Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 19637 

1The Department published its preliminary 

results for this administrative review in Certain 

Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary 

Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; Calendar Year 2012, 79 FR 60447 (October 

7, 2014) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated 

September 30, 2014 (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

2AR Printing is also known as A.R. Printing & 

Packaging (India) Pvt. Ltd. 

3See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results of Countervailing Duty Review: Certain 

Lined Paper Products from India’’ from Christian 

Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul 

Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance (Decision Memorandum), dated 

concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice. 

4See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China: 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the 

People’s Republic of China; and Notice of 

Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 

(September 28, 2006) (Lined Paper Order). 

5See Preliminary Results. 

6See the Department’s October 10, 2014, Third 

Supplemental Questionnaire to the GOI. 

7See the GOI’s October 31, 2014, Third 

Supplemental Questionnaire Response. 

8See Memorandum to Eric B. Greynolds, Program 

Manager, AD/CVD Duty Operations, Office III, 

‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire Responses 

Submitted by the Government of India,’’ (March 4, 

2015). 

9Petitioner is the Association of American School 

Paper Suppliers (Petitioner). 

10See Petitioner’ March 11, 2015, case brief. 

11See the GOI’s March 16, 2015, rebuttal brief. 

12On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

13See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

Continued 

a. The Appropriate Unit of Measure On 

Which to Base Sales and Cost Data for 

King Young 

b. Limiting the Model Matching 

Methodology for Width and Length 

c. Allegation That King Young’s Piece 

Sales Are Outside the Ordinary Course of 

Trade 

d. Allegation That King Young’s Channel 3 

Sales Are Outside the Ordinary Course of 

Trade 

e. Level of Trade for King Young 

f. Clerical Error in King Young’s 

Preliminary Dumping Margin 

g. King Young’s Unaffiliated Suppliers’ 

Cost of Production 

h. General and Administrative Expense 

Ratio for King Young 

i. Financial Expenses for King Young 

j. Labor and Overhead Ratios for King 

Young 

k. King Young’s Allocation of Fixed 

Overhead Costs 

l. AFA Rate for Hen Hao 

6. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–08436 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–844] 

Certain Lined Paper Products From 

India: Final Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; Calendar 

Year 2012 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) completed the 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

certain lined paper products from India 

for the January 1, 2012, through 

December 31, 2012, period of review 

(POR) 1 in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). The respondent in 

this administrative review is A.R. 

Printing & Packaging India Private 

Limited (AR Printing).2 In these final 

results, the Department made changes to 

the subsidy rate determined for AR 

Printing. Our analysis of comments 

received is contained in the Decision 

Memorandum accompanying this 

Federal Register notice.3 The final net 

subsidy rate for AR Printing is listed 

below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ 

section. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 

482–1009. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 28, 2006, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register the CVD order on certain lined 

paper products from India.4 On October 

7, 2014, the Department published the 

Preliminary Results of administrative 

review of the Lined Paper Order for the 

POR.5

After the Preliminary Results, we 

issued a third supplemental 

questionnaire providing the 

Government of India (GOI) with an 

opportunity to describe the steps on 

which it based its claims that AR 

Printing did not use certain subsidy 

programs at issue in the review,6 to 

which the GOI responded on October 

31, 2014.7 On March 4, 2015, we 

conducted verification at the GOI offices 

in New Delhi, India.8

Petitioner 9 submitted a case brief on 

March 11, 2015,10 and the GOI 

submitted a rebuttal brief on March 16, 

2015.11 No interested party requested a 

hearing. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is certain lined paper products. The 

products are currently classifiable under 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) item numbers: 

4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 

4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 

4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 

4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 

4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 

4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 

4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

product description remains dispositive. 

A full description of the scope of the 

order is contained in the memorandum 

from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul 

Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

‘‘Countervailing Duty (CVD) 

Administrative Review: Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India.’’ The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS).12 ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and is available to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

room 7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Methodology 

The Department has conducted this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). For each of the 

subsidy programs found 

countervailable, we find that there is a 

subsidy, i.e., a government-provided 

financial contribution that gives rise to 

a benefit to the recipient, and that the 

subsidy is specific.13

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

19638 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

14See Memorandum to Eric B. Greynolds, 

Program Manager, AD/CVD Duty Operations, Office 

III, ‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire Responses 

Submitted by the Government of India,’’ (March 4, 

2015) (GOI Verification Report). 

In making these findings, we relied, in 

part, on facts otherwise available on the 

administrative record because AR 

Printing: (1) Failed to respond to the 

Department’s requests for necessary 

information and therefore necessary 

information was not on the record; (2) 

withheld requested information; (3) 

failed to provide requested information 

by the established deadlines; and (4) 

significantly impeded this proceeding. 

See sections 776(a)(1) and (2)(A)–(C) of 

the Act. Furthermore, because we 

determine that AR Printing failed to 

cooperate by not acting to the best of its 

ability to comply with the Department’s 

requests for information, we drew an 

adverse inference in selecting from 

among the facts otherwise available. See 

section 776(b) of the Act. 

Changes Since Preliminary Results 

After the Preliminary Results, the 

Department verified information from 

the GOI concerning the Market 

Development Assistance, Status 

Certificate, and Market Access Initiative 

programs.14 Based on the findings at 

verification and for the reasons set forth 

in the Decision Memorandum, we find 

that AR Printing did not use these three 

programs during the POR. Therefore, we 

did not include subsidy rates for these 

programs when determining the AFA 

attributable to AR Printing. 

For a full description of the analysis 

concerning the Status Certificate, 

Market Access Initiative, and Market 

Development programs, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum, which also 

incorporates by reference our analysis 

from the Preliminary Results pertaining 

to other programs for which the 

Department’s analysis and 

determinations have not changed. For 

all other issues, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5), we calculated the listed 

net subsidy rate for 2012: 

Company Net subsidy 

rate 

A.R. Printing & Packaging 

India Pvt. Ltd. (AR Printing).

37.43 percent 

ad valorem. 

Assessment Rates 

The Department intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) 15 days after 

publication of these final results of 

review, to liquidate shipments of subject 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by AR Printing, entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after January 1, 2012, through December 

31, 2012, at the ad valorem rate listed 

above. 

Cash Deposit Instructions 

The Department intends to instruct 

CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated CVDs in the amount shown 

above for AR Printing on shipments of 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of these final results of 

review. For all non-reviewed firms, we 

will instruct CBP to collect cash 

deposits of estimated CVDs at the most 

recent company-specific or all-others 

rate applicable to the company. 

Accordingly, the cash deposit 

requirements that will be applied to 

companies covered by this order, but 

not examined in this review, are those 

established in the most recently 

completed segment of the proceeding 

for each company. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 6, 2015. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

I. Summary 

II. Analysis of Programs 

Programs Determined to be Countervailable 

A. Programs Addressed in the Preliminary 

Results 

1. Advance Authorization Program (AAP) 

2. Export Promotion of Capital Goods 

Scheme (EPCGS) 

3. Pre- and Post-Shipment Loans 

4. Export Oriented Units (EOUs) 

5. State Government of Maharashtra 

(SGOM) Programs 

A. Sales Tax Incentives Provided by SGOM 

B. Electricity Duties Exemptions Under the 

SGOM Package Program of Incentives of 

1993 

C. Loan Guarantees Based on Octroi 

Refunds by the SGOM 

D. Land for Less than Adequate 

Remuneration (LTAR) 

B. Changes from the Preliminary Results 

III. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether the Department 

Should Continue to Find Pursuant to 

Adverse Facts Available that AR Printing 

Benefited from the Status Certificate 

Program, Market Access Initiative 

Program and Market Development 

Assistance Programs During the POR 

IV. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–08423 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). 

Agency: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 

Title: West Coast Region Vessel 

Identification Requirements. 

OMB Control Number: 0648-0355. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Request: Regular (extension of 

a currently approved information 

collection). 

Number of Respondents: 1,125. 

Average Hours Per Response: 45 

minutes. 

Burden Hours: 169. 

Needs and Uses: This request is for 

extension of a currently approved 

information collection. 

The success of fisheries management 

programs depends significantly on 

regulatory compliance. The vessel 

identification requirement is essential to 

facilitate enforcement. The ability to 

link fishing (or other activity) to the 

vessel owner or operator is crucial to 

enforcement of regulations issued under 

the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens 

Fishery Conservation and Management 

Act. A vessel’s official number is 

required to be displayed on the port and 

starboard sides of the deckhouse or hull, 

and on a weather deck. It identifies each 

vessel and should be visible at distances 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES