alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          JUN-30-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1998
[CASH]                                               0
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                     0
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                       0
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           12,725
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                 10,000,000
[COMMON]                                     1,255,142
[OTHER-SE]                                           0
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                         0
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                      725
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                      0
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                     (725)
[EPS-BASIC]                                          0
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.2**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 No. 333-32062 pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan of Learning Tree International, Inc., and Form S-8 No. 333-103372 pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan of Learning Tree International, Inc., ofour report dated April 23, 2007, with respect to the fiscal year 2006 and 2005 consolidated financial statements of Learning Tree International, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 28, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

McLean,Virginia 

December 10, 2007
Exhibit 4.1

 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 

  NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON

 2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN, N.Y. 11217

 May 25, 2010

 Hennion & Walsh, Inc.

2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza

Parsippany, New Jersey 07054

 Smart Trust, Value Architects Disciplined Core Portfolio Trust, 2010 Series C Dear Sirs:

 The Bank of New York Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Value Architects Disciplined Core Portfolio Trust, 2010 Series C set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on May 25, 2010, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (File No. 333-166147) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.

	  	  	Very truly yours,    
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ DEBORAH A. OWENS 

      
      

      
        Vice President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.

March 31, 2006

/s/STEPHANIE G. DIMARCOStephanie G. DiMarco Chief Executive Officer and President


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Petition for Exemption or Rulemaking 14 CFR § 11.81 “section 333.” 

To whom it may concern, 

My name is Jean-Mario Moril. I am a co-owner of eaglelens photography based out of San Diego, CA. My 

partner (Wassef Karmal) and I would like to apply for the stated exemption in order to be fully in 

compliance with the FAA rules and regulations. Our business model is to provide aerial imaging that will 

allow businesses to better promote their brand. 

We use some of the latest technological advanced drones to ensure safety to both persons and 

property. Our standard operating procedure includes a three man team. One that flies the drone, one 

that operates the camera/video, and one that serves as an observer to ensure safety from start to finish. 

Operating equipment includes; 

Dji Inspire 1 with dual remote function 

Tornado H920 

Typhoon Q500+ 

Website: http://www.eaglelensphotography.com/
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

HAROLD KING A/K/A HAROLD 

KEENE,

Appellant,

v.

MARGO GEORGE,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00184-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 4

of Travis County, Texas

(TC# C-1-CV-16-005327)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. It 

appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes no other 

order with respect thereto. We further order this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2017.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Carbon Nanotubes

Sample

ID #

Date of

Sample

Sample Time

in Mins

Total Air

Flow (L/Min)

Date of

Results

CN

St

1 15-Nov-10 156 780 22-Nov-10 No 

2 15-Nov-10 240 1200 22-Nov-10 No 

3 16-Nov-10 240 1200 7-Dec-10 No 

4 16-Nov-10 420 2100 7-Dec-10 No 

5 16-Nov-10 420 2100 7-Dec-10 No 6 17-Nov-10 80 400 7-Dec-10 No 7 18-Nov-10 120 600 7-Dec-10 

8 18-Nov-10 240 1200 7-Dec-10 

9 18-Nov-10 240 1200 15-Dec-11 No 

10 19-Nov-10 240 1200 15-Dec-11 

11 19-Nov-10 60 300 15-Dec-11 No 

12 29-Nov-10 120 600 15-Dec-11 No 

13 29-Nov-10 180 900 15-Dec-11 No 

14 30-Nov-10 240 1200 15-Dec-11 No 

15 30-Nov-10 120 600 15-Dec-11 No 

17 29-May-13 420 2100 12-Jun-13 No 

18 31-May-13 420 2100 12-Jun-13 No 

Note: Samples taken using a SKC Leland LegacyNote: Cassette, MCE, 0.8um, 37mm, 3 Piece, Pre-BandedAnalysis used : NIOSH Method 7402

** COMPA
Carbon Nanotubes

Sample

ID #

Location Description of Sample Date of

Sample

Sample

Time

(Mins)

Pump

Flow

(L/Min)

Total Air

Flow (L)

Date of

Results

1 22 Dec 10 240 5 1200 6 Jan 11 2 28 Dec 10 300 5 1500 6 Jan 11 

3 5 Jan 11 240 5 1200 6 Jan 11 

4 7 Jan 11 300 5 1500 6 Jan 11 5 17 Jan 11 2880 0 0 27 Jan 11 6 17 Jan 11 1200 5 6000 27 Jan 11 7 19 Jan 11 N/A 0 0 27 Jan 11 

8 18 Jan 11 1260 5 6300 27 Jan 11 9 20 Jan 11 360 5 1800 22 Feb 11 

10 31 Jan 11 300 5 1500 22 Feb 11 11 1 Feb 11 300 5 1500 22 Feb 11 

12 3 Feb 11 300 5 1500 22 Feb 11 

13 4 Feb 11 360 5 1800 22 Feb 11 

14 8 Feb 11 360 5 1800 3 Mar 11 15 11 Feb 11 120 5 600 3 Mar 11 

16 24 Feb 11 420 5 2100 3 Mar 11 17 14 Jul 11 480 5 2400 22 Jul 11 

18 15 Jul 11 480 5 2400 22 Jul 11 

19 18 Jul 11 480 5 2400 22 Jul 11 

20 19 Jul 11 480 5 2400 22 Jul 11 

21 18 Nov 11 270 5 1350 15 Dec 11 22 22 Nov 11 240 5 1200 15 Dec 11 

Note: Samples taken using a SKC Leland LegacyNote: Cassette, MCE, 0.8um, 37mm, 3 Piece, Pre-BandedAnalysis used : NIOSH Method 5040 for EC

** COMPAN
**EXHIBIT 13.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report onForm 20-F/ A of Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PTTelekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk. (the “Company”) for theyearly period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Rinaldi Firmansyah, Director of Financeof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company./s/ Rinaldi Firmansyah Name: Rinaldi FirmansyahTitle:  Director of FinanceDate:  April 25, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Max Carnecchia, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Accelrys, Inc. (the Company) and I, Michael A. Piraino, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Transition Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company for the period covered by this Report.



/S/    MAX
CARNECCHIAMax Carnecchia President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 14, 2011




/S/    MICHAEL A.
PIRAINOMichael A. Piraino Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 14, 2011


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date of the Report and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 19, 2004 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                |  |                            
|                |  | John P. Manning            
|                |  | Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIMMY LEE BILLS,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

KEN CLARK, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 12-17827 

D.C. No. 2:06-cv-02223-MCEGGH

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 27, 2014**

Before: HAWKINS and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit

Judge.*** 

FILED

JUN 18 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Timothy M. Tymkovich, United States Circuit Judge

for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.
In the prior appeal of this case, Bills v. Clark, 628 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2010),

we articulated a two-part test for deciding whether a mental impairment constitutes

an “extraordinary circumstance” sufficient to equitably toll a prisoner’s time to file

a petition for habeas corpus relief under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act of 1996. 

Under the first prong, Bills explains that a mental impairment is an

“extraordinary circumstance” only when it is “so severe that either (a) petitioner

was unable rationally or factually to personally understand the need to timely file,

or (b) petitioner’s mental state rendered him unable to personally” prepare and file

the habeas petition. Bills, 628 F.3d at 1099–1100. Bills’s second prong requires

the prisoner to show that, despite his diligence, “the mental impairment made it

impossible to meet the filing deadline under the totality of the circumstances.” Id.

at 1100. Stated another way, to be eligible for equitable tolling, the otherwise

diligent petitioner’s mental impairment must be the cause-in-fact of any delay. See

Stancle v. Clay, 692 F.3d 948, 959 (9th Cir. 2012) cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 133 S.

Ct. 1465, 185 L. Ed. 2d 372 (2013). 

The district court concluded Mr. Bills has not met the second prong of Bills

because he was not “diligent in attempting to comply with the filing requirements.” 

Bills, 628 F.3d at 1101. After our own careful review of the record, and

considering the totality of the circumstances surrounding Mr. Bills’s untimely
petition, we agree with the district court that Mr. Bills has not exercised the

requisite diligence to benefit from equitable tolling. 

AFFIRMED.
fs1a10510ex10xxii_chinabct.htm


 



Exhibit 10.21







Confirmation Agreement







Party A: Guangxi Liuzhou Baicaotang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.


Party B: Jiang Youru


Party C: Guangxi Liuzhou Baicaotang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Guigang Branch







In consideration of:


Party B signed the "Personal loan / Guarantee contract"(2007,No.005) with Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Co., Ltd. Liuzhou Branch ,Longcheng Sub-Branch (hereinafter referred to as ICBC Longcheng sub-branch) on February 12 th  2007. The loan agreement  amount of RMB1,800,000 yuan ,term of the agreement for 96 months, and the repayment of the loan  principal and interest on a monthly basis equal to repay the loan principal and interest way. Party C to provide a property as collateral.







The above-mentioned loan of party B actually for the Party A using.


To crystallize A ,B, C parties’ rights and obligations of the above-mentioned loan, after negotiating, the parties hereby agree as follows:







Article 1


Party A actual use of all of the above-mentioned loans.


Party A confirmed that the above-mentioned loan which B borrowed the entire amount from the ICBC Longcheng sub-branch are the actual use of Party A. Party B transfer the total amount of the loan to party A’s use as a Travel section (no interest no mortgage ) before December 31 st , and list on Party A’s account of the “own travel section of Party B” From January 1 st  2009,Party A still continue to use all of the above-mentioned loans.







Article2 Party A is responsible for repayment of all the above-mentioned loans







From January 1st 2009, the two sides agree that Party A should bear the responsibility and the above loan account in full recognition in the Party A’s account as "bank loans", Party A, as the actual use of all of these loans, unconditionally undertake the obligation to repay all the loan principal and interest of Party B, until full satisfaction of principal and interest, and to bear the full cost may arise (Bonds due to the costs incurred by the creditor claims).







Article3  Party C continue to bear the responsibility of collateral.







To ensure that the "agreement" the successful fulfillment of Party C collateral duty not due to the above A and B sides of the relevant facts change confirmation, Party C continue to bear the collateral liability for the above loans.


The above facts are the confirm of A ,B, C pairs’ relevant facts.


 


This agreement is to be written up in three original copies with the Party A, B, C shall each hold one original copy, entry into force after the seal of  Party A, C and Party B sign the agreement.


 


 




  





1











  








 


Party A : Guangxi Liuzhou Baicaotang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.


Legal Representative: /s/ Huitian Tang







Party B :


Legal Representative: /s/ Jiang Youru







Party C: Guangxi Liuzhou Baicaotang Pharmaceutical Co.Ltd. Guigang Branch


Legal Representative: /s/ Huitian Tang







Date : 12/31/2008







 

 







 




2
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-28239 and 333-90399) and in the related
Prospectuses and in Form S-8 (Nos. 333-15355, 333-15353, 333-29321,
333-15349, 333-15357, 333-29319, 333-84381, 333-84373, 333-84377, 333-93397,
and 333-93249) of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated
January 27, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
February 22, 2000
## Draft Proposal CB-38

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Dwelling Unit Electric Metering (CB-38)

Objective: Simplify electrical metering requirements to indicate that the dwelling units in Use Group R

‐ 2

buildings must be separately metered.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C405.7 as follows:

C405.7 Electrical energy consumption (mandatory). In buildings having individual Every dwelling

units, provisions shall be made to determine the elec trical energy consumed by each tenant by separately

metering individual dwellin g units in Use Group R-2 buildings shall have a separate electrical meter

.

Reason: Simplification. The intent is to apply to R

‐ 2 buildings and there is no need to indicate in the

code the reason for the criterion; only what is required.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,799
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                       540
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,225
<PP&E>                                           3,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,624
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           111
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,046
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,302
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (876)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,004
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,551
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,453
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,453
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 20-12547

____________________

In Re: Mosaic Management Group, Inc.,

Debtor.

___________________________________________________

___

UNITED STATES TRUSTEE REGION 21,

Plaintiff-Appellee

Cross-Appellant,

versus

BAST AMRON LLP,

Defendant-Appellant

Cross-Appellee.

USCA11 Case: 20-12547 Document: 121-1 Date Filed: 08/08/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 20-12547

____________________

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 16-bk-20833-EPK

____________________

Before JORDAN, BRASHER, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded 

our opinion in In re Mosaic Mgmt. Grp., Inc., 71 F.4th 1341 (11th Cir. 

2023), in light of United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, 

LLC, 602 U. S. ___ (2024). United States Tr. Region 21 v. Bast Amron 

LLP, No. 23-278, 2024 WL 3089471 (U.S. June 24, 2024). We now 

vacate the bankruptcy court’s decision and remand for proceedings 

to implement the Supreme Court’s decision in Hammons.

VACATED and REMANDED.

USCA11 Case: 20-12547 Document: 121-1 Date Filed: 08/08/2024 Page: 2 of 2