alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic 

and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of 

any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go 

to press. 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 18-BG-1057

IN RE MICHAEL B. ADELHOCK

2018 DDN 131

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 431566

BEFORE: Beckwith, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Ferren, Senior Judges. 

O R D E R

(FILED – December 20, 2018)

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey

that suspended respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period 

of three years or until further order of the court; this court’s October 15, 2018, order

suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline 

should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding 

reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a 

response to this court’s order to show cause or an affidavit as required by D.C. Bar 

R. XI, §14 (g), it is

ORDERED that Michael B. Adelhock is hereby suspended from the practice 

of law in the District of Columbia for a period of three years with reinstatement 

conditioned on a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010); In 

re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical 

reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not 

participate). It is 
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of 

respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar 

R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit. 

PER CURIAM
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **3 -**  **6 111** 

JACQUES PAUL VILLAFANA , P etitioner

- Appell ant ,

v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA , Respondent

- Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea stern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. James R. Spencer , District Judge. ( 3 :12

- cv - 0 0141

- JRS )

Submitted : May 30 , 2013 Decided: June 5, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jacques Paul Villafana , Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jacques Paul Villafana seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)

. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonab le jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on p rocedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Villafana has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal co ntentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## C H 3 

## N

C H 3 

## C H 2

ECOSAR Version 1.11 Results Page

SMILES : CN(C)C12CC3CC(C1)CC(C2)C3 CHEM : Dimethyladamantylamine CAS Num: 3717-40-6 ChemID1: MOL FOR: C12 H21 N1 MOL WT : 179.31 Log Kow: 3.105 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate) Log Kow: 3.330 (User Entered) Log Kow: (PhysProp DB exp value - for comparison only) Melt Pt: 275.00 (deg C, User Entered for Wat Sol estimate) Melt Pt: (deg C, PhysProp DB exp value for Wat Sol estimate) Wat Sol: 5.306 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate) Wat Sol: (User Entered) Wat Sol: (PhysProp DB exp value)

-------------------------------------- Values used to Generate ECOSAR Profile

-------------------------------------- Log Kow: 3.330 (User Entered) Wat Sol: 5.306 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

------------------------------------------------ Available Measured Data from ECOSAR Training Set

------------------------------------------------

No Data Available

-------------------------------------- ECOSAR v1.11 Class-specific Estimations

-------------------------------------- Aliphatic Amines Predicted ECOSAR Class Organism Duration End Pt mg/L (ppm)

=========================== ================== ======== ====== ========== Aliphatic Amines : Fish 96-hr LC50 4.606 Aliphatic Amines : Daphnid 48-hr LC50 0.641 Aliphatic Amines : Green Algae 96-hr EC50 0.389 Aliphatic Amines : Fish ChV 0.167 Aliphatic Amines : Daphnid ChV 0.061 Aliphatic Amines : Green Algae ChV 0.145

=========================== ================== ======== ====== ========== Neutral Organic SAR : Fish 96-hr LC50 9.413 * (Baseline Toxicity) : Daphnid 48-hr LC50 6.043 * : Green Algae 96-hr EC50 7.480 * : Fish ChV 1.063 : Daphnid ChV 0.829 : Green Algae ChV 2.575
Note: * = asterisk designates: Chemical may not be soluble enough tomeasure this predicted effect. If the effect level exceeds the water solubility by 10X, typically no effects at saturation (NES) are reported.

------------------------------ Class Specific LogKow Cut-Offs

------------------------------ If the log Kow of the chemical is greater than the endpoint specific cut-offs presented below, then no effects at saturation are expected for those endpoints.
Aliphatic Amines:

---------------- Maximum LogKow: 6.0 (Fish, Mysid LC50) Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (Daphnid LC50) Maximum LogKow: 7.0 (Green Algae EC50) Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (Fish, Daphnid ChV) Maximum LogKow: 7.0 (Green Algae ChV)
Baseline Toxicity SAR Limitations:

--------------------------------- Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (Fish 96-hr LC50; Daphnid LC50) Maximum LogKow: 6.4 (Green Algae EC50) Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (ChV)
Acknowledgement



 Exhibit 10.2 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 

Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”) has commenced a private placement that includes the placement of up to
1,500,000 shares of 8.0% Non-Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (the “Series C Preferred”). On or before the date hereof, each of Prairie Capital IV, L.P. and Prairie Capital IV QP, L.P. (collectively,
the “Prairie Capital Funds”) agreed to acquire shares of Series C Preferred in this private placement as more fully set forth on the signature page to that certain securities purchase agreement, dated as of May 21, 2010, by
among the Company and the investors set forth therein (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”). 
 Notwithstanding
anything in the Securities Purchase Agreement to the contrary, the Prairie Capital Funds shall be entitled to reduce their aggregate commitment pursuant thereto by providing written notice to the Company prior to the Closing (as defined in the
Securities Purchase Agreement) to the extent that the Prairie Capital Funds determine in good faith that the performance of their obligations under the Securities Purchase Agreement would violate any federal or state law, rule or regulation and/or
subject either of the Prairie Capital Funds or any of their respective affiliates to regulation as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. Any reduction in such commitment shall reduce the number of Preferred Shares the
Prairie Capital Funds are required to purchase pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement. Notwithstanding anything in Section 7(d) of the Securities Purchase Agreement to the contrary, this Acknowledgement shall be a part of and not be
superceded by the Securities Purchase Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be duly
executed as of May 21, 2010. 
  

			
	TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /S/ MARK A. HOPPE

		 	Name: Mark A. Hoppe
		 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
J

~~ SED STq T

~ S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
o 

### ~~~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

o lk 2

G ~ ~ lq ~ PROZ ~ 

### OV 2 8 2 , r)l2

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Mr. J. R. Stroble Director, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221
Dear Mr. Stroble: This is in response to your November 20, 2012, request for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence with the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) draft certification expansion memo to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) characterizing transuranic (TRU) waste at the Savannah River Site (SRS). Your request is in accordance with the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) procedures that are intended to ensure that DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate appropriately with EPA approvals for waste characterization activities at DOE TRU waste generator sites. We concur that DOE's latest draft certification expansion letter to include the five foot setback configuration (approved by EPA September 11, 2012) comports with all of EPA's existing approvals for CH TRU waste (debris, soils, and solids) and our recent approval of RH TRU debris waste at SRS. EPA issued a baseline approval of the SRS-CCP's CH TRU waste characterization program on July 10, 2006 (See A-98-49; II-A4-64 in the EPA Air pocket) and the RH TRU (non BCL) waste characterization program on April 18, 2012 (See A-98-49; II-A4-161 in the EPA Air pocket). EPA has also received and reviewed quarterly tiering reports covering Tier 2 changes to the waste characterization program implemented by CCP at SRS and have found all changes made to be 

### acceptable. Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft certification expansion memo for SRS-CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9422 or Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462.
Sincerely,



# -~ Edward Feltcorn Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable * Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100 1 /o Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Papercc:

Joe Franco, CBFO Tom Morgan, CBFO Marcus Pinzel, CBFO Court Fesmire, CBFO QA Site Documents
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          34,856               3,218,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,343                 201,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,874               3,582,068
<PP&E>                                         153,428                 312,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,302               3,895,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          303,419                 205,883
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,029,578               2,122,620
<PREFERRED>                                  1,029,578               2,122,620
<COMMON>                                        11,565                   9,911
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,830                  94,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,302               3,895,130
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               700,053               1,687,780
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,531,718               4,664,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,690,865)             (3,282,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,942,829)               (305,114)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,690,865)             (3,124,777)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.36)                  (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)                  (0.51)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/S/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President of the General Partner andPrincipal Executive Officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.PDate:May 11, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 19, 2004 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Date of report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): July 13, 1998 (July 10, 1998)






                              TRANSIT GROUP, INC.
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



     Florida
(State or other jurisdiction of    33-30123-A                  59-2576629
incorporation or organization)   (Commission File No.)       (IRS Employer
                                                          Identification No.)








                             2859 Paces Ferry Road
                                   Suite 1740
                             Atlanta, Georgia 30339
          (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
                                                  (770) 444-0240
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

<PAGE>
                       
ITEM 9.    SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES PURSUANT TO REGULATION S

           On July 10, 1998,  Transit  Group,  Inc.  ("Transit  Group")  issued
76,177  shares of its common  stock to Charles  D.  Bates and  Elizabeth  Bates
("Sellers")  pursuant  to a Stock  Exchange  Agreement  whereby  Transit  Group
acquired  all of the  outstanding  shares of  capital  stock of 579809  Ontario
Limited and 962454 Ontario Limited.  Such shares of common stock were issued to
the Sellers by Transit Group in reliance upon the exemption  from  registration
contained in Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933.

           An additional  115,314 shares of exchangeable stock of Transit Group
of Canada, Inc. were issued to the Sellers.  Such shares are convertible at any
time into shares of common stock of Transit Group.

           Transit  Group,  headquartered  in  Atlanta,  Georgia,  is a holding
company in the  business of acquiring  and  consolidating  short-,  medium- and
long-haul trucking companies.


                                   SIGNATURE

           Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the  Registrant  has duly  caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                      TRANSIT GROUP, INC.



Date:  July 13, 1998                  /s/ Philip A. Belyew
                                      --------------------
                                      Philip A. Belyew
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SETION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Energy  Producers,  Inc. (the
"Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Mel
Herzog, Chairman and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
       or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
       material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of
       the Company.


       Date:  August 7, 2003


       /s/ Mel Herzog
       --------------
       Mel Hezog
       Chief Executive Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0572-20

TIMOTHY DONHAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE DALLAS COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J.,

joined.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of arson and sentenced to six years in prison. In the bill of

costs, the trial court assessed Appellant a $25 time payment fee. See TEX. LOCAL GOV’T

CODE § 133.103. On appeal, the Court of Appeals struck a portion of that fee as being
TIMOTHY DONHAM - 2

unconstitutional. Donham v. State, No. 05-19-00764-CR & No. 05-19-00765 (Tex. App. –

Dallas May 27, 2020). 

The State has filed a petition for discretionary review challenging the court’s

constitutional analysis. We recently handed down our opinion in Dulin v. State, Nos. PD0856-19 & PD-0857-19, 2021 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 273 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 31, 2021),

in which we held that the time payment fee was assessed prematurely because the pendency

of appeal suspends the obligation to pay court costs. As a result, there was no need to reach

the State’s constitutional arguments. 

We grant review on our own motion of the following ground:

Should the “Time Payment Fee” be struck as prematurely assessed?

Addressing that ground in light of Dulin, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals,

and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

The State’s petition is refused.

DATE DELIVERED: May 12, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH
For the Docket

Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida’s Lakes and Flowing Waters

Docket ID No. OW-2009-0596

Meeting with Representatives from Mosaic and counsel

July 13, 2010

In Attendance:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Ephraim King, OST

 Evelyn Washington, OST

Mosaic – James Voyles

Arnold & Porter, LLP – Jeremy Karpatkin

 Lester Sotsky

Summary:

Mosaic requested the meeting to discuss the proposed Water Quality Standards for the State of 

Florida’s Lakes and Flowing Waters rule, published in January 2010. Specifically, Mosaic

provided comments on:

 Instream Protection Values (IPVs) for the Bone Valley and the health of streams with 

high nutrient levels

 Reference approach and percentile selection

 Lakes criteria and delineation and the health of lakes with high nutrient levels

 Procedure for Site-specific Alternative Criteria (SSACs) and variances

EPA did not provide any information about EPA positions regarding addressing comments 

received or possible final rule requirements.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3875 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 100 percent cotton woven color wall 

fabric, dyed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2009 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 100 percent cotton 

woven color wall fabric, dyed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 100 PERCENT COTTON WOVEN COLOR WALL 

4 FABRIC, DYED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 100 percent cotton woven 

color wall fabric, dyed (provided for in subheading 

5208.32.30) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3875 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS