Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 72 / Wednesday, April 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules 20195 

governments or small organizations are 

expected to be affected by this action. 

All 136 small businesses affected by this 

action are estimated to incur annualized 

cost impacts of less than 1%. Facilities 

eligible to use Form A (those meeting 

the appropriate activity threshold which 

have 500 pounds per year or less of 

reportable amounts of the chemical) will 

have a lower burden. Thus, this action 

is not expected to have a significant 

adverse economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. A 

more detailed analysis of the impacts on 

small entities is located in EPA’s 

economic analysis support document 

(Ref. 8). 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This action does not contain an 

unfunded mandate of $100 million or 

more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 

1531 through 1538, and does not 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments. This action is not subject 

to the requirements of UMRA because it 

contains no regulatory requirements that 

might significantly or uniquely affect 

small governments. Small governments 

are not subject to the EPCRA section 313 

reporting requirements. EPA’s economic 

analysis indicates that the total cost of 

this action is estimated to be $531,002 

in the first year of reporting (Ref. 8). 

E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the States, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175. This action relates to toxic 

chemical reporting under EPCRA 

section 313, which primarily affects 

private sector facilities. Thus, Executive 

Order 13175 does not apply to this 

action. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

The EPA interprets Executive Order 

13045 as applying only to those 

regulatory actions that concern 

environmental health or safety risks that 

the EPA has reason to believe may 

disproportionately affect children, per 

the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory 

action’’ in section 2–202 of the 

Executive Order. This action is not 

subject to Executive Order 13045 

because it does not concern an 

environmental health risk or safety risk. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211, because it is not a 

significant regulatory action under 

Executive Order 12866. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

This rulemaking does not involve 

technical standards. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

The EPA believes the human health or 

environmental risk addressed by this 

action will not have potential 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on minority, low-income or indigenous 

populations. The results of this 

evaluation are contained below. 

This action does not address any 

human health or environmental risks 

and does not affect the level of 

protection provided to human health or 

the environment. This action adds an 

additional chemical to the EPCRA 

section 313 reporting requirements. By 

adding a chemical to the list of toxic 

chemicals subject to reporting under 

section 313 of EPCRA, EPA would be 

providing communities across the 

United States (including minority 

populations and low income 

populations) with access to data which 

they may use to seek lower exposures 

and consequently reductions in 

chemical risks for themselves and their 

children. This information can also be 

used by government agencies and others 

to identify potential problems, set 

priorities, and take appropriate steps to 

reduce any potential risks to human 

health and the environment. Therefore, 

the informational benefits of the action 

will have a positive impact on the 

human health and environmental 

impacts of minority populations, lowincome populations, and children. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 372 

Environmental protection, 

Community right-to-know, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements, and 

Toxic chemicals. 

Dated: April 8, 2015. 

Gina McCarthy, 

Administrator. 

Therefore, 40 CFR part 372 is 

proposed to be amended as follows: 

PART 372—TOXIC CHEMICAL 

RELEASE REPORTING: COMMUNITY 

RIGHT-TO-KNOW 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 372 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 11023 and 11048. 

■ 2. In § 372.65, paragraph (a) is 

amended by adding in the table the 

entry for ‘‘1-Bromopropane’’ in 

alphabetical order and in paragraph (b) 

by adding in the table the entry for 

‘‘106–94–5’’ in numerical order to read 

as follows: 

§ 372.65 Chemicals and chemical 

categories to which this part applies. 

* * * * * 

(a) * * * 

Chemical name CAS No. Effective 

date 

* * * * * 

1-Bromopropane ..... 106–94–5 1/1/16 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

CAS No. Chemical name Effective 

date 

* * * * * 

106–94–5 .. 1-Bromopropane 1/1/16 

* * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–08664 Filed 4–14–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 15–88, RM–11747; DA 15– 

444] 

Television Broadcasting Services; 

Bend, Oregon 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Commission has before it 

a petition for rulemaking filed by TDS 

Broadcasting LLC (‘‘TDS’’), the licensee 

of KOHD, channel 51, Bend, Oregon, 

requesting the substitution of channel 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

20196 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 72 / Wednesday, April 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

18 for channel 51 at Bend. While the 

Commission instituted a freeze on the 

acceptance of full power television 

rulemaking petitions requesting channel 

substitutions in May 2011, it 

subsequently announced that it would 

lift the freeze to accept such petitions 

for rulemaking seeking to relocate from 

channel 51 pursuant to a voluntary 

relocation agreement with Lower 700 

MHz A Block licensees. TDS has 

entered into such a voluntary relocation 

agreement with T-Mobile USA, Inc. and 

states that operation on channel 18 

would remove any potential 

interference with authorized wireless 

operations in the adjacent Lower 700 

MHZ A Block. 

DATES: Comments must be filed on or 

before April 30, 2015, and reply 

comments on or before May 11, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, Office of the Secretary, 

445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 

20554. In addition to filing comments 

with the FCC, interested parties should 

serve counsel for petitioner as follows: 

F. William LeBeau, Esq., Holland & 

Knight LLP, 800 17th Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joyce Bernstein, Joyce.Bernstein@

fcc.gov, Media Bureau, (202) 418–1647. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 

15–88, adopted April 10, 2015, and 

released April 10, 2015. The full text of 

this document is available for public 

inspection and copying during normal 

business hours in the FCC’s Reference 

Information Center at Portals II, CY– 

A257, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, 

DC 20554. This document will also be 

available via ECFS (http://www.fcc.gov/ 

cgb/ecfs/). (Documents will be available 

electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/ 

or Adobe Acrobat.). To request this 

document in accessible formats 

(computer diskettes, large print, audio 

recording, and Braille), send an email to 

fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission’s 

Consumer and Governmental Affairs 

Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 

418–0432 (TTY). This document does 

not contain proposed information 

collection requirements subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any 

proposed information collection burden 

‘‘for small business concerns with fewer 

than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the 

Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 

2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). 

Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. Members of the public 

should note that from the time a Notice 

of Proposed Rule Making is issued until 

the matter is no longer subject to 

Commission consideration or court 

review, all ex parte contacts (other than 

ex parte presentations exempt under 47 

CFR 1.1204(a)) are prohibited in 

Commission proceedings, such as this 

one, which involve channel allotments. 

See 47 CFR 1.1208 for rules governing 

restricted proceedings. 

For information regarding proper 

filing procedures for comments, see 47 

CFR 1.415 and 1.420. 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Television. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Barbara A. Kreisman, 

Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. 

Proposed Rules 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR 

part 73 as follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336, 

and 339. 

§ 73.622 [Amended] 

■ 2. Section 73.622(i), the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments 

under Oregon, is amended by removing 

channel 51 at Bend and adding channel 

18 at Bend. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08751 Filed 4–14–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS