alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3855 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3855

    To amend title 13, United States Code, to make clear that each 
decennial census, as required for the apportionment of Representatives 
 in Congress among the several States, shall tabulate the total number 
of persons in each State, and to provide that no information regarding 
United States citizenship or immigration status may be elicited in any 
                              such census.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Baca introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 13, United States Code, to make clear that each 
decennial census, as required for the apportionment of Representatives 
 in Congress among the several States, shall tabulate the total number 
of persons in each State, and to provide that no information regarding 
United States citizenship or immigration status may be elicited in any 
                              such census.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Every Person Counts Act''.

SEC. 2. CENSUS DATA COLLECTION.

    (a) Requirement.--Section 141(b) of title 13, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``United States.'' and inserting ``United 
States, and shall tabulate the total number of persons in each 
State.''.
    (b) Prohibition.--Section 141(a) of such title 13 is amended by 
striking ``as necessary.'' and inserting ``as necessary, except that in 
no event may the Secretary include any question or otherwise elicit any 
information regarding United States citizenship or immigration 
status.''.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be considered 
to permit or require the exclusion, from any decennial census of 
population, of--
            (1) any person on the basis of age;
            (2) personnel in the Armed Forces serving abroad;
            (3) Federal employees (and their dependents) stationed 
        abroad; or
            (4) any other persons outside of the United States (besides 
        those under paragraph (2) or (3)) who can be traced to the 
        State of their usual place of residence, as determined by the 
        Secretary of Commerce.
    (d) Definition.--For purposes of this Act, the term ``census of 
population'' has the meaning given such term by section 141(g) of such 
title 13.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3978 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3978

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 16, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 
2007 to authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to accept and use 
 gifts for otherwise authorized activities of the Center for Domestic 
   Preparedness that are related to preparedness for and response to 
                   terrorism, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Responder Anti-Terrorism 
Training Resources Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS FOR FIRST RESPONDER TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS 
              AND RESPONSE TRAINING.

    Section 1204 of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 
Commission Act of 2007 (6 U.S.C. 1102) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Acceptance of Gifts.--
            ``(1) Authority.--Notwithstanding section 873(b) of the 
        Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 453(b)), the Secretary 
        may accept and use gifts of property, both real and personal, 
        and may accept gifts of services, including from guest 
        lecturers, for otherwise authorized activities of the Center 
        for Domestic Preparedness that are related to preparedness for 
        and response to terrorism.
            ``(2) Report.--The Secretary shall report annually to the 
        Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives 
        and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 
        of the Senate--
                    ``(A) any gifts that were accepted under this 
                subsection in the preceding year;
                    ``(B) how such gifts contribute to the mission of 
                the Center for Domestic Preparedness; and
                    ``(C) the amount of Federal savings that were 
                generated from the acceptance of such gifts.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 15, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10340

Summary Calendar

MICKEY FRANK PRYOR,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CV-808

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mickey Frank Pryor, Texas prisoner # 1536612, appeals the district 

court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as barred by the limitations 

period of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). In support of his claims of error, Pryor argues 

that he properly filed a second state habeas application; the second application 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 11, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-10340 Document: 00513305211 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/11/2015
No. 14-10340

2

tolled the limitations period pursuant to § 2244(d)(2); and, based on the tolling, 

his § 2254 petition was timely filed.

The record contains no proof that Pryor filed a second state habeas 

application, much less a properly-filed application that tolled the limitations 

period under § 2244(d)(2). Specifically, the state court records submitted in 

the district court, which are entitled to a presumption of regularity, see Webster 

v. Estelle, 505 F.2d 926, 929-30 (5th Cir. 1974), do not contain the second 

application that Pryor purportedly filed. Pryor has never submitted the 

application, and the assertions made in this court, offered as proof of such a 

filing, are too vague to show he properly filed a second state habeas application. 

See Ross v. Estelle, 694 F.2d 1008, 1011 (5th Cir. 1983). Finally, the record, as 

supplemented by an unopposed motion, indicates that a second application was 

not part of the state court’s official record and that there was no proof that 

Pryor ever filed one. In light of the foregoing, we find no error, plain or 

otherwise, in the district court’s ruling regarding § 2244(d). See Salts v. Epps, 

676 F.3d 468, 474 (5th Cir. 2012); Starns v. Andrews, 524 F.3d 612, 617 (5th 

Cir. 2008). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-10340 Document: 00513305211 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/11/2015
p130175.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0175

Focus Ready Draft 1/10/2013

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ AH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
p130175.eng

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 0-1

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0175

 

 

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
p130175.eng

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0175

 

 

 

Page 3

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
p130175.eng

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

Page 4

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
p130175.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT 24.2

                    Consent of Newlan & Newlan
      is included in the Opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1 hereto
EXHIBIT 2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Colin Gervaise-Brazier, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Paygard, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Date: June 21, 2004

                                             /s/ Colin Gervaise-Brazier
                                             --------------------------
                                             Colin Gervaise-Brazier
                                             President
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41828

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROSENDO TORRES-LUNA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-606

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rosendo Torres-Luna (Torres) appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and sentence for being an alien found unlawfully in

the United States after deportation and following an aggravated

felony conviction. Torres argues that the “felony” and

“aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2)

are unconstitutional. Torres also asserts that his appeal is not

barred by the waiver-of-appeal provision in his plea agreement. 

The Government argues that the waiver bars the appeal. 
No. 05-41828

-2-

We assume, arguendo only, that the waiver does not bar the

instant appeal. Torres’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed

by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Torres contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the

basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States

v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Torres properly concedes that his

argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review.

AFFIRMED.
Terms Of Collateral Loan For Casinovations Incorporated

Gaming Venture Corp., U.S.A. (GVC) agrees to deposit $200,000 ii a 200 day 
Certificate of Deposit (CD) with Bank West located at 3500 West Sahara Avenue 
in Las Vegas, Nevada.

GVC agrees to allow Casinovations Incorporated (Casinovations) to use GVC's CD 
as collateral for a loan from Bank West.

Bank West has agreed to loan Casinovations up to the full amount of GVC's CD 
and charge Casinovations an interest rate which is the rate of the CD plus 2%.

Terms Between GVC and Casinovations

GVC agrees not to redeem the CD prematurely within the 200 day period.

Casinovations agrees to pay GVC a payment equal to 8.5% of the total amount of 
the CD when Casinovations pays off the principal of the loan to Bank West. The 
payment will be 8.5% of the principal of $200,000 or a total of $17,000, not 
the total of the CD after interest has accrued, If Casinovations cannot pay 
off the loan balance after the 200 day period, half of the $17,000 payment 
must paid to GVC.  GVC will then have the option of renewing the CD and 
allowing Casinovations to continue with the loan or convert the principal 
balance of the loan into Casinovations common stock with registration rights. 
If GVC elects to renew the CD, the same terms from the first 200 day period 
will go into effect including a full 8.5% of the principal being due when the 
loan is repaid. The $8,500 which is due after the first 200 day period will 
not b~ deducted from the 8.5% due when the loan is repaid if the CD is rolled 
over for another 200 day period

In the event that Casinovations defaults on the loan to Bank West, 
Casinovations agrees to repay the amount of the CD in either Casinovations 
stock with registration rights or in a payment plan based on either additional 
financing or their revenue stream. GVC will make the decision on which option 
to take. If the repayment is in Casinovations stock, the amount of shares will 
be determined by the average closing price of Casinovations stock the 5 days 
prior to the default if Casinovations has achieved status as a publicly traded 
company.

Casinovations agrees to utilize a portion of the proceeds from any exercise of 
warrants or other financing activities to either pay down the principal of the 
outstanding loan or pay GVC directly against the CD. Casinovations agrees to 
pay ten cents (.10) of every dollar raised by warrant conversion or other 
financing to pay down the balance of the loan or pay GVC directly 
Casinovations agrees to use their best efforts to utilize a portion of their 
revenue stream to pay off parts of the principal balance during this 200 day 
period.

Casinovations and GVC agree to allow for amendments to the terms of this loan 
over the life of the loan if both sides agree to new terms through 
negotiations.

The signatures below by both parties indicates acceptance of these terms.
1. Radiological issue

– Does the currentl y generated sludge have a radiological

component ( i.e. , is this sludge a mixed waste)? In the FR notice for the proposed delisting of the currentl y generated sludge (64 FR 42320) we wrote , based on information that you submitted , that “In June 1990, the filter cake was found to contain trace levels of special nuclear material ( i.e., uranium at ty picall y less than 30 picocuries per gram). As of October 1991, this special nuclear material contamination was eliminate d from the filter cake.” In the description of waste streams in the delisting petition , the low level radioactive treatment s ys tem receives small quantities of radioactive materials including uranium and radioactive materials contained in storm water from building roofs. Does precipitation and microfiltration sufficiently remove the radioactive component in this waste so that subsequent sludge formation is not a mixed waste? 2. How is the current delisted filter cake disposed of? The delisting for this waste includes a condition requiring it be di spos ed in a Subtitle D landfill. 3. A ll Federal delistings granted are condition al exclusions which includ e several condition s including a condition pres cribing permissible disposal. For a t yp ical delisted w aste , this condition has been disposal in a Subti tle D landfill. What disposal options are available for management of this material under NRC regulations ? Does NRC regulation of the sludge continue indefinitely , or does it end if the radiation levels drop below some limit? We ’ve been assum ing that disposal in a Subtitle D landfill is not an option. 4. Fluoride in groundwater

– Based on recent analy sis of Final Effluent Pond (FEP) groundwater monitoring samples, has the concentration of fluoride in the groundwater changed since the sampling events of the 2001/2002 timeframe? 5. Fluoride in sludge

– Fluoride concentration (both total and leachate) were determined on filter cake for the January 14, 2000 delisting of the (then) current ly produc ed sludge. Fluoride concentrations were determined on sludge samples (not dewatered filter cake) collected from the FEPs for the pending delisting petition. Do you have anal yt ical results that show total and leachable fluoride concentrations for dewatered FEP slu dge? Perhaps you collected some fluoride data on filtered samples when you did the recent FEP sludge removal project. 6. Active life of the FEPs

– Do you have a revised estimate of how many years you expect to utilize the FEPs until they are decommissio n ed and closed?
EXHIBIT 3.2

STATE OF DELAWARE  SECRETARY OF STATE  DIVISION OF  CORPORATIONS  FILED 09:00 AM
01/29/1996 960026950 - 2530006


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF
                           U.S. TELNET HOLDINGS, INC.

                     Pursuant to Section 241 of the General
                    Corporation Law of the State of Delaware


          THE UNDERSIGNED,  being the Chairman of the Board of Directors of U.S.
TELNET HOLDINGS, INC., A Delaware corporation, does hereby certify as follows:

          FIRST:  That the  Certificate  of  Incorporation  has been  amended by
striking  out Article  FIRST as it now exists and  inserting in lieu thereof the
following:

              FIRST:  The name of the corporation is USTN HOLDINGS, INC.

          SECOND:  That the  corporation has not received any payment for any of
its stock and that this  amendment has been duly adopted in accordance  with the
provisions  of  Section  241 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State  of
Delaware by resolutions of the board of directors.

          IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  hereunto  set my hand  this 21st day of
September, 1995.


                                                     /s/ Michael B. Fischer
                                                         Assistant Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FISCAL
YEAR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                       9,512,480
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             9,672,387
<PP&E>                                                      55,613,086
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (436,373)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              77,587,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        8,382,263
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                 69,512,180
<COMMON>                                                        25,933
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (1,289,044)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                77,587,692
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     0
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               13,087,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           9,215,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             22,198,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         22,198,770
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (72,201,432)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     4.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0


</TABLE>