alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Photon
Dynamics, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof and to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Report"), and
pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), Jeffrey A. Hawthorne, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard Okumoto, Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 22, 2004

/s/ JEFFREY A. HAWTHORNE                   /s/ RICHARD OKUMOTO
-----------------------------------        -------------------------------------
JEFFREY A. HAWTHORNE                       RICHARD OKUMOTO
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND SECRETARY

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
fs1a10510ex10xlvii_chinabct.htm


 


 








 


Exhibit 10.47


 


Proxy Agreement




 


 


Party A: Guangxi Liuzhou Baicaotang Medicine Ltd.


 


Legal Representative: Tang Huitian


 


 


Party B: Liuzhou Baicaotang Property Management Ltd.


 


Representative: Tang Huitian


 


 


Whereas,


 



	
(1)  

	
Liuzhou Baicaotang Property Management Ltd. (“BCT Property”) holds a 51% equity interest in Guangxi Liuzhou Baicaotang Medicine Retail Ltd. (“BCT Retail”);







 



	
(2)  

	
Party A holds a 49% equity interest in BCT Retail;







 



	
(3)  

	
Party B desires to grant a proxy to Party A providing Party A the full rights to appoint the directors, officers and management of BCT Retail;







 



	
(4)  

	
The parties desire to enter into this Proxy Agreement in order to make the contractual relationship between the parties consistent with past practices and understandings between the parties as it relates to the transfer of 51% of the equity interest of BCT Retail to BCT Property in April 2008.







 


 


Party A and Party B hereby enter into the following Proxy Agreement (“Proxy Agreement”):


 



	
1.  

	
Party B hereby grants an irrevocable proxy to Party A providing Party A the full rights to appoint the directors, officers and management of BCT Retail and to vote any shares of capital stock of BCT Retail that Party B would otherwise be entitled to vote in connection with taking such actions.







 



	
2.  

	
The revocation of any proxy described above would require the prior written consent of Party A. Any such revocation shall not affect the validity of any decision or act taken prior to such revocation’s effectiveness, pursuant to such proxy.







 



	
3.  

	
Any dispute arising out of the performance of this Proxy Agreement shall be mutually negotiated between the parties. When failing to get a consistent settlement, any party may submit such dispute to the People’s Court of Liunan District, Liu Zhou City for determination.







 



	
4.  

	
The terms and conditions set forth in herein should not be modified unless written agreed by the parties.







 


 




  





1











  






 


 



	
5.  

	
This Proxy Agreement is made in nineteen counterparts with Party A holding two copies, Party B holding sixteen copies and the other one copy will be submitted to competent AIC for registration and filing. This Proxy Agreement shall become binding in the date signed by the Parties.







 








	
Party A: Guangxi Liuzhou Baicaotang Medicine Ltd.


	  
	
Legal Representative:/s/ Tang Huitian


	  
	
Date: May 19, 2010







 


 



	
Party B: Liuzhou Baicaotang Property Management Co., Ltd


	  
	
Representative:/s/ Tang Huitian


	  
	
Date: May 19, 2010







 







 


 


 


 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Woolfe, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 672]

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (James R. Harvey, J.), rendered October 30, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18 [1]). We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying that part of his motion seeking a pretrial hearing on the validity of the search that yielded the contraband. The court properly refused to conduct a hearing because defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing that he had a privacy interest in the apartment sufficient to confer standing to contest the search (see *Rakas v Illinois,*439 US 128, 149 [1978], *reh denied*439 US 1122 [1979]; *People v Rodriguez,*69 NY2d 159, 163-164 [1987]; *People v Ponder,*54 NY2d 160, 166 [1981]). We also conclude that, viewing the evidence, the law and the circumstances of this case, in totality and as of the time of the representation, defendant was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel *(see generally People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly report of Collectible Concepts Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Paul S. Lipschutz, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:   October 18, 2005                     By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
                                                ----------------------
                                             Paul S. Lipschutz
                                             Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Softstone Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Keith  Boyd,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my
knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                        /s/  Keith  Boyd
Dated:  May  19,  2003                  ----------------------------------------
                                        Keith  Boyd
                                        Chief  Financial  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

The Board of Directors
MECON, Inc.

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration 
statement (No. 333-7324) on Form S-8 of MECON, Inc. of our report dated May 
1, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MECON, Inc. and 
subsidiary as of March 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of 
the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1998, which report appears 
in the March 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-KSB of MECON, Inc.

                                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

San Francisco, California
June 26, 1998
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION FEDERALAVIATIONADMINISTRATION (F.A.A.)

WILLIAMALFRED HICKS,

### JR., a/k/a BILLY HICKS, Complainant -against- NOTICE OFADOPTION OF MOTIONS AND ANSWER CITY OFMOUNTAIRY, NORTH Docket No.16-15-07 CAROLINA; and THE COUNTY OF

**S.!1~\VE0** 

### NORTH CAROLINA; through the

**M~t:.** 

### AIRY/SURRY COUNTY AIRPORT 

## AUG 42Gb AUTHORITY, Respondent 

### PART 16 DOCKETS

Now comes Respondent, Surry County, North Carolina, a body politic and corporate, through counsel, to provide notice to the Federal Aviation Administration in the above entitled matter that it adopts the Motions and Answer ofthe MountAiry/Surry County Airport Authority, filed or to be filed with the Federal AviationAdministration in the above entitled action as its own response. 

### eft.. This is the ;)

## l' day ofJuly, 2015.

Edwin M. Woltz \ Edwin M. Woltz, Attorney at Law, PLLC 

### 119 Rawley Ave. MountAiry, NC 27030 Phone (336) 786-5556 Fax (336) 789-0651 woltz@woltzlaw.usCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Edwin M. Woltz, certify that on July ]'t



# ~~ 2015 I filed and served this NOTICE OF ADOPTION OFMOTIONSAND ANSWERby placingthe original thereofand three copies to the FAA, and a copy to counsel ofrecord, inprepaid first class or express envelopes in the custody ofthe United States Mail addressed as follows:
FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk AGC-600 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 Randolph M. James Attorney for Plaintiffs Randolph M. James, P.C. P.O. Box 20069 Winston-Salem, NC 27120 Attorney For Complainant
Howard C. Jones, II, Attorney at Law 105 West Fourth Street, Suite 400-E Winston-Salem, NC 27101 Attorney for Mount Airy/Surry County Airport Authority Hugh B. Campbell, III 235 E. Independence Blvd. PO Box 1846 Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030 Attorney for the City ofMount Airy, North Carolina

Edwin M. Woltz Edwin M. Woltz, Attorney at Law, PLLC 119 Rawley Avenue Mount Airy, NC 27030 Phone (336) 786-5556 Fax (336) 789-0651 woltz@woltzlaw.us
### Opinion issued September 29, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 00002
- CV

——————————— CLELIA DE LA CRUZ , Appellant

V. JOSE LUIS DURAN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2014
- 09053

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Clelia De La Cruz, filed a notice of nonsuit on February 17, 2015, stating she no longer desired to prosecute this “suit” against appellee, Jose Luis Duran. This Court issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on April 21, 2015, noting that appellan t’s Notice of Nonsuit was not a motion to dismiss in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1, but that it led the Court to believe this appeal was moot. Thus,2

we stated the appeal might be dismissed unless any party responded to the notice within 10 days of the date of the notice. No response was filed. No opinion has issued. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
**Exhibit**** 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Shaw Hong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

Dated: March 11, 2011

 
|       | By:        | **/s/ SHAW HONG**                                 |
|------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|       |       | **Shaw Hong**                                     |
|       |       | *Chief Executive Officer, President and Director* |
| ** ** | ** ** | *(Principal Executive Officer)*                   |

 

 

I, Anson Chan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

Dated: March 11, 2011

** **
|       | By:        | **/s/ ANSON CHAN**                             |
|------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|
|       |       | **Anson Chan**                                 |
|       |       | *Chief Financial Officer*                      |
| ** ** | ** ** | *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
INDIANA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (INARNG) DRINKING WATER 

PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Warsaw Armory, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army National 

Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act 

(SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the American 

public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to ensure the 

EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: March 2020

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory’s ability to detect

Future Testing Event: March 2023

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Indiana National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 317-247-3105

Office E-mail Address: ng.in.inarng.list.pao@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Marryan Sproat < marryan_sproat@yahoo.com> 

Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:43 AM 

Faulk, Scott (OST); EAS (OST) 

EAS KAULAPAPA 

IMG_20131126_000l.pdf; IMG_20131126_0002.pdf 

Aloha Department of Transportation(DOT), 

,;_;: --

Hi my name is Marian Sprout and we are head of the Mule trip and Coffee Store located in Kalae 

Near Kalaupapa Hike!Trail. 

On behalf of the Molokai community, we decided that it would be much easier to collect signatures 

from 

local citizens who wants to support Mokulele Airlines to provide inter-island flights to Kalaupapa. 

The patition shows signatures & addresses of residences, so no signature will be stated as fault. 

1
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 380 

To provide for the establishment of a task force within the Bureau of Justice 

Statistics to gather information about, study, and report to the Congress 

regarding, incidents of abandonment of infant children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2009 

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 

Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for the establishment of a task force within 

the Bureau of Justice Statistics to gather information 

about, study, and report to the Congress regarding, incidents of abandonment of infant children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Infant Abandonment 

5 Prevention Act of 2009’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 380 IH

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF TASK FORCE. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General, acting 

3 through the Director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 

4 shall establish a task force (to be known as the ‘‘Task 

5 Force on Infant Abandonment’’) to carry out the fol6 lowing: 

7 (1) Collecting information from State and local 

8 law enforcement agencies and child welfare agencies 

9 regarding incidents of abandonment of an infant 

10 child by a parent of that child. 

11 (2) Maintaining that information in a com12 prehensive database. 

13 (3) Studying that information and making find14 ings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding 

15 that information. 

16 (4) Submitting reports in accordance with this 

17 section. 

18 (b) INFORMATION INCLUDED.—The information re19 ferred to in subsection (a) shall include information with 

20 respect to the following: 

21 (1) The prevalence of such incidents. 

22 (2) The demographics of such children and 

23 such parents. 

24 (3) The factors that influence the decision of 

25 such parents to abandon such children. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 380 IH

1 (4) The circumstances surrounding such aban2 donments, including the time, place, and manner of 

3 such abandonments. 

4 (5) The outcomes for such children and such 

5 parents after such abandonments. 

6 (6) Trends and variations in the matters set 

7 forth in paragraphs (1) through (5). 

8 (c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘infant 

9 child’’ means a child not more than 12 months of age. 

10 (d) REPORTS.—Not later than one year after the date 

11 of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the 

12 task force shall submit a report to the Congress detailing 

13 its methodology, findings, conclusions, and recommenda14 tions. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly report of Collectible  Concepts Group,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending August 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Paul S. Lipschutz,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc.  and will be retained by
Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:   September 28, 2004                           By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
                                                        ----------------------
                                                     Paul S. Lipschutz
                                                     Principal Financial Officer