alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted), Vincent F.
Sollitto, Chief Executive Officer of Photon Dynamics, Inc. (the Company), and Richard L. Dissly, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.    The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2002 (the Report), to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    VINCENT F.
SOLLITTOVincent F. Sollitto Chief Executive Officer





/s/    RICHARD L.
DISSLYRichard L. Dissly Chief Financial Officer





DATED: December 11, 2002.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22167-22168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD906


Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
convene a meeting of the Risk of Overfishing (denoted by P*) Working 
Group (P* WG) for the Main Hawaiian Island Deep 7 Bottomfish Fishery. 
The P* WG will review the P* dimensions and criteria, provide new 
scores (as appropriate), and recommend an appropriate risk of 
overfishing levels. This will be the basis for the specification of 
Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) levels for the Scientific and 
Statistical Committee (SSC) to consider.

[[Page 22168]]


DATES: The P* WG meeting will be on May 6, 2015. For specific times and 
agendas, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The P* WG meeting will be held at the Council office, 1164 
Bishop Street, Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813; telephone: (808) 522-
8220.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director; 
telephone: (808) 522-8220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public comment periods will be provided. The 
order in which agenda items are addressed may change. The meetings will 
run as late as necessary to complete scheduled business.

Schedule and Agenda for the P* WG Meeting

May 6, 2015--10 a.m.-4 p.m.

1. Introductions
2. Recommendations from previous Council meetings
3. Overview of the P* process
4. State of the Science for the Main Hawaiian Island Deep 7 Bottomfish
a. Summary of comments from the Center for Independent Expert reviewers 
affecting uncertainties
b. Report on assessment update using 2011 model with 3 years of data
5. Review of the P* Dimensions and Criteria
a. Assessment information
b. Uncertainty characterization
c. Stock status
d. Productivity and susceptibility
6. Working group revision of criteria (if needed)
7. Working group re-scoring session
8. General discussion
9. Public comment
10. Summary of scores and P* recommendations

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds, (808) 522-8220 
(voice) or (808) 522-8226 (fax), at least five days prior to the 
meeting date.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: April 16, 2015.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-09195 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
321, 324 (1996). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err

in denying appellant's motion. 3 Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.



## / Hardesty 

# pe Parraguirre J.

cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge Cory Kay Winans Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

3 We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel. We further deny appellant's request for appellate counsel.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4008 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4008

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1639 Dickerson Boulevard in Monroe, North Carolina, as the ``Second 
          Lieutenant Samuel I. Parker Postal Carrier Annex''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2009

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1639 Dickerson Boulevard in Monroe, North Carolina, as the ``Second 
          Lieutenant Samuel I. Parker Postal Carrier Annex''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SECOND LIEUTENANT SAMUEL I. PARKER POSTAL CARRIER ANNEX.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1639 Dickerson Boulevard in Monroe, North Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Second Lieutenant Samuel I. Parker Postal 
Carrier Annex''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Second 
Lieutenant Samuel I. Parker Postal Carrier Annex''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 40-8943;ASLBP No. 07-859-03-MLA-BD01]


Crow Butte Resources, Inc. (North Trend Expansion Project); 
Notice of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Reconstitution

    Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.313(c) and 2.321(b), the Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board in the above-captioned North Trend Expansion Project 
license amendment proceeding is hereby reconstituted by appointing 
Administrative Judge G. Paul Bollwerk, III to serve as Chairman in 
place of Administrative Judge Ann Marshall Young.
    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall continue 
to be filed in accordance with the NRC E-filing rule. See 10 CFR 2.302 
et seq.

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland this 15th day of April 2015.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-09261 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)  November 10, 2004

MAGNUM HUNTER
RESOURCES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Nevada                                         | 1-12508                 | 87-0462881                       
|---------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ---------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (Commission File Number | (IRS Employer Identification No.)

600 East Las Colinas
Blvd., Suite 1100, Irving, Texas 75039(Address of principal
executive offices)        (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (972)
401-0752

Not applicable(Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under
any of the following provisions:

[  ]    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[  ]    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

[  ]    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[  ]    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

---

ITEM 5.02   Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers

On November 10, 2004, Walker Tucei was elected to the Board of Directors of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of James R. Latimer III.  Mr. Tucei was also added as a member of the
Audit Committee.

ITEM 9 - Financial Statements and Exhibits

Exhibit 99.1     Press Release dated November 12, 2004.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

| | MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC.BY:  /s/ Morgan F. JohnstonMorgan F. JohnstonSr. Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:       November 16, 2004
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan




 Exhibit 10.4 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

The FleetCor Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”) is hereby amended as follows: 

1. 
 Section 3(a) of the
Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 “a. Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment under
Section 3(c), the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”), that may be issued pursuant to the Plan is 6,085,260 shares. If any Award expires, or is terminated,
surrendered or forfeited, in whole or in part, the unissued Common Stock covered by such Award shall again be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan. If shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to the Plan are repurchased by, or are
surrendered or forfeited to, the Company at no more than cost, such shares of Common Stock shall again be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan; provided, however, that the cumulative number of such shares that may be so reissued
under the Plan will not exceed 6,085,260 shares. Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.” 

All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning as set forth in the Plan. 

To the extent anything in this Amendment is in conflict with the Plan, this Amendment shall control. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the
terms and conditions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 
 This Amendment shall become effective as of the 25th day of
January, 2005. 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Ronald F. Clarke

	Name:	 	Ronald F. Clarke
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
	
	 Adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on January 25, 2005

 
 Adopted by the Stockholders on January 25,
2005
#### *The Treasurers vs. W. B. Buckner.*

Where a sheriff has no process giving him authority to receive money, a person who pays to his deputy cannot look to him. And where one, deceived by no shew of authority, pays money to J. S. himself, tiren being sheriff, that which the sheriff had not authority to receive, J. S. personally is liable for, and not the official bond of the sheriff. But should the sheriff, having writs which authorize him to collect, exact from the debtor more than was lawfully required, even without levy, the payment is not voluntary, and it is a violation of his official bond.

*Before*Wardlaw, J., *Beaufort, January Term,*1842.

This was a suggestion of breach on the official bond of William B. Buckner, late sheriff of Beaufort district, a judgment having been previously obtained therefor. The breach alleged was an exaction by the sheriff, from the plaintiff, under and by virtue of sundry executions in his office, of the sum of two hundred and fifty-six dollars and thirty-two cents, over and above the amounts due on the said executions. Plea — the general issue. The plaintiff *328being admitted to have proved his case, the defendant moved for a non-suit, on the ground that the exaction complained of, not having been made by actual levy and sale under the execution, was no breach of the condition of the sheriff’s bond, and the motion was sustained.

From which the plaintiff appealed, on the grounds,

1. That the cause of action was rightly suggested, as a breach of the sheriff’s official *bond;*and,

2. That the judgment was otherwise contrary to law.

Mr. Rhett, for the motion,

cited 1 McCord Rep. 395; Cheves’s Rep. 113.

McCarthy, contra.

*Curia,per*

Wardlaw, J.

This case, like another between the same parties, just decided, was heard upon a report prepared by counsel, after a *pro forma*decision on the circuit ; and to the other, reference may be had for the opinion of this court as to the practice in suggestions after a judgment upon a sheriff’s bond, and as to the general measure of liability on such bond.

What in this case is called a non-suit, might have been better called an order to quash the suggestion.

Where a sheriff has no process giving him authority to receive, a person who pays to his deputy cannot look to him; *Chilles vs.*Holloway, 4 McCord, 164; and if one, deceived by no show of authority, should pay to J. S., himself, then being sheriff, that which a sheriff had not authority to receive, his recourse would be to J. S., personally, and not to the sheriff’s bond. But where a sheriff, having writs which authorize him to collect, exacts from the debt- or more than can lawfully be required, even without levy the payment is not voluntary; 1 McCord, 395; Cheves’s L. R. 113; and the sheriff either wilfully abuses his office, or negligently or unskilfully performs his duty, so as to violate the condition of his official bond.

The order of the circuit court is set aside, and a new trial ordered.

Richardsó'n, O’Neall, Evans, and Butler, JJ., concurréd.
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:42 AM

To: 'ceb@smemaine.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Schandler, Andrea (FAA); Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha 

(FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information

February 20, 2015 

Mr. Charles Burnham 

Special Projects Coordinator 

Sevee & Maher Engineers, Inc. 

4 Blanchard Road 

P.O. Box 85A 

Cumberland Center, ME 04021 

Dear Mr. Burnham: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1008). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the proposed UAS operation. The description should include 

the size and include the aircraft’s manual. 

 Provide description of proximity to airports. 

 Describe the process used to document UAS discrepancies and the corrective action taken in the aircraft 

record. Examples of processes include (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain 

its UAS and ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the 

petitioner has elected to maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and 

inspection recommendations. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by March 6, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 
2

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
EXHIBIT 3


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Paygard, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/John Mitchell
 Date: January 27, 2004                           ----------------
                                                  John Mitchell
                                                  Chief Financial Officer


                                                  /s/Colin Gervaise-Brazier
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  Colin Gervaise-Brazier
                                                  President
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-QSB of American Community Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                       |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Randy P. Helton                  
|                       |  |     |  | Randy P. Helton                      
|                       |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
 AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, Department of Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment. Pursuant to Section 251 of the Trade Act 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2341 
                    *et seq.*), the Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. Accordingly, EDA has initiated investigations to determine whether increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each of these firms contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firm's workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm. List of Petitions Received by EDA for Certification Eligibility To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
[3/28/2015 through 4/7/2015]
Firm name
Firm address
Date accepted for 
                             investigation
Product(s)Clear Automation, LLC
85 Robert Porter Road, Southington, CT 06489
4/7/2015
The firm manufactures system integrated automation robotic equipment.
 Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA's regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Dated: April 7, 2015. Michael S. DeVillo, Eligibility Examiner.


[FR Doc. 2015-08370 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-WH-P