alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-13-309-E

July 19, 2013

 Exemption No. 10460A

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1329

Mr. Alan Kasher

Director of Operations

Southwest Airlines Co.

P.O. Box 36611

Dallas, Texas 75235

Dear Mr. Kasher:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 

10460. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and 

limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 1, 2013, Southwest Airlines (SWAA) petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) for an exemption from § 121.291(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to permit SWAA to add the Boeing 737-700 to 

its operations specifications without conducting the required partial ditching (overwater)

demonstration. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to SWAA.

Our Decision
2

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10460

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations 

1. This exemption will remain in effect until the air carrier successfully conducts the 

required partial evacuation and ditching demonstrations, no later than November 30, 

2013.

2. SWAA must submit a plan to complete the partial emergency evacuation demonstrations 

to the FAA for approval in accordance with the guidance in FAA Order 8900.1 for those 

new aircraft types and models to be used in passenger-carrying operations that are not 

currently on the SWAA certificate. The plan must be submitted at least 15 days prior to 

the conduct of the demonstration and ensure that all demonstrations are completed by 

November 30, 2013.

3. All crewmember operating manual revisions and training will be completed and training 

records updated prior to commingling of crewmembers.

4. Until the partial emergency evacuation and ditching demonstrations are completed on 

these aircraft, no cross utilization of crewmembers on these aircraft will be permitted. 

Pre-merger SWAA crewmembers will not be scheduled with pre-merger Air Tran 

Airways , Inc. (ZZDA) crewmembers until the partial emergency evacuation and

ditching demonstrations have been completed.

This exemption terminates November 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovich

Deputy Director, Flight 

 Standards Service
D.T.W., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-0633

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 13, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Allen L. Register, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, a Causey1 order was issued directing the parties to 

brief the issue of whether the trial court erred in committing the appellant to a 

moderate-risk placement when the Department of Juvenile Justice (the 

1 State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987).

 
Department) had recommended probation. See B.K.A. v. State, 122 So. 3d 928, 

930 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). The public defender recognized the error and asked this 

Court to reverse and remand pursuant to B.K.A. The State concedes error. 

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the appellant’s adjudication of delinquency, but

REVERSE the particulars of the commitment and REMAND with instructions for 

the trial court to receive a recommendation from the Department regarding a 

restrictiveness level before committing the appellant.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.

2
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADDED BY



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No.
1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of America’s Suppliers Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for
the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Marc Joseph,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                 
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained
    in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
    as of and for the period covered   by the Report.



|Dated: August 15, 2014 | /s/ Marc Joseph                                                            
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |                                                                            
|                       | Marc Joseph                                                                
|                       |                                                                            
|                       | President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3819 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3819

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
     To extend the commercial space transportation liability regime.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION LIABILITY REGIME EXTENSION.
    Section 70113(f) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``December 31, 2009.'' and inserting ``December 31, 2012.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Wayne R. Hellman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operating ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: September 27, 2006 /s/ Wayne R. Hellman         Name: Wayne R. Hellman    Title: Chief Executive Officer
AFS-15-806-E 

March 20, 2015 

 Exemption No. 7897G 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-12728 

Mr. Douglas Carr 

Vice President 

National Business Aviation Association, Inc. 

1200 G Street NW, Suite 1100 

Washington, DC 20005 

Dear Mr. Carr: 

This letter is to inform you that we have extended Exemption No. 7897, as amended, for 12 

months. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and 

limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated March 10, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of the National Business Aviation Association, Inc. (NBAA) for an extension of 

Exemption No. 7897. That exemption from §§ 91.409(e) and 91.501(a) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows NBAA to operate small civil airplanes and helicopters 

of United States registry under the operational rules of §§ 91.503 through 91.535 and to select 

an inspection program as described in § 91.409(f). 

You also requested the FAA remove condition number 6 so the exemption would be valid for 

operations outside of the United States. In accordance with § 11.83, the FAA must verify 

that the exemption would be in compliance with the Standards of the International Civil 

Aviation Organization (ICAO). 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment of the exemption would not set a 

precedent.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-88869) pertaining to the Illuminet Holdings, Inc.
1997 Equity Incentive Plan and the Illuminet Holdings, Inc. 1999 Stock Purchase
Plan; the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47530) pertaining to the
Illuminet Holdings, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with Roger H.
Moore and the Illuminet Holdings, Inc. 1997 Equity Incentive Plan; and the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-50770) and related Prospectus for
certain shares issued in connection with the NTC merger of our report dated June
30, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of
Illuminet Holdings, Inc. at December 31, 1999 and for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 1999 included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 7, 2001
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Kallassy, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
February 14, 2011
 
 By:
/s/ John A. Kallassy
 Name:
John A. Kallassy
 Title:
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00101-CR

James NEALY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR2878

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 16, 2012

DISMISSED

On August 24, 2011, appellant was placed on community supervision for a period of two 

years pursuant to a plea bargain. On December 13, 2011, the terms of appellant’s community 

supervision were amended. Appellant did not file a notice of appeal until February 15, 2012. 

Therefore, it appears appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal.

Also, the trial court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal states this “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). “In a 
04-12-00101-CR

- 2 -

plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written 

motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record does not contain a written motion ruled on before 

trial nor does it indicate the trial court granted appellant permission to appeal. This court must 

dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the appellant has the right of appeal has not been 

made a part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, on February 27, 2012, this 

court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an 

amended trial court certification that shows defendant has the right of appeal was made part of 

the appellate record. See Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, 

order); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. Appellant was granted an extension of time in which to file 

an amended trial court certification until April 25, 2012. No amended trial court certification has 

been filed; therefore, this appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3963 

AN ACT 

To provide specialized training to Federal air marshals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3963 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal Investigative 

3 Training Restoration Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FEDERAL AIR MARSHALS. 

5 Section 44917 of title 49, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(e) CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING PRO8 GRAM.— 

9 ‘‘(1) NEW EMPLOYEE TRAINING.—Not later 

10 than 30 days after the date of enactment of the 

11 Criminal Investigative Training Restoration Act, the 

12 Federal Air Marshal Service shall require Federal 

13 air marshals hired after such date to complete the 

14 criminal investigative training program at the Fed15 eral Law Enforcement Training Center as part of 

16 basic training for Federal air marshals. 

17 ‘‘(2) EXISTING EMPLOYEES.—A Federal air 

18 marshal who has previously completed the criminal 

19 investigative training program shall not be required 

20 to repeat such program. 

21 ‘‘(3) ALTERNATIVE TRAINING.—Not later than 

22 3 years after the date of enactment of the Criminal 

23 Investigative Training Restoration Act, an air mar24 shal hired before such date who has not completed 

25 the criminal investigative training program shall be 

26 required to complete a alternative training program, 
3 

•HR 3963 EH

1 as determined by the Federal Law Enforcement 

2 Center, that provides the training necessary to 

3 bridge the gap between the mixed basic police train4 ing, the Federal air marshal programs already com5 pleted by the Federal air marshal and the criminal 

6 investigative training provided through the criminal 

7 investigative training program. Any such alternative 

8 program shall be deemed to have met the standards 

9 of the criminal investigative training program. 

10 ‘‘(4) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

11 Not less than $3,000,000 is authorized to be appro12 priated for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011 to 

13 carry out this subsection. 

14 ‘‘(5) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing in this sub15 section shall be construed to reclassify Federal air 

16 marshals as criminal investigators.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3963 

AN ACT 

To provide specialized training to Federal air 

marshals.
# NORAD continues the 60-year tradition of tracking Santa

/ Published Dec. 14, 2015

JOINT BASE MCGUIRE-DIX-LAKEHURST, N.J. - In 1955, the Cold War was eight years old.

 Tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union were high.

 Josef Stalin was dead, Nikita Khrushchev had taken his place, the Warsaw Pact had been created and the Continental Air Defense Command (CONAD) – NORAD's (North American Aerospace Defense Command) forerunner – had been established with the mission of "defending the United States against air attack." This was all part of President Dwight D. Eisenhower's New Look Policy toward containing the Soviet threat.

 At the CONAD operations center in Colorado Springs, Colorado, there was a direct phone line to the center's director of operations. Its purpose: To inform CONAD that United States was at war with the Soviet Union.

 In December 1955, the phone rang.

 Fortunately for Col. Harry Shoup, the director of operations, the United States had not gone to war with Russia. Instead of the president, it was a little girl in Colorado Springs. The child was following the directions in a Sears Roebuck & Co. advertisement printed in a local newspaper.

 The ad read: "Hey, Kiddies! Call me direct and be sure and dial the correct number." The number in the advertisement was one digit off and instead of getting the local department store it went directly to CONAD.

 The child asked Shoup if he was Santa Claus. Shoup paused, but he recovered and replied, "Yes, I am."

 More calls started coming in. Shoup eventually had his Airmen take over telling them to that they now had an additional duty: Whoever answered the phone was Santa Claus.

 Sixty years later, the tradition continues.

 Beginning Dec. 1, visitors can visit www.noradsanta.org. The website features a mobile version, a holiday countdown, new games, daily activities and is available in eight languages: English, Spanish, German, French, Italian, Chinese, Japanese and Portuguese.

 Official NORAD Tracks Santa apps are available in the Windows, Apple and Google Play stores, so parents and children can count down the days until Santa’s launch on their smart phones and tablets.

 Tracking opportunities are also offered on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Google. Santa followers can go to any of these sites and search for @noradsanta to get started.

 On Dec. 24, the website will be on duty as Santa Claus makes his way around the world.

 Starting at 12:01 a.m. MST on Dec. 24, website visitors can watch Santa make preparations for his flight. NORAD's Santa Cams will stream videos as Santa makes his way around the world delivering presents.

 At 4 a.m. Mountain Standard Time – 6 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, trackers worldwide can speak with a phone operator to inquire as to Santa's whereabouts by dialing the toll-free number 1-877-Hi-NORAD (1-877-446-6723) or by sending an email to noradtrackssanta@outlook.com.

 Now the most important part is making sure you are on Santa's "Nice" list.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3667 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3667

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 16555 Springs Street in White Springs, Florida, as the ``Clyde L. 
                   Hillhouse Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLYDE L. HILLHOUSE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 16555 Springs Street in White Springs, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Clyde L. Hillhouse Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clyde L. 
Hillhouse Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 1, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3667

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 16555 Springs Street in White Springs, Florida, as the ``Clyde L. 
                   Hillhouse Post Office Building''.
```