alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              2,332,560
<SECURITIES>                                           91,110
<RECEIVABLES>                                          86,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    3,162,171
<PP&E>                                                198,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (64,859)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      4,019,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               2,097,200
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                               17,594
<OTHER-SE>                                          1,904,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        4,019,140
<SALES>                                             1,430,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    1,480,665
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    3,520,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (2,039,861)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           97,644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (2,137,505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2,137,505)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.13)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc Teal, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership");



1. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
3. The Partnership's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date (the "Evaluation Date") within 45 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report; and
3. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



1. The Partnership's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Partnership's auditors and the audit committee of the Partnership's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



1. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Partnership's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Partnership's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Partnership's internal controls; and



1. The Partnership's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|Date:  November 20, 2003 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                     
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------
|                         | Marc N. Teal, Chief
Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-42743, 333-62131, 333-73807, 333-83229, 333-87493, 333-61746
and 333-108136, and Form S-4 Nos. 333-112711 and 333-112765) of NCO Group, Inc.
of our report dated February 6, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of NCO Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 15, 2004
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00071

- CV

EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER REGION 2

v. GLOBAL SPECTRUM, LP D/B/A SPECTRA VENUE MANAGEMENT AND NUECES COUNTY

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019C CV

- 61753

- 2

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in

acco rdance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 30, 2022
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Energy  Producers,  Inc.

(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  March 31, 2004,

as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof

(the  "Report"),  I,  Charles Alliban,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the

Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to

ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)

or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of

the Company.



Date:  May 17, 2004



/s/ Charles Alliban

------------------

Charles Alliban

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Dennis R. Alexander,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 17, 2005



/s/ Dennis R. Alexander

Dennis R. Alexander

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3775 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3775

To exempt certain small businesses from the attestation requirement of 
             section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2009

  Mr. Garrett of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To exempt certain small businesses from the attestation requirement of 
             section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business SOX Compliance Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM.

    Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Securities and Exchange Commission shall modify its regulations under 
section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7262) to 
exempt non-accelerated filers (as defined in such regulations on the 
date of enactment of this Act) from the requirements of subsection (b) 
of such section.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. on
Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2016 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Koichi Miyata, President and Representative Director of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial
Group, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Date:
June 29, 2016



|                  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Koichi Miyata
|Name:             |  | Koichi Miyata                        
|Title:            |  | President and Representative Director
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), I, Darrell Borne, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that:

This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|May 21, 2004 |  | /s/DARRELL BORNEDarrell Borne
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
The Board of Directors
Pixar:
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 33-99838 and No. 333-62047) on Form S-8 of Pixar of our reports dated
January 29, 1999, relating to the balance sheets of Pixar as of December 31,
1997 and January 2, 1999, and the related statements of operations,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended January 2, 1999, and the related schedule, which reports appear or
are incorporated by reference in the 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Pixar.
                                          /s/ KPMG LLP
 
San Francisco, California
March 31, 1999
#### Stahlnecker v. Stahlnecker.

*Judgment*— *Revival*— *Decedents’ estates*— *Death of defendant*— Act *of June 7, 1917.*

Under the Act of June 7, 1917, P. L. 447, a *scire facias*to revive a judgment will be quashed where it has been issued more than two years after the death of the defendant in the judgment.

*Scire facias*to revive judgment. C. P. Snyder Co., Feb. T., 1922, No. 67.

*H. H. Grimm,*for writ of *scire facias; A. F. Gilbert,*contra.

April 25, 1922.

Potter, P. J.,

This is a writ of *scire facias*issued out of the Court of Common Pleas of Snyder County to revive judgment No. 24, of December Term, 1902, in which David Stahlnecker is the plaintiff and Aaron Stahlnecker is the defendant.

Aaron Stahlnecker died on Oct. 16,1918, and no administration of his estate has been had up to the present time. The praecipe for the writ of *scire facias*is dated Feb. 2, 1922; the writ of *scire facias*is dated the same day, and was served upon J. E. Stahlnecker and upon Carrie Moyer on the 4th day of the same month by the Sheriff of Snyder County, and upon J. L. Stahlnecker by the Sheriff of Allegheny County on the 14th day of the same month.

The Fiduciaries Act of June 7, 1917, § 15, cl. (f), P. L. 447, 476, provides as follows: “Judgments which were not liens on the real estate of the decedent by entry or revival, by due process of law, within five years prior to the death of such decedent, shall not be revived as liens of record against real estate by the *746death of the defendant, but shall rank and be treated simply as ordinary debts not of record; and the lien thereof shall be continued, after the expiration of one year from the decease of such debtor, only by a writ of *scire facias*to revive, issued within one year after the death of the decedent, indexed as provided in clauses (a) and *(d)*of this section, and duly prosecuted to judgment; and then to be a lien only for the period of five years, unless the same be revived by writ of *scire facias*as provided in clause *(a)*of this section.”

Aaron Stahlnecker died on Oct. 16, 1918. The year during which the writ of *scire facias*might have issued expired on Oct. 16, 1919. It is plainly seen that this writ of *scire facias*is over two years too late and will have to be quashed.

An administration could have been raised, if necessary, in order to expedite matters, and the act hereinbefore cited states how it can be done.

And now, to wit, April 25, 1922, the writ of *scire facias*in this case is quashed, the costs incident to it to be paid by the use-plaintiff.

From Charles P. Ulrich, Selins Grove, Fa.
Order entered April 22, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00141-CV

IN RE IRVING LONG TERM CARE, LLC D/B/A LAS BRISAS 

REHABILITATION & WELLNESS SUITES AND THI OF TEXAS, LLC,

Relators

Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-12843-K

ORDER

Justices Molberg, Partida-Kipness, and Reichek

It has come to our attention that two of the defendants have removed the 

underlying suit to the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

Texas through the filing of a March 17, 2021 notice of removal in the trial court. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1446(d), once removal is effected, “the State court shall 

proceed no further unless and until the case is remanded.” 28 U.S.C. §1446(d); see 

Meyerland Co. v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Co, 848 S.W.2d 82, 83 (Tex. 1993).

Accordingly, for administrative purposes, this original proceeding is 

ABATED. It may be reinstated on prompt motion by any party showing that the 
case has been remanded and specifying what further action, if any, is required from 

this Court.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    Exhibit 4.68

  FIRST AMENDMENT FOR PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION ON CDMA 2000-IX EQUIPMENT IN
    DIVRE V EAST JAVA NO. K.TEL. 179/HK.910/ITS-00/2006, DATED 1 AUGUST 2006

<TABLE>
<S>                     <C>
The Parties:            1.   TELKOM; and

                        2.   SAMSUNG Consortium ("Consortium").

Preceding Agreement:    Main Agreement No. K.TEL.107/HK.910/ITS-00/2006.

Transfer of Right and
Obligation:             TELKOM transfers all rights and obligations in the main
                        agreement to the Consortium. Nevertheless the
                        contractual single responsibility of the result of works
                        cause of the execution of the main agreement and the
                        amendment is still at the hand of the Consortium.

Payment:                Payment shall be made by TELKOM through direct transfer.
</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. on
Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Koichi Miyata, President and Representative Director of Sumitomo
Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. certify that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Date:
July 29, 2011



|                  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Koichi Miyata
|Name:             |  | Koichi Miyata                        
|Title:            |  | President and Representative Director
Order entered June 10, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 12 - 01486 - CR No. 05 - 12 - 01487 - CR LOUIS HANCOCK DAITCH , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F11 - 45639 - J , F11 - 45640 - J



### O RDER In these cases, appellant raises issues related to the costs assessed against him. The records, however, do not contain costs bills or other documents with itemized lists of costs assessed in the cases. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, supplemental clerk’s records containing detailed itemizations of the costs assessed in the cases, including, but not limited to, s pecific court costs, fees, and court

appointed attorney fees. The supplemental clerk’s records shall also include documents explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court

- appointed attorney fee.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  PHYTOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:  March 28, 2008By:/s/ Harmel S. RayatHarmel S. Rayat
Chief Financial Officer   This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.