# Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Latitude: 21 o 

# 22’15” N Longitude: 157 o 

# 53’33” W
HDOH Facility ID No. 9-102271 HDOH Release ID No. 99051, 010011, 020028

April 2010

Prepared by:

TEC Inc. 1003 Bishop St. Suite 1505 Pauahi Tower Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

Prepared for:

Commander Navy Region Hawaii Environmental Department, Code N45 850 Ticonderoga Street, Suite 110 Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860-5101

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## i 

# Table of Contents

Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. ................ i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. ........... 1 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. ........ 8 1.1 Project Objective ....................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Previous Reports ....................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Background ............................................................................................................... 9 1.3.1 Site Description ............................................................................................ 9 1.3.2 Facility Information ..................................................................................... 9 1.3.3 UST Information .......................................................................................... 9 1.4 Previous Environmental Investigations .................................................................... 9 1.5 Regulatory Updates ................................................................................................. 12 1.6 RHMW05 Installation ............................................................................................. 12 2.0 Sample Collection and Analyses ....................................................................................... 13 2.1 Monitoring Well Purging ........................................................................................ 13 2.2 Groundwater Sample Collection ............................................................................. 13 2.3 Groundwater Sample Analyses ............................................................................... 14 3.0 Groundwater Sample Analytical Results ........................................................................... 14 3.1 January, February, and March 2010 Sample Analytical Results ............................ 14 3.2 Groundwater Contaminant Trend ........................................................................... 16 3.3 Results of Oil/Water Interface Measurements ........................................................ 18 3.4 Groundwater Status ................................................................................................. 19 4.0 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................ 23 5.0 References .................................................................................................................... ...... 27

List of Tables Table 1 Analytical Results for Quarterly Gr oundwater Sampling Release Response Report ..15 Table 2 Oil/Water Inte rface Measurements ..............................................................................19 Table 3 Action Levels fo r Compounds of Concern ..................................................................20 Table 4 Results Categories and Responses to Groundwater Monitoring Results .....................20
List of Figures Figure 1 TPH Trends in Groundwater, Round 18 (Jan. 26/27, Feb. 23, and March 30, 2010) ..25 Figure 2 PAH Trends in Groundwater, Round 18 (Jan. 26/27, Feb. 23, and March 30, 2010) .26
List of Appendices Appendix A – Laboratory Analytical Reports Appendix B – January, February, and Ma rch 2010 TPH-DRO Results Memorandum

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 1 

# Executive Summary This quarterly groundwater monitoring report presents the results of groundwater sampling conducted on January 26 and 27, 2010 and resample events at RHMW02 on February 23, 2010 and again on March 30, 2010 at the United States (US) Navy Bulk Fuel Storage Facility at Red Hill, Oahu, Hawaii (the Facility). The sampli ng and reporting was conducted by TEC Inc. (TEC) for the Fleet and Industrial Supply Center (FISC) at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Th is report is part of a series of quarterly groundwater monitoring repor ts provided by the US Navy to the State of Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) in accordance with HDOH’s release response requirements. Currently, there are 18 active a nd 2 inactive, 12.5 million gallon, field-constructed underground storage tanks (USTs) located at the Facility.
Background In 2002, the US Navy installed a groundwater monitoring well (cur rently named RHMW01) into the basal aquifer, directly located betw een RHMW02 and US Navy Well 2254-01, within the lower access tunnel. Gr oundwater samples from this well i ndicated that petroleum from the Facility has migrated to the basal aquifer (AMEC, 2002). In 2005, the US Navy began quarterly monitoring of the aquifer to protect their drin king water resource associated with the US Navy Well 2254-01. US Navy Well 2254-01 is located approximately 3,000 feet down-gradient from the Facility USTs and provides approximately 24% of the potable water to the Pearl Harbor Water System (PHWS).
By September 2005, the US Navy had installe d two more groundwater monitoring wells (RHMW02 and RHMW03) within the Facil ity UST system, a background groundwater monitoring well (RHMW04) located north of UST tank 20 and ad jacent to the US Navy Firing Range, and a groundwater monitoring well within the US Navy Well 2254-01 infiltration gallery (RHMW2254-01).
All five wells were sampled twice as part of a comprehensive environmental investigation and risk assessment (TEC, 2006). For this investig ation, groundwater samples were analyzed for petroleum constituents and compared agains t HDOH Drinking Water E nvironmental Action Levels (EALs) (HDOH, July 2005). In additio n, a three-dimensional (3-D) groundwater model was developed to produce site-specific risk-based levels (SSRBLs) for compounds of concern. The results of this modeling effort indicated that Jet Propulsion (JP)–5 fuel presented the biggest risk to the US Navy water supply, due to its mobility and toxicity. Finally, the model determined that a non-aqueous plume (free product) of JP-5 would need to migrate to within 1,100 feet of the US Navy Well 2254-01 infiltrati on gallery for HDOH EALs to be exceeded within the gallery. Based on this, free-product must be observed in RHMW01 for EALs to be exceeded at the US Navy Well 2254-01.
In April 2009, another groundwater monitoring well (RHMW05) was installed within the lower access tunnel between RHMW01 and US Navy Well 2254-01. It was installed to identify the extent of contaminant migration before it reaches US Navy Well 2254-01 (see Figure 1).

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 2 During the summer and fall of 2008, HDOH updated their EALs, which resulted in significant changes to the action levels associated with methylnaphthalenes. The HDOH Drinking Water toxicity EAL for these compounds was 240 micrograms per liter (  g/L). This concentration assumed that methylnaphthalenes were not human carcinogens. Once evidence emerged and was accepted by the US Environmental Protecti on Agency (USEPA) that methylnaphthalenes are carcinogenic to humans, HDOH a dopted more rigorous EALs of 4.7  g/L for 1- methylnaphthalene and 24  g/L for 2-methylnaphthalene (HDOH, 2008).
The HDOH Drinking Water EAL for naphthalene was also updated during this process. Previously, HDOH based their naphthalene EA L on USEPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goal (USEPA PRG) of 6.2  g/L, which is associated with a non-cancer Hazard Index of 1. In deference to the California Department of Pub lic Health’s Drinking Water Notification Levels, (HDOH, 2008) HDOH updated their naphtha lene drinking water EAL to 17  g/L.
Finally, the HDOH Drinking Water EAL for TPH-DRO was increased from 100  g/L to 210  g/L, although the Groundwater Gross Cont amination EAL for TPH-DRO remains 100  g/L.

Groundwater Protection Plan In 2008, the US Navy completed the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Final Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2008), which specified SSRBLs and various required ac tions based on the category status (i.e., categorie s 1 through 4) of each groundwate r monitoring well. In 2009, the Plan was revised to account for ongoing changes, such as the installa tion of monitoring well RHMW05. The main objective of the Plan is to protect the groundwater quality of US Navy Well 2254-01, which provides potabl e water to the PHWS. This is accomplished by comparing petroleum concentrations in the Facility well s to established SSRBLs and taking appropriate action. A secondary, but impor tant objective of the Plan is to identify leaking USTs by evaluating increasing concentratio n trends, or the presence of free product in one or more groundwater monitoring wells. This quarterly re port compares observed water quality to these established categories and associated actions.

Current Results On January 26 through 27, 2010, five groundw ater samples (i.e., RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05 and RHMW2254-01), along with th e required quality control samples (duplicate, matrix spike, spike duplicate, and trip blank) were collected for analysis. Samples were analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) quantified as Di esel-Range Organics (DRO) and Gasoline Range Organi cs (GRO), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), and dissolved lea d. Due to elevated concentrations of TPHDRO at RHMW02, additional samples were collect ed on February 23, 2010 and March 30, 2010 and analyzed for TPH-DRO.

TPH-DRO TPH-DRO was detected at 312 (μg/L) in RHMW01, 2,770 μg/L (i.e ., the average of normal and duplicate samples) in RHMW02, and at 2,060 μg/L in RHMW05. TPH-DRO was not detected above the laboratory method detection lim it (MDL) in RHMW03 and RHMW2254-01. The

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 3 HDOH Drinking Water EAL and SSRBL for TPH-DRO are 210 μg/L and 4,500 μg/L, respectively.

TPH-GRO For TPH-GRO the HDOH Drinking Water EAL is 100 μg/L. In samples RHMW01, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01 TPH-GR O was not observed above th e laboratory MDL (i.e., 30 μg/L). In the regular and duplicate samples from RHMW02, TP H-GRO was detected at an average of 40.2F μg/L [F indicates that the compound was identified, but the concentration was above the MDL and below the reporting limit (RL) , therefore is considered an estimate].
Other Parameters above HDOH Drinking Water EALs In RHMW02, the average concentrations between the normal and duplicate sample of naphthalene and 1-methylnaphthalene were 20.4 μg/L and 8.65 μg/L, respectively. This is above the HDOH Drinking Water EALs of 17 μg/L for naphthalene, and 4.7 μg/L for 1- methylnaphthalene.
Trend Analysis The following is a discussion of compounds th at exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs during two or more recent consecutive sampling events, thus establishing a trend:

RHMW01 At RHMW01, concentrations of TPH-DRO have been greater than the HDOH Drinking Water EAL since September 2005, but less than 25 percent of the SSRBL of 4,500  g/L. TPH-DRO had exhibited a decreasing tre nd since October 2008 with the lo west concentration (i.e., 248 μg/L) recorded in July 2009. Since July 2009, th is trend began increasing with 299F μg/L and 312F μg/L detected in October 2009 and January 2010, respectively.

RHMW02 From September 2005 through February 2009, TP H-DRO exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL and was greater than 50 percent of th e SSRBL (estimated solubility limit of 4,500  g/L). However, there has been a de creasing trend since the SSRBL was exceeded in October 2008 to below 50 percent of the SSRBL in May and Ju ly 2009. However, since increasing above 50 percent of the SSRBL in October 2009, TPH-DR O continued exhibiting an increasing trend through January 2010. In January 2010, TPH-DRO in creased to an average of 2,770 μg/L. This prompted resample events in February 2010 when TPH-DRO increased to an average of 7,780 μg/L, above the SSRBL and again in March 2010 when TPH-DRO averaged 2,490 μg/L. It is important to note that in Ja nuary and February 2010 tentativ ely identified compounds (TICs) apparently not associated with petroleum fr om the Facility were detected at significant concentrations in RHMW02. However, TICs were not observed at significant concentrations for the March 2010 sampling event. After subtractin g the TICs from the January and February 2010 results, TPH-DRO was detected at an averag e of 1,925 μg/L and 3,200 μg/L, respectively (see Appendix B).
For other parameters, 1-methylnaphthalene and 2- methylnaphthalene have almost consistently averaged concentrations above HDOH Drinking Water EALs (i.e., 4.7  g/L and 24  g/L, respectively) since September 2005. However, a significantly decreasi ng trend since October

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 4 2008 has since brought these con centrations below the HDOH Dri nking Water EALs. In January 2010, 1-methylnaphthalene increased above th e HDOH Drinking Water EAL to an average concentration of 8.645 μg/L, after decreasing to the lowest concentration of any round in October 2009 (i.e., 3.245  g/L). In January 2010, although not exceeding the HDOH Drinking Water EAL, 2-methylnaphthalene increased to an average concentration of 3.25  g/L after decreasing in October 2009. Naphthalene has e xhibited a historical trend similar to 2- methylnaphthalene at RHMW02. However, in October 2009 and Janu ary 2010, naphthalene increased to an averaged 21.65  g/L and 20.4  g/L, respectively, greater than the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 17  g/L.

RHMW03 At RHMW03, historically, conc entrations of TPH-DRO have fluctuated around the HDOH Drinking Water EAL, but have been significantl y lower than corresponding values observed at RHMW01 and RHMW02. However, during the la st four sampling events (i.e., May 2009, July 2009, October 2009, and January 2010), TPH-DRO was not detected above the laboratory MDL. These results represent a continuing decreasin g trend for TPH-DRO that has existed since October 2008.

RHMW05 At RHMW05 there is an incr easing trend for TPH-DRO. Th e January 2010 concentration was 2,060 μg/L, a significant increase as compared with the October 2009 concentr ation of 673 μg/L. The January 2010 concentration is greater than the HDOH EAL, but less than 50 percent of the SSRBL for TPH-DRO. However, as with RH MW02, TICs apparently not associated with petroleum from the Facility were detected at significant concentratio ns in RHMW05. After subtracting the TICs from the January 2010 resu lts, TPH-DRO was estimate d at a concentration of 541 μg/L (see Appendix B).
US Navy Well 2254-01 At RHMW2254-01, no compounds have been detected above the laboratory MDLs since trace concentrations of TPH-GRO and 2-methylnaphtha lene were observed in the February and May 2009 events. However, in January 2010 naphtha lene was detected at 0.0375F μg/L via EPA Method 8270C SIM, just above the laborat ory MDL (i.e., 0.0326 μg/L) and below the HDOH EAL (i.e., 17 μg/L).

Current Groundwater Status To date, there is no observation of a trend (i.e., two or more consecutive events) of light-non aqueous phased liquids (LNAPL), otherwise known as free product, on groundwater in any of the Facility monitoring wells.
US Navy Well 2254-01 Although a trace concentration of naphthalene was detected at RHMW2254-01 during the January 2010 sampling event, it does not place the well into the Category 1 status. Because no contamination trend (i.e., two or more consecutive events of detectable concentrations) has been established, RHMW2254-01 loca ted at US Navy Well 2254-01, does not meet the Category 1 definition.

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 5 RHMW03 Based upon the January 2010 sampling event, RHMW03 is not eligible for any category status change since no compounds were detected above the laboratory MDLs.
Category 1 Status Locations
There are no Category 1 st atus locations based u pon the January 2010 event.
Category 2 Status Locations RHMW01 The January 2010 sampling event indicates that RH MW01 should remain in Category 2 status. This is because the TPH-DRO co ncentration increased to 312F  g/L and is greater than the HDOH Drinking Water EAL (210  g/L), but less than half the SSRBL of 4,500  g/L (estimated solubility limit of JP-5).

RHMW05 Based upon the January 2010 sampling event, RHMW05 should remain in a Category 2 status. TPH-DRO in RHMW05 (i.e., 2,060 μg/L) is above the drinking water EAL of 210 μg/L and has been showing an increasing trend over the last four rounds. However, TICs apparently not associated with petroleum from the Facility were detected at significant concentrations in RHMW05. After subtracting the TICs, TPH-DRO was estimated at a concentration of 541 μg/L (see Appendix B).
Category 2 for RHMW01 and RHMW05 requires: 1. Quarterly reports to be sent to HDOH; and 2. Initiation of a leak determination progr am to identify if tanks are leaking.
Category 3 Status Locations RHMW02 Results from the January 2010 sampling event and the resample events in February and March 2010 indicate that RHMW02 is in Category 3 st atus. This is because TPH-DRO, after subtracting the TICs apparently not associated w ith petroleum from the F acility, is greater than the HDOH Drinking Water EAL (210  g/L), and is between one half and the established SSRBL value of 4,500  g/L (estimated solubility limit of JP-5 ). Specifically, the maximum observed TPH-DRO concentration among the January 2010 and February 2010 sampling efforts occurred during the re-sampling of RHMW02 on Fe burary 23, 2010 with concentrations of 3,470  g/L and 2,930  g/L (duplicate). These con centrations were corrected by removing apparently nonfuel related compounds from the TPH-DRO tota l concentration (see Appendix B). The March 2010 re-sampling results di d not contain large con centrations of apparently non-fuel related TIC compounds. The March 2010 TPH-DRO concentrations of 2,630  g/L and 2,350  g/L (duplicate) provide an averag e TPH-DRO concentration 2,490  g/L (Appendix B).
In addition, the HDOH Dr inking Water EAL of 17  g/L for naphthalene was exceeded in January 2010 [i.e., 20.4  g/L (the average of normal and duplicate samples)].

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 6 Category 3 response at RHMW02 requires:

1. Send quarterly reports to HDOH; 2. Initiation of a leak determination progr am to identify if tanks are leaking; 3. Increase free product monitoring frequenc y to once per month (if concentrations increasing); 4. Notify HDOH verbally within 7 days and fo llow with written notification in 30 days; 5. Remove sampling pumps, measure product in pertinent wells with interface probe, reinstall pumps if product is not detected; and 6. Immediately evaluate tanks for leaks.
Category 4 Status Locations There are no Category 4 status locations.

Conclusions and Recommendations There is no indication of an immediate threat of disruption to drinking wate r resources of the US Navy Well 2254-01 as a result of the January and February 2010 data . However, a trace concentration of naphthalene was detected just above the laborato ry MDL, but significantly less than the HDOH drinking water EAL at RHMW2254-01. The increasing TPH-DRO concentrations at RHMW05 are of significant concern. This well is less than 700 feet from the east end of the US Navy Well 2254-01 infiltration gallery. The TPH-DRO concentration in this well was nearly 50 percent of the SSRBL prior to a re-quantification that adjusted the concentration by removing apparently non-fuel related TIC compounds from the TPH-DRO total concentration (Appendix B). If the total TPH- DRO concentration at RHMW05 had been from fuel-related compounds, there could be a high probability of contamination at some point entering the infiltration gallery. It is recommende d that future quarterly analytical results be closely assessed at RHMW05, since its non-TIC adju sted concentrations exhibit an increasing contaminant trend for TPH-DRO (i.e., 200 μg /L in May 2009, 491μg/L in July 2009, 673 μg/L in October 2009, and 2,060 μg/L in January 2010). In addition, consideration should be given to performing a more detailed analyt ical assessment of the contamin ation found in this well (and other wells) such as having future samples an alyzed using the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) analytical methods in addition to TPH-GRO and TPH-DRO analytical methods.
With the exception of RHMW03 and RHMW2254-01, compound concentrations for all the other monitoring wells (i.e., RHMW01, RHMW 02, and RHMW05) are exhibiting increasing contaminant trends for TPH-DRO relative to th e concentrations obser ved in October 2009. Current results from RHMW01 are st ill at concentration levels w ithin the historical range. However, results from RHMW02 and RHMW05 have been exhibiting signif icant increases (i.e., for the non-TIC adjusted concentrat ions). After a thorough analysis of the analytical results from RHMW02 and RHMW05, TICs appare ntly not attributed to pe troleum from the Facility contributed to a significant increase of TPH-DRO during Ja nuary and February 2010 (see Appendix B). After subtracting these TICs, the estimated TPH-DRO concentrations in RHMW02 and RHMW05 remain within the historical range.

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 7 Quarterly groundwater sampling for TPH-DRO, TPH-GRO, VOCs, PAHs, and dissolved lead should continue at the Facility until such time that data indicates that a different monitoring plan is warranted.

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 8 

# 1.0 Introduction This report presents the results of the 18 th 

## groundwater sampling event, conducted in January 2010 and resample events at RHMW02 in February and March 2010 at the Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Oahu, Hawaii (hereafter refe rred to as “the Facility”). Th e Facility consists of 18 active and two inactive underground storag e tanks (USTs) operated by th e Fleet and Industrial Supply Center (FISC), Pearl Harbor. The groundwater sampling and analysis event is part of a groundwater monitoring program fo r the UST site in response to past UST releases, previous environmental investigations, and recommendations from the State of Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH). 

# 1.1 Project Objective This groundwater sampling project was performed to evaluate the presence of chemicals of potential concern in groundwater underlying the Facility. The project wa s conducted to ensure the Navy remains in compliance with HDOH UST release response requirements as described in Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) 11-281 Subc hapter 7, Release Response Action. The groundwater sampling program followe d the procedures described in Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Groundwater Protection Plan [TEC Inc. (TEC), 2008 update d in 2009], also referred to as “the Plan”.
This groundwater sampling event was condu cted by TEC under United States (US) Navy Contract Number N47408-04-D-8514, Task Order No. 54. 

# 1.2 Previous Reports The following groundwater monitoring reports we re previously submitted to the HDOH:

1. Groundwater Sampling Report, First Quarter 2005 (submitted April 2005); 2. Groundwater Sampling Report, Second Quarter 2005 (submitted August 2005); 3. Groundwater Sampling Report, Third Quarter 2005 (submitted November 2005); 4. Groundwater Sampling Report, Fourth Quarter 2005 (submitted February 2006); 5. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2006 (submitted September 2006);
6. Groundwater Monitoring Results, December 2006 (submitted January 2007); 7. Groundwater Monitoring Results, March 2007 (submitted May 2007); 8. Groundwater Monitoring Results, June 2007 (submitted August 2007); 9. Groundwater Monitoring Results, September 2007 (submitted October 2007); 10. Groundwater Monitoring Results, January 2008 (submitted March 2008); 11. Groundwater Monitoring Results, April 2008 (submitted May 2008); 12. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2008 (submitted October 2008); 13. Groundwater Monitoring Results, October and December 2008 (submitted February 2009);

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 9 14. Groundwater Monitoring Results, February 2009 (submitted May 2009); 15. Groundwater Monitoring Results, May 2009 (submitted July 2009); 16. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2009 (submitted September 2009); and 17. Groundwater Monitoring Results, Oc tober 2009 (submitted December 2009). 

# 1.3 Background The following sections provide a description of th e site and information on the Facility and USTs.

1.3.1 Site Description The Facility is located in Red Hill, Oahu, Hawaii. Land adjacent to the north of the Facility is occupied by Halawa Correctional Facility and private businesses. Land to the south and west of the Facility includes the Coast Guard Reservation. Moanalua Va lley is located east of the Facility (Dawson, 2006).
The Navy Public Works Department operates a pot able water infiltratio n tunnel approximately 1,550 feet hydraulically down-gradient from the Facility (Dawson, 2006). The US Navy Well 2254-01 is located approximately 3,000 feet down-grad ient (west) of the Facility and provides approximately 24% of the potab le water to the Pearl Harbor Water System (PHWS), which serves approximately 52,200 military consumers (TEC, 2008).

1.3.2 Facility Information The Facility consists of 18 active and two inact ive USTs operated by Navy FISC Pearl Harbor. Each UST has a capacity of 12.5 million gallons. The bottom of the USTs is located approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer (Dawson, 2006).

1.3.3 UST Information The USTs were constructed in the early 1940s. The tanks were fabricated from steel and currently contain Jet Propulsion (J P)–5 fuel, JP-8, and F-76 (diese l marine fuel). Previously, several tanks stored Navy Special Fuel Oil, Navy Distillate, aviation gasoline, and motor gasoline. Each tank measures approximately 245 f eet in height and 100 feet in diameter. The upper domes of the tanks lie at depths varyin g between approximately 100 feet and 200 feet below the existing ground surface (TEC, 2006). 

# 1.4 Previous Environmental Investigations 1998 to 2001: From 1998 to 2001, the Navy conducted an i nvestigation at the Facility to assess potential releases from the fuel storage USTs and piping systems. In February 2001, the Navy installed a one-inch diameter RHMW01 (previ ously known as MW-V1D) to monitor for contamination of the basal aquifer underlying the Facility. The well was installed and completed at approximately 100 feet below grade within the lower access t unnel. At the time of well completion, depth to water in RHMW01 was measur ed at 86 feet below grade (Dawson, 2006).
In February 2001, groundwater samples collec ted from RHMW01 contai ned total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) concentrations ra nging from 883 micrograms per liter (  g/L) to 1,050  g/L and total lead ranging from 10.4  g/L to 15  g/L. The maximum total lead concentration in the

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 10 samples was equal to the primar y drinking water standard of 15  g/L for lead and exceeded the HDOH Tier 1 groundwater action level of 5.6  g/L (Dawson, 2006).
2005 – Groundwater Sampling: The Navy began quarterly groundwater sampling at existing monitoring wells in 2005. Da wson Group, Inc. collected groundw ater samples from RHMW01 and the Red Hill Navy Pump Station (US Navy We ll 2254-01) in February, June, September, and December 2005.
Samples collected in February and June 2005 were not filtered in the field prior to analysis for lead. Analytical results for samples collected from RHMW01 indicated concentrations of total lead were above the HDOH Tier 1 action level of 5.6  g/L. The results were not considered appropriate for risk assessment si nce the sample had not been filte red. In addition, lead was not a component of fuels from the tanks near RHMW01. Lead may have been part of the Facility construction material (TEC, 2007). Previous sa mpling efforts showed elevated lead when analyzed as unfiltered samples. Subsequent efforts where the lead samples were filtered has resolved this issue.
Samples were filtered in September and Decembe r 2005, and dissolved lead concentrations were below the HDOH Tier 1 action level. Concentra tions of all other cont aminants of potential concern were below HDOH Tier 1 action levels.
2005 – Site Investigation: As part of a site investigatio n, TEC installed three groundwater monitoring wells at the Facility between June and September 2005. Well RHMW02 was installed in the lower access tunnel near Tanks 5 and 6. Well RHMW03 was installed in the lower access tunnel near Tanks 13 and 14. Well RHMW04 was inst alled north of UST tank 20 to provide geochemistry for water moving through the basal aquifer beneath the Facility. Wells RHMW02 and RHMW03 were completed to depths of approximately 125 feet below the tunnel floor, and well RHMW04 was comp leted to a depth of approxi mately 300 feet below ground surface outside the tunnel. Groundwater samples we re collected from the three newly installed wells and two existing wells (RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01) in September 2005.
Naphthalene and trichloroethylene were dete cted in samples collected from RHMW02 at concentrations greater than the HDOH Tier 1 acti on levels. Lead was detected in the sample collected from RHMW01 at a con centration greater than the HDOH Tier 1 action level; however, the sample was not filtered in the field pr ior to analysis. Analytical results for filtered samples obtained by Dawson during the same period indicated concentrations of dissolved lead were below the HDOH Tier 1 action level.
2006 – Site Investigation: Dedicated sampling pumps were in stalled in five wells (RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW04, a nd US Navy Well 2254-01). TEC collected groundwater samples from the wells in July 2006. The gr oundwater samples were analyzed for petroleum constituents. Naphthalene was detected in sa mples collected from RHMW02 at concentrations above the HDOH Tier 1 action level.
In September 2005, with concurrence from the HDOH, the Navy decided to use the newer HDOH Environmental Action Levels (EALs) for the Red Hill Site Investigation and Risk

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 11 Assessment project. The EALs pr ovide action levels for more ch emicals, and are more useful for conducting screening risk assessments. Since the HDOH (HDOH May 2005) Policy Letter stated that the two sets of action levels shoul d not be mixed, the Tier 1 screening levels presented in HAR Section 11-281-78 would no longer be used to evaluate environmental impact at the Facility.
2006 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collected in December 2006. Analytical results indicated the following:

 No chemicals were detected in groundwat er from US Navy Well 2254-01 or RHMW03;

 TPH as diesel range organics (TPH-DRO) was detected in groundwater above the HDOH Drinking Water EALs in RHMW01; and

 TPH as gasoline range organics (TPH-GRO), TPH-DRO, and naphthale ne were detected in groundwater above the HDOH Dri nking Water EALs in RHMW02.
2007 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were co llected in March, June, and September 2007. Analytical resu lts indicated the following:

 No chemicals were detected above HDOH Drinking Water EALs at US Navy Well 2254-01;

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01 during all three sampling events;

 TPH-GRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Wate r EALs at RHMW02 in March;

 TPH-DRO and naphthalene exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 during all three sampling events;

 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphtha lene exceeded the HDOH Groundwater Gross Contamination EAL at RHMW02 duri ng all three sampling events; and

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Wate r EALs at RHMW03 in June.
2008 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collect ed in January, April, July, and October 2008. Analytical re sults indicated the following:

 No chemicals were detected above HDOH Drinking Water EALs at US Navy Well 2254-01;

 Trace detections of 1-methylnaphthalene and naphthalene prompted a resample event in December at US Navy Well 2254-01, no chemi cals were detected above the MDL;

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01 during all four sampling events;

 TPH-GRO did not exceed HDOH Dr inking Water EALs at RHMW02;

 TPH-DRO, naphthalene, 1-me thylnaphthalene, and 2-met hylnaphthalene exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW 02. Additionally, the SSRBL of 4,500  g/L for TPH-DRO was exceed in the October sampling event; and

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking W ater EALs at RHMW03 during all four sampling events. 2009 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were coll ected in February, May, July, and October 2009. Analytical re sults indicated the following:

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 12  No chemicals have been detected above HDOH Drinking Water EA Ls at US Navy Well 2254-01;

 Trace TPH-GRO at US Navy Well 2254-01 was de tected above the laboratory MDL and significantly below the laboratory reporting limit and HDOH EAL, in February and May 2009;

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01 during all four sampling events;

 TPH-GRO has not exceed HDOH Dr inking Water EALs at RHMW02;

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 during all four sampling events;

 Naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-me thylnaphthalene exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 in February 2009, however only 1-methylnaphthalene exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EALs in May and July 2009 and only naphthalene exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL in October 2009;

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW03 in February, but not in May, July, or October; and

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EAL at RHMW05 during the July and October 2009 sampling events.


# 1.5 Regulatory Updates During the summer and fall of 2008, HDOH updated their EALs, which resulted in significant changes to the action levels associated with me thylnaphthalenes. The drinking water toxicity EAL for these compounds was 240  g/L. This concentration pres umed that methylnaphthalenes were non-carcinogenic. Evidence th at they are human carcinogens has now been accepted by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). As a result, HDOH adopted more rigorous EALs of 4.7  g/L for 1-methylnaphthalene and 24  g/L for 2-methylnaphthalene, corresponding to a residential tap water scenario, an d a 1 in a million cancer risk (HDOH, 2008).
The drinking water EAL for naphthalene has also been updated during this process. Previously, HDOH based their naphthalene EAL on USEPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goal (USEPA PRG) of 6.2  g/L, which is associated with a non -cancer Hazard index (HI) of 1. The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) ge nerally considers a Hazard quotient (HQ) of 1.0 or less to be acceptable. For multiple chemicals or fractions at an exposure point (e.g. for a monitoring well) a HI is calcu lated by summing the HQs. HDOH has updated their naphthalene drinking water EAL to 17  g/L, in deference to the Californi a Department of Public Health’s Drinking Water Notification Levels, a Hazard Index of 2.7 (HDOH, 2008).
Finally, the HDOH Drinking Water EAL for TPH-DRO was increased from 100  g/L to 210  g/L, although the HDOH Groundwat er Gross Contamination EAL for TPH-DRO remains 100  g/L.


# 1.6 RHMW05 Installation In April 2009, a new groundwater monitoring we ll, RHMW05, was installed by TEC under US Navy Contract Number N47408-04-D-8514, Task Orde r No. 54. RHMW05 is located within the

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 13 lower access tunnel between RHMW01 and RH MW2254-01(located at the US Navy Well 2254- 01). It was installed to identify the extent of contaminant migration prior to contaminants reaching the infiltration gallery at the US Navy Well 2254-01. 

# 2.0 Sample Collection and Analyses Field activities relating to gr oundwater sample collection were conducted on January 26 and 27, 2010. Groundwater samples were collected from four monitoring wells located inside the Facility lower access tunnel and one monitoring well located at the Red Hill Navy Pump Station. Sampling and analysis were conducted according to Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2009). A total of eight samples were collected as follows:

 one environmental sample from RHMW2254-01 (i.e., located at the US Navy Well 2254-01), RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05;

 one duplicate sample from RHMW02 (sampled as RHMWA01 and reported as RHMW02D); and

 one matrix spike and matrix sp ike duplicate from RHMW2254-01.
Due to elevated TPH-DRO concentrations in RHMW02, additional samples were collected on February 23, 2010 and March 3 0, 2010. During February and March, two samples were collected for TPH-DRO as follows:

 one environmental sample from RHMW02; and

 one duplicate sample from RHMW02 (sampled as RHMWA01 and reported as RHMW02D). 

# 2.1 Monitoring Well Purging All monitoring wells were purged prior to sa mpling. Well purging was considered complete when no less than three successive water quality parameter measurements had stabilized within approximately 10 percent. Field parameters were measured at regular intervals during well purging and included pH, temperature, specific conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity. During the February 2010 resample of RHMW02, th e field parameters measured were limited to pH and turbidity as a result of a faulty wate r quality analyzer. We ll purging was considered complete when greater than three well volumes had been purged. Purge water was collected and disposed in the Facility oil/water separator system. 

# 2.2 Groundwater Sample Collection Each monitoring well was sampled immediatel y following purging. All wells were sampled directly from their dedicated bladder pum p system, except for RHMW02 and RHMW05. RHMW02 and RHMW05 were sampled using disposab le bailers. Samples were placed into sampling containers with appropriate preservatives [i.e., hydrochloric acid (HCl) for volatile organic analysis, nitric acid (HNO 3 

## ) for dissolved lead]. Dissolved lead samples were filtered in the field and placed in preserved bottles. Sample containers were labeled with the date, sample identification number, type of analysis, and sampler’s name. The containers were placed on ice in sample coolers and transporte d under chain-of-custody procedur es to the certified laboratory for analysis.

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 14 

# 2.3 Groundwater Sample Analyses Groundwater samples were analyzed by SGS Environm ental Service, Inc. in Anchorage, Alaska for TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO by EPA Method 8015B, VOCs by EPA Method 8260B, PAHs by EPA Method 8270C SIM, and dissolved lead by EPA Method 6020. 

# 3.0 Groundwater Sample Analytical Results This section provides a summary of analytical results for groundwater samples collected from four monitoring wells located in the lower access tunnel of the Facility and one monitoring well located at the Red Hill Navy Pump Station. D uplicate sample results from monitoring well RHMW02 are reported in this document as RHMW 02D. A summary of groundwater analytical results for TPH-DRO, TPH-GRO, VOCs, PAHs, and dissolved lead is included in Table 1. Complete analytical laboratory repo rts are provided in Appendix A. 

# 3.1 January, February, and March 2010 Sample Analytical Results Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH- DRO, TPH-GRO, VOCs, PAHs, and dissolved lead, with the exception of the February and March 2010 re-sampling efforts at RHMW02 where only TPH-DRO was analyzed. The results for e ach groundwater monitoring well are discussed below.

RHMW01 TPH-DRO at 312F μg/L exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EALs of 210 μg/L. Concentrations of 2-methylnaphthalene, acenaphthene, flourene, naphthalene, and phenanthrene were detected at 0.0559 μg/L, 0.0372F μg/L, 0.0384F μg/L, 0.33 μg/L, and 0.0204F μg/L, respectfully (Table 1). All of these con centrations are below the HDOH EALs for each constituent. No other constituents we re detected above the laboratory MDL.

RHMW02 TPH-DRO, TPH-GRO, 1-methylna phthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, acenaphthene, fluoranthene, flourene, and naphthalene were detected in RHMW02. In January 2010, TPH-DRO was detected at RHMW02 in the normal and dupl icate samples at 2,130 μg/L and 3,410 μg/L, respectively. During the resa mple event in February 2010, TPH-DRO was detected in the normal and duplicate samples at 8,650 μg/L and 6,910 μg/L, respectively. These results exceeded the HDOH EAL of 210 μg/L, and the site-s pecific risk based le vel (SSRBL) of 4,500 μg/L. However, after a thorough analysis of the analytical data, tentatively identified compounds (TICs) that are apparently not attributed to fuel from the Facility were contributing to elevated TPH-DRO concentrations. Adjusted con centrations (i.e., not including increases from TICs) for TPH-DRO are estimated at 1,740 μg/L and 2,110 μg/L, from the normal and duplicate samples from January 2010, respectively; and 3,470 μg/L and 2,930 μg/L, from the normal and duplicate samples from February 2010, respectively (see Appendix B). The March 2010 resampling results did not contain large concentr ations of apparently non-fuel related TIC compounds. The March 2010 TPH-DRO concentrations of 2,630  g/L and 2,350  g/L (duplicate) provide an averag e TPH-DRO concentration of 2,490  g/L (Appendix B).Page 1 of 1 Table 1. Analytical Results for Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Release Response Report (January 26 - 27, February 23, and March 31, 2010) Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii

Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL TPH as DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS 210 100 **312** F 165 440 **2130** 161 430 **3410** 169 449 ND U 165 440 **2060** 169 449 ND U 160 426 **8650** 165 440 **6910** 163 435 **2630** 172 460 **2350** 167 444 TPH as GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS 100 100 ND U 30 100 42.3 F 30 100 38.1 F 30 100 ND U 30 100 ND U 30 100 ND U 30 100 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 4.7 10 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 **9.03** 0.165 0.549 **8.26** 0.17 0.568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 0.0207 F 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 24 10 0.0559 0.0167 0.0556 3.85 0.165 0.549 2.65 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 0.0246 F 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ACENAPHTHENE 370 20 0.0372 F 0.0167 0.0556 0.247 0.0165 0.0549 0.231 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ACENAPHTHYLENE 240 2000 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ANTHRACENE 1800 22 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BENZO(a)ANTHRACENE 0.092 4.7 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BENZO(a)PYRENE 0.2 0.81 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BENZO(b)FLUORANTHENE 0.092 0.75 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BENZO(g,h,i)PERYLENE 1500 0.13 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BENZO(k)FLUORANTHENE 0.92 0.4 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CHRYSENE 9.2 1 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA DIBENZ(a,h)ANTHRACENE 0.0092 0.52 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA FLUORANTHENE 1500 130 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 0.0209 F 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 0.019 F 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA FLUORENE 240 950 0.0384 F 0.0167 0.0556 0.144 0.0165 0.0549 0.122 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA INDENO(1,2,3-c,d)PYRENE 0.092 0.095 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAPHTHALENE 17 21 0.33 0.0344 0.111 **17.3** 0.341 1.1 15.7 0.352 1.14 ND U 0.0333 0.108 ND U 0.0356 0.115 0.0375 F 0.0326 0.105 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA PHENANTHRENE 240 410 0.0204 F 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 0.0182 F 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA PYRENE 180 68 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.52 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 200 970 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.067 500 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 5 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 2.4 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE (TCP) 0.6 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 70 3000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 0.04 10 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) 0.0065 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 600 10 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 0.15 7000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 5 10 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 180 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 75 5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ACETONE 22000 20000 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BENZENE 5 170 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 0.22 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BROMOFORM 100 510 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BROMOMETHANE 8.7 50000 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5 520 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CHLOROBENZENE 100 50 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CHLOROETHANE 8600 16 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CHLOROFORM 70 2400 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CHLOROMETHANE 1.8 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 70 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 0.43 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 0.16 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ETHYLBENZENE 700 30 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 0.86 6 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA M,P-XYLENE (SUM OF ISOMERS) 10000 20 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA METHYL ETHYL KETONE (2-BUTANONE) 7100 8400 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE) 2000 1300 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA METHYLENE CHLORIDE 4.8 9100 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAPHTHALENE 17 21 ND U 0.62 2 **31.5** 0.62 2 9.3 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA STYRENE 100 10 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) 5 170 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TOLUENE 1000 40 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 100 260 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) 5 310 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA VINYL CHLORIDE 2 3400 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA XYLENES, TOTAL 10000 20 ND U 1 2 ND U 1 2 ND U 1 2 ND U 1 2 ND U 1 2 ND U 1 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6020 LEAD 15 50000 ND U 0.31 1 1.53 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA PAHs - Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons MDL - Method detection limit VOCs - Volatile organic compounds RL - Reporting limit UG/L - Micrograms per Liter TPH - Total petroleum hydrocarbons

Q - Data qualifier ND - Indicates that the compound was not detected above the stated method detection limit U - Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected at or above the stated limit NA - not analyzed F - Indicates that the compound was identified but the concentration was above the MDL and below the RL

- Result exceeds one or both HDOH EALs
1

2 January 27, 2010 January 26, 2010 January 26, 2010 January 27, 2010

Final Drinking Water Action Levels for Human Toxicity, Table D-3a, Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater , HDOH, 2009 Groundwater Gross Contamination Action Levels, Table G-1, Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater , HDOH, 2009 January 26, 2010

8015B (Petroleum)

8270C SIM

(PAHs)

8260B (VOCs) RHMW02DUG/L February 23, 2010 February 23, 2010 January 27, 2010 RHMW05 UG/L RHMW2254-01 UG/L RHMW02 UG/L RHMW02

UG/L RHMW02D UG/L RHMW03 UG/L Method HDOH Drinking Water EALs 1 for Human Toxicity UG/L HDOH Groundwater Gross Contamination EALs 2 UG/L Chemical RHMW01 UG/L RHMW02 RHMW02DUG/L UG/L March 30, 2010 March 30, 2010

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 16 TPH-GRO was detected above th e laboratory MDL of 30 μg/L in the normal and duplicate samples (i.e., 42.3F μg/L and 38.1F μg/L, respec tively). Naphthalene was analyzed by USEPA Method 8270C SIM and USEPA Method 8260B. USEPA Method 8260B produced the highest naphthalene concentrations, which averaged 20 .4 μg/L from the normal and duplicate sample (HDOH Drinking Water EAL is 17 μg/L). In addition, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2- methylnaphthalene, acenaphthene, and flourene were detected at average concentrations of 8.645 μg/L, 3.25 μg/L, 0.239 μg/L, and 0.133 μg/L, respec tively (Table 1). Fluoranthene was only detected in the duplicate sample at 0.0209F μg/L . All of these concentrations are below the HDOH EALs for each constituent, except for 1-methylnaphthalene (HDOH Drinking Water EAL is 4.7 μg/L). The only other constituent detected above the laboratory MDL was dissolved lead in the normal sample only, at a concentration of 1.53 μg/L (HDOH Drinking Water EAL is 15 μg/L).

RHMW03 No parameters were detected above the laboratory MDLs in RHMW03 (Table 1).

RHMW05 TPH-DRO was detected at a c oncentration of 2,060 μg/L. This concentration exceeds the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 210 μg/L and the HDOH Groundw ater Gross Contamination EAL of 100 μg/L. However, TICs apparently not associated with petroleum from the Facility were detected at significant concentrations in RHMW05. Afte r subtracting the TICs, TPH-DRO was estimated at a concentration of 541 μg/L (see Appendix B).
In addition, 1-methylnaphthale ne, 2-methylnaphthalene, fluora nthene, and phenanthrene were detected above the laborator y MDL at 0.0207F μg/L, 0.0246F μg/L, 0.019F μg/L, and 0.0182F μg/L, respectively. All of these concentrations are below the HDOH EALs for each constituent (Table 1).
US Navy Well 2254-01 Naphthalene was detected at 0.0375F μg/L, ju st above the laboratory MDL and below the HDOH drinking water EAL of 17 μg/L (Table 1).


# 3.2 Groundwater Contaminant Trend Groundwater samples have been collected and analyzed by TEC since September 2005. Figure 1 shows TPH trends in groundwater at the Facility. Fi gure 2 shows PAH trends in groundwater at the Facility. In these figures , open icons (without da ta) represent locations where the compounds being analyzed we re not detected.
The following is a discussion of compounds th at exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs during two or more recent consecutive sampling events, thus establishing a trend:

RHMW01 At RHMW01, concentrations of TPH-DRO have been greater than the HDOH Drinking Water EAL since September 2005, but less than 25 percent of the SSRBL of 4,500  g/L. TPH-DRO had exhibited a decreasing tre nd since October 2008 with the lo west concentration (i.e., 248

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 17 μg/L) recorded in July 2009. Since July 2009, th is trend began increasing with 299F μg/L and 312F μg/L detected in October 2009 and January 2010, respectively.

RHMW02 At RHMW02, from September 2005 through March 2009, TPH-DRO exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL and was greater than 50 percen t of the SSRBL (estimated solubility limit of 4,500  g/L). Specifically, the concentration of TPH-DRO was relatively stable at RHMW02 until July 2008, ranging from 2,250 to 2,995 μg/L. However, during the July and October 2008 sampling events, these average co ncentrations increase d. The July 2008 average concentration was 4,055 μg/L and the October 2008 average concentration was 5,420 μg/L. Both of these values were significantly above the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 210 μg/L, with the October 2008 average also exceeding th e SSRBL of 4,500 μg/L.
However, TPH-DRO at RHMW02 has shown a d ecreasing trend from October 2008 through July 2009. During this period, TPH-DRO remain ed above the HDOH Drinking Water EAL, but was below 50 percent of the SSRBL of 4,500 μg/L. In October 2009, TPH-DRO began an increasing trend greater than 50 percent of th e SSRBL which continued through February 2010 when it exceeded the SSRBL. It is important to note that in January and February 2010, TICs apparently not associated with petroleum fr om the Facility were detected at significant concentrations. After subtracting the TICs from these results, the January 2010 TPH-DRO average shows a slight decrease from the Oct ober 2009 event. However, the February 2010 resampling event showed an incr eased average of 3,200 μg/L (A ppendix B), exceeding the HDOH Drinking Water EAL and being over 50 percent of the SSRBL. The TPH-DRO concentration averaged 2,490 μg/L during the March 2010 re-sampling event when unlike during January and February, TICs were not obser ved at significant concentratio ns (Appendix B).
For other parameters, the average concentr ation for 1-methylnaphthalene (i.e., 8.645  g/L) exhibited an increase from an October 2009 concentration that was less than the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 4.7  g/L. Naphthalene had shown an increasing trend since its lowest concentration in May 2009. In January 201 0, naphthalene in RHMW02 (i.e., 20.4 μg/L) exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 17 μg/L , but slightly decreased relative to the October 2009 concentration (i.e., 21.65 μg/L).

RHMW03 At RHMW03, historically, conc entrations of TPH-DRO have fluctuated around the HDOH Drinking Water EAL, but have been significantl y lower than corresponding values observed at RHMW01 and RHMW02. However, during the la st four sampling events (i.e., May 2009, July 2009, October 2009, and January 2010), TPH-DRO was not detected above the laboratory MDL. These results represent a continuing decreasin g trend for TPH-DRO that has existed since October 2008.

RHMW05 At RHMW05 there is an increasing trend for TP H-DRO over the last four sampling rounds. The January 2010 concentration was 2,060 μg/L, an in crease as compared with the October 2009 concentration of 673 μg/L. The January 2010 con centration is greater than the HDOH EAL, but less than 50 percent of the SSRBL for TPH-DRO. However, as with RHMW02, TICs apparently

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 18 not associated with petroleum from the Facility were detected at significant concentrations in RHMW05. After subtracting the TICs from the January 2010 results, TPH-DRO was estimated at a concentration of 541 μg/L (see Appendix B). US Navy Well 2254-01 At US Navy Well 2254-01, no compounds have been detected above the la boratory MDLs since trace concentrations of TPH-GRO and 2-methylnapht halene that were observed in the February and May 2009. However, in January 2010, naphthalene was detected at 0.0375F μg/L via EPA Method 8270C SIM, just above the laborat ory MDL (i.e., 0.0326 μg/L) and below the HDOH EAL (i.e., 17 μg/L). 

# 3.3 Results of Oil/Water Interface Measurements The presence and thickness of light-non aque ous phased liquids (LNAPL), otherwise known as free product, released from the USTs is monitored at the Facility (see Ta ble 2). Static water levels and fuel thickness is measur ed to a precision of ± 0.01 feet.
In January 2008, fuel was measured in mon itoring wells RHMW01 and RHMW02 at a thickness of < 0.01 ft, but has not been observed in other monitoring wells. Measurements to determine the presence and thickness of fuel were conducted at RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05 prior to the January 2010 sampling round. At the end of February and March, subsequent rounds of oil/wate r interface measurements were conducted. Since January 2008, no free product has been observed in any of these wells.

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 19 Table 2. Oil/Water In terface Measurements

Date RHMW01 RHMW02 RHMW03 RHMW05 SWL

(ft) LNAPL (ft) SWL (ft) LNAPL (ft) SWL (ft) LNAPL (ft) SWL 6 

## (ft) LNAPL (ft) January 2008 17.74 < 0.01 18.78 < 0.01 NT 1 

## NT 1 

## ---- ---- July 2008 19.04 0.00 18.91 0.00 18.86 0.00 ---- ---- October 2008 18.61 0.00 18.56 0.00 18.82 0.00 ---- ---- November 2008 18.50 0.00 18.45 0.00 18.51 0.00 ---- ---- January 2009 19.28 0.00 19.22 0.00 19.27 0.00 ---- ---- February 2009 NT 2 

## NT 2 

## 18.66 0.00 18.75 0.00 ---- ---- March 2009 18.59 0.00 18.57 0.00 18.67 0.00 ---- ---- May 2009 3 

## 18.69 0.00 18.64 0.00 18.72 0.00 NT 5 

## NT 5 

## May 2009 18.91 0.00 18.86 0.00 18.90 0.00 NT 5 

## NT 5 

## July 2009 4 

## 18.66 0.00 18.59 0.00 18.64 0.00 18.63 0.00 August 2009 18.37 0.00 18.30 0.00 18.47 0.00 18.21 0.00 September 2009 18.20 0.00 18.17 0.00 18.24 0.00 18.11 0.00 October 2009 18.17 0.00 18.14 0.00 18.24 0.00 18.10 0.00 November 2009 18.50 0.00 18.45 0.00 18.50 0.00 18.47 0.00 December 2009 18.29 0.00 18.26 0.00 18.31 0.00 18.19 0.00 January 2010 18.05 0.00 18.01 0.00 18.09 0.00 17.97 0.00 February 2010 18.17 0.00 18.12 0.00 18.17 0.00 18.12 0.00 March 2010 17.88 0.00 17.86 0.00 17.93 0.00 17.76 0.00 SWL - Static water level, elevation above mean sea level LNAP L - Light Non-Aqueous Phased Liquid, fuel pr oduct on groundwater attributed to the Facility ft

- Feet NT - Not Taken 1 - The January 2008 measurement at RHMW03 wa s not taken due to equipment malfunction 2
- During the February 2009 measurements, RHMW01 was inaccessibl e due to extensive work being conducted at Tank 02 3 - The measurements scheduled for April 2009 were postponed until May 6, 2009 due to RHMW05 drilling activities 4 – The June 2009 measurements were skipped due to th e installation of dedicated oil/water interface probes 5 - Oil/water interface measurements were not taken at RHMW05 until the installation of the oil/water interface probe was complet ed 6 – Elevation at RHMW05 is estimated from the difference betw een RHMW01 and RHMW05 during a survey conducted in January 2010 ---- - Time period prior to the installation of RHMW05 Oil/water interface measurements were not taken in April 2008 

# 3.4 Groundwater Status Constituents of concern are defined as petroleum -related chemicals that have been observed in the groundwater samples above the HDOH EALs. In accordance with the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Final Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2008), Table 3 defines the constituents of concern in gr oundwater at the Facility and the SSRBLs and updated EALs for each (HDOH 2008).

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 20 Table 3. Action Levels for Constituents of Concern

Chemical EAL (μg/L) SSRBL (μg/L) Petroleum Mixtures TPH-DRO 210 4,500 TPH-GRO 100 4,500 Semi-Volatile Compounds 1-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 24 NA Naphthalene 17 NA NA – Not applicable or not determined SSRBLs are applicable at RHMW 01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05 EALs are applicable at US Navy Well 2254-01 

## In addition, the Plan defines four results categor ies of groundwater status for the Facility, based on concentrations of constituents of c oncern in RHMW01, RH MW02, RHMW03, RHMW05 and the US Navy Well 2254-01, and requires speci fic responses when these categories are observed during quarterly groundwater sampling. Table 4 describes each of the four results categories and identifies response actions to be taken in accordance with the Plan. Table 4. Results Categories and Response Actions to Changes in Groundwater Status

Results Category RHMW02 RHMW03 or RHMW05* RHMW01 US Navy Pumping Well 2254-01

Results Category 1: Result above detection limit but below drinking water EAL and trend for all compounds stable or decreasing A A A,D,M,E

Results Category 2: Trend for any compound increasing or drinking water EAL exceeded A, B A, B A,B,C,D,E,F,G,K, L,O
Results Category 3: Result Between 1/10X SSRBL and SSRBL for benzene, or between 1/2X SSRBL and SSRBL for TPH A,B,G,H,I,J A,B,E,G,H,I,J A,B,C,D,E,F,G,I,J, K,L,O

Results Category 4: Result Exceeding any SSRBL or petroleum product observed A,C,D,E,F,I,J, K,M,N A,C,D,E,F,I, J,K,M,N,O A,C,D,E,F,G,I,J,K, L,O
*RHMW05 was installed in April 2009 and has been subsequently been added to this Table. Specific Responses: A. Send quarterly reports to HDOH B. Begin program to determine the source of leak C. Notify HDOH verbally within 1 day and fo llow with written notification in 30 days D. Notify FISC Chain of Command within 1 day E. Send Type 1 Report (see box below) to HDOH

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 21 F. Send Type 2 Report (see box below) to HDOH G. Increase monitoring frequency to once pe r month (if concentrations increasing) H. Notify HDOH verbally within 7 days and follow with written notification in 30 days I. Remove sampling pumps, measure product in pe rtinent wells with interface probe, re-install pumps if product is not detected. J. Immediately determine leaking tank K. Collect samples from nearby Halawa Deep Monitoring Well (2253-03) and OWDF MW01 L. Provide alternative water source at 2254-01 M. Prepare for alternative wa ter source at US Navy Well 2254-01 N. Re-measure for product every month with reports to HDOH O. Install additional monitoring well downgradient
Report Types HDOH Type 1 Report

 Re-evaluate Tier 3 Risk Asse ssment/groundwater model results

 Proposal to HDOH on a course of action HDOH Type 2 Report

 Proposal for groundwater treatment

Free Product Measurements In response to the previous Ca tegory 3 status at RHMW02, free product measurements have been collected at the Facility m onitoring wells (Table 2). To date , there is no tren d (i.e., two or more consecutive events) of fuel presence on groundwater at any of these wells.
US Navy Well 2254-01 Although a trace concentration of naphthalene wa s detected at US Navy Well 2254-01 during the January 2010 sampling event, it does not place the well into the Category 1 status. Because no contamination trend (i.e., two or more consecutive events of detectable concentrations) has been established, US Navy Well 2254-01 does not meet the Category 1 definition.

RHMW03 Based upon the January 2010 sampling event, RHMW03 is not eligible for any category status change since no compounds were detected above the laboratory MDLs.
Category 1 Status Locations
There are no Category 1 st atus locations based u pon the January 2010 event.
Category 2 Status Locations RHMW01 The January 2010 sampling event indicates that RH MW01 should remain in Category 2 status. This is because the TPH-DRO concentration of 312F  g/L is greater than the HDOH Drinking

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 22 Water EAL (210  g/L), but less than half the SSRBL of 4,500  g/L (estimated solubility limit of JP-5).

RHMW05 Based upon the January 2010 sampling event RHMW05 should remain in a Category 2 status. TPH-DRO in RHMW05 (i.e., 2,060 μg/L) is above the drinking water EAL of 210 μg/L and has been showing an increasing trend over the last four rounds. However, as with RHMW02, TICs apparently not associated with petroleum fr om the Facility were detected at significant concentrations in RHMW05. After subtracting the TICs from the January 2010 results, TPHDRO was estimated at a concentration of 541 μg /L which still exceeds the drinking water EAL (Appendix B).
Category 2 for RHMW01 and RHMW05 requires: 1. Quarterly reports to be sent to HDOH; and 2. Initiation of a leak determination progr am to identify if tanks are leaking.
Category 3 Status Locations RHMW02 Results from the January 2010 sampling event and the resample event in February 2010 indicate that RHMW02 remains in Category 3 status. Th is is because TPH-DRO, after subtracting the TICs apparently not associated with petroleum from the Facility, is greater than the HDOH Drinking Water EAL (210  g/L), and is between one half a nd the established SSRBL value of 4,500  g/L (estimated solubility limit of JP-5). Specifically, the ma ximum observed TPH-DRO TICs adjusted concentration among the Ja nuary 2010 and February 2010 sampling efforts occurred during the February 2010 effort with adjusted concentrations of 3,470  g/L and 2,930  g/L (duplicate) (Appendix B). However, TP H-DRO averaged 2,490 μg/L during the March 2010 re-sampling event when unlike during Januar y and February, TICs were not observed at significant concentrations (Appendix B).
In addition, the HDOH Dr inking Water EAL of 17  g/L for naphthalene was exceeded in January 2010 [i.e., 20.4  g/L (the average of normal and duplicate samples)].
Category 3 response at RHMW02 requires:

1. Send quarterly reports to HDOH; 2. Initiation of a leak determination progr am to identify if tanks are leaking; 3. Increase free product monitoring frequenc y to once per month (if concentrations increasing); 4. Notify HDOH verbally within 7 days and fo llow with written notification in 30 days; 5. Remove sampling pumps, measure product in lower access tunnel well s with interface probe, re-install pumps if product is not detected; and 6. Immediately evaluate tanks for leaks.
Category 4 Status Locations There are no Category 4 status locations.

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 23 

# 4.0 Summary and Conclusions Summary There is no indication of an immediate threat of disruption to drinking wate r resources of the US Navy Well 2254-01 as a result of the January and February 2010 data . However, a trace concentration of naphthalene was detected just above the laborato ry MDL, but significantly less than the HDOH drinking water EAL at RHMW2254-01. The increasing TPH-DRO concentrations at RHMW05 are of significant concern. This well is less than 700 feet from the east end of the US Navy Well 2254-01 infiltration gallery. The TPH-DRO concentration in this well was nearly 50 percent of the SSRBL prior to a re-quantification that adjusted the concentration by removing apparently non-fuel related TIC compounds from the TPH-DRO total concentration (Appendix B). If the total TPH- DRO concentration at RHMW05 had been from fuel-related compounds, there could be a high probability of contamination at some point entering the infiltration gallery.
With the exception of RHMW03 and RHMW2254-01, compound concentrations for all the other monitoring wells (i.e., RHMW01, RHMW 02, and RHMW05) are exhibiting increasing contaminant trends for TPH-DRO relative to th e concentrations obser ved in October 2009. Current results from RHMW01 are st ill at concentration levels w ithin the historical range. However, results from RHMW02 and RHMW05 have been exhibiting signif icant increases (i.e., for the non-TIC adjusted concentrat ions). After a thorough analysis of the analytical results from RHMW02 and RHMW05, TICs appare ntly not attributed to pe troleum from the Facility contributed to a significant increase of TPH-DRO during Ja nuary and February 2010 (see Appendix B). After subtracting these TICs, the estimated TPH-DRO concentrations in RHMW02 and RHMW05 remain within the historical range.

Conclusions/Recommendations

 To date, there is no trend (i.e., two or more consecutive events) of fuel presence on groundwater at the Facility wells (Table 2). In fact, fuel on the groundwater has been observed only once (i.e., in January 2008 in RHMW01 and RHMW02 at less than 0.01 ft.). It is recommended that the Facility c ontinue regular monitoring of Facility wells for the presence of fuel on groundwater.

 The concentration of TPH-DRO measured in the newest monitoring well, RHMW05, in January 2010 (i.e., 2,060  g/L) exceeded the HDOH Drinki ng Water EAL, but was less than half of the SSRBL. RHMW05 is locat ed between RHMW01 and the US Navy Well 2254-01. It is recommended that future quarterly analytical results be closely assessed at RHMW05, since its non-TIC adjusted concentr ations exhibit an increasing contaminant trend for TPH-DRO (i.e., 200 μg/L in May 2009, 491μg/L in July 2009, 673 μg/L in October 2009, and 2,060 μg/L in January 2010).

 RHMW01 and RHMW02 are exhibiting increa sing contaminant trends, however, when adjusted for apparently non-fuel related TICs are still at co ncentration levels within the historical range. It is r ecommended that quarterly moni toring of the Facility wells continue so that overall gr oundwater quality trends may be established/observed and proactive action taken if the groundwater quality shows greate r evidence of deterioration.

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 24  The US Navy Well 2254-01 is not imminently threatened at this time; however, monitoring should continue to evaluate the extent of contaminant migration from upgradient locations.

 Do a more detailed analytical assessment of the contamination found in RHMW05 (and other wells) such as having future samp les analyzed using the MADEP analytical methods in addition to TPH-GRO a nd TPH-DRO analytical methods.

 The following activities are in process to monitor and/or clarify the groundwater contamination situation at the Facility: 1. Re-evaluate risk assessment and groundw ater model (TEC, 2007) to ensure both are valid and protective of human health and the envi ronment under the existing conditions; 2. Continue monthly free product m easurements at RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05; 3. Continue to collect samples from n earby Halawa Deep Monitoring Well (2253- 03), OWDF MW01, and RHMW04 to a ssess regional groundwater trends; 4. Prepare for alternative wa ter source at US Navy Well 2254-01, if appropriate. 5. Continue quarterly groundwater monitori ng of Facility wells for TPH-DRO, TPHGRO, VOCs, PAHs, and lead until such time that new data indicates that a different monitoring program is warranted.Figure1TPHTrendsinGroundwater,Round18(January26–27,February23,The HDOH toxicity EALs were updated in Fall, 2008.•TPHDRO Residential Tap Water EAL is 210 ug/L; and(January2627,February23,andMarch30,2010)RedHillFuelStorageFacilityOahu,Hawaii•TPH-DROResidentialTapWaterEALis210ug/L;and•TPH-GRO Residential Tap Water EAL is 100 ug/L;(HDOH, 2008).Figure2PAHTrendsinGroundwater,Round18(January26–27,February23,The HDOH toxicity EALs were updated in Fall, 2008.• Naphthalene Residential Tap Water EAL is 17 ug/L;1th l hth l R id ti l T W t EAL i 4 7 /L d(January2627,February23,andMarch30,2010)RedHillFuelStorageFacilityOahu,Hawaii•1-methylnaphthaleneResidentialTapWaterEALis4.7ug/L; and• 2- methylnaphthalene ResidentialTap Water EAL is 24 ug/L(HDOH, 2008).

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 27 

# 5.0 References AMEC. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Investigation Report , Prepared for NAVFAC Pacific, August 2002.
Dawson Group, Inc. Fourth Quarter 2005 Groundwater Sam pling Report, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Hawaii. February 2006.
Hawaii Administrative Rules, Titl e 11, Chapter 281, Subchapter 7.

HDOH. Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, Summary Lookup Tables. March 2009.

HDOH. Use of May 2005 Environmental Action Levels (“EALs”) at Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites . Memo. July 2005.

HDOH. Evaluation of Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater . Summer 2008 (updated October 2008).
Massachusetts Department of E nvironmental Protection (MADEP). Implementation of the MADEP VPH/EPH Approach. Final Policy, October 2002
The Environmental Company, Inc. and AMEC. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Work Plan, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. June 2005.
TEC, Inc. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Fi nal – Addendum Planning Documents, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. May 2006.
TEC, Inc. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Technical Report, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii

. August 2007.
TEC, Inc. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. January 2008 revised in December 2009.

# Appendix A
Laboratory Analytical Reports

# APPENDIX A-1

Laboratory Analytical Results January 26 - 27, 2010

## SGS Work Order:

Contents:
Cover Page Case Narrative Final Report Pages Quality Control Summary Forms Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Forms 

## Project: Client: 

# SGS North America Inc. Alaska Division Level II Laboratory Data Report

Released by:

Note: Unless otherwise noted, all quality assurance/quality control criteria is in compliance with the standards set forth by the proper regulatory authority, the SGS Quality Assurance Program Plan, and the National Environmental Accreditation Conference. 

## 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 1100328

# Case Narrative THEENVC The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 1100328 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Customer: Project: 

# SGS North America Inc.

Refer to the sample receipt form for information on sample condition. 

### 1100328005 PS RHMW02-WG18 DRO by 8015C - Unknown hydrocarbon with several peaks is present. 

### 1100328006 PS RHMWA01-WG18 DRO by 8015C - Unknown hydrocarbon with several peaks is present. 

### 1100328008 PS RHMW05-WG18 DRO by 8015C - Unknown hydrocarbon with several peaks is present. 

### 1100328003 BMSD RHMW2254-WG18 MSD 8270D SIM - MS recovery is outside of QC criteria for fluoranthene (biased high). Refer to LCS for accuracy. 

### 947960 LCS V XX/20449 ] 8260B - LCS recovery for 1,1-dichloroethane does not meet QC criteria (biased high). This analyte was not detected above the PQL in the associated samples. 

### 947961 LCSD V XX/20449 8260B - LCSD recovery for 1,1-dichloroethane, cis-1,3-dich loropropene and methyl-t-butyl ether does not meet QC criteria (biased high). These analytes were not detected above the PQL in the associated samples. 

### 947963 CCV V MS/11094 ] 8260B - CCV recovery for 1,1-dichloroethane does not meet QC criteria (biased high). This analyte was not detected above the PQL in the associated samples.

# Laboratory Analytical Report

Project: Client:

Workorder No.: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)



### 1100328

Certification:
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, other than the conditions noted on the sample data sheet(s) and/or the case narrative. This certification applies only to the tested parameters and the specific sample(s) received at the laboratory. 1003 Bishop Street, Pauahi Tower Suite 1550 Honolulu, HI 96813
Attn: Rick Adkisson T: (808)528-1445 F:(808)528-0768

Jennifer Serna

Project Manager 

### 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager.

SGS No rth Americ a Inc . En vir onmenta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com Member of SG S Group

### Enclosed are the analytical results associated with the above work order. If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any other assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager at 907-562-2343. All work is provided under SGS general terms and conditions ( <http://www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm> ), unless other written agreements have been accepted by both parties.
SGS maintains a formal Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program. A copy of our Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), which outlines this program, is available at your request. The laboratory certification numbers are AK00971 (DW Chemistry & Microbiology) & UST-005 (CS) for ADEC and AK100001 for NELAP (RCRA methods: 1020A, 1311, 3010A, 3050B, 3520C, 3550C, 5030B, 5035B, 6010B, 6020, 7470A, 7471B, 8021B, 8081B, 8082A, 8260B, 8270D, 8270D-SIM, 9040B, 9045C, 9056A, 9060A, AK101 and AK102/103). Except as specifically noted, all statements and data in this report are in conformance to the provisions set forth by the SGS QAP and, when applicable, the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program and other regulatory authorities. The following descriptors or qualifiers may be found in your report:

* The analyte has exceeded allowable regulatory or control limits. ! Surrogate out of control limits. B Indicates the analyte is found in a blank associated with the sample. CCV Continuing Calibration Verification CL Control Limit D The analyte concentration is the result of a dilution. DF Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit (i.e., maximum method detection limit) E The analyte result is above the calibrated range. F Indicates value that is greater than or equal to the DL GT Greater Than ICV Initial Calibration Verification J The quantitation is an estimation. JL The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation is a low estimation. LCS(D) Laboratory Control Spike (Duplicate) LOD Limit of Detection (i.e., 2xDL) LOQ Limit of Quantitation (i.e., reporting or practical quantitation limit) LT Less Than M A matrix effect was present. MB Method Blank MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate) ND Indicates the analyte is not detected. Q QC parameter out of acceptance range. R Rejected RPD Relative Percent Difference U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Note: Sample summaries which include a result for "Total Solids" have already been adjusted for moisture content.

All DRO/RRO analyses are integrated per SOP. Print Date: 2/10/2010

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

## SAMPLE SUMMARY Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Project Name: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Workorder No.: 1100328 

## Analytical Methods

Method Description Analytical Method 8270 PAH SIM Semi-Vol GC/MS Liq/Liq ext. 8270D SIMS AFCEE 3.1 8260 (W) SW8260B Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS SW6020 DRO by 8015C (W) SW8015C GRO (W) SW8015C Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am



## Sample ID Cross Reference
Client Sample ID Lab Sample ID 1100328001 RHMW2254-WG18
1100328002 RHMW2254-WG18 MS
1100328003 RHMW2254-WG18 MSD
1100328004 RHMW03-WG18
1100328005 RHMW02-WG18
1100328006 RHMWA01-WG18
1100328007 RHMW01-WG18
1100328008 RHMW05-WG18
1100328009 TB01-WG18

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L MMS6300 MXX22713 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS6300 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:21 Prep Batch: MXX22713 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328001-G Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 ug/L VFC9854 VXX20443 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 95.2 50-150 % VFC9854 VXX20443 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9854 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:28 Prep Batch: VXX20443 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328001-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 0.320 U 0.426 mg/L XFC9100 XXX22248 0.160 1 5a Androstane <surr> 87.1 50-150 % XFC9100 XXX22248 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 940 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC9100 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 19:56 Prep Batch: XXX22248 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328001-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.300 1 Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 101 73-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 99.7 80-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 103 76-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS11094 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 17:00 Prep Batch: VXX20449 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328001-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Acenaphthene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Fluorene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Phenanthrene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Anthracene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Fluoranthene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Pyrene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Chrysene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Naphthalene 0.0375 J 0.105 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0326 1 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.0316 U 0.0526 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0158 1 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 115 50-126 % XMS5285 XXX22249 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 950 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS5285 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 13:56 Prep Batch: XXX22249 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328001-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L MMS6300 MXX22713 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS6300 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:43 Prep Batch: MXX22713 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328004-G Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 ug/L VFC9854 VXX20443 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 95.3 50-150 % VFC9854 VXX20443 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9854 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 12:41 Prep Batch: VXX20443 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328004-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 0.330 U 0.440 mg/L XFC9100 XXX22248 0.165 1 5a Androstane <surr> 92.6 50-150 % XFC9100 XXX22248 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC9100 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 20:59 Prep Batch: XXX22248 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328004-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.300 1 Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 101 73-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 99.1 80-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 102 76-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS11094 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 17:31 Prep Batch: VXX20449 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328004-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Acenaphthene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Fluorene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Phenanthrene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Anthracene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Fluoranthene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Pyrene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Chrysene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Naphthalene 0.0666 U 0.108 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0333 1 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.0322 U 0.0538 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0161 1 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 110 50-126 % XMS5285 XXX22249 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 930 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS5285 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 15:34 Prep Batch: XXX22249 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328004-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 1.53 1.00 ug/L MMS6300 MXX22713 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS6300 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:45 Prep Batch: MXX22713 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328005-G Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 42.3 J 100 ug/L VFC9854 VXX20443 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 111 50-150 % VFC9854 VXX20443 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9854 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 13:19 Prep Batch: VXX20443 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328005-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 2.13 0.430 mg/L XFC9100 XXX22248 0.161 1 5a Androstane <surr> 90.8 50-150 % XFC9100 XXX22248 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 930 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC9100 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 21:20 Prep Batch: XXX22248 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328005-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene 3.49 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene 5.48 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.300 1 Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene 5.10 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Naphthalene 31.5 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene 0.920 J 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 3.73 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 101 73-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 98.1 80-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 104 76-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS11094 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 18:02 Prep Batch: VXX20449 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328005-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Acenaphthene 0.247 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Fluorene 0.144 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Phenanthrene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Anthracene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Fluoranthene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Pyrene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Chrysene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0330 U 0.0549 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0165 1 Naphthalene 17.3 1.10 ug/L XMS5287 XXX22249 0.341 10 1-Methylnaphthalene 9.03 0.549 ug/L XMS5287 XXX22249 0.165 10 2-Methylnaphthalene 3.85 0.549 ug/L XMS5287 XXX22249 0.165 10 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 111 50-126 % XMS5285 XXX22249 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS5285 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:07 Prep Batch: XXX22249 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328005-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS5287 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 02/03/10 12:45 Prep Batch: XXX22249 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328005-H Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L MMS6300 MXX22713 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS6300 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:47 Prep Batch: MXX22713 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328006-G Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 38.1 J 100 ug/L VFC9854 VXX20443 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 112 50-150 % VFC9854 VXX20443 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9854 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 13:38 Prep Batch: VXX20443 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328006-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 3.41 0.449 mg/L XFC9100 XXX22248 0.169 1 5a Androstane <surr> 83.1 50-150 % XFC9100 XXX22248 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 890 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC9100 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 21:41 Prep Batch: XXX22248 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328006-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene 4.42 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene 6.48 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.300 1 Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene 6.42 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Naphthalene 9.30 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene 1.19 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 4.54 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 106 73-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 98.7 80-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 103 76-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS11094 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 18:33 Prep Batch: VXX20449 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328006-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Acenaphthene 0.231 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Fluorene 0.122 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Phenanthrene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Anthracene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Fluoranthene 0.0209 J 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Pyrene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Chrysene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0340 U 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Naphthalene 15.7 1.14 ug/L XMS5287 XXX22249 0.352 10 1-Methylnaphthalene 8.26 0.568 ug/L XMS5287 XXX22249 0.170 10 2-Methylnaphthalene 2.65 0.0568 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0170 1 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 112 50-126 % XMS5285 XXX22249 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 880 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS5285 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:39 Prep Batch: XXX22249 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328006-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 880 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS5287 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 02/03/10 13:17 Prep Batch: XXX22249 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328006-H Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L MMS6300 MXX22714 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS6300 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 17:15 Prep Batch: MXX22714 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328007-L Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 ug/L VFC9854 VXX20443 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 98.2 50-150 % VFC9854 VXX20443 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9854 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 13:57 Prep Batch: VXX20443 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328007-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 0.312 J 0.440 mg/L XFC9100 XXX22248 0.165 1 5a Androstane <surr> 92.7 50-150 % XFC9100 XXX22248 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC9100 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 22:02 Prep Batch: XXX22248 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328007-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.300 1 Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 101 73-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 100 80-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 102 76-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS11094 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 19:04 Prep Batch: VXX20449 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328007-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Acenaphthene 0.0372 J 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Fluorene 0.0384 J 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Phenanthrene 0.0204 J 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Anthracene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Fluoranthene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Pyrene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Chrysene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Naphthalene 0.330 0.111 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0344 1 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.0334 U 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.0559 0.0556 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0167 1 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 121 50-126 % XMS5285 XXX22249 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 900 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS5285 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 17:11 Prep Batch: XXX22249 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328007-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L MMS6300 MXX22713 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS6300 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:49 Prep Batch: MXX22713 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328008-G Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 ug/L VFC9854 VXX20443 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 96.9 50-150 % VFC9854 VXX20443 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9854 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:23 Prep Batch: VXX20443 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328008-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 2.06 0.449 mg/L XFC9100 XXX22248 0.169 1 5a Androstane <surr> 88.5 50-150 % XFC9100 XXX22248 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 890 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC9100 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 22:23 Prep Batch: XXX22248 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328008-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.300 1 Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 99.6 73-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 99.7 80-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 105 76-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS11094 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 19:36 Prep Batch: VXX20449 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328008-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Acenaphthene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Fluorene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Phenanthrene 0.0182 J 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Anthracene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Fluoranthene 0.0190 J 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Pyrene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Chrysene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0344 U 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Naphthalene 0.0712 U 0.115 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0356 1 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.0207 J 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.0246 J 0.0575 ug/L XMS5285 XXX22249 0.0172 1 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 120 50-126 % XMS5285 XXX22249 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 870 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS5285 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 17:44 Prep Batch: XXX22249 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328008-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### TB01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328009 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 08:05 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 ug/L VFC9854 VXX20443 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 101 50-150 % VFC9854 VXX20443 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9854 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:42 Prep Batch: VXX20443 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328009-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### TB01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328009 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 08:05 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.300 1 Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### TB01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328009 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 08:05 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 3.10 1 Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.620 1 o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 0.310 1 Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 ug/L VMS11094 VXX20449 1.00 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 101 73-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 98.1 80-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 108 76-120 % VMS11094 VXX20449 1

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: 

### TB01-WG18 SGS Ref. #: 1100328009 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 08:05 Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS11094 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:28 Prep Batch: VXX20449 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328009-B Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S GroupMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947654 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) XXX22248 SW3520C 02/01/2010
QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units Analysis Date DL



### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department


### Diesel Range Organics 0.300 U 0.400 mg/L 02/02/10 

### 0.150
Surrogates


### 5a Androstane <surr> 93.2 60-120 % 02/02/10

Instrument Method Batch XFC9100

SW8015C HP 7890A FID SV E FMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947711 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) XXX22249 SW3520C 02/01/2010
QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units Analysis Date DL



### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS


### Acenaphthylene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Acenaphthene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Fluorene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Phenanthrene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Anthracene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Fluoranthene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Pyrene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Chrysene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 Naphthalene 0.0620 U 0.100 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0310 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.0300 U 0.0500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.0150
Surrogates 

### Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 109 50-126 % 02/02/10

Instrument Method Batch XMS5285

8270D SIMS HP 6890/5973 MS SVQAMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947747 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20443 SW5030B 02/01/2010
QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008, 1100328009

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units Analysis Date DL



### Volatile Fuels Department


### Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 ug/L 02/01/10 

### 30.0
Surrogates


### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 96.8 50-150 % 02/01/10

Instrument Method Batch VFC9854

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCAMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947859 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) MXX22713 SW3010A 02/01/2010
QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328008

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units Analysis Date DL



### Metals by ICP/MS



### Lead 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310

Instrument Method Batch MMS6300

SW6020 Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3Matrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947864 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) MXX22714 SW3010A 02/01/2010
QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328007

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units Analysis Date DL



### Metals by ICP/MS



### Lead 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310

Instrument Method Batch MMS6300

SW6020 Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3Matrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947959 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 SW5030B 02/02/2010
QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008, 1100328009

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units Analysis Date DL



### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass SpectroscopyMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947959 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 SW5030B 02/02/2010

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units Analysis Date DL



### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy



### Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.120 Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.150 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.150 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.150 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 3.10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.150 n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 3.10 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.150 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.620 Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 1.50 Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.150 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.120 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.150 Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.300 Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.940 Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.150Matrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947959 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 SW5030B 02/02/2010

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units Analysis Date DL



### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy


### 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 3.10 Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 1.00 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.620 Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.620 o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 0.310 Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 ug/L 02/02/10 

### 1.00
Surrogates 

### 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 103 73-120 % 02/02/10 

### Toluene-d8 <surr> 100 80-120 % 02/02/10 

### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 105 76-120 % 02/02/10

Instrument Method Batch VMS11094

SW8260B HP 5890 Series II MS1 VJAMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947712 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) XXX22249 SW3520C 02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS 

### Acenaphthylene LCS 0.403 81 ( 50-101 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Acenaphthene LCS 0.406 81 ( 45-93 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Fluorene LCS 0.421 84 ( 50-98 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Phenanthrene LCS 0.434 87 ( 50-104 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Anthracene LCS 0.437 87 ( 55-105 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Fluoranthene LCS 0.512 102 ( 58-109 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Pyrene LCS 0.491 98 ( 56-105 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo(a)Anthracene LCS 0.523 105 ( 55-120 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chrysene LCS 0.464 93 ( 56-109 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene LCS 0.481 96 ( 45-120 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[k]fluoranthene LCS 0.493 99 ( 56-112 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[a]pyrene LCS 0.507 101 ( 57-110 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene LCS 0.456 91 ( 55-111 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene LCS 0.461 92 ( 54-113 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene LCS 0.439 88 ( 49-116 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Naphthalene LCS 0.354 71 ( 44-89 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

1-Methylnaphthalene LCS 0.385 77 ( 42-92 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

2-Methylnaphthalene LCS 0.363 73 ( 45-89 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Surrogates 

### Terphenyl-d14 <surr> LCS 103 ( 50-126 ) 02/02/2010Matrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947712 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) XXX22249 SW3520C 02/01/2010

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Batch Method Instrument 

### XMS5285

8270D SIMS HP 6890/5973 MS SVQAMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947748 Lab Control Sample 947749 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20443 SW5030B 02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008, 1100328009

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Volatile Fuels Department 

### Gasoline Range Organics LCS 198 99 ( 79-108 ) 200 ug/L 02/01/2010 LCSD 185 93 7 (< 20 ) 200 ug/L 02/01/2010

Surrogates 

### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> LCS 100 ( 50-150 ) 02/01/2010 LCSD 98 2 02/01/2010

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9854

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCAMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947860 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) MXX22713 SW3010A 02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328008

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Metals by ICP/MS



### Lead LCS 1030 103 ( 80-120 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010

Batch Method Instrument 

### MMS6300

SW6020 Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3Matrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947865 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) MXX22714 SW3010A 02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328007

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Metals by ICP/MS



### Lead LCS 1020 102 ( 80-120 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010

Batch Method Instrument 

### MMS6300

SW6020 Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3Matrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947960 Lab Control Sample 947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 SW5030B 02/02/2010

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008, 1100328009

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass SpectroscopyMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947960 Lab Control Sample 947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 SW5030B 02/02/2010

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy



### Benzene LCS 31.2 104 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 32.3 108 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Toluene LCS 32.1 107 ( 77-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 33.3 111 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Ethylbenzene LCS 32.1 107 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 32.9 110 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

n-Butylbenzene LCS 35.9 120 ( 80-124 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 37.0 123 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,4-Dichlorobenzene LCS 32.3 108 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 34.4 115 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dichloroethane LCS 33.2 111 ( 80-129 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 34.2 114 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene LCS 34.1 114 ( 80-128 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 35.9 120 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

4-Chlorotoluene LCS 34.5 115 ( 79-128 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 36.6 122 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chlorobenzene LCS 32.0 107 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 32.7 109 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) LCS 94.8 105 ( 69-134 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 96.6 107 2 (< 20 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene LCS 34.8 116 ( 80-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 31.7 106 9 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

4-Isopropyltoluene LCS 34.6 115 ( 80-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 36.6 122 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene LCS 35.3 118 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 36.6 122 * 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

n-Propylbenzene LCS 34.0 113 ( 80-129 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 35.8 119 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010Matrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947960 Lab Control Sample 947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 SW5030B 02/02/2010

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy



### Styrene LCS 32.7 109 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 33.6 112 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dibromomethane LCS 33.0 110 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 33.5 112 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene LCS 32.7 109 ( 80-124 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 34.5 115 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene LCS 32.3 108 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 35.0 117 8 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Acetone LCS 80.9 90 ( 50-135 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 81.7 91 1 (< 20 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane LCS 32.6 109 ( 76-123 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 34.5 115 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane LCS 33.1 110 ( 73-130 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 35.0 117 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Methyl-t-butyl ether LCS 53.2 118 ( 80-120 ) 45 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 55.2 123 * 4 (< 20 ) 45 ug/L 02/02/2010

Tetrachloroethene LCS 32.0 107 ( 79-122 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 32.5 108 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dibromochloromethane LCS 28.9 96 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 30.4 101 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,3-Dichloropropane LCS 33.2 111 ( 80-121 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 34.8 116 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dibromoethane LCS 32.2 107 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 32.8 109 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Carbon tetrachloride LCS 32.1 107 ( 80-126 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 33.2 111 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane LCS 33.5 112 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010Matrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947960 Lab Control Sample 947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 SW5030B 02/02/2010

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy



### LCSD 35.1 117 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chloroform LCS 31.6 105 ( 80-124 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 32.2 107 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromobenzene LCS 31.7 106 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 33.1 110 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chloromethane LCS 32.7 109 ( 67-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 34.0 113 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,3-Trichloropropane LCS 30.8 103 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 32.6 109 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromomethane LCS 27.1 90 ( 30-140 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 30.9 103 13 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromochloromethane LCS 29.4 98 ( 77-129 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 29.4 98 0 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Vinyl chloride LCS 29.0 97 ( 72-145 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 29.2 97 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dichlorodifluoromethane LCS 31.8 106 ( 62-153 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 32.6 109 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chloroethane LCS 29.7 99 ( 67-133 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 30.1 100 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

sec-Butylbenzene LCS 34.2 114 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 35.9 120 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromodichloromethane LCS 34.4 115 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 35.5 118 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1-Dichloroethene LCS 27.5 92 ( 76-130 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 28.4 95 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

2-Butanone (MEK) LCS 94.0 104 ( 66-136 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 94.8 105 1 (< 20 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010Matrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947960 Lab Control Sample 947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 SW5030B 02/02/2010

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy 

### Methylene chloride LCS 27.4 91 ( 63-131 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 28.3 94 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Trichlorofluoromethane LCS 29.4 98 ( 68-145 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 29.8 99 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

P & M -Xylene LCS 66.2 110 ( 80-120 ) 60 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 67.7 113 2 (< 20 ) 60 ug/L 02/02/2010

Naphthalene LCS 31.8 106 ( 75-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 33.7 112 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

o-Xylene LCS 31.4 105 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 32.8 109 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromoform LCS 29.4 98 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 31.0 103 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1-Chlorohexane LCS 48.6 108 ( 70-125 ) 45 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 49.3 109 1 (< 20 ) 45 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene LCS 34.2 114 ( 80-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 36.0 120 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

tert-Butylbenzene LCS 33.1 110 ( 80-122 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 34.7 116 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,1-Trichloroethane LCS 32.9 110 ( 80-122 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 33.0 110 0 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1-Dichloroethane LCS 37.9 126 ( 80-120 ) * 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 38.8 129 * 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

2-Chlorotoluene LCS 34.0 113 ( 80-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 35.7 119 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Trichloroethene LCS 33.0 110 ( 80-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 33.7 112 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene LCS 33.2 111 ( 79-132 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 33.6 112 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010Matrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947960 Lab Control Sample 947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 SW5030B 02/02/2010

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy



### 1,2-Dichlorobenzene LCS 31.9 106 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 34.2 114 7 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

2,2-Dichloropropane LCS 33.6 112 ( 80-132 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 33.5 112 0 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Hexachlorobutadiene LCS 31.5 105 ( 77-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 32.7 109 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) LCS 34.0 113 ( 80-121 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 34.3 114 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dichloropropane LCS 35.3 118 ( 80-121 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 36.3 121 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1-Dichloropropene LCS 34.1 114 ( 80-122 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 34.3 114 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,2-Trichloroethane LCS 32.1 107 ( 77-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 33.9 113 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,3-Dichlorobenzene LCS 32.7 109 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 34.5 115 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene LCS 30.5 102 ( 77-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 32.6 109 7 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Xylenes (total) LCS 97.6 108 ( 80-120 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010 LCSD 100 112 3 (< 20 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010

Surrogates 

### 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> LCS 99 ( 73-120 ) 02/02/2010 LCSD 100 0 02/02/2010

Toluene-d8 <surr> LCS 97 ( 80-120 ) 02/02/2010 LCSD 96 2 02/02/2010

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> LCS 102 ( 76-120 ) 02/02/2010 LCSD 102 1 02/02/2010Matrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947960 Lab Control Sample 947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 SW5030B 02/02/2010

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

Batch Method Instrument 

### VMS11094

SW8260B HP 5890 Series II MS1 VJAMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 947982 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) XXX22248 SW3520C 02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department 

### Diesel Range Organics LCS 4.84 97 ( 75-125 ) 5 mg/L 02/02/2010

Surrogates 

### 5a Androstane <surr> LCS 98 ( 60-120 ) 02/02/2010

Batch Method Instrument 

### XFC9100

SW8015C HP 7890A FID SV E FMatrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Original Prep



### 947866 Matrix Spike 947867 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1100319001 Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) MXX22714 3010 H20 Digest for Metals ICP-MS 02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100328007

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Metals by ICP/MS


### Lead MS (0.620) U 985 99 ( 80-120 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010 MSD 1010 101 3 (< 15 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010

Batch Method Instrument 

### MMS6300

SW6020 Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3Matrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike 1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001 Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) MXX22713 3010 H20 Digest for Metals ICP-MS 02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS


### Lead BMS (0.620) U 1050 105 ( 80-120 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 1010 101 4 (< 15 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010

Batch Method Instrument 

### MMS6300

SW6020 Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3

Volatile Fuels Department 

### Gasoline Range Organics BMS (60.0) U 462 103 ( 79-108 ) 450 ug/L 02/01/2010 BMSD 468 104 1 (< 20 ) 450 ug/L 02/01/2010 Surrogates 

### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> BMS 51.1 102 ( 50-150 ) 02/01/2010 BMSD 51.4 103 1 02/01/2010

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9854

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCA

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department 

### Diesel Range Organics BMS (0.320) U 5.06 92 ( 75-125 ) 5.49 mg/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 4.56 84 11 (< 30 ) 5.43 mg/L 02/02/2010 Surrogates 

### 5a Androstane <surr> BMS .104 95 ( 50-150 ) 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.0947 87 10 02/02/2010

Batch Method Instrument 

### XFC9100

SW8015C HP 7890A FID SV E F

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass SpectroscopyMatrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike 1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001 Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 Volatiles Extraction AFCEE 3.1 8260 (W) 02/02/2010

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy



### Benzene BMS (0.240) U 28.8 96 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 29.0 97 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Toluene BMS (0.620) U 29.8 99 ( 77-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 31.2 104 5 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Ethylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 30.3 101 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.8 103 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 n-Butylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 33 110 ( 80-124 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 34.5 115 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,4-Dichlorobenzene BMS (0.300) U 30.9 103 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.1 107 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,2-Dichloroethane BMS (0.300) U 30.6 102 ( 80-129 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.7 102 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 31.6 105 ( 80-128 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 33.0 110 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 4-Chlorotoluene BMS (0.620) U 32 107 ( 79-128 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 33.8 113 6 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Chlorobenzene BMS (0.300) U 29.9 100 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 31.1 104 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) BMS (6.20) U 96.2 107 ( 69-134 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 86.9 97 10 (< 20 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BMS (0.620) U 31.7 106 ( 80-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 31.1 104 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 4-Isopropyltoluene BMS (0.620) U 32.3 108 ( 80-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 33.8 113 5 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BMS (0.300) U 33.2 111 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 33.2 111 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 n-Propylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 31.6 105 ( 80-129 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.9 110 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Styrene BMS (0.620) U 29.9 100 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.6 102 3 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Dibromomethane BMS (0.620) U 30.6 102 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.7 102 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BMS (0.620) U 30.8 103 ( 80-124 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.3 108 5 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BMS (0.620) U 31.4 105 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.8 109 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Acetone BMS (6.20) U 83.7 93 ( 50-135 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 81.4 90 3 (< 20 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BMS (0.300) U 32.6 109 ( 76-123 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.4 108 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010Matrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike 1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001 Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 Volatiles Extraction AFCEE 3.1 8260 (W) 02/02/2010

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy 

### 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BMS (1.24) U 33.4 111 ( 73-130 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 33.3 111 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Methyl-t-butyl ether BMS (3.00) U 51.7 115 ( 80-120 ) 45.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 50.5 112 2 (< 20 ) 45.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Tetrachloroethene BMS (0.620) U 29.3 98 ( 79-122 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.3 101 3 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Dibromochloromethane BMS (0.300) U 27.7 92 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 28.9 96 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,3-Dichloropropane BMS (0.240) U 31.7 106 ( 80-121 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.9 110 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,2-Dibromoethane BMS (0.620) U 30.8 103 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 31.6 105 3 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Carbon tetrachloride BMS (0.620) U 30.2 101 ( 80-126 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.1 100 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane BMS (0.300) U 31.4 105 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.3 108 3 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Chloroform BMS (0.600) U 29.2 97 ( 80-124 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 29.3 98 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Bromobenzene BMS (0.620) U 29.8 99 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.8 103 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Chloromethane BMS (0.620) U 31.9 106 ( 67-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 31.3 104 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,2,3-Trichloropropane BMS (0.620) U 30.4 101 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.7 102 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Bromomethane BMS (1.88) U 31.1 104 ( 30-140 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 31.6 105 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Bromochloromethane BMS (0.620) U 27 90 ( 77-129 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 27.7 92 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Vinyl chloride BMS (0.620) U 26.9 90 ( 72-145 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 26.7 89 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Dichlorodifluoromethane BMS (0.620) U 30 100 ( 62-153 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.0 100 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Chloroethane BMS (0.620) U 27.1 90 ( 67-133 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 27.3 91 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 sec-Butylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 31.7 106 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 33.2 111 5 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Bromodichloromethane BMS (0.300) U 32.3 108 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.6 109 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,1-Dichloroethene BMS (0.620) U 26.2 87 ( 76-130 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 25.8 86 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010Matrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike 1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001 Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 Volatiles Extraction AFCEE 3.1 8260 (W) 02/02/2010

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy 

### 2-Butanone (MEK) BMS (6.20) U 98.5 109 ( 66-136 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 92.6 103 6 (< 20 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Methylene chloride BMS (2.00) U 26 87 ( 63-131 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 26.4 88 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Trichlorofluoromethane BMS (0.620) U 26.9 90 ( 68-145 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 26.9 90 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 P & M -Xylene BMS (1.24) U 61.3 102 ( 80-120 ) 60.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 63.5 106 4 (< 20 ) 60.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Naphthalene BMS (1.24) U 32.6 109 ( 75-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 33.0 110 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 o-Xylene BMS (0.620) U 29.3 98 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.4 101 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Bromoform BMS (0.620) U 29.3 98 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 29.9 100 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1-Chlorohexane BMS (0.620) U 44.8 99 ( 70-125 ) 45.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 46.1 102 3 (< 20 ) 45.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 31.9 106 ( 80-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 33.4 111 5 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 tert-Butylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 30.8 103 ( 80-122 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.1 107 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,1,1-Trichloroethane BMS (0.620) U 30.5 102 ( 80-122 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.3 101 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,1-Dichloroethane BMS (0.620) U 34.5 115 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 34.9 116 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 2-Chlorotoluene BMS (0.620) U 31.9 106 ( 80-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 33.1 110 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Trichloroethene BMS (0.620) U 30.2 101 ( 80-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.5 102 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BMS (0.620) U 30.9 103 ( 79-132 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.6 102 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,2-Dichlorobenzene BMS (0.620) U 30.2 101 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 31.4 105 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 2,2-Dichloropropane BMS (0.620) U 31.4 105 ( 80-132 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 31.4 105 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Hexachlorobutadiene BMS (0.620) U 29.2 97 ( 77-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 31.6 105 8 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) BMS (0.620) U 31.3 104 ( 80-121 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.4 108 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,2-Dichloropropane BMS (0.620) U 32.2 107 ( 80-121 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.7 109 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010Matrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike 1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001 Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX20449 Volatiles Extraction AFCEE 3.1 8260 (W) 02/02/2010

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy 

### 1,1-Dichloropropene BMS (0.620) U 31 103 ( 80-122 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 31.0 103 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,1,2-Trichloroethane BMS (0.620) U 31.2 104 ( 77-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 31.8 106 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,3-Dichlorobenzene BMS (0.620) U 30.8 103 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 32.0 107 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene BMS (0.620) U 30.1 100 ( 77-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.9 103 3 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Xylenes (total) BMS (2.00) U 90.6 101 ( 80-120 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 93.9 104 4 (< 20 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010 Surrogates 

### 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> BMS 29.8 99 ( 73-120 ) 02/02/2010 BMSD 28.9 96 3 02/02/2010 Toluene-d8 <surr> BMS 28.9 96 ( 80-120 ) 02/02/2010 BMSD 29.4 98 2 02/02/2010 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> BMS 30.9 103 ( 76-120 ) 02/02/2010 BMSD 30.9 103 0 02/02/2010

Batch Method Instrument 

### VMS11094

SW8260B HP 5890 Series II MS1 VJA

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MSMatrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike 1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001 Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) XXX22249 3520 Liquid/Liquid Ext for 8270 SIM 02/01/2010

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS 

### Acenaphthylene BMS (0.0316) U .459 87 ( 50-101 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.423 80 8 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Acenaphthene BMS (0.0316) U .448 85 ( 45-93 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.399 75 12 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Fluorene BMS (0.0316) U .469 89 ( 50-98 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.437 82 7 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Phenanthrene BMS (0.0316) U .469 89 ( 50-104 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.459 86 2 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Anthracene BMS (0.0316) U .488 93 ( 55-105 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.484 91 1 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Fluoranthene BMS (0.0316) U .562 107 ( 58-109 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.585 110 * 4 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Pyrene BMS (0.0316) U .539 102 ( 56-105 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.549 103 2 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Benzo(a)Anthracene BMS (0.0316) U .543 103 ( 55-120 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.568 107 5 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Chrysene BMS (0.0316) U .457 87 ( 56-109 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.495 93 8 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene BMS (0.0316) U .466 89 ( 45-120 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.539 101 15 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Benzo[k]fluoranthene BMS (0.0316) U .442 84 ( 56-112 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.523 98 17 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Benzo[a]pyrene BMS (0.0316) U .467 89 ( 57-110 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.565 106 19 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene BMS (0.0316) U .482 92 ( 55-111 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.527 99 9 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BMS (0.0316) U .495 94 ( 54-113 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.538 101 8 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BMS (0.0316) U .48 91 ( 49-116 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.500 94 4 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Naphthalene BMS 0.0375 J .387 67 ( 44-89 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.366 62 6 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 1-Methylnaphthalene BMS (0.0316) U .424 81 ( 42-92 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.407 77 4 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 2-Methylnaphthalene BMS (0.0316) U .389 74 ( 45-89 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.377 71 3 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010 Surrogates 

### Terphenyl-d14 <surr> BMS .56 106 ( 50-126 ) 02/02/2010 BMSD 0.577 108 3 02/02/2010Matrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 02/10/2010 8:51 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike 1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001 Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) XXX22249 3520 Liquid/Liquid Ext for 8270 SIM 02/01/2010

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Batch Method Instrument 

### XMS5285

8270D SIMS HP 6890/5973 MS SVQA

# APPENDIX A-2

Laboratory Analytical Results February 23, 2010

## SGS Work Order:

Contents:
Cover Page Case Narrative Final Report Pages Quality Control Summary Forms Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Forms 

## Project: Client: 

# SGS North America Inc. Alaska Division Level II Laboratory Data Report

Released by:

Note: Unless otherwise noted, all quality assurance/quality control criteria is in compliance with the standards set forth by the proper regulatory authority, the SGS Quality Assurance Program Plan, and the National Environmental Accreditation Conference. 

## 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 1100658

## CASE NARRATIVE Print Date: 3/4/2010

Workorder No.: 1100658 Project Name: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Lab Sample ID 

## Sample Comments

Sample Type Client Sample ID Refer to the sample receipt form for information on sample condition.

1100658001 AK102 - Unknown hydrocarbon with several peaks is present.

PS RHMW02-WG18B

1100658002 AK102 - Unknown hydrocarbon with several peaks is present.

PS RHMWA01-WG18B

SG S N o rth A m eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l D ivision 200 W e st Potter D rive A nc hora ge A K 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w w w .us.sgs.com M em ber of SG S Group

# Laboratory Analytical Report

Project: Client:

Workorder No.: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)



### 1100658

Certification:
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, other than the conditions noted on the sample data sheet(s) and/or the case narrative. This certification applies only to the tested parameters and the specific sample(s) received at the laboratory. 1003 Bishop Street, Pauahi Tower Suite 1550 Honolulu, HI 96813
Attn: Rick Adkisson T: (808)528-1445 F:(808)528-0768

Jennifer Serna

Project Manager 

### 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager.

SGS No rth Americ a Inc . En vir onmenta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com Member of SG S Group

### Enclosed are the analytical results associated with the above work order. If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any other assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager at 907-562-2343. All work is provided under SGS general terms and conditions ( <http://www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm> ), unless other written agreements have been accepted by both parties.
SGS maintains a formal Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program. A copy of our Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), which outlines this program, is available at your request. The laboratory certification numbers are AK00971 (DW Chemistry & Microbiology) & UST-005 (CS) for ADEC and AK100001 for NELAP (RCRA methods: 1020A, 1311, 3010A, 3050B, 3520C, 3550C, 5030B, 5035B, 6010B, 6020, 7470A, 7471B, 8021B, 8081B, 8082A, 8260B, 8270D, 8270D-SIM, 9040B, 9045C, 9056A, 9060A, AK101 and AK102/103). Except as specifically noted, all statements and data in this report are in conformance to the provisions set forth by the SGS QAP and, when applicable, the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program and other regulatory authorities. The following descriptors or qualifiers may be found in your report:

* The analyte has exceeded allowable regulatory or control limits. ! Surrogate out of control limits. B Indicates the analyte is found in a blank associated with the sample. CCV Continuing Calibration Verification CL Control Limit D The analyte concentration is the result of a dilution. DF Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit (i.e., maximum method detection limit) E The analyte result is above the calibrated range. F Indicates value that is greater than or equal to the DL GT Greater Than ICV Initial Calibration Verification J The quantitation is an estimation. JL The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation is a low estimation. LCS(D) Laboratory Control Spike (Duplicate) LOD Limit of Detection (i.e., 2xDL) LOQ Limit of Quantitation (i.e., reporting or practical quantitation limit) LT Less Than M A matrix effect was present. MB Method Blank MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate) ND Indicates the analyte is not detected. Q QC parameter out of acceptance range. R Rejected RPD Relative Percent Difference U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Note: Sample summaries which include a result for "Total Solids" have already been adjusted for moisture content.

All DRO/RRO analyses are integrated per SOP. Print Date: 3/4/2010

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

## SAMPLE SUMMARY Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Project Name: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Workorder No.: 1100658 

## Analytical Methods

Method Description Analytical Method DRO by 8015C (W) SW8015C Print Date: 3/4/2010 4:07 pm



## Sample ID Cross Reference
Client Sample ID Lab Sample ID 1100658001 RHMW02-WG18B
1100658002 RHMWA01-WG18B

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 3/4/2010 4:07 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG18B SGS Ref. #: 1100658001 Collection Date/Time: 02/23/10 10:25 Receipt Date/Time: 02/24/10 11:00 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 8.65 0.440 mg/L XFC9119 XXX22334 0.165 1 5a Androstane <surr> 81.3 50-150 % XFC9119 XXX22334 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC9119 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 03/02/10 01:29 Prep Batch: XXX22334 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 03/01/10 10:05 Container ID:1100658001-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 3/4/2010 4:07 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG18B SGS Ref. #: 1100658002 Collection Date/Time: 02/23/10 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 02/24/10 11:00 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 6.91 0.435 mg/L XFC9119 XXX22334 0.163 1 5a Androstane <surr> 89.3 50-150 % XFC9119 XXX22334 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 920 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC9119 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 03/02/10 01:50 Prep Batch: XXX22334 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 03/01/10 10:05 Container ID:1100658002-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S GroupMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 03/04/2010 16:07 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 950630 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) XXX22334 SW3520C 03/01/2010
QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100658001, 1100658002

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units Analysis Date DL



### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department


### Diesel Range Organics 0.300 U 0.400 mg/L 03/02/10 

### 0.150
Surrogates


### 5a Androstane <surr> 91.7 60-120 % 03/02/10

Instrument Method Batch XFC9119

SW8015C HP 7890A FID SV E FMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 03/04/2010 16:07
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 950633 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) XXX22334 SW3520C 03/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1100658001, 1100658002

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department 

### Diesel Range Organics LCS 4.09 82 ( 75-125 ) 5 mg/L 03/02/2010

Surrogates 

### 5a Androstane <surr> LCS 94 ( 60-120 ) 03/02/2010

Batch Method Instrument 

### XFC9119

SW8015C HP 7890A FID SV E F

# APPENDIX A-3

Laboratory Analytical Results March 30, 2010

## SGS Work Order:

Contents:
Cover Page Case Narrative Final Report Pages Quality Control Summary Forms Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Forms 

## Project: Client: 

# SGS North America Inc. Alaska Division Level II Laboratory Data Report

Released by:

Note: Unless otherwise noted, all quality assurance/quality control criteria is in compliance with the standards set forth by the proper regulatory authority, the SGS Quality Assurance Program Plan, and the National Environmental Accreditation Conference. 

## 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 1101343

## CASE NARRATIVE Print Date: 4/8/2010

Workorder No.: 1101343 Project Name: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Lab Sample ID 

## Sample Comments

Sample Type Client Sample ID Refer to the sample receipt form for information on sample condition.

1101343001 AK102 - The pattern is consistent with a weathered middle distillate.

PS RHMW02-WG18C

1101343002 AK102 - The pattern is consistent with a weathered middle distillate.

PS RHMWA01-WG18C

SG S N o rth A m eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l D ivision 200 W e st Potter D rive A nc hora ge A K 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w w w .us.sgs.com M em ber of SG S Group

# Laboratory Analytical Report

Project: Client:

Workorder No.: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)



### 1101343

Certification:
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, other than the conditions noted on the sample data sheet(s) and/or the case narrative. This certification applies only to the tested parameters and the specific sample(s) received at the laboratory. 1003 Bishop Street, Pauahi Tower Suite 1550 Honolulu, HI 96813
Attn: Rick Adkisson T: (808)528-1445 F:(808)528-0768

Jennifer Serna jennifer.serna@sgs.com Project Manager 

### 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager.

SGS No rth Americ a Inc . En vir onmenta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com Member of SG S Group

### Enclosed are the analytical results associated with the above work order. If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any other assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager at 907-562-2343. All work is provided under SGS general terms and conditions ( <http://www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm> ), unless other written agreements have been accepted by both parties.
SGS maintains a formal Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program. A copy of our Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), which outlines this program, is available at your request. The laboratory certification numbers are AK00971 (DW Chemistry & Microbiology) & UST-005 (CS) for ADEC and AK100001 for NELAP (RCRA methods: 1020A, 1311, 3010A, 3050B, 3520C, 3550C, 5030B, 5035B, 6010B, 6020, 7470A, 7471B, 8021B, 8081B, 8082A, 8260B, 8270D, 8270D-SIM, 9040B, 9045C, 9056A, 9060A, AK101 and AK102/103). Except as specifically noted, all statements and data in this report are in conformance to the provisions set forth by the SGS QAP and, when applicable, the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program and other regulatory authorities. The following descriptors or qualifiers may be found in your report:

* The analyte has exceeded allowable regulatory or control limits. ! Surrogate out of control limits. B Indicates the analyte is found in a blank associated with the sample. CCV Continuing Calibration Verification CL Control Limit D The analyte concentration is the result of a dilution. DF Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit (i.e., maximum method detection limit) E The analyte result is above the calibrated range. F Indicates value that is greater than or equal to the DL GT Greater Than ICV Initial Calibration Verification J The quantitation is an estimation. JL The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation is a low estimation. LCS(D) Laboratory Control Spike (Duplicate) LOD Limit of Detection (i.e., 2xDL) LOQ Limit of Quantitation (i.e., reporting or practical quantitation limit) LT Less Than M A matrix effect was present. MB Method Blank MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate) ND Indicates the analyte is not detected. Q QC parameter out of acceptance range. R Rejected RPD Relative Percent Difference U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Note: Sample summaries which include a result for "Total Solids" have already been adjusted for moisture content.

All DRO/RRO analyses are integrated per SOP. Print Date: 4/8/2010

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

## SAMPLE SUMMARY Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Project Name: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Workorder No.: 1101343 

## Analytical Methods

Method Description Analytical Method DRO by 8015C (W) SW8015C Print Date: 4/8/2010 5:29 pm



## Sample ID Cross Reference
Client Sample ID Lab Sample ID 1101343001 RHMW02-WG18C
1101343002 RHMWA01-WG18C

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 4/8/2010 5:29 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG18C SGS Ref. #: 1101343001 Collection Date/Time: 03/30/10 10:25 Receipt Date/Time: 03/31/10 11:14 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 2.63 0.460 mg/L XFC9145 XXX22440 0.172 1 5a Androstane <surr> 86.7 50-150 % XFC9145 XXX22440 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 870 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC9145 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 04/07/10 16:23 Prep Batch: XXX22440 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 04/02/10 09:55 Container ID:1101343001-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 4/8/2010 5:29 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG18C SGS Ref. #: 1101343002 Collection Date/Time: 03/30/10 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 03/31/10 11:14 Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch LOQ/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 2.35 0.444 mg/L XFC9145 XXX22440 0.167 1 5a Androstane <surr> 89 50-150 % XFC9145 XXX22440 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 900 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC9145 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 04/07/10 16:44 Prep Batch: XXX22440 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 04/02/10 09:55 Container ID:1101343002-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t (907 )562.2343 f ( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S GroupMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 04/08/2010 17:30 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 954865 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) XXX22440 SW3520C 04/02/2010
QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1101343001, 1101343002

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units Analysis Date DL



### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department


### Diesel Range Organics 0.300 U 0.400 mg/L 04/07/10 

### 0.150
Surrogates


### 5a Androstane <surr> 76.6 60-120 % 04/07/10

Instrument Method Batch XFC9145

SW8015C HP 7890A FID SV E FMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 04/08/2010 17:30
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 954867 Lab Control Sample 954869 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) XXX22440 SW3520C 04/02/2010

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1101343001, 1101343002

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department 

### Diesel Range Organics LCS 3.94 79 ( 75-125 ) 5 mg/L 04/07/2010 LCSD 4.10 82 4 (< 20 ) 5 mg/L 04/07/2010

Surrogates 

### 5a Androstane <surr> LCS 84 ( 60-120 ) 04/07/2010 LCSD 87 4 04/07/2010

Batch Method Instrument 

### XFC9145

SW8015C HP 7890A FID SV E F

# Appendix B
January, February, and Ma rch 2010 TPH-DRO Results Memorandum

## April 19, 2010



# January 2010 Sampling Event at the Red Hill Facility

TPH-DRO at RHMW02
The January 2010 total petroleum hydrocarbon, diesel range organics (TPH-DRO) results at RHMW02 were significantly impacted by two large peaks identified by the laboratory as caprolactam and DEET. These tentatively identified compound (TIC) peaks were reported as part of the TPH-DRO result because according to the analytical method, all peaks within th e diesel range must be quantified. However, these TICs are apparently unrelated to Red Hill Bulk Fuels Storage Facility (Facility) stored fuels. Caprolactam is a monomer used to produce “Nylon 6” and is found in plastics and possibly in paints and floor polishes. DEET is a pesticide commonly u sed as an insect repellent.
Neither of these TIC compounds was detected as part of the laboratory extraction or instrument quality control process (e.g., method blanks, instrument blanks, and laboratory control spikes). Also, caprolactam and DEET are not used or found in th e SGS laboratory that performed the analysis. Therefore, the TICs are not laboratory introduced c ontaminants. In addition, the same field personnel performed the January sampling and their sampling appr oach was identical to th at used in previous Facility sampling events. Furthermore, the field personnel were extremely careful and cognizant not to introduce any contaminants to the collected and/or shi pped samples. Consequently, it is not believed that the TICs were introduced via the anal ytical or sampling/shipping process.
As shown in Table 1, these two significant TIC peaks (i.e., identified by the laboratory as caprolactam and DEET) contributed significantly to the reported TPH-DRO results. Although the TPH-DRO analytical method requires that all peaks in the diesel range be quan tified for the “officially reported” TPH-DRO result, Table 1 estimates what the respective TPH-DRO concentrations would have been without the two TIC peaks. The reprocessing or re-quan tification results were provided by the laboratory. These “adjusted concentrations” more closely represent what would be anticipated with normal and duplicate samples.

## Table 1 – January 2010 RHMW02 Analytical Results**
January 2010 Results Official TPH-DRO Result (  g/L) Estimated TPH-DRO Result without the two TIC peaks included (  g/L)

RHMW02 2,130 1,740
RHMW02D (duplicate sample) 3,410 2,110

Table 1 Note: ** TICs are “tentatively identified” compounds. The TPH-DRO analytical method is not specific (i.e., is designed to quantify any and all organic compounds within the diesel range). By scanning the TPH-DRO extract via GC/MS, unknown peaks have been “tentatively identified” (i.e., without the benefit of “neat” standards and the use of specific me thods designed to accurately quantify the particular TIC peaks “identified”). Therefore, although the TICs are believed to be the “identified” compounds, there is some inherent uncertainty associ ated with this identification proces s. This uncertainty is why the “officially reported” TPH-DRO result must quantify all the organic compounds within the TPH-DRO range. 

## In summary, these TICs from the January 2010 sampling event are apparently not attributable to stored fuels at the Facility, they are not laboratory contaminan ts, and it is unlikely that they were introduced by the sampling/shipping process.

TPH-DRO at RHMW05
Similar to RHMW02, the January 2010 TPH-DRO result for RHMW05 was significantly impacted by two large peaks identified by the laboratory as caprol actam and DEET. These TIC peaks were reported as part of the TPH-DRO result because according to the an alytical method, all peaks within the diesel range must be quantified. However as mentioned above, these TICs are apparently unre lated to Facility stored fuels. Caprolactam is a monomer used to produce “Nylon 6” and is found in plastics and possibly in paints and floor polishes. DEET is a pes ticide commonly used as an insect repellent.
As with RHMW02, neither of these TIC compounds was detected as part of the laboratory extraction or instrument quality control process (e.g., method blanks, instrument blanks, and laboratory control spikes). Also, caprolactam and DEET are not used or found in the SGS laboratory that performed the analysis. Therefore, the TICs are not laboratory introduced c ontaminants. In addition, the same field personnel performed the January sampling and their sampling appr oach was identical to th at used in previous Facility sampling events. Furthermore, the field personnel were extremely careful and cognizant not to introduce any contaminants to the collected and/or shi pped samples. Consequently, it is not believed that the TICs were introduced via the anal ytical or sampling/shipping process.
As shown in Table 2, these two significant TIC peaks contributed significantly to the reported TPH-DRO results. Although the TPH-DRO analytical method requires that all peaks in the diesel range be quantified for the “officially reported” TPH-DRO resu lt, Table 2 estimates what the respective TPH-DRO concentrations would have been without the two TIC peaks. The reprocessing or re-quantification results were provided by the laboratory.

## Table 2 – January 2010 RHMW05 Analytical Results**
January 2010 Results Official TPH-DRO Result (  g/L) Estimated TPH-DRO Result without the two TIC peaks included (  g/L)

RHMW05 2,060 541
Table 2 Note: ** TICs are “tentatively identified” compounds. The TPH-DRO analytical method is not specific (i.e., is designed to quantify any and all organic compounds within the diesel range). By scanning the TPH-DRO extract via GC/MS, unknown peaks have been “tentatively identified” (i.e., without the benefit of “neat” standards and the use of specific me thods designed to accurately quantify the particular TIC peaks “identified”). Therefore, although the TICs are believed to be the “identified” compounds, there is some inherent uncertainty associ ated with this identification proces s. This uncertainty is why the “officially reported” TPH-DRO result must quantify all the organic compounds within the TPH-DRO range. 

## In summary, these TICs from the January 2010 sampling event are apparently not attributable to stored fuels at the Facility, they are not laboratory contaminan ts, and it is unlikely that they were introduced by the sampling/shipping process. 

# February 2010 Re-sampling Eve nt at the Red Hill Facility

TPH-DRO at RHMW02
Per the Facility Groundwater Protection Plan, becau se of the January 2010 results for RHMW02, the monitoring well was re-sampled in February 2010 for TPH-DRO. The February 2010 TPH-DRO results for RHMW02 were significantly impacted by three relativ ely large TIC peaks. The first peak (i.e., likely caprolactum) provided the largest TIC contribution toward the “officially reported” TPH-DRO concentration. The second peak was initially thought to be DEET, but following additional analyses, was identified to likely be dodecanoic acid. The third TIC peak was not able to be identified, even after subsequent analyses.
These three TIC peaks were reported as part of the TPH-DRO result because accord ing to the analytical method, all peaks within the diesel range must be quan tified. Caprolactam is a monomer used to produce “Nylon 6” and would be found in plastics and possibly in paints and floor polishes. Dodecanoic acid is not used or found in the SGS laboratory and was not found as part of the laboratory quality control process (e.g., instrument and method blanks), thus is not a laboratory contaminant. The third TIC peak that contributed to the “officially reported” TPH-DRO concentration could not be identified, even given subsequent analyses.
Chromatograms from the February laboratory data depict the two TIC peaks (i.e., identified as caprolactam and dodecanoic acid) that apparently ar e unrelated to Facility stored fuels and the third unknown TIC compound. The three peaks are su mmarized on the chromatograph as follows:

 The first peak marked (~2 minutes) should be capro lactam/nylon6. This is the largest TIC peak and is the major TIC contributor to the “officially reported” TPH-DRO result.

 The second peak marked (~4 minutes) was initia lly thought to be DEET, but following subsequent analysis was identified as likely to be dodecanoic acid.

##  The third peak marked (~6.6 minutes) is an unidentified/unknown compound (i.e., not identifiable following an 8270 analytical method TIC library search). This peak was also present on the chromatograms for the January 2010 TPH-DRO samp le results, but was much smaller and did not significantly influence the “officially reported” January TPH-DRO results.
Note that none of these three TIC peaks appear as part of the associated laboratory quality control process (e.g., method blanks and instrument blanks).
Table 3 depicts the “official reported” TPH-DRO results that include all three TIC peaks described above. Table 3 also estimates what the TPH-DRO results would be in the event that th e three TIC peaks (i.e., likely caprolactam, dodecanoic acid, and an unknown co mpound) were not present. This reprocessing or re-quantification of the chromatogram s was performed by the laboratory. 

## Table 3 – February 2010 RHMW02 Analytical Results**
February 2010 Results Official TPH-DRO Result (  g/L) Estimated TPH-DRO Result without the three major TIC peaks included (  g/L) RHMW02 8,650 3,470 RHMW02D (duplicate sample) 6,910 2,930

Table 3 Note: ** TICs are “tentatively identified” compounds. The TPH-DRO analytical method is not specific (i.e., is designed to quantify any and all organic compounds within the diesel range). By scanning the TPH-DRO extract via GC/MS, unknown peaks have been “tentatively identified” (i.e., without the benefit of “neat” standards and the use of specific me thods designed to accurately quantify the particular TIC peaks “identified”). Therefore, although the TICs are believed to be the “identified” compounds, there is some inherent uncertainty associ ated with this identification proces s. This uncertainty is why the “officially reported” TPH-DRO result must quantify all the organic compounds within the TPH-DRO range. 

## In summary, for the February anal ytical results, the first two TICs (and possibly the third TIC) are apparently not attributable to stored fuels at the F acility and they are likely not laboratory contaminants. Also, it is believed that none of these three TIC peaks have been significant contaminants of past Facility TPH-DRO reported concentrations prior to the January and February 2010 sampling events. In addition, the same field personnel performed the February sampling and their sampling approach was identical to that used in previous Facility sampling events. Furt hermore, the field personnel were extremely careful and cognizant not to introduce any contaminants to th e collected and/or shipped samples. Consequently, TEC does not believe that the TICs were introduced via the analytical or sampling/shipping process.
One identifiable variable that occurred during the Janua ry and February sampling events that was not true with earlier rounds was the ongoing process of dism antling/removing temporary PVC collection pipelines and the demobilization of various e quipment and supplies from the tunnel complex. It is unclear how or if these occurrences may have had any effect/influence on the January and February 2010 TPH-DRO results.

# March 2010 Re-sampling Event at the Red Hill Facility

TPH-DRO at RHMW02 Per the Facility Groundwater Protection Plan, because of the February 2010 results for RHMW02, the monitoring well was re-sampled in March 2010 for TPH-DRO. These sampling results (normal andduplicate samples) did not show large concentrations of the TICs described above that are apparently nonfuel related. Furthermore, the TPH-DRO concentrati ons more closely approximate the levels that have been historically observed from RHMW02. Table 4 presents the RHMW02 TPH-DRO March 2010 results. 

## Table 4 – March 2010 RHMW02 Analytical Results

March 2010 Results Official TPH-DRO Result (  g/L)

RHMW02 2,630 RHMW02D (duplicate sample) 2,350

Please feel free to contact me if you have any ques tions or comments on my ce ll phone at 865-742-2181.
Sincerely,

Rick Adkisson TEC, Project Manager