alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Edwin Molina, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of USA Video Interactive Corp;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entitles, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the  date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

---



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





By: /s/ Edwin Molina

-----------------------------------

Name: Edwin Molina

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:May 15, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2

                                  Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Tollgrade
Communications, Inc. (the "Corporation"), hereby certifies that the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Dated:  March 26, 2003

/s/ Samuel C. Knoch
--------------------------------
Name:  Samuel C. Knoch
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Star Gas LLC: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 333-100976 on Form S-3, No. 333-49751 on Form S-4 and Nos.333-40138, 333-46714 and 333-53716 on Form S-8 of Star Gas Partners, L.P. of our reports dated December 12, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Star Gas Partners, L.P. as of September 30, 2004 and 2005, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), partners’ capital and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2005, and the related financial statement statement schedules,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005, which reports appear inthe September 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Star Gas Partners, L.P. 

 

Our report dated December 12, 2005 contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Partnership may not be able to fund its working capital requirements, which raises substantial doubt about thePartnership’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 

 

Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 142. 

 

KPMG LLP 

Stamford, Connecticut 

March 15, 2006
**Exhibit**** 32**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

I, Shaw Hong,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Reportof OmniVision Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJuly 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations ofOmniVision Technologies, Inc. A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to OmniVision Technologies, Inc.and will be retained by OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: September 10, 2007
|        | By:          | **/s/****SHAW HONG**                                                                            |
|--------|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | *** *** | **Shaw Hong***Chief Executive Officer**, President and Director  (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

I, Peter V. Leigh,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Reportof OmniVision Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJuly 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations ofOmniVision Technologies, Inc. A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to OmniVision Technologies, Inc.and will be retained by OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: September 10, 2007
|        | By:          | **/s/****PETER V. LEIGH**                                                                     |
|--------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | *** *** | **Peter  V. Leigh**

*Chief  Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2011-CE-031-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 8.0 $ 680.00 $0 $ 680.00 773 $525,640.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $525,640

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Replace with 

serviceable elevator 

spar

16.0 $1,360.00 $1,000 $2,360.00

Replace with new 

elevator spar 16.0 $1,360.00 $1,250 $2,610.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
*Present*— Chancellors Rutledge, Burke and Marshall,

#### T. Lowndes and wife vs. E. Lemprire.

June 1800.

case cxxvi.

record rfoox , page 115.

A^beques^of slaves under *feaesF6*must be complied choice made lor the lega-number out ‘of tie whole estate, the^testatrix iiad original-she acquired on the death thér.lei bl°"

Chancellor Rutledge

delivered the decree.

It is evident that testatrix intended to give complain-an^ ^cn negroes under the age of fifteen years, and in doing so, probably contemplated the tender age of complain-ai!^ herself. Testatrix certainly counted upon some of the negroes being taken from those she was entitled to from her brother’s estate, as she had but three of her. own under that age. It is clear from the last codicil that she intended complainant should, have ten at all evcn^s’ *b7*givTna,' the choice out of her estate at large. .It is also clear that.another of her nieces was equally the oh-jec^ °f ^ier bounty, by the manner of wording the bequest to her “ of six young negro women slaves.” The other bequests are ill general terms, and left in a great measure tp tlie discretion of the executors.

1 Upon viewing the list of the negroes belonging to the estate, it appears that the intentions of testatrix may be fully complied with, because there are more than ten ne-groes who were under fifteen years of age when she be-came entitled to them, that may be chosen for complainant,: and a sufficient number of women who were young when.the testatrix died, that may be allotted by the executor to the other legatee. It is ordered and decreed *591that ten negroes, agreeable to the bequest of testatrix, be chosen lor complainant, and if it should happen that any of them have died since the list filed, others shall be chosen as nearly of the age of those who are dead as will make up the ten out of the estate at large; and that it be deferred to the master to liquidate the account of defendant, and report thereon.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4176 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4176

 To amend the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
  2010 to authorize construction of an Aegis Ashore Test Facility at 
                Pacific Missile Range Facility, Hawaii.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2009

 Mr. Abercrombie introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
  2010 to authorize construction of an Aegis Ashore Test Facility at 
                Pacific Missile Range Facility, Hawaii.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aegis Ashore Test Facility 
Construction Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZED MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.

    (a) Project Authority.--The table entitled ``Missile Defense 
Agency'' in section 2401 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111-84) is amended by 
inserting after the item relating to Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, the 
following new item relating to construction of an Aegis Ashore Test 
Facility at Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai, Hawaii:

 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hawaii........................................  Pacific Missile Range Facility..................    $68,500,000.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 2404(a) of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division 
B of Public Law 111-84) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 
        ``$3,177,496,000'' and inserting ``$3,245,996,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ``$1,048,783,000'' and 
        inserting ``$1,117,283,000''.
    (c) Relation to Military Construction Funding Table.--Section 4001 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 
Law 111-84) shall apply to the military construction project authorized 
by the amendment made by subsection (a) to the same extent and in the 
same manner as if the project had been included in the table contained 
in section 4501 of such Act and listed as the conference agreement the 
amount specified for the project in the amendment.
                                 <all>
```
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 11/04/2011 05:05 PM 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule 

Hi all, 

Attached are the handouts from the EO 12866 meeting yesterday. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule 

When: Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:00 AM-10:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern 

Time (US & Canada). 

Where: Room 9104 New Executive Office Building 

 

 

Theresa Pugh, APPA has requested this meeting. 

2060AR31_2011_11_3_appa_Handout1.pdf 

 

2060AR31_2011_11_3_appa_Handout2.pdf 

EGU MACT Comment Excerpt.pdf
FORM 8-K


                           SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                Washington, D.C.  20549



                                     CURRENT REPORT


                    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
                                   Exchange Act of 1934


                                       June 22, 2001



                                     AJAY SPORTS, INC.
                   (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



   DELAWARE                          0-18204                        39-1644025
---------------                  ------------------              -------------
(State or other                   (Commission file            (I.R.S. Employer
 jurisdiction of                      number)           Identification Number)
 incorporation or
 organization)

32751 Middlebelt Road, Ste. B
Farmington Hills, MI                                                     48334
-------------------------------------                    ---------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	                          (Zip Code)


          Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (248) 851-5651


                                       N/A
               -------------------------------------------------
           Former name or former address, if changed from last report



<PAGE>


Item 5:	Other Events

            On June 20, 2001, the Board of Directors of Ajay Sports, Inc.
            (the "Registrant") extended the expiration date of the
            Registrant's publicly traded common stock warrants until June 30,
            2002.  The warrants were set to expire on June 30, 2001 had they
            not been extended.  The exercise of six warrants allows the holder
            to purchase one share of the common stock of the Registrant for
            $6.00 per share.   The warrants are traded under the symbol
            "AJAYW".

<PAGE>
                                  SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                 AJAY SPORTS, INC.



                                 By   \s\Ronald N. Silberstein
                                      -------------------------------
                                      Robert N. Silberstein
                                      Chief Financial Officer

Date:   June 22, 2001
**Exhibit 10.1**

Amendment to License Agreement with Two Dog Net, Inc.,

dated November 5, 2002

 

 

**AMENDMENT TO LICENSEAGREEMENT**

 

The followingprovisions are hereby incorporated into, and are hereby made a part of, thatcertain License Agreement dated September 10, 2002, (the “Agreement”) betweenTwo Dog Net, Inc., a California corporation, (“Licensor”) and D.W.C.Installations, a Nevada corporation, (“Licensee”) and such provisions shall beeffective as of November 5, 2002 (the “Effective Date”).  All capitalized terms in this Amendment, tothe extent not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings assigned tosuch terms in the Agreement.

 

1.                                       Licensorhas agreed to accept 2,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Licenseein exchange for the $1,984,500 Licensee owed to Licensor.

 

2.                                       Article4.4 Insurance is deleted in its entirety.

 

3.                                       Allother provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged.

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, Maker has caused this Amendment to Promissory Note to be duly executedand delivered as of the Effective Date.

 
| LICENSEE:                  | LICENSOR:                 |
|----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                       |                      |
| D.W.C.  Installations,     | Two Dog Net,  Inc.,       |
| a Nevada  corporation      | a California  corporation |
|                       |                      |
|                       |                      |
|   /s/ Sholeh Hamedani |                      |   /s/ Nasser Hamedani |   |
| By:                        | Sholeh  Hamedani          | By: | Nasser  Hamedani |
| Its:                       | President  and CEO        | Its: | Chairman of  the Board |
|                            |                           |  |  |  |  |

 

 

----
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 026

Attachment Name

CAS RN 1456803-14-7 Summary of Molecular Weight Distributions and Percent Monomer Calculations

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 2a. (Chem 6)

Contains CBI

Report Number

 Sanitized Version
All CBI has been removed
REGULATION II - PERMIT SYSTEM 

RULE 2:10 Further Information 

In order to determine the nature, extent, quantity or degree of air contaminants 

which are or may be. discharged by a stationary source. the Control Officer may 

at any time require from any person subject to these regulations all of the following: 

A. analysis. plans, specifications and data on the process and production rate, 

equipment descriptions and any other information needed. 

B. facilities for sampling and testing purposes. The Control Of!lcer shall identify in writing the size and location of the sampling platform. All facilities 

shall be constructed in accordance with the General Industry Safety Orders 

of the State of California. 

C. testing to determine the emissions of air contaminants. 

D. continuous monitoring equipment to measure and record the source operating 

condition and/or contaminant emissions. 

The Control officer may require that the disclosures required by this rule be 

certified by a professional engineer registered by the State of California. The 

cost of providing such information shall be paid by the applicant or permit holder. 

MODOC COUNTY APCD 

January 15, 1989 

• * * * * 

RULE 2.10 

Page 1