alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2022 AFSAM

Combined Arms Barricade Team Match

CT5110

SHOOTER TEAM SCORE ROST # STATE\COUNTRY 

1 ALL GUARD (BRAVO) 646

SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 162 CO

SGT NICKERSON, MAXIM E 147 VT

SFC LOVE, COLTON L 163 IL

SFC CAPPS, JOSEPH A 122 AR

2 ALL GUARD (ALPHA) 644

SFC VARGAS, ERIK J 128 CA

SSG FULMER, MICAH N 133 CO

SGT HALL, HOWARD H 129 CA

MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 123 AR

3 BAROST RED 593

SSG CATT, KEVIN 101 UK

WO1 DOUGLAS, JIM 100 UK

CPL ROWAN, RYAN 103 UK

SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 102 UK

4 ALL GUARD (CHARLIE) 577

SFC SAGER, DEVIN S 132 CO

MSG JACKSON, JEREMY L 127 NM

SGT THOMPSON, COLBY R 143 OK

MSG GREGSON, JACOB J 139 UT

5 USAR 545

MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 115

SFC WALSH, THOMAS M 112 UT

MAJ URICK, GRANT M 114 WY

SGT HUGHES, DEVIN E 113 TN

6 BAROST BLUE 537

MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 117 UK

SSG HAZELTON, JONATHON 119 UK

SSG GORDON, COLIN 118 UK

MAJ ROSIE, LANCE 116

7 BAROST WHITE 323

LCPL GUIVER, HARRY 111 UK

Thursday, March 31, 2022 Page 1 of 2 Time printed: 18:01:08
SHOOTER TEAM SCORE ROST # STATE\COUNTRY 

CPL HAMILTON, JAMES 110 UK

CW2 WADDINGTON, JOHN 109 UK

CW2 HOWARD, CHRIS 108 UK

8 NETHERLANDS 313

CPL POOT, MARTIN 107 NETHERLANDS

SGT SMIT, ANDREW J 105 NETHERLANDS

MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 106 NETHERLANDS

1SG BOELLAARD, MAX L 104 NETHERLANDS

Thursday, March 31, 2022 Page 2 of 2 Time printed: 18:01:08
** **

**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONUNDER SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifiesthat this periodic report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AdventSoftware, Inc.

 
| April 3, 2007 |   | /s/ Graham V. Smith                       |   |   |   |   |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|               |   | Graham V. Smith                           |   |   |
|               |   | Principal Financial Officer and Secretary |   |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AdventSoftware, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CAMI STOUGH,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-1001

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 9, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Orange County,

Jenifer M. Harris, Judge.

Eric D. Dunlap and Steven K. Foster,

Assistant General Counsels, of Orange 

County Sheriff's Office, Orlando, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Cami Stough, a sergeant with the Orange County Sheriff’s Office, appeals the trial 

court’s order finding her in direct criminal contempt for refusing an order to bring detained 

juveniles into the courtroom. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.830. She argues, inter alia, that the 

contempt proceedings did not comport with the requirements of rule 3.830, and further, 
2

that the record does not support the trial court’s finding of direct criminal contempt. We 

agree and commend the State for properly conceding error. Accordingly, we reverse the 

order on appeal and remand with instructions to vacate the order.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2129

DEREK N. JARVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE CHRISTMAS ATTIC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00954-CMH-TRJ)

Submitted: December 17, 2013 Decided: December 19, 2013

Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This 

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order Jarvis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

deny Jarvis’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20490-20491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL15-59-000]


Navopache Electric Cooperative, Inc.; Notice of Petition for 
Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on April 8, 2015, pursuant to Rule 207 of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207, Navopache Electric Cooperative, Inc. 
(Navopache), filed a petition for declaratory order requesting that the 
Commission confirm Navopache's rights to purchase power and energy to 
serve its customer from suppliers other than the Public Service Company 
of New Mexico without anticompetitive limitations on the amount of such 
purchases, all as more fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public

[[Page 20491]]

Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' link on 
the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#571112051418393b3e393204222727382523173132253479303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="23656671606c4d4f4a4d46705653534c515763454651400d444c55">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on May 8, 2015.

    Dated: April 10, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08741 Filed 4-15-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# RECEIVED HEA FEe - t 

## 2012 

# RINGoocKer

January 26,2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED7002 2410 0005 1322 2399 Federal Aviation Administration Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 Re: Evergreen Intemational Airlines, Inc./FAA Case No. 2011NM90013 REQUEST FORHEARING Dear Sir or Madam, In accordance with Section 13 .16 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations, Evergreen International Airlines, Inc. requests a hearing in the above-referenced matter. Sincerely,

Cathryn V. Dannnel Attorney ofrecord Evergreen International Airlines, Inc.
Cc: DavidF. Shayne Office ofRegional Counsel- ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration NorthwestMountainRegion 1601 Lind Avenue, SW Renton, W A 98057

1200 FifthAvenue I Suite 1920 I Seattle, WA 98101 I 206.624.9914 

# DL

Damme!Law PLLG 

# II
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0270

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOR-EL RUBEN QUIROZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 20, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 14 2020

10/14/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0270
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S)1350

       (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of Dynegy
Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Nick J. Caruso, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: May 14, 2003

                                                    /s/ Nick J. Caruso
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    Nick J. Caruso
                                                    Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
#### The Chattahoochee Manufacturing Company, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Daniel C. Shultze, defendant in error.

Where no error of law is complained of, the discretion of the court below in refusing a new trial will not be interfered with unless abused.

New trial. Before Judge Buchanan. Troup Superior Court. May Term, 1873.

A report of this ease is unnecessary.

C. W. Mabry, for plaintiff in error.

Longley *&*Harris, for defendant.

*226Warner, Chief Justice.

It appears from the record in this case that Holly was indebted to the plaintiff, by note, the sum of $325 00; that the plaintiff sued out an attachment against the defendant, Holly, and garnished the Chattahoochee Manufacturing Company, which garnishment was served on the company on the 1st of April, 1870. In answer to the summons of garnishment the company denied its indebtedness to the defendant, except in the sum of ten cents. The plaintiff traversed the answer of the garnishee, and on the trial thereof, the jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sura of $325 00, with interest. A motion was made for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and decidedly against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to the principles of justice and equity; which motion was overruled by the court, and the defendant excepted. There is no error of law complained of in this case. The court below, in the exercise of its discretion, overruled the motion for a new trial, and this court, in accordance with its repeated rulings heretofore made, will mot interfere to control that discretion.

Let the judgment of the court below bé affirmed.
----

|   | (1)     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August 18, 2009 | By:    | /s/  Kyle Kennedy                                              |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                              |   | Kyle Kennedy                                                        |   |
|                              |   | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection  with the quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September  30,  2002,  of  Magnum  Hunter  Resources,  Inc.,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  the undersigned  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements
of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

     2. the information  contained in this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.


/s/Gary C. Evans
---------------------------------
Gary C. Evans, Chairman
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Date: November 14, 2002
Filed 11/9/05 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2005 ND 183

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Kevin Deon Moore, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20050144

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Debbie Gordon Kleven, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

DeWayne A. Johnston, 405 Bruce Avenue, Ste. 100A, Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Mark Jason McCarthy (appeared), Assistant State’s Attorney, and Meredith H. Larson (argued), third-year law student, P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, N.D. 58206-5607, for plaintiff and appellee.

State v. Moore

No. 20050144

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Kevin Deon Moore appeals from a judgment of conviction for attempted murder.  On appeal, Moore argues the trial court erred in not allowing him to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing.

[¶2]On February 23, 2005, Moore plead guilty to attempted murder as part of a plea agreement in which the State agreed to drop terrorizing charges against him.  On March 24, 2005, Moore moved to withdraw the plea.  The trial court denied Moore's motion, and Moore was sentenced to forty years in the North Dakota Department of Corrections with fifteen years suspended.

[¶3]The trial court’s judgment of conviction is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and the trial court did not abuse its discretion.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶4]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Children's Internet, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sholeh Hamedani, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/S/ SHOLEH HAMEDANI
-------------------------------------
Sholeh Hamedani,
Chief Executive Officer, President,
and Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3767 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3767

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 170 North Main Street in Smithfield, Utah, as the ``W. Hazen 
                    Hillyard Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. W. HAZEN HILLYARD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 170 North Main Street in Smithfield, Utah, shall be known 
and designated as the ``W. Hazen Hillyard Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``W. Hazen 
Hillyard Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Mrs. Miller *vs.*Executors of Miller and others.

DECEMBER. 1784.

cjse w

|»Ci?. *hook,,*P- *:;'L*

vi¿le ante,

Allowance for money, i-iii “•teest

The master’s report was read, whereupon ordered, that the masicEs report he confirmed, and that the executors pay the seventy pounds sterling, assessed (as (lower) with interest from the 23d November, 1783, in March next. That the defendants, Bernard Beckman asid Tho-ns ¡is Harvey pay one-third of the money assessed on the respective sinus due by then», with interest, and give- bend with security for the remainder, payable the first day of Jammy, 178(5, with interest: And that the executors do-gay all the costs at law and in equity.
November 18, 2014 

Kevin Schlemmer 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

SkyWest Airlines' Essential Air Service Termination Notice for Moab, UT 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

This letter will serve as SkyWest Airlines termination notice for turboprop air service 

between Moab, UT (CNY) and Salt Lake City, UT (SLC). The last day of service will be 

on April30, 2015. 

SkyWest will transition to an all jet fleet in 2015 and will eliminate the EMB-120 

Brasilia from the SkyWest fleet. This turboprop aircraft is currently used in service from 

Moab, UT under the Essential Air Service Program. This fleet change is driven in part by 

the additional challenges associated with the new FAR 117 flight and duty rules 

implemented in January 2014. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Thompson 

Chief Operating Officer 

SkyWest Airlines
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3061 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3061

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 190-
day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the 
                           Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 25, 2021

Ms. Collins (for herself and Ms. Smith) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 190-
day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the 
                           Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Mental Health Inpatient 
Equity Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF 190-DAY LIFETIME LIMIT ON INPATIENT PSYCHIATRIC 
              HOSPITAL SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1812 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395d) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by adding ``or'' at the end;
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``; or'' at the 
                end and inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (3); and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``(but shall not be 
        included'' and all that follows before the period at the end.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2023.
                                 <all>
```
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                 ----------------------------------





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated January 20, 1999, appearing on
page 42 of Exabyte Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended January 2, 1999.




/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 23, 2000