## I NDIANA 

## D EPARTMENT OF 

## E NVIRONMENTAL 

## M ANAGEMENT

We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment.

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue

Gov ernor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232

- 8603 Thomas W. Easterly Toll Free (800) 451

- 6027

Commissioner www.idem.IN.gov

Recycled Paper An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle 

# Minor Source Operating Permit Renewal
OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY

Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership 1004 W. Washington Street Shelbyville, Indiana 46176

(herein known as the Permittee) is hereby authorized to operate subject to the conditions contained

h erein, the source described in Section A (Source Summary) of this permit.

This permit is issued to the above mentioned company under the provisions of 326 IAC 2

- 1.1,

326 IAC 2

- 6.1 and 40 CFR 52.780, with conditions listed on the attached pages.

Indiana statutes from IC 1 3 and rules from 326 IAC, quoted in conditions in this permit, are those applicable at the time the permit was issued. The issuance or possession of this permit shall not alone constitute a defense against an alleged violation of any la w, regulation or standard, except for the requirement to obtain a M SOP under 326 IAC 2

- 6.1

.

Operation Permit No.: M14 5

- 3001 9

- 00029

Issued by:

Iryn Calilung, Section Chief

Permits Branch Office of Air Quality Issuance Date:

Expiration Date: 

# DRAFTFreudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 2 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

TA BLE OF CONTENTS

A. SOURCE SUMMARY

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 4

A.1 General Information [326 IAC 2

- 5.1

- 3(c)][326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 4(a)]

A.2 Emission Units and Pollution Control Equipment Summary

B. GENERAL CONDITIONS

................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 6

B.1 Definitions [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1]

B.2 Permit Term [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7(a)][326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5][IC 13

- 15

- 3

- 6(a)]

B.3 Term of Conditions [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5]

B.4 Enforceability

B.5 Severability

B.6 Property Rights or Exclusive Privilege

B.7 Duty to Provide Inf ormation

B.8 Annual Notification [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(5)]

B.9 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3]

B.10 Prior Permits Superseded [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5]

B.11 Termination of Right to Operate [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7(a)]

B.12 Permit Renewal [326 I AC 2

- 6.1

- 7]

B.13 Permit Amendment or Revision [326 IAC 2

- 5.1

- 3(e)(3)][326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6]

B.14 Source Modification Requirement

B.15 Inspection and Entry [326 IAC 2

- 5.1

- 3(e)(4)(B)][326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(4)][IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2] [IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2][IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1]

B.16 Transfer of Ownership or Operational Control [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6]

B.17 Annual Fee Payment [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 7]

B.18 Credible Evidence [326 IAC 1

- 1

- 6]

C. SOURCE OPERATION CONDITIONS

................................ ................................ ................................ .. 11

Emission Limitatio ns and Standards [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(1)]

C.1 Particulate Emission Limitations For Processes with Process Weight Rates Less Than One Hundred (100) Pounds per Hour [326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2]

C.2 Permit Revocation [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9]

C.3 Opacity [326 IAC 5

- 1]

C.4 Open Burning [326 IAC 4

- 1] [IC 13

- 17

- 9]

C.5 Incineration [326 IAC 4

- 2] [326 IAC 9

- 1

- 2]

C.6 Fugitive Dust Emissions [326 IAC 6

- 4]

C.7 Asbestos Abatement Projects [326 IAC 14

- 10] [326 IAC 18] [40 CFR 61, Subpart M]

Testing Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)( 2)]

C.8 Performance Testing [326 IAC 3

- 6]

Compliance Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11]

C.9 Compliance Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11]

Compliance Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(2)]

C.10 Compliance Monitoring [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11]

C.11 Instrume nt Specifications [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11]

Corrective Actions and Response Steps

C.12 Response to Excursions or Exceedances

C.13 Actions Related to Noncompliance Demonstrated by a Stack TestFreudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 3 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(2)]

C. 14 Malfunctions Report [326 IAC 1

- 6

- 2]

C.15 General Record Keeping Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5]

C.16 General Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11] [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 2] [IC 13

- 14

- 1

- 13]

D.1. EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

................................ ................................ ................. 17

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(1)]

D.1.1 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3]

D.2 EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

- Grinding and Cutting operations

................. 18

Emission Limitations and Standards

D.2.1 Particulate Matter (PM) [ 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2]

Co mpliance Determination Requirements

D.2.2 Particulate Control

E. 1 EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

................................................................................ 20 E.1.1 General Provisions Relating to HAP [326 IAC 20

- 1

- 1] [40 C FR 63, Subpart A]

E. 1 .2 Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing NESHAP [326 IAC 20

- 8

- 1] [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

Annual Notification

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 21 Malfunction Report

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 22 Ongoing Compliance Status Repo rt

................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 24

Appendix A

- NESHAP for Chromium Emissions from Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks

- Subpart NFreudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 4 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

SECTION A SOURCE SUMMARY

This permit is based on i nformation requested by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), Office of Air Quality (OAQ). The information describing the source contained in conditions A.1 and A.2 is descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable condit ions. However, the Permittee should be aware that a physical change or a change in the method of operation that may render this descriptive information obsolete or inaccurate may trigger requirements for the Permittee to obtain additional permits or seek modification of this permit pursuant to 326 IAC 2, or change other applicable requirements presented in the permit application.

A.1 General Information [ 326 IAC 2

- 5. 1

- 3(c)][ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 4(a)]
The Permittee owns and operates a stationary hard chromium electroplating and tool and die for rubber manufacturing operation

.

Source Address: 1004 W. Washington Street

, Shelbyville , Indiana 46176

General Source Phone Number: 31 7

- 42 1

- 9280

SIC Code: 3471 and 3544 County Location: Shelby

Source Location Status: Attainment for all criteria pollutants

Source Status: Minor Source Operating Permit Program Minor Source, under PSD and Emission Offset Rules Minor Source, Sect ion 112 of the Clean Air Act Not 1 of 28 Source Categories

A.2 Emission Units and Pollution Control Equipment Summary

This stationary source consists of the following emis sion units and pollution control devices:

( a ) O ne (1) h ard c hromium e lectroplating o peration with a maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity of 11,760,000 Ampere

- hours (A

- hr) per year consisting of:

( 1 ) one (1) hard chromium electroplating tank , identified as T3, constructed in 1994, equipped with a composite mesh

- pad system for control, having a rectifier with a maximum potential capacity of 1,200 amperes, exhausting to one (1) stack,

identified as S1

.

( 2 ) T hree (3) chrome rinse tanks, identif ied as T4, exhausting inside the building

.

( 3 ) O ne (1) alkaline rinse tank, identified as T1, exhausting inside the building

.

( 4 ) O ne (1) alkaline stripping tank, identified as T2, exhausting to the single mesh pad

mist eliminator

.

This hard chromium electroplating operation is considered an affected source under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N.

( b ) W elding operation consisting of one (1) metal inert gas (MIG) station, with a maximum wire consumption rate of 0.0023 pounds of wire per hour (lb wire/hr ), one (1) tungsten inert gas (TIG) station, with a maximum wire consumption rate of 0.0023 lb wire/hr, and one (1) stick welding station, with a maximum wire consumption rate of 0.0057 lb wire/hr

.

( c ) T hree (3 ) pneumatic blaster s , identified as Gritblas ter 23A, Gritblaster 23B and Gritblaster

23C , with maximum capacities of 75, 75, and 120 pounds per hour, respectively, using

one Torit dust collector for all three blasters for control, and exhausting inside the building

.

( d ) V arious machining equipmen t including:Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 5 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

(1) S urface grind ers, identified as Surface Grinder No. 4 and Surface Grinders TTD 216, 220, 229, 230, 235, 236, 237, 261 and 266

.

(2) P edestal grind ers, identified as Pedestal Grinder 7A, 7B, 43, 43A and 43D.

(3) F iberboard cutting.

( e ) Three (3) mills for metal finishing, identified as Mill Nos. 29, 59 and 60 using a total maximum of 165 gallons per year of non VOC liquid coolant

.

(f) Five (5) Okuma lathe for metal finishing, identified as Lathe Nos. 28, 29, 45, 50, 62 and
65, using liquid coolant

.

( g ) N atural gas

- fired heating units with a total capacity less than 10 MMBtu/hr

.

(1) Space Heaters

( h ) O ne (1) parts washer with a maximum capacity of five gallons, using mineral spirits, with a maximum usage capacity o f 60 gallons per year

.Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 6 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

SECTION B GENERAL CONDITIONS

B.1 Definitions [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 1] Terms in this permit shall have the definition assigned to such ter ms in the referenced regulation. In the absence of definitions in the referenced regulation, the applicable definitions found in the statutes or regulations ( IC 13

- 11, 326 IAC 1

- 2 and 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 1 ) shall prevail.

B.2 Permit Term [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 7(a)][ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 9.5][ IC 13

- 1 5

- 3

- 6(a)]
(a) This permit, M14 5

- 3001 9

- 00029

, is issued for a fixed term of ten (10) years from the issuance date of this permit, as d etermined in accordance with IC 4

- 21. 5

- 3

- 5(f) and

IC 13

- 1 5

- 5

- 3. Subsequent revisions, modifications, or amendments of this permit do not affect the expiration date of this permit.

(b) If IDEM, OAQ , upon receiving a timely and complete renewal permit appl ication, fails to issue or deny the permit renewal prior to the expiration date of this permit, this existing permit shall not expire and all terms and conditions shall continue in effect

, until the renewal permit has been issued or denied.

B.3 Term of Co nditions [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 9.5] Notwithstanding the permit term of a permit to construct, a permit to operate, or a permit modification, any condition established in a permit issued pursuant t o a permitting program approved in the state implementation plan shall remain in effect until:

(a) the condition is modified in a subsequent permit action pursuant to Title I of the Clean Air Act; or

(b) the emission unit to which the condition pertains permanently ceases operation.

B.4 Enforceability
Unless otherwise stated, all terms and conditions in this permit, including any provisions designed to limit the source's potential to emit, are enforceable by I DEM, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and by citizens in accordance with the Clean Air Act.

B.5 Severability
The provisions of this permit are severable; a determination that any porti on of this permit is invalid shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the permit.

B.6 Property Rights or Exclusive Privilege
This permit does not convey any property rights of an y sort or any exclusive privilege.

B.7 Duty to Provide Information
(a) The Permittee shall furnish to IDEM, OAQ, within a reasonable time, any information that IDEM, OAQ may request in writing to de termine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. Upon request, the Permittee shall also furnish to IDEM, OAQ copies of records required to be kept by this permit.

(b) For information furnished by the Permittee to IDEM, OAQ, the Permittee may include a claim of confidentiality in accordance with 326 IAC 17.1. When furnishing copies of requested records directly to U. S. EPA, the Permittee may assert a claim of

confi dentiality in accordance with 40 CFR 2, Subpart B.Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 7 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

B.8 Annual Notification [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(5)]
(a) An annual notification shall be submitted by an authorized individual to the Off ice of Air Quality stating whether or not the source is in operation and in compliance with the terms and conditions contained in this permit.

(b) The annual notice shall be submitted in the format attached no later than March 1 of each
year to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air Quality

100 North Senate Avenue

MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

(c) The notification shall be considered timely if the date postmarked on the enve lope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipper on the private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due.

B.9 Preventive Maintenance Plan [ 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3] (a) A Preventive Maintenance Plan meets the requirements of 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3 if it includes, at

a minimum:

(1) Identification of the individual(s) responsible for inspecting, maintaining, and repairing emission control devices;

(2) A description of the items or conditions that will be inspected and the inspection schedule for said items or conditions; and

(3) Identification and q uantification of the replacement parts that will be maintained in inventory for quick replacement.

The Permittee shall implement the PMPs.

(b) If required by specific condition(s) in Section D of this permit where no PMP was previously required, the Perm ittee shall prepare and maintain Preventive Maintenance Plans (PMPs) no later than ninety (90) days after issuance of this permit or ninety (90) days after initial start

- up, whichever is later, including the following information on each facility:

(1) Ide ntification of the individual(s) responsible for inspecting, maintaining, and repairing emission control devices;

(2) A description of the items or conditions that will be inspected and the inspection schedule for said items or conditions; and

(3) Identi fication and quantification of the replacement parts that will be maintained in inventory for quick replacement.

If, due to circumstances beyond the Permittee’s control, the PMPs cannot be prepared and maintained within the above time frame, the Permittee may extend the date an additional ninety (90) days provided the Permittee notifies:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air QualityFreudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 8 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

100 North Senate Avenue

MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4 620 4

- 2251

The Permittee shall implement the PMPs.

(c) A copy of the PMPs shall be submitted to IDEM, OAQ upon request and within a reasonable time, and shall be subject to review and approval by IDEM, OAQ

. IDEM,
OAQ may require the Permittee to revise i ts PMPs whenever lack of proper maintenance causes or is the primary contributor to an exceedance of any limitation on emissions.

(d) To the extent the Permittee is required by 40 CFR Part 60/63 to have an Operation Maintenance, and Monitoring (OMM) Plan for a unit, such Plan is deemed to satisfy the PMP requirements of 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3 for that unit.

B.10 Prior Permits Superseded [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 9.5]
(a) All terms and conditions of p ermits established prior to M14 5

- 3001 9

- 00029 and issued pursuant to permitting programs approved into the state implementation plan have been

either:

(1) incorporated as originally stated,

(2) revised, or

(3) deleted.

(b) All previous registrations and per mits are superseded by this permit.

B.11 Termination of Right to Operate [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 7(a)]
The Permittee's right to operate this source terminates with the expiration of this permit unless a timely and complete renewal application is submitted at least one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the date of expiration of the source’s existing permit, consistent with 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 7

.

B.12 Permit Renewal [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 7] (a) The application for renewal shall be submitted using the application form or forms prescribed by IDEM, OAQ and shall include the information specified in 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 7

. Such information shall be included in the application for each emission unit at this source

. The renewal application does require an affirmation that the statements in the application are true and complete by an "authorized individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 1(1)

.

Request for renewal shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Permit Administration and Support Section, Office of Air Quality

100 North Senate Avenue

MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

(b) A timely renewal applica tion is one that is:

(1) Submitted at least one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the date of the expiration of this permit; andFreudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 9 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

( 2) If the date postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipper on the private shipping rece ipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due.

(c) If the Permittee submits a timely and complete application for renewal o f this permit, the source’s failure to have a permit is not a violation of 326 IAC 2

- 6.1 until IDEM, OAQ takes final action on the renewal application, except that this protection shall cease to apply if, subsequent to the completeness determination, the P ermittee fail s to submit by the deadline specified, pursuant to 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 4(b)

, in writing by IDEM, OAQ any additional information identified as being needed to process the application.

B.13 Permit Amendment or Revision [ 326 IAC 2

- 5. 1

- 3(e)(3)][ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6] (a) Permit amendments and revisions are governed by the requirements of 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6 whenever the Permittee seeks to amend or modify this permi t.

(b) Any application requesting an amendment or modification of this permit shall be

submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Permit Administration and Support Section, Office of Air Quality

100 North Senate Avenue

MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 100 3 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

(c) The Permittee shall notify the OAQ no later than thirty (30) calendar days of implementing a notice

- only change. [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6(d)]

B.14 Source Modification Requirement
A modification, construction, or reconstruction is governed by the requirements of 326 IAC 2.

B.15 Inspection and Entry [ 326 IAC 2

- 5. 1

- 3(e)(4)(B)][ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(4)][ IC 13

- 1 4

- 2

- 2][ IC 13

- 1 7

- 3

- 2][ IC 13

- 3 0

- 3

- 1]
Upon presentation of proper identification cards, credentials, and other documents as may be required by law, and subject to the Permit tee’s right under all applicable laws and regulations to assert that the information collected by the agency is confidential and entitled to be treated as such, the Permittee shall allow IDEM, OAQ, U.S. EPA

, or an authorized representative to perform

the f ollowing:

(a) Enter upon the Permittee's premises where a permitted source is located, or emissions related activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

(b) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 1 4

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 1 7

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 3 0

- 3

- 1, have access to and copy , at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

(c) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 1 4

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 1 7

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 3 0

- 3

- 1, inspect , at reasonable tim es, any facilities , equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit;Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 10 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

(d) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 1 4

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 1 7

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 3 0

- 3

- 1, sample

or mo nitor , at reasonable times, substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with this permit or applicable requirements; and

(e) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 1 4

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 1 7

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 3 0

- 3

- 1, utilize any photographic, re cording, testing, monitoring, or other equipment for the purpose of assuring compliance with this permit or applicable requirements.

B.16 Transfer of Ownership or Operational Control [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6]
(a) The Permittee must comply with the requirements of 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6 whenever the Permittee seeks to change the ownership or operational control of the source and no other change in the permit is necessary.

(b) Any application requesting a change in the ownership or operational control of the source shall contain a written agreement containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage and liability between the current and new Permittee. The

app lication shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Permit Administration and Support Section, Office of Air Quality

100 North Senate Avenue

MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

The application which shall be sub mitted by the Permittee does require an affirmation that the statements in the application are true and complete by an "authorized individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 1(1)

.

(c) The Permittee may implement notice

- only changes addressed in the request f or a notice

only change immediately upon submittal of the request. [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6(d)(3)]

B.17 Annual Fee Payment [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 7] (a) The Permittee shall pay annual fees due no later tha n thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of a bill from IDEM, OAQ,

.

(b) The Permittee may call the following telephone numbers: 1

- 80 0

- 45 1

- 6027 or

31 7

- 23 3

- 4230 (ask for OAQ, Billing, Licensing, and Training Section)

, to determine the appropriate permit fee.

B.18 Credible Evidence [ 326 IAC 1

- 1

- 6] For the purpose of submitting compliance certifications or establishing whether or not the Permittee has violated or is in violation of any condition of this permit, nothing in this permit shall preclude the use, including the exclusive use, of any credible evidence or information relevant to whether the Permittee would have been in compliance with the condition of this permit if the appropriate performan ce or compliance test or procedure had been performed.Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 11 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

SECTION C SOURCE OPERATION CONDITIONS

Entire Source

Emission Limitations and Standards [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(1)]

C.1 Particulate Emission Limitations For Processes with Process Weight Rates Less Than One Hundred (100) Pounds per Hour [ 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2]

Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2(e)(2), particulate emissions from any process not exempt under

326 IAC 6

- 3

- 1(b) or (c) which has a maximum process weight rate less th an 100 pounds per hour

and the methods in 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2(b) through (d) do not apply shall not exceed 0.551 pounds per

hour.

C.2 Permit Revocation [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 9]

Pursuant to 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 9 (Revocation of Permits), this permit to operate may be revoked for any of the following causes:

(a) Violation of any conditions of this permit.

(b) Failure to disclose all the relevant facts, or misrepresentation in obtaining this permit.

(c) Changes in regulatory requirements that mandate either a temporary or permanent reduction of discharge of contaminants. However, the amendment of appropriate sections of this permit shall not require revocation of this permit.

(d) Noncompliance with orders issue d pursuant to 326 IAC 1

- 5 (Episode Alert Levels) to reduce emissions during an air pollution episode.

(e) For any cause which establishes in the judgment of IDEM

, the fact that continuance of this permit is not consistent with purposes of this article

.

C .3 Opacity [ 326 IAC 5

- 1]

Pursuant to 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 2 (Opacity Limitations), except as provided in 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 1 (Applicability) and 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 3 (Temporary Alternative Opacity Limitations), opacity shall meet the following, unless otherwise stated in this permit:

(a) Opacity shall not exceed an average of forty percent (40%) in any one (1) six (6) minute averaging period as determined in 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 4.

(b) Opacity shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) f or more than a cumulative total of fifteen (15) minutes (sixty (60) readings as measured according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9 or fifteen (15) one (1) minute nonoverlapping integrated averages for a continuous opacity monitor) in a six (6) hour peri od.

C.4 Open Burning [ 326 IAC 4

- 1] [ IC 13

- 1 7

- 9]
The Permittee shall not open burn any material except as provided in 326 IAC 4

- 1

- 3,

326 IAC 4

- 1

- 4 or 326 IAC 4

- 1

- 6. The previous sente nce notwithstanding, the Permittee may open burn in accordance with an open burning approval issued by the Commissioner under

326 IAC 4

- 1

- 4.1.

C.5 Incineration [ 326 IAC 4

- 2] [ 326 IAC 9

- 1

- 2]
The Permittee shall not operate an incinerator except as provided in 326 IAC 4

- 2 or in this permit. The Permittee shall not operate a refuse incinerator or refuse burning equipment except as provided in 326 IAC 9

- 1

- 2 or in this permit.Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 12 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

C.6 Fugi tive Dust Emissions [ 326 IAC 6

- 4] The Permittee shall not allow fugitive dust to escape beyond the property line or boundaries of the property, right

- of

- way, or easement on which the sourc e is located, in a manner that would

violate 326 IAC 6

- 4 (Fugitive Dust Emissions).

C.7 Asbestos Abatement Projects [ 326 IAC 1 4

- 10] [ 326 IAC 18] [40 CFR 61, Subpart M]
(a) Notification requirements apply to each owner or operator. If the combined amount of regulated asbestos containing material (RACM) to be stripped, removed or disturbed is at least 260 linear feet on pipes or 160 square feet o n other facility components, or at least thirty

- five (35) cubic feet on all facility components, then the notification requirements of

326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 3 are mandatory. All demolition projects require notification whether or not asbestos is present.

(b) The Permittee shall ensure that a written notification is sent on a form provided by the Commissioner at least ten (10) working days before asbestos stripping or removal work or before demolition begins, per 326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 3, and shall update such notice as

ne cessary, including, but not limited to the following:

(1) When the amount of affected asbestos containing material increases or decreases by at least twenty percent (20%); or

(2) If there is a change in the following:

(A) Asbestos removal or demolition start date;

(B) Removal or demolition contractor; or

(C) Waste disposal site.

(c) The Permittee shall ensure that the notice is postmarked or delivered according to the guidelines set forth in 326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 3(2).

(d) The notice to be submitted shall in clude the information enumerated in

326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 3(3).

All required notifications shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air Quality

100 North Senate Avenue

MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003

I ndianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

The notice shall include a signed certification from the owner or operator that the information provided in this notification is correct and that only Indiana licensed workers and project supervisors will be used to impleme nt the asbestos removal project.

(e) Procedures for Asbestos Emission Control The Permittee shall comply with the applicable emission control procedures in

326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 4 and 40 CFR 61.145(c). Per 326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 1, emission control requirements are appli cable for any removal or disturbance of RACM greater than three (3) linear feet on pipes or three (3) square feet on any other facility components or a total of at least 0.75 cubic feet on all facility components.Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 13 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

(f) Demolition and Renovation

The Permitt ee shall thoroughly inspect the affected facility or part of the facility where the demolition or renovation will occur for the presence of asbestos pursuant to

40 CFR 61.145(a).

(g) Indiana Licensed Asbestos Inspector The Permittee shall comply with 326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 1(a) that requires the owner or operator, prior to a renovation/demolition, to use an Indiana Licensed Asbestos Inspector to thoroughly inspect the affected portion of the facility for the presence of asbestos. The requirement to use an Indiana Licensed Asbestos inspector is not federally enforceable.

Testing Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(2)]

C.8 Performance Testing [ 326 IAC 3

- 6] (a) For performance testing required by this permit, a test protocol, except as provided elsewhere in this permit, shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of A ir Quality

100 North Senate Avenue

MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

no later than thirty

- five (35) days prior to the intended test date.

(b) The Permittee shall notify IDEM, OAQ of the actual test date at least fourteen (14) days prior to the actual test date.

(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 3

- 6

- 4(b), all test reports must be received by IDEM, OAQ not later than forty

- five (45) days after the completion of the testing. An extension may be granted by IDEM, OAQ if the Permittee submits to IDEM, OAQ a reasonable written explanation not later than five (5) days prior to the end of the initial forty

- five (45) day period.

Compliance Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11]

C.9 Compliance R equirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11]
The commissioner may require stack testing, monitoring, or reporting at any time to assure compliance with all applicable requirements by issuing an order under 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11. Any monitoring or testing shall be performed in accordance with 326 IAC 3 or other methods approved by the commissioner or the U. S. EPA.

Compliance Monitoring Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(2)]

C.10 Compliance Monitoring [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11] Compliance with applicable requirements shall be documented as required by this permi t. The Permittee shall be responsible for installing any necessary equipment and initiating any required monitoring related to that equipment. All monitoring and record keeping requirements not already legally required shall be implemented when operation begins.

C.11 Instrument Specifications [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11] (a) When required by any condition of this permit, an analog instrument used to measure a parameter related to the operat ion of an air pollution control device shall have a scaleFreudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 14 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

such that the expected maximum reading for the normal range shall be no less than twenty percent (20%) of full scale

.

(b) The Permittee may request that the IDEM, OAQ approve the use of an instrument t hat does not meet the above specifications provided the Permittee can demonstrate that an alternative instrument specification will adequately ensure compliance with permit conditions requiring the measurement of the parameters.

Corrective Actions and Res ponse Steps

C.12 Response to Excursions or Exceedances
Upon detecting an excursion where a response step is required by th e D Section or an exceedance of a limitation in this permit:

(a) T he Permittee shall take reasonable response steps to restore operation of the emissions unit (including any control device and associated capture system) to its normal or usual manner of op eration as expeditiously as practicable in accordance with good air pollution control practices for minimizing excess emissions.

(b) The response shall include minimizing the period of any startup, shutdown or

malfunction

. The response may include, but i s not limited to, the following:

(1) initial inspection and evaluation;

(2) recording that operations returned or are returning to normal without operator action (such as through response by a computerized distribution control system);

or

(3) any necess ary follow

- up actions to return operation to normal or usual manner of operation.

(c) A determination of whether the Permittee has used acceptable procedures in response to an excursion or exceedance will be based on information available, which may incl ude, but is not limited to, the following:

(1) monitoring results;

(2) review of operation and maintenance procedures and records; and/or

(3) inspection of the control device, associated capture system, and the process.

(d) Failure to take reasonable r esponse steps shall be considered a deviation from the permit.

(e) The Permittee shall record the reasonable response steps taken.

C.13 Actions Related to Noncompliance Demonstrated by a Stack Test
(a) When the results of a stack test performed in conformance with Section C

- Performance Testing, of this permit exceed the level specified in any condition of this permit, the Permittee shall submit a description of i ts response actions to IDEM, OAQ, no later than
seventy

- five (75) days after the date of the test.

(b) A retest to demonstrate compliance shall be performed no later than one hundred eighty (180) days after the date of the test. Should the Permittee demo nstrate to IDEM, OAQFreudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 15 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

that retesting in one hundred eighty (180) days is not practicable, IDEM, OAQ may extend the retesting deadline

(c) IDEM, OAQ reserves the authority to take any actions allowed under law in response to noncompliant stack tests.

Rec ord Keeping and Reporting Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(2)]

C.14 Malfunctions Report [ 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 2]

Pursuant to 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 2 (Records; Notice of Malfunction):

(a) A record of all malfunctions, including startups or shutdowns of any facility or emission control equipment, which result in violations of applicable air pollution control regulations

o r applicable emission limitations shall be kept and retained for a period of three (3) years and shall be made available to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), Office of Air Quality (OAQ) or appointed representative upon request.

( b) When a malfunction of any facility or emission control equipment occurs which lasts more than one (1) hour, said condition shall be reported to OAQ, using the Malfunction Report Forms (2 pages). Notification shall be made by telephone or facsimile, as soon as practicable, but in no event later than four (4) daytime business hours after the beginning

of said occurrence.

(c) Failure to report a malfunction of any emission control equipment shall constitute a

violation of 326 IAC 1

- 6, and any other appl icable rules. Information of the scope and expected duration of the malfunction shall be provided, including the items specified in

326 IAC 1

- 6

- 2(a)(1) through (6).

(d) Malfunction is defined as any sudden, unavoidable failure of any air pollution contro l equipment, process, or combustion or process equipment to operate in a normal and usual manner. [ 326 IAC 1

- 2

- 39]

C.15 General Record Keeping Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5] (a) Records of all required monitoring data, reports and support information required by this permit shall be retained for a period of at least five (5) years from the date of monitoring sample, measurement, report, or application. These records shall be physically present or electronically accessible at the source location for a minimum of three (3) years. The records may be stored elsewhere for the remaining two (2) years as long as they are available upon request. If the Commissioner makes a reques t for records to the Permittee, the Permittee shall furnish the records to the Commissioner within a

reasonable time.

(b) Unless otherwise specified in this permit, for all record keeping requirements not already legally required, the Permittee shall be a llowed up to ninety (90) days from the date of permit issuance or the date of initial start

- up, whichever is later, to begin such record keeping.

C.16 General Reporting Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11] [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 2] [ IC 13

- 1 4

- 1

- 13] (a) Reports required by conditions in Section D of this permit shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air Quality

100 North Senate AvenueFreudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 16 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

(b) Unless otherwise specified in this permit, any notice, report, or other submission required by this permit shall be considered timely if the da te postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipper on the private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due.

(c) Reporting periods are based on calendar years, unless otherwise specified in this permit. For the purpose of this permit “calendar year” means the twelve (12) month period from January 1 to December 31 inclusive.Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 17 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

SECTION D.1 EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

Emissions Unit Description:

( a ) O ne (1) h ard c hromium e lectroplating o peration with a maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity of 11,7 60,000 Ampere

- hours (A

- hr) per year consisting of:

( 1 ) one (1) hard chromium electroplating tank, identified as T3, constructed in 1994, equipped with a composite mesh

- pad system for control, having a rectifier with a maximum potential capacity of 1,200 amperes, exhausting to one (1) stack, identified

as S1

.

( 2 ) T hree (3) chrome rinse tanks, identified as T4, exhausting inside the building

.

( 3 ) O ne (1) alkaline rinse tank, identified as T1, exhausting inside the building

.

( 4 ) O ne (1) alkaline stripping tank, identified as T2, exhausting to the single mesh pad

mist eliminator

.

This hard chromium electroplating operation is considered an affected source under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N.

(The information describing the process containe d in this emissions unit description box is descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions.)

Emission Limitations and Standards [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(1)]

D.1.1 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3]

A Preventive Maintenance Plan is required for this facility and its control device

. Section B

Preventative Maintenance Plan contains the Permittee's obligation with regard to the preventative

mai ntenance plan required by this condition.Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 18 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

SECTION D.2 EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

Emissions Unit Description:

( b ) W elding operation consisting of one (1) metal inert gas (MIG) station, with a maximum wire consumption rate of 0.0023 pounds of wire per hour (lb wire/hr), one (1) tungsten inert gas (TIG) station, with a maximum wire consumption rate of 0.0023 lb wire/hr, and one (1) stick welding station, with a maximum wire consumption rate of 0.0057 lb wire/hr

.

( c ) T hree ( 3 ) pneumatic blas ter s , identified as Gritblaster 23A, Gritblaster 23B and Gritblaster 23C

, with maximum capacities of 75, 75, and 120 pounds per hour, respectively, using one Torit dust

collector for all three blasters as control, and exhausting inside the building

.

( d ) V arious machining equipment including:

(1) S urface grind ers identified as Surface Grinder No. 4, TTD 216, 220, 229, 230, 235, 236, 237, 261and 266.

(2) P edestal grind ers, identified as Pedestal Grinder 7A, 7B, 43, 43A and 43B.

(3) F iberboard cut ting.

(The information describing the process contained in this facility description box is descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions.)

Emission Limitations and Standards

D.2.1 Particulate [326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2] (a) Pursuant to 32 6 IAC 6

- 3

- 2(c), the allowable particulate matter emissions rate from the welding operation which has a maximum process weight rate less than 100 pounds per hour shall not exceed 0.551 pounds per hour.

(b) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2 (Particulate Emission Li mitations for Manufacturing Processes), the allowable particulate emission rate from the two ( 2 ) pneumatic blaster s, identified as 23A and 23B shall each not exceed 0.45 pounds per hour when operating at a process weight rate of 75 pounds per hour, each.

The pounds per hour limitation was calculated with the following equation:

Interpolation of the data for the process weight rate up to 60,000 pounds per hour shall be accomplished by use of the equation:

E = 4.10 P 0.67 where E = rate of emission in p ounds per hour;

and P = process weight rate in tons per hour

(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2 (Particulate Emission Limitations for Manufacturing Processes), the allowable particulate emission rate from the one ( 1 ) pneumatic blaster

, identified as 23C shall not exceed 0.62 pounds per hour when operating at a process weight rate of 120 pounds per hour.

The pounds per hour limitation was calculated with the following equation:

Interpolation of the data for the process weight rate up to 60,000 pounds per hour shallFreudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 19 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

be accomplished by use of the equation:

E = 4.10 P 0.67 where E = rate of emission in pounds per hour;

and P = process weight rate in tons per hour

(d) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2 (Particulate Emission Limitations for Manufacturing

Pro cesses), the allowable particulate emission rate from the grinding and cutting operations shall not exceed the pounds per hour limitation calculated with the following equation:

Interpolation of the data for the process weight rate up to 60,000 pounds per hour shall be accomplished by use of the equation:

E = 4.10 P 0.67 where E = rate of emission in pounds per hour;

and P = process weight rate in tons per hour

Compliance Determination Requirements

D.2.2 Particulate Control
In order to comply w ith condition D.2.1, the baghouse for particulate control shall be in operation and control emissions from the pneumatic blasting operation at all times that the facility is in operation.Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 20 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

SECTION E. 1 EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

Emissions Unit Operation: Hard Chromium Electroplating Operation

( a ) O ne (1) Hard Chromium Electroplating Operation with a maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity of 11,760,000 Ampere

- hours (A

- hr) per year consisting of:

( 1 ) one (1) hard chromium electropla ting tank, identified as T3, equipped with a composite mesh

- pad system for control, having a rectifier with a maximum potential capacity of 1,200 amperes, exhausting to one (1) stack, identified as S1

.

( 2 ) T hree (3) chrome rinse tanks, iden tified as T4, exhausting inside the building

.

This hard chromium electroplating operation is considered an affected source under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N.

(The information describing the process contained in this emissions unit description box is descrip tive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions.)

E. 1 .1 General Provisions Relating to NESHAP [326 IAC 2 0

- 1

- 1 ] [40 CFR 6 3 , Subpart A]
(a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 6 3 , the Permittee shall comply with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A

- General Provisions, which are incorporated by reference as 326 IAC 2 0

- 1

- 1, except as otherwise specified in 40 CFR 6 3 , Subpart N.

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.10, the Permittee shall submit all required notifications and
reports to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air Quality

100 North Senate Avenue

MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

E. 2. 2 N ational Emission Standards (N ESHA P) for Chromium Emissions from Hard and Decorative

Ch romium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks [40 CFR Part 6 3 , Subpart N ] [ 326 IAC

20

- 8

- 1]

T he Permittee shall comply with the following provisions of 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart N (included

as Attachment A of this permit)

, which are incorporated by refer ence as 326 IAC 20

- 8

- 1 , except as otherwise specified in 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart N :

(1) 63.340 (2) 63.341 (3) 63.342 (a) (4) 63.342 (b)(1) (5) 63.342 (c)(1)(ii) (6) 63.342 (f) (7) 63.343 (a)(1)(ii), (3) and (5) (8) 63.343 (b)(1) (9) 63.343 (c)(1)(i) and (ii) (10) 63.346 (11) 63. 347 (12) 63.348Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 21 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY

COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT BRANCH

MINOR SOURCE OPERATING PERMIT

ANNUAL NOTIFI CATION

This form should be used to comply with the notification requirements under 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(5).

Company Name: Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership

Address: 1004 W. Washington Street

City: Shelbyville , Indiana 46176

Phone #: 31 7

- 42 1

- 9280

MSOP #: M14 5

- 3001 9

- 00029

I hereby certify that Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership

:  still in operation.

 no longer in operation. I hereby certify that Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership

:  in compliance with the requirements of

MSOP M14 5

- 3001 9

- 00029

.  not in compliance with the requirements of

MSOP M14 5

- 3001 9

- 00029

.

Authorized Individual (typed):

Title:

Signature:

Date:

If there are any conditions or requirements for which the source is not in compliance, provide a narrative description of how the source did or will achieve compliance and the date compliance was, or will be

achieved.

Noncompliance:Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 22 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

MALFUNCTION REPORT

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

OFF ICE OF AIR QUALITY

COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT BRANCH

FAX NUMBER: ( 317 ) 23 3

- 6865

This form should only be used to report malfunctions applicable to Rule 326 IAC 1

- 6 and to qualify for the exemption under 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 4.

THIS FACILITY MEETS THE APPLICABILI TY REQUIREMENTS BECAUSE IT HAS POTENTIAL TO EMIT 25 TONS/YEAR PARTICULATE MATTER ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR SULFUR DIOXIDE ?_____

, 25 TONS/YEAR NITROGEN OXIDES?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR VOC ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR HYDROGEN SULFIDE ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR TOTAL REDUCED SU LFUR ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR REDUCED SULFUR COMPOUNDS ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR FLUORIDES ?_____, 100 TONS/YEAR CARBON MONOXIDE ?_____, 10 TONS/YEAR ANY SINGLE HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR ANY COMBINATION HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT ?_____, 1 TON/YEAR LEAD OR LEAD COMPOUNDS MEASURED AS ELEMENTAL LEAD ?_____, OR IS A SOURCE LISTED UNDER 326 IAC 2

- 5. 1

- 3(2) ?_____. EMISSIONS FROM
MALFUNCTIONING CONTROL EQUIPMENT OR PROCESS EQUIPMENT CAUSED EMISSIONS IN EXCESS OF APPLICABLE LIMITATION ________.

THIS MALF UNCTION RESULTED IN A VIOLATION OF: 326 IAC _______ OR, PERMIT CONDITION # _______ AND/OR PERMIT LIMIT OF _______________

THIS INCIDENT MEETS THE DEFINITION OF “MALFUNCTION” AS LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE ? Y N

THIS MALFUNCTION IS OR WILL BE L ONGER THAN THE ONE (1) HOUR REPORTING REQUIREMENT ? Y N

COMPANY:__________________________________________ _______________PHONE NO. ( )

___________________ LOCATION: (CITY AND COUNTY)______________________________________________

_______ ____________________ PERMIT NO. ________________ AFS PLANT ID: _______ _________ AFS POINT ID : ________________ INSP:__________ CONTROL/PROCESS DEVICE WHICH MALFUNCTIONED AND REASON:______________________

__________________

__________________________________ ________________________________________ ___________________________

DATE/TIME MALFUNCTION STARTED: _____/_____/ 20____ ________________

_________________________ AM / PM

ESTIMATED HOURS OF OPERATION WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION: ____________

_____________ ______________

DATE/TIME CONTROL EQUIPMENT BACK

- IN SERVICE______/______/ 20____ _______________ AM/PM

TYPE OF POLLUTANTS EMITTED: TSP

, PM

- 10

, SO2

, VOC

, OTHER:___________

_____________________________

ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF POLLUTANT EMITTED DURI NG MALFUNCTION: _________

______________________________

_________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________

MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE EMISSIONS:________

_____________________________ ______________________ ___

_________________________________________________________________________ __________________________

REASONS WHY FACILITY CANNOT BE SHUTDOWN DURING REPAIRS:

CONTINUED OPERATION REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ESSENTIAL CONTINUED OPERATION NECESSARY TO PREVENT INJURY TO PERSONS:_______

______________________________ * SERVICES:_______

___________________________ ___

CONTINUED OPERATION NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEVERE DAMAGE TO EQUIPM ENT:__________________________ INTERIM CONTROL MEASURES: (IF APPLICABLE)___________________

_______________________________________ __

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

MALFUNCTI ON R EPORTED BY:____________________

______ ________TITLE:________________

___________ (SIGNATURE IF FAXED)

MALFUNCTION RECORDED BY:_______________________DATE:__________________TIME:__________________

*SEE PAGE 2

PAGE 1 OF 2Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 23 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

Please note

- This form sh ould only be used to report malfunctions applicable to Rule 326 IAC 1

- 6 and to qualify for the exemption under 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 4.

326 IAC 1

- 6

- 1 Applicability of rule

Sec. 1. This rule applies to the owner or operator of any facility required to obtain a p ermit under

326 IAC 2

- 5.1 or 326 IAC 2

- 6.1.

326 IAC 1

- 2

- 39 “Malfunction” definition

Sec. 39. Any sudden, unavoidable failure of any air pollution control equipment, process, or combustion or process equipment to operate in a normal and usual manner.

* Essential services are interpreted to mean those operations, such as, the providing of electricity by power plants. Continued operation solely for the economic benefit of the owner or operator shall not be sufficient reason why a facility cannot be shut down during a control equipment shutdown.

If this item is checked on the front, please explain rationale:

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

PAGE 2 OF 2Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 24 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality Compliance and Enforcement Branch

MINOR SOURCE OPERATING PERMIT

CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING AND ANODIZING NESHAP

ON GOING COMPLIANCE STATUS REPORT

Source Name: Freudenber

- NOK General Partnership

Source Address: 1004 W. Washington St., Shelbyville, IN 46176 Mailing Address: 1004 W. Washington St., Shelbyville, IN 46176

MSOP Permit No.: M14 5

- 3001 9

- 00029

Tank ID #: T3 Type of process: Hard Monitoring Parameter: Pressure drop across the composite mesh pad system

Parameter Value:

Limits: Total chromium concentration may not exceed 0.03 mg/dscm

This form is to be used to report compliance for the Chromi um Electroplating and Anodizing NESHAP only. The frequency for completing this report may be altered by IDEM , OAQ, Compliance and Enforcement Branch.

**Companies classified as a major source :**  **Submit this report no later than 30 days after the end of the r eporting period.**  **Companies classified as an area source :**  **Complete this report no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period,**

**and retain on site unless otherwise notified.**

This form consists of 2 pages Page 1 of 2

BEGINNING AND ENDING DATES O F THE REPORTING PERIOD:

TOTAL OPERATING TIME OF THE TANK DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD:

MAJOR AND AREA SOURCES: CHECK ONE

**9** NO DEVIATIONS OF THE MONITORING PARAMETER ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TANK FROM THE COMPLIANT VALUE

OR RANGE OF VALUES OCCURRED DURING T HIS REPORTING PERIOD.

**9** THE MONITORING PARAMETER DEVIATED FROM THE COMPLIANT VALUE OR RANGE OF VALUES DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD (THUS INDICATING THE EMISSION LIMITATION MAY HAVE BEEN EXCEEDED, WHICH COULD RESULT IN MORE FREQUENT REPORTING).

AREA (I.E ., NON

- MAJOR) SOURCES OF HAP ONLY : IF DEVIATIONS OCCURRED, LIST THE AMOUNT OF TANK OPERATING TIME EACH MONTH THAT MONITORING RECORDS

SHOW THE MONITORING PARAMETER DEVIATED FROM THE COMPLIANT VALUE OR RANGE OF VALUES.

JAN APR JUL OCT

FEB MAY AUG NOV

MAR JUN SEP DEC

HARD CHROME TANKS / MAXIMUM RECTIFIER CAPACITY LIMITED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 40 CFR 63.342(c)(2) ONLY:

LIST THE ACTUAL AMPERE

- HOURS CONSUMED (BASED ON AN AMP

- HR METER) BY THE INDIVIDUAL TANK.

JAN APR JUL OCT

FEB MAY AUG NOV

MAR JUN SEP DECFreudenber

- NOK General Partnership Page 25 of 25 Shelbyville , Indiana M145

- 30019

- 00029

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley 

# DRAFT

CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING AND ANODIZING NESHAP

ONGOING COMPLIANCE STATUS REPORT

ATTACH A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED Page 2 of 2

IF THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN REQUIRED BY 40 CFR 63.342 (f)(3) WAS NOT FOLLOWED, PROVIDE AN

EXPLANATION OF THE REASONS F OR NOT FOLLOWING THE PLAN AND DESCRIBE THE ACTIONS TAKEN FOR THAT EVENT:

DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES IN TANKS, RECTIFIERS, CONTROL DEVICES, MONITORING, ETC. SINCE THE LAST STATUS REPORT:

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

ALL SOURCES: CHECK ONE

**9** I CERTIFY THAT THE WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS IN 40 CFR 63.342(f) WERE FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN ON FILE; AND, THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT IS

ACCURATE AND TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWL EDGE.

**9** THE WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS IN 40 CFR 63.342(f) WERE NOT FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN ON FILE, AS EXPLAINED ABOVE AND/OR ON ATTACHED.

Submitted by:

Title/Position:

Signature:

Date:

Phone:

# A ppendix A

Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership

1 0 0 4 West Washington Street Shelbyville , Indiana 4 6 176

Permit No. M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 2 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley



### Title 40: Protection of Environment

Subpart N

— National Emission Standards for Chromium E missions From Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks

Source: 60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, unless otherwise noted.

§ 63.340 Applicability and designation of sources.

(a) The affected source to which the provisions of thi s subpart apply is each chromium electroplating or chromium anodizing tank at facilities performing hard chromium electroplating, decorative chromium electroplating, or chromium anodizing.

(b) Owners or operators of affected sources subject to the provisio ns of this subpart must also comply with the requirements of subpart A of this part, according to the applicability of subpart A of this part to such sources, as identified in Table 1 of this subpart.

(c) Process tanks associated with a chromium electropla ting or chromium anodizing process, but in which neither chromium electroplating nor chromium anodizing is taking place, are not subject to the provisions of this subpart. Examples of such tanks include, but are not limited to, rinse tanks, etching tanks, and cleaning tanks. Likewise, tanks that contain a chromium solution, but in which no electrolytic process occurs, are not subject to this subpart. An example of such a tank is a chrome conversion coating tank where no electrical current is applied.

(d) Af fected sources in which research and laboratory operations are performed are exempt from the provisions of this subpart when such operations are taking place.

(e) If you are an owner or operator of an area source subject to this subpart, you are exempt fro m the obligation to obtain a permit under 40 CFR part 70 or 71, provided you are not required to obtain a permit under 40 CFR 70.3(a) or 71.3(a) for a reason other than your status as an area source under this subpart. Notwithstanding the previous sentence , you must continue to comply with the provisions of this subpart applicable to area sources.

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 27787, June 3, 1996; 64 FR 69643, Dec. 14, 1999; 70 FR 75345, Dec. 19, 2005]

§ 63.341 Definitions and nomenclatu re.

(a) Definitions. Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Act, in subpart A of this part, or in this section. For the purposes of subpart N of this part, if the same term is defined in subpart A of this part and in this section, it shall have the meaning given in this section.

Add

- on air pollution control device means equipment installed in the ventilation system of chromium electroplating and anodizing tanks for the purposes of collecting and containing chromium emissions from the tank(s).

Air pol lution control technique means any method, such as an add

- on air pollution control device or a chemical fume suppressant, that is used to reduce chromium emissions from chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks.

Base metal means the metal or met al alloy that comprises the workpiece.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 3 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

Bath component means the trade or brand name of each component(s) in trivalent chromium plating baths. For trivalent chromium baths, the bath composition is proprietary in most cases. Therefore, the trade or

brand nam e for each component(s) can be used; however, the chemical name of the wetting agent contained in that component must be identified.

Chemical fume suppressant means any chemical agent that reduces or suppresses fumes or mists at the surface of an electropl ating or anodizing bath; another term for fume suppressant is mist suppressant.

Chromic acid means the common name for chromium anhydride (CrO 3 ).

Chromium anodizing means the electrolytic process by which an oxide layer is produced on the surface of a

base metal for functional purposes (e.g., corrosion resistance or electrical insulation) using a chromic acid solution. In chromium anodizing, the part to be anodized acts as the anode in the electrical circuit, and the chromic acid solution, with a concentrat ion typically ranging from 50 to 100 grams per liter (g/L), serves as the electrolyte.

Chromium anodizing tank means the receptacle or container along with the following accompanying internal and external components needed for chromium anodizing: rectifier s fitted with controls to allow for voltage adjustments, heat exchanger equipment, circulation pumps, and air agitation systems.

Chromium electroplating tank means the receptacle or container along with the following internal and external components needed for chromium electroplating: Rectifiers, anodes, heat exchanger equipment, circulation pumps, and air agitation systems.

Composite mesh

- pad system means an add

- on air pollution control device typically consisting of several

mesh

- pad stages. The purpose of the first stage is to remove large particles. Smaller particles are removed in the second stage, which consists of the composite mesh pad. A final stage may remove any reentrained particles not collected by the composite mesh pad.

Decorative chromium elec troplating means the process by which a thin layer of chromium (typically 0.003 to 2.5 microns) is electrodeposited on a base metal, plastic, or undercoating to provide a bright surface with wear and tarnish resistance. In this process, the part(s) serves as the cathode in the electrolytic cell and the solution serves as the electrolyte. Typical current density applied during this process ranges from 540 to 2,400 Amperes per square meter (A/m 2 ) for total plating times ranging between 0.5 to 5 minutes.

Elec troplating or anodizing bath means the electrolytic solution used as the conducting medium in which the flow of current is accompanied by movement of metal ions for the purposes of electroplating metal out of the solution onto a workpiece or for oxidizing the base material.

Emission limitation means, for the purposes of this subpart, the concentration of total chromium allowed to be emitted expressed in milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (mg/dscm), or the allowable surface tension expressed in dynes pe r centimeter (dynes/cm).

Enclosed hard chromium electroplating tank means a chromium electroplating tank that is equipped with an enclosing hood and ventilated at half the rate or less that of an open surface tank of the same surface area.

Facility means t he major or area source at which chromium electroplating or chromium anodizing is performed.

Fiber

- bed mist eliminator means an add

- on air pollution control device that removes contaminants from a gas stream through the mechanisms of inertial impaction and Brownian diffusion. These devices are typically installed downstream of another control device, which serves to prevent plugging, and consist of one or more fiber beds. Each bed consists of a hollow cylinder formed from two concentric screens; the fiber

b etween the screens may be fabricated from glass, ceramic plastic, or metal.

Foam blanket means the type of chemical fume suppressant that generates a layer of foam across the surface of a solution when current is applied to that solution.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 4 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

Fresh water means water, such as tap water, that has not been previously used in a process operation or, if the water has been recycled from a process operation, it has been treated and meets the effluent guidelines

for chromium wastewater.

Hard chromium electroplating or industrial chromium electroplating means a process by which a thick layer of chromium (typically 1.3 to 760 microns) is electrodeposited on a base material to provide a surface with functional properties such as wear resistance, a low coefficient of fricti on, hardness, and corrosion resistance. In this process, the part serves as the cathode in the electrolytic cell and the solution serves as the electrolyte. Hard chromium electroplating process is performed at current densities typically ranging from
1,600 to 6,500 A/m 2 for total plating times ranging from 20 minutes to 36 hours depending upon the desired plate thickness.

Hexavalent chromium means the form of chromium in a valence state of +6.

Large, hard chromium electroplating facility means a facility th at performs hard chromium electroplating and has a maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity greater than or equal to 60 million ampere

- hours per year (amp

- hr/yr).

Maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity means the summation of the total insta lled rectifier capacity associated with the hard chromium electroplating tanks at a facility, expressed in amperes, multiplied by the maximum potential operating schedule of 8,400 hours per year and 0.7, which assumes that electrodes are energized 70 perce nt of the total operating time. The maximum potential operating schedule is based on operating 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, 50 weeks per year.

Open surface hard chromium electroplating tank means a chromium electroplating tank that is ventilated at a rate consistent with good ventilation practices for open tanks.

Operating parameter value means a minimum or maximum value established for a control device or process parameter which, if achieved by itself or in combination with one or more other operatin g parameter values, determines that an owner or operator is in continual compliance with the applicable emission limitation or

standard.

Packed

- bed scrubber means an add

- on air pollution control device consisting of a single or double packed

bed that conta ins packing media on which the chromic acid droplets impinge. The packed

- bed section of the scrubber is followed by a mist eliminator to remove any water entrained from the packed

- bed section.

Research or laboratory operation means an operation whose prima ry purpose is for research and development of new processes and products, that is conducted under the close supervision of technically trained personnel, and that is not involved in the manufacture of products for commercial sale in commerce, except in a d e minimis manner.

Small, hard chromium electroplating facility means a facility that performs hard chromium electroplating and has a maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity less than 60 million amp

- hr/yr.

Stalagmometer means an instrument used to m easure the surface tension of a solution by determining the mass of a drop of liquid by weighing a known number of drops or by counting the number of drops obtained from a given volume of liquid.

Surface tension means the property, due to molecular forces, that exists in the surface film of all liquids and tends to prevent liquid from spreading.

Tank operation means the time in which current and/or voltage is being applied to a chromium electroplating tank or a chromium anodizing tank.

Tensiometer means an instrument used to measure the surface tension of a solution by determining the amount of force needed to pull a ring from the liquid surface. The amount of force is proportional to the

surface tension.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 5 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

Trivalent chromium means the form of chromium in a va lence state of +3.

Trivalent chromium process means the process used for electrodeposition of a thin layer of chromium onto a base material using a trivalent chromium solution instead of a chromic acid solution.

Wetting agent means the type of chemical fum e suppressant that reduces the surface tension of a liquid.

(b) Nomenclature. The nomenclature used in this subpart has the following meaning:

(1) AMR=the allowable mass emission rate from each type of affected source subject to the same emission

limitatio n in milligrams per hour (mg/hr).

(2) AMR sys =the allowable mass emission rate from affected sources controlled by an add

- on air pollution control device controlling emissions from multiple sources in mg/hr.

(3) EL=the applicable emission limitation from §6 3.342 in milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (mg/dscm).

(4) IA total =the sum of all inlet duct areas from both affected and nonaffected sources in meters squared.

(5) IDA i =the total inlet area for all ducts associated with affected sources in meters squ ared.

(6) IDA i,a =the total inlet duct area for all ducts conveying chromic acid from each type of affected source performing the same operation, or each type of affected source subject to the same emission limitation in meters squared.

(7) VR=the total of ventilation rates for each type of affected source subject to the same emission limitation in dry standard cubic meters per minute (dscm/min).

(8) VR inlet =the total ventilation rate from all inlet ducts associated with affected sources in dscm/min.

(9) VR i nlet,a =the total ventilation rate from all inlet ducts conveying chromic acid from each type of affected source performing the same operation, or each type of affected source subject to the same emission

limitation in dscm/min.

(10) VR tot =the average total ventilation rate for the three test runs as determined at the outlet by means of the Method 306 in appendix A of this part testing in dscm/min.

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 42894, July 19, 2004]

§ 63.342 Standards.

(a) Each owner or o perator of an affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart shall comply with these requirements on and after the compliance dates specified in §63.343(a). All affected sources are regulated by applying maximum achievable control technology.

(b ) Applicability of emission limitations. (1) The emission limitations in this section apply during tank operation as defined in §63.341, and during periods of startup and shutdown as these are routine occurrences for affected sources subject to this subpar t. The emission limitations do not apply during periods of malfunction, but the work practice standards that address operation and maintenance and that are required by paragraph (f) of this section must be followed during malfunctions.

(2) If an owner or o perator is controlling a group of tanks with a common add

- on air pollution control device, the emission limitations of paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section apply whenever any one affected source is operated. The emission limitation that applies to the group of affected sources is:Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 6 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(i) The emission limitation identified in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section if the affected sources are performing the same type of operation (e.g., hard chromium electroplating), are subject to the same

emissio n limitation, and are not controlled by an add

- on air pollution control device also controlling nonaffected sources;

(ii) The emission limitation calculated according to §63.344(e)(3) if affected sources are performing the same type of operation, are subje ct to the same emission limitation, and are controlled with an add

- on air pollution control device that is also controlling nonaffected sources; and

(iii) The emission limitation calculated according to §63.344(e)(4) if affected sources are performing diff erent types of operations, or affected sources are performing the same operations but subject to different emission limitations, and are controlled with an add

- on air pollution control device that may also be controlling

emissions from nonaffected sources.

(c)(1) Standards for open surface hard chromium electroplating tanks. During tank operation, each owner or operator of an existing, new, or reconstructed affected source shall control chromium emissions discharged to the atmosphere from that affected sour ce by either:

(i) Not allowing the concentration of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed 0.015 milligrams of total chromium per dry standard cubic meter (mg/dscm) of ventilation air (6.6 ×

10 −6 grains per dry stand ard cubic foot (gr/dscf)) for all open surface hard chromium electroplating tanks that are affected sources other than those that are existing affected sources located at small hard chromium electroplating facilities; or

(ii) Not allowing the concentration of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed 0.03 mg/dscm (1.3 × 10 −5 gr/dscf) if the open surface hard chromium electroplating tank is an existing affected source and is located at a small, hard chromium electroplating facility; or

(iii) If a chemical fume suppressant containing a wetting agent is used, by not allowing th e surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath contained within the affected tank to exceed 45 dynes per centimeter (dynes/cm) (3.1 × 10 −3 pound

- force per foot (lb f /ft)) as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 dynes/cm (2.4 ×

10 −3 lb f /ft) as measured by a tensiometer at any time during tank operation.

(2) Standards for enclosed hard chromium electroplating tanks. During tank operation, each owner or operator of an existing, new, or reconstructed affected source shall control chromium emissions dischar ged to the atmosphere from that affected source by either:

(i) Not allowing the concentration of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed 0.015 mg/dscm (6.6 × 10 −6 gr/dscf) for all enclosed hard chromium electroplating tanks that are affected sources other than those that are existing affected sources located at small, hard chromium electroplating facilities; or

(ii) Not allowing the concentration of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed 0.03 mg/dscm (1.3 × 10 −5 gr/dscf) if the enclosed hard chromium electroplating tank is an existing affected source and is located at a small, hard chromium electroplating facility; or

(iii) I f a chemical fume suppressant containing a wetting agent is used, by not allowing the surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath contained within the affected tank to exceed 45 dynes/cm (3.1 ×

10 −3 lb f /ft) as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 d ynes/cm (2.4 × 10 −3 lb f /ft) as measured by a tensiometer at any time during tank operation; or

(iv) Not allowing the mass rate of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to

exceed the maximum allowable mass emission rate determ ined by using the calculation procedure in §63.344(f)(1)(i) for all enclosed hard chromium electroplating tanks that are affected sources other than those that are existing affected sources located at small, hard chromium electroplating facilities; or

(v) Not allowing the mass rate of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed the maximum allowable mass emission rate determined by using the calculation procedure inFreudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 7 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

§63.344(f)(1)(ii) if the enclosed hard chromium electrop lating tank is an existing affected source and is located at a small, hard chromium electroplating facility.

(3)(i) An owner or operator may demonstrate the size of a hard chromium electroplating facility through the definitions in §63.341(a). Alternativel y, an owner or operator of a facility with a maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity of 60 million amp

- hr/yr or more may be considered small if the actual cumulative rectifier capacity is less than 60 million amp

- hr/yr as demonstrated using the fol lowing procedures:

(A) If records show that the facility's previous annual actual rectifier capacity was less than 60 million amp

hr/yr, by using nonresettable ampere

- hr meters and keeping monthly records of actual ampere

- hr usage for

each 12

- month rolling period following the compliance date in accordance with §63.346(b)(12). The actual cumulative rectifier capacity for the previous 12

- month rolling period shall be tabulated monthly by adding the capacity for the current month to the capacities for the pre vious 11 months; or

(B) By accepting a federally

- enforceable limit on the maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity of a hard chromium electroplating facility and by maintaining monthly records in accordance with §63.346(b)(12)

to demonstrate that th e limit has not been exceeded. The actual cumulative rectifier capacity for the previous

12

- month rolling period shall be tabulated monthly by adding the capacity for the current month to the capacities for the previous 11 months.

(ii) Once the monthly rec ords required to be kept by §63.346(b)(12) and by this paragraph (c)(3)(ii) show that the actual cumulative rectifier capacity over the previous 12

- month rolling period corresponds to the large designation, the owner or operator is subject to the emission limitation identified in paragraph (c)(1)(i), (iii), (c)(2)(i), (iii), or (iv) of this section, in accordance with the compliance schedule of §63.343(a)(5).

(d) Standards for decorative chromium electroplating tanks using a chromic acid bath and chromium

a nodizing tanks. During tank operation, each owner or operator of an existing, new, or reconstructed affected source shall control chromium emissions discharged to the atmosphere from that affected source by either:

(1) Not allowing the concentration of tot al chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed 0.01 mg/dscm (4.4×10 −6 gr/dscf); or

(2) If a chemical fume suppressant containing a wetting agent is used, by not allowing the surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath contained within the affected source to exceed 45 dynes/cm (3.1 ×

10 −3 lb f /ft) as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 dynes/cm (2.4 × 10 −3 lb f /ft) as measured by a tensiometer at any time during operation of the tank.

(e) Standards for decorative chromium electroplating tanks using a trivalent chromium bath. (1) Each owner or operator of an existing, n ew, or reconstructed decorative chromium electroplating tank that uses a trivalent chromium bath that incorporates a wetting agent as a bath ingredient is subject to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements of §§63.346(b)(14) and 63.347(i), but are not subject to the work practice requirements of paragraph (f) of this section, or the continuous compliance monitoring requirements in §63.343(c). The wetting agent must be an ingredient in the trivalent chromium bath components purchased from vendors.

(2) E ach owner or operator of an existing, new, or reconstructed decorative chromium electroplating tank that uses a trivalent chromium bath that does not incorporate a wetting agent as a bath ingredient is subject to the standards of paragraph (d) of this sect ion.

(3) Each owner or operator of existing, new, or reconstructed decorative chromium electroplating tank that had been using a trivalent chromium bath that incorporates a wetting agent and ceases using this type of bath must fulfill the reporting require ments of §63.347(i)(3) and comply with the applicable emission limitation within the timeframe specified in §63.343(a)(7).

(f) Operation and maintenance practices. All owners or operators subject to the standards in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section a re subject to these operation and maintenance practices.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 8 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(1)(i) At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners or operators shall operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control devices an d monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices.

(ii) Malfunctions shall be corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence.

(iii) Operation and maintenance requirements established pursuant to section 112 o f the Act are enforceable independent of emissions limitations or other requirements in relevant standards.

(2)(i) Determination of whether acceptable operation and maintenance procedures are being used will be

based on information available to the Adminis trator, which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results; review of the operation and maintenance plan, procedures, and records; and inspection of the

source.

(ii) Based on the results of a determination made under paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this s ection, the Administrator may require that an owner or operator of an affected source make changes to the operation and maintenance plan required by paragraph (f)(3) of this section for that source. Revisions may be required if

the Administrator finds that the plan:

(A) Does not address a malfunction that has occurred;

(B) Fails to provide for the proper operation of the affected source, the air pollution control techniques, or the control system and process monitoring equipment during a malfunction in a ma nner consistent with good air pollution control practices; or

(C) Does not provide adequate procedures for correcting malfunctioning process equipment, air pollution control techniques, or monitoring equipment as quickly as practicable.

(3) Operation and m aintenance plan. (i) The owner or operator of an affected source subject to paragraph (f) of this section shall prepare an operation and maintenance plan no later than the compliance date, except for hard chromium electroplaters and the chromium anodizing operations in California which have until January 25, 1998. The plan shall be incorporated by reference into the source's title V permit, if and when a title V permit is required. The plan shall include the following elements:

(A) The plan shall specify th e operation and maintenance criteria for the affected source, the add

- on air pollution control device (if such a device is used to comply with the emission limits), and the process and control system monitoring equipment, and shall include a standardized c hecklist to document the operation and maintenance of this equipment;

(B) For sources using an add

- on control device or monitoring equipment to comply with this subpart, the plan shall incorporate the operation and maintenance practices for that device or monitoring equipment, as identified in Table 1 of this section, if the specific equipment used is identified in Table 1 of this section;

(C) If the specific equipment used is not identified in Table 1 of this section, the plan shall incorporate proposed op eration and maintenance practices. These proposed operation and maintenance practices shall be submitted for approval as part of the submittal required under §63.343(d);

(D) The plan shall specify procedures to be followed to ensure that equipment or proce ss malfunctions due to poor maintenance or other preventable conditions do not occur; and

(E) The plan shall include a systematic procedure for identifying malfunctions of process equipment, add

- on air pollution control devices, and process and control sys tem monitoring equipment and for implementing

corrective actions to address such malfunctions.

(ii) If the operation and maintenance plan fails to address or inadequately addresses an event that meets the characteristics of a malfunction at the time the pl an is initially developed, the owner or operator shall revise the operation and maintenance plan within 45 days after such an event occurs. The revised plan shallFreudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 9 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

include procedures for operating and maintaining the process equipment, add

- on air pollution control device, or monitoring equipment during similar malfunction events, and a program for corrective action for such

events.

(iii) Recordkeeping associated with the operation and maintenance plan is identified in §63.346(b). Reporting associated with th e operation and maintenance plan is identified in §63.347 (g) and (h) and paragraph (f)(3)(iv) of this section.

(iv) If actions taken by the owner or operator during periods of malfunction are inconsistent with the procedures specified in the operation and maintenance plan required by paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, the owner or operator shall record the actions taken for that event and shall report by phone such actions within 2 working days after commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. This re port shall be followed by a letter within 7 working days after the end of the event, unless the owner or operator makes alternative reporting arrangements, in advance, with the Administrator.

(v) The owner or operator shall keep the written operation and m aintenance plan on record after it is developed to be made available for inspection, upon request, by the Administrator for the life of the affected source or until the source is no longer subject to the provisions of this subpart. In addition, if the oper ation and maintenance plan is revised, the owner or operator shall keep previous (i.e., superseded) versions of the operation and maintenance plan on record to be made available for inspection, upon request, by the Administrator for a period of 5 years aft er each revision to the plan.

(vi) To satisfy the requirements of paragraph (f)(3) of this section, the owner or operator may use applicable standard operating procedure (SOP) manuals, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) plans, or other ex isting plans, provided the alternative plans meet the requirements of this section.

(g) The standards in this section that apply to chromic acid baths shall not be met by using a reducing agent to change the form of chromium from hexavalent to trivalent.

T able 1 to §63.342

— Summary of Operation and Maintenance Practices

Control technique Operation and maintenance practices Frequency

Composite mesh

pad (CMP) system 1. Visually inspect device to ensure there is proper drainage, no chronic acid buildup on the pads, and no evidence of chemical attack on the structural integrity

of the device 1. 1/quarter.

2. Visually inspect back portion of the mesh pad closest to the fan to ensure there is no breakthrough

of chromic acid mist 2. 1/quarter.

3. Visually i nspect ductwork from tank to the control

device to ensure there are no leaks 3. 1/quarter.

4. Perform washdown of the composite mesh

- pads in

accordance with manufacturers recommendations 4. Per manufacturer.

Packed

- bed scrubber (PSB) 1. Visually inspe ct device to ensure there is proper drainage, no chromic acid buildup on the packed beds, and no evidence of chemical attack on the structural integrity of the device 1. 1/quarter.

2. Visually inspect back portion of the chevron blade

mist eliminator t o ensure that it is dry and there is no breakthrough of chromic acid mist 2. 1/quarter.

3. Same as number 3 above 3. 1/quarter.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 10 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

4. Add fresh makeup water to the top of the packed

bed a,b 4. Whenever makeup

is added.

PBS/CMP system 1. Same as for CM P system 1. 1/quarter.

2. Same as for CMP system 2. 1/quarter.

3. Same as for CMP system 3. 1/quarter.

4. Same as for CMP system 4. Per manufacturer.

Fiber

- bed mist

eliminator c 1. Visually inspect fiber

- bed unit and prefiltering

device to ensu re there is proper drainage, no chromic acid buildup in the units, and no evidence of chemical attack on the structural integrity of the devices 1. 1/quarter.

2. Visually inspect ductwork from tank or tanks to the

control device to ensure there are no leaks 2. 1/quarter.

3. Perform washdown of fiber elements in accordance

with manufacturers recommendations 3. Per manufacturer.

Air pollution control device (APCD) not

listed in rule To be proposed by the source for approval by the

Administrator To be proposed by

the source for approval by the

Administrator.

Monitoring Equipment

Pitot tube Backflush with water, or remove from the duct and rinse with fresh water. Replace in the duct and rotate 180 degrees to ensure that the same zero reading is

obtain ed. Check pitot tube ends for damage. Replace pitot tube if cracked or fatigued 1/quarter.

Stalagmometer Follow manufacturers recommendations

a If greater than 50 percent of the scrubber water is drained (e.g., for maintenance purposes), makeup water

may be added to the scrubber basin.

b For horizontal

- flow scrubbers, top is defined as the section of the unit directly above the packing media such that the makeup water would flow perpendicular to the air flow through the packing. For vertical

- flow units, th e top is defined as the area downstream of the packing material such that the makeup water would flow countercurrent to the air flow through the unit.

c Work practice standards for the control device installed upstream of the fiber

- bed mist eliminator to pr event plugging do not apply as long as the work practice standards for the fiber

- bed unit are followed.

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995; 60 FR 33122, June 27, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 27787, June 3, 1996; 62 FR 42920, Aug. 11, 1997; 68 FR 37347, June 23, 2003; 69 FR 42894, July 19, 2004; 71 FR 20456, Apr. 20, 2006]

§ 63.343 Compliance provisions.

(a) Compliance dates. (1) The owner or operator of an existing affected source shall comply with the emission limitations in §63.342 as follows:

(i) No later than 1 year after January 25, 1995, if the affected source is a decorative chromium electroplating tank; andFreudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 11 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(ii) No later than 2 years after January 25, 1995, if the affected source is a hard chromium electroplating tank or a chromium anodizing tank.

(2) The own er or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source that has an initial startup after January 25, 1995, shall comply immediately upon startup of the source. The owner or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source that has an initial startup af ter December 16, 1993 but before January 25, 1995, shall follow the compliance schedule of §63.6(b)(1).

(3) The owner or operator of an existing area source that increases actual or potential emissions of hazardous air pollutants such that the area source becomes a major source must comply with the provisions for existing major sources, including the reporting provisions of §63.347(g), immediately upon becoming a major source.

(4) The owner or operator of a new area source (i.e., an area source for which co nstruction or reconstruction was commenced after December 16, 1993) that increases actual or potential emissions of hazardous air pollutants such that the area source becomes a major source must comply with the provisions for new major sources, immediately upon becoming a major source.

(5) An owner or operator of an existing hard chromium electroplating tank or tanks located at a small, hard chromium electroplating facility that increases its maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity, or its

actual cu mulative rectifier capacity, such that the facility becomes a large, hard chromium electroplating facility must comply with the requirements of §63.342(c)(1)(i) for all hard chromium electroplating tanks at the facility no later than 1 year after the month in which monthly records required by §§63.342(c)(2) and 63.346(b)(12) show that the large designation is met, or by the compliance date specified in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, whichever is later.

(6) Request for an extension of compliance. An o wner or operator of an affected source or sources that requests an extension of compliance shall do so in accordance with this paragraph and the applicable paragraphs of §63.6(i). When the owner or operator is requesting the extension for more than one aff ected source located at the facility, then only one request may be submitted for all affected sources at the facility.

(i) The owner or operator of an existing affected source who is unable to comply with a relevant standard under this subpart may request that the Administrator (or a State, when the State has an approved part 70 permit program and the source is required to obtain a part 70 permit under that program, or a State, when the State has been delegated the authority to implement and enforce the emi ssion standard for that source) grant an extension allowing the owner or operator up to 1 additional year to comply with the standard for the affected source. The owner or operator of an affected source who has requested an extension of compliance under th is paragraph and is otherwise required to obtain a title V permit for the source shall apply for such permit or apply to have the title V permit revised to incorporate the conditions of the extension of compliance. The conditions of an extension of complia nce granted under this paragraph will be incorporated into the owner or operator's title V permit for the affected source(s) according to the provisions of 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR part 71, whichever is applicable.

(ii) Any request under this paragraph for an extension of compliance with a relevant standard shall be submitted in writing to the appropriate authority not later than 6 months before the affected source's compliance date as specified in this section.

(7) An owner or operator of a decorative chro mium electroplating tank that uses a trivalent chromium bath that incorporates a wetting agent, and that ceases using the trivalent chromium process, must comply with the emission limitation now applicable to the tank within 1 year of switching bath operat ion.

(b) Methods to demonstrate initial compliance. (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, an owner or operator of an affected source subject to the requirements of this subpart is required to conduct an initial performance test as required under §63.7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California which have until January 25, 1998, using the procedures and test methods listed in §§63.7 and 63.344.

(2) If the owner or operator of an affected source meets all of the following criteria, an initial performance test is not required to be conducted under this subpart:Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 12 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(i) The affected source is a hard chromium electroplating tank, a decorative chromium electroplating tank or

a chromium ano dizing tank; and

(ii) A wetting agent is used in the plating or anodizing bath to inhibit chromium emissions from the affected source; and

(iii) The owner or operator complies with the applicable surface tension limit of §63.342(c)(1)(iii), (c)(2)(iii), or (d)(2) as demonstrated through the continuous compliance monitoring required by paragraph (c)(5)(ii) of this

section.

(3) If the affected source is a decorative chromium electroplating tank using a trivalent chromium bath, and the owner or operator is sub ject to the provisions of §63.342(e), an initial performance test is not required to be conducted under this subpart.

(c) Monitoring to demonstrate continuous compliance. The owner or operator of an affected source subject

to the emission limitations of th is subpart shall conduct monitoring according to the type of air pollution control technique that is used to comply with the emission limitation. The monitoring required to demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations is identified in th is section for the air pollution control techniques expected to be used by the owners or operators of affected sources.

(1) Composite mesh

- pad systems. (i) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected source, or a group of affe cted sources under common control, complying with the emission limitations in §63.342 through the use of a composite mesh

- pad system shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the test methods and procedures in §63.344(c), and shall establish as a site

- specific operating parameter the pressure drop across the system, setting the value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation, using the procedures in §63.344(d)(5). An owner or operator may conduct multiple performan ce tests to establish a range of compliant pressure drop values, or may set as the compliant value the average pressure drop measured over the three test runs of one performance test and accept ±2 inches of water column from this value as the compliant ran ge.

(ii) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under §63.7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California, which have until January 25, 1998, the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, shall monitor and record the pressure drop across the composite mesh

- pad system once each day that any affected source is operating. To be in compliance with the standards, the compo site mesh

- pad system shall be operated within ±2 inches of water column of the pressure drop value established during the initial performance test, or shall be operated within the range of compliant values for pressure drop established during multiple perf ormance tests.

(iii) The owner or operator of an affected source complying with the emission limitations in §63.343 through the use of a composite mesh

- pad system may repeat the performance test and establish as a new site

specific operating parameter the pressure drop across the composite mesh

- pad system according to the requirements in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section. To establish a new site

- specific operating parameter for pressure drop, the owner or operator shall satisfy the requirements s pecified in paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A) through (D) of this section.

(A) Determine the outlet chromium concentration using the test methods and procedures in §63.344(c);

(B) Establish the site

- specific operating parameter value using the procedures §63.344(d )(5);

(C) Satisfy the recordkeeping requirements in §63.346(b)(6) through (8); and

(D) Satisfy the reporting requirements in §63.347(d) and (f).

(iv) The requirement to operate a composite mesh

- pad system within the range of pressure drop values

establishe d under paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section does not apply during automatic washdown cycles of the composite mesh

- pad system.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 13 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(2) Packed

- bed scrubber systems. (i) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an

affected sour ce, or group of affected sources under common control, complying with the emission limitations in §63.342 through the use of a packed

- bed scrubber system shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in §63.344(c), and shall establ ish as site

- specific operating parameters the pressure drop across the system and the velocity pressure at the common inlet of the control device, setting the value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation using the procedures in §63.344(d) (4) and (5). An owner or operator may conduct multiple performance tests to establish a range of compliant operating parameter values. Alternatively, the owner or operator may set as the compliant value the average pressure drop and inlet ve locity pressure measured over the three test runs of one performance test, and accept ±1 inch of water column from the pressure drop value and ±10 percent from the velocity pressure value as the compliant range.

(ii) On and after the date on which the init ial performance test is required to be completed under §63.7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California which have until January 25, 1998, the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sourc es under common control, shall monitor and record the velocity pressure at the inlet to the packed

- bed system and the pressure drop across the scrubber system once each day that any affected source is operating. To be in compliance with the standards, the scrubber system shall be operated within ±10 percent of the velocity pressure value established during the initial performance test, and within ±1 inch of water column of the pressure drop value established during the initial performance test, or within th e range of compliant operating parameter values established during multiple performance tests.

(3) Packed

- bed scrubber/composite mesh

- pad system. The owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, that uses a pa cked

- bed scrubber in conjunction with a composite mesh

- pad system to meet the emission limitations of §63.342 shall comply with the monitoring requirements for composite mesh

- pad systems as identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.

(4) Fiber

- bed mist eliminator. (i) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, complying with the emission limitations in §63.342 through the use of a fiber

- bed mist eliminator shall de termine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in §63.344(c), and shall establish as a site

- specific operating parameter the pressure drop across the fiber

- bed mist eliminator and the pressure drop across the control device installed upstre am of the fiber bed to prevent plugging, setting the value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation using the procedures in §63.344(d)(5). An owner or operator may conduct multiple performance tests to establish a range of com pliant pressure drop values, or may set as the compliant value the average pressure drop measured over the three test runs of one performance test and accept ±1 inch of water column from this value as the compliant range.

(ii) On and after the date on whic h the initial performance test is required to be completed under §63.7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California which have until January 25, 1998, the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affe cted sources under common control, shall monitor and record the pressure drop across the fiber

- bed mist eliminator, and the control device installed upstream of the fiber bed to prevent plugging, once each day that any affected source is operating. To be i n compliance with the standards, the fiber

- bed mist eliminator and the upstream control device shall be operated within ±1 inch of water column of the pressure drop value established during the initial performance test, or shall be operated within the rang e of compliant values for pressure drop established during multiple performance tests.

(5) Wetting agent

- type or combination wetting agent

- type/foam blanket fume suppressants. (i) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected so urce complying with the emission limitations in §63.342 through the use of a wetting agent in the electroplating or anodizing bath shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in §63.344(c). The owner or operator shall establish a s the site

- specific operating parameter the surface tension of the bath using Method 306B, appendix A of this part, setting the maximum value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation. In lieu of establishing the maximum surfac e tension during the performance test, the owner or operator may accept 45 dynes/cm as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 dynes/cm as measured by a tensiometer as the maximum surface tension value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation. However, the owner or operator is exempt from conducting a performance test only if the criteria of paragraph (b)(2) of this section are met.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 14 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(ii) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under §63 .7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California, which have until January 25, 1998, the owner or operator of an affected source shall monitor the surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath. Operation of the affected source at a surface tension greater than the value established during the performance test, or greater than 45 dynes/cm as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 dynes/cm as measured by a tensiometer if the owner or operator is using this value in accordance with paragraph (c)(5)(i) of this section, shall constitute noncompliance with the standards. The surface tension shall be monitored according to the following schedule:

(A) The surface tension shall be measured once every 4 hours during oper ation of the tank with a stalagmometer or a tensiometer as specified in Method 306B, appendix A of this part.

(B) The time between monitoring can be increased if there have been no exceedances. The surface tension shall be measured once every 4 hours of ta nk operation for the first 40 hours of tank operation after the compliance date. Once there are no exceedances during 40 hours of tank operation, surface tension measurement may be conducted once every 8 hours of tank operation. Once there are no exceedanc es during 40 hours of tank operation, surface tension measurement may be conducted once every 40 hours of tank operation on an ongoing basis, until an exceedance occurs. The minimum frequency of monitoring allowed by this subpart is once every 40 hours of tank operation.

(C) Once an exceedance occurs as indicated through surface tension monitoring, the original monitoring schedule of once every 4 hours must be resumed. A subsequent decrease in frequency shall follow the schedule laid out in paragraph (c)(5) (ii)(B) of this section. For example, if an owner or operator had been monitoring an affected source once every 40 hours and an exceedance occurs, subsequent monitoring would take place once every 4 hours of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occu r for 40 hours of tank operation, monitoring can occur once every 8 hours of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occur for 40 hours of tank operation on this schedule, monitoring can occur once every 40 hours of tank operation.

(iii) Once a bath so lution is drained from the affected tank and a new solution added, the original monitoring schedule of once every 4 hours must be resumed, with a decrease in monitoring frequency allowed following the procedures of paragraphs (c)(5)(ii) (B) and (C) of this section.

(6) Foam blanket

- type fume suppressants. (i) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected source complying with the emission limitations in §63.342 through the use of a foam blanket in the electroplating or anodizing bath shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in §63.344(c), and shall establish as the site

- specific operating parameter the thickness of the foam blanket, setting the minimum thickness that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation. In lieu of establishing the minimum foam blanket thickness during the performance test, the owner or operator may accept 2.54 centimeters (1 inch) as the minimum foam blanket thickness that corresponds to compliance

with th e applicable emission limitation. All foam blanket measurements must be taken in close proximity to the workpiece or cathode area in the plating tank(s).

(ii) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under §63 .7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California which have until January 25, 1998, the owner or operator of an affected source shall monitor the foam blanket thickness of the electroplating or anodizing bath. Ope ration of the affected source at a foam blanket thickness less than the value established during the performance test, or less than 2.54 cm (1 inch) if the owner or operator is using this value in accordance with paragraph (c)(6)(i) of this section, shall constitute noncompliance with the standards. The foam blanket thickness shall be measured according to the following schedule:

(A) The foam blanket thickness shall be measured once every 1 hour of tank operation.

(B) The time between monitoring can be incr eased if there have been no exceedances. The foam blanket thickness shall be measured once every hour of tank operation for the first 40 hours of tank operation after the compliance date. Once there are no exceedances for 40 hours of tank operation, foam b lanket thickness measurement may be conducted once every 4 hours of tank operation. Once there are no exceedances during 40 hours of tank operation, foam blanket thickness measurement may be conducted once every 8Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 15 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

hours of tank operation on an ongoing basi s, until an exceedance occurs. The minimum frequency of monitoring allowed by this subpart is once per 8 hours of tank operation.

(C) Once an exceedance occurs as indicated through foam blanket thickness monitoring, the original monitoring schedule of once every hour must be resumed. A subsequent decrease in frequency shall follow the schedule laid out in paragraph (c)(6)(ii)(B) of this section. For example, if an owner or operator had been monitoring an affected source once every 8 hours and an exceedance occurs, subsequent monitoring would take place once every hour of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occur for 40 hours of tank operation, monitoring can occur once every 4 hours of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occur

for 40 hours of tank operation on this schedule, monitoring can occur once every 8 hours of tank operation.

(iii) Once a bath solution is drained from the affected tank and a new solution added, the original monitoring schedule of once every hour must be resumed, with a decrease in monitoring frequency allowed following the procedures of paragraphs (c)(6)(ii) (B) and (C) of this section.

(7) Fume suppressant/add

- on control device. (i) If the owner or operator of an affected source uses both a fume suppressant and add

- on c ontrol device and both are needed to comply with the applicable emission limit, monitoring requirements as identified in paragraphs (c) (1) through (6) of this section, and the work practice standards of Table 1 of §63.342, apply for each of the control te chniques used.

(ii) If the owner or operator of an affected source uses both a fume suppressant and add

- on control device, but only one of these techniques is needed to comply with the applicable emission limit, monitoring requirements as identified in par agraphs (c) (1) through (6) of this section, and work practice standards of Table 1 of §63.342, apply only for the control technique used to achieve compliance.

(8) Use of an alternative monitoring method. (i) Requests and approvals of alternative monitori ng methods shall be considered in accordance with §63.8(f)(1), (f)(3), (f)(4), and (f)(5).

(ii) After receipt and consideration of an application for an alternative monitoring method, the Administrator may approve alternatives to any monitoring methods or procedures of this subpart including, but not limited to, the following:

(A) Alternative monitoring requirements when installation or use of monitoring devices specified in this subpart would not provide accurate measurements due to interferences caused by substances within the effluent gases; or

(B) Alternative locations for installing monitoring devices when the owner or operator can demonstrate that installation at alternate locations will enable accurate and representative measurements.

(d) An owner or operator who uses an air pollution control device not listed in this section shall submit a description of the device, test results collected in accordance with §63.344(c) verifying the performance of the device for reducing chromium emissions to the atmos phere to the level required by this subpart, a copy of the operation and maintenance plan referenced in §63.342(f) including operation and maintenance practices, and appropriate operating parameters that will be monitored to establish continuous compliance with the standards. The monitoring plan submitted identifying the continuous compliance monitoring is subject to the Administrator's approval.

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995; 60 FR 33122, June 27, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 42920, Aug. 11, 1997; 68 FR 37347, J une 23, 2003; 69 FR 42895, July 19, 2004]

§ 63.344 Performance test requirements and test methods.

(a) Performance test requirements. Performance tests shall be conducted using the test methods and procedures in this section and §63.7. Performance test r esults shall be documented in complete test reports that contain the information required by paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(9) of this section. The test plan to be followed shall be made available to the Administrator prior to the testing, if requested.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 16 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(1) A brief process description;

(2) Sampling location description(s);

(3) A description of sampling and analytical procedures and any modifications to standard procedures;

(4) Test results;

(5) Quality assurance procedures and results;

(6) Records of operati ng conditions during the test, preparation of standards, and calibration procedures;

(7) Raw data sheets for field sampling and field and laboratory analyses;

(8) Documentation of calculations; and

(9) Any other information required by the test method.

(b) (1) If the owner or operator of an affected source conducts performance testing at startup to obtain an operating permit in the State in which the affected source is located, the results of such testing may be used to demonstrate compliance with this subpa rt if:

(i) The test methods and procedures identified in paragraph (c) of this section were used during the performance test;

(ii) The performance test was conducted under representative operating conditions for the source;

(iii) The performance test repor t contains the elements required by paragraph (a) of this section; and

(iv) The owner or operator of the affected source for which the performance test was conducted has sufficient data to establish the operating parameter value(s) that correspond to compl iance with the standards, as required for continuous compliance monitoring under §63.343(c).

(2) The results of tests conducted prior to December 1991 in which Method 306A, appendix A of this part, was used to demonstrate the performance of a control techn ique are not acceptable.

(c) Test methods. Each owner or operator subject to the provisions of this subpart and required by §63.343(b) to conduct an initial performance test shall use the test methods identified in this section to demonstrate compliance wi th the standards in §63.342.

(1) Method 306 or Method 306A, “Determination of Chromium Emissions From Decorative and Hard Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Operations,” appendix A of this part shall be used to determine the

chromium concentration from hard or decorative chromium electroplating tanks or chromium anodizing tanks. The sampling time and sample volume for each run of Methods 306 and 306A, appendix A of this part shall be at least 120 minutes and 1.70 dscm (60 dscf), respectively. Methods 306 and 306A, appendix A of this part allow the measurement of either total chromium or hexavalent chromium emissions. For the purposes of this standard, sources using chromic acid baths can demonstrate compliance with the emission limits of §63.342 by measur ing either total chromium or hexavalent chromium. Hence, the hexavalent chromium concentration measured by these methods is equal to the total chromium concentration for the affected operations.

(2) The California Air Resources Board (CARB) Method 425 (whi ch is available by contacting the California Air Resources Board, 1102 Q Street, Sacramento, California 95814) may be used to determine the chromium concentration from hard and decorative chromium electroplating tanks and chromium anodizing

tanks if the fo llowing conditions are met:Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 17 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(i) If a colorimetric analysis method is used, the sampling time and volume shall be sufficient to result in 33 to 66 micrograms of catch in the sampling train.

(ii) If Atomic Absorption Graphite Furnace (AAGF) or Ion Chromatogr aphy with a Post

- column Reactor (ICPCR) analyses were used, the sampling time and volume should be sufficient to result in a sample catch that is 5 to 10 times the minimum detection limit of the analytical method (i.e., 1.0 microgram per liter of sample fo r AAGF and 0.5 microgram per liter of sample for ICPCR).

(iii) In the case of either paragraph (c)(2) (i) or (ii) of this section, a minimum of 3 separate runs must be conducted. The other requirements of §63.7 that apply to affected sources, as indicated in Table 1 of this subpart, must also be met.

(3) Method 306B, “Surface Tension Measurement and Recordkeeping for Tanks Used at Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Facilities,” appendix A of this part shall be used to measure the

surface tensi on of electroplating and anodizing baths.

(4) Alternate test methods may also be used if the method has been validated using Method 301, appendix A of this part and if approved by the Administrator. Procedures for requesting and obtaining approval are

cont ained in §63.7(f).

(d) Establishing site

- specific operating parameter values. (1) Each owner or operator required to establish

site

- specific operating parameters shall follow the procedures in this section.

(2) All monitoring equipment shall be installed s uch that representative measurements of emissions or process parameters from the affected source are obtained. For monitoring equipment purchased from a vendor, verification of the operational status of the monitoring equipment shall include execution of t he manufacturer's written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation, and calibration of the system.

(i) Specifications for differential pressure measurement devices used to measure velocity pressure shall be

in accordance with section 2 .2 of Method 2 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A).

(ii) Specification for differential pressure measurement devices used to measure pressure drop across a control system shall be in accordance with manufacturer's accuracy specifications.

(3) The surface tension of electroplating and anodizing baths shall be measured using Method 306B, “Surface Tension Measurement and Recordkeeping for Tanks used at Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Facilities,” appendix A of this part. This method should also be fo llowed when wetting agent type or combination wetting agent/foam blanket type fume suppressants are used to control chromium emissions from a hard chromium electroplating tank and surface tension measurement is conducted to demonstrate continuous complianc e.

(4) The owner or operator of a source required to measure the velocity pressure at the inlet to an add

- on air pollution control device in accordance with §63.343(c)(2), shall establish the site

- specific velocity pressure

as follows:

(i) Locate a velocit y traverse port in a section of straight duct that connects the hooding on the plating tank or tanks with the control device. The port shall be located as close to the control system as possible, and shall be placed a minimum of 2 duct diameters downstream and 0.5 diameter upstream of any flow disturbance such as a bend, expansion, or contraction (see Method 1, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A). If 2.5 diameters of straight duct work does not exist, locate the port 0.8 of the duct diameter downstream and 0.2

of t he duct diameter upstream from any flow disturbance.

(ii) A 12

- point velocity traverse of the duct to the control device shall be conducted along a single axis according to Method 2 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A) using an S

- type pitot tube; measurement of th e barometric pressure and du ct temperature at each traverse point is not required, but is suggested. Mark the

S

- type pitot tube as specified in Method 1 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A) with 12 points. Measure the velocity pressure (Δ p) values for the velocity points and record. Determi ne the square root of the individual velocityFreudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 18 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

point Δ p values and average. The point with the square root value that comes closest to the average square root value is the point of average velocity. The Δ p value measured for this point during the performa nce test will be used as the reference for future monitoring.

(5) The owner or operator of a source required to measure the pressure drop across the add

- on air pollution control device in accordance with §63.343(c) (1) through (4) may establish the pressur e drop in accordance with the following guidelines:

(i) Pressure taps shall be installed at any of the following locations:

(A) At the inlet and outlet of the control system. The inlet tap should be installed in the ductwork just prior to

the control devic e and the corresponding outlet pressure tap should be installed on the outlet side of the control device prior to the blower or on the downstream side of the blower;

(B) On each side of the packed bed within the control system or on each side of each mesh pad within the control system; or

(C) On the front side of the first mesh pad and back side of the last mesh pad within the control system.

(ii) Pressure taps shall be sited at locations that are:

(A) Free from pluggage as possible and away from any flow d isturbances such as cyclonic demisters.

(B) Situated such that no air infiltration at measurement site will occur that could bias the measurement.

(iii) Pressure taps shall be constructed of either polyethylene, polybutylene, or other nonreactive materials

.

(iv) Nonreactive plastic tubing shall be used to connect the pressure taps to the device used to measure pressure drop.

(v) Any of the following pressure gauges can be used to monitor pressure drop: a magnehelic gauge, an inclined manometer, or a “U” tub e manometer.

(vi) Prior to connecting any pressure lines to the pressure gauge(s), each gauge should be zeroed. No calibration of the pressure gauges is required.

(e) Special compliance provisions for multiple sources controlled by a common add

- on air poll ution control

device. (1) This section identifies procedures for measuring the outlet chromium concentration from an add

on air pollution control device that is used to control multiple sources that may or may not include sources not affected by this subpa rt.

(2) When multiple affected sources performing the same type of operation (e.g., all are performing hard chromium electroplating), and subject to the same emission limitation, are controlled with an add

- on air pollution control device that is not contro lling emissions from any other type of affected operation or from any nonaffected sources, the applicable emission limitation identified in §63.342 must be met at the outlet of the

add

- on air pollution control device.

(3) When multiple affected sources per forming the same type of operation and subject to the same emission

limitation are controlled with a common add

- on air pollution control device that is also controlling emissions from sources not affected by these standards, the following procedures should be followed to determine compliance with the applicable emission limitation in §63.342:

(i) Calculate the cross

- sectional area of each inlet duct (i.e., uptakes from each hood) including those not affected by the standard.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 19 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(ii) Determine the total sample time per test run by dividing the total inlet area from all tanks connected to the control system by the total inlet area for all ducts associated with affected sources, and then multiply this number by 2 hours. The calculated time is the minimum sample ti me required per test run.

(iii) Perform Method 306 testing and calculate an outlet mass emission rate.

(iv) Determine the total ventilation rate from the affected sources by using equation 1:

where VR tot is the average total ventilation rate in dscm/min for the three test runs as determined at the outlet by means of the Method 306 testing; IDA i is the total inlet area for all ducts associated

with affected sourc es; IA total is the sum of all inlet duct areas from both affected and nonaffected sources; and VR inlet is the total ventilation rate from all inlet ducts associated with affected

sources.

(v) Establish the allowable mass emission rate of the system (AMR sys ) in milligrams of total chromium per hour (mg/hr) using equation 2:

where Σ VR inlet is the total ventilation rate in dscm/min from the affected sources, and EL is the applicable emission limitation from §63.342 in mg/dscm. The allowable mass emission rate (AMR sys ) calculated from equation 2 should be equal to or more than the outlet three

- run average mass emission rate determined from Method 306 testing in order for the source to be in compliance with the standard.

(4) When multiple affected sources performing different types of operations (e.g., hard chromium electroplating, decorative chromium electroplating, or chromium anodizing) are controlled by a common ad d

on air pollution control device that may or may not also be controlling emissions from sources not affected by these standards, or if the affected sources controlled by the common add

- on air pollution control device perform the same operation but are sub ject to different emission limitations (e.g., because one is a new hard chromium plating tank and one is an existing small, hard chromium plating tank), the following procedures should be followed to determine compliance with the applicable emission limita tion in §63.342:

(i) Follow the steps outlined in paragraphs (e)(3)(i) through (e)(3)(iii) of this section.

(ii) Determine the total ventilation rate for each type of affected source using equation 3:

where VR tot is the average total ventilation rate in dscm/min for the three test runs as determined at the outlet by means of the Method 306 testing; IDA i,a is the total inlet duct area for all ducts conveying chro mic acid from each type of affected source performing the same operation, or each type of affected source subject to the same emission limitation; IA total is the sum of all duct areas from both affected and nonaffected sources; and VR inlet,a is the total ven tilation rate from all inlet ducts conveying chromic acid from each type of affected source performing the same operation, or each type of affected source subject to the same emission limitation.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 20 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(iii) Establish the allowable mass emission rate in mg/hr fo r each type of affected source that is controlled by

the add

- on air pollution control device using equation 4, 5, 6, or 7 as appropriate:

VR hc1 × EL hc1 × 60 minutes/hour = AMR hc1 (4)

VR hc2 × EL hc2 × 60 minutes/hour = AMR hc2 (5)

VR dc × EL dc × 60 minutes/hou r = AMR dc (6)

VR ca × EL ca × 60 minutes/hour = AMR ca (7)

where “hc” applies to the total of ventilation rates for all hard chromium electroplating tanks subject to the same emission limitation, “dc” applies to the total of ventilation rates for the

deco rative chromium electroplating tanks, “ca” applies to the total of ventilation rates for the chromium anodizing tanks, and EL is the applicable emission limitation from §63.342 in mg/dscm. There are two equations for hard chromium electroplating tanks beca use different emission limitations may apply (e.g., a new tank versus an existing, small tank).

(iv) Establish the allowable mass emission rate (AMR) in mg/hr for the system using equation 8, including each type of affected source as appropriate:

AMR hc1 + A MR hc2 + AMR dc + AMR ca = AMR sys (8)

The allowable mass emission rate calculated from equation 8 should be equal to or more than the outlet

three

- run average mass emission rate determined from Method 306 testing in order for the source to be in compliance wi th the standards.

(5) Each owner or operator that uses the special compliance provisions of this paragraph to demonstrate compliance with the emission limitations of §63.342 shall submit the measurements and calculations to support these compliance methods with the notification of compliance status required by §63.347(e).

(6) Each owner or operator that uses the special compliance provisions of this section to demonstrate compliance with the emission limitations of §63.342 shall repeat these procedures if a tank is added or removed from the control system regardless of whether that tank is a nonaffected source. If the new nonaffected tank replaces an existing nonaffected tank of the same size and is connected to the control system through the same size inlet duct then this procedure does not have to be repeated.

(f) Compliance provisions for the mass rate emission standard for enclosed hard chromium electroplating

tanks. (1) This section identifies procedures for calculating the maximum allowable mass emissio n rate for owners or operators of affected sources who choose to meet the mass emission rate standard in §63.342(c)(2)(iv) or (v).

(i)(A) The owner or operator of an enclosed hard chromium electroplating tank that is an affected source

other than an existi ng affected source located at a small hard chromium electroplating facility who chooses to meet the mass emission rate standard in §63.342(c)(2)(iv) shall determine compliance by not allowing the mass rate of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discha rged to the atmosphere to exceed the maximum allowable mass emission rate calculated using equation 9:

MAMER = ETSA × K × 0.015 mg/dscm (9)

Where:

MAMER = the alternative emission rate for enclosed hard chromium electroplating tanks in mg/hr.

ETSA = the h ard chromium electroplating tank surface area in square feet(ft 2 ).Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 21 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

K = a conversion factor, 425 dscm/(ft 2 × hr).

(B) Compliance with the alternative mass emission limit is demonstrated if the three

- run average mass emission rate determined from Method 306 testing is less than or equal to the maximum allowable mass emission rate calculated from equation 9.

(ii)(A) The owner or operator of an enclosed hard chromium electroplating tank that is an existing affected

source located at a small hard chromium elect roplating facility who chooses to meet the mass emission rate standard in §63.342(c)(2)(v) shall determine compliance by not allowing the mass rate of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed the maximum allowable mas s emission rate calculated using equation 10:

MAMER = ETSA × K × 0.03 mg/dscm. (10)

(B) Compliance with the alternative mass emission limit is demonstrated if the three

- run average mass emission rate determined from testing using Method 306 of appendix A to part 63 is less than or equal to the maximum allowable mass emission rate calculated from equation 10.

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 27787, June 3, 1996; 69 FR 42896, July 19, 2004]

§ 63.345 Provisions for new and reconstructed sourc es.

(a) This section identifies the preconstruction review requirements for new and reconstructed affected sources that are subject to, or become subject to, this subpart.

(b) New or reconstructed affected sources. The owner or operator of a new or reconst ructed affected source is subject to §63.5(a), (b)(1), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (f)(1), as well as the provisions of this paragraph.

(1) After January 25, 1995, whether or not an approved permit program is effective in the State in which an affected source is ( or would be) located, no person may construct a new affected source or reconstruct an affected source subject to this subpart, or reconstruct a source such that it becomes an affected source subject to this subpart, without submitting a notification of con struction or reconstruction to the Administrator. The notification shall contain the information identified in paragraphs (b) (2) and (3) of this section, as appropriate.

(2) The notification of construction or reconstruction required under paragraph (b)(1 ) of this section shall

include:

(i) The owner or operator's name, title, and address;

(ii) The address (i.e., physical location) or proposed address of the affected source if different from the owner's or operator's;

(iii) A notification of intention to c onstruct a new affected source or make any physical or operational changes to an affected source that may meet or has been determined to meet the criteria for a reconstruction as defined in §63.2;

(iv) An identification of subpart N of this part as the bas is for the notification;

(v) The expected commencement and completion dates of the construction or reconstruction;

(vi) The anticipated date of (initial) startup of the affected source;

(vii) The type of process operation to be performed (hard or decorativ e chromium electroplating, or chromium anodizing);Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 22 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(viii) A description of the air pollution control technique to be used to control emissions from the affected source, such as preliminary design drawings and design capacity if an add

- on air pollution cont rol device is used; and

(ix) An estimate of emissions from the source based on engineering calculations and vendor information on control device efficiency, expressed in units consistent with the emission limits of this subpart. Calculations

of emission es timates should be in sufficient detail to permit assessment of the validity of the calculations.

(3) If a reconstruction is to occur, the notification required under paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall include the following in addition to the informatio n required in paragraph (b)(2) of this section:

(i) A brief description of the affected source and the components to be replaced;

(ii) A brief description of the present and proposed emission control technique, including the information required by paragra phs (b)(2) (viii) and (ix) of this section;

(iii) An estimate of the fixed capital cost of the replacements and of constructing a comparable entirely new

source;

(iv) The estimated life of the affected source after the replacements; and

(v) A discussion of any economic or technical limitations the source may have in complying with relevant standards or other requirements after the proposed replacements. The discussion shall be sufficiently

detailed to demonstrate to the Administrator's satisfaction that the technical or economic limitations affect the source's ability to comply with the relevant standard and how they do so.

(vi) If in the notification of reconstruction, the owner or operator designates the affected source as a

reconstructed source and declar es that there are no economic or technical limitations to prevent the source from complying with all relevant standards or requirements, the owner or operator need not submit the information required in paragraphs (b)(3) (iii) through (v) of this section.

(4) The owner or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source that submits a notification in accordance with paragraphs (b) (1) through (3) of this section is not subject to approval by the Administrator. Construction or reconstruction is subject onl y to notification and can begin upon submission of a complete

notification.

(5) Submittal timeframes. After January 25, 1995, whether or not an approved permit program is effective in the State in which an affected source is (or would be) located, an owner or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source shall submit the notification of construction or reconstruction required by paragraph (b)(1) of this section according to the following schedule:

(i) If construction or reconstruction commences after J anuary 25, 1995, the notification shall be submitted as soon as practicable before the construction or reconstruction is planned to commence.

(ii) If the construction or reconstruction had commenced and initial startup had not occurred before January
25, 1 995, the notification shall be submitted as soon as practicable before startup but no later than 60 days after January 25, 1995.

§ 63.346 Recordkeeping requirements.

(a) The owner or operator of each affected source subject to these standards shall fulfi ll all recordkeeping requirements outlined in this section and in the General Provisions to 40 CFR part 63, according to the applicability of subpart A of this part as identified in Table 1 of this subpart.

(b) The owner or operator of an affected source s ubject to the provisions of this subpart shall maintain the following records for such source:Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 23 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(1) Inspection records for the add

- on air pollution control device, if such a device is used, and monitoring equipment, to document that the inspection and maint enance required by the work practice standards of §63.342(f) and Table 1 of §63.342 have taken place. The record can take the form of a checklist and should identify the device inspected, the date of inspection, a brief description of the working condition of the device during the inspection, and any actions taken to correct deficiencies found during the inspection.

(2) Records of all maintenance performed on the affected source, the add

- on air pollution control device, and monitoring equipment;

(3) Records of the occurrence, duration, and cause (if known) of each malfunction of process, add

- on air pollution control, and monitoring equipment;

(4) Records of actions taken during periods of malfunction when such actions are inconsistent with the operation and maintenance plan;

(5) Other records, which may take the form of checklists, necessary to demonstrate consistency with the provisions of the operation and maintenance plan required by §63.342(f)(3);

(6) Test reports documenting results of all performance te sts;

(7) All measurements as may be necessary to determine the conditions of performance tests, including measurements necessary to determine compliance with the special compliance procedures of §63.344(e);

(8) Records of monitoring data required by §63.34 3(c) that are used to demonstrate compliance with the standard including the date and time the data are collected;

(9) The specific identification (i.e., the date and time of commencement and completion) of each period of excess emissions, as indicated by monitoring data, that occurs during malfunction of the process, add

- on air pollution control, or monitoring equipment;

(10) The specific identification (i.e., the date and time of commencement and completion) of each period of excess emissions, as indicate d by monitoring data, that occurs during periods other than malfunction of the process, add

- on air pollution control, or monitoring equipment;

(11) The total process operating time of the affected source during the reporting period;

(12) Records of the act ual cumulative rectifier capacity of hard chromium electroplating tanks at a facility expended during each month of the reporting period, and the total capacity expended to date for a reporting period, if the owner or operator is using the actual cumulativ e rectifier capacity to determine facility size in accordance with §63.342(c)(2);

(13) For sources using fume suppressants to comply with the standards, records of the date and time that fume suppressants are added to the electroplating or anodizing bath;

(14) For sources complying with §63.342(e), records of the bath components purchased, with the wetting agent clearly identified as a bath constituent contained in one of the components;

(15) Any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the req uirements for a waiver of recordkeeping or reporting requirements, if the source has been granted a waiver under §63.10(f); and

(16) All documentation supporting the notifications and reports required by §63.9, §63.10, and §63.347.

(c) All records shall be maintained for a period of 5 years in accordance with §63.10(b)(1).

§ 63.347 Reporting requirements.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 24 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(a) The owner or operator of each affected source subject to these standards shall fulfill all reporting requirements outlined in this section and in th e General Provisions to 40 CFR part 63, according to the applicability of subpart A as identified in Table 1 of this subpart. These reports shall be made to the Administrator at the appropriate address as identified in §63.13 or to the delegated State auth ority.

(1) Reports required by subpart A of this part and this section may be sent by U.S. mail, fax, or by another

courier.

(i) Submittals sent by U.S. mail shall be postmarked on or before the specified date.

(ii) Submittals sent by other methods shall b e received by the Administrator on or before the specified date.

(2) If acceptable to both the Administrator and the owner or operator of an affected source, reports may be

submitted on electronic media.

(b) The reporting requirements of this section apply to the owner or operator of an affected source when such source becomes subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(c) Initial notifications. (1) The owner or operator of an affected source that has an initial startup before January 25, 1995, shall notify the Administrator in writing that the source is subject to this subpart. The notification shall be submitted no later than 180 calendar days after January 25, 1995, and shall contain the following information:

(i) The name, title, and address of the owner or operator;

(ii) The address (i.e., physical location) of each affected source;

(iii) A statement that subpart N of this part is the basis for this notification;

(iv) Identification of the applicable emission limitation and compliance date for each affec ted source;

(v) A brief description of each affected source, including the type of process operation performed;

(vi) For sources performing hard chromium electroplating, the maximum potential cumulative potential rectifier capacity;

(vii) For sources perfo rming hard chromium electroplating, a statement of whether the affected source(s) is located at a small or a large, hard chromium electroplating facility and whether this will be demonstrated through actual or maximum potential cumulative rectifier capacit y;

(viii) For sources performing hard chromium electroplating, a statement of whether the owner or operator of an affected source(s) will limit the maximum potential cumulative rectifier capacity in accordance with §63.342(c)(2) such that the hard chromium electroplating facility is considered small; and

(ix) A statement of whether the affected source is located at a major source or an area source as defined in §63.2.

(2) The owner or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source that has an initial st artup after January 25, 1995 shall submit an initial notification (in addition to the notification of construction or reconstruction required by §63.345(b) as follows:

(i) A notification of the date when construction or reconstruction was commenced, shall be submitted simultaneously with the notification of construction or reconstruction, if construction or reconstruction was commenced before January 25, 1995;Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 25 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(ii) A notification of the date when construction or reconstruction was commenced, shall be submit ted no later than 30 calendar days after such date, if construction or reconstruction was commenced after January 25, 1995; and

(iii) A notification of the actual date of startup of the source shall be submitted within 30 calendar days after

such date.

(d) Notification of performance test. (1) The owner or operator of an affected source shall notify the Administrator in writing of his or her intention to conduct a performance test at least 60 calendar days before the test is scheduled to begin to allow the Administrator to have an observer present during the test. Observation of the performance test by the Administrator is optional.

(2) In the event the owner or operator is unable to conduct the performance test as scheduled, the provisions of §63.7(b)(2) ap ply.

(e) Notification of compliance status. (1) A notification of compliance status is required each time that an affected source becomes subject to the requirements of this subpart.

(2) If the State in which the source is located has not been delegated th e authority to implement the rule, each time a notification of compliance status is required under this part, the owner or operator of an affected source shall submit to the Administrator a notification of compliance status, signed by the responsible offic ial (as defined in §63.2) who shall certify its accuracy, attesting to whether the affected source has complied with this subpart. If the State has been delegated the authority, the notification of compliance status shall be submitted to the appropriate au thority. The notification shall list for each affected source:

(i) The applicable emission limitation and the methods that were used to determine compliance with this limitation;

(ii) If a performance test is required by this subpart, the test report docum enting the results of the performance test, which contains the elements required by §63.344(a), including measurements and calculations to support the special compliance provisions of §63.344(e) if these are being followed;

(iii) The type and quantity of h azardous air pollutants emitted by the source reported in mg/dscm or mg/hr if the source is using the special provisions of §63.344(e) to comply with the standards. (If the owner or operator is subject to the construction and reconstruction provisions of § 63.345 and had previously submitted emission estimates, the owner or operator shall state that this report corrects or verifies the previous estimate.) For sources not required to conduct a performance test in accordance with §63.343(b),

the surface tensio n measurement may fulfill this requirement;

(iv) For each monitored parameter for which a compliant value is to be established under §63.343(c), the specific operating parameter value, or range of values, that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limit;

(v) The methods that will be used to determine continuous compliance, including a description of monitoring and reporting requirements, if methods differ from those identified in this subpart;

(vi) A description of the air pollution control technique for each emission point;

(vii) A statement that the owner or operator has completed and has on file the operation and maintenance plan as required by the work practice standards in §63.342(f);

(viii) If the owner or operator is determining facil ity size based on actual cumulative rectifier capacity in accordance with §63.342(c)(2), records to support that the facility is small. For existing sources, records from any 12

- month period preceding the compliance date shall be used or a description of h ow operations will change to meet a small designation shall be provided. For new sources, records of projected rectifier capacity for the first 12

- month period of tank operation shall be used;Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 26 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(ix) A statement by the owner or operator of the affected sourc e as to whether the source has complied with the provisions of this subpart.

(3) For sources required to conduct a performance test by §63.343(b), the notification of compliance status shall be submitted to the Administrator no later than 90 calendar days following completion of the compliance demonstration required by §63.7 and §63.343(b).

(4) For sources that are not required to complete a performance test in accordance with §63.343(b), the notification of compliance status shall be submitted to the Admin istrator no later than 30 days after the compliance date specified in §63.343(a), except the date on which sources in California shall monitor the surface tension of the anodizing bath is extended to January 25, 1998.

(f) Reports of performance test result s. (1) If the State in which the source is located has not been delegated the authority to implement the rule, the owner or operator of an affected source shall report to the Administrator the results of any performance test conducted as required by §63.7 or §63.343(b). If the State has been delegated the authority, the owner or operator of an affected source should report performance test results to the appropriate authority.

(2) Reports of performance test results shall be submitted no later than 90 days following the completion of the performance test, and shall be submitted as part of the notification of compliance status required by paragraph (e) of this section.

(g) Ongoing compliance status reports for major sources. (1) The owner or operator of an af fected source that is located at a major source site shall submit a summary report to the Administrator to document the ongoing compliance status of the affected source. The report shall contain the information identified in paragraph (g)(3) of this sectio n, and shall be submitted semiannually except when:

(i) The Administrator determines on a case

- by

- case basis that more frequent reporting is necessary to accurately assess the compliance status of the source; or

(ii) The monitoring data collected by the ow ner or operator of the affected source in accordance with §63.343(c) show that the emission limit has been exceeded, in which case quarterly reports shall be submitted. Once an owner or operator of an affected source reports an exceedance, ongoing complian ce status reports shall be submitted quarterly until a request to reduce reporting frequency under paragraph (g)(2) of this section is approved.

(2) Request to reduce frequency of ongoing compliance status reports. (i) An owner or operator who is required to submit ongoing compliance status reports on a quarterly (or more frequent basis) may reduce the frequency of reporting to semiannual if all of the following conditions are met:

(A) For 1 full year (e.g., 4 quarterly or 12 monthly reporting periods), the ongoing compliance status reports demonstrate that the affected source is in compliance with the relevant emission limit;

(B) The owner or operator continues to comply with all applicable recordkeeping and monitoring requirements of subpart A of this part and this subpart; and

(C) The Administrator does not object to a reduced reporting frequency for the affected source, as provided in paragraphs (g)(2) (ii) and (iii) of this section.

(ii) The frequency of submitting ongoing compliance status reports may b e reduced only after the owner or operator notifies the Administrator in writing of his or her intention to make such a change, and the Administrator does not object to the intended change. In deciding whether to approve a reduced reporting frequency, the Administrator may review information concerning the source's entire previous performance history during the 5

- year recordkeeping period prior to the intended change, or the recordkeeping period since the source's compliance date, whichever is shorter. Reco rds subject to review may include performance test results, monitoring data, and evaluations of an owner or operator's conformance with emission limitations and work practice standards. Such information may be used by the Administrator to make a judgment a bout the source's potential for noncompliance in the future. If the AdministratorFreudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 27 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

disapproves the owner or operator's request to reduce reporting frequency, the Administrator will notify the owner or operator in writing within 45 days after receiving notic e of the owner or operator's intention. The notification from the Administrator to the owner or operator will specify the grounds on which the disapproval is based. In the absence of a notice of disapproval within 45 days, approval is automatically granted

.

(iii) As soon as the monitoring data required by §63.343(c) show that the source is not in compliance with the relevant emission limit, the frequency of reporting shall revert to quarterly, and the owner shall state this exceedance in the ongoing complia nce status report for the next reporting period. After demonstrating ongoing compliance with the relevant emission limit for another full year, the owner or operator may again request approval from the Administrator to reduce the reporting frequency as all owed by paragraph (g)(2) of

this section.

(3) Contents of ongoing compliance status reports. The owner or operator of an affected source for which compliance monitoring is required in accordance with §63.343(c) shall prepare a summary report to

document th e ongoing compliance status of the source. The report must contain the following information:

(i) The company name and address of the affected source;

(ii) An identification of the operating parameter that is monitored for compliance determination, as requ ired by §63.343(c);

(iii) The relevant emission limitation for the affected source, and the operating parameter value, or range of values, that correspond to compliance with this emission limitation as specified in the notification of compliance status req uired by paragraph (e) of this section;

(iv) The beginning and ending dates of the reporting period;

(v) A description of the type of process performed in the affected source;

(vi) The total operating time of the affected source during the reporting period ;

(vii) If the affected source is a hard chromium electroplating tank and the owner or operator is limiting the maximum cumulative rectifier capacity in accordance with §63.342(c)(2), the actual cumulative rectifier capacity expended during the reporting p eriod, on a month

- by

- month basis;

(viii) A summary of operating parameter values, including the total duration of excess emissions during the reporting period as indicated by those values, the total duration of excess emissions expressed as a percent

of th e total source operating time during that reporting period, and a breakdown of the total duration of excess emissions during the reporting period into those that are due to process upsets, control equipment malfunctions, other known causes, and unknown cau ses;

(ix) A certification by a responsible official, as defined in §63.2, that the work practice standards in §63.342(f) were followed in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan for the source;

(x) If the operation and maintenance plan required by §63.342(f)(3) was not followed, an explanation of the reasons for not following the provisions, an assessment of whether any excess emission and/or parameter monitoring exceedances are believed to have occurred, and a copy of the report(s) required by § 63.342(f)(3)(iv) documenting that the operation and maintenance plan was not followed;

(xi) A description of any changes in monitoring, processes, or controls since the last reporting period;

(xii) The name, title, and signature of the responsible official who is certifying the accuracy of the report; and

(xiii) The date of the report.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 28 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(4) When more than one monitoring device is used to comply with the continuous compliance monitoring required by §63.343(c), the owner or operator shall report the results as required for each monitoring device. However, when one monitoring device is used as a backup for the primary monitoring device, the owner or operator shall only report the results from the monitoring device used to meet the monitoring requirements of

this subpart. If both devices are used to meet these requirements, then the owner or operator shall report the results from each monitoring device for the relevant compliance period.

(h) Ongoing compliance status reports for area sources. The requirements of t his paragraph do not alleviate affected area sources from complying with the requirements of State or Federal operating permit programs under 40 CFR part 71.

(1) The owner or operator of an affected source that is located at an area source site shall prepa re a summary report to document the ongoing compliance status of the affected source. The report shall contain the information identified in paragraph (g)(3) of this section, shall be completed annually and retained on site, and made available to the Admin istrator upon request. The report shall be completed annually except as provided in paragraph (h)(2) of this section.

(2) Reports of exceedances. (i) If both of the following conditions are met, semiannual reports shall be prepared and submitted to the Adm inistrator:

(A) The total duration of excess emissions (as indicated by the monitoring data collected by the owner or operator of the affected source in accordance with §63.343(c)) is 1 percent or greater of the total operating time for the reporting perio d; and

(B) The total duration of malfunctions of the add

- on air pollution control device and monitoring equipment is 5 percent or greater of the total operating time.

(ii) Once an owner or operator of an affected source reports an exceedance as defined in paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section, ongoing compliance status reports shall be submitted semiannually until a request to reduce reporting frequency under paragraph (h)(3) of this section is approved.

(iii) The Administrator may determine on a case

- by

- case basis that the summary report shall be completed more frequently and submitted, or that the annual report shall be submitted instead of being retained on site, if these measures are necessary to accurately assess the compliance status of the source.

(3) R equest to reduce frequency of ongoing compliance status reports. (i) An owner or operator who is required to submit ongoing compliance status reports on a semiannual (or more frequent) basis, or is required to submit its annual report instead of retaining it on site, may reduce the frequency of reporting to annual and/or be allowed to maintain the annual report onsite if all of the following conditions are met:

(A) For 1 full year (e.g., 2 semiannual or 4 quarterly reporting periods), the ongoing compliance status reports demonstrate that the affected source is in compliance with the relevant emission limit;

(B) The owner or operator continues to comply with all applicable recordkeeping and monitoring requirements of subpart A of this part and this subpart; and

(C) The Administrator does not object to a reduced reporting frequency for the affected source, as provided in paragraphs (h)(3) (ii) and (iii) of this section.

(ii) The frequency of submitting ongoing compliance status reports may be reduced only afte r the owner or operator notifies the Administrator in writing of his or her intention to make such a change, and the Administrator does not object to the intended change. In deciding whether to approve a reduced reporting frequency, the Administrator may r eview information concerning the source's previous performance history during the 5

- year recordkeeping period prior to the intended change, or the recordkeeping period since the source's compliance date, whichever is shorter. Records subject to review may include performance test results, monitoring data, and evaluations of an owner or operator's conformance with emission limitations and work practice standards. Such information may be used by the Administrator to make a judgement about the source's potenti al for noncompliance in the future. If the Administrator disapproves the owner orFreudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 29 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

operator's request to reduce reporting frequency, the Administrator will notify the owner or operator in writing within 45 days after receiving notice of the owner or operato r's intention. The notification from the Administrator to the owner or operator will specify the grounds on which the disapproval is based. In the absence of a notice of disapproval within 45 days, approval is automatically granted.

(iii) As soon as the mo nitoring data required by §63.343(c) show that the source is not in compliance with the relevant emission limit, the frequency of reporting shall revert to semiannual, and the owner shall state this exceedance in the ongoing compliance status report for th e next reporting period. After demonstrating ongoing compliance with the relevant emission limit for another full year, the owner or operator may again request approval from the Administrator to reduce the reporting frequency as allowed by paragraph (h)(3) of

this section.

(i) Reports associated with trivalent chromium baths. The requirements of this paragraph do not alleviate affected sources from complying with the requirements of State or Federal operating permit programs under title V. Owners or operato rs complying with the provisions of §63.342(e) are not subject to paragraphs (a) through (h) of this section, but must instead submit the following reports:

(1) Within 180 days after January 25, 1995, submit an initial notification that includes:

(i) The s ame information as is required by paragraphs (c)(1) (i) through (v) of this section; and

(ii) A statement that a trivalent chromium process that incorporates a wetting agent will be used to comply with §63.342(e); and

(iii) The list of bath components that comprise the trivalent chromium bath, with the wetting agent clearly identified; and

(2) Within 30 days of the compliance date specified in §63.343(a), a notification of compliance status that contains an update of the information submitted in accordance with paragraph (i)(1) of this section or a statement that the information is still accurate; and

(3) Within 30 days of a change to the trivalent chromium electroplating process, a report that includes:

(i) A description of the manner in which the process h as been changed and the emission limitation, if any, now applicable to the affected source;

(ii) If a different emission limitation applies, the applicable information required by paragraph (c)(1) of this section; and

(iii) The notification and reporting r equirements of paragraphs (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) of this section, which shall be submitted in accordance with the schedules identified in those paragraphs.

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 27787, June 3, 1996; 62 FR 4465, Jan. 30, 1997, 62 FR 42921, Aug. 11, 1997; 69 FR 42897, July 19, 2004]

§ 63.348 Implementation and enforcement.

(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by the U.S. EPA, or a delegated authority such as the applicable State, local, or Tribal agency. If the U.S . EPA Administrator has delegated authority to a State, local, or Tribal agency, then that agency, in addition to the U.S. EPA, has the authority to implement and enforce this subpart. Contact the applicable U.S. EPA Regional Office to find out if implemen tation and enforcement of this subpart is delegated to a State, local, or Tribal agency.

(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this subpart to a State, local, or Tribal agency under subpart E of this part, the authorities contained in paragraph (c) of this section are retained by the Administrator of U.S. EPA and cannot be transferred to the State, local, or Tribal agency.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 30 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(c) The authorities that cannot be delegated to State, local, or Tribal agencies are as specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this section.

(1) Approval of alternatives to the requirements in §§63.340, 63.342(a) through (e) and (g), and 63.343(a).

(2) Approval of major alternatives to test methods under §63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), as defined in §63.90, and as

r equired in this subpart.

(3) Approval of major alternatives to monitoring under §63.8(f), as defined in §63.90, and as required in this subpart.

(4) Approval of major alternatives to recordkeeping and reporting under §63.10(f), as defined in §63.90, and

as required in this subpart.

[68 FR 37347, June 23, 2003]

Table 1 to Subpart N of Part 63

— General Provisions Applicability to Subpart N

General provisions

reference Applies to subpart N Comment

63.1(a)(1) Yes Additional terms defined in §63.341; when overla p between subparts A and N occurs, subpart N takes precedence.

63.1(a)(2) Yes

63.1(a)(3) Yes

63.1(a)(4) Yes Subpart N clarifies the applicability of each paragraph in subpart A to sources subject to subpart N.

63.1(a)(6) Yes

63.1(a)(7) Yes

63.1(a )(8) Yes

63.1(a)(10) Yes

63.1(a)(11) Yes §63.347(a) of subpart N also allows report submissions via fax and

on electronic media.

63.1(a)(12)

– (14) Yes

63.1(b)(1) No §63.340 of subpart N specifies applicability.

63.1(b)(2) Yes

63.1(b)(3) No This pr ovision in subpart A is being deleted. Also, all affected area and major sources are subject to subpart N; there are no exemptions.

63.1(c)(1) Yes Subpart N clarifies the applicability of each paragraph in subpart A to sources subject to subpart N.

63.1( c)(2) Yes §63.340(e) of Subpart N exempts area sources from the obligation to obtain Title V operating permits.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 31 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

63.1(c)(4) Yes

63.1(c)(5) No Subpart N clarifies that an area source that becomes a major source is subject to the requirements for major sou rces.

63.1(e) Yes

63.2 Yes Additional terms defined in §63.341; when overlap between subparts A and N occurs, subpart N takes precedence.

63.3 Yes Other units used in subpart N are defined in that subpart.

63.4 Yes

63.5(a) Yes Except replace the ter m “source” and “stationary source” in §63.5(a) (1) and (2) of subpart A with “affected sources.”

63.5(b)(1) Yes

63.5(b)(3) Yes Applies only to major affected sources.

63.5(b)(4) No Subpart N (§63.345) specifies requirements for the notification of

cons truction or reconstruction for affected sources that are not major.

63.5(b)(5) Yes

63.5(b)(6) Yes

63.5(d)(1)(i) No §63.345(c)(5) of subpart N specifies when the application or

notification shall be submitted.

63.5(d)(1)(ii) Yes Applies to major affec ted sources that are new or reconstructed.

63.5(d)(1)(iii) Yes Except information should be submitted with the Notification of Compliance Status required by §63.347(e) of subpart N.

63.5(d)(2) Yes Applies to major affected sources that are new or reconst ructed except: (1) replace “source” in §63.5(d)(2) of subpart A with “affected source”; and (2) actual control efficiencies are submitted with the Notification of Compliance Status required by §63.347(e).

63.5(d)(3)

– (4) Yes Applies to major affected sourc es that are new or reconstructed.

63.5(e) Yes Applies to major affected sources that are new or reconstructed.

63.5(f)(1) Yes Except replace “source” in §63.5(f)(1) of subpart A with “affected

source.”

63.5(f)(2) No New or reconstructed affected sources shall submit the request for approval of construction or reconstruction under §63.5(f) of subpart A by the deadline specified in §63.345(c)(5) of subpart N.

63.6(a) Yes

63.6(b)(1)

– (2) Yes Except replace “source” in §63.6(b)(1)

– (2) of part A with “affec ted

source.”

63.6(b)(3)

– (4) YesFreudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 32 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

63.6(b)(5) Yes Except replace “source” in §63.6(b)(5) of subpart A with “affected

source.”

63.6(b)(7) No Provisions for new area sources that become major sources are contained in §63.343(a)(4) of subpart N.

63.6(c)(1)

– (2) Yes Except replace “source” in §63.6(c)(1)

– (2) of subpart A with

“affected source.”

63.6(c)(5) No Compliance provisions for existing area sources that become major sources are contained in §63.343(a)(3) of subpart N.

63.6(e) No §63.342(f) of subpart N contains work practice standards (operation and maintenance requirements) that override these provisions.

63.6(f)(1) No §63.342(b) of subpart N specifies when the standards apply.

63.6(f)(2)(i)

– (ii) Yes

63.6(f)(2)(iii) No §63.344(b) of subpart N spec ifies instances in which previous performance test results for existing sources are acceptable.

63.6(f)(2)(iv) Yes

63.6(f)(2)(v) Yes

63.6(f)(3) Yes

63.6(g) Yes

63.6(h) No Subpart N does not contain any opacity or visible emission

standards.

63.6( i)(1) Yes

63.6(i)(2) Yes Except replace “source” in §63.6(i)(2)(i) and (ii) of subpart A with

“affected source.”

63.6(i)(3) Yes

63.6(i)(4)(i) No §63.343(a)(6) of subpart N specifies the procedures for obtaining an extension of compliance and the date by which such requests must

be submitted.

63.6(i)(4)(ii) Yes

63.6(i)(5) Yes

63.6(i)(6)(i) Yes This paragraph only references “paragraph (i)(4) of this section” for compliance extension provisions. But, §63.343(a)(6) of subpart N also contains provisio ns for requesting a compliance extension.

63.6(i)(6)(ii) Yes

63.6(i)(7) Yes

63.6(i)(8) Yes This paragraph only references “paragraphs (i)(4) through (i)(6) of this section” for compliance extension provisions. But, §63.343(a)(6) of subpart N also cont ains provisions for requesting a compliance extension.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 33 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

63.6(i)(9) Yes This paragraph only references “paragraphs (i)(4) through (i)(6) of this section” and “paragraphs (i)(4) and (i)(5) of this section” for compliance extension provisions. But, §63.343(a) (6) of subpart N also contains provisions for requesting a compliance extension.

63.6(i)(10)(i)

– (iv) Yes

63.6(i)(10)(v)(A) Yes This paragraph only references “paragraph (i)(4)” for compliance extension provisions. But, §63.343(a)(6) of subpart N also co ntains provisions for requesting a compliance extension.

63.6(i)(10)(v)(B) Yes

63.6(i)(11) Yes

63.6(i)(12)(i) Yes This paragraph only references “paragraph (i)(4)(i) or (i)(5) of this section” for compliance extension provisions. But, §63.343(a)(6) of subpart N also contains provisions for requesting a compliance

extension.

63.6(i)(12)(ii)

– (iii) Yes

63.6(i)(13) Yes

63.6(i)(14) Yes

63.6(i)(16) Yes

63.6(j) Yes

63.7(a)(1) Yes

63.7(a)(2)(i)

– (vi) Yes

63.7(a)(2)(ix) Yes

63.7(a)(3) Yes

63.7 (b)(1) No §63.347(d) of subpart N requires notification prior to the performance test. §63.344(a) of subpart N requires submission of a

site

- specific test plan upon request.

63.7(b)(2) Yes

63.7(c) No §63.344(a) of subpart N specifies what the test plan should contain, but does not require test plan approval or performance audit samples.

63.7(d) Yes Except replace “source” in the first sentence of §63.7(d) of subpart

A with “affected source.”

63.7(e) Yes Subpart N also contains test methods specific to affected sources covered by that subpart.

63.7(f) Yes §63.344(c)(2) of subpart N identifies CARB Method 425 as acceptable under certain conditions.

63.7(g)(1) No Subpart N identifies the items to be reported in the compliance test [§63.344(a)] and the ti meframe for submitting the resultsFreudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 34 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

[§63.347(f)].

63.7(g)(3) Yes

63.7(h)(1)

– (2) Yes

63.7(h)(3)(i) Yes This paragraph only references “§63.6(i)” for compliance extension provisions. But, §63.343(a)(6) of subpart N also contains provisions for requesting a compliance extension.

63.7(h)(3)(ii)

– (iii) Yes

63.7(h)(4)

– (5) Yes

63.8(a)(1) Yes

63.8(a)(2) No Work practice standards are contained in §63.342(f) of subpart N.

63.8(a)(4) No

63.8(b)(1) Yes

63.8(b)(2) No §63.344(d) of subpart N specifies the monitoring location when there are multiple sources.

63.8(b)(3) No §63.347(g)(4) of subpart N identifies reporting requirements when multiple monitors are used.

63.8(c)(1)(i) No Subpart N requires proper maintenance of monitoring devices expected to be used by sources subject to subpart N.

63.8(c)(1)(ii) No §63.342(f)(3)(iv) of subpart N specifies reporting when the O&M plan is not followed.

63.8(c)(1)(iii) No §63.343(f)(2) identifies the criteria for whether O&M procedures are acceptable.

63.8(c)(2)

– (3) No §63.344(d)(2) requires appropriate use of monitoring devices.

63.8(c)(4)

– (7) No

63.8(d) No Maintenance of monitoring devices is required by §§63.342(f) and 63.344(d)(2) of subpart N.

63.8(e) No There are no performance evaluation procedures for the monitoring devices expected to be used to comply with subpart N.

63.8(f)(1) Yes

63.8(f)(2) No Instances in which the Administrator may approve alternatives to the monitoring methods and procedures o f subpart N are contained in §63.343(c)(8) of subpart N.

63.8(f)(3) Yes

63.8(f)(4) Yes

63.8(f)(5) Yes

63.8(f)(6) No Subpart N does not require the use of CEM's.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 35 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

63.8(g) No Monitoring data does not need to be reduced for reporting purposes

because s ubpart N requires measurement once/day.

63.9(a) Yes

63.9(b)(1)(i)

– (ii) No §63.343(a)(3) of subpart N requires area sources to comply with major source provisions if an increase in HAP emissions causes them to become major sources.

63.9(b)(1)(iii) No §6 3.347(c)(2) of subpart N specifies initial notification requirements

for new or reconstructed affected sources.

63.9(b)(2) No §63.347(c)(1) of subpart N specifies the information to be contained

in the initial notification.

63.9(b)(3) No §63.347(c)(2) of subpart N specifies notification requirements for new or reconstructed sources that are not major affected sources.

63.9(b)(4) No

63.9(b)(5) No

63.9(c) Yes This paragraph only references “§63.6(i)(4) through §63.6(i)(6)” for compliance extension prov isions. But, §63.343(a)(6) of subpart N also contains provisions for requesting a compliance extension. Subpart N provides a different timeframe for submitting the request than §63.6(i)(4).

63.9(d) Yes This paragraph only references “the notification date s established in paragraph (g) of this section.” But, §63.347 of subpart N also

contains notification dates.

63.9(e) No Notification of performance test is required by §63.347(d) of subpart

N.

63.9(f) No

63.9(g) No Subpart N does not require a performa nce evaluation or relative accuracy test for monitoring devices.

63.9(h)(1)

– (3) No §63.347(e) of subpart N specifies information to be contained in the notification of compliance status and the timeframe for submitting

this information.

63.9(h)(5) No Sim ilar language has been incorporated into §63.347(e)(2)(iii) of subpart N.

63.9(h)(6) Yes

63.9(i) Yes

63.9(j) Yes

63.10(a) Yes

63.10(b)(1) Yes

63.10(b)(2) No §63.346(b) of subpart N specifies the records that must beFreudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Pag e 36 of 36 Shelbyville , Indiana M 145

- 300 19

- 00 0 2 9 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

maintained.

63.10(b)(3) No S ubpart N applies to major and area sources.

63.10(c) No Applicable requirements of §63.10(c) have been incorporated into §63.346(b) of subpart N.

63.10(d)(1) Yes

63.10(d)(2) No §63.347(f) of subpart N specifies the timeframe for reporting performance t est results.

63.10(d)(3) No Subpart N does not contain opacity or visible emissions standards.

63.10(d)(4) Yes

63.10(d)(5) No §63.342(f)(3)(iv) and §63.347(g)(3) of subpart N specify reporting

associated with malfunctions.

63.10(e) No §63.347(g) and ( h) of subpart N specify the frequency of periodic reports of monitoring data used to establish compliance. Applicable requirements of §63.10(e) have been incorporated into §63.347(g) and (h).

63.10(f) Yes

63.11 No Flares will not be used to comply with the emission limits.

63.12

– 63.15 Yes

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 27787, June 3, 1996; 70 FR 75345, Dec. 19, 2005]



### Printed from the Federal Code of Regulations on January 20 , 2011.

### Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality

Technic al Support Document (TSD) for a Minor Source Operating Permit Renewal

Source Background and Description

Source Name: Fr e udenberg

- NOK General Partnership

Source Location: 1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, IN 46176 County: Shelby

SIC Code: 3471 and 3544

Permit Re newal No.: M 145

- 30019

- 000 29

Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

The Office of Air Quality (OAQ) has reviewed the operating permit renewal application f rom Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership relating to the operation of a hard chromium electroplating and tool and die for rubber manufacturing operation

. On December 16, 2010

, Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership submitted an application to the OAQ requesti ng to renew its operating permit. Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership was issued its first MSOP Renewal (M 145

- 21676

- 000 29 ) on May 1, 2006, to this source previously known as Technical Tool & Design, LLC. Technical Tool & Design, LLC was purchased by Freud enberg

- NOK General Partnership and the name was changed in a notice only change (134

- 24314

- 00029) issued on March 22, 2007.

Permitted Emission Units and Pollution Control Equipment

The source consists of the following permitted emission units:

( a ) O n e (1) h ard c hromium e lectroplating o peration with a maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity of 11,760,000 Ampere

- hours (A

- hr) per year consisting of:

( 1 ) one (1) hard chromium electroplating tank, identified as T3, constructed in 1994, equipped w ith a composite mesh

- pad system for control, having a rectifier with a maximum potential capacity of 1,200 amperes, exhausting to one (1) stack,

identified as S1

.

( 2 ) T hree (3) chrome rinse tanks, identified as T4, exhausting inside the building

.

(3) One (1) alkaline rinse tank, identified as T1, exhausting inside the building.

(4) One (1) alkaline stripping tank, identified as T2, exhausting to the single mesh pad

mist eliminator.

This hard chromium electroplating operation is considered an affected s ource under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N.

( b ) W elding operation consisting of: one (1) metal inert gas (MIG) station, with a maximum wire consumption rate of 0.0023 pounds of wire per hour (lb wire/hr), one (1) tungsten inert gas (TIG) station, with a maximum w ire consumption rate of 0.0023 lb wire/hr, and one (1) stick welding station, with a maximum wire consumption rate of 0.0057 lb wire/hr

.

( c ) T hree (3 ) pneumatic blaster s , identified as Gritblaster 23A, Gritblaster 23B and Gritblaster

23C

, with maximum ca pacities of 75, 75, and 120 pounds per hour, respectively, using

one Torit dust collector for all three blasters for control, and exhausting inside the building

.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Page 2 of 10 Shelbyville, Indiana TSD for M145

- 30019

- 00029 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

( d ) V arious machining equipment including:

(1) S urface grind ers, identified as Surface Grind er No. 4 and Surface Grinders TTD 216, 220, 229, 230, 235, 236, 237, 261 and 266

(2) Pedestal grinders, identified as Pedestal Grinder 7A, 7B, 43, 43A and 43D.

(3) F iberboard cutting.

(e) Three (3) mills for metal finishing, identified as Mill Nos. 29, 59 and 60 using a total maximum of 165 gallons per year of non VOC liquid coolant

.

(f) Five (5) Okuma lathe for metal finishing, identified as Lathe Nos. 28, 29, 45, 50, 62 and 65, using liquid coolant

.

( g ) Natural gas

- fired heating units with a total capacity less than 10 MMBtu/hr.

(1) Space Heaters

( h ) O ne (1) parts washer with a maximum capacity of five gallons , using mineral spirits, with a

maximum usage capacity o f 60 gallons per year

.

Emission Units and Pollution Con trol Equipment Constructed and/or Operated without a Permit

The source does not have any unpermitted emission units during this review.

Emission Units and Pollution Control Equipment Removed From the Source

The source has removed the following emissio n units since the previous permit :

O ne (1) coolant recycling unit , identified as Coolant Wizard Recycler

.

Existing Approvals

S ince the issuance of the MSOP ( 145

- 21676

- 000 29 ) on May 1, 2006

, t he source has constructed or has been operating under the fo llowing additional approvals :

Notice Only Change No. ( 145

- 24314

- 00029 ) issued on March 22, 2007.

All terms and conditions of previous permits issued pursuant to permitting programs approved

into the St ate I mplementation P lan have been either incorpora ted as originally stated, revised, or deleted by this permit. All previous registrations and permits are superseded by this permit.

Enforcement Issue

There are no enforcement actions pending.

Emission Calculations

See Appendix A of this document for detailed emission calculations

. County Attainment Status

The source is located in Shelby County

.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Page 3 of 10 Shelbyville, Indiana TSD for M145

- 30019

- 00029 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

Pollutant Designation

SO 2 Better than national standards.

CO Unclassifiable or attainment effective November 15, 1990.

O 3 Attainment effective October 1 9, 2007, for the 8

- hour ozone standard. 1

PM 10 Unclassifiable effective November 15, 1990.

PM 2.5 Unclassifiable or attainment effective April 5, 2005

NO 2 Cannot be classified or better than national standards.

Pb Not designated.

1 Unclassifiable or atta inment effective October 18, 2000, for the 1

- hour ozone standard which was revoked effective June 15, 2005.

(a) Ozone Standards Volatile organic compounds (VOC) and Nitrogen Oxides (NO

x ) are regulated under the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the purposes of att aining and maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone. Therefore, VOC and NO

x emissions are considered when evaluating the rule applicability relating to ozone. Shelby County has been designated as attainment or unclassifiab le for ozone. Therefore, VOC and NO

x emissions were reviewed pursuant to the requirements for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), 326 IAC 2

- 2.

(b) PM 2.5 Shelby County has been classified as attainment for PM 2.5

. On May 8, 2008

, U.S. EPA

prom ulgated the requirements for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) for PM 2.5 emissions

. These rules became effective on July 15, 2008. Indiana has three years from the publication of these rules to revise its PSD rules, 326 IAC 2

- 2, to include th ose requirements. The May 8, 2008 rule revisions require IDEM to regulate PM 10 emissions as a surrogate for PM 2.5 emissions until 326 IAC 2

- 2 is revised.

(c) Other Criteria Pollutants Shelby County has been classified as attainment or unclassifiable in Indiana for SO2, CO, PM10, NO2 and Lead (Pb)

. Therefore, these emissions were reviewed pursuant to the requirements for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), 326 IAC 2

- 2.

Fugitive Emissions

The fugitive emissions of criteria pollutants and haz ardous air pollutants are counted toward the

determination of 326 IAC 2

- 6.1 (Minor Source Operating Permit ) applicability.

Since this type of operation is not one of the twenty

- eight (28) listed source categories under 326

IAC 2

- 2

, 326 IAC 2

- 3 , or 326 IAC 2

- 7 , and there is no applicable New Source Performance Standard that was in effect on August 7, 1980, fugitive emissions are not counted toward the

determination of PSD

, Emission Offset , and Part 70 Permit applicability.

Unrestricted Potential Emissions

Appendix A of this TSD reflects the unrestricted potential emissions of the source.

Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.340(e), Subpart N, the source is an area source for chromium and is exempt from the obligation to obtain a permit under 40 CFR Part 70 or 71. Als o t he potential to emit (as defined in 326 IAC 2

- 7

- 1(29)) of all criteria pollutants is less than 100 tons per year. T he

source is not subject to the provisions of 326 IAC 2

- 7

. However, the source performs hard chrome plating and pursuant to 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 3(a) any chromium electroplating source is subject

to 326 IAC 2

- 6.1. Th erefore, a Minor Source Operating Permit ( MSOP) Renewal will be issued.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Page 4 of 10 Shelbyville, Indiana TSD for M145

- 30019

- 00029 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(a) The potential to emit (as defined in 326 IAC 2

- 7

- 1(29)) of all regulated pollutants is still

less than 10 0 tons per year. T he source is not subject to the provisions of 326 IAC 2

- 7. The PTE of all other regulated criteria pollutants are currently less than twenty

- five (25) tons per year. Therefore, the source is subject to the provisions of 326 IAC 2

- 6.1. Therefore, the source will be issued an MSOP Renewal.

(b) The potential to emit (as defined in 326 IAC 2

- 7

- 1(29)) of any single HAP is less than ten (10) tons per year and/or the potential to emit (as defined in 326 IAC 2

- 7

- 1(29)) of a

combination of HAPs is less than t wenty

- five (25) tons per year. Therefore, this source is

an are a source under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and not subject to the provisions of 326 IAC 2

- 7. Therefore, the source will be issued an MSOP Renewal.

Potential to Emit After Issuance

The table below summarizes the potential to emit, reflecting all limits of the emission units. Any control equipment is considered enforceable only after issuance of this MSOP and only to the extent that the effect of the control equip ment is made practically enforceable in the permit.

Process/

Emission Unit Potential To Emit of the Entire Source After Issuance of Renewal (tons/year)

PM PM10 * PM2.5 SO 2 NOx VOC CO Total

HAPs Worst Single

HAP

Hard Chromium Plating Tank (ID#T3) 0.19 0. 19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19

Total

Chromium Welding Operation 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pneumatic Blasting

Gritblaster 23A 0. 000048 0. 000048 0. 000048 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Pneumatic Blasting

Gritblaster 23B 0.000006 0.0 00006 0.000006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Pneumatic Blasting

Gritblaster 23C 0.000006 0.000006 0.000006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Grinding 2. 6 3 2. 6 3 2. 6 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fibercutting 2.58 2.58 2.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Mills & Lathes 0.0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00

Natural Gas

Combustion 0.01 0.02 0.02 neg. 0.30 0.02 0.00 0.00

Parts Washer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 03 0.00 0.00

Total PTE of Entire

Source ** 5.41 5.42 5.42 0.00 0.30 0.32 0.25 0.19

Title V Major Source

Thres holds NA 100 100 100 100 100 100 25 10

PSD Major Source

Thresholds 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 NA NA

Emission Offset/

Nonattainment NSR Major Source

Thresholds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

negl. = negligible

* Under the Part 70 Permit program (40 CFR 70), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM10), not particulate matter (PM), is considered as a "regulated air pollutant".

** Even though the PTE of the entire source is less than 25 tons per year, pu rsuant to 326 IAC

- 6.1

- 3(a) any chromium electroplating source is subject to 326 IAC 2

- 6.1 (MSOP).Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Page 5 of 10 Shelbyville, Indiana TSD for M145

- 30019

- 00029 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

This existing stationary source is not major for PSD because the emission s of each regulated pollutant are less than two hundred fifty (<250) tons per yea r, not major for Emission Offset

because the emission s of the nonattainment pollutants are less than one hundred (<100) tons per

year, and it is not in one of the twenty

- eight (28) listed source categories.

Federal Rule Applicability

Pursuant to 40 CFR 64.2, Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) is not included in the permit,

because the unlimited potential to emit of the source is less than the Title V major source thresholds and the source is not required to obtai n a Part 70 or Part 71 permit. Compliance Assuranc e Monitoring (CAM)

There are no New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) ( 326 IAC 12 and 40 CFR Part New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)

60) included in the permit.

The r equirements of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)

National Emission Standards for Chromium Emissions From Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks , Subpart N are still included in the permit for the

hard chromium electroplating tank, identified as T3

.

The hard chromium electroplating operations are subject to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Subpart N.

Under NESHAP , Subpart N

, the hard chromium electroplating tank, identified as T3 is considered an existing affected source because the construction of the source commenced prior to December 16, 1993 and the source is not reconstructed.

The hard chromium electroplating tank, identified as T3, is s ubject to the following portions of Subpart N. Non applicable portions of the NESHAP will not be included in the permit

.

Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.340(e), any source that is an area source and is subject to this subpart is exempt from the obligation to obt ain a permit under 40 CFR part 70 or 71, provided that the source is not required to obtain a permit under 40 CFR 70.3(a) or 71.3(a) for a reason other than status as an area source under this subpart. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, you must conti nue to comply with the provisions of this subpart applicable to area sources.

Non applicable portions of the NESHAP will not be included in the permit. T he hard chromium electroplating tank, identified as T3 , is subject to the following portions of Subpar t N.

(1) 63.340 (2) 63.341 (3) 63.342 (a) (4) 63.342 (b)(1) (5) 63.342 (c)(1)(ii) (6) 63.342 (f) (7) 63.343 (a)(1)(ii), (3) and (5) (8) 63.343 (b)(1) (9) 63.343 (c)(1)(i) and (ii) (10) 63.346 (11) 63. 347 (12) 63.348Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Page 6 of 10 Shelbyville, Indiana TSD for M145

- 30019

- 00029 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

The provisi ons of 40 CFR 63 Subpart A

– General Provisions, which are incorporated as 326 IAC

20

- 1

- 1, apply to the facility described in this section except when otherwise specified in 40 CFR 63 Subpart N

.

S tate Rule Applicability

- Entire Source

The following stat e rules are applicable to the source:

(a) 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3 (Preventive Maintenance Plan) The source is subject to 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3.

(b) 326 IAC 2

- 6.1 ( Minor Source Operating Permits (MSOP) )

MSOP applicability is discussed under the unrestricted potential emis sions section above.

( c ) 326 IAC 2

- 2 ( Prevention of Significant Deterioration(PSD) )

This source was constructed in 1972, which is prior to the August 7, 1977 rule applicability date.

Pursuant to 326 IAC 2

- 2 (PSD), this source was a minor stationary sourc e in 1972 since it is not one of the 28 listed source categories under 326 IAC 2

- 2 and the potential emissions of all the attainment regulated pollutants were less than 250 tons per year. The source continues to be a

minor source and 326 IAC 2

- 2 (PSD) doe s not apply

.

( d ) 326 IAC 2

- 3 (Emission Offset ) The requirements of 326 IAC 2

- 3 (Emission Offset) do not apply to this source because potential

emissions of VOC are less than 25 tons per year and potential emissions of NOx are less than 100
tons per year

. The potential to emit (PTE) of all criteria pollutants is less than one hundred (100) tons per year. Therefore, this source is a minor source and 326 IAC 2

- 3 (Emission Offset) does not apply. The source remains a minor source under 326 IAC 2

- 3.

( e ) 326 IAC 2

- 4.1 (Major Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)) The potential to emit of any single HAP is less than ten (10) tons per year and the potential to emit of a combination of HAPs is less than twenty

- five (25) tons per year from the decorative plat ing

tanks

. Therefore, this source is an area source under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and not subject to the provisions of 326 IAC 2

- 4.1. T he operation of the chromium electroplating tank at the source is subject to the NESHAP Subpart N. Theref ore, 326 IAC 2

- 4.1 does not apply.

( f ) 326 IAC 2

- 6 (Emission Reporting)

Pursuant to 326 IAC 2

- 6

- 1, this source is not subject to this rule, because it is not required to have an operating permit under 326 IAC 2

- 7 (Part 70), it is located in Shelby County, it has actual

emissions of NOx and VOC of less than twenty

- five (25) tons per year, and it does not emit lead into the ambient air at levels equal to or greater than 5 tons per year. Therefore, 326 IAC 2

- 6 does not apply.

( g ) 326 IAC 5

- 1 (Opacity Limita tions)

Pursuant to 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 2 (Opacity Limitations), except as provided in 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 3 (Temporary Alternative Opacity Limitations), opacity shall meet the following, unless otherwise stated in this permit:

(1) Opacity shall not exceed an average of f orty percent (40%) in any one (1) six (6) minute averaging period as determined in 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 4.

(2) Opacity shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) for more than a cumulative total of fifteen (15) minutes (sixty (60) readings as measured according to 40 CF R 60, Appendix A, Method 9 or fifteen (15) one (1) minute nonoverlapping integrated averages for a continuous opacity monitor) in a six (6) hour period.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Page 7 of 10 Shelbyville, Indiana TSD for M145

- 30019

- 00029 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(h) 326 IAC 6

- 4 (Fugitive Dust Emissions) The Permittee shall not allow fugitive dust to escape beyo nd the property line or boundaries of the property, right

- of

- way, or easement on which the source is located, in a manner that would violate

326 IAC 6

- 4 (Fugitive Dust Emissions).

(i) 326 IAC 6.5 PM Limitations Except Lake County This source is not subjec t to 326 IAC 6.5 because it is not located in one of the following counties: Clark, Dearborn, Dubois, Howard, Marion, St. Joseph, Vanderburgh, Vigo or Wayne.

(j) 326 IAC 6.8 PM Limitations for Lake County This source is not subject to 326 IAC 6. 8 because it is not located in Lake County.

( k ) 326 IAC 6

- 4 (Fugitive Dust Emissions Limitations)

Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 4 (Fugitive Dust Emissions Limitations), the source shall not allow fugitive dust to escape beyond the property line or boundaries of th e property, right

- of

- way, or easement on which the source is located, in a manner that would violate 326 IAC 6

- 4.

( l ) 326 IAC 20 (Hazardous Air Pollutants) See Federal Rule Applicability Section of this TSD.

State Rule Applicability

– Individual Faciliti es

326 IAC 8

- 1

- 6 (New Facilities: General Reduction Requirements (BACT)) This source was constructed prior to January 1, 1980 . In addition, none of the emission units at this source have potential emissions of twenty

- five (25) tons or more per year. The refore, 326

IAC 8

- 1

- 6 (BACT) is not applicable to this source.

Hard Chrome Electroplating Tank

326 IAC 6

- 3

- 1 (Particulate Emission Limitations for Manufacturing Processes)

Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 1(c)(6), the hard chromium electroplating operation, hard chromium electroplating tank, identified asT3, is exempt from the requirements of 326 IAC 6

- 3 because it has particulate matter limitations established under 326 IAC 20

- 8 (Hard and Decorative Chomium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks). Therefore , this rule does not apply.

326 IAC 20

- 8 (Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks) (a) The provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A

– General Provisions, which are incorporated as 326 IAC 20

- 1

- 1, apply to the facility desc ribed in this section except when otherwise specified in 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart N.

(b) The hard chromium electroplating tank , identified as T3

, is subject to 326 IAC 20

- 8. 326

IAC 20

- 8 incorporates by reference 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. The Permittee shal l comply with the provisions of 40 CFR 63, Subpart N, as detailed in the Federal Rule Applicability

Determination section.

326 IAC 20 (Hazardous Air Pollutants) See Federal Rule Applicability Section of this TSD.

326 IAC 7

- 1.1 Sulfur Dioxide Emission Lim itations

Th e s e emission unit s are not subject to 326 IAC 326 IAC 7

- 1.1 because the SO 2 PTE (or limited SO 2 PTE) is less than 25 tons/year or 10 pounds/hour.

Welding Operation

326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2 (Particulate Emission Limitations for Manufacturing Processes)Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Page 8 of 10 Shelbyville, Indiana TSD for M145

- 30019

- 00029 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(a) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2(c), the allowable particulate matter emissions rate from the welding operation not already regulated by any New Source Performance Standard, and which has a maximum process weight rate less than 100 pounds per hour shall not exceed 0.551 pounds per hour.

(b) The particulate from the two ( 2 ) pneumatic blaster s, identified as Gritblaster 23A and

Gritblaster 23B , with maximum capacities of 75 pounds per hour, each, shall each be limited by the following: Pneumatic Blasting

Inte rpolation of the data for the process weight rate up to sixty thousand (60,000) pounds per hour shall be accomplished by use of the equation:

E = 4.10 P 0.67 where E = rate of emission in pounds per hour and P = process weight rate in tons per hour

E = 4.10 (0.0375) 0.67
= 0.45 lbs PM/hr

Controlled Compliance calculation:

PM after control = ( 0.287 tons PM/yr) * ( 1 yr/8,760 hrs) * (2,000 lbs/ton) = 0. 07 lbs PM/hr (see Appendix A for the tons/yr calculation)

The baghouse shall b e in operation at all times the two (2 ) pneumatic blaster s, identified

as Gritblaster 23A and Gritblaster 23B is in operation, in order to comply with this limit.

(c) The particulate from the one ( 1 ) pneumatic blaster , identified as Gritblaster 23C with

m aximum capacity of 120 pounds per hour, shall be limited by the following:

Interpolation of the data for the process weight rate up to sixty thousand (60,000) pounds per hour shall be accomplished by use of the equation:

E = 4.10 P 0.67 where E = rate of emission in pounds per hour and P = process weight rate in tons per hour

E = 4.10 (0.06) 0.67
= 0.62 lbs PM/hr

Controlled Compliance calculation:

PM after control = ( 0.287 tons PM/yr) * ( 1 yr/8,760 hrs) * (2,000 lbs/ton) = 0. 07 lbs PM/hr (see Appendix A for the tons/yr calculation)

The baghouse shall be in operation at all times the one (1 ) pneumatic blaster , identified

as Gritblaster 23C is in operation, in order to comply with this limit.

(d) The particulate from the grinding and cutting operations shall be limited by the following: Surface Grind ers and Fiber Cutting O perations

Interpolation of the data for the process weight rate up to sixty thousand (60,000) pounds per hour shall be accomplished by use of the equation:

E = 4.10 P 0.67 where E = rate of emission in pounds per hour and P = process weight rate in tons per hour

Compliance Determination and Monitoring Requirements

Permits issued under 326 IAC 2

- 6.1 are required to ensure that sources can demonstrate compliance with all applicable state and federal rules on a continuous basis. All state and federalFreudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Page 9 of 10 Shelbyville, Indiana TSD for M145

- 30019

- 00029 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

rules contain compliance provisions, however, these provisions do not always fulfill the requirement for a continuous demonstration. When this occurs, IDEM, OAQ, in conjunction with the source, must develop specific conditions to satisfy 326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5. As a result, Compliance

Determination R equirements are included in the permit. The C ompliance D etermination

R equirements in Section D of the permit are those conditions that are found directly within state and federal rules and the violation of which serves as grounds for enforcement action.

If the Compliance Determination R equirements are not sufficient to demonstrate continuous compliance, they will be supplemented with Compliance Monitoring R equirements, also in Section D of the permit. Unlike Compliance Determination Re quirements, failure to meet Compliance Monitoring conditions would serve as a trigger for corrective actions and not grou nds for enforcement action. However, a violation in relation to a compliance monitoring condition will arise through a source ' s failure to take the appropriate corrective actions within a specific time period.

The compliance determination and monitoring requirements applicable to this source are as

follows:

Emission Unit/Control Operating Parameters Frequency

Composite Mesh

- pad system Pressure Drop

5.4 + 1 inches of water Once per day

These monitoring conditions are necessary because the composite m esh

- pad system for the chromium electroplating operations must operate properly to ensure compliance with

40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart N.

There continues to be no specific testing required with the issuance of this permit.

Recommendation

The staff recom mends to the Commissioner that the MSOP Renewal be approved. This recommendation is based on the following facts and conditions:

Unless otherwise stated, information used in this review was derived from the application and

additional information submitte d by the applicant.

An application for the purposes of this review was received on December 16, 2010

.

Conclusion

The operation of this hard chromium electroplating and tool and die for rubber manufacturing operation shall be subject to the conditions of the attached MSOP Renewal No. 145

- 30019

- 000 29

.

IDEM Contact

(a) Questions regarding this proposed permit can be directed to Janet Mobley at the Indiana Department Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, Permits Branch, 100 North Senate

A venue, MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251 or by telephone at (317) 234

- 5373 or toll free at 1

- 800

- 451

- 6027 extension 4

- 5373

.Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership Page 10 of 10 Shelbyville, Indiana TSD for M145

- 30019

- 00029 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(b) A copy of the findings is available on the Internet at: http://www.in.gov/ai/appfiles/idem

- caats/

(c) For additional information about air permits and how the public and interested parties can participate, refer to the IDEM’s Guide for Citizen Participation and Permit Guide on the Internet at:

www. idem. in.govAppendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 1 of 12 TSD App ASUMMARYCompanyName:Freudenberg-NOK General PartnershipAddress CityIN Zip:1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit Number:145-30019-00029Reviewer:Janet MobleyEmission Unit PM PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx VOC CO Total HAPsWorst Single HAPHard ChromiumPlating Tank (ID#T3)0.19 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19Chromium Compounds<10 eachWelding Operation0.001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Pneumatic Blasting -Gritblaster 23A0.0024 0.0024 0.0024 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Pneumatic Blasting -Gritblaster 23B0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Pneumatic Blasting -Gritblaster 23C0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Grinding2.63 2.63 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Fibercutting2.58 2.58 2.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Mills & Lathes0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00Natural GasCombustion0.01 0.02 0.02 neg. 0.30 0.02 0.25 neg.neg.Parts Washer0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00TOTAL 5.41 5.42 5.42 0.00 0.30 0.32 0.25 0.19PM10=PM=PM2.5Emission Unit PM PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx VOC CO Total HAPsWorst Single HAPHard ChromiumPlating Tank (ID#T3)0.19 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19Chromium Compounds<10 eachWelding Operation0.001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Pneumatic BlastingGritblaster 23A0.000048 0.000048 0.000048 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Pneumatic Blasting -Gritblaster 23B0.000006 0.000006 0.000006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Pneumatic Blasting -Gritblaster 23C0.000006 0.000006 0.000006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Grinding2.63 2.63 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Fibercutting2.58 2.58 2.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Mills & Lathes0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00Natural GasCombustion0.01 0.02 0.02 neg. 0.30 0.02 0.25 neg.neg.Parts Washer0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00TOTAL 5.41 5.42 5.42 0.00 0.30 0.32 0.25 0.19Uncontrolled POTENTIAL TO EMIT IN TONS PER YEARControlled POTENTIAL TO EMIT IN TONS PER YEARAppendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 2 of 12 TSD App APM/PM10 and HAP EmissionsFrom Chromium Electroplating TanksCompanyName:Freudenberg-NOK General PartnershipAddress CityIN Zip:1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit Number:145-30019-00029Reviewer:Janet MobleyUnitID#T3These tanks are controlled by a chemical fume suppressant system.Emission Unit PM* PM10*Chromium CompoundsEmission Factor in grains/A-hr Chrome Tank ID#T3 0.25 0.25 0.25Hard Chromium PlatingTank (ID#T3)0.19 0.19 0.19Potential to Emit before Control in tons/yr Total 0.19 0.19 0.19Emission factors are from AP-42, Chapter 12.20 Electroplating,Table 12.20-1 for Chromium Electroplating (07/96). SCC 3-09-010-18)* Assume PM10 emissions are equal to PM & PM2.5 emissions.Methodology:PTE before Control (tons/yr) = Max. Capacity (A) x 8760 hr/yr x Emission Factor (grain/A-hr) x 1 lbs/7000 grains x 1 ton/2000 lbsMax. Capacity(Amp)1,200Appendix A: Welding and Thermal CuttingPage 3 of 12 TSD App ACompany Name: Freudenberg-NOK General PartnershipAddress City IN Zip: 1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit No./Plt ID: 145-30019-00029Reviewer: Janet MobleyPROCESSNumberofStationsMax. electrodeconsumptionper stationEMISSION FACTORS * (lb pollutant / lb electrode) EMISSIONS (lb/hr)TOTAL HAPS(lb/hr)WELDING (lbs/hr) PM = PM10 Mn Ni Cr PM = PM10 Mn Ni CrMetal Inert Gas (MIG) 1 0.00228 0.0055 0.0005 1.25E-05 0.00000114 0.000 0.000 1.14E-06Stick 1 0.0057 0.037 0.003 2.11E-04 1.71E-05 0.000 0.000 1.71E-05Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG)(carbonsteel)1 0.00228 0.0055 0.0005 1.25E-05 0.00000114 0.000 0.000 1.14E-06EMISSION TOTALSPM = PM10 Mn Ni Cr Total HAPsPotential Emissions lbs/hr2.36E-04 1.94E-05 0.00 0.00 1.94E-05Potential Emissions lbs/day5.66E-03 4.65E-04 0.00 0.00 4.65E-04Potential Emissions tons/year0.001 8.49E-05 0.00 0.00 8.49E-05METHODOLGY*Emission Factors are default values for carbon steel unless a specific electrode type is noted in the Process column. ConsultAP-42 or other reference for different electrode types.Welding emissions, lb/hr: (# of stations)(max. lbs of electrode used/hr/station)(emission factor, lb. pollutant/lb. of electrode used)Cutting emissions, lb/hr: (# of stations)(max. metal thickness, in.)(max. cutting rate, in./min.)(60 min./hr.)(emission factor,lb. pollutant/1,000 in. cut, 1" thick)Emissions, lbs/day = emissions, lbs/hr x 24 hrs/dayEmissions, tons/yr = emissions, lb/hr x 8,760 hrs/day x 1 ton/2,000 lbs.Plasma cutting emission factors are from the American Welding Society study published in Sweden (March 1994).Welding and other flame cutting emission factors are from an internal training session document.See AP-42, Chapter 12.19 for additional emission factors for welding.Appendix A: Emission CalculationsAbrasive Blasting - ConfinedPage 4 of 12 TSD App AUnit - Gritblaster 23ACompany Name:Freudenberg-NOK General PartnershipAddress City IN Zip:1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit Number:145-30019-00029Reviewer:Janet MobleyTable 1 - Emission Factors for AbrasivesAbrasive lb PM / lb abrasive lb PM10 / lb PMSand 0.041 0.70Grit 0.010 0.70Steel Shot 0.004 0.86Other 0.010Potential to Emit Before ControlFR = Flow rate of actual abrasive (lb/hr) = 0.0548 lb/hr (per nozzle)w = fraction of time of wet blasting = 0 %N = number of nozzles = 1EF = PM emission factor for actual abrasive from Table 1 = 0.010 lb PM/ lb abrasivePM10 emission factor ratio for actual abrasive from Table 1 = 1.00 lb PM10 / lb PMPM PM10Potential to Emit (before control) = 5.5E-04 5.5E-04 lb/hr= 1.3E-02 1.3E-02 lb/day= 2.4E-03 2.4E-03 ton/yrPotential to Emit After Control PM PM10Emission Control Device Efficiency = 98.0% 98.0%Potential to Emit(after control)= 1.1E-05 1.1E-05 lb/hr= 2.6E-04 2.6E-04 lb/day= 4.8E-05 4.8E-05 ton/yrMETHODOLOGYEmission Factors from STAPPA/ALAPCO "Air Quality Permits", Vol. I, Section 3 "Abrasive Blasting" (1991 edition)Potential to Emit (before control) = EF x FR x (1 - w/200) x N (where w should be entered in as a whole number (if w is 50%, enter 50))Potential to Emit (after control) = [Potential to Emit (before control)] * [1 - control efficiency]Potential to Emit (tons/year)= [Potential to Emit (lbs/hour)] x [8760 hours/year] x [ton/2000 lbs]Emission Factor (EF)Appendix A: Emission CalculationsAbrasive Blasting - ConfinedPage 5 of 12 TSD App AUnit - Gritblaster 23BCompany Name:Freudenberg-NOK General PartnershipAddress City IN Zip:1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit Number:145-30019-00029Reviewer:Janet MobleyTable 1 - Emission Factors for AbrasivesAbrasive lb PM / lb abrasive lb PM10 / lb PMSand 0.041 0.70Grit 0.010 0.70Steel Shot 0.004 0.86Other 0.010Potential to Emit Before ControlFR = Flow rate of actual abrasive (lb/hr) = 0.0068 lb/hr (per nozzle)w = fraction of time of wet blasting = 0 %N = number of nozzles = 1EF = PM emission factor for actual abrasive from Table 1 = 0.010 lb PM/ lb abrasivePM10 emission factor ratio for actual abrasive from Table 1 = 1.00 lb PM10 / lb PMPM PM10Potential to Emit (before control) = 6.8E-05 6.8E-05 lb/hr= 1.6E-03 1.6E-03 lb/day= 3.0E-04 3.0E-04 ton/yrPotential to Emit After Control PM PM10Emission Control Device Efficiency = 98.0% 98.0%Potential to Emit(after control)= 1.4E-06 1.4E-06 lb/hr= 3.3E-05 3.3E-05 lb/day= 6.0E-06 6.0E-06 ton/yrMETHODOLOGYEmission Factors from STAPPA/ALAPCO "Air Quality Permits", Vol. I, Section 3 "Abrasive Blasting" (1991 edition)Potential to Emit (before control) = EF x FR x (1 - w/200) x N (where w should be entered in as a whole number (if w is 50%, enter 50))Potential to Emit (after control) = [Potential to Emit (before control)] * [1 - control efficiency]Potential to Emit (tons/year) = [Potential to Emit (lbs/hour)] x [8760 hours/year] x [ton/2000 lbs]Emission Factor (EF)Appendix A: Emission CalculationsAbrasive Blasting - ConfinedPage 6 of 12 TSD App AUnit - Gritblaster 23CCompany Name:Freudenberg-NOK General PartnershipAddress City IN Zip:1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit Number:145-30019-00029Plt ID:Janet MobleyTable 1 - Emission Factors for AbrasivesAbrasive lb PM / lb abrasive lb PM10 / lb PMSand 0.041 0.70Grit 0.010 0.70Steel Shot 0.004 0.86Other 0.010Potential to Emit Before ControlFR = Flow rate of actual abrasive (lb/hr) = 0.0068 lb/hr (per nozzle)w = fraction of time of wet blasting = 0 %N = number of nozzles = 1EF = PM emission factor for actual abrasive from Table 1 = 0.010 lb PM/ lb abrasivePM10 emission factor ratio for actual abrasive from Table 1 = 1.00 lb PM10 / lb PMPM PM10Potential to Emit (before control) = 6.8E-05 6.8E-05 lb/hr= 1.6E-03 1.6E-03 lb/day= 3.0E-04 3.0E-04 ton/yrPotential to Emit After Control PM PM10Emission Control Device Efficiency = 98.0% 98.0%Potential to Emit (after control) = 1.4E-06 1.4E-06 lb/hr= 3.3E-05 3.3E-05 lb/day= 6.0E-06 6.0E-06 ton/yrMETHODOLOGYEmission Factors from STAPPA/ALAPCO "Air Quality Permits", Vol. I, Section 3 "Abrasive Blasting" (1991 edition)Potential to Emit (before control) = EF x FR x (1 - w/200) x N (where w should be entered in as a whole number (if w is 50%, enter 50))Potential to Emit (after control) = [Potential to Emit (before control)] * [1 - control efficiency]Potential to Emit (tons/year) = [Potential to Emit (lbs/hour)] x [8760 hours/year] x [ton/2000 lbs]Emission Factor (EF)Appendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 7 of 12 TSD App ACompany Name: Freudenberg-NOK General PartnershipAddress City IN Zip: 1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit No.: 145-30019-00029Reviewer: Janet MobleyGrindersThe data used below is from Permit Renewal 145-21676-00029 issued May 1, 2006.Source Information:PM Generation Factor, lb/hr 0.04Maximum Operating Hours 8,760Emission Calculations:Annual Collector AnnualFinishing Particulate Control Particulate ParticulateUnit Generated Efficiency (1) Available Emissions (2)(lbs/yr) (%) (lbs/yr) (tons/yr)Potential Emissions:Surface Grinder TTD 230 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Surface Grinder TTD 229 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Surface Grinder TTD 237 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Surface Grinder TTD 235 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Surface Grinder TTD 220 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Surface Grinder TTD 261 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Surface Grinder TTD 266 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Surface Grinder No. 4 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Surface Grinder TTD 236 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Surface Grinder TTD 216 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Pedestal Grinder 7A 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Pedestal Grinder 7B 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Pedestal Grinder 43 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Pedestal Grinder 43D 350 0.0 350.40 0.1752Pedestal Grinder 43A350 0.0 350.40 0.1752(1) For potential emissions, assume 0% control efficiency of PM controls 2.63Note: The original consideration of the building as a control has been removed.(2) Assume that all particulate emitted is PM-10Methodology:Potential Particulate Generated, lbs = (PM Generation Factor, lb/hr x Maximum Operating Hours)Particulate Available, lbs = (Particulate Generated, pounds) x ((100 - Collector Control Efficiency, %)/100)Particulate emissins (tons/yr) = particulate emissions (lbs/yr) / 2000 (lbs/ton)3/3/2011Appendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 8 of 12 TSD App ACompany Name: Freudenberg-NOK General PartnershipAddress City IN Zip: 1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit No.: 145-30019-00029Reviewer: Janet MobleyFiber CuttingSource Information:Actual Operating Hours 520Actual Particulate Collected, lbs 300Actual Control Efficiency, % 98 Engineering EstimatePM Generation Factor, lb/hr 0.5887 Calculated ValueMaximum Operating Hours 8,760 24 hrs/day, 365 days/yrAbove data is from Permit Renewal 145-21676-00029 issued May 1, 2006Emission Calculations:Annual Collector AnnualFinishing Particulate Control Particulate ParticulateUnit Generated Efficiency (1) Available Emissions (2)(pounds/yr) % (pounds/yr) (tons/yr)Potential Emissions:Fiberboard Cutting 5,157 0 5,156.99 2.58Methodology:Particulate Generated, lbs = (PM Generation Factor, lb/hr x 8760 Operating Hours )Particulate Available, lbs = (Particulate Generated, pounds) x ((100 - Collector Control Efficiency, %)/100)Particulate Emissions, tons/yr) = particulate emissions (lbs/yr) / 2000 (lbs/ton)(1) For potential emissions, assume 0% control efficiency of PM controlsNote: The original consideration of the building as a control has been removed.(2) Assume that all particulate emitted is PM-103/3/2011Appendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 9 of 12 TSD App ACompany Name: Freudenberg-NOK General PartnershipAddress City IN Zip: 1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit No.: 145-30019-00029Reviewer: Janet MobleyMills and Lathes, Potential VOC EmissionsSource Information used:Actual Annual Usage, gallons 165 Source verified the actual usage for this renewal was the same amount.Actual Plant Operation, hours/year 2,080 8 hrs/day, 5 days/week, 52 weeks/yearMaximum Operating Hours 8,760 24 hrs/day, 365 days/yrEmission Calculations:Actual Potential Coolant Annual CoolantFinishing Coolant Coolant Density Coolant VOCUnit Used (1) Used (1) Used Content VOC Emissions(gallons/year) (gallons/year) (lb/gal) (lbs/yr) (%) lbs/yr tons/yrPotential Emissions:Lathe No. 2822.00 92.65 9.1 843.15 8.6 72.51 0.0363Mill No. 2922.00 92.65 9.1 843.15 8.6 72.51 0.0363Lathe No. 4522.00 92.65 9.1 843.15 8.6 72.51 0.0363Lathe No. 6222.00 92.65 9.1 843.15 8.6 72.51 0.0363Lathe No. 5022.00 92.65 9.1 843.15 8.6 72.51 0.0363Mill No. 5922.00 92.65 9.1 843.15 8.6 72.51 0.0363Mill No. 6022.00 92.65 9.1 843.15 8.6 72.51 0.0363Lathe No. 6511.00 46.33 9.1 421.58 8.6 36.26 0.0181Total Potential Usage165.00 694.900.2719(1) Conservative - neglects coolant shipped offsite as waste, assume No. 65 uses half as much as other units(2) The previous assumption that the Coolant Wizard loses 1% of total coolant during processing has been deleted. The coolantwizard has been removed from the source.Methodology:Actual Annual Coolant Used by machine = Actual Annual Usage (total gallons used) at the source / 7.5 (the number of machines and counting Lathe No. 65 as only using 1/2 the amount)Potential Coolant Used (gallons/year) = actual gallons used (gallons/year) * 8760 (max hrs/yr) / 2080 (actual plant operation,hrs/year)Annual Coolant Used (pounds) = potental coolant used (gal/yr) * coolant densityVOC emissions (lbs/yr) = potential coolant used (lbs) * coolant VOC content % / 100VOC emissions (tons/yr) = VOC emissions (lbs/yr) / 2000 (lbs/year)Potential to Emit3/3/2011Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit Number:145-30019-00029Reviewer:Janet MobleyMMBtu/hr MMCF/yr0.7 6.0PM* PM10* SO2 NOx VOC COEmission Factor in lb/MMCF 1.9 7.6 0.6 100.0 5.5 84.0**see below0.01 0.02 0.00 0.30 0.02 0.25MethodologyAppendix A: Emissions CalculationsPage 10 of 12 TSD App ANatural Gas Combustion OnlyMM BTU/HR <100Space HeatersCompany Name:Address City IN Zip:Heat Input Capacity Potential ThroughputPollutantPotential Emission in tons/yr*PM emission factor is filterable PM only. PM10 emission factor is filterable and condensable PM10 combined.**Emission Factors for NOx: Uncontrolled = 100, Low NOx Burner = 50, Low NOx Burners/Flue gas recirculation = 32All emission factors are based on normal firing.MMBtu = 1,000,000 BtuMMCF = 1,000,000 Cubic Feet of GasPotential Throughput (MMCF) = Heat Input Capacity (MMBtu/hr) x 8,760 hrs/yr x 1 MMCF/1,000 MMBtuEmission Factors are from AP 42, Chapter 1.4, Tables 1.4-1, 1.4-2, 1.4-3, SCC #1-02-006-02, 1-01-006-02, 1-03-006-02, and 1-03-006-03(SUPPLEMENT D 3/98)Emission (tons/yr) = Throughput (MMCF/yr) x Emission Factor (lb/MMCF)/2,000 lb/tonSmall BoilersFreudenberg-NOK General Partnership1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit Number:145-30019-00029Reviewer:Janet MobleyBenzene Dichlorobenzene Formaldehyde Hexane Toluene2.1E-03 1.2E-03 7.5E-02 1.8E+00 3.4E-036.255E-06 3.574E-06 2.234E-04 5.361E-03 1.013E-05Lead Cadmium Chromium Manganese Nickel5.0E-04 1.1E-03 1.4E-03 3.8E-04 2.1E-031.489E-06 3.276E-06 4.170E-06 1.132E-06 6.255E-06Methodology is the same as previous page.Potential Emission in tons/yrAppendix A: Emissions CalculationsPage 11 of 12 TSD App ANatural Gas Combustion OnlyMM BTU/HR <100HAPs - MetalsEmission Factor in lb/MMcfPotential Emission in tons/yrThe five highest organic and metal HAPs emission factors are provided above.Additional HAPs emission factors are available in AP-42, Chapter 1.4.HAPs EmissionsCompany Name:Address City IN Zip:HAPs - OrganicsEmission Factor in lb/MMcfAppendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 12 of 12 TSD App ACompany Name: Freudenberg-NOK General PartnershipAddress City IN Zip: 1004 W. Washington Street, Shelbyville, Indiana 46176Permit No.: 145-30019-00029Reviewer: Janet MobleyParts WasherType of OperationandSolvent UsedDensity ofSolvent(lbs/gal)VOC content ofSolvent (%)MaximumSolventUsed(gal/year)AverageSolvent Loss(%)PotentialAnnualSolvent Loss(gals/yr)PotentialVOCemitted(tons/yr)Mineral Spirits 6.59 100.00% 60.00 100.00 60.00 0.03Methodology:Based on information provided by the source. Estimate is for 8760 hours of operation.Source Information given:Solvent Density, lbs/gallon and VOC content % based on MSDS SheetSolvent Used (gal/year) = 30 gallons 2x/yearPotential Annual Solvent Loss = Average solvent Loss (%) /100 * gallons of solvent used per yearGallons of Solvent lost/year (lbs) = potential annual solvent loss (gallons) * 2.5Potential VOC Emissions (lbs/year) = gallons of solvent lost/year (lbs) * density of solvent (lbs/gallon)Potental VOC emissions (tons/year) = potential VOC emitted (lbs/year) /2000 (lb/ton)Note: The original assumption that the average solvent loss (%) of 37.5 based on a US EPA Guidance was changed to 100% in thispermit.3/3/2011

## I NDIANA 

## D EPARTMENT OF 

## E NVIRONMENTAL 

## M ANAGEMENT

We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment.

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232

- 8603 Thomas W. Easterly Toll Free ( 800) 451

- 6027

Commissioner www.idem.IN.gov

Recycled Paper An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle March 3, 2011

Mr. Robert Sams Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership

555 Marathon Blvd Findlay, OH 45840

Re: Public Notice Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership

Permit Level: MS OP

- Renewal

Permit Number: 145

- 30019

- 00029

Dear Mr. Sams :

Enclose d is a copy of your draft MSOP

- Renewal , Technical Support Document, emission calculations, and the Public Notice which will be printed in your local newspaper.

The Office of Air Quality (OAQ) has submitted the draft permit pac kage to the Shelbyville

– Shelby County Public Library

, 57 W. Broadway in Shelbyville, IN . As a reminder, you are obligated by 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 6(c) to place a copy of the complete p ermit application at this library no later than ten (10) days after submittal of the application or additional information to our department. We highly recommend that even if you have already placed these materials at the library, that you confirm with th e library that these materials are available for review and request that the library keep the materials available for review during the entire permitting process.

You will not be responsible for collecting any comments, nor are you responsible for having the notice published in the newspaper. The OAQ has requested that the Shelbyville News in Shelbyville, IN publish

this notice no later than March 7, 2011

.

Please review the enclosed documents carefully. This is your opportunity to comment on the draft permit and notify the OAQ of any corrections that are needed before the final decision. Questions or comments

about the enclosed documents should be directed to Janet Mobley , Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, 100 N. Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46204 or call (800) 451

- 6027, and ask for extension 4

- 5373 or dial (317) 23 4

- 5373

.

Sincerely,

Michelle Denney

Permits Branch Office of Air Quality

Enclosures
PN Applicant Cover letter. dot 3/27/08

## I NDIANA 

## D EPARTMENT OF 

## E NVIRONMENTAL 

## M ANAGEMENT

We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environmen t.

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232

- 8603 Thomas W. Easterly Toll Free (800) 451

- 6027

Commissioner www.idem.IN.gov

Recycled Paper An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle 

### ATTENTION: PUBLIC NOTICES, LEGAL ADVERTISING

March 3, 2011

The Shelbyville News

1 23 E. Washington St

P.O. Box 750 Shelbyville, IN 46176

Enclosed, please find one Indiana Department of Environmental Management Notice of Public

Comment for Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership

, Shelby County, Indiana.

Since our agency must comply with requirements which call for a Notice of Public Comment , we request that you print this notice one time, no later than March 7, 2011

.

Please send a notarized form, clippings showing the date of publication

, and the billing to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Accounting, Room N134 5 , 100 No rth

Senate Avenue , Indianapolis, Indiana, 4620 4

.

We are required by the Auditor’s Office to request tha t you place the Federal ID Number on all claims. If you have any conflicts, questions, or problems with the publishing of this notice or if you do not receive complete public notice information for this notice, please call Michelle Denney at 800

- 451

- 6027 and ask for extension 3

- 6867 or dial 317

- 23 3

- 6867

.

Sincerely,



### Michelle Denney

Permit Branch Office of Air Quality

cc: OAQ Billing, Licensing and Training Section

Permit Level: MSOP

- Renewal

Permit Number: 145

- 30019

- 00029

Enclosure PN Newspaper.dot 3/27/08

## I NDIANA 

## D EPARTMENT OF 

## E NVIRONMENTAL 

## M ANAGEMENT

We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment.

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232

- 8603 Thomas W. Easterly Toll Free (800) 451

- 6027

Commissioner www.idem.IN.gov

Recycled Paper An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle 

### March 3, 2011

To: Shelbyville

– Shelby County Public Library

From: Matthew Stuckey, Branch Chief

Permits Branch Office of Air Quality

Subject: Important Information to Display Regarding a Public Notice for an A ir

Permit

Applicant Name: Freudenberg

– NOK General Partnership

Permit Number: 145

- 30019

- 00029

Enclosed is a copy of important information to make available to the public. This proposed project is regarding a source that may have the potential to significantly impact air quality. Librarians are encouraged to educate the public to make them aware of the availability of this information. The following information is enclosed for public reference at your library:

**•** 

### Noti ce of a 30

- day Period for Public Comment

**•** 

### Request to publish the Notice of 30

- day Period for Public Comment

**•** 

### Draft Permit and Technical Support Document

You will not be responsible for collecting any comments from the citizens. Please refer all questions and request for the copies of any pertinent information to the person named

below.

Members of your community could be very concerned in how these projects might affect

them and their families. Please make this information readily available until you

rec eive a copy of the final package.

If you have any questions concerning this public review process, please contact Joanne Smiddie

Brush, OAQ Permits Administration Section at 1

- 800

- 451

- 6027, extension 3

- 0185. Questions pertaining to the permit itself shou ld be directed to the contact listed on the notice

.

Enclosures PN Library.dot 03/2 7 /0 8

## I NDIANA 

## D EPARTMENT OF 

## E NVIRONMENTAL 

## M ANAGEMENT

We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment.

Mitchell E. Daniels J r. 100 North Senate Avenue

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232

- 8603 Thomas W. Easterly Toll Free (800) 451

- 6027

Commissioner www.idem.IN.gov

Recycled Paper An Equal Opportunity Employer Plea se Recycle 

### Notice of Public Comment

March 3, 2010 Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership

145

- 30019

- 00029

Dear Concerned Citizen (s):

You have been identified as someone who could potentially be affected by this

propos ed air permit. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management, in our ongoing efforts to better communicate with concerned citizens, invites your comment on the draft permit.

Enclosed is a Notice of Public Comment, which has been placed in the Legal Advertising section of your local newspaper. The application and supporting documentation for this proposed permit have been placed at the library indicated in the Notice. These documents more fully describe the project, the applicable air pollution

cont rol requirements and how the applicant will comply with these requirements.

If you would like to comment on this draft permit, please contact the person named in the enclosed Public Notice. Thank you for your interest in the Indiana’s Air Permitting Progr am.

Please Note: If you feel you have received this Notice in error, or would like to be removed from the Air Permits mailing l ist, please contact Patricia Pear with the Air

Permits Administ ration S ection at 1

- 800

- 451

- 6027, ext. 3

- 6875 or via e

- mail at

PPEAR @ IDEM.IN.GOV. If you have recently moved and this Notice has been forwarded to you, please notify us of your new address and if you wish to remain on the mailing list. Mail that is returned to IDEM by the Post Office with a forwarding address

in a different county will be removed from our list unless otherwise requested.

Enclosure

PN AAA Cover.dot 3/27/08

### FACSIMILIE OF PS Form 3877 

# Mail Code 61

- 53

IDEM Staff MIDENNEY 3/3/2011 Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership 145

- 30 019

- 00029 (draft ) AFFIX STAMP

HERE IF

USED AS

CERTIFICATE

O F MAILING Name and

address of

Sender 

# ► Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality

– Permits Branch

100 N. Senate Indianapolis, IN 46204 Type of Mail:



### CERTIFICATE OF

MAILING ONLY

Line Article

Number Name, Address , Street and Post Office Address Postage Handing
Cha rges Act. Value ( If Registered ) Insured

Value Due Send if

COD R.R.

Fee S.D. Fee S.H.

Fee Rest.

Del. Fee

Remarks


### 1 Robert Sams Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership 555 Marathon Blvd. Findlay OH 45840 (Source CAATS)



### 2 Joseph Katzemberger Engineering Mgr Freudenberg

- NOK General Partnership 1004 W Washington Shelbyville IN 46176 (RO CAATS)



### 3 Mr. Charles L. Berger B erger & Berger, Attorneys at Law 313 Main Street Evansville IN 47700 (Affected Party)



### 4 Mr. Hugh Garner 10203 S Degelow Road Milroy IN 46156 (Affected Party)



### 5 Shelbyville City Council and Mayors Office 44 West Washington Shelbyville IN 46176 (Local Off icial)



### 6 Shelby County Commissioners 25 West Polk Shelbyville IN 46176 (Local Official)



### 7 Shelbyville Shelby Co Public 57 W Broadway Shelbyville IN 46176

- 1294 (Library)



### 8 Shelby County Health Department 1600 E. SR 44B Shelbyville IN 46176 (Health Department)



### 9 Margaret Brunk Shelby County Council PO Box 107 Fountaintown In 46130 (Affected Party)



### 10 Tami Grubbs Shelby County Council 2961 N 100 W Shelbyville In 46176 (Affected Party)



### 11

12

13

14

15

Total number of pieces Listed by Sender 

# 10 Total number of Pieces

Received at Post Office Postmaster, Per (Name of Receiving employee) The full declaration of value is required on all domestic and international registered mail. The maximum indemnity payable for the reconstruction of nonnegotiable documents under Express Mail document reconstructing insurance is $50,000 per piece subject to a limit of $50, 00 0 per occurrence. The maximum indemnity payable on Express mil merchandise insurance is $500. The maximum indemnity payable is $25,000 for registered mail, sent with optional postal

insurance. See **Domestic Mail Manual** R900, S913 , and S921 for limitations of coverage on

inured and COD mail. See **International Mail Manual** for limitations o coverage on international mail. Special handling charges apply only to Standard Mail (A) and Standard Mail (B) parcels.