alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
YieldUP International Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-19645, 333-19647, 333-19649, 333-50743) on Forms S-3 and S-8 of YieldUP
International Corporation of our report dated February 5, 1999, relating to the
balance sheet of YieldUP International Corporation as of December 31, 1998, and
the related statements of operations, redeemable Series A Preferred Stock and
stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report
on Form 10-KSB/A of YieldUP International Corporation.

Our report dated February 5, 1999, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, which raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
September 13, 1999
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF


THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  April 11, 2012


EMRISE CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware001-1034677-0226211(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)2530 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC27,713(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)


(408) 200-3598


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


N/A


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2.):


[  ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[  ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[  ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[  ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))











---







Item 5.02  Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.





On April 11, 2012, the Board of Directors of EMRISE Corporation (the “Company”) appointed Tim Blades, age 55,  as Director of Finance, Principal Accounting Officer and Secretary of the Company.  Since March 6, 2012, Mr. Blades has been serving, and continues to serve, in an interim finance position for the Company.  Mr. Blades is currently the owner of TJB Advisory Services Limited, located in England, for which he has worked as an independent, self-employed, consultant since 2010.  From 2002 until 2010, Mr. Blades served as the Regional Managing Partner of Grant Thorton UK LLP.








---







SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Date:  April 17, 2012EMRISE CORPORATIONBy:/s/ Carmine T. OlivaCarmine T. OlivaChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Tom W. Ward, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this 10-Q Report of Exabyte Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Dated: August 15, 2005

| /s/  TOM W. WARD |
|------------------|

Tom W. Ward

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
----

----

----

| ​                                    | ​ | ​ | Oil(U.S.$/BBL) | ​ | ​ | Condensateand LPG(U.S.$/BBL) | ​ |
|--------------------------------------------|---------|---------|----------------|---------|---------|------------------------------|---------|
| Africa                                     | ​ | ​ | ​        | ​ | 54.46   | ​                      | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | 48.76 | ​ | ​ |
| Asia                                       | ​ | ​ | ​        | ​ | N/A     | ​                      | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | 47.40 | ​ | ​ |
| Europe                                     | ​ | ​ | ​        | ​ | 49.30   | ​                      | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | 30.65 | ​ | ​ |
| Average for Total                          | ​ | ​ | ​        | ​ | 50.49   | ​                      | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | 38.60 | ​ | ​ |
| Note: “N/A” is Not Applicable. | ​ | ​ | ​        | ​ | ​ | ​                      | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ |
| ​           | ​ | ​ | Gas(U.S.$/Mcf) | ​ |
|-------------------|---------|---------|----------------|---------|
| Africa            | ​ | ​ | ​        | ​ | 5.05 | ​ | ​ |
| Asia              | ​ | ​ | ​        | ​ | 2.95 | ​ | ​ |
| Europe            | ​ | ​ | ​        | ​ | 5.79 | ​ | ​ |
| Average for Total | ​ | ​ | ​        | ​ | 5.54 | ​ | ​ |

----

| ​                                        | ​ | ​ | Estimated by EniNet Proved Reservesas of December 31, 2017 | ​ |
|------------------------------------------------|---------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|---------|
| ​                                        | ​ | ​ | Oil,Condensate,and LPG(mmBBL)                                   | ​ | ​ | Gas(BCF) | ​ | ​ | OilEquivalent(mmBOE) | ​ |
| Properties reviewed byDeGolyer and MacNaughton | ​ | ​ | ​                                                         | ​ |
| Total Proved                                   | ​ | ​ | ​                                                         | ​ | 741.0 | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | 1,587.7 | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | 1,031.9 | ​ | ​ |
| ​ | [SEAL] | ​ | ​ | /s/ Lloyd W. Cade​Lloyd W. Cade, P.E.Senior Vice PresidentDeGolyer and MacNaughton | ​ |
|---------|--------|---------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|

----

| ​ | [SEAL] | ​ | ​ | /s/ Lloyd W. Cade​Lloyd W. Cade, P.E.Senior Vice PresidentDeGolyer and MacNaughton | ​ |
|---------|--------|---------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|

----
*yrcsent*— Chancellors jIutsoey Mathews and Bctleege,

*JUNE,*1792.

#### Logan *vs.*the Executor of Abraham Ladson.

CASE 1XXIV.

n. 11.310,346.

DEC^^”OOK*

a^rson and issue living then^a^liiS* tation over to ^n1 the llmi' tation over is g0üd*

The question in this case arose on a clause of the will of Mrs. Rachel Ladson, the mother of Abraham Ladson, the defendant's testator. She bequeathed to her son Abraham Ladson, certain personal estate, with a limita-¿ion over to Miss Perry if he should die without issue living at the time of his death. Abraham died without leaving issue living at his death,* and the complainant who had married the lady to whom the limitation over was made, filed a bill for recovery of the property. The defendant admitted the will, but insisted that the limitation over was too remote, and therefore void as tending to -a perpetuity.

The court said that the only question then for its determination was, whether the limitation over being of personal estate is warranted by the rules of law, or whether it is too remote. If this was a new question it would ho proper and necessary to enter into a minute discussion of the principles on which it is to be, determined and to assign the particular reasons and grounds of the decree in this case, but the numerous adjudications already had on the same point in this court and the court of chancery in England, renders such a discussion altogether needless. Suffice it to say, that although a limitation over of a per-annul chattel after a dying without issue generally will *272not be admitted, yet if it is confined within a life or lives in being, or within ten months, or the birth of a child, or in case of the death of such child before the age of twenty - one years, the limitation over is good, for then the danger of the perpetuity, which is said to be so much abhorred by the law is avoided; all the candles are lighted and are consuming together, and the last remainder is in reality only to the remainder man who happens to survive the rest. The cases of Atkinson and Hutchinson,, in 3 P. Wms. 258, and of Sheffield and lord Orrery, in 3 Atk. 282, and Read and Snell, 2 Atk. 642, determined in England, and those of Sams and Mathews, and Elliot and Elliot in this court, are strong in point. Those authorities must not now bo shaken, and future cases of a similar kind must he decided agreeable to thos'c determinations.

The court is of opinion therefore that the limitation over to Rachael Perry, on the contingency of A. Ladson dying without lawful issue living at the time of his death, was good — and decree that the property bequeathed by the will of Rachael Ladson to Iia'chael Perry on such contingency, he delivered up to the complainants: That the defendants do account before the master for the value of such of the pi’operty as was sold by their testator, and also for the profits and income of the property from the time of his death; and that the costs of this suit be paid by defendants out of the estate of their testator.
#### WILSON v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.

Before Townsend, J., Lexington, September, 1900.

Affirmed.

Action for damages for personal injuries by Georgiana Wilson and John Wilson against. Southern Railway Co. Prom order refusing motion of defendant to require plaintiff to submit to physical examination, defendant appeals.

*Messrs. B. L. Abney*and *B. M. Thomson,*for appellant,

submit their argument in Easier *v.*this defendant, *post.*

*Messrs. G. T. Graham*and *P. H. Nelson,*contra,

cite: *Is the order now appealable:*35 S. E. R., *797',*32 S. E. R-, 417; 30 S. E. R., 614. *The Court has no power to subject a party to such examination:*11 Sup. Ct. R., 1001; 113 U. S., 724; 4 How., 242; 24 Pa. St., 314; 29 Hun., 154; 50 ' N. Y. Sup. Ct, 412; 53 Mo., 509; 102 Ill., 272; 10 E. R., 278; 40 A. R., 1114; 32 N. E., 389; 33 N. E-, 951; 28 N. E-, 360. *In States where statutes permit such orders they are only granted along with an order requiring examination of party orally:*27 N. Y. S., 966; 34 N. Y. S., 572. *There is no statute here permitting such examination, but the contrary:*Code, 390.

April 1, 1901.

The "opinion of the Court was delivered by

*117Mr. Justice Gary.

The appeal herein was heard in connection with that in the case of R. T. Easier, an infant, &c., plaintiff, against Southern Railway Company, defendant, *post,*as the facts .were similar and the same question was presented by the *exceptions;*the principles announced in that case, in which the opinion has just been filed, are conclusive of this appeal.

The order of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Jones *dissents.*
# UNITED STATES

# SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION

# Washington, D.C. 20549

# FORM 8-K

# Current Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

# The Securities Exchange
Act of 1934

# Date of Report (Date
of earliest event reported): January 4, 2006

# MAF BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)

_________________

|                                                        |                          |                                     
|------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                | 0-18121                  | 36-3664868                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of 
        Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|55th Street & Holmes Avenue
 Clarendon Hills, Illinois  |                          | 60514
(Zip Code)                    
|(Address of principal executive
           offices)     |                          |                                     

Registrants
telephone number, including area code (630) 325-7300

# Not Applicable

(Former
name or former address, if changed since last year)

Check
the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

_   Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

_   Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

_   Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

_   Pre-commencement communications
pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

---

# Item 1.08   Other Events.

Attached as Exhibit 99.1, and incorporated
herein by reference, is a copy of the press release issused by MAF Bancorp, Inc. on January 4, 2006,
announcing preliminary results of EFC Bancorp, Inc. merger consideration elections.

2

---

# Signature

Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

| |  | MAF BANCORP, INC.BY: /s/ Jerry A. Weberling
Jerry A. WeberlingExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 4, 2006

3

---

# INDEX TO EXHIBITS

# Exhibit

Exhibit 99.1    Press Release dated January 4, 2006.

4

---
**Exhibit23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.’s333-127884, 333-120674, 333-101753, 333-60532, 333-54968, 333-39112,333-79577, 333-56883 and 333-20883) pertaining to the Accelrys, Inc. Amendedand Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, Accelrys, Inc. 2005 Employee StockPurchase Plan, Accelrys, Inc. 2004 New-Hire Equity Incentive Plan,Pharmacopeia, Inc. 1994 Incentive Stock Plan, Pharmacopeia, Inc. Employee StockPurchase Plan, Pharmacopeia, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan and 1995 DirectorOption Plan and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.’s 333-119752and 333-34478) and the related prospectus of Accelrys, Inc. andPharmacopeia, Inc. of our reports dated June 1, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of Accelrys, Inc., Accelrys Inc.management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingof Accelrys, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended March 31, 2007.
|                       | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                  |                           |
|                  |                           |
| San Diego, California |                           |
| June 1, 2007          |                           |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Company's unaudited financial statements as of and for the fiscal three month
period ended March 29, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to 
such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                           65182
<SECURITIES>                                     12674
<RECEIVABLES>                                    89211
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2506
<INVENTORY>                                      13313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                193714
<PP&E>                                          542129
<DEPRECIATION>                                  259739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  645415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           108245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            18920
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         33365
<OTHER-SE>                                      367619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    645415
<SALES>                                         185104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                185104
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   150566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    98
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  35395
<INCOME-TAX>                                     14656
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              20578
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     20578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .79
        

</TABLE>
Request for Information Michael Duncan (FAA-2015-2757) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Duncan: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-2757).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date 

listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by December 16, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 7:40 AM 

To: mdmichaelduncan@gmail.com
ex10-23.htm



Exhibit 10.23


 



Coal Tar sales contracts


Seller: Shanxi Changyuan Coking Co., Ltd


Purchaser: Taiyuan Hongxing Carbon Co., Ltd 







The Seller and Purchaser reach the following agreement through friendly negotiation.







1, Product name: Coal Tar







2, Quantity: 800 Ton/Month







3, Price: RMB1700 / Ton (including tax). It shall inform the purchaser in a timely manner if there is a change in price.


(Due to the fluctuation of the price, the price shall be adjusted through a Price Adjustment Letter)







4, Quality Standard: the first class national standard: Water Content<=4%, Density 1.15g/cm3--1.20g/cm; Light oil:1%;carbolic oil 2%; acyl oil:4%,asphalt:65%~70%; ash<=0.14%


 The quality is subject to seller’s laboratory test report, purchaser may check it. It shall be settled through negotiation if dispute arise.







5, Settlement amount and reasonable loss: It shall be based on the weights calculated from seller, purchaser supervise the weight process. It shall be settled through negotiation if the weight difference is significant.







6, Settlement: Money transfer or bill of exchange with tax receipt of 17% value-added tax.


7, Delivery place and method: By trucks and purchase bear the cost







8, Default responsibility and solutions: The default party takes the full responsibility, and it shall be settled through negotiation if there is a contract dispute.







9, The contract is in duplicate, seller and purchaser each hold a contract, the contract come into force once it is signed and sealed by both parties.


 



	
Seller: Xiaoyi Jinhui Coal&Coking Co., Ltd

	
Purchaser: Taiyuan Hongxing Carbon Co. Ltd


	
Signature (Seal)

	
Signature (Seal)












Valid period: From January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009