alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          17,224
<SECURITIES>                                       105
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,252)
<INVENTORY>                                     98,469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               295,400
<PP&E>                                          39,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,617)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 365,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          225,406
<BONDS>                                         28,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           680
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   365,871
<SALES>                                        105,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,767
<CGS>                                           57,092
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,624
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               410,567
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,389)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    662
<INCOME-TAX>                                       304
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                358
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       358
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
[774 NYS2d 36]

#### In the Matter of Michael R. Bressler (Admitted as Michael Roy Bressler), a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

March 23, 2004

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Thomas J. Cahill (James T. Shed*of counsel), for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

*48Respondent Michael R. Bressler was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on November 22, 1993, under the name Michael Roy Bressler. At all times relevant to these proceedings, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within this Department.

In a previous order (3 AD3d 71), this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (ii), based on his substantial admissions under oath that he had committed professional misconduct and other uncontested evidence of misconduct.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (Committee) now moves for an order, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.11, accepting respondent’s resignation from the practice of law and striking his name from the roll of attorneys. 22 NYCRR 603.11 (a) permits an attorney who is the subject of an investigation or pending disciplinary proceeding to resign from the practice of law by submitting an affidavit of resignation to the Committee stating his intention to resign. Respondent’s affidavit must also state that his or her resignation is freely and voluntarily rendered, with full awareness of the implications of resignation; that he or she is aware of the pending investigation or disciplinary proceeding; and that if charges are predicated on the misconduct being investigated, he or she could not successfully defend himself or herself on the merits against such charges *(see 22*NYCRR 603.11 [a] [1]-[3]).

Respondent has submitted an affidavit in compliance with 22 NYCRR 603.11. In his affidavit, he indicates his intention to resign and that his resignation is being freely and voluntarily given. Further, he acknowledges that there are pending disciplinary charges against him alleging multiple instances of professional misconduct including the neglect of six legal matters entrusted to him, misrepresentations to five separate clients and to the Committee and failing to deposit client funds into a special account. Respondent further acknowledges that he cannot successfully defend himself on the merits against these charges.

In light of respondent’s submission of an affidavit in full compliance with 22 NYCRR 603.11 (a), the Committee’s motion for an order accepting respondent’s resignation from the practice of law should be granted (22 NYCRR 603.11 [b]-[d]).

Accordingly, the Committee’s motion for an order accepting respondent’s resignation from the practice of law and striking *49his name from the roll of attorneys should be granted, and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York nunc pro tunc to January 21, 2004.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.23

                                    AMENDMENT

      THIS AMENDMENT, dated as of January 3, 2001 and effective as of December
13, 2000 (the "Amendment") is entered into between TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. ("Tollgrade") and CHRISTIAN L. ALLISON (the "Executive").

                             AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, Tollgrade and the Executive entered into an Agreement dated as of the
13th day of December, 1995, as amended by those certain amendments dated January
14, 1997, January 8, 1998, December 30, 1998 and January 18, 2000, governing the
employment of Executive and certain benefits to be received by Executive in the
event his employment is terminated (collectively, the "Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, Tollgrade and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement upon the
terms and conditions stated in this Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the faithful performance of
the mutual covenants herein contained, and intending to be legally bound hereby,
Tollgrade and the Executive agree as follows:

1.       Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the
         meaning assigned to them in the Agreement.

2.       The Agreement shall be amended such that the Executive's base salary,
         as specified in Section 2(b) of the Agreement, shall be increased to
         $315,000 per annum, plus the cost of the Executive's annual long term
         disability premium.

3.       Except as modified by this Amendment, the provisions of the Agreement
         shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date
first written above.


TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


By:     /s/ Sara Antol                              /s/ Christian L. Allison
       -------------------------------              ---------------------------
Title:  Secretary & General Counsel
       -------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21299-21300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08783]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Cemeteries and Memorials, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, 38 U.S.C. App. 2 that a meeting of the Advisory 
Committee on Cemeteries and Memorials will be held on May 12-13, 2015, 
in the National Cemetery Administration's training room 104 at 1100 
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20002, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The 
meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on the administration of national cemeteries, soldiers' lots 
and plots, the selection of new national cemetery sites, the erection 
of appropriate memorials, and the adequacy of Federal burial benefits.
    On May 12, the Committee will receive mandatory training from the 
Office of General Counsel in the morning and updates on VA and National 
Cemetery Administration (NCA) issues by appropriate VA staff. On the 
morning of May 13, the Committee will receive background information on 
NCA projects and updates from ex-officio members.
    Time will be allocated on both May 12 and May 13 to receive public

[[Page 21300]]

comments at 1:00 p.m. Public comments are limited to three minutes 
each. Individuals wishing to make oral statements before the Committee 
will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. Individuals 
who speak are invited to submit 1-2 page summaries of their comments at 
the time of the meeting for inclusion in the official meeting record.
    Members of the public may direct questions or submit written 
statements for review by the Committee in advance of the meeting to Mr. 
Michael Nacincik, Designated Federal Officer, VA, NCA (43A2), 1100 1st 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20002, or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3cecac0cbc2c6cf8dcdc2c0cacdc0cac8e3d5c28dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="137e7a707b72767f3d7d72707a7d707a785365723d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>. In the public's communications with the 
Committee, the writers must identify themselves and state the 
organizations, associations, or persons they represent. Any member of 
the public wishing to attend the meeting should contact Mr. Nacincik at 
(202) 632-8035.

    Dated: April 13, 2015.
Jelessa Burney,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-08783 Filed 4-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
PARTIES TO PREVIOUS FORM OF CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


Larry A. Cates
Janell Jones
Louis A. Kaucic
James W. Kirkpatrick
David R. Parsley
Carin L. Stutz
Douglas D. Waltman
Exh.
10.33

    
      
        
          	
                  

                	
                  OCZ
      Technology Group, Inc.

                	 
      


        

      

    

    


    
      
        	
                6373
      San Ignacio Ave.., San Jose, CA 95119

              	
                Tel:
      (408) 733-8400 Fax: (408)
733-4900

              


      

    

    


    December
30, 2009

     

    
      
        
          
            	
                    Mr. Sunit Saxena

                  	 
      
	    
      	 
      
	  
        	 
      


          

        

      

    

    


    Re:
Appointment to the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of OCZ Technology Group,
Inc. (the “Company”)

    


    Dear
Sunit:

    


    On behalf
of the Board, I am pleased to advise you that the Board has determined to
unanimously recommend to the stockholders of the Company your appointment as a
member of the Board.  We are prepared to make the recommendation and
effect the appointment as soon as possible, but we would like your confirmation
that you are prepared to serve before we take this
action.  Accordingly, please return a copy of this letter to me
executed below to confirm your willingness to serve.

    


    Also, for
diligence and SEC disclosure purposes, we have enclosed a form of Director and
Officer Questionnaire and request that you complete the questionnaire and return
it Kerry Smith, our Chief Financial Officer, as soon as possible.

    


    You will
receive the same compensation as all other directors, which is as
follows:  $5,000 as a general quarterly stipend; $1,000 per meeting of
the Board attended by you in person; $500 per meeting of the Board attended by
you via telephone; $5,000 annually should you serve on the Audit Committee of
the Board; $2,500 annually for each of other committee of the Board on which you
serve but do not chair; and $7,500 annually for each committee of the Board for
which you serve as the chair.  You will also receive options to
purchase 110,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price to be valued at
fair market value as determined by the Board at the meeting immediately
following your appointment.  The options will vest ratably each month
over the 36 months immediately following their issuance.

    


    We hope
that you will be available to attend our next regular Board meeting on Tuesday,
January 26, 2010 at 10:00 AM, California time.  We are looking forward
to your joining the Board and I am personally looking forward to working with
you.

    


    
      
        
          	 
      	
                  Yours
      truly,

                
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                    
      

                	 
      
	 
      	
                  Ryan
      Petersen

                


        

      

    

    


    This is
to advise you that I am prepared to serve on the Board if appointed by the
stockholders of the Company.

    


    
      
        
          	
                     
      

                	 
      
	
                  Sunit
      Saxena
```

EX-99.3 Certification Pursuant to Section 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of chief executive officer

I, Luigi Brun, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for Tekron,  Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrant's officers and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and the company has:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c) presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant' officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

        a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's officers and I have indicated in this Quarterly Report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 12, 2003

/s/ Luigi Brun
    ----------
    Luigi Brun
    Chief Executive Officer
```
ADAM H. PUT1NAM 

nNANCIAt SEflVICEB COMMITTED 

44? CMNIIOH KUUS!: OFF U B\MJXM> 

WASHWCTON. DC Z0E1E-DSI2 

(MII2J5-1J52 

6K EACT DAVIHI M SIMTT 

BAmm, K 33B30-4533 

tsn) 634-3630 

eimigrcasofthe www.f^tanvuVwnfwiM^ 0<» 

August 23,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretaiy 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

400 7th Street, SW Room 10200 

Washington, DC 20590 

Secretary LaHood; 

It is my understanding that Lakeland Linder Regional Airport has applied for a grant 

through the Department of Transportation's Small Community Air Service Development 

Program. The presence of a low fare carrier would play a pivotal role in the fiiture growth 

of tlic City and County. 

Cuncntly, tlic City of Lakeland is investing over $1.4M on infrastructure projects to 

pfepai*e for commerciaJ service. In August, 2010, the Florida Department of Tranqwrtation 

panted the aiipoit $2.0M to ftind the iniprovemwits necessary to accommodate scheduled 

flight operations, including ticketing areas, baggage claim, the security checkpoint, access 

controls, and offices for T.S.A. Lakeland Linder Regional Airport is completing its work 

with T.S.A. and will be in a position to launch its commercial program in the beginning of 

2011. 

Low fare swvice to Lakeland would not only benefit our region, but also to the small 

comnumities where the flights will operate, providing those cities with the economic benefit 

of stimulated air travel and Iowa" airjfares. The fimds from the ^ant will be used exclusively 

at non-primary airports, where low fere carriers can aipitalize on the lower infrastructure 

costs to permit tower fares for passengers. Central Florida has been one of the hardest hit 

areas during this recession, ajKl the increased trafGc that the Air Service would brmg to our 

region would be not only extremely beneficial to this Region, but also to the State through 

added tourist and business travel. 

It is my smcere desire that Lakeland Linder Regional Airport*s application for 

funding be given serious consideration in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. 

Sincerely, 

Adam H. Putnam 

Member of Congress 

HMTEOON FECKtCDPtfEll
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OLXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of SPACEHAB,Incorporated (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”),I, Thomas B. Pickens, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           the report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/Thomas B. Pickens, III                         |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Thomas B. Pickens, III,   Chief Executive Officer |
| December 3, 2007                                  |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany thereport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as is not tobe incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

 

----
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting: Briefing on Ozone Proposal

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2008

- 0699

Date: February 2 , 2015

On January 28 , 2015

, Erika Sasser, Division Director of the Health and Environmental Impacts Division, presented an overview of the Agency’s November 25 , 2015 , proposed revisions to the

National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone to staff members of the U.S. House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The presentation used in the briefing is available here: http://www.epa.gov/groundlevelozone/pdfs/2014decwebinar.pdf

The attendees were as follows:

U.S. Environmental Protection A gency Erika Sasser Cheryl Mackay Kevin Culligan Paul Gunning

House Oversight and Government Reform Staff Joseph Brazauskas

Drew Colliatie

Bill McGrath

Christina Aizcorbe Beverly Britton Fraser
Argued and submitted November 30,

sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed December 29, 2004

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*BRANDON LEROY BOSWORTH, *Appellant.*

CF020608; A119645

103 P3d 679

Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Jennelle Meeks Barton, Deputy Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Maiy H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Doug M. Petrina, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Deits, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM

Sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. *State v. Perez,*196 Or App 364, 102 P3d 705 (2004); *State v. Dilts,*337 Or 645, 103 P3d 95 (2004)
1 ... SeeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 -41 1- CV CE NT R ALGAR DE N & P E T AP P E L L ANT COM P ANY, I NC. V . TI M O TH Y V O KES, D O SK O C I L A PPELL EES M ANU F AC T UR I NG CO. , I NC . , AN D A S P E N P E TP R O D U C T S , I N C .

----- -----

FR O M THE 1 41ST DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- W e h a v e c o n s i d e re d “ A p p e l l a n t C e n tra l G a rd e n &P e t C o m p a n y ’s U nop po sed M ot i on To Di sm i ssA ppe al . ” I ti s t he cou rt ’ s opi ni on t hatt he m o ti o n s h o u l d b e g ra n te d ; th e re fo re , w ed i s m i s sth ea p p e a l . SeeTex. R. A pp. P . 4 2 .1 (a )(1 ), 4 3 .2 (f).2

C os t s oft he app ea l s hal l bepa i d byt he part y i ncu r r i ng t he sa m e, f or w h i c h l e t e x e c u ti o n i s s u e . SeeTe x. R. App . P. 43. 4.
P E RCU R I AM
PA N EL: L I V I N G STO N , D A U PH I N O T, an d GA RD N ER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: M a y 21, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6350

RICHARD CHILDS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN,

JR., Office of the Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-97-3412-AW)

Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998

Before ERVIN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Childs, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Childs v. Smith, No. CA-97-3412-AW (D. Md. Feb. 17,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED