alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Andrew L. Boyd, plaintiff in error, *vs.*A. B. Merriam, defendant in error.

Land was sold by the sheriff, under three *fi. fas.,*two from a justice’s court and one from the superior court, the purchaser put in possession, and the execution satisfied by the sale. The defendant in exetion brought suit for damages against the plaintiff in the *fi. fa.*issued *562from the superior court, on the ground that his execution was illegal and void:

*Held,*that the action could be maintained, and that the court erred in granting a non-suit.

Trespass. Execution. Judicial sale. Before Judge Hopkins. Fulton Superior Court. March Term, 1874.

A report of this case is unnecessary.

M. A. Bell, for plaintiff in error.

Thrasher *&*Thrasher, for defendant.

Trippe, Judge.

It was not denied on the argument by defendant in error that his execution was illegal and void. Counsel for defendant rested his case on the ground that there were two other *fi. fas.*also levied on the same property at the same' time, and as under them the sale was legal, he cannot be held liable for having his execution also levied. This position cannot be maintained. The fact that a valid and legal *fi. fa.*is levied on a defendant’s property, and is proceeding to sell it, neither justifies or excuses the enforcement of a void process against that property. Were it so, it would operate as an outlawry, in one sense, of any man’s estate, if there happened to be a good judgment against it which was being enforced. It seems that in this case the three executions were all levied, the property sold under the three, and that defendant’s *fi. fa.*participated in the proceeds of the sale'; and under that sale the purchaser was put in possession. Because a man maybe, lawfully stricken down, it is no excuse for a third person to deal him another *unlawful*blow. As to whether an illegal levy upon land is a trespass, see *McDougald vs. Dougherty,*12 *Georgia,*613, approved in *Wallace et al. vs. Iiolly,*13 *Ibid.,*392. If the levy itself did not constitute a trespass, the sale and delivery of possession by the sheriff to the purchaser would complete it. We think the court erred in dismissing plaintiff’s action..

Judgment reversed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3983 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3983

      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain high-performance 
                             loudspeakers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 2009

 Mr. Markey of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain high-performance 
                             loudspeakers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN HIGH-PERFORMANCE LOUDSPEAKERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Loudspeakers not    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        mounted in their                                                   31/2012.......
                        enclosures
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8518.29.80), the
                        foregoing which
                        meet a
                        performance
                        standard of not
                        more than 1.5 dB
                        for the average
                        level of 3 or
                        more octave
                        bands, when such
                        loudspeakers are
                        tested in a
                        reverberant
                        chamber according
                        to Institute of
                        Electronics and
                        Engineers (IEEE)
                        Standard 219-1975
                        and International
                        Electrotechnical
                        Commission (IEC)
                        Standard 60268-5.

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership");
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  February 22, 2005 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                     
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------
|                         | Marc N. Teal, Chief
Financial Officer



69
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Quarterly  report of Collectible  Concepts  Group,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending August 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Paul S.  Lipschutz,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc.  and will be retained by
Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:   April 14, 2005                       By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Paul S. Lipschutz
                                               Chief Executive Officer
*Present*— Chancellors Mathews and Rhteedg-e.

#### Snow and others *vs.*Callum, executor of Snow.

JULY, 1797.

CASE ‘CiSVIII.

DECREE BOOK, vol. ii.

Travelling expenses and wages not lowed to an Specific lega-^contribute0 proporciona-payment ^of testator^s ure of other auest offree" dom to a1 female slave and her issue, after ten ^testator’sTM death — the freef tho’ tiie mother died ten years. TM

Chancellor Rutledge

delivered the decree of the COUl’t.

Upon considering the master’s report, and on exami-of the defendant’s accounts, the court are of opi-njon that the charges for travelling expenses and overseers wages, which he has allowed to the executor, should struck out, as they are not warranted by the act of assembly, which regulates the allowance therein given to executors; and this court has uniformly in such cases referred them for recovery of such charges to their actions at law, on a quantum meruit. The account must there-. ^ore S° hack again to the master to be new .stated. There can be no doubt on tiie will of George Snow: that the ¡imitations over are too remote: a variety of cases hav- * ing been determined on that point in this court. David Snow, the first taker therefore had a good right to dispose of the property bequeathed him by his father} subject however to a contribution out of his legacy in proportion with the Dther specific legatees to the payment of Ids father’s debts, on a deficiency of other assets of the estate; and as it is alleged that the whole of the legacies -of some of the specific legatees, and parts of others have. *543"been sold, and the money applied to the payment of the testator G. Snow’s debts,' it must be referred back to the master to ascertain the fact, and report specially thereon, and the sums to be paid by those legatees who have hitherto contributed nothing or but little out of their resp'ective legacies towards reimbursing or indemnifying those whose legacies have been disposed of in the manner above mentioned. With respect to the bequest of freedom to the woman slave, Minda and her increase, after ten years from testator’s death, his intention is so plain that there can he no doubt but the children were emancipated, though their mother died within the ten years.

*Note.*— The refusal to allow the executors the charge for overseer’s wages, is not a prohibition to employ overseers where required, but to prevent their charging overseer’s wages for their own services, on the plantation. The statute being express that executors and administrators shall have no other compensation for all the;r services to the estate, than two and a half per cent, on monies received, and the same sum Qn monies paid on account of the estate, except in cases of interest money. If an executor claims more for extra services, he must make up an issue, and try it before a jury.
PASSENGER MANIFEST INFORMATION 

Required Enhanced Passenger Manifest Information 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 243, the following information is furnished on behalf of HRN with respect 

to the system to be used for solicitation and collection of the full name of, and contact name and 

telephone number for, each U.S. citizen passenger boarded for each flight segment operated by HRN 

to or from points in the United States. 

1. Every passenger is required to provide a passport at check-in for a covered flight segment. Each 

passenger who offers a United States passport at check-in will be identified as a U.S.citizen. The 

information required under section 243.7(a)(1) (the full name of the passenger), and additional 

voluntary information under section 243.7(a)(2) (contact name and telephone number), if given, will 

be collected for each U.S. citizen passenger by the following procedures: 

At the reservation counter the full name and contact name and number of the traveler is requested. 

This information is then transmitted onto the Passenger Reservation Record (“PNR”). 

At the check-in counter, when U.S. citizens are recognized, the agent will recheck the data collected 

from the PNR and any omissions will be corrected on the Departure Control System (“DCS”) at this 

point. 

2. The required information gathered through these procedures will be consolidated and retained 

until confirmation is received that all passengers have disembarked from the covered flight segment. 

Passengers refusing to provide their full names will be denied boarding. 

3. HRN will inform the Managing Director of Overseas Citizen Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs, 

U.S. Department of State, immediately upon learning of an aviation disaster involving a covered flight

segment operated by HRN by calling the Department of State Operations Center at +1 202 647 1512. 

4. HRN will also transmit, by telephone or telefax as appropriate, a complete and accurate 

compilation of the collected U.S. passenger manifest information to the U.S. Department of State 

and, upon request, to the Director, Family Support Services, National 

Transportation Safety Board, as quickly as possible, but not later than 3 hours, after learning of an 

aviation disaster involving a covered flight segment operated by HRN or after a request from the 

Department of Transportation to ascertain the effectiveness of the carrier’s system. 
5. HRN’s contacts, available at any time HRN is operating a covered flight segment, who may be 

contacted concerning the passenger manifest information gathered under Part 243, are being 

provided separately to the DOT on a confidential basis.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,779
<SECURITIES>                                    38,540
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,569
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,362
<PP&E>                                          17,548
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,647
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,368
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              122
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,307
<SALES>                                         29,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,001
<CGS>                                            5,070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   397
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    209
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (148)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                357
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       357
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
FOR
        IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    NR08-06  DYNEGY COMPLETES SALE OF CALCASIEU PEAKING PLANT  HOUSTON (April 1, 2008)  Dynegy Inc. (NYSE: DYN) today announced that it has completed the sale of the Calcasieu Power Generation Facility, a peaking plant in Sulphur, Louisiana, to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C. for approximately $57 million.  Dynegy does not expect any accounting gains or losses on the transaction. The sale of the Calcasieu facility (322-megawatt summer capacity rating/351-megawatt winter capacity rating) was agreed to in January 2007 and recently received the final requisite approvals by various federal and state agencies. Dynegy Inc. produces and sells electric energy, capacity and ancillary services in key U.S. markets.  The companys power generation portfolio consists of more than 19,000 megawatts of baseload, intermediate and peaking power plants fueled by a mix of coal, fuel oil and natural gas.DYNC ###
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

January 24, 2018

No. 04

- 1 8

- 00 018

- CV

IN RE STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.

, Janet Ann Lorenz

- Floyd, and Lisa Horton

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan M arion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The Real Parties in Interest, Margarito Guajardo and Maria Luisa Guajardo's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to February 23, 2018.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_________________________ KEITH E . HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 201 8

- CI

- 00083 , styled Margarito Guajardo and Maria Luisa Guajardo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

, Janet Ann Lorenz

- Floyd, and Lisa Horton , pending in the 131st Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Mery presiding. Trial cause number 2018

- CI

00083 is the cause number into which certain extra

- contractual claims were severed from the contractual claims in trial cause number 2017

- CI

- 17407.
Specimen Common Stock Certificate



 Exhibit 4.7 

 

 

  
 EC 

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

CUSIP 292554 10 2 

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS AND LEGENDS 

THIS CERTIFIES THAT 

IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF 

FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01 PER SHARE, OF 

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. 

transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney on surrender of
this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 

WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 

Dated: 

TREASURER AND CFO 

PRESIDENT AND CEO 

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 

AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY 

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 

BY 

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 








 

 

  
 The Corporation
will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional, or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such requests shall be made to the Corporation’s Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. 

KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, OR DESTROYED THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF
INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE. 
 The following abbreviations, when used
in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 

TEN COM — as tenants In common TEN ENT — as tenants by the entireties JT TEN — as joint tenants with right
of 
 survivorship and not as tenants 

in common 

UNI GIFT MIN ACT — Custodian 

(Cust) (Minor) 

under Uniform Gifts to Minors 

Act 

(State] 

UNIF TRF MIN ACT — Custodian (until age ) 

(Cust) 

under Uniform Transfer 

(Minor) 

to Minors Act 

(State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ; hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OH OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 

; Shares 

of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 

Attorney 

to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

 Dated 

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE 

FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OF ENLARGEMENT ,OR ANY 

CHANGE WHATEVER. 

Signature(s) Guaranteed 

By 

THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN
ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Financial
Federal Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended April 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exhange Commission (the
"Report"), Paul R. Sinsheimer, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company

     A signed original of this written statement required by section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



June 7, 2006                     /s/ Paul R. Sinsheimer
------------                     ---------------------------
Date                             Paul R. Sinsheimer
                                 Chief Executive Officer and President