alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.11

SCHERING CORPORATION
2000 Galloping Hill Road        Kenilworth, N.J. 07033

Telephone: (908) 298-4000

Confidential
Materials omitted and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote such omissions.

November
30, 2004

Mr.
Arthur Hiller
Senior Vice President, Sales & Marketing
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
40 Landsdowne Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4815



Dear
Mr. Hiller:

I
am writing with regard to the Addendum, effective June 1, 2003, to the 1995 Collaboration Agreement among Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Schering Corporation and Schering-Plough,
Ltd., including as such Addendum was previously amended (the "Additional Field Force Agreement").

As
you are aware, Schering and Millennium previously agreed to extend until [**] the deadline for a decision by the JSC on whether or not to continue joint
funding of the Additional Field Force for the 2005 calendar year. In order to ensure that the parties reach a fully informed decision that reflects the best interests of both companies and the
product, Schering is willing to agree to a further extension of the deadline until the JSC meeting scheduled for December 6, 2004, as follows.

Any
capitalized terms that are not expressly defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Additional Field Force Agreement.

The
parties hereby agree to the following additional amendments to the Additional Field Force Agreement in connection with the deadline to renew joint funding obligations for 2005
pursuant to Sections 4.1 and 2.4 of the Additional Field Force Agreement:



All
other terms and conditions of the Additional Field Force Agreement will remain in full force and effect.

---



Please
indicate your agreement to this Amendment by signing below and returning one fully executed original to my attention.

| | Regards,
SCHERING-CORPORATION
on behalf of itself and its Affiliate Schering-Plough Ltd.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Margriet Gabriel-RegisMargriet Gabriel-Regis
Vice President                         

AGREED:
MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

|By:          | /s/ A. J. Hiller      | 
|------------ | --------------------- | 
|Name(print): | A. J. Hiller          | 
|Title:       | Senior Vice President | 

---



QuickLinks
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

June 26, 2009

Ms. Jennifer Bruch Hogan

Hogan & Hogan, L.L.P.

Two Houston Center

909 Fannin, Suite 2700

Houston, TX 77010

Mr. Joseph S. Horrigan

Horrigan & Goehrs, L.L.P.

909 Fannin, Suite 1600

Houston, TX 77010-1003

RE:Case Numbers:  07-0784 consolidated with 07-0785

Court of Appeals Numbers:  14-03-00663-CV & 14-05-00474-CV

Trial Court Number:  308,541-403

Styles:HARRY HOLMES, II, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS J. HOLMES, SR., DECEASED AND AS TRUSTEE OF ANY TRUST NAMED AS A LEGATEE IN THE WILL OF THOMAS J. HOLMES, SR., DECEASED

v.

DOUGLAS G. BEATTY, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF KATHRYN V. HOLMES, DECEASED

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed consolidated opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 07-0784Page 1**
Election dated as of March 31, 2010



 Exhibit 4.L 

[LETTERHEAD] 

March 31, 2010 
 Bank of
America, N.A., as Agent 
 Mail Code: CA5-701-05-19 

1455 Market Street,
5th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94103 
 Attention:
Robert J. Rittelmeyer 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is hereby made to the Credit Agreement (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified and in effect from time to
time, the “Credit Agreement”), dated as of June 1, 2005, among Mentor Graphics Corporation, an Oregon corporation (the “Borrower”), the Banks party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Agent (the
“Agent”). Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this letter have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Credit Agreement. 

Pursuant to Section 2.05 of the Credit Agreement, the Borrower hereby elects, solely upon the occurrence of the Closing Date under
that certain Credit Agreement for a $20 million term loan facility, dated on or about April 6, 2010, by and among Borrower, the Agent, and the other financial institutions party thereto, to reduce the Commitments under the Credit Agreement from
One Hundred Forty Million Dollars ($140,000,000.00) to One Hundred Million Dollars ($100,000,000.00). 
 [Signature Page Follows]









			
	Sincerely,
	
	Mentor Graphics Corporation, an Oregon corporation
		
	By:	 	/s/ ETHAN MANUEL
	Name:	 	Ethan Manuel
	Title:	 	Treasurer
ex10-44.htm


Exhibit 10.44


 




FORM OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2010 BETWEEN


ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC. AND _________________________________


 


First Amendment


 


FIRST AMENDMENT, dated as of January 1, 2010 (“First Amendment”) to the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of June 4, 2008, between Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (“Advance” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, and __________________________ (the “Executive”) (the “Agreement”).


 


The Company and the Executive agree as follows:


 


1.           Amendment of Section 4(d) of the Agreement.  Effective January 1, 2010, Section 4(d)(i)(B) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is inserted in lieu thereof:


 


4.           Termination of Employment.


 



(d).        Termination by the Company Other than for Due Cause, Death or Disability




 








(i) Termination Payment.


 


(B)           an amount equal to the average value of the annual bonuses pursuant to Section 3(b) paid to Executive for the three completed fiscal years immediately prior to the date of such termination; provided, however, that if Executive has been employed by the Company for fewer than three complete fiscal years prior to the date of such termination, Executive shall receive an amount equal to the average value of the annual bonuses pursuant to Section 3(b) that the Executive has received during the period of the Executive’s employment (the “Termination Bonus Payment”), and


 


 


2.           Full Force and Effect.   Except for those terms and provisions amended herein, all other terms and conditions in the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 







 


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


 






  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have executed this First Amendment as of the date first written above.


 



 



	 	
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	 	 	 	 	(SEAL) 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Print Name: 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Title: 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Address: 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Executive	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Print Name: 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Signature: 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Address:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09232]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 73

Sulfur Dioxide Allowance System

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 72 to 80, 
revised as of July 1, 2014, on page 159, in Sec.  73.35, remove 
paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and (iii).
[FR Doc. 2015-09232 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

New Alexandria Borough and : Selective Insurance Company of :

America, :

Petitioners :

:

v. : No. 567 C.D. 2016

: Workers’ Compensation Appeal : Board (Tenerovich), :

Respondent :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 17 th day of March , 2017, the opinion filed January 5,

2017, in the above

- captioned matter shall be designated Opinion rather than

Memorandum Opinion, and it shall be reported.

___________________________________ DAN PELLEGRINI, Senior Judge
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1427

___________________________

Charles Chambers

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

v.

Jay Cassady, Warden

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________

 Submitted: May 2, 2016

Filed: May 5, 2016 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before MURPHY, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Charles Chambers--who is serving a 10-year state prison

sentence for second-degree robbery--filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition claiming that

the state trial court lacked jurisdiction to accept his guilty plea. During the

proceedings below, Chambers filed a motion under the All Writs Act, see 28 U.S.C.

§ 1651, requesting a temporary restraining order and injunctive relief related to prison
policies on legal assistance and supplies. He appeals the district court’s1

 interlocutory

order denying his motion.

The denial of a temporary restraining order is not immediately appealable. See

Hamm v. Groose, 15 F.3d 110, 112-13 (8th Cir. 1994). While we have jurisdiction

to review the denial of injunctive relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), we find no abuse

of discretion in the district court’s ruling. First, the requested injunction and

Chambers’s section 2254 petition concerned different subject matter. See Devose v.

Herrington, 42 F.3d 470, 471 (8th Cir. 1994). Second, relief under the All Writs Act

is only available to parties who lack an adequate alternative remedy, see In re Montes,

677 F.2d 415, 416 (5th Cir. 1982) (per curiam); and an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

is available to a prisoner who claims that prison policies on legal assistance and

supplies have resulted in a denial of access to the courts and have caused an actual

injury to the prisoner. See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 351 (1996).

Accordingly, we affirm. Chambers’s motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal is granted, and his motion to stay is denied as moot.

______________________________

1

The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

-2-
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4008 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1639 Dickerson Boulevard in Monroe, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Second 

Lieutenant Samuel I. Parker Postal Carrier Annex’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2009 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1639 Dickerson Boulevard in Monroe, North 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Second Lieutenant Samuel I. Parker 

Postal Carrier Annex’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SECOND LIEUTENANT SAMUEL I. PARKER 

4 POSTAL CARRIER ANNEX. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1639 Dickerson Boulevard in 

7 Monroe, North Carolina, shall be known and designated 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4008 IH

1 as the ‘‘Second Lieutenant Samuel I. Parker Postal Car2 rier Annex’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Second Lieutenant 

7 Samuel I. Parker Postal Carrier Annex’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
### ENCLOSURE 

### 2 State Implementation Plan Completeness Checklist

## SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST SUBMITTAL OF THE SECTION 189(d)

## soA REASONABLE FURTHER PROGRESS PM-10 STATE IMPLEMENTATIONPLAN (SIP) REVISION FOR THE MARICOPA COUNTY AND APACHE JUNCTION (METROPOLITAN PHOENIX) NONATTAINMENT AREA



### 1. SUBMITTAL LETTER FROM GOVERNORIDESIGhTEE Included. 2. 

### EVIDENCE OF ADOPTION See Submittal Letter. 

### 3. STATE LEGAL AUTHOIUTY FOR ADOPTION/IMPLEMENTATION See Enclosure 1. 

### 4. COMPLETE COPY OF ACTUAL REGULATIONS See Enclosure 

### 3(Commitment Resolutions MAG Volumes 1and 

### 2; Pinal County Paving Commitment and Open Burn Ordinances) 5. 

### EVIDENCE THAT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT REQUIREMENTS MET See Enclosure 3 

### (MAG Appendix 

### D and Pinal County enclosures) 

### 6 EVIDENCE OF PUBLIC HEARING See Enclosure 

### 3 (MAG Appendix 

### D and Pinal County enclosures) 7 

### PUBLIC COMMENTS AND AGENCY RESPONSE See Enclosure 3 

### (MAG Appendix D 

### and Pinal County enclosures)

Page 1of 38. IDENTIFICATION OF POLLUTANTS REGULATED BY RULE Particulate Matter 10 microns in size and smaller (PM-10)

9. IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCESIATTAINMENTSTATUS This SIP contains an updated inventory ofparticulate matter sources inthe Maricopa County PMloNonattainrnent Serious Area (see MAG Appendix B). 10. WRITTEN SUMMARY OF RULEIRULE CHANGE See Enclosure 3 and Pinal County enclosures 11. RULE CHANGES INDICATEDBY UNDERLINING AND CROSS-OUTS See Enclosure 3 and Pinal County enclosures 12. RULE EFFECTS ON EMISSIONS The effects ofthe control measures package can be found in Chapters 

### 7 and 

### 8 ofthe MAG Plan 13 DEMONSTRATION THATNAAQS, PSD INCREMENTS AND RFP ARE PROTECTED See Chapters 

### 7 and 

### 8 ofthe MAG Plan. 14. EVIDENCE THAT EMISSIONSLIMITATIONS ARE BASED ON CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY Not applicable. 15. MODELING SUPPORT See Appendix 

### I of the MAG Plan. 16. IDENTIFICATIONS OF SECTIONSOF RULE CONTAINING EMISSION LIMITS, WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS,AND/OR RECORD KEEPINGIREPORTING REQUIREMENTS See Commitment Resolutions MAG Volumes 1 and 2; Pinal County Paving Commitment and Open Burn Ordinances.

Page 2 of 317. COMPLIANCEIENFORCEMENT STRATEGIES See 

### Commitment Resolutions MAG 

### Volumes 1 and 2; Pinal County Paving Commitment and Open Burn Ordinances. 18. ECONOMIC TECHNICALJUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATION FROM EPA POLICIES No known deviation 

### from EPA policy.

Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos.333-42770, 333-109258 and 333-138537, Form S-4 Nos. 333-33912, 333-42778,333-75882, 333-90401 and 333-90403 and Form S-8 Nos. 333-15355, 333-15353,333-29321, 333-15349, 333-15357, 333-29319, 333-84381, 333-84373, 333-84377,333-93397, 333-93249, 333-35896, 333-98472, 333-71396, 333-71398, 333-81234,333-82598, 333-102543, 333-104856, 333-104857 and 333-139158) of MillenniumPharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports datedFebruary 23, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statementsand financial statement schedule of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of MillenniumPharmaceuticals, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2006.
|  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|--|--------------------------------|

 

Boston, MassachusettsFebruary 23, 2007

----
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-1463-000]


Triton Energy, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Triton Energy, Inc.'s application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application 
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is May 4, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9adcdfc8d9d5f4f6f3f4ffc9efeaeaf5e8eedafcffe8f9b4fdf5ec"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="591f1c0b1a16373530373c0a2c2929362b2d193f3c2b3a773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 14, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-09044 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                          31,170
<SECURITIES>                                   163,779
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                       283
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          72,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 374,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       281,274
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   374,905
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,037
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 82,003
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,901
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,102
<DISCONTINUED>                                     122
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,224
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99


</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2121

___________ Glynetta Dayberry, Personal * Representative of the Estate of Justin * Todd Dayberry, Deceased, * * Plaintiff/Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Chris Ralston, Individually and as an * Officer of the Beebe, White County * [UNPUBLISHED] Police Department; Dennis Briggs, * Individually and as Chief of Police of * the City of Beebe, White County, * Arkansas; Donald Ward, Individually * as the Mayor of the City of Beebe, * White County, Arkansas; Lou Lavelle, * City Council member; Linda Anthony, * City Council member; Janet Rogers, * City Council member; Harold Welch, * City Council member (originally sued * as “Harlod Welch”); Ricky Jackson, * City Council member; Bobby Robinson, * City Council member; City of Beebe, * White County, Arkansas; John Does, I * through X, * * Defendants, * * Troxell Estate, * * Intervenor-Appellee. *1 The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- ___________ Submitted: December 26, 2003 Filed: January 8, 2004

___________ Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Glynetta Dayberry, personal representative of Justin Todd Dayberry, deceased, appeals the district court’s 1 award of $3,150 in attorney’s fees to the estate of deceased attorney Buddy Troxell, based on quantum meruit. After careful review, we conclude that the district court made no factual or legal mistakes, or any clear error of judgment in applying the relevant factors, and the award fell within the court’s range of discretion. See Pinkham v. Camex, Inc. , 84 F.3d 292, 294 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (standard of review); Pamida, Inc. v. E.S. Originals, Inc. , 281 F.3d 726, 729 (8th Cir. 2002) (defining abuse-of-discretion standard). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0002043

28-JUN-2017

07:59 AM