alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Werner, Christopher

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 5:04 PM
To: Werner, Christopher; Lorang, Phil; Beaver, Melinda Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 a nd 13563: EPA NPRM -- Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirement s for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55)

Categories: Regional Haze

The interagency reviewers accept this modification. Thank you very much.

From: Werner, Christopher [mailto:Werner.Christopher@epa .gov]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 4:18 PM
To: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>; Lorang, Phil <Lorang.Phil@epa.gov>; Beaver, Melinda <Beaver.Melinda@epa.gov> Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: EPA NPRM -- Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 206 0-AS55)

Aaron, EPA proposes the following language in place of the language highlighted by reviewers on page 3 8. Please advise if this will be acceptable. EPA consents to all oth er changes in the document.

“We are proposing these changes to make clear the c onnections between the existing long-strategy and r easonable progress goal requirements. Although the regional haze SIPs submitted by the States during the first planning period generally demonstrated a clear understanding of the connections between these two program elements, re cent comments by some owners of industrial sources and S tates have indicated confusion as to the meaning of these provisions.”

Chris Werner US EPA – Office of Air Quality Planning and Standar ds Air Quality Policy Division (919) 541-5133 werner.christopher@epa.gov

From: Szabo, Aaron [ mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov ]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 2:44 PM
To: Werner, Christopher < Werner.Christopher@epa.gov >; Lorang, Phil < Lorang.Phil@epa.gov >; Beaver, Melinda

< Beaver.Melinda@epa.gov > Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: EPA NPRM -- Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 206 0-AS55)

Attached please find additional summary of interage ncy comments under EO 12866 and 13563 for the draft proposed rule entitled, Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirement s for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55). The interagency comments are in response to the last RLSO version s ubmitted to OMB for review. I accepted all changes from that version and the interagency comments within this ve rsion are new.

Thank you and please let me know if you have any co mments or questions.

Aaron L. Szabo Policy Analyst2 Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Office of Management and Budget
202-395-3621 Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly  Report of EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Qfor the period ending  June 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
 "Report"),  I,  Dennis R. Alexander,  Chief Executive
Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company,
 certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge and
belief that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
 August 20, 2010





/s/ Dennis AlexanderDennis
      R. AlexanderCEO
      and Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# FILED
May 25, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON

GARY BERN ARD SANDERS, ) ) Petitioner, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9902-CC-00045 ) vs. ) LAUDERDALE C OUNTY ) STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) No. 5071 ) Respondent. )

O R D E R
This matter is before the Court upon the state’s mo tion, pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals, to aff irm the judgment of the trial court in this case by order ra

ther than formal opinion. The above -captioned case represents an appeal from the trial court’s denial of the petitioner’s peti tion for writ of habeas corpu s. The petitioner is currentl y serving a li

fe sentence for 1975 convictions of felony murder and armed robbery. In his present petition, the petitio ner contends: 1) he could not have been convicted of murder and robbery after the state s ought to nolle prosequi prior similar charg es; 2) his constitutional rights were v

iolated when he was not present at the hearing on the commutation o f his death sentence; 3) the robber y statute under which he was conv

icted is void because he did not receive notice of an amendment to the statute; and 4) he was not afforded an opportunity to be heard at his sentencing hearing.
Having review ed the state’s motion in lig ht of the petitioner’s brief and response, and the record as a w hole, we conclude that the moti on is well-taken and should be granted. In deny ing the petition, the tri al court found that the petitioner had failed to show upon the face of the judg ment or the record that the proc eedings upon which the judgment w

as rendered that the convic ting court was w

ithout jurisdiction or authority to sentence the pet itioner or that the petiti oner’s sentence of imprisonment or other restraint has exp ired. See State v. Archer , 851 S.W.2d 157 (Tenn. 1993).2 We agree with the trial court’s ruling. The convicting court in this case had jurisdiction over both the subject matter and person, and not hing in the record before us demonstrates that the conv icting court’s acti ons were unauthorized. Nor has the petitioner shown that his sentence has expired. Accordingly, even if the petitioner’s claim has merit, such clai m renders the judgment voi dable, not void, and it may not be collaterally attack

ed in a suit for habeas corpus r elief. Passarella v. State , 891 S.W.2d 619, 627 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). The court below therefore cor rectly denied the petitioner the requested habea s corpus relief.
Accordingly, having reviewed the entire record in light of the petitioner’s claims, we cannot find any error committed by the trial court in denying the petition. It is therefore ORDERED that the st ate’s motion is granted. P u r suant t o R u l e 20 of

t h e R u l es of t he C our t of C ri m i nal A ppeal s , w

e af f i r m t he t ri a l cour t ’ s deni a l of

t h e pet i t i oner ’ s pet i t i on f o r w ri t of habeas c

o r pus. Costs of this appeal shall be assessed against the state.

______________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, JUDG E

______________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

______________________________ JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 21763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-15-014]


Government In The Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  April 28, 2015 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS:  Open to the public,

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-463 and 731-TA-1159 (Review)(Oil 
Country Tubular Goods from China). The Commission is currently 
scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the 
Commission on May 7, 2015.
    5. Vote in Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1014, 1016, and 1017 (Second 
Review)(Polyvinyl Alcohol from China, Japan, and Korea). The Commission 
is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and 
views of the Commission on May 12, 2015.
    6. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission:

     Issued: April 15, 2015.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-09174 Filed 4-16-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4066 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4066

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
    alternative fuel credit and the alternative fuel mixture credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 7, 2009

  Mr. Kagen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
    alternative fuel credit and the alternative fuel mixture credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALTERNATIVE FUEL AND ALTERNATIVE FUEL MIXTURE CREDITS MADE 
              PERMANENT.

    (a) Alternative Fuel Credit.--Subsection (d) of section 6426 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph (5).
    (b) Alternative Fuel Mixture Credit.--Subsection (e) of section 
6426 of such Code is amended by striking paragraph (3).
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--Paragraph (6) of section 6427(e) of 
such Code is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (A),
            (2) by striking ``, and'' at the end of subparagraph (B) 
        and inserting a period, and
            (3) by striking subparagraphs (C) and (D).
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to fuels sold or used after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
November 24, 1970 

Honorable Luther T. Sebren 

County Auditor, Orange County 

opinion No. M-736 

Orange County Courthouse Re: Maximum salary to be paid 

Orange, Texas 77630 the official court reuorter 

for the County Court at Law 

of Orange County. 

Dear Mr. Sebren: 

You have 

salary that may be 

requested our opinion as to the maximum 

paid the official court reporter for the 

County Court at Law of Orange County. In compliance with our 

opinion request procedure you first received an official opinion 

from the County Attorney of Orange County, Texas, on this 

question. 

The County Court at Law of Orange County was created 

by the provisions of Article 1970-349, Vernon's Civil Statutes. 

Subdivision (b) of Section 4 of Article 1970-349 provides for 

the appointment of an official court reporter and reads as 

follows: 

"(b) The Judge of the County Court at Law may 

appoint an official court reporter, who must meet 

the qualifications prescribed by law for that office and who is entitled to the compensation fixed 

by the Commissioners Court of Orange County." 

The maximum salary that may be paid official shorthand reporters, including official shorthand reporters of each 

county court at law is governed by Article 2326, Vernon's Civil 

Statutes. Attorney General's Opinion V-707 (1948). See also 

Attorney General's Opinions M-436 (1969) and C-505 (1965). 

The maximum compensation provided official shorthand 

reporters by the provisions of Article 2326, Vernon's Civil 

Statutes, is $6,600.00. It is our opinion that the provisions 

of Article 1970-349, Vernon's Civil Statutes, did not change, 

amend or modify the compensation prescribed in Article 2326. 

-3382- -J 
Hon. Luther T. Sebren, page 2 (M-736) 

You are therefore advised that the maximum salary that may be 

paid the official court reporter for Orange County is $6,600.00. 

SUMMARY 

The salary of the official court reporter for 

the County Court at Law of Orange County is governed 

by the provisions of Article 2326, Vernon's Civil 

Statutes, and the maximum salary that may be paid 

such official is $6,600.00 per,pnum. 

Prepared by John Reeves 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Kerns Taylor, Chairman 

W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman 

William J. Craig 

Malcom Smith 

Ben Harrison 

Scott Garrison 

MEADE F. GRIFFIN 

Staff Legal Assistant 

ALFRED WALKER 

Executive Assistant 

NOLA WHITE 

First Assistant 

-3383-
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In  connection  with the  Quarterly  report of  Collectible  Concepts
Group,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  November 30,
2001 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Paul S.  Lipschutz,  Principal  Financial  Officer  of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (3)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (4)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.

           A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906
has been provided to Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc. and will be retained by
Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc.and  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  July 20, 2004                               By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
                                                      ----------------------
                                                   Paul S. Lipschutz
                                                   Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4035 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4035

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the estate of a 
    decedent to use the capital loss carryover of the decedent as a 
                     deduction against estate tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 5, 2009

 Mr. Marchant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the estate of a 
    decedent to use the capital loss carryover of the decedent as a 
                     deduction against estate tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CAPITAL LOSS CARRYOVER AS A DEDUCTION AGAINST 
              ESTATE TAX.

    (a) In General.--Part IV of subchapter A of chapter 11 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 
following new section:

``SEC. 2059. UNUSED CAPITAL LOSS CARRYOVER.

    ``(a) In General.--For purposes of the tax imposed by section 2001, 
the value of the taxable estate shall be determined by deducting from 
the value of the gross estate an amount equal to the unused capital 
loss carryover of the decedent.
    ``(b) Unused Capital Loss Carryover.--For purposes of this section, 
the term `unused capital loss carryover' means an amount equal to the 
capital loss carryover under section 1212(b) which would (but for the 
decedent's death) be carried from the decedent's last taxable year to a 
later taxable year of the decedent (or the surviving spouse of the 
decedent).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to estates of decedents dying after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 402 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 402

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in 
    Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ``William C. Tallent Department of 
                 Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILLIAM C. TALLENT DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 
Clinic in Knoxville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the 
``William C. Tallent Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 
Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the outpatient 
clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the William C. Tallent Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2009.

            Attest:                  LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.

                       By

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 402

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in 
    Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ``William C. Tallent Department of 
                 Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3931 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3931

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for 2 years the 
election to treat the cost of a qualified film or television production 
      as an expense which is not chargeable to a capital account.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 2009

  Ms. Watson (for herself, Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. Chu, Mr. Filner, Mrs. 
   Capps, Mr. Baca, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mrs. Bono Mack, Mr. Farr, Mr. 
     Honda, Mr. Issa, Mr. Sherman, Ms. Woolsey, and Mrs. Davis of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for 2 years the 
election to treat the cost of a qualified film or television production 
      as an expense which is not chargeable to a capital account.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN QUALIFIED FILM AND 
              TELEVISION PRODUCTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (f) of section 181 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2009'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to qualified film and television productions commencing after December 
31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE18,UNITED STATES CODE)**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code), I, Darrell Borne, the Chief FinancialOfficer, Secretary and Treasurer of First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation, aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,that:

ThisQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| October 28, 2005 | By:    | /s/ DARRELL  BORNE                                              |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Name: Darrell Borne                                             |
|                  |   | Title: *Chief Financial Officer,  Secretary and Treasurer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation and will be retainedby First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of China Pharma  Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Zhilin Li,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a)or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



                                                        Date: March 11, 2009

                                                        By:  /s/ Zhilin Li
                                                             -------------
                                                             Zhilin Li
                                                         Chief Executive Officer