alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of The Children’s Internet, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Richard
        J. Lewis III ,
        Chief
        Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
  
 /s/
        Richard J. Lewis III
 Richard
        J. Lewis III
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 and
        Acting Chief Financial Officer
 November
        19, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3945 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3945

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Himic Anhydride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2009

  Mr. Spratt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Himic Anhydride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HIMIC ANHYDRIDE.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Himic Anhydride     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (provided for in                                                   31/2012.......
                        subheading
                        2917.20.00)......

     (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
16624

#### STATE v. WYATT

(70 S. E. (2d) 635)

*408
      *Messrs. Samuel N. Burts*and *John H. Nolen,*of Spartanburg, *for Appellant,*cite:

*Mr. Samuel Watt, Solicitor,*of Spartanburg, *for Respondent.*

May 7, 1952.

Henderson, Acting Associate Justice.

The prosecuting witness, a white married woman, lived not far from the city of Spartanburg. At about 8:30 on the morning of May 3, 1951, her husband had gone away to his work and she was alone at the home. After working for a while among the flowers in her front yard she went into the house, and upon going from the front room into her bedroom the defendant, a Negro man, jumped from behind a door, where he had been hiding, flung a cloth or sheet over her head and shoulders, threw her to the floor, and in spite of her struggles and entreaties, committed the crime of rape.

He was tried at the Court of General Sessions for Spar-tanburg County, and was convicted of rape by the jury. The trial Judge sentenced him to death.

On his appeal to this court he presents three exceptions. It is first contended that the presiding Judge was in error in charging the jury that emission is not necessary to be proven. The instruction was correct. The *409carnal knowledge which is a necessary element of rape is completed by penetration, however slight, and it is not necessary for the State to,prove emission. 75 C.J.S., Rape, § 10, p. 473; 44 Am. Jur. 903. Our old case of *State v. Le Blanc,*3 Brev. 339, cited by appellant, does not hold to the contrary.

The next question raised by the appellant is that the State has failed to prove penetration beyond a reasonable doubt.

We think that the evidence along this line was ample. The victim said that he had sexual intercourse with her. The appellant contends that this was not sufficient, and that more details should have been given. Here, however, we have a married woman, and without doubt she fully understood the meaning of these words. She also testified that the defendant had accomplished his purpose. A medical examination made of her at the hospital, to which she was immediately carried, showed that she had very recently had sexual relations.

The third exception is that the presiding Judge erred in allowing the State to introduce testimony that the defendant was seen in the vicinity the day before and the day after the crime was committed.

This evidence, we think, was admissible in connection with other evidence in the case. It was material in establishing the identity of the defendant, and in showing his presence in the neighborhood at about the time of the crime. Before the trial the defendant fully confessed the crime, and he offered no evidence at the trial.

We find no error in the entire record.

When the defendant was arraigned he had no counsel, and the Circuit Judge appointed the present attorneys to represent him. They are commended for their faithful services as officers of the Court.

*410All of the exceptions are overruled, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Baker, C. J., and Fishburne, Taylor and Oxner, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3867 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3867

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Cuprate(4-), [2-[[3-[[substituted]-
 1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-hydroxy-5-sulfophenyl](substituted)azo], 
                              sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Cuprate(4-), [2-[[3-[[substituted]-
 1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-hydroxy-5-sulfophenyl](substituted)azo], 
                              sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CUPRATE(4-), [2-[[3-[[SUBSTITUTED]-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2-
              YL]AMINO]-2-HYDROXY-5-SULFOPHENYL](SUBSTITUTED)AZO], 
              SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Cuprate(4-), [2-    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        [[3-                                                               31/2011.......
                        [[substituted]-
                        1,3,5-triazin-2-
                        yl]amino]-2-
                        hydroxy-5-
                        sulfophenyl](subs
                        tituted)azo],
                        sodium salt. (CAS
                        No. P 98-99. Acc.
                        158282) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        2921.59.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit ****32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Shaw Hong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended October 31, 2009 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OmniVisionTechnologies, Inc. and will be retained by OmniVision Technologies, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

Dated: December 10,2009

 
|   | By:    | **/s/ SHAW HONG**                                 |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | **Shaw Hong**                                     |
|   |   | *Chief Executive Officer, President and Director* |
|   |   | *(Principal Executive Officer)*                   |

 

I, Anson Chan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended October 31, 2009 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to OmniVision Technologies, Inc. and will be retained byOmniVision Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

Dated: December 10,2009

 
|   | By:    | **/s/ ANSON CHAN**                              |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | **Anson Chan**                                  |
|   |   | *Chief Financial Officer*                       |
|   |   | *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
15667

#### WALL v. FLETCHER *ET AL.*

(31 S. E. (2d), 147)

*Messrs. DePass &*DePass, of Spartanburg, S. C., Counsel for Appellant,

*149*Mr. Donald Russell, Mr. C. B. Daniel,*and *Messrs. Osborne, Butler & Moore,*all of Spartanburg, S. C., Counsel for Respondents,

July 25, 1944.

PER CURIAM:

The opinion in the case of *Mason v. Williams et al.,*205 S. C., 130, 31 S. E. (2d), 140, is controlling of the ultimate issue in this case, and renders unnecessary a decision of the questions raised by this appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Mr. Chief Justice Baker, Messrs. Associate Justices Fishburne and Stukes, and Circuit Judges G. Duncan Bellinger and E. D. LidE, Acting Associate Justices, concur.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

EG&G Defense Materials, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. DACA87-89-C-0076 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60276 

Terry L. Elling, Esq. 

Elizabeth N. Jochum, Esq. 

Holland & Knight LLP 

Tysons Comer, VA 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Travis P. Sommer, JA 

Trial Attorney 

SUMMARY BINDING DECISION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE WILSON 

By ADR agreement approved by the Board on 6 April 2016, the parties requested 

that this appeal be decided by a "bench decision" at the conclusion of the ADR 

proceeding. This summary decision will only address the reasonableness and 

allowability of appellant's compensation cost at issue in this appeal. The parties had also 

requested that the Board address whether the government's claim for contract years 2004 

and 2005 is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. However, at the hearing, 

appellant conceded that the statute of limitations was not applicable in the instant appeal 

(tr. 1/9). This decision has no value as precedent, cannot be cited in any other proceeding 

and cannot be appealed. It may not be set aside except for fraud. 

DECISION 

The Board finds that appellant's compensation costs for contract years ,2004 and 

2005 are reasonable and allowable. Accordingly, the appeal is sustained. 

Dated: 10 May 2016 

OWEN C. WILSON 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60276, Appeal of EG&G 

Defense Materials, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREYD. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### Exparte Edward Fenwick.

CASE XXVII.

s. a. p. 93.

A petition was presented by Mr. Drayton in behalf of Mr. Fenwick, praying that he may have permission ■either to mortgage his plantation on John’s Island to the *127executor of his father's will, or sell other tracts 01 iana, f~po the pm'pones therein menticne.d0* Whereupon order~ ed, that Me. Fenwick be permitted to cell under the direction of the master, huids to the amount of the demands due by him to his hither's estate, according to the prayer of his prtithm, after accounting with the master for the ne~eOoes which he in liable for: And that the bonds for the amount sales be deposited with the master as a security for such amount0

DECEMBER. 1785

Dcvi~ee per~ nutted lo tell land mud~ the cliicu~i~n tnd the 1n)uucl~ to stuuuuj at a. 1)ledgQ ;lih~ debt to cst~th~

E. B. p. 93.

Ordero~1, that atta~hrn~t; for ccnt~mpt OL' nor~corn~ pliarce with a decr~ or ba grai~ted by a jod~c at ~is ciLamb~r~ oa affidavit9 ia tho ns~a~ ma~mer,

*

 Sic deriveS, from the will of his father the hnds in question.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3880 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3880

  To suspend temporarily the duty on b-Alanine, N-[3-(acetylamino)-4-
  [(2,4-dinitrophenyl)azo]phenyl]-N-(3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)-, methyl 
                                 ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on b-Alanine, N-[3-(acetylamino)-4-
  [(2,4-dinitrophenyl)azo]phenyl]-N-(3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)-, methyl 
                                 ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. B-ALANINE, N-[3-(ACETYLAMINO)-4-[(2,4-
              DINITROPHENYL)AZO]PHENYL]-N-(3-METHOXY-3-OXOPROPYL)-, 
              METHYL ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      b-Alanine, N-[3-    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (acetylamino)-4-                                                   31/2011.......
                        [(2,4-
                        dinitrophenyl)azo
                        ]phenyl]-N-(3-
                        methoxy-3-
                        oxopropyl)-,
                        methyl ester.
                        (CAS No. 70729-65-
                        6) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2921.59.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
12788

#### SPARTANBURG COUNTY HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.

(150 S. E., 894)

*Messrs. H. B. DePass*and *Prank G. Tompkins,*for .appellant.

*458
      *Messrs. Nicholls, Wyche & Byrnes,*for respondent.

December 17, 1929.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment in a condemnation proceeding.

The land of the railway company, through which the commission sought to condemn a right of way, consists of a tract containing 50 or more acres; the highway with its right of way cuts off a small triangular piece of land separated from the major portion of the land.

The jury rendered a verdict to the effect that the benefits to the landowner counterbalanced any damage sustained.

The railway company has appealed upon the sole ground of error in the Judge’s charge to the effect: “If you come to the conclusion that the premises in question, the small tract of land, *or any land adjoining it,*has been benefited by reason of the construction of the road, then you will assess that benefit and take it away from the damages.”

The contention is that the jury was permitted to consider the benefit to other adjoining lands which belonged to other persons, and was not confined, as it should have been, to the ■ land of the railway company.

We think that the expression used by his Honor, Judge Sease, clearly referred to the triangular piece of land and to the land *of the Railway Company*which adjoined and was separated from it by the highway. This appears to have been the understanding at the time of all parties, and, if the jury might have been misled by the expression which is claimed to have been ambiguous and misleading, doubtless his Honor would have made the matter clear if he had been so requested.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Watts and Messrs. Justices Brease, Stabler and Carter concur.
1 

### Whalen, Marilyn

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 7:27 PM

To: Richard Takaba (richard.takaba@doh.haw aii.gov); roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov

Cc: stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov; Christiansen, St even H CIV NAVFAC HI, PRP41; Kishaba,

Raelynn I CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Shimabuku, J une T. CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Tsutsui, Bruce

O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3; Lovgren, Andrew C LT NAVSUP, 700; Linder, Steven; Pallarino,

Bob; Tsutsui, Bruce O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE 3; Nakamura, Peter M CIV NAVFAC HI, EV1;

Mizuno, Arleen M CIV NAVFAC HI, PRJ412

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - JULY 22, 2014

Importance: High

Hi Richard/Roxanne:

I apologize for the lateness of this week's report.

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of July 22, 2014. In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will be

annotated.

1. Preliminary Work Plan

a. Item 1

‐ Models to estimate downward vertical migration of free product.

b. Item 2

‐ Methods or options for non

‐ invasive scanning of basalt to determine area and volume of contaminant

mass prior to any drilling investigation.

c. Item 3

‐ Methods and locations for borings to most efficiently characterize the extent of contamination.

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable)

a. Action 1

‐ Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation

of release point(s) within Tank 5.

b. Action 2

‐ The rate of vertical migration for the released JP

‐ 8 free product is unknown. Information from the

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration. This information is necessary to

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination. Prepare models for petroleum JP

‐ 8 releases of 10,000,

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5. Progress in developing

these models should be included in the preliminary work plan.

c. Action 3

‐ Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of

the released JP

‐ 8 free product. Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased

monitoring are required to address this plume.

d. Action 4

‐ Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future

releases from the USTs within the Complex. This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete.

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical.

The Navy participated in the public informational meeting at Radford High School on 15 July 2014.

The Draft Work Plan for Installation of Two Sentinel Wells was submitted to the DOH on 16 July 2014.2 Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Vr,

Aaron
2023 AFSAM

Pistol Barricade Team Match

PT2330 (agg of PI2030)

SHOOTER TEAM SCORE ROST # PI2030 STATE\COUNTRY 

1 USAR GOLD 1016

Score

1 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 134 250 ID

2 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 133 252 CO

3 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 132 251 HI

4 SFC WILLIS, RICHARD 135 263 KY

2 ALL GUARD ALPHA 994

Score

1 1SG CAPPS, JOSEPH A 111 273 AR

2 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 108 231 AR

3 SSG FULMER, MICAH N 116 247 CO

4 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 110 243 ND

3 ALL GUARD BRAVO 982

Score

1 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 119 278 CO

2 SFC STAATS, JOHN A 118 225 AR

3 SFC SAGER, DEVIN S 152 263 CO

4 SFC ARCHAMBAULT, MAX 117 216 VT

4 MARINE CORPS 881

Score

1 SSG STEWART, JUDE O 100 211 VA

2 GYSGT RANTON, CHAD W 101 258 VA

3 SGT MULLER, SHAUN P 102 215 VA

4 SGT FLEITAS, NICKOLAS 103 197

5 AFSAM IND 848

Score

1 SGT MARLAR, SAMUEL A 143 143 MA

2 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 142 222

3 SFC KEENOM, DAVID D 141 228 TN

4 SGT SMIT, ANDREW 140 255 NETHERLANDS

6 BAROST RED 823

Score

1 SSG CATT, KEVIN 122 199 UK

2 SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 121 221 UK

3 MAJOR ROSIE, LANCE 123 203 UK

4 WO1 DOUGLAS, JAMES 120 200 UK

7 USAR BLACK 778

Score

1 SFC GODEL, JASON W 125 243 TX

2 CPT PANTOJA, LUIS 126 177 KS

Wednesday, May 3, 2023 Page 1 of 2 Time printed: 20:19:29
SHOOTER TEAM SCORE ROST # PI2030 STATE\COUNTRY 

3 CW4 KNOTE, ANDY T 124 199 KY

4 SPC GADZIK, TIMOTHY J 127 159 IL

8 BAROST WHITE 768

Score

1 MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 138 212 UK

2 SSG GORDON, COLIN 136 164 UK

3 CPL ROWAN, BRIAN 137 190 UK

4 SGT COLGAN, JOHNATHON 139 202 UK

9 BAROST BLUE 743

Score

1 CFN PICKLES, JOSHUA 131 147 UK

2 CPL FILGATE, MICHAEL 130 198 UK

3 LCPL BURGESS, MARCUS 129 218 UK

4 LCPL FERGUSON, ANDREW 128 180 UK

10 COAST GUARD 741

Score

1 E5 DUERR, DAVID C 107 208 CA

2 SFC PHELPS, STEFAN S 106 174 VA

3 E-5 LUSH, TRAVIS C 105 199 VA

4 SFC BOLANOS, STEVEN L 104 160 CA

11 NETHERLANDS 714

Score

1 PVT DOPPERT, SANTINO 112 156 NETHERLANDS

2 CPL BUSSTRA, MARTIJN 114 181 NETHERLANDS

3 MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 115 179 NETHERLANDS

4 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX 113 198 NETHERLANDS

Wednesday, May 3, 2023 Page 2 of 2 Time printed: 20:19:29