alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 402 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 402

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in 
    Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ``William C. Tallent Department of 
                 Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILLIAM C. TALLENT DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 
Clinic in Knoxville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the 
``William C. Tallent Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 
Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the outpatient 
clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the William C. Tallent Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Robert F. Reeves,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A1 18 4 . TI PPI NS v . THE STATE.

Th i s cas e was d o ck et ed b y t h i s co u rt on J an u ary 9
, 20 1 9
, an d ap p el l an t ’ s b ri ef

an d en u m erat i o n s o f erro r were d u e J an u ary 2 9
, 2 0 1 9

. As o f t h e d at e o f t h i s o rd er,
ap p el l an t h as no t fi l ed a b ri ef an d en um erat i o n of erro rs an d h a s n o t r e q u es t ed an

ex t en s i o n o f t i m e i n wh i ch t o d o s o

. Acco rd i n g ly
, t hi s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED

as ab an d o n ed p u rs u an t t o Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l es 1 3 an d 2 3

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. February 11, 2019

02/11/2019
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. SEASON HYMAS, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-30130 D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00017-EJL-2
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 8, 2014 ** Seattle, Washington Before: ALARCÓN, TASHIMA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. Defendant Season Hymas pleaded guilty to one count of misdemeanor theft from a financial institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b). She appeals the district court’s order imposing restitution in the amount of $100,272.72. 

# FILED
JUL 10 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).Reviewing for abuse of discretion, United States v. Booth , 309 F.3d 566, 575 n.6 (9th Cir. 2002), we affirm the district court’s order. Under the Mandatory Victims Restitu tion Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, courts are directed to order restitution “in the full amount of each victim’s losses.” 18 U.S.C. § 3664(f)(1)(A). When more than one defendant has contributed to the loss, courts have discretion to either “make each defendant liable for payment of the full amount [or] apportion liability among the defendants to reflect the level of contribution to the victim’s loss.” 18 U.S.C. § 3664(h). The district court properly exercised its discretion when it declined Defendant’s request to apportion restituti on to reflect her low degree of culpability and responsibility for the victim’s loss. The court was aware that it had such discretion, but nonetheless found Defendant blameworthy with respect to the offense for which she was charged. The reason the district court gave is also consistent with the purposes that restitution is designed to serve. See United States v. Green , 722 F.3d 1146, 1150 (9th Cir.) (noting that the purpose of restitution is “not to punish the defendant, but to make the victim whole again” (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied , 134 S. Ct. 658 (2013). Even if the court could have apportioned restitution in lightof the fact that her codefendant’s

2sentence had already been imposed, its decision not to do so was properly within its discretion. AFFIRMED.

3
EX-10.3






ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF CONTRACT OF PURCHASE AND SALE




For good and valuable consideration received, GRUBB & ELLIS EQUITY ADVISORS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (“Assignor”), hereby transfers, sets over and assigns to G&E HC REIT II
Muskogee LTACH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), all of Assignor’s right,
title and interest in, to and under that certain Contract of Purchase and Sale between Assignor and
MUSKOGEE LTACH, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company (“Seller”), dated April 16, 2010,
as amended May 17, 2010 by that certain First Amendment to Contract of Purchase and Sale
(collectively the “Agreement”) copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, for
certain property located in the City of Muskogee, Muskogee County, Oklahoma, and more particularly
described in the Agreement. Assignee hereby accepts this assignment of the Agreement. Assignee
hereby assumes Assignor’s obligations under the Agreement occurring after the date hereof. The
undersigned parties hereby ratify and confirm the Agreement, as amended, in all respects.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have executed this instrument as of the 27day of
May, 2010.



ASSIGNOR:



GRUBB & ELLIS EQUITY ADVISORS, LLC


a Delaware limited liability company



By: Michael Rispoli

Name: Michael Rispoli

Title: Chief Financial Officer





ASSIGNEE:



G&E HC REIT II Muskogee LTACH, LLC,





a Delaware limited liability company



By: Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP,


A Delaware limited partnership, its member



By: Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc.,





A Maryland corporation, its General Partner



By: /s/ Shannon K S Johnson

Name: Shannon K S Johnson

Title: Chief Financial Officer
FacilityID SourceID LocationType Longitude Latitude UTMzone

EE1_NEI11153 EE101004L -89.315722 31.335861 EE1_NEI11153 EE102001L -89.31501007 31.33832932 EE1_NEI11153 EE102002L -89.31472778 31.33832932 EE1_NEI11153 EE102003L -89.31333923 31.33777428 EE1_NEI11153 EE102005L -89.31555939 31.33832932 EE1_NEI11153 EE102006L -89.31528473 31.33805275 EE1_NEI11153 EE102007L -89.31528473 31.33832932 EE1_NEI11153 EE102008L -89.31528473 31.33832932 EE1_NEI11153 EE102009L -89.31555939 31.33805275 EE1_NEI11153 EE102010L -89.31555939 31.33805275 EE1_NEI11153 EE102011L -89.31501007 31.33777428 EE1_NEI11153 EE102012L -89.31501007 31.33777428 EE1_NEI11153 EE102013L -89.31501007 31.33777428 EE1_NEI11153 EE102014L -89.31501007 31.33777428 EE1_NEI11153 EE102015L -89.31501007 31.33777428 EE1_NEI11153 EE102016L -89.31501007 31.33777428 EE1_NEI11153 EE102017L -89.31555939 31.33805275 EE1_NEI11153 EE102018L -89.31555939 31.33805275SourceType Lengthx Lengthy Angle HorzDim VertDim

A 182.8799997 30.47999995 90 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0AreaVolReleaseHgt StackHgt_m StackDiameter_m ExitGasVel_m ExitGasTemp_K Elevation_m

0.99974399 0.99974399 0.0009144 9.144E-05 295.37

0 6.736080106 0.609599999 15.00000067 324.8115 0 6.736080106 0.609599999 15.00000067 324.8115 0 30.78479995 0.0762 8.999982033 588.674 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405 0 14.30426407 0.982979969 7.459492344 368.1405HillHeight
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Westergaard.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Anne H. Straton,
Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.








Date: 
March 9, 2010








/s/ 
Anne H. Straton


Anne H.
Straton,


Principal
Executive Officer


Principal
Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer
II 

Calendar No. 391 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4139 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 20, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7464 Highway 503 in Hickory, Mississippi, 

as the ‘‘Sergeant Matthew L. Ingram Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT MATTHEW L. INGRAM POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 7464 Highway 503 in Hickory, 

6 Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ser7 geant Matthew L. Ingram Post Office’’. 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4139 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Matthew 

5 L. Ingram Post Office’’. 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS

PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 391 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4139 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostIngram Post Office’’. ory, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Sergeant Matthew L. al Service located at 7464 Highway 503 in HickMAY 18, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
          ------------------------------------------------------------
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Cristino L. Perez, the Chief Financial Officer of Resolve Staffing, Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A  of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter  ended June 30, 2002 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated: August 28, 2003



                                         /s/ Cristino L. Perez
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         Name: Cristino L. Perez
                                         Title: Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32

       SGD HOLDINGS, LTD. FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 2004
      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Terry Washburn, certify that

1.   I am the President and Acting Chief Executive Officer of SGD Holdings, Ltd.

2.   Attached to this certification is Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April
     30, 2004, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by the issuer
     with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), which
     contains financial statements.

3.   I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
     to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     o    The periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
          and

     o    The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the issuer for the periods presented.


June 21, 2004                                /s/ Terry Washburn
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Terry Washburn
                                             President and Acting CEO
                                             (and equivalent of CFO)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by SGD Holdings, Ltd. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.




                                       27
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 25, 2013

t1118

Order 

Clerk

November 25, 2013

147546

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147546

COA: 309243 

Calhoun CC: 2011-001132-FH

DEON LAMONT JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-4198

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SPENCE SILVER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,

District Judge. (4:07-cr-00025-RBS-JEB-1)

Submitted: September 29, 2008 Decided: October 10, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James S. Ellenson, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck

Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Brian J. Samuels, Assistant

United States Attorney, Cameron M. Rountree, Third Year Law

Student, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Spence Silver was convicted, by a jury, of possession of

a firearm by a person previously convicted of a felony. The

district court imposed a sentence of 115 months’ imprisonment. On

appeal, Spence argues that the district court erred by granting the

government’s motion in limine and precluding Silver from

introducing evidence of the fact that one of the arresting officers

had recently been convicted of the misdemeanor offense of driving

under the influence. He argues that the officer’s disregard for

the law he swore to uphold showed that the officer would disrespect

the oath to testify truthfully. Silver also contends that the

officer’s credibility was a crucial issue in his trial.

 We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and joint appendix

and find no error in the district court’s determination that the

officer’s DUI conviction was not relevant to his truthfulness, and

therefore was not admissible to impeach the officer’s testimony.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order granting the

motion in limine, and also affirm Silver’s conviction for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Silver,

No. 4:07-cr-00025-RBS-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. dated Oct. 11, 2007; entered

Oct. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order entered April 20, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00954-CV

ABDUL MATEEN MODI, Appellant

V.

AFSHEEN IMRAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 003-03597-2019

ORDER

By postcard notice dated April 6, 2021, we notified appellant that his brief 

was past due and instructed him to file his brief along with an extension motion 

within ten days. Before the Court is appellant’s April 16, 2021 request for an 

extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to 

May 17, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.  20549 FORM 8-K Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 21, 2006 MAF BANCORP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) _____________________________ Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation)
        0-18121(Commission File Number)
        36-3664868(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)55th Street & Holmes AvenueClarendon Hills, Illinois(Address of principal executive offices)
        
        60514(Zip Code)  Registrants telephone number, including area code(630) 325-7300 Not Applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last year) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: o
        Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) o
        Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))        Item 7.01.  Regulation FD Disclosure On February 21, 2006, MAF Bancorp, Inc. (MAF) issued a press release announcing its participation in the Americas Community Bankers Community Bank Investor Conference to be held in San Francisco, California on February 21-22, 2006.  The Companys presentation on February 22, 2006, will be broadcast on the Internet athttp://www.corporate-ir.net/ireye/confLobby.zhtml?ticker=MAFB&item_id=1194048and will also be available through MAFs website at www.mafbancorp.com. The press release, attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, and the presentation materials being used at the conference, attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2, are incorporated herein by reference.   2        SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. MAF BANCORP, INC.By:/s/ Jerry A. WeberlingJerry A. WeberlingExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer  Date: February 21, 2006   3        EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit 99.1
        Press Release dated February 21, 2006 99.2
        Conference Presentation Materials    4
August 3, 2015

Mr. James Mackler

Bone, McAllester Norton, PLLC

Counsel

511 Union Street, Suite 1600

Nashville, TN 37219

Dear Mr. Mackler:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121,

91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and 

what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your May 20, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Unmanned Aircraft 

Professional Services, LLC into the public docket (No. FAA−2015−1887), but we are unable 

to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3