alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (23,081)
<INVENTORY>                                     78,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,263
<PP&E>                                          27,353
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,259)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          213,185
<BONDS>                                        197,863
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           207
<OTHER-SE>                                   (199,758)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,799
<SALES>                                         32,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,983
<CGS>                                           16,150
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,199
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                41,068
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    662
<INCOME-TAX>                                       876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,944
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,744
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.03)


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 19, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00503

- CV

Texas Industrial Energy Consumers , Appellant

v.

Public Utility Commission of Texas , Appellee

DIRECT APPEAL FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

PROJECT NO. 53298

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is a direct appeal from the Commission’s decision of August 3, 2023

. Appellant has filed a

motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion , the Court agrees that the motion

should be granted . Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismiss es the appeal. A ppellant

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal

.
Exhibit 10.3


VENDOR   Craig Berky                  SHIP   T.J. Jesky
         Interplex Medical LLC        TO     IVPSA Corporation
         25 Whitney Dr. Suite 114
         Milford, OH 45150
         513.248.5120


SHIPPING METHOD            SHIPPING TERMS                 DELIVERY DATE
---------------            --------------                 -------------
      N/A           Submitted invoices net 30 days      November 26, 2007


QTY  ITEM #            DESCRIPTION              JOB   UNIT PRICE   LINE TOTAL
---  ------            -----------              ---   ----------   ----------
 1           Design and Development activities           $25,000      $25,000
             for Avitsian IJ Catheter
             Development Agreement dated
             October 26, 2007

                                                       SUBTOTAL
                                                      SALES TAX
                                                          TOTAL       $25,000

1. Please send two copies of your invoice.

2. Enter this order in accordance with the prices, terms,
   delivery method, and specifications listed above.

3. Please notify us immediately if you are unable to ship as
   specified.

4. Send all correspondence to:
   T.J. Jesky
   500 N. Rainbow #300
   Las Vegas, NV 89107
   Phone 702.375.5742

                                       /s/ T. J. Jesky             11/27/2007
                                       --------------------------------------

<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
       (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: February 12, 2010
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibChief Executive Officer
/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 2, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00530

- CV

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

,

Ap pellant

v.

TFHSP, L.L.C.

, Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 01820

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

T he appellee's motion to refer case to alternative dispute resolution is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs [145A2100DD-AADD001000.A0E501010.999900]
 AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
 ACTION: Additional tribal consultation meeting.
 SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) published a notice in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         on March 25, 2015 (80 FR 15807), announcing that the American Indian Education Study Group (Study Group) will conduct four consultation meetings with Indian tribes to obtain oral and written comments. This notice announces an additional consultation meeting scheduled for  May 1, 2015, making a total of five tribal consultations meetings.
 DATES: The BIE will host an additional consultation meeting on Friday, May 1, 2015.  We will consider all comments received by May 15, 2015, 5:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time.
 ADDRESSES: Submit comments by mail or hand-deliver written comments to  Ms. Jacquelyn Cheek, Special Assistant to the Director, Bureau of Indian Education,  1849 C Street NW., Mailstop 4657-MIB, Washington, DC 20240; facsimile: (202) 208-3312;  or email to: 
                        *IAEDTC-CMTS@bia.gov.*
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jacquelyn Cheek, Special Assistant to the Director, Bureau of Indian Education, telephone: (202) 208-6983.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The additional tribal consultation meeting on the BIE Restructuring will be held on the following date and location: Date
Time
LocationFriday, May 1, 2015
8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. (Central Standard Time)
Renaissance Oklahoma City, Convention Center Hotel, 10 North Broadway Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK 73102.
 Information for this set of consultations is available on the BIE Web site at 
                    *http://www.bie.edu/​Consultations.* As required by 25 U.S.C. 2011(b), the purpose of consultation is to provide Indian tribes, school boards, parents, Indian organizations, and other interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the implementation plan developed following the submittal of the American Indian Study Group's Blueprint for Reform and Secretarial Order 3334. The consultation will cover issues raised during previous consultation meetings and those issues currently being considered by BIE on Indian education programs. Dated: April 13, 2015. Kevin K. Washburn, Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.


[FR Doc. 2015-08851 Filed 4-16-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.40

                           DIRECTOR CASH COMPENSATION

      The following is the cash compensation arrangement for outside directors
of Photon Dynamics, Inc. As of December 14, this cash compensation arrangement
applies to each outside director of Photon Dynamics, which directors include all
directors other than Jeffrey Hawthorne, Photon Dynamics' Chief Executive
Officer. The cash compensation arrangement is as follows:

      1. Each outside director is entitled to receive an annual retainer fee of
$15,000, plus a per meeting fee of $2,000 for in person meetings and $1,000 for
telephonic meetings.

      2. Each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation and Employee Ownership
Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, is entitled to
receive, in addition to their Board compensation, a per meeting fee of $1,000
for in person meetings and $500 for telephonic meetings.

      3. The Chairman of each committee is entitled to receive, in addition to
their Board compensation and committee attendance fees, an annual retainer as
follow: Chairman of the Audit Committee - $15,000; Chairman of the Compensation
and Employee Ownership Committee - $5,000; and Chairman of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee - $3,000.
0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91

Weighted Emissions ‐ g/ho

Ranking

Non‐Cataytic Heater Weighted Average Emissions Distribution:

Comparison with Weighted Averages Calculated via ASTM method

EPA Weighted Emissions (g/hr) ASTM Weighted Emissions (g/hr)

Washington State Limit (4.5 g/hr) for Non‐Catalytic Heaters

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Weighted Emissions ‐ g/ho

Ranking

Cataytic Heater Weighted Average Emissions Distribution:

Comparison with Weighted Averages Calculated via ASTM Method

EPA Weighted Emissions (g/hr) ASTM Weighted Emissions (g/hr)

Washington State Limit (2.5 g/hr) for Catalytic Heaters

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Weighted Emissions ‐ g/ho

Ranking

Pellet Heater Weighted Average Emissions Distribution:

Comparison with Weighted Averages Calculated via ASTM Method

EPA Weighted Emissions (g/hr) ASTM Weighted Emissions (g/hr)

Washington State Limit (4.5 g/hr) for Non‐Catalytic Heaters

EC/R 7/6/2010 DRAFT - Do Not Quote or Cite
```

EX-99.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of chief executive officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tekron, Inc, a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Luigi Brun, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Luigi Brun
    ----------
    Luigi Brun
    Chief Executive Officer
    August 12, 2003
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert C. Howell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ending June 30, 2005 on
Form 10-QSB of Organetix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:


      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: August 15, 2005

/s/ Robert C. Howell
------------------------------
Name: Robert C. Howell
Title: Chief Financial Officer
### 5/16/2013

On May 16 , 20 13 during the quarterly rad-NESHAP conference call between EPA HQ, EPA Region 8 (Angelique Diaz) and the State of Utah I asked Jay Morris about the projected closure date of cell 3 at the White Mesa uranium mill. He stated that it is expected to close in early 20 14 after some dewatering and reshaping of the tailings before placement of the radon barrier.
SNAPSHOT

Guam Farmers, 2018

(percent)

Sex

Male 71

Female 29

Age

<45 5

45 - 64 50

65+ 45

Lived on their farm 57

Primary Occupation

Farming 75

Other 25

Race

Chamarro 71

Chinese 3

Filipino 17

White 3

Other 6

ACH17-18/August 2020

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

Farms and Land

In 2018, Guam had 264 farms, up 154% 

from 104 farms in 2007. These farms 

accounted for 2,441 acres of farmland, 

or 2% of all land in Guam. This was an 

increase of 1,441 acres (144%) from the 

2007 level. 

During the same time, the average farm 

size decreased 4%, from 9.6 acres in 

2007 to 9.2 acres in 2018.

Farm counts increased across most 

size groups. Farms with 1 to 2 acres 

experienced the largest change, 

increasing by 57 farms or 211%.

Since the last Census of Agriculture in 2007 in Guam, the number of farms and land in farms 

more than doubled, and the value of agricultural production increased.

What is a “farm”? The Guam Census of Agriculture defines a farm as any place from which 

$1,000 or more of agricultural products were produced and sold, or normally would have 

been sold, during the census year.

264

farms

2,441

acres

9.2 acres

average farm size 

Farm Counts by Size 

2007 2018

< 1 acre 13 55

1-2 acres 27 84

3-4 acres 13 35

5-9 acres 19 44

10-19 acres 15 16

20+ acres 17 30

Commodity Group by Value of Sales (dollars)

2007 2018

Vegetables and melons 1,497,580 1,840,346

Nursery crops 604,868 1,027,980

Livestock and livestock products 52,900 81,400

Poultry and poultry products (D) 57,950

Fruits and nuts 287,074 (D)

Root crops 46,701 (D)

Fish and aquaculture products (D) (D)

Total 2,796,173 3,842,853

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.

45%

The percentage of farms 

with internet access. 

Mobile broadband was the 

most common mode (42%).

For more information about the Census of 

Agriculture, visit www.nass.usda.gov/AgCensus.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Top Commodities by Number of Farms, 2018

No. of Farms

Lemons and limes 161

Bananas 157

Mangoes 131

Avocados 122

Guam Agriculture

Results from the 2018 Census of Agriculture

Farms and Farmland, 2007 and 2018

2007 2018 % change

Number of farms 104 264 154

Land in farms (acres) 1,000 2,441 144

Average farm size (acres) 9.6 9.2 -4

Sales of vegetables and melons account for 

48% of total sales. Watermelons, cucumbers, 

and eggplants are the largest vegetable crops 

by pounds produced. Bananas are the largest 

commodity by pounds produced.

Highlights
MICHIGAN ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (MIARNG) DRINKING WATER 

PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at

Grand Ledge Annex, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army 

National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water 

Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the 

American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to 

ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: April 2023

PFOA + PFOS Results: Non-detect in finished drinking water, less than 2ppt

Future Testing Event: April 2024

History: Grand Ledge Annex has been on well water since initial operation began in 1993. 

Sampling for PFOS and PFOA began May 2017 and continues on an annual basis. No 

exceedances or issues have been found during any of the sampling efforts to date. 

There is a current CERCLA investigation including the Grand Ledge Annex

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Michigan National Guard Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 517-940-0881

Office E-mail Address: ng.mi.miarng.list.pao@army.mil

Water quality report: A water quality report is/is not required for this location
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUGUST
31, 2000 BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
AUGUST 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                              42
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    42
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      42
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,639
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        42
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,597)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,597)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,597)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>