alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FINAL STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVISION TO MEET OBLIGATIONS UNDER CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 110(A)(2)(A)-(M) FOR THE 8-HOUR OZONE
AND PM 2.5 NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS

On April 18, 2008, the Division of Air Qual ity (DAQ) commenced a thirty day public comment period to accept written comments and/or a written request for a public hearing on a proposed revision to the State Implementation Plan to attain and maintain the national ambient air quality standards for ozone and very fine particulate matter. Written comments were accepted through 6:00 PM on Monday, May 19, 2008. No comme nter submitted written comments regarding proposed revisions to rule 45CSR8, and no pers on requested a public hearing. Consequently, DAQ published in the West Virginia Register on May 23, 2008, a public notice announcing that a public hearing will not be held.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


The Board of Directors
Doane Products Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-98110 on Form S-3 and No. 333-43643 on Form S-4) of Doane Products Company of
our report dated February 13, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Doane Products Company-Successor as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows
of Doane Products Company-Successor for the years ended December 31, 1997 and
1996 and for the three month period ended December 31, 1995 and the consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows of Doane Products
Company-Predecessor for the nine months ended September 30, 1995, which report
appears in the March 27, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of Doane Products
Company and subsidiary.

                                             /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

                                             KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Houston, Texas
March 27, 1998
## ftpn'l 10, 20 & rbor^ oyCAZ-mvi. VS"3b it*- to GL$t ?0 &&( \Z-302 

### *Wbn, T£ "7 SI H y^Uiiw \A^tVt AJLCJ^Z)^ 0S~- m - oob^i ~az_ t (4- wuuWiaru, tf 

### HLED IN 

## C0URT0FCRIMINALAPPEALS APR 17 2m A&e/Acosta, Clerk 

## SiVtOvoft^, (J^o\ \ <ko Lc U0sCleans s,C/em
H. R. 3940 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To clarify the availability of existing funds for political status education in the 

Territory of Guam, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING POLITICAL STATUS EDUCATION IN GUAM. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Interior 

may provide technical assistance to the Government of Guam under 

section 601(a) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize appropriations 

for certain insular areas of the United States, and for other purposes’’, approved December 24, 1980 (48 U.S.C. 1469d(a)), for public 

education regarding political status options only if the political 

status options are consistent with the Constitution of the United 

States. 

SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE IN AMERICAN SAMOA AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS. 

(a) DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 8103(b) of the Fair 

Minimum Wage Act of 2007 (29 U.S.C. 206 note) (as amended 

by section 520 of division D of Public Law 111–117) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)(B), by inserting ‘‘(except 2011 when 

there shall be no increase)’’ after ‘‘thereafter’’ the second place 

it appears; and 

(2) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ‘‘except that, beginning 

in 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘except that there shall be no such 

increase in 2010 or 2011 and, beginning in 2012’’. 

(b) GAO REPORT.—Section 8104 of such Act (as amended) is 

amended— 

(1) by striking subsections (a) and (b) and inserting the 

following: 

‘‘(a) REPORT.—The Government Accountability Office shall 

assess the impact of minimum wage increases that have occurred 

pursuant to section 8103, and not later than September 1, 2011, 

shall transmit to Congress a report of its findings. The Government 

Accountability Office shall submit subsequent reports not later than 

April 1, 2013, and every 2 years thereafter until the minimum 
H. R. 3940—2 

wage in the respective territory meets the federal minimum wage.’’; 

and 

(2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b). 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3603 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3603

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
               To rename the Ocmulgee National Monument.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Ocmulgee National Monument in Macon, Georgia, shall be known 
and redesignated as the ``Ocmulgee Mounds National Monument''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Ocmulgee National Monument shall be 
deemed to be a reference to the ``Ocmulgee Mounds National Monument''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3603

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

               To rename the Ocmulgee National Monument.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                 828
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       20,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,510
<INVENTORY>                                          2,268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    10,071
<PP&E>                                              13,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                       5,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      34,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               13,422
<BONDS>                                             11,552
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          4,025
<COMMON>                                               149
<OTHER-SE>                                           8,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        34,494
<SALES>                                             23,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    35,127
<CGS>                                                8,087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       52,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     6,409
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (16,972)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (16,972)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      (805)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (17,777)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (1.22)



</TABLE>
|       (3)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|       (4)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:       May 20,      2008 | By:    | /s/ Seth Shaw           |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                |   | Seth      Shaw               |   |
|                                |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|                                |   |                         |   |
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF LINDA BRYSON


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

     In  connection  with the Periodic  Report of Quantum  Companies,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Kelleher,  President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1.) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2.) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: June 28, 2004        By: /s/ Michael Kelleher
                                 -------------------
                                   Michael Kelleher
                                   President
EXHIBIT
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly  Report of EGPI
      Firecreek, Inc .
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  June 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
 "Report"),  I,  Dennis R. Alexander,  Chairman, Principal
      Executive Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company,
 certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
      ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
       August 8, 2006





/s/
      Dennis R. Alexander


Dennis
      R. Alexander


Chairman,
      Principal Executive Office and


Chief
      Financial Officer
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 ANNUITY TERMS AND CONDITIONS 
 Terms 

Unless pre-approved by Company, Purchase Payments are limited to a maximum of $1 million, per product and per Contract owner, in any one Contract or
combination of Contracts within a 12 month period. A Contract with joint owners is considered to have only one Contract owner for purposes of this provision. Company reserves the right to decline any Purchase Payment submitted without pre-approval.
Commission may be reduced on Purchase Payment submissions of $1 million or more. 
 Chargeback 

1. Subject to the provisions of the Commission section of this Agreement, Agency will immediately repay Company commissions not to exceed amounts paid,
in accordance with the following: 
  

	 	a.	Agency will repay commissions paid on the Purchase Payments if Purchase Payments are returned to the Contract owner in the absence of a withdrawal. Annuitizations are
not considered to be returned to the Contract owner. 

  

	 	b.	Agency will repay Company 100% of commissions on the amount withdrawn from a Contract, less applicable surrender charges, if withdrawals in excess of 10% of the
Contract value are made during the first Contract year. 

  

	 	c.	In the event that a Contract is surrendered under the “Free Look” provision, or otherwise rescinded, then Chargebacks will be made against all commission paid
with respect to such Contract. 

  

	 	d.	The Chargeback provisions will not apply to Trail commissions. 

  

	 	e.	The Chargeback provisions will not apply to: 

  

	 	•	 	 Withdrawals of amounts which do not exceeded the 10% free withdrawal provision of the Contract; 



 

	 	•	 	 Non-commissionable transfers and rollovers between Company products; 



 

	 	•	 	 Death benefits or withdrawls upon confinement in a hospital or nursing home, if such confinement qualifies under the terms of the Contract;



  

	 	•	 	 Systematic withdrawals from qualified plans made according to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Sections 72(t) or 401(a)(9); 



 

	 	•	 	 Systematic withdrawals from non qualified plans made according to IRC Section 72(q), or which are calculated in the same manner as IRC Sectoin
401(a)(9); or 


  

	 	•	 	 Benefit payments under an annuitization option of the Contract. 



Symetra Life Insurance Company | Sales Agreement For Fixed Products
Exhibit 32.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Ronald Heineman, the Chief Executive Officer of Resolve Staffing, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the fiscal
      quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: December 9, 2005

/s/ Ronald Heineman
------------------------------
Name: Ronald Heineman
Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                       23
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James T. Demetriades, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of SeeBeyond Technology Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of SeeBeyond Technology Corporation.

| |  | By:    | /s/JAMES T. DEMETRIADES
| |  | ------ | -----------------------
| |  | Name:  | James T. Demetriades   
| |  | Title: | Chief Executive Officer

I,
Barry J. Plaga, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SeeBeyond
Technology Corporation on Form 10- Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SeeBeyond
Technology Corporation.

| |  | By:    | /s/BARRY J. PLAGA      
| |  | ------ | -----------------------
| |  | Name:  | Barry J. Plaga         
| |  | Title: | Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Children's Internet, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Sholeh Hamedani, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section}1350, as
adopted pursuant to {section} 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.



  /S/ SHOLEH HAMEDANI
Sholeh Hamedani,
Chief Executive Officer, President,
and Chief Financial Officer
May 21, 2004
EXHIBIT - 31.1
SITEWORKS, INC.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Carl Nurse, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of SiteWorks, Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report.
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)(4) and 15d-15(e)(4)) forthe registrant and have:

(a)     designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)     evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)     disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors  (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)     all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)     any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

DATED:  September 30, 2004
/s/ CarlNurse                                       Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer
20845*

#### PUBLIC SAVINGS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent v. Elizabeth BRYANT, a/k/a Lizzie Bryant, and The Estate of Silas Nelson, Appellant.

(250 S. E. (2d) 926)

Supreme Court

*Robert N. Jenkins*and *Robert L. Gailliard,*of *Neighborhood Legal Assistance Program, Inc.,*Charleston, *for appellant.*

*154*George J. Morris,*of *Hawkins & Morris,*Charleston, *for respondent.*

Jan. 8, 1979.

*

 Reporter’s Note: This opinion was inadvertently omitted from the 1979 edition of *South Carolina Reports.*The Reporter apologizes for any inconvenience this omission might have caused.

Littlejohn, Justice:

This action was commenced by Public Savings Life Insurance Company against Elizabeth Bryant, beneficiary named in a policy of insurance issued on the life of Silas Nelson. The complaint was instigated after his death, but within two years after the date of issue of the policy, and alleges that the insurance company is entitled to vacate the policy because the insured represented that he was in sound health on the date of issue and, also, misstated material facts in completing the application for the policy.

The beneficiary counterclaimed, asking that the complaint be dismissed and that the amount specified in the policy be paid.

The lower court granted summary judgment. We affirm.

The motion was based upon hospital records and depositions of Dr. John L. Colwell, of Ronald D. Hetrick, agent who wrote the policy, and of the defendant beneficiary. In addition, the insurance company had, under Rule 89, submitted requests to make admissions as to hospital and medical treatments and medical records. To each of the requests the beneficiary replied that she “... cannot truthfully admit or deny those matters ... •

In response to the motion for summary judgment, the beneficiary filed one counter affidavit, in which she did not contradict any of the factual showing of the insurance company, but concluded, “... that there are material issues of fact and law pending in this case, the basis of which will more fully appear in a memorandum submitted herewith, ...” The memorandum was on the law and was submitted by her attorney.

We have held that an opponent to a summary judgment may not rely solely upon a general denial without making any factual showing in opposition to the motion. *Garrett v. Reese,*262 S. C. 327, 204 S. E. (2d) 432 (1974). Since the showing was not contradicted, we think the relief granted was appropriate.

*155Counsel, on appeal, has submitted that the hospital records, showing that the insured was hospitalized, should not have been considered by the trial judge. Inasmuch as the same were not objected to at trial, the issue may not be raised for the first time in this court.

We agree with the lower court that there was no genuine factual issue for determination by the jury.

Affirmed.

Lewis, C. J., and Ness, Rhodes and Gregory, JJ., concur.