alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           1002396
<NAME>                          Million Dollar Saloon, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                           US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                    727043
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              33141
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                22844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          791765
<PP&E>                                                   3623461
<DEPRECIATION>                                           1718248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           2702453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     180764
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                    5732
<OTHER-SE>                                               2382856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             2702453
<SALES>                                                  3540869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         4320797
<CGS>                                                    2179445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            1996842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          2129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           162762
<INCOME-TAX>                                               28135
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       140627
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                              140627
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.02



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6417

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHEDRICK OWEN GRAVES, a/k/a Shedrick Graves, a/k/a Shadrick Graves,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-00112-RBS-TEM1)

Submitted: March 19, 2021 Decided: July 2, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chief Judge Gregory dissents.

Shedrick Owen Graves, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shedrick Owen Graves appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) and § 404(b) of the First Step Act 

of 2018, Pub. L. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Graves, No. 4:06-cr-00112-RBS-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 17, 2020 & entered 

Mar. 18, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the 
incorporation by reference of our report dated January 30, 1998 included in 
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The ForeFront Group, Inc. for the year 
ended December 31, 1997 in the previously-filed Registration Statements of 
The ForeFront Group, Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-07721, 333-19147 
and 333-33995) and Form S-3 (Reg. No. 333-18491).



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Houston, Texas
March 17, 1998
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended  September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Zhilin Li,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a)or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



                                                         Date: March 11, 2009

                                                         By:  /s/ Zhilin Li
                                                              -------------
                                                              Zhilin Li
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

HALLANDALE BEACH ORTHOPEDICS a/a/o CYNTHIA JOSEPH,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-234

[June 30, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Mardi Levey Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. COCE16-

20777 and CACE19-005468.

Michael A. Rosenberg, Thomas L. Hunker and Peter Weinstein of Cole, 

Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

David B. Pakula of David B. Pakula, P.A., Pembroke Pines and Amir 

Fleischer of Marks & Fleischer, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Geico Indem. Co. v. Muransky Chiropractic, P.A., No. 

4D21-0457 (Fla. 4th DCA June 24, 2021).

GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09058]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Medical Rehabilitation Research 
Resource.
    Date: June 18-19, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Washington Embassy Row, 2015 Massachusetts Ave. 
NW., Washington, DC 20036.
    Contact Person: Joanna Kubler-Kielb, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6916, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#43282a262f2129032e222a2f6d2d2a2b6d242c35"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0b60626e6769614b666a626725656263256c647d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 15, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-09058 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Amendment No.1 to the PMI Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan


 EXHIBIT 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 

Effective May 21, 2010 

TO 
 THE
PMI GROUP, INC. 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

(Amended May 21, 2009) 

THE PMI GROUP, INC., having adopted The PMI Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) as of May 27,
2004, and having amended and restated the Plan as of November 16, 2005, and again as of September 19, 2007, again as of May 21, 2009, hereby amends the restated Plan as follows effective as of May 21, 2010: 

4.1    Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.3, the total number of Shares
available for grant under the Plan is 21,000,000. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the aggregate number of Shares subject to Awards of Restricted Stock, Stock Units, Performance Units and Performance Shares granted under the Plan shall not
exceed 6,000,000. Shares granted under the Plan may be either authorized but unissued Shares or treasury Shares. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, The PMI Group, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed this Amendment No. 1 to the restated Plan on the date indicated below. 
  

			
	THE PMI GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Charles Broom
	Name:	 	Charles Broom
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President
		
	Date:	 	May 24, 2010
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, James
B. Smith, certify that:




(1) I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tidelands Oil & Gas
Corporation, ("Registrant").




(2) Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;




(3) Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;




(4) The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;




(b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




(5) The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information ; and




(b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.










Date:  
November 19,
2008                                          /s/  James B.
Smith


James B.
Smith, President, CEO (Principal Executive Officer),


CFO
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Thomas Napier & Co. *vs.*Abraham Lipman.

Tried before his Honor Judge Evahs, Charleston, January Term, 1837.

This case was on issue docket, but I do not recollect how long it had been docketed. On the last day of the court, after all the cases on the docket were considered or continued to the next term, an application was niade by Mr. Moise, for leave to withdraw the pleas put in by the defendant, and for leave to plead *de novo.*This was resisted by Mr. O. M. Smith, on the ground, that he had no notice until the morning of that day, of the intended application. [ could see no objection to the motion ; nor can I now perceive in what possible manner the plaintiff can be prejudiced. The motion involves two distinct propositions. The first, to withdraw his pleas. This is a motion that 1 never before heard objected to, and has always, so far as my experience has gone, been granted, as a matter of course. Then the defendant stands without plea. He then applies for leave to plead, which is always granted of Course, where the plaintiff cannot, in any way, he delayed or hindered, in the trial of his case.

JOSIAH J. EVANS.

*296
      *Grounds of Appeal.*

1. That iiot one day’s notice was given of the motion, and n«t cause shewn fot the motion ; even the plea, intended to be filed, not stated, is against law, and contrary to the practice of the court."

2. That the said order is oppressive on the plaintiff, and subverts all the rules of pleading and practice.

OLIVER M. SMITH, *Plaintiff’s Attorney.*

O. M. Smith, for motion,

Moise, contra.

Filed 20th February, 1837.

Mr. Justice Evans

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only ground argued and insisted on, in this court, is, that the order should not have been granted, but on the condition of paying costs. This is the usual term upon which such orders are made, and if it had been brought to my view, at the Circuit Court, would have been annexed to the order. The order is also defective, in not specifying the nature of the new plea. It must be an issuable ploa. The order of the Circuit Court is therefore amended, so as to read as follows : It is ordered, that the defendant have leave to withdraw his pleas, heretofore pleaded, and that he have' leave to plead a new issuable plea, on paying the costs of this amendment.

JOSÍAH J. EVANS.

We concur,

RICHARD GANTT,

*3.*B. O’NEALL,

J. S. RICHARDSON,

Á. B. BUTLER,-.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Click Commerce, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael W. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                       /s/ Michael W. Nelson
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Michael W. Nelson,
                                       Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Dated: November 14, 2002               and Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-55498, 333-51234 and 333-94357) of Insignia
Solutions plc and Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-51760,
333-34632, 333-76693, 33-99296 and 33-99592) of Insignia Solutions plc of our
report dated January 17, 2003, except for Note 14, which is as of March 5, 2003,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

San Jose, CA
March 29, 2005
EXHIBIT 23.4

Consent of Cawley
Gillespie & Associates, Inc. Petroleum Engineers

As
independent petroleum engineers, Cawley Gillespie & Associates, Inc. Petroleum
Engineers hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
on Form S-3 of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. (the Company) of all references
to our reports and our firm included in or made part of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. This registration statement on Form S-3
is to be filed on or about September 26, 2003.

| | /s/ Cawley Gillespie &Associates, Inc.Cawley Gillespie & Associates, Inc.Petroleum Engineers
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                             
| | Fort Worth, TexasSeptember 24, 2003
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No. 201600181

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### ALIA N. WARNER Hospital Corpsman Second Class (E

- 5), U.S. Navy Appellant

______________________ ___ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Bethany L. Payton

- O’Brien, JAGC, USN

.

For Appellant: Major Jason L. Morris
, USMC R

. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq

.

_________________________ Decided 31 August 2016

_________________________ Before P ALMER , M ARKS , G ROHARING , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the co nvening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00635-CR

Edgar R. Hernandez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-04-302732, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Edgar Hernandez seeks to appeal a judgment of conviction for indecency with a child

by contact. The trial court has certified that this is a plea bargain case and Hernandez has no right

of appeal. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

___________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 9, 2009

Do Not Publish
*¿■'reseñe*— -Chancellors Rvttxsse, Burke and Masseuse.

#### Legatee and executrix of Wm. Johnson, jun. *vs.*the executor of Wm. Johnson, sen.

Nov. 1800.

OA3B CXXÍ.V

3ttEC2i.EE BOOK», V0o iL po 117,

T1 cou... will presumí e^oi^a chiw" on slight tu^iipsu thirty *xxx*death of th! 11' ”

The only question in this case, related to the legiti-saacy of William Johnson, junior. His father, William Johnson, senior, in his will, used an expression which created a doubt on the legitimacy of his son’s birth, Some testimony was given on the subject. One of the witnesses testified that William Johnson, senior, and the mother of William Johnson, junior, had lived together, as husband and wife, and were so considered in the neighbourhood.

The court in delivering its decree, said, that the evidence of legitimacy was very slight; but that the court Would presume a marriage, after the lapse of thirty yearsj especially as all the parties were dead; and if a contrary prcsuroptioH should prevail, it would have the effect of *596bastardizing a person after his death, which would be. .contrary to every principle of law, justice and equity. And the court said it would act the more readily on the, presumption, as there was no legal heir of ¥m. Johnson, senior, to contest the legitimacy of Win. Johnson, junior. And it was decreed accordingly,
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A1 97 4 . KATI E RENEE PYLES v . THE STATE.

Kat i e Ren ee Py l es p l ead ed g u i l ty t o s ev eral o ffen s es , i n cl u di n g t wo co u n t s o f

h o m i ci d e b y v eh i cl e. Sh e s ub s eq u en t l y fi l ed a m o ti o n t o m o di fy s en t en ce. Th e t ri al

co u rt den i ed t h e m o t i o n o n Sep t em b er 2 7

, 20 1 8, an d Py les fi led a n o t i ce o f ap p eal o n

No v em b er 6

, 2 0 1 8. W e l ack ju ri s d ict i o n b ecau s e t h e n o t ice o f ap p eal was n o t t i m el y

fi led

. A n o t i ce o f ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed w i t hi n 3 0 d ay s of en t ry o f t h e o rd er s o u g h t to

b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro p er an d t i m el y fi l i ng o f a n o t i ce o f ap p eal

i s an ab so lu t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri sd i ct i o n o n t h i s Co u rt

. Ro wl a n d v. S t a t e , 2 6 4 G a. 8 7 2

, 8 72 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) ( 1 9 9 5 )

. B ecau s e Py l es fi l ed h er n o t i ce o f

ap p eal 4 0 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t he t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er, h er ap peal i s u n t i m el y , an d i t i s

h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. May 31, 2019

05/31/2019