25074 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 85 / Friday, May 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: April 21, 2014. 

Judith A. Enck, 

Regional Administrator, Region 2. 

[FR Doc. 2014–09982 Filed 5–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2008–0122; FRL–9910–03- 

Region 10] 

Approval and Promulgation of State 

Implementation Plans: Washington; 

Puget Sound Ozone Maintenance Plan 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to 

approve a maintenance plan for the 

Central Puget Sound area to maintain 

the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS) through 

2015. This plan was submitted by the 

Washington Department of Ecology as a 

revision to its State Implementation 

Plan on January 10, 2008. The 

maintenance plan for this area meets all 

Clean Air Act requirements, and 

demonstrates that the Central Puget 

Sound area will remain in attainment 

with the 1997 and 2008 ozone NAAQS 

through 2015. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 2, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10– 

OAR–2008–0122, by any of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: R10-Public_Comments@

epa.gov. 

• Mail: Mr. Keith Rose, U.S. EPA 

Region 10, Office of Air, Waste and 

Toxics, AWT–107, 1200 Sixth Avenue, 

Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. EPA 

Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 

900, Seattle WA 98101. Attention: Keith 

Rose, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, 

AWT–107. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during normal hours of 

operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Please see the direct final rule which is 

located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Keith Rose at telephone number: (206) 

553–1949, email address: rose.keith@

epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 10 

address. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 

further information, please see the 

direct final action, of the same title, 

which is located in the Rules section of 

this Federal Register. The EPA is 

simultaneously approving the State’s 

SIP revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the EPA 

views this as a noncontroversial SIP 

revision and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the preamble to 

the direct final rule. If the EPA receives 

no adverse comments, the EPA will not 

take further action on this proposed 

rule. 

If the EPA receives adverse 

comments, the EPA will withdraw the 

direct final rule and it will not take 

effect. The EPA will address all public 

comments in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. The EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period on this action. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. Please note 

that if we receive adverse comment on 

an amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

the EPA may adopt as final those 

provisions of the rule that are not the 

subject of an adverse comment. 

Dated: April 10, 2014. 

Michelle L. Pirzadeh, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2014–09880 Filed 5–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 80 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0546; FRL–9910–24– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AS21 

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel 

Additives: 2013 Cellulosic Biofuel 

Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to revise the 

2013 cellulosic biofuel standard 

published on August 15, 2013. This 

action follows from EPA having granted 

two petitioners’ requests for 

reconsideration of the 2013 cellulosic 

biofuel standard. EPA granted 

reconsideration because one of the two 

companies that EPA expected to 

produce cellulosic biofuel in 2013 

announced soon after EPA signed its 

final rule that it intended to produce 

substantially lower volumes of 

cellulosic biofuel in 2013 than it had 

earlier reported to EPA. Since the 

cellulosic biofuel standard was based on 

EPA’s projection of cellulosic biofuel 

production in 2013, EPA deemed this 

new information to be of central 

relevance to the rule, warranting 

reconsideration. On reconsideration, 

EPA is directed to base the standard on 

the lower of ‘‘projected’’ production of 

cellulosic fuel in 2013 or the cellulosic 

biofuel applicable volume set forth in 

the statute. Since data are available to 

show actual production volumes for 

2013, EPA’s ‘‘projection’’ and proposal 

are based on actual cellulosic biofuel 

production in 2013. This action only 

affects the 2013 cellulosic biofuel 

standard; all other RFS standards 

remain unchanged. EPA is proposing a 

revised cellulosic biofuel standard of 

0.0005% for 2013. In the ‘‘Rules and 

Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register, we are making this same 

amendment as a direct final rule. If we 

receive no adverse comment, the direct 

final rule will go into effect and we will 

not take further action on this proposed 

rule. 

DATES: A request for a public hearing 

must be received by May 19, 2014. If a 

public hearing request is received, EPA 

will publish a document in the Federal 

Register indicating the time and place 

for the hearing. If a public hearing is 

held, written comments must be 

received within 30 days after the date of 

the hearing. If no public hearing is held 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 85 / Friday, May 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 25075 

then comments must be received on or 

before June 2, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2012–00546, by one of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 

• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and 

Information Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. 

• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, 

EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Docket’s normal 

hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2012– 

0546. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http://

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

For additional instructions on 

submitting comments, go to Section I.B 

of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section of this document. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air and Radiation Docket and 

Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC. The Public 

Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The telephone 

number for the Public Reading Room is 

(202) 566–1744, and the telephone 

number for the Air Docket is (202) 566– 

1742. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia 

MacAllister, Office of Transportation 

and Air Quality, Assessment and 

Standards Division, Environmental 

Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood 

Drive, Ann Arbor MI 48105; Telephone 

number: 734–214–4131; Fax number: 

734–214–4816; Email address: 

macallister.julia@epa.gov, or the public 

information line for the Office of 

Transportation and Air Quality; 

telephone number (734) 214–4333; 

Email address OTAQ@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Why is EPA issuing a proposed rule? 

EPA is proposing to amend the 2013 

cellulosic biofuel standard that was 

finalized in ‘‘Regulation of Fuels and 

Fuel Additives: 2013 Renewable Fuel 

Standards; Final Rule,’’ (August 15, 

2013; 78 FR 49794). This action follows 

from EPA having granted, on January 

23, 2014, requests for reconsideration of 

the 2013 cellulosic biofuel standard 

submitted by the American Petroleum 

Institute and the American Fuel & 

Petrochemical Manufacturers. In 

granting reconsideration, EPA 

determined that petitioners had met the 

statutory criteria of section 307(d)(7)(B) 

of the Clean Air Act, since petitioners 

had identified new information of 

central relevance that became available 

after the comment period closed but 

within the time period specified for 

parties to seek judicial review. A direct 

final rule that would make the same 

changes as those proposed in this 

document appears in the ‘‘Rules and 

Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register. The EPA is taking direct final 

action because we view this action as 

noncontroversial. We have explained 

our reasons for granting reconsideration 

in the preamble to the direct final rule. 

If we receive no relevant adverse 

comment or hearing request on the 

direct final rule, we will not take further 

action on this proposed rule. If EPA 

receives relevant adverse comment or a 

hearing request, we will publish a 

timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register of the direct final rule. We will 

address all public comments in any 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. We will not institute a 

second comment period on this action. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

must do so at this time. For further 

information about commenting on this 

rule see the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. 

The proposed changes to the 

regulatory text are identical to those 

presented in the direct final rule 

published in the ‘‘Rules and 

Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register. For further information, 

including a detailed explanation and 

rationale for the proposal and the text of 

the proposed regulatory revisions, see 

the direct final rule published in the 

‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this 

Federal Register. 

II. Does this action apply to me? 

Entities potentially affected by this 

proposed rule are those involved with 

the production, distribution, and sale of 

transportation fuels, including gasoline 

and diesel fuel or renewable fuels such 

as ethanol and biodiesel. Potentially 

regulated categories include: 

Category NAICS1

Codes SIC 2 Codes Examples of potentially 

regulated entities 

Industry ............................................................. 324110 2911 Petroleum Refineries. 

Industry ............................................................. 325193 2869 Ethyl alcohol manufacturing. 

Industry ............................................................. 325199 2869 Other basic organic chemical manufacturing. 

Industry ............................................................. 424690 5169 Chemical and allied products merchant wholesalers. 

Industry ............................................................. 424710 5171 Petroleum bulk stations and terminals. 

Industry ............................................................. 424720 5172 Petroleum and petroleum products merchant wholesalers. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
25076 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 85 / Friday, May 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

Category NAICS1

Codes SIC 2 Codes Examples of potentially 

regulated entities 

Industry ............................................................. 454319 5989 Other fuel dealers. 

1 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). 

2Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system code. 

This table is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

regulated by this proposed action. This 

table lists the types of entities that EPA 

is now aware could potentially be 

regulated by this proposed action. Other 

types of entities not listed in the table 

could also be regulated. To determine 

whether your activities would be 

regulated by this action, you should 

carefully examine the applicability 

criteria in 40 CFR part 80. If you have 

any questions regarding the 

applicability of this proposed action to 

a particular entity, consult the person 

listed in the preceding section. 

III. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

A. Submitting CBI 

Do not submit confidential business 

information (CBI) to EPA through 

www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly 

mark the part or all of the information 

that you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

B. Tips for Preparing Your Comments 

When submitting comments, 

remember to: 

• Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

• Follow directions—The agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

• Explain why you agree or disagree, 

suggest alternatives, and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

• Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

• If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

• Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

• Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

• Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

C. Docket Copying Costs 

You may be charged a reasonable fee 

for photocopying docket materials, as 

provided in 40 CFR part 2. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

This proposed action is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

the terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 

FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is 

therefore not subject to review under 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 

FR 3821, January 21, 2011). 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

There are no new information 

collection requirements associated with 

the proposed standards in this 

rulemaking. The proposed standards 

would impose no new or different 

reporting requirements on regulated 

parties. The existing information 

collection requests (ICR) that apply to 

the RFS program are sufficient to 

address the reporting requirements in 

the proposed regulations. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. The OMB control 

numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40 

CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

generally requires an agency to prepare 

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 

rule subject to notice and comment 

rulemaking requirements under the 

Administrative Procedures Act or any 

other statute unless the agency certifies 

that the rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. Small entities 

include small businesses, small 

organizations, and small governmental 

jurisdictions. 

For purposes of assessing the impacts 

of today’s proposed rule on small 

entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A 

small business as defined by the Small 

Business Administration’s (SBA) 

regulations at 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a 

small governmental jurisdiction that is a 

government of a city, county, town, 

school district or special district with a 

population of less than 50,000; and (3) 

a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. 

After considering the economic 

impacts of today’s rule on small entities, 

I certify that this proposed rule will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

This proposed rule reconsiders the 

annual volume requirement for 

cellulosic biofuel for 2013 which is 

being reduced from the total of 6 million 

ethanol-equivalent gallons finalized in 

the 2013 RFS annual rule and published 

on August 15, 2013 to 810,185 ethanolequivalent gallons. The impacts of the 

RFS2 program on small entities were 

already addressed in the RFS2 final rule 

promulgated on March 26, 2010 (75 FR 

14670), and this proposed rule will not 

impose any additional requirements on 

small entities beyond those already 

analyzed. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This proposed action contains no 

Federal mandates under the provisions 

of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 

1531–1538 for State, local, or tribal 

governments or the private sector. This 

action implements mandate(s) 

specifically and explicitly set forth by 

the Congress in Clean Air Act section 

211(o) without the exercise of any 

policy discretion by EPA. Therefore, 

this action is not subject to the 

requirements of sections 202 or 205 of 

the UMRA. 

This action is also not subject to the 

requirements of section 203 of UMRA 

because it contains no regulatory 

requirements that might significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments. This 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 85 / Friday, May 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 25077 

proposed rule only applies to gasoline, 

diesel, and renewable fuel producers, 

importers, distributors and marketers 

and merely proposes to revise the 2013 

cellulosic biofuel standard to reflect 

actual production in 2013 for the RFS 

program. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the States, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132. This action 

proposes to revise the 2013 annual 

cellulosic biofuel standard for the RFS 

program and only applies to gasoline, 

diesel, and renewable fuel producers, 

importers, distributors and marketers. 

Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not 

apply to this rule. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000). This proposed rule will be 

implemented at the Federal level and 

affects transportation fuel refiners, 

blenders, marketers, distributors, 

importers, exporters, and renewable fuel 

producers and importers. Tribal 

governments would be affected only to 

the extent they purchase and use 

regulated fuels. Thus, Executive Order 

13175 does not apply to this action. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

EPA interprets EO 13045 (62 FR 

19885, April 23, 1997) as applying only 

to those regulatory actions that concern 

health or safety risks, such that the 

analysis required under section 5–501 of 

the EO has the potential to influence the 

regulation. This action is not subject to 

EO 13045 because it does not establish 

an environmental standard intended to 

mitigate health or safety risks and 

because it implements specific 

standards established by Congress in 

statutes (section 211(o) of the Clean Air 

Act). 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ as defined in Executive 

Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning 

Regulations That Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 

FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)) because it is 

not likely to have a significant adverse 

effect on the supply, distribution, or use 

of energy. This action simply proposes 

to revises the 2013 annual cellulosic 

standard for renewable fuel under the 

RFS program. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law 

104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) 

directs EPA to use voluntary consensus 

standards in its regulatory activities 

unless to do so would be inconsistent 

with applicable law or otherwise 

impractical. Voluntary consensus 

standards are technical standards (e.g., 

materials specifications, test methods, 

sampling procedures, and business 

practices) that are developed or adopted 

by voluntary consensus standards 

bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide 

Congress, through OMB, explanations 

when the Agency decides not to use 

available and applicable voluntary 

consensus standards. 

This proposed rulemaking does not 

involve technical standards. Therefore, 

EPA is not considering the use of any 

voluntary consensus standards. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 

7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

EPA has determined that this 

proposed rule will not have 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on minority or low-income populations 

because it does not affect the level of 

protection provided to human health or 

the environment. This action does not 

relax the control measures on sources 

regulated by the RFS regulations and 

therefore will not cause emissions 

increases from these sources. 

V. Statutory Authority 

Statutory authority for this proposed 

action comes from section 211 of the 

Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7545. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Air pollution control, Diesel 

fuel, Environmental protection, Fuel 

additives, Gasoline, Imports, Oil 

imports, Petroleum, Renewable fuel. 

Dated: April 22, 2014. 

Gina McCarthy, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2014–10134 Filed 5–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 81 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0266; FRL–9910–31– 

Region–9] 

Designation of Areas for Air Quality 

Planning Purposes; State of Arizona; 

Pinal County and Gila County; Pb 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 107(d)(3) 

of the Clean Air Act, the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 

redesignate the Hayden area in Arizona, 

which encompasses portions of 

southern Gila and eastern Pinal 

counties, from ‘‘unclassifiable’’ to 

‘‘nonattainment’’ for the 2008 national 

ambient air quality standards for lead 

(Pb). EPA’s proposal to redesignate the 

Hayden area is based on recorded 

violations of the Pb standards at the 

Arizona Department of Environmental 

Quality’s (ADEQ’s) Globe Highway 

monitoring site, located near the towns 

of Hayden and Winkleman, Arizona, 

and additional relevant air quality 

information. The effect of this action 

would be to redesignate the Hayden area 

to nonattainment for the Pb standards 

and thereby to impose certain planning 

requirements on the State of Arizona to 

reduce Pb concentrations within this 

area, including, but not limited to, the 

requirement to submit, within 18 

months of redesignation, a revision to 

the Arizona state implementation plan 

that provides for attainment of the Pb 

standards as expeditiously as 

practicable, but no later than five years 

after the date of redesignation to 

nonattainment. 

DATES: Any comments must arrive by 

June 2, 2014. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS