alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT TO APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                 AMENDED AND RESTATED 1995 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


    This  amendment  is  executed  this  11th day of May,  2006,  by  Applebee's
International, Inc. (the "Company").

    WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Applebee's International,  Inc. Amended
and Restated 1995 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan");

    WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to revise the tax withholding
provisions to comply with applicable accounting rules; and

    WHEREAS,  in accordance  with  Section 12.1 of the Plan, this Amendment does
not require the approval of the stockholders of the Company.

    NOW, THEREFORE,  effective as of May 11, 2006, the Plan is hereby amended as
follows:

    1. Sections 13.1 and 13.2 are amended to read in their entirety as follows:

    13.1 Withholding  Requirements.  Prior to the delivery of any Shares or cash
pursuant to an Award (or the exercise thereof), the Company shall have the power
and the right to deduct or withhold,  or require a  Participant  to remit to the
Company,  an amount  that does not  exceed  the  minimum  statutory  withholding
required by Federal (including FICA), state and local tax authorities, including
the   Participant's   share  of  payroll  taxes  that  are  applicable  to  such
supplemental taxable income.

    13.2  Withholding  Arrangements.  The Committee,  in its sole discretion and
pursuant to such  procedures  as it may specify from time to time,  may permit a
Participant to satisfy such tax withholding obligation,  in whole or in part, by
(a) electing  to have the Company  withhold  otherwise  deliverable  Shares,  or
(b) delivering to the Company Shares then owned by the Participant having a Fair
Market  Value  equal to the amount  required to be  withheld.  The amount of the
withholding  requirement  shall not exceed  the  minimum  statutory  withholding
required by Federal (including FICA), state and local tax authorities, including
the   Participant's   share  of  payroll  taxes  that  are  applicable  to  such
supplemental  taxable income. The Fair Market Value of the Shares to be withheld
or delivered  shall be  determined as of the date that the taxes are required to
be withheld.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the company has caused this Plan to be adopted as of May 11,
2006.

                                        APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                        "Company"

                                        By: /s/ Rebecca Tilden
                                           --------------------------
                                        Title:  Vice President
                                              -----------------------
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I,Patrick P. Fourteau, the Chief Executive Officer and President of ScielePharma, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to thebest of my knowledge, that:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| October 31, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Patrick P. Fourteau                              |
|------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|             |   | Name: Patrick P. Fourteau                            |
|             |   | Title: *Chief Executive Officer  and President* |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Sciele Pharma, Inc. and will beretained by Sciele Pharma, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

----
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4195 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Peace Corps Commemorative Foundation 

to establish a commemorative work in the District of 

Columbia and its environs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4195 RFS

1 SECTION 1. MEMORIAL TO COMMEMORATE THE ESTAB2 LISHMENT OF THE PEACE CORPS AND TO 

3 HONOR THE IDEALS UPON WHICH IT WAS 

4 FOUNDED. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH COMMEMORA6 TIVE WORK.—The Peace Corps Commemorative Founda7 tion may establish a commemorative work on Federal land 

8 in the District of Columbia and its environs to commemo9 rate the formation of the Peace Corps and to honor the 

10 ideals upon which the Peace Corps was founded. 

11 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO12 RATIVE WORKS ACT.—The establishment of the com13 memorative work shall be in accordance with chapter 89 

14 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the 

15 ‘‘Commemorative Works Act’’). 

16 (c) USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS PROHIBITED.—Federal 

17 funds may not be used to pay any expense of the establish18 ment of the commemorative work. The Peace Corps Com19 memorative Foundation shall be solely responsible for ac20 ceptance of contributions for, and payment of the expenses 

21 of, the establishment of the commemorative work. 

22 (d) DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.—If, upon payment 

23 of all expenses for the establishment of the commemora24 tive work (including the maintenance and preservation 

25 amount required by section 8906(b)(1) of title 40, United 

26 States Code), or upon expiration of the authority for the 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4195 RFS

1 commemorative work under section 8903(e) of title 40, 

2 United States Code, there remains a balance of funds re3 ceived for the establishment of the commemorative work, 

4 the Peace Corps Commemorative Foundation shall trans5 mit the amount of the balance to the Secretary of the Inte6 rior for deposit in the account provided for in section 

7 8906(b)(3) of title 40, United States Code. 

8 SEC. 2. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

9 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

10 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

11 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

12 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

13 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

14 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro15 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

16 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
4. Lease Section 4.1.1, Initial Term Base Rent, shall reflect that theTenant’s monthly base rental amount of $35,572.50 will continue through March 31, 2010.Beginning April 1, 2010 and continuing through March 31, 2011, the new monthly base rentalamount shall be TWENTY-SEVEN THOUSAND EIGHTY-THREE and 33/100 DOLLARS ($27,083.33).5. Lease Section 4.1.2, Renewal Term Base Rent, shall reflect the Tenant’smonthly base rental amount during the Renewal Term shall be TWENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND EIGHTHUNDRED THIRTY AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($28,830.00).     Except as amended hereby, all other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain unchangedand in full force and effect.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment of Lease to be duly executedthe day and year first above written.         Attest:   REGIONAI INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT      CORPORATIONOF SOUTHWESTERN      PENNSYLVANIA           /s/David P. Myron VP & Treasurer   By /s/Donald F. Smith, Jr. Donald F. Smith, Jr., President           (CorporateSeal)                 Attest:   TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.           /s/Jennifer M. Reinke   By /s/Sara M. Antol               Title: Secretary & G.C.  (Corporate Seal)
8085

#### STATE *EX REL.*LYON, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. BRADY.

Nuisance. — When a respondent in an action to enjoin a nuisance files a return showing a complete abandonment in good faith of the nuisance and a discontinuance of the same within the jurisdiction of the Court, and that he does not contemplate doing any of the acts alleged in the petition as a nuisance within the jurisdiction of the Court, the petition will he dismissed with costs to the petitioner.

Petition in the original jurisdiction' of tire Court by Hoo. J. Fraser Lyon, Attorney General, against P. A. Brady *et al.*

*331
      *Attorney Geheral J. Fraser Lyon,*for petitioner.

*Messrs. Nelson, Nelson & Gettys,*contra.

January 8, 1912.

The following order was filed):

Per Curiam.

Returns to the rule to 'show cause 'herein issued having 'been made by the respondieotsi, Charles J. Lynch, J. W. Rice, A. N. Elirodl, F. W. Airmbrusber and T. A. Heise, and said return being sufficient in that they show a complete abatement and' discontinuance in good1 faith of the alleged nuisance within the jurisdiction of this Court, and the declaration that the respondents do not contemplate doing any of the -acts alleged in the petition herein a© a nuisance, within the jurisdiction of this Court,

It is ordered, that the petition and rule to show cause herein be dismissed.

That the respondents herein do pay the costs- of this pro ceeding, and' that the same be taxed and adjusted by the clerk and submitted to -the Court for approval.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10612

Summary Calendar

DENNIS RAY WALKER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ALEXANDER M. KALMANOV,

Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:97-CV-179

-------------------- January 31, 2001

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Dennis Ray Walker (#655576), a state prisoner, has appealed

the district court's order granting the motion for summary judgment

of Dr. Alexander M. Kalmanov and the district court's judgment

dismissing Walker's civil rights action as frivolous.

Walker contends that the district cou rt erred in dismissing

his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) because he was not

proceeding in forma pauperis ("IFP") in the district court. The

district court's error was harmless. Section 1915A(b)(1), 28

U.S.C., requires the dismissal of frivolous claims and ap pliesNo. 00-10612

-2-

regardless whether the prisoner has paid a filing fee. S ee Ruiz v.

United States , 160 F.3d 273, 274 (5th Cir. 1998).

Walker contends that the district court erred in granting Dr.

Kalmanov's motion for summary judgment. Walker complains that Dr.

Kalmanov "continually ejected" Walker from the Medical Department;

that Dr. Kalmanov altered his medical records ; that Dr. Kalmanov

removed him from the Tele-Med program, preventing him from having

access to specialists; that Dr. Kalmanov cancelled medications

which would have relieved his pain and suffering; that Dr. Kalmanov

t old another doctor that Walker was a "'troublemaker'"; that Dr.

Kalmanov overprescribed an antibiotic in order to clear his

condition prior to an examinatio n by Dr. Kalmanov's supervisor;

that Dr. Kalmanov's affidavit and the district court's opinion were

inaccurate in failing to discuss examinations of Walker by Dr.

K almanov on May 14, 1996, July 2, 1996, August 22, 19 96, and

September 11, 1996; and t hat Dr. Kalmanov's supervisor changed

Walker's medication after examining Walker in March 1997. The

summary judgmen t evidence does not show that Dr. Kalmanov was

d eliberately indifferent to Walker's serious medical needs. S ee

Norton v. Dimazana , 122 F.3d 286, 292 (5th Cir. 1997); Varnado v.

Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991).

Walker argues that Dr. Kalmanov retaliated against him by

ejecting him fromthe infirmary after his discussion with Walker

regar d ing Walker's pending civil action against Dr. Kalmanov.

Walker has failed to present summary judgment evidence showing that

there is a ge nuine issue regarding the questions whether Dr.

Kalmanov was motivat ed to retaliate against him and whether Dr.No. 00-10612

-3-

Kal manov's ejection of Walker from the infirmary was materially

adverse. S ee Johnson v. Rodriguez

, 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir.

1997); Woods v. Smith , 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995).

The judgment is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.5


 


Spherix Independent Board
of Directors Compensation


(Approved by the Board on 5/25/10)


 


Below
is the Compensation Committee’s recommendation regarding annual compensation
for outside, independent Board of Directors:


 


	
  Annual
  Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  5,000

  	
   

  	
  To
  be paid in cash at May Board Meeting annually.

  
	
  Stock
  Options

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  10,000

  	
   

  	
  To
  be calculated by dividing $10,000 by the closing stock price the day the
  Stock Options are awarded; and at the May Board Meeting annually
  thereafter. The Options will vest in full on the day of award and will be
  exercisable for a period of five (5) years.

  
	
  Board
  Meeting Fees

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,500

  	
   

  	
  To
  be paid for all in-person Board Meetings. Members must be present to be paid.

  
	
  Committee
  Meeting Fees

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  800

  	
   

  	
  To
  be paid for all in-person Committee Meetings. Members must be present to be
  paid.

  
	
  Teleconference
  Fees

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  300

  	
   

  	
  To
  be paid for all teleconferences called by either the Chairman of the Board,
  the President, or by the Chairman of the relevant Committee. Members must be
  on-line to be paid.

  
	
  Additional
  Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,000

  	
   

  	
  To
  be paid to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
ex-1019.htm


Non-Employee Director Fee Schedule








	
Annual Board Retainer

	
$65,000 ($25,000 in the form of cash and $40,000 in the


form of restricted stock vesting May 31, 2011.)


	  	  
	
Lead Director Annual Retainer:

	
$10,000


	  	  
	
Committee Chair Annual Retainer:

	  
	
Audit

	
$10,000


	
Compensation

	
$  5,000


	
Governance

	
$  5,000


	
Loan

	
$  5,000


	
Trust

	
$  2,500


	
NAII

	
$  1,000


	
CDC

	
$  1,000


	Foundation	$  1,000 
	 	  
	
Meeting Fees:

	  
	
Board

	
$  1,500


	
Committee Chairs

	
$  1,000


	
Committee Members

	
$  1,000
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14259 and #14260]; [RHODE ISLAND Disaster #RI-00013]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Rhode Island dated 04/06/2015. *Incident:*
                         Condo Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         03/11/2015.
 DATES: *Effective:*
                         04/06/2015. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/05/2015. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/06/2016.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Kent. *Contiguous Counties:* Rhode Island: Bristol, Providence, Washington. Connecticut: New London, Windham. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.813Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14259 5 and for economic injury is 14260 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Rhode Island, Connecticut. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: April 6, 2015. Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-08968 Filed 4-17-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edwin Molina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. this report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the 1934 Act, and  2. the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the registrant's financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.  By: /s/ Edwin Molina ----------------------------------- Name: Edwin Molina Title: President and Chief Executive Officer  Date:August 15, 2011
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4087 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on nylon woolpacks used to 

package wool. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2009 

Mr. NUNES (for himself, Mr. CONAWAY, and Mr. REHBERG) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on nylon 

woolpacks used to package wool. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NYLON WOOLPACKS USED TO PACKAGE WOOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.12 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 nylon woolpacks used to package wool) is amended by 

7 striking the date in the effective period column and insert8 ing ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4087 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.25



 Exhibit 10.25 

Summary of Demand Loan 

Ms. Hanying Li, chief executive officer of Tianli Agritech, Inc. (“Tianli”), has advanced funds to Wuhan Fengze Agricultural Science and
Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“Fengze”), a Chinese company controlled by Tianli through contracts with Tianli’s wholly owned subsidiary, Wuhan Fengxin Agricultural Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”), a
Chinese limited liability company. The aggregate amount of such funds as of March 31, 2010 was $564,421. Such funds were advanced pursuant to an oral loan agreement (the “loan”). The principal terms of the loan are as follows: 

  

	1.	The loan is payable on demand by Ms. Li. 

  

	2.	The loan bears no interest. 

  

	3.	Ms. Li will not be entitled to demand repayment of the loan prior to January 1, 2011. 


 

	4.	Ms. Li may not demand repayment at any time that Fengze lacks sufficient cash to repay the loan without becoming insolvent or, in the opinion of Fengze’s
management, materially harming Fengze’s liquidity. 

  

	5.	Fengze shall have the ability to repay the loan in whole or in part at any time, provided that it has sufficient cash to do so without becoming insolvent or, in the
opinion of Fengze’s management, materially harming Fengze’s liquidity.
# Q U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION! 

### i 

# D

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ) ) ) ) )

### ~.UG 

## l 7 Z015 

## HE.ARII\lG DOCKET In the Matter of:
REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION FDMS Docket FAA-2013-0852 FAA Case No. 2010GL110030

COMPLAINANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL Pursuantto section 233(a) ofthe Rules ofPractice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions, 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(a), the Complainant hereby appeals the initial decision ofAdministrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin inthis matter, served July 27, 2015.

Respectfully submitted, Peter J. Lynch Assistant ChiefCounsel

for Enforcement, AGC-300 

# J James W. Tegtmeier, Manager, Midwest Enforcement Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 2300 E. DevonAvenue, Room 479 Des Plaines, IL 60018 (847) 294-7058 Dated: August 11, 20152 CERTIFICATE 

### OF SERVICE I hereby certify that onthis date I have sentby U.S. mail, postage prepaid, certified return-receipt requested, two copies ofthe Complainant's Notice ofAppeal In the Matter of Regent Aerospace Corporation, FDMS DocketFAA-2013-0852, FAA Case No. 20lOGLll0030, addressed to: JohnS. Hoff, Esq. Jeffrey Clement, Esq. HoffLaw Group Suite 3300 135 S. LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60603-4134 In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, certified return-receipt requested, the original and one copy ofthe foregoing document to: Hearing Docket Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Bldg., Suite 2Wl000

# cJ~'T 

# dlwllrw - Dated: August ll, 2015