T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ARM AN DO VA LE NCI A CHA VEZ; NO R MA S YL VI A V AL E NC I A, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 71934 A ge nc yN os . A 070- 913- 944

A 070- 913- 945 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t10, 2010 ** B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , H A W K IN S , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A rm ando V a l e nc i aC ha ve z a nd N orm aS y l vi aV a l e nc i a , na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of M exi co, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order s u m m a r ilya f

f irm in g a n im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s ( “I J ” ) d e c is io n d e n y in g th e ir appl i c a t i ons f

orc anc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l f

orf a i l ur e t o pr os e c ut e . W e ha ve 

# FI LED AU G 27 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 71934 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of l aw , i nc l udi ng du e p r o c e s s c la im s , Ra m v . I NS , 24 3 F . 3d 51 0, 51 6 (9th C i r. 20 01 ), and w e r evi ew f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the pr e t e rm i s s i on of an appl i c a t i on f

orc anc e l l a t i on of r e m o v a l f

o rf a ilu r e to c o m p lyw ith f

in g e rp r in tin g r e g u la tio n s . See Cuiv. Mukasey , 5 3 8 F . 3 d1 2 8 9 , 1 2 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he I Jdi d notabus e hi s di s c r e t i on bypr e t e rm i tt i ng pe t i t i one r s ’ appl i c a t i on f orc a nc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l , w he r e pe t i t i one r s f a i l e d t o c om pl yw i th the r e q u ir e m e n ts to p r o v id e th e irf in g e rp r in ts w ith in th e tim e au th o r iz e db yth e I J . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 47 (c ). T he IJi nstruct ed pet i t i on er s i n b oth o ra l and w ri tt en form at t o sub m i tthem se l ves f

or fi ng erpri nt i ng , i nform ed them of the consequences of a f a ilu r e to d o s o , an dh a da lr e a d yg r an te do n e c o n tin u an c e du e to th e ir m is u n d e r s tan d in g o f

f in g e rp r in t r e g u la tio n s , y e t te n m o n th s la te rp e titio n e r s c o u ld notpr ovi de ar e a s onabl e e xpl ana t i on f orthe i rf a i l ur e t o c om pl yw i th the fi ng erpri nt i ng re qu i re m ent . A cc ordi ng l y, the pet i t i on er s have notes t abl i shed that th e irf a ilu r e to c o m p lyw a s ar e s u lt o f g o o dc au s e . Se e i d. ; c

f . C ui , 53 8 F . 3d at 1 2 9 3 - 9 . P e titio n e r s ’ du e p r o c e s s c o n te n tio n f a ils a s w e ll. Se e La ta v . I NS , 204 F . 3 d1 2 4 1 , 1 2 4 6 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ) (req u i ri n g ag en cy erro r fo r a p et i t i o n er t o est ab l i sh a vi ol at i on of du e proces s) . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .