alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 1073

WAYNE G U GEL , Plaintiff

- Appellant , and DOLORES STEGELIN; ANNE H. RACK , Plaintiffs ,

v.
PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , Defendant

- Appellee , and SHURWEST, LLC , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 3:21

- cv - 01444

- BHH )

Submitted : November 21, 2023 Decided: January 18, 2024

Before NIEMEYER and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1073 Doc: 22 Filed: 01/18/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: Robert Rikard, Jeremy C. Hodges, RIKARD & PROTOPAPAS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. D. Quattlebaum, Jonathan D. Klett, HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina; Todd M. Fuller, CARLTON FIELDS, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1073 Doc: 22 Filed: 01/18/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM: Wayne Gugel appeals the district court’s orders granting Pacific Life Insurance Company’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to dismiss Gugel’s South Carolina law claims for aiding and abetting the breach of a fiduciary duty and negligent misrepresentation and
d enying Gugel’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(b) motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s
orders

. Gugel v. Pac. Life Ins. Co.
., No. 3:21

- cv - 01444

- BHH ( D.S.C. Mar. 18, 20 22 & Dec. 21, 2022 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1073 Doc: 22 Filed: 01/18/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00243

- CR

SAMUEL CRAWFORD PATTERSON

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 361st District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 00251

- CRF

- 361

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Samuel Crawford Patterson appealed the trial court’s judgment of conviction. He

now moves to dismiss the appeal , citing the parties have reached an agreement in the

underlying criminal proceeding

. Patterson and his attorney have signed the motion

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a).

A ccordingly, Patterson’s motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is

dismissed. Id

.

TOM GRAY

Chief JusticePatterson v. State Page 2 Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Rex Davis 1

Motion granted

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed July 13 , 2022

Do not publish

[CR25]

1 The Honorable Rex Davis, Senior Justice (Retired) of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment

of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX

. G OV ' T C ODE §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
       (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: February 13, 2009
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibChief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0717

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LYNDSEY MAE LALICKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until January 3, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 2 2021

12/02/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0717
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration April 17, 2015 [Disaster Declaration #14266 and #14267]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of New York dated 04/09/2015. *Incident:*
                         Apartment Building Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         03/06/2015. *Effective Date:*
                         04/09/2015. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/08/2015. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/11/2016.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster:
                    ( print page 21793) *Primary Counties:*
                     Schenectady. *Contiguous Counties:* New York: Albany, Montgomery, Saratoga, Schoharie. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.813Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14266 5 and for economic injury is 14267 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is New York. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: April 9, 2015. Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-08972 Filed 4-17-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3841 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3841

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal carryover basis 
 for decedents dying in 2009, to increase the estate tax exemption to 
 $5,000,000, and to reduce the maximum estate and gift tax rate to 45 
                                percent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 2009

 Mr. Schrader introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal carryover basis 
 for decedents dying in 2009, to increase the estate tax exemption to 
 $5,000,000, and to reduce the maximum estate and gift tax rate to 45 
                                percent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business and Family Farm 
Estate Tax Relief Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. RETENTION OF ESTATE TAX; REPEAL OF CARRYOVER BASIS.

    (a) In General.--Subtitles A and E of title V of the Economic 
Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, and the amendments 
made by such subtitles, are hereby repealed; and the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such subtitles, and amendments, had 
never been enacted.
    (b) Sunset Not To Apply.--Section 901 of the Economic Growth and 
Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to title V of 
such Act.
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--Subsections (d) and (e) of section 511 
of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, and 
the amendments made by such subsections, are hereby repealed; and the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such subsections, 
and amendments, had never been enacted.

SEC. 3. MODIFICATIONS TO ESTATE AND GIFT TAX.

    (a) $5,000,000 Applicable Exclusion Amount.--Subsection (c) of 
section 2010 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
applicable credit amount) is amended by striking all that follows ``the 
applicable exclusion amount'' and inserting ``. For purposes of the 
preceding sentence, the applicable exclusion amount is $5,000,000.''.
    (b) Freeze Maximum Estate and Gift Tax Rates at 45 Percent.--
Paragraph (1) of section 2001(c) of such Code is amended by striking 
the last 3 items in the table and inserting the following new item:

``Over $1,500,000............................  $555,800, plus 45 percent of the excess of such amount over
                                                $1,500,000.''.
 

    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to estates of decedents dying, and gifts made, after December 31, 
2009.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1451

BONNIE G. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS; LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INCORPORATED; DART TRANSPORTATION; WILBUR E. JOHNSON; GARY WHITE, III; JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR.; MARILYN GURLEY; J. RENE JOSEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-02-268-3-19BD) Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 23, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bonnie G. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Bonnie G. Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice her civil rights complaint. The court dismissed Smith’s complaint based in part on her failure to allege specific facts supporting her claims of conspiracy or violation of her equal protection right. Because Smith may be able to proceed with this action by amending her complaint to allege sufficient facts to state a claim, the dismissal order is not final and thus is not subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23



           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors
Horizon Financial Corp. and Subsidiary

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 333-99780 and No. 333-127178) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-155525)
of our report dated June 10, 2009 relating to the consolidated statements of
financial position of Horizon Financial Corp. and Subsidiary as of March 31,
2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes
in stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2009, and in our
same report, with respect to Horizon Financial Corp. and Subsidiary's internal
control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2009, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Horizon Financial Corp. and Subsidiary, for the
years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Bellingham, Washington
June 10, 2009

<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21297-21298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08938]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2006-24812]


Petition for Waiver of Compliance and Notice of Public Hearing; 
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 3, 2015 (80 FR 18292), the Federal Railroad 
Administration (FRA) provided notice of a public hearing to receive 
views, data, and comments regarding BNSF Railway's (BNSF) petition for 
modification and extension of its waiver of compliance from certain 
provisions of the Federal railroad safety regulations contained in 
title 49 Code of Federal Regulations part 232, Brake System Safety 
Standards for Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains and Equipment, in 
Docket Number FRA-2006-24812. The notice contained an incorrect date of 
the public hearing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Zuiderveen, Railroad Safety 
Specialist, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
(202) 493-6337, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c3f18091a09024236190508091e1a0909022c080318420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="de8daabba8bbb0f084abb7babbaca8bbbbb09ebab1aaf0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>.

[[Page 21298]]

Correction

    In the Federal Register of April 3, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015-07656, on 
page 18292, in the second column, correct the paragraph to read:
    In addition, FRA is extending the comment period for this waiver 
petition to June 21, 2015, to allow adequate time for any additional 
comments to be submitted following the public hearing on May 21, 2015.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 11, 2015.
Ron Hynes,
Director, Office of Technical Oversight.
[FR Doc. 2015-08938 Filed 4-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shant S.
Hovnanian, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2004


By:    /s/ Shant S. Hovnanian
       ----------------------
Name:  Shant S. Hovnanian
Title: Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       4
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00436-CV

IN RE STEPHANIE DUNLAP HADSALL §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 158th District Court

of Denton County (17-2904-158)

February 6, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

The court grants Relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The trial court’s 

contempt and commitment orders are void. The trial court is instructed to vacate 

both its contempt and commitment orders.

Because this court has previously ordered Relator’s release from the Denton 

County Jail pending final determination of her petition for writ of habeas corpus, no 

further action regarding her confinement is required.

It is further ordered that Real Party in Interest shall bear the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3805 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3805

To amend the Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2005 to extend by 2 years the 
period for the conduct of the electronic duck stamp pilot program under 
                               that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 13, 2009

 Mr. Wittman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2005 to extend by 2 years the 
period for the conduct of the electronic duck stamp pilot program under 
                               that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Electronic Duck Stamp Extension Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ELECTRONIC DUCK STAMP PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 4 of the Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-
266; 16 U.S.C. 718 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``3-year'' and inserting 
        ``5-year''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``3'' and inserting 
        ``5''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
          ------------------------------------------------------------
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Cristino L. Perez, the Chief Financial Officer of Resolve Staffing, Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal  quarter
     ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
     Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 19, 2003



                                                  /s/ Cristino L. Perez
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Cristino L. Perez
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

| By:    | /s/ STEPHEN WONG                                        |   |   |
|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|        |                                                         |   |   |
|        | **Stephen Wong*President and Chief Executive Officer*** |   |   |
| Date:  | **November 8, 2002**                                    |   |   |