alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 57723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23781]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process 
Guideline

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) invites public comment on DOE's 
intent to publish the Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management 
Process Guideline. The guideline describes a risk management process 
that is targeted to the specific needs of electricity sector 
organizations and adds to the body of resources that help refine the 
definition and application of effective cybersecurity for all 
organizations in the Electricity Sector.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before Friday, October 28, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted to Matthew Light, U.S. 
Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy 
Reliability, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585.; Fax 
202-586-2623; E-mail: matthew.light@hq.doe.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Request for additional information 
should be directed to Matthew Light at matthew.light@hq.doe.gov, phone 
202-316-5115.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE invites public comment on DOE's intent 
to publish a guidance document entitled: Electricity Sector 
Cybersecurity Risk Management Process Guideline. The primary goal of 
this guideline is to describe a risk management process that is 
targeted to the specific needs of electricity sector organizations. 
This document is designed to add to the body of resources that help 
refine the definition and application of effective cybersecurity for 
all organizations in the Electricity Sector.
    The Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process 
Guideline was developed by the DOE, in collaboration with the National 
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the North American 
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), and representatives from both 
the public and private sector. The NIST Special Publication 800-39, 
Managing Information Security Risk provides the foundational 
methodology for this document.
    The Electricity Sector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process 
Guideline is available for review at https://public.commentworks.com/CW_DOE_AWF/.

    Authority:  6 U.S.C. 101 note.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on September 8, 2011.
Patricia A. Hoffman,
Assistant Secretary, Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2011-23781 Filed 9-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3899 

To extend temporarily the duty on 1,3-bis(4-aminophenoxy)benzene (RODA). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 22, 2009 

Mr. OLSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the duty on 1,3-bis(4- 

aminophenoxy)benzene (RODA). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,3-BIS(4-AMINOPHENOXY)BENZENE (RODA). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.15 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 1,3-bis(4-aminophenoxy)benzene (RODA)) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2012’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or withVerDate Nov 24 2008 03:52 Oct 23, 2009 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3899.IH H3899

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3899 IH

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

2 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 24, 2018

No. 04-18-00018-CV

IN RE STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.,

Janet Ann Lorenz-Floyd, and Lisa Horton

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The Real Parties in Interest, Margarito Guajardo and Maria Luisa Guajardo's Unopposed 

Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to 

February 23, 2018.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CI-00083, styled Margarito Guajardo and Maria Luisa Guajardo v. 

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Janet Ann Lorenz-Floyd, and Lisa Horton, pending in the 131st

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Mery presiding. Trial cause number 2018-CI00083 is the cause number into which certain extra-contractual claims were severed from the contractual claims in 

trial cause number 2017-CI-17407.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 4, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00008

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.J.E ., a Child

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009

- EM5

- 04650

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants filed a brief with an appendix and a supplemental brief with an appendix.

Both appendices contain the following documents that are not part of the clerk’s record on

appeal : (a) A ffidavit of Brittney Decole Grady, (b) A ffidavit of S onya Jones, (c) Petitioner’s

Motion Setting Case on Bexar County Jury Docket, (d) Bexar County Docket Sheet, and (d)

Bexar County District Clerk Receipt 48931022

.

With limited exceptions not relevant here, an appellate court may not consider matters

outside the appellate record. Fox v. Wardy , 234 S.W.3d 30, 33 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2007, pet.

dism’d w.o.j.)

. Attachment of documents as exhibits or appendices to briefs is not formal

inclusion in the record on appeal, and we cannot consider such documents. Id. “An appendix is

not a substitute for a clerk ’ s record nor are citations to the appendix a substitute f or citations to

the record.” Willms v. Wilson , No. 05

– 08

– 01718

– CV, 2009 WL 4283109, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Dec. 2, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op.).

Appellants are therefore ORDERED to

, no later than August 15, 2022

, provide written

proof to this court that (1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing any additional documents on

which they wish to rely has been requested from the district clerk and (2) the clerk’s fee has been

paid or arrangements have been made to p ay the clerk’s fee for the supplemental record

.

The district clerk is ORDERED to file the supplemental clerk’s record no later than ten

days from the date appell ants request and pay for the supplemental record.

I t is so ORDERED on this 4th day of August, 2022

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 24, 2015, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning Consortium, 
Inc. (``IMS Global'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA; Microsoft, 
Redmond, WA; PARCC, Inc., Washington, DC; State of Michigan Department 
of Education, Lansing, MI; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 
have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, Jenzabar, Cambridge, MA; SungKyunKwan University, Gyeonggi-
do, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; and McGraw-Hill CTB, Nashville, TN, have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IMS Global intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 8, 
2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on January 5, 2015 (80 FR 259).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-09316 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
# T **ABER** 

# L **AW** 

# G **ROUP** 

# PC

P.O. BOX 60036 | IRVINE, CA 92602 | TEL 949.735.8217 | FAX 714.707.4282 | staber@taberlaw.com April 9, 2013

By E

- Mail and U.S. Mail

Office of the Chief Counsel ATTN: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC

- 610

Room 923

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591

Re: Virginia One Dev e lopment, LLC, R.W. Parsons, Inc., D. Scott Henderson, DSH Diplomat, LLC, Colony Creek, LLC, and Crossings Townhomes, LLC v. The City of Atlanta ; Director’s Determination for Docket No. 16

- 12

- 0 9

.

Dear Sir/Madam:

Based on the fact that the City of Atlanta filed its Rebuttal on October 19 , 201 2 , and that 14 C.F.R. § 16.31(a) states that the Director’s Determination be issued 120 days after the last

substantive pleading is filed, we were expectin g the Director’s Determination on or about February 19 , 201 3 . One of the purposes the FAA gave for separating the Part 16 process from

the Part 1 3 process was to provide a more expeditious ruling on matters. It has now been 50 days since the FAA

- imposed deadline has passed.

Since we have not yet received the Director’s Determination or an Order extending the time period in which the Director can make his determination

, my clients and I are wondering when can we expect to receive either the Director’s Determination or an Order indicating when

the Determination will be issued

.

Please feel free to call us or send an e

- mail to staber@taberlaw.com if you have any questions of comments.

Sincerely,

TABER LAW GROUP , P.C.

Steven M. Taber

cc: Mr. Michael Flannagan
**EXHIBIT 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES OF COMPANY**       **Company**             Kabushiki Kaisha Photon Dynamics Japan  100%Photon Dynamics Korea, Inc. South Korea  100%Photon Dynamics Canada, Inc., formerly known asImage Processing Systems, Inc. Canada  100%Intelligent Reasoning Systems, Inc. United States  100%Korea Photon Dynamics South Korea  100%Photon Dynamics Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. China  100%Photon Dynamics Nova Scotia Company Canada  100%Salvador Imaging, Inc. United States  100%The subsidiaries listed are all included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
April 25,1997                                                          (Logo)EDS



                       Consumer Asset Management Division
                     of Electronic Data Systems Corporation
                        Annual Statement as to Compliance



The  management of the Consumer  Asset  Management  Division of Electronic  Data
Systems  Corporation has reviewed the activities of the Division during the year
ended  December 31, 1996 and of the  performance  under the Servicing  Agreement
relating to Equicon  Mortgage Loan Trust 1995-2,  dated October 1, 1995 has been
made  under  my  supervision,  and to the  best of my  knowledge,  based on such
review,  the  Consumer  Asset  Management  Division of  Electronic  Data Systems
Corporation  has fulfilled all its  obligations  under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement relating to Equicon Mortgage Loan Trust 1995-2,  dated October 1, 1995
for the year ended December 31, 1996.


/s/Mark S. O'Bryan
Mark S. O'Bryan
Chief Operating Officer
Consumer Asset Managtement Division



                                              Consumer Asset Management Division
                                              190 South Warner Road
                                              Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-2127
                                              (610) 989-1000
                                              Fax:(610) 975-3665
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-K Annual Report of Eldorado Resorts LLC and Eldorado Capital Corp. (collectively, the
"Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 24, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ROBERT M. JONESRobert M. Jones, Chief Financial Officer
of Eldorado Resorts LLC
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
1 

### United States Environmental Protection Agency

Docket Index for [EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 201 1

- 0955 ]
Revisions to Title V Operating Permits Program s , State of California, Five Air Pollution Control District s
Docket Index Category/ Item Number

I. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for South Coast AQMD

 Title V program revision submittal from CARB , dated August 19 , 20 1 1 I

- A

 SCAQMD Rule 3000

- Clean Copy I

- B

 SCAQMD Rule 3000

- Strikeout Copy I

- C

 SCAQMD Rule 3001

- Clean Copy I

- D

 SCAQMD Rule 3001

- Strikeout Copy I

- E

 SCAQMD Rule 3002

- Clean Copy I

- F

 SCAQMD Rule 3002

- Strikeout Copy I

- G

 SCAQMD Rule 3003

- Clean Copy I

- H

 SCAQMD Rule 3003

- Strikeout Copy I

- I

 SCAQMD Rule 3005

- Clean Copy I

- J

 SCAQMD Rule 3005

- Strikeout Copy I

- K

 SCAQMD Rule 3006

- Clean Copy I

- L

 SCAQMD Rule 3006

- Strikeout Copy I

- M

 SCAQMD Final Staff Report, October , 201 0 I

- N

I I
. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for San Luis Obispo County APCD

 Title V program revision submittal from CARB , dated August 19 , 20 11 I I

- A

 SLOCAPCD Rule 216

- Clean Copy I I

- B

 SLOCAPCD Rule 216

- Strikeout Copy I I

- C

 SLOCAPCD Final Staff Report (undated) I I

- D

I II
. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for Ventura County APCD

 Title V program revision submittal from CARB , dated August 19 , 20 11 I II

- A

 VCAPCD Rule 33

- Clean Copy I II

- B

 VCAPCD Rule 33

- Strikeout Copy I II

- C

 VCAPCD Rule 33.1

- Clean Copy III

- D

 VCAPCD Rule 33.1

- Strikeout Copy III

- E2  VCAPCD Final Staff Report, February 25, 2011 III

- F

I V
. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for Monterey Bay Unified APCD

 Title V program revision submittal from CARB , dated November 7 , 20 11 I V

- A

 MBUAPCD Rule 218

- Clean Copy I V

- B

 MBUAPCD Rule 218

- Strikeout Copy I V

- C

 MBUAPCD Final Staff Report (undated) I V

- D

V
. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for Santa Barbara County APCD

 Title V program revision submittal from CARB , dated April 21 , 20 11 V

- A

 SBCAPCD Rule 1301

- Clean Copy V

- B

 SBCAPCD Rule 1301

- Strikeout Copy V

- C

 SB CAPCD Final Staff Report, January 20, 2011 V

- D

V I. Federal Register Notice s

 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2011

- 0955 , 77 FR 16509 (March 21, 2012) V I

- A

V II
. Comment Letters on Proposed Action

 Placeholder for comment letters VI I

- A
EXHIBIT 10.23


 


TERMINATION OF AGREEMENTS


 


This
Termination of Agreements (“Termination”) is entered this 12th day of March,
2010, by and between Ferrellgas, L.P. and Ferrellgas, Inc. (collectively, “Ferrellgas”)
and Samson Dental Practice Management, L.L.C. (“Samson”).


 


WHEREAS,
the parties entered into a Services Agreement dated September 11, 2008 and
entered into a Sub-Contractor Business Associate Agreement dated August 11,
2008 (collectively, the “Agreements”), and


 


WHEREAS,
the services anticipated by such agreements are no longer necessary, and the
parties desire to terminate the obligations under the Agreements;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.                                       The parties
agree that the Services Agreement and Sub-Contractor Business Associate Agreement
are hereby terminated, effective March 12, 2010.


 


2.                                       Each party
acknowledges the satisfactory and full performance of the other party and
agrees that all claims and obligations inuring pursuant to such Agreements are
hereby cancelled and released.


 


3.                                       The parties
acknowledge that Ferrellgas does not have in its possession any Protected
Health Information, as defined in the Sub-Contractor Business Associate
Agreement.


 


4.                                       The parties
acknowledge that Samson has paid all sums due to Ferrellgas pursuant to the
Services Agreement, and that Ferrellgas has performed all duties required of it
pursuant to that Agreement.


 


 


	
   

  	
  Samson
  Dental Practice

  	
   

  	
  Ferrellgas,
  L.P. by

  
	
   

  	
  Management,
  L.L.C.

  	
   

  	
  Ferrellgas, Inc.,
  its general partner

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/
  Pamela Breuckmann

  	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/
  Trent Hampton

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Trent
  Hampton, VP Legal

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Ferrellgas, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/
  Trent Hampton

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Trent
  Hampton, VP Legal
EXHIBIT 32.0
 Section 1350 CERTIFICATION
   (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibChief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Brendan J. McGillBrendan J. McGillSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer  Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to
Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation and will be retained by Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]



   Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.
   600 East Las Colinas Blvd., Suite 1200, Irving, TX  75039
   Phone (972) 401-0752      Fax   (972) 401-3110
   Internet Address:  http://www.magnumhunter.com



NEWS

                                                         FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
American Stock Exchange
   o  Common -  MHR
   o  Bonds -  MHR.B
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        MAGNUM HUNTER CLOSES PLACEMENT OF
                   $50 MILLION OF CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK


Irving, Texas, February 3, 1999, Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. ("Magnum Hunter")
announced today that definitive  agreements have been executed with ONEOK,  Inc.
(NYSE:  OKE), the eighth largest  natural gas  distributor in the United States,
relating to ONEOK's  purchase of $50 million of Convertible  Preferred  Stock of
Magnum Hunter in a private  placement.  The new agreements  also include ONEOK's
ability to market certain of Magnum Hunter's natural gas production in the state
of Oklahoma and ONEOK's ability to participate in future  acquisitions of Magnum
Hunter in the state of Oklahoma.

The  Preferred  Stock will have a  liquidation  value of $50 million and will be
convertible  into Magnum Hunter's common stock at $5.25 per share.  Dividends on
the Preferred Stock will be payable in cash at the rate of 8% per annum and will
be cumulative.  Magnum Hunter will use the net proceeds from the  transaction to
repay senior bank indebtedness, to provide working capital for general corporate
purposes and to finance acquisitions,  as determined by Magnum Hunter's Board of
Directors. ONEOK will nominate two new members to Magnum Hunter's existing Board
of Directors.

ONEOK, Inc. is engaged in natural gas intrastate  distribution and transmission,
gas processing,  gas marketing and gas production.  ONEOK has approximately 31.6
million shares of common stock outstanding.
                       
                                ####

Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. is one of the nation's fastest growing independent
exploration and development companies engaged in three principal activities: (1)
the acquisition,  production and sale of crude oil,  condensate and natural gas;
(2) the  gathering,  transmission  and  marketing  of natural  gas;  and (3) the
managing and operating of producing oil and natural gas  properties for interest
owners.

           
             FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MICHAEL P. MCINERNEY,
                        INVESTOR RELATIONS (972) 401-0752