alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                                      5


          <LEGEND>  THIS  SCHEDULE   CONTAINS  SUMMARY   FINANCIAL   INFORMATION
     EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARONEX  PHARMACEUTICALS INC. SET
     FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED March 31, 1998
     AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
       
<S>                                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                        3,306,000
<SECURITIES>                                                 22,346,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             21,366,000
<PP&E>                                                        5,914,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                3,815,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               28,576,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         5,991,000
<BONDS>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                         15,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   22,567,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 28,576,000
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                520,000
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                5,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (4,911,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (4,911,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (4,911,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (.32)
        

</TABLE>
#### A. W. Thompson *v.*Solomon & William Crocker.

Defendants executed, and delivered to the plaintiff, the following paper: “ I promise and agree to execute a good and legal mortgage to A. W. Thompson for any piece of land he may wish that will be sufficient to pay him a debt of one hundred and fifty dollars, which *we*owe him, for defending a case in the Court of Equity, James Tollison against us. Given under our hands and seals, this 12th April, 1828. It shall be as much as one hundred and fifty acres and no more, except we wish it.” S. Crocker, one of the defendants, subsequently, did execute a mortgage to the plaintiff, which was accepted by him, Held, that according to the true construction of the instrument, it was an acknowledgment of a debt due by *both,*with an agreement that *one*of them should give a specific lien, by mortgage, to secure the payment; and, that, notwithstanding the delivery of the mortgage, the debt remained the debt of *both,*and that the action would lie against both. Nonsuit granted below set aside.

*Before E VANS, J., at Spartanburg, Fall Term,*1838.

This was an action on the following paper: “ I promise and agree to execute a good and legal mortgage to A. W. Thompson, for any piece of land he may wish, that will be sufficient to pay him a debt of one hundred and fifty dollars, which *we*owe him for defending a case in the court of equity, James Tollison against us. Given under our hands and seals this 12th April, 1828. It shall be as much as one hundred and fifty acres, and no more, except we wish it.” Signed and sealed by defendants.

Solomon Crocker, subsequently, did execute a mortgage to the plaintiff, which was accepted by him. The- circuit judge was of opinion, that the agreement above recited was only executory, and was subsequently executed and discharged, by the delivery of the mortgage. Under this view, the plaintiff submitted to a nonsuit, with leave to set it aside.

Curia, per Evans, J.

Upon a review of this case, I am satisfied I was wrong, in nonsuiting the plaintiff on the circuit. I think, the true construction of the instrument is an acknowledgment of *24a debt due by both, with an agreement that one of them should give a' specific lien, by mortgage, to secure the payment. This was done by Solomon Crocker, but the debt still remained the debt of both, and an action would lie against both on this paper. This construction is confirmed by the fact that the instrument was not delivered up when the mortgage was executed. A creditor may take a mortgage from one joint obligor to secure a debt due by both ; and that I take to be, in substance, what was intended in this case. The motion, to set aside the nonsuit, is granted.

*Henry*and *Bobo,*for plaintiff.

*Young*and *Dean,*contra.

Gannt, O’Neall, Eakle, Butler and Richardson, Justices, concurred.
FPL Port Everglades Next Generation Clean Energy Center Winston

_ Hobgood to: Andrew Parks 05/03/2012 01:11 PM History: This message has been replied to and forwarded. Dear Mr. Parks, The U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service has received your request for informal consultation, dated February 22, 2012. The above-referenced project involves the replacement of four existing oil-fired generators with one natural gas-fired 1,250 megawatt unit. The proposed replacement will result in net decreases of sulphur dioxide, p articulate matter , nitrogen oxides, and lead and net increases of carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, and greenhouse gasses. Florida Power and Light (FPL), as the Region 4 Environmental Protection Agency's non-Federal agent, has concluded that " N o adverse impacts to federal or state listed species are expected in association with construction..." FPL has agreed to comply with the Manatee Protection Plan for 3 years. The Service supports FPL's determination. Thank you for your cooperation in the effort to conserve fish and wildlife resources. If you have any questions regarding this email, p lease contact Winston Hobgood at 772-469-4306. Sincerely yours, Winston Hobgood US Fish and Wildlife Service 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                                                              April 28, 2003
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)_______________________________


                          MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


         Nevada                    1-12508                   87-0462881
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction     (Commission               (IRS Employer
    of incorporation)            File Number)            Identification No.)


         600 East Las Colinas Boulevard, Suite 1100, Irving, Texas 75039
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Address of principal executive offices)            (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code       (972) 401-0752
                                                      -------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

<PAGE>

Item 12. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

     The  following  information  shall not be deemed  "filed"  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  except as shall be
expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.

     On April 28, 2003, Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. reported its first quarter
2003 financial results.

Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

     (c) Exhibits

     99.1 Press Release, dated April 28, 2003.


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                          MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC.


                                                /s/ Chris Tong
                                          BY:____________________________
                                                Chris Tong
                                                Sr. Vice President and CFO

Dated:      April 28, 2003
# Euroopan unionin C 212A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 212A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 62. vuosikerta24. kesäkuu 2019 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 212A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

62. vuosikerta24. kesäkuu 2019

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | Oikaisuja |
| 2019/C 212 A/01 | Oikaisu ilmoitukseen avoinna olevasta toimesta Amsterdamissa toimivan Euroopan lääkeviraston (EMA) toimitusjohtaja (Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – palkkaluokka AD 14) COM/2019/20037 ( EUVL C 165 A, 14.5.2019 ) | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

Oikaisuja

2019/C 212 A/01

Oikaisu ilmoitukseen avoinna olevasta toimesta Amsterdamissa toimivan Euroopan lääkeviraston (EMA) toimitusjohtaja (Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – palkkaluokka AD 14) COM/2019/20037 ( EUVL C 165 A, 14.5.2019 )

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

Oikaisuja

| 24.6.2019 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 212/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2019

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 212/1

---

Oikaisu ilmoitukseen avoinna olevasta toimesta Amsterdamissa toimivan Euroopan lääkeviraston (EMA) toimitusjohtaja (Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – palkkaluokka AD 14) COM/2019/20037

(
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti C 165 A, 14. toukokuuta 2019
  )

(2019/C 212 A/01)

Sivulla 6, kohdassa ”Rekisteröitymisen määräaika”:

on:

”Rekisteröityminen päättyy 13. kesäkuuta 2019 klo 12.00 (Brysselin aikaa), jonka jälkeen rekisteröityminen ei ole enää mahdollista.”

pitää olla:

pitää olla

”Rekisteröityminen päättyy 4. heinäkuuta 2019 klo 12.00 (Brysselin aikaa), jonka jälkeen rekisteröityminen ei ole enää mahdollista.”

---
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

277) ll-K- (1) -90 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:58 AM Sheet 277 of 325 
petroleum 

Supply Annual 

1982 

mWF-^TM $txf *V\ 

Volume 1 

This report was prepared by the 

Energy Information Administration, 

the independent statistical and 

analytical agency within the Department of Energy. The information contained herein should not 

be construed as advocating or 

necessarily reflecting any policy position of the Department of Energy 

or any other organization. 

Energy Information Administration 

Washington, D.C. 20585 

June 1983 

P.2 

DOE/EIA-0340(82)/1 

Volume 1 of 2 

Dist. Category UC-98 

II-K-CD-90 

*sr'"T5sap
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43997

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

BILLY J. RHOTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 754

Filed: October 27, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Idaho County. Hon. Gregory Fitzmaurice, District Judge. 

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence, 

affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Billy J. Rhoton pled guilty to grand theft by possession of stolen property, Idaho Code 

§§ 18-2403(4), 18-2407(1)(b)(1). The district court imposed a unified sentence of twelve years, 

with a minimum period of confinement of five years; suspended the sentence; and placed Rhoton

on supervised probation for five years. Subsequently, Rhoton admitted to violating the terms of 

the probation. The district court consequently revoked probation, ordered execution of the 

underlying sentence, and retained jurisdiction. After Rhoton completed his rider, the district 

court relinquished jurisdiction. Rhoton filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of 

sentence, which the district court denied. Rhoton appeals.
2

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In 

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the 

record, including any new information submitted with Rhoton’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude no 

abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Rhoton’s 

Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Click Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael W. Nelson, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 
| (1)    | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                          |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                  |
| (2)    | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |

 

 

 
| Date:  **November 4, 2003** |   | /s/ Michael W. Nelson                        |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Michael W. Nelson

*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

                A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Click Commerce, Inc.and will be retained by Click Commerce, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Peter A. Bleasby

Director

Industry Relations

& Standards

HY1RON

SAF-T-COTL

POWER-SAVER'

P.O. Box 850

Mr. Sterling, Kentucky

40353-0850

Research & Development Ronald O. Daubach

ne-ring Manager

& Measurements

Research & Development

OSRAM SYLVANIA INC. Dennis P. Duzyk Tel 606-498-0526

OSRAM S` -Vr oratory

100 Endicott Street Marketing Manager Fax 606-498-0528

100 Endir,0 S; let Danvers, MA 01923 Toll Free 800-264-0526

Danvers, MA C 923 Telephone (508) 750-2613

Teleohone (SC , 750-2354 Fax (508) 750-2083

_ rAn^ -^n_OnRf} Internet:daubach@hq,sylvania.com

E UCTS

Research & Development

pager ... KENNETH

CSF SY.. 'A INC. Technical Relations H. CARR

CONTROLLER

1 1 .c Street

Danv e,s, -

'

-3

-' Philips Lighting Compan Telep (. 50-2354 y

1560 Lisbon Road Fax(508)75C-2 30 Lewiston, Maine 04240

207-784-3591 114 POPLAR STREET • MEADVILLE, PA 16335 • 814/336-4468

FAX 207-786-8924 FAX#8141337-3128

9 Law Drive: Fe JC

201-808-1800, Ext. 5870

Fax:201-808-6633 3091 South University Drive

ND 58103

General Office

(701) 293-7383

Fax

(701) 232-8032

U.S. Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

read ,

--ti------ ,, .a

Project Leader, Lighting Group

Room A313, Building 226

Building and Fire Research Laboratory

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Gaithersburg, MD 20899

ROBERT C. SORENSEN

President & CEO

708-389-8000

FAX 708-371-0627

1-800-860-3392

23rd Street a Alsip,

' TOOL

TEL 301 504-0508

x1341

FAX 301 504-0124

NICHOLAS MOGAN

SENIOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEER

DIRECTORATE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES

Phone (301) 975-6444

Fax (301) 975-4032 U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON , D.C. 20207

EE-RM-94-220-IF COMMENT 27B-2
Summary of HMEC Non-Employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.10 

Summary of Horace Mann Educators Corporation Non-Employee Director Compensation 

 

			
	 Compensation Element
	  	 Non-Employee Director Compensation

	 Board Chairman Annual Retainer
	  	 $90,000

		
	 Board Member Annual Retainer (other

    than Board Chairman)
	  	 $40,000

		
	 Committee Chairman Annual Retainer
	  	 $30,000 Audit Committee

$10,000 Compensation Committee

$ 7,500 all other Committees

		
	 Committee Member Annual Retainer

    (other than Committee Chairman)
	  	 $10,000 Audit Committee

$ 5,000 all other Committees

		
	 Share-based Compensation
	  	 Fair value on the date of the respective awards is used to determine the number of Restricted Stock Units
(“RSUs”) awarded.
 $60,000 in RSUs upon joining the Board and an additional $60,000 in RSUs if joining within 6 months
after the prior Annual Shareholder Meeting or an additional $30,000 in RSUs if joining more than 6 months after the prior Annual Shareholder Meeting but before the next Annual Shareholder Meeting.

An annual award of $60,000 in RSUs thereafter following the Annual Shareholder Meeting.

All awards have a 1 year vesting period.

		
	 Deferred Fees Match
	  	 Directors electing to defer cash compensation into Common Stock equivalent units (“CSUs”) receive a 25% match in additional CSUs.

		
	 Basic Group Term Life Insurance
	  	 Premium for $10,000 face amount

		
	 Business Travel Accident Insurance
	  	 Premium for $100,000 coverage



Annual retainer fees are paid following the Annual Shareholder Meeting of each year. The annual retainer fees are prorated to the extent
that a non-employee Director joins the Board after the Annual Shareholder Meeting or leaves the Board prior to the next Annual Shareholder Meeting. 

Last revision date: May 27, 2010 
  

 1
MDE 

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 610 • Baltimore MD 2 1230-1719 

410-537-3314 • 1-800-633-6 101 • www.mde.maryland.gov 

Larry Hogan 

Governor 

Boyd Rutherford 

Lieutenant Governor 

July 31, 2015 

Mr. Shawn M . Garvin, Regional Administator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region Ill (3RA00) 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

Ben Grumbles 

Secretary 

The enclosed materials comprise an original and one copy of an application for Program Authorization 

for the State of Maryland under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). 

The application consists of the following: 

• A revised Program Description, which describes the program elements for which authori zation is 

being sought, and discusses how the M aryland Department of the Environment implements its 

currently authori zed program and these additional program elements; and 

• An Attorney General 's Statement, in which the M aryland Attorney General certifies that the 

State of Maryland has adequate legal authority to implement the revi sed program described in the 

Program Description. 

The M emorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the State of M aryland and the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency concerning implementation of the RCRA program in M aryland, executed in January 

200 I pursuant to 40 CFR §27 1.8, remains unchanged. The MOA is not included with this application. 

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Ed ward Hammerberg of my staff 

at (410) 537-33 14. 

ce y, ~ 

r, Acting Director 

Land M anagement Administration 

Enclosure 

cc: Ben Grumbles, Secretary or the Environment 

Mr. A.Hussain Alhija 

Mr. Edward Hammerberg 

~ Rccyclrd Paper www.mde.maryland.gov TTY Users I -XOO-735-2258 

Via Maryland Relay Service
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6641

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AUGUSTINE PEREZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-90-112-R, CA-97-179-R) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Augustine Perez, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Augustine Perez seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Perez , Nos. CR-90-112-R; CA-97-179-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 9 & Mar. 18, 1998). While the district court erred by denying certain of Perez’s claims as untimely filed, since the statute of limitations was waived by the Government’s failure to raise the defense, we find these nonconstitutional claims cannot be raised in a collateral attack and are patently meritless. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED