alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Anton J. Drescher, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of USA Video Interactive Corp;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entitles, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

---



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





By: /s/ Anton J. Drescher

------------------------------------

Name: Anton J. Drescher

Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 13th, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  JANUARY 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         19,956
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,850,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,873,054
<PP&E>                                         18,314
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,379)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,879,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,324,409
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,832
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,455,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,879,989
<SALES>                                        3,583,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,394,946
<CGS>                                          2,714,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,446,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             80,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,158,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (652,596)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,158,635
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>  
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      10,088,000
<SECURITIES>                                53,760,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,710,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            72,071,000
<PP&E>                                      21,295,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,104,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,744,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,797,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,615,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                87,744,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,764,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,776,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             887,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,768,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,768,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,768,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

Deborah S. Hunt 

Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 

POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE 

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 

Tel. (513) 564-7000 

www.ca6.uscourts.gov

 Filed: March 14, 2018 

 

 

Mr. Ronald Satish Emrit 

8756 Las Vegas Court 

Apartment 2023 

Fort Worth, TX 76116 

 Re: Case No. 17-4178, Ronald Emrit v. Memorial Hosp/Joe DiMaggio

Originating Case No. : 1:17-cv-00596 

Dear Mr. Emrit: 

 The Court issued the enclosed Order today in this case. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 

 

s/Jeanine R. Hance 

Case Manager 

Direct Dial No. 513-564-7037 

cc: Mr. Richard W. Nagel 

Enclosure 

No mandate to issue 

Case: 1:17-cv-00596-MRB-SKB Doc #: 5 Filed: 03/15/18 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 22 (1 of 3)
No. 17-4178 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

RONALD SATISH EMRIT, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v.

MEMORIAL HOSPITAL/JOE DIMAGGIO 

HOSPITAL, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

O R D E R 

 Before: SUHRHEINRICH and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.*

This matter is before the court upon initial consideration to determine whether this appeal 

was taken from an appealable order. 

 Ronald Satish Emrit filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of Ohio on September 11, 2017. The district court entered an order on September 15, 

2017, determining that Florida was the proper venue for the case and transferring the action to 

the federal district court in Florida. Emrit appealed from the transfer order on November 7, 

2017.

 An order transferring an action from one district court to another is not a final or 

appealable order. Hadix v. Johnson, 228 F.3d 662, 669 (6th Cir. 2000); Cruz v. Ridge, 383 F.3d 

62, 64-65 (2d Cir. 2004); Carefirst of Md., Inc. v. Carefirst Urgent Care Ctr. (In re Carefirst of 

Md., Inc.), 305 F.3d 253, 256, 262 (4th Cir. 2002). 

 

*

The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of 

Kentucky, sitting by designation. 

Case: 1:17-cv-00596-MRB-SKB Doc #: 5 Filed: 03/15/18 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 23 (2 of 3)
No. 17-4178 

- 2 - 

 It is ordered that appeal No. 17-4178 is DISMISSED.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk 

Case: 1:17-cv-00596-MRB-SKB Doc #: 5 Filed: 03/15/18 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 24 (3 of 3)
Case: 3:17-mj-00395-MJN Doc #: 4 Filed: 08/29/17 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 19
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4256 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4256

  To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 to 
allow specified energy property grants to real estate investment trusts 
        without regard to the ratable share income limitations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 9, 2009

   Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California (for herself, Mr. Heller, Ms. 
   Berkley, and Mr. Nunes) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 to 
allow specified energy property grants to real estate investment trusts 
        without regard to the ratable share income limitations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sustainable Property Grants Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF REIT RATABLE SHARE LIMITATION FOR ARRA GRANTS 
              WITH RESPECT TO SPECIFIED ENERGY PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (f) of section 1603 of the American 
Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 is amended by inserting after 
``Code of 1986'' the following: ``, except that subsection (d)(1) 
thereof shall not apply in the case of a real estate investment trust 
(as defined in section 856 of such Code)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to grants made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

3/22/2019

 Southern District of Ohio

JaToya D. Bostock

3:17-cv-325

Westlake Financial Solutions LLC, et al

✔ JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND

AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY

✔ Walter H. Rice

Report and Recommendations

Case: 3:17-cv-00325-WHR-SLO Doc #: 41 Filed: 03/22/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 293
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 20015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08502]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR


Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Availability of Funds and Funding Opportunity 
Announcement for Grant Applications for the Workforce Data Quality 
Initiative--Round V

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Funding Opportunity Number: FOA-ETA-15-06.

SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration (ETA) announces the 
availability of approximately $10 million to award approximately eight 
grants of up to $1.2 million to State Workforce Agencies (SWA) for the 
Workforce Data Quality Initiative (WDQI).
    The purpose of WDQI is to support the development and expansion of 
State workforce longitudinal administrative databases over a three-year 
grant period. Collecting longitudinal workforce and education data will 
provide a comprehensive picture of workers' earnings throughout their 
careers. Through analysis, these data will demonstrate the relationship 
between education and training programs, as well as the additional 
contribution of the provision of other employment services. These 
grants will help support the emphasis on accountability and 
transparency that is a key feature of the recently enacted WIOA and 
will be funded through section 171(c)(2) of WIA and section 169 of 
WIOA. These grants will also help support the implementation of WIOA by 
connecting the data infrastructure across programs, enabling states to 
meet the performance accountability requirements under WIOA.
    The complete FOA and any subsequent FOA amendments in connection 
with this solicitation are described in further detail on ETA's Web 
site at http://www.doleta.gov/grants/ or on http://www.grants.gov. The 
Web sites provide application information, eligibility requirements, 
review and selection procedures, and other program requirements 
governing this solicitation.

DATES: The closing date for receipt of applications under this 
announcement is May 6, 2015. Applications must be received no later 
than 4:00:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda K. Forman, 200 Constitution 
Avenue NW., Room N-4716, Washington, DC 20210; Telephone: 202-693-3416.
    The Grant Officer for this FOA is Steven Rietzke

    Signed: April 8, 2015 in Washington, DC.
Eric D. Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer/Division Chief, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-08502 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Paul J. Kelly, certify that:

1. I       have reviewedthis quarterly report of Orchid BioSciences, Inc.;

2. Based       on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of   a material fact or omit   to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of   the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with   respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,    the financial statements, and other financial information included in this    report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the    periods presented in this report;

  4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible      for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant      and have: 

 a)      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure      that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly      during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 b) evaluated      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered      by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed      in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial      reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter      (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s    other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent    evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors    (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 a)      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation      of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely      to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize      and report financial information; and

 b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees      who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over      financial reporting.

|   | Date: August        14, 2003 | /s/ Paul J. Kelly      |
|--------|------------------------------|------------------------|
|   |                         | Paul J. Kelly, M.D.    |
|   |                         | Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09106]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Interest Rates: Correction

    On April 8, 2015, in Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 67, Pages 18922-
18923, the Small Business Administration (SBA) incorrectly published an 
interest rate called the optional ``peg'' rate (13 CFR 120.214). This 
rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for 
maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be 
used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. 
The correct rate is 2.125 (2\1/8\) percent for the April-June quarter 
of FY 2015.
    Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for 
any third party lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the 
cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New 
York Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted 
by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate 
will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given 
State.

Linda S. Rusche,
Director, Office of Financial Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015-09106 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edwin Molina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1.

this report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the 1934 Act, and



2.

the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the registrant's financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



By: /s/ Edwin Molina

-----------------------------------

Name: Edwin Molina

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:November 13th, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

MEGAN HANCOCK

TRENTON HANCOCK

LILLY HANCOCK

CADRIAN NOE,

RAEDAN NOE, all b/n/f

APRIL HOLLONAND

TIA MAYNARD; and

APRIL HOLLON

TIA MAYNARD

Plaintiffs,

vs.

GENERAL MOTORS,

LLC,

d/b/a GENERAL MOTORS

COMPANY, d/b/a

General Motors, et al

Defendant(s)

Case No: 3:17CV309

PLAINTIFFS' ATTORNEY'S VERIFIED DEMONSTRATION OF CAUSE AS TO WHY

THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT

Comes now, Attorney I. Marshall Pinkus on behalf of the Plaintiffs, being first duly

sworn upon his oath, and in response to the Court's 'ORDER' issued on January 31, 2018

states as follows:

1. The original complaint for damages was filed on September 1,2017, (Doc #1) along

with a summons directed to General Motors' Resident Agent, (Doc # 2), both served by

registered United States Mail 2. Counsel believes that the Defendant(s) received service

because soon after; GM, by their attorney, Andrew B. Bloomer, P.C. Kirkland and Ellis
/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 2, 2014

No. 04-14-00530-CV

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Appellant

v.

TFHSP, L.L.C.,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-01820

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

The appellee's motion to refer case to alternative dispute resolution is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF ACCELRYS, INC.



|                                       |  |                 
|-------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|Accelrys GmbH                          |  | (Germany)       
|Accelrys Software Incorporated         |  | (Delaware)      
|Accelrys Limited                       |  | (United Kingdom)
|Accelrys SARL                          |  | (France)        
|Accelrys KK                            |  | (Japan)         
|Accelrys Software Solutions Pvt., Ltd. |  | (India)         
|Alto Merger Sub, Inc.                  |  | (Delaware)      
|Oxford Molecular Limited               |  | (United Kingdom)
|SciTegic, Inc.                         |  | (Delaware)      
|Synopsys Scientific Systems Limited    |  | (United Kingdom)
|Synomics Limited                       |  | (United Kingdom)