alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Spears, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

1. The verdict of the jury is supported by the evidence.

2. 'The entire charge not being in the recoid, and therefore presumed to have been correct as applicable to the facts, a new trial will not be ordered because the court refused to charge “ that the fact that the goods alleged to have been taken from the house of the prosecutor, were found in the possession of the defendant, was not *conclusive*proof that the defendant was guilty of burglary.”

Criminal law.. Burglary.- New trial. Before Judge Bartlett. Jasper Superior Court. February Adjourned Term, 1874.

For the facts of this case, see the decision.

C. L. Bartlett, for plaintiff in error.

J. W. Preston, solicitor’general, by Jackson & Clarke, for the state. ' .

Warner, Chief Justice.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of burglary. On the trial of the case the jury found the defendant guilty. A motion was made for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and without any evidence to support it, and because the court refused to charge the jury as requested, “that the fact that the goods alleged to have been taken from the house of the prosecutor were found *253in the possession of the defendant, is not conclusive proof that the defendant is guilty of burglary.”

1. In looking through the evidence contained in the record» it is quite sufficient to sustain the verdict, in our judgment, if the jury believed- the witnesses, and according to the numerous and repeated rulings of this court, we will not interfere with the verdict on that ground, the more especially as the court below before which the trial was had, has refused to do so.

2. The charge of the court to the jury is not in the record, and is not excepted to; the legal presumption, therefore, is, that the court charged the law correctly as applicable to the facts of the case, and its refusal to charge as requested, in relation to the possession of the goods by the defendant not being *conclusive*proof of the defendant’s guilt, was not error.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.
#### Riley Wilson, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

On the trial of an indictment for an assault with intent to murder, the jury may, if the evidence warrant it, find the defendant guilty of an assault, but it is uot competent for the jury to find a verdict of an attempt to make an assault. There is no such crime, and the verdict is void.

Criminal law. Assault with intent to murder.- Before Judge Strozer. Mitchell Superior Court. May Term, 1874.

Wilson was placed on trial for an assault with intent to commit murder, alleged to have been committed on April 3d, 1873, upon the person of one Solomon Davis. The jury found 1 him “guilty of an attempt to make assault.” A motion in arrest of judgment was made upon the ground that there was no such crime. The motion was overruled, and defendant excepted.

T. B. Lyon ; B. F. Lyon, for plaintiff in error.

B. B. Bower, solicitor general, for the state.

McCay, Judge.

We are not clear that, under the evidence, the jury could have found the defendant guilty of even an assault. True, he presented his gun, but he announced an intention to shoot only, on condition, and we are inclined to think it was a con*206dition lie had a right to impose. He was at his own house, and it does not clearly appear that the persons at the gate had any right to interfere with what was going on in the house. Be this as it may, the jury have not found any verdict for an assault. Plainly and in terms, they say they find him guilty .of attempt to make an assault. The question is, can any judgment be entered upon such a verdict? Is it a legal verdict? Is there any such crime? The Code, section 4357, defines an assault to be “an attempt to commie a violent injury oil the person of another.” Under section 4712, to make out an attempt to commit a crime it must appear that the accused done some act towards the commission of it, and either fail in the perpetration thereof, or be prevented or intercepted in executing the same. As an assault is itself an attempt to commit a crime, an attempt to make an assault can only be an attempt to attempt to do it, or to state the matter still more definitely, it is to do any act towards doing an act towards the commission of the offense. This is simply absurd. As soon as any act is done towards committing a violent injury on the person of another, the party doing the act is guilty of an assault, and he is not guilty until he has done the act. Yet it is claimed that he may he guilty of an attempt to make an assault, when, under the law, he must do an act before the attempt is complete. The refinement and metaphysical accumen that can see a tangible idea in the words an attempt to attempt to act is too great for practical use. It is like conceiving of the beginning of eternity or the starting place of infinity.

Judgment reversed.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3926 

To direct the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

to jointly conduct a study on the incidence of breast cancer among 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. BOSWELL (for himself, Mr. WALZ, Mr. HALL of New York, Mr. 

LOBIONDO, Mrs. DAHLKEMPER, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, and Mr. 

LOEBSACK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans’ 

Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs to jointly conduct a study on the incidence of breast cancer among members of the Armed 

Forces and veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Armed Forces Breast 

5 Cancer Research Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3926 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY ON BREAST CANCER AMONG MEMBERS OF 

2 THE ARMED FORCES AND VETERANS. 

3 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Defense and the Sec4 retary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly conduct a study 

5 on the incidence of breast cancer among members of the 

6 Armed Forces (including members of the National Guard 

7 and Reserve components) and veterans. Such study shall 

8 include the following: 

9 (1) A determination of the number of the mem10 bers and veterans diagnosed with breast cancer. 

11 (2) A determination of demographic informa12 tion regarding such members and veterans, includ13 ing— 

14 (A) race; 

15 (B) ethnicity; 

16 (C) sex; 

17 (D) age; 

18 (E) possible exposure to hazardous ele19 ments or chemical or biological agents (includ20 ing any vaccines) and where such exposure oc21 curred; 

22 (F) the locations of duty stations that such 

23 member or veteran was assigned; 

24 (G) the locations in which such member or 

25 veteran was deployed; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3926 IH

1 (H) the geographic area of residence prior 

2 to deployment. 

3 (3) An analysis of breast cancer treatments re4 ceived by such members and veterans. 

5 (4) Other information the Secretaries consider 

6 necessary. 

7 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

9 and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit 

10 to Congress a report containing the results of the study 

11 required under subsection (a). 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3938 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain nonwoven polypropylene zippered 

sleeping bag carry cases, not under 77.5 cm in circumference and not 

exceeding 106.7 cm in circumference. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 27, 2009 

Mr. ADERHOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain nonwoven polypropylene zippered sleeping bag carry cases, not under 

77.5 cm in circumference and not exceeding 106.7 cm 

in circumference. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN NONWOVEN POLYPROPYLENE SLEEP4 ING BAG CARRY CASES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3938 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sleeping bag carry cases imported separately from sleeping bags, with a body of 

nonwoven polypropylene and 

a top of nonwoven polyester, 

and with a zipper running 

completely around the perimeter sealing the top to the 

body, not under 77.5 cm in 

circumference and not exceeding 106.7 cm in circumference, valued not over $1 

(provided for in subheading 

6307.90.98) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3892 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 20, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 101 West Highway 64 Bypass in Roper, North 

Carolina, as the ‘‘E.V. Wilkins Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3892 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. E.V. WILKINS POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 101 West Highway 64 Bypass 

4 in Roper, North Carolina, shall be known and designated 

5 as the ‘‘E.V. Wilkins Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘E.V. Wilkins Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 13, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership");
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  August 19, 2004 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                     
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                       | Marc N. Teal, Chief
Financial Officer



69
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,555
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                   18
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,105
<PP&E>                                         421,691
<DEPRECIATION>                                 115,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 356,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          29,348
<BONDS>                                        211,719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   356,656
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               76,016
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  45,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                23,369
<INCOME-TAX>                                   600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            22,769
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   22,769
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.37



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.’s 333-127884, 333-120674, 333-101753, 333-60532, 333-54968, 333-39112, 333-79577, 333-56883 and 333-20883) pertaining to the Accelrys, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004Stock Incentive Plan, Accelrys, Inc. 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Accelrys, Inc. 2004 New-Hire Equity Incentive Plan, Pharmacopeia, Inc.1994 Incentive Stock Plan, Pharmacopeia, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Pharmacopeia, Inc. 2000 StockOption Plan and 1995 Director Option Plan and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.’s 333-119752 and 333-34478) and the related prospectus of Accelrys, Inc. and Pharmacopeia, Inc. of our reports dated May 29, 2008, with respectto the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Accelrys, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Accelrys, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2008.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

San Diego, California 

May 29, 2008
Exhibit 32.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc., (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-K/A) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K/A
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: July 9, 2004 |  | /s/ MICHAEL S. LISS    
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    | 
|Dated: July 9, 2004 |  | /s/ JON A. DELUCA      
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3915 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3915

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on phenyl (4,6-dimethoxy-
                       pyrimidin-2-yl) carbamate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 22, 2009

  Mr. Schock introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on phenyl (4,6-dimethoxy-
                       pyrimidin-2-yl) carbamate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHENYL (4,6-DIMETHOXY-PYRIMIDIN-2-YL) CARBAMATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.33.59 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to phenyl (4,6-dimethoxy-
pyrimidin-2-yl) carbamate) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
*Present•*— Chancellors Ectiebce. Hutsom, and Mathews,

#### Grant executor of Graham *vs.*William Stewart.

MARCH. 1787.

case xxxii.

it. b. p. 120.

Bill to be taken pro con-cree founded on lt>

Complainant idty to abide the order of thedefendant appearing.

Bill and affidavit read — Ordered, that the bill he taken pro confesso: That the bond and mortgage in bill mentioned he deemed fraudulent and void; and that the defendant do bring and cancel tbc same beiorc the master of this court, and pay the costs of this suit: And that the complainant give security, to be approved by the master, “i the sum of *2501.*conditioned to abide such order as may bo made on the defendant appearing to the suit, and payTM mg such costs to the complainant, as this court shall or-t]el%
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    Exhibit 4.89

  FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT OF MSOAN ACEH AREA
    DIVRE I SUMATERA NO. K.TEL.433/HK.820/ITS-00/2006 DATED 29 DECEMBER 2006

<TABLE>
<S>                    <C>
The Parties:           1.   TELKOM; and

                       2.   PT NEC Indonesia ("NEC").

Preceding Agreement:   Main Agreement No. K.TEL 189/HK.810/TCC-00/2006 dated 16
                       August 2006.

Scope of agreement:    NEC agrees to procure and install the MSOAN Aceh Area
                       Divre I Sumatera.

Performance Bond:      In 14 days since 28 December 2006, DKU must submit bank
                       guarantee or Surety Bond issued by Insurance Company
                       chosen by TELKOM.
</TABLE>
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

 42

 44

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
# Delegation of Authority To Transfer Certain Funds in Accordance With Section 610 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as Amended

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 610 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (FAA) and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to you the authority, subject to fulfilling the requirements of section 652 of the FAA and section 7009(d) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2014 (Division K, Public Law 113-76), to make the determination necessary for and to execute the transfer of $44,979,000 of Fiscal Year 2014 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement—Overseas Contingency Operations funds to the Economic Support Fund—Overseas Contingency Operations (ESF-OCO) account; $10,500,000 of Fiscal Year 2014 Foreign Military Financing—Overseas Contingency Operations funds to the ESF-OCO account; and $32,176,000 of Fiscal Year 2014 Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining, and Related Programs funds to the ESF-OCO account.

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2015-08685

Billing code 4710-10