alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Chanticleer Holdings, Inc. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Attached to this certification is Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, a periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which contains financial statements. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer for the periods presented. |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 11, 2011 | /s/ Michael D. Pruitt       |
|--------------|-----------------------------|
|         | Michael D. Pruitt           |
|         | Chief Executive Officer and |
|         | Chief Financial Officer     |

----
The HONORABLE FERNANDO J. GAITAN, JR., United States District Judge

1

for the Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-4070

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Western District of Missouri.

Gary F. Tagbering, also known as *

Richard W. Gaines, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: June 19, 1997

 Filed: June 25, 1997

___________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gary F. Tagbering pleaded guilty to a drug-trafficking offense and to using

firearms in relation to drug-trafficking offenses. The district court sentenced him to 1

sixty months in prison on the drug offense, a consecutive sixty-month term on the

firearms offense, and three years of supervised release. After the Supreme Court’s

decision in Bailey v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), the district court granted

Tagbering’s motion to vacate the firearms conviction, and he was released from prison
-2-

to begin his three-years of supervised release on the drug-trafficking offense. Three

months later, the district court revoked supervised release and sentenced Tagbering to

two years in prison for violating supervised release conditions. Tagbering then moved

the district court to credit his revocation sentence with 108 days that he served in prison

on the vacated firearms conviction after he had completed serving the drug-trafficking

portion of his initial sentence. The district court denied that motion, and Tagbering

appeals. We affirm. 

Tagbering argues that the revocation sentence is directly related to his original

conviction and therefore the 108 days should be credited “in the interest of fairness.”

However, a prisoner has no constitutional right to credit for prison time served on a

prior illegal conviction against a sentence imposed as a result of subsequent unlawful

conduct. See Holscher v. Young, 440 F.2d 1283, 1290 (8th Cir. 1971). In addition,

the applicable federal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b), does not appear to authorize credit

for time spent in “official detention” in these circumstances, and in any event the

Attorney General must make initial sentence credit decisions under that statute. See

United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329 (1992). Thus, the district court did not abuse

its discretion in denying Tagbering’s motion.

Accordingly, we affirm. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 
 Certification
        of Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 C.W.
        Gilluly, Chief Financial Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the “Company”) certifies
        in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Annual
        Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB/A for year ended June 30, 2006 and that
        to
        the best of his or her knowledge:
 
 1.
              the
                  report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              the
                  information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 The
        purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
        Section
        1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.
 
 A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.
 
 
 October
            2,
            2007                                                                /s/
            C.W. Gilluly,
            Ed.D.
 C.W.
            Gilluly,
            Ed.D.
 Principal
            Finance
            Officer
 (Chief Financial Officer)
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE> 5
  <MULTIPLIER> 1,000

  <S>                                  <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000
  <PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-2000
  <CASH>                               350
  <SECURITIES>                         0
  <RECEIVABLES>                        0
  <ALLOWANCES>                         0
  <INVENTORY>                          0
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                     350
  <PP&E>                               0
  <DEPRECIATION>                       0
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                       350
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                520
  <BONDS>                              0
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
  <PREFERRED>                          0
  <COMMON>                             500
  <OTHER-SE>                           <670>
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         350
  <SALES>                              0
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                     0
  <CGS>                                0
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                        0
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                     670
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                      <670>
  <INCOME-TAX>                         0
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                  <670>
  <DISCONTINUED>                       0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
  <CHANGES>                            0
  <NET-INCOME>                         <670>
  <EPS-BASIC>                          LESS THAN $.01
  <EPS-DILUTED>                        LESS THAN $.01



</TABLE>
Opinion issued October 18, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00803-CV

———————————

IN RE TYSON WRIGHT, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Tyson Wright, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to 

vacate its July 8, 2019 denial of the motion for reconsideration of the September 26, 

2018 ruling striking relator’s counteraffidavit concerning costs and medical 

expenses.1 Wright has also filed a motion for emergency relief.

 

1 The underlying case is Jennifer Perry v. Tyson Wright, cause number 2017-32538, 

pending in the 127th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable R.K. 

Sandill presiding.
2

We deny the petition. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.
### .,Martin,**IVU~hael** 

### (O$J]**~** 

### ... From:. 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: Wanda Friday <wrfricfay@yahoo.com> Friday, July 06, 2012 4:15 AM EAS (OST) Comment on EAS Service at Kake, Alaska DOT"OST-2008-0217

I am writing to say that I support Wings ofAlaska intheir endeavorto return air service to Kake. Air excursions' rate is

.....way too expensive to travel with & we do notfly fr:om Kake to Juneau as a result. I strongly believe all Kake would benefit.fromthe competitive rate they.offer. Air**Ex~i.Jrsions** also· only use**th~r** small planes most ofthe time, so freight usually takes longer than it should (since space is limited&' passenger freight comesdown before freight). It is senseless to use two little planes when they own 

### & operate a much larger plane! Wings has a Caravan and they use itwhen it is necessary (which is a great advantage, especially around holidays). I notice other people in the community currently charter the Caravan occasionally, so obviously other residents appreciate that size plane. I also notice thatTal Air charters come into Kake quite often, so that also shows me that other residents would rather fly with othercompanies instead ofair excursions. It is my hope that Wings ofAlaska will be able to returntheir air service to Kake. They offered reliable, excellent service to Kake in the past & I believe itwould be beneficial

# to our community. Sincerely,
Wanda R. Friday Sent from my iPhone

1 

# .·
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3876 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3876

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 100 percent cotton narrow woven 
                                fabric.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 100 percent cotton narrow woven 
                                fabric.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 100 PERCENT COTTON NARROW WOVEN FABRIC.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00       100 percent        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        cotton narrow                                                      31/2011.......
                        woven fabric, 2
                        in.(w) x 8 in.(1)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        5806.31.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-20315

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RENE MALDONADO SOSA, also known as Samuel Valencia, also known as

Samuel Rodriguez Valencia, also known as Samuel Valencia-Rodriguez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CR-830-1

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rene Maldonado Sosa

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Sosa has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Sosa’s response. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 30, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-20315 Document: 00511710351 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/30/2011
No. 11-20315

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Sosa’s motion to proceed pro se

and to file a separate pro se brief is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158

F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

2

Case: 11-20315 Document: 00511710351 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/30/2011
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates II L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|February 16, 2010 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ex10-13.htm



Exhibit 10.13


 



Sales contract of Industrial and Mineral Products


 


                      Contract No._____


Supplier: Taiyuan Hongxing Carbon Black Co., Ltd


 


Buyer:    Shandong Luhe Group Co.,Ltd


 


Place of signing contract: Qingxu: Taiyuan


 


Date of signing contract: January 30, 2008


 


1. Product name, trade mark, model, quantity, amount of money, delivery time and quantity


 



	
Product Name

	
Model

	
Unit

	
Quantity Required/Monthly

	
Price


(RMB per ton)

	
Amount(RMB)

	
Remarks


	
Carbon Black

	
N220

	
Ton

	
150

	
5700

	  	
1. The price in this agreement is current market price 

2. The quantity is decided by the number actually occurred. 

3. Goods will be dispatched upon receipt of payment






	
Carbon Black

	
N330

	
Ton

	
120

	
5400

	  	
 


	
Carbon Black

	
N660

	
Ton

	
80

	
5400

	  	 
	
Total

	  





 


2. Quality requirements, technical standards, the conditions and duration of which supplier is responsible for: National standard or by buyer’s standard


 


3. The place of delivery and method: buyer’s warehouse, Specific quantity and delivery time are subject to telephone or fax-based communication


 


4. Means of transport, expense for transport and related items: The buyer bear the burden


 


5. Reasonable wear and tear and method of calculation    None


 


6. Packaging standards, supply and recycle of packaging materials   None


 


7. Acceptance criteria, methods, and period to hold discussion on goods delivered: Within 7 days after the delivery


 


8. Random spare, number and supply method of accessories    None


 


9. Payment method and period: Within 30 days after the delivery and the invoice being recognized.


 


10. If guaranty is needed, the guaranty agreement is also needed as appendix    None


 


11. Liability for breach of contract: It shall be settled according to the contract law of PRC


 


12. The mechanism of dispute settlement:  It shall be settled through negotiation.


 


13. Other agreed matters:


 


  a. Quality Assurance Documents


 


  b. The price is subject to the market condition, and the quantity is determined by the actual number occurred. It shall inform the buyer at 7 day’s advance if there is a change in above items.


 



	
Supplier:


Company Name (Seal):


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent :


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:

	
Buyer:


Company Name:


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent:


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:







 Valid period: From February 1, 2008 to December 31,2008
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-36487,
333-39324 and 333-100142) of Chelsea Property Group, Inc. (formerly Chelsea GCA
Realty, Inc.) and CPG Partners, L.P. (formerly Chelsea GCA Realty Partnership,
L.P.) and in the related Prospectus of our report dated February 21, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of CPG Partners LP
included in the Annual Report (Form-10-K) of CPG Partners LP for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 18, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6111

JACQUES PAUL VILLAFANA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District 

Judge. (3:12-cv-00141-JRS)

Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 5, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacques Paul Villafana, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jacques Paul Villafana seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Villafana has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### R e : S o l a O pt i cal H e r b Lev i ne to: Dante Rod r i guez 10 /26 /2011 02 : 04 PM Dante, T he new data po i nt i s i nte re s t i ng, we ll be l ow the MCL. M y s ugge s t i on wou l d be to c o ll e c t a c oup l e mo re, but do s o on a mo re f requent ba s i s . M y re c ommendat i on wou l d be to s amp l e month l ya c oup l e of t i me s and then i f the re c ent data a re c onf i r med de c l a re s u cc e ss. T he gu i dan c e and reg s a re p rettyf l e x i b l e. T he gu i dan c e, s ee page 72 and 73 of li n k , s a ys that 2 to 5 y ea rs of po s t remed i at i on s amp li ng m i ght be requ i red. T hat t i me f r ame ha s been s at i s f i ed, we c ou l d t rya s tat i s t i c a l ana l ys i s of the data f rom '07 to p re s ent to dete r m i ne a t rend. If the t rend i s c on v i n c i ng, a s I s u s pe c t i t wou l d be then i t wou l d s uppo rt the c l a i m that the p l ume ha s atta i ned the A R A R. T he li n k d i sc u ss e s a c oup l e of s tat i s t i c a l method s , p retty s i mp l e to c a l c u l ate. F o re x amp l e s ee F i gu re s 4 - 3 and 4 - 4. I wou l d be happ yto d i sc u ss fu rthe rw i th y ou. http://www.geot r an s i n c . c om/pub li c at i on s /Mon i to r i ng

_ P

_and _T_sys tem s .pdf He r b Le v i ne, U S EPA , 415.972.3062 Dante Rod r i guez 10/26/2011 09:50:21 AM H i He r b - As e x p l a i ned i n m y v o i c ema il , I'm fo ll o... F ro m: D an t e R od ri gue z/R 9 /USEPA/US To: H e r b Le v i ne /R 9 /USEPA/US@EPA D a t e: 10 /26 /2011 09 : 50 AM S ubj e c t: S o l a O p ti c al H i He r b - As e x p l a i ned i n m y v o i c ema il , I'm fo ll ow i ng up on S o l a O pt i c a l to s ee i f the re i s a te c hn i c a l j u s t i f i c at i on fo r w r app i ng i t up now and mo v i ng on to de li s t i ng. Atta c hed i s the l a s t g roundwate rmon i to r i ng repo rt ( not i n c l ud i ng append i x) that I ha v e, wh i c h doe s not i n c l ude 2010 data ( fo rwh i c h the re wa s one e v ent )
. T he c ont r a c to rto l d me that the J une 2010 re s u l t fo r1,1 - DC A ( the l a s t c ontam i nant e xc eed i ng MCL ) wa s 2.5 ug/ l i n we ll W - 27 ( the l a s t we ll mon i to red ) , s afe l ybe l ow the MCL of 5.0 ug/ l
. T he yw ill s end me the data s heet s do c ument i ng th i s . T he yha v en't y et put togethe rthe c omp l ete annua l repo rt ( a l though the 1,1 - DC A numbe rfo rwe ll W - 27 i s the on l y rea ll y re l e v ant numbe r) . Can y ou p l ea s e re v i ew and l et me k now y ou r thought s ? T han ks ! Dante Rod r i gue z , P
. E. Remed i a l P roj e c t Manager U. S
. EPA

Reg i on 9 ( 415 ) 972 - 3166 rod r i gue z .dante @ epa.gov [atta c hment "Y

_ S o l aMonRept2010

_sc an.pdf" de l eted b yHe r b Le v i ne/R9/U SEPA /U S ] ======================================================