alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3951 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 388
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3951

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 18, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Roy 
                  Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROY RONDENO, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Roy Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roy 
Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 388

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3951

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Roy 
                  Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 18, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELDO KLINGENBERG,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 12-70441

Tax Ct. No. 15355-09L

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted December 17, 2013** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Eldo Klingenberg appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s judgment permitting

the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Commissioner”) to proceed with an

action to collect his federal income tax liability for tax year 2005. We have

jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a). We review de novo the Tax Court’s legal

FILED

JAN 02 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
conclusions and for clear error its findings of fact. Johanson v. Comm’r, 541 F.3d

973, 976 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

The Tax Court properly determined that Klingenberg was precluded from

challenging his tax liability for tax year 2005 because he received notice of the

deficiency but failed to petition the tax court for a deficiency hearing. See 26

U.S.C. § 6330(c)(2)(B) (permitting challenge to the underlying tax liability if the

taxpayer “did not receive any statutory notice of deficiency for such tax liability or

did not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute such tax liability”); Hagner v.

United States, 285 U.S. 427, 430 (1932) (a properly mailed letter carries with it a

presumption of receipt); see also United States v. Zolla, 724 F.2d 808, 810 (9th

Cir. 1984) (postal form 3877 is highly probative and sufficient, in the absence of

contrary evidence, to show that the notice of deficiency was properly made).

We reject Klingenberg’s contentions concerning the proper scope of the

evidence, false or contradictory witness testimony, and the allegedly improper

exclusion of exhibits.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

(per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

2 12-70441
Meeting Log

Includes all face-to-face meetings and phone calls between EPA personnel and stakeholders following 

signature of the “Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Modifications to Renewable Fuel Standard and 

Diesel Sulfur Programs” Proposed Rule (77 FR 61313, October 9, 2012).

Date: January 23, 2013

Attendees: EPA staff (Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of General Counsel); Ensyn 

Corporation.

Subject: Comments regarding renewable heating oil proposed rule and market update.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, James T. Demetriades,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Reportof SeeBeyond Technology Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of SeeBeyond Technology Corporation.

 

 
| By:    | /s/   JAMES T.  DEMETRIADES |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | James T. Demetriades                  |
| Title: | *Chief  Executive Officer*            |

 

 

I, Barry J. Plaga, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Reportof SeeBeyond Technology Corporation on Form 10- Q for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of SeeBeyond Technology Corporation.

 

 
| By:    | /s/   BARRY J.  PLAGA |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Barry J. Plaga                  |
| Title: | *Chief  Financial Officer*      |

 

----
FORM 8-K


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549



                                 CURRENT REPORT

                Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
                              Exchange Act of 1934


                                  June 29, 1999
                                 Date of Report



                                AJAY SPORTS, INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


   Delaware                       0-18204                          39-1644025
------------------       -------------------------      ------------------------
 (State or other         (Commission                    (I.R.S. Employer
  jurisdiction of         file number)                   Identification Number)
  incorporation or
  organization)


  1501 E. Wisconsin Street
  Delavan, WI                                                     53115
----------------------------                             -----------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                 (Zip Code)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (414) 728-5521


                                       N/A
           ---------------------------------------------------------
           Former name or former address, if changed from last report


<PAGE>


 ITEM 5:  Other Events

      On June 29, 1999 Ajay Sports,  Inc. (the  "Registrant")  announced,  via a
news release,  that its Board of Directors has extended the  expiration  date of
the Registrant's  publicly traded common stock warrants until June 30, 2000. The
warrants  were set to expire on June 30,  1999 had they not been  extended.  The
exercise of six  warrants  allows the holder to purchase one share of the common
stock of the Registrant  for $6.00 per share.  The warrants are traded under the
symbol "AJAYW".


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

 Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  the
 Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
 undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


 Date: June 29, 1999

                                AJAY SPORTS, INC.



                               By: \s\Robert R. Hebard
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Robert R. Hebard, Secretary
ADDENDUM NO. 5

                                      to

                    REINSURANCE AGREEMENT, Ref. # STLWL0100

                                    between

                  STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA

                             Indianapolis, Indiana

                                      and

                     WINTERTHUR LIFE RE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                 Dallas, Texas


Both parties hereby mutually agree that the above referenced Agreement shall be
amended as follows:

1.   The Agreement shall be terminated for new business produced on or after
     October 1, 1998.

     Coverage for business reinsured under the Agreement prior to October 1,
     1998 shall remain in
     full force and effect until expiration or cancellation of such business,
     whichever first occurs.

2.   Schedule II - Coinsurance Percentages, of the Agreement shall be replaced
     by the attached
     Schedule II.

This Addendum does not alter, amend or modify the Agreement other than as set
forth in this Addendum,
and it is subject otherwise to all the terms and conditions of the Agreement
together with all the Addenda
and supplements thereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum in duplicate on the
dates and places
set forth below:

STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY             WINTERTHUR LIFE RE INSURANCE
OF INDIANA                                  COMPANY
Indianapolis, Indiana                       Dallas, Texas



Date:  8-20-98                              Date:  7-20-98


By: /s/ Gerald R. Hochgesang                By:  /s/ John Brill


Title:  Senior Vice President               Title:  Senior Vice President



Witness:/s/ Carla James                       Witness:/s/ James Allen

____________________________________________________________________________
STLWL0100-Add 5 10/01/98         Page 1                            07/20/98




                                  SCHEDULE II




A.        COINSURANCE PERCENTAGES


CALENDAR PERIOD OF ISSUE          JURISDICTION        QUOTA SHARE REINSURED

January 1, 1995 - August 31, 1995     All                      70%

September 1, 1995 - March 31, 1996    All                      50%

April 1, 1996 - September 30, 1998    All                      25%

October 1, 1998 and later             All                       0%





























_______________________________________________________________________________
STLWL0100 - Add 5 10/01/98       Page 2                             07/20/98
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

ANTHONY SUTTON

PETITION OF : DANIEL SILVERMAN,
ESQUIRE :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 8 EM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2020, upon consideration of the Motion to

Withdraw as Counsel, the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of

Philadelphia County for that court to determine whether Anthony Sutton’s present counsel

should be permitted to withdraw.

If present counsel is allowed to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to resolve any

issues relative to Anthony Sutton being appointed counsel or granted leave to proceed

p ro se

.

The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to enter its

order regarding this remand within 9 0 days after the expiration of the judicial emergency

declared by this Court at 531 JAD and to promptly notify this Court of its determi nation.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30498 Summary Calendar

TERRENCE SHALOW, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR., Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

(95-CV-912)

October 1, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This matter is before the court on appeal by Terrence Shalow of an adverse

summary judgment in his Title VII employm ent discrimination claims. Finding1 Toda y’s ruling moots the appellee’s motion to strike appellant’s brief and record

excerpts.

2 neither error of fact nor law and for essentially the reasons stated and authorities

cited by the district court in its Memorandum Ruling signed on February 5, 1996

and filed February 6, 1996, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED. 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL JUDE LAREDO

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee s

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 13

- 00 073

- CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 4

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110C10680 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the motion of Brock Benjamin, retain ed attorney for the

Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause.

Before the Court can act on this motion it is necessary for the trial court to hold a hearing.

The trial court is directed to conduct a hearing to determine whether Appellant has retained new

counsel or is indigent and entitled to the appointment of couns el. The hearing should be held no

later than April 23, 2013. The court is authorized to enter any orders it deems necessary, including

an order appointing appellate counsel. The court reporter is directed to prepare a transcription of

the hearing and fil e it with this Court within ten days after the hearing is held.

If the court determines that Appellant is not indigent, the court shall make written findings

of fact and conclusions of law and file same with the trial court clerk. The county clerk shall

prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing any orders entered by the trial court related to the

1hearing, including an order appointing counsel if Appellant is entitled , and the written findings of

fact, if any, and file it with this Court by May 3, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3 rd day of April, 2013

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
Order entered February 14, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-17-00154-CV

IN RE LIBERTY BROWN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-16449



### ORDER Before Justice Francis, Justice Fillmore, and Justice Whitehill

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s February 13, 2017

petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)              of              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the              Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /S/                SHOLEH HAMEDANI                                                                                                            |   |   |        |
| Sholeh                Hamedani,Chief                Executive Officerand                Chief Financial OfficerAugust                21, 2006 |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                                                               |   |   |        |

----
ex10-22.htm



Exhibit 10.22


 



Sales contract of Industrial and Mineral Products


 


                  Contract No. JY-03


Seller: Second factory, Taiyuan Coal GasificationCo.,Ltd                     


Address: in the factory


Purchaser: Taiyuan Hongxing Carbon black Co., Ltd Date: 01/2008







1. Product name, price, delivery time and quantity


 



	
Product Name

	
Trademark

	
Model

	
Manufa-cuturer

	
Unit

	
Quantity

	
Price


(RMB)

	
Amount


(RMB)

	
Remarks


	
Coal Tar

	  	  	  	
Ton

	
1000

	
1700

	  	
1. The price in this agreement is current market price 2. There is 17% tax included in the price.3. The quantity is adjustable based on the output .


	
Total

	  	  	  





 


2. Quality Standard: YB/T5075-93


3. The conditions and duration of which supplier is responsible for: Disagreement shall be raised within 2 days after the pickup of goods


4. Packaging standards, supply and recycle of packaging materials


5. Random spare, number and supply method of accessories


6. Reasonable wear and tear and method of calculation: It shall be based on the weights calculated from seller


7. Proprietary rights of the products are transferred upon the completion of the weighting, but proprietary rights belong to the seller if the purchaser fails to make the payment.


8. Place and means of delivery: Delivered to the designated place


9. Means of transport, expense for transport and related items


10. Acceptance criteria, methods, date and period: the Quality Standard: YB/T5075-93, the goods shall be stored in separate place and dispute over quality shall be settled within 2 days after the arrival of goods in the purchaser’s warehouse. The seller will not take the responsibility if the goods are mixed with other products in storage and it exceeds the 2 days period stated above.


11. Installation and test of equipment set


12. Means, date and place of settlement: The price is subject to the market condition, and the quantity is determined by the actual number occurred.


13. Means of guaranty (the guaranty agreement could be made in addition to this one )


14. The condition of termination of this contract: The purchase fails to perform according to the agreement within one month and the seller deduct the corresponding amount of goods, the purchase fails to perform for 3 consecutive months.


15. Default responsibility: It shall be settled according to the contract law of PRC


16. The means of dispute solution: It shall be settled through negotiation, or mediated by the business and administrative regulators,or go for


a. arbitration


b. lawsuit


17. The contract valid period: From January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009


18. Other unspecified issues shall be settled through negotiation.


 



	
Supplier:


Company Name (Seal):


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent :


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:

	
Buyer:


Company Name:


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent:


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:

	
Attestation:


 


 


 


Attestation Organization


Manager


 


Date:
Amendment to the Employment and Change in Control Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO 

EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), effective as of November 1, 2008, is made
on May 18, 2010 between MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and BAXTER F. PHILLIPS, JR. (the “Executive”). 

WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive previously entered into an Employment and Change in Control Agreement on November 10, 2008, which
agreement has thereafter been amended (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire
to further amend the Employment Agreement in order to clarify the limitation on severance compensation and conform that limitation to the Company’s intent. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth (including definitions of
capitalized terms which are set forth in Section 19 and throughout the Employment Agreement) and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company and Executive agree as follows: 

1. Section 19(b) of the Employment Agreement is amended to read as follows: 

(b) “Bonus” means the highest amount payable under Executive’s Annual Cash Bonus plus the highest amounts
payable under all Executive’s outstanding and long-term cash incentive bonus awards (and, where equity compensation is substituted in lieu of long-term cash incentive bonus award(s), the highest amounts that would be payable if such long-term
cash incentive bonus award(s) had been made and outstanding, based on standard grant procedures, parameters and rules for the applicable year(s)) that contain (or would contain) as a year of measurement, the year in which Executive is terminated.
Bonus does not include any stock option, stock appreciation, stock purchase, restricted stock, restricted unit, performance stock, performance unit, shadow stock or similar equity incentive plan, program, arrangement or grant, one time bonus or
payment, any amounts contributed by the Company or any Subsidiary for the benefit of Executive to any qualified or nonqualified deferred compensation plan, or any amounts designated by the parties as amounts other than Bonus. 

2. In all other respects, the Employment Agreement is unchanged. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of May 18, 2010. 

 

					
	MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY	  	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Don L. Blankenship
	  	
	Name:	 	Don L. Blankenship	  	
	Title:	 	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer	  	
			
		 	 /s/ Baxter F. Phillips, Jr.
	  	
		 	Baxter F. Phillips, Jr.