Impact of E10/E15 Placement on Average In-Use RVP Levels in 2

Region CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg

PADD 1 8.5 7.0 8.0 9.0 7.0 8.3 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.34 -0.27

PADD 2 9.2 7.1 8.9 9.3 7.1 9.0 8.8 7.0 8.5 0.07 -0.45

PADD 3 8.5 7.0 8.2 8.9 7.0 8.5 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.29 -0.30

PADDs 4/5-CA 9.1 7.0 8.9 9.5 7.0 9.2 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.29 -0.49

California N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00

Nationwide 8.8 7.0 8.2 9.2 7.0 8.5 8.7 7.0 8.1 0.24 -0.32

Lotus Notes Friendly Version

Impact of E10/E15 Placement on Average In-Use RVP Levels in 2017

Assuming E10/E15 is Distributed Evenly Nationwide

CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg

PADD 1 8.5 7.0 8.0 9.0 7.0 8.3 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.34 -0.27

PADD 2 9.2 7.1 8.9 9.3 7.1 9.0 8.8 7.0 8.5 0.07 -0.45

PADD 3 8.5 7.0 8.2 8.9 7.0 8.5 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.29 -0.30

PADDs 4/5-CA 9.1 7.0 8.9 9.5 7.0 9.2 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.29 -0.49

California N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00

Nationwide 8.8 7.0 8.2 9.2 7.0 8.5 8.7 7.0 8.1 0.24 -0.32

Assuming 75% of RFG is E15 (Balance of E15 goes to CG)

CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg

PADD 1 8.5 7.0 8.0 9.2 7.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.43 -0.36

PADD 2 9.2 7.1 8.9 9.5 7.1 9.1 8.8 7.0 8.6 0.21 -0.58

PADD 3 8.5 7.0 8.2 9.1 7.0 8.6 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.38 -0.39

PADDs 4/5-CA 9.1 7.0 8.9 9.6 7.0 9.3 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.43 -0.63

California N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00

Assuming E10/E15 is Distributed Evenly Nationwide

RFS1 Ref Case RFS2 Ref Case Tier 3 Control RVP 

Under 

RFS2

RVP 

Under 

Tier3

Tier 3 Control RVP 

Under 

RFS2

RVP 

Under 

Tier3

RFS1 Ref Case RFS2 Ref Case Tier 3 Control RVP 

Under 

RFS2

RVP 

Under 

Tier3

Region

Region

RFS1 Ref Case RFS2 Ref Case
Nationwide 8.8 7.0 8.2 9.3 7.0 8.6 8.7 7.0 8.2 0.34 -0.41

Assuming 90% of RFG is E15 (Balance of E15 goes to CG)

CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg

PADD 1 8.5 7.0 8.0 9.2 7.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.47 -0.40

PADD 2 9.2 7.1 8.9 9.6 7.1 9.2 8.8 7.0 8.6 0.27 -0.64

PADD 3 8.5 7.0 8.2 9.1 7.0 8.6 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.42 -0.43

PADDs 4/5-CA 9.1 7.0 8.9 9.7 7.0 9.4 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.49 -0.69

California N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00

Nationwide 8.8 7.0 8.2 9.4 7.0 8.6 8.7 7.0 8.2 0.38 -0.45

Tier 3 Control RVP 

Under 

RFS2

RVP 

Under 

Region Tier3

RFS1 Ref Case RFS2 Ref Case
2017

CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg

8.5 7.0 8.0 9.2 7.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.43 -0.36 8.5 7.0 8.0

9.2 7.1 8.9 9.5 7.1 9.1 8.8 7.0 8.6 0.21 -0.58 9.2 7.1 8.9

8.5 7.0 8.2 9.1 7.0 8.6 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.38 -0.39 8.5 7.0 8.2

9.1 7.0 8.9 9.6 7.0 9.3 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.43 -0.63 9.1 7.0 8.9

N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00 N/A 7.0 7.0

8.8 7.0 8.2 9.3 7.0 8.6 8.7 7.0 8.2 0.34 -0.41 8.8 7.0 8.2

RVP 

Under 

RFS2

RVP 

Under 

Tier3

RFS1 Ref Case RFS2 Ref Case

Assuming 75% of RFG is E15 (Balance of E15 goes to CG) Assuming 9

Tier 3 Control RFS1 Ref Case

CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg

9.2 7.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.47 -0.40

9.6 7.1 9.2 8.8 7.0 8.6 0.27 -0.64

9.1 7.0 8.6 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.42 -0.43

9.7 7.0 9.4 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.49 -0.69

N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00

9.4 7.0 8.6 8.7 7.0 8.2 0.38 -0.45

90% of RFG is E15 (Balance of E15 goes to CG)

RFS2 Ref Case Tier 3 Control RVP 

Under 

RFS2

RVP 

Under 

Tier3