alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Edward Hathaway

U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Region 1 5 Pos t Offic e Square , Suit e 10 0 Boston , Massachusett s 02109-391 2 SuperfundRecord s Cente r 

### SITE : f^as-Manc t BREAK : _JL-i= _ OTHER - 

### S2H5 1

Subject : EP

A Propose d Deletio n o

f Portion s o

f Eastlan dWoole n Mil

l Site , Corinna , Maine . Amende d Response : Eastlan d Woole n Mil l Partia l Deletio n Technical Memorandum , Jun e 29 , 2012 . I n hono r ofth e man y wh o mad e possibl e th e Eastlan dWoole n Mil l Site cleanup , I suppor t th e propose d 201 2 U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency partia l delistin g ofth e EW M Superfun d Site in Corinna , Maine . I furthe r suppor t th e EP A partia l Site delistin g fromth e National Prioritie s Lis t with special emphasi s o n th e 201 2 remova l o f histori c Wincheste r

Par k fromth e EW

M Superfun dSite boundaries ; Tow n o

f Corinn aTa

x Ma p 1 8 Lo t 53 , Penobsco t

Count y Registr y o f Deeds , 1913 . When creatin g futur e EP

A report s an dmap s concernin g th e EW M Superfun dSite i n Corinna , pleas e conside r

th e informatio n no w in th e publi c domai n vi am y delistin g respons e lette r

t o th e EP A date d Augus t

29 , 2012 . Thank yo u kindly , Everett E . Simpso n 8 8 Pleasan t

Vale Roa d Corinna , Main e 0492 8 Septembe r

10 , 201 2

y SDM S DocI D 52173 7EASTER N MAINE . CH 4 10SEP2012 : PK ; 2 T ;• . FOREVE Rs s

\ . 

### l*h, [ y . V. J

'S- L XU'S f o'ri^ i •}|J.,,.ili1iri<l'(iiVilfl.iiii)JiJilii:il,,.lrll,i,iJiii ; J.-)iI, l
1 

### Icenhour, Melissa K.
From: Bill Herz [WCHerz@tfi.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 9:35 AM To: Neuffer.Bill@epamail.epa.gov Cc: Icenhour, Melissa K.; csl@gknet.com; Schellhorn, Jim Subject: TFI List - Active Nitric Acid Facilities Attachments: tfi list for epa - active nitric acid facilities - sept 22 2009 - wch.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed



### Dear Bill:
Please find attached the list of active TFI member nitric acid facilities. Thank

- you,

Bill

William C. Herz, MPH Vice President, Scientific Programs The Fertilizer Institute 820 First Street NE, Union Ctr Plaza Ste 430 Washington, DC 20002 dd (202) 515

- 2706 mobile (202) 256

- 9986 Main (202) 962

- 0490 Fax (202) 962

- 0577

### TFI Member Company Active Nitric Acid Facilities September 9, 2009

1 2140038v1/21436-0021 Company Location No. of Active Trains No. of Trains Subject to NSPS Acid Strength 1 1. Agrium U.S. Inc. Kennewick, WA 1 1 Weak 2. Agrium U.S. Inc. North Bend, OH 1 1 Weak 3. Agrium U.S. Inc. Sacramento, CA 1 1 Weak 4. Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc. Benson, AZ 2 2 Weak 5. CF Industries, Inc. Donaldsonville, LA 3 3 Weak 6. Coffeyville Resources, LLC Coffeyville, KS 1 1 Weak 7. Dyno Nobel, Inc. Battle Mountain, NV 1 1 Weak 8. Dyno Nobel, Inc. Cheyenne, WY 4 2 Weak 9. Dyno Nobel, Inc. Donora, PA 1 0 Weak 10. Dyno Nobel, Inc. Louisiana, MO 1 0 Weak 11. Dyno Nobel, Inc. Deer Island, OR 1 0 Weak 12. Geneva Nitrogen, LLC Vineyard, VT 2 0 Weak 13. J.R. Simplot Co. Helm, CA 1 1 Weak 14. Koch Nitrogen Co., LLC Beatrice, NE 1 1 Weak 15. Koch Nitrogen Co., LLC Dodge City, KS 1 1 Weak 16. Koch Nitrogen Co., LLC Enid, OK 1 0 Weak 17. Koch Nitrogen Co., LLC Fort Dodge, IA 1 1 Weak 18. LSB Chemical Corp. – Cherokee Nitrogen Co. Cherokee, AL 1 1 Weak 19. LSB Chemical Corp. – El Dorado Nitrogen Baytown, TX 1 1 Weak 20. LSB Chemical Corp. – El Dorado Chemical Co. El Dorado, AR 4 1 3 Weak/ 1 Strong 21. LSB Chemical Corp. – Pryor Chemical Co. Pryor, OK 3 3 Weak 22. PCS Nitrogen Co. Augusta, GA 2 2 Weak 23. PCS Nitrogen Co. Geismar, LA 3 1 Weak 24. PCS Nitrogen Co. Lima OH 1 1 Weak

1 “Weak nitric acid” is defined as acid which is 30-70 percent in strength. 40 C.F.R. § 60.71(b). “Strong nitric acid” is defined as acid which is greater th an 70 percent in strength.

### TFI Member Company Active Nitric Acid Facilities September 9, 2009

2 2140038v1/21436-0021 Company Location No. of Active Trains No. of Trains Subject to NSPS Acid Strength 1 25. Rentech Energy Midwest Corp. East Dubuque, IL 2 2 Weak 26. Terra Industries, Inc. Sergeant Bluff, IA 2 1 Weak 27. Terra Industries, Inc. Claremore, OK 2 2 Weak 28. Terra Industries, Inc. Woodward, OK 1 1 Weak 29. Terra Industries, Inc. Yazoo City, MS 4 3 Weak

TOTAL 29 Locations 50 35 49 Weak/ 1 Strong
22588

#### James F. JONES and Frances F. Jones, Respondents v. Richard A. TURNER, Appellant.

(345 S. E. (2d) 500)

Supreme Court

*Frank S. Potts, Lewis, Lewis, Bruce & Truslow,*Columbia, *for appellant.*

*Warren C. Powell, Jr.,*of *Belser, Baker, Barwick, Ravenel, Tool & Bender,*Columbia, *for respondents.*

Submitted Dec. 11, 1985.

Decided June 30, 1986.

*Per Curiam:*

This is an appeal from an order overruling appellant’s demurrer and granting respondents leave to amend their complaint. According to the Statement of the Case, which is binding on the parties, appellant’s counsel was not notified of the hearing on the motions nor was he present.

Because appellant did not have notice of the hearing, the order was improperly issued. *See, e.g., Whittle v. Multiple Services, Inc.,*283 S. C. 559, 324 S. E. (2d) 62 (1984); *Herring v. Credit Bureau of Columbia,*272 S. C. 368, 252 S. E. (2d) 123 (1979); *Brown v. Mickens,*256 S. C. 346, 182 S. E. (2d) 417 (1971). Accordingly, the order appealed from is vacated and the case is remanded.

Vacated and remanded.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Edwin Molina, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of USA Video Interactive Corp;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entitles, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the  date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

---



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





By: /s/ Edwin Molina

-----------------------------------

Name: Edwin Molina

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:November 13th, 2007
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
4.68

    


    Power
of Attorney

    


    
      	
              Principal:

            	
              Zhen
      Yang

            


    

    
      	
              ID
      No.:

            	
              3301
      0619 6405 1804 90

            


    

    


    
      	
              Agent:

            	
              Leilei
    Wang

            


    

    
      	
              ID
      No.:

            	
              110102197304020437

            


    

    
      
        	
                Address:

              	
                No.1001,
      Building 1, Xiao Yang Yi Bin Hutong, Dongcheng District,
      Beijing

              


      

    

    


    The
Principal, Zhen Yang, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, hereby
authorizes Mr. Wang Leilei to exercise all voting powers as a shareholder of
SHANGHAI DACHENG NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., (“Dacheng”) during the term of
this Power of Attorney, including not limited to acting as the authorized
representative to nominate and elect senior management officers such as
directors, general manager at shareholders’ meetings of Dacheng.

    


    Unless
consented by the board of directors of KongZhong China Co., Ltd., (“KongZhong”)
the aforesaid authorization is irrevocable. The Principal also agrees that
KongZhong is entitled to appoint a new agent to replace the original agent, and
will execute relevant documents and take all necessary actions to complete the
new appointment.

    


    The
Agent, with the authorization of the Principal, shall exercise shareholders’
voting powers of Dacheng with due diligence and care, and will act in accordance
with directions of the board of directors of KongZhong.

    


    This
Power Attorney will come into effect on the day of execution and will expire
upon dissolution of KongZhong.

    


    
      
        
          
            
              
                	/s/ Zhen Yang (Signature)
	
                        Zhen
      Yang

                      
	
                        Date: May 13,
      2010
##### 



FIRST SHARES BANCORP, INC.

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or
her capacity as an officer of First Shares Bancorp, Inc. (First Shares),
that, to his or her knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report of First Shares on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First
Shares Bancorp, Inc.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  November 14, 2003/s/ Kimberly B. KlingKimberly B. Kling
Secretary, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


22
Exhibit 99.1

                FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION
              INITIATES QUARTERLY CASH DIVIDEND


NEW YORK, NY:  December 14, 2004 - Financial Federal
Corporation (NYSE: FIF) today announced that its Board of
Directors has declared its first quarterly cash dividend of
$0.10 per share of common stock.  The dividend is payable on
January 31, 2005 to stockholders of record at the close of
business on January 7, 2005.

Paul R. Sinsheimer, Chairman and CEO, commented: "We are
pleased to enhance shareholder value by starting to provide
a cash return.  Our current and projected levels of
liquidity and leverage enable us to pay a cash dividend and
to continue to grow our finance receivables portfolio at a
sound pace."


This document contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those
contained in the forward-looking statements.  Readers are
referred to the most recent reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that identify such risks and uncertainties.


Financial Federal Corporation specializes in financing
industrial and commercial equipment through installment sales
and leasing programs for dealers, manufacturers and end users
nationwide.  For additional information, please visit us at
www.financialfederal.com.



CONTACT:  Steven F. Groth, Chief Financial Officer
          (212) 599-8000
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-136-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-53717) of Doane Pet Care Company of our report dated
March 29, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Doane
Pet Care Company and Subsidiaries as of January 1, 2000 and December 30, 2000
and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholder's equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31,
1998, January 1, 2000 and December 30, 2000, which report is included in the
Annual Report of Doane Pet Care Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December
30, 2000.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Houston, Texas
April 3, 2001
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-11051

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Reginald Rayshawn Taylor, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-95-1

______________________________

Before King, Haynes, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Reginald Rayshawn Taylor has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Taylor has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 3, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-11051 Document: 00516845128 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2023
No. 22-11051

2

appellate review.1 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

_____________________

1

 Prior to the appointment of counsel for the appeal, Taylor filed this appeal pro 

se referencing a desire to bring a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255. Because this is a direct appeal of the original judgment, that statute is not properly 

before us. Our dismissal does not preclude the filing of an appropriate § 2255 claim in the 

district court.

Case: 22-11051 Document: 00516845128 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/03/2023
----

| (1)     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  May 21, 2010 | By:    | /s/  Kyle Kennedy                                              |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   | Kyle Kennedy                                                        |   |
|                           |   | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 18.1

May 21, 1998

To GT Interactive Software Corp.:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

During the fourth quarter of 1997, the convergence of marketplace forces led the
Company to reconsider its royalty advance evaluation process. Rapid
technological innovation, shelf-space competition, shorter product life cycles
and buyer selectivity have made it extremely difficult to determine the
likelihood of individual product acceptance and success. As a result, the
Company expensed royalty advances of $73,821,000 on products that were in
development or on sale as of December 31, 1997. The Company has, effective
January 1, 1998, changed its accounting for future royalty advances, treating
such costs as research and development expenses, which are expensed as incurred.
These changes will create symmetry in accounting for both internally and
externally developed products.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we
have reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial
reporting, in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion
stated below is based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to
an acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under the
circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have
relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.


Very truly yours,

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
<PAGE>

                           CONTIFINANCIAL CORPORATION
                              Subsidiary Companies

                                 March 31, 1999

ContiFinancial Services Corporation

ContiMortgage Corporation

California Lending Group, Inc.

ContiWest Corporation

ContiTrade Services L.L.C. (99%)

Triad Financial Corporation

ContiAsset Receivables Management, LLC (90%)

Warminster National Abstract, Inc.

Keystone Mortgage Partners L.L.C. (75%)

American Commercial Capital LLC (50%)

ZTS Corp. [Royal MortgageBanc] (99%)*

Resource One Consumer Discount Company, Inc.*

ContiInsurance Agency, Inc.*

Fidelity Mortgage Decisions Corporation*

Crystal Mortgage Company, Inc.*

Lenders M.D., Inc.*

*Subsidiary of ContiMortgage Corporation
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Chemical Design Holdings plc

(United Kingdom)Chemical Design Incorporated

(New Jersey)Chemical Design International Limited

(United Kingdom)Chemical Design Limited

(United Kingdom)Chemical Design SARL

(France)Chemical Design Supplies Limited

(United Kingdom)Chemical Design West Coast Incorporated

(California)Genetics Computer Group Incorporated

(Wisconsin)Health Designs, Incorporated

(New York)Accelrys GmbH

(Germany)Accelrys Incorporated

(Delaware)Accelrys Limited

(United Kingdom)Accelrys SARL

(France)Accelrys kk

(Japan)Oxford Molecular Group, Inc.

(Delaware)Oxford Molecular Limited

(United Kingdom)Oxford Molecular SA

(France)Synopsys Scientific Systems Limited

(United Kingdom)Synopsys Scientific Systems Incorporated

(New Jersey)Synomics Limited

(United Kingdom)


---

QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WAL

- MART STORES, INC., AND

WAL

- MART ASSOCIATES, INC.

,

Appellant s

,

v.

DAMIAN OCHOA

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 0 52

- C V

Appeal from the

168 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 201 7 DCV 3151 )

O R D E R

The Court has this day considered the Appellant s ’ unopposed motion for emergency stay

and concludes the motion should be GRANTED. The 168 th District Court is directed to stay all

proceedings , including discovery, in cause number 201 7 DCV 3151 , styled Damian Ochoa v. Wal

Mart Stores, Inc., and Wal

- Mart Associates, Inc. , pending disposition of this appeal or further

order of th is Court.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 13 th day of February , 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 16, 2009

jm 

# Order

June 16, 2009

138800

JASON JAMES PETERSEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138800

CoA: 290579

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plai ntiff-appellant having failed to pay the partial filing fee as required by the order of May 1, 2009, the Clerk of the Court is hereby

directed to close this file.