alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.  20549 FORM 8-K Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 2, 2006 MAF BANCORP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) _____________________________ Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation)
        0-18121(Commission File Number)
        36-3664868(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)55th Street & Holmes AvenueClarendon Hills, Illinois(Address of principal executive offices)
        
        60514(Zip Code)  Registrants telephone number, including area code(630) 325-7300 Not Applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last year) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: o
        Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) o
        Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) o
        Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))           Item 7.01
        Regulation FD Disclosure. Attached as Exhibit 99.1 is a copy of the press release issued by MAF Bancorp, Inc. on February 2, 2006, announcing that it has adopted a stock repurchase program under which it is authorized to repurchase up to 1.7 million shares of its common stock.  The new shares, which may be repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, represent approximately 4.9% of MAF Bancorps 34.4 million outstanding shares.  The repurchased shares will be used in connection with the Companys employee benefit plans and for other general corporate purposes.           SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. MAF BANCORP, INC.By:/s/ JERRY A. WEBERLINGJerry A. WeberlingExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer  Date:  February 2, 2006           INDEX TO EXHIBITS Exhibit Exhibit 99.1
        Press Release dated February 2, 2006.
## NO. 12

- 0 8

- 003 9 3

- C R

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RHONDA LYNN ROBERTSON

, ' APPEAL FROM THE 241S T

APPELLANT

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, APPELLEE ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rhonda Lynn Robertson appeals her conviction for tampering with physical

evidence. In her sole issue, Appellant argues that the trial court’s judgment should be

reformed to accurately reflect the proceedings below. We modify the judgment and

aff irm as modified.

B ACKGROUND

Appellant was charged by indictment with tampering with physical evidence

under Texas Penal Code Section 37.09 , alleged as a third degree felony. Appellant

pleaded guilty to the charged offense and “TRUE” to a punishment enhanc ement

. The

trial court found Appellant guilty of the charged offense and found the enhancement to be

“TRUE

. ” The trial court assessed Appellant's punishment at fifteen years of

impr isonment. This appeal followed.

J UDGMENT

In her sole issue, Appellant a sks that we reform the trial court’ s judgment to

accurately reflect the proceedings at trial. The State has joined Appellant in this request.

During the proceedings, the State alleged an enhancement to which Appellant pleaded

“TRUE,” and the trial court f ound to be “TRUE.” However, the judgment currently

recites “N/A” next to the enhancement paragraph. Appellant and the State agree that

these recitations are incorrect.2 We have the authority to reform a judgment to make the record speak the truth.

Ingram v. State , 261 S.W.3d 749, 754 (Tex. App.

— Tyler 2008, no pet.); see also

Thompson v. State , 108 S.W.3d 287, 290 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003)

. The Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure expressly authorize us to modify the judgment of the trial court.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.2. Therefore, we sustain Appellant’ s sole issue.

D ISPOSITION

We hav e sustained Appellant’ s sole issue. Accordi ngly, we modify the trial

court’ s judgment to reflect that the Appellant pleaded “TRU E” to the enhancement

paragraph. As modified, we af firm the judgment of the trial court.

JAMES T. WORTHEN

Chief Justice

Opinion delivered December 31 , 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBL ISH)
Exhibit 12.1



                SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF DEBT-TO-EQUITY RATIO
                            (Dollars in Thousands)




                                                      July 31,
                                             -------------------------
                                                2002           2001
                                             ----------     ----------

          Total debt                         $1,123,874     $1,025,083

          Stockholders' equity               $  248,569     $  206,411

          Debt-to-equity ratio                      4.5            5.0
                                                    ===            ===


                                       41
<PAGE>   1


Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-34642) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc. 1995 Incentive Award Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-22159) pertaining to the Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333-45689 and 333-69641) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Advanced
Lighting Technologies, Inc. 1998 Incentive Award Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-45695) pertaining to the Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc. 1997 Billion Dollar Market Capitalization Incentive Award
Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-58609) pertaining to the
Company's 8% Senior Notes due 2008, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-58613) pertaining to the Company's securities and securities of ADLT Trust I
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-58621) pertaining to the
Company's securities of our report dated September 24, 1999, except for Note U,
as to which the date is September 28, 1999 and Note L, as to which the date is
October 11, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc. as of June 30, 1999 and for the year then
ended, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A No. 3) for the year ended
June 30, 1999.


                                                         /s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
April 24, 2000
# OAR Box 1828

Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 104 ) ll-K-(B)-9 3 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7 p. i

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:51 AM Sheet 104 of 325P. 2 

## P ' II-K-(B)-9 3 ^

REVISE DN0 XCONTRO L TECHNOLOG YCOS T ALGORITHM S Lette r fro

m T . Hogan , EE

A t o R . Short , EPA:EAB Octobe r 26 , 198 2 THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUNDI

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-9 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME ON PAGES F-3
AND F-4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,656,958
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,306,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,669,306
<PP&E>                                       6,249,494
<DEPRECIATION>                               (808,612)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,979,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,667,091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,257
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,312,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,979,112
<SALES>                                      3,610,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,714,332
<CGS>                                        1,183,361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,203,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (187,774)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             454,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,097,265
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,902,290
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,194,975
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,194,975
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57


</TABLE>
# Vigilant National Guard Airmen and Soldiers will help safeguard revelers in Las Vegas and New York

/ Published Dec. 31, 2014

CARSON CITY, Nev. - It won't just be Elvis impersonators ringing in the New Year in the Las Vegas area tonight.

An annual domestic operatons exercise, held for the last 12 years, means that Nevada National Guard members will have a higher profile during the New Year's holiday period Tuesday night after 4 p.m. through New Year's Day. The increased visibility of Guardsmen is due to their participation in an annual domestic operations exercise. With Soldiers and Airmen on duty during the annual exercise, the Nevada National Guard will be able to quickly provide military resources in the case of any contingency.

The exercise is not due to any specific threat to any area of Nevada, officials said in a news release. It will be conducted alongside civilian resources such as local law enforcement and first response agencies.

More than 65 Nevada Guard troops are set to participate in the exercise, including Soldiers and Airmen from the 137th and 72nd Military Police Companies, the 1-221st Armored Reconnaissance Squadron, the 92nd Civil Support Team, the 152nd Airlift Wing, the 17th Sustainment Brigade, the 485th Military Police Company and the 152nd Airlift Wing. A Nevada Army Guard UH-72 Lakota helicopter will also be in the area on a training flight, but it is not participating in the exercise.

And across the nation in New York City, about 150 members of a task force, along with members of the 24th Civil Support Team, and a New York Naval Militia patrol craft will be on duty New Year's Eve as revelers gather to welcome 2015. About 500 members of the New York National Guard are on state active duty serving in the task force, which augments the Metropolitan Transit Authority Police Department, the Bridge and Port Authority Police Department and the Amtrak Police at city transportation hubs.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 31


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Keith Dressel, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Meelick
       Acquisition Corp.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
       statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
       to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
       such statements are made, not misleading with respect to the period
       covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
       information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
       material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
       flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this
       quarterly report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
       procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for
       the registrant and have:
a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
       information relating to the registrant is made known to me particularly
       during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
       procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
       quarterly report (the
      "Evaluation Date"); and
c.     Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness
       of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of
       the Evaluations Date;
5.     Based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
       reporting, I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the board of
       directors:
a.     All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
       controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
       process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
       registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and
b.     Any fraud, whether or not material that involves management or other
       employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
       controls.

Date: November 17, 2003                       By: /s/ Keith Dressel
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Keith Dressel
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") by Schlotzsky's, Inc. ("Registrant"), the
undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | /s/RICHARD H. VALADEName: Richard H. Valade
Title: Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 31, 2003
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
U

. S

. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING

— ENE RGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS

PROPOSED RULEMAKING FOR DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20 585

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Room 8E

- 089

Purpose

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this public meeting to discuss proposed

energy conservation standards for distribution transformers. DOE will review the rulemaking

process, address the analyses that support the proposed efficiency levels, and s eek comments,

data, and information from interested parties.

Agenda

9:00 am Welcome

Jim Raba

9:05 am Introductions, Agenda Review, Opening Statements

Jim Raba and Doug Brookman, Facilitator

9:30 am Rulemaking History, Schedule, and Scope ; Negotiated Rulemaking

Process

Brian Coffey

9:45 am EPCA Factors, Scope, Definitions

, Test Procedure, Equipment Classes

Brian Coffey

10:00 am Engineering Analysis

Brian Coffey

10:15 am 15 Minute Break

10:30 am Markups, Loading, Distribution Ch annels , Life

- Cycle Cost and

Payback Period Analysis, National Impact Analysis, Refurbishments

Christopher Bolduc

11 am Trial Standard Levels and Proposed Standards

Christopher Bolduc

11:15 am Discussion of Proposed Standards

Attendees

12:45 pm Closing Remarks

Jim Raba
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0379 Directorate ID: 2009-SW-26-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. Model 204B and certain serial-numbered Model 

205A-1 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 13 Model 204B and 52 Model 205A-1 Helicopters in 

the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of the chain, loss of tail rotor 

blade pitch control, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $4,922 to replace a chain

$14,925 to replace a damper kit on a Model 204B

$152,214 to install a tail rotor push-pull control 

system on an affected Model 205A-1

Labor per Helicopter

at $85/work-hour

(.25, 60 per year, to inspect

the link segments in a chain; 

.5 work hour to replace a 

chain on a Model 204B; 3 

work hours to install a 

damper kit on a Model 204B; 

and 225 work hours to install 

a tail rotor push-pull control 

system on a Model 205A-1)

$1,275 for the inspection

$9,930 to replace a chain (assuming 2 would be 

replaced)

$15,180 to install a damper kit on a Model 204B 

(assuming 2 would be installed)

$171,339 to install a tail rotor push-pull control 

system on an affected Model 205A-1

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $192,159

Total US Fleet Cost $227,204

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Mike Kohner
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3963 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 3, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To provide specialized training to Federal air marshals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3963 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal Investigative 

3 Training Restoration Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FEDERAL AIR MARSHALS. 

5 Section 44917 of title 49, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(e) CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING PRO8 GRAM.— 

9 ‘‘(1) NEW EMPLOYEE TRAINING.—Not later 

10 than 30 days after the date of enactment of the 

11 Criminal Investigative Training Restoration Act, the 

12 Federal Air Marshal Service shall require Federal 

13 air marshals hired after such date to complete the 

14 criminal investigative training program at the Fed15 eral Law Enforcement Training Center as part of 

16 basic training for Federal air marshals. 

17 ‘‘(2) EXISTING EMPLOYEES.—A Federal air 

18 marshal who has previously completed the criminal 

19 investigative training program shall not be required 

20 to repeat such program. 

21 ‘‘(3) ALTERNATIVE TRAINING.—Not later than 

22 3 years after the date of enactment of the Criminal 

23 Investigative Training Restoration Act, an air mar24 shal hired before such date who has not completed 

25 the criminal investigative training program shall be 

26 required to complete a alternative training program, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3963 RFS 

1 as determined by the Federal Law Enforcement 

2 Center, that provides the training necessary to 

3 bridge the gap between the mixed basic police train4 ing, the Federal air marshal programs already com5 pleted by the Federal air marshal and the criminal 

6 investigative training provided through the criminal 

7 investigative training program. Any such alternative 

8 program shall be deemed to have met the standards 

9 of the criminal investigative training program. 

10 ‘‘(4) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

11 Not less than $3,000,000 is authorized to be appro12 priated for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011 to 

13 carry out this subsection. 

14 ‘‘(5) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing in this sub15 section shall be construed to reclassify Federal air 

16 marshals as criminal investigators.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Alternative Perspective on Optimu

DOE Designs

Nov. 1, 2011

Prepared by: Carlos Gaytan

Prolec GE
Summary of Structure of DOE Engineering Analysis

 Definition of Product Classes

 MV Liquid Filled MV and LV Dry Type MV and LV Dry Type

 Identification of Design Lines and Representative U

 5 DL’s for MV Liquid Filled 5 DL’s for MV and 3 DL’s for LV Dry Type

 Technical Design Inputs

 Broad range of A&B factor combinations for a complete set of ef

Broad range of A&B factor combinations for

a complete set of ef

 Core and Winding Material combinations Estimate of Material Prices from 2006-2010 data plus markups Included consideration for labor costs Included consideration for labor costs

 Output of Engineering Analysis

 For each Design Line: Charts with plots of full database of desig

Powering reliable solutions for you 

combination of core and winding materials
Example of Engineering Analysis Results

$3,500 $4,000 

dEL 0 dEL 1 dEL

2 dEL

3

dEL

4 dEL

5 dEL

6

$3,000 

Price ($)

$2,500 

acturer Selling M5_CuAl_dgw

M3_AlAl_dgw_M3_CuAl_dgwM2 AlAl dgw 

$2,000 

ManufaM2

_

AlAl

_dgw

_

M2_CuAl_dgwZDMH_AlAl_dgZDMH_CuCu_SA1_AlAl_dgwSA1 CuCu dg

$1,500 

99.00% 99.10% 99.20% 99.30% 99.40% 99.50% 

Efficiency at 50% Load, Temperature Corrected

SA1

_

CuCu

_dg

CSLs

Cf f O (S )Chart 

for DL1 

from D

OE Engineering Analysis (Sep.’11

), w

designs developed by DOE for this DL. This representatio

difficult to discern the competitiveness of each of the core 
Simplified Cost Efficiency Charts

50 kVA Single Phase (DL1) 

DOE Min Price by Efficiency Level

$3,300$2 700$2,900$3,100$2,300$2,500$2,700

OE Minium Price M3 M2 ZD

SA

$1,700$1,900

D$2,100O

C f

$1,500

dEL0 dEL1 dEL2 dEL3 dEL4 dEL5 dEL6

DOE Efficiency Level

This 

Chart uses the same data as the previous 

for DL1, but 

the lowest price designs by core material for each Efficiency L

chart clearly shows the trend of competitiveness of each cor
Simplified Cost Efficiency Charts

25 kVA Single Phase (DL2) 

DOE Min Price by Efficiency Level

$2,500$2,100$2,300$1 500$1,700$1,900

Minimum Price 

$1,100$1,300$1,500

DOE M

$700$900

dEL0 dEL1 dEL2 dEL3 dEL4 dEL5 dEL6 dEL7

DOE Efficiency Level

This Chart for DL2 (25 kVA) showing only most competitiv

(lowest price) for each Efficiency Level, by core mate
Simplified Cost Efficiency Charts

150 kVAThree Phase 

DOE Min Price by Efficiency Level

$8,000$8,750$9,500$6,500$7,250

E Minimum PriceM3 M2 ZDMH SA1

$4,250$5,000

DO$5,750

$3,500

dEL0 dEL1 dEL2 dEL3 dEL4 dEL5 dEL6 dEL7

DOE Efficiency Level

This Chart is for DL4. It clearly depicts the relationship betwe

Efficiency Level by Core Material. This provides a more unde

picture of the relationship between price and core material f
Simplified Cost Efficiency Charts

1500 kVA Three Phase (DL5) DOE Min Price by Efficiency Level

$50,000$40 000$45,000$35,000$40,000

OE Min Price M3 M2 ZDMH SA1

$25 000$30,000

DO

$20,000$25,000

dEL0 dEL1 dEL2 dEL3 dEL4 dEL5 dEL6

DOE Efficiency Level

This final Chart is for DL5, and shows the lowest price desig

Efficiency Level by core material