alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FPDOCS 34890560.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

STORMY BLANKINSHIP, ) CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00777

)

) JUDGE WATSON

Plaintiff, )

) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

) WITH PREJUDICE

v. )

)

)

SEQUEL YOUTH AND FAMILY )

SERVICES, )

)

Defendant. )

Now come the Plaintiff Stormy Blankinship and Defendant Sequel Youth and Family

Services (hereafter the “Parties”), by and through the undersigned counsels, and hereby stipulate

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) to the Plaintiff’s dismissal of this action with prejudice.

The Parties have resolved this matter to their mutual satisfaction.

/s/ Robert M. Robenalt

Robert M. Robenalt (0042251)

FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP

250 West Street, Suite 400

Columbus, Ohio 43215

Tel.: 614-221-1425

Fax: 614-221-1409

rrobenalt@fisherphillips.com

Attorney for Defendant Sequel Youth and Family

Services

Case: 2:17-cv-00777-MHW-CMV Doc #: 21 Filed: 01/29/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 60
FPDOCS 34890560.1

/s/ Rayl L. Stepter (per written authorization)

Rayl L. Stepter (0047505)

5650 Paul Blazer Parkway

Dublin, Ohio 43017

Telephone: 614-468-4100

Facsimile: 614-468-4101

Email: raylstepter@stepterlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff Stormy Blankinship

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing Stipulation

of Dismissal With Prejudice was filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system this 29th day of January,

2019, and that said system will electronically notify and serve all Parties of record.

/s/ Robert M. Robenalt

Robert M. Robenalt (0042251)

Case: 2:17-cv-00777-MHW-CMV Doc #: 21 Filed: 01/29/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 61
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No's 333-80341, 333-20883, 333-56883 and 333-79577) of our report
dated January 28, 2000, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Pharmacopeia, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999, except for Note 9, for
which the date is March 8, 2000.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Pharmacopeia, Inc.
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of Pharmacopeia,
Inc.'s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.


                                                     ERNST&YOUNG LLP

San Diego, California
March 29, 2000
Report of Independent Public Accountants


To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated financial statements of
Household Finance Corporation (the "Company") and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and have issued our
report thereon dated January 21, 1998.  We have not audited
any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period subsequent to December 31, 1997, or performed
any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report on
those statements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention
that caused us to believe that the Company was not in
compliance with any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or
conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the
"Agreement"), dated November 1, 1995, in conjunction with
the Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates
Series 1995-2 insofar as they relate to accounting matters. 
It should be noted, however, that our audit was not directed
primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of
the Company's system of internal accounting controls over
the Company's home equity loan portfolio, including those
loans serviced under the Agreement to the extent we
considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by
generally accepted auditing standards.  In accordance with
these standards, the purpose of our study and evaluation,
which included obtaining an understanding of the accounting
systems, was to determine the nature, timing and extent of
the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion
on the financial statements.  Our study and evaluation also
took into consideration certain of the criteria and audit
requirements in the Audit Guide for Audits of Non-Supervised
Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development.  However, certain procedures included in the
audit guide are not applicable to the home equity loans
being serviced for the Trustee, and therefore, were not
performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records
relating to home equity loans serviced for the Trustee that,
in our opinion, Section 3.10 of the Agreement required us to
report.

This report is intended solely for the information and use
of the Board of Directors and management of the Company and
should not be used for any other purpose.



Chicago, Illinois
January 21, 1998<PAGE>
# Europeiska unionens C 250/2019

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 250 |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 62 årgången25 juli 2019 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 250

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

62 årgången25 juli 2019

---

| Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Upplysningar |
| | UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN |
| | EuropaparlamentetRådet |
| 2019/C 250/01 | Gemensamt uttalande från parlamentet, rådet och kommissionen om Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU) 2019/1243 av den 20 juni 2019 om anpassning till artiklarna 290 och 291 i fördraget om Europeiska unionens funktionssätt av ett antal rättsakter som föreskriver tillämpning av det föreskrivande förfarandet med kontroll | 1 |

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

IV   Upplysningar

UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN

EuropaparlamentetRådet

2019/C 250/01

Gemensamt uttalande från parlamentet, rådet och kommissionen om Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU) 2019/1243 av den 20 juni 2019 om anpassning till artiklarna 290 och 291 i fördraget om Europeiska unionens funktionssätt av ett antal rättsakter som föreskriver tillämpning av det föreskrivande förfarandet med kontroll

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

IV Upplysningar

UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN

Europaparlamentet Rådet

| 25.7.2019 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | C 250/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2019

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

C 250/1

---

Gemensamt uttalande från parlamentet, rådet och kommissionen om Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU) 2019/1243 av den 20 juni 2019 om anpassning till artiklarna 290 och 291 i fördraget om Europeiska unionens funktionssätt av ett antal rättsakter som föreskriver tillämpning av det föreskrivande förfarandet med kontroll (1)

(2019/C 250/01)

I punkt 27 i det interinstitutionella avtalet om bättre lagstiftning bekräftade de tre institutionerna behovet av att anpassa all befintlig lagstiftning till de rättsliga ramar som infördes i och med Lissabonfördraget, i synnerhet behovet av att ge hög prioritet åt en snabb anpassning av alla grundläggande akter som fortfarande hänvisar till det föreskrivande förfarandet med kontroll. Denna förordning, som följer kommissionens förslag i detta avseende, tillgodoser det behovet genom att anpassning avseende det föreskrivande förfarandet med kontroll föreskrivs i ett betydande antal akter som ingår i det förslaget. De tre institutionerna kommer att fortsätta att arbeta med anpassningen av de återstående akterna i förslaget.

---

(1)  EUT L 198, 25.7.2019, s. 241.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JONATHAN BOATNER, 

Defendant. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

:

Case No. 3:17-mj-00392 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

BINDOVER ORDER 

This matter was set for preliminary examination on September 8, 2017. Defendant 

appeared with counsel and waived his right to a preliminary examination. The Court 

found the waiver to be knowing and voluntary and therefore orders that Defendant be 

bound over to the grand jury to answer the charge. 

September 8, 2017 s/Sharon L. Ovington 

 Sharon L. Ovington 

 United States Magistrate Judge
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7368

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DARNELL FREEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-02-427)

Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 22, 2006

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darnell Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. LeDora Knight, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Darnell Freeman appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to reinstate his appeal. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Freeman, No. CR-02-427 (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 2953.

#### Ridgeway *v.*Cutter.

April Term, 1892.

This was a motion to have an appeal declared abandoned, the appellant having failed to file case with the clerk of the Circuit Court within ten days after the same had become settled.

The court thereupon granted the following order, bearing date May 16, 1892 :

The case herein having been settled on the twentieth day of February, A. D. 1892, and the same not having been filed in the clerk’s office of the Circuit Court within ten days, as required by the forty-ninth rule of the Circuit Court, all of which appears by the motion papers herein, it is ordered, that the said appeal be declared abandoned, and the plaintiff be allowed to proceed as if no appeal had been taken.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3940 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                    September 28, 2010.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
3940) entitled ``An Act to amend Public Law 96-597 to clarify the 
authority of the Secretary of the Interior to extend grants and other 
assistance to facilitate political status public education programs for 
the peoples of the non-self-governing territories of the United 
States.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

            Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
      following:

SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING POLITICAL STATUS EDUCATION IN 
              GUAM.

    It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Interior may 
provide technical assistance to the Government of Guam under section 
601(a) of the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize appropriations for 
certain insular areas of the United States, and for other purposes'', 
approved December 24, 1980 (48 U.S.C. 1469d(a)), for public education 
regarding political status options only if the political status options 
are consistent with the Constitution of the United States.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE IN AMERICAN SAMOA AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE 
              NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS.

    (a) Delayed Effective Date.--Section 8103(b) of the Fair Minimum 
Wage Act of 2007 (29 U.S.C. 206 note) (as amended by section 520 of 
division D of Public Law 111-117) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by inserting ``(except 2011 when 
        there shall be no increase)'' after ``thereafter'' the second 
        place it appears; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ``except that, 
        beginning in 2010'' and inserting ``except that there shall be 
        no such increase in 2010 or 2011 and, beginning in 2012''.
    (b) GAO Report.--Section 8104 of such Act (as amended) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsections (a) and (b) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(a) Report.--The Government Accountability Office shall assess 
the impact of minimum wage increases that have occurred pursuant to 
section 8103, and not later than September 1, 2011, shall transmit to 
Congress a report of its findings. The Government Accountability Office 
shall submit subsequent reports not later than April 1, 2013, and every 
2 years thereafter until the minimum wage in the respective territory 
meets the federal minimum wage.''; and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b).

            Amend the title so as to read: ``An Act to clarify the 
        availability of existing funds for political status education 
        in the Territory of Guam, and for other purposes.''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 3940

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-2 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 615
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Anton J. Drescher, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of USA Video Interactive Corp;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entitles, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

---



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





By: /s/ Anton J. Drescher

------------------------------------

Name: Anton J. Drescher

Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 14, 2008
#### Muriel C. HUME, Administratrix of the Estate of Donald E. Hume, Deceased, Respondent-Petitioner, v. DURWOOD MEDICAL CLINIC, INCORPORATED; James H. Black, M.D.; Charles Harris, M.D.; and Harold P. Hope, M.D., Appellants.

(327 S. E. (2d) 322)

Supreme Court

Nov. 14, 1984.

ORDER

Petitioner requests the Court to issue a writ of *certiorari*to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Hume v. Durwood Medical Clinics, Inc., S. C., 318 S. E. (2d) 119 (Ct. App. 1984).

The Writ is granted.

The Appendix shall be docketed as the Transcript of Record as of the date of this order. Petitioner shall file eight additional copies of the Appendix by the deadline for filing the petitioner’s brief. The materials in the Appendix are not required to be certified copies. The parties are directed to file *418briefs in accordance with Rule 8 of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, except only one original brief and nine copies shall be required. This matter shall proceed in conformity with the Court rules.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

JANET FREEMAN,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:17-cv-764
v. CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

On May 7, 2018 a Report and Recommendation was issued by the Magistrate Judge

affirming the decision to deny benefits issued by the Social Security Administration. Thereafter,

a timely objection was filed by the plaintiff Pamela Arvin Blocker.

Under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 72(b)(3), this court “must determine de novo any part of the

magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” The undersigned has reviewed

the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge, and the

objections filed by the plaintiff.

Upon review, this Court finds, as did the Magistrate Judge, that the decision of the

Administrative Law Judge for the Social Security Administration was supported by substantial

evidence and was not otherwise contrary to law, all of which require this court to affirm the denial

of benefits. Blakely v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 518 F.3d 399, 406 (6th Cir. 2009).


IT IS SO ORDERED that the decision denying benefits is AFFIRMED and this case is

dismissed.
9-14 -\0lk PZ
DATE ED A. SARGUS, JR.

CHIE ITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 24, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00058

- CR

Cynthia Torres LEAL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 08

- 00087

- CRF

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant ’ s motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of November, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Meeting Log**

Includes all face
-to - face m e etings and phone calls between EPA personnel and stakeholders following signature of the “Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Modifications to Renewable Fuel Standard and Diesel Sulfur Programs” Proposed Rule (77 FR 61313, October 9, 2012). Date: January 23, 2013 Attendees: EPA staff (Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of General Counsel); Ensyn Corporation. Subject: Comments regarding renewable heating oil proposed rule and market update.
EXHIBIT 1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Mitchell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Paygard, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Date: June 21, 2004

                                                     /s/John Mitchell
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     John Mitchell
                                                     Chief Financial Officer