alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21**

**Partnership Subsidiaries**

A.P. Woodson Company—District of Columbia 

C. Hoffberger Company —Maryland 

ChampionEnergy Corporation—Delaware 

Champion Oil Company —Connecticut 

Columbia Petroleum Transportation, LLC—Delaware 

Hoffman Fuel Company of Bridgeport—Delaware 

Hoffman Fuel Company of Danbury—Delaware 

Hoffman Fuel Company of Stamford —Delaware 

J.J. Skelton Oil Company —Pennsylvania

Lewis Oil Company, Inc. —New York 

Marex Corporation—Maryland 

Meenan Holdings of New York, Inc.—New York 

Meenan Oil Co., Inc.—Delaware 

Meenan OilCo., L.P.—Delaware 

Minnwhale, LLC .—New York 

Ortep of Pennsylvania, Inc.—Pennsylvania 

Petro Holdings, Inc.—Minnesota 

Petro Plumbing Corporation—New Jersey 

Petro, Inc.—Delaware 

Petroleum Heat andPower Co., Inc.—Minnesota 

RegionOil Plumbing, Heating and Cooling Co., Inc.—New Jersey 

Richland Partners, LLC—Pennsylvania 

RyeFuel Company —Delaware 

Star Gas Finance Company—Delaware 

Star Acquisitions, Inc.—Minnesota 

TG&E Service Company, Inc.—Florida
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600181

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

ALIA N. WARNER

Hospital Corpsman Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Bethany L. Payton-O’Brien, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Major Jason L. Morris, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 31 August 2016

_________________________

Before PALMER, MARKS, GROHARING, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3998 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the service treatable as 

service engaged in combat with the enemy for utilization of non-official 

evidence for proof of service-connection in a combat-related disease or 

injury. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2009 

Mr. BRALEY of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the service 

treatable as service engaged in combat with the enemy 

for utilization of non-official evidence for proof of serviceconnection in a combat-related disease or injury. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Compensation for 

5 Combat Veterans Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3998 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF SERVICE TREATABLE AS SERV2 ICE ENGAGED IN COMBAT WITH THE ENEMY 

3 FOR UTILIZATION OF NON-OFFICIAL EVI4 DENCE FOR PROOF OF SERVICE-CONNEC5 TION IN COMBAT-RELATED DISEASES OR IN6 JURIES. 

7 Section 1154(b) of title 38, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(b)’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(2) A veteran who during active service described 

13 in paragraph (1) served in a combat zone for purposes 

14 of section 112 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or 

15 a predecessor provision of law, shall be treated as having 

16 engaged in combat with the enemy in active service for 

17 purposes of that paragraph during such service in that 

18 combat zone.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 20496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08742]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10014, Ameribank, Inc., Northfork, West Virginia

    NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (``FDIC'') as Receiver for Ameribank, Inc., Northfork, West 
Virginia (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its receivership for 
said institution. The FDIC was appointed receiver of Ameribank, Inc. on 
September 19, 2008. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been 
completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance 
with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to 
proven creditors.
    On April 10, 2015, the FDIC published its Notice to All Interested 
Parties of the Termination of the Receivership of Ameribank, Inc., in 
the Federal Register (80 FR 19319). In that Notice, the location of 
Ameribank, Inc., was incorrectly identified as Northfolk, West 
Virginia. This Notice is to correct that error.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 32.1, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: April 13, 2015.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08742 Filed 4-15-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) Friday, October 18, 2013 4:03 PM 'cityofportalexander@yahoo.com' Faulk, Scott (OST) Update on EAS at Port Alexander Harris Aircraft Service, Inc.pdf
DearMayor Gifford and the City Council ofPort Alexander: ' '_ ' i
.. · .. :·...· • :.·. :. .· ·,! ;**~** ; ;

-- . l**-~-** ·---·-'

:_:._. '_;

I would like to update you onthe Essential Air Service ("EAS") situation at Port Alexander, and give you an opportunityto submit any comments ifyou wish. As you may know, the Department ofTransportation issued Order 2013-9-6, on September 9, 2013, to solicitproposals from all interested air carriers to provide EAS at Port Alexander for a new contract, beginning March 1, 2014. Those proposals were due no later than October 15,2013. Atthis stage, we would normally ask for yourpreferences for various air carriers and service options. However, inresponse to the Department's request for proposals, Harris Aircraft Service, Inc. ("Harris Air"), the incumbent, was the only air carrierto submit a proposal. Nonetheless, we wantto give you an opportunityto submit any final comments for the record that you may have. A copy ofHarris Air's proposal is attached and may also be accessed online viathe Federal Docket Management System at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=DOT-OST-1999-6244-0040 I wantto give you an opportunity to submit any formal comments for the record before submitting a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. We request that you submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but in any case no later thanNovember 15, 2013. We will carefully consider your comments before submitting a recommendation for a decision. Ifyou have any questions or ifyou find thatyouneed additional time to draft your comments, please let me know. Please send your comments ScottFaulk at the following email address: scott.faulk@dot.gov orby fax to (202) 366-7638. Ifyou have any questions, please feel free. to contact him directly at (202) 366-9967. Sincerely, Kevin D. Schlemmer Chief, Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division United States Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 (202) 366-3176 phone (202) 366-7638 fax

1
# Eiropas Savienības C 250/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 250 |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 62. gadagājums2019. gada 25. jūlijs |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 250

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

62. gadagājums2019. gada 25. jūlijs

---

| Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Paziņojumi |
| | EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI |
| | Eiropas ParlamentsPadome |
| 2019/C 250/01 | Parlamenta, Padomes un Komisijas kopīgais paziņojums par Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2019. gada 20. jūnija Regulu (ES) 2019/1243, ar ko vairākus tiesību aktus, kuros paredzēta regulatīvās kontroles procedūras izmantošana, pielāgo Līguma par Eiropas Savienības darbību 290. un 291. pantam | 1 |

Saturs

Lappuse

IV   Paziņojumi

EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI

Eiropas ParlamentsPadome

2019/C 250/01

Parlamenta, Padomes un Komisijas kopīgais paziņojums par Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2019. gada 20. jūnija Regulu (ES) 2019/1243, ar ko vairākus tiesību aktus, kuros paredzēta regulatīvās kontroles procedūras izmantošana, pielāgo Līguma par Eiropas Savienības darbību 290. un 291. pantam

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

IV Paziņojumi

EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI

Eiropas Parlaments Padome

| 25.7.2019 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 250/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2019

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 250/1

---

Parlamenta, Padomes un Komisijas kopīgais paziņojums par Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2019. gada 20. jūnija Regulu (ES) 2019/1243, ar ko vairākus tiesību aktus, kuros paredzēta regulatīvās kontroles procedūras izmantošana, pielāgo Līguma par Eiropas Savienības darbību 290. un 291. pantam (1)

(2019/C 250/01)

Iestāžu nolīguma par labāku likumdošanas procesu 27. punktā visas trīs iestādes atzina nepieciešamību saskaņot visus spēkā esošos tiesību aktus ar tiesisko regulējumu, kas ieviests ar Lisabonas līgumu, un jo īpaši nepieciešamību piešķirt augstu prioritāti tūlītējai visu to pamataktu saskaņošanai, kuri joprojām atsaucas uz regulatīvo kontroles procedūru. Tika saņemts attiecīgs Komisijas priekšlikums, un šī regula ir atbilde uz minēto nepieciešamību, jo tajā paredzēta regulatīvās kontroles procedūras saskaņošana daudzos minētajā priekšlikumā iekļautajos aktos. Visas trīs iestādes turpinās darbu pie atlikušo minētajā priekšlikumā iekļauto aktu saskaņošanas.

---

(1)  OV L 198, 25.7.2019., 241. lpp.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 402 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 402

 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in 
    Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ``William C. Tallent Department of 
                 Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2009

     Mr. Duncan (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Roe of 
Tennessee, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Gordon of Tennessee, 
 and Mr. Davis of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in 
    Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ``William C. Tallent Department of 
                 Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILLIAM C. TALLENT DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 
Clinic in Knoxville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the 
``William C. Tallent Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 
Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the outpatient 
clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the William C. Tallent Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________

)

JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 06-0664 (PLF)

)

UNITED STATES PAROLE )

 COMMISSION, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

___________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day, it is 

hereby

ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [Dkt. No. 132] is 

GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court denies judgment to the plaintiff on his 

Administrative Procedure Act claim, and grants judgment to the plaintiff on his procedural due 

process claim; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that prior to any imposition by defendant United States 

Parole Commission of a Special Sex Offender Aftercare Condition upon the plaintiff’s parole, or 

any similar condition or conditions including assignment to the Sex Offender Unit of the Court 

Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia and assignment to sex 

offender treatment, the defendants must provide the plaintiff with the following procedural 

protections:

(1) written notice that sex offender classification and 

conditions are being considered; 
2

(2) a hearing, held sufficiently after the notice to permit 

him to prepare, at which disclosure is made of the evidence being 

relied upon for the classification and sex offender conditions;

(3) an opportunity at the hearing to be heard in person, to 

present documentary evidence, to present testimony of witnesses, 

and to confront and cross-examine witnesses called by the 

government, except upon a finding, not arbitrarily made, of good 

cause for not permitting such presentation, confrontation, or crossexamination; 

(4) administration of the hearing by an independent 

decision-maker; 

(5) a written statement by the independent decision-maker

as to the evidence relied on and the reasons for classifying him as a 

sex offender and imposing sex offender conditions; and 

(6) effective and timely notice of all the foregoing rights;

it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants’ motion for an extension of time

[Dkt. No. 152] to supplement the record is DENIED AS MOOT; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion to strike and for sanctions

[Dkt. No. 159] is DENIED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_______________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: August 8, 2014
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Roger Martin Bradford, Appellant

No. 06-15-00192-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 71st District Court of 

Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 15-

0152X). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess, participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by deleting the fees for 

appellant’s court-appointed attorney. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Roger Martin Bradford, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 2, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
FIRST SHARES BANCORP, INC.
Exhibit 31.1
I, Jerry R. Engle, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First SharesBancorp, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuerand we have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 14, 2003
 
/s/ Jerry R. EngleJerry R. EnglePresident and ChiefExecutive Officer
19
(logo)KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


           1600 Market Street
           Philadelphia, PA 19103-7212




                        Independent Accountant's Report

We   have   examined   management's   assertion  about  Electronic  Data Systems
Corporation-Consumer  Asset  Management  Division's  (the Division's) compliance
with the  minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in  the  Mortgage   Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(USAP) as  of,  and  for  the  period  ending, December 31, 1995 included in the
accompanying management assertion.  Management is responsible for the Division's
compliance  with  those  minimum  servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's  assertion  about  the  Division's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was  made  in  accordance  with  standards  established  by  the
American  Institute  of  Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on  a  test  basis, evidence about the Division's compliance with the
minimum   servicing  standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in  the  circumstances.  We  believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal determination of the Division's  compliance  with  the  minimum  servicing
standards.

In  our  opinion,  management's   assertion  that  Division  complied  with  the
aforementioned  minimum  servicing  standards  as  of  and for the period ending
December  31,  1995   is   fairly   stated,   in   all    material     respects.


/s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Philadelphia, PA
April 17, 1996
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of 2000 New Commerce, Inc., a Nevadacorporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Troy Nikolai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that tomy knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

***/s/ Troy Nikolai***

 

Troy Nikolai

Dated: December 21, 2005
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Frank, McCl anahan and Senior Judge Willis

JULIA M. GREENWAY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2115-06-4 PER CURIAM MAY 15, 2007 JOHN B. GREENWAY

FROM THE CIRCUIT COUR T OF FAIRFAX COUNTY R. Terrence Ney, Judge (Polly B. Knight; Knight & Stough , LLP, on briefs), for appellant. Appellant submitting on briefs. (Drake T. Brodin, on brief), for appellee. Appellee submitting on brief.
Julia M. Greenway (wife) ap peals from the circuit court’s July 27, 2006 final decree awarding John B. Greenway a divorce a vinculo matrimonii . On appeal, wife lists eight questions presented, challenging the court’s equitable distribution and child support rulings. Upon review of the record and briefs of the partie s, we dismiss this appeal for wife’s failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 5A:20(d).
ANALYSIS In her opening brief, wife included no statemen t of facts and recite s in argument only selected factual assertions without providing a fair recitation of all the evidence bearing on the issues raised. Rule 5A:20(d) requires an appellant’s open ing brief to include “[ a] clear and concise statement of the facts that relate to the questions presented, with references to the pages of the

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.- 2 - transcript, written statement, record, or appendix.” B ecause this Court “will not search the record for errors in order to interpret the appellant’s contention and correct deficiencies in a brief,” Buchanan v. Buchanan , 14 Va. App. 53, 56, 415 S.E.2d 237, 239 (1992), we will not consider a “Question Presented” that is unsupported by the requirements of Rule 5A:20. See , e.g. , Barrs v.
Barrs , 45 Va. App. 500, 512, 612 S.E.2d 227, 232-33 (2005); Courembis v. Courembis , 43 Va. App. 18, 26, 595 S.E.2d 505, 509 (2004). Wife set forth no statement of facts relating to her questions pres ented. By fai ling to provide such a statement of facts, wife has failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 5A:20(d). “[S]tatements unsupported by argument, authority, or citations to the record do not merit appellate consideration.” Buchanan , 14 Va. App. at 56, 415 S.E.2d at 239. Thus, we will not consider these issues on appeal. Accordingly, wife’s appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.