alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**I, Michael L. Chasen, Chief Executive Officer of Blackboard Inc.(the “Company”), do hereby certify, under thestandards set forth in and solely for the purposes of18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to myknowledge that:     1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Companyfor the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “QuarterlyReport”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 as amended; and     2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.     /s/ Michael L. Chasen       Michael L. Chasen     Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 7, 2005
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 26, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00297-CV QUANTA BUILDING GR OUP, LLC, AND ALEJANDRO VALLADARES, Appellants V. MAZON ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-05633 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justi ce Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns We reinstate this appeal. This case was abated on September 22, 2022 due to bankruptcy. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 8.2. The Court conducted an independent review of the federal Public Access to Court El ectronic Records (PACER) system which shows the bankruptcy case associated with this appeal was closed on December 29, 2022, effectively dissolving the automatic stay. We notified the parties by le tter, requesting they inform the Court of the status of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would–2– result in the appeal being dismi ssed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),(c). To date, neither party has responded. Because we gave the parties an oppor tunity to show why we should not dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this appeal. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

220297F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT QUANTA BUILDING GROUP, LLC, AND ALEJANDRO VALLADARES, Appellants
No. 05-22-00297-CV V. MAZON ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-05633. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opini on of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered January 26, 2023
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Quarterly  report of Collectible  Concepts  Group,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  November 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Paul S.  Lipschutz,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc.  and will be retained by
Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:   April 14, 2005                       By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Paul S. Lipschutz
                                               Chief Executive Officer
0392

#### Annie Mae WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. The SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL BANK, Appellant.

(326 S. E. (2d))

Court of Appeals

*347
      *Stan McGuffin*and *L. Henry McKellar,*Columbia, *for appellant.*

*Thomas K. Fowler,*Columbia, *for respondent.*

Heard Dec. 10, 1984.

Decided Feb. 6, 1985.

Shaw, Judge:

Respondent Annie Mae Williams drew a check for $2.49 on appellant South Carolina National bank with insufficient funds on deposit. When SCN returned her check stamped “account closed,” Williams was prosecuted for drawing a fraudulent check. Williams brought this action for negligence and SCN raised three defenses: the first is a general denial, the second alleges sole negligence on Williams’ part, the third alleges contributory negligence. The trial court granted Williams’ motion to strike the material paragraphs of SCN’s second defense and the entire third defense. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

A motion to strike is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court; its decision will not be reversed absent a showing of abuse of discretion. *Totaro v. Turner,*273 S. C. 134, 254 S. E. (2d) 800 (1979).

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting Williams’ motion to strike as it related to the material paragraphs of SCN’s sole cause defense because “redundant matter ... in a pleading ... may be stricken.” S. C. Code Ann. Section 15-13-60 (1976). By bringing this action *348Williams assumed the burden of proving SCN proximately caused her damages. *Bain v. Self Memorial Hospital,*281 S. C. 138, 314 S. E. (2d) 603 (Ct. App. 1984). Since general denials put in issue every material allegation of the complaint not admitted, by raising a general denial SCN will be entitled to introduce evidence controverting Williams’ causation claims. *Funderburke v. Johnson,*253 S. C. 430, 171 S. E. (2d) 597 (1969). A separate defense on causation was unnecessary.

However, the trial court abused its discretion in granting Williams’ motion to strike as it related to the contributory negligence defense. The court construed SCN’s third defense as a continuation of the allegations regarding causation; although inartfully drafted, we find it raises the affirmative defense of contributory negligence. The defense of contributory negligence cannot be used at trial unless it is affirmatively pled. *Lawrence v. Southern Railway-Carolina Division,*169 S. C. 1, 167 S. E. 839 (1933); *Leader v. South Carolina Highway Department,*244 S. C. 195, 136 S. E. (2d) 262 (1964).

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Sanders, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.
22584

#### Ruth SMITH, Appellant v. INDEPENDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

(346 S. E. (2d) 22)

Supreme Court

*263
      *Stuart W. Snow,*Florence, *for appellant.*

*Arthur E. Justice, Jr.,*of *Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney,*Florence, *for respondent.*

Heard June 4, 1986.

Decided June 30, 1986.

*Per Curiam:*

This case involves a time limitation clause in an accidental death policy. By summary judgment the trial court held the clause valid and enforceable. Ruth Smith (Smith), mother of the insured and beneficiary under the policy, appeals.

We affirm.

Walter Smith was the insured under an accidental death policy issued by Independent Life and Accident Insurance Company (Insurer). On February 4, 1982, he was severely injured in an automobile accident. While being treated for his injuries he developed pneumonia and died on August 6, 1982. When Insurer denied her claim for the $6,000 proceeds of the policy, Smith sued.

The policy excluded coverage for a death occurring more than 90 days after the original injury. Summary judgment was based upon this policy provision.

The sole issue we address is Smith’s contention that the 90-day provision should be held void as violative of public policy.

The majority of jurisdictions which have considered this question hold such time limitation clauses valid and enforceable. *See*39 A. L. R. (3d) 1311. The two grounds most generally cited are (1) freedom of contract, and (2) problems related to proof of causation where death occurs long after the original injury.

*264Smith stresses the harshness and severity of the 90-day clause. Insurer counters that many factors, including the premium charged, support the reasonableness of the clause.

We recognize the hardship which may result from provisions such as the one before us here. However, all types of insurance contracts are specifically regulated by state statutes and rules of the South Carolina Insurance Department. Accordingly, the matter is one for legislative consideration.

Smith’s remaining exception is without merit, and we affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 23.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation
Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)
Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  we, the  undersigned  President and Chief
Executive  Officer  and Sr.  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of
Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation, (the "Company"), herby certify that to the best
of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
ended June 30, 2006 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the  financial  condition  and results of  operation  of the  Company.  A signed
original of this written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to
the  registrant  and will be retained by it and furnished to the  Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: August 21, 2006

                                 /s/ Michael Ward          /s/ James B. Smith
                                ----------------------    ----------------------
                                President and CEO         Sr. V.P. and CFO
# Den Europæiske Unions C 250/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 250 |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 62. årgang25. juli 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 250

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

62. årgang25. juli 2019

---

| Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Oplysninger |
| | OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER |
| | Europa-ParlamentetRådet |
| 2019/C 250/01 | Fælles erklæring fra Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet og Kommissionen om Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) 2019/1243 af 20. juni 2019 om tilpasning af en række retsakter, der indeholder bestemmelser om brug af forskriftsproceduren med kontrol, til artikel 290 og 291 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde | 1 |

Indhold

Side

IV   Oplysninger

OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER

Europa-ParlamentetRådet

2019/C 250/01

Fælles erklæring fra Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet og Kommissionen om Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) 2019/1243 af 20. juni 2019 om tilpasning af en række retsakter, der indeholder bestemmelser om brug af forskriftsproceduren med kontrol, til artikel 290 og 291 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

IV Oplysninger

OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER

Europa-Parlamentet Rådet

| 25.7.2019 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | C 250/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2019

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

C 250/1

---

Fælles erklæring fra Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet og Kommissionen om Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) 2019/1243 af 20. juni 2019 om tilpasning af en række retsakter, der indeholder bestemmelser om brug af forskriftsproceduren med kontrol, til artikel 290 og 291 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde (1)

(2019/C 250/01)

I punkt 27 i den interinstitutionelle aftale om bedre lovgivning anerkendte de tre institutioner behovet for tilpasning af al eksisterende lovgivning til den retlige ramme, der blev indført ved Lissabontraktaten, og navnlig behovet for at give høj prioritet til hurtig tilpasning af alle basisretsakter, der stadig henviser til forskriftsproceduren med kontrol. Efter Kommissionens forslag desangående opfylder denne forordning dette behov med tilpasningen af et betydeligt antal retsakter i det pågældende forslag til forskriftsproceduren med kontrol. De tre institutioner vil fortsætte arbejdet med tilpasning af de resterende retsakter i forslaget.

---

(1)  EUT L 198 af 25.7.2019, s. 241.

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 407 

To provide for the release of any reversionary interest of the United States 

in and to certain lands in Reno, Nevada. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2009 

Mr. HELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the release of any reversionary interest of 

the United States in and to certain lands in Reno, Nevada. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RAILROAD LANDS DEFINED. 

4 For the purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘railroad 

5 lands’’ means those lands within the City of Reno, Ne6 vada, located within portions of sections 10, 11, and 12 

7 of T.19 N., R. 19 E., and portions of section 7 of T.19 

8 N., R. 20 E., Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada, that were 

9 originally granted to the Union Pacific Railroad under the 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 407 IH

1 provisions of the Act of July 1, 1862, commonly known 

2 as the Union Pacific Railroad Act. 

3 SEC. 2. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST. 

4 Any reversionary interests of the United States (in5 cluding interests under the Act of July 1, 1862, commonly 

6 known as the Union Pacific Railroad Act) in and to the 

7 railroad lands as defined in section one of this Act are 

8 hereby released. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-15-014]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

 United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

 April 28, 2015 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

 Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

 Open to the public,

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-463 and 731-TA-1159 (Review)(Oil Country Tubular Goods from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on May 7, 2015.

5. Vote in Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1014, 1016, and 1017 (Second Review)(Polyvinyl Alcohol from China, Japan, and Korea). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on May 12, 2015.

6. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission:

 Issued: April 15, 2015.

William R. Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-09174 Filed 4-16-15; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

I, Michael W. Ferro, Jr.,certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Click Commerce, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period of this reportbased on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

| Date: November 14, 2005 | /s/ MICHAEL W. FERRO, JR.                                     |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| * *                     | Michael W.  Ferro, Jr                                         |
| * *                     | *Chief  Executive Officer and Chairman of the  Board of Directors* |

 

----
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0326.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:26PM -----

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 02/08/2010 08:00PM 

Subject: Fw: Qualitative health effects from HAPs for RICE NESHAP

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/08/2010 08:00PM -----

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 02/08/2010 05:41PM 

Subject: Qualitative health effects from HAPs for RICE NESHAP 

Melanie, 

Attached is the revised HAPs benefits section of the RIA with citations. Please forward to 

Cortney for interagency distribution. 

(See attached file: RICE HAPs 2.8.10.docx) 

Thank you! 

Amy Lamson 

Air Benefit and Cost Group 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

109 TW Alexander Dr. (C439-02) 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desk...For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0326.txt (1 of 2)2/19/2010 12:50:38 PM
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0326.txt

Phone: (919) 541-4383 

Fax: (919) 541-0839 

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desk...For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0326.txt (2 of 2)2/19/2010 12:50:38 PM