alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

I, Christopher G. Payan, certify that:

 

| 1.  I havereviewed this Form 10-K of Emerging Vision, Inc.; |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant's othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)) forthe registrant and we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

 

c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date:  March 31, 2006  

 

 

| /s/ Christopher G. Payan |
|--------------------------|
| Christopher G. Payan     |
| Chief Executive Officer  |
|                     |
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly report of Collectible Concepts Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul S. Lipschutz, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:   July 24, 2006                             By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
                                                     ----------------------
                                                  Paul S. Lipschutz
                                                  Principal Financial Officer
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




Cash and Equity Bonus Determinations under 2010 Compensation Program




Fiscal Year 2010

Bonus Payments for Executive Officers



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Cash Bonus Earned	 	Equity Bonus Earned (options)
	Steve Plochocki
	 	$	25,000	 	 	 	0	 
	Pat Cline
	 	$	376,766	 	 	 	15,000	 
	Donn Neufeld
	 	$	20,000	 	 	 	0	 
	Paul Holt
	 	$	50,000	 	 	 	0	 
	Phil Kaplan
	 	$	0	 	 	 	0
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
NAME                                          STATE OF INCORPORATION

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
BAB Rad, Inc.                                 New York

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Breathco Incorporated                         Florida

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
CCC Indiana Lithotripsy, Inc.                 Florida

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Clinical Marketing, Ltd.                      Delaware

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Clinical Studies, Ltd.                        Delaware

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
DDC Real Estate Corp.                         Florida
fka Dasco Development Corporation, Inc.

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Dekalb Endoscopy Center, Inc.                 Georgia

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Innovative Clinical Solutions, Ltd.           Delaware

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Montgomery Radiation Care at Baptist, Inc.    Delaware

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Oncology Therapies, Inc.                      Delaware

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Oncology Therapies of America, Inc.           Florida
fka Oncology Therapies, Inc.

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
PhyMatrix Management Co., Inc.                Florida
fka Phychoice, Inc.

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
PhyMatrix Network Management, Inc.            Delaware

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
PhyMatrix of Central Georgia, Inc.            Delaware

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
PhyMatrix Pulmonary Network, Inc.             Florida

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
PhyMatrix Urology Network, Inc.               Delaware

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Physician Consultant and Management Company   North Carolina
of North Carolina

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Physician Consultant and Management Company   New York
of New York

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Physician Consultant and Management           Florida
Corporation

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Urology Consultant of South Florida, Inc.     Florida

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

DAVID NORMAN MURPHY

PETITION OF: ERIC J. FILER, ESQUIRE :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No s . 85 and 86 MM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2 nd day of December , 2021, in consideration of the Application to

Withdraw Appearance, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of

Schuylkill County for that court to determine whether Attorney Eric J. Filer should be

granted leave to withdraw. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(B) (providing that an attorney may not

unilaterally withdraw his or her appearance with respect to a criminal defendant; rather,

a court must determine whether leave to withdraw is warranted). In the event the court

permits Attorney File r to withdraw, the court is ORDERED to determine whether David

Norman Murphy is entitled to appointment of another attorney for purposes of allocatur

review.

The Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County is ORDERED to enter its order

regarding this remand within 90 days and to notify this Court promptly of its determination

.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3773 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the first-time 

homebuyer tax credit, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2009 

Ms. EDWARDS of Maryland (for herself, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. LOBIONDO) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 

Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the first-time homebuyer tax credit, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER TAX 

4 CREDIT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (h) of section 36 of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘December 1, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘June 1, 2010’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3773 IH

1 (b) ELECTION TO TREAT PURCHASE IN PRIOR

2 YEAR.—Subsection (g) of section 36 of such Code is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘December 1, 2009’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘January 1, 2010’’, and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘In the 

7 case of a purchase of a principal residence after De8 cember 31, 2009, and before June 1, 2010, a tax9 payer may elect to treat such purchase as made on 

10 December 31, 2009, for purposes of this section 

11 (other than the preceding sentence and subsections 

12 (c) and (f)(4)(D)).’’. 

13 (c) EXTENSION OF WAIVER OF RECAPTURE.—Sub14 paragraph (D) of section 36(f)(4) of such Code is amend15 ed— 

16 (1) by striking ‘‘December 1, 2009’’ and insert17 ing ‘‘June 1, 2010’’, and 

18 (2) by striking ‘‘IN 2009’’ in the heading and in19 serting ‘‘AFTER 2008’’. 

20 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall apply to residences purchased after No22 vember 30, 2009. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
=====================================================================
            SUBSIDIARY NAME                STATE OF INCORPORATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                      <C>    
GMGP, Inc.                               Georgia
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Gift Mart Limited Partner, Inc.          Georgia
---------------------------------------------------------------------
LFGP, Inc.                               Georgia
---------------------------------------------------------------------
E. C. Holdings, Inc.                     Georgia
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AMC Tampa, Inc.                          Florida
=====================================================================
</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 7, 2016

NO. 03-15-00203-CR

Ronnie Hue Montgomery, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6607

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TYRONE T. SEDGWICK, a/k/a T-Bone, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-94-79, CA-97-454) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone T. Sedgwick, Appellant Pro Se. John Granville Douglass, Mary Hannah Lauck, James Brien Comey, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sedgwick , Nos. CR-94-79; CA-97-454 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market Integrity,  Inc.on Form 10-QSB
for the period  ending  September  30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Daniel L.  Hodges,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



 /s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
Chief Financial Officer
February 13, 2003



<PAGE>
Letter agreement with Ms. White.



 Exhibit 10.9 

Kathy Brittain White 
 c/o Novell, Inc.

 404 Wyman St. 
 Waltham, MA 02451

 Dear Ms. White: 
 You and
Novell, Inc. (the “Company”) are parties to (1) a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated April 7, 2009, granted under the Novell, Inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”), (2) a Nonqualified Stock Option
Agreement, dated April 7, 2009, granted under the 2009 Plan and (3) a Stock Option Agreement Outside Directors Grant, dated June 3, 2008, granted under the Novell, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan (the “2000 Plan”) (together, the
“Equity Agreements”). In recognition of your loyal service to the Company as a non-employee member of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) for the past several years, the Board has determined that it is appropriate
to amend the Equity Agreements to accelerate the vesting of the restricted stock units and nonqualified stock options granted thereunder so that they are fully vested as of April 18, 2010. 

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority of the Board under the 2009 Plan and the 2000 Plan, the Equity Agreements are hereby amended as follows:

  

	 	1.	The last sentence in the first paragraph of Section 3(a) of the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated April 7, 2009, is hereby amended to read as follows:


 “Except as otherwise provided in subparagraphs 3(b) or 3(c) below, 50% of the Restricted Units shall vest
on the first anniversary of the Date of Grant and 50% of the Restricted Units shall vest on April 18, 2010, provided that the Grantee is a Director (as defined in the Plan) of the Company on such dates.” 

 

	 	2.	The first paragraph in Section 2(a) of the Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Agreement, dated April 7, 2009, is hereby amended to read as follows:


 “Except as otherwise provided in subparagraphs 2(b) or 2(c) below, the Option shall vest and become
exercisable as to 50% of the Shares subject to the Option on the first anniversary of the Date of Grant and as to 50% of the Shares subject to the Option on April 18, 2010, provided that the Grantee is a Director (as defined in the Plan) of the
Company on such dates.” 
  

	 	3.	The paragraph entitled “Vesting Schedule” in Section 1 of the Stock Option Agreement Outside Directors Grant, dated June 3, 2008, is hereby amended
to read as follows: 

 “Except as otherwise set forth in the Plan, this Option will vest over two
(2) years with 50% of the Shares subject to the Option vesting on June 3, 2009 and 50% of the Shares subject to the Option vesting on April 18, 2010, provided that the Optionee is a Service Provider on such vesting dates.”









	 	4.	In all respects not amended, the Equity Agreements are hereby ratified and confirmed. 


The Equity Agreements shall be amended as described above, effective as of the date first written above, provided that you consent to the
foregoing amendments by signing below. 
 Sincerely, 

Novell, Inc. 
  

	
	  

	Name:
	Title:

 Agreed and Accepted: 

Kathy Brittain White
ex10_2.htm


ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS UNDER LETTER OF INTENT









For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Golden Group Services, Ltd., does hereby assign and transfer to Aviation Surveillance Systems,
Inc. all of its right, title, and interest in the following agreement and related documents, together with all rights accrued or to accrue under such documents:





Letter of Intent for Checotah Field Development Project dated May 19, 2010  wherein Golden Group Services, Ltd. is
the Purchaser and Shale Gas Partners, LLC and Checotah Pipeline, LLC are the Sellers.









Golden Group Services, Ltd.

 

By: /s/ Brad Van Siclen

Its:  Director



 

Dated:  June 3, 2010
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51059

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN CORRALEJO-MONTOYA, also known as Omar Antonio

Corralejo-Montoya,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-861

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan CorralejoMontoya raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.’s 333-127884, 333-120674, 333-101753, 333-60532, 333-54968, 333-39112, 333-79577, 333-56883 and 333-20883) pertaining to the Accelrys, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004Stock Incentive Plan, Accelrys, Inc. 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Accelrys, Inc. 2004 New-Hire Equity Incentive Plan, Pharmacopeia, Inc. 1994 Incentive Stock Plan, Pharmacopeia, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Pharmacopeia, Inc. 2000 StockOption Plan and 1995 Director Option Plan and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.’s 333-119752 and 333-34478) and the related prospectus of Accelrys, Inc. and Pharmacopeia, Inc. of our reports dated May 20, 2009, with respectto the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Accelrys, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Accelrys, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2009.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

San Diego, California 

May 26, 2009
Amendment No. 1 to the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.29 

WHEREAS, DynCorp International Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the DynCorp International Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(the “Plan”) to secure for the Company and its shareholders the benefits of the incentive inherent in increased common stock ownership by employees and directors of the Company; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend the
Plan at any time subject to any requirement for stockholder approval imposed by applicable law and certain shareholder approval requirements imposed by the Plan; 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to amend the definition of “Change in Control” in Section 11.3 of the
Plan; 
 WHEREAS, such amendment does not require shareholder approval pursuant to applicable law or the terms of the
Plan; and 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to and in exercise of the authority retained by the Board under
Section 12.1 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective March 10, 2010, to provide as follows: 
 1. Section
(a) of the definition of “Change in Control” in Section 11.3 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 

“(a) (i) sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company to a Person or Group which is not an
Affiliate of Veritas Capital Management, L.P. (“Veritas”); (ii) a sale by the Company, Veritas, or any corporation, partnership, limited liability company or other entity which is affiliated through equity ownership or otherwise
(“Affiliate”) with the Company or Veritas resulting in more than 50% of the voting stock of the Company being held by a Person or Group that does not include Veritas or any of its Affiliates or (iii) a merger or consolidation of the
Company into another Person which is not an Affiliate of Veritas; if and only if any such event listed in clauses (i) through (iii) of this paragraph results in both (x) the inability of Veritas to elect a majority of the Board of
Directors of the Company or of the resulting entity and (y) the ability of another Person or Group that does not include Veritas or any of its Affiliates to elect a majority of the Board of Directors of the Company or of the resulting
entity;” 
 2. The Plan, except as otherwise set forth herein, shall remain in full force and effects in all other
respects.