alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Finnish Air Force Commander Meets Virginia Guard Leaders

/ Published April 12, 2024

HAMPTON, Va. - Maj. Gen. Juha-Pekka Keränen, commander of the Finnish Air Force, met with Virginia National Guard leaders April 8 at Joint Base Langley-Eustis.

Maj. Gen. James W. Ring, the adjutant general of Virginia, Brig. Gen. Catherine M. Jumper, commander of the Virginia Air National Guard, and other senior Virginia Air National Guard leaders hosted the visit. 

Keränen was joined by Finnish Col. Markus Mecklin, the defense cooperation attache, and Maj. Mikko Kankaisto, Keränen’s military assistant. The trio flew from Fort Belvoir, Virginia, to Langley on a UH-60 Black Hawk, flown by VNG aviators assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 224th Aviation Regiment, 29th Infantry Division. 

Ring and Jumper greeted the Finnish detachment and introduced them to senior leaders with the 192nd Wing, who provided an overview of the wing’s operations and answered questions from their Finnish partners. 

The Finnish leaders saw one of the wing’s F-22 Raptors and the 185th Cyberspace Operations Squadron, 192nd Operations Group’s new purpose-built facility. Wing leaders briefed the Finns on their cyber defense and intelligence capabilities.  

Ring said the visit strengthened the already solid relationship between the Finnish military and the Virginia National Guard. 

“The Virginia National Guard values our partnership with the Finnish Defence Forces,” said Ring. “We are stronger together training as a multinational joint force across all domains. The Virginia National Guard welcomes the opportunity for continued training opportunities with our Finnish partners, both at home and abroad.”

Keränen agreed, saying he looked forward to continued opportunities to strengthen the bond. 

“It’s always great to see our friends and discuss how to operate together and how to expand our cooperation,” said Keränen. “Hopefully in the future we will cooperate even more than we have now.”

The VNG enjoys an enduring relationship with Finland that includes military training exchanges between Finnish Defence Forces and VNG Soldiers and Airmen. 

Finnish troops served with Virginia’s 29th Infantry Division during the Stabilization Force 10 rotation in Bosnia-Herzegovina in 2001-2002, sparking enduring friendships, and VNG personnel have trained shoulder-to-shoulder with their Finnish counterparts for many years, building deep professional and personal bonds.

In recent years, Soldiers and Airmen conducted cyber training with their Finnish counterparts, competed in a Finnish sniper competition, and learned from Finland’s expertise in operating and thriving in Arctic conditions, among other exchanges. VNG Army and Air cyber warriors also traveled to Finland to participate in the Elements of Cyber exercise.

Finland and the United States have a shared commitment to peace and stability. Their security cooperation has broadened over almost 30 years. National Guard leaders believe they will only be strengthened in the years ahead.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-50518

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE FIDENCIO TORRES-DIAZ, also known as Marcos Torres, also known

as Eduardo Santos-Ramirez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-651

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Fidencio Torres-Diaz appeals the 41-month sentence imposed 

following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following prior removal. 

He argues that his sentence, which is at the low end of the applicable 

guidelines range, is greater than necessary to meet the sentencing objectives 

of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Specifically, he contends that the district court did not 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 12, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-50518 Document: 00512935490 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2015
No. 14-50518

account for his minimal criminal background and the fact that he reentered 

the United States to be with his family, including his youngest daughter, who 

has a disabling disease.

Torres-Diaz did not object to the reasonableness of his sentence and, 

thus, we review for plain error. See United States v. Peltier, 505 F.3d 389, 

391-92 (5th Cir. 2007). Torres-Diaz argues that such an objection is not 

required to preserve the substantive reasonableness of a sentence for review, 

but he acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent and 

raises the issue to preserve it for further review. As Torres-Diaz also

recognizes, his assertion that the presumption of reasonableness should not 

apply because U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 is not based on empirical data or national 

experience is foreclosed. See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 

357, 366-67 (5th Cir. 2009). 

With regard to Torres-Diaz’s claim that his sentence did not reflect his 

personal circumstances, the district court considered his arguments that a 

lesser sentence was warranted based on his background and family 

circumstances, but determined that a sentence within the guidelines range 

was proper. We must defer to the district court’s sentencing decision, see Gall 

v. United States, 552 U.S. 49-50, 51-52 (2007), and Torres-Diaz’s disagreement 

with the district court’s weighing of the § 3553(a) factors is insufficient to rebut 

the presumption of reasonableness or show that the sentence was plainly 

erroneous. See United States v. Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 339 (5th 

Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-50518 Document: 00512935490 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/12/2015
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly  Report of EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Qfor the period ending  September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
 "Report"),  I,  Dennis R. Alexander,  Principal Executive
Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company,
 certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
 November 11, 2009





/s/
      Dennis AlexanderDennis
      R. AlexanderPrincipal
      Executive Office and Chief Financial
Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Click Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael W. Nelson,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

| Date: November 14, 2005 | /s/ MICHAEL W.  NELSON                   |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                         | Michael W. Nelson                        |
| * *                     | *Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Click Commerce, Inc. and will beretained by Click Commerce, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### STATE v. GIBBES.

Constitution — Municipal Ordinances. — Sec. 17, art. III., Constitution, requiring acts and joint resolutions to relate to but one subject, and that to be expressed in their titles, does not apply to municipal ordinances.

Before Watts, J., Charleston, June, 1900.

Affirmed.

Indictment against John Gibbes for violating ordinances of city of Charleston. He was convicted before the recorder,- and appealed to the Court of General Sessions, which affirmed'the judgment below, and he now appeals to this Court.

*Mr. Young*presents argument of *Mr. Thos. B. Curtis,*for appellant,

citing sec. 619, Revised Ordinances of Charleston, art. Ill, sec. 17, Constitution 1895; 13 Ency., 673; 10 Ency., 67411.; 1 Bay, 1.

*Mr. James Bvans*presents argument of *Solicitor Jervey,*

citing art. III., sec. 17, Con.; 4 Am. R., 298; 23 Ency., 234, 241, 238-9, 263, 272; 17 Ency., 245.

June 4, 1901.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The appellant was tried, convicted and sentenced before the recorder of the city of Charleston, for being drunk and disorderly, under section 619 of the revised ordinances of the city of Charleston which is as follows : “If any person shall appear in a public place in a state of nudity, or in a dress not becoming his or her sex, or shall make any indecent exposure of his or her person, or be guilty of any disorderly, lewd or indecent conduct, cursing and swearing, clamorous noises, drunkenness, quarreling, *501fighting, scurrilous, obscene, indecent or profane writing, pictures, marks or figures, on any walls, fences, houses or structures, or shall print, engrave, make, exhibit, sell or offer to sell any indecent or lewd book, picture or any other thing, or shall throw from any house or window, water, offal or other matter, upon the sidewalks, shall be subject to a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, or imprisonment not exceeding thirty days.” He appealed to the Circuit 'Court, 'but his appeal was dismissed, whereupon he appealed to this Court upon the following exception: “That his Honor, the Circuit Judge, erred in dismissing the appeal upon the ground that sec. 619 of the general ordinances of the city of Charleston relate, to more than one subject, and as such is in derogation of art. III., sec. 17, of the Constitution of the State, and is, therefore, void.” The caption of art. III. is “Legislative.Department;” sec. 17 thereof is as follows: “Every act or resolution having the force of law shall relate to but one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title.” We fail to see wherein this provision has any application whatsoever to an ordinance of a municipal corporation.

It is the judgment of this Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.
# Christmas comes early for Guardsmen, families

/ Published Dec. 27, 2010

NEW ORLEANS - All members of the Louisiana National Guard’s 256th Infantry Brigade Combat Team are finally home after serving a year-long deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, returning throughout the first three weeks of December.

“These Soldiers are truly great Americans,” said Army Maj. Gen. Bennett C. Landreneau, the adjutant general of the Louisiana National Guard. “These heroes stepped up to our nation’s call to protect our freedoms, and it is great to welcome them home.” 

Approximately 3,000 Guardsmen, assigned to different units within the 256th, received smiles, hugs and cheers as they unloaded buses at their unit armories across Louisiana.

“It really feels great to be home,” Army Spc. Dex Legendre said.  “The timing of our return will make this a very special holiday season.”

In January, the 256th IBCT mobilized and deployed approximately 3,000 troops to Iraq as they began their second tour in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. 

These Soldiers completed demobilization training in Camp Shelby, Miss., before returning to Louisiana.

“We had a multitude of missions, and the Soldiers did an outstanding job,” said Army Col. Jonathan Ball, the 256th commander. “I have a lot of pride in their performance.”

The 256th's Soldiers were spread throughout Iraq conducting various missions to include: base defense and entry control point operations, convoy security, personal security, garrison command, special operation missions and unmanned aerial flight operations.  

Louisiana Guardsmen routinely interacted with personnel from the local Iraqi military, U.S. Embassy and United Nations within the International Zone, formerly known as the Green Zone.

“Morale stayed high the whole time, and they did an outstanding job,” said Army Command Sgt. Maj. Kenneth Wagner, the 256th senior enlisted advisor. “I was never more proud to be their sergeant major.”

During this 2010 deployment, they helped set the conditions for the responsible withdrawal of U.S. Armed Forces and equipment as they transitioned to Operation New Dawn in September 2010.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying Quarterly Report of TS Electronics,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the
"Report"), I, Keith Boyd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May  17,  2004

                                        /s/  Keith  Boyd
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Keith  Boyd
                                        Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.















                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO DISCIPLINARY BOARD : : : No. 284 DISCIPLINARY BOARD APPOIN TMENT DOCKET

**O R D E R**
**PER CURIA M:** 

AND NOW , this 25 th day of February, 201 5 , James C. Haggerty , Esquire, Philadelphia , is hereby appointed as a member of th e Disciplinary Board for a term of three years commencing April 1, 201 5

.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2013

p0722

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2013

146470

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146470

COA: 311794

Livingston CC: 08-017709-FC

MOURAD ELMANAR, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 19, 2018

s1212

Order 

Clerk

December 19, 2018

157679

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157679

COA: 340042

Ingham CC: 09-000230-FH

BARRY C. SHIFFER, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2018 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3837 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for clarification 

on the use of funds relating to certain homeland security grants, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2009 

Ms. KILROY (for herself, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. 

PASCRELL, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. RICHARDSON, Ms. NORTON, 

Mr. SIRES, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. CLEAVER, and Ms. TITUS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide 

for clarification on the use of funds relating to certain 

homeland security grants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening and Up5 dating Resources and Equipment Act’’ or the ‘‘SURE 

6 Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3837 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION ON USE OF FUNDS RELATING TO 

2 CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2008 of the Homeland 

4 Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 609) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(4), by inserting before the 

6 semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘, and any re7 lated maintenance agreements, user fees, or 

8 sustainment costs’’; 

9 (2) in subsection (b)(3), by adding at the end 

10 the following new subparagraph: 

11 ‘‘(C) EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.—With 

12 respect to the use of amounts awarded to a 

13 grant recipient under section 2003 or 2004 for 

14 equipment purchase and maintenance costs, the 

15 Administrator may not— 

16 ‘‘(i) impose a limit on the amount of 

17 any such award that may be used to pay 

18 for such purchase and maintenance costs, 

19 including any costs referred to in sub20 section (a)(4); or 

21 ‘‘(ii) impose any additional limitation, 

22 including any fiscal year limitation, beyond 

23 the limitations described in the matter pre24 ceding paragraph (1) and in paragraph (4) 

25 of subsection (a), on the amount of any 

26 such award that may be used for a specific 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3837 IH

1 type, purpose, or category of equipment 

2 purchase or maintenance cost.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact5 ment of this section and shall apply to grants made under 

6 section 2003 or 2004 of the Homeland Security Act of 

7 2002 (6 U.S.C. 604 and 605), in accordance with the pro8 visions specified in section 2008 of such Act (6 U.S.C. 

9 609), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, on or 

10 after October 1, 2008. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# FUMIGANT VOC REGULATIONS ENCLOSURE 2 NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS

### CALIFORNIA STATE OF ._,_"
. f

. ....................

.. 

### 1001

- - . 

### 11111

.........



### STREET ...........-...-....- - - t
. 

### 4TH FLOOR ATTN: SHERYL STILLWELL -.--......-.... - - - 

# PROOF OF PUBLICATION

.................. . .......... 

### SACRAMENTO CA 95814
- 1 .-.-



# COUNTY 

# OF FRESNO STATE OF CALIFORN

The undersigned states:

3, ' I. I' lf!~QU,>~$Y;spedal &(c$np&dahbn ,o( bnp"agd needsr2$l&se n~tify4DPR at 1916~49$-4360.llY/TDD speech-to-speechusen maydial 7-1.1 fbr'thitali6miA kldy Sarvlce: 

## . , ' (PUB: Pecember 8,9, 1008) FPROOFAD McClatchy Newspapers in and on all dates herein stated was a corporation, and the owner and publisher of The Fresno Bee.

The Fresno Bee is a daily newspaper of general circulation now published, and on all-the-dates herein stated was published in the City of Fresno, County of Fresno, and has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Fresno, State of California, under the date of November 22, 1994, Action No. 520058-9.

The undersigned is and on all dates herein mentioned was a citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years, and is the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of said newspaper; and that the notice, a copy of which is hereto annexed, marked Exhibit A, hereby made a panhereof, was published inThe Fresno Bee in each issue thereof (intype not smaller than nonpareil), on the following dates.

I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Exhibit 10.1

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED
S.E.C. REDACTED COPY

Confidential Portion Indicated by "[***]"

AMENDMENT TO EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

This Amendment to the Exclusive Distribution Agreement dated June 27, 2002 is made this 9th day of July, 2003, between Unisource, Inc.
("Unisource"), a Colorado corporation with its principal place of business at 283 Elk Spring Trail, Edwards, Colorado 81632, and First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation ("Horizon"), a Delaware
corporation with its principal place of business at 6195 Shiloh Road, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005.

RECITALS

A.    Unisource
is engaged in the business of developing, manufacturing, and selling pharmaceutical products.

B.    Horizon
is engaged in the business of marketing and distributing pharmaceutical products.

C.    Unisource
and Horizon have entered into an Exclusive Distribution Agreement dated June 27, 2002 ("Supply Agreement") concerning two related pharmaceutical
products, one containing Dexchlorpheniramine Tannate and Pseudoephedrine Tannate, and the other containing Dexchlorpheniramine Tannate, Pseudoephedrine Tannate, and Dextromethorphan Tannate
(individually the "Product" and collectively the "Products," and defined further below).

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties, it is agreed:

AGREEMENTS





1

---









2

---





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this instrument to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.

| |  | FIRST HORIZON PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION
| |  | ----------------------------------------
| |  |                                         
| |  |                                         
| |  | By:                                     
| |  | Title:                                  
| |  |                                         
| |  |                                         
| |  | UNISOURCE, INC.                         
| |  |                                         
| |  |                                         
| |  | By:                                     
| |  | Title:                                  

3

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Wayne Pastore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



Date: May 3, 2011/s/ WAYNE PASTORE Wayne Pastore Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks