alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k
David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,
J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

May 1, 2018

t0423 

# Order

Clerk 

### May 1, 2018

155565 (20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 15 5565 COA: 336612 Wayne CC: 93-002575-FH KENNETH KARL WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 20, 2018 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00003]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m., Thursday, January 13, 2022.

PLACE: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the public may only virtually 
attend the open portions of this meeting. If you would like to 
virtually attend, at least 24 hours in advance, visit FCA.gov, select 
``Newsroom,'' and then select ``Events.'' From there, access the linked 
``Instructions for board meeting visitors.''

STATUS: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Portions Open to the Public

<bullet> Approval of December 9, 2021 minutes
<bullet> Small Association Workgroup
<bullet> Bookletter-068 Tier 1/Tier 2 Capital Framework Guidance 
(Revised)
<bullet> OIG Year in Review and Report on FY 2021 Financial Statement 
Audit

Portions Closed to the Public

<bullet> Executive Session with Financial Statement Auditors \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 
552b(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

<bullet> Report on FY 2021 FISMA Audit \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 
552b(c)(2).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: If you need more information, need 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley 
Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4056.

Ashley Waldron,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-00003 Filed 1-3-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company as of and for the period covered   by the      Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      March 19, 2010 | /s/      Peter Engel            |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                       |                            |
|                       | Peter      Engel                |
|                       |                            |
|                       | Principal      ExecutiveOfficer |

----
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
August 5, 2015 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2015-3 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the
closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the
same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from August 5, 2015 through December 31, 2015, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 25, 2016
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
**Exhibit      32**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION**

|                                 |                                     |                                                       |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                  May 14, 2007 |                                          | /s/ Robert                  A.                  Hovee |
|                                 | Robert                  A. Hovee,        |
|                                 | Chief                  Executive Officer |

|                                   |                                       |                                                           |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                    May 14, 2007 |                                            | /s/ David                    J.                    Barnes |
|                                   | David                    J. Barnes,        |
|                                   | Chief                    Financial Officer |

----
0753

#### Michael K. WHETSTONE, Appellant v. Ronald Owens WHETSTONE, Sr., Diane Venson Whetstone, and Ronald Owens Whetstone, Jr., a minor under fourteen (14) years of age, Respondents.

(346 S. E. (2d) 532)

Court of Appeals

*John H. Hydrick,*West Columbia, *for appellant.*

*Donna K. Holt*and *Gwyn DuBose-Schmitt,*Columbia, *for respondent.*

Heard May 26, 1986.

Decided July 21, 1986.

Gardner, Judge:

Michael K. Whetstone (the grandfather) instituted this action against his son Ronald Owens Whetstone, Sr., (the father) and Diane Venson Whetstone (the mother) and Ronald Owens Whetstone, Jr., (the grandchild) seeking visitation privileges with the grandchild, who at the time was *404about 18 months old. The grandfather’s petition also sought to enjoin a pending adoption action; the father and mother had previously consented to the adoption. The appealed order denied visitation privileges to the grandfather for the reason that it was not in the grandchild’s best interest and also denied the injunction against the continuance of the adoption proceeding. We dismiss the appeal as being moot.

Section 20-7-2220, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976) as amended, provides, in effect, that an appeal does not stay an order of the family court regarding a child and that it does not discharge the child from the custody of the court. The grandfather neither petitioned the Supreme Court for a supersedeas and a reinstatement of the previous temporary injunction as to the adoption proceeding nor did he petition petition to intervene in the adoption action. Subsequently, the adoption of the child by unknown parents living in North Carolina was completed.

Section 20-7-1770(a), Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), as amended, provides:

> (a) After the final decree of adoption is entered, the relation of parent and child and all the rights, duties and other legal consequences of the natural relation of child and parent shall thereafter exist between such adopted child and the person adopting such child and the kindred of the adoptive parents. From the date the final decree of adoption is entered, the adopted child shall be considered a natural child of the adopting parents for all inheritance purposes, both by and from such child, to the exclusion of the natural or blood parents or *kin of such*child_[Emphasis ours.]

Since the grandfather failed to intervene in the adoption proceeding and failed to petition the Supreme Court for an order of supersedeas, we hold that the final adoption decree effectively mooted the issue presented to this court; this appeal is, therefore, dismissed. And it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Goolsby, J., concurs.

Cureton, J., concurs in result only.
Exhibit 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Spear & Jackson, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Lewis Hon Ching
Ho, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Lewis Hon Ching Ho
----------------------
Lewis Hon Ching Ho
Chief Administrative Officer

May 15, 2007
LABEL # 102



## DANGER!

MAY BE FATAL IF INHALED, ABSORBED THROUGH SKIN, OR

SWALLOWED. CONTACT MAY CAUSE SEVERE EYE IRRITATION. PROLONGED OR REPEATED INHALATION MAY CAUSE LIVER, KIDNEY, LUNG, HEART, AND REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS BASED ON

ANIMAL DATA.

PRECAUTIONS: Do not breathe process vapors or mists. Use only with adequate ventilation. Avoid process vapor / mist contact with skin and eyes.

FIRST AID: For vapor inhalation, remove the aff ected individual to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration. If breathing is difficult, give oxygen. Seek immediate medical attention. In case of eye contact, flush eyes with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes. Seek medical attention if irritation persists.

FIRE: In case of fire, use water, dry chemical, or protein type air foam to extinguish. Toxic combustion products may be released. Wear a self-contained breathing device.

Read the Material Safety Data Sheet prior to handling for recommended protective equipment and detailed hazard and precautionary information.

For industrial use only
#### Oliver Jackson WICKER, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Respondent-Appellant v. ANDERSON COUNTY COUNCIL, the governing body of Anderson County, South Carolina; Daniel L. Rhodes, David L. Hooper, James M. Cox, Jr., Harold E. Beebe, and Robert L. Wiles, Members of the Anderson County Council; and J. David Watson, Administrator of Anderson County, South Carolina, Appellants-Respondents.

(347 S. E. (2d) 96)

Supreme Court

*480April 10, 1986.

ORDER

Respondent-Appellant (Wicker) moves to remand this case to the lower court to consider his motion for a new trial and a petition to intervene.

The lower court order was filed on February 3, 1986. Appellants-Respondents filed their notice of intent to appeal from this order on February 10,1986. Wicker filed his notice of intent to appeal on February 11, 1986. Also on February 11,1986, Wicker filed a motion for a new trial and a petition to intervene with the lower court.

Under Rule 59(b), SCRCP, the motion for a new trial was timely made. Therefore, the appeal and the cross-appeal are dismissed without prejudice, and the case is remanded to the lower court to consider the post-trial motions. *See Otten v. Otten,*287 S. C. 166, 337 S. E. (2d) 207 (1985).

It is so ordered.
03 APR 1992

James D. Boyd

Executive Officer

California Air Resources Board

1102 “Q” Street

Post Office Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

Dear Mr. Boyd;

On January 28, 1992, you submitted revisions to the Califor

nia State Implementation Plan (SIP) for achieving and maintaining

the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. These revisions in

clude new and amended rules and regulations for seven districts

in California.

We have reviewed these rules for completeness and found that

most of them conform to the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part

51, Appendix V and the amendments published in the Federal

Register on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216). We are now in the

process of reviewing these rules. Once reviewed, we will prepare

rulemaking notices for submittal to our Headquarters office for

publication in the Federal Register.

The following rules were found to be indomplete: Ventura

County Air Pollution Control District — Rules 26 and 29. For

your information, we have enclosed a copy of our completeness

checklist indicating which items were found to be incomplete.

We cannot process the incomplete rules as revisions to the

SIP at this time because the necessary documentation was not sub

mitted with the rules. We are returning all copies of the incom

plete rules for your use in a future submittal.

We did not perform a completeness review on the Kern County

Air Pollution Control District (KCAPCD) Rules 202, 210.1, and

210.6. Matt Haber, Chief, New Source Section, has spoken with

the KCAPCD to request that they withdraw these rules because the

District which adopted the rules does not exist any longer due to

the unification of the San Joaquin Valley counties into one
/

District. New rules will need to be adopted by the successor

Districts (Kern County, Southeast Desert portion and San Joaquin

Valley Unified portion).

If you have any questions regarding our review, please call

Julie Rose of the Northern California, Nevada, and Hawaii

Rulemaking Section in the Air and Toxics Division at 4 15—744—

1184.

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL s;GNEJ BY:

DAVID P. HOW EKAWW

Daniel W. McGovern

Regional Administrator

Enclosures

*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

AMANDA OWENS, 

Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:17-cv-287

 

vs.

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent case)

Defendant.

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION

(DOC. 17) FOR AN AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 

(“EAJA”); AND (2) AWARDING EAJA ATTORNEY’S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES

IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,690.00

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ joint 

stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney’s fees, costs, and 

expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the total 

amount of $3,690.00. Doc. 17. There being no dispute that all requirements are met for the 

reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties’ joint stipulation for an 

EAJA award (doc. 17); and (2) AWARDS Plaintiff EAJA fees, costs, and expenses in the 

amount of $3,690.00. As no further matters remain pending for review, this case remains

TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: April 24, 2018 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
Case: 3:17-mj-00440-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/19/17 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 3:17-mj-00440-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/19/17 Page: 2 of 9 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 3:17-mj-00440-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/19/17 Page: 3 of 9 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 3:17-mj-00440-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/19/17 Page: 4 of 9 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 3:17-mj-00440-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/19/17 Page: 5 of 9 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 3:17-mj-00440-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/19/17 Page: 6 of 9 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 3:17-mj-00440-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/19/17 Page: 7 of 9 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 3:17-mj-00440-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/19/17 Page: 8 of 9 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 3:17-mj-00440-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/19/17 Page: 9 of 9 PAGEID #: 9
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6375

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CEDRICK L. SNIPES, a/k/a Cederick L. Snipes,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior 

District Judge. (2:05-cr-00718-PMD-1)

Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cedrick L. Snipes, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cedrick L. Snipes appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 

U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error, given that Snipes is ineligible for the 

reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of 

the district court. United States v. Snipes, No. 2:05-cr-00718-

PMD-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# ·=== U·SAIRWAYS

Shawn David Dlroctur- Airbus/Embraer Fleet Engineering Septem.ber 03, 2014 US Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30, West Building GroWld P'loor, Room W12-140 l200New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Subject: A319/320/3:21 Series- :F.uselage ·Tackand Rivet Holes in Fitting Bracket$ at Frame 50 to 

### lnspection/.Repair Referenees: INDocket

### No. 2014·0455; Directorate Identifier**2014-NM~006~AD** fBI .Ajrbus SB**A320~53~1257,** dtd. Dec. 21,2012 IC/Airbus SB A320-53·1261, dtd. Dec. 21, 2012 fDI SB A320-53-l261 Correspondence between American Airlines and Airbus !E/EASA PAD No. 13-030 CommentResponseDocum.cnt (CRO), Comment #2 To Whom It

### May Concem, Reference

### /AINPRM directs inspection ofTackHoles at FR50 to FR63 

### between P33/P39 (LH only) .in

. floor area in accordance witb Reference fBI SB on all A319. A320 and A321 series aircraft up to and · . 

### MSN 5200 a.nd defines certain 

### initi.al thresholds 

### as described in paragraphs (g)(l.**)~** (g)(2) 

### and (g)(3) of AD. Reference /Alparagraph (h) also directs modification in accordance with Reference /C/ SB, before 

### Flight Cycles or 96,000 Flight Hours, whichever occuts 

## nt$1:. However 

### Re(erenoo /C/ 

### at its current. only applicable to four 

### operators, AFR, D2F, DLH and SVR. Through. 

### Reference fDI 

### communication and Reference IE/ CRD, US Ai:rways understand$ that Refere:nce ICI 

### SB w.i11 be revised to reflect 

### all by Reference IBI. however this has not happened to date. US Airways requests that every effortbe made by the FAA to incorporate Revision 1to Reference /C/ release 

### ofthe final rule or failing that the final rule be amended upon release ofRevision 1to Reference Thankyou for the oppor.tu.nity to comment on this proposed. rule. Sincerely,

# ~ Shawn David Director- Airbus/EmbraerFleet Engineering
cc: Cbris Albrecht, PMI 

### Jon Oberdick, 1m
- Fleet 

### Engineering Mar.k Rodu, MD

- Tech Programs and Quality Assurance 

### Myles**Nichols~** 

### MD**~** 

### Quality; CASS and 

### Traming Jim. Ursitti, Manager

- Engineermg Regulatory Compliance**J>ill~hutl.!h** lollcrnilli<>n:•ll\irp(!Tt. P.O. B1:r.< ID41\. HG.ifENT. Pil'l$bllrgh, PA**1~231-0346** (412)**~~8-~S2D**
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0326.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:26PM ----- To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US
Date: 02/08/2010 08:00PM Subject: Fw: Qualitative health effects from HAPs for RICE NESHAP

Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/08/2010 08:00PM ----- To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA From: Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US
Date: 02/08/2010 05:41PM Subject: Qualitative health effects from HAPs for RICE NESHAP

Melanie,

Attached is the revised HAPs benefits section of the RIA with citations. Please forward to Cortney for interagency distribution.

(See attached file: RICE HAPs 2.8.10.docx)

Thank you!

Amy Lamson Air Benefit and Cost Group Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency 109 TW Alexander Dr. (C439-02) Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desk...For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0326.txt (1 of 2)2/19/2010 12:5 0:38 PMfile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0326.txt

Phone: (919) 541-4383 Fax: (919) 541-0839

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desk...For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0326.txt (2 of 2)2/19/2010 12:5 0:38 PM
**Exhibit 32.2**

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. §1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, the undersigned certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Millennium Pharmaceuticals,Inc.
|                      | /s/ MARSHA H. FANUCCI         |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: March 1, 2007 | Marsha H. Fanucci             |   |
|                 | Senior Vice President and     |   |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer       |   |
|                 | (Principal financial officer) |   |

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.and will be retained by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----