alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: FEBRUARY 24, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

HOTTON ENTERPRISES, INC. 

dfb/a PREMIER AVIATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-1081 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012WP070156) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

~~~·~ Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrativ~Law Ju e 

Attachment - Service List 
Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

ONE COPY 

Ashok Vij, President/CEO 

Horton Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a/ Premier Aviation, Respondent 

1951 East Airport Drive 

Tucson, AZ 85756 

TEL: 520-907-8926 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Adam Runkel, Complainant's Counsel 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-1081 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Western-Pacific Region, APW-7.12 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 425-227-2914 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2.,..-
LEGAL_US_E # 114643728.1 

Exhibit 1 – Participating Teams 

Atlanta Hawks

Boston Celtics 

Brooklyn Nets 

Charlotte Hornets 

Chicago Bulls 

Cleveland Cavaliers 

Denver Nuggets 

Detroit Pistons 

Golden State Warriors 

Indiana Pacers 

Los Angeles Clippers 

Los Angeles Lakers 

Memphis Grizzlies 

Milwaukee Bucks 

Minnesota Timberwolves 

New Orleans Pelicans 

New York Knicks 

Oklahoma City Thunder 

Orlando Magic 

Philadelphia 76ers 

Phoenix Suns 

Portland Trail Blazers 

Sacramento Kings 

San Antonio Spurs 

Toronto Raptors 

Utah Jazz 

Washington Wizards
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Statement Requiredby 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, the undersigned officer of Archipelago Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to such officer’s knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 14,  2005 | /s/ Gerald D. Putnam                       |   |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | Gerald D. Putnam                           |
|                          | Chairman of the Board  and Chief Executive |
|                          | Officer                                    |
|                          |                                       |
| Date: November 14,  2005 | /s/ Nelson Chai                            |   |
|                          | Nelson Chai                                |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer                    |
|                               |                                            |        |  |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 andis not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerald D. Schiefelbein, Chief Financial Officer of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (a) | the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*    *    *



|                       |  |                           
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------
|By:                    |  | /s/ Gerald D. Schiefelbein
|                       |  | Gerald D. Schiefelbein    
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer   
|                      
|Date: November 8, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

 

M. Donald Hayes, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No.: 3:17-cv-280 

 Judge Thomas M. Rose 

John Paul Rieser, Trustee, et al., 

 

Appellees.

______________________________________________________________________________ 

ENTRY AND ORDER SUMMARILY AFFIRMING THE RULING 

OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT AND TERMINATING CASE

______________________________________________________________________________ 

On August 18, 2017, Pro Se Appellant M. Donald Hayes appealed a final decision of the 

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio. On September 22, 2017, 

Bankruptcy Court Clerk's Certified the Record on Appeal. When it was noticed that the 

certification was returned as undeliverable, the Court re-mailed this notice on July 26, 2018, 

ordering Pro Se Appellant to file a brief by August 27, 2018. 

 Bankruptcy Rule 8018 requires that the appellant must serve and file a brief within 30 

days after the docketing of notice that the record has been transmitted or is available 

electronically. The Court’s remailing of the Bankruptcy Notice informed Pro Se Appellant that 

the briefing date had been extended until August 27, 2018. It has still not been filed. 

 A party proceeding pro se is entitled to some indulgences. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 

519, 520–21 (1972). But “the lenient treatment generally accorded to pro se litigants has 

limits.” Pilgrim v. Littlefield, 92 F.3d 413, 416 (6th Cir. 1996); Greer v. Home Realty Co. of 

Memphis Inc., 2010 WL 6512339, at *2 (W.D. Tenn. July 12, 2010) (“Although district courts 
-2-

may liberally construe the federal and local rules for pro se litigants, even pro se litigants are 

obligated to follow these rules”); Looper v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp., 2008 WL 2965887, at *8 

(E.D. Tenn. July 30, 2008) (plaintiff's “pro se status does not exempt him from complying with 

the rules of procedure”). A pro se party that fails to comply with procedural rules can be 

dismissed. Jawara v. Suntrust Bank, No. 3:15-CV-00305, 2016 WL 2770657, at *1–2 (M.D. 

Tenn. May 12, 2016), aff'd sub nom. Jawara v. Suntrust Bank (6th Cir. May 23, 2016). 

 Here, Pro Se Appellant failed to meet the requirements set out in the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure. Accordingly, the Court SUMMARILY AFFIRMS the ruling of the 

Bankruptcy Court; and DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court 

shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure. The instant case is TERMINATED from the dockets of the United 

States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Dayton.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Monday, September 10, 2018. 

 

 s/Thomas M. Rose 

 _____________________________________ 

 THOMAS M. ROSE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Form of Certificate for Partnership Units of Kilroy Realty, L.P.



 EXHIBIT 4.5 

CERTIFICATE FOR PARTNERSHIP UNITS 

OF 

KILROY REALTY, L.P. 
  

			
	No.	  	Common Units

 Kilroy Realty Corporation, as
the General Partner of Kilroy Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), hereby certifies that this certificate represents
                     units of common limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (the “Partnership Units”) issued to
                    , a limited partner of the Operating Partnership, whose partnership interest in the Operating Partnership is as set forth in the
Agreement of Limited Partnership of Kilroy Realty, L.P., dated as of January 31, 1997 as it may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time in accordance with its terms (the “Partnership Agreement”), under which the
Operating Partnership is existing (copies of which are on file at the Operating Partnership’s principal office at 12200 W. Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90064). 

THE PARTNERSHIP UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE OR INSTRUMENT MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED, SOLD, ASSIGNED, PLEDGED, HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED
OF UNLESS SUCH TRANSFER, SALE, ASSIGNMENT, PLEDGE, HYPOTHECATION OR OTHER DISPOSITION COMPLIES WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (A COPY OF WHICH IS ON FILE WITH THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP AS INDICATED ABOVE). EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE
PROVIDED IN THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT, NO TRANSFER, SALE, ASSIGNMENT, PLEDGE, HYPOTHECATION OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF THE PARTNERSHIP UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE MADE EXCEPT (A) PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”), OR (B) IF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP HAS BEEN FURNISHED WITH A SATISFACTORY OPINION OF COUNSEL FOR THE HOLDER OF THE PARTNERSHIP UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE THAT SUCH
TRANSFER, SALE ASSIGNMENT, PLEDGE, HYPOTHECATION OR OTHER DISPOSITION IS EXEMPT FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5 OF THE ACT AND THE RULES AND REGULATIONS IN EFFECT THEREUNDER. 

 

							
	DATED:	  		  	
		 		  	KILROY REALTY CORPORATION
			
		 		  	General Partner of Kilroy Realty, L.P.
			
	ATTEST:	  		  	
				
	By:	 	  
	  	By:
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 3 Filed: 05/24/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 17
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 3 Filed: 05/24/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 18
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Richard F. Ambury, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Star Gas Partners, L.P. and will be retained by Star Gas Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                  |  |                                                                                     |  |                                                                                           
|----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. STAR GAS FINANCE
COMPANY By: STAR GAS LLC (General Partner)
|                  |  |                                                                                    
|December 12, 2005 |  | By:                                                                                 |  | /s/ Richard F. Ambury                                                                     
|                  |  |                                                                                     |  | Richard F. Ambury Chief Financial Officer
Star Gas Partners, L.P. Star Gas Finance Company
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-229-1

Carlos Alberto Acosta Ruiz 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 35) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: January 22, 2018 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge
MARK EUSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3332

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 19, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley

, Judge

.

Mark Euson, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 452 Unemployed Number in thousands 16 to 17 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU03000086Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Unemployment Level - 16-17 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:07:06 PM)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6189

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THOMAS JERMAINE ROBINSON, a/k/a Tony,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:05-cr-00667-TLW-1)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 24, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Jermaine Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah Brereton Barbier, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Thomas Jermaine Robinson appeals the district court’s

judgment reducing his sentence pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district

court. See United States v. Robinson , No. 4:05-cr-00667-TLW-1

(D.S.C. filed Jan. 27, 2009 & entered Jan. 28, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Cal Guard discovers parallels in Ukraine's disaster relief efforts

/ Published Nov. 18, 2008

SACRAMENTO - For California National Guardsmen, the annual fire season has rendered moot the question of whether natural disasters will strike the state. No longer do they ask "if," but only "when" and "where."

On the eve of Vigilant Guard '09, the National Guard's weeklong emergency-response training exercise, Cal Guardsmen learned their Ukrainian counterparts face a similar burden on their own native soil.

Each summer in Western Ukraine, floods hammer the region surrounding the Carpathian Mountains, and this July especially heavy rains brought a record deluge, causing the worst financial damage in more than 100 years.

On Nov. 12, at the Joint Force Headquarters here in Sacramento, Ukrainian delegates prepared for Vigilant Guard by briefing Maj. Gen. William H. Wade II, the California National Guard's adjutant general, and other key leadership on the difficult lessons gleaned from the recent catastrophic floods.

"The damage was equal to approximately one billion U.S. dollars," said Maj. General Vasyl Kvashuk, director of the Ukrainian Army's Civil Protection Department, through a translator. "In my opinion, people were not informed [in a timely manner] about the flooding."

Kvashuk said many Ukrainian officials failed to disseminate information about the threat of floods, and more importantly, "how to behave" once heavy waters struck the villages at the base of the mountains. 

"We lost 40 lives," said Kvashuk. "We lost both children and adult persons during the flood."

Many well-meaning citizens, said Kvashuk, actually caused further damage to life and property due to ignorance on how to respond properly. In one instance, a man overpopulated his small boat with neighbors, ultimately capsizing and drowning all eight passengers.

Ukraine is one of two nations participating in the California National Guard's Peace to State Partnership Program, the other being Nigeria.

Like California, Ukrainian officials are learning to deal with their natural disasters through "real-world emergencies."

"It's not (ideal) to learn from your current emergencies," said Kvashuk, but also noted that the Transcarpathian region, the nation's most frequently flooded area, reacted best to the severe torrent in July.

In short, they've embraced the inevitability of the floods as an opportunity to improve their responsiveness.

It is that desire to bolster their readiness that brought the Ukrainians and a host of other nations to California to participate in Vigilant Guard, which by simulating a major earthquake offers participants a close-to-real-world training environment.

"We initiated a partnership with the National Guard of California 15 years ago," said Kvashuk, expressing his gratitude for the training benefits generated by the alliance. "We have learned much from our partnership."
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL VINCENT ANGUILLE
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 3964

[ March 21, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Lisa M. Porter , Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 004710

- CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel,

Assistant Attorne y General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

P ER C URIAM

.

On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred by imposing : (1) a sentence for misdemeanor possession of cannabis in excess of the statutory maximum; (2) court cost s for that offense under section 938.05(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2017), after imposing costs under the same statutory provision for a companion felony charge in the case ; and (3) costs under section 318.18, Florida Statutes ( 2017), when no traffic offense w as charged in the case . Appellee confesses error, and does not oppose
reversal of the sentence on the cannabis charge and reversal of the order imposing the contested costs

. After reviewing the record, we agree that
the trial court erred . We reverse the sentence and contested costs imposed by the trial court for the cannabis charge and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remand ed

.

C IKLIN
, D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER
, JJ., concur.2 * * *

Not final until disposition o f timely filed motion for rehearing.
B #

# 8

6 œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ.

>

Allegro q. = 120

f

arco

œ œ

>

œ

>

œ.

>

œ œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

For ceremonial version,

jump to m. 100, 2nd beat

fi

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

5

P

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

œ Jœ œ

. œ. œ.

B ##  ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

œ

. œ. œ. œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ

13

P

œ Jœ œ

j

œ

B ##

œ

j

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

. œ

. œ

. œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

 ̇.

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

21

P

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

B ## œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ J

œ œ Jœ

f

 ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

29

P

œ

j

œ

œ

. œ. œ.

B ## œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ #œ

. œ. œ

.  ̇.  ̇. œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.

J

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

P

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

37

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

B ## œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

œ

. œ. œ. œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ

45

P

œ Jœ œ

j

œ

B ##

œ

j

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

. œ

. œ

. œ

j

œ #œ

j

œ

f

 ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

53

P

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

B ## œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

.

œ

.

œ

. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

f

 ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

61

P

œ

j

œ

œ

. œ. œ.

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Words & Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

40th Army Band, VTARNG

Viola

The Official March of the National Guard Bureau -Full Orchestra VersionDedicated to the Men and Women, Soldiers and Airmen of America's National Guard
B #

# œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ #œ

. œ. œ

.  ̇.  ̇. œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.

J

œ ‰ ‰

œ.

>

F

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

69

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

B ## œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

œ

. œ. œ. œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ

77

P

œ Jœ œ

j

œ

B ##

œ

j

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

. œ

. œ

. œ

j

œ #œ

j

œ

f

 ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

85

P

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

B ## œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

.

œ

.

œ

. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

f

 ̇. œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

93

P

œ

j

œ

œ

. œ. œ.

B ## œ

j

œ œ

j

œ œ

j

œ #œ

. œ. œ

.  ̇.  ̇. œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.

Ceremonial version,

from m. 4 fi

J

œ ‰ ‰

>

œ.

F

 ̇. >

101

œ. >

œ.  ̇. >

B ##

 ̇. œ. œ œ œ

- œ. œ.  ̇. J

œ

‰ ‰

>

œ.  ̇. >

109

œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇.

B ##

œ. œ œ œ œ. œ œ œ œ. œ. J

œ

‰ ‰

œ. > ̇. >

117

 ̇. œ. œ. œ‰

œ œ

J

œ

B ##

œ. œ. œ. œ œ œ  ̇. J

œ

‰ ‰ œ.

>

f

‰

œ

>

œ

>

œ.

>

125

œ. jœ ‰ ‰ ‰

œ

>

œ

>

œ.

>

B ## j

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

J

œ

>

ƒ

œ

>

J

œ

>

œ. > œ. >

œ

>

œ

>

2

œ. >œ

>

œ

>

2

œ

>

J

œ

>

œ

> œ

>

2

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ.

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Official March of the National Guard Bureau

-Viola2
Docket No. FAA-2013-0543