45324 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 150 / Tuesday, August 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2014–16–01 MD Helicopters, Inc.: 

Amendment 39–17925; Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0514; Directorate Identifier 

2014–SW–027–AD. 

(a) Applicability 

This AD applies to Model MD900 

helicopters, serial numbers 900–00008 

through 900–00140, with main rotor upper 

hub assembly (upper hub) part number 

900R2101006–105, –107, –109, or –111 

installed, certificated in any category. 

(b) Unsafe Condition 

This AD defines the unsafe condition as a 

cracked upper hub. This condition could 

result in failure of the upper hub and 

subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. 

(c) Effective Date 

This AD becomes effective August 20, 

2014. 

(d) Compliance 

You are responsible for performing each 

action required by this AD within the 

specified compliance time unless it has 

already been previously accomplished. 

(e) Required Actions 

Within the next 25 hours time-in-service 

(TIS) or at the next annual inspection, 

whichever occurs first: 

(1) Clean each upper hub inspection area 

as shown in Figure 1 of MD Helicopters 

Service Bulletin SB900–122, dated April 8, 

2014 (SB900–122). 

(2) Eddy current inspect the upper hub for 

a crack by following the Accomplishment 

Instructions, paragraphs 2.A.(3) through 

2.A.(11) of SB900–122. This eddy current 

inspection must be performed by a Level II 

or higher technician with the National 

Aerospace Standard 410 or equivalent 

certification who has performed an eddy 

current inspection within the last 12 months. 

If there is a crack, before further flight, 

replace the upper hub with an airworthy 

upper hub. 

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft 

Certification Office, FAA, may approve 

AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: 

Eric Schrieber, Aviation Safety Engineer, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 3960 

Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California 

90712; telephone (562) 627–5348; email 

eric.schrieber@faa.gov. 

(2) For operations conducted under a 14 

CFR part 119 operating certificate or under 

14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that 

you notify your principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office or 

certificate holding district office before 

operating any aircraft complying with this 

AD through an AMOC. 

(g) Subject 

Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) 

Code: 6220 Main Rotor Head. 

(h) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) MD Helicopters Service Bulletin SB900– 

122, dated April 8, 2014. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(3) For MD Helicopters, Inc. service 

information identified in this AD, contact 

MD Helicopters, Inc., Attn: Customer 

Support Division, 4555 E. McDowell Rd., 

Mail Stop M615, Mesa, AZ 85215–9734; 

telephone 1–800–388–3378; fax 480–346– 

6813; or at http://www.mdhelicopters.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, 

Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., 

Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

(202) 741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 24, 

2014. 

Lance T. Gant, 

Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–18163 Filed 8–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0790; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–061–AD; Amendment 

39–17916; AD 2014–15–14] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are superseding 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 89–12–10, 

for certain The Boeing Company Model 

747 airplanes. AD 89–12–10 required 

replacement of certain underwing fuel 

tank access doors with stronger, fireresistant doors. This new AD requires 

inspecting certain fuel tank access doors 

for installation of impact-resistant 

doors, and stencils and index markers; 

corrective actions if necessary; revising 

the maintenance program to incorporate 

certain new airworthiness limitations; 

and adding airplanes to the 

applicability. This AD was prompted by 

a report of a standard access door 

installed instead of an impact-resistant 

access door and stencils missing from 

some impact-resistant access doors and 

adjacent wing skin. We are issuing this 

AD to prevent foreign object penetration 

of the fuel tank, which could cause a 

fuel leak near an ignition source (e.g., 

hot brakes or engine exhaust nozzle), 

consequently leading to a fuel-fed fire. 

DATES: This AD is effective September 9, 

2014. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in this AD 

as of September 9, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; 

fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view 

this referenced service information at 

the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0790; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Docket Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Suzanne Lucier, Aerospace Engineer, 

Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6438; fax: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 150 / Tuesday, August 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 45325 

425–917–6590; email: suzanne.lucier@

faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to supersede AD 89–12–10, 

Amendment 39–6230 (Docket No. 88– 

NM–57–AD; 54 FR 23643, June 2, 1989). 

AD 89–12–10 applied to certain The 

Boeing Company Model 747 100, 747– 

200, 747–300, and 747SP series 

airplanes. The NPRM published in the 

Federal Register on September 25, 2013 

(78 FR 58962). The NPRM was 

prompted by reports indicating that a 

standard access door was located where 

an impact-resistant access door was 

required, and stencils were missing 

from some impact-resistant access doors 

and adjacent wing skin. The NPRM 

proposed to require an inspection of the 

left- and right-hand wing fuel tank 

access doors to determine whether 

impact-resistant access doors are 

installed in the correct locations, and 

replacement of any standard door with 

an impact-resistant access door if 

necessary. The NPRM also proposed to 

require an inspection for the presence of 

stencils and index markers on impactresistant access doors, and application 

of new stencils or index markers if 

necessary. The NPRM also proposed to 

require revising the maintenance 

program to incorporate changes to the 

airworthiness limitations section. The 

NPRM also proposed to add airplanes to 

the applicability. We are issuing this AD 

to prevent foreign object penetration of 

the fuel tank, which could cause a fuel 

leak near an ignition source (e.g., hot 

brakes or engine exhaust nozzle), 

consequently leading to a fuel-fed fire. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. The 

following presents the comments 

received on the proposal (78 FR 58962, 

September 25, 2013) and the FAA’s 

response to each comment. 

Request To Revise Maintenance 

Planning Data (MPD) Document 

Number 

United Airlines requested that we 

revise the MPD document number 

specified in paragraph (h)(1) of the 

NPRM (78 FR 58962, September 25, 

2013) to reference Boeing 747–400 MPD 

Document D621U400–9, Revision 

August 2012. United Airlines pointed 

out that the airworthiness section of the 

document is located in Section 9 of the 

document identified as D621U400–9. 

We agree with the commenter for the 

reason provided. We have revised 

paragraph (h)(1) of this final rule 

accordingly. 

Request To Reference Aircraft 

Maintenance Manual (AMM) 

British Airways (BA) stated the AMM 

would be a better location for an 

appropriate task than the maintenance 

program. BA stated that Task 57–AWL– 

01, ‘‘Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access 

Doors,’’ of Sub-section B.2, ‘‘ImpactResistant Fuel Tank Access Doors,’’ of 

Section B, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations 

(AWLs)—Fuel Systems,’’ of Section 9, 

Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and 

Certification Maintenance Requirements 

(CMRs), of the D621U400–9 Boeing 

747–400 Maintenance Planning Data 

(MPD) Document D621U400–9, 

Revision August 2012, does not have a 

fixed interval or a defined inspection 

type, but simply requires that the access 

panels are verified to be impact resistant 

prior to installation. BA stated that this 

cannot be described as scheduled 

maintenance and does not consider the 

best place for this Critical Design 

Configuration Control Limitation 

(CDCCL) to be an operator’s 

maintenance program. BA stated that 

many CDCCL items are satisfied through 

the AMM rather than with a 

maintenance program task. BA gave an 

example of CDCCL Task 28–AWL–16, 

‘‘Fuel Tank Access Doors 

Configuration’’ of Sub-section B.1, 

‘‘AWLs—Fuel System Ignition 

Prevention,’’ of Section B, 

‘‘Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs)— 

Fuel Systems,’’ of Section 9, 

Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and 

Certification Maintenance Requirements 

(CMRs), of the D621U400–9 Boeing 

747–400 Maintenance Planning Data 

(MPD) Document D621U400–9, 

Revision August 2012, which also 

relates to fuel tank access door 

installation and has no fixed interval; 

however, this CDCCL requirement is 

satisfied through the AMM procedure 

relating to these panels, and not through 

a task in an operator’s maintenance 

program. 

We infer that the commenter is 

requesting that Task 57–AWL–01, 

‘‘Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access 

Doors,’’ of Sub-section B.2, ‘‘ImpactResistant Fuel Tank Access Doors,’’ of 

Section B, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations 

(AWLs)—Fuel Systems,’’ of Section 9, 

Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and 

Certification Maintenance Requirements 

(CMRs), of the D621U400–9 Boeing 

747–400 Maintenance Planning Data 

(MPD) Document D621U400–9, 

Revision August 2012, contain a 

reference to the AMM similar to CDCCL 

Task 28–AWL–16, ‘‘Fuel Tank Access 

Doors Configuration’’ of Sub-section 

B.1, ‘‘AWLs—Fuel System Ignition 

Prevention,’’ of Section B, 

‘‘Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs)— 

Fuel Systems,’’ of Section 9, 

Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and 

Certification Maintenance Requirements 

(CMRs), of the D621U400–9 Boeing 

747–400 Maintenance Planning Data 

(MPD) Document D621U400–9, 

Revision August 2012. 

We disagree with the request to add 

an AMM reference. The requirement 

specified in Task 57–AWL–01 identifies 

the safety critical item to be maintained 

and does not mandate a specific AMM. 

The inclusion of a reference to an AMM 

is not necessary. However, operators 

may refer to the AMMs that are 

referenced in CDCCL Task 28–AWL–16. 

We have not changed this AD in this 

regard. 

Clarification of Inspection Area 

Paragraph (g)(2) of the NPRM (78 FR 

58962, September 25, 2013) proposed to 

require an inspection for the presence of 

stencils and index markers on impactresistant access doors, and application 

of new stencils or index markers if 

necessary. As specified in Boeing 

Service Bulletin 747–28–2315, dated 

January 11, 2012, the stencils and index 

markers are located on the doors and 

adjacent wing skin. Therefore, we have 

revised paragraph (g)(2) of this AD to 

specify doing an inspection for the 

presence of stencils and index markers 

on impact-resistant access doors and 

adjacent wing skin. We have also 

clarified in the SUMMARY section and 

Discussion paragraph of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

that the AD was prompted by a report 

of a standard access door installed 

instead of an impact-resistant access 

door and stencils missing from some 

impact-resistant access doors and 

adjacent wing skin. 

Clarification of Maintenance Program 

Revision 

Paragraph (h) of the NPRM (78 FR 

58962, September 25, 2013) specifies 

that the actions specified in paragraphs 

(h)(1) and (h)(2) of the NPRM must be 

done; however, the affected airplane 

models were not identified. We have 

revised paragraph (h)(1) of this AD to 

specify that the actions are applicable 

for Model 747–400, 747–400D, 747– 

400F series airplanes. We have also 

revised paragraph (h)(2) of this AD to 

specify that the actions are applicable 

for Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747– 

100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747– 

200F, 747–300, 747SR, and 747SP series 

airplanes. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

45326 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 150 / Tuesday, August 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comments received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

with the change described previously 

and minor editorial changes. We have 

determined that these minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 

58962, September 25, 2013) for 

correcting the unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 58962, 

September 25, 2013). 

We also determined that these 

changes will not increase the economic 

burden on any operator or increase the 

scope of this AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 189 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Inspection .......................................... Up to 13 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,105 ........... $0 Up to $1,105 ..... Up to $208,845. 

Maintenance program revision .......... 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .............................. $0 $85 ................... $16,065. 

We estimate the following costs to do 

any necessary replacements that would 

be required based on the results of the 

inspection. We have no way of 

determining the number of aircraft that 

might need these replacements: 

ON-CONDITION COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Replacement (per door) ............................................... 3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 ........................... $8,000 $8,255 

Stencil and index marker (14 doors) ............................ 17 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,445 ...................... $0 1,445 

According to the manufacturer, some 

of the costs of this AD may be covered 

under warranty, thereby reducing the 

cost impact on affected individuals. We 

do not control warranty coverage for 

affected individuals. As a result, we 

have included all costs in our cost 

estimate. 

Authority for this Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this AD will 

not have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 

89–12–10, Amendment 39–6230 (Docket 

No. 88–NM–57–AD; 54 FR 23643, June 

2, 1989), and adding the following new 

AD: 

2014–15–14 The Boeing Company: 

Amendment 39–17916; Docket No. 

FAA–2013–0790; Directorate Identifier 

2013–NM–061–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective September 9, 2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD replaces AD 89–12–10, 

Amendment 39–6230 (Docket No. 88–NM– 

57–AD; 54 FR 23643, June 2, 1989). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 

747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 

747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 

747SP series airplanes; certificated in any 

category; as identified in Boeing Service 

Bulletin 747–28–2315, dated January 11, 

2012. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 28, Fuel. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by report of a 

standard access door installed instead of an 

impact-resistant access door and stencils 

missing from some impact-resistant access 

doors and adjacent wing skin. We are issuing 

this AD to prevent foreign object penetration 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 150 / Tuesday, August 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 45327 

of the fuel tank, which could cause a fuel 

leak near an ignition source (e.g., hot brakes 

or engine exhaust nozzle), consequently 

leading to a fuel-fed fire. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Inspection and Corrective Action 

Within 72 months after the effective date 

of this AD, do the actions specified in 

paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747– 

28–2315, dated January 11, 2012. 

(1) Do either a general visual inspection or 

ultrasonic non-destructive test of the left- and 

right-hand wing fuel tank access doors to 

determine whether impact-resistant access 

doors are installed in the correct locations. If 

any standard access door is found, before 

further flight, replace with an impactresistant access door, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 

Service Bulletin 747–28–2315, dated January 

11, 2012. 

(2) Do a general visual inspection of the 

left- and right-hand wing fuel tank impactresistant access doors and adjacent wing skin 

to verify stencils and index markers are 

applied. If a stencil or index marker is 

missing, before further flight, apply a stencil 

or index marker, as applicable, in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Boeing Service Bulletin 747–28–2315, dated 

January 11, 2012. 

(h) Maintenance Program Revisions 

Within 60 days after the effective date of 

this AD, do the actions specified in 

paragraphs (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, as 

applicable. 

(1) For Model 747–400, –400D, and –400F 

series airplanes: Revise the maintenance 

program to incorporate Critical Design 

Configuration Control Limitation (CDCCL) 

Task 57–AWL–01, ‘‘Impact-Resistant Fuel 

Tank Access Doors,’’ of Sub-section B.2, 

‘‘Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access Doors,’’ 

of Section B, ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations 

(AWLs)—Fuel Systems,’’ of Section 9, 

Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and 

Certification Maintenance Requirements 

(CMRs) D621U400–9, of the Boeing 747–400 

Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document 

D621U400–9, Revision August 2012. 

(2) For Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747– 

100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 

747–300, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes: 

Revise the maintenance program to 

incorporate CDCCL Task 57–AWL–01, 

‘‘Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access Doors,’’ 

of Sub-section C.2, ‘‘Impact-Resistant Fuel 

Tank Access Doors,’’ of Section C, 

‘‘Airworthiness Limitations—Fuel Systems,’’ 

of the Boeing 747–100/200/300/SP 

Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and 

Certification Maintenance Requirements 

(CMRs) Document D6–13747–CMR, Revision 

August 2012. 

(i) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or 

CDCCL 

After accomplishing the revisions required 

by paragraph (h) of this AD, no alternative 

actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/or 

CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, 

intervals, and/or CDCCLs are approved as an 

alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in 

accordance with the procedures specified in 

paragraph (j) of this AD. 

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be 

emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(k) Related Information 

For more information about this AD, 

contact Suzanne Lucier, Aerospace Engineer, 

Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle 

Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

phone: 425–917–6438; fax: 425–917–6590; 

email: suzanne.lucier@faa.gov. 

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 747–28–2315, 

dated January 11, 2012. 

(ii) CDCCL Task 57–AWL–01, ‘‘ImpactResistant Fuel Tank Access Doors,’’ of Subsection B, Airworthiness Limitations 

(AWLs)—Fuel Systems, of Section 9, 

D621U400–9, Airworthiness Limitations 

(AWLs) and Certification Maintenance 

Requirements (CMRs) of Boeing 747–400 

Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) 

Document, Revision August 2012. 

(iii) CDCCL Task 57–AWL–01, ‘‘ImpactResistant Fuel Tank Access Doors,’’ of Subsection C.2., ‘‘Impact Resistant Fuel Tank 

Access Doors,’’ of Section C, ‘‘Airworthiness 

Limitations—Fuel Systems,’’ of the Boeing 

747–100/200/300/SP Airworthiness 

Limitations (AWLs) and Certification 

Maintenance Requirements (CMRs) 

Document D6–13747–CMR, Revision August 

2012. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 13, 

2014. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–17922 Filed 8–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0311; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–CE–014–AD; Amendment 

39–17927; AD 2014–16–03] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Fuji Heavy 

Industries, Ltd. Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for Fuji 

Heavy Industries, Ltd. Models FA–200– 

160, FA–200–180, and FA–200–180AO 

airplanes. This AD results from 

mandatory continuing airworthiness 

information (MCAI) issued by an 

aviation authority of another country to 

identify and correct an unsafe condition 

on an aviation product. The MCAI 

describes the unsafe condition as 

deterioration of brake performance due 

to seal defects caused by deterioration 

due to age of the O-rings of the brake 

master cylinder. We are issuing this AD 

to require actions to address the unsafe 

condition on these products. 

DATES: This AD is effective September 9, 

2014. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in the AD 

as of September 9, 2014. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES