Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2022 / Notices 425 

1See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the 

Federal Republic of Germany and the People’s 

Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 

FR 68405 (December 2, 2020) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 77431 

(December 2, 2020). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

8166 (February 4, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the People’s 

Republic of China: Respondent Selection,’’ dated 

May 12, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Refillable Stainless Steel 

Kegs from the People’s Republic of China: Decision 

Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

6See Memorandum ‘‘U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) Data Release,’’ dated February 19, 

2021 at Attachment 1; see also Memorandum ‘‘U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Data 

Release,’’ dated May 12, 2021 at Attachment 1. 

7See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011); see also the 

‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below. 

8See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

9See Order. 

10See Initiation Notice, 86 FR 8166, 8167 

(January 11, 2018) (‘‘All firms listed below that 

wish to qualify for separate rate status in the 

administrative reviews involving NME countries 

must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate 

application or certification, as described below.’’). 

See Appendix II for the list of companies that are 

subject to this administrative review that are 

considered to be part of the China-wide entity. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–61–2021] 

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 261— 

Alexandria, Louisiana, Authorization of 

Production Activity, Avant Organics 

LLC (Specialty Chemicals), Alexandria, 

Louisiana 

On September 1, 2021, Avant 

Organics LLC submitted a notification of 

proposed production activity to the FTZ 

Board for its facility within FTZ 261, in 

Alexandria, Louisiana. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (86 FR 50324, 

September 8, 2021). On December 30, 

2021, the applicant was notified of the 

FTZ Board’s decision that no further 

review of the activity is warranted at 

this time. The production activity 

described in the notification was 

authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the FTZ Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.14. 

Dated: December 30, 2021. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–28557 Filed 1–4–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–093] 

Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

certain producers and/or exporters 

made sales of refillable stainless steel 

kegs (kegs) at less than normal value 

and that one company had no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the period of review (POR) 

December 13, 2019, through November 

30, 2020. Interested parties are invited 

to comment on these preliminary results 

of review. 

DATES: Applicable January 5, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Romani and Konrad Ptaszynski, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0198 or 

(202) 482–6187, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 16, 2019, we published 

in the Federal Register an antidumping 

duty order on kegs from the People’s 

Republic of China (China).1 On 

December 2, 2020, we published in the 

Federal Register a notice of opportunity 

to request an administrative review of 

the Order.2 On February 4, 2021, based 

on timely requests for an administrative 

review, Commerce initiated the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on kegs.3 The 

administrative review covers 30 

companies, which includes the 

mandatory respondent, Guangzhou Ulix 

Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd. (Ulix).4

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this Order 

are refillable stainless steel kegs. A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

provided in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.5

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

One company that received a separate 

rate in previous segments of the 

proceeding and is subject to this review 

did not have any exports of subject 

merchandise during the POR.6 Based on 

information on the record, we 

preliminarily determine that Guangzhou 

Jingye Machinery Co., Ltd. (Jingye)’s 

had no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR. Consistent 

with our practice in non-market 

economy (NME) cases, we are not 

rescinding this review with respect to 

these companies but, rather, intend to 

complete the review and issue 

appropriate instructions to CBP based 

on the final results of the review.7 For 

additional information regarding these 

preliminary determinations, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

China-Wide Entity 

Under Commerce’s policy regarding 

the conditional review of the Chinawide entity,8 the China-wide entity will 

not be under review unless a party 

specifically requests, or Commerce selfinitiates, a review of the entity. Because 

no party requested a review of the 

China-wide entity in this review, the 

entity is not under review, and the 

entity’s rate (i.e., 77.13 percent) is not 

subject to change.9 Aside from the noshipment companies discussed above, 

Commerce considers all other 

companies for which a review was 

requested (none of which filed a 

separate rate application) listed in 

Appendix II to this notice, to be part of 

the China-wide entity.10

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. A list of 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is included as 

an appendix to this notice. In addition, 


TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE