alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-02-0197 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L A AUGUST 21 , 2002

______________________________ ROY DAY AND $750 CASH BOND, APPE LLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 15 4TH DIST RICT COURT OF LAMB COUNTY; NO. 3196-A; H ONORAB LE FELIX KLEIN, J UDGE

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. Proceeding pro se , appellant Roy Day filed a m otion for new trial indicating an intent to appeal fro m the trial court’s default judgment. The motion for new trial /notice of appeal was untim ely filed and thus, we m ust dism iss this proceeding for want of jurisdiction. On March 4, 2 002, the trial court signed a default judgm ent against Day for forfeitureof a $750 b ond for failing to appear to answer a f elony charge. On April 19,2

2002, Day filed a m otion for new trial alleging he had not received notice of the trial setting and claiming that he w as in the county j ail at the time of trial. He also indicated tha t his failure to appeal was not intentional. Byletter date d August 1, 2002, this Court notified Day of the defect and asked that he explain why

this proceeding should not be dism issed for want of jurisdiction. Day responded and requested that his appeal not bedismissed because he was hospitalized from a heart attack. Whether the docum ent filed by Day is interpreted as a m otion for new trial or a not ice of ap pea l, it is untimely becaus e either would have needed tobe filed by Ap ril 3, 2002, within 30 days after t he default judgm ent was signed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a); see also Tex. R. A pp. P. 26.1. The docum ent filed on April 19, 2002, does not invoke our jurisdiction. Accordingly, the purported appeal is dism issed for want of jurisdiction. Don H. Rea vis Justice Do not publish.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|By:                                   |  | /s/ STEPHEN WONG
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|Stephen Wong                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: November 10, 2003
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4035 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the estate of a 

decedent to use the capital loss carryover of the decedent as a deduction 

against estate tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2009 

Mr. MARCHANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

estate of a decedent to use the capital loss carryover 

of the decedent as a deduction against estate tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CAPITAL LOSS CARRYOVER AS 

4 A DEDUCTION AGAINST ESTATE TAX. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part IV of subchapter A of chap6 ter 11 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following new section: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4035 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 2059. UNUSED CAPITAL LOSS CARRYOVER. 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the tax imposed 

3 by section 2001, the value of the taxable estate shall be 

4 determined by deducting from the value of the gross estate 

5 an amount equal to the unused capital loss carryover of 

6 the decedent. 

7 ‘‘(b) UNUSED CAPITAL LOSS CARRYOVER.—For pur8 poses of this section, the term ‘unused capital loss carry9 over’ means an amount equal to the capital loss carryover 

10 under section 1212(b) which would (but for the decedent’s 

11 death) be carried from the decedent’s last taxable year to 

12 a later taxable year of the decedent (or the surviving 

13 spouse of the decedent).’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to estates of decedents dying after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
CONTIFINANCIAL CORPORATION
                         ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT AND AGENTS

The undersigned,  a director of  ContiFinancial  Corporation (the "Company"),  a
Delaware  corporation,  which intends to file with the United States  Securities
and Exchange Commission,  under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"), as amended, each fiscal year an Annual Report on Form
10-K, or such other form  appropriate for the purpose  pursuant to Section 13 or
15(d)  of  the  exchange  Act,  together  with  possible   amendments   thereto,
constitutes  and  appoints  James E.  Moore and Alan L.  Langus and each of them
singly,  as  attorneys-in-fact  and agents with full power of  substitution  and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign in any and all
capacities  and file of cause to be filed any such  Annual  Report on Form 10-K,
and any and all amendments thereto, and all instruments  necessary or incidental
in connection therewith, and hereby grants to said attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them singly,  full power and authority to do and perform in the name
and on behalf of the undersigned and in any and all capacities, any and all acts
and  things  whatsoever  necessary  or  appropriate  to be done in and about the
premises,  as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned  might or
could  do  in  person,   hereby   ratifying   and   confirming   all  that  said
attorneys-in-fact  and  agents  or any of his  substitute  or  substitutes,  may
lawfully  do or cause to be done by  virtue  hereof.  IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the
undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 4th day of June, 1997

                                                      /s/Michael J. Zimmerman
                                                      Michael J. Zimmerman
Resignation of Robin Tjon



 Exhibit 10.02 

Exhibit 10.02 – Resignation of Robin Tjon 

June 4, 2010 
 Board of Directors

 AMHN, Inc. 
 100 North First Street

 Suite 104 
 Burbank, CA 91502

 Effective immediately, please consider this letter my resignation as Secretary and as a member of the Board of Directors of AMHN, Inc. My
resignation was not the result of a disagreement with the Company or any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies, or practices. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Robin Tjon
	Robin Tjon

  

 8
Unassociated Document






EXHIBIT 10.1


 





 




April 23, 2010







James Marshall, Chief Financial Officer


Green Planet Group, Inc.


7430 East Butherus Drive, Suite D


Scottsdale, Arizona 85258







Re: Professional Services Provided for Lumea, Inc.


 


Dear Mr. Marshall:


 


This letter serves as our notification to Green Planet Group, Inc. ("Green Planet") that effective this date, Semple, Marchal & Cooper, LLP ("SMC") is resigning as the auditors of Easy Staffing Services, Inc. and Easy Staffing Solutions, Inc. ("Easy") and ESSI, Inc. ("ESSI") for the fiscal years ended February 28, 2009 and 2008, such audits being performed on behalf of Lumea, Inc.


 


In our attempt to complete the audits of Easy and ESSI, SMC requested access to certain financial and accounting information for the subject companies. The former management personnel of Easy and ESSI failed, and refused, to provide the requested information to SMC. SMC also made inquiries of the former management personnel of Easy and ESSI in regard to the financial position and results of operations as at and for the periods ended February 28, 2009 and 2008. SMC was provided contradictory statements and erroneous information by management in relation to the inquiries it made in regards to the assets, liabilities, equity, and business operations of Easy and ESSI.


 


SMC requested that the former management personnel of Easy and ESSI provide a standard management representation letter confirming the validity and accuracy of the financial statements of Easy and ESSI as provided to SMC, amongst other representations- Cliff Blake, as the former President of Easy and ESSI, refused to provide the management representations requested by SMC. Under Generally Accepted Auditing Standards ("GAAS"), AU Section 333, SMC is required to receive such representation from management. The lack of a management representation letter is a violation of GAAS.


 


Based on the foregoing scope limitations, SMC was unable to complete the audits of the corporate financial statements for Easy and ESSI for the fiscal years ended February 28, 2009 and 2008. Additionally, based on the inconsistencies found in the documentation provided to SMC personnel and the contradictory statements made by Easy and ESSI management, SMC is not able to rely on the representations of the management of Easy and ESSI and is therefore unable to render an opinion in regard to the subject corporate financial statements.


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/ Robert M. Semple, CPA


 


Robert M. Semple, CPA


 


       CC:  Steven D. Marchal, CPA


               Deborah A. Tutrone, CPA




 


INDEPENDENT MEMBER OF THE BDO SEIDMAN ALLIANCE
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4073 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the payments to certain 

veterans for certain travel expenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. MINNICK (for himself, Mr. SHULER, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. KISSELL, Mr. TEAGUE, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

MICHAUD, and Mrs. KIRKPATRICK of Arizona) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

payments to certain veterans for certain travel expenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Veterans Reim5 bursement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED PAYMENTS FOR TRAVEL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 111 of title 38, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4073 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘in accord2 ance with subsection (i)’’ after ‘‘including lodging 

3 and subsistence’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(i)(1) Notwithstanding subsection (g)(2)(A), in de7 termining the amount of allowances or reimbursement to 

8 be paid under this section to a veteran described in para9 graph (2) for lodging and subsistence expenses, the Sec10 retary shall use the amount that is equal to the amount 

11 that would be payable or reimbursable under subchapter 

12 I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, if such vet13 eran were an employee of the Department of Veterans Af14 fairs traveling on official business away from the employ15 ee’s home. 

16 ‘‘(2) A veteran described in this paragraph is a vet17 eran eligible for payments under subsection (b)(1) if such 

18 veteran— 

19 ‘‘(A) is traveling in connection with— 

20 ‘‘(i) treatment or care for a service-con21 nected disability; or 

22 ‘‘(ii) a scheduled compensation and pension 

23 examination; and 

24 ‘‘(B) such travel— 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4073 IH

1 ‘‘(i) is more than 150 miles from the resi2 dence of the veteran; or 

3 ‘‘(ii) requires lodging and subsistence be4 cause of inclement weather, as determined by 

5 the Secretary.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (i) of section 111 

7 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection 

8 (a), shall take effect on the date that is 30 days after the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,779
<SECURITIES>                                    38,540
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,569
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,870
<PP&E>                                          17,548
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,647
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,752
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,815
<SALES>                                         29,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,642
<CGS>                                            5,070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   397
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (263)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                113
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       113
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
*Camden.*

Heard by Chancellor *James.*

cake ixw.

#### Executor of Philip Hawkins, *vs.*Thomas Sumter, et. al.

A security in a bond, lor a sheriff’s faithful performance of his-duties, who has obtained possession of the sheriff’s books, after his death, insolvent, shall be obliged to produce those books in evidence, on a subpoena duces tecum, in a suit between other persons, notwithstanding- the surety was apprehensive of danger to himself, from the disclosure of the books.

FEB’Y, 1814.

Wjxxiam Maye ant, having been ordered to shew cause'ivny,ail attachment should not issue against him for not obeying a subpeena duces tecum, requiring him to produce the official books of Wm, EL Davis, Esq. former sheriff of Camden district; for cause says,- that he was one of the securities in the bond given by the said sheriff upon his appointment to his said office, conditioned for the faithful discharge of his said office, &c. and that divers claims are made against the estate of the said W". R. Davis, (now deceased) on account of failures to discharge the duties of his said office faithfully ; which claims, if true? would cause a right of action on the bond aforesaid1 *447against the said William Mayrant. And the said Wm. Mayrant says, that the estate of the said Win. R. Davis is insolvent, and that should any recovery be had against the said Wm. Mayrant upon the bond aforesaid, he could not obtain from the estate of the said Davis, any reimbursement of what he should have to pay upon such recovery. And the said Wm. Mayrant further says, that if the .said books were in his possession, he believes he could not shew them, without discovering evidence which might, as to some of the said claims, operate against his own interest, and give to some of the claiming parties the means partly, or wholly of establishing against himself a right to a recovery upon the said bond. But the said Wm. Mayrant is not administrator nor successor in office of the said Wm. It. Davis.

Hooker and Levy, for W. Mayrant the witness.

On hearing arguments of counsel on both sides of this question, it was considered that the cause shewn by Wm. Mayrant in this case, was insufficient, and it is therefore decreed that the said Mayrant stands out in contempt of the court, and that an attachment must issue against him.

W. D. James*

On this case being mentioned to the judges (sitting in the Court of Appeals, in Equity) on the behalf of Mr. Mayrant, they were of opinion that the decision was correct, though as there could not be any formal appeal, in such a case, there was no regular judgment pronounced.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO 

DISCIPLINARY BOARD

:

:

:

No. 284

DISCIPLINARY BOARD APPOINTMENT 

DOCKET

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2015, James C. Haggerty, Esquire,

Philadelphia, is hereby appointed as a member of the Disciplinary Board for a term of 

three years commencing April 1, 2015.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                              [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG]


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Board of Directors of Open Text Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Open Text Corporation of our reports dated July 29, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Open Text Corporation as of June
30, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated statements of income, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June
30, 2002, and the related consolidated financial statement schedule, Schedule II
- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, which is included in Item 14(a)(2), which
reports appear in the June 30, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Open Text
Corporation.





/s/  KPMG LLP


Chartered Accountants

Toronto, Canada
September 25, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24-0 119 IN THE MATTER OF B.D., Youth in Need of Care. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension oftime, and good cause appearing therefore, Appellant is granted an extension of time until May 31, 2024 to prepare, serve, and file the Opening Brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 18 2024

04/18/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0119
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08578]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee; Notice 
of Partially Closed Meeting

    The Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee 
(SITAC) will meet on April 28, 2015, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, Room 6087B, 14th Street between Constitution and 
Pennsylvania Avenues NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on 
technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable 
to sensors and instrumentation equipment and technology.

Agenda

Public Session

    1. Welcome and Introductions.
    2. Remarks from the Bureau of Industry and Security Management.
    3. Industry Presentations.
    4. New Business.

Closed Session

    5. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 
Sec. Sec.  10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 
participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dc85aab9a8a8b9f28facaeb5b2bbb9ae9cbeb5aff2b8b3bff2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ec7e8fbeaeafbb0cdeeecf7f0f9fbecdefcf7edb0faf1fdb0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a> no later than April 21, 2015.
    A limited number of seats will be available during the public 
session of the meeting. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to 
the Committee. The public may submit written statements at any time 
before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of 
public presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee 
suggests that the materials be forwarded before the meeting to Ms. 
Springer.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the General Counsel, formally determined on September 6, 2013 pursuant 
to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. app. 2 Sec.  10(d), that the portion of this meeting dealing 
with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control List and U.S. 
export control policies shall be exempt from the provisions relating to 
public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 Sec. Sec.  10(a)(1) and 
10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the 
public.
    For more information contact Yvette Springer on (202) 482-2813.

    Dated: April 8, 2015.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-08578 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>