alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

JOHN FREDERICK BALLENTINE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

No. 97-7568

WARDEN OF GREENSVILLE

CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-97-181-R)

Submitted: June 30, 1998

Decided: July 30, 1998

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

John Frederick Ballentine, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond

Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

John Frederick Ballentine filed a petition for habeas corpus relief

under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), which was

referred to a magistrate judge for a report and recommendation, who

recommended dismissing the petition. The report contained language

advising Ballentine that he must file written objections to the report

within ten days of service, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C)

(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The magistrate judge's report was entered on the district court's

docket on October 20, 1997, and objections were due on November

3, 1997. On October 27, 1997, Ballentine mailed a nine-page document he entitled "Appeal" to the district court and the respondent. The

document does not specifically express an intent to appeal to this

Court, but takes issue with various aspects of the magistrate judge's

report and recommendation.

This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory orders. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The magistrate judge's report is not

such an order. However, according Ballentine's document a liberal

construction, see Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147 (4th Cir. 1978), we

construe the "appeal" notice as objections to the magistrate judge's

report. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability, dismiss the

appeal and remand the case to the district court with instructions to

construe Ballentine's filing styled "Appeal" as timely objections to

the magistrate judge's report. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED

 2
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-13-00079-CV

____________________

IN RE JOHN S. MORGAN

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

In this mandamus proceeding, John S. Morgan contends the trial court 

abused its discretion in failing to grant Morgan’s motion to dissolve a writ of 

garnishment. A writ of supersedeas, which dissolved the writ of garnishment, 

issued after Morgan filed his mandamus petition. Subsequently, the real party in 

interest suggested the petition was moot. The relator has not shown the petition is 

not moot. Without addressing the merits of the petition, we dismiss the petition for 

writ of mandamus as moot. See In re Uresti, 377 S.W.3d 696, 697 (Tex. 2012) 

(dismissing petition for mandamus relief under the mootness doctrine).
2

PETITION DISMISSED.

 PER CURIAM 

Submitted on February 25, 2013

Opinion Delivered April 4, 2013

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
January 28, 2015 

CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Ron Curry, Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 (6 RA) 

1445 Ross A venue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

RE: Oklahoma State Implementation Plan Revision Submitted July 201 0 

Withdrawal of OAC 252: I 00-5-2.1 (a)(3) 

Dear Administrator Curry: 

15 II PH 6: 14 

In a letter dated September 24, 2013, Governor Mary Fallin appointed me as her designee for the 

purpose of submitting documents to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for 

approval and incorporation into the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State of Oklahoma. 

The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is given the primary responsibility 

and authority to p~pare and implement ~he ~tate's air quality mB!lagement plan under Oklahoma 

Statutes. 

On behalf of the State of Oklahoma, I request withdrawal of a portion of Oklahoma's 2010 SIP 

revision. This revision was received in the EPA Region 6 office on July 27,2010 and includes a 

cover letter dated July 16, 2010. Specifically, the State requests withdrawal of DEQ rule OAC 

252:100-5-2.l(a)(3) that exempts de minimis and pennit exempt facilities from emission 

inventory reporting requirements. Withdrawal of this portion of the SIP revision will ensure that 

Oklahoma's SIP provisions for emission inventories remain consistent with the federal 

requirements. All other portions of the SIP submittal will be retained in the SIP revision and 

should continue through the EPA review process. DEQ plans to undertake rulemaking this year 

that will clarify requirements and ensure consistency of state and federal emission inventory 

requirements for these small sources. 

If you have questions, please contact Mr. Eddie Terrill, Director, Air Quality Division, 

Department of Environmental Quality at ( 405) 702-4100. 

Michael Teague 

Secretary of Energy and Environment 

cc: Scott Thompson, Executive Director, Department of Environmental Quality 

Eddie Terrill, Director, DEQ Air Quality Division 

cc: Guy Donaldson, Section Chief, Air Planning Section, EPA Region VI (6PD-L) 

Carrie Paige, Air Planning Section, EPA Region VI ( 6PD-L)
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3945 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Himic Anhydride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 27, 2009 

Mr. SPRATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Himic Anhydride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HIMIC ANHYDRIDE. 

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting 

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Himic Anhydride (provided 

for in subheading 

2917.20.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2012 ’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3945 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

d1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

139308 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139308 

 COA: 285140 

Oakland CC: 2007-218133-FC 

CHERYL BEAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## Appendix 4. FOB Data for Weiner Study

Variable Label Type Comments ANIMLnumerica l Animal Numbercharacter NA
SEX Sex character NA DOSEGP Dose Group numerical Values presented are in mg/kg; Letter designates protocol under which data were collected

PHASE Day character NA DAY Time of Observation numerical 2 Hr (A);4 Hr (B); 4 Hr (C); 8 Hr (D); 2 Hr (F); 4 Hr (G); 8 Hr (H); 4 Hr (I) TEST Behavior/ Observation character

EASE_OF_HANDLING_IN_HAND NA 0 Code NA
NA 1= 0 VEHICLE (All Protocols) 2= 25 B-CYF.(A);10 L-CYH.(B); 500 RESM.(C);10 TEFL.(D); 12.5 B-CYF(F);350 RESM.(G);15 ESFENV. (H);-65 CYPER.(I) 3= 45 B-CYF.(A);20 L-CYH.(B);750 RESM.(C);15 TEFL.(D); 150 S-BIO.(F);12.5 DELTA (G) 4= 200 S-BIO.(A);100 CYPER.(B);25 DELTA(C);25 ESFEN. 5= 300 S-BIO.(A);150 CYPER.(B);35 DELTA(C);50 ESFEN.(D) 6= 15 FENPRO.(A); 200 PERM.(B);400 PYR.(C);40 BIFEN.(D) 7= 30 FENPRO.(A);250 PERM.(B); 800 PYR.(C); 55 BIFEN.(D)

SEE SCORING CRITERIA FOR MORE INFORMATION POSTURE CONVULSIONS_-_TONIC

CHROMODACRYORRHEA PALPEBRAL_CLOSURE FECES_CONSISTENCY EASE_OF_REMOVAL LACRIMATION CONVULSIONS_-_CLONIC TREMORS BITINGVariable Label Type Comments TEST (cont.) Observation character

MUCOUS_MEMBRANES_-_color

TIME_TO_FIRST_STEP_(seconds)

BIZARRE/STEREOTYPIC_BEHAVIOR EYES_-_color SKIN_-_color EYE_PROMINENCE RESPIRATORY_characterACTER RED_DEPOSITS_-_mouth CRUSTY_DEPOSITS_-_eyes CRUSTY_DEPOSITS_-_nose CRUSTY_DEPOSITS_-_mouth RED_DEPOSITS_-_eyes RED_DEPOSITS_-_nose

MUSCLE_TONE MOBILITY GAIT
TREMORS GAIT_SCORE AROUSAL CONVULSIONS_-_CLONIC CONVULSIONS_-_TONIC

BACKING REARING GROOMING URINATION DEFECATION TOUCH_RESPONSE APPROACH_RESPONSE STARTLE_RESPONSE PUPIL_RESPONSE EYEBLINK_RESPONSE TAIL_PINCH_RESPONSE OLFACTORY_ORIENTATION PALPEBRAL_CLOSURE RESPIRATORY_RATE SEE SCORING CRITERIA FOR MORE INFORMATION FUR_APPEARANCE Code SALIVATION PILOERECTIONVariable Label Type Comments TEST (cont.) Observation characterHINDLIMB_EXTENSOR_STRENGTH GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_FORE_TRIAL_1 GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_FORE_TRIAL_2 GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_FORE_TRIAL_3 GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_FORE_MEAN GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_HIND_TRIAL_1 GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_HIND_TRIAL_2 GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_HIND_TRIAL_3 GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_HIND_MEAN ROTAROD_PERFORMANCE_(seconds) HINDLIMB_FOOTSPLAY_(mm)_TRIAL_1 HINDLIMB_FOOTSPLAY_(mm)_TRIAL_2 HINDLIMB_FOOTSPLAY_(mm)_MEAN BODY_TEMPERATURE_(degrees_F)
RESULT Result numerical SEE SCORING CRITERIA FOR MORE INFORMATION
CATEGORY Test Category For Data Collection numerical SEE SCORING CRITERIA FOR MORE INFORMATION

SUBCAT Type Of Observations numerical SEE SCORING CRITERIA FOR MORE INFORMATION Code FORELIMB_EXTENSION

Code (1-18) or Numerical Value HINDLIMB_EXTENSION AIR_RIGHTING_REFLEX

CATALEPSY_(seconds) BODY_WEIGHT_(g)

1 = FOB1 [tests 1a-1f & 2a] 2 = FOB2 [tests 2b-2o & 3a-m & 4a-j] 3 = FOB3 [tests 5a-d & 6a-c])

1= Home Cage 2= Handling 3= Open Field 4=Sensory
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Nos.333-31344, 333-42770, 333-75168, 333-82654 and 333-109258) and
Form S-4 (Nos. 333-33912, 333-42778, 333-75882, 333-90401 and 333-90403) and in
the related Prospectuses and in Form S-8 (Nos. 333-15355, 333-15353, 333-29321,
333-15349, 333-15357, 333-29319, 333-84381, 333-84373, 333-84377, 333-93397,
333-93249, 333-35896, 333-38472, 333-71396, 333-71398, 333-81234, 333-82598,
333-102543, 333-104856 and 333-104857) of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of
our report dated January 21, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 5, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salary.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), G. Kent Plunkett, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Bryce Chicoyne, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our best knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be
filed for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: August 11, 2008



/s/ G. Kent PlunkettG. Kent PlunkettChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 11, 2008



/s/ Bryce ChicoyneBryce ChicoyneSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

     Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, L. B. (Brad) Clarke, Chief Executive Officer of Organetix, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 15, 2005

/s/ L. B. (Brad) Clarke
-------------------------------
L. B. (Brad) Clarke
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Photon Dynamics, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof and to which this
Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Report"), and pursuant to the
requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), Jeffrey A. Hawthorne, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Richard Okumoto, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, each hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 14, 2004

/s/ JEFFREY A. HAWTHORNE                  /s/ RICHARD OKUMOTO
-------------------------------------     -------------------------------------
JEFFREY A. HAWTHORNE                      RICHARD OKUMOTO
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND SECRETARY

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
CERTIFICATION

I, David Bloom, Chief Executive Officer of Chelsea
Property Group, Inc., the sole general partner of CPG Partners, L.P. ("the OP"),
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, do hereby certify as
follows:

|1. | The annual report of Form 10-K of the OP for the period ended December 31,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the OP.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this
Certification this 17th day of March, 2005.

| | /s/ David Bloom
          David Bloom
          Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to CPG Partners L.P. and will be retained by CPG Partners
L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF APRIL 30, 1999 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                            2299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   896337
<ALLOWANCES>                                     15391
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  887267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7416
<OTHER-SE>                                      131244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    887267
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 64903
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               28568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  26925
<INCOME-TAX>                                     10420
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              16505
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     16505
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
<FN>
<F1>THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDE A NONCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | this quarterly report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents,
               in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
               Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 4, 2004 |                                                                                                          
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | /s/ Chris TongChris TongSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Accounting Officer)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130836 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver & (65) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. MONIKA MAZUMDER, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Deepika S. Mazumd er, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130836 COA: 261331 Washtenaw CC: 04-001101-NM UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS, ROBERT A. KOEPKE, PH.D., RAJIV TANDON, M.D., SATOSHI MINOSHIMA, M.D., WASHTENAW COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH, JOSEPH YAROCH, M.D., MOONSON R. ELLIOTT ENINSCHE, B.A., R.S.W., C.S.M., and RICHARD PFOUTZ, M.S.W., C.S.W., Defendants, and

MOHAMED AZIZ, M.D., and STEPHAN F. TAYLOR, M.D., Defendants-Appellants, and

SRINIBAS MAHAPATRA, M.D., Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for st ay of trial court proceedings is DENIED without prejudice to the filing of another mo tion following the Court of Appeals conflict panel decision in Ward v Siano , 270 Mich App 584 (2006). The application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals remains pending.

l0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk