alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_____________ No. 95-2674MN

_____________ Brian Madge, * * Appellant, * * v. * * United States of America; * Darryl Williams, * * Appellees. *

_______________________ * * Darlow T. Madge, * * Appellant, * * v. * * United States of America; * Darryl Williams, * * Appeal from the United States Appellees. * District Court for the District

_______________________ * of Minnesota. * Darlow T. Madge, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant, * * v. * * Internal Revenue Service; * Darryl Williams, * * Appellees. *

_______________________ * * United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Roger Vold; Lynne Leger, * * Appellants, * *

### -2-

Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance * Company, * * Defendant. *

_______________________ * * In Re: Search Warrants for * 875 Forest Arms Lane, Orono, * MN 55364; 3032 Colfax Avenue, * South, Minneapolis, MN 55408 * * Darlow T. Madge; Brian A. Madge,* *

Appellants. *

_____________ Submitted: March 7, 1996 Filed: March 11, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________
PER CURIAM. Brian Madge, Darlow T. Madge, Roger Vold, and Lynne Leger appeal the distri ct court's rulings denying the Madges' motion to return seize d proper tyand petitions to quash Internal Revenue Service summonses, and granting the government's petition to enforce summonses. Having carefully considered the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the controlling legal prin ciples are well established and the issues do not warrant a comprehensive opinion. The appellants' argument s challenging the district court's jurisdiction are without merit. See26 U.S.C. §§ 7402, 7604, 7609 ; Denison v. Commission er of Internal Revenue ,. 751 F.2d 241, 242 (8th Cir. 1984) (pe r curiam); United States v. Claes , 747 F.2d 491, 494 (8th Cir
. 1984). We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

### -3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
exv10w18






Exhibit 10.18




Ply Gem Industries, Inc.

5020 Weston Parkway, Suite 400

Cary, N.C. 27513




May 27, 2010





			
	Re:	 	Retention Bonus Award, Amendment




Dear Gary:




          Reference is made to the Letter Agreement between Ply Gem Industries, Inc. (the
“Company”) and you, as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, dated November
7, 2008, regarding your Retention Bonus Award (the “Retention Bonus Award Letter”). All
capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning attributed to them in the
Retention Bonus Award Letter.




          This letter hereby amends the Retention Bonus Award Letter as follows:




          1. The amount of the Retention Bonus referenced in the third paragraph of the Retention Bonus
Award Letter shall be amended by deleting the number “$2,000,000” and replacing it with
“$3,000,000”.




          2. The Payment Date referenced in the third paragraph of the Retention Bonus Award Letter
shall be amended by deleting the phrase “September 1, 2011” and replacing it with “the earlier of
(x) the effective date of the initial public offering of the Company generating gross proceeds in
excess of $100 million and (y) September 1, 2011”.




          This letter amendment agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Delaware, without regard to conflicts of laws principles which could cause the laws
of another jurisdiction to apply. The parties acknowledge that any statements or representations
that may have been made heretofore regarding the terms and matters dealt with in this letter
amendment agreement are void and have no effect and that neither party has relied thereon.




          Nothing in this letter amendment agreement shall be deemed to entitle you to continued
employment with the Company.




          All other terms of the Retention Bonus Award Letter shall remain in full force and effect.




 









 





          Kindly sign this letter amendment agreement in the space indicated below at which time this
agreement shall become a binding agreement between you and the Company, enforceable in accordance
with its terms.




          On behalf of the Company, I thank you for your continued service.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	 	 	/s/ Shawn K. Poe	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name:	 	Shawn K. Poe	 	 
	 	 	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer	 	 






	 	 	 

	Accepted and Agreed to:
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	     /s/ Gary E. Robinette
 


	 	 
	Gary E. Robinette
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Click Commerce, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael W. Ferro, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                       /s/ Michael W. Ferro, Jr.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael W. Ferro, Jr.,
Dated:  November 14, 2002              Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Frederick T. HOPKINS, Jr.

(318 S. E. (2d) 112)

Supreme Court

June 22, 1984.

ORDER

On April 17,1984, the Court ordered the Respondent to pay into the Office of the Probate Judge for Lexington County, within thirty (30) days, the sum of Eighteen Thousand and No/100 ($18,000.00) Dollars as approximately the amount of attorney fees alleged to have been wrongfully collected incident to the handling of a tort claim and the collection of insurance policies from Mrs. Barbara Land. The Respondent failed to fully comply with the Court’s Order of April 17,1984, although he did pay the sum of Four Thousand Six Hundred and No/100 ($4,600.00) Dollars into the Probate Court on or about June 4, 1984. On June 5, 1984, the Court found the Respondent in contempt of Court and placed him in the Richland County Jail for a term of six (6) months or until he purged himself of all matters involved.

The matter is now before the Court upon the request of the Respondent that the Court suspend the jail term to allow the Respondent time to purge himself of the contempt. The Respondent, Frederick T. Hopkins, Jr., has tendered his consent to disbarment in accordance with Section 27 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure. He further agrees to pay immediately by certified check the sum of Five Thousand and No/100 ($5,000.00) Dollars to the Probate Judge of Lexington County in accordance with the Court’s Order of April 17,1984, with the remaining balance of Eight Thousand Four Hundred and No/100 ($8,400.00) Dollars to be paid within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order. The Respondent’s wife, Cheryl Turner Hopkins, an attorney, also has agreed to be obligated for this debt, both jointly and severally, with the Respondent. The Respondent further agrees that he will complete within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order, the Affidavit required by Section 30C of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, and will, within fifteen (15) days, pay to Court Reporter Karen Johnson the sum of Two Hundred Eighty-seven and No/100 ($287.00) Dollars for the transcript ordered by him in the case of *State v. Winston N. Johnson.*

*131The Respondent’s proposal has been reviewed, and

IT IS ORDERED that the consent to disbarment of Frederick T. Hopkins, Jr., be, and hereby is, accepted. He will, within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, deliver to the Clerk of this Court his license to practice law in the State of South Carolina and his name shall be irrevocably stricken from the rolls of attorneys.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Respondent’s sentence of six (6) months is suspended upon condition that he comply with the terms of this Order. If the Respondent fails to comply with the terms of this Order within the time period provided, he shall be recommitted to the Richland County Jail for the completion of his term of imprisonment. The Sheriff of Richland County is hereby directed to release the Respondent until further Order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Respondent shall not leave the State of South Carolina until such time as all the terms of this Order have been fully complied with.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3667 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

16555 Springs Street in White Springs, Florida, as the ‘‘Clyde L. 

Hillhouse Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CRENSHAW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 16555 Springs Street in White Springs, Florida, as the ‘‘Clyde L. Hillhouse Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLYDE L. HILLHOUSE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 16555 Springs Street in White 

6 Springs, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Clyde L. Hillhouse Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3667 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Clyde L. Hillhouse 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
# Michigan National Guard supports COVID-19 vaccination effort

/ Published Dec. 29, 2020

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. – The Michigan National Guard, on the front lines of the fight against COVID-19 since March, is now helping the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) get Michigan residents vaccinated.

Task Force Spartan is providing more than 45 vaccination and testing teams, consisting of medical and administrative personnel, to assist in vaccination and administrative support to local hospitals.

“During Michigan’s COVID-19 response, MDHHS is ensuring medical facilities have access to the COVID-19 vaccine to safeguard our health care professionals,” said Dr. Joneigh Khaldun, chief medical executive and chief deputy for health, MDHHS. “The partnership between MDHHS and the Michigan National Guard is vital to the success of the vaccine distribution and plays a significant role in the success of our mission.”

The teamwork between MDHHS and the MING helps ensure vaccinations are distributed promptly to help mitigate COVID-19 and protect people in Michigan’s 83 counties.

“We are looking forward to ultimately trying to save lives in the state of Michigan,” said U.S. Army Command Sgt. Maj. James Taylor, 63rd Troop Command, Michigan Army National Guard, and senior noncommissioned officer in charge of Task Force Spartan.

Since the spring, the MING has had more than 1,100 Soldiers and Airmen throughout the state supporting communities during the pandemic.

“National Guard members have been essential to our testing strategy and have been providing support to help conduct testing in nursing facilities, prisons and through numerous pop-up testing events across the state,” said Khaldun. “We appreciate their support throughout the pandemic and look forward to our continued partnership as we move into their next chapter of the pandemic.”

The Guard is ready to surge testing and vaccination efforts when needed anywhere in Michigan.

“I think their (MING) ability to have a coordinated, concerted effort is great, and I’m glad they’re involved in the distribution process,” said Dr. Marc McClelland, a pulmonary and critical care physician at Spectrum Health Butterworth Hospital, Grand Rapids. “I really appreciate their support and service and especially so close to home here with COVID-19.”

McClelland was the first in his hospital to receive the vaccine.

“It was pretty exhilarating because it feels like this moment has been long in coming, and I’d like for everybody to look at this as a really great opportunity,” he said.

Even though McClelland has received the vaccine, he is not letting his guard down. He said there are too many unknowns with a new vaccine, and until most people are vaccinated, he will continue washing his hands thoroughly and wearing his mask.

“This mission is literally saving the lives of people – that is a very powerful sentiment,” said U.S. Army Maj. Douglas Smith, Michigan Army National Guard, and the officer in charge of Task Force Spartan. “The level of effort and passion that our Guardsmen have for helping our communities is amazing to witness.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,647
<SECURITIES>                                     3,844
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,032
<ALLOWANCES>                                       308
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,095
<PP&E>                                           1,430
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,702
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,310
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,073
<CGS>                                            5,495
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,153
<INCOME-TAX>                                        92
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,061
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
#### Ex Parte Albert C. Dulaney.

No. A-1277.

Decided June 18, 1947.

Rehearing overruled July 16, 1947.

(203 S. W., 2d Series, 203.)

*Albert C. Dulaney,*of San Antonio, for petitioner.

*Raymond Gerhart,*of San Antonio, for respondents.

PER CURIAM:

This is an original habeas corpus proceeding in which the relator, Albert C. Dulaney, seeks release from an. order of the District Court of the 73rd Judicial District of Bexar County, adjudging him to be in contempt and committing him to jail. It arose in connection with the trial of cause No. F-9883 in such court styled John G. Kircher, et ux. v. Albert C. Dulaney, et al, wherein the relator, who was present in open court, was ordered to produce in court a certain promissory note dated December 1, 1945, executed by John G. Kircher, et ux., payable to Albert C. Dulaney, Trustee, or give evidence showing the present physical location'of the note and the owners thereof, which the relator refused to do. He was thereupon in open court adjudged to be in contempt and ordered imprisoned in the county jail until such time as he shall produce the note in court “or produce evidence satisfactory to the court showing where said note may be found, and in whose hands the said note is at the present time.”

It is the settled law of this State, as well as in other jurisdictions, that in order to obtain the relief here sought the relator must show that the order or writ of commitment is absolutely void. To sustain that burden it must affirmatively appear that the court was without jurisdiction, and that as a result thereof the relator is restrained of his liberty without *109due process of law. Ex Parte Lipscomb, 111 Texas 409, 239 S. W. 1101; Ex Parte Duncan, 127 Texas 507, 95 S. W. (2d) 675; Ex Parte Hughes, 133 Texas 505, 129 S. W. (2d) 270; Ex Parte Genecov, 143 Texas 476, 186 S. W. (2d) 225. That burden the relator has failed to discharge. On the contrary it appears that the court had jurisdiction to enter the order and issue the commitment, and thus no element of the principle of due process has been violated.

Therefore, the relator is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Bexar County.

Opinion delivered June 18, 1947.

Rehearing overruled July 16, 1947.
June 18, 2014

Mr. Thomas Trester

Windway Capital Corp.

N6225 Resource Drive

Sheboygan Falls, WI 53085

Dear Mr. Trester:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 91.409(a) and (b), of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we 

can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 6, 2014, exemption request on behalf of Windway Capital Corp.

(Windway), into the public docket (No. FAA-2014-0375), but we are unable to process your 

request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of 

the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

 The specific reasons why you need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside 

the United States if applicable. 

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open during 

this period. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at 

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 493-5260.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure

§ 11.81
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly report of Collectible Concepts Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul S. Lipschutz, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (3)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (4)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Collectible Concepts Group, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  July 21, 2004                    By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
                                           -----------------------
                                        Paul S. Lipschutz
                                        Principal Financial Officer
86-459

#### SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Petitioner v. Iva N. DEGLMAN, Respondent.

(345 S. E. (2d) 727)

Supreme Court

July 10, 1986.

ORDER

Petitioner asks this Court to issue a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in *South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Iva N. Deglman,*288 S. C. 149, 341 S. E. (2d) 638 (Ct. App. 1986). We grant the writ as to all Questions.

The Appendix shall be docketed as the Transcript of Record as of the date of this order. Petitioner shall file eight additional copies of the Appendix by the deadline for filing the petitioner’s brief. The materials in the Appendix are not required to be certified copies. The parties are directed to file briefs in accordance with Rule 8 of the Rule of Practice of the Supreme Court, except only one original brief and nine copies shall be required. This matter shall proceed in conformity with the Court’s rules.