alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

July 20 , 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations 1200 New Jersey Ave nue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re ference : Amendment to Section 333 exemption #11509, docket # FAA
- 2015
- 0481 granted

Aviation Systems Engineering Company and approved May 8, 2015 Attachments : (1) Operating Limits (Proprietary)

(2) Drone Aviation Corp WATT
- 200 Operations Manual V1.0 (Proprietary) Dear Sir/Madam, Aviation Systems Engineering Comp any (ASEC) was issued exemption #11509 (the Exemption) under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act ) for the purpose of conducting unmanned aircraft system ( UAS ) operations for technical demonstration and training purposes . ASEC hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption to include tethered, m ulti
-rotor UAS for operation in full compliance with the conditions set forth within the Exemption, with requested modifications listed in Attachment (1). ASEC submits that a tethered system provides additional , equivalent safety features that do not currently exist with free
- flight small UAS (sUAS), and, when combined with appropriate safety management practices, can further reduce risk. Tethered s UASs are rotorcraft, weighting 55 or fewer pounds including its payload. They operat e, under normal conditions, at near zero speed , hovering at the end of a hardened tether. The tether is encased with Kevlar material able to withstand 600 pounds of force, providing a conduit for primary and backup electric ground power to the air vehicle, at a tethered distance controlled by a ground winch system. It will operate only in line of sight of the pilot in command (PIC) and will utilize a safety observer. Such operations will insure that the sUAS will “not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or to the public.” With exceptions noted in Attachment (1), ASEC requests permission to operate the following s UAS based on its type, s ize, weight, and speed under the same terms and conditions contained within the Exemption and provided by the parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations identified within attachment (2) hereto attached to this request.2

**Aircraft Manu**  **facturer Model**  **Class Maximum**  **Tak eoff Weight**  **Max Speed** Drone Aviation Corp WATT Tethered, rotorcraft, e lectric 22 lbs 2.5 m/s ASEC respectfully requests the same finding from the FAA as provided to Aerial Mob, LLC as to its amended exemption , # 11066A, docket ID FAA
- 2014
- 0353, dated February 2, 2015. The FAA found the amendment request was not precedent setting, that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register , and that any delay in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the organization. Thank you for your time in regards to this petition and please send correspondence to: Brent Klavon ASEC, Inc. 904
- 772
- 8442 , x205 Brent.klavon@asec
- incorporated.com On behalf of ASEC, I look forward t o your response.
Sincerely, Mike Marrinan ASEC, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald Heineman,  the Chief Executive Officer of Resolve Staffing,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A  of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter  ended March 31, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated: November 10, 2004


/s/ Ronald Heineman
----------------------
Name: Ronald Heineman
Title: Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit****32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Shaw Hong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2010 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and will be retained byOmniVision Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

Dated: March 12,2010

 
|   | ** ** |                                              |
|--------|------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:        | **/s/ SHAW HONG**                                 |
|   |       | **Shaw Hong**                                     |
|   |       | *Chief Executive Officer, President and Director* |
|   |       | *(Principal Executive Officer)*                   |

 

 

I, Anson Chan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2010 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and will be retained byOmniVision Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

Dated: March 12,2010

 
|   | By:    | **/s/ ANSON CHAN**                              |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | **Anson Chan**                                  |
|   |   | *Chief Financial Officer*                       |
|   |   | *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
ex10-42.htm



Exhibit 10.42




 


 


April 20, 2010


EXTENSION N2 TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF AUGUST 1, 2004







By and between Siberian Energy Group Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and David Zaikin (“Employee”) entered into this 20th day of April, 2010, and made effective as of January 1, 2010.







WHEREAS the Company and the Employee previously signed the Employment Agreement, which stated the term of employment to start on August 1, 2004 and to end on December 31, 2008 (the “Agreement”, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A), and the One year term extension agreement for 2009 services;







AND WHEREAS the Company and the Employee wish to further extend the term of the employment agreement;







NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH, that the Company and the Employee agree as follows:







Point 4 “Term” of the employment Agreement to be revised and the term of the Agreement to be extended until June 30, 2010 (the “Extended Term”).







Point 5.1 “Compensation” of the employment Agreement to be revised and annual salary of the Employee to be stated as US$180,000.







Point 6 “Stock Option” of the employment Agreement is to be removed. A new Stock Option agreement will be entered into between the Company and the Employee upon the resolution of the Board of directors of the Company.







All other provisions of the Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2004 shall remain in full force and effect until the expiration of the Extended Term.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.








	  	  
	
EMPLOYEE

	
COMPANY


	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	/s/ David Zaikin	/s/ Elena Pochapski
	
David Zaikin

	
Elena Pochapski


	 	
CFO


	 	
Siberian Energy Group Inc.
H. R. 3767 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 170 North 

Main Street in Smithfield, Utah, as the ‘‘W. Hazen Hillyard Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. W. HAZEN HILLYARD POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 170 North Main Street in Smithfield, Utah, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘W. Hazen Hillyard Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘W. Hazen Hillyard Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit 

 Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Decided July 2, 2019 

Before 

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge 

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

 

No. 16-1580 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v.

DENNIS M. FRANKLIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

 Appeal from the United States District 

Court for the Western District 

of Wisconsin 

No. 3:14-CR-00128 

James D. Peterson, 

Chief Judge. 

____________________________________________________________________________ 

No. 16-1872 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v.

SHANE SAHM, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

 Appeal from the United States District 

Court for the Western District 

of Wisconsin 

No. 3:15-CR-00110 

James D. Peterson, 

Chief Judge. 

 

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION 

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 
Nos. 16-1580 & 16-1872 Page 2 

O R D E R

The Supreme Court of Wisconsin has answered the question of state law that this 

court certified to it. United States v. Franklin, 928 N.W.2d 545 (Wis. 2019). Burglary under 

Wisconsin law, Wis. Stat. § 943.10(1m), applies to burglaries of vehicles as well as 

buildings and dwellings. That means the state crime is broader than the federal generic 

crime of burglary that may serve as a predicate for enhanced offenses under the federal 

Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). See Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 

2243 (2016) (Iowa burglary statute broader than federal generic burglary because it 

applies to burglaries of vehicles). In response to our request, the Supreme Court of 

Wisconsin has decided definitively that the state crime is not “divisible” among 

different locations for purposes of applying the Armed Career Criminal Act. As a result, 

the prior Wisconsin burglary convictions of defendants-appellants Dennis Franklin and 

Shane Sahm do not qualify as prior convictions for “violent felonies” to support their 

federal sentences under the Armed Career Criminal Act. The parties have submitted 

statements of position under Circuit Rule 52. They and we agree on the next step. The 

federal sentences for both Franklin and Sahm in these appeals are hereby VACATED 

and their cases are REMANDED to the district court for resentencing without applying 

the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e).
Exhibit
      32








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The Children’s Internet, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tyler
      Wheeler, Acting Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.











/s/
      Tyler Wheeler


Tyler
      Wheeler


Acting
      Chief Executive Officer


and
      Acting Chief Financial Officer


May
      20,
      2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6606
WAYNE EUGENE HERMANS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus A. D. ROBINSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Vi rginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:06-cv-00259) Submitted: August 10, 2007 Decided: August 17, 2007 Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne Eugene Hermans, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Wayne Eugene Hermans seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hermans has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 21505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08614]

[[Page 21505]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

First Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 231, Special Committee 231 
TAWS-GPWS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 231, TAWS-GPWS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
first meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 231, TAWS- GPWS.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 28-29, 2014 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA Headquarters, RTCA, Inc., 
1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 213. The agenda will 
include the following:

May 28

 Welcome
 Administrative Remarks
 Agenda Review
 Introductions
 RTCA Process Overview
 FAA Presentation on the desire for a MOPS update
 SC-231 Scope and Terms of Reference review
 SC-231 Structure and Organization of Work
 Proposed Schedule
 RTCA workspace presentation
 Other Business
 Date and Place of Next Meeting
 Adjourn, Review of terms of reference
 Status of DO-342A and DO-315C Drafts
 Industry updates
 WG-1 DO-315C draft review

May 29

 Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting.
    Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 9, 2014.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-08614 Filed 4-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 13. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION 3. AIR RESOURCES BOARD CHAPTER 5. STANDARDS FOR MOTOR

VEHICLE FUELS ARTICLE 1. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE SUBARTICLE 2. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE SOLD BEGINNING MARCH 1, 1996 This database is current through 12/26/2003, Register

2003, No. 52. s 2262.7. Standards for Aromatic Hydrocarbon Content.

<General Materials (GM) - References, Annotations, or Tables > Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 43018 and 43101, Health and Safety Code; and WesternOil and Gas Ass'n. v. Orange County Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal.3d 411, 121 Cal. Rptr. 249 (1975). Reference: Sections 39000, 39001, 39002, 39003, 39010, 39500, 39515, 39516, 41511, 43000, 43016, 43018 and 43101, Health and Safety Code; and WesternOil and Gas Ass'n. v. Orange County Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal.3d 411, 121 Cal. Rptr. 249 (1975).

HISTORY

1. New section filed 11-16-92; operative 12-16-92 (Register 92, No. 47).

2. Amendment filed 6-2-95; operative 7-3-95 (Register 95, No. 22).

3. Amendment filed 9-21-98; operative 9-21-98 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(d) (Register 98, No. 39).

4. Repealer filed 8-3-2000; operative 9-2-2000 (Register 2000, No. 31). 13 CA ADC s 2262.7 END OF DOCUMENT 13 CA ADC § 2262.7 Page 1 13 CCR s 2262.7 Cal. Admin. Code tit. 13 , s 2262.7

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 8-K/A

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of report (Date of Earliest Event Reported):August 27, 1998 (June 16, 1998)






                               TRANSIT GROUP, INC.
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



      Florida
(State or other jurisdiction of       33-30123-A                59-2576629
incorporation or organization)   (Commission File No.)        (IRS Employer
                                                           Identification No.)








                              2859 Paces Ferry Road
                                   Suite 1740
                             Atlanta, Georgia 30339
          (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
                                 (770) 444-0240
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
<PAGE>
ITEM 7.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

           (a)    Financial Statements of Business Acquired

     The K. J. Transportation, Inc. and Affiliates Combined Financial Statements
and Independent  Auditors'  Report for the fiscal years ending December 31, 1997
and 1996 are contained in Exhibit 99.1 hereto.

           (b)    Pro Forma Financial Information

     Such required pro forma financial information is contained in Exhibit 
99.2 hereeto.

           23.1   Consent of Davie Kaplan Chapman & Braverman, PC

           99.1   K. J. Transportation, Inc. and Affiliates Combined Financial
Statements and Independent Auditors' Report for the fiscal years ending
December 31, 1997 and 1996.

           99.2   Pro Forma Statements of Operations for the twelve months 
ending December 31, 1997 and six months ending June 30, 1998.

                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  Report to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
                                               TRANSIT GROUP, INC.



Date: August 31, 1998                          /s/ Philip A. Belyew
                                               --------------------
                                                   Philip A. Belyew
                                                   President and Chief
                                                    Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (F.A.A.) 

WILLIAM ALFRED HICKS, JR., 

a/k/a BILLY HICKS, 

Complainant 

-against- NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF 

MOTIONS AND ANSWER 

CITY OF MOUNT AIRY, NORTH Docket No.16-15-07 

CAROLINA; and THE COUNTY OF S.!1~\VE0 

NORTH CAROLINA; through the M~t:. 

AIRY/SURRY COUNTY AIRPORT AUG 4 2Gb 

AUTHORITY, 

Respondent PART 16 DOCKETS 

Now comes Respondent, Surry County, North Carolina, a body politic and corporate, through 

counsel, to provide notice to the Federal Aviation Administration in the above entitled matter 

that it adopts the Motions and Answer of the Mount Airy/Surry County Airport Authority, filed 

or to be filed with the Federal Aviation Administration in the above entitled action as its own 

response. eft.. 

This is the ;) l' day of July, 2015. 

Edwin M. Woltz \ 

Edwin M. Woltz, Attorney at Law, PLLC 

119 Rawley Ave. 

Mount Airy, NC 27030 

Phone (336) 786-5556 

Fax (336) 789-0651 

woltz@woltzlaw.us 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Edwin M. Woltz, certify that on July ]'t ~~ 2015 I filed and served this NOTICE OF 

ADOPTION OF MOTIONS AND ANSWER by placing the original thereof and three copies to 

the FAA, and a copy to counsel of record, in prepaid first class or express envelopes in the custody 

of the United States Mail addressed as follows: 

FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk 

AGC-600 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Randolph M. James 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Randolph M. James, P.C. 

P.O. Box 20069 

Winston-Salem, NC 27120 

Attorney For Complainant 

Howard C. Jones, II, Attorney at Law 

105 West Fourth Street, Suite 400-E 

Winston-Salem, NC 27101 

Attorney for Mount Airy/Surry County Airport Authority 

Hugh B. Campbell, III 

235 E. Independence Blvd. 

PO Box 1846 

Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030 

Attorney for the City of Mount Airy, North Carolina 

Edwin M. Woltz 

Edwin M. Woltz, Attorney at Law, PLLC 

119 Rawley Avenue 

Mount Airy, NC 27030 

Phone (336) 786-5556 

Fax (336) 789-0651 

woltz@woltzlaw.us