alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**OMB Control Number: 2060-0482 Expiration Date: 10/31/11** 

**EPA Form # 5900-145, Revised 6/08**



### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

STRATOSPHERIC OZONE PROTECTION PROGRAM 

### CLASS I CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE

METHYL BROMIDE SECOND



### - PARTY DESTRUCTION

ANNUAL REPORT 

### (Sec 82.13)



## SECTION 1 COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

1.1 Date of Submission 1.2 Year To Which This Report Applies

1.3 Original Submittal Re-submittal

1.4 Have you submitted a one-time destruction repor t to EPA (per Sec 82.13)? **Yes No** 

1.5 Have you submitted a destruction verification t o the producer or importer (per Sec 82.13)? **Yes No** 

1.6 Company Information

**Company Name**

**Street Address**

**City State**  **Zip Code**



### 1.7 Company Contact Identification

**Reporting Company Contact Person Phone Number**  **Fax Number**

**E-mail Address**



### 1.8 Destruction Total

**Second-Party Destruction of Methyl Bromide (kg):**

1.9 Signature of Reporting Company Representative

I certify under penalty of law that I have personal ly examined and am familiar with the information su bmitted in this and all attached documents, and that based on my inquiry of those in dividuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe that the submitted information is true, accurate, and comple te. I am aware that there are significant penaltie s for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment.

**Name**

**Title**

**Signature Date** 



## SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO: For U.S. Postal Service:

**Tracking System Program Manager Stratospheric Protection Division**  **U.S. EPA (6205J) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW**  **Washington, DC 20460** For Private Courier:

**Tracking System Program Manager Stratospheric Protection Division**  **U.S. EPA (6205J) 1310 L Street, NW; 10**  **th Floor**  **Washington, DC 20005**

**Information in reports submitted in compliance with the final rule may be claimed as confidential. A**  **company may assert a claim of confidentiality for i nformation submitted by clearly**  **marking that information as confidential. Such inf ormation shall be treated in accordance with EPA’s**  **procedures for information claimed as confidential at 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart B,**  **and will only be disclosed by the means set forth i n the subpart. If no claim of confidentiality acco**  **mpanies the report when it is received by EPA, it m ay be made public without further**  **notice to the company (40 CFR 2.203).**

**The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for t his collection of information is estimated to avera**  **ge 18 hours per response. Send comments on the Age ncy's need for this**  **information, the accuracy of the provided burden es timates, and any suggested methods for minimizing r**  **espondent burden, including through the use of auto mated collection**  **techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies D ivision, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822**  **T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20 460. Include the OMB**  **control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.**
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28533]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trial Planning Grant 
(R34); NIAID Clinical Trial Implementation Cooperative Agreement 
(U01); NIAID SBIR Phase II Clinical Trial Implementation Cooperative 
Agreement (U44); Investigator Initiated Extended Clinical Trial 
(R01).
    Date: February 3-4, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F21B, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Maryam Feili-Hariri, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F21B, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5026, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#264e47544f544f4b4066484f474f4208484f4e08414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fa929b88938893979cba94939b939ed4949392d49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 29, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-28533 Filed 1-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a) on or before June 22, 2015.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODXL, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion Control (“Deputy Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix of subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on December 2, 2014, National Center for Natural Products Research (NIDA MProject), Inc., University of Mississippi, 135 Coy Waller Complex, University, Mississippi 38677-1848 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I
 The company plans to cultivate marihuana in support of the National Institute on Drug Abuse for research approved by the Department of Health and Human Services. Dated: April 14, 2015. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-09323 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of the Company


On Command Corporation

     On Command Development Corporation
     On Command Video Corporation
     SpectraVision, Inc.
     Spectradyne International, Inc.
          On Command Hong Kong Limited
          On Command Australia Pty Limited
          On Command (Thailand) Limited
          Spectradyne Singapore Pfc Limited
     On Command Canada, Inc.
     Kalevision Systems, Inc. Canada
     Spectradyne International, Inc. Sucursal en Mexico

Ascent Sports
 Holdings, Inc.
Ascent Sports, Inc.
Ascent Arena and Development Corporation
Ascent Arena Company, LLC
The Denver Nuggets Limited Partnership
The Colorado Avalanche LLC
Beacon Communications Corp.
Beacon Music Publishing, Inc.
Club Pictures, Inc.

                                       6
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff 

ELDORA JAMES 

v. Record No. 1812-95-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

BEST PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. MARCH 12, 1996 

AND 

TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' 

COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Thomas Stark, IV; Williamson & Lavecchia, 

on brief), for appellant. 

 (P. Dawn Bishop; Matthew J. Ide; Sands, 

Anderson, Marks & Miller, on brief), for 

appellees. 

 Eldora James appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation 

Commission denying her application seeking compensation for an 

occupational disease. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs 

of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 

5A:27. 

 This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in 

The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, 

___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from 

cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or 

however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under 

the present provisions of the Act"). 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

 Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3744 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide a special rule 

for the period of admission of H–2A nonimmigrants employed as dairy 

workers and sheepherders, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 7, 2009 

Mr. ARCURI (for himself and Mr. LEE of New York) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

a special rule for the period of admission of H–2A nonimmigrants employed as dairy workers and sheepherders, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dairy and Sheep H– 

5 2A Visa Enhancement Act’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3744 IH

1 SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT STATUS FOR DAIRY WORKERS AND 

2 SHEEPHERDERS. 

3 Section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the Immigration and 

4 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)) is 

5 amended by inserting after ‘‘abandoning’’ the following: 

6 ‘‘who is coming temporarily to the United States to per7 form agricultural labor or services as a sheepherder or 

8 dairy worker, or’’. 

9 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RULE FOR PERIOD OF ADMISSION OF H–2A 

10 NONIMMIGRANTS EMPLOYED AS SHEEP11 HERDERS OR DAIRY WORKERS. 

12 Section 218(h) of the Immigration and Nationality 

13 Act (8 U.S.C. 1188(h)) is amended by adding at the end 

14 of the following: 

15 ‘‘(3) In the case of an alien admitted as an H– 

16 2A worker for employment as a dairy worker or 

17 sheepherder— 

18 ‘‘(A) the initial period of admission shall 

19 be for a period of 3 years; 

20 ‘‘(B) the period of admission may be ex21 tended for additional periods of 3 years; and 

22 ‘‘(C) no period of absence from the United 

23 States may be required as a condition of ap24 proval of an extension under subparagraph 

25 (B).’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3744 IH

1 SEC. 4. WORKERS ENGAGED IN THE RANGE PRODUCTION 

2 OF LIVESTOCK. 

3 The Secretary of Labor shall issue regulations that 

4 address the specific requirements for the provision of 

5 housing to workers engaged in the range production of 

6 livestock. 

7 SEC. 5. RANGE PRODUCTION OF LIVESTOCK. 

8 Nothing in section 218 of the Immigration and Na9 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1188) shall preclude the Secretary 

10 of Labor and the Secretary of Homeland Security from 

11 continuing to apply special procedures and requirements 

12 to the admission and employment of aliens in occupations 

13 involving the range production of livestock. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Case: 2:17-mj-00481-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/23/17 Page: 1 of 4  PAGEID #: 1

Case: 2:17-mj-00481-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/23/17 Page: 2 of 4  PAGEID #: 2

Case: 2:17-mj-00481-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/23/17 Page: 3 of 4  PAGEID #: 3

Case: 2:17-mj-00481-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/23/17 Page: 4 of 4  PAGEID #: 4
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A133
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6032
REGINALD EUGENE HAYDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BARBARA F. TAYLOR, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-956-R) Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 17, 1997 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Eugene Hayden, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a federal inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens * complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(A) (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hayden v. Taylor , No. CA-96-956-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000040514-NOV-201109:21 AM
Case 1:00-cr-00090-SSB Document 108 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:00-cr-00090-SSB Document 108 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3872 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3872

To suspend temporarily the duty on Substituted cyan acetic acid pentyl 
                                 ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on Substituted cyan acetic acid pentyl 
                                 ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUBSTITUTED CYAN ACETIC ACID PENTYL ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Substituted cyan    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        acetic acid                                                        31/2011.......
                        pentyl ester.
                        (CAS No. P 03-
                        108) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        2921.59.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
22578

#### Martha Little AIKEN, Respondent v. Lynn Chastain AIKEN, Appellant.

(345 S. E. (2d) 710)

Supreme Court

*William J. Barnes,*Greenville, *for appellant.*

*Everett Hope Garner*of *Holler, Dennis & Olive,*Columbia, *for respondent.*

Heard May 20, 1986.

Decided June 16, 1986.

Chandler, Justice:

Martha Little Aiken (Wife) and Lynn Chastan Aiken (Husband) .were divorced in Georgia in March, 1982. A detailed settlement agreement was executed by the parties and incorporated into a Georgia order dated June 24, 1982.

After the divorce, Husband moved to Pickens County, South Carolina. He failed to make alimony and child support payments and Wife brought this action, requesting that he *371be held in contempt. Husband counterclaimed for custody of the parties’ elder child.

Although it was not requested by either party, the Family Court modified the terms of the Georgia order with respect to Husband’s times of visitation with the parties’ younger son. Husband contends this was error. We agree.

While visitation orders are subject to continuing review *[See King v. Gardner,*274 S. C. 493, 265 S. E. (2d) 260 (1980) ], a party may not receive relief not contemplated in the pleadings. *See Gainey v. Gainey,*279 S. C. 68, 301 S. E. (2d) 763 (1983).

Accordingly, that portion of the Family Court’s order reducing the frequency of Husband’s visitation schedule is reversed. The schedule provided for by the June 24, 1982, Georgia order is reinstated.

Husband’s remaining exceptions are without merit, and. we affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 23. *See Haselwood v. Sullivan,*283 S. C. 29, 320 S. E. (2d) 499 (Ct. App. 1984) (contempt); *Mitchell v. Mitchell,*283 S. C. 87, 320 S. E. (2d) 706 (1984) (child support); *Nienow v. Nienow,*268 S. C. 161, 232 S. E. (2d) 504 (1977) (attorney’s fees).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Ness, C. J., and Gregory, Harwell and Finney, JJ., concur.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Shanna Delaine Gluck, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00048

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.
CR1400939 ). Opinion delive red by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of thi s date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Shanna Delaine Gluck, has adequately indicated h er inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 17, 201 5

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Order issued September [_~, 2012

In The

No. 05-11-00271-CV

W. ERIC BRAUSS; ET AL., Appellants

V.

TRIPLE M HOLDING GMBH, ET AL., Appellees

ORDER

Before the Court is a motion for argument filed by appellants W. Eric Brauss and Christine

Martin Brauss and a motion to expand time for oral argument and to file a supplemental brief filed

by appellants Texas Horseshoe, Droege Investment Gbr., WolfHeimerdinger and Sandy Marks (the

"Horseshoe Appellants"). Appellants T.H. Song-Winkler, Michele Roelcke, and Susan Brauss (the

"Song-Winkler Appellants") timely requested oral argument in their brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.7.

We GRANT the motions in part and render the following orders.

It is ORDERED that the time for opening argument for all appellants will be allocated as

follows: (1) ten (10) minutes for counsel representing appellants W. Eric Brauss and Christine

Martin Brauss; (2) ten (10) minutes for counsel representing the Horseshoe Appellants; and (3) ten

(10) minutes for counsel representing the S ong-Winkler Appellants. Appellees and cross-appellants

Triple M Holding GmbH, et al., will be permitted twenty-five (25) minutes for argument. A total
of five (5) minutes for rebuttal will be permitted for all appellants. Counsel for appellants are

directed to agree on how to apportion the allotted time for rebuttal. No additional time will be

allowed.

It is also ORDERED that the Horseshoe Appellants’ Supplemental Brief as to Mootness

received September 4, 2012 is deemed filed as of the date of this order. The Appendix to the

Horseshoe Appellants’ Supplemental Brief as to Mootness is STRICKEN without prejudice to the

filing of a properly sworn and authenticated appendix within ten (10) days of the date of this order.

See TEX. R. App. P. 10.2. The Song-Winkler Appellants are GRANTED leave to file a response to

the supplemental brief as to mootness within ten (10) days of this order.

In all other respects, the pending motions are

JUSTICE

-2-