alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-3.htm



Exhibit 10.3


 



Sales contract of Industrial and Mineral Products


      


                      Contract No.______


Supplier: Taiyuan Hongxing Carbon Black Co., Ltd


 


Buyer:    Henan Galaxy Tyre Co., Ltd


 


Place of signing contract: Qingxu:Taiyuan


 


Date of signing contract: January 23, 2009


 


1. Product name, trade mark, model, quantity, amount of money, delivery time and quantity


 




	
Product Name

	
Model

	
Unit

	
Quantity Required/Monthly

	
Price


(RMB per ton)

	
Amount(RMB)

	
Remarks


	
Carbon Black

	
N220

	
Ton

	
100

	
5000

	 	
1. The price in this agreement is current market price 

2. The quantity is decided by the number actually occurred.




	
Carbon Black

	
N330

	
Ton

	
100

	
4700

	  	
 


	
Carbon Black

	
N660

	
Ton

	
100

	
4700

	  	  
	
Total

	  







 


2. Quality requirements, technical standards, the conditions and duration of which supplier is responsible for: National standard or by buyer’s standard


 


3. The place of delivery and method: buyer’s warehouse, Specific quantity and delivery time are subject to telephone or fax-based communication


 


4. Means of transport, expense for transport and related items: The buyer bear the burden


 


5. Reasonable wear and tear and method of calculation    None


 


6. Packaging standards supply and recycle of packaging materials   None


 


7. Acceptance criteria, methods, and period to hold discussion on goods delivered: Within 7 days after the delivery


 


8. Random spare, number and supply method of accessories    None


 


9. Payment method and period: Within 30 days after the delivery and the invoice being recognized.


 


10. If guaranty is needed, the guaranty agreement is also needed as appendix    None


 


11. Liability for breach of contract: It shall be settled according to the contract law of PRC


 


12. The mechanism of dispute settlement:  It shall be settled through negotiation.


 


13. Other agreed matters:


 


  a. Quality Assurance Documents


  b. The price is subject to the market condition, and the quantity is determined by the actual number occurred. It shall inform the buyer at 7 day’s advance if there is a change in above items.


 



	
Supplier:


Company Name (Seal):


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent :


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:

	
Buyer:


Company Name:


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent:


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:







 Valid period: From January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009
Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York 1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336.8708

Matthew J. Clark

703.336. 8714 Email Address

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com Ma rch 6 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Additional Information in Support of AIG PC Global Services, Inc. 's Petition for

Exemption (Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0913)

To Whom it May Concern :

As you are aware, this office represents AIG PC Global Services, Inc. ("AIG PCGS")

regarding the above

- referenced Petition for Exemption, in which AIG PCGS seeks regulatory relief

to allow commercial operation of small unmanned aircraft system ("sUAS"). Please accept this

letter as confirmation of our response to the Request for Additional Information received from Nia

Daniels, Program Analyst , Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Safety, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

, on March 3, 2015.

The a dditional supporting m aterial contains proprietary and confidential information and was

submitted electronically to Ms. Daniels and via e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov on March 6,

2015.

If you have any questions or require any addition al information to process AIG PCGS 's

Petition, please do not hesitate to call

.

M C K ENNA L ONG & A LDRIDGE LLP

/s/

Mark E. McKinnon

Matthew J. Clark

C ounsel for AIG PC Global Services, Inc

.
22131

#### The STATE, Respondent, v. Garnett Jewel DAVIS, Appellant.

(317 S. E. (2d) 452)

Supreme Court

*Asst. Appellate Defender Tara D. Shurling, ofS. C.,*Columbia, *for appellant.*

*Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Attys. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr.*and *Carolyn M. Adams*and *Sol. James C. Anders,*Columbia, *for respondent.*

Submitted Feb. 22, 1984.

Decided June 18, 1984.

Per Curiam:

Appellant was convicted of assault and battery with intent to kill and was sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment. She excepts to the trial court’s refusal to give her requested jury instruction on self-defense. We affirm.

The requested instruction did not state the correct law of self-defense in this jurisdiction. The trial judge’s instructions, considered as a whole, did charge the jury accurately under *State v. Bolton,*266 S. C. 444, 223 S. E. (2d) 863 (1976); therefore, we affirm appellant’s conviction. *46
      *2*
      *45While we find no reversible error in the instructions *46given, we suggest to the trial bench that the following instruction on self-defense be used in those cases where the facts indicate that a self-defense charge is appropriate.

Self-defense is a complete defense. If established, you must find the defendant not guilty. There are four elements required by law to establish self-defense in this case. First, the defendant must be without fault in bringing on the difficulty. Second, the defendant must have actually believed he was in imminent danger of losing his life or sustaining serious bodily injury, or he actually was in such imminent danger. Third, if his defense is based upon his belief of imminent danger, a reasonably prudent man of ordinary firmness and courage would have entertained the same belief. If the defendant actually was in imminent danger, the circumstances were such as would warrant a man of ordinary prudence, firmness and courage to strike the fatal blow in order to save himself from serious bodily harm or losing his own life. Fourth, the defendant had no other probable means of avoiding the danger of losing his own life or sustaining serious bodily injury than to act as he did in this particular instance. If, however, the defendant was on his own premises he had no duty to retreat before acting in self-defense. These are the elements of self-defense.

If you have a reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt after considering all the evidence including the evidence of self-defense, then you must find him not guilty. On the other hand, if you have no reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt after considering all the evidence including the evidence of self-defense then you must find him guilty.

Appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.
APPENDIX VI
IDAHO HANDLER ACTIVITY COUNT REPORT'

March 13, 2008

Total Number of Handlers (includes inactive/non-notifier sites) 2,301

Total Number of Active Generators 1,178

Large Quantity Generators 29

Small Quantity Generators 95

Conditional Exempt SQGs 1,054

HW Transporters 54

Subject to CEI Universe (Calculated Universe) 11

BIFs

Incinerators

Land Disposers

Treatment/Storage

o

o

10

3

Used Oil Fuel Handlers (Notifiers) 50

1st Spec Marketers

Off-Spec Burners

Off-Spec Marketers

Processers/Re-Refiners

Transporters

24

11

10

7

33

Universal Waste Handlers (Idaho Department of Agriculture) 18

,

File:

Source: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information (RCRAlnfo), Idaho State Notifiers Database

(generated from the Notification of Regulated Waste Activity Forms [8700-12] submitted to DEQ).

IH (RCRA Admin)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20429
 FORM 10-Q/A
  þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009
 o
    
    OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from  to
 Commission file number 0-29709
 HARLEYSVILLE SAVINGS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
  Pennsylvania
    
    23-3028464(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
  
   
   
  þ o
 o o
  o o o þ
 o þ




---



##### 



Explanatory Note
  Part II OTHER INFORMATION
 Item 6. Exhibits
  No.
    
    Description31.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer31.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer32.0
    
    Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  HARLEYSVILLE SAVINGS FINANCIAL CORPORATIONDate: February 12, 2010
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibChief Executive OfficerDate: February 12, 2010
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Brendan J. McGillBrendan J. McGillExecutive Vice PresidentTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, J. Scott Kamsler, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Centillium Communications, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner January 28, 2008 Mr. Robert Varney Regional Administrator U .S. EPARegion 1 1 Congress Street Suite 1100 

### Boston, MA 02114-2023 Re: Revision to New Hampshire State Implementation Plan Certifying Reasonably Available Control Technology Under the 8-Hour Ozone Standard Dear Mr . Varney: Pursuant to 40 CFR 51 .912 and Clean Air Act Sections 172(c)(1), 182(b)(2), and 184(b)(1), the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) hereby submits for your approval a revision to the New Hampshire State Implementation Plan (SIP) to certify reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements under the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard. The NHDES submits this SIP in accordance with the general SIP submittal requirements of 40 CFRPart 51, Appendix Vand guidance provided by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) . On September 15, 2006, the NHDES published a notice in the Union Leader requesting public comment on the proposed SIP revision. Apublic hearing for the proposed SIP revision was held on October 20, 2006, at 10:00a.m . The USEPAprovided comments on the proposed SIPon October 27, 2006

. NHDES addressed these comments and incorporated documentation certifying the public hearing in the attached SIP revision. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Elizabeth Nixon at (603) 271-0883. Sincerely, Robert R

. Scott Director Air Resources Division rrs/ern Enclosure cc : Anne Arnold, USEPA, Region 1 DES Web site: www .des.nh .gov P .O . Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0095 Telephone: (603) 271-1370 - Fax: (603) 271-1381 " TDDAccess: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964 The State of New

Hampshire DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Property
Sale and Purchase Contract

     

     

    
      The
Seller: The Projects Department, Building11, Hongxiangmingyuan of Heilongjiang
Yongtai Company (“Party A”)

    

     

    
      The
Buyer: Harbin Renhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Party B”)

    

     

    
      Business
License No.:230100400006209

    

     

     NOW, after
friendly negotiations and in consideration of the Property and the mutual
covenants contained herein, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

     

    Article
I The Basic Information

     

    The
property is located at Building 10 and Building 11, No. 28 Changjiang Road,
Nangang District, Harbin with the construction area of 2557.64 square
meters.

     

    Article
II Purchase Price

     

    The
purchase price of Property is RMB 15000 for each squire meters with the total
amount of RMB 38,364,600 (the “Purchase Price”).

     

    Article
III Payment Method

     

    As of the
execution of this Contract, Party B shall pay to Party A, as an advance payment,
RMB 26,855,220 (the “Advance Payment”) and the remaining payment will by paid in
full before December 20, 2012, RMB11,509,380 (the “Remaining Payment”). The
parties can deal with the related matters about the property right by paying the
remaining payment.

     

    Article
IIV Term

     

    As of the
execution of this Contract, Party A shall deliver the property to Party
B.

     

    Article V
The Breach of Overdue Payment for Party B

     

    As Party
B can not follow the Article 3 herein, Party A has the right to terminate the
contract with taking back the property and won’t return the total payment of
Party B as the indemnity for Party A.

     

    Article
VI The Agreement on Property Registration

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

    Article
VII Taxes and Fees

     

    Party B
shall pay all taxes and fees resulting from or payable in connection with
property registration, property right transfer and property using.

     

    Article
VIII Miscellaneous

     

    This
contract will be effective after being signed and sealed by both parties. This
contract is made in four originals that should be held by Party A and Party B as
the same legal force.


     

     

    
      Party A:
(Sealing) The Projects Department, Building11, Hongxiangmingyuan of

      Heilongjiang
Yongtai Company

    

     

    Legal
Representative/ Authorised Representative:

     

    April 10,
2010


     

     

    Party B:
(Sealing) Harbin Renhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

     

    Legal
Representative/ Authorised Representative: Shaoming Li

     

    April 10,
2010
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)  September 30, 2003

MAGNUM HUNTER
RESOURCES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Nevada                                                         | 1-12508                 | 87-0462881                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ---------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (Commission File Number | (IRS Employer Identification No.)

600 East Las Colinas
Blvd., Suite 1100, Irving, Texas 75039(Address of principal
executive offices)        (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (972)
401-0752

(Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)

Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure.

The
following information shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such a filing.

On
September 30, 2003, Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. reported its 2004 Production Guidance.

Item 7. Financial Statements and
Exhibits.

(c)
Exhibits

99.1 Press
Release, dated September 30, 2003.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

| | MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC.BY:  /s/ Chris TongChris TongSr. Vice President and CFO
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:       September 30, 2003
PUERTO RICO ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (PRARNG) DRINKING 

WATER PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Camp Santiago, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army National 

Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act 

(SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the American 

public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to ensure the 

EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: June 2021

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory’s ability to detect

Future Testing Event: September 2021

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Puerto Rico National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 787-289-1400

Office E-mail Address: ng.pr.prarng.mbx.ngpr-pao@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
<PAGE>

                                               Exhibit 23.1
                                               ------------

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Individual, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-02806 and 333-07815), of our reports
dated February 15, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of Individual, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994, which report is included or incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                         COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 1997
SCWC-18-0000781

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

STACY EDWARD HARDOBY,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000781; 2CPC-17-0000693)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stacy Edward Hardoby’s

application for writ of certiorari, filed on December 24, 2019,

is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 13, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000781

13-FEB-2020

11:46 AM
exv10w22









    Exhibit 10.22






    FOURTH
    AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE




    SERVICES AGREEMENT



 



    This Fourth Amendment (the “Amendment”) to that
    certain Amended and Restated Executive Services Agreement dated
    as of November 30, 2009 (the “Employment
    Agreement”) by and between Chateau Holdings, Inc, (the
    “Lender”), Robert Katz (the “Employee”) and
    The Film Department Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as
    successor-in-interest
    to The Film Department Holdings, LLC, (the “Company”),
    is made as of May 12, 2010 (the “Effective
    Date”), and is entered into by and between Company, Lender
    and Employee.



 



    WHEREAS, Company, Lender and Employee have previously entered
    into the Employment Agreement; and



 



    WHEREAS, Company, Lender and Employee have agreed to amend
    specific terms of the Employment Agreement in accordance with
    the terms set forth below. All capitalized terms not defined
    herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the
    Employment Agreement.



 



    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements made herein,
    the parties hereto agree as follows:



 



    1. The Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting
    both references to “May 14, 2010” in
    Sections 1 and 4, and substituting “June 1,
    2010” in lieu thereof in both instances.



 



    2. This Employment Agreement is intended to comply with
    Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
    amended (the “Code”) and the regulations and guidance
    promulgated thereunder (collectively, “Code
    Section 409A”) and will be interpreted in a manner
    intended to comply with Code Section 409A.



 



    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this
    Amendment as of the date first above written.



 


	 	 	 
	

    THE FILM DEPARTMENT HOLDINGS INC.


	
 
	
    CHATEAU HOLDINGS, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
    /s/  Mark
    Gill


    

	
 
	
    /s/  Robert
    Katz


    


	

    By: Mark Gill


	
 
	
    By: Robert Katz

	

    Its: CEO


	
 
	
    Its: President

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
    /s/  Robert
    Katz


	
 
	
 
	
    


	
 
	
 
	
    Robert Katz







	 	 	 

	4th Amendment to Amended and Restated Exec. Srvcs Agrmt.

	 	1