alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-1.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1







SUMMARY OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE-BASED RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS







On February 26, 2013, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) approved a new manner in which the Company will make annual awards of restricted stock to its named executive officers. Previously, annual equity awards of restricted stock were not tied to any specific performance metric. The Board resolved that an annual incentive award to the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer (if any) shall be paid in restricted stock with three (3) year cliff vesting based on a formula related to the Company’s return on average assets (“ROAA”). The formula for determining the number of shares of restricted stock to be awarded is based on the Company’s achievement of its annual ROAA goals, this year ranging from 0.85% (threshold award percentage) to 1.25% (stretch award percentage) of achievement, with a straight line calculation being used for awards between the ROAA threshold and the stretch. If the threshold ROAA target is achieved, then the eligible executive will automatically receive a minimum number of shares of restricted stock, which will range up to a maximum number if the stretch is achieved.


 


For 2013, the following executive officers are eligible to receive bonus awards of restricted stock based on the foregoing ROAA linked formula in the following fashion:


 



	 	
●

	
Remer Y. Brinson, III (CEO): 2,500 shares (threshold) – 5,000 shares (stretch).








	 	
●

	
Thomas J. Flournoy (CFO): 1,500 shares (threshold) – 3,000 shares (stretch).
March	16th,	2016

U.S.	Department	of	Transportation

Docket	Management	System

1200	New	Jersey	Ave.,	SE

Washington,	DC	20590

Re: Petition	for	Amendment	To	Exemption	No.	14961	Issued	To	Insight	

Environmental	INC	Pursuant	To	Section	333	of	The	FAA	Reform	Act,	Docket	FAA2015-5299

Ladies	and	Gentlemen:

On	February	25th,	2016,	FAA	granted	the	referenced	exemption	to	conduct	aerial	data

collection	to	Insight	Environmental	INC	(“Insight”).	Insight	respectfully	requests	an

amendment	to	authorize	the	use	of	additional	UAV	systems	that	have	previously	been

approved	for	FAA.

Insight	seeks	approval	to	use	each	of	the	1120	UAS	platforms	listed	on	Attachment 1

which have	all	been	previously	reviewed	and	approved	by	the	Secretary.	These are	the	same

UAS platforms listed	under	the	Approved	Unmanned	Aerial	System	(UAS)	Make/Model	Under

Section	333	list	published	by	FAA,	dated	March	4th,	2016.

Insight requests	authority	to	utilize	the	UAS	platforms	listed	in	Attachment	1	in the

same manner	and	subject	to	all	conditions	as	set	forth	in	Insight’s	Exemption	No.	14961.

An	amendment	to	Exemption	No. 14961 to	authorize use	of	each	of	the	UAS	systems

listed	on Attachment	1	is	respectfully	requested.

Yours	very	truly,

/s/	Todd Morrison

Todd	Morrison

CEO,	Insight	Environmental	INC
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3921 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3921

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for 90 days the 
   first-time homebuyer credit for taxpayers who have entered into a 
        binding contract before the termination of such credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2009

    Mr. Donnelly of Indiana (for himself and Mr. Gary G. Miller of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for 90 days the 
   first-time homebuyer credit for taxpayers who have entered into a 
        binding contract before the termination of such credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit 
Guarantee Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. 90-DAY EXTENSION OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER CREDIT IN CASE OF 
              BINDING CONTRACT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (h) of section 36 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``This section'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
        this section'', and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Binding contract exception.--In the case of a 
        principal residence purchased by the taxpayer not later than 
        the 90-day period beginning on December 1, 2009, pursuant to a 
        written binding contract which was in effect on November 30, 
        2009--
                    ``(A) paragraph (1) shall not apply,
                    ``(B) clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (f)(4)(D) 
                shall apply with respect to the purchase of such 
                residence, and
                    ``(C) in the case of such a purchase after December 
                31, 2009, the taxpayer may elect to treat such purchase 
                as made on December 31, 2009, for purposes of this 
                section (other than subsections (c) and (f)(4)(D)).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (4) of section 1400C(e) of 
such Code is amended by inserting ``(in the case of a purchase to which 
section 36(h)(2) applies, before the end of the 90-day period described 
therein)'' after ``December 1, 2009''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to residences purchased after November 30, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3780 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the first-time homebuyer tax credit for members of the Armed Forces and certain Federal 

employees serving on extended duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2009 

Mr. MAFFEI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the first-time homebuyer tax credit for members of the 

Armed Forces and certain Federal employees serving 

on extended duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service Members’ 

5 Homebuyer Tax Credit Extension Act 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3780 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER CREDIT 

2 FOR INDIVIDUALS ON QUALIFIED OFFICIAL 

3 EXTENDED DUTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (h) of section 36 of the 

5 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘This section’’ and inserting the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—This section’’, and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(2) SPECIAL RULE FOR QUALIFIED EXTENDED

12 DUTY.— 

13 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an indi14 vidual who serves on qualified official extended 

15 duty outside the United States for at least 180 

16 days in calendar year 2009— 

17 ‘‘(i) paragraph (1) shall be applied by 

18 substituting ‘December 1, 2010’ for ‘De19 cember 1, 2009’, 

20 ‘‘(ii) subparagraph (D) of subsection 

21 (f)(4) shall be applied by substituting ‘De22 cember 1, 2010’ for ‘December 1, 2009’, 

23 and 

24 ‘‘(iii) in the case of a purchase of a 

25 principal residence after December 31, 

26 2009, and before December 1, 2010, the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3780 IH

1 taxpayer may elect to treat such purchase 

2 as made on December 31, 2009, for pur3 poses of this section (other than sub4 sections (c) and (f)(4)(D)). 

5 ‘‘(B) QUALIFIED OFFICIAL EXTENDED

6 DUTY.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), the 

7 term ‘qualified official extended duty’ means 

8 qualified official extended duty (as defined in 

9 section 121(d))— 

10 ‘‘(i) as a member of the uniformed 

11 services, 

12 ‘‘(ii) as a member of the Foreign 

13 Service of the United States, or 

14 ‘‘(iii) as an employee of the intel15 ligence community. 

16 Any term used in the preceding sentence which 

17 is also used in paragraph (9) of section 121(d) 

18 shall have the same meaning as when used in 

19 such paragraph.’’. 

20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (4) of 

21 section 1400C(e) of such Code is amended by striking 

22 ‘‘December 1, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 3780 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to purchases made after November 

3 30, 2009. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10696

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DARRELL MURPHY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-3-4

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Darrell Murphy has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Murphy has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 22, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-10696 Document: 00511149791 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


We, Tim Bumgarner and Byron Hudson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of American Pallet Leasing, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents
in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
American Pallet Leasing, Inc.



                                   By:   /s/ Tim Bumgarner
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Tim Bumgarner, Chief Executive Officer


                                   By:   /s/ Byron Hudson
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Byron Hudson, Chief Financial Officer
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan




 Exhibit 10.3 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

The FleetCor Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”) is hereby amended as follows: 

1. 
 Section 3(a) of the
Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 “a. Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment under
Section 3(c), the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”), that may be issued pursuant to the Plan is 5,085,260 shares. If any Award expires, or is terminated,
surrendered or forfeited, in whole or in part, the unissued Common Stock covered by such Award shall again be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan. If shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to the Plan are repurchased by, or are
surrendered or forfeited to, the Company at no more than cost, such shares of Common Stock shall again be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan; provided, however, that the cumulative number of such shares that may be so reissued
under the Plan will not exceed 5,085,260 shares. Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.” 

All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning as set forth in the Plan. 

To the extent anything in this Amendment is in conflict with the Plan, this Amendment shall control. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the
terms and conditions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 
 This Amendment shall become effective as of the 10th day of June,
2004. 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Ronald F. Clarke

	Name:	 	Ronald F. Clarke
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
	
	Adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on June 10, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 67 (Wednesday, April 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18842-18843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
section 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted,

[[Page 18843]]

these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than April 23, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director, 
Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. Cathay Financial Holding Co., Ltd., Cathay Life Insurance Co., 
Ltd., Liang Ting Industrial Co., Ltd., Lin Yuan Investment Co., Ltd., 
Pai Hsing Investment Co., Ltd., Tung Chi Capital Co., Ltd., and Wan Ta 
Investment Co., Ltd., all in Taipei, Taiwan; to acquire Conning 
Holdings Corp., Hartford, Connecticut, and thereby engage in financial 
and investment advisory activities, and agency transactional services 
for customer investments, pursuant to sections 225.28(b)(6)(i) and 
225.28(b)(7)(i).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 3, 2015.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-08045 Filed 4-7-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
;•,-•' n--<• - ^, (I- ,1-1 1 , , -J - ^. -

,„.|'''i'-i''jTOr 

:'fi:^^H],ATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

-••i-1 ^JPEMIOHS OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC. 

; ''If.' 1 ^ h S ^^CEIVED 

IN THE MATTER OF JUN 13 2WI 

EMPIRE FLIGHT ACADEMY |EARIN G DOCKE T 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0290 

Chief Administrative Law Judge Ronnie A. Yoder 

AGENCY^ REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 

RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

COMES NOW the Agency, by and through its designated representative, the Regional 

Counsel for the Eastern Region and his duly designated agents, and moves for a two 

week (14 days) extension of time to respond to Respondent's Motion for Partial 

Summary Judgment (hereinafter "the Motion"). In support of this request, the Agency 

submits as follows: 

(1) The Motion was served on May 31, 2011 and thus, under 14 CFR Section 13.218(d), 

the Agency has 10 days to file an answer, or until June 1, 2010. 

(2)To respond to the Motion, Agency counsel needs to confer with the reporting 

inspector, Louis Misiano. 

(3)Mr. Misiano is out of the office until June 20, 2011, due to a combination of training 

and pre-scheduled leave that he is taking. The attorney for the Agency, the undersigned, 

will be taking personal leave most of the week of June 6-10, 2011. 
(4) Counsel for Empire Flight Academy (Respondent) has indicated that Respondent 

would have no objection to an extension of time for the Agency to file an answer to the 

Motion, specifically a two-week extension to June 24, 2011. 

(5) Given the procedural schedule that has been adopted in this case, the two-week 

extension would not prejudice Respondent. 

Wlffi^FORETthe Agency requests that it be granted a two week extension, to June 24, 

2011, to file an answer to the Motion. 

Respectftilly submitted, 

ALFRED R. JOHNSON, JR. 

REGIONAL COUNSEL 

By: i^^JL^ 

Zachary M. Befman 

Attorney 

Date: June 6, 2011 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date sent via facsimile and first class mail a copy of the 

foregoing AGENCY'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 

RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT to: 

Gregory S. Winton, Esq. 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

Telefax: (301)294-2525 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

ChieT7v3mimstrative Law Judge^ 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-3 20 

1200 New Jeresey Avenue, S.E. 

Washignton, D.C. 20590 

Telefax: (202366-7536 

I hereby certify that I have this date sent via first class mail a copy of the foregoing 

AGENCY'S REOUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 

RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Att. Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10000 

Date: June 6, 2011 

. Hooks 

Paralegal Specialist 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434
Han: Robert S. Calvert OPINIONNO. WW 390

Comptrollerof Public Accounts Capitol Station Re: Austin, Texas If an applicant (anauthorized licenseddealer) for lnltlal.

reglstratlonof a motor vehicle Inhis or its own name truthfullyaffirms on oath that he purchased the vehicle "for the exalusive purpose of resale and not foruse other than to demonstrate sameto prospective purchasers thereof In an effort to effeot the resale thereof,"would either of the taxes l(8) and Sec.lm osed by Sec.

2 a) 7 of Artlcle 7047k,VACS, be due? Dear Mr. Calvert: You request the opinion lng question: of this office on the follow-

"If an applicant (an authorized licenseddealer) for Initial registration of a motor vehicle In his or Its own name truthfully affirms on oath that he purchased the vehicle 'forthe exclusivepurpose of resale and not for use other than to demonstrate same to prospective purchasers thereof In an effort to effect the resale thereof,'would either of the 1 (a) and Sec. 2(a) ofArticle taxes Imposed by Sec. 7O&'k, VACS, be due?" question specificallyapplicable request the oplnlonwe have lnthe word applicant "an authorized In order tomake your to the facts upon which you serted In parenthesis after licensed dealer". Under the facts submittedby you, we hold that neither the sales tax nor use tax imposed by Sections 1 and 2 I%-

.spectlvely of Article 7047k, Vernon's Civil Statutes,would be due on the demonstration cars of authorized licensed dealersuntil such cars are sold. Whether a sales or use tax would then accrue would dependupon the facts.Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 2, OpinionNo. WW 390

We do not pass upon the right,method and form of registrationof such cara, by such auth6rlzed licensed dealers, as this question Is not beforeus. S U,M M A R.Y Demonstration cars of authorized licensed motor vehicle dealers are'not subject to either the sales tax or use tax Imposed by Sections l.and 2 tispectlvelyof Article 7047k, V.C.S. until such cars are eold.
We do notpas8 upon the right,method and form of registration of such cars, by such authorized licensed dealers, as this question Is not beroreus. Yours very truly
WILL WILSON Attorney General of,Texas

,... LPL/fb

APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Qeorge P. Blackburn, Chairman Ho&don Brownlee, Jr. Cecil C. Rotsch
F. C. (Jack)Goodman REVIEWED FORTHEATTORNEY OENERAL By: W. V. GEPPERT
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

s1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147460

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147460

COA: 312805

Luce CC: 06-000887-FC

ROBERT PAUL DALGLIESH, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).