990 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2022 / Notices 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask the BLM in your 

comment to withhold your personal 

identifying information from public 

review, the BLM cannot guarantee that 

it will be able to do so. 

Authority: 43 CFR 2800, 40 CFR 

1502.9, 40 CFR 1506.6, 43 CFR 46.435, 

and 43 CFR 1610.2. 

Gregory Sheehan, 

State Director, Bureau of Land Management, 

Utah. 

[FR Doc. 2021–27518 Filed 1–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1230] 

Certain Electric Shavers and 

Components and Accessories Thereof; 

Commission Determination To Review 

in Part an Initial Determination 

Granting in Part Complainant’s Motion 

for Summary Determination of a 

Violation of Section 337; Schedule for 

Filing Written Submissions on the 

Issues Under Review and on Remedy, 

the Public Interest, and Bonding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined to review in part an initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 33) of 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’), granting in part summary 

determination on violation of section 

337 and including a recommended 

determination (‘‘RD’’) on remedy and 

bonding. The Commission has 

determined to review the ID’s findings 

concerning the economic prong of the 

domestic industry requirement. The 

Commission requests briefing from the 

parties on the issue under review, and 

briefing from the parties, interested 

government agencies, and interested 

persons on the issues of remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2532. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 18, 2020, the Commission 

instituted this investigation based on a 

complaint filed by Complainant Skull 

Shaver (‘‘Skull Shaver’’) of Moorestown, 

New Jersey. 85 FR 73510–11 (Nov. 18, 

2020). The complaint alleged violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, or the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain electric shavers 

and components and accessories thereof 

by reason of infringement of certain 

claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,726,528 and 

D672,504. Id. The Commission’s notice 

of investigation named the following 

eleven entities as respondents: 

Rayenbarny Inc. (‘‘Rayenbarny’’) of New 

York, New York; Bald Shaver Inc. 

(‘‘Bald Shaver’’) of Toronto, Canada; 

Suzhou Kaidiya Garments Trading Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Suzhou’’) d.b.a. ‘‘Digimator’’ of 

Suzhou, China; Shenzhen Aiweilai 

Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Aiweilei’’) d.b.a. 

‘‘Teamyo’’ of Shenzhen, China; 

Wenzhou Wending Electric Appliance 

Co., Ltd. of Yueqing City, China; 

Shenzhen Nukun Technology Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Nukun’’) d.b.a. ‘‘OriHea’’ of Shenzhen, 

China; Yiwu Xingye Network 

Technology Co. Ltd. (‘‘Yiwu Xingye’’) 

d.b.a. ‘‘Roziapro’’ of Yiwu, China; 

Magicfly LLC (‘‘Magicfly’’) of Hong 

Kong; Yiwu City Qiaoyu Trading Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Yiwu City’’) of Yiwu, China; 

Shenzhen Wantong Information 

Technology Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wantong’’) d.b.a. 

‘‘WTONG’’ of Shenzhen, China; and 

Shenzhen Junmao International 

Technology Co., Ltd. (‘‘Junmao’’) d.b.a. 

‘‘Homeas’’ of Shenzhen, China. The 

notice of investigation also named the 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations 

(‘‘OUII’’) as a party. Id. 

The Commission terminated 

Rayenbarny from the investigation 

because its accused product was 

actually imported by Benepuri LLC 

(‘‘Benepuri’’) of Menands, New York; 

the Commission allowed Benepuri to 

intervene as a respondent. Notice, 85 FR 

82514, 82515 (Dec. 18, 2020). The 

Commission later granted Skull Shaver’s 

motion to amend the Complaint and the 

notice of investigation to correct the 

name of Wenzhou Wending Electric 

Appliance Co., Ltd. d.b.a. ‘‘Paitree’’ is 

Wenzhou Wending Electric Appliance 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wenzhou’’), and to correct 

the addresses of several respondents. 

Notice, 86 FR 14645, 14645 (Mar. 17, 

2021). The Commission terminated 

Magicfly from the investigation on the 

basis of settlement. Notice at 2 (May 19, 

2021). The Commission terminated 

Nukun and Benepuri from the 

investigation on the basis of withdrawal 

of the complaint. Notice at 2 (June 21, 

2021) (Nukun); Notice at 2 (Oct. 28, 

2021) (Benepuri). All of the remaining 

respondents (i.e., all respondents other 

than Magicfly, Nukun, Benepuri and 

Rayenbarny) defaulted. See Notice at 3 

(May 21, 2021) (seven defaulting 

respondents); Notice at 2 (Dec. 9, 2021) 

(Bald Shaver). Taken together, the eight 

defaulting respondents are: Suzhou; 

Yiwu City; Wenzhou; Aiweilai; Junmao; 

Wantong; Yiwu Xingye; and Bald 

Shaver. 

On May 26, 2021, Skull Shaver filed 

a motion for summary determination of 

violation of section 337 by the eight 

defaulting respondents and for a 

recommendation that the Commission 

issue a general exclusion order (‘‘GEO’’) 

and cease and desist orders (‘‘CDOs’’). 

See Complainants’ Motion for Summary 

Determination of Violation and for 

Recommended Determination on 

Remedy and Bonding (‘‘Skull Shaver 

Motion’’). On June 7, 2021, OUII filled 

a response in support of Skull Shaver’s 

motion. See Commission Investigative 

Staff’s Response to Skull Shaver’s 

Motion for Summary Determination of 

Violation (‘‘OUII Response’’). No 

respondent filed a response to Skull 

Shaver’s motion. 

On September 23, 2021, OUII filed a 

notice of supplemental authority 

concerning the domestic industry 

requirement. On September 28, 2021, 

the ALJ issued an order (Order No. 31) 

ordering certain supplementation of 

Skull Shaver’s domestic industry 

analysis. On October 14, 2021, Skull 

Shaver submitted its supplement in 

response to Order No. 31. No other 

responses to Order No. 31 were filed. 

On November 18, 2021, the ALJ grantedin-part Skull Shaver’s motion for 

summary determination as the subject 

ID. 

The ID finds that Skull Shaver owns 

the asserted patents, and that those 

patents are valid and enforceable. ID at 

3. The ID further finds that although all 

respondents imported, sold for 

importation, or sold within the United 

States after importation at least one 

accused article, the only respondents 

whose articles infringe the asserted 

patents are Yiwu Xingye and Yiwu City. 

Id. at 3–4. The ID finds that personal 

jurisdiction is not necessary over each 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2022 / Notices 991 

defaulting respondent, but that the 

defaulting respondents waived any 

opportunity to contest the allegation 

that personal jurisdiction exists. Id. The 

ID further finds that Skull Shaver meets 

the technical prong and the economic 

prong of the domestic industry 

requirement. Id. at 4. As to remedy, the 

RD finds that there is a widespread 

pattern of unauthorized use of the 

asserted patents and that a GEO is 

necessary to prevent circumvention. Id. 

at 4. The RD also recommends issuance 

of CDOs against the two infringing 

respondents that maintain domestic 

inventories. RD at 80–81. The RD 

recommends a bond rate of 100% 

because complete pricing information is 

not available. RD at 82. 

No petitions for review of the ID were 

filed. 

The Commission has determined to 

review the ID’s findings concerning the 

economic prong of the domestic 

industry requirement, and not to review 

the ID’s findings on other issues. 

The parties are asked to brief the 

following issues concerning the 

economic prong of the domestic 

industry requirement: 

(1) Within each of the general 

categories of labor (management, 

marketing/creative, customer service, 

and logistics/warehousing), please 

explain which particular activities differ 

from those of a mere importer, including 

by addressing the extent to which the 

activities do not need to take place in 

the United States either as a legal or a 

practical matter. 

(2) Please provide, to the extent 

permitted by the record, a breakout or 

estimated breakout of the claimed 

expenditures by type of activities to 

allow separate consideration of 

expenses for activities that do not need 

to take place in the United States either 

as a legal or a practical matter. In your 

answer please be sure to address (a) the 

various tasks performed by 

management, (b) the work done by 

logistics/warehouse employees related 

to quality control and repair, and (c) the 

work done by marketing/creative 

employees related to industrial design, 

research and development, and 

prototyping. 

(3) Does the total claimed expense for 

logistics/warehouse labor costs (see, 

e.g., ID at 63) include all activities done 

by those workers, or only quality control 

and repair work? 

In connection with the final 

disposition of this investigation, the 

statute authorizes issuance of: (1) An 

exclusion order that could result in the 

exclusion of the subject articles from 

entry into the United States, and/or (2) 

one or more cease and desist orders that 

could result in the Defaulting 

Respondents being required to cease 

and desist from engaging in unfair acts 

in the importation and sale of such 

articles. Accordingly, the Commission is 

interested in receiving written 

submissions that address the form of 

remedy, if any, that should be ordered. 

If a party seeks exclusion of an article 

from entry into the United States for 

purposes other than entry for 

consumption, the party should so 

indicate and provide information 

establishing that activities involving 

other types of entry either are adversely 

affecting it or likely to do so. For 

background, see Certain Devices for 

Connecting Computers via Telephone 

Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC 

Pub. No. 2843, Comm’n Op. at 7–10 

(December 1994). 

The statute requires the Commission 

to consider the effects of any remedy 

upon the public interest. The public 

interest factors the Commission will 

consider include the effect that an 

exclusion order and/or CDO would have 

on: (1) The public health and welfare; 

(2) competitive conditions in the U.S. 

economy; (3) U.S. production of articles 

that are like or directly competitive with 

those that are subject to investigation; 

and (4) U.S. consumers. The 

Commission is therefore interested in 

receiving written submissions that 

address the aforementioned public 

interest factors in the context of this 

investigation. 

If the Commission orders some form 

of remedy, the U.S. Trade 

Representative, as delegated by the 

President, has 60 days to approve, 

disapprove, or take no action on the 

Commission’s determination. See 

Presidential Memorandum of July 21, 

2005. 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). 

During this period, the subject articles 

would be entitled to enter the United 

States under bond, in an amount 

determined by the Commission and 

prescribed by the Secretary of the 

Treasury. The Commission is therefore 

interested in receiving submissions 

concerning the amount of the bond that 

should be imposed if a remedy is 

ordered. 

Written Submissions: The parties to 

the investigation are requested to file 

written submissions on the issue under 

review as set forth above. Parties to this 

investigation, interested government 

agencies, and any other interested 

parties are invited to file written 

submissions on the issues of remedy, 

the public interest, and bonding. Such 

submissions should include views on 

the recommended determination by the 

ALJ on remedy and bonding. 

In its initial written submissions, 

Skull Shaver is also requested to 

identify the remedy sought and Skull 

Shaver and OUII are also requested to 

submit proposed remedial orders for the 

Commission’s consideration. Skull 

Shaver is further requested to provide 

the HTSUS subheadings under which 

the subject articles are imported and to 

supply identification information for all 

known importers of the subject articles. 

Initial written submissions, including 

proposed remedial orders, must be filed 

no later than close of business on 

January 18, 2022. Reply submissions 

must be filed no later than the close of 

business on January 25, 2022. No further 

submissions on any of these issues will 

be permitted unless otherwise ordered 

by the Commission. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above. The Commission’s paper 

filing requirements in 19 CFR 210.4(f) 

are currently waived. 85 FR 15798 (Mar. 

19, 2020). Submissions should refer to 

the investigation number (Inv. No. 337– 

TA–1230) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. (See 

Handbook for Electronic Filing 

Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/ 

documents/handbook_on_filing_

procedures.pdf). Persons with questions 

regarding filing should contact the 

Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment by marking each document 

with a header indicating that the 

document contains confidential 

information. This marking will be 

deemed to satisfy the request procedure 

set forth in Rules 201.6(b) and 

210.5(e)(2) (19 CFR 201.6(b) & 

210.5(e)(2)). Documents for which 

confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document 

must also be filed simultaneously with 

any confidential filing. All information, 

including confidential business 

information and documents for which 

confidential treatment is properly 

sought, submitted to the Commission for 

purposes of this Investigation may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) By the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
992 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2022 / Notices 

personnel, solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All contract personnel will 

sign appropriate nondisclosure 

agreements. All non-confidential 

written submissions will be available for 

public inspection at the Office of the 

Secretary and on EDIS. 

The Commission vote for these 

determinations took place on January 3, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 4, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–00086 Filed 1–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1578–1579 

(Preliminary)] 

Lemon Juice From Brazil and South 

Africa; Institution of Antidumping Duty 

Investigations and Scheduling of 

Preliminary Phase Investigations 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the institution of investigations 

and commencement of preliminary 

phase antidumping duty investigation 

Nos. 731–TA–1578–1579 (Preliminary) 

pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the 

Act’’) to determine whether there is a 

reasonable indication that an industry 

in the United States is materially 

injured or threatened with material 

injury, or the establishment of an 

industry in the United States is 

materially retarded, by reason of 

imports of lemon juice from Brazil and 

South Africa, provided for in 

subheadings 2009.31.40 and 2009.31.60 

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States, that are alleged to be 

sold in the United States at less than fair 

value. Unless the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extends the 

time for initiation, the Commission 

must reach preliminary determinations 

in antidumping duty investigations in 

45 days, or in this case by February 14, 

2022. The Commission’s views must be 

transmitted to Commerce within five 

business days thereafter, or by February 

22, 2022. 

DATES: December 30, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie 

Duffy (202–708–2579), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these investigations may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—These investigations 

are being instituted, pursuant to section 

733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1673b(a)), in response to 

petitions filed on December 30, 2021, by 

Ventura Coastal LLC, Ventura, 

California. 

For further information concerning 

the conduct of these investigations and 

rules of general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B 

(19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A and B (19 CFR part 207). 

Participation in the investigations and 

public service list.—Persons (other than 

petitioners) wishing to participate in the 

investigations as parties must file an 

entry of appearance with the Secretary 

to the Commission, as provided in 

§§ 201.11 and 207.10 of the 

Commission’s rules, not later than seven 

days after publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register. Industrial users 

and (if the merchandise under 

investigation is sold at the retail level) 

representative consumer organizations 

have the right to appear as parties in 

Commission antidumping duty 

investigations. The Secretary will 

prepare a public service list containing 

the names and addresses of all persons, 

or their representatives, who are parties 

to these investigations upon the 

expiration of the period for filing entries 

of appearance. 

Limited disclosure of business 

proprietary information (BPI) under an 

administrative protective order (APO) 

and BPI service list.—Pursuant to 

§ 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the 

Secretary will make BPI gathered in 

these investigations available to 

authorized applicants representing 

interested parties (as defined in 19 

U.S.C. 1677(9)) who are parties to the 

investigations under the APO issued in 

the investigations, provided that the 

application is made not later than seven 

days after the publication of this notice 

in the Federal Register. A separate 

service list will be maintained by the 

Secretary for those parties authorized to 

receive BPI under the APO. 

Conference.—In light of the 

restrictions on access to the Commission 

building due to the COVID–19 

pandemic, the Commission is 

conducting the staff conference through 

video conferencing on January 20, 2022. 

Requests to appear at the conference 

should be emailed to 

preliminaryconferences@usitc.gov (DO 

NOT FILE ON EDIS) on or before 

January 18, 2022. Please provide an 

email address for each conference 

participant in the email. Information on 

conference procedures will be provided 

separately and guidance on joining the 

video conference will be available on 

the Commission’s Daily Calendar. A 

nonparty who has testimony that may 

aid the Commission’s deliberations may 

request permission to participate by 

submitting a short statement. 

Please note the Secretary’s Office will 

accept only electronic filings during this 

time. Filings must be made through the 

Commission’s Electronic Document 

Information System (EDIS, https://

edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paperbased filings or paper copies of any 

electronic filings will be accepted until 

further notice. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

§§ 201.8 and 207.15 of the 

Commission’s rules, any person may 

submit to the Commission on or before 

January 25, 2022, a written brief 

containing information and arguments 

pertinent to the subject matter of the 

investigations. Parties shall file written 

testimony and supplementary material 

in connection with their presentation at 

the conference no later than noon on 

January 19, 2022. All written 

submissions must conform with the 

provisions of § 201.8 of the 

Commission’s rules; any submissions 

that contain BPI must also conform with 

the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 

207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The 

Commission’s Handbook on Filing 

Procedures, available on the 

Commission’s website at https://

www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_

on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates 

upon the Commission’s procedures with 

respect to filings. 

In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 

207.3 of the rules, each document filed 

by a party to the investigations must be 

served on all other parties to the 

investigations (as identified by either 

the public or BPI service list), and a 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE