21208 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Notices 

1See Helical Spring Lock Washers from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 

2013, 80 FR 13833 (March 17, 2015) (Final Results) 

and accompanying ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review: Helical Spring Lock 

Washers from the People’s Republic of China; 

2012–2013’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Final Results of the 

Eighteenth Administrative Review of Helical Spring 

Lock Washers from the People’s Republic of China: 

Analysis of the Preliminary Results Margin 

Calculation for Jiangsu RC Import & Export Co., 

Ltd.’’ dated March 9, 2015 (Calculation 

Memorandum). 

3See letter from Jiangsu RC, ‘‘RC Final Results 

Ministerial Error Comments: Antidumping Duty 

Order on Helical Spring Lock Washers from the 

People’s Republic of China’’ dated March 16, 2015. 

section 733(d) and (f) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.224. Because the amended rate 

for Hoifat results in a reduced cash 

deposit rate, the rate for Hoifat will be 

effective retroactively to April 1, 2015, 

the date of publication of the 

Preliminary Determination. 

Amended Preliminary Determination 

As a result of this amended 

preliminary determination, we have 

revised the preliminary estimated 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Hoifat as follows: 

Exporter Producer 

Weighted-average 

margin 

(percent) 

Zhongda United Holding Group Co., Ltd ............................... Jiaxing Zhongda Metalwork Co., Ltd ..................................... 22.64 

Jiaxing Zhongda Import & Export Co., Ltd ............................. Jiaxing Zhongda Metalwork Co., Ltd ..................................... 22.64 

Nanjing Topsun Racking Manufacturing Co., Ltd .................. Nanjing Topsun Racking Manufacturing Co., Ltd .................. 85.26 

Ningbo ETDZ Huixing Trade Co., Ltd .................................... Haifa (Ningbo) Office Equipment Co., Ltd ............................. 50.23 

Ningbo ETDZ Huixing Trade Co., Ltd .................................... Ningbo Decko Metal Products Trade Co., Ltd ....................... 50.23 

Ningbo ETDZ Huixing Trade Co., Ltd .................................... Lianfa Metal Product Co., Ltd ................................................ 50.23 

Meridian International Co., Ltd ............................................... Zhejiang Limai Metal Products Co. Ltd .................................. 50.23 

Zhejiang Limai Metal Products Co., Ltd ................................. Zhejiang Limai Metal Products Co., Ltd ................................. 50.23 

HoiFat (NingBo) Office Facilities Co., Ltd .............................. HoiFat (NingBo) Office Facilities Co., Ltd .............................. 50.23 

PRC-Wide Entity ..................................................................... ................................................................................................. 112.68 

Postponement of the Final 

Determination 

In the Preliminary Determination, the 

Department stated that it would make 

its final determination for this 

antidumping duty investigation no later 

than 75 days after the preliminary 

determination. 

Section 735(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’) provides that a final 

determination may be postponed until 

not later than 135 days after the date of 

the publication of the preliminary 

determination if, in the event of an 

affirmative determination, a request for 

such postponement is made by 

exporters who account for a significant 

proportion of exports of the subject 

merchandise, or in the event of a 

negative preliminary determination, a 

request for such postponement is made 

by petitioner. In addition, section 

351.210(e)(2) of the Department’s 

regulations require that requests by 

respondents for postponement of a final 

determination be accompanied by a 

request for extension of provisional 

measures from a four month period to 

not more than six months. 

On April 7, 2015, Zhongda United 

Holding Group Co., Ltd., one of the two 

mandatory respondents in this 

investigation, requested a 60-day 

extension of the final determination and 

extension of the provisional measures. 

Thus, because our amended preliminary 

determination is affirmative, and the 

respondent requesting a postponement 

of the final determination and an 

extension of the provisional measures 

accounts for a significant proportion of 

exports of boltless steel shelving, and no 

compelling reasons for denial exist, we 

are postponing the deadline for the final 

determination by 60 days until August 

14, 2015, based on the publication date 

of the 

Preliminary Determination 

International Trade Commission 

Notification 

In accordance with section 733(f) of 

the Act, we notified the International 

Trade Commission of our amended 

preliminary determination. 

This amended preliminary 

determination is issued and published 

in accordance with sections 733(f) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.224(e). 

Dated: April 10, 2015. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08898 Filed 4–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–822] 

Helical Spring Lock Washers From the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Department) is amending the final 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

helical spring lock washers (HSLW) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC) 1 to correct a ministerial error. 

The period of review (POR) is October 

1, 2012, through September 30, 2013. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 17, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sergio Balbontin, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone 202– 

482–6478. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 9, 2015, the Department 

disclosed to interested parties its 

calculations for the Final Results.2 On 

March 16, 2015 we received a 

ministerial error allegation from Jiangsu 

RC Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu 

RC).3

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

are HSLWs. The product is currently 

classified under subheading 

7318.21.0000, 7318.21.0030, and 

7318.21.0090 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written product 

description is dispositive. A full 

description of the scope of the order is 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Notices 21209 

4See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

5See Calculation Memorandum at Attachment I. 

6 Id. 

7See memoranda, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013’’ and 

‘‘Calculation Memorandum for the Amended Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013’’ dated concurrently with this 

Notice. 

8The Department determined that Guoxin is not 

eligible for a separate rate and that Winnsen, whose 

request for a review was timely withdrawn, had not 

been assigned a separate rate. 

1See Countervailing Duty Investigation of 53-Foot 

Domestic Dry Containers from the People’s 

Continued 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.4

Ministerial Error 

Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (Act), and 19 CFR 

351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as 

an error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or 

other arithmetic function, clerical error 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any similar 

type of unintentional error which the 

Secretary considers ministerial.’’ We 

have analyzed Jiangsu RC’s ministerial 

error comments and have determined, 

in accordance with section 751(h) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), that we 

made ministerial errors in our 

calculations for the Final Results. For 

the Final Results, the Department 

identified and valued five labor inputs 

to use in calculating the surrogate value 

for Jiangsu RC.5 In calculating the 

surrogate value, the Department 

inadvertently double-counted two of 

these five labor inputs.6

In accordance with section 751(h) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are 

amending the Final Results. The revised 

weighted-average dumping margins are 

detailed below. 

Amended Final Results of Review 

As a result of correcting this 

ministerial error, we determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the POR: 7

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Jiangsu RC Import & Export Co., 

Ltd ........................................... 189.81 

PRC-wide Rate ........................... 189.81 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations 

performed for these amended final 

results to interested parties within five 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the 

Department shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. For customers or importers of 

Jiangsu RC for which we do not have 

entered value, we calculated customer- 

/importer-specific antidumping duty 

assessment amounts based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping duties 

calculated for the examined sales of 

subject merchandise to the total sales 

quantity of those same sales. For 

customers or importers of Jiangsu RC for 

which we received entered-value 

information, we have calculated 

customer/importer-specific 

antidumping duty assessment rates 

based on customer/importer-specific ad 

valorem rates in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

The Department announced a 

refinement to its assessment practice in 

NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement 

in practice, for entries that were not 

reported in the U.S. sales databases 

submitted by companies individually 

examined during this review, including, 

in this case, Suzhou Guoxin Group 

Wang Shun Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. 

(Guoxin) and Winnsen Industry Co., 

Ltd. (Winnsen), the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the revised PRC-wide rate of 189.81 

percent.8 In addition, for companies for 

which the Department determined that 

the exporter under review had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries that entered 

under that exporter’s case number (i.e., 

at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated 

at the PRC-wide rate. We intend to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of these 

amended final results of review. 

Notification 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

These amended final results of review 

are issued and published in accordance 

with section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 

1930 Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f). 

Dated: April 10, 2015. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08894 Filed 4–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–015] 

53-Foot Domestic Dry Containers From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

53-foot domestic dry containers 

(domestic dry containers) from the 

People’s Republic of China (PRC) as 

provided in section 705 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act). For 

information on the estimated subsidy 

rates, see the ‘‘Final Determination’’ 

section of this notice. 

DATES: Effective: April 17, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Yasmin Nair, David Cordell (Singamas), 

or Ilissa Shefferman (CIMC), AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–3813, (202) 482– 

0408 or (202) 482–4684, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 29, 2014, the 

Department published the preliminary 

determination of the countervailing 

duty (CVD) investigation of domestic 

dry containers from the PRC in the 

Federal Register.1 On September 30, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES