alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Somalia

On April 12, 2010, by Executive Order 13536, I declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the deterioration of the security situation and the persistence of violence in Somalia, acts of piracy and armed robbery at sea off the coast of Somalia, which have repeatedly been the subject of United Nations Security Council resolutions, and violations of the arms embargo imposed by the United Nations Security Council.

On July 20, 2012, I issued Executive Order 13620 to take additional steps to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13536 in view of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2036 of February 22, 2012, and Resolution 2002 of July 29, 2011, and to address: exports of charcoal from Somalia, which generate significant revenue for al-Shabaab; the misappropriation of Somali public assets; and certain acts of violence committed against civilians in Somalia, all of which contribute to the deterioration of the security situation and the persistence of violence in Somalia.

Because the situation with respect to Somalia continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on April 12, 2010, and the measures adopted on that date and on July 20, 2012, to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond April 12, 2015. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13536.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2015-08420

Billing code 3295-F5
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-34642) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc. 1995 Incentive Award Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-22159) pertaining to the Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333-45689 and 333-69641) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Advanced
Lighting Technologies, Inc. 1998 Incentive Award Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-45695) pertaining to the Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc. 1997 Billion Dollar Market Capitalization Incentive Award
Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-58609) pertaining to the
Company's 8% Senior Notes due 2008, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-58613) pertaining to the Company's securities and securities of ADLT Trust I
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-58621) pertaining to the
Company's securities of our report dated September 28, 1998, except for the
sixth paragraph of Note C, as to which the date is March 15, 1999, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.
as of June 30, 1998 and for each of the two years in the period ended June 30,
1998, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A No. 2) for the year ended June
30, 1999.

                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
February 29, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             60,173
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     388,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                      194,125
<INVENTORY>                                       541,933
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,303,742
<PP&E>                                          1,563,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                    613,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  5,059,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,283,312
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              943
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,397,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    5,059,667
<SALES>                                         4,306,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,306,408
<CGS>                                           3,293,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,529,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                284,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,881,759)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      795,309
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,677,068)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,677,068)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.46)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of D.W.C. Installations (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Sholeh Hamedani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Sholeh  Hamedani     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Sholeh  Hamedani         |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| November 12,  2002       |

 

 

----
Michael Charles Lewis

Photographer

– Licensed Insurance Agent West Virginia 5336 Westbrook Drive Cross Lanes WV, 25313 

### Specific Sections in which Michael Lewis is seeking an exemption:
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF: Michael Lewis

- Photographer FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a),91.103, 91.119, 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95) Extent of relief and my reason for seeking relief: In order to use Unmanned Aircra ft Systems for commercia l use. I am seeking this exemption in order to legally conduct business and comply with all Federal regulations and standards put forth by the FAA while operating our Unmanned Aircraft Systems. How my request would benefit the public as a whole: Granting the petition for Michael Lewis would allow for me to be able to efficiently, legally, economically, and safely perform aerial video and photography of special events, sporting events, land surveillance, heating/cooling thermal imaging inspections, real estate, search and rescue (volunteer) , commercial inspections, and commercial maintenance over certain areas of these United States. Using Unmanned Aircraft Systems such as drone technology would greatly reduce negative impacts on the environment and also provide a safer alternative for businesses to conduct land and equipment inspections. Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rule: By adhering to gu ide lines set forth by the FAA I would not be going above the recommended altitude nor flying at night therefore avoiding any hazardous accidents such as coll iding with a manned aircraft. I, Michael Lewis, will be giving notification to the FAA 72 hours prior to any commercial use. Also we will be regularly test flying and doing daily maintenance logs to ensure the quads are in proper working order for each job or event as to prevent damage or bodily injury. 

### Summary to publish in the Federal Register stating

-- 1. SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b),91.405(a),91.103, 91.119, 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95) 2. We are seeking exemption in order to use our UAS for commercial use.
Submitted on October 15th , 2015 by: Michael Charles Lewis Photographer

– Licensed Insurance Agent West Virginia 5336 Westbrook Drive Cross Lanes WV 25313 Emitsem1@gmail.com
National Guard

Senior Enlisted Leadership Bench Program

Calendar Year 2023 - 2024 Application

Last Name: State:

*Select the state of

your Wing/Home

Unit

First Name:

Middle Name:

Rank: DOR:

Wing:

Unit:

DoD ID:

*Stat Tour: Enter

your directorate

*Stat Tour: Enter

your office symbol

*ADOS: Select

your actualstatus Status: Component:

Duty Title:

Education Level:

Last PME: 

EJPME II:

Work Phone: 

Cell Phone:

Military Email:

Personal Email:

Primary AFSC/MOS:

Rank/Name of Rater:

2nd: 3rd:

Rank/Name of Senior Rater:

MSD (Age 60 Date):

Highest Military Award:

Date of Award:

Do you have a referral evaluation on file?

What are you applying for?

*If you apply for assignments, you are automatically enrolled in executive-level education

Are you assigned or projected to a Joint Position?

Deployments: 

I certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that all of the information provided on this application is 

accurate, complete, and made in good faith. I meet the retention standards of NGR 600-200, AGR eligibility

requirements IAW AR 135-18 and/or Statutory requirements IAW ANGI 36-6. I agree, I must be able to enter an 

assignment on short notice and could be expected to perform up to three years in an assignment depending on 

mission requirements. I understand that any information provided may be investigated at any time, and if 

falsified, is grounds for rejection and may lead to punishment under the Uniform Code of Military Justice

(UCMJ). I understand the information provided above must be reflected on my enlisted record brief or enlisted 

selection brief.

Applicant Signature

Special Considerations:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  Certification
                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
         of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers of Bronco Energy Fund, Inc. (the  "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



                                         /s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Date: March 16, 2006                     ---------------------------
                                         Name:  Daniel L. Hodges

                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                         /s/ James Marshall

Date: March 16, 2006                    ---------------------------
                                         Name:  James Marshall
                                         Title: Principal Financial Officer and
                                         Treasurer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.

                                       20
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




Additional Agreement




To: Woori Bank




As to the Credit Facility Agreement dated as of May 24, 2010 for a loan of 180,000,000 U.S. dollars
(the “Credit Facility Agreement”), the parties to the Credit Facility Agreement hereby additionally
agree to the following:




1. In the event of additional borrowings from a financial institution other than Woori Bank, the
Borrower shall have a prior consultation thereof with Woori Bank.




2. Amkor Technology Inc., the head company in the United States of America, shall guarantee this
foreign currency loan of 180,000,000 U.S. dollars up to the amount of 234,000,000 U.S. dollars,
which is 130% of the loan amount.




3. The loan proceeds shall be used to repay 180,000,000 U.S dollars of the Series
A Bonds in the amount of 385,000,000 U.S dollars issued as of May 15, 1999 and the proper evidences
should be provided to Woori Bank.




4. Amkor Technology Inc. uses the proceeds ($180 million), as a repayment of intercompany bonds
from Amkor Technology Korea, for the repayment of existing 3rd party debts and so on.
But not for the repayment of debts from related parties.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 

	 	 	 	May 24, 2010	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Borrower:
	 	/s/ JooHo Kim	 	((seal))
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	JooHo Kim
Representative Director	 	 
	 

	 	Address:
2021 AFSAM

Anti Body Armor

PI2250

SHOOTER SCORE ROST # TEAM NAME 

1 SFC NOE, JOSEPH T 119 ALL-GUARD ALPHA 172

2 SFC BAUTISTA, MICHAEL R 125 ALL-GUARD (BRAVO) 164

3 SSG MORRIS, SEAN D 159 USAR BLACK 164

4 TSGT DANIEL, SCOTTY W 138 ALL-GUARD (CHARLIE) 163

5 SGT HUGHES, DEVIN E 158 USAR BLACK 159

6 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 160 USAR GOLD 158

7 SSGT ROOK, GAVIN W 121 ALL-GUARD (CHARLIE) 158

8 SSG DEMENT, JERRY D 316 ALL-GUARD (BRAVO) 156

9 SGT GRIFFETH, ALEXANDRA I 114 ALL-GUARD (CHARLIE) 155

10 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 118 ALL-GUARD ALPHA 153

11 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 120 ALL-GUARD (BRAVO) 153

12 SFC GODEL, JASON W 156 USAR BLACK 153

13 MSG GREGSON, JACOB J 108 ALL-GUARD (CHARLIE) 152

14 SSG VARGAS, ERIK J 132 ALL-GUARD (BRAVO) 150

15 MSG SMITH, MATTHEW B 136 149

16 SSG ABEYTA, PATRICK M 164 AFSAM HONORS 145

17 SFC SWANSON, BRANDON N 100 ALL-GUARD ALPHA 144

18 SFC KEENOM, DAVID D 112 141

19 CPT MILLER, GARRETT E 117 ALL-GUARD ALPHA 140

20 CW3 KNOTE, ANDY T 163 USAR GOLD 139

21 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 162 USAR GOLD 137

22 MSG BURDETTE, RODERICK II 165 AFSAM HONORS 135

23 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 157 USAR BLACK 129

24 CSM BALL, MICHAEL E 166 AFSAM HONORS 122

25 SGM MININO, ANTHONY A 167 AFSAM HONORS 120

26 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 131 116

27 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 161 USAR GOLD 115

28 TSGT WENG, RYAN B 137 105

Page 1 of 1 Time printed: 9/2/2021 6:21:50 PM
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Mikel H. Williams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.       /s/ MIKEL H. WILLIAMS         Mikel H. Williams
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7469

MARION L. SHERROD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COLBERT L. RESPASS; SEAN DILLARD; CAPTAIN OLIVER; MARCEL 

SLEDGE,

Defendants - Appellees

and

GEORGE T. SOLOMON; FELIX TAYLOR; NURSE PATTERSON; RAHIM 

AKBAR; HIRAM BEASLEY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03252-FL)

Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 30, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Marion L. Sherrod, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Marion L. Sherrod appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sherrod v. 

Respass, No. 5:14-ct-03252-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2017). We deny Sherrod’s motion to 

file an amended complaint, a motion more properly addressed to the district court, but 

have considered the material as a supplement to his informal brief. We deny Sherrod’s

request for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1657

In re: DAVID HILL,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(1:21-cv-00112-CMH-TCB; 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)

Submitted: July 26, 2022 Decided: September 22, 2022

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1657 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

In this petition for a writ of mandamus, David Hill, a federal inmate, seeks an order 

from this court compelling the district court to accept and consider the postjudgment 

motions he attempted to file after the court imposed a prefiling injunction on Hill. See Hill 

v. McNulty, No. 1:21-cv-00112-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va., PACER No. 61). “[M]andamus is 

a drastic remedy that must be reserved for extraordinary situations.” In re Murphy-Brown, 

LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks omitted). We may afford 

a petitioner mandamus relief “only when (1) petitioner has no other adequate means to 

attain the relief he desires; (2) petitioner has shown a clear and indisputable right to the 

requested relief; and (3) the court deems the writ appropriate under the circumstances.” Id. 

(cleaned up). 

Upon review of Hill’s petition and the relevant materials, we conclude that Hill has 

not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief.*

 Accordingly, we deny the petition for a 

writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

* We observe that in Appeal No. 22-6223, United States v. Hill, we have vacated the 

district court’s order imposing what is essentially the same prefiling injunction underlying 

the instant mandamus petition, see United States v. Hill, No. 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1 (E.D. 

Va., PACER No. 435), and remanded that matter to the district court for further 

proceedings related to the prefiling injunction. 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1657 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32

      SGD HOLDINGS, LTD. FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2004
      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Terry Washburn, certify that

1.   I am the President and Acting Chief Executive Officer of SGD Holdings, Ltd.

2.   Attached to this certification is Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October
     31, 2004, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by the issuer
     with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), which
     contains financial statements.

3.   I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
     to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     o    The periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
          and

     o    The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the issuer for the periods presented.


December 17, 2004                          /s/ Terry Washburn
                                           --------------------------
                                           Terry Washburn
                                           President and Acting CEO
                                           (and equivalent of CFO)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by SGD Holdings, Ltd. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 09

- 00396

- CR

Todd S. PERDOK

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007

- CR

- 8186

Honorable George H. Godwin , Judge Pre siding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca S immons , Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 20 , 2010

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal by withdrawing his notice of appeal.

The motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH