alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4139 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 20, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7464 Highway 503 in Hickory, Mississippi, 

as the ‘‘Sergeant Matthew L. Ingram Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4139 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT MATTHEW L. INGRAM POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 7464 Highway 503 in Hickory, 

4 Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ser5 geant Matthew L. Ingram Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Matthew 

10 L. Ingram Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 13, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Open Text Corporation (the “Company”) forthe year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul McFeeters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adoptedpursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 25, 2008
Exhibit 32.1
Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation
Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)
Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 (as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002), we, the undersigned  President and Chief Executive
Officer and Sr. Vice  President and Chief  Financial  Officer of Tidelands Oil &
Gas  Corporation,  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certify  that  to the  best  of my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
September  30, 2006 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the  financial  condition  and results of  operation  of the  Company.  A signed
original of this written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to
the  registrant  and will be retained by it and furnished to the  Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: November 13, 2006

                                    /s/ Michael Ward          /s/ James B. Smith
                                    ----------------          ------------------
                                    President and CEO         Sr. V.P. and CFO
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operation

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

August 24. 20 16

Re: Amendment to the Application for exemption under 333 section ( Mahdad Emadipour

-

Exemption/Rulemaking ID: FAA

- 2016

- 0447

- 0001 )
Dear Sir or Madam;

I applied for Exemption under 333 section for the purpose of using UAS for aerial cinematography

. I request an amendment to the application to get exemption for one of my UAS (Gryphon Dynamics 1400 super) in the application when its total weight is 60lbs

. I wish to operate the gryphon dynamics 1400 super with total weight 60lbs under the same terms and conditions contained in the m y application for exemption under 333 section

. T he manual and specification of the Gryphon Dynamic 1400 super is already attached with the application for the exemption

.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an amendment to the application for exemption

.

Sincerely,

Mahdad Emadipour
Apt 120, Patrician Apartments

2432 Pacific Coast HWY
Lomita, CA 90717 Email: mahdad.emadipour@yahoo.com

Tel: 310

- 896

- 1120
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


We, Tim Bumgarner and Byron Hudson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of American Pallet Leasing, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents
in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
American Pallet Leasing, Inc.



                                   By:   /s/ Tim Bumgarner
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Tim Bumgarner, Chief Executive Officer


                                   By:   /s/ Byron Hudson
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Byron Hudson, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                            Section 906 Certification
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Financial Federal Corporation for the quarter ended April 30, 2003, the
undersigned officer, being the Chief Executive Officer of Financial Federal
Corporation, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
     2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
     the quarter ended April 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Financial
     Federal Corporation.



June 10, 2003                           /s/ Paul R. Sinsheimer
--------------                          -------------------------------------
Date                                    Paul R. Sinsheimer
                                        Chief Executive Officer and President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6607

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TYRONE T. SEDGWICK, a/k/a T-Bone,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-94-79, CA-97-454)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone T. Sedgwick, Appellant Pro Se. John Granville Douglass,

Mary Hannah Lauck, James Brien Comey, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Sedgwick, Nos. CR-94-79; CA-97-454 (E.D.

Va. Apr. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OMNIPOINT
CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         346,998
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,798
<INVENTORY>                                     39,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               471,087
<PP&E>                                       1,406,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                 316,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,327,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          415,958
<BONDS>                                      2,657,762
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    597,109
<COMMON>                                           552
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,327,632
<SALES>                                         59,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               404,214
<CGS>                                          167,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  880,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               218,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                31,705
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             261,771
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (694,903)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (686,653)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (707,571)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (13.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (13.23)


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4049 

To extend temporarily the duty suspension on 2- 

(Methoxycarbonyl)benzylsulfonamide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2009 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the duty suspension on 2- 

(Methoxycarbonyl)benzylsulfonamide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-(METHOXYCARBONYL)BENZYLSULFONAMIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.35 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2-(Methoxycarbonyl)benzylsulfonamide) is amended, in 

7 the effective period column, by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘12/31/2012’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or withVerDate Nov 24 2008 19:41 Nov 07, 2009 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4049.IH H4049

PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4049 IH

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

2 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Advent Software, Inc.



|               |  |  |  |                                                           
|-------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|March 10, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    STEPHANIE G.
DIMARCO                               
|               |  |  |  | Stephanie G. DiMarco Chief Executive Officer and President
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 36612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15626]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7508]

Determination Pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me under the Foreign Missions 
Act (FMA), 22 U.S.C. 4301 et seq., and specifically 22 U.S.C. 4304(b) 
and (c), and by the authority vested in me under the FMA and Delegation 
of Authority No. 147 of September 13, 1982, and Delegation of Authority 
No. 198 of September 16, 1992, I hereby determine that it is reasonably 
necessary on the basis of reciprocity or otherwise to adjust for costs 
and procedures of obtaining benefits for missions of the United States 
abroad that the benefit of obtaining zoning approval and permit 
issuances associated with the construction of the People's Republic of 
China's diplomatic and consular facilities and residences in the United 
States, be predicated on the payment of surcharges, calculated by the 
Department's Office of Foreign Missions (OFM) to reflect the fee the 
U.S. Embassy in Beijing and its consular posts are required to pay the 
Beijing Service Bureau for Diplomatic Missions, or its regional 
counterparts, for the provision of services associated with the filing 
and approval matters pertaining to the construction of diplomatic or 
consular facilities in China. The authority to regulate foreign mission 
benefits under the FMA has been delegated to the Director of the Office 
of Foreign Missions (Delegation of Authority No. 214).

    Dated: June 14, 2011.
Patrick J. Kennedy,
Under Secretary for Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-15626 Filed 6-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-43-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3940 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3940

 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to extend grants and other 
 assistance to facilitate a political status public education program 
                        for the people of Guam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2009

 Ms. Bordallo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to extend grants and other 
 assistance to facilitate a political status public education program 
                        for the people of Guam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    Congress reaffirms that it is the responsibility of the Secretary 
of the Interior to advance the economic, social, and political 
development of the Territories of the United States.

SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR POLITICAL STATUS PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAM.

    The Secretary of the Interior may, in exercise of the 
administrative authority granted under section 3 of the Organic Act of 
Guam (48 U.S.C. 1421a), extend to the Government of Guam and its 
agencies and instrumentalities assistance, including assistance in the 
form of grants, research, planning assistance, studies, and agreements 
with Federal agencies, to facilitate a public education program 
regarding political status options for the Territory of Guam.
                                 <all>
```
### Order issued September [_~, 2012

In The



### No. 05-11-00271-CV W. ERIC BRAUSS; ET AL., Appellants

V. TRIPLE M HOLDING GMBH, ET AL., Appellees



### ORDER Before the Court is a motion for argument filed by appellants W. Eric Brauss and Christine Martin Brauss and a motion to expand time for oral argument and to file a supplemental brief filed by appellants Texas Horseshoe, Droege Investment Gbr., WolfHeimerdinger and Sandy Marks (the "Horseshoe Appellants"). Appellants T.H. Song-Winkler, Michele Roelcke, and Susan Brauss (the "Song-Winkler Appellants") timely requested oral argument in their brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.7. 

### We GRANT the motions in part and render the following orders. It is ORDERED that the time for opening argument for all appellants will be allocated as follows: (1) ten (10) minutes for counsel representing appellants W. Eric Brauss and Christine Martin Brauss; (2) ten (10) minutes for counsel representing the Horseshoe Appellants; and (3) ten (10) minutes for counsel representing the S ong-Winkler Appellants. Appellees and cross-appellants Triple M Holding GmbH, et al., will be permitted twenty-five (25) minutes for argument. A totalof five (5) minutes for rebuttal will be permitted for all appellants. Counsel for appellants are

directed to agree on how to apportion the allotted time for rebuttal. No additional time will be allowed. It is also ORDERED that the Horseshoe Appellants’ Supplemental Brief as to Mootness received September 4, 2012 is deemed filed as of the date of this order. The Appendix to the Horseshoe Appellants’ Supplemental Brief as to Mootness is STRICKEN without prejudice to the filing of a properly sworn and authenticated appendix within ten (10) days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. App. P. 10.2. The Song-Winkler Appellants are GRANTED leave to file a response to the supplemental brief as to mootness within ten (10) days of this order. In all other respects, the pending motions are

JUSTICE



### -2-
**Exhibit 13**

----

**Exhibit 13****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002**

 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley    Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title    18, United States Code), eachof the undersigned officers of Eidos plc (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that: 

 The accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F    for the year ended June 30, 2004 of the Company as filed with the U.S. Securities    and Exchange Commission(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained inthe Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

Signed: /s/ MICHAEL McGARVEY

  Dated: December 20, 2004

  Name: Michael McGarvey

Title: Chief Executive Officer 

Signed: /s/ STUART CRUICKSHANK

Dated: December 20, 2004

Name: Stuart Cruickshank 

Title: Chief Financial      Officer 

106

----
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF COMPANY



|Company                                                    |  |               |  |     |  
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- |  | --- | -
|Kabushiki Kaisha Photon Dynamics                           |  | Japan         |  | 100 | %
|Photon Dynamics Korea Inc.                                 |  | Korea         |  | 100 | %
|CR Technology, Inc.                                        |  | United States |  | 100 | %
|Image Processing Systems Inc.                              |  | Canada        |  | 100 | %
|Intelligent Reasoning Systems, Inc.                        |  | United States |  | 100 | %
|Akcron Corporation, Ltd.                                   |  | Korea         |  | 100 | %
|Photon Dynamics International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. |  | China         |  | 100 | %



The subsidiaries
listed are all included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
Submitted on record and briefs November 23,

reversed December 15, 2004

#### In the Matter of Alan E. Bradsteen, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*ALAN E. BRADSTEEN, *Appellant.*

0212-73484; A120277

106 P3d 647

Liza Langford filed the brief for appellant.

Denise G. Fjordbeck, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim and Schuman, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*635PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals the trial court’s decision committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period of 180 days. ORS 426.130. We reverse.

Appellant was held for five judicial days after he was placed on a hospital hold. *See*ORS 426.232. At the end of that period, he was placed on a second hold for five days. The hearing on his case occurred on the tenth day after the initial hold. Appellant argues, and the state concedes, that the second hold violated ORS 426.232(2), which provides that “■under no circumstances may the person [held on a hospital hold] be held for longer than five judicial days.” ORS 426.095(2) requires a hearing within five judicial days except in circumstances that did not exist in this case. We agree with the parties that the statutes are unambiguous in this respect. Because the hearing did not occur within the required period, the trial court should have dismissed the case.

Reversed.