alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
08/17/2010 1245 803-288-8147 Cape Air Lebanon N ·/2:,1:,: F' (I() 1./(1(1·/ 

I 

Glenn Greilsamer 

180 West 20'h. Street 

Apt 16£ 

New York, NY 10011 

August 11, 2010 

Edward LaRocque 

Cape Air 

Lebanon Airport 

5 Airpark Road 

West Lebanon, NH 03784 

Dear Cape Air, 

I recently flew rolllld trip on the White Pla:insiWestchester, NY to Lebanon, NH route. In my 9+ years of 

living in NY, it was certainly one of the most enjoyable and relaxing flights I have taken from the New 

York City area. Friends had invited me up to their NH home in previous SUIllIIlers but the drive had kept 

me from accepting the invitation. Knowing of Cape Air's service that jncIudes a chauffeured pick-up in 

Manhattm and drives you directly to the departing Signature terminal jn White Plajns, made the trip 

relaxing and I felt I was instantly leaving the hustle and bustle of the city behind upon pick up. 

I have flown Cape Air in the past and always enjoyed their customer oriented service however this trip 

-was a particular pleasure, The Manhattan pick-up and drop-<>ffrnake a huge impact in the ease of getting 

to the airport Additionally, both White Plains and Lebanon are so Hghtly trafficked that it decreases the 

stress ofnonnal ajr travel considerab1y as well. Last but not least, the Cape Air personnel greeted me 

with a smile and offered excellent service- even making an espresso for me! 

I look forward to visiting NH next summer and flying Cape Air. 

Sincerely, 

,.~ 

/!JvvW'w}4! '\ 

Glenn Grcilsamer 

.. , .;':
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerald D. Schiefelbein, Chief Financial Officer of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (a) | the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*     *     *



|                  |  |                           
|----------------- |  | --------------------------
|By:               |  | /s/ Gerald D. Schiefelbein
|                  |  | Gerald D. Schiefelbein    
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer   
|                 
|Date: May 9, 2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAMIAN CHRISTOPHER METZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 456 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of February, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4127 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that alien unprivileged 

enemy belligerents may only be tried by military commissions if tried 

for alleged conduct for which a term of incarceration or the death 

penalty may be sought. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2009 

Mr. GOHMERT (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN

of California, Mr. OLSON, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Ms. FOXX, Mr. ROE

of Tennessee, Ms. FALLIN, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. CARTER, 

Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. 

SHADEGG, Mr. PITTS, Mr. POSEY, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. ROONEY, 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. COLE, Mr. 

LATTA, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. BONNER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. 

GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. PENCE, Mr. CULBERSON, 

Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. BACHUS, Ms. GRANGER, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. 

ALEXANDER, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, Mr. 

RYAN of Wisconsin, and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that 

alien unprivileged enemy belligerents may only be tried 

by military commissions if tried for alleged conduct for 

which a term of incarceration or the death penalty may 

be sought. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4127 IH

1 SECTION 1. TRIAL OF ALIEN UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY BEL2 LIGERENTS BY MILITARY COMMISSION MAN3 DATORY FOR CERTAIN OFFENSES. 

4 Section 948c of title 10, United States Code, is 

5 amended by inserting before the period at the end the fol6 lowing: ‘‘and if subject to trial for any alleged conduct for 

7 which a term of incarceration or the death penalty may 

8 be sought or obtained may only be tried by such a commis9 sion’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
22226

#### Jack ROGERS, Respondent, v. EFIRD’S EXTERMINATING CO., INC., Appellant.

(325 S. E. (2d) 541)

Supreme Court

*William Douglas Gray*of *Watkins, Vandiver, Kirven, Gable & Gray,*Anderson, *for appellant.*

*Harold P. Threlkeld*of *McIntosh, Threlkeld, Glenn & Sher-ard,*Anderson, *for respondent.*

*378Heard Jan. 9, 1985.

Decided Jan. 30, 1985.

Chandler, Justice:

Efird’s Exterminating Co., Inc. (Efird) appeals from a jury verdict for damages allegedly caused by it to the residence of Respondent (Rogers).

We affirm.

The sole issue presented is whether or not the trial judge erred in his jury instruction on the accrual time of a cause of action under the “discovery rule.” We hold he did not.

In April, 1970, Efird contracted to perform termite extermination of Roger’s residence. In the process, support wall blocks underneath the front porch were removed but not replaced by Efird. Within the statutory six year period for commencing an action, Rogers noticed cracks in the joints between the house wall and porch slab. He testified, however, that what he observed appeared to be normal settlement and that it was not until 1979 that the damage was sufficient to call for an investigation of its cause. On June 29, 1981, he instituted this action, in answer to which Efird plead the Statute of Limitations in bar.

In its brief Efird concedes that failure to replace the blocks caused the front porch to separate from the residence, necessitating repairs and resulting in damages.

The parties agree that the “discovery rule” applies to determine when Roger’s cause of action accrues. *Brown v. Sandwood Development Corporation,*277 S. C. 581, 291 S. E. (2d) 375 (1982); *Campus Sweater v. M. B. Kahn,*515 F. Supp. 64 (D. C. S. C. 1979). Efird’s sole contention is that the trial judge erred in charging the jury that, under the rule, one must know not only that he has been injured but also “what or who proximately caused that injury.” Efird argues that “causation” is not an element of the rule as adopted in S. C. Code Ann. § 15-3-535 (1976 & Supp. 1983),

When the jury charge is viewed as a whole, the language complained of was not erroneous. In the next sentence the trial judge charged “In other words, you have to be able to not only discern that an injury has resulted, but you have to *379be able to discern that *someone else*proximately caused that injury.” (Emphasis supplied.)

In *Snell v. Columbia Gun Exchange, Inc.,*276 S. C. 301, 278 S. E. (2d) 333 (1981) we held:

> The exercise of reasonable diligence means simply that an injured party must act with some promptness where the facts and circumstances of an injury would put a person of common knowledge and experience on notice that some right of his has been invaded or that some claim *against another party*might exist. (Emphasis supplied.)

The language in the charge “you have to be able to discern that someone else proximately caused that injury” conveys the same meaning as the language in *Snell*“that some claim against another party might exist.”

Affirmed.

Littlejohn, C. J., and Ness, Gregory and Harwell, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          407,741
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,542,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (290,984)
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,934,312
<PP&E>                                       25,884,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                5,277,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               23,154,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         8,963,223
<BONDS>                                       2,501,163
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        160,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   11,529,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 23,154,090
<SALES>                                       4,943,210
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              4,943,210
<CGS>                                         2,314,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2,314,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             17,739,852
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              801,428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (15,262,662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (15,262,662)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                (15,262,662)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.95)
        


</TABLE>
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Steve Mendoza, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00137

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 213th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

1496373D ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Jus tice Stevens, Chief Justice

Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We further order that the appellant, Steve Mendoza, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JANUARY 16, 2019

BY O RDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 21243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08859]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and section 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than May 4, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Meredith R. Willson, individually and as co-trustee of the Hugh 
M. Willson S Corp Family Trust and the Hugh M. Willson S Corp Marital 
Trust, all of Athens, Tennessee, to retain voting shares of Citizens 
National Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of 
Citizens National Bank, both in Athens, Tennessee; and by the Hugh M. 
Willson S Corp Family Trust, and the Hugh M. Willson S Corp Marital 
Trust (Meredith R. Willson and Paul G. Willson, co-trustees of both) 
and Debra M. Willson; all of Athens, Tennessee, to join the previously 
approved Willson Family control group.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Ronald L. Mordy and Margaret S. Mordy, as trustees of the Ronald 
L. Mordy and Margaret S. Mordy Revocable Living Trust, Dated 8-20-02, 
all of Independence, Kansas; to acquire voting shares of 1889 
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The 
First National Bank of Nevada, both in Nevada, Missouri. In addition, 
Joseph W. Swearingen, as a member of the Swearingen/Mordy family group, 
has applied to retain voting shares of 1889 Bancshares, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The First National Bank of 
Nevada, both in Nevada, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 14, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-08859 Filed 4-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
INAL 

3Jn tbe Wniteb ~tates Qeourt of jf eberal QClaims 

No. 16-lOOC 

(Filed: March 9, 2016) 

(NOT TO BE REPORTED) 

********************************** 

FREDRICK WAYNE CONNORS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED ST ATES, 

Defendant. 

********************************** 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Fredrick Wayne Connors, Carson City, Nevada, prose. 

FILED 

MAR - 9 2016 

U.S. COURT OF 

FEDERAL CLAIMS 

James W. Poirier, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United 

States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the defendant. With him on the brief were 

Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, and Robert E. 

Kirschman, Jr., Director, and Franklin E. White, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 

ORDER 

LETTOW, Judge. 

Plaintiff Fredrick Wayne Connors has filed an action without paying the court's filing 

fee, instead requesting a fee waiver under the informa pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 

Pursuant to Paragraph 1915( e )(2) of that statute, "the court shall dismiss the case at any time if 

the court determines that ... the action . .. is frivolous or malicious." The government has filed 

a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Def. 's Mot. to Dismiss, 

ECFNo. 5. 

Mr. Connors has filed at least ten complaints "against various communications and 

technology companies" between 2010 and 2015, all of which were dismissed as frivolous or 

failing to state a claim. See, e.g., Connors v. Charter Business, No. 14-cv-688, 2015 WL 

2194500, at *3 (D. Nev. May 11, 2015) (discussing plaintiffs filing history and dismissing 

complaint as frivolous for making fanciful allegations of eavesdropping). In this instance, 

Mr. Connors alleges that an "Organization" implanted a "VERI CHIP" on his inner ear, applied 

"electricity and high decibel level frequency," and performed improper surveillance over 
Mr. Connors. Compl. at 2-4. Mr. Connors in effect claims he was "used as an object to develop 

new technology against [his] will." Compl. at 1 (capitalization omitted). 1 Mr. Connors' 

allegations are factually and legally frivolous within the meaning of Paragraph 1915(e)(2), and 

accordingly the action must be dismissed. 

CONCLUSION 

The defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the complaint shall be dismissed 

on the ground that it is frivolous. 2 The clerk is directed to enter judgment in accord with this 

disposition. 

No costs. 

It is so ORDERED. 

Charles F. Lettow 

Judge 

1 Mr. Connors neither defines the "Organization" nor does he make any allegation that it 

is part of, has a connection with, the Government of the United States. Consequently, he has not 

stated a claim against the only defendant that is cognizable in this court. 

2

The application for leave to proceed informa pauperis is GRANTED. 

2
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; RFA RM13-006: Pioneer Awards.
    Date: May 6-8, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Arnold Revzin, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4146, MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
1153, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a081f0c0013141b3a19090854141312541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0d2c5d6dac9cec1e0c3d3d28ecec9c88ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Auditory Neuroscience.
    Date: May 7-8, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20895, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: John Bishop, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5182, MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 408-
9664, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#32505b415a5d4258725141401c5c5b5a1c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f89a918b90978892b89b8b8ad6969190d69f978e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 16, 2015.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-09237 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
In the Matter of 

## SERVED JUNE 6, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

Docket No. FAA-2010-0620 DIAMOND AIR CHARTER, INC. ) ) ) ) ) (CP10EA0004) Respondent 

### ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF FIFTHLITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE OnMay 1, 2012 an Order Granting Continuance and Setting Fifth Litigation Scheduling Conference was filed. OnJune 1, 2012 the FAA filed a Motion for Postponement ofthe Fifth Litigation Scheduling Conference set for June 7, 2012 at 9:30am Eastern standard time (EST). The FAA cited multiple grounds for the Motion, and noted thatthe Respondent had no objectionto the Motion. From June 1, 2012 through June 5, 2012 the Office ofHearings (OH) clerical staff made multiple telephone calls to bothparties to determine whatthree dates/times the parties were recommending for a rescheduled conference. On June 5, 2012 the parties recommended July 9, 2012 at 1:30pmEST. The OH clerical staffconsulted with the undersigned, and then orally confirmed with the parties that July 9, 2012 at 1:30pm EST was an acceptable date. After reviewing all relevant pleadings, motions, caselaw, regulation, statutory authority, and being fully advised; It

### Is Hereby Ordered: 1. The FAA's Motion''for Postponement ofthe Fifth Litigation Scheduling Conference is granted. 2. The Fifth Litigation Scheduling Conference is continued from June 7, 2012 at 9:30am ESTto 

### July 9, 

### 2012 at 

### 1:30pm. The Office ofHearings shall initiate the conference call.

Attachment

- Service ListFAA DocketNo. CP10EA0004 (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICELIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: HearingDocketClerk, AGC:-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W10001 ONE COPY Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel Aviation LawExperts One Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 TEL: 301-294-8550 FAX: 301-294-2525 Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel, EAL-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 The HonorableJ.E. Sullivan, AdministrativeLawJudge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20, RoomE12-320 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536

1Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edwin Molina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1.

this report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the 1934 Act, and



2.

the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the registrant's financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



By: /s/ Edwin Molina

-----------------------------------

Name: Edwin Molina

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:November 8th, 2006