alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

13-3815

M&R Helicopters LLC, et al v. FAA

FAA-2010-1211

O R D E R 

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 3(a)(2) and 3rd Cir. LAR Misc. 107.2(a), it is

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed for failure to timely prosecute 

insofar as petitioner failed to retain counsel to represent M&R Helicopters, LLC. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this order be issued forthwith as the in lieu of a 

formal mandate.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Dated: January 10, 2014

JK/cc: Michael B. Selig

Federal Aviation Administration

Charles Raley, Esq.

Case: 13-3815 Document: 003111503496 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/10/2014
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 28, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10407

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR OMAR FUENTES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:01-CR-49-1

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar

Omar Fuentes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Fuentes has filed a response. 

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its

own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). Article III, § 2, of the Constitution limits federal

court jurisdiction to actual cases and controversies. 
No. 05-10407

-2-

Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). The case-or-controversy

requirement demands that “some concrete and continuing injury

other than the now-ended incarceration or parole -- some

‘collateral consequence’ of the conviction -- must exist if the

suit is to be maintained.” Id.

Fuentes has served the sentence that was imposed upon the

revocation of his supervised release. The order revoking

Fuentes’s term of supervised release imposed no further term of

supervised release. Accordingly, there is no case or controversy

for this court to address, and the appeal is dismissed as moot. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied as unnecessary. 

MOTION DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Home Publications Forms Publications Basin Plan 

## W ater Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin (Basin Plan) The Water Quality Control Plan for the Cent ral Coastal Basin (Basin Plan) is the B oard's master water quality control planning document. It designates beneficial uses and water quality objecti ves for waters of the State, including surface waters and groundwater. It also includes programs of implem entation to achieve water quality objectives. 

### Basin Plan The current Basin Plan consists of the 2016 Basin Plan edition and all amendments fully-approved after October 2014 as listed below: Basin Plan 2016 Notes about the 2016 Basin Plan edition Basin Plan 2016 (without Appendix) Basin Plan 2016 (strikeout/underline showing changes since 2011) Basin Plan amendments approved and in effect (approved by Office of Administrative Law) since October 2014: None at this time. 

### Adopted Amendments Pending Further Approval Basin Plan amendments do not become effect ive until sequentially adopted by the Regional Water Board, and approved by the State Water Board and the California Offi ce of Administrative Law. Amendments containing new or revised water quality standards also require the approval of t he U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Basin Plan Amendments Approved by the Central Coast Regional Water Board: Resolution No. R3-2015-0004. Total maximum daily loads for nutrients in the Pajaro River basin . 7/30/2015. 

### Amendments Under Development Amendment to revise Beneficial Use Designations and to make Editorial Changes. Scoping Meeting Notice - April 18, 2016 at the Central Coast Water Board Hearing Room.


### Triennial Review The California Water Code and the Clean Water Act and require Basin Plans to be reviewed and updated periodically (at a minimum every three years). Go to the Central Coast Basin Plan Triennial Review Process page

. 

### Previous Editions of the Basin Plan 1971 (interim) 1975 1989 1994 

### Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board http://www.w aterboards.ca.gov/centralcoast/publications_forms/publicat...

1 of 2 4/21/2016 11:42 AM2011 

### Information Tools and Links Basin Plan Information Tools Glossary| Acronyms Basin Plan Links California Code of Regulations (CCR) | California Environmental Q uality Act (CEQ A) guidelines| California Water Code | Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) | Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) | Office of Administrative Law| PorterCologne | Water Quality Protection Program for M onterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary| Central Coast Regional TMDL Projects

Conditions of Use| Privacy Policy Copyright © 2016 State of California The California Water Boards include the State Water Resour ces Control Board and nine Regional Boards The State Water Board is one of five environmental entities operating under the authority of the California Environmental Protection Agency Cal/EPA| ARB | CalRecycle | DPR | DTSC | OEHHA| SWRCB 

### Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board http://www.w aterboards.ca.gov/centralcoast/publications_forms/publicat...

2 of 2 4/21/2016 11:42 AM
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4017 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

43 Maple Avenue in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Ann Marie 

Blute Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2009 

Mr. MCGOVERN (for himself, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. OLVER, Ms. 

TSONGAS, Mr. MARKEY of Massachusetts, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. NEAL of 

Massachusetts, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, and Mr. DELAHUNT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 43 Maple Avenue in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ANN MARIE BLUTE POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 43 Maple Avenue in Shrewsbury, 

6 Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4017 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post 

5 Office’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 23



                       Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-34642) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc. 1995 Incentive Award Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-22159) pertaining to the Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333-45689 and 333-69641) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Advanced
Lighting Technologies, Inc. 1998 Incentive Award Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-45695) pertaining to the Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc. 1997 Billion Dollar Market Capitalization Incentive Award
Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-58609) pertaining to the
Company's 8% Senior Notes due 2008, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-58613) pertaining to the Company's securities and securities of ADLT Trust I
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-58621) pertaining to the
Company's securities of our report dated September 28, 1998 (except Note U, as
to which the date is March 15, 1999), with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended June 30, 1998.


                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Cleveland, Ohio
March 15, 1999
EXHIBIT 31.2

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Carroll A. Wallace, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this 10-Q Report of Exabyte Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Dated: August 15, 2005

| /s/ CARROLL A. WALLACE |
|------------------------|

Carroll A. Wallace

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3819 

To extend the commercial space transportation liability regime. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2009 

Mr. GORDON of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. HALL of Texas, Ms. GIFFORDS, 

and Mr. OLSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science and Technology 

A BILL 

To extend the commercial space transportation liability 

regime. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION LI4 ABILITY REGIME EXTENSION. 

5 Section 70113(f) of title 49, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2009.’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘December 31, 2012.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the notices must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 15, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

                    1.                     *Horizon Bancorp,*                     Michigan City, Indiana; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Peoples Bancorp, and indirectly acquire Peoples Federal Savings Bank of DeKalb County, both in Auburn, Indiana, and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to section 225.28 (b)(4)(ii).                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 15, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-09019 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 45228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18330]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8811]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``From Bauhaus to Buenos Aires: Grete Stern and Horacio 
Coppola'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``From Bauhaus to Buenos Aires: Grete Stern 
and Horacio Coppola,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, NY, from on or 
about May 23, 2015, until on or about September 13, 2015, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: July 29, 2014.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-18330 Filed 8-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
EXHIBIT 23.3

Consent of Ryder Scott
Company, L.P.

As
independent petroleum engineers, Ryder Scott Company, L.P. hereby consents to the
incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of Magnum Hunter
Resources, Inc. (the Company) of all references to our reports and our firm
included in or made part of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002. This registration statement on Form S-3 is to be filed on or
about September 26, 2003.

| | /s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
| | ------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                       
| | Houston, TexasSeptember 24, 2003
Technical Support Document (TSD) for the Base Year Inventor Forthe Marshall County, WV 2010 S02NAAQS NonattainmentArea

Submitted May 2015 bythe WestVirginia Department ofEnvironmental Protection

TSD Prepared June 2015 by Jessica L. Fry Office ofAirMonitoring and Analysis, 3AP40 U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region 3 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

Reviewedby Alice H. Chow, Associate Director Office ofAir Monitoring and Analysis (3AP40)

### I. Introduction

The purpose ofthis document is to provide a technical summary ofthe Office ofAir Monitoring and Analysis (OAMA) review ofthe emissions inventories submitted with the West VirginiaDepartment ofEnvironmental Protection (WVDEP) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision: Base Year Inventory, Marshall, WV Nonattainment Area (NAA) for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (S02) NAAQS. Underthe Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 172(c)(3) states are required to submit emissions inventory information for all relevant sources for the areas that are designated nonattainment. The WVDEP has submitted a 2011 Base Year Inventory for the Marshall County, WV 2010 S02NAAQS Nonattainment Area in orderto fulfill the CAA requirements. Any questions pertaining to this technical summary should be directed to Alice H. Chow, Associate Director, Office ofAir Monitoring and Analysis, at 215-814-2144 or via email at chow.alice@epa.gov.



### II 2011 Base Year Inventory

Under section 172(c)(3) states are required to submit a comprehensive, accurate, current accounting ofactual emissions from all sources (point, nonpoint, nomoad, and omoad) in the nonattainment area. This inventory contains actual annual emissions of S02. The base year inventory (typically one ofthe years in whichthe areawas designated
as attainingthe standard) includes emissions estimates from point, nonpoint, omoad, and nomoad sources. TheNAA is composed ofthe Clay, Franklin, and Washington Tax Districts in Marshall County, WV. Forthe purpose ofthe base year inventory, emissions for the entire county were submitted.

WVDEP submitted a 2011 base year inventory for all source categories in the NAA. EPA guidance for emissions inventory development provides that actual emissions should be used for purposes ofthe base year inventory. WVDEP used emissions from EPA's 2011 NEI v2 for the 2011 base year inventory. Documentation for the 2011 NEI canbe found at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011inventory.html.

OAMA staffreviewedthe results, procedures, and methodologies for the SIP base year, and found them to be acceptable.
02/23/2010 17:50 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS 0001/00 2 

& 

>«-* 

H::^ 

F^B \ 1 ^WO 

. ,;:^^MG-)CKEt 

U.S, Department 

of Transportation 8^0 independence Avenue, S.W. 

Federal Aviofion Washington. D,C. 20591 

Administration 

VIA FAX AND FIRST CLASS MAIL -; 

Febniai7 5,2010 c 

-n 

•. — 1 

11-.-o -r; 

W. Chris Harrison ~ 

Directorof Legal Affairs > ^^ai 

Pinnacle Airlines, inc. Sj 

1689NoncomiiihBoulevard, Suite 111 ll S 

Memphis, l^J 38132 '— ^ 

Fax: 901-348-2493 

Re: In the Mailer of Pinnacle Airlines, Docket No. FAA-2009-0180 

Dear Mr. Harrison, 

I am writing lo noiily you that the last two documents served by Pinnacle do not appear 

to have been served in the manner spccillcd in the certificate of service and to again ask 

that you use expedited means for service of all documents on the agency. 

Pinnacle's December 9, 2009 Motion to Strike indicated that it was sent via email, fax 

and regular US, Mail. However, the agency did not receive an email or faxed copy of 

the motion; only the U.S. Mail copy was received. As you are aware, security measures 

and .<!creening processes significantly delays the delivery of documents sent by U.S. Mail. 

Undersigned counsel did not receive Pinnacle's most recent motion until after Judge 

Benkin's December 18, 2009 order was issued. Obviously, the agency had no opportuixity 

to respond to your motion imder those circumstances. Piimacie's December 15, 2009 

Notice of Appeal indicated that it was served by email and U.S. Mail, however, that too 

appears to have only been sent by U.S. Mail and received well after its date of .service. 

No email copy was received. 

The agency again requests that all documents be served by fax, email, or expedited 

delivery service, in addition to US mail. The agency will continue to use expedited 

means for the serviee of all documents. 

Sincerely, 

ra Ponto 

Attorney, Enforcement Division 

Telephone: (202) 267-9863 
02/23/2010 17;50 FAX 2024835142 FAA DMS @|002/002 

Cc: (Via U.S. Mail) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Wa.shington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

(Via fax and U.S. Mail) 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Lavy Judge 

Office oflleariiigs 

Department of Transportation (M-20) 

Room El 2-320 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.H, 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax: 202-366-7536
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 11, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 11, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0273. ASHLEY CLAXTON v. DALE ADAMS.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16EV005072