T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T N ERY RO D O LFO G U ERRA SA LA ZA R, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 72991 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 951- 248 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B e f o r e : S I L V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N a n dN .R . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . N e ryR odol f

o G ue rr aS a l a z ar , na t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of a B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order s um m ar i l y di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um 

# FI LED SEP 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 72991 2 a n dw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e f a c tu a l f in d in g s , I N S v . E l i as - Zac ar i as , 5 0 2 U . S. 4 7 8 , 4 8 1 & n .1 ( 1 9 9 2 ) , an dd e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s , V asqu ez -Zavala v. A s h c r o ft , 3 2 4 F .3 d1 1 0 5 , 1 1 0 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e I J ’s f in d in g th a t G u e rr aS a la z arf a ile dto e s tab lis h th e th r e a ts m a d e a g a in s t h im in G u a te m a lar is e to th e le v e l o f p e r s e c u tio n . Se e Li m v . I

NS , 2 2 4 F . 3 d9 2 9 , 9 3 6 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ). S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce al so sup p o rt s th e IJ’ s fi n d i n g th atG u erra S al azar d i dn o td em o n strat e h e su fferedp ast pers ec ut i on or has aw el l -f ou nd ed fe arof future pers ec ut i on on ac coun tof a p r o te c te dg r o u n d . Se e E l i as - Zac ar i as , 5 0 2 U .S . a t 4 8 2 . Be c au s e G u e rr aSa l a z arf a i l e dt o me e tth e l o w e rb u r d e n o f p r o o f f o ra s y l u m, it f o llo w s th a t h e h a s n o t m e t th e h ig h e rs tan d ar df o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See Zehat ye v. G on zales , 4 5 3 F .3 d1 1 8 2 , 1 1 9 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . F i na l l y , gi ve n the l a c k of ne xus be tw e e n the ha rm he a l l e ge dl ys uf f e r e d and apr ot e c t e d gr ound, G ue rr aS a l a z a r ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe thi rt e e n- y e arde l ayi n the ad j u d i cat i o n o f h i s asyl u m ap p l i cat i o n v i o l at edh i s du e p ro cess ri g h t s fai l s b ecau se h e h a s n o t s h o w n p r e

ju d ic e . Se e N

g o n g o v . A s h c r o

ft , 39 7 F . 3d 82 1, 82 3 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) ( ap e titio n e rm u s t b e p r e ju d ic e db yadu e p r o c e s s v io la tio n ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.