alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Cash Technologies, Inc.
Los Angeles, California


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Cash Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-41536) of our
report dated August 31, 2000 except for Note 9, which is dated September 12,
2000, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Cash Technologies,
Inc. as of May 31, 2000 and for the year then ended, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.  Our report contains an explanatory
paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.



Los Angeles, California

September 12, 2000


                                      56
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00210

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 00210\00210_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00210\00210_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00210\00210_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00210\00210_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00210\00210_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00210\Supplemental Documents\00210_Midwest Generation ICR Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00210\Supplemental Documents\00210_MWG - Crawford - Aerial Plan - 091610.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00210\Supplemental Documents\00210_MWG-Crawford Block Diagram #1 - WWT-1 - 101210.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00210\Supplemental Documents\00210_MWG-Crawford Water Balance-101210.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00210\Supplemental Documents\00210_questionnairefinal.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00210\00210_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00210\00210_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00199

- CV

IN RE KOLBY LISTENBE E RELATOR

----------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING TRIAL COURT NO. 153

- 297658

- 18

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- The court has considered relator’s petit ion for writ of mandamus , real
parties in interest response, and relator’s reply and is of the opinion that relief
should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM
PANEL: KERR, PITTMAN, and BIRDWELL, JJ.

DELI VERED: July 13, 2018

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
**Exhibit E-6**

**CERTIFICATION**

        Pursuant  to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Michael McGarvey, the Chief  Executive Officer of Eidos plc (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the  best of his knowledge:

**1.**   The Company's Annual  Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2002, to which this Certification  is attached as Exhibit E- 6 (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements  of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as  amended; and

**2.**   The information contained  in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report  and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual  Report.

Dated: September 27, 2002

/s/ Michael McGarvey     Michael McGarveyChief Executive Officer
E6-1
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4069 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4069

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow S corporations the 
          deduction for charitable contributions of inventory.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2009

    Mr. Hare (for himself and Mr. Davis of Illinois) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow S corporations the 
          deduction for charitable contributions of inventory.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``S Corporation Inventory Contribution 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. S CORPORATIONS ALLOWED DEDUCTION FOR CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS 
              OF INVENTORY.

    (a) In General.--Section 170(e)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 (relating to certain contributions of inventory and other 
property) is amended by striking ``(other than a corporation which is 
an S corporation)''.
    (b) Limitation.--Section 170(e)(3)(A) of such Code is amended by 
adding at the end the following flush sentence:
                ``In the case of a taxpayer other than a C corporation, 
                the aggregate amount of such contributions for any 
                taxable year which may be taken into account under this 
                subparagraph shall not exceed 10 percent of the 
                taxpayer's aggregate net income for such taxable year 
                from all trades or businesses from which such 
                contributions were made, computed without regard to 
                this section.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subclause (I) of section 170(c)(3)(C)(i) of such Code 
        is amended by striking ``C corporation'' and inserting 
        ``corporation''.
            (2) Subparagraph (C) of section 170(c)(3) of such Code is 
        amended by striking clause (ii) and by redesignating clauses 
        (iii) and (iv) as clauses (ii) and (iii), respectively.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to contributions made after December 31, 2009, and to taxable 
years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**IN THE MATTER OF**

**RICHARD M. CORCORAN**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 1624 Disciplinary Docket No. 3** 

**No. 74 DB 2009 Attorney Registration No. 75280**  **(Cambria County)**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 11 th**  **day of August, 2016, the Petition for Reinstatement is**  **granted. Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses in curred by the Board in the**  **investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinst atement.**  **See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).**
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3170 

To ensure that nothing in Federal law, other than an explicit statement 

in an Act of Congress, shall be construed to provide an executive agency 

with the authority to mandate, or implement a mandate, that an individual be inoculated by a COVID–19 vaccine, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2021 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To ensure that nothing in Federal law, other than an explicit 

statement in an Act of Congress, shall be construed 

to provide an executive agency with the authority to 

mandate, or implement a mandate, that an individual 

be inoculated by a COVID–19 vaccine, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Forced Vaccination 

5 for COVID–19 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3170 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR EXECUTIVE AGENCIES TO ISSUE 

2 COVID–19 VACCINE MANDATES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Unless specifically stated in an 

4 Act of Congress, nothing in Federal law shall be construed 

5 to provide an executive agency with the authority to man6 date, or implement a mandate, that an individual be inocu7 lated by a COVID–19 vaccine, including a mandate that 

8 an individual either be inoculated by such a vaccine or 

9 agree to undergo periodic testing for COVID–19. 

10 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

11 shall be construed to permit or otherwise authorize Con12 gress or an executive agency to enact or otherwise impose 

13 a mandate described in subsection (a). 

14 (c) DEFINITION OF EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—The term 

15 ‘‘executive agency’’ means an executive agency as defined 

16 in section 105 of title 5, United States Code, excluding 

17 the uniformed services as defined in section 101(a)(5) of 

18 title 10, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
fs1a10510ex10xvii_chinabct.htm


 



Exhibit 10.17


 


Liquid Capital Loan Agreement


 


Borrower (Party A): Guangxi Hefeng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.


Address: Donglan County, Third Development District


Legal Representative: Jin Hua Li


Address: Wuzhou, Guangxi


Creditor (Party B): Jin Hua Li







Due to its production and operation needs, Party A apply for a loan from Party B and Party B agrees to make a loan to Party A. To specify the parties’ rights and obligations and in accordance with Contract Law and other laws and regulations, Party A and Party B entered into this agreement after negotiation.







Article 1. The type of loan is Liquid Capital Loan.







Article 2. The usage of loan is to purchase raw materials.







Article 3. Loan amount is RMB 500,000. The term of the loan is 12 months, from 12/29/2008 to 12/28/2009.







Article 4. The loan interest is 0.58% per month. The interest shall be calculated daily from the date of withdrawal. The interest shall be paid monthly. The principle shall be paid on the expiry date of the loan.







Article 5. The source of the repayment fund shall be from the operation revenue.







Article 6. Rights and obligations of the parties:


 


1. Party A’s rights and obligations: (1) Withdraw and use the loan in accordance with this agreement. (2) Shall not repay the loan before the expiry date without Party B’s consent. (3) Voluntarily accept Party B’s investigation, study and monitor of the usage of the loan. (4) Repay the loan principle and interest in accordance with the terms in this agreement. (5) If Party A fails to repay the loan within the terms specified in this agreement, it shall be deemed Party A grants Party B an automatic loan extension.







2. Party B’s rights and obligations: (1) Party B has the right to demand Party A to repay the loan within any amount of time. (2) Party B has the right to demand Party A to provide any documents related to the loan. (3) Party B shall provide enough fund to Party A in accordance with the loan agreement.







Article 7 The agreement has two copies, each party holds one copy with equal legal effect.







Party A: Guangxi Hefeng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.


Legal Representative (Signature): /s/ Jin Hua Li







Party B: /s/ Jin Hua Li







Date: 12/29/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the accompanying financial statements and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-28-1996
<CASH>                                         122,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,699
<INVENTORY>                                    117,289
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               422,392
<PP&E>                                         191,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 562,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          282,589
<BONDS>                                         21,085
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           925
<OTHER-SE>                                     252,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   562,234
<SALES>                                        421,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               421,018
<CGS>                                          340,568
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  381,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,270)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,011
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,199
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,812
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,812
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        

</TABLE>
LARRY S. KAPLAN lkaplan@kmalawfirm.com (3 I 2l 345-3035 KAPLAN, MASSAMILLO 

### & ANDREWS, LLO 200 WEST MADISON STREET 16TH FLOOR CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 TELEPHONE (312) 345-3000

FACSIMILE (312) 345-3119 www.kmalawfirm.com

December22,2014 **J~.L.E;W** YORK OFFICE 70 EAST 55TH STREET 25"" FLOOR NEW YORK, NEW YoRK_IQ022 TELEPHONE (212) 922-0450 FACSIMILE (212) 922-0530

DOCKETNO. 16-14-08 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Attention: FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk AGC-600 

# ~[E(G~QWJ[E~

FederalAviationAdministration 800 IndependenceAvenue SW Washington, DC 20591 Dear Office ofthe ChiefCounsel, 

### DEC 24

## 2014 PART 16 DOCKETS

On December 18, 2014, Respondents served their Answer to Complainants' 917 page Complaint. Respondents' Answer was served via FedEx, and arrived at the FAA offices on December 19, 2014, the due date grantedby the Director in an Order dated December I, 2014. Respondents served their Answer to the Complaint on the Complainants via U.S. Mail on December 19, 2014 because the Post Office was closed on December 18, 2014 at the time the Answer was given to FedEx for delivery. Respondents inadvertently provided a Certificate of Service dated December 17, 2014. Respondents have enclosed acorrected Certificate ofService to read the correct service dates, December 18,2014to the FAA and December 19,2014to the Complainants,withnoticeto Complainants. On December 22, 2014, Respondents were advised that although the FAA had received three copies of Respondents' Answer, the FAA had not received the original. This was an oversight on Respondents' part, and the original is served with this correspondence, with notice to Complainants. OnDecember22, 2014, Respondentsalsorealizedthattwo ofthe Complainants' "Formal Complaint Issues" (52A and a duplicate no. 68) had not been specifically referenced in their Answer served on December 18, 2014- notably, however, a denial and substantive response to the subject matter categories of these specific "Formal Complaint Issues" are included in Respondents' Answer. This oversight was due in part to the fact that these "Formal Complaint Issues" had either been unconventionally numbered or misnumbered. Respondents served their supplemental response containing references to these "Formal Complaint Issues" on December 22, 2014, as soon as they realizedthe oversight.KAPLAN, MASSAMILLO & ANDREWS, LLO December22, 2014 Page 2

LSK:kus Enclosures Verytruly yours,

### KA~ , , MASSAMILLO& ANDREWS, LLC 

## J\ " ,, v Larry S. Kaplan
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 1314

In re: DANIEL HEGGINS

,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:21

- hc

- 02017

- FL )

Submitted : June 24, 2021 Decided: July 1, 2021

Before KEENAN

, DIAZ

, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Daniel Heggins , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Daniel Heggins petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has

unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He seeks an order from this

court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in

th e district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. * We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

* Our review of the pending action reveals that Heggins is scheduled to be released

from incarceration in the Eastern District of North Carolina on July 19, 2021.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Darrel Slack, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Centillium Communications, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Exhibit 31.1
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
I, Jerry R. Engle, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First SharesBancorp, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuerand we have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2004      /s/ Jerry R. Engle Jerry R. Engle President and Chief