22164 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Notices 

1See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 79 FR 

43710 (July 28, 2014). 

2See the memoranda to Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, from Jeff Pedersen, 

International Trade Analyst, Office IV, 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

entitled, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review’’ dated January 13, 2015 and February 11, 

2015 and the memorandum to Gary Taverman, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

from Valerie Ellis, International Trade Analyst, 

Office IV, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, entitled, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review’’ dated March 16, 2015. 

3For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Memorandum from Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, entititled ‘‘Preliminary Rescission of 

the 2013–2014 Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China’’ issued concurrently 

with and hereby adopted by this notice 

(‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’). 

4See Memorandum from Jeffrey Pedersen, 

International Trade Analyst, Office IV AD/CVD 

Operations, to Howard Smith, Acting Director, 

Office IV, AD/CVD Operations entitled ‘‘2013–2014 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or 

Not Assembled into Modules, from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Bona Fide Sales 

Analysis for Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics 

Co., Ltd.’’ dated concurrently with and hereby 

adopted by this notice (‘‘Bona Fide Sales Analysis 

Memorandum’’). 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

1,821,891. 

Estimated Time per Response: 5 

seconds to 2 hours per response. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 78,576 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: April 16, 2015. 

Mickelson, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015–09095 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–979] 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules, From the People’s Republic 

of China: Preliminary Rescission of 

2013—2014 Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting a new 

shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of the 

antidumping duty order on crystalline 

silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or 

not assembled into modules (solar 

cells), from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’). The NSR covers one 

exporter and producer of subject 

merchandise, Hengdian Group DMEGC 

Magnetics Co., Ltd. (‘‘DMEGC’’). The 

period of review (‘‘POR’’) is December 1, 

2013, through May 31, 2014. The 

Department preliminarily determines 

that DMEGC’s sale to the United States 

was not bona fide; therefore, we are 

preliminarily rescinding this NSR. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on the preliminary results of 

this review. 

DATES: Effective: April 21, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffrey Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 28, 2014, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of a new 

shipper review of the antidumping duty 

order on solar cells from the PRC.1 The 

Department subsequently issued an 

antidumping duty questionnaire, and 

supplemental questionnaires, to DMEGC 

and received timely responses thereto. 

Also, interested parties submitted 

comments on surrogate country and 

surrogate value selection. The 

Department extended the deadline for 

issuing the preliminary results of this 

review until April 7, 2015.2

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, 

and modules, laminates, and panels, 

consisting of crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic cells, whether or not 

partially or fully assembled into other 

products, including, but not limited to, 

modules, laminates, panels and building 

integrated materials.3 Merchandise 

covered by this review is classifiable 

under subheadings 8501.61.0000, 

8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030, 

and 8501.31.8000 of the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, our 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Methodology 

The Department is conducting this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’) and 19 CFR 

351.214. For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and in the 

Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the internet at http://www.trade.gov/ 

enforcement/. The signed Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum and the 

electronic versions of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Preliminary Rescission of the 

Antidumping New Shipper Review of 

DMEGC 

As discussed in the Bona Fide Sales 

Analysis Memorandum,4 the 

Department preliminarily finds that the 

sale made by DMEGC to the United 

States is not a bona fide sale. The 

Department reached this conclusion 

based on the totality of circumstances 

surrounding the reported sale, 

including, among other things, the price 

and quantity of the sale and DMEGC’s 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Notices 22165 

5See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 

6See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

7See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

8See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

9See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

10See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 

6041, 6042 (February 4, 2015). 

11For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011). 

1See Laminated Woven Sacks from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 

2014, 80 FR 4537 (January 28, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary 

Continued 

failure to provide evidence that the 

subject merchandise was resold at a 

profit. Because the non-bona fide sale 

was the only reported sale of subject 

merchandise during the POR, and thus 

there are no reviewable transactions on 

this record, we are preliminarily 

rescinding the instant administrative 

review. See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

Because much of the factual information 

used in our analysis of DMEGC’s sale 

involves business proprietary 

information, a full discussion of the 

basis for our preliminary determination 

is set forth in the Memorandum to 

Howard Smith, Acting Director, AD/

CVD Operations, Office IV, ‘‘Preliminary 

Bona Fide Sales Analysis for Hengdian 

Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.,’’ 

dated April 7, 2015, which is on the 

record of this proceeding. 

Public Comment 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of the preliminary 

results of review.5 Rebuttals to case 

briefs may be filed no later than five 

days after the briefs are filed. All 

rebuttal comments must be limited to 

comments raised in the case briefs.6

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing must submit a written request 

to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement & Compliance, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, within 30 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice.7 Requests should contain the 

party’s name, address, and telephone 

number, the number of participants, and 

a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral 

argument presentations will be limited 

to issues raised in the briefs. If a request 

for a hearing is made, the Department 

intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, at a date and 

time to be determined.8 Parties should 

confirm by telephone the date, time, and 

location of the hearing two days before 

the scheduled date. 

All submissions, with limited 

exceptions, must be filed electronically 

using ACCESS. An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by the Department’s 

electronic records system, ACCESS, by 

5 p.m. Eastern Time (‘‘ET’’) on the due 

date. Documents excepted from the 

electronic submission requirements 

must be filed manually (i.e., in paper 

form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in 

Room 18022, and stamped with the date 

and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the 

due date.9

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this NSR, which will 

include the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in any briefs received, no 

later than 90 days after the date these 

preliminary results of review are issued 

pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

‘‘Act’’). 

Assessment Rates 

If the Department proceeds to a final 

rescission of DMEGC’s NSR, the 

assessment rate to which DMEGC’s 

shipments will be subject will not be 

affected by this review. However, the 

Department initiated an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on solar cells from the PRC covering 

numerous exporters, including DMEGC, 

and the period December 1, 2013 

through November 30, 2014, which 

encompasses the POR of this NSR.10

Thus, if the Department proceeds to a 

final rescission, we will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

continue to suspend entries during the 

period December 1, 2013 through 

November 30, 2014 of subject 

merchandise exported by DMEGC until 

CBP receives instructions relating to the 

administrative review of this order 

covering the period December 1, 2013 

through November 30, 2014. 

If the Department does not proceed to 

a final rescission of this new shipper 

review, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1), we will calculate 

importer-specific (or customer) 

assessment rates based on the final 

results of this review. However, 

pursuant to the Department’s refinement 

to its assessment practice in NME cases, 

for entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales database submitted by 

DMEGC, the Department will instruct 

CBP to liquidate such entries at the 

PRC-wide rate.11

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Effective upon publication of the final 

rescission or the final results of this 

NSR, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(e), the Department will instruct 

CBP to discontinue the option of posting 

a bond or security in lieu of a cash 

deposit for entries of subject 

merchandise by DMEGC. If the 

Department proceeds to a final 

rescission of this new shipper review, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the PRC-wide rate for DMEGC because 

the Department will not have 

determined an individual margin of 

dumping for DMEGC. If the Department 

issues final results for this new shipper 

review, the Department will instruct 

CBP to collect cash deposits, effective 

upon the publication of the final results, 

at the rates established therein. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 7, 2015. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Scope 

2. Bona Fide Sales Analysis 

[FR Doc. 2015–09206 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–916] 

Laminated Woven Sacks From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On January 28, 2015, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

‘‘Department’’) published the 

Preliminary Results 1 of the 2013–2014 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES