alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Philip K. Woodlief, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Doane Pet Care Company, herebycertify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Doane Pet Care Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: March 30, 2006       /s/ PHILIP K. WOODLIEF   Philip K. Woodlief   Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
#### HAYES v. SEASE.

AppEai,. — -It is error in the clerk to dismiss an appeal, under Rule 1, for failure to file “Return” in time without ten days notice of such motion to adverse party.

Motion to reinstate appeal. Action by B. S. J. Hayes against T. Sims Sease, February term, 1896, Eexington County. Verdict for plaintiff for $825. Motion for new trial was made, and on February 29, Circuit Judge filed order granting new trial, unless plaintiff remitted $250. Defendant served notice of appeal 9th March, and ón 12th March plaintiff moved for taxation of costs. On 14th March defendant served exceptions to taxation of costs by clerk, which has not yet been heard on Circuit. On 15th March plaintiff served notice of motion for new trial on after-discovered evidence. This motion was heard September term, 1896, and order refusing motion was filed January 28th, 1897, and notice of such filing accepted January 29th, 1897. On January 30th, 1897, plaintiff learned for first time that judgment had been entered up on 12th March, 1896, for $575, without costs. On February 27, 1897, proposed case and exceptions were served. “Return” mailed to clerk of this Court March 2d, 1897. Appeal dismissed by clerk March 3d, 1897, without notice of motion to defendant.

*Messrs. Meetze & Midler,*for the motion.

*Mr. J. Brooks*Wingard, contra.

May 27, 1897.

Per Curiam.

This is a motion to reinstate an appeal dismissed by the clerk on the 3d March last. ■ Upon examination of the papers, it appears that no notice of the motion before the clerk to dismiss the appeal for failure to file the “Return” in proper time, was given the adverse party. Rule 1 of this Court provides that ten days notice of such motion shall be given the adverse party, and the provisions of that rule being applicable to *389this case, it was error in the clerk to dismiss the appeal without such notice.

We may add, if it were not that the point just decided settles the question here, this Court would be disposed, under the facts in this case, to favorably consider the motion on the principles announced in *Crosswell*v. *Connecticut Indemnity*Association, filed on the 18th instant.

It is, therefore, ordered, that the motion to reinstate the appeal be granted.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 20 22

- 2486

_____________________________ R OBERT G. F OUSHEE , Appellant ,

v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Jason L. Jones , Judge

. January 2 9 , 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. R OWE , R AY , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Robert G. Foushee, pro se , Appellant

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21279-21280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08920]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDIO TRUST


Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 103(c)(6) of the Presidio Trust 
Act, 16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix, and in accordance with the Presidio 
Trust's bylaws, notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the 
Presidio Trust Board of Directors will be held commencing 6:30 p.m. on 
Thursday, May 14, 2015, at the Observation Post, 211 Lincoln Boulevard, 
Presidio of San Francisco, California. The Presidio Trust was created 
by Congress in 1996 to manage approximately eighty percent of the 
former U.S. Army base known as the Presidio, in San Francisco, 
California.

[[Page 21280]]

    The purposes of this meeting are to take action on the minutes of 
previous Board meetings, to provide the Chairperson's report, to 
provide the Executive Director's report, to provide a partner report, 
to present ``Strategy 2020,'' to provide an update on the New Presidio 
Parklands Project, to take action on a budget adjustment, and to 
receive public comment in accordance with the Trust's Public Outreach 
Policy. Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, 
such as needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Mariella 
deMey at 415.561.5300 prior to May 7, 2015.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 14, 2015.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Observation Post, 211 
Lincoln Boulevard, Presidio of San Francisco.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Cook, General Counsel, the 
Presidio Trust, 103 Montgomery Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, 
California 94129-0052, Telephone: 415.561.5300.

    Dated: April 13, 2015.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-08920 Filed 4-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
EXHIBIT 31.2
                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Linda Bryson, Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Companies, Inc. certify
 that:

(1) I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-QSB of Quantum Companies,
Inc;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this periodic report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this periodic
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this periodic report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this periodic report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this periodic report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of the date within 90 days prior to filing date of this
     periodic report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)presented in this periodic report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee


     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

(6) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
periodic report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: June 7, 2006                /s/ Linda Bryson
                                                      -----------------
                                                       Linda Bryson
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3992 

To amend the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

Act of 2000 to provide compensation for certain persons injured in 

the course of employment at the Feed Materials Production Center 

(commonly referred to as ‘‘Fernald’’ or the Piqua Organic Moderated 

Reactor in Ohio. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2009 

Mr. DRIEHAUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education 

and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 to provide compensation 

for certain persons injured in the course of employment 

at the Feed Materials Production Center (commonly referred to as ‘‘Fernald’’ or the Piqua Organic Moderated 

Reactor in Ohio. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3992 IH

1 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF MEMBER OF THE SPECIAL EX2 POSURE COHORT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3621(14) of the Energy 

4 Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

5 Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(D) The employee was so employed for a 

8 number of work days aggregating at least 250 

9 work days before January 1, 2009, by the De10 partment of Energy or a Department of Energy 

11 contractor or subcontractor at the Feed Mate12 rials Production Center (commonly referred to 

13 as ‘Fernald’) or the Piqua Organic Moderated 

14 Reactor in State of Ohio.’’. 

15 (b) REAPPLICATION.—A claim that an individual 

16 qualifies, by reason of section 3621(14)(D) of the Energy 

17 Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

18 Act of 2000 (as added by subsection (a)), for compensa19 tion or benefits under that Act shall be considered for 

20 compensation or benefits notwithstanding any denial of 

21 any other claim for compensation with respect to the indi22 vidual. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gregg Fryett, CEO of Energy Producers, Inc. certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Energy Producers, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of  material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements, and other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such  disclosure controls   and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the small  business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.



c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the  small  business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business

issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a  significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 18, 2004



/s/ Gregg Fryett

Gregg Fryett

Chief Executive Officer
#### Jim Cooper, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

Where it is doubtful from all the facts and circumstances disclosed by the record whether the defendant was guilty of murder, this court will give him the benefit of that doubt and order a new trial, especially where the judge of the superior court stated, in sentencing him for the offense of murder, that he did so reluctantly.

New trial. Before Judge Gibson. Richmond Superior Court. October Term, 1873.

For the facts, see the decision.

S. F. Webb ; H. A. Duncan, for plaintiff in error.

Davenport Jackson, solicitor general, by Jackson *&*Clarke, for the state.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of murder, and on the trial thereof was found guilty, and sentenced to be executed. A motion was made for a new trial, which was overruled by the»court, and the defendant excepted. In looking through the evidence in the record, we are not satisfied that it makes out a clear case of murder under the law. And inasmuch as that is a doubtful question from all the facts and circumstances as»disolosed by the record, we give the defendant the benefit of the doubt, and grant him a new trial, and the more especially do we do so in this case, because it appears from the record that the presiding judge before whom the trial was had, stated in sentencing the defendant for the offense of murder that he did so *reluctantly.*

Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3951 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 427
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3951

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 18, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

                              May 20, 2010

                      Previous reporting vitiated

                             June 14, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Roy 
                  Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROY RONDENO, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Roy Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roy 
Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 427

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3951

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Roy 
                  Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 14, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|Date: February 22, 2005 | /s/ John P. Manning        
|----------------------- | ---------------------------
|                        | John P. Manning            
|                        | Principal Executive Officer