alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3686 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3686

   To authorize appropriations for the Federal Trade Commission for 
         certain international technical assistance activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 2009

  Mr. Towns (for himself and Mr. Whitfield) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize appropriations for the Federal Trade Commission for 
         certain international technical assistance activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FTC.

    Section 25 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57c) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``There'' and inserting ``(1) There''; and
            (2) by inserting at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(1) Authorization for international technical 
        assistance.--There are authorized to be appropriated to the 
        Commission $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 
        2016 to continue to enhance its provision of international 
        technical assistance with respect to foreign consumer 
        protection and competition regimes, including--
                    ``(A) expenses for consultations and meetings 
                hosted by the Commission with foreign government agency 
                officials and appropriate representatives and staff to 
                exchange views concerning developments relating to the 
                Commission's mission, development and implementation of 
                cooperation agreements, and provision of technical 
                assistance for the development of foreign consumer 
                protection or competition regimes; and
                    ``(B) necessary administrative and logistical 
                expenses for such consultations and meetings including, 
                meals, travel, transportation, and related lodging or 
                subsistence.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of T.J.T., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endingSeptember 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Larry B. Prescott, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Code Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/Larry B.  Prescott    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Larry B.  Prescott       |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| December 19,  2003       |

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 27, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *The Delle Foundation, Susan J. Seestrom, Robert D. Castille, all in Los Alamos, New Mexico; and Jeffrey F. Howell,*                     Austin, Texas; to retain voting                           ( print page 19321)                        shares of Trinity Capital Corporation, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Los Alamos National Bank, both in Los Alamos, New Mexico.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 7, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-08283 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**C M**  **F** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 18 - 0597 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. VAUGHN DAVID JAMES ,

Defendant and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including January 2 3 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 15 2021

12/15/2021

Case Number: DA 18-0597
January 28, 2015 CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Ron Curry, Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 (6 RA) 1445 Ross A venue, Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75202-2733 RE: Oklahoma State Implementation Plan Revision SubmittedJuly 2010 Withdrawal ofOAC 252:I00-5-2.1(a)(3) DearAdministrator Curry: 

### 15 II PH 6: 14

In a letter dated September 24, 2013, Governor Mary Fallin appointed me as her designee for the purpose of submitting documents to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval and incorporation into the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State ofOklahoma. The Oklahoma Department ofEnvironmental Quality (DEQ) is given the primary responsibility and authority to**p~pare** and implement**~he ~tate's**  air quality mB!lagement plan under Oklahoma Statutes. 

### On behalfofthe State ofOklahoma, I request withdrawal ofa portion ofOklahoma's 2010 SIP revision. This revision was received in the EPA Region 6 office on July 27,2010 and includes a cover letter dated July 16, 2010. Specifically, 

### the State requests withdrawal ofDEQ rule OAC 252:100-5-2.l(a)(3) that exempts de minimis and pennit exempt facilities from emission inventory reporting requirements. Withdrawal ofthis portion ofthe SIP revision will ensure that Oklahoma's SIP provisions for emission inventories remain consistent with the federal requirements. All other portions ofthe SIP submittal will be retained in the SIP revision and should continue through the EPA review process. DEQ plans to undertake rulemaking this year that will clarify requirements and ensure consistency of state and federal emission inventory requirements for these small sources. If you have questions, please contact Mr. Eddie Terrill, Director, Air Quality Division, Department ofEnvironmental Quality at ( 405) 702-4100.

Michael Teague Secretary ofEnergy and Environment

cc: ScottThompson, Executive Director, Department ofEnvironmental Quality Eddie Terrill, Director, DEQ AirQuality Division cc: Guy Donaldson, Section Chief, AirPlanning Section, EPA Region VI (6PD-L) Carrie Paige, Air Planning Section, EPA Region VI (6PD-L)
October 15, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAYBREAK EXPRESS, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-09-01032-CV V.

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUBROGEE OF BURR 

COMPUTER ENVIRONMENTS, INC. AND J. SUPOR & SONS TRUCKING & 

RIGGING CO., Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, LEXINGTON 

INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUBROGEE OF BURR COMPUTER 

ENVIRONMENTS, INC. and J. SUPOR & SONS TRUCKING & RIGGING CO., 

signed August 10, 2009, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to 

Lexington. We REVERSE the portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding 

attorney’s fees to Lexington, and RENDER judgment that Lexington take nothing 

with respect to attorney’s fees. 

Further, we find no error in the remainder of the judgment and order it 

AFFIRMED.

We order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CTT International Distributors Inc.
      (“CTT”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Amit
      Sankhala, President, Chief Executive Officer of CTT and sole member of the
      Board
      of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of CTT.








*/s/
      Amit Sankhala*


Amit
      Sankhala


Chief
      Executive Officer






May
      15,
      2006






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CTT International Distributors Inc.
      (“CTT”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Amit
      Sankhala, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of CTT, certify, pursuant to
      s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of CTT.








*/s/
      Amit Sankhala*


Amit
      Sankhala


Chief
      Financial Officer






May
      15,
      2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSHUA ADAM JANIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 104 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSHUA ADAM JANIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 105 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSHUA ADAM JANIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 106 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM[ 104 MAL 2023, 105 MAL 2023 and 106 MAL 2023 ]

- 2

AND NOW , this 9th day of August, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# New York Air Guard Honors Former President Martin Van Buren

/ Published Dec. 6, 2022

KINDERHOOK, N.Y. - The New York Air National Guard marked the 240th birthday of President Martin Van Buren, the first president not born a British subject, in his rural hometown Dec. 5.

Air Force Brig. General Denise Donnell, the commander of the New York Air National Guard, and Command Chief Master Sgt. Jeffery Trottier laid a wreath from President Joe Biden at Van Buren’s grave in Kinderhook Reformed Church Cemetery to mark the event.

Airmen from the 109th Airlift Wing at Stratton Air National Guard Base in Scotia provided the honor cordon and color guard.

Since 1967, military officers have laid wreaths from the current occupant of the White House at the graves of former presidents on their birthdays.

The New York National Guard’s headquarters handles the honor for Van Buren and Chester Arthur, buried outside Albany. The Air Guard’s 107th Attack Wing does the honors for Millard Fillmore in Buffalo.

Van Buren was the eighth president, serving from 1837 to 1841. He retired to Kinderhook and died in 1862.

“It is great to see so many people here on this cold yet sunny day,” Donnell told the audience of 75 people. “It’s a privilege to be here today representing President Biden.”

The Kinderhook ceremony is a communitywide event, said Kinderhook Village Mayor Mike Abrams.

Along with the wreath from the president, wreaths were presented from the town and village of Kinderhook, the garden club, the nearby village of Valatie, the National Park Service, which maintains Van Buren’s home as a historic site, and a local group that supports the Park Service.

Fourth graders from the local elementary school recited the details of Van Buren’s life.

Martin Van Buren was proud to be from Kinderhook and happy to describe himself as “a farmer in my native town,” National Park Service Ranger Dawn Olsen told the audience.

He would still feel at home here today, once he got over automobiles and traffic lights, Olsen said. He would fit right in talking to people at the farmers market, she said.

Van Buren grew up in Kinderhook speaking Dutch at home. He was a lawyer who served as a judge and then as a New York state senator before being elected governor.

He was considered a political genius who turned the Democratic Party into a national party.

He served as secretary of state and vice president for President Andrew Jackson before running for president himself in 1836.

He took one of his nicknames, “Old Kinderhook,” from his hometown. During his campaign “OK Clubs” were created to promote his candidacy.

Van Buren reportedly would scrawl the initials of his nickname “OK” on documents he approved, giving the world the term OK.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 21

- 00269

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 415th District Court Parker County, Texas Trial Court No. CV21

- 0600

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### T IMOTHY 

### M. H ALL AND 

### P HILIP 

### L. H ALL


### , Appellants

V



### .

M ELISSA 

### A NN 

### R IVAS


### , P HILLIP 

### A NDREW 

### R IVAS


### , AND 

### A NN E 

### V ICKERS 

### C RAWFORD



### - H ALL


### , AS 

### T RUSTEE OF THE 

### A NNE 

### V ICKERS 

### C RAWFORD



### H ALL 

### T RUST 

### , Appellees2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We ha ve considered appellant s’ “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant s must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : November 4, 2021
#### James A. Fort, plaintiff in error, *vs.*James P. West *et al.,*administrators, defendants in error.

1. That the defendant married the sister-in-law of the judge’s wife, does not disqualify the latter from presiding.

2. Where suit is brought on a note given for the purchase money of land, a plea to the effect that the widow of the vendor claimed dower in the property sold which had not been set apart, and that the defendant would not be protected in paying said note as the title would be imperfect, was properly stricken on demurrer.

3. The defendant not residing in the county in which the suit was pending, it was not error to refuse his counsel time to procure his affidavit to an amended plea, as the oath of s;uch attorney would have been sufficient.

Judge. Dower. Vendor and purchaser. Pleadings. Attorneys. Before Judge Clark. Sumter Superior Court. April Term, 1874.

A report of this case is unnecessary.

Allen Fort; Hawkins & Hawkins, for plaintiff in error.

Jack Brown; C. T. Goode; Cook & Crisp, by brief, for defendants.

Warner, Chief Justice.

1. This was an action brought'by the plaintiffs against the defendant on a promissory note for §2,000 00. On the trial of the case, the defendantobjected to Judge Clark’s presiding, because he was related by affinity to the defendant within the fourth degree. It appears from the record, that the defendant married the widow of A. W. Williams, who was the brother of Judge Clark’s wife, and that Williams died after Judge Clark’s intermarriage with his sister. In our judgment, Judge Clark was not disqualified from presiding in the case, under the provisions of the 205th section of the Code: *Deupree vs. Deupree, 45th Georgia Reports,*414; Hubback on Succession, 276; 12th Petersdorf’s, Ab., 565.

*5852, 3. There was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the defendant’s plea, or in refusing to give him time to make oath to his amended plea, as he lived in Stewart county. By the 3449th section of the Code, when the defendant does not reside in the county in which the suit is pending, the agent or attorney at law of the defendant may make oath to his plea, which the defendant’s attorney could have done in this case. From the facts disclosed in the record, we fear the defendant was' more anxious to gain *time*than to obtain *justice,*but as damages have not been claimed, we do not award any.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.
Exhibit 99.8
                                                                    ------------


                        Report of Independent Accountants


The First National Bank of Atlanta
77 Reeds Way
New Castle Corporate Commons
New Castle, Delaware 19720

and

The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street
Corporate Backed Asset Unit
New York, NY 10286

                        Wachovia Credit Card Master Trust

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report of
Management on Compliance, that The First National Bank of Atlanta (the
"Company"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation, complied with
Sections 3.2, 3.4, 4.2, and 4.3 of the Amended and Restated Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of June 4, 1999, between the Company and The Bank
of New York (the "Agreement") and Section 7, Article IV of the Series 1995-1,
Series 1999-1, Series 1999-2, and Series 2000-1 Supplements to the Amended and
Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated October 26, 1995, March 24, 1999,
September 21, 1999, and August 1, 2000, respectively (the "Supplements"), during
the period November 1, 1999 through October 31, 2000. Management is responsible
for the Company's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned requirements during the period November 1, 1999 to October 31,
1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of The First National
Bank of Atlanta and The Bank of New York and is not intended to be and should
not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                     /s/  Ernst & Young LLP   .
                                                     --------------------------



November 14, 2000


                                       16
### INDIANA ARA 21

### IDEM INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment. Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232-8603 Thomas W. Easterly Toll Free (800) 451-6027 Commissioner www.idem.IN.gov March 4, 2009 Bharat Mathur, Acting Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, IL 60604
Dear Mr. Mathur: Re: Authorization Revision Application 21 

### I am pleased to submit Indiana's latest hazardous waste program revision, incorporating changes to Indiana's hazardous waste management program that implement federal changes to the hazardous waste management program from July 24, 2002, through August 5, 2005. This application requests authorization for ten (10) checklists in RCRA Clusters 13 through 16 as listed in the addendum to the program description. This application consists of an addendum to the approved state Program Description and a Supplemental Attorney General's Statement. The Memorandum of Agreement approved on December 6, 2001, remains in effect. We greatly appreciate the assistance of Mr. Gary Westefer in preparation of the application. If you have questions regarding this authorization revision application, please contact Mr. Michael Dalton of the Office of Land Quality at (317) 232-8884.

Thoma Easterly Commissioner Attachments cc: Mr. Gary Westefer, U.S. EPA Region 5 (with enclosures)

Recycled Paper An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle 0