22144 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

10. Protection of Children From 

Environmental Health Risks 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have concluded this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves a 

special local regulation issued in 

conjunction with a regatta or marine 

parade. This rule is categorically 

excluded from further review under 

paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the 

Commandant Instruction. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0181 to 

read as follows: 

§ 165.T07–0181 Safety Zone; Low Country 

Splash, Charleston, SC. 

(a) Regulated Areas. The following 

regulated area is a moving safety zone: 

all waters 50 yards in front of the lead 

safety vessel preceding the first race 

participants, 50 yards behind the safety 

vessel trailing the last race participants, 

and at all times extend 100 yards on 

either side of the race participants and 

safety vessels. The Low Country Splash 

swimming race consists of a 5 mile 

course that starts at Daniel Island Pier 

on the Wando River, crosses the main 

shipping channel of Wando River at 

Hobcaw Point, and finishes at the 

Charleston Harbor Resort Marina. 

(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated 

representative’’ means Coast Guard 

Patrol Commanders, including Coast 

Guard coxswains, petty officers, and 

other officers operating Coast Guard 

vessels, and Federal, state, and local 

officers designated by or assisting the 

Captain of the Port Charleston in the 

enforcement of the regulated areas. 

(c) Regulations. 

(1) All persons and vessels are 

prohibited from entering or transiting 

through the regulated areas unless 

authorized by the Captain of the Port 

Charleston or a designated 

representative. 

(2) Persons and vessels desiring to 

enter or transit through the regulated 

areas may contact the Captain of the 

Port Charleston by telephone at (843) 

740–7050, or a designated 

representative via VHF radio on channel 

16, to request authorization. If 

authorization to enter or transit through 

the regulated areas is granted by the 

Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative, all persons 

and vessels receiving such authorization 

must comply with the instructions of 

the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 

designated representative. 

(3) The Coast Guard will provide 

notice of the regulated areas by Local 

Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, and on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Effective Date. This rule is 

effective on Saturday, May 30, 2015, 

and will be enforced from 7:30 a.m. 

until 9:45 a.m. 

Dated: April 9, 2015. 

B.D. Falk, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of 

the Port Charleston. 

[FR Doc. 2015–09048 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2015–0227] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone, Block Island Wind Farm; 

Rhode Island Sound, RI 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish a 500-yard safety zone around 

each of five locations where the Block 

Island Wind Farm (BIWF) wind turbine 

generator (WTG) foundations will be 

constructed in the navigable waters of 

the Rhode Island Sound, RI, from July 

1 to September 30, 2015. These safety 

zones are intended to safeguard 

mariners from the hazards associated 

with construction of the BIWF WTG 

foundations. Vessels will be prohibited 

from entering into, transiting through, 

mooring, or anchoring within these 

safety zones while construction vessels 

and associated equipment are present, 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port (COTP), Southeastern New England 

or the COTP’s designated representative. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules 22145 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before May 21, 2015. Requests for 

public meetings must be received by the 

Coast Guard on or before May 12, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2015–0227 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket 

Management Facility (M–30), U.S. 

Department of Transportation, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries 

accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except federal 

holidays. The telephone number is 202– 

366–9329. 

See the ‘‘Public Participation and 

Request for Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for further instructions on 

submitting comments. To avoid 

duplication, please use only one of 

these three methods. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, contact Mr. Edward G. LeBlanc, 

Waterways Management Division at 

Coast Guard Sector Southeastern New 

England, telephone 401–435–2351, 

email Edward.G.LeBlanc@uscg.mil. If 

you have questions on viewing or 

submitting material to the docket, call 

Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms 

BIWF Block Island Wind Farm 

FR Federal Register 

NTM Notice To Mariners 

WTG Wind Turbine Generator 

A. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http://

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

1. Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2015–0227), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http://

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http://

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an email address, 

or a telephone number in the body of 

your document so that we can contact 

you if we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, type the 

docket number [USCG–2015–0227] in 

the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a 

Comment’’ on the line associated with 

this rulemaking. 

If you submit your comments by mail 

or hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

2. Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, type the 

docket number (USCG–2015–0227) in 

the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rulemaking. You may also visit the 

Docket Management Facility in Room 

W12–140 on the ground floor of the 

Department of Transportation West 

Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

3. Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

4. Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one, using one of the methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

B. Regulatory History and Information 

The Coast Guard has not promulgated 

a rule regarding construction of the 

BIWF WTG foundations. 

C. Basis and Purpose 

The legal basis for the proposed rule 

is 33 U.S.C., 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 

701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; and 

Department of Homeland Security 

Delegation No. 0170.1, which 

collectively authorize the Coast Guard 

to establish safety zones. 

This rule is necessary to provide for 

the safety of life and navigation, for both 

workers and the boating public, within 

the vicinity of the BIWF in Rhode Island 

Sound, RI. 

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes to establish 

a 500-yard safety zone around each of 

five locations where the BIWF WTG 

foundations will be constructed in the 

navigable waters of the Rhode Island 

Sound, RI, from 1 July to 30 September 

2015. Locations of these platforms are: 

Platform Latitude Longitude 

WTG 1 ....... 41° 7.544′ N .. 71° 30.454′ 

W. 

WTG 2 ....... 41° 7.196′ N .. 71° 30.837′ 

W. 

WTG 3 ....... 41° 6.886′ N .. 71° 31.268′ 

W. 

WTG 4 ....... 41° 6.612′ N .. 71° 31.747′ 

W. 

WTG 5 ....... 41° 6.383′ N .. 71° 32.259′ 

W. 

These safety zones are intended to 

safeguard mariners from the hazards 

associated with construction of the 

BIWF WTG foundations. Vessels will be 

prohibited from entering into, transiting 

through, mooring, or anchoring within 

these safety zones while construction 

vessels and associated equipment are 

present unless authorized by the COTP, 

Southeastern New England or the 

COTP’s designated representative. 

E. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
22146 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

1. Executive Order 12866 and Executive 

Order 13563 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, as supplemented 

by Executive Order 13563, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. 

We expect the adverse economic 

impact of this proposed rule to be 

minimal. Although this regulation may 

have some adverse impact on the 

public, the potential impact will be 

minimized for the following reasons: 

Although these safety zones will be in 

effect from 1 July 2015 to 30 September 

2015, vessels will only be restricted 

from the zones during periods of actual 

construction activity; the BIWF is 

located approximately three miles 

offshore of Block Island and the safety 

zone are only 500-yards in radius 

centered on the five BIWF WTG 

foundation locations, allowing plenty of 

room for vessels to pass without having 

to divert a long distance around the 

construction areas. 

Notification of BIWF construction 

activity and the effective enforcement 

periods of the associated safety zones 

will be made to mariners through the 

Rhode Island Port Safety Forum, and 

local and broadcast NTMs. 

2. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 

(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires federal agencies to consider the 

potential impact of regulations on small 

entities during rulemaking. The term 

‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this proposed rule will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

This proposed rule would affect the 

following entities, some of which might 

be small entities: owners or operators of 

vessels intending to enter, transit, moor, 

or anchor within 500 yards of the five 

BIWF WTG foundation construction 

locations. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rulemaking would economically 

affect it. 

3. Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rulemaking would affect your 

small business, organization, or 

governmental jurisdiction and you have 

questions concerning its provisions or 

options for compliance, please contact 

the person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. The Coast Guard 

will not retaliate against small entities 

that question or complain about this 

proposed rule or any policy or action of 

the Coast Guard. 

4. Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

expenditure, we do discuss the effects of 

this rule elsewhere in this preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) (2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

10. Protection of Children From 

Environmental Health Risks 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rulemaking is not an 

economically significant rule and would 

not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that might 

disproportionately affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action appears to be one of a 

category of actions which do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules 22147 

significant effect on the human 

environment. 

A preliminary environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

is available in the docket where 

indicated under ADDRESSES. These 

safety zones are intended to safeguard 

mariners from the hazards associated 

with wind farm construction activity. 

Vessels will be prohibited from entering 

into, transiting through, mooring, or 

anchoring within these safety zones 

while construction vessels and 

associated equipment are present unless 

authorized by the Captain of the Port 

(COTP), Southeastern New England or 

the COTP’s designated representative. It 

appears that this action will qualify for 

Coast Guard Categorical Exclusion 

(34)(g), as described in figure 2–1 of the 

Commandant Instruction. 

We seek any comments or information 

that may lead to the discovery of a 

significant environmental impact from 

this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 165 

reads as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T0227 to read as follows: 

§ 165.T0227 Safety Zone, Block Island 

Wind Farm; Rhode Island Sound, RI. 

(a) Location. Areas within a 500-yard 

radius of the following five positions are 

safety zones: 

Platform Latitude Longitude 

WTG 1 ......... 41° 7.544′ N. 71° 30.454′ 

W. 

WTG 2 ......... 41° 7.196′ N. 71° 30.837′ 

W. 

WTG 3 ......... 41° 6.886′ N. 71° 31.268′ 

W. 

WTG 4 ......... 41° 6.612′ N. 71° 31.747′ 

W. 

WTG 5 ......... 41° 6.383′ N. 71° 32.259′ 

W. 

(b) Enforcement Period. From 1 July 

to 30 September 2015, vessels will be 

prohibited from entering into any of 

these safety zones, when enforced, 

during construction activity of five 

Block Island Wind Farm (BIWF) wind 

turbine generators (WTG) located in the 

positions listed in 2(a) above. 

(c) Definitions. The following 

definitions apply to this section: 

Designated representative. A 

‘‘designated representative’’ is any Coast 

Guard commissioned, warrant or petty 

officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has 

been designated by the Captain of the 

Port, Sector Southeastern New England 

(COTP), to act on his or her behalf. 

(d) Regulations. (1) The general 

regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23 

as well as the following regulations 

apply to the safety zones established in 

conjunction with the construction of the 

Block Island Wind Farm; Rhode Island 

Sound, RI. These regulations may be 

enforced for the duration of 

construction. 

(2) Vessels may not enter into, transit 

through, moor, or anchor in these safety 

zones during periods of enforcement 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port (COTP), Southeastern New England 

or the COTP’s designated representative. 

Vessels permitted to transit must 

operate at a no-wake speed, in a manner 

which will not endanger construction 

vessels or associated equipment. 

(3) Failure to comply with a lawful 

direction from the Captain of the Port 

(COTP), Southeastern New England or 

the COTP’s designated representative 

may result in expulsion from the area, 

citation for failure to comply, or both. 

Dated: April 1, 2015. 

J.T. Kondratowicz, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Southeastern New England. 

[FR Doc. 2015–09036 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2015–0209; FRL–9926–46– 

Region 4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; North Carolina; 

Charlotte; Base Year Emissions 

Inventory and Emissions Statement 

Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour 

Ozone Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

state implementation plan revision 

submitted by the State of North 

Carolina, through North Carolina 

Department of Environment and Natural 

Resources, on July 7, 2014, to address 

the base year emissions inventory and 

emissions statement requirements for 

the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient 

air quality standards (NAAQS) for the 

State’s portion of the Charlotte GastoniaRock Hill, North Carolina-South 

Carolina Area. Annual emissions 

reporting (i.e., emission statement) and 

a base year emissions inventory are 

required for all ozone nonattainment 

areas. The Area is comprised of the 

entire county of Mecklenburg and 

portions of Cabarrus, Gaston, Iredell, 

Lincoln, Rowan and Union Counties in 

North Carolina; and a portion of York 

County in South Carolina. EPA will 

consider and take action on the South 

Carolina submission for the emissions 

inventory and emissions statement for 

its portion of this Area in a separate 

action. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before May 21, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2015–0209 by one of the following 

methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: R4–ARMS@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2015– 

0209,’’ Air Regulatory Management 

Section (formerly the Regulatory 

Development Section), Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch (formerly the 

Air Planning Branch), Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae 

Benjamin, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal 

holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane 

Spann, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS