alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDING MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,374
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,055)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,939
<PP&E>                                          12,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,607)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,422
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     25,258
<COMMON>                                        35,716
<OTHER-SE>                                    (71,938)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,458
<SALES>                                         17,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,574
<CGS>                                               65
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,866
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,866
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,866
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
Motion Granted and Order filed April 12, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00818

- CR

____________ JESUS F. MORALES , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 184 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1399181



### ORDER
Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has filed a motion to review the record so he may prepare a pro se brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous
v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is GRANTED

. Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 239th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in ac cordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before April 27, 2016 ; that theclerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant

is made; and that appellant fi le his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that
date.

PER CURIAM
p130076.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0076

Focus Ready Draft 11/19/2012

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ AH

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1
p130076.eng

 

SAT (concerns) (11/09/2012):

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P1B1T1

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1ppb,

amide SAR), XB Testing (Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 2
p130076.eng

Page 3
p130076.eng

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0076

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 4
p130076.eng

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0076

 

 

 

Page 5
p130076.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 6
p130076.eng

 

 

 

 

 

Page 7
# goFarm GF

- 1 Preflight Checklist

Before Energizing System

1. Arms up and locked in flight position

2. Props installed on correct motors

3. Prop bolts tight

4. Props clean and undamaged

5. Motors turn smoothly

6. Batteries secure

7. Wiring in good condition

8. Flight control system connections secure

9. Transmitter on

a. Transmitter vehicle select: SeedScout

b. Transmitter battery level > flight minimum

10. Ground Control S tation (GCS) on

a. Waypoints loaded , as appropriate

b. Waypoints in clear airspace, according to UAS flight rules

11. Flight b a ttery voltage >

= 90% maximum pack voltage

a. >= 22.7V for 6S LiPo flight pack

12. Weather forecast

a. VMC for duration of planned flight + 30 minutes

b. Winds < 15 kts steady, 25 kts gust



## Energize System

13. Connect main power connector

14. Monitor for correct startup sequence

15. On GCS :

a. Communications link established

b. GPS positioning locked

c. Accelerometers calibrated

d. Compass calibrated

e. Transmitter control direction correct

f. Altitude limitation set

g. Distance limitation set

h. Waypoints loaded onboard UAS



## Starting Motors

16. Position UAS at launch location

17. Establish position as “home”

18. Reset flight timer

19. Verify desired flight control mode

20. Verify surroundings are clear

a. “Clear Props!”
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6641

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AUGUSTINE PEREZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-90-112-R, CA-97-179-R)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Augustine Perez, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Augustine Perez seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Perez, Nos. CR-90-112-R; CA-97-179-R (W.D. Va.

Apr. 9 & Mar. 18, 1998). While the district court erred by denying

certain of Perez’s claims as untimely filed, since the statute of

limitations was waived by the Government’s failure to raise the

defense, we find these nonconstitutional claims cannot be raised in

a collateral attack and are patently meritless. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Tempest UAS 

The Tempest UAS airframe (the UA) is designed for fast assembly, easy stowage, and simple 

recovery. Although it is designed for hand launch, typical operations utilized a custom cradle and 

bungee launch system, referred to as a hi-start, that could be set up in a matter of minutes. Figure 

4(a) shows the Tempest UA on its hi-start launch cradle just prior to launch, and Figure 4(b) 

shows a CAD-model three-view of the Tempest UA airframe with major dimensions. 

(a) 

Figure 4 (a) Tempest UA in its hi-start catapult cradle moments before launch for 10 Jun 

2010 supercell intercept,
(b) 

(b) CAD-model three-view, of the Tempest UA with dimensions in meters. 

The wings of the Tempest UA are designed for an estimated maximum 14-g load, and are 

unchanged from the original high-performance sailplane design, except for slight 

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics modifications to accommodate a 

meteorological sonde mount. The fuselage is completely redesigned to accommodate an electric 

motor, electronic speed controller (ESC), a propulsion battery, and the UAS avionics and 

communications hardware with its dedicated battery. The typical takeoff weight is 14 lb (6.4 kg). 

The Tempest UA is launched under manual control from a handset connected to the GCS console. 

After climb-out, the UAS operator takes control from the manual pilot and verifies that the C3 

systems are functioning before the UA is “electronically leashed” to the tracker. Once the UA is 

leashed the autopilot receives steering commands from the NetUAS software running on the UA 

flight computer. The UA then follows the GPS location of the tracker as it is driven.
### Court of Appeals, State of Michigan

ORDER

People of MI v Madison Danielle Perry

Docket No. 355330

LC No. 2020

- 00345

- AR Ma rk T. Boonstra Presiding Judge

Jane E. Markey

Deborah A. Servitto Judges

The August 12, 2021 majority opinion is hereby AMENDED to correct a clerical error: On the first page author line, the “ P ER C URIAM ” designation is corrected to read " S ERVITTO

, J. "

In all other respects, the August 12, 2021 majority opinion remains unchanged.

_______________________________ Presiding Judge
First Amendment to Loan Agreement For Construction and Other Matters



 Exhibit 10-3 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT 

FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER MATTERS 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to Loan Agreement for Construction and other Matters is entered into this
18th day of May, 2010, by and between Pineapple House of
Brevard, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Borrower”) and Branch Banking and Trust Company (“Lender”). 

RECITALS 

WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender previously entered into a Loan Agreement for Construction and other Matters dated November 18,
2005 (“Loan Agreement”); and, 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Loan Agreement as provided herein;

 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. 

2. The Note as defined in the Loan Agreement has been modified on even date. The principal balance of the Note will hereafter and for all
purposes not exceed $881,000.00. The interest reserve is currently $106,791.08. Finally, the Note is hereinafter non-revolving. 

3. The Loan Agreement is hereinafter revised to reflect the modification of the Note as set forth in Paragraph 2, hereof. 

4. All the other terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this instrument the date stated above. 

 

									
	Lender:	 		 	Borrower:
	Branch Bank and Trust Company	 		 	Pineapple House of Brevard, Inc.
					
	By:	 	     /s/ Debra Pavlakos
	 		 	By:	 	     /s/ Stephen R. Wherry, Treasurer

		 	Debra Pavlakos, Senior Vice President	 		 		 	Stephen R. Wherry, Treasurer








 CONSENT 

The undersigned Guarantors hereby consent to the forgoing First Amendment. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this instrument the date stated above. 

 

			
	The Goldfield Corporation
		
	By:	 	   /s/ Stephen R. Wherry, S.V.P.

	Stephen R. Wherry, Senior Vice President
	
	Bayswater Development Corporation
		
	By:	 	   /s/ Stephen R. Wherry, Treasurer

	Stephen R. Wherry, Treasurer
	
	Oak Park of Brevard, Inc.
		
	By:	 	   /s/ Stephen R. Wherry, Treasurer

	Stephen R. Wherry, Treasurer
	
	Southeast Power Corporation
		
	By:	 	   /s/ Stephen R. Wherry, Treasurer

	Stephen R. Wherry, Treasurer
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Amendment to the Quarterly  Report of First Horizon
Pharmaceutical Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"),  I, Mahendra G. Shah,  Ph.D.,  Chairman,  Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Mahendra G. Shah, Ph.D
---------------------------
Mahendra G. Shah, Ph.D.
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
August 16, 2002
November 18, 2014
Kevin Schlemmer Office ofAviation Analysis US Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Ave SE Washington, D.C. 20590 SkyWest Airlines' Essential Air Service Termination Notice for Moab, UT
DearMr. Schlemmer: This letter will serve as SkyWestAirlines termination notice for turboprop air service between Moab, UT (CNY) and SaltLake City, UT (SLC). The last day ofservice will be on April30, 2015. SkyWest will transition to an alljet fleet in 2015 and will eliminate the EMB-120 Brasilia from the SkyWest fleet. This turboprop aircraft is currently used in service from Moab, UTunderthe Essential Air Service Program. This fleet change is driven in part by the additional challenges associated with the new FAR 117 flight and duty rules implemented in January 2014. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely,

Michael Thompson ChiefOperating Officer SkyWest Airlines
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                            ALPHANET SOLUTIONS, INC.
 
                  COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                        -----------------------
                                                           1995        1996
                                                        ----------- -----------
<S>                                                     <C>         <C>
Pro forma net income................................... $     2,439 $     3,463
                                                        =========== ===========
Weighted average number of common shares and common
 shares equivalent
  Common shares........................................       3,400       4,690
  Shares necessary to fund S Corporation Distribution
   less outstanding loan to shareholder................         551         130
  Cheap stock (treasury stock method)..................          37           9
                                                        ----------- -----------
                                                              3,988       4,829
                                                        =========== ===========
Pro forma net income per share......................... $      0.61 $      0.72
                                                        =========== ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         220,562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,920
<PP&E>                                          36,871
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 274,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,007
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,446,185
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   274,618
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (452,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3822 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3822

To permit employers to provide contributions and assistance to certain 
          employees who purchase individual health insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 2009

 Mr. Deal of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Blunt, 
  Mr. Barton of Texas, and Mr. Buyer) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and in 
 addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit employers to provide contributions and assistance to certain 
          employees who purchase individual health insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS AND ASSISTANCE FOR EMPLOYEE HEALTH 
              INSURANCE PURCHASES.

    (a) In General.--An employer that does not offer health benefits 
coverage to its employees as of the date of the enactment of this Act 
is permitted in accordance with law to provide tax-free defined 
contributions and administrative assistance to such employees who 
choose to purchase health insurance coverage in the individual market. 
The provision of such tax-free contributions and administrative 
assistance shall not constitute establishment or maintenance of a group 
health plan for purposes of applying part 7 of subtitle B of title I of 
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 or title XXVIII of 
the Public Health Service Act.
    (b) Construction.--A State may not prohibit an employer from taking 
any of the actions described in subsection (a) and may not prohibit the 
sale of health insurance coverage to employees in cases where an 
employer's involvement is limited to withholding premiums from the 
employees' paychecks and sending the premium payments to the health 
insurance issuer offering the coverage on the employees' behalf.
    (c) Not Treated as List Billing.--The provisions of section 
702(c)(2)(ii) of title 29, Code of Federal Regulations (relating to 
list billing) shall not be construed to apply to actions described in 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
## FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 05/04/99 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 98-4230

________________________ D. C. Docket No. 97-3799-CIV-DAVIS RALPH RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States; DORIS MEISSNER, Commission, Immigration and Naturalization Service; ROBERT WALLIS, Acting District Director, I mmigration and Naturalization Service; UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW, Defendants-Appellants.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________ (May 4, 1999) Before CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge. B Y T H E C O U R T : The United States Supreme Court narrowly has restricted the circumstances in which a court of appeals can recall a mandate in a case. Calderon v. Thompson , 118 S. Ct. 1489, 1498 (1998). In view of what the Supreme Court instructs in Calderon , we deny the Petitioner-2- Richardson’s “Application to Withdraw this Court’s Mandate and Stay or Summarily Reverse its Decision in light of Reno v. American-Ara b Anti-Discrimination Committee, et al. ” Since Richardson has filed a petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court, we would welcome, however, an opportunity to revisit our decision in Richardson v. Reno , 162 F.3d 1338 (1998), in light of the Supreme Court’s decisi on in Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee , 119 S. Ct. 936 (1999) (“AADC ”), if the Supreme Court should vacate our decision and remand for further proceedings in this case, which would automatically recall the mandate. Unless and until that happens, this Court lacks the authority to decide whether INA § 1252(b)(9) precludes jurisdiction, independently of INA § 1252( g), or any other issues arising in the wake of the AADC decision. 8 U.S.C. §§ 1252(b)(9) and 1252(g). See American-Arab , 119 S. Ct. at 943; Richardson , 162 F.3d at 1345-46, 1354, 1358 n.99, 1373-74, 1377.