alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 1852** 

JOHN M. DICKSON, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JUDGE BRYANT L. SUGG, Newport News Circuit Court 7th Judicial Court of Virginia As an “ enterprise ” for RICO purposes Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act; FORMER JUDGE MR. HOWARD VINCENT CONWAY, JR., Of the Newport News Circuit Court Formerly of 7th Judicial Court of Virgini a As an “ enterprise ” for RICO purposes Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO); COMMONWEALTH ’ S ATTORNEY MR. THOMAS C. DANIEL, Commonwealth ’ s Attorney ’ s Office For the city of Ne wport News Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO); CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS VIRGINIA, As
an “ enterprise ” for RICO purposes Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterpris e Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO); CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO); MR. R. DEAN BARKER, CSAT for, Hampton/Newport News. C.I.T./Jail Services Coordinator Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under the Racketeer Influenced and Co rrupt Organizations Act (RICO) ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United Stat es District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 4:15

- cv
- 00050

- AWA

- DEM )2 Submitted : October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

John M. Dickson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
John M. Dickson, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order
dismissing his civil complaint a s frivolous pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2012) . We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Dickson v

. Sugg , No.

4:15

- cv
- 00050

- AWA

- DEM (E.D. Va. July 2, 2015) . We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
INDIANA ARA 21 

IDEM INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment. 

Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue 

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 

(317) 232-8603 

Thomas W. Easterly Toll Free (800) 451-6027 

Commissioner www.idem.IN.gov 

March 4, 2009 

Bharat Mathur, Acting Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, IL 60604 

Dear Mr. Mathur: 

Re: Authorization Revision Application 21 

I am pleased to submit Indiana's latest hazardous waste program revision, 

incorporating changes to Indiana's hazardous waste management program that 

implement federal changes to the hazardous waste management program from July 24, 

2002, through August 5, 2005. This application requests authorization for ten (10) 

checklists in RCRA Clusters 13 through 16 as listed in the addendum to the program 

description. 

This application consists of an addendum to the approved state Program Description 

and a Supplemental Attorney General's Statement. The Memorandum of Agreement 

approved on December 6, 2001, remains in effect. 

We greatly appreciate the assistance of Mr. Gary Westefer in preparation of the 

application. If you have questions regarding this authorization revision application, 

please contact Mr. Michael Dalton of the Office of Land Quality at (317) 232-8884. 

Thoma Easterly 

Commissioner 

Attachments 

cc: Mr. Gary Westefer, U.S. EPA Region 5 (with enclosures) 

Recycled Paper An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle 0
TORI SCOTT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 5914

_____________ ________________/

Opinion filed February 13, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. John T. Brown , Judge

.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, General Counsel and Melissa Joy Ford, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pame la Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO

, WETHERELL

, and BILBREY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

JEFFREY WILLUHN, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, 

Res • ondent. 

No. 85201 

FILE 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting 

respondent's motion to dismiss. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark 

County; Eric Johnson, Judge. 

Review of the documents before this court reveals a 

jurisdictional defect. It appears that appellant's claims against Jason 

Roderick remain pending below. Because these claims against Roderick 

remain pending below, the order challenged on appeal is not appealable as 

a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1) and has not been certified as final 

under NRCP 54(b). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 

416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). No other statute or court rule 

allows for an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown v. MHC 

Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345. 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I 947A 

- acq9?-
"may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). 

Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

/14_,tepo.,tit-..‘ J. 

Hardesty 

A4w11...(2 

Stiglich Herndon 

cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge 

Jeffrey Willuhn 

Marquis •Aurbach Coffing 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

J. , J. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
C H 3

N

C H 3

C H 2

 ECOSAR Version 1.11 Results Page

 

 SMILES : CN(C)C12CC3CC(C1)CC(C2)C3

 CHEM : Dimethyladamantylamine

 CAS Num: 3717-40-6

 ChemID1: 

 MOL FOR: C12 H21 N1 

 MOL WT : 179.31

 Log Kow: 3.105 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

 Log Kow: 3.330 (User Entered)

 Log Kow: (PhysProp DB exp value - for comparison only)

 Melt Pt: 275.00 (deg C, User Entered for Wat Sol estimate)

 Melt Pt: (deg C, PhysProp DB exp value for Wat Sol estimate)

 Wat Sol: 5.306 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

 Wat Sol: (User Entered)

 Wat Sol: (PhysProp DB exp value)

 

 

 --------------------------------------

 Values used to Generate ECOSAR Profile

 --------------------------------------

 Log Kow: 3.330 (User Entered)

 Wat Sol: 5.306 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

 

 

 ------------------------------------------------

 Available Measured Data from ECOSAR Training Set

 ------------------------------------------------

 

 No Data Available

 

 

 --------------------------------------

 ECOSAR v1.11 Class-specific Estimations

 --------------------------------------

 Aliphatic Amines

 Predicted

 ECOSAR Class Organism Duration End Pt mg/L (ppm)

 =========================== ================== ======== ====== ==========

 Aliphatic Amines : Fish 96-hr LC50 4.606

 Aliphatic Amines : Daphnid 48-hr LC50 0.641

 Aliphatic Amines : Green Algae 96-hr EC50 0.389

 Aliphatic Amines : Fish ChV 0.167

 Aliphatic Amines : Daphnid ChV 0.061

 Aliphatic Amines : Green Algae ChV 0.145

 

 =========================== ================== ======== ====== ==========

 Neutral Organic SAR : Fish 96-hr LC50 9.413 *

 (Baseline Toxicity) : Daphnid 48-hr LC50 6.043 *

 : Green Algae 96-hr EC50 7.480 *

 : Fish ChV 1.063

 : Daphnid ChV 0.829

 : Green Algae ChV 2.575

 

 Note: * = asterisk designates: Chemical may not be soluble enough to
 measure this predicted effect. If the effect level exceeds the

 water solubility by 10X, typically no effects at saturation (NES)

 are reported.

 

 

 ------------------------------

 Class Specific LogKow Cut-Offs

 ------------------------------

 If the log Kow of the chemical is greater than the endpoint specific cut-offs

 presented below, then no effects at saturation are expected for those endpoints.

 

 Aliphatic Amines:

 ----------------

 Maximum LogKow: 6.0 (Fish, Mysid LC50)

 Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (Daphnid LC50)

 Maximum LogKow: 7.0 (Green Algae EC50)

 Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (Fish, Daphnid ChV)

 Maximum LogKow: 7.0 (Green Algae ChV)

 

 Baseline Toxicity SAR Limitations:

 ---------------------------------

 Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (Fish 96-hr LC50; Daphnid LC50)

 Maximum LogKow: 6.4 (Green Algae EC50)

 Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (ChV)
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Jules Francois Parisien, M.D., as Assignee of Vital Abner, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent. </font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin Toell of counsel), for appellant.Abrams, Cohen &amp; Associates, P.C. (Frank Piccininni of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Richard J. Montelione, J.), entered September 23, 2016. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the insured vehicle had not been involved in the alleged accident in question. </p><p>In support of its motion, defendant submitted the transcript of the examination under oath (EUO) of its insured, in which she testified that she had been parking her vehicle at the time of the alleged accident, that no accident had occurred and that plaintiff's assignor, a pedestrian, had not been struck by her vehicle. In a supporting affidavit, the insured attested to the same facts. The EUO testimony and the affidavit are sufficient to demonstrate, prima facie, that "the alleged injury [did] not arise out of an insured incident" (<i>Central Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Group of Ins. Cos.</i>, 90 NY2d 195, 199 [1997]; <a href="../2009/2009_52601.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Andromeda Med. Care, P.C. v NY Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.</i>, 26 Misc 3d 126</a>[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 52601[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2009]; <a href="../2009/2009_52379.htm" target="_blank"><i>Midwood Med. Equip. &amp; Supply, Inc. v USAA Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 25 Misc 3d 139</a>[A], <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>2009 NY Slip Op 52379[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2009]). Since plaintiff opposed defendant's motion only with an affirmation by counsel, who did not assert that he possessed personal knowledge of the facts, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to defendant's motion (<i>see Zuckerman v City of New York</i>, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]).</p><p>Plaintiff's remaining contention lacks merit.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: August 02, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3862 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benz[cd]indolium, 1-ethyl-2-[1,2,3,4- 

tetrahydro-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2,2,4-trimethyl-6-quinolinyl]-,chloride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2009 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benz[cd]indolium, 1- 

ethyl-2-[1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2,2,4- 

trimethyl-6-quinolinyl]-,chloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENZ[CD]INDOLIUM, 1-ETHYL-2-[1,2,3,4- 

4 TETRAHYDRO-1-(2-HYDROXYETHYL)-2,2,4- 

5 TRIMETHYL-6-QUINOLINYL]-,CHLORIDE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3862 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Benz[cd]indolium, 1-ethyl-2- 

[1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)- 2,2,4-trimethyl6-quinolinyl]-,chloride. (CAS 

No. 63817–45–8) (provided 

for in subheading 

2921.59.80) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting: Briefing on Ozone Proposal

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

Date: February 2, 2015

On January 28, 2015, Erika Sasser, Division Director of the Health and Environmental Impacts 

Division, presented an overview of the Agency’s November 25, 2015, proposed revisions to the 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone to staff members of the U.S. House of 

Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee. 

The presentation used in the briefing is available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/groundlevelozone/pdfs/2014decwebinar.pdf

The attendees were as follows:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Erika Sasser

Cheryl Mackay

Kevin Culligan

Paul Gunning

House Oversight and Government Reform Staff

Joseph Brazauskas

Drew Colliatie

Bill McGrath

Christina Aizcorbe

Beverly Britton Fraser
Exhibit 32


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Children's Internet, Inc.
(the "Company") on  Form 10-QSB for  the period  ending September  30, 2003 as
filed  with the  Securities and  Exchange  Commission on  the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Sholeh Hamedani, Chief Executive Officer, President, and   Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant  to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.



  /S/ SHOLEH HAMEDANI
-------------------------
Sholeh Hamedani,
Chief Executive Officer, President,
and Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2003
- 1

-

No. 52 SSM 2 The People &c., Respondent, v. Justin Hymes , Appellant.

Submitted by Nathaniel V. Riley, for appellant. Submitted by Nicole K. Intschert, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM : The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Initially, defendant asserts that County Court erroneously admitted certain testimony regarding the victim’s out

- of

-- 2

- SSM No. 2

- 2

- court disclosures of sexual abuse, and failed to instruct the jury that such evidence could be considered only for the “purpose o f explaining the investigative process and completing the narrative of events leading to the defendant ’ s arrest ” ( People v Ludwig , 24 NY3d 221, 231 [2014]; see People v Cullen , 24 NY3d 1014, 1016 [2014]). Because defendant did not object on either basis b efore the trial court, we conclude that these arguments are unpreserved and, therefore, unreviewable by this Court ( see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bayne , 82 NY2d 673, 676 [1993] ; People v West , 56 NY2d 662, 663 [1982]; compare People v Smith , 22 NY3d 462, 465 [2013]). Furthermore, on this record, defendant has failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating “t he absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations ” for trial counsel ’ s failure to lodge an objection to the testimony now challenged on app eal or to seek a limiting instruction with respect to such testimony ( People v Honghirun , 29 NY3d 284, 289 [2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see People v Rivera , 71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]). Therefore, defendant’s claim
of ineffective assistance of counsel on this direct appeal must be rejected . To the extent defendant wishes to advance such a claim based upon matters outside the record, he may commence a proceeding pursuant to CPL 440.10 ( see People v Mendoza , 33 NY3d 414, 419 n [2019 ]; People v Brown , 45 NY2d 852, 853

- 854 [1978]).

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Ste in, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided March 26, 2020
Order entered August 21, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01705
- CR JULIO RUIZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. F08
- 24859
- P



### O RDER
T he Court GRANTS the State’s August 19, 2013 motion for extension of time to file the
State’s brief.
We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the bri e f tendered as of the date of this order

.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3843 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3843

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to publish redacted medical quality-assurance records 
 of the Department of Veterans Affairs on the Internet website of the 
                              Department.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 2009

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to publish redacted medical quality-assurance records 
 of the Department of Veterans Affairs on the Internet website of the 
                              Department.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency for America's Heroes 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF MEDICAL QUALITY-ASSURANCE RECORDS.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Disclosure.--Subsection (a) of section 5705 of title 
        38, United States Code, is amended by striking ``except as 
        provided in subsection (b) of this section'' and inserting ``if 
        such record or document contains identifying information 
        described in paragraph (2) of subsection (b)''.
            (2) Internet database.--Paragraph (3) of section 5705(b) of 
        title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(3) In addition to a disclosure made under paragraph (1), and 
subject to paragraph (2), not later than 30 days after a record or 
document described in subsection (a) is created, the Secretary shall 
make the record or document available on the Internet website (or 
successor protocol) of the Department in a manner that is easily 
accessible by the public.''.
    (b) Unredacted Disclosure.--Subsection (e) of section 5705 of such 
title is amended by striking ``except as provided for in subsection (b) 
of this section'' and inserting ``that contains identifying information 
described in paragraph (2) of subsection (b)''.
    (c) Prior Records.--In carrying out subsection (b)(3) of section 
5705 of title 38, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a)(2) 
of this section, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall ensure that 
records or documents described in subsection (a) of such section 5705 
that were created during the two-year period preceding the date of the 
enactment of this Act are made available on the Internet website of the 
Department.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3988 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3988

To amend section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to specify articles that 
  qualify as commercially interchangeable merchandise for purposes of 
                         certain duty drawback.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2009

 Mr. Boccieri introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to specify articles that 
  qualify as commercially interchangeable merchandise for purposes of 
                         certain duty drawback.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMERCIALLY INTERCHANGEABLE MERCHANDISE FOR DUTY DRAWBACK 
              PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 313(j) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1313(j)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(5) For purposes of this subsection, merchandise is 
        `commercially interchangeable' with imported merchandise if it 
        is classifiable under the same 8-digit subheading of the 
        Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to claims filed for drawback under section 313(j) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930 on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```