alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7580

HENRY BATISTE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

D. P. LOATHER, City Council Chairman; RANDY

BLACKMON, Sheriff; MIKE PEOPLES, Lieutenant,

Acting Chief Jailer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JASPER COUNTY JAIL; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. C. Weston Houck, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-3313-6-12AK)

Submitted: September 22, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Henry Batiste, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick M. Higgins, HOWELL,

GIBSON & HUGHES, P.A., Beaufort, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Batistie v. Loather, No. CA-95-3313-6-12AK (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2023 AFSAM

The Dory

CA4

SHOOTER SCORE ROST # TIME TEAM NAME 

1 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 133 USAR GOLD 33.45 200

2 SSG FULMER, MICAH N 116 ALL GUARD BRAVO 35.56 188

3 SFC STAATS, JOHN A 118 All Guard Bravo 39.6 169

4 SGT FLEITAS, NICKOLAS 103 MARINE CORPS 39.69 169

5 MAJ FREEMAN, SAMUEL K 109 All Guard Alpha 39.76 168

6 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 132 USAR GOLD 40.52 165

7 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 119 All Guard Bravo 40.88 164

8 SGT MULLER, SHAUN P 102 Marine Corps 41.58 161

9 SFC SAGER, DEVIN S 700 43.63 153

10 SFC WILLIS, RICHARD 135 USAR GOLD 43.76 153

11 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 110 All Guard Alpha 44.67 150

12 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX 113 Netherlands 45.46 147

13 LCPL BURGESS, MARCUS 129 BAROST BLUE 46.79 143

14 1SG CAPPS, JOSEPH A 111 All Guard Alpha 47.72 140

15 SFC GODEL, JASON W 125 USAR BLACK 48.64 138

16 SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 121 Barost Red 52.82 127

17 SFC KEENOM, DAVID D 141 AFSAM IND 53.73 125

18 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 108 ALL GUARD ALPHA 56.52 118

19 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 142 AFSAM IND 59.18 113

20 SFC PHELPS, STEFAN S 106 Coast Guard 60.22 111

21 CPL BUSSTRA, MARTIJN 114 Netherlands 62.56 107

22 E-5 LUSH, TRAVIS C 105 Coast Guard 65.39 102

23 SGT SMITH, ANDREW 140 AFSAM IND 65.43 102

24 SSG ARCHAMBAULT, MAXIMIL D 117 All Guard Bravo 65.9 102

25 SSG STEWART, JUDE O 100 MARINE CORPS 69.37 96

26 SGT COLGAN, JOHNATHON 139 BAROST WHITE 69.49 96

27 CPL FILGATE, MICHAEL 130 BAROST BLUE 69.64 96

28 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 134 USAR GOLD 71.98 93

29 MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 115 Netherlands 72.51 92

30 SSG CATT, KEVIN 122 Barost Red 74.68 90

31 E5 DUERR, DAVID C 107 Coast Guard 76.51 87

32 CPL ROWAN, BRIAN 137 BAROST WHITE 77.15 87

33 CPT PANTOJA, LUIS 126 USAR BLACK 81.69 82

34 GYSGT RANTON, CHAD W 101 Marine Corps 86:84 79

35 CW4 KNOTE, ANDY T 124 USAR BLACK 88.57 76

36 SPC GADZIK, TIMOTHY J 127 USAR BLACK 92.16 73

37 SFC BOLANOS, STEVEN L 104 COAST GUARD 92.41 72

38 MAJOR ROSIE, LANCE 123 Barost Red 97.37 69

39 CFN PICKLES, JOSHUA 131 BAROST BLUE 107.26 62

40 MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 138 BAROST WHITE 112.41 60

41 PVT DOPPERT, SANTINO 112 Netherlands 121.05 55

42 LCPL FERGUSON, ANDREW 128 BAROST BLUE 130.38 51

Page 1 of 2 Time printed: 4/28/2023 4:49:35 PM
SHOOTER SCORE ROST # TIME TEAM NAME 

43 SSG GORDON, COLIN 136 BAROST WHITE 150.57 44

44 WO1 DOUGLAS, JAMES 120 Barost Red 172.87 39

45 SGT MARLAR, SAMUEL A 143 AFSAM IND 177.94 38

Page 2 of 2 Time printed: 4/28/2023 4:49:35 PM
16242

#### KALBER v. REDFEARN *ET AL.*

(54 S. E. (2d) 791)

*225
      *Messrs. Sinkler, Gibbs & Simons,*of Charleston, *for Appellant,*

*226
      *Mr. John E. Wilmeth,*of Haytsville, *for Respondents,*

*243July 29, 1949.

PER CURIAM.

Being satisfied that the Honorable J. Woodrow Lewis, Circuit Judge, correctly decided all issues in this case, we direct that the Decree filed by him, omitting the last paragraph, be published as the opinion of this Court.

All exceptions are overruled, and the judgment affirmed.
1

July 20, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Reference: Amendment to Section 333 exemption #11509, docket # FAA-2015-0481 granted 

Aviation Systems Engineering Company and approved May 8, 2015

Attachments: (1) Operating Limits (Proprietary)

(2) Drone Aviation Corp WATT -200 Operations Manual V1.0 (Proprietary)

Dear Sir/Madam,

Aviation Systems Engineering Company (ASEC) was issued exemption #11509 (the Exemption) 

under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) for the purpose 

of conducting unmanned aircraft system (UAS) operations for technical demonstration and training

purposes. ASEC hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption to include tethered, multi-rotor UAS

for operation in full compliance with the conditions set forth within the Exemption, with requested 

modifications listed in Attachment (1). ASEC submits that a tethered system provides additional, 

equivalent safety features that do not currently exist with free-flight small UAS (sUAS), and, when 

combined with appropriate safety management practices, can further reduce risk. 

Tethered sUASs are rotorcraft, weighting 55 or fewer pounds including its payload. They operate, 

under normal conditions, at near zero speed, hovering at the end of a hardened tether. The tether is 

encased with Kevlar material able to withstand 600 pounds of force, providing a conduit for primary and 

backup electric ground power to the air vehicle, at a tethered distance controlled by a ground winch 

system. It will operate only in line of sight of the pilot in command (PIC) and will utilize a safety 

observer. Such operations will insure that the sUAS will “not create a hazard to users of the national 

airspace system or to the public.” 

With exceptions noted in Attachment (1), ASEC requests permission to operate the following sUAS 

based on its type, size, weight, and speed under the same terms and conditions contained within the 

Exemption and provided by the parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations identified 

within attachment (2) hereto attached to this request. 
2

Aircraft 

Manufacturer Model Class Maximum Takeoff Weight Max Speed

Drone Aviation Corp WATT Tethered, rotorcraft, 

electric 22 lbs 2.5 m/s

ASEC respectfully requests the same finding from the FAA as provided to Aerial Mob, LLC as to its

amended exemption, # 11066A, docket ID FAA-2014-0353, dated February 2, 2015. The FAA found the

amendment request was not precedent setting, that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the 

petition in the Federal Register, and that any delay in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the 

organization.

Thank you for your time in regards to this petition and please send correspondence to: 

Brent Klavon

ASEC, Inc.

904-772-8442, x205

Brent.klavon@asec-incorporated.com

On behalf of ASEC, I look forward to your response.

Sincerely, 

Mike Marrinan

ASEC, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

p0826 

# Order

Clerk September 3, 2013

147139

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147139

COA: 309262

Oakland CC: 2011

- 238414

- FC

ROLANDO FLORES, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
&Moe ofme ^0€(/rvtu ('0^m/m4M(Ay ^ n 

Commissioners 

Rick Modesitt 

David Blair Couch 

Wayne Dunn 

( ^ l4v<)<^ ^<M//rvtuj W€6t Vi/rmmd^i 

No. 1 Court Square 

'pRWiOM Suite 203 

Parkersburg,WV 26101 

Phone 304-424-1984 

June 3, 2010 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Service District X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Order 2010-2-16, Docket OST-2005-20734 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

For several years our Mid-Ohio Valley Regional Airport has experienced continuing decline of 

enplanements for several reasons. Some we can solve, mainly the number of flights available, 

dependability and price competition. 

In order for us to compete and be a viable airport, we must make changes. Colgan has been a 

reliable carrier, but not competitive. Their two flights per day seem to actually be hurting our viability. 

After reviews of three carrier proposals we have found Gulfstream and their twenty-four flights 

per week to be our best chance for reinvigoration and grov^^th. This, to us, is the only good growth 

opportunity. Even using Cleveland as our "hub" seems very workable, though Washington is better. 

We respectfully request your support of Gulfstream's twenty-four flights per week option being 

awarded to the Mid-Ohio Valley Regional Airport through the Essential Air Service Program. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Sincerely, 

WD/ad 

Marty Seufer, County Administrator • Ph. 304-424-1976 • Fax 304-424-0194 

Regular terms of the Commission First Thursday in January, April, July and October 

Regular sessions Monday and Thursday 9:30am to 12 noon.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 24, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130097 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 130097 COA: 261967 Wayne CC: 00-006096 JEREMEY HURLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to a ppeal the October 20, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1 ), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE defendant’s senten ce and REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for resentencing. Defendant has demonstrated both good cause and actual prejudice, entitling him to relief under MCR 6.5 08(D). The sentence imposed was invalid. MCR 6.508(D)(3)(b)(iv). The se ntencing guidelines pl aced defendant in an intermediate cell that required the imposition of a jail term, unless there was a substantial and compelling reason for a departure. MCL 769.34(4)(a). No substantial and compelling reason was offered to permit the imposition of a pris on sentence. On remand,
the circuit court shall sentence defendant within the appropr iate sentencing guidelines range, or articulate on the record a substan tial and compelling reason for departing from the sentencing guidelines range in accordance with People v Babcock , 469 Mich 247 (2003).

We do not retain jurisdiction.

s0517 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 24, 2006

Clerk
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Shmuel Arvatz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
September 30, 2001 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of ClickSoftware Technologies
Ltd.


                                           By:  /s/ SHMUEL ARVATZ
                                                -----------------
                                           Name:   Shmuel Arvatz
                                           Title:  Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer


                                       34
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                     OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                                               1,048,357
<SECURITIES>                                                            38,625
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           25,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     1,114,558
<PP&E>                                                                  20,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           8,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       1,753,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  314,204
<BONDS>                                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                                 1,632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0   
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                           1,437,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         1,753,554
<SALES>                                                                657,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       657,910
<CGS>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       335,323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        372,209
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            33,587
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    338,622
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           338,622
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              .23
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of TJT, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terrence J. Sheldon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Code Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/TERRENCE J. SHELDONTerrence J. Sheldon Chief
Executive OfficerDecember 20, 2002 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

41

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and section 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 15, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. The Belva H. Rasmussen 2012 Irrevocable Trust, Roseville, 
Minnesota, Pamela M. Harris, Falcon Heights, Minnesota, and Eva B. 
Rasmussen, Edina, Minnesota, individually and as trustees, and Benjamin 
T. Rasmussen, Edina, Minnesota, to retroactively join the Rasmussen 
Family Control Group; to acquire voting shares of Northeast Securities 
Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of Northeast Bank, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 26, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-07296 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
To: John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

From: Theresa Nguyen/DC/USEPA/US

Date: 08/30/2010 11:11AM

Subject: Re: Revised Substitute Data Percents

John,

I thought I sent this to you last week, but when checked my Sent box, it wasn't there. 

Sorry. Here it is.

PARAMETER CD TOTAL OPERATING 

TIME WITH 

SUBSTITUTE DATA

TOTAL OPERATING 

TIME

TOTAL SUBSTITUTE 

OPERATING TIME / 

TOTAL OPERATING 

TIME

CO2C 37,727 7,725,372 0.5%

FLOW 71,547 6,584,739 1.1%

NOXC 35,208 12,231,074 0.3%

NOXR 116,005 11,903,499 1.0%

SO2C 74,487 6,028,639 1.2%

John Schakenbach---08/30/2010 11:06:28 AM---Thuy,

From: John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US

To: Theresa Nguyen/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 08/30/2010 11:06 AM

Subject:Revised Substitute Data Percents

Thuy,

Any luck with the revised data substitution percents? Last week we discussed that the 

substitute data operating time by parameter should be divided by the total operating time 

for all units having that parameter, instead of the total operating time for all units.

John Schakenbach

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Clean Air Markets Division

schakenbach.john@epa.gov

Phone: 202-343-9158

Fax: 202-343-2359
WYOMING ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (WYARNG) DRINKING WATER 

PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Camp Guernsey does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army National 

Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act 

(SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the American 

public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to ensure the 

EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: March 2021

PFOA + PFOS Results: 0.50 ppt

Future Testing Event: March 2025

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Wyoming National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office E-mail Address: ng.wy.wyarng.list.pao-distribution@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3864 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3864

   To suspend temporarily the duty on (Alkylamino-hydroxyphenyl)azo-
    hydroxysubstituted benzene, substituted [(hydroxy-naphthalenyl) 
            hydroxybenzene], chromium complex, sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on (Alkylamino-hydroxyphenyl)azo-
    hydroxysubstituted benzene, substituted [(hydroxy-naphthalenyl) 
            hydroxybenzene], chromium complex, sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. (ALKYLAMINOHYDROXYPHENYL) AZO-HYDROXY-SUBSTITUTED BENZENE, 
              SUBSTITUTED [(HYDROXYNAPHTHALENYL) HYDROXYBENZENE], 
              CHROMIUM COMPLEX, SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      (Alkylamino-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        hydroxyphenyl)azo-                                                 31/2011.......
                        hydroxy-
                        substituted
                        benzene,
                        substituted
                        [(hydroxy-
                        naphthalenyl)
                        hydroxybenzene],
                        chromium complex,
                        sodium salt. (CAS
                        No. Acc. 19875)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2921.59.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```