alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0042

_____________________________
H AROLD L YNN S TEPHENSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Cou rt for Escambia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge

. May 11, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , R AY , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 o r 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Unassociated Document


    Repayment
Agreement

     

    Lender:
[____]

     

    Borrower:
[____]

     

    The
Borrower [______] is the shareholder of  Trunkbow Technologies
(Shenzhen ) Co., Ltd. with [__]% of shares. Due to the large expenditure that is
needed for regular operations and for public offering and listing process,
[______] borrowed from the company in order to facilitate and fasten the
payment.

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              Accounting
      date for the loan: [_______]

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.

            	
              Amount
      borrowed: [__________]

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              3.

            	
              Repayment
      schedule: within [__] months

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              4.

            	
              Repayment
      method: by cash or any vouchers of
expenditure

            


    

     

    
      Lender:


    

     

    Signature:  ____________________

     

    Date:
[__________]

     

     

    
      Borrower:
__________________ 

    

     

    
      Signature:  ____________________

       

      Date:
[__________]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 6, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135165 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 135165 COA: 266208 Ingham CC: 04-000072-FH DARNELL WALKER, JR., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the second and third paragraphs of Part II(C) and all of Part II(D) of the September 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals. These portions of the Court of Appeals di scussion of the notice requirement and the “good-faith exception” to the 180-day rule statute, MCL 780.131, are dicta. In all other respects, the application for leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be review ed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would simply de ny leave to appeal.

d0130 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 6, 2008

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 20572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08608]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Notice of Meeting

Date/Time:  Friday, April 24, 2015 (10:00 a.m.-1:45 p.m.)

Location:  2301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20037.

Status:  Open Session--Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection 
(c) of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in 
subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, 
Public Law 98-525.

Agenda:  April 24, 2015 Board Meeting; Approval of Minutes of the One 
Hundred Fifty-Fourth Meeting (January 23, 2015) of the Board of 
Directors; Chairman's Report; Vice Chairman's Report; President's 
Report; Reports from USIP Board Committees; Update on Afghanistan and 
Pakistan; Countering Violent Extremism Review; Other General Issues.

Contact:  Denson Staples, Assistant to the Board Liaison Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d495e594c5d41485e6d585e445d03425f4a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1074636471607c756350656379603e7f6277">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 9, 2015.
Michael Graham,
Senior Vice President for Management and Chief Financial Officer, 
United States Institute of Peace.
[FR Doc. 2015-08608 Filed 4-15-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         6,851,427
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      61,480
<MORTGAGE>                                     462,473
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    8,670
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               7,695,538
<CASH>                                          58,081
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               3,445
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         118,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,254,008
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              7,074,444
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   4,548
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           89,641
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                266,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           86,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,735
<OTHER-SE>                                     893,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,254,008
<PREMIUMS>                                      91,568
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            224,431
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              13,791
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                     193,237
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     20,987
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            51,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,361
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,022
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,059
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,059
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.46
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3942 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3942

      To provide for the issuance of a veterans health care stamp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2009

  Mr. Burgess (for himself, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Gordon of 
 Tennessee, Mr. Marshall, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. 
   McCotter, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Wolf, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of 
 California, and Mr. Platts) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in 
  addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide for the issuance of a veterans health care stamp.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Health Care Stamp Act''.

SEC. 2. VETERANS HEALTH CARE STAMP.

    (a) In General.--In order to afford a convenient way for members of 
the public to contribute to funding for the medical care and treatment 
of veterans, the United States Postal Service shall provide for the 
issuance and sale of a special postage stamp, hereinafter referred to 
as the ``veterans health care stamp'', in accordance with subsections 
(b) and (c).
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--The issuance and sale of the veterans 
health care stamp shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, United 
States Code, except that--
            (1) all amounts becoming available from the sale of such 
        stamp shall be transferred to the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs in accordance with section 416(d) of such title; and
            (2) such stamp shall not be subject to any numerical 
        limitation under section 416(e)(1)(C) of such title.
    (c) Annual Reissuance.--The veterans health care stamp shall bear 
such illustration, depiction, or other image or design as the Postal 
Service shall determine in time to allow for its reissuance to coincide 
with Veterans Day of each year.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 29, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 29, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0411. MARGARET ELIZABETH BUTLER v. JENAI B. LEE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2013CV227415
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Richard J. Gaynor, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: May 8, 2008 |  | /s/RICHARD J. GAYNORRichard J. Gaynor Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
2022 AFSAM

Anti Body Armor

PI2250

SHOOTER SCORE ROST # TEAM NAME 

1 SFC VARGAS, ERIK J 128 ALL GUARD (ALPHA) 161

2 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 123 ALL GUARD (ALPHA) 159

3 SGT NICKERSON, MAXIM E 147 ALL GUARD (BRAVO) 159

4 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 162 ALL GUARD (BRAVO) 154

5 MSG GREGSON, JACOB J 139 ALL GUARD (CHARLIE) 151

6 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 115 USAR 150

7 SGT HALL, HOWARD H 129 ALL GUARD (ALPHA) 149

8 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 114 USAR 149

9 SSG FULMER, MICAH N 133 ALL GUARD (ALPHA) 146

10 SSG CATT, KEVIN 101 BAROST RED 146

11 MSG SCHULTZ, ROY 331 NETHERLANDS IND 143

12 SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 102 BAROST RED 143

13 SFC CAPPS, JOSEPH A 122 ALL GUARD (BRAVO) 133

14 HUGHES, DEVIN 113 USAR 133

15 MSG JACKSON, JEREMY L 127 ALL GUARD (CHARLIE) 130

16 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 234 USAR IND 129

17 SSG HAZELTON, JONATHON 119 BAROST BLUE 128

18 SGT SMIT, ANDREW J 105 NETHERLANDS 127

19 CPL ROWAN, RYAN 103 BAROST RED 127

20 MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 117 BAROST BLUE 124

21 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX L 104 NETHERLANDS 120

22 SGT THOMPSON, COLBY R 143 ALL GUARD (CHARLIE) 120

23 CW2 HOWARD, CHRIS 108 BAROST WHITE 120

24 WO1 DOUGLAS, JIM 100 BAROST RED 119

25 SFC LOVE, COLTON L 163 ALL GUARD (BRAVO) 117

26 CW2 WADDINGTON, JOHN 109 BAROST WHITE 117

27 SFC WALSH, THOMAS M 112 USAR 111

28 CPL POOT, MARTIN 107 NETHERLANDS 109

29 SFC SAGER, DEVIN S 132 ALL GUARD (CHARLIE) 107

30 LCPL GUIVER, HARRY 111 BAROST WHITE 104

31 MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 106 NETHERLANDS 103

32 SSG GORDON, COLIN 118 BAROST BLUE 95

33 MAJ ROSIE, LANCE 116 BAROST BLUE 81

34 CPL HAMILTON, JAMES 110 BAROST WHITE 70

Page 1 of 1 Time printed: 3/29/2022 6:26:20 PM
Opinion issued July 9 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 18 - 01039 - CV

——————————— CITY OF HOUSTON , Appella nt

V. MOSES AVILA , Appell e e s
On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Cou rt Ca se No. 2017 - 32616

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying the City of Houston’s amended plea to the jurisdiction. Th e order was signed by the trial court on November 9, 2018. On April 30, 2019, the parties filed a jo int motion for voluntary2

dismissal and entry of judgment informing this court that they have reached a settlement. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1. T o effectuate the parties’ agreement , we render judgment that Moses Avila take nothing against the City of Houston. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2). Costs are assessed against the incurring party, and all other relief requested against the City of Houston is denied. Pursuant to Rule 18.1, we direct the clerk of this court to issue the mandate three days after the issuance of the judgment. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 18.1. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Kelly, and Goodman.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-21-2015]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elizabeth Whiteman at                         *Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov*                         or (202) 482-0473.                    

Dated: April 10, 2015.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-08762 Filed 4-15-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**RESOLVE      STAFFING, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| */s/                Ronald E. Heineman*                                                                                                  |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ronald                E. HeinemanChief                Executive Officer, Chief Accounting OfficerDate:                November 27, 2007. |   |
**Exhibit 32.1**

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. §1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, the undersigned certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Millennium Pharmaceuticals,Inc.
|                      | /s/ DEBORAH DUNSIRE                   |   |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: March 1, 2007 | Deborah Dunsire                       |   |
|                 | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                 | (Principal executive officer)         |   |

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.and will be retained by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Dismiss and Opinion Filed December 11, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-15-01412-CV No. 05-15-01413-CV IN RE DONALD GENE BLANTON, Relator Original Proceeding from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 23078-86, No. 23592-86 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Franci s, Myers, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Francis In this petition for writ of mandamus, relator requests that the Court order the trial court to rule on his “Motion for State Production Indict ment to the State’s Sworn Affidavit Evidence Relied on To Defendant’s Conviction Defendant Actu ally Innocent.” Relato r asks the trial court to order the State to submit a motion to the Te xas Court of Criminal Appeals recommending that his convictions be immediately ove rturned. The trial judge filed a response to the petition for writ of mandamus explaining that he has take n no action on relator’s mo tion because the trial court’s plenary power over the cases has expired. Although we agree that the trial court’s “p lenary jurisdiction” over the underlying judgments of conviction has expired, we also note the court retains the power and duty to address motions raising collateral post-conviction matters committed to it by statute or relevant–2– procedural rule

. State v. Patrick , 86 S.W.3d 592, 594 (Tex. Cr im. App. 2002) (plurality opinion). As the Court of Criminal Appeals explained: When a conviction has been affirmed on appeal and the mandate has issued, general jurisdiction is not restored in the trial court. The trial court has special or limited jurisdiction to ensure that a higher court's mandate is carried out and to perform other functions specified by statut e, such as finding facts in a habeas corpus setting, or as in this case, determining entitlement to DNA testing. Patrick , 86 S.W.3d at 594 (footnotes omitted). In this case, the trial court lacks the authority to grant the relief sought and has so advised relator by his response to the petition for writ of mandamus. Although the preferred and better practice is for trial courts to advise a party at the time the court determines it lacks authority to take action on a motion, no purpose would be served in this case by requiri ng the trial judge to sign an order conveying the same information by way of a denial of the motion. As a result, the petition for writ of mandamus is now moot. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) ( “A case beco mes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings.”); Dow Chem. Co. v. Garcia, 909 S.W.2d 503, 505 (Tex. 1995) (orig. proceeding) (court will not i ssue mandamus if it would be useless or unavailing). We dismiss the petition fo r want of jurisdiction.

151412F.P05 /Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE