alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Airspan Networks, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Aronstam, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    PETER ARONSTAM                               
|Peter AronstamChief Financial OfficerAugust 13, 2003



A signed original of this
statements required by Section 906 has been provided to Airspan Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Airspan Networks, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3873 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Anthracenesulfonic acid, 1-amino-9, 

10-dihydro-4-[ [4-[[methyl[(4-methylphenyl) sulfony]amino]methyl]pheny] 

amino]-9, 10-dioxo-, sodium salt (1:1). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2009 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Anthracenesulfonic 

acid, 1-amino-9, 10-dihydro-4-[ [4-[[methyl[(4- 

methylphenyl) sulfony]amino]methyl]pheny] amino]-9, 

10-dioxo-, sodium salt (1:1). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-ANTHRACENESULFONIC ACID, 1-AMINO-9, 10- 

4 DIHYDRO-4-[ [4-[[METHYL[(4-METHYLPHENYL) 

5 SULFONY]AMINO]METHYL]PHENY] AMINO]-9, 

6 10-DIOXO-, SODIUM SALT (1:1). 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3873 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Anthracenesulfonic acid, 1- 

amino-9, 10-dihydro-4-[ [4- 

[[methyl[(4-methylphenyl) 

sulfony]amino]methyl]pheny] 

amino]-9, 10-dioxo-, sodium 

salt (1:1) (CAS No. 72828– 

82–1) (provided for in subheading 2921.59.80) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

5 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Frank, McClanahan and Senior Judge Willis 

JULIA M. GREENWAY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2115-06-4 PER CURIAM 

 MAY 15, 2007 

JOHN B. GREENWAY 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY 

R. Terrence Ney, Judge 

 (Polly B. Knight; Knight & Stough, LLP, on briefs), for appellant. 

Appellant submitting on briefs. 

 (Drake T. Brodin, on brief), for appellee. Appellee submitting on 

brief. 

 Julia M. Greenway (wife) appeals from the circuit court’s July 27, 2006 final decree 

awarding John B. Greenway a divorce a vinculo matrimonii. On appeal, wife lists eight questions 

presented, challenging the court’s equitable distribution and child support rulings. Upon review of 

the record and briefs of the parties, we dismiss this appeal for wife’s failure to comply with the 

requirements of Rule 5A:20(d). 

ANALYSIS

 In her opening brief, wife included no statement of facts and recites in argument only 

selected factual assertions without providing a fair recitation of all the evidence bearing on the 

issues raised. 

 Rule 5A:20(d) requires an appellant’s opening brief to include “[a] clear and concise 

statement of the facts that relate to the questions presented, with references to the pages of the 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
 - 2 - 

transcript, written statement, record, or appendix.” Because this Court “will not search the record 

for errors in order to interpret the appellant’s contention and correct deficiencies in a brief,” 

Buchanan v. Buchanan, 14 Va. App. 53, 56, 415 S.E.2d 237, 239 (1992), we will not consider a 

“Question Presented” that is unsupported by the requirements of Rule 5A:20. See, e.g., Barrs v. 

Barrs, 45 Va. App. 500, 512, 612 S.E.2d 227, 232-33 (2005); Courembis v. Courembis, 43 

Va. App. 18, 26, 595 S.E.2d 505, 509 (2004). 

 Wife set forth no statement of facts relating to her questions presented. By failing to provide 

such a statement of facts, wife has failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 5A:20(d). 

“[S]tatements unsupported by argument, authority, or citations to the record do not merit 

appellate consideration.” Buchanan, 14 Va. App. at 56, 415 S.E.2d at 239. Thus, we will not 

consider these issues on appeal. 

 Accordingly, wife’s appeal is dismissed. 

Dismissed.
P.1 

OAR Box 1126 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

29)11-1-151 

Docket Number: 

A-83-22 

Printed 4/18/2008 9:58:22 AM Sheet 29 of 182 
3

.2 

/9-^naxj^jr-/^/ 

,federal cRegister /.;y,iA:^^ioJl^!.f Mqnday,SJulyi;29!,i-1985- /•iNotices^ £30791^ 

'ma y make their'^ 

••• :'i '&\i.iaia&^iskj^ 

^eai*vi 

'•va^I?. i-ni-iffiPMjnj^nfl-m-ttgFn and atrPMfid i-vK&ptyWltFfiP' 

V - s^fdi8ajMf4ifo'.n^ pwaaea; 

*_. ...mmmim}.. 

_ __ ^ ^te^g^^^^w^nayellieirjisgdriimai 

#Ifcndt ^ 

L#£,(CCQ? 

inolexoeiedtiieni 

__ i-;on*»,ey^.th£e£y^^ 

go, 

3«^fe 

^'-^•^'-qroiHaHiirauuiui'Ui.icuusire 

afeyaiheasuramien 

v

'a^/%athe-criteria. dirough 

•,prpgrama<)f the Agency and the States^ r^ ,. „„^ 

V a^The AgencyJs considering developments T^ 

:> ;,and .approval of methods for a%f&JJy -a.;, ba>ii^iJH0^ye^1at ^'j^b^^^A^^onc d eyeiywee Y?^ f P .W^Y^^;/'a 

•'measurementsu^^ 

•SF'. ran once-eye 

-'^J i - S --.aa^i,-i\-faa—^•?•^••^fa-^iaar'.La -'£*• : 

.: .Impacts 

;;:l;metals'c 

/because _____.__ __,._..______ __._.. ... i_. „_.___ _T^.__j__.__„.,>_;_._- ,i_.Vft_ -,_„T.J., ;....„..,.......,......,.,.,....... ............ 

• -'/ca 

r

oxidatibii 'states; and p] .these ciiteriii'; applying'the-iiite^^ 
P.3 

m.. 

.^'.'SfflTSliifV •Federal•• Register /. Vol. /50, No; 145-/ M6hday;i'JufyV2ffi^^^ 

s developed < 

' basis. However.at: thi8:time» no '-EPAw, •J mbr-a-than ontia fev&iy'. 

! *'-%^er^e.^thMourfday';a 

m&A' 

se':ri%-more ^dehti 

?..l:.^<'-.'Novenlb(8fa2SlBfeli»1 

ie ffl;;:i^a^ffie*Bsult<6f:coii 

M^tifr 

ia*'--*" La, 

iou8i: 3efitiied.®'Genti 

i-SSaa 

ll^^aiTheirUses^ ^ 

$!'**',;'. P oSsl ^ 

^Vv-;^'species is very sensitive,-saltwater'-5''-"''v'>'''''models^dr unstressed'wd 8^8^;^' ^ 

iunless M ^poHaht 8pei;iesJ8:^p^;^ .„, 

sensitive.'' However;* a concentration tliat;

 !!'i*. 

would beverely harm 50 percerit'of the' 

^ u^.^Mk-MA-tftflttll
<PAGE>



                                                               EXHIBIT 21.1


                     SUBSIDIARIES OF DOANE PET CARE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                JURISDICTION OF       PERCENTAGE
NAME                                            FORMATION             OWNED
----                                            ---------             -----
<S>                                             <C>                   <C>
DPC Investment Corp                               Delaware               100%

Doane Pet Care (Europe) ApS                       Denmark                100%

A/S Arovit Pet Food                               Denmark                100%

DPC International Limited                         United Kingdom         100%

Ipes Iberica, S.A.                                Spain                  100%

Doane Pet Care (UK) Limited                       United Kingdom         100%

Arovit Petfood Deutschland G.m.b.H.               Germany                100%

A/S Arovit Petfood Norway                         Norway                 100%

Arovit Petfood France s.a.r.l.                    France                 100%

Arovit Petfood Italia S.R.L.                      Italy                  100%

Arovit Petfood Spain, S.A.                        Spain                  100%

Arovit Petfood UK Ltd.                            United Kingdom         100%

Arovit Petfood Benelux B.V.                       The Netherlands        100%

Carat Tiernahrungsgesellschaft m.b.H.             Austria                100%

Pyramid Pet Equipment ApS                         Denmark                100%

Doane/Windy Hill Joint Venture L.L.C.             Texas                  100%

ZAO Crona                                         Russia                  51%

Effeffe S.p.A.                                    Italy                   50%

Doane International Pet Products LLC              Delaware                50%

</TABLE>
OREGON ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (ORARNG) DRINKING WATER PFAS 

SNAPSHOT 

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at the 

Oregon Youth Challenge Program, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. 

Additionally, Army National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the 

Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water 

supplied to the American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base 

drinking water to ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is 

not exceeded.

Test Date: August 2023

PFOA + PFOS Results: Not Detected

Future Testing Event: Summer 2025

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Oregon National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 971-355-3530

Office E-mail Address: OMD_PublicAffairs@omd.oregon.gov

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC, BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, INC., EUROPLAY CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, CLARIA

INNOVATIONS, LLC, MONTO HOLDINGS PTY LTD.,
Movants

- Appellants

-------------------------------------------------

AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., Plaintiffs

- Appellee s

v.

PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC, LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Defendants

-------------------------------------------------

PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC, LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Plaintiffs

v.

TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC., Defendant

- Appellee

_______ _______________

2023

- 2181

______________________ Case: 23-2181 Document: 57 Page: 1 Filed: 02/08/2024IN RE : PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC 2
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in Nos. 5:18

- cv

- 00767

- BLF,

5:18

- cv

- 05619

- BLF, 5:18

- md

- 02834

- BLF, Judge Beth Labson Freeman.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

P ER C URIAM

.
O R D E R

Europlay Capital Advisors, LLC, Claria Innovations,LLC, Monto Holdings Pty Ltd. and Brilliant Digital Entertainment, Inc. move to dismiss the above

- captioned appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b).

Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. and
Twitch Inte ractive, Inc. respond s.

Upon consideration the reof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
The motion is granted to the e xtent that the above

- captioned appeal is dismissed with no costs.

February 8, 202 4
Date F OR THE C OURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: February 8, 2024 Case: 23-2181 Document: 57 Page: 2 Filed: 02/08/2024
Opinion filed No vember 13, 20 08



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

__________ 

### No. 1 1- 08 -0 02 32 -CR

____ ____ __ DA RRELL D EE F ORE MA N, Ap pellant

V. STA TE OF TEX AS , A ppellee On App eal from the 266th Distric t Court

Erath County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR 12987
M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N The jury convicted D arr ell Dee For eman, upon his plea of g uilty , of unlawf

ul possession of a fire arm, found the enhanc ement alleg ation to be true, and asse ssed his punishment at confineme nt fo r t we nty y e ars . We a ff

ir m. Appellant’s c ourt-appointed c o u n s e l h a s f il e d a mo ti o n to withdraw. The motion is supported by a br ie f i n w hic h c ouns e l pr of e ssi on a lly and c on sc ie nti ou sly

e xami ne s the re c or d a

nd a pp lic a ble law and states that she has conclude d that the appeal i s frivolous. Counsel has provided a ppellant wi th a c op y of the br ie f a

nd a dv ise d a

pp e lla nt of hi s r ig ht t o r e vie w t he re c or d a

nd fi le a re sp on se2

to counsel’s brie f. A re sponse has not bee n filed. Court-appointed c ounsel has complied with the require ments of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 3 86 U. S. 7 38 (1 96 7) ; In re Sc hulman , 2 5 2 S. W. 3 d 4 0 3 ( T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 08 ); Sta

ffo rd v . S tate , 8 13 S.W. 2d

50 3 (Tex
. Cr im
. Ap p. 19 91 ); Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W. 2d 80 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gai no us v . S

tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); and Ea de n v . S tate , 161 S.W .3d 173 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2005, no pet.)
. Following the proce dures outlined in An de rs , we have indepe ndently revie wed the r ecor d, and we a g re e that the a

pp e a l is wi tho ut me ri t. We not e that couns e l ha s th e re sp on sib ili ty to a dv ise a pp e lla nt t hat he may

fi le a pe tit ion fo r d isc re tio na

ry re vie w b y

the Te xas C ourt

of Cr imi na l App e a ls. Ex parte Owe ns , 206 S.W .3d 670 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) . L ikewise, this court a dvises appellant that he may file a petition f or discretionar

y revie w pursuant to T EX . R. A PP . P. 66. Blac k v . S tate , 217 S.W .3d 687 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2007, no pet.)
. The motion to withdraw is g rante d, and the judg ment is affirme d.
PER C URI AM
November

13, 2008 Do not publish. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , an d

S t r an g e , J.
Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") by Schlotzsky's, Inc. ("Registrant"), the
undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | /s/JOHN C. WOOLEYName: John C. Wooley
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 31, 2003
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Schlotzsky's, Inc. and will be retained by Schlotzsky's, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, James S. Cox, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advent Software, Inc.;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
| April 29,   2015                                  |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                   |   |
| /s/   James S. Cox                                     |   |
| James   S. Cox                                         |   |
| Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| (Principal   Financial and Accounting Officer)         |   |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40717

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HERBERT LIMBI VILLAGRAN

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CR-134-ALL

Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Herbert Limbi Villagran appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction for transportation of illegal aliens by means of a motor

vehicle for private financial gain. Villagran argues that the district court erred

in increasing his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6) after finding

that the offense “involved intentionally or recklessly creating a substantial risk

of death or serious bodily injury to another person.” The question whether a

defendant’s conduct creates a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 16, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40717

2

is a legal question, and therefore is reviewed de novo. United States v. SolisGarcia, 420 F.3d 511, 514 (5th Cir. 2005).

The record reflects that Villagran was driving a tractor trailer carrying

five illegal aliens. Three of the five aliens were inside of a box under the bunk

of the sleeping compartment. The box under the bunk was not intended for

human travel. Because the aliens were in a closed compartment, the aliens

could not easily communicate with the driver of the vehicle. Moreover, if the

tractor trailer had been involved in an accident, no one would think to look for

injured passengers in the compartment under the bunk. Given that three of the

five aliens that Villagran concealed under the bunk in the sleeper compartment

faced a greater risk than ordinary passengers traveling without seatbelts, the

district court’s adjustment under § 2L1.1(b)(6) was not error. Id. at 516 (5th Cir.

2005).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      13,867
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             0
<LOANS>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             301,265
<DEPOSITS>                                       0
<SHORT-TERM>                               973,100
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         66,317
<LONG-TERM>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                        10
<OTHER-SE>                                (738,162)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             301,265
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            247,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (247,929)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0
<LOANS-NON>                                      0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    0
<RECOVERIES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0


</TABLE>