alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit_10-3.htm










Exhibit 10.3


 





 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-1 (No.333-128028) of Ituran Location and Control Ltd. of our reports dated February 12, 2010 relating to the financial statements and management’s report of Ituran of Argentina S.A., on the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting, included in Ituran Location and Control Ltd.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009. Gustavo R. Chesta (Partner) Estudio Urien & Asociados Buenos Aires, Argentina


















	
Gustavo R. Chesta (Partner)


	
Estudio Urien & Asociados - Argentina


	
May 20, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>                            This schedule  contains  summary  financial
                                    information extracted from the consolidated
                                    Statements of Operations and Balance Sheets
                                    and  is   qualified   in  its  entirety  by
                                    reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1
<CURRENCY>                          US Dollars
       
<S>                                 <C> 
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                     1
<CASH>                              2,869,450
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       22,729,646
<ALLOWANCES>                        609,716
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    29,825,274
<PP&E>                              51,243,773
<DEPRECIATION>                      5,679,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      123,445,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               37,364,683
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                            213,665
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                          32,372,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        123,445,897
<SALES>                             61,838,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    61,838,691
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       57,952,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  1,671,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     2,214,887
<INCOME-TAX>                        209,009
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 2,005,878
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        2,005,878
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.09
        

</TABLE>
fs1a10510ex10xii_chinabct.htm


 



 


Exhibit 10.12


 


Liquid Capital Loan Agreement


 


Borrower (Party A): Guangxi Hefeng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.


Address: Donglan County, Third Development District


Legal Representative: Jin Hua Li


Address: Wuzhou, Guangxi


Creditor (Party B): Jin Hua Li







Due to its production and operation needs, Party A apply for a loan from Party B and Party B agrees to make a loan to Party A. To specify the parties’ rights and obligations and in accordance with Contract Law and other laws and regulations, Party A and Party B entered into this agreement after negotiation.







Article 1. The type of loan is Liquid Capital Loan.







Article 2. The usage of loan is to purchase raw materials.







Article 3. Loan amount is RMB 1.5 million. The term of the loan is 12 months, from 2/13/2006 to 2/12/2007.







Article 4. The loan interest is 0.68% per month. The interest shall be calculated daily from the date of withdrawal. The interest shall be paid monthly. The principle shall be paid on the expiry date of the loan.







Article 5. The source of the repayment fund shall be from the operation revenue.







Article 6. Rights and obligations of the parties:


 


1. Party A’s rights and obligations: (1) Withdraw and use the loan in accordance with this agreement. (2) Shall not repay the loan before the expiry date without Party B’s consent. (3) Voluntarily accept Party B’s investigation, study and monitor of the usage of the loan. (4) Repay the loan principle and interest in accordance with the terms in this agreement. (5) If Party A fails to repay the loan within the terms specified in this agreement, it shall be deemed Party A grants Party B an automatic loan extension.







2. Party B’s rights and obligations: (1) Party B has the right to demand Party A to repay the loan within any amount of time. (2) Party B has the right to demand Party A to provide any documents related to the loan. (3) Party B shall provide enough fund to Party A in accordance with the loan agreement.







Article 7 The agreement has two copies, each party holds one copy with equal legal effect.







Party A: Guangxi Hefeng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.


Legal Representative (Signature): /s/ Jin Hua Li







Party B: /s/ Jin Hua Li







Date: 2/13/2006
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T MAY 26, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 9- 12 66 8

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 0 8- 00 19 6- CR-KOB -TMP UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,
ve rs us EDWARD BROWNING MCCLAIN, a.k .a. E.B. McCl ai n, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e North ern Dis tri ctof Al ab am a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Ma y 26 , 20 10 ) Befo re BLACK, HULL andANDERSON, Circu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Afte r or al arg um en t an d c aref ul co ns id erat io n, we re ad il y co nc lu de th atth e jud gm en t i n t hi s ca se sh ou ldbe affi rm ed . Firs t, we s umm ari ly reject ap pe ll an t’sarg um en t t ha t the di st ric t co urt ab us edit s d is cret io n i n fa il in g t o g ran t a m is tri al on

th e g ro un ds th atap pe ll an t’s tria l s ho ul d h av e b een sev eredfro m th atof c ode fen da ntPet ta grue . App el la ntha s fa il edto est ab li sheit he r th e requi si te pre jud ic e,
orth atsev eran ce was th e p ro pe r rem edy forpre jud ic e. Uni te d S ta te s v . Bro wne , 50 5 F .3d12 29 , 12 68 -6 9 (1 1 Cir . 20 07 ) (ci ti ng Zafir o v . Uni te d S ta te s, 5 06 U.S. th 53 4, 5 38 -3 9, 1 13 S.Ct . 93 3, 9 38 (19 93 )). In de ed , with re sp ectto th e p reju di ce pr on g, ap pe ll an t’s ar gu m en t i s n otas s tro ng as t he si m il ar ar gu m en t wh ic h we reject edin Uni te d S ta te s v . Bla nk en sh ip , 38 2 F .3d11 10 , 11 22 an d 1 12 5 (1 1 Cir
. th 20 04 ). Furth erm or e, ap pe ll an t fa il edto est ab li sh th atth e d is tri ctco urt’s caut io na ry in st ru ct io n was in su ffi ci en t t o re m edy an y po ss ib le pre

jud ic e, orth atsev eran ce was th e o nl y pe rm is si bl e rem edy . See i d. at11 22 , 11 25 -2 6. W e al so co nc lu de th atth ere i s n o m eri t i n app el la nt ’s cha ll en ge gro un de d up on Bat so n v . Kentuc ky, 476 U.S. 79 , 10 6 S .Ct. 1 71 2 (1 98 6) . Like th e d is tri ct
co urt, we as su m e th atap pe ll an t es tabl is he d apri m a fac ie cas e. Howev er, we
can no t co nc lu de th atth e d is tri ctco urt was cle arl y erro ne ou s i n fi nd in g t ha t t he go ve rn m en t’s re as on s fo r eac h s tri ke were cr ed ib le an d ra ce n eu tra l. Fi na ll y , we rejectsu m

m ari ly app el la nt ’s cha ll en ge to th e su ffi ci en cy of t he

2ev id en ce. The re was am pl e ev id en ce t o s up po rt t he jury’ s v erd ic t. 1 AFFIR MED.

We do not reac h the constitutionality of the hone st service s mail fraud statute, 18 1 U.S.C. § 1346, because McClain did not present a f acia l or as applied c halleng e to the constitutionality

of that statute in his briefs on a ppeal. 3
MARK EUSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3332

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 19, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Mark Euson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

ANTHONY SUTTON 

PETITION OF : DANIEL SILVERMAN, 

ESQUIRE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 8 EM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2020, upon consideration of the Motion to 

Withdraw as Counsel, the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of 

Philadelphia County for that court to determine whether Anthony Sutton’s present counsel 

should be permitted to withdraw. 

If present counsel is allowed to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to resolve any 

issues relative to Anthony Sutton being appointed counsel or granted leave to proceed 

pro se. 

The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to enter its 

order regarding this remand within 90 days after the expiration of the judicial emergency 

declared by this Court at 531 JAD and to promptly notify this Court of its determination.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Form S-8 No.'s 333-80341, 333-20883, 333-56883, 333-79577, and
333-39112) pertaining to the 1994 Incentive Stock Plan and 2000 Stock Option
Plan and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-34478) of our report
dated January 26, 2001, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Pharmacopeia, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2000.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Pharmacopeia, Inc.
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of Pharmacopeia,
Inc.'s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.



                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Diego, California
March 23, 2001
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARY ISABEL RUIZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00181-CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 4

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160C07963)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until January 31, 2020. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Carl DeKoatz, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare the 

Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before January 31, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2

ndday of January, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
goFarm GF-1 Preflight Checklist

Before Energizing System

1. Arms up and locked in flight position

2. Props installed on correct motors

3. Prop bolts tight

4. Props clean and undamaged

5. Motors turn smoothly

6. Batteries secure

7. Wiring in good condition

8. Flight control system connections secure

9. Transmitter on

a. Transmitter vehicle select: SeedScout

b. Transmitter battery level > flight minimum

10. Ground Control Station (GCS) on 

a. Waypoints loaded, as appropriate

b. Waypoints in clear airspace, according to UAS flight rules

11. Flight battery voltage >= 90% maximum pack voltage

a. >= 22.7V for 6S LiPo flight pack

12. Weather forecast

a. VMC for duration of planned flight + 30 minutes

b. Winds < 15 kts steady, 25 kts gust

Energize System

13. Connect main power connector

14. Monitor for correct startup sequence

15. On GCS:

a. Communications link established

b. GPS positioning locked

c. Accelerometers calibrated

d. Compass calibrated

e. Transmitter control direction correct

f. Altitude limitation set

g. Distance limitation set

h. Waypoints loaded onboard UAS

Starting Motors

16. Position UAS at launch location

17. Establish position as “home”

18. Reset flight timer

19. Verify desired flight control mode

20. Verify surroundings are clear

a. “Clear Props!”
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08173]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD892


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Fisheries of the 
Northeastern United States; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) River 
Herring and Shad (RH/S) Advisory Panel (AP) will meet to develop 
recommendations for the 2016-18 RH/S Cap on the Atlantic mackerel 
fishery and provide general input on RH/S conservation.

DATES: The meeting will be Friday, April 24, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar, but anyone can also 
attend at the Council office address (see below). The webinar link is: 
http://mafmc.adobeconnect.com/2015rhsap/. Please call the Council at 
least 24 hours in advance if you wish to attend at the Council office.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. 
State St., Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D. Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: (302) 
526-5255. The Council's Web site, www.mafmc.org will also have details 
on webinar access and any background materials.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council's River Herring and Shad (RH/S) 
Advisory Panel (AP) will meet to develop recommendations for the 2016-
18 RH/S Cap on the Atlantic mackerel fishery and provide general input 
on RH/S conservation. There will also be time for public questions and 
comments. The Council will utilize the input from the RH/S AP at the 
June 2015 Council meeting when setting the 2016-18 RH/S Cap on the 
Atlantic mackerel fishery and discussing RH/S conservation.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to M. Jan Saunders, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.

    Dated: April 6, 2015.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-08173 Filed 4-8-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAMES AUGUSTE , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 2391

[ June 3, 2015 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Ilona M. Holmes

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 10

- 665CF10A

.
Dane K. Chase of Chase Law Florida, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West P alm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

M AY and C ONNER , JJ., concur

. W ARNER , J., concurs specially with opinion

.

W ARNER , J., concurring specially

.
I concur in the affirmance of the order summarily denying the motion for postconviction relief and write to note that, as to appellant’s second ground, Puglisi v. State, 112 So. 3d 1196 (Fla. 2013) is not controlling. Appellant contended that trial counsel was ineffective for calling a witness whose testimony conflicted with the defendant, and that counsel’s strategy was patently unreasonable. The court denied this claim, because it was apparent that the appellant insisted on calling the witness, not trial counsel (which appellant concedes on appeal). Therefore, it did not
amount to a stra tegic decision on the part of trial counsel.2

Appellant contends, however, that based upon Puglisi , the decision to call witnesses was counsel’s responsibility, not the defendant’s. Therefore, he could still claim ineffective assistance. In Puglisi

, the supreme court did so hold, receding from cases such as Blanco v. State , 452 So. 2d 520, 524 (Fla. 1984), which had held that the decision to call witnesses was ultimately the defendant’s. Nevertheless, Puglisi does not apply in this case, because appellan t’s trial took place before Puglisi issued. Thus, a Blanco analysis would apply and did give the appellant the ultimate decision on which witnesses to call. See England v. State , 151 So. 3d 1132, 1141 (Fla. 2014). As he made the decision to call the wit ness, compelling counsel to do so, this cannot constitute ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
March 24, 2015

Mr. Marc Parmelee

19409 Leisure Lane

Lago Vista, TX 78645

Dear Mr. Parmelee:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your February 3, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0295), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
ex10-9.htm



Exhibit 10.9


 



Sales contract of Industrial and Mineral Products


 


                      Contract No._____


Supplier: Taiyuan Hongxing Carbon Black Co., Ltd


 


Buyer:    Xuzhou Xulun Rubber Co.,Ltd


 


Place of signing contract: Qingxu: Taiyuan


 


Date of signing contract: January 1, 2009







1. Product name, trade mark, model, quantity, amount of money, delivery time and quantity


 



	
Product Name

	
Model

	
Unit

	
Quantity Required/Monthly

	
Price


(RMB per ton)

	
Amount(RMB)

	
Remarks


	
Carbon Black

	
N220

	
Ton

	
250

	
5000

	  	
1. The price in this agreement is current market price 

2. The quantity is decided by the number actually occurred.




	
Carbon Black

	
N330

	
Ton

	
250

	
4700

	  	
 


	
Carbon Black

	
N660

	
Ton

	
250

	
4700

	  	  
	
Total

	  





 


2. Quality requirements, technical standards, the conditions and duration of which supplier is responsible for: National standard or by buyer’s standard


 


3. The place of delivery and method: buyer’s warehouse, Specific quantity and delivery time are subject to telephone or fax-based communication


 


4. Means of transport, expense for transport and related items: The buyer bear the burden


 


5. Reasonable wear and tear and method of calculation    None


 


6. Packaging standards, supply and recycle of packaging materials   None


 


7. Acceptance criteria, methods, and period to hold discussion on goods delivered: Within 7 days after the delivery


 


8. Random spare, number and supply method of accessories    None


 


9. Payment method and period: Within 30 days after the delivery and the invoice being recognized.


 


10. If guaranty is needed, the guaranty agreement is also needed as appendix    None


 


11. Liability for breach of contract: It shall be settled according to the contract law of PRC


 


12. The mechanism of dispute settlement:  It shall be settled through negotiation.


 


13. Other agreed matters:


 


  a. Quality Assurance Documents


 


  b. The price is subject to the market condition, and the quantity is determined by the actual number occurred. It shall inform the buyer at 7 day’s advance if there is a change in above items.








	
Supplier:


Company Name (Seal):


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent :


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:

	
Buyer:


Company Name:


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent:


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:







Valid period: From January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009
**EXHIBIT 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES OF COMPANY**     **Company**    Kabushiki Kaisha Photon Dynamics Japan 100%Photon Dynamics Korea, Inc. South Korea 100%PhotonDynamics Canada, Inc., formerly known as Image Processing Systems, Inc. Canada 100%Intelligent Reasoning Systems, Inc. United States 100%Akcron Corporation, Ltd. South Korea 100%Photon Dynamics International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. China 100%Photon Dynamics Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. China 100%Intelligent Reasoning Systems Intl KK South Korea 100%Photon Dynamics Nova Scotia Company Canada 100%The subsidiaries listed are all included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.