alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The

HONORABLE FERNANDO J. GAITAN, JR., United States District Judg e 1 for the Western District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-4070

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Gary F. Tagbering, also known as * Richard W. Gaines, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 19, 1997 Filed: June 25, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Gar y F. Tagbering pleaded guilty to a drug-trafficking offense and to usin g firearms in relation to drug-trafficking offenses. The district court sentenced him to 1 sixty months in prison on the drug offense, a consecutive sixty-month term on th e firear ms offense, and three years of supervised release. After the Supreme Court’ s decision in Bailey v. United States , 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), the district court grante d Tagbering’s motion to vacate the firearms co nviction, and he was released from prison-2-

to beg in his three-years of supervised release on the drug-trafficking offense. Thre e months later, the district co urt revoked supervised release and sentenced Tagbering to two years in prison for violating supe rvised release conditions. Tagbering then moved the district court to credit his revocation sentence with 108 days that he s erved in prison on the vacated firearms con viction after he had completed serving the drug-trafficking portion of

his initial sentence. The district court denied that motion, and Tagberin g appeals . We affirm.

T a gbering argues that the revocation sentence is directly related to his original convic tion and therefore the 108 days should be credited “in the interest of fairness.” How ever, a prisoner has no constitutional right to credit for prison time served on a prior i llegal conviction against a sentence imposed as a result of subsequent unlawful conduct

. See Holscher v. Young , 440 F.2d 1283, 1290 (8th Cir. 1971). In addition, the applicable federal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b), does not appear to authorize credit for time spent in “official detention” in these circumstances, and in any event th e Attorney General must make initial sentence credit decisions under that statute. See United States v. Wilson , 503 U.S. 329 (1992). Thus, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Tagbering’s motion.
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# State Partnership for Peace units pair up for deployment

/ Published Nov. 6, 2008

HOHENFELS, Germany - The pairing of state National Guards with former Warsaw Pact nations to train Afghanistan National Army soldiers has been "a huge success" during its early stages, officials report. 

The first group - a task force of Latvian soldiers supplemented by members of the Michigan Army National Guard - debuted during the just-concluded Operational Mentor and Liaison Team exercise. They will deploy together to Afghanistan next month.

"The partnering of these nations is really establishing this holistic approach to the global war on terror," said Maj. Frank Buchheit, director of training at the Joint Multinational Readiness Center. "There are so many countries who want to contribute, but don't necessarily have the means to contribute entirely.

"Now, with this state partnership program, they have the ability to contribute." Buchheit said another group will be here next month. Soldiers from Hungary and the Ohio National Guard make up the second group. More could follow.

For more than a decade, states militias have been partnered with former Warsaw Pact nations and breakaway Soviet republics. The partners have trained together both overseas and in the U.S.

Units do the first level of their training at their home stations. They do their second phase at JMRC and then do the final level in Afghanistan. These combined Partnership for Peace units do all three levels of training together.

"This is just an absolute huge step in the right direction to enable more nations to contribute in action that they support the GWOT," Buchheit said. "There's been training in the past, but now they get the opportunity to contribute to the GWOT. It's absolutely essential."

The training at JMRC has evolved over the years, Buchheit said. It started out with five situational training exercise lanes, but now has expanded to cover the battalion staff. It now includes interaction with Afghanistan National Army members who are brought to Hohenfels to primarily receive training, and secondly to provide realistic scenarios, vignettes and learning to be OMLTs.

"The success rate of units that has completed the training is tremendous," Buchheit said. "They are more likely to succeed in the Level 3 training."

Buchheit credits the JMRC cadre members with this improvement. It has allowed the diverse units to experience more realistic training.

"You've got some squared away officers and NCOs down there who aren't content with the status quo," Buchheit said. "They have taken the program to a couple of different echelons.

"We continue to improve the program each time." Buchheit said he believes the training will enhance the partnerships between the states and former Warsaw Pact nations. The arrangement will only serve to heighten the battle against terrorists.

"We're now spreading the spirit of cooperation farther across the broader breath," Buchheit said. "The more we do this, the better. I think it's absolutely great."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,102
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                     35,920
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,373
<PP&E>                                         227,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 478,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,730
<BONDS>                                        270,173
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   478,225
<SALES>                                        234,544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               234,544
<CGS>                                          171,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,077
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,387
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,690
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    322
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,012
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2013-0626; Dir ID 2012-NM-180-AD
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.7

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


                  KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Eric W. Golden, Bobby G. Jenkins and Barry F.
Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the PANAVISION INC. (the
"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and
on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or
officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any
instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the
Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of
attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable
securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents
this 3rd day of February 2003.



                                            /S/ PATRICK WHITTINGHAM
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Patrick Whittingham
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Audited
Consolidated Financial Statemetns of Alphanet Solutions, Inc. as of December 31,
1998 and for the 12-month period ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,377
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,300
<INVENTORY>                                      3,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,009
<PP&E>                                          10,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,634
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,894
<SALES>                                        171,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,536
<CGS>                                          140,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  77
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,334
<INCOME-TAX>                                       623
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11<F1><F2>
<FN>
<F1>This amount is in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement No. 28 and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 98.
<F2>The word "primary" should be deleted and replaced with the word "Basic".
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3643 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3643

To make technical corrections to section 3013(b) of the Water Resources 
                        Development Act of 2007.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2009

Mr. Alexander introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make technical corrections to section 3013(b) of the Water Resources 
                        Development Act of 2007.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA.

    Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 
642), as amended by section 3013(b) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1109), is further amended by striking ``the 
first section of the Mississippi River Flood Control Act of May 15, 
1928 (45 Stat. 534),'' and inserting the following: ``the first section 
and section 6 of the Mississippi River Flood Control Act of May 15, 
1928 (45 Stat. 534), and any other provision of law,''.
                                 <all>
```
2021 AFSAM

Match 380

Agg of RT3600 + CT5160

1 .

1528 77 -

ALL-GUARD (ALPHA)

CT5160

RT3600 77

Team Scores Score V Total - Vs

584

944

ROSTER# RT3600 Individual Scores

International Rifle Team Match

Conaway Cup Challenge

1 ) MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 118 271 - 28

2 ) SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 120 264 - 21

3 ) SFC NOE, JOSEPH T 119 138 - 7

4 ) SFC SWANSON, BRANDON N 100 271 - 21

2 .

1518 76 -

USAR BLACK

CT5160

RT3600 76

Team Scores Score V Total - Vs

506

1012

ROSTER# RT3600 Individual Scores

International Rifle Team Match

Conaway Cup Challenge

1 ) MAJ URICK, GRANT M 162 256 - 16

2 ) SGT HUGHES, DEVIN E 158 232 - 16

3 ) SSG MORRIS, SEAN D 159 278 - 27

4 ) MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 161 246 - 17

3 .

1488 53 -

ALL-GUARD (BRAVO)

CT5160

RT3600 53

Team Scores Score V Total - Vs

546

942

ROSTER# RT3600 Individual Scores

International Rifle Team Match

Conaway Cup Challenge

1 ) SSGT ROOK, GAVIN W 121 242 - 20

2 ) TSGT DANIEL, SCOTTY W 138 219 - 11

3 ) SSG VARGAS, ERIK J 132 248 - 10

4 ) SSG DEMENT, JERRY D 316 233 - 12

4 .

1424 54 -

USAR GOLD

CT5160

RT3600 54

Team Scores Score V Total - Vs

498

926

ROSTER# RT3600 Individual Scores

International Rifle Team Match

Conaway Cup Challenge

1 ) MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 157 209 - 10

2 ) CW3 KNOTE, ANDY T 163 230 - 8

3 ) SFC GODEL, JASON W 156 258 - 18

4 ) CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 160 229 - 18

Saturday, September 4, 2021 Time printed: 08:45:38 Page 1 of 2
5 .

1394 38 -

ALL-GUARD (CHARLIE)

CT5160

RT3600 38

Team Scores Score V Total - Vs

484

910

ROSTER# RT3600 Individual Scores

International Rifle Team Match

Conaway Cup Challenge

1 ) SFC BAUTISTA, MICHAEL R 125 229 - 10

2 ) MSG SMITH, MATTHEW B 136 262 - 11

3 ) SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 131 265 - 14

4 ) MSG GREGSON, JACOB J 108 154 - 3

Saturday, September 4, 2021 Time printed: 08:45:39 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3951 Reference Change Senate (RCS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3951

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 18, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

                              May 20, 2010

                      Previous reporting vitiated

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Roy 
                  Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROY RONDENO, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Roy Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roy 
Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
ex10-19.htm



Exhibit 10.19


 



Sales contract of Industrial and Mineral Products


 


                      Contract No._____


Supplier:Taiyuan Hongxing Carbon Black Co., Ltd


 


Buyer:    Shandong Zhengfang Tyre Co., Ltd


 


Place of signing contract: Qingxu: Taiyuan


 


Date of signing contract : December 30, 2007


 


1. Product name, trade mark, model, quantity, amount of money, delivery time and quantity


 



	
Product Name

	
Model

	
Unit

	
Quantity Required/Monthly

	
Price


(RMB per ton)

	
Amount(RMB)

	
Remarks


	
Carbon Black

	
N220

	
Ton

	
60

	
5900

	  	
1. The price in this agreement is current market price 

2. The quantity is decided by the number actually occurred.




	
Carbon Black

	
N330

	
Ton

	
40

	
5600

	  	
 


	
Carbon Black

	
N660

	
Ton

	
50

	
5600

	  	  
	
Total

	  





 


2. Quality requirements, technical standards, the conditions and duration of which supplier is responsible for: National standard or by buyer’s standard


 


3. The place of delivery and method: buyer’s warehouse, Specific quantity and delivery time are subject to telephone or fax-based communication


 


4. Means of transport, expense for transport and related items: The buyer bear the burden


 


5. Reasonable wear and tear and method of calculation    None


 


6. Packaging standards, supply and recycle of packaging materials   None


 


7. Acceptance criteria, methods, and period to hold discussion on goods delivered: Within 7 days after the delivery


 


8. Random spare, number and supply method of accessories    None


 


9. Payment method and period: Within 30 days after the delivery and the invoice being recognized.


 


10. If guaranty is needed, the guaranty agreement is also needed as appendix    None


 


11. Liability for breach of contract: It shall be settled according to the contract law of PRC


 


12. The mechanism of dispute settlement:  It shall be settled through negotiation.


 


13. Other agreed matters:


 


  a. Quality Assurance Documents


 


  b. The price is subject to the market condition, and the quantity is determined by the actual number occurred. It shall inform the buyer at 7 day’s advance if there is a change in above items.


 



	
Supplier:


Company Name (Seal):


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent :


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:

	
Buyer:


Company Name:


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent:


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:







 Valid period: From January 1, 2008 to December 31,2008
(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Registrant.March 6, 2009
 By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. Tietz

Dennis J. Tietz,President and Director of Cronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Registrant/s/ Frank P. VaughanFrank P. Vaughan,Chief Financial Officer of Cronos Capital Corp,.General Partner of the Registrant
  
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 26, 2014

No. 04-12-00237-CR

Phillip Wayne GRIFFIS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 7th District Court, Smith County, Texas

Trial Court No. 007-1767-08

The Honorable Kerry L. Russell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D Chapa, Justice

The court has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing En Banc, and the motion 

is DENIED.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Irik P. Sevin, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Star Gas Partners, L.P. and will be retained by Star Gas Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                                     |  |                   |  |                                                                                       
|----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY By: STAR GAS LLC (General Partner)
|                  |  |  | 
|December 14, 2004 |  |  |  | By:                                                                                 |  | /s/ Irik P. Sevin
|                  |  |  |  |                                                                                     |  |                   |  | Irik P. Sevin Chief Executive Officer Star Gas Partners, L.P. Star Gas Finance Company