286 - PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REFERRAL TO MEDIATION

Page 1 of 2

Case: 3:17-cv-00286-WHR-SLO Doc #: 9 Filed: 01/10/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 43
Southern District of Ohio Supplemental Procedures for Alternative Dispute

Resolution.

4. The parties have pursued initial discovery and otherwise are familiar with the

facts of the case, thus mediation is appropriate at this time.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request referral to mediation at this time.

Respectfully submitted,

____s/Robert L. Guehl_____

Robert Guehl (# 0005491)

2312 Far Hills Avenue

Dayton, OH 45419

Telephone: 937-479-5598

Email: rguehlesq@gmail.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this January 10, 2018, the foregoing has been filed via the

Court’s electronic filing system. Notice of filing will be performed by the Court’s electronic

filing system, and Parties may access the document through the Court’s electronic filing

system.

____s/Robert L. Guehl_____

Robert Guehl

Pennessi v. Hanger, Case No. 3:17-cv-286 - PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REFERRAL TO MEDIATION

Page 2 of 2

Case: 3:17-cv-00286-WHR-SLO Doc #: 9 Filed: 01/10/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 44
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

Copperhead Industrial Inc., et al.,
Case No. 1:17-cv-609
Plaintiffs,
Judge Susan J. Dlott

Ms
: Order Overruling Objections and
G.E. Schmidt, Inc., et al., t Affirming Report and Recommendation
Defendants.

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman.
Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and issued a Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 31) on May 29, 2018 through which she recommended that the Motions
to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction filed by Defendant G.E. Schmidt, Inc. (Doc.
7) and Defendant Kyokutoh Co., Ltd. (Doc. 15) be denied. Subsequently, Defendants filed
Objections (Doc. 32) to the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiffs filed a Response in
Opposition to the Objections (Doc. 34), and Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. 36).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and
considered de novo the filings in this matter as required by Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court OVERRULES the Objections
and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 1foay of she tom bens ; 20hS

BY THE COURT:

iii g. Naat,

Susan J. Dlott
United States District Judge