alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc.
2250 UNIOIN STREET, SUITE 301
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94123
TELEPHONE: (415) 409-8703
FACSIMILE: (415) 409-8704
E-MAIL: LHCI@PACBELL.NET

|LA JOLLA | www.ljcinvestors.com | SAN FRANCISCO
|-------- | -------------------- | -------------

March 20, 2002

Mr. Dominick F. Maggio
USData Authority, Inc.
3500 NW Boca Raton Boulevard
Building 811
Boca Raton, FL 33431

RE: Convertible Debenture and Warrants

Dear Dominick,

This letter amends the 9 3/4% Convertible Debenture dated April 5, 2001, the Conversion Warrants dated April 5, 2001 and the Warrants dated February 6, 2001, all issued to LaJolla Cove Investors, Inc. by USData Authority, Inc.

The price of $1.40 set forth in sections 3.1(y) of the Convertible Debenture and section 1.4(y) of the Conversion Warrants, and the price of $4 set forth in section 1.4 of the Warrants is hereby changed to $0.30.

Except as specifically amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Convertible Debenture, Conversion Warrants and Warrants shall remain in full force and effect.

Sincerely,

/S/ Travis W. Huff
Travis W. Huff
Portfolio Manager

USData Authority, Inc.
By: /S/ Dominick F. Maggio
Title: EVP & COO
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2199
ANDREA G. BRIGGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant - Appellee, and HAROLD M. KOENIG, VADM, Surgeon General; DONALD F. HAGAN, VADM; RONALD I. RIDENOUR, RADM, Commander; THOMAS K. BURKHARD, Captain,Deputy Commander; DAVID GERVAIS, Captain; CAPTAIN MCCLERKLIN; PETER GARMS; MARK W. MATTINGLEY, CDR; DIANE M. LACKEY, LT; CHARLES A. PHILLIPS, JR., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA95-3064-CCB) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 13, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrea G. Briggs, Appellant Pro Se. Donna Carol Sanger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the Defendants on her employment discrimination action brought pursuant to the Civil Service Reform Act, 5 U.S.C. § 1221 (1994), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no rev ersible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Briggs v. Dalton , No. CA-95-3064-CCB (D. Md. Apr. 15 and July 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Lamarun Resources Inc.: Exhibit 10.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Laurence Sookochoff, P. Eng 

CONSENT OF GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANT 

I hereby consent to the inclusion and reference of my report
dated May 5, 2010, titled "Geological Evaluation Report on the Gold Coin
Property” on Form S-1 to be filed by Lamarun Resources Inc. with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission. 



__________________

Laurence Sookochoff 

Dated the 5th day of May, 2010
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40384

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY GUZMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CR-1424-1

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Johnny Guzman has

requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Guzman has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending  June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Dennis R. Alexander,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 23, 2005



/s/ Dennis R. Alexander

Dennis R. Alexander

Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7491** 

LOUIS GAINEY, JR. , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE , Respondent

– Appellee , and
ATTORNEY GENERAL ALAN WILSON , Respondent
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg
. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 5:15

- cv - 03253

- BHH )

Submitted : February 16, 2017 Decided: February 22, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge , DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Louis Gainey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Susannah Rawl Cole, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Louis Gainey, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabilit y. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sa tisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 5 29 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gainey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and l egal4 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**523 CA 13-01990**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF BUFFALO NIAGARA BUSINESS PARK, LLC, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW FOR CITY OF BUFFALO, ASSESSOR OF CITY OF BUFFALO, CITY OF BUFFALO, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS, AND COUNTY OF ERIE, INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

ZDARSKY, SAWICKI & AGOSTINELLI LLP, BUFFALO (GERALD T. WALSH OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY A. BALL, CORPORATION COUNSEL, BUFFALO (CAVETTE A. CHAMBERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

MOSEY PERSICO LLP, BUFFALO (MARGARET A. HURLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered August 20, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order granted the motions of respondents and intervenor to dismiss.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order that, inter alia, granted the motions of respondents and intervenor to dismiss the petition in this tax certiorari proceeding pursuant to the Real Property Tax Law article 7. On appeal, petitioner contends that Supreme Court erred in granting the motions because the petition was timely filed and service was proper. We reject that contention. It is undisputed that petitioner never served the original petition on any party herein and, pursuant to RPTL 702 (3), the failure to file and serve the petition “shall constitute a complete defense to the petition and the petition must be dismissed.” In view of our decision, we need not address petitioner’s remaining contentions.

Entered: June 13, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Quarterly  report of Collectible  Concepts  Group,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Paul S. Lipschutz,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc.  and will be retained by
Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: October 20, 2005                          By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Paul S. Lipschutz
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3944 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3944

   To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
 Streets Act of 1968 to authorize grant funds to be used for Troops-to-
                             Cops program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2009

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
 Streets Act of 1968 to authorize grant funds to be used for Troops-to-
                             Cops program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Let's Re-Up the Troops-to-Cops 
Program Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF TROOPS-TO-COPS PROGRAM.

    Section 1701(b) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The purposes for which'' and inserting 
        ``(1) in general.--The purposes for which'' with appropriate 
        indentation; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Troops-to-cops program.--
                    ``(A) In general.--For grants made during the 3-
                year period beginning on January 1, 2010, in addition 
                to the purposes described in paragraph (1), grants made 
                under subsection (a) may be used to hire former members 
                of the Armed Forces (and to pay the full salary of such 
                former members) to serve as career law enforcement 
                officers for deployment in community-oriented policing, 
                particularly in communities that are adversely affected 
                by a recent military base closing.
                    ``(B) Definition.--In this paragraph, `former 
                member of the Armed Forces' means a member of the Armed 
                Forces of the United States who has been honorably 
                discharged from the Armed Forces of the United 
                States.''.
                                 <all>
```
December 16, 2010 

Mr. Stephen Saint 

President 

Indigenous Peoples Technology and Education Center 

10575 SW 147th Circle 

Dunnellon, FL 34432 

Dear Mr. Saint: 

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for 

exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it. 

We Have the Petition 

We’ve received your December 3, 2010, petition on behalf of Indigenous Peoples Technology 

and Education Center, Inc., for an exemption from § 21.190(c)(2) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would allow Indigenous extend 

the weight allowance for a powered parachute, light-sport aircraft intended for both flight 

operations and operation on public roadways. 

We’ve added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA-2010-1221) and we are processing 

it. We will contact you if we need additional information. 

How We’ll Process the Petition 

A petition for an exemption, according to 14 CFR 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 

120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a 

summary of the petition in the Federal Register for public comment unless, according to 

14 CFR 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it. 

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions in the meantime, you may contact me at (202) 267-4059. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Frances Shaver 

Program Analyst 

Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT
CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, E. Leon Daniel, Chief Executive Officer, and I, John OKeefe, Chief
Financial Officer, of Ivanhoe Energy Inc., hereby certify that:

(a)  the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2002 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

*     *     *

|                        |  |                                 
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|By:                     |  | /s/ E. Leon DanielE. Leon Daniel
|                       
|                       
|Date: August 12, 2002  
|                       
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|By:                     |  | /s/ John OKeefe
John OKeefe   
|                       
|                       
|Date: August 12, 2002  

Page 16 of 16
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James T. Demetriades, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of SeeBeyond Technology Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of SeeBeyond Technology Corporation.

| |  |        |  |                        
| |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
| |  | By:    |  | /s/JAMES T. DEMETRIADES
| |  | Name:  |  | James T. Demetriades   
| |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

I,
Barry J. Plaga, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SeeBeyond
Technology Corporation on Form 10- Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SeeBeyond
Technology Corporation.

| |  |        |  |                        
| |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
| |  | By:    |  | /s/BARRY J. PLAGA      
| |  | Name:  |  | Barry J. Plaga         
| |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 12.1



                FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF DEBT-TO-EQUITY RATIO
                            (Dollars in Thousands)



                                                      July 31,
                                               ---------------------
                                                 1999         1998
                                               --------     --------

          Total debt                           $745,442     $602,822

          Stockholders' equity                 $144,982     $123,229

          Debt-to-equity ratio                      5.1          4.9
                                                    ===          ===

                                      18
<PAGE>
November 24,1970

Honorable Luther T. Sebren County Auditor, Orange County opinion No. M-736 Orange County Courthouse Re: Maximum salary tobepaid Orange, Texas 77630 the official court reuorter for the County Court at Law of Orange County. Dear Mr. Sebren:

You have salary that may be requested our opinion as to themaximum paid the official court reporter for the County Court at Law of Orange County. In compliance with our opinion request procedure you first received an official opinion from the County Attorney of Orange County, Texas, on this question. The County Court at Law of Orange County was created by the provisions ofArticle 1970-349, Vernon's Civil Statutes. Subdivision (b)of Section 4 ofArticle 1970-349 provides for the appointment of an official court reporter and reads as follows: "(b) The Judge of the County Court at Lawmay appoint an official court reporter, who must meet the qualifications prescribed by law for that office andwho is entitled to the compensation fixed by the Commissioners Court of Orange County." Themaximum salary thatmay bepaid official shorthand reporters, including official shorthand reporters of each county court at law isgoverned byArticle 2326,Vernon's Civil Statutes. Attorney General's Opinion V-707 (1948). See also Attorney General's Opinions M-436 (1969) and C-505 (1965).

The maximum compensation provided official shorthand reporters by the provisions ofArticle 2326,Vernon's Civil Statutes, is $6,600.00. It isour opinion that theprovisions ofArticle 1970-349, Vernon's Civil Statutes, did not change, amend ormodify the compensation prescribed inArticle 2326.

-3382- -JHon. Luther T. Sebren, page 2 (M-736)

You are therefore advised that themaximum salary thatmay be paid the official court reporter for Orange County is $6,600.00. SUMMARY The salary of the official court reporter for the County Court at Law of Orange County isgoverned by the provisions ofArticle 2326,Vernon's Civil Statutes, and themaximum salary thatmay bepaid such official is $6,600.00 per,pnum.

Prepared by John Reeves Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E.Allen, Co-Chairman William J. Craig Malcom Smith Ben Harrison Scott Garrison MEADE F. GRIFFIN Staff LegalAssistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE FirstAssistant

-3383-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                          3,081                 
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                  14,344
<ALLOWANCES>                     (133)
<INVENTORY>                      0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               19,466
<PP&E>                        226,467
<DEPRECIATION>                (13,467)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                240,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          17,539
<BONDS>                       188,817 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0     
<PREFERRED>                         1 
<COMMON>                           29 
<OTHER-SE>                     48,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  240,158
<SALES>                        30,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               34,306
<CGS>                          14,324 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  17,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                9,735
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              9,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (1,925)  
<INCOME-TAX>                     (732)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (1,234)    
<DISCONTINUED>                     0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                (1,384)   
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                   (2,618)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.24) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0.00    
        

</TABLE>