alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J~~SED STqT

~

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~~~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

o 

lk 

~lq~ PROZ ~ G~ 2 

OV 2 8 2,r)l2 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. J. R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

This is in response to your November 20, 2012, request for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 

(EPA's) concurrence with the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) draft certification expansion memo 

to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) characterizing transuranic (TRU) waste at the Savannah 

River Site (SRS). Your request is in accordance with the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) procedures that 

are intended to ensure that DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate 

appropriately with EPA approvals for waste characterization activities at DOE TRU waste generator 

sites. We concur that DOE's latest draft certification expansion letter to include the five foot setback 

configuration (approved by EPA September 11, 2012) comports with all of EPA's existing approvals for 

CH TRU waste (debris, soils, and solids) and our recent approval of RH TRU debris waste at SRS. 

EPA issued a baseline approval of the SRS-CCP's CH TRU waste characterization program on July 10, 

2006 (See A-98-49; II-A4-64 in the EPA Air pocket) and the RH TRU (non BCL) waste 

characterization program on April 18, 2012 (See A-98-49; II-A4-161 in the EPA Air pocket). EPA has 

also received and reviewed quarterly tiering reports covering Tier 2 changes to the waste 

characterization program implemented by CCP at SRS and have found all changes made to be 

acceptable. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft certification expansion memo for 

SRS-CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9422 or Rajani 

Joglekar at (202) 343-9462. 

Sincerely, 

-~ 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable * Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 1001/o Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Tom Morgan, CBFO 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO 

Court Fesmire, CBFO QA 

Site Documents
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2707 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to improve a program that provides 

livestock disaster assistance, and for other purposes 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 10, 2021 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to improve a program 

that provides livestock disaster assistance, and for other 

purposes 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Livestock Disaster Re5 lief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL AGRICULTURAL DISASTER ASSIST7 ANCE. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 1501(a)(4)(A) of the Ag9 ricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9081(a)(4)(A)) is amendVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:33 Aug 12, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2707.IS S2707

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2707 IS

1 ed by inserting ‘‘and unweaned cattle’’ after ‘‘dairy cat2 tle’’. 

3 (b) LIVESTOCK FORAGE DISASTER PROGRAM.—Sec4 tion 1501(c)(3) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 

5 9081(c)(3)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (C)(iii)(I)— 

7 (A) in item (aa), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

8 end; 

9 (B) in item (bb), by striking ‘‘by’’ at the 

10 end and inserting ‘‘or’’; and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(cc) the national average 

13 corn price per bushel for the 3- 

14 month period immediately pre15 ceding that March 1; by’’; and 

16 (2) in subparagraph (D)(ii)(II)— 

17 (A) in item (aa), by striking ‘‘3’’ and in18 serting ‘‘4’’; 

19 (B) in item (bb), by striking ‘‘4 monthly’’ 

20 and inserting ‘‘6 monthly’’; and 

21 (C) in item (cc), by striking ‘‘an amount 

22 equal to’’ and all that follows through the pe23 riod at the end and inserting the following: ‘‘an 

24 amount equal to— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2707 IS

1 ‘‘(AA) in the case of a 

2 county with a normal graz3 ing period of not less than 8 

4 months, 8 monthly pay5 ments using the monthly 

6 payment rate determined 

7 under subparagraph (B); or 

8 ‘‘(BB) in the case of a 

9 county with a normal graz10 ing period of less than 8 

11 months, 1 monthly payment 

12 for each month of the nor13 mal grazing period for that 

14 county, using the monthly 

15 payment rate determined 

16 under that subparagraph.’’. 

17 (c) EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOR LIVESTOCK, 

18 HONEY BEES, AND FARM-RAISED FISH.—Section 

19 1501(d) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 

20 9081(d)) is amended— 

21 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

22 (A) by inserting ‘‘(including drought)’’ 

23 after ‘‘adverse weather’’; and 

24 (B) by striking ‘‘, that are not covered 

25 under subsection (b) or (c)’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 2707 IS

1 (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘(including 

2 transportation costs)’’ after ‘‘shortages’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

File Name: 20a0672n.06

No. 20-3152

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CORTEZES DIMING,

Defendant-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE NORTHERN 

DISTRICT OF OHIO

BEFORE: MOORE, GILMAN, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Cortezes Diming pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. And 

because two of the firearm’s serial numbers1 were worn off (which Diming concedes), his

presentence investigation report concluded that U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4)(B)’s enhancement for 

possessing a firearm with “an altered or obliterated serial number” should apply. The district court 

disagreed; it reasoned that the enhancement applies only if the serial number became less legible 

because someone acted with “some element of intentionality” and that instances of negligence or 

“regular wear and tear” would be insufficient. This conclusion led to a lower base offense level 

and ultimately resulted in a ten-month term of imprisonment. 

1At the sentencing hearing, a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives special 

agent testified that when the gun was originally stamped, its serial number had seven digits—a “T” 

followed by “six numerics.”
No. 20-3152

United States v. Diming

-2-

We agree with the government that the district court’s narrow view of the enhancement 

caused it to improperly calculate the Guidelines range, which rendered the sentence procedurally 

unreasonable. See United States v. Mack, 808 F.3d 1074, 1084 (6th Cir. 2015). This is because 

the district court did not have the benefit of our decision in United States v. Sands, 948 F.3d 709 

(6th Cir. 2020), which we issued a few weeks after the court sentenced Diming. In Sands, we

clarified that § 2K2.1(b)(4) applies if the serial number “is materially changed in a way that makes 

accurate information less accessible.” Id. at 715 (citation omitted). We further explained that 

because § 2K2.1(b)(4)(B) is a strict liability enhancement, it “make[s] no distinction between serial 

numbers that have been obliterated intentionally from those numbers that have otherwise been 

obliterated by forces of nature.” Id. at 718 (citation omitted). Thus, whether the changes to the 

serial number were intentional (or not) “play[s] no role in the analysis.” Id. 

Because Sands expressly rejected the district court’s standard that included intent as a 

requirement, we vacate Diming’s sentence and remand for resentencing with instructions to apply 

the enhancement in light of Sands and his concession that the firearm’s serial number was missing 

digits.
<PAGE>


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





      We hereby consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.  333-20851,  333-58009 and 333-86521),
of AlphaNet Solutions,  Inc. and its wholly-owned  Subsidiary (the "Company") of
our  report  dated  February  22,  2001  relating  to  the  Company's  financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey
March 23, 2001
Exhibit 32.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc., (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 29, 2004 |  | /s/    MICHAEL S.
LISS 
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|Dated: March 29, 2004 |  | /s/    JON A.
DELUCA   
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, W. Gordon Lancaster, Chief Financial Officer, of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that:  (a)
    
    the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2004 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related
interpretations; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. * * * Chief Financial Officer By:
    
    /s/ W. Gordon Lancaster

W. Gordon Lancaster
 Date: May 07, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Robert C. Howell, Chief Financial Officer of Organetix, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1)     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 18, 2006

/s/ Robert C. Howell
-----------------------
Robert C. Howell
Chief Financial Officer
### Section 5

Demonstration that GRIC has Sufficient Personnel and Resources to Develop, Implement and Enforce AQMP. See Attachment D ofTAS: 

# +Narrative ofGRIC's Capabilities to Effectively Administer CAA Programs 

# + GRIC DEQ Organizational Chart 

# + GRIC AQMP Ordinances
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ ISOM W. HARRIS, IV, Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

______________________
2024

- 1786

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF

- 844E

- 18

- 0486

- I

- 1

.

______________________ O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the pe tition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

July 19, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 19, 2024 Case: 24-1786 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 07/19/2024
2012 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-21-2012

Wilson v. Superintendent SCI Huntingdon

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 11-1720

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2012 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Wilson v. Superintendent SCI Huntingdon" (2012). 2012 Decisions. Paper 966.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012/966
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

__________

No. 11-1720

__________

FRED WILSON, Appellant

v.

SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HUNTINGDON; 

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 2-09-cv-04797)

District Judge: The Honorable John R. Padova

ARGUED April 17, 2012

BEFORE: SCIRICA, AMBRO, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion Filed May 16, 2012)

__________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

__________

It is ordered that the opinion in the above case, filed on May 16, 2012, be amended 

as follows:

On the first page of the caption, delete “[Argued]” after Adrian N. Roe, Esq.

This amendment does not change the date of filing, May 16, 2012.

By the Court,

Circuit Judge

/s/ Richard L. Nygaard

Dated: 21 May 2012
p.1 

OAR Box 1490 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

42) IV-C-15 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/4/2008 11:51:47 AM Sheet 42 of 273 
P.2 

PES 

A MACTEC COMPANY 

A-94-52 

Pacific Environmental Ser _ „ _ . _ 

5001 South Miami Boulevard, bu.w JLL-J~ •* 

P.O. BOX 12077 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 

Office: 919/941-0333 Fax: 919/941-0234 

Home Page: www.mactec.com 

February 20, 2002 

Mr. Mike Cassidy 

Kohler Company 

Mail Stop 009 

Kohler, WI 53044 

Dear Mike: 

;FE8 11 m 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

FEB 2 0 2002 

- ^ : 

Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today. Per our conversation, I am 

forwarding a copy ofthe August 27,1993, response submitted by R. David Lundy to Bruce 

Jordan, US EPA, on the Brownwood, TX, facility. 

As I mentioned, based on the public comment letters for the Brownwood and Spartanburg 

facilities, we would like to update our database with the most recent information (e.g., calendar 

year 2001) data on the HAP contents on the resins and gel coats used at both of these facilities. 

Therefore, we are requesting the total HAP content (total HAP is sufficient, you do not need to 

break it down by type of HAP monomer) ofeach resin and gel coat used at each facility and the 

relative amount (by weight) ofeach resin used and gel coat used at each facility. This level of 

detail is being requested to allow us to determine the relative ranking of these facilities in the 

database. Lastly, if it is not considered confidential, could you provide the total resin usage and 

the total gel coat usage (separately, not combined totals) at each facility in calendar year 2001? 

This will help us in our effort for re-costing the proposed standard. 

Ifthe level of detail requested above is not readily available, then ranges of HAP contents 

for resins and gel coats (as we discussed) with an approximation ofthe weighted average HAP 

content for resins and for gel coats may be sufficient. 

Thank you for any help you can provide. If you have any questions concerning this 

request, please call me at 919-941-0333. If you wish to speak to the EPA Project Lead, his name 

is Keith Barnett and he can be reached at 919-541-5605. 

Sincerely, 

Kenneth R. Meardor 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

krmeardon@,mactec.com 

919-941-0333 (phone) 

919-941-0234 (fax) 

Enclosure
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Click Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael W. Ferro, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.
| Date: May 16, 2005 | /s/ MICHAEL W. FERRO, JR.                                             |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| * *                | Michael W.  Ferro, Jr.                                                |
| * *                | *Chief  Executive Officer and*

* Chairman of the Board of Directors* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Click Commerce, Inc. and will beretained by Click Commerce, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
# AC **C CPI Saf** **et y**  **& Health Tr** **aining Thr** **ough Sept**  **ember 2011** 

**August 2011**  **September 2011 To** **tal Through September**  **2011** Job Description Fully Complete Fully Complete Fully Complete In Progress

Instructor Online Instructor Online Instructor Online Started, not finished Applicator 2 44 1 34 85 478 290 Helper 26 88 39



## Te **st Scor** **es thr** **ough Sept**  **ember 2011**  **100% 90**  **- 99%**  **70 -**  **89%** Pe rcent achieving test scores 46% 45% 9% Helper 2 7 1 5 26 88 39 Other 3 31 12 95 135 696 393 Supervisor 1 26 31 32 111 315 301 To tal **8 108**  **45 166**  **402 1743**  **1023** 

## To**tal Students Fully Completed Thr** **ough Sept**  **ember 2011**  **To tal Students**  **Started or Finished**  **Thr ough**  **Sept ember**  **2011 2145**  **3168**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MIKECHEL BROOKER,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 528 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

13

- 3815
M&R Helicopters LLC, et al v. FAA

FAA

- 2010

- 1211



### O R D E R
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 3(a)(2) and 3rd Cir. LAR Misc. 107.2(a), it is

ORDERED that the above

- captioned case is hereby dismissed for failure to timely prosecute insofar as p etitioner failed to retain counsel to represent M & R Helicopters, LLC . It is
FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this order be issued forthwith as the in lieu of a formal man date.
For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Dated: January 10, 2014 JK/cc: Michael B. Selig Federal Aviation Administration Charles Raley, Esq. Case: 13-3815 Document: 003111503496 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/10/2014
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03516

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   334,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (334,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.02


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Partners of 

Star Gas Partners, L.P.: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements No. 333-100976 on Form S-3 and No. 333-49751 on Form S-4 of Star Gas Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries of our report dated December 6, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofStar Gas Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partner’s capital and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended September 30, 2007, the related financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, which report appears in the September 30, 2007 annual report onForm 10-K of Star Gas Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries. 

KPMG LLP 

Stamford, Connecticut 

December 6, 2007