# Implementation, Maintenance, and Enforcement

of the

PM 2.5 

# National Ambient Air Quality Standard

State Implementation Plan

SIP Number:

08-01

February 15, 2008

Prepared fo r:

U.S. ENVI RONMENTAL P R OT ECTION AGENCY

Prepared by:

MARYL AND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONM ENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore Maryland 212302 

## This Page Left Intentionally Blank3 

## TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4

M ARYLAND ’ S A PPROACH ............................................................................................................ 4 (A) Emission Limits and Other Control Measures ............................................................ 5 (B) Ambient Air Quality Monitoring/Data System ........................................................... 5 (C) Program for Enforcement of C ontrol Measures under §110(a)(2)(A) ........................ 7 (D) Interstate Transport ..................................................................................................... 8 (E)(i) Adequate Resources (L egal & Personnel and Funding) ........................................... 11 (ii) Boards ....................................................................................................................... 12 (iii) Reliance on Local Units of Government ................................................................... 12 (F) Stationary Source Monitoring System ...................................................................... 13 (G) Emergency Power: Comparable Authority to §303 .................................................. 14 (H) Future SIP Revisions ................................................................................................. 15 (I) Nonattainment Area Requirement ............................................................................ 15 (J) Consultation with Government Officials .................................................................. 16 Public Notification of NAAQS Exceedances ........................................................... 17 PSD and Visibility Protection ................................................................................... 17 (K) Air Quality Modeling ................................................................................................ 18 Air Quality Data ........................................................................................................ 18 (L) Permitting Fees ......................................................................................................... 18 (M) Consultation/Participation by Affected Local Entities ............................................. 19

2.0 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 204 1.0 Introduction

The purpose of this document is to examine Maryland’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) and determine if all necessary air quality monitoring, implementation, maintenance, and enforcement

measures for the PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) are in place.

§110(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act lists specific requirements of a ny plan. Should any portion of Maryland’s state implementation plan be found lacking, a prompt submittal to correct such

deficiencies must be made.

The ambient air quality monitori ng/data system section of this document under §110(a)(2)(B) is intended to replace Maryland's air qualit y monitoring network SIP revision of December 20, 1979 approved by the Environm ental Protection Agency (EPA) on August 31, 1981 (FR 46:43677).

Maryland’s Approach

§110(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act provides a de tailed listing of various requirements for Maryland’s state implementation plan regarding the national ambi ent air quality standards. Below, each subparagraph from (A) through (M ) is broken down, with various provisions supporting the requirements.5 ____________________________________________________________________________



## §110(a)(2) of the Clean Ai r Act (Subparagraphs A – M) and Maryland Requirements

________________________ ______________________ ___________________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(A) Emission Limits and Other Control Measures:

Include enforceable emission limitations and other control measures, means, or techniques (including economic incentives such as fees, marketable permits, and auctions of emissions rights), as well as sche dules and timetables for compliance.

Maryland Requirement:

• The SO 2 , particulate matter, opacity and NOx control regulations found under COMAR 26.11 Air Quality.

• COMAR 11.14.08 Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program

• Mirant Consent Decree, which was entered by the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Virginia on April 20, 2007.

• In addition, by April 4, 2008, Maryland will submit a PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan that will include adopted regulations necessary to meet the NAAQS.



### ________________________ ______________________ ___________________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(B) Ambient Air Quality Monitoring/Data System :

Provide for establishment and operation of devi ces, methods, systems, and procedures to: (i) monitor, compile, and analyze data on ambi ent air quality, and (ii) make such data

available to EPA.

Maryland Requirement:

• Maryland's authority to monitor ambien t air quality is found under §§2-103(b)(2) and 2-301 (a)(1), Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland; and COMAR 26.11.04.03 (specifying methods of m easuring ambient air quality levels shall be those specified in 40 C.F.R. Parts 50, 53 and 58).6 • No specific statutory author ity is necessary to authorize data analysis or the

submission of such data to EPA. Fe deral grant requirements establish the obligation to provide data to EPA.

• MDE establishes, operates, and maintain s a network of ambient air monitors throughout Maryland. All ambient air monitors in the Maryland network that are used to determine compliance with the NAAQS have been designated by EPA as either Reference or Equivalent monitors. All ambient air monitors in the Maryland network are subjected to the Quality Assurance requirements of 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix A. In addition, all sa mplers are located at sites that have met the minimum siting requireme nts of Part 58, Appendix E.

• In order to keep EPA informed of changes to the sampling network, MDE provides EPA Region III with prior notific ation of any planned changes to the network. As needed, details of these ch anges and anticipated approvals of the changes are communicated to EPA. Purs uant to 40 C.F.R. Part 58, Subpart B, Section 58.10, MDE sends the EPA Re gional Administrator an Annual Monitoring Network Plan for approval th at details any modifications to the network. This plan also provides a de scription of each modification, the reason for each modification, and any other inform ation relevant to the modifications. Section 58.10 also requires MDE (begi nning July 1, 2010) to perform and submit to the EPA Regional Administrator an assessment of the Maryland ambient air monitoring network every five years to de termine, at a minimum, if the network meets the monitoring objectives defined in 40 C.F.R., Part 58, Appendix D, whether new sites are needed, whether ex isting sites are no longer needed and can be terminated, and whether new technologi es are appropriate for incorporation

into the network.

• Maryland has and will continue to subm it data to EPA's Air Quality System (AQS). MDE collects and reports to EPA all ambient air quality data for SO 2 , CO, O 3 , NO 2 , PM 10 , and PM 2.5 . The reports comply with the federal requirements of 40 CFR 58.35. As necessa ry, the submitted data is reviewed, edited, validated, and entered into the EP A air quality system (AQS) for updating pursuant to prescribed AQS procedures . The EPA AQS receives each report within 90 days after th e end of the quarterly reporting period.

• MDE analyzes such air quality data to determine attainment status or progress.

This ambient air quality monitoring /data system section is intended to replace Maryland's air quality mon itoring network SIP revision of December 20, 1979 approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on August 31, 1981 (FR 46:43677).



### ________________________ ______________________ ___________________7 _____________________________________________________________________________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(C) Program for Enforcement of Control Measures under §110(a)(2)(A):

Include a program to provide for enforcement of PM 2.5 measures in (A), and regulation of the modification and construction of any sta tionary source within the areas covered by the plan as necessary to assure that the PM 2.5 NAAQS is achieved, including a permit program as required in parts C and D.

Maryland Requirement:

• Enforcement and Penalties: §§2-601—614, Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland. Maryland is not precluded fr om regulating condensable PM 2.5 and can regulate

sources of PM 2.5 with the existing COMAR 26.11.02.

• Permit Program requirements unde r COMAR 26.11.02 and COMAR 26.11.03. Maryland is not precluded fr om regulating condensable PM 2.5 and can regulate

sources of PM 2.5 with the existing COMAR 26.11.02 and COMAR 26.11.03.

• PSD requirements under COMAR 26.11.06.14. Maryland is following EPA’s interim gui dance calling for use of PM-10 as a surrogate for the EPA fine particle NAAQS related to the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), specifical ly, the April 5, 2005, Steven D. Page memorandum entitled “Implementation of New Source Review Requirements in PM-2.5 Nonattainment Areas,” and the October 23, 2997 John S. Seitz memorandum entitled “Interim Implementation of New Source Review Requirements for PM2.5,” referenced therein.

• NSR requirements under COMAR 26.11.17.



### ________________________________ ________________________________8 

### ________________________________________________ _______________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(D) Interstate Transport :

(i) Contain adequate provisions prohib iting any source or other type of emissions activity from emitting any air pollutant in amounts which will:

(I) contribute significantly to nonattainment in, or interfere with maintenance by, any other State with respect to any such national primary or secondary ambient air quality standard.

(II) interfere with measures required to be included in the applicable implementation plan for any oth er State under part C to prevent significant deterioration of air quality or to protect visibility.

Maryland Requirement:

• Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) under COMAR 26.11.28 submitted to EPA for approval as part of Mary land's SIP on October 24, 2007.

• COMAR 26.11.27 Emission Limitations for Powe r Plants which is more stringent than the federal CAIR and further reduces Maryland’s NOx and SO 2 emissions below the federal requirements through requi rements for on-site control. These regulations implement the requirements of the Healthy Air Act (Ch. 23, Acts of 2006), and apply to 15 coal-fired electric generating units. The regulations were submitted to EPA for approval as part of Maryland's SIP on July 12, 2007.

• Permitting requirements under COMAR 26.11.02.

• Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) regulations under COMAR 26.11.17 and PSD requirements under COMAR 26.11.06.14. Pursuant to the August 15, 2006 William T. Harnett Guidance Memorandum, “Guidance for State Implementation Plan (SIP) Submissions to Meet Current Outstanding Obligations Under Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) fo r the 8-Hour Ozone and PM 2.5 NAAQS”, Maryland has fulfilled its 110(a)(2)(D)(i) requirements with respect to

Nonattainment New Source Review and Pr evention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) due to the following:

1. All major stationary sources for 8-hour ozone and the EPA fine particle NAAQS are currently subject to PSD and NNSR permitting programs. Maryland has also met the June 15, 2007 deadline for submitting SIPs to address the Phase II ozone implementation rule requirements.9 2. Major sources are subject to PSD and NNSR permitting programs implemented in accordance with EPA’s interim guidance calling for use of PM-10 as a surrogate for the EPA fine particle NAAQS related to the PSD and NNSR program requirements.

• The State of Maryland confirms that it is meeting this requirement for the use of PM 10 as a surrogate for the EPA fine particle NAAQS in the PSD and NNSR programs.

• The State of Maryland confirms that (1) the existing PSD regulation under COMAR 26.11.06.14 incorporates the federal program by reference and (2) an update to the current federal requirements is underway.

• The State of Maryland confirms that the existing NNSR program requirements under COMAR 26.11.17 were recently amended and submitted to EPA for approval as part of Maryland's SIP on October 24, 2007.

• Maryland is required to develop a nd implement a Regional Haze State Implementation Plan to protect visib ility. In addition, Maryland will be developing and implementing a PM 2.5 SIP in 2008 that will assist with reducing visibility reducing pollutants.10 (D) (con'd)

(ii) Insure compliance with the a pplicable requirements of §§ 126 1 and 115 2

(interstate and internatio nal pollution abatement).

Maryland Requirement:

• Permitting regulations under COMAR 26.11.02.

• PSD regulation under COMAR 26.11.06.14.

• §2-301(a)(1) Environment Article, Annotat ed Code of Maryland (authority to control air pollution).

• In addition, nothing in Maryla nd's statutory or regulatory authority prohibits or

otherwise interferes with Maryland's ability to ex ercise sections 126 and 115 of

the CAA.



### ________________________ ______________________ ___________________

1 §126 (a) Each plan shall (1) re quire each major proposed new or modified sour ce (A) subject to Part C or (D) which may significantly contribut e to pollution in excess of the NAAQS in any AQCR outside the State in which such source intends to locate or modify, to provide written notice to all nearby States the pollution levels of which may be affected by such source 6 0 days prior to the date on which commencement of construction is to be permitted by the State, and (2) identify all major existi ng stationary sources which may have the impact described in (1) with respect to new or modified sources and provide notice to all nearby States of the identity of such sources. (b) Any State may petition EPA for a finding that any major source or group of stationary sources emits or woul d emit any pollutant in violation of the prohibition of § 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) or this section. (c ) Notwithstanding any permit which may have been granted by the Stat e, it shall be a violation of this section and the plan - (1) for any major proposed new or modified source with respect to which a finding has been made under subsection (b) to be constructed or to operate in violation of this section and the prohibition of § 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) or this section, or (2) for any major exis ting source to operate more than 3 months after such finding has be en made. EPA may permit the c ontinued operation of a source beyond the expiration of the 3-month period if the source comp lies with the emission limitations and compliance schedules as may be provided by EPA to bring about co mpliance with the requirements of § 110(a)(2 )(D)(ii). Nothing shall be construed to preclude any such source from being eligib le for an enforcement order under § 113(d) after the expiration of such period during which EPA has permitted continuous operation.

2 § 115 (a) Whenever EPA, upon receipt of reports, surveys or st udies from any duly constituted international agency has reason to believe that any pollutants emitted in the US cause or contribute to pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endang er public health or welfare in a foreign country or whenever the Secretary of State requests it to do so, EPA shall give formal

notification to the Governor of the State in which such emissions originate. (b) The EPA notice shall be deemed to be a findin g under § 110(a)(2)(H)(ii) which requires a plan revision with respect to so much of the applicable pl an as is inadequate to prev ent or eliminate the endangerment. Any foreign country so affected by such emission of pollutants shall be invited to appear at an y public hearing associated with any revision of the appropriate portion of the applicab le plan. (c) This section shall apply on ly to a foreign country which EPA determines ha s given the US the same rights with respect to the prevention or control of air pollution occurring in that country. (d) Recommendations issued following any abatement conference conducted prior to CAA 1977 shall remain in effect with respect to any pollutant for which no NAAQS has been established under § 109 unless EPA, after consultation with all agencies, which were part y to the conference, rescinds any such recommendation.11 CAA§110(a)(2)

(E) Assurances re: (i) Adequate Resources (L egal & Personnel and Funding) (ii) Boards (iii) Reliance on Local Units of Government

(E) (i) Adequate Resources (Legal & Personnel and Funding) :

Provide necessary assurances that the stat e will have adequate personnel, funding, and authority under state law to carry out such implementation plan (and is not prohibited by any provision of federal or state law from carrying out such implementation plan).

Maryland Requirement:

• This is accomplished thr ough the §105 grant process a nd the Maryland Clean Air Fund (§2-107 Environment Article, Annotat ed Code of Maryland) composed of funds collected from application fees, permit fees, renewal fees, and civil or administrative penalties or fines.

• The Clean Air Fund may be used for (1 ) identifying, monito ring, and regulating air pollution in the State, including program developm ent of these activities as provided in the State budget; and (2) pr oviding grants to local governments to supplement funding for programs conducted by local governments that are consistent with the Maryland program.

• Other authorities to carry out the Stat e Implementation Plan may be found under the following sections of the Environmen t Article, Annotated Code of Maryland:

§§2-103(b)(2) Authority to monitor ambient air quality in the State.

§2-105 (Air pollution emergency), Envi ronment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland.

(§§ 2-201-206 The Air Quality Control Advisory Council consultation

process.

§2-301(a)(1) Authority to adopt rules a nd regulations for th e control of air pollution in the State, including tes ting, monitoring, record keeping, and reporting requirements;

§2-301(a)(2) authority to adopt regula tions that establish standards and procedures to be followed whenever pollution of the air reaches an emergency condition.

§2-302 (b) Standards in ai r quality control areas.

§2-302 (c) Ambient air quality standards.12 §2-302 (d) Emission standards fo r air quality control areas.

§§2-601—614 Enforcement and penalties.

(E) (ii) Boards :

Requirements that the State comply with th e requirements respecting State boards under § 128 3

.

Maryland Requirement:

• Maryland does not have any board or body, which approves air quality permits or

enforcement orders.

(E) (iii) Reliance on Local Units of Government :

Necessary assurances that, where the State has relied on a local or regional government, agency, or instrumentality for the implemen tation of any plan provision, the State has responsibility for ensuring adequate imp lementation of such plan provision.

Maryland Requirement:

• Maryland does not rely on localitie s for specific SIP implementation.



### ________________________________ _____________________________

3 § 128 (a) each plan shall contain requirements that - (1) any board or body which approves permits or enforcement orders shall have at least a majority of members who represent the public interest and do not deri ve any significant portion of their income from persons subject to permits or enforcement orders, and (2) any potential conflicts of interest by members of such board or body or the head of an executive agency with similar powers be disclosed. A State may a dopt any requirements respecting conflicts of interest for such boards or bodies or heads of executive agencies, or any other entities which are more stringent than the requirements of (1) and (2).13 _____________________________________________________________________________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(F) Stationary Source Monitoring System : Require sources to report and monitor; State use of reports and public availability

Require, as may be prescribed by EPA:

(i) installation, maintenance, and replacement of equipment, and implementation of other necessary st eps, by owners or operators of stationary sources to monitor emissions.

Maryland Requirement:

• §2-103(b)(2) Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland.

• §2-301(a)(1) Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland.

• Specific monitoring requirements are found throughout COMAR 26.11 (i.e. COMAR 26.11.01.10 & COMAR 26.11.01.11).

(ii) Periodic reports on the nature and amounts of emissions and

emissions-related data.

Maryland Requirement:

• COMAR 26.11.01.04 Testing & Monitoring.

• COMAR 26.11.01.05 Records and Information.

• COMAR 26.11.01.05-1 Emission Statements.

• COMAR 26.11.01.07 Malfunctions & Other Te mporary Increases in Emissions.

• COMAR 26.11.01.10 & .11 CEM Requirements.

• Also, specific monitoring requirements for specific types of sources under other chapters.14 (iii) Correlation of such reports by the St ate agency with any emission limitations or standards established pursuant to CAA, which reports shall be available at reasonable times for public inspection.

Maryland Requirement:

• §2-302 (b) and (c), Environment Articl e, Annotated Code of Maryland and specific monitoring requirements are found throughout COMAR 26.11 (i.e. COMAR 26.11.01.10 & COMAR 26.11.01.11).



### ________________________ ______________________ ___________________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(G) Emergency Power: Comp arable Authority to §303 :

Provide for authority comp arable to that in § 303 4 (concerning emergency powers) and adequate contingency plans to implement such authority.

Maryland Requirement:

• §2-105 (Air pollution emergency), Envir onment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland.

• §2-301(a)(2), Environment Article authorit y to adopt regulations that establish standards and procedures to be followed whenever pollution of the air reaches an emergency condition.

• COMAR 26.11.05, Air Pollution Episode System , currently in the Maryland SIP, codified at 40 CFR 52.1070(c).

• §2-604 (Administrative corre ctive order authority) a nd § 2-609 (a) (Civil injunctive authority) Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland used to

address accidental or other releases that are not authorized by statute, regulation or permit or occur in conjunction with violations of existing regulatory requirements.

4 § 303. Notwithstanding any other CAA provisions, EPA upon rece ipt of evidence that a pollution source or combination of sources (including moving sources) is presenting an imminent and substantial enda ngerment to public health or welfare, or the environment, may bring suit on behalf of the US in district court to immediately restrain any person causing or contributing to the alleged pollution to stop the emission of pollutants causing or co ntributing to such pollution or to take such other action as may be necessary. If it is not practicable to assure prompt pr otection of public health or we lfare or the environment by commencement of such a civil action, EPA may issue such orders as may be necessary to protect p ublic health or welfare or the environment. Prior to taking any action, EPA shall consult with appropriate State and local aut horities and attempt to confirm the accuracy of the information on which the proposed action is based. Any order issued by EPA shall be effective upon issuance and shall remain in effect for a period of not more than 60 days, unless EPA brings an action pursuant to the first sentence of this section before the expiration of that period. Whenever EPA br ings such an action within the 60-day period, such order shall remain in effect for an additional 14 days or longer as authorized by the court.15 __________________________________________________________________________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(H) Future SIP Revisions : Provide for revision of such plan:

from time to time as necessary to take account of revis ions of such national primary or secondary ambient air qua lity standard or the availability of improved or more expeditious methods of attaining such standard.

Maryland Requirement:

• §2-301(a)(1) Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland.

(ii) except as provided in (3)(C), whenev er EPA finds on the basis of information available to EPA that the plan is subs tantially inadequate to attain the NAAQS which it implements or to otherwise comply with any additional CAA requirements.

Maryland Requirement:

• §2-301(a)(1) Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland.

• Maryland's SIP is essentially a compilati on of regulations. The authority to develop or revise a SIP is based on the authority to adopt new regulations and revise existing regulatio ns to meet the NAAQS.



### ________________________ ______________________ ___________________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(I) Nonattainment Area Requirement :

In the case of a plan or plan revision for an area designated as a nonattainment area, meet the applicable requirements of part D (relating to nonattainment areas).

Maryland Requirement:

• §2-301(a)(1) and §2-302(d) Environment Ar ticle, Annotated Code of Maryland.

• COMAR 26.11.17 Requirements for Major New Sources and Modifications.



### ________________________________ ________________________________16 ____________________________________________________________________________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(J) Consultation with Government Officials :

Meet applicable requirements of § 121 5 (consultation).

Maryland Requirement:

• Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee (MWAQC) was certified in 1991 by chief executives of Maryland, Virgin ia and the District of Columbia as the entity responsible for carrying out the regional pl anning requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (membership includes local elected officials).

• Interstate Air Quality Council (IAQC) Memorandum of Understanding signed 3/24/05 by the Governors of Maryland, Virg inia and the District of Columbia.

• COMAR 26.11.26 provides a legal platfo rm for the various consultation procedures that have been developed between the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), Maryland Departme nt of Transportation (MDOT), and Metropolitan Planning Organi zations (MPOs). The MPOs provide the forum for consultation with local governments. Maryland's MPOs are: (1) the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB), (2) the National Capital Transportation Planning Board (TPB) for the Washi ngton region, (3) the Wilmington Area Planning Council (WILMAPCO) for New Castle Count y, Delaware and Cecil County, Maryland, and (4) the Hagerstown/Eastern Panhandle (HEP) for the Hagerstown area, which includes Wash ington County, Maryland and the counties of Berkeley and Jefferson in West Virginia.

• The Air Quality Control Advisory C ouncil consultation process (§§ 2-201-206 Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland).

• COMAR 26.11.17 nonattainment New Source Review requirements; PSD permit requirements under COMAR 26.11.06.14

.

5 § 121. In carrying out requirements for plans to contain - (1) any transportation controls, air quality maintenance plan requirements or preconstruction review of dir ect sources of pollution, or (2) any measure referred to - (A) in part D), or (B) in part C, and in carrying out the requirements of § 113(d), the St ate shall provide a satisfactory process of consultation with g eneral purpose local governments, designated orga nizations of elec ted officials of local government s and any FLM having authority over Federal land to which the State plan applies. Such proce ss shall be in accordance with re gulations promulgated by EPA. Only a general purpose unit of local government, regional agency, or council of governments adversely affected by action of EPA approving any portion of a plan may petition for judicial review.17 CAA§110(a)(2)

(J) Public Notification of NAAQS Exceedances :

Meet applicable requirements of § 127 6 (public notification).

Maryland Requirement:

• All relevant SIPs and plans to achieve the NAAQS contain public notification provisions related to air monitoring le vels such as Ozone Action Days, Air Quality Action Days, Clean Air Partne rs, Airwatch.net, and MDE's website.

• MDE provides extended range air qual ity forecasts, which give the public advanced notice of air qual ity events. This advance no tice allows the public to limit their exposure to unhea lthy air and enact a plan to reduce pollution at home

and at work.

• MDE forecasts daily ozone and PM 2.5 levels and issues e-mails to the public,

businesses and the media via AirAlerts. AirAlert e-mail forecasts and

notifications are free to the public and users can sign-up at www.cleanairpartners.net. The forecast is also available on the air quality hotline at (410) 537-3247. Visitors to the Clean Air Partners web site can also monitor current air quality conditions throughout the region and can customize their AirAlert profile to meet their air quality information needs.

• In addition, air quality calendars display past air quality information and dynamic graphs provide summaries of unhealthy air quality experienced throughout the region. This feature of the web site allo ws the public to mo nitor long term air quality and see how one year compares to previous years.

(J) PSD and Visibility Protection :

Meet applicable requireme nts of Part C (PSD a nd visibility protection).

Maryland Requirement:

• Maryland incorporated PSD require ments by reference (COMAR 26.11.06.14). Maryland is following EPA’s interim gui dance calling for use of PM-10 as a surrogate for the EPA fine particle NAAQS related to the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), specifical ly, the April 5, 2005, Steven D. Page memorandum entitled “Implementation of New Source Review Requirements in PM-2.5 Nonattainment Areas,” and the October 23, 2997 John S. Seitz memorandum entitled “Interim Implementation of New Source Review Requirements for PM 2.5 ,” referenced therein.

6 § 127. (a) Each plan shall c ontain measures to regularly notify the public of when any NAAQS is exceeded or was exceeded during the preceding year, to advise the public of health hazards associat ed with such pollution, and to enhance awareness of measures which can be taken to prevent the standards from be ing exceeded and ways in which the public can participate in regulatory and other effort s to improve air quality.18 ___________________________________________________________________________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(K) Air Quality Modeling :

(i) Provide for performance of air quality modeling as EPA may prescribe for the purpose of predicting the effect on ambient air quality of any emissions of any air pollutant for which EPA has established a NAAQS.

Maryland Requirement:

• §2-302 Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland.

• Inherent in the obligation to meet the NAAQS is the authority for the Department to perform modeling as required under the CAA to demonstrate attainment.

(K) Air Quality Data :

(ii) Provide for the submission, upon request, of data related to such air quality modeling to EPA.

Maryland Requirement:

• Maryland will continue to submit Air quality modeling data as part of Maryland's relevant SIP submissions in accordance with the Clean Air Act and through federal grant commitments.



### ________________________________ ________________________________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(L) Permitting Fees :

Require owner of a major stationary source to pay, as a condition of any permit required under CAA, a fee sufficient to cover: (i) r easonable cost of re viewing and acting upon any permit application, and (ii) if the owner receives a pe rmit, the reasonable costs of implementing and enforcing the terms and c onditions of the permit (not including court

costs or costs associated w ith enforcement), until fee requirement is superseded by EPA approval of a Title V fee program.

Maryland Requirement:

• COMAR 26.11.02.16—19.



### ________________________ ______________________ ___________________19 

### ________________________ ______________________ ____________________

CAA§110(a)(2)

(M) Consultation/Participation by Affected Local Entities :

Provide for consultation and participation by local political subdivisions affected by the plan.

Maryland Requirement:

• Broad authority under §2-301(a)(1) Envi ronment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland.

• COMAR 26.11.26 for conformity purposes.

• the Metropolitan Washington Air Qualit y Committee (MWAQC) was certified in 1991 by chief executives of Maryland, Virgin ia and the District of Columbia as the entity responsible for carrying out the regional pl anning requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (membership includes local elected officials).

• The Metropolitan Planning Organizati ons (MPOs) provide the forum for consultation with local governments. Maryland's MPOs are:

(1) the Baltimore Regional Transportati on Board (BRTB) and the Interagency Consultation Group (ICG);

(2) the National Capital Transportation Planning Board (TPB) for the Washington region;

(3) the Wilmington Area Planning Council (WILMAPCO) for New Castle County, Delaware and Cecil County, Maryland; and

(4) the Hagerstown/Eastern Panhandle (HEP) for the Hagerstown area, which includes Washington County, Maryland a nd the counties of Berkeley and Jefferson in West Virginia.

• the Interstate Air Quality Committ ee (IAQC) Memorandum of Understanding signed 3/24/05 by the Governors of Mary land, Virginia and the District of

Columbia.20 2.0 Conclusion

Based on the information provided above, Maryla nd fully complies with the requirements of §110(a)(2)(A)

 (M). Therefore, Maryland concludes th at no further implementation plans are

needed.