p.1 

OAR Box 1394 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

22) ll-B-17 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/3/2008 7:22:11 AM Sheet 22 of 57 
TO: 

FORM: 

DATE: 

NON CBI SITE VISIT REPORT 

Project File 

Plastic Composites NESHAP 

Melanie Proctor 

Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

July 10,1998 

SUBJECT: Site Visit - Glasforms, Inc., Binningham, Alabama 

EPA Contract 68-D6-0013, ESD Project 93/58 

I. PjKpQSS N V 

The purpose ofthe visit was to collect information on the wet area enclosures that 

Glasforms constructed around their pultrusion lines. The visit was also intended to determine if 

industry's proposed wet area enclosure definition accurately describes Glasforms' wet area 

enclosure, which may be used in determimng the existing source MACT floor for pultrusion. 

n. Place and Date 

Glasforms, Inc. 

3943 Valley East Industrial Drive 

Birmingham, Alabama 35217 

January 15,1998 

in. Participants 

Glasforms. Inc. 

Mr. Roger Bass, Pultrusion General Manager 

Mr. Terry McQuarrie, Vice President 

Mr. Nick Taylor, Plant Manager 

EES 

Mr. Robert Jemison, Environmental Consultant 

Ms. Melanie Proctor, Environmental Consultant 
P.3 

Site Visit Report 

Glasforms, Inc. 

Page 2 

IV. Pultrusion Lines and Wet Area Enclosures 

The Glasforms, Inc. facility in Birmingham, Alabama, has five pultrusion lines each of 

which is equipped vvith a wet area enclosure around the resin bath. Two pultrusion lines have a 

large bath (98 inches long, 44 inches wide at the entrance, and 30 inches wide at the exit ofthe 

bath) and a radio frequency device. Three pultrusion lines have a small bath (57 inches long, 21 

inches wide at the entrance, and 26.5 inches wide at the exit ofthe bath) and no radio frequency 

device. The detailed dimensions ofthe wet area enclosures, the measurements of clearances for 

all openings in the enclosures, and the distances ofthe enclosures to other components ofthe 

pultrusion lines are presented in Attachment I. The following calculations are also included in 

Attachment I: (1) total surface area ofthe enclosures, (2) total area of openings in the enclosures, 

and (3) percent open area in the surface area ofthe enclosures. In addition to the information 

presented in Attachment I, pictures and a video tape ofthe pultrusion operation at the 

Birmingham facility are presented in Attachment II and III, respectively. 

Mr. McQuarrie indicated that radio frequency devices, which are located between the 

resin bath and the heated metal die, are necessary for products with a larger diameter because the 

time products spend in the heated metal die is not sufficient to cure these products. The radio 

frequency device starts to pre-cure large diameter products from the inside by using radio waves. 

Mr. McQuarrie pointed out that the wet area enclosure cannot connect directly to the radio 

frequency device because heat is generated that could melt the enclosure or cause arcing of 

electricity. The radio frequency device is a closed unit with openings that are only large enough 

to allow the product to enter and to exit. The product is almost dry when it enters the radio 

frequency device. 

Mr. Bass explained that he calculated the total area of openings in the enclosure around 

the large bath pultrusion machines to be 4.4 percent ofthe total surface area ofthe enclosure. 

Based oh Mr. Bass' calculations, the total area of openings in the enclosure around the small bath 

pultrusion machines is 3.4 percent ofthe total surface area ofthe enclosure. Mr. Bass pointed 

out that he considered the top ofthe resin bath to be the bottom ofthe enclosure, which means 

that the resin bath was not included in the enclosure surface area calculations. He also pointed 

out that the area displaced by the entering reinforcement might have to be subtracted from the 

entrance open area. However, Mr. Bass explained that this was not done in his calculations 

because the amount and size ofthe entering reinforcement changes depending on the product that 

is being made. If this were included, the total percent of open area would be even less than 4.4 

and 3.4 percent, respectively. 

As indicated on the diagrams in Attachment I, the open areas on the back side ofthe 

enclosures that are used to add resin are covered with flexible brush coverings. Mr. Bass 

indicated that these areas were included in the total open area calculations which may or may not 

be correct. The two 2.5 by 2.5 inch open areas on the front side ofthe enclosures that are used 

7-
P.4 

Site Visit Report 

Glasforms, Inc. 

Page 3 

for resin recirculating pumps in the large resin baths are also covered with flexible brush 

coverings around each ofthe 1.5 inch diameter hoses. Mr. Bass explained that the areas covered 

by the flexible brush were also included in the total open area calculations. Again, if these areas 

are removed from the calculation, the total percent of open area would be further reduced. 

V. Comparison Between Glasforms' Wet Area Enclosures and Industry's Proposed Wet 

Area Enclosure Definition 

During the site visit PES determined if Glasforms' wet area enclosures were accurately 

described by the wet area enclosure definition proposed by industry. Industry's proposed wet 

area enclosure definition is presented in Attachment IV. 

PES determined that the clearances and dimensions of Glasforms' wet area enclosures 

were accurately described by the proposed wet area enclosure definition provided by industry but 

several sections ofthe proposed industry definition could be clarified and better defined to 

accurately reflect the wet area enclosure design used by Glasforms. For example, the proposed 

industry definition states that "the open areas on the enclosure ends shall not exceed 5 percent of 

the total area ofthe top, bottom, sides, and ends ofthe enclosure." The open area of Glasforms' 

wet area enclosures ranges from 4.4 to 3.4 percent ofthe total surface area. The proposed 

industry definition could define the allowable total open area more clearly to better reflect 

Glasforms design. In addition, the total open area calculations for Glasforms' wet area 

enclosures may have to be reexamined with regard to issues discussed in Section IV of this report 

(i.e., flexible brush coverings and open area displaced by the entering reinforcement). 

VI. Wet Area Enclosure Emission Data 

Emission testing at Glasforms at an air flow rate of approximately 200 feet per minute (to 

ensure capture of all emissions) and at a line speed not exceeding 18 inches per minute indicated 

that emissions from pultrusion lines with wet area enclosures were 21.8 pounds of hazardous air 

pollutants (HAP) per ton of neat resin. The resin that was used during the emission test had a 

HAP content of 43.7 percent. The HAP emission rate of 21.8 pounds per ton of resin used 

corresponds to an emission factor of 2.5 percent of available HAP. Emission testing at the same 

air flow rate, line speed, and resin HAP content indicated that emissions from pultrusion lines 

without wet area enclosures were 109.2 pounds of HAP per ton of neat resin. This emission rate 

corresponds to an emission factor of 12.5 percent of available HAP. For details relating to the 

emission calculations refer to Attachment V. The test report is contained in Attachment VI. 

3 
P.5 

Site Visit Report 

Glasforms, Inc. 

Page 4 

v n . Cost Information 

Mr. McQuarrie stated that the total annual maintenance costs were $755 for each large 

enclosure and $437 for each small enclosure. According to Mr. McQuarrie, the total construction 

costs were $765 for each large enclosure and $397 for each small enclosure. He indicated that at 

this facility there were no design costs for the enclosures, which may not be the case for other 

facilities. The detailed costs for constructing the large and the small enclosures are presented in 

Attachment I. 

VIII. Production and Operating Data 

The Binningham facility used 647 tons Of resin in 1996 with a weighted average HAP 

content of 46.7 percent. The San Jose facility used 399 tons of styrenated resin in 1996 with a 

weighted average HAP content of 46.2 percent. The San Jose facility also used 197 tons of nonstyrenated resin. The total amount of styrenated and non-styrenated resin at the San Jose facility 

was 596 tons in 1996 with a weighted average HAP content of 30.9 percent. The detailed resin 

usage data is shown in Attachment I. 

The products produced by Glasforms, Inc. include round rods, tubing, and flatbar. The 

line speed ranges from 12-48 inches per minute to 36 - 72 inches per minute. A pultrusion 

machine can produce up to 10 product streams at the same time. The product that was produced 

during the January 1994 source test in San Jose was 0.242 by 0.421 inch flatbar at a line speed 

between 12 and 30 inches per minute. The line speed during the emission test did not exceed 18 

inches per minute (see Attachment 1). 

IX. Other Emission Pointe 

The Birmingham and the San Jose facilities are both using acetone for cleaning purposes. 

The acetone usage for both facilities is presented in Attachment 1. Cleaners that contain HAP 

are not being used at either facility. 

Resin mixing at the Birmingham facility is conducted in a separate mixing room. The 

bulk resin is pumped from outside storage tanks into mixing vessels. Specialty resins that are 

received in 55 gallon drums are added manually into the mixing vessels. Any additional 

ingredients such as filler, catalyst, and pigment are added manually. The mixing vessels are 

covered except for a slot for the mixing shaft. The slot for the mixing shaft is covered by flexible 

brush coverings that surround the shaft. The mixing vessel cover has hinges that allow the front 

third ofthe cover to be lifted up to add ingredients. The mixing vessel cover is lifted only when 

ingredients are added to mixing vessel. 

H 
P.6 

Site Visit Report 

Glasforms, Inc. 

Page 5 

The resin batch is mixed for approximately two to five minutes to obtain a homogeneous 

mixture. The resin batch is checked for viscosity, gel time, and peak exotherm. After the mixing 

process is complete, the covered container is delivered to the pultrusion wet out tank. The 

covered resin batch is either pumped into the pultrusion wet out tank or a molasses valve is 

inserted through the wet area enclosure opening to accept the resin batch directly from the 

covered container. A new resin batch is prepared one to four times per shift per machine 

depending on the product being produced. 

5 
P.7 

Attachment I 

Information Provided During the Site Visit in Response to 

the Site Visit Questionnaire 

6 
P.8 

EXISTING SOURCE MACT 

FOR THE PULTRUSION PROCESS 

WET AREA ENCLOSURES 

DATE: January 15,1998 

TO: Madeleine L Strum, Ph.D. 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning Standards 

Emissions Standards Division 

MD-13 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

FROM: Terry S-McQuarrieOiY^ 

Glasforms, Inc. 

271 Barnard Ave. 

San Jose, CA 95125 

Attached please find the following information requested by Linda Herring in her 

correspondence of December 11,1997: 

Section 1: Wet Area Enclosure Measurements 

Section 2: Cost Information 

Section 3: Production and Operating Data 

Section 4. Other Emission Points 

7 
P.9 

Section I of Attachment 1 

The drawing ofthe wet area enclosure (for pultrusion lines with small baths) is contained in the CBI 

files. 

i 
P.10 

SURFACE AREA OF SMALL BATH COVERS 

OP: Width x the length. 

26.5" x 57*-a 1,510.5 sq-ins 

OTTOM: Same as top. 

26.5" x 57" = 1,510.5 sq-irts 

SIDES: Height x Length 

(14"x57")x2ea.= 1,596 sq-ins 

'JTTRANCE: Width x Height 

26.5" X14" =371 sq-ins 

DOT: Width x Height 

26.5" X14" =371 sq-ins 

'OTAL SURFACE AREA =5,359 sq-in 

TOTAL OPEN AREA OF SMALL BATH COVERS 

zNTRANCE OPEN AREA BETWEEN <c*WZ. **"* **TUf:OVER: 0.5" gap between 

he sides and top, with a 3" x 21" gap under the c^>JW 

(14" + 14" + 21") x 0.5" + (3"x 21") = 87.5 sq-ins 

OPEN AREA AT ENTRANCE OF c<T : 336 holes with a .312 diameter. 

(.312 x .312 x3.14x .25) x 336 = 25.68 sq-ins 

OPEN AREA ON BACK SIDE OF COVER USED TO ADD RESIN: 1 cut out 5.5" x 10" with 

flexible brush coverings. 

5.5" x 10" = 55 sq-ins if considered a opening 

OPEN AREA ON EXIT OF BATH COVER: Open area 4" high x 12" wide. This opening fits 

around the dies and resin drip tray. On a normal set up there is a 0.5" gap above the dies and 

a 2" x 2" open space on both sides of dies. 

(2"x2")X2 + ( 10" x 0.5") =13 sq-ins 

TOTAL OPEN AREA^81.18 sq-in 

TOTAL % of OPEN AREA: 181.18+ 5,359 = 3.4% 

°\ 
P.11 

SECTION 2 

COST INFORMATION 

This Section addresses the following requested issues: 

2.1 Capital cost for each wet area enclosure. 

2.2 Operating and maintenance costs for each wet area enclosure 

o 
P.12 

BATH COVER (LARGE) 

MATL & PRICE LIST 

C-BZE 

TOTAL COST $765.15 

AVERAGE ANNUAL MAINT 

£&JZ 

TOTAL COST $754 81 

\v 
P.13 

BATH COVER (SMALL) 

MATL.& PRICE LIST 

£-B31 

TOTAL COST $396.52 

AVFRAGF ANNUAI MAINT 

<L#J: 

TOTAL COST $436.55 

1/ 
P.M 

Section III (Production and Operating Data) of Attachment 1 is contained in the CBI Files 

\°) 
P.15 

SECTION 4 

OTHER EMISSION POINTS 

This Section address the following requested issues: 

4.1 .Amount and types of cleaners used. 

4.2 Description of the mixing process. 

W 
P.16 

ANNUAL SOLVENT USAGE 

1996 

LOCATION 

San Jose 

Birmingham 

SOLVENT 

Acetone 

Acetone 

QUANTITY, 

Lbs 

36,052 

34,272 

LBS/GAL 

6.49 

6.49 

TOTAL 

GALLONS 

5,555 

5,281 

\1 
P.17 

DESCRIPTION OF THE MIXING PROCESS 

1. Bulk resin is pumped (drum resin manually added) into a mbcing vessel. The 

mixing vessel is covered except for a slot for the mbcing shaft. 

2. Additional ingredients are manually added in the order specified on the batch 

sheet: i.e., filler, catalyst, pigment, etc. The mixing vessel cover is lifted only 

during the addition step. 

3. Resin batch is mixed until homogeneous; i.e., 2-5 minutes. 

4. Resin batch is checked for viscosity, gel time, and peak exotherm. 

5. The covered container is delivered to pultrusion wet out tank. 

6. The covered resin batch is either pumped into resin holding tank or the 

molasses valve is inserted through the wet enclosure opening to accept the resin 

batch. 

7. Process is repeated 1-4 times per shift per machine depending upon 

puilruded composite being processed. 

io 
P.18 

Attachment II 

26 Non-CBI Photos 

(Note: An additional 5 photos are contained in the CBI files) 

^ 
P.19 

\i> 
P.20 

W 
P.21 

nS 
•^rvv. p-,-nV7**L' -

'''-A •'-•'•

 i:S-tyt.ff\.-

'' '• . " :*#- ' S>-

P.22 

IK 
P.23 

If 
P.24 

* . * t \ '.'•• ' v • 

7^ 
P.25 

z\ 
:..^\ip.-^:f^^^|^|^p^^^;'>\r.r

.- -.'; i'--'* 

<t& 
P.27 

<lXo 
'••f^i.^j^:.i >••:,<- ->.^,:W-. ys>M&:sh 

1

 "WK \ .*" **•'•?• • • •• • 

P.28 

[ ; 

. #' • 

nA 
P.29 

<& 
P.30 

iA 
P.31 

^o 
P.32 

Attachment III is contained in the CBI files 

?>\ 
P.33 

Attachment IV 

Industry's Proposed Wet Area Enclosure Definition 

yu 
P.34 

- ^ V z^44? */?/***„ /TF" 

inc 

271 Barnard Avenue, San Jose, Califomia 9512S 

Fax (408)297-0601 Phone (408)297-9300 

Normal Delivery x 

Company: U.S. EPA 

Attention: Dr. Madeline L Strum 

From: Terry S. McQuarrie 

Urgent Delivery Confidential 

Fax#: (919)541-3470 

Date: November 24,1997 

Dear Madeline: 

Attached please find the check Ustfor wet area enclosures tor the MACT for existing 

•sources for pultrusion. This lias been reviewed by Tom Griffiths and myself. Afteryou 

have reviewed this Gst, please let me have a few proposed dates for your visit to the 

Glasforms faality in Birmingham, i look forward to our meeting in Binningham. 

cc: Tom Griffiths-Omega Pultrusions 

John Schwertzer-SPI 

Dave Evans-Creative Pultrusions 

Pages Including Cover: 

if you do not receive aff pages, please call us at (408) 297-9300. 

l?f> 
P-35 

NOV ZA. "*f ia\'lT>crvi eu-arw o xi**, . . 

* • 

tl ~ * 

WET AREA ENCLOSURES INDUSTRY PROPOSAL 

The source shall employ enclosures on all wet process areas when using open 

resin baths. Enclosures shall be designed and installed according to the 

following criteria: ' 

1. The enclosure shall cover the top, bottom, and sides ofthe open bath area in 

which reinforcements are wet out and are moving toward the dle(s). The ends of 

the enclosure shall be closed as much as prac&cat>with allowance for openings 

to enable the material to enter and exit the enclosure. 

1.1. The enclosure shall extend firom the fiber carding index to within 6 

Inches ofthe die entrance or Radio Frequency (RF) preheat unit 

1.2. The open areas on the enclosure ends shall not exceed 5% ofthe 

total area of the top, bottom, sides and ends of-the enclosure. 

1.3. The stock exiting the RF pre-heat unit, and Just prior to the die, does -

not require a cover. 

2. Resin drip off at the die entrance shall be allowed, but must be collected in a 

device that is covered and has no more than 1.0" clearance around the drip off. 

3. .Access panels, doors, hatches, or flexible curtains' shad be considered part of 

the enclosure. 

4. Ports fbr level control devices, monitoring devices, agitation shafts, fill hoses, 

etc.. shall have no more than 1.0" dearance. 

5. No fans, blowers or air lines shall be allowed within the enclosure. The 

enclosure shall not be ventilated. 

6. Procedures -shall be enforced and records kept to show that the enclosure is 

In place during operation. 

31 
P.36 

AttachmentV 

Emission Calculations 

^ 
P.37 

Emission Calculations Based on the 1994 Emission Test Data from the 

Glasforms Facility Located in San Jose, California 

Emission test data for wet area enclosure with two exhaust fans fapproximatelv 200 feet per 

minute of air flow: 

(A) Pounds of HAP Emissions per Ton of Resin Used 

1. Average HAP emission rate = 0.225 lbs/hr (Attachment VI, page 4). 

2. 3 hours of emissions per batch of resin at a line speed of 18 inches per minute at 0.22S 

lbs/hr = 0.675 Ibis HAP emitted per batch. (Based on Attachment 1, section 3, Table 

MCP-3 A, it took 3 hours to consume the resin batch. Resin use starts at 9:25 and 

continues until 12:25. At 13:00 the machine pulls dry glass.) 

3. Composition of the resin batch (Attachment VI, page 5): 

Component 

Resin A 

Resin B 

Added Styrene 

Other 

Total 

Amount (lbs) 

30 

28 

6 

13.72 

77.372 

HAP Content 

(% by weight) 

42.4 

33.1 

100 

0 

43.73* 

HAP (lbs) 

12.72 

9.27 

6.00 

0 

27.99 

Total HAP content ofthe neat resin plus any HAP added 

5. 

Total resin plus HAP = 64 lbs/77.372 lbs = 82.72% ofthe batch is resin plus added HAP. 

Actual weight of batch one which was used in the 3 hour period = 74.8 lbs 

(Attachment VI, Appendix D, page 1 ofthe computation notebook). 

74.8 lbs resin mix x 82.72% resin plus added .HAP = 61.87 lbs of resin plus added HAP. 

0.675 lbs HAP emitted per 61.87 lbs of resin plus added HAP = 21.82 lbs HAP emitted 

per ton of resin plus any HAP added. 

it 
P.38 

(B) Emissions in terms of Percent Available HAP 

1. HAP in the 77.372 lbs resin batch - 27.99 lbs. 

HAP in the 74.8 lbs resin batch = (74.8 lbs x 27.99 lbs)/77.372 lbs = 27.06 lbs 

2. 27.06 lbs of .HAP are used over a 3 hour period. 27.06 lbs/3 lirs = 9.02 lbs .HAP used per 

hour at a line speed of 18 inches per minute. 

3. 0.225 lbs HAP emitted per hour/9.02 lbs HAP used per hour = 2.49 % of available HAP 

emitted. 

Emission test data without wet area enclosure with two exhaust fans fapproximatelv 200 feet per 

mimtteof air flow; 

(A) Pounds of HAP Emissions per Ton of Resin Used 

1. Average HAP emission rate = 1.126 lbs/hr (Attachment VI, page 4). 

2. 61.87 lbs of resin plus added HAP are used in 3 hours at a line speed of 18 inches per 

minute during the emission test with the wet area enclosure and an air flow rate of 200 

feet per minute (see calculation step (A) 4 above). 

The emission test without the wet area enclosure and an air flow rate of 200 feet per 

minute was conducted at the same line speed (18 inches per minute) and for the same 

product as for the emission test with the wet area enclosure. Therefore, the hourly resin 

plus added HAP usage is the same in both cases and calculated as follows: 

61.87 lbs of resin plus added HAP/3 hours = 20.62 lbs of resin plus added HAP used per 

hour. 

3. 1.126 lbs HAP emitted per 20.62 lbs of resin plus IL\P = 109.21 lbs HAP emitted per ton 

of resin plus any HAP added. 

(B) Emissions in terms of Percent Available HAP 

1. 9.02 lbs HAP used per hour at a line speed of 18 inches per minute and for the same 

product as for the emission test with the wet area enclosure (see calculation step (B) 2 

above). 

2. 1.126 lbs .HAP emitted per hour/9.02 lbs HAP used per hour = 12.48 % of available HAP 

emitted. 

31 
P.39 

Attachment VI 

Non-CBI Version of Emission Test Report 

3* 
P.40 

//-f+-Zm&r*tt«T JU— 

INDUSTRY PROPOSAL: 

EXISTING SOURCE MACT FOR PULTRUSION 

PULTRUSION INDUSTRY COUNCIL 

COMPOSITES INSTITUTE 

OCTOBER 27,1997 
P.41 

INDUSTRY PROPOSAL 

EXISTING SOURCE MACT FOR PULTRUSION 

DATE: October 27,1997 

TO: Madeline L. Strum 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning Standards 

Emissions Standards Division 

MD-13 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

FROM: Pultrusion Industry Council 

Composites Institute 

Society ofthe Plastics Industry 

Attached please find the following Industry Proposal and supporting 

documentation for an Existing Source MACT for Pultrusion: 

1. Wet .Area Enclosures Industry Proposal 

2. Supporting Data 

3. Air Quality Management District Approvals 

4. Enforcement 

I IO 
P.42 

SECTION 1: WET AREA ENCLOSURES INDUSTRY PROPOSAL 

"Wet area endosures(induding resin bath covers)shall be designed to prevent 

the contact of free-flowing air with wet resin in order to reduce HAP emissions. 

The enclosure shall be designed to cover the top, bottom, and the sides ofthe 

area in which reinforcements are wet out, and are moving toward the die(s). The 

enclosure shail extend to the die entrance or radio frequency(RF) preheat unit; 

thus the enclosure covers all sides except the entrance. The entrance allows 

reinforcements) to enter the enclosure. Access panels, doors, hatches, or 

flexible curtains shall be considered part ofthe enclosure provided that they are 

designed to fit Ports for level controi devices, monitoring devices, agitation 

shafts, fill hoses, etc., shall have no more than 1.0" clearance. 

Resin drip off at the die entrance shail be allowed, but must be collected in a 

device that is covered and has no more than 1.0" clearance around the drip off". 

^ v 
P.43 

SECTION 2: SUPPORTING DATA 

Attached please find the following report commissioned by Glasforms, Inc. and 

prepared by CH2M Hill for the Bay .Area Mr Quality Management 

District(BAAQMD)in order to determine styrene emission factors for Title V 

applicability: 

Title V 

Styrene .Emission Factor Report 

Glasforms, Inc. 

271 Barnard Avenue 

San Jose, California 95125" 

Prepared by 

CH2MHm 

1111 Broadway, Suite 1200 

Oakland, California 94607-4046 

February, 1994 

V(l/ 
P.44 

Title V 

Styrene Emission Factor Report 

Glasforms, Inc. 

271 Barnard Avenue 

San Jose, California 95125 

Prepared by 

CH2MHILL 

1111 Broadway, Suite 1200 

Oakland, Califoniia 94607-4046 

February 1994 
Contents 

Page 

Summary ii 

Introduction 1 

Test Mediods and Results 2 

Emission Factor Calculations 4 

Appendix A. Source Test Plan 

Appendix B. Source Test Report Results 

Appendix C. Emission Factor Calculations 

Appendix D. Field Notes and .Material Safety Data Slieets 

\. 

i 

Tables 

Number 

1 Glasforms Title V Emission Factors iii 

2 Summary of Styrene Emission Rates 3 

3 . Average Emission Rates 4 

4 <£m--tzc Formula 5 

5 Styrene Emission Factors . ... . . . ..... . . . . .. . 6 

HI 
Summary 

This document presents the findings of the styrene emission factor study conducted at 

Glasforms, Incorporated, 271 Barnard Avenue, San Jose, Califonua. The puipose of 

this study was to determine Title V emission factors' in accordance with the 

requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 

Emission factors were developed for various operating and test condition scenarios to 

simulate actual operating conditions and conditions .specified by. the testing protocol.. 

Glasfonns manufactures fiberglass-reinforced products using the pultrusion process. In 

this process, continuous fiberglass strands axe drawn through a polyester resin bath. 

The polyester-resin-coated strands .are then drawn through a forming bushing and cured 

by an electrically heated die. Styrene, a component of the polyester resin, is emitted 

during this manufacturing process. 

To determine the emission factors, .styrene emission rates were monitored firom a 

single pultrusion line. This monitoring was accomplished by constructing tTemporaiy 

Total Enclosure (TTE) around fb& pultrusion Une and measuring the necessaiy 

parameters for emission factor calculations. These parameters include: TTE inlet and 

outiet air flow rates, TTE inlet and outlet styrene concentrations, and the polyester 

resin bath styrene weight Styrene inlet and outlet concentrations were measured at 

flow rate conditions ranging from namral draft (approximately 80 to 100 feet per 

minute) to forced air (approximately 150 to 200 feet per minute). 

By monitoring the styrene concentrations at given air flow rates, styrene emissions can 

be calculated in pound-per-hour rates. Emission rates varied from a low of 0.106 

pounds per hour to a high of 1.151 pounds per hour. The low rate was observed 

during covered natural-draft sampling conditions. The high rate was observed during 

uncovered high forced air (i.e., 200 feet per minute) conditions. 

Given the styrene emission rates, and knowing the weight of the styrene in the 

polyester resin, emission facton could be derived in terms of the styrene emission loss 

per total mass of the .styrene in the resin mixture. These factors, expressed as the 

percentage of styrene weight loss per mass of styrene in the resin mixture, are 

presented in expressions consistent with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

AP-42 Emission Factor Document, Section 4-12, Polyester Resin Plastic Product 

Fabrication. The factors observed in this^study ranged from 0.43 to 0.85*percent 

weight loss for covered conditions .and 1.05 to 4*0l for uncovered conditions. 

/Ms 

The results indicate that air flow directly influences emission rates. Specifically, 

styrene emissions increase as air flow increases. The conelation between increased 

volatile organic compound emissions with increased air flows is not unique or 

unexpected. Forced air was utilized during portions of this smdy to satisfy the TTE 

test protocol established by the EPA. 

if v*\o\ rftv\t<JJd(A _ . 

n 

'•A h 
At the EPA-specified TTE minimum air flow rate of 200 feet per minute, the 

volumetric air flow rate through iht TTE was approximately 4,000 cubic feet per 

minute. This high volumetric flow rate presents a condition that would not normally 

occur at this facility, and it generates emission rates that do not represent die nonnai 

operating conditions. The TTE test protocol is not source-specific, and, in this study, 

the use of forced air does not appear to be an appropriate parameter. 

Operation of the pultrusion line occun widiin an enclosed building, .and it is not 

exposed to direct forced air or exhaust ventilation impacts, which would increase 

evaporative loss rates and directly increase emission rates. Therefore, natural draft 

concentrations provide emission rates that correspond to actual operating conditions. 

Because the BAAQMD Title V program thresholds .are based on a facility's actual 

emissions,- natural draft testing conditions provide results that axe representative of 

actualemission rates and consistent with the B.AAQMD program. The 0.43 percent 

weight loss factor presents an emission factor for actual operating conditions and 

should be considered the appropriate factor for BAAQMD Title V applicability. 

The emission factors and corresponding test conditions are described in Table 1. 

. Table 1 

Glasforms Title V Emission Factors 

Test Condition Percent Weight Loss* 

Covered, 2 exhaust fansb \ >er 2.H 

Uncovered, 2 exhaust fans6 >©T 12.4G 

\ Covered, 1 exhaust fanc 0.85 no} nt*ifm.rtJ 

Covered, natural draft1 0.43 n*ln*\rt**+J 

Uncovered, natural draft? 1.05 »o\ sttrfiiutJ 

"Expressed as percentage of styrene emission loss per mass styrene monomer 

b

 Approximately 200 feet per minute 

'Approximately 150 feet per minute . ~* 

dApproximately 80 feet per minute 

'Approximately 100 feet per minute 

iu 

HV 
Introduction 

CH2M HILL was contracted by Glasforms, Inc., San Jose, Califomia, to provide 

assistance in determining styrene emission factors for Title V applicability. Under 

Title V, styrene is identified as a Hazardous Air PoUutant (HAP). Facilities that may 

emit greater than 10 tons per year of a single HAP axe subject to Title V. The 

BAAQMD interprets 10 tons of potential emissions as equal to 7 tons of actual 

emissions. 

Styrene emissions result from the operation of the facility's fiberglass pultrusion lines. 

Styrene is a component of the polyester resin that functions as the matrix for the 

fiberglass strands. The BAAQMD currently assumes a styrene factor of 5.5 percent 

styrene loss per mass of styrene monomer mput, based on data presented in EPA .AP42. 

In preparing for this report, a source test plan was developed and submitted to the 

BAAQMD for approval. Tte plan consisted of constructing a TTE in accordance wiui 

EPA guideUnes. Sampling mediods and analyses were conducted in accordance with 

BAAQMD methodology. The source test results were used to detennine styrene 

emission factora expressed in terms of percentage of stvrene loss per mass of styrene 

monomer input A copy of the BAAQMD approved test plan is included in 

Appendix A. 

V 
P.49 

Test Methods and Results 

Styrene emissions from the pultrusion line were measured using a gas/gas TTE. The 

TTE is a stmcture that encloses the pultrusion Une and provides for the capture of 

fugitive styrene emission losses. Inlet and outlet styrene concentrations were 

monitored using direct flame ionization detection (FID) instruments in accordance with 

BAAQMD Method ST-7. The results of the .FID provided real time total hydrocarbon 

analyses that were documented by strip chart recorders. -

Background contamination was monitored periodically at the inlet and outlet sample 

streams using an on-site gas chromatograph. No background contaminants were 

observed during the sampling. 

Sampling was conducted at several different air flow rates that were regulated through 

the combined operation and non-operation of two fans. .Air flow rates were altered to 

simulate high-air-velocity conditions and natural draft conditions. 

Sampling was conducted under the two different operating scenarios, as weU. The 

first scenario, with the polyester resin bath cover in place, provided momtoring 

conditions consistent with BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 50, Section 306, Polyester 

Resin Operations compliance. Section 306 requires that all polyester resin baths be 

covered to reduce volatile organic compound emissions. The second scenario, without 

the cover, was intended to provide data for future evaluations of styrene emission 

control efficiencies. 

All emission sampling was conducted on Januaiy 12,1994. The emissions, sampling 

was observed by representatives of the BAAQMD Pennit Services and Source Test 

Sections. A more detailed discussion of die test methods, field .sampling, and 

analytical data can be found in Appendix B. 

Given the styrene emission concentrations and air flow rates for the specific sampling 

periods, emission rates can be calculated and expressed in pounds of styrene emissions 

per hour of operation. The highest emission rates, 1.151 to 1.100 pounds per hour, 

were found when the cover was open and the air flow rates were high (approximately 

230 feet per minute). The lowest emission rates, 0.106 to 0.137 pounds per hour, 

were observed when the cover was down and air flow represented natural draft 

conditions (approximately 80 feet per minute). The emission rates are summarized in 

Table 2 on the foUowing page. 

i\<_ 
Test Condition 

Cover Closed 

Cover Closed 

Cover Closed 

Cover Open 

Cover Open 

Cover Closed 

Cover Closed 

Cover Closed 

Cover Open 

feet per minute 

••pounds per hour 

Table 2 

Summary of Styrene Emission Rates 

Sample Period 

(24 hr) 

1000 -1050 

1100 -1155 

1200 -1255 

1410 -1450 

1500 -1600 

1610 -1730 

1735 -1815 

1830-1930 

1935-2015 

-

Air Row Rate 

(FPM") 

190.6 

229.4 

225.7 

226.8 

233.2 

149.2 

80.9 

82.5 

108.2 

Emission Rate 

(lb/hr*) 

0.215 

0.261 

0.200 

1.151 

1.100 

0.239 

0.137 

0.106 

0.293 1 

4<\ 
Emission Factor Calculations 

Emission factor calculations were based on die test results and die styrene weight 

content of the polyester resin at the time of tbe .sampling. The actual emission 

calculations are presented ih Appendbc C. Glasform's field notes, MCP-2 Batch Sheet, 

resin suppUer certificates of analysis, and Material Safety Data Sheets are located in 

Appendix D. 

The foUowing steps were taken in the emission factor calculation: 

• Determine the average styrene emissions rates 

• Determine the styrene weight content of the polyester resin 

• Express the styrene emission factor in terms of percentage of 

styrene loss per mass of styrene monomer 

Average Styrene Emission Rate Determination 

Given tiie styrene emission rates ftom the test results, average hourly emission rates 

were calculated ftom multiple periods of similar sampUng conditions (e.g., air flow 

rate, cover open or closed, etc.). This procedure provided consistent average emission 

rates for .similar sampling conditions. The results of diis procedure .are found in 

Table 3. 

Table3 | 

Average Emission Rates 

test Condition ~ 

Covered, 2 exhaust fans 

Uncovered, 2 exhaust fans 

Covered, 1 fan 

Covered, natural draft 

| Uncovered, natural draft 

Average Emission Rate' 

(lbs/hr) ^ 

0.225 

1.126 

0.239 | 

0.122 

0.293 

•Where single data points exist, it was assumed that data represented tiie average 

emission rate. 

6° 
P.52 

Polyester Resin Styrene Content Detennination 

Glasfonns prepares polyester resin mixtures in accordance with specific formulas. 

These formulas include various combinations of polyester resins, additives, fillers, 

catalyst, and styrene. The formulas vary to conform with specific end-product uses 

and requirements. tC^jz: 

C$1 <-A-^zz was prepared in total batch weights of approximately 77 pounds. 

The two polyester resins used,* ^&zz: contained premixed amounts of 

styrene. Additional styrene was added in amounts .specified by the formula. The total 

weight of the .styrene per 77 pound batch was approximately 28 pounds. That amount 

equates to a .styrene content of approximately 36 percent. The 

formula is presented in Table 4 below. ~%>jr 

6 

d 

d 

Table 4 

Formula 

tt Component 

/{mC*t>j A 

.Amount 

30 

28 

Units 

lb 

lb 

Amount 

Obs) 

30 

28 

Styrene 

Content 

(% by weight) 

42.4 

33.1 

| lb | 6 100 

Approximate Batch Weight 77.4 pounds 

Approximate Styrene Weight 28.0 pounds 

Styrene 

Weight 

Obs) 

12.72 

9.27 

6.00 

Percent Styrene Content 36 percent Cm cl« d'-j fig* - UJPm*f*mt--*s) 

6\ 
P.53 

Emission Factor Determination 

Once the average styrene emission rates and polyester resin styrene weight content 

were known, emission factors were calculated for each specific test condition. 

Consistent with the EPA emission factor expression format, the factors were calculated 

in terms of percentage of .styrene loss per mass of styrene monomer. This calculation 

was completed by dividing each styiene emission factor by the total styrene weight of 

the polyester resin. Table 5 presents the resultant emission factors. 

Table 5 

Styrene Emission Factors 

Test Condition 

Covered, 2 exhaust fans* 

Uncovered, 2 exhaust fans" 

| Covered, 1 exhaust fan' 

J Covered, natural draft1 

1 Uncovered, natural draft0 

Percent Weight Loss* | 

Q«8r 2 . / * | 

£02* 12.+V I 

0.85 /j#/*/«'^ V 1 

0.43 not tnftvfcf \ 

1.05 #*/ rttrltvfcf \ 

"Expressed as percentage of styrene emission loss per mass styrene monomer 

"Approximately 200 feet per minute 

'Approximately 150 feet per minute 

'Approximately 80 feet per minute 

'Approximately 100 feet per minute -

> 
P.54 

APPENDIX A 

P: 
P.55 

Engineers 

Pbm&s 

Economists 

Scientists 

Oaober 7, 1993 

SF036368.AQ 

Bay Area Air Quality Management District 

939 Ellis Street 

San Francisco, CaUfornia 94109 

Attention: Mr. Gary Fend 

\ 

Dear Gary: ' 

Subject: Approval of Source Test Plan, Glasforms, Inc., San Jose, CA 

Reference: BAAQMD Plant Number 6164 

CH2M HILL and our subcontractor, DaRos Associates, have been contracted by 

Glasfonns, Inc., San Jose, California, to assist in the development of a styrene emission 

factor. This emission factor wfll aid in evaluating the applicability of the Tide V Permit 

requirements (Proposed Regulation 2, Rule 5). Mr. Alex Saschin recommended that 

Glasforms source test a continuous pultrusion process machine to determine a facility 

specific emission factor. As a result, CH2M HELL prqpared a source test plan based upon 

Mr. Saschin's recommendation. 

Attached please find a copy of the proposed .source test plan for your review and approval. 

As we briefly discussed on Tuesday, October 5, 1993, the test methodologies are based 

upon the use of the total temporaiy enclosure EPA guidance document in conjunction wiui 

BAAQMD Method ST-7. 

We .are confident that this plan wfll satisfy your .requirements. Should there be any 

questions or comments please feel free to contact either myself at (916) 920-0212 extension 

or Bruce DaRos at (408) 864-5998. In the event that we are unable to resolve issues- which 

may delay approval of the plan, we are more than willing to discuss any concerns at our 

meeting which is tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, October 13,1993. 

Socramento Office 3840 Jtash Court. Suite 110 L M 9169200300 

Sacramento. CA9S834-1644 ) 5H \ Fa* No. 916 9204463 
P.56 

Bay Area Air Quality Management District 

Page 2 

October 7,1993 

SF036368.AQ 

Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. We look forward to your approval of die 

proposed test plan. 

Sincerely, 

CH2MHILL 

yaSigjA.SLilrDavid A. Omoto 

Air Quality Specialist 

DAO/dao/ 

cc: AlexSaschin/BAAQMD 

Terry McQuarrie/Glasforms 

Brace DaRos/DaRos .Associates 

Joel Refeman/CH2M .HILL 
P.57 

SOURCE TEST PLAN TO DETERMINE STYRENE EMISSION FACTOR FOR A 

CONTINUOUS PULTRUSION PROCESSES LOCATED AT GLASFORMS, INC, 

SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 

PURPOSE 

The purpose of the testing is to detennine an emission factor for styrene from 

continuous pultrusion processes. The pultrusion process equipment is operated by 

Glasfonns, bic (Glasfonns), and is located at 271 Barnard Avenue, San Jose, California. 

PROCESS DESCRIPTION 

Pultrusion is a fabricating process, which can be thought of as extrusion by pulling, 

that is used to produce continuous cross-sectional lineals similar to those made by 

extruding metals such as aluminum: Some examples of pultruded products are: electrical 

insulation materials, ladders, walkway gratings, and structural materials. 

In panicuiar, the Glasfonns process uses continuous fiber reinforcement (fiberglass) 

drawn through a polyester resin bath to coat each fiber with a specially formulated 

thermosetting resin mixture. The coated fiber is .assembled by a forming guide and then 

drawn through an electrically heated die. Cure of the thermosetting resin is initiated by 

heat in the die and an organic peroxide catalyst in the .resin mix. Tne rate of reaction is 

controlled by heating the die. The .resulting pultruded product is cut to length and ready 

for use as it leaves the machine. The Glasforms process uses a resin consisting primarily of 

basic polyester resin, styrene, filler, and catalyst. Depending upon the formulation needed, 

styrene concentration can vary between 28.6 percent to 50 percent by weight Copies of 

Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) "representative" of the constituent materials typicaUy 

used by Glasforms are attached. 

yiETHODS 

The foUowing test plan methods are proposed: 

Fugitive and point source emissions of styrene from the pultrusion process 

equipment wfll be measured using a Total Temporaiy Enclosure (TTE) as described in the 

document, The Measurement Solution: Using a Temporary Total Enclosure for Capture 

Efficiency Testing EPA-450/4-91-020, in conjunction with * Bay Area Air QuaUty 

Management District (BAAQMD) Method ST-7, described in the BAAQMD Manual of 

Procedures, which uses direct Flame Ionization Detectors (FED). -

1. A TTE structure wfll be constructed that encloses: (1) a portion of the area after the 

entry of the fiberglass (prior to the resin coating reservoir), (2) the resin reservoir, and 

(3) the forming guide. The TTE structure will be fabricated from 4 mil flame 

.SAQSFO3«368/001.WPS 10/93 y, 
P^8_ 

CH2M HDLL/GLASFORMS - OCTOBER 4,1993 

RE: SOURCE TEST PLAN TO DETERMINE A STYRENE EMISSION FACTOR 

FOR A PULTRUSION PROCESS LOCATED AT GLASFORMS, INC, SAN 

JOSE, CALIFORNIA 

retara'ant polyethylene plastic film supported on existing structures and additional 

framing as required. One side of the TTE will utilize an existing concrete wall 

adjacent the process equipment. Seams and attachment of the plastic film to supports 

wfll be made using duct tape The TTE will be rectangular in shape with one Natural 

Draft Opening (NDO) and one exhaust. Ambient air wfll be moved through the TTE 

using appropriately sized blowers or fans to achieve a face velodty of not less than 

.200 feet per minute 

Average face velocity tests for the TTE will be made using a Davis Instruments 

mechanical vane anemometer and checked with a Kurz, Model 440, hot-wire air fiow 

meter per the method protocol. .Air fiow measurements that are required at any other 

ducts or source points will be made using BAAQMD Methods 17 and 18. 

2. Tbe TTE inlet and outlet Volatile Organic Carbon (VOC) concentrations will be 

measured simultaneously using two (2) Bechman, Model 400, Total Hydrocarbon 

(THC) .Analyzers employing direct FIDs. Both- .analyzers wfll be operated using 

100 percent hydrogen fueL Sample gases will be coUected at the TTE inlet and. outlet 

using a .stainless steel or Teflon raked probe. The raked probes wfll be configured 

onsite and will at a minimum consist of four. (4) .sample points arranged to collect an 

equal portion of sample gases from each location and combine them into one 

composite sample stream foi\ analysis. The composite sample gases wfll be transported 

to each analyzer via unheated Teflon sampling lines with no further sample 

conditioning. Analyzers wfll be placed as close to the process as feasible to minimize 

the length of the sample line needed. 

3. Calibration ofthe THC analyzers will be accomplished with field-prepared standards of 

styrene in zero air contained in new Tedlar bags. 

4. Each test nm will be four (4) hours long and will be performed .as follows: 

4a. The sampling system wfll be leak checked prior to start-up and at the completion of 

the test day. Additional leak checks wfll be performed on an "as needed" basis 

foUowing any disruption or upset to the sampling system. 

4b. The THC analyzers will be wanned up, zeroed, and calibrated with styrene in air 

standards (typically 5-50 parts per milUon by volume). 

4c The test wfll begin by collecting VOC data continuously on standard fiat bed strip-chart 

recorders. Calibrations wfll be repeated at two (2) hour intervals. 

SAC/5FO3W8/00LWP5 10/93 $1 
P.59 

CH2M HILL/GLASFOHMS - OCTOBER 4,1993 

RE: SOURCE TEST PLAN TO DETERMINE A STYRENE EMISSION FACTOR 

FOR A PULTRUSION PROCESS LOCATED AT GLASFORMS, INC, SAN 

JOSE, CALIFORNIA 

4d. At least once during the testing, caUbration gas will be introduced into the inlet of the 

sampling Une. This procedure will be compared to the usual caUbration to determine 

Une losses. 

4e. TTE volumetric flow rate wfll be measured each hour. This will be accomplished by 

measuring the linear velocity of the air at the inlets and exhaust locations. The exact 

measurement locations wfll determined using the method protocol. The average linear 

velocity wfll be multipUed by the cross sectional area to give the volumetric flow rate in 

cubic feet per minute. Hourly values wfll be used for final data reduction. 

4f. Data reduction will be as foUows: 

VOC data from the strip-charts wfll be integrated an averaged for five (5) minute 

intervals. These readings will be averaged into one (1) hour values. Mass stvrene 

emissions wfll be calculated as the sum of afl measured emission point concentrations 

conected for background VOCs based on the volumetric flowrate determined during 

the same period. 

5. The amount of resin during the test period wfll be detennined gravimetrically. 

Specifically, Glasfonns wfll use a OSE WS 900-IS Industrial Parts Counting Meter wfll 

be used to formulate resin mixtures. According to the manufacturer, this balance is 

capable of 0.1 pound resolution and was recently calibrated on August 14,1993. Prior 

to initiation of the. emission monitoring tests, the pultrusion machine to be tested wfll 

be cleaned and prepared for a new batch of resin. The resin reservoir wfll be tared 

prior to the addition of the new resin mixture. The resin mixture will be delivered to 

the reservoir in covered five (5) gallon pails that have been also been tared to obtain 

an initial weight The resin mixture and pails wfll be reweighed to detennine resin 

"hang-up" after charging the reservoir. Upon completion of the test period, the 

reservoir wfll be weighed to detennine the weight of any unused resin mixture. The 

net usage of resin during the test period will then be calculated by determining the 

amount of resin delivered to the reservoir less the weight of the unused resin in the 

reservoir. Net usage for a four (4) hour test is estimated to be approximately fifty (50) 

pounds. 

6. An emission factor for styrene wfll be calculated on a weight percent basis for styrene 

emitted per pound of styrene in the resin mixture. 

7. FoUowing the completion of the field tests, a final report will be completed. The 

report will include a full description of all test methods, equipment used (including aU 

appropriate calibration data); summary of results; pertinent drawings, figures, and 

photographs (if available); process parameters; and copies of all raw data and field 

notes. 

SAQSP036368/M1.WPS 10/93 ^ 5* 
P.60 

\ 

APPENDIX B 

5T.. 
P.61 

DaRos Associates 

CONSULTANTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ANO R1SKASSESSM.ENT 

7013 Realm Otto • Suite F 

pSanJoM.Cafifbmia 9S119 

February 8, 1994 ' 

CH2MHXU. 

3840 Rosin Court 

Suite UO 

Sacramento, California 95834-1644 

ATXEHTXOM: David A. Omoto 

Air Quality specialist 

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT - Styrene Emissions from a Continuous Fiber Pulttuaion 

Process 

Dear Mr. Oroto: 

This report presents tbe .results of emissions .monitoring a-easureoents to 

determine styrene (Vinyl benzene) emissions froa a continuous fi.ber .pultrusion 

process .located at Glasforms, Inc.# (Glasforms), 271 Barnard Avenue, San Jose, 

California. Tha following .sections* provide an overview of the test progran, a 

brief rilnraif-mlon of the -sampling and analysis methods, and results. Presented in 

the appendix axe all raw field-{lata, a -description of tbe quality control/quality 

assurance program applicable to this task, and saaple calculations which show how 

tbe results were derived from the data. 

Test Program Overview 

Fugitive emissions of styrene, a Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), from a 

pultrusion process equipment line were measured using a gas/gas Total Temporary 

Enclosure (TIB) as described in the document, The Measurement Solution: Psinq A 

Temporary Total Enclosure for Capture Efficiency Testing, EPA-450/4-91-020. The 

purpose of the TXS was te completely encapsulate the pultrusion equipment and 

capture any VOC's to allow for accurate measurement of the process VOC H— < w w 

rate. Ventilation of the TTE was attained using two explosion proof, air powered, 

sixteen (16) inch diameter variable speed fans. Styrene concentrations were 

continuously measured at the inlet and outlet of the TIE using Bay Area Air. 

Quality Management District (BAAQKD), Method ST-7, described in the BAAQMD Manual 

of Procedures. This method utilise* direct flame ionization detection instruments 

calibrated with known concentrations of a VOC in air. Additionally, to determine 

potential background contamination from acetone, which is used at the faciUty 

as a'permitted clean-up solvent for epoxy resin lines, the inlet and outlet 

sanple streams were periodically analyzed using an on-site gas chromatograph to 

speciate acetone and styrene. 

Page 1 of 10 

(oQ 
DaRos Assoc^tes/CH2M H.ILL - January 31, 1994 

RB: Styrene Emissions from a Continuous Fiber Pultrusion Process 

PAOE: 2 of 10 

All testing was conducted on January 12, 1994 during operation of the 

pultrusion equipment by Glasforms personnel. Mr. Terry S. McQuarrie and Mr. Ken 

E. Bass, Glasforms, provided process data and coordination of testing activities. 

Testing was performed by Mr. Bruce C. DaRos, DaRos Associates and Mr. Mark Chips. 

Testing was observed at various stages by Mr. Gary Fend and Mr. Alex Saschin, 

BAAQMD. Mr. David A. Omoto and Ms. Tanya Canp of CH2M HILL were also present to 

observe tbe testing. 

Total Temporary Enclosure 

A TIE consisting of two Natural Draft Openings (NDO), designated the inlet 

and outlet, was constructed on.the day prior to testing. The inlet NDO 

incorporated an existing man door leading to the outside of the building that was 

located in close proximity to the process equipment. The outlet NDO opening was 

constructed as part of the TIE and incorporated a transition section to enhance 

face velocity air flow measurements. The geometric configuration and opening 

areas of inlet and outlet NDO's were identical. Figure 1 presents a floorplan 

diagraa of the TIE constructed for these tests. 

Specifically, the TTE structure was fabricated using heavy wall PVC 

tubing/fittings as framing and covered with 4 mil flame retardant polyethylene 

sheeting, lhe structure was framed in such a manner to be self supporting, and 

all seams and abutments were sealed using duct tape. Per Method 204, Criteria for 

and Verification of a Permanent of Temporary Total Enclosure (contained ln the 

TTE method guidelines previously referenced), specific minimum criteria for 

construction and operation of a TIE were implemented to ensure an adequate 

enclosure for these tests. Table 1 presents a list of these criteria vs. the 

actual TTE configuration and -test findings. Supporting calculations are presented 

in the appendix to this report. 

Sampling/Measurement Locations 

Emission sampling and air flow measurements were conducted at the inlet and 

outlet NDO's of the TTE. All measurements were made at a sample/traverse point 

located at the centroid of four equal areas of the NDO cross-section per United 

States Environmental Protection Agency Method 1 (40 CFR, Part 60). 

Face Velocity/Volumetric Flowrate 

Face velocities (FV) at the TIE openings were measured using a Davis 

Instruments Manufacturing Company vane anemometer and/or an Alnor, Model 8565, 

Conpuflow TberaoAnemometer. These measurements were conducted to verify that the 

inlet and outlet NDO FV's were consistent with the TTE operating criteria during 

the test period. Xntercomparrison of measurements collected during operation of 

the TTE from both instruments showed close agreement. The direction of flow was 

verified using the vane anemometer and with the use of smoke tracer tubes at 

various times during the tests. FV measurements were made by taking four minute 

flow readings at the previously described NDO traverse points. A digital 

stopwatch was used to time the flow measurements. 

0( 

sf 
P.63 

sryssss: e ; saws .M- «— 

PAGE: 3 of 10 

Gp£ 

* ^ Inc., San Jose, California 

? 
,P-64 , 

.DaRos Assoclates/CH2M HI.LL - January 31, 1995 

RE: Styrene Emissions from a Continuous Fiber Pultrusion Process 

PAGE: 4 of 10 

Table 1: Temporary Total Enclosure Construction Criteria vs. Actual Test 

Conditions 

Condition 1: Any NDO shall be at least 4 equivalent diameters from each VOC 

emitting point. 

Actual Test Condition: Based on an equivalent NDO duct diameter of 5.1 feet, the 

VOC source is"approximately 3.5 and 3.7 equivalent duct 

diameters respectively from the inlet and outlet NDO 

openings. These distances do not meet the criteria. lhey 

were the maximum achievable distances with regard to 

constraints posed within the facility for construction of 

the TTE. Based on the test data and observations, thorough 

mixing of fugitive VOC's was achieved and there is not 

inpact to the test data. 

Condition 2: Any exhaust point from the enclosure shall be at least 4 equivalent 

duct or hood diameters from each NDO. 

Actual Test Condition: Not appUcable to this enclosure because there are no 

active exhaust points. 

Condition 3: The total area of a U NDO's shall not exceed 5% of the surface area 

of the enclosure's walls, floor, and ceiling. 

Actual Test Condition: Based on a total NDO area of 40.6 ft2(1), and a. total 

enclosure surface area of 1600 ft2, the NDO is 

approximately 2.5% of tbe surface area and therefore meets 

the criteria. 

Condition 4: The average Face Velocity (FV) of air through all NDO's shall be at 

least 200 ft/mlh(n. The Direction of air through a U NDO's shall 

be into the enclosure. 

Actual Test Condition: Test measurements were conducted at different operating 

FV's through the TTE, some of which were intentionally 

below the prescriEed FV criteria. Two test scenarios were 

conducted at the prescribed FV (reference Table 2) . Air 

velocity measurements made during the tests indicated the 

direction to be inward at all times during operation of 

one or more ventilation fans. In addition, smoke tracer 

tubes were used to visually verify flow direction. Some 

backflow was noted hovever during the natural draft tests 

when both fans were shutdown. 

1 ft2 = square feet 

2 ft/min = feet per minute 

£3 

Ct> 
P.65 

PAGE: 5 of 10 

« . 1 <=o«tin,*d>. T-^«T « * •--« • Construction Criteria v,. **u* 

*

w N Test Conditions 

^ A Endows whose areas are not included as NDO's 

routine operation of the process. 

Actual Test Condition: Not applicable to this enclosure. 

<W ° 
P.66 

DaRos Associates/CH2M HILL - January 31, 1994 

RE: Styrene Emissions from a Continuous Fiber Pultrusion Process 

PAGE: 6 of 10 

Ambient temperature and relative humidity conditions in the TTE were 

monitored/determined from dry and wet bulb thermometer readings using a Bendix, 

"Psychron," Electric Psychrometer. Dry bulb temperatures were also monitored 

using a type K thermocouple and Omega, Series 872, Digital Thermometer as a cross 

reference. Measurements were made near the outlet NDO. Generally, readings were 

recorded every half hour during the test period. Theae measurements were not used 

as part of the data reduction for this report; however, they are presented to 

document TTE operating conditions. 

Volumetric flowrate calculations are based on the average one-hour FV 

measurements during the test period and do not include any corrections for 

moisture. Barometric pressure was obtained from the San Jose International 

Airport. Table 2 presents a summary of the ambient conditions, FV measurements, 

and volumetric flowrates. Copies of the field data sheets and associated 

calculations are presented in the appendix to this report. 

Emission Monitoring 

A U emission sanpling and analysis was done ln accordance with procedures 

and methodology described In BAAQMD Method ST-7. Continuous samples were 

coUected at tbe Inlet and outlet NDO's of the TTE using raked teflon probes 

consisting of four inlets each which combined the samples into one composite 

stream. Bach of the raked probes was located as described in . the 

Sampling/Measurement Locations section of this report. Each of the composited gas 

samples was transported to the respective analyzer via non-heated teflon tubing 

and discrete, teflon coated, diaphragm vacuum pumps. 

Tbe VCC concentration of the sampled gases were measured simultaneously 

using two Beckman, Model 400, Total Hydrocarbon (THC) analyzers employing direct 

Flame Ionization Detectors (FID). Both analyzers were operated using 100% 

hydrogen fuel. Tbe analyzers were zeroed using ultrapure air, and calibrated 

using a •/- 1% National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) traceable 

gas mixture of styrene in ultrapure air. The analyzers were zeroed and calibrated 

by admitting the appropriate standard into the sampling system via the raked 

probes using new 40 Ute r (L) tedlar bags containing the appropriate span gas. 

This method of calibration takes into account any losses that may be attributable 

to the sampling system. A description of the THC analyzer specifications is 

presented in the appendix to this report. 

Real time THC analyzer output was recorded on standard flat bed strip-chart 

recorders. .Copies of the analyzer strip charts, chart data reduction, and 

calibration gas certificate are presented in the appendix to this report. 

4 ^ 

s 
P.67 

DaRos Assoolates/CH2M HILL - January 31, 1994 

RE: Styrene Emissions from a Continuous Fiber Pultrusion Process 

PAGE: 7 of 10 

Table 2. Total Temporary Enclosure Operating Parameters 

TIME DBT1 WBT3 RH* Inlet FV* Outlet FV Avg. Volumetric 

(24 Hr.) ("T2) (°P> (%?) (FPM7) (FPM) Flowrate1 (CFtf) 

0800 NOTE: Fans Nos. 1 and 2 operational 

47 42 66 -

0830 49 43 61 -

0900 49 44 67 -

O920 NOTE: Pour first batch of resin mixture into process eguipment 

0930 51 45 62 

1000 NOTE: Process stable with cover down 

55 48 59 

1005 - . - 197.5 

1010 -

1025 

1030 54 47 59 

1035 NOTE: FV measured over resin bath is 117 FPM 

1045 - 165 

1050 -

210 

213 

(Avg. HV « 190.6) 

167.5 3,868 

1100 

1115 

1120 

1130 

1150 

1155 

1200 

1230 

1250 

1255 

1300* 

57 

-

-

59 

-

-

59 

60 

-

m» 

60 

49 

•^ 

•^ 

49 

^ 

-

49 

50 

-

• •• • -

50 

55 

-

-

\

4 7 

— 

47 

48 

-

. .. mm. 

48 

230 

225. 

233.8 

(Avg. EV - 229.4) 

228.8 4,656 

221.3 

230 (Avg. £t/ » 225.7) 

4,581 

1330 63 50.5 37 - - • 

J.400 NOTE: Pour second batch of resin mixture into process equipment 

63 50.5 37 - (Est. FV « 226) 

1405 NOTE: FV measured over uncovered resin bath cover is 120 FPM 4,587 

aDBT 

top s 

HJBT 

*RH ' 

« % « 

*FV i 

7FPM 

Dry Bulb Temperature 

degrees Fahrenheit 

Vet bulb- Temperature 

Relative Humidity 

Percent 

Face Velocity 

Feet per Minute 

flowrate based on average of inle t and outlet FV measurements for test period, 

typicaUy 1-hour 

'CFM a Cubic Feet per Minute 

U cv 
DaRos Assoclates/CH2M HILL - January 31, 1994 

RE: Styrene Emissions from a Continuous Fiber Pultrusion Process 

PAGE: 8 of 10 

Table 2 (continued). Total Temporary Enclosure Operating Parameters 

TIME DBT1 WBT3 RH4 Inlet FV6 

(24 Hr.) («T2) (*F) (%*) (PPM7) 

Outlet FV Avg. Volumetric 

(FPM) Flowrate1 (CFM9) 

1410 NOTE: Process stable with cover open 

1415 240 

1430 

1445 

1450 

63 50.5 37 

224 

230 

213 (Avg. FV * 226.8) 

4,603 

1500 

1530 

1550 

1555 

1600 

64 

64 

64 

52 

52 

52 

42 

42 

42 

236.3 

230 (Avg. FV « 233.2) 

4,733 

1610 NOTE: Cover down 

1620 NOTE: Fan No. 1 operational, Fan No. 2 shut-down 

1625 - 143.8 

1630 64 52 42 

1635 - 140 

1640 NOTE: FV measured over resin bath cover is 99 FPM 

1725 - 163.8 (Avg. FV - 149.2) 

1730 62 - x - - - 3,028 

1735 NOTE: All fans shut-down [natural draft ventilation only] 

- 77 

1800 58 50 56 -

1805 NOTE: Pour third batch of resin into process equipment 

- - - - 103.8 

1810 - 62.8 (Avg. FV « 80.9) 

1815 NOTE: FV measured over resin bath cover is 5-20 FPM 1,642 

1830 

1850 

1855 

1900 

1930 

59 . 

-

-

60 

57 

50 

-

-

51 

49 

52 

-

-

53 

55 

87.5 

77.5 

(Avg. FV • 82.5) 

1,674 

1935 NOTE: Process stable with cover open 

- - - 100 109 

1940 - - - 123 

1945 - 100 

2000 56 48 55 -

2005 96 

2010 - 121 (Avg. FV « 108.2) 

2015 NOTE: FV measured over resin bath cover is 5-20 FPM 2,196 

£7 a 
P.69 

TUZ£%S K ". saw* —— *~"s 

PAGE: 9 of 10 

Table 3. Summary of Styrene Emissions 

Time Period 

(24 hour) 

Volumetric 

Flowrate, 

(CFM1) 

INLET 

conc.2, Rate* 

(PPMv3) (lbs/Hr*) 

OUTLET 

conc., Rate, •?••*£ . 

(PPMv) (lbs/Hr) Rate, (lbs, 

Cover Down, TIE5 FV»* 190.6 FEM7 

"iOOO - 1050 3,868 0.66 

Cover Down, TIE FV« 229.4 FK4 

1100 - U55 4,656 0-49 

Cover Down, TIE FV - 225.7 ISM 

1200-1255 4,581 0.51 

0.044 

0.04 

0.041 

3.85 

3.74 

3.02 

• - -**2-*n5S' """eft

 m Si * TM« 

1300 - 1405 4,587 «•»•* 

Cover Open, TTE FV-^226.8 FPM 

1410 - 1450 4,603 0-8-5 

Cover Open, TIE FV « 233.2 FBI 

15O0 ^1600 4,733 0.64 

Cover Down, TIB FV - 149.2 FPM 

1610 - 1730 3,028 *-01 

Cover Down, TIE FV - 80.9 FPM 

1735 - 1815 1,642 1-82 

Cover Down, TIE FV« 82.5 FPM 

1830-1930 1,674 1.32 

Cover Open, TTE FV - 108.2 FPM 

1935 - 2015 2,196 0.6 

0.068 

0.053.. 

0.053 

0.052 

0.038 

0.023 

15.22 

14.0 

5.54 

6.63 

4.94 

8.27 

0.259 

0.301 

0.241 

0.686 

1.219 

1.153 

0.292 

0.189 

0.144 

0.316 

0.215 

0.261 

0.2 

0.619 

1.151 

1.1 

0.239 

0.137 

0.106 

0.293 

*CFM « 

2

conc.

 s 

'PPMV a 

4lbs/Hr » 

5TTE a 

Spy « 

7FPM a 

Cubic Feet per Minute 

concentration 

Parts per MilUon, volume 

pounds per hour 

Total Temporary Enclosure 

Face Velocity 

Feet per Minute 

c? 

Ci~ 
P.70 

DaRos Associates/CH2M BILL - January 31, 1994 

RE: Styrene Emissions from a Continuous Fiber Pultrusion Process 

PAGE: 10 of 10 

To determine the presence of acetone vapors in the inlet and outlet sampled 

gas streams, grab samples were coUected and analyzed using a Hewlett-Packard 

(HP), Model 5890, Gas Chromatograph (GC). Five cubic centimeter aliquots of each 

of the composited sample streams were injected onto the GC and separated using 

a six foot by 1/8 .inch glass column packed with 1% SP-1000 on Carbopak, 80/100 

mesh. The chromatogram was obtained using an isothermal program at 225 degrees 

Centigrade at 30 cc/minute nitrogen carrier gas through the column with component 

detection by FID with hydrogen fuel-The GC was calibrated using standards of 

acetone and styrene prepared on-site ln new 40 L tedlar bags f lUed with a known 

volume of ultrapure air as well as the NIST traceable styrene ln air gas mixture. 

Chromatographic data was recorded using a HP 3393A Reporting Integrator. Copies 

of the raw data are presented In the appendix to this report. 

Test Results 

Table 3 presents a summary .of the styrene emission test results. The 

styrene emission rate was calculated by subtracting the inlet mass rate, or 

background VOC, from the outlet mass rate to arrive at a corrected hourly rate. 

Gas chromatography results of samples coUected to determine background 

concentrations of potential acetone interference indicated insignificant levels 

and were not used to correct any of the data. Copies of the date, data reduction, 

a sanple calculation showing how the results were derived, and proces data 

suppUed by Glasforms are presented in the appendix to this report. 

If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not 

hesitate to contact me at (408) 864-5998. 

Sincerely, 

^v— 1 2 

Bruce C. DaRos 

Principal 

Enclosures 

FILE D16::40130CH2.WP 

<o°> Of-
P.71 

DaRos ^aUmtmiam HILL - ^SL^^S^ m Process 

RE: Styrene Emissions from a Continwu 

PAGE: Append^ 

APPENDIX 

70 
P.72 

DaRos .Assoc.Lates/CB2M BILL - January 31, 1994 

RE: Stvrene Emissions froa a Continuous Pultrusion Process 

PAK : Appendix 

QUALITY ASSURANCE/ptJALm CONTROL 

Quality Assurance/Quality Control was maintained as follows during the 

conduct of emission testing and data reduction: 

1. All portions of the sampling system which contact the sample, zero, or span 

gases are TeflonTM, TedlarTM, PyrexTM, stainless steel, quartz, or platinum. 

2. AU sampling equipment is properly maintained and calibrated and was cleaned 

prior to testing. 

3. The sampi ing equipment was leak checked prior to the initiation of testing and 

a t the completion of the tests. Additional leak tests were performed on an 'as 

needed' basis following any disruption or upset to the sampling system. 

4. The sampling system was zeroed and spanned before and after each test run to 

determine instrument drift. 

5. Any drift detected after tbe initia l calibration was recorded and used to 

correct the data. 

6. -Where possible, stratification checks were performed to-determine if 

stratification of the stack gases exists. Generally, thorough mixing was 

evident at aU sampling locations. 

7. Only the highest purity reagents and known standards were used. 

K ^ 
P.73 

DaRos A8SOclates/CH2M HILL - January 31 , 1994 

RE: Styrene Emissions from a Continuous Pultrusion Process 

PAOE: Appendix 

SPECIFICATIONS OF CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS MONITORING ANALYZERS FOR EMISSIONS 

ANALYSIS 

ANALYTE: 

ANALYZER MANUFACTURER: 

MODEL: 

.PRINCIPLE OF DETECTION: 

RANGES OF DETECTION: 

•SENSITIVITY: 

NOISE LEVEL: 

PRECISION: 

RESPONSE TIME (O - 90V): 

PRECISION: 

OPEMTINO'TEMPERATURE RANGE: 

AMBIENT HUMIDITY LIMITS: 

ZERO DRIFT: 

SPAN DRIFT: 

LINEARITY: 

MEET OR EXCEED OS EPA REQUIREMENTS: 

MEET OR EXCEED CARB REQUIREMENTS: 

MEET OR EXCEED BAAQMD REQUIREMENTS: 

Hydrocarbons 

Beckman 

400 

Flame Ionization 

XI, XlO, X100, XI,000 

0 - 1 ppm to 0 - 2% full 

scale as methane 

Unknown 

+/- 1% fuU scale 

0.6 seconds (3 lpra bypass) 

32 - 110 degrees F 

95% RH 

+/- 1% fuU scale/24 hours 

+/- It fuU scale/24 hours 

Unknown 

YES 

YES 

YES 

FUE 0A12::CEWIST.WP 

!\l 

^ 
O^J~ \U Wl- - &JU^^A^ »«^ " >-3-

T*f*£ t>*r- .w&l 

(^* F •***•}*-) 

of 00

 T 7

 **-

liojo 

loH^LI 

-rJ©jfl»-

—1X93 L. 

__jn<r. i-

_:UA.O 

..ji3 o 

. jir©. . 

...i\sC~ — 

. .poo A . . 

U$o 

izsrT 

a .ISM 

. H-oo 

l£JO 

IV-.00 

N to 

•*^HF4 

". wEt I.fc^*^ - •*'^-^*ftVl - -

war. 

6JJL*£ 

•V3 

XO 

fcj r1 ^ _.. ___. .. . "" -" 

bS P^~ 

* -io t- ir^'• a*.r 2sr, i^r - ^IS-TY-M. J-^v-

»-*- ?*-

fftlttCli^- ^ *-* 73 
P.75 

c?>i 

< ^ 
TcM.^'^iVpr — G»,fc*A^— 

P.76 

xo 

H*Zo . . 

ItoS^T _. .. 

L/fcOfrOL. ;__ 

J.52Z- : 

ll3,3« '. 

t>&7 u»*£T 

fi*-v 8. ej£ «F*>*^ A *>V. . . — ... . 

. ao****:. r«r/*<"-^ •*'*>. its-vfM 

imhp1 i .• 1st), j L 0 rr 

sgjcJtd 

w v ff-n 

-_JS.SO 

_u»5T o sau%.i3xoJ&**^ 

. . . ^-—M : 

1^0O._ ... _! . £0. *M J_ . " . ; ; 

...|\V>. .. . . l^b*F_^.^.._Jl3 _. ' : ! 

...mr.. . . . .M^.joo.f^-^.iJ^uQSs^:^ov?^^^?^*^^^^^^!^^ 

. -IVK>. . iJb*T.~Sl*fl\+«K*+ - Xf3*^-- iW3^«A)6-. \>5>Ui*,42^ ,isv~.. 

.l*tV-T . 0uSfcd-C loo-€P^...-^JUv^.,.^ .. . 

itcmo . _ _ _£ij j^y fc J. _ 

. .too^ " SCPj»ou^JkUj4.SU*.--&v^*ft.-?—3> -.«&•***-

3o|0 . (olj iSSi %-T, luft- —.0«J&J$^. 12.1 .<dU»~-» .. 

Xo\?~ f>i <Q />MJ ^ Uff&v -«*»*->. S-fcotf-WW. .-C"«c?4 <Mfr«*%^ • 

7-5 
P.77 

&C*2,<ZG<+*£ , Italic J&£ Is 

22 

ii 

•H 

05 V ^ O 

..€.&..?_... 

tf 

,»mLyp) -• ~~ ?U#" 

- —rj 

...... 

• i : ! I : • : :— ^ r--r-*-H -

M i l L i . I ;.-l5—-, ' j • j . 

i *>.l\ ' r~ ^

 l

- j—*—r 

; fl>M>t4r-.-{^0^.~ « 'i:£**m,.%mtOCml- . 

-1 - . 

i_U 

» I 

T 

•vl 

..!.-..: 

-••••Jin-43.>~t.-l- ^ I 

• - • 

c f»b\x\&$ 1.: 

AA.+ I 

.4. »" • p« * 

IV—-
flt^4fat^«., /Aft I y-/2-S»- A*<»<r io*3 

nr**C 

TY£. i»»f r ?r£ svTccr" 

c.tt**T ' ?<*•© txtlfc f* H 
P.79 

•*>•• % 

L: 

sss 

5 J 

ill 

J 

V 

. 

^ 

QtLfrt.^er* Ml t 

\ 

/A%tf 

t-o 

V 

SO 

& 

noo 

«r 

i p . 

. <r . 

& 

_.<.. . 

.... .:*>_.. . 

• >r\ 

5?. -

.-:-.&.: 

-JQf . •**.. . 

•5" 

/<> 

... ir 

fto *r 

2o 

sr 

*?- rr 

S<> 

X 

poo 

«r 

JO 

fir 

*o 

i f 

So 

I f 

HO 

*r 

5 * 

S.C 

f6 PO 

or 

10 

;ir 

So 

Ifi/tm. 1 /-AS-5> - s h<*4- J A * 

7"n£. jtvcttr" TC<L wrxCT 

• 

/ . / */ » P.13V 

?.0(-»vrcCtS fc.« S.So -+. 

l»l 0.*l ©>3 * 

/ .r • (•*> °'<*&-

.'•'. .. . *.7 C<") °»** 

/ , * 1*1 °J$s~ 

. /.L I.O ^."W-v 

. .a. » . . i.s: ©••***" 

.. /•*• .. .i. r . Mt f 

S.P..^ j JJ.Y :_^. J,*fr...fc 

VjHr.1 t.tfc. Y j * < i - • : M 

..: AJ--J. ;..; i«sL, j..-A-vsr-.* 

' i.i. » f.o • O.VI O 

.. .IW . . P..3.— _.£.•* V*" . 

J.O . . ;*..sr ... . MV* 

?.o . ' xx . .i, ^ J 

5.f *•*. .. c.5l 5 

1.0 *.« \ o.SYT JL 

. I.*- -.!•*• ' o.ny £ 

/ J . M aSVtf «* 

/ • * o.» */31V "" 

v,r .. *.s MS 

jo.o Ai.y - /vr 

,./-3.. . .i, i . .^.o^fu 

1.0 *.? o.sir 

A * ft*/ O.SIT-

/.2- 1.0 o/flu 

'•3 M ^•JPYfr. ^ 

ao *•* o.frn * 

a-o t.v o.ahii * 

uo ox o.lil 

A - O /.-jr o.s{-»i 

l«o oM o-y*0! 

i*o ox Wi 

I'O o.H o.$l*t 

n.o i^r o-tif\ 

• 

t . C 6-t C x.^s 

-*• O.V0*»tCT\ -».^$" *5 ^ 

4.0 r.^r ^.iv 

>.t ^ r ^.ny 

^•.r 5*',^r. *.>3 

^.o o r nv 

^^- •. &*r . >•*> 

iS.o ...._•.|a.*ir -W1/ 

. a^.oJ.J ...3?^r. .. '^-r. 

..._%:P-..,. . _33.Hr..i ^»P 

.A0!

0

..—.; iV^T-l . ;.. .•£• .. 

: is.o | i ; ,2.*jr ? fci/ 

jfe f J^jJ! L._L u . 

__

,

.'."!tw-

0

. .i ;T:.1,nK-p..1- ,L_I,,fc<>7" 

-iir.o » | ft^.o | • ia.T 

•^•r ' « ^ ^ . _i»-r 

...at' 0 i. ':( .. . .. .i?-T->. 

.ss-.r »:\ .|«.i 

.a^.r | \%o 

..«/.o ..^ . \ . _lo."T" 

<L*.0 . \ |JA 

21.0 / |i. t 

*M«« \ 52A» 

fo.o • A no-Jr--, 

9.H.O ) \%?t 

S1-? . It.-T 

A?.0 / fKT 

«J0 { /H. > 

^ . 0 ) //*^ \ /3.T- " 

*»-r ( ^ u< r' 

/ tP-7 0 \ ) ' 

(^*.0 -7+U.> \ / * 

A>.P / |l. l > 

W . o ( jT .y . 

*i. O / H'^ 

a^. o \ ^•'L 

i ^ . o • i * u^ 

10.0 I S>1 

1.r* r **S 

« ^ S«l 
P.80 

S fet^^^t immjt^ m ; /-/2-••>*• * *•"»•»-

TTC t*><-Z7 Tt& OVTLCT 

Tw\.£. 

H**m< 

SO 

sr 

»fo 

s -pr . 

id 

* ----*• 

3 0 ; 

1.2. 

1 * 

US' 

xi.kr 

l.l 0««) ••**•? 

1.0 

i.r 

sr 

„tr... 

. d*" 

30 

ST 

vr 

/ 7 0 0 

or 

to 

if 

XD 

%r 

30 

.U.-._ 

o.Vtl J 

« 

•v* 

•**• 

•ft 

* 

. . .S.l* 

- oA-ft. 

• ^ 1 

AT...j...:,oanft. 

o&i'-i 

-, A l |—Lo* 

_L g.P • I 

UL ,lo«S*tV. 

n.^ft 

•i<* I Q*Vt :-:/»r. 

«.. . 

* . T 

a.o 

./.*_ L-a.; « j 

-/.*e.R-^tAS\ . 

/,r — D•>v t i 

.a.»r ..MS . •ft 

• 

3 

17r 

Jt.o .lias. 

(•W^ftji* * 

Q.*iU 

HA 

1.1 

» 1 

a.o 

#1.0 

».r 

a.o 

a.o 

JLL. 

i.»r 

i.sr 

uur 

I.Crf 

/.<-r 

#.»r 

»©*r 

i>vr 

0.111 

o. t o 

O.*0. 

••Hi . 

r»*w* 

0.%| 

o.SlU 

0.111* 

*.r 

tr 

«?.o 

II. o 

*r 

IV.O 

l*° 

n.r 

\l.O 

..-u-r 

>L>„ £•*.< . 

(Jil-O i.ll* 

.. . .*-.* * 1. 

...p.ir r 

v\ 

u 

4 . 

'-H l_U*,»r 

CSC** 

. ,S.o -

1ST. . 

11-0 ' 

ta.r •. 

o —9 0 

flr.o 

|A..O 

*,r 

/. L. ^&y. w 

- C 

^12-

. . . . C5u ^ 

>r T 

».r 

?.r 

|0.0 

ib.r 

12.0 

9.0 

*.o 

l-.o 

no 

) 

t 

Y«?r 

r.# 

s.93 

SJT3 

r.n 

4.1^ 

is* 

A. 

- 5 T 

7^ •*r 

y> 

ss 

i.<* 

/.r 

i.r 

I.S 

© L i r i.a 

/.?r 

/•tr 

/.»r 

i.»r 

/••r 

.o.?r 

o.^-U 

o.<»*r •A 

O 

it 

ft 

O.J3T? 

Ib.O 

lb.0 

ir r 

/H.O 

Je^ 

te^>-

io. «. 

71 7<r 
P.81 

G\(.Kf.&iHJK,<, I [fait -> P

 lx*4s± •P/vfriCX/vt.t r ~ 0.->t» •</«</ 577/ 

. /*>y-./5"" 

v -

7-f*. —- !"iC-

•i -• 

-i-l«0 & SWftfr.. 2,Hy.&<u/CL_y..T 

; TTT1 s * ! fy * 

U 1 ? j j f j r ? 

:

ulttft,/_! !v< -.ooSiim i.J 

ir 

•• • 

L 

frKurk.1-?** igg,v c 1^ fate./f^ ir-^^^da-ct^y^^; 

• - i .- \ rf-t-y-i 1 1 f-ej-—-—H-i ' ' • ' 

. — ^ p ri 

- - !r- Q.V W lbs Srirtfrq. ... 

j ihiL 

! • { ; 1 

V 1 

X... 

vt*. \ ' '-0

M-v : .. .. — . WA-. 

V-KIJT.U y * y _i_ - O^Z^jUi^nr^oe 

f*tt*^C«^--«> "" *' OV|, V«-*T ) ^ *»*S" /^/vfv. $ryu*>^ 

f\ 
P.82 

APPENDIX C 

V 
P.83 

UKMitlllL £-ri&K>e- CoAsrmfxrr PROJECTmc^B^3656t.fi,Ct SHT OF 

i n 11'«• • i • 11 * 11' 1111111 -J H i n 

;• ijj ji.i|j i I illiipnTTiii : 

lll' H 

f+f •H+ tit i_i_L I I I J I 

•*-3&.fcCtta*Wg^~7^ fr-**"1 ' !/^fe7 

» . ! I i i • | ' ! I I • i.^TTT •''|l*IU||IHim | ITTT I ' a . • , | 

' ' I I M • 

'••«•»» ' » « « « » ' J t . t J_!_ 

i TT M • < 

—_•._ . 

'^iCc'MfiotJexnz 

—v-»- - tC/^zi: 

-fZbA*M4T7DjJ — 

"~3£~:..'"7~/i " 

% $ri&a*& Si (fiJ-r,. 

I » 11 • J i • *•» • 

^ -^ - ..... 

• 33 r •/ -. 

'-••" / 

ep .... 

ih /oO 

<}-

,, •.. -72^T^sry^^w:r7yr:r~/^.T7^g- r&es//J /s • 

izLrrziirr t - k 

. •• ' 

— j . ... . ~^, ,•(•-.• *-

• i * . -— — • — -{ — ' •• . '•' • • ' '^T — - — * • * j > — ...•• - . — t • . . — .. . ...—_. . 

fH-H-r 

vnm "t*- i_L~-- ^ . fc 

H^^TTT^-P* ^ ---j--

1—r 

£2-

REV 9/90 FORM*. 
P.84 

GKWIH/LL OUWLU I *'•»''wo fUgra^ . 

Srifie»cr fOr. u*s CAvc's. PROJECTNQ.3WSS36t.J4 SHT./__ofJ^ 

»:•••...;j,J. « I» i 11 '» •••!-•_.-j• • •.....•.'• -.. " "^..!. . 

i _ i _ JLj ^...D-J.XIJ-j--^——J - . -*. ... . 

• ; » . » w .-»•..•! . 

Irzrizirri^^^^^^k/.^:. /e»i&* .r/&i*:: //«?/»**• riser- A* 

— Llb>/»1K\ 

£p*/tf7*eO> O. Sals' O. -22.S* 

0*S<oo 

m .WZ' t./Q 

a0i/e7*e& 0.3**1 0.2.&1 

C* to-fr**) O.IQ/Lr 

C* /oo •//***) 

^" CttXr&t&rG' % SnAefre- ' i*Jeie»rir Loss re*, /bv^tt* SrlHe

% STI&NS- fo.p-xs- Ih sntefir ett.t-nh>/hr 

V> REVa<90 FORM 
/' .**• 

P.85 

- • — . _ -ZTJLZlS'mJ.JD UMlt y 

PROJECT NO. %AS'3a66.& SHT..2 

l^XS^n^'/amHj/ /oo 

Sr****r

 LOSS; y r/*J to^ ^ 

% *jr Loss »/o.2i* /ia STH*** \ , "} 

^ Z*.<n lb*/z«rc+J/foo(/?** 

~j 1 „ [ fTf Ml+ ****{ 

^ 

REva*90 FO 
P.86 

...... ~- srif&tLT orf. t 7" Co*ne*r PROJECT uo.J^J^Ik^^fi SHT./_ OF 

VTJ.^S- ••—-1- ~ 

frw^^i k -- Po«i*rihe;'.:/Zesf+> c&e* f a?u^& ///z/<r+ r?sr . ^. 

: — i -

'.':' Contour • Ami*•'.: vJ^uz__ ^ntfw /5irs&3* 

tisj: 

STjAerte-

<£*?zx: 

4? 

£^^f 

c^^rz 

lh$ /oo 

c*z: 

70T/iCm. 

g/rrcH- hJr. ??.S*?-

\ * 

fi> CALC»<.»Tir % srt&Tve- or &ATCH-

/SnAe*"e 

f * /o* 

 5>^'^ = (roZ &nj// 

Y$ REV 9/90 FORM 
P.87 

APPENDIX D 

0. 
Department- GMS-fegS2g £ 

Subject — 

Name., t** g" ""?"" 

Address. 

VooK-iTl 

tKtBst-t. Bntd 

Computation Notebook. 

OtnnJioVStttlOMfyPit^iicUCo.mililnah^MAOIW. . .f 

91 

7333 3 ^36-^8 8 
P.89 

-mm 

JJHS. 

L fiwwj. 

.IttgL Tib 

the. 

Vdj 

TTY T 1 •,,r]

a

*?/f> \et\''!Slt

JT

.

r

f''l 

' I " -! 

f&l 

9/8% 

-&i&ffiA. £/?sc 

i i 

dnfae*fki>\ TfTT kfrt£ 

T 

J 

I 

<C^3Z fi • 1-tMB * MM* *|~ I f 

• » J « - M** « , a* 

rh: .V~Z(N4z 

I I 

. ?##.-

• I I 

i I i . 

1 

1 I 1 

• 

1 

« • 

• 

1 1 

I 

• 

I 

• 

. • 

. 

1

 : i 

: ; 

; « 

• 

• ! • • 

• • 

. 1 

fl 

• i i 

< • i 

^^JZ T £.**JC 

V%&-> 

I | ; • • : • j i i 

.! I .• • • • • ;. i —.-

I i • • • • . • ! 

I -I • • • i i • . i « i . f ... . 

4|-i"!4i i >2«4E 

— 1 • 1 • : i : j I | • 

I-

*.. lAVZ J@*«M 

-tfAEbt., e$&i.$%ffi&i^ 

• -1—!* • • * • * • • • • • ^r\ i • i- A -' • t *•*"» rr«1 •„ '—. — 

i 

fc. 

Alii 
P.90 

Certificate ofAnalysis - Resin B 

This page of attachment VI is contained in the CBI files. 
P.91 

Certificate ofAnalysis - Resin A 

This page of attachment VI is contained in the CBI files. 

16 
P.92 

Page 1 of Material Safety Data Sheet - Resin B 

This page of attachment VI is contained in the CBI files. 

( 
P.93 

Page 2 of Material Safety Data Sheet - Resin B 

This page of attachment VI is contained in the CBI files. 

( \ > 
P.94 

Page 3 of Material Safety Data Sheet - Resin B 

This page of attachment VI is contained in the CBI files. 

13 
MATERIAL SAFETY 

DATASHEET 

Ashland P.O. BOX 2219 

COLUMBUS, OHIO 43216 

(616) 889-3333 

P.95 

. » ^ *«w« . 

Eaargancy 

T«Itphone 

1(800) 274-5263 ei 

1(800) ASHLAWD 

003S05 STYRENE MONOMER SO PPH INH IB 

IMS MSDS COWUES W H 29 CC* 1910.1200 (IMS HAZARD G9MJNICATI0N STANDARD) 

Page: 

Protect Km i STVUtHE M0QM81 SO PM 1MHIB 

CASM*«CRt IOO-«2-3 

fft SiMMM5 AVE SAM JOSB CA 95125 

OS 50 044 3605360-

99211-90 

Data Stoat Net OM3614-004.000 

Siearacdat . mm 

T0t|ust*eM 

ATTHs PLANT K»./SAFETY OIR. 

05/93 

1 BASHAW) AVE 

jose CA9SUS 

StCTIO N l-PHOOUC I I OLN I I ? I CAT I ON 

Gararal or Ganartc I0 i AROMATIC KWROCARBON 

OOT tteartf Claaalffcatlont riAWUBLE LIQUID (173. US) 

StbCIIO N I 1-COWHQNtNI S 

'U^h^VaTs^^k ®3\^J^^W& %?1^S!" S U DEFINITION PAGE POR CLARIFICATION 

IMRB>1£NT 

CAS #» 100-42-S 

X (by WT) 

100 

PEL 

SO PTM 

TLV 

80 PPM 

Hot* 

( I I 

Motest 

I 1) ACGIH

 /0 ?J^^ T

^

E W?^WM m CSLL1|«?* Sm ° * •«««••• » '<» •**- M0 « R8C0WOOS A UMT Of 

I M S CHMICAL is SUBJGCT TO THE REPORTING fteouiRwoas ce SECTION BIS OP SARA TITLS HI . 

OM I I I -CHTSICA L DAI A 

Boll-Ins Point 

vapor Praaaura' 

Spoclfic Vapor Otwlty AIR •» 1 

Spoclfic Gravity 

Pareant Vblatltaa 

Evaporation Rata 

for PROOUCT 

for PROOUCT 

AIR> 1 

\ 

• 

. mm 

•« 4%m, 

S.B 

' -VBIB U 

100.00* 

.49 

I tlf OH MA I I D N 

(N-AVr-A. ACETATE « 1) 

aESDEQ 

FLAS-J P01NTCTCC ) 88.0 Oo0 P ( 31.1 D«9 C) 

EXPLOSIVE UNIT (PRODUCT) uw»-_i.v * 

EXmOUISONQ MEDIA* REGULAR POMC OR MATER POS OR CARBON 010X106 OR ORY CHMCAL 

HAaWOjgJttggSl'llON PROOUCrSt MAY POM TOXIC MATERXALSt. CARSON OXOXtOC AMI CARBON MONOXIDE. VARIOUS 

nt*r

12-m-3mmml-J7-^ * W* * T U $ MTO1 A MJ . FACEPIECB OPSUOEO IN Tt« POStTTVE 

SPU* Ai. RHE * SS^O N MAZ^tVAPOtt f&j^VlBtTHANM R AND KAY Tfrva ALONtt TrC OWDUWORlfrVrt MOVED 

i^T^o^^olWbrr^ £S& ST^C^N)?^ ^ 

NEVER UgStfiUlNS OR cum w TORCH ON OR MBAR OM M CEVBI BATTY) BKAUSB PROOUCT «V W JUST RESIDUE) CAN 

AU FIVE GALLON PAILS AMD -UR6ER METAL CONTAmgg INCLUDING TAKK CASS AMO TANK TRUCKS SHOULD BB GROUNDED 

ADO/OR BONOS) MHEH MATBOAL l-tTRANSFERRBD. 

MFPACOOESi tCALTH-a-* PLAMAABILnV. B ReACTIVITY- 2 

SECTIO N V-HLA.LI H HAJAH D DAI A 

PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE LEVEL SO WN 

THRE9-OL0 UNI T V4UK SO WM 

EFFECTS OF ACUTE OVEREXPOSURE! 

EVES - CAH CAUSE SEVERE IFHITATTOK. REDNESS. TEARIKS. BLURRED VISION, 

SON - PfiOUOKGTO OR SEATED CONTACT CAN CAUSE WOERXTB IRRITATION. ftEf-ATTlNG. DERMATITIS. 

CONTINUED ON PAGE: 2 W 
P.96 

MATERIAL SAFETY 

DATASHEET 

Ashland 

AanLAiNjj CM£.M1L,ALV IN C 

{.MOM* « attiMi on, t « 

P.O. BOX 2219 

COLUMBUS, OHIO 43216 

(614) 889-3333 

24-HOUR 

Eaergency 

Telephone 

1(800) 274-5263 e 

1(800) ASHLAND 

002505 STYRENE MONOMER 5 0 PPM INH IB 

V-HEAL1 H HAZAR D OAT A IConl.nucO t 

Page : 

FIRST AlOt 

w

 TM<j&%T83®^ RDCVS coNrAM,^^ a<mfl«. UUNDER 

IF IN EYESs PLUSH W M LARGE AMOUNTS OP MATER. LIFTIWS'WPER AND LONER LI0S OCCASIONALLY, GET MEDICAL ATTENTION. 

IP SNALLOWEOt OO WT INOUCE VOWTING. KEEP PERSON VAM4. QUIET, AMO GET MEDICAL ATTENTION. ASPIRATION OP 

MATERIAL INTO THE LUN6S DUE TO VOMITING CAN CAUSE CHEWCfc. PNEUOUTIS MUCH CAN Be FATAL. 

IP BREATHED; IP AFFECTED. REMOVE INDIVIDUAL TO FRESH AIR. IF BREATHING I S DIFFICULT; ADMINISTER OXVG&f, IF 

BREATHING HAS STOPPfo GIVE ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION. KEEP PERSON MARK, QUIET AND GET MffllCAL ATTENTION. 

PRIMARY ROUTE(S) OF ENTRVt 

IM1ALAT10N. SKIN CONTACT 

EFFECTS OF CHRONIC OVEREXPOSURE: 

THEIM 

.BflOQRAM 

^SiBL Y 

THAT ! 

N THE N Q BIOASSAY 

MAY 

C W ^SS8^EST^^SO2S^S V L^OJSSS. 1 0 ewse

 ^ MtwWMS EFfECTS» """^

 uamSt "*« 

ON VI - Hfc I V OA l A 

Hr&RM K PCUMMZATIONt CAN OCCUR — AVOID EXPOSURE TO EXCESSIVE HEAT. PEROXIDES ANO POLYMERIZATION 

STABILITY! STABLE' 

INCOMPATIBILITY! AVOIO CONTACT MlTHt. STRONG MINERAL ACIOS. 

ON V I I - S.'a LL OH LCA l PKOCtOUHt S 

STEPS TO 8 8 TARSI IN CASE MATERIAL-IS RELEASED CR SPILUSt . 

SMALL SPILLs ABSORB UOUIO ON V0MCUUTS. FLOOR ABSORBBtT. OR OHCR ABSCR8B<T MATERIAL AM) TRANSFER TO HOOD. 

ELIMINATE ALL SOURCES OF IGNITION SUCH AS FLAKES. FLAMES (INCLUDING PILOT LIGHTS). ANO ELECTRICAL SPARKS. 

VENTILATE AREA. 

Hi NOngY_AUTHPRrneS *S REWlRtO. PUMjR^CUUNTMraPER SPIU&) PROOUCT TO 

K'^aSajIS 1*

0

^'*"^SSUCT.TRAHSFE R CWTSSNAT S ABSORBE^.SOILA» 

tS FOR.OISPOSAL. 

ELIMINATE ALL I 

N8 PROTECTIVE 

AT_S0UR£t. • 

HASTE DISPOSAL tCTHOOi 

LARGE SPILL. DESTROY 8V UQUtO INCINERATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 

Vfc tOUICWtN l TO bfc ust o 

nsnwr* S5o®SltAlSR^^S^grR^S[|^R0

?S, 

*

m

e£}iFkV_s¥U sumaEN T «

B

*

I

*1CA L (GENERAL ANO/CR LOCAL 60-tAUST) VENTILATION T O MAINTAIN EXPOSURE 

PROTECTIVE CLOVESt WEAR RESISTANT GLOVES SUCH ASt . POLYEIMfLENE 

OTHER PROTECTIVE WHPNWTi TO PREVENT REPEATED OR PROLOMBS SKIN CONTACT. WEAR IteERVIOUS CL0THIN9 AIO BOOTS. 

ON U-SPtCIA L PHtCAUIION S OK OIHH H COKMtNI S 

THE INraRMAIlOlt ACCWRJUTEO _-__ , 

TS.-M ESS?JU5SL

!.SB?J5?^ i5PmS&JftJ*m&L&BW!Eml TO BE VHEIHR ORIGINATING 

."^m^^^nf^Smh^T W ""»** OF HEED THAT T * INK-M-AEST}* 

I. 

"ts 

IAS T PACE—SE B ATTACJMEHT PAGE ENCLOSED—LAST PAGE 

C 

^ 

9*d OCTQ tiQ9 OO.*. Cl.raiotr . 
P.97 

MATERIAL SAFETY 

OATA SHEET 

Ashland 

ASHLAND CHEMICAL, INC 

UHUItf* N itMtt OH. he 

P.O. BOX 2219 

COLUMBUS, OHIO 43216 

(614) 889-3333 

24-HOUR 

Emergency 

Telephone 

1(800) 274-5263 or 

1(800) ASHLAKD 

DEFINITIONS 

his definition page Is intended for vse with Material Safety Data Sheets supplied by tha Ashland Chamical Company, 

ecipients ef these data sheets should consult tha OSHA Safety and Health Standards <29 CFR 1910). particularly 

Apart Q - Occupational Health and Environmental Control and subpart I - Personal Protective Equipment for 

enerel guidance on control of potential Occupational Health and Safety Hazards. 

SECTION I 

PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION 

ENERAL OR GENERIC ID: Chamical family or product 

sscriptlon. 

OT HAZARD CLASSIFICATION: Product meets DOT 

iterla for hazards listed. 

SECTION II 

COMPONENTS 

tmponents are listed bt this section If they .present a 

yslcal or health hazard and are present at or above 

; in the mixture. If a component ia identified as a 

J-tCINOGB-4 by NTP. IARC. or OSHA as of the date 

the MSOS. It wBI be Usted and footnoted in this 

stlon when present at or above 0.1%-in the product 

native condusions concerning carcinogenicity aro not 

.-orted. Additional health information may be found in 

;tion V. Continents subject te the reporting 

lufrements ef Section 313 ef SARA Tide Ul are 

miffed in the footnotes in this section along with 

ical percentages. Other componenu may be listed if 

med appropriate. 

tosure recommendations are for components. OSHA 

nitssfete Exposure Limits (PELS) and American 

iferenee of Governmental Industrial Hygienists 

OH) Threshold Unit Values (TLVs) appear on the 

with the component Identification. Other 

MwnendMiens appear as footnotes. 

SECTION III 

PHYSICAL PATA 

UNO POINT: Of product If known. The lowest 

» of tfie components it Usted for mixtures. 

OR PRESS-USE: Of product if-known. The highest 

t of the components is listed for mixtures. 

CIFIC VAPOR DENSITY: Compared to AIR • 1. If 

Specific Vapor Density of a product Is not known, 

rahie Is expressed as lighter or greater than air. 

2IFIC GRAVITY.- Compared to WATER • 1. If 

jffc Gravity of product is not known the value Is 

essad as less than or greater than water. 

f applicable. 

JENT VOLATILES: Percentage ef material with 

boiling point below 425 degrees Fahrenheit and 

* pressure above 0.1mm Hg at 68 F. 

'ORATION RATE: Indicated as—faster or slower 

ETHYL ETHER, unless otherwise stated. 

SECTION IV 

FIRS -ANO EXPLOSION OATA 

H POINT: Method Identified. 

OSlON LIMITS: For product if known. The lowset 

of the components fcs listed for mixtures. 

ROOUS DECOMPOSITION PRO0UCTS: Known or 

,ted hatardous products resulting from heating. 

ifl or other reactions. 

g^CHOM IV front.) 

EXTINGUISHING MEDIA* Following 

Protection Association criteria 

National Fir* 

FIREFIGKTINO PROCEDURES: Minimum equipment to 

protect firefighters from toxic products of vaporisation, 

combustion or decomposition in fire situations. Other 

firefighting hazards may also be Indicete.d. 

SPECIAL FIRE ANO EXPLOSION HAZARDS: States " 

hazards not covered by other sections. 

NFPA CODES: Hazard ratings assigned by the National 

Fire Protection Association. 

ffgenow Y 

HEALTH HAZARD OATA^ 

PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE LIMIT: For producL 

THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUE: For product 

EFFECTS OF ACUTE OVEREXPOSURE: Potential local 

and systemic effects due to single or short term 

overexposure to the eyes and skin or through inhalation 

or ingestion. 

EFFECTS OF CHRONIC OVEREXPOSURE Potential local 

and systemic effects due to repeated er long term 

overexposure to the eyes and skin er through inhalation 

er ingestion. 

FIRST AlOt Procedures to be followed when dealing 

with accidental overexposure. 

PRIMARY ROUTE OF ENTRY: Based on properties and 

expected use. 

SECTION VI 

REaCTfYTTT PAIA * 

HAZARDOUS POLYMERI.ZATION: Conditions te evoid to 

prevent hazardous polymerisation resulting in a large 

'release of energy. 

• STABILITY: Conditions to avoid to prevent hazardous or 

violent decomposition, 

INCOMPATIBILITY: Materials and conditions to avoid to 

prevent hazardous reactions. 

.recnorf YM 

SPILl OR LEAK PRPCEPlffi-SS 

Reasonable precautions to be taken and methods of 

containment clean-up .and disposal Consult federal, 

stata and local regulations for accepted procedures and 

any reporting or notification requirements. 

ggfiflPN VW . • 

PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT TO BE USED 

Protective equipment which may be needed when 

handling the product 

SECTION IX 

SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS OR OTHER COMMENTS 

Covers any relevant points not previously mentioned. 

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 

'ners should be either reconditioned by CERTIFIED firms er properly disposes* of by APPROVED firms. Disposal of 

ners should be in accordance with applicable laws snd regulations. "EMPTY" drums should not be given to 

usts. Serious accidents have resulted from the misuse of "EMPTIED* containers (drums.pails.eteJ. Refer to Sections 

© 

W 

B'd orr a «j^r» rwu. 
P.98 

•r 

l 

•**» 

MATERLAL SAFETY 

DATA SHST 

Ashland P.O. BOX 2219 

COLUMBUS. OHIO 43216 

(614) 889-3333 

/.H-a' 

Eaer£ 

- Telep 

1(800) 2*. 

1(800) AS. 

LAST PAGE-SEE MTACHMEMT PAGE EHCLOSED—LAST PAGi 

} 

i 

I 

! 

9^-
P.99 

Illl SCOTT-MARRIN, INC 

653 1 BOX SPRINGS BLVD. • RIVERSIDE. CA 92507 

TELEPHONE (7141 653-6780 • F.AX (7141653-2430 

REPOR T O P AXTAJL'irSI S 

NIS T TRACEABL B GA S idiaCTTJI-UE S 

D.&RO01 

KX DXTEs 11/15/93 

BRUCE DAROS 

DAROS .ASSOCIATES 

172 OBBRT DRIVE 

.SAN JOSB, CA 95136-

COST0KBR ORDER NUMBERS 93-118 PAGE 1 

HIST TRACEABLE 

CZLXNDER NUMBER COMPONENT CONCENTKRriON(v/v) REFERENCE STANDARD 

CCS 647 7 Styrene 23.61 + 0.47 ppa VOLUMETRIC 

Air Balance 

^ JLJI_ m Cylinder Pressure: 1200 1fsiR,m„m. ,r, ,,_.^'_. 

ppm m umole/mole % » tnole-% 

The above analysis is traceable t o the National Institut e of standards and Technology 

by intercoaparisort" with the reference standard liste d above. 

Where indicated, volumetric and gravimetric reference standards are traceable thru use 

of our analytical. ba!UanceA(\NIST Report No. MM&? 232.09/202&91. 

Analysts //l/l VLA \ AK Approved* /Yl I Au/JL^ 

M.S. Calhoun QQ^ ' J,T * Narrin 

tka aai* liability mt tkla tin^i»r Car gaa wfclek falls ta co^ly vttk tkla aaalyaia a&all ba inlmmi t er rwlyal a tkataat by tka 

. *ttko«. aaera caat. STAN DAR D CAUBRATION GASES IN ALUMINU M CYLINDER S 

^ 
p.1 

•*'.v* .• 

l-aaTaMaui 

" % • 

V «• ••**• 4* 

f^***.* ** 

V<-4* 1 * • . 

• a j ••• 

" ••." * .• 

• >./ . .' 

*** *.*-> •• 

/» 

ai-

• ' i •iii 

iiii 

l-i*' 

•tM j • v * | I 

•oe^Bt-taffea, t. ,«»,•. —*tT* aaW* ^ •**-» •••«•'••»>" -**•>V-p » l***tp-4—• • ••>.•>•> -nl -—J - -1—e»» al- * en . • • ilaa— . ea».iM*.4»^ l »»aie- . Ftrr*ioi/-itiF*7i..i••'.: • i i rep*? 

} :

 :|:::' !"; I ;pl" , v 

•tla-tel h*\m » • f f ••« • • *»• • •*• » • • • • " • * ••» •»•» .•••»•••• • ••• > •*»• o*Mp*ef aaa t- l 1 *•>*•• • «*| | *>•>,» 

• i • ! : *• *.. !• * i i •' -* 1 

.». 

ll 

l 

t 

V 

•A 

i*. •». . •, , 

......... . _j . m 
P.2 

••• • •.-.' * 

• 'yyitir'' 

{ •• ••/ : .•. 

0 . • « 

« 

• 

t 

c 

t 

« 

t 

t 

• 

« 

« 

Hi! !».. 

••i 

KV 

i :• 

....•• • ••• " 

i|Mj:}»i|».i-r^-|"« f-\." } r-f " r-j—i-ij:i»,.-..j..|.|.,i 

• * . • • • • • I : . ! . I -i* j ! 1 

- I -;rr-j 

J 

•: l -

i . . 

i 

• i : j.;.l

 :i- *i i-w4 

' • ....... . - - ' * 

—.^i - j.:..: ..J.l ..1^ -

. • | •! i S r 1-

 w 

<•» 

< 4 » 

r«, 

<»> 

r „ 

<e» 

tea 

t p 

< 0 

• • • • • • i • 

! • • **e>4BW I •••>•••> • ••••• > a ••>•»* teat* 4»e->e| na m ..LLU 1.1.11.0^ *loo 
P.3 

i 

!

 : • • i 

_}im. • .,1 ;. L . : ' . J. ~i-v —..: .\-..: »J-

. .!"**";" "•"

 : ""i "V "• •• • " * ' "~*jT .. 

• 'I ' : • ' • • • * 5 . . 

Hw."'""—i"""? ' H" i* ":" 1 • I'.' rr 

!'" • • I . " I • a ' * . ' I *• I . I I. . 

I • » • ! 1 I • • I a L » '^ * 

BaBa-*BMt>HB«4aB«) aa «*••>. • .<• e> *ie> •)•>• I t> * a • • ••• * i t • • 4k ae. ^a4»ea*..t» *> • (ea • • • ••• » Of •••)• , • wvaeMeseaasaaktBt-aaaaaTo-Pa^^-M ••:!? | : * •! |. ; ... | . ; ; : ;. . , s -^ 

... I • i • J • • I- i . ; ! .*,.* 

• • • I • .-.* ; . : •. I • | i !•!•.. • :> 

aj>4*aaaaaV •>•>• • a*aa>aa>*tle*»aaea| tea * • 4>4> I • •*» • e • • • 4B (-aa •« • e • • atB * • I •*• » • _•••*• * " **n* W *-*••«-laeaat 4BB aa*Aa3l 

:- • 1 : S ] ••• : i i s ' . , s [ • i , • :. ' ieej 

I 

. ..« , •' . 

• «! • 

, • ; I : ! ' Its-*** rv< r ' 

I* •• i « i • i * . ! ••? « • !: 

• ••:'.•. • i •*!•* . •••{. t : > : 

•>• • • ••»•» aaeala • • * (io t alt * •* . .«"."* • ew| • • • t t» . • i|a > H e —...tl 

•- •! • • • ' - • • • • • . • '.' v • 
P.4 

t 

V 

• *» .. . 

V 

' V 

V 

••• -**, :' v 

•* 

t 

. . . *•• * 

••-• •,•*.•.•' c 

•"

 V *:

- tc 

-*; *«--v-nprVev * 

• • • • • 4a 

. - *. • * 

• ' tr 

••' *j. • 1 

i 

•a 

li 

% 

(. 

4a. 

« 

« 

•e 

W 

I. 

I. 

Ve-J*"-.* V 

«al # 

t» 

44 

l< 

• I I 

• • • 

4*h« 

.r 

TTT: 

I—i-'h 

i;:' 

•ii- ; 

• » 

1

 I • • ' •:* 

-.—, — —:-,«.•—Lj..i..*_.i_ r i _ 

•. ! i .I:.- ' •: 

- ••• .*i • i • . * : 

J • • •• l . i 

• * • • • eH>a**t»iBB>a I—•> ^—•J > .tpJ„, < l t . , 

! 

,4102' 
—••-*> %r**i'in _ P i 

* 

B^VTf^J^ 

I 

1 

« 

« 

I

* . i . , : • •• • ; • i i • • * • • •• ;• • : •:•*%*• 

- •! il l . : - M !• :• ••!•••• :d£$* *" 

* I ...... i ....... | .. . . . • ..... . . ~.i.... . _ . I.aaeae******..«| _ I 1 » * • • _***1»^^^-*'• ••tf.l> 

>.•:: JO.. 20 • 3n -*0 • 50 : 60 70 , Tn" 7 100"'P «*•-

)-:" . PIP,. 20 i 3!) -SO • 50 • 60 70 , I, -lllll 

• M P f •**• — '• • : • T . v—•»_——.*—. - — :

 ! i

 I . ' i>-

^•fT'.-! 1:ii i ; •• ; i ; : M !Tl 

-.! I- . • '• • : ! | : • « l ' i • J i i-i i • 

V t •*! • . • I B . _ •>->•. fta . • I t.. t • 4> t>. • ••••- > •••••>.•*•• > • • • ••»., — . 1 -»43. • t> — « B f — -*•••••» • „ 

.... :"

 ! i •» '• ! i •*• i • '• ; : : I :! * . ll 

7,0 

M 

111 

2.1 

5.0 

I I ! '• I 

.].........I ' {— « •• ? -I . 

i ; : ttf*o-if-cc"-o-

• 1 

1 

• 

1 

. 1 

. • * 

• 

i 

! 

i-H 

I—h*-***.*** 

1 

! i • 

4. ...... . •.._• . 

I 

K *m 

ht €A 

I* -

VI A> 

Itl. -v. 

•I 1 
•l 

i 

•:;«•?*••.••»•••• • ' 

****.. "ii". • • • •• • 

• • ..••*.••. . • * 

*•'••!••«<•• • • :*••* 

.••:•'.'• Hr-.***' 

% Y.c^wmmmm^ts&m^- ;?m;

imY ^m*. #

' *. • 

•'." / • . • 

• * •"• •• • * • 

• -V * ' 

• • . Set) e*. • • 

*• %• 

.. •*• i' 

• y • • 

\V4%V> * 

• •• «* ^ , t . . . 

*-V-&**-**-.•• •*. 

V Y V •: • 

V J*,:/."..; . •" 

-I .••C::*s

 :*. ••' 

1 'I' ? ': • 

• .•!•» • • 

•*y 

.• •» • . ' .V.. -V-

•OS*.-- .;; 

• • ••••• 

. . .. 

• . .. • . • • 9 . 

.. .' • 

. '• • •?•.••; 

• •» s * ••. •.. . 

• .•.•..-••-.• 

. {••••. • 

*. J* *.*•. ••• 

• ••" • :••.:. • 

ji %* W & J-l I 1:1.1 IIIIMM^i»UvJJilMllllU..JJMI 

tt *ai* .•,,• • 

- J&t, ' ZIOO*tt>IO* ON1UVHO •lc *-

OwwCwwOi<w%y-aP«>wwOO< > 

.* •• • i •• • 

%* ft • 

.• • 

>»' 
If 

SET: 

,J.Yz. 

rr-sa ip~) V .*=T- vrlrtr. 

I**** •>>« Ja- •> 1 f*) *>«t*| •• •••••kk. • •*» 

• • • a •> • • ^oat * • < .a a at) * aaa a> J« l * • 

r \ 

I -**a*BAl I I • • • I l l •**•*•*• -iiB-B-i • I I • •**•**• a-l • a 4> 4>4>. p|t«t>aa»>— I 4* • 

•MltJ . fl) . «tW-«fSA«A«lWB.it»»aM-*»t->tJ» BA H .1 •.*•.• • *fl»4» J ***ta»t 

-"y.-::::T>—TI- ~fc- -.[ ••• <PlBiiiajlt « L-faWflfl tala4»41 M a • a* t||taa> 4 lif t —it) i-Jol ai. *at* 

r r * | * • I ! Lrt.-J. L '—t . ~_ 

• 4 * 

I s. 

• . * • i • 

• *^mm*+m*l—A***-*m • TV 

M 

I*. » • • a a 

.r. 

•h 

utiaflOP »|> a afl • % t j 

«• • }• *a • fla t | 

mmwmmmmmmmmJmtmmmmmttmm ••••• • 

I T -.-..-.I .- -

• • a • <•••• ^ a fl •) 

• a M a u • • * ** I • ' * 

aa* e)ae»>t}. 4 . i l at ••> • | • T • • • 

"•MariMMBMaajaf l •*•*•*••• *—***•> «Ma-BBfl»t»|a»e» • •*->>•• ••••«• * * afljaa l 

r.rCfc. -: . :..r ..:..!. . . : . i 

•***~***fi.e* •*•• • * l*~ J. " • . 1 

aaBaBa-aMaehe • • a a tat* fo*at*atfl * I V 

Qi 

w V •» *• 

A 

«* .• — 

O 

VA 
P.8 

: He ."*\« 

—*. • 

•a'-a/: . 

a**..**. -** 

: < '• 

V * • • • ••F 

I i * 

~T"V'*i !-:--j-;-t 

JL • 1 i - iJj 

; -. j _ . .-_ ... « ...... ?. 

f —•—4- » U.^H* * «••>•• » \.a.v. M . l M .ta.4.al4 . 

•' i" I i ' 5 • * I 

eaaaaritMaA-tlA^ aa* e>e*e**a»»» • a* 4Ba I e»4 a o •**-•» oear • •> a #aaa > as • eat* tal a at ata I 

;.|- • I • I • • '•' 

§ 

/OCP 
. a •»*•** * 

ii-ii « i 

. . I 

aaeeli i»mlilnnh. i •«»•• l l ..... . ..te<y t |«^.|»«it.»»»«4» < n I • i til l l,Hlltm l I*. Oi l II I 
P.10 

C'-^YYY-. 

,4'^^''t^3--' 
""•K* "a**" -**  .• P.11 

. 

•..v: » 

•. • • • . 

IriMlsaBB^aaBiU 

••**•«.•«*: 

• • -t. 

. 1 .. 

V ' . • • J-J* 

^ **•" . .... 

• * >•• •* A-V -

• •• » 

I 

I 

i 

> •i,!i ' -S j * . j ,* « I , : | :n C I ' 

Tvh*

4

*i " " i*"*T"T "1 • ".'" ' '•'•"\r iTi rbiTT^.-rrT 

• ••• - •.*!•• 1 *•.«'! • : i i ; • 1 1 ! •••• 1 '35 : •• 

.! •»__ .V > . 1 1 :•: 1 • - : . j-r T " 

•¥•1 T/I 1 1 *)" / JP* 1 * *t ' •• . •• l-"-***. •-!•• : .|.- l ......••• • .^ *.>I*^ F — • —' . 

ii.l .niT/ini''.!....a...-..:-..*! .. s . . T;..-!,S5- • ..•. ^ Ci: 
P.12 

•"-a."**-' 

I

 : ! 

• \ JJ|1^-U4.-1 

. i . • . . • • . 

: • -• >..........,*••.% • • ••A...A.. A V.*^.tM^^e* > . 

'•*•"*'•• . ^ ...•.'• ; it-j v.! » 

. "•. • . - *• .. . 

'.••«••.•.34 . - . * • *. .• 

;p C 
- ~— "r*ff* r ••#« ) *~*> 

NUL FACTOR= i.ee68E-»ee 

P.13 

".»-.fc«fi»i 

&Sl^*^\V:: 

; f . i • •%... 

f».- v . .. . 

.

r

.'v-*..:••'. • j -• •»• • » 

•.:*.• • . • 

*•». 

/•:< 

1 

sror T* /te- 2€^t3A»< 

STOP 

RUN t 8 

UORKF1LE ID' B 

WORKFILE NAME' 

JAN/12/94 11'24'83 

AREAS: 

RT 

8.82 

8.29 

AREA TYPE AR/HT AREA* 

1982 BV 8.181 4.886 

18583 VV 8:298 • 95.114 

TOTAL AREA-* 48565 

HUL FACTOR-* 1.9988E+88 *f* 

Ivi.rJ ***** —*^ *— ^--**%i*r.-> aa-aaaaaU 

• *i .--.>.. :*.v *••*:•/;.•• 

OTT^.^ $T/fiC+>K- l%tCf>frt. 

. j • **..;• • • • • \ .*•••••.• -

-—*»* • • , «f v . *» 

V . .... • • •"*_ ... 

•r > 

* : *•** . •.v;:. 

. • .***% •» . . • 

. •• • ••/.•»•• • -•••"i 

7.58 

tOP 

RUN i 9 

UORKFILE IO' B 

HORKFILE NAME' 

JAN/12/94 U'38*86 

AREA* 

RT 

8.83 

8.33 

7.58 

AREA TYPE 

1389 PB 

35597 PV 

119588 ee 

AR/HT 

8.874 

8.386 

e.381 

AREA* 

8.837 

22.748 

76.416 

**-**, 

TOTAL AREAs 156409 

HUL FACTOR^ l.t-»98E*»88 W#*t 

'.. * aa* •sjm*»\'f. a/a*.-*|-4» /(( 
P.M 

. • *. 

• a • %*•*•• • i \ • • _* ... . 

\ :.t

 :.:V.-.•:.*"' ••..•••. 

*•."•

 i**""*f'- .«N« £.*•*» •"•••:

. 

!-•.-.• '•rv.-V'.'*.*-.>-

• • . •.•••» UX>*0 BB e.Jtfl 7 641 < 

TOTAL AREA' J 564Sfl 

NUL FACTORS 1.8488E+88 Wlt^t 

RUN i 18 

VORKFILE ID' B 

UORKFILE NAHE« 

JAN/12/94 ll»47'53 

^•ts: 

AREA* 

RT 

8.83 

8.34 

7.51 

AREA TYPE AR/HT 

erlSS

 w •••» 

«SSf VB 8.584 

185428 BB 8.381 

TOTAL AREA** 175778 

HUL FACTOR--: 1.8888E-488 

AREA* 

1.117 

• 38.983 

59.576 .••u^-Js^^-^.-.^-^'.-' ' 

32\ /^c-TTC «v7i-CT@ 

• • *• • a-faa . _ •_•• *t 

. .» . ..*.•• • •• 

. . . 

•-*.—;•.• . . : 

• ••'•*•*•"":•> . ••* ••"> j . '• h 

"^7.5 1 

•*.>•••:< / •• *v ••••.•• 

*- "r . -*»• • • " . - .i** » •.*• 

* ; -.•.. • ..*>*. • .-'•: ' • " • • 

• '..'.'i.i .•.••-. '• -. • «;• . 

STOP 

RUN i 11 

UORKFILE IO' B 

UORKFILE NAME' 

• •> » ••*•>•• • • 

.-v 

,-• •* 1 * - .- • 

JAH/12/94 12-84'88 

AREA* 

RT 

8.83 

8.32 

8.71 

7.51 

TOTAL AREA= 

w i n r**.«••••»••» AI% _ 

AREA TYPE 

2184 

48757 

25454 

25676 

BV 

VV 

VB 

BB 

AR/HT 

8.893 

8.273 

8.331 

0.384 

AREA* 

2.863 

47.885 

24.957 

25.175 

...'.. M -. 

"•** • ;'.*•* * •* * 

181998 
P.15 

1

 •**.••.•*•: • ;••-* ' 

I**- 'Vi 

-.....•.•. »•*•-.-. * •-:. 

i . • •• * • • * 

•L • • • 

•••.St'*. ••-* *.v*• .%!•. • 

f;^-,'t^yfi.'^k.\'rf^' \ 

*>*• • • " * *^ T • • "a,. 

*••>• •"* • •* aa ' 

""^.a ? /Cti 77"& //^cCT(sl» 

nss 

STOP 

RUNt ./12 r • • « 

UORKFILE.ID? B." "'•* • 

UORKFILE NAME':' • -. * • .; 

AREA* "* 

o

R L - fREATYPE.. 

. 8.84 1158 B8 

8.32 42835 PV* 

8.72 19813 VB 

W/12/9 

• i*. 

• 

AR/HT 

8.873 

8.271 

8.288 

TOTAL AREAs : 63798 

MUL FACTORS 1.0988E+68 

AREA* 

1.883 

£7.142 

31.856 

? ? R P TSP 7 7 . ^ jcc rrc tr»7t<Yr(£, 

iW 

STOP 

RUN * 13 

UORKFILE IO* B 

UORKFILE NAME' 

JAH/12/94 14'19*83 

AREA* 

RT 

8.19 

8.32 

8.72 

7.52 

AREA TYPE AR/HT 

4639 PV 8.162 

54852 VV 8.283 

37769 VB 8.399 

124468 68 8.383 

AREA* 

2.892 

24.739 

17.834 

56.135 

• • • -•• -

'••>.. 

r •.M**»\. 

*•» v- .t 

.»': 

-w .•" 

..*/••. .*•».•„:•....

V a .•..%• ;... _, 

•v i". •?* 

f>-Yc*U$im$> 

l-a^*. fl(**l^i;a^'*-U3i% 

/» 

•c*. 

i*r Au 7 

•113 
•"•••-•"•"7*. *'J

 "a-rv.".. •-'*• . ' ' •* 

v.^.v-wt.*^t*.-*f^..^<.*:;--.*.^ 

*r.v. 

ir. 

Vi* V • • • •• cv.-i 

y.y-*. •-,-.• • •„* 

if : . 

.* •* ..'

 V

. *, •*! *'..' -• -•• • .."•• . " * . •*. ." ..•*••• "**' ^V 

,.-.« v"?'C:r~' • 

•W " • • tJ / • * •.;•• '«>. * 

TTCnp-- v tec TTC rvTLCT <3,H»T- P 

'7.52 

J , 

•3I.2.J 

-33.67 

STOP 

RUH t 14 

UORKFILE 10' B 

UORKFILE HAKE' 

AREA'/. 

RT 

8.19 

8.33 

8.72 

7.52 

38.23 

33.67 

I TOTAL AREA= 

JAN/12/94 

AREA TYPE 

5765 

55324 

44599 

136828 

2587 

3479 

BV 

VV 

VB 

BB 

BB 

PB 

A 

248588 

AR/HT 

8.155 

8.294 

8.464 

8.383 

8.487 

8.588 

14=41=48 

AREA* 

2.319 

22.256 

17.942 

55.843 

1.841 

1.488 

rt£**r 

*£. H>*,.-S^-eV;'*'"- • 

££2iaaBBBBBBM^BBBBBBBB^ 

T^^*;^WS5^ 

1 •..*. >'•:•• ••"•. .••••*.* 

•* \. •*.. > ... . *..-•, 

•••• *>*•}:>... **: 

• • A* 

» .* ••*•..>.• •'.'• •"' 

••£Z. • \.;i' ."Va.-'-vj:;;, 

J^*^*pv.«««w»*'5-;«j«J 

.-,•->';.*...•>./•;•. **•*-

. • • V •- " •- " *" • 

•'**•. -i* ••. •• *••• 

•• t-t*. 1 , J* ••• *• 

:'••••.••.*•., • •* . 

• : •*•• » > • : 

••-'tV"--^..-"-" 
P.17 

.••>• . • 

."*.•*.*• 

..••W 

111**1/1/. 

?-i^.-"-:-.-.-V.>v 

•*•.*-*•.•••••;• • 

'.-f'-v '••&•-•. V 

• • .:v*,wf.-. •..-. 

-. * 

-. * t. 

/. • 

•«*•»{»•/'• 

' • /•*,;<*:,* • 

HUL FACTORS 1.8888E+88 

/cc 77S IVOCT <&> ^0

^-

RUN# 18 

UORKFILE ID* B 

UORKFILE NAHE * 

JAH/12/94 16*88*41 

AREA* 

RT 

8.19. 

8.33 

8.71 

1.91 

3.81 

4.15 

5.84 

5.98 

6.81 

7.39 

7.58 

8.78 

9.78 

18.53 

11.34 

12.16 

12.95 

13.73 

14.18 

14.69 

15.24. 

16.89 

16.58 

16.95 

17.73 

18.49 

AREA TYPE 

28863 BV 

83488 

84525 

79883 

21214 

12878 

15381 

7912 

23447 

21914 

33461 

13117 

35285 

49347 

32139 

15557 

6944 

6543 

12129 

32213 

2172 

9431 

915 

15254 

15253 

38421 

W 

W 

VP 

PB 

PB 

PB 

PB 

PV 

W 

W 

PV 

W 

W 

W 

PV 

PB 

PB 

BP 

PV 

PB 

PB 

BB 

PB 

PV 

BV 

AR/HT 

8.159 

8.335 

8.472 

8.872 

8.496 

8.417 

0.376 

8.197 

0.399 

8.385 

8.415 

8.199 

8.516 

8.748 

8.511 

8.275 

8.275 

8.282 

8.364 

8.468 

8.879 

8.236 

8.183 

8.381 

8.349 

8.461 

AREA* 

3.868 

12.277 

12.438 

11.638 

3.128 

1.775 

2.258 

1.164 

3.448 

3.221 

4.921 

1.929 

5.189 

7.257 

4.726 

2.288 

1.821 

8.962 

1.784 

4.737 

8.319 

1.387 

8.135 

2.243 

2.243 

4.474 

TOTAL AREAs 679998 

HUL FACTORS 1.8886E488 

/. 

*.*••• *•

 ; -. • . 

• *-Y8 'l-V--.*.*.-:-.*.**.,, • '

- «-•• • • • , • ;.. ; 

••"'• • ••** , e • 

*..-•:. . ' • . '. N . ,1. " ' • .. 

.•*.* . •

 % 

. if-'. ••* •V* •< 

fv\-->:'-** . -• 

i- — 

,W 
-

* 

! 

i 

••• 

tfAPr*-f»* 

"^7.54 

So? 

lattetf**-***' 

• 

P.18 

« 

RUN I 19 

UORKFILE ID' 3 

UORKFILE KANE' 

JAH/12/94 16'36*34 

AREA* 

RT 

8.83 

8.32 

0.72 

7.54 

AREA TYPE 

936 BB 

45406 BV 

27468 VB 

13163 8V 

AR/HT 

8.867 

8.267 

8.365 

8.374 

AREA* 

1.876 

52.287 

.31.582 

15.135 

.•*>•«>>;. :»• 'M^y:rL" 

f ..yv; 

TOTAL AREAs 85973 

NUL FACTORS 1.8888E4B0 

[CC trt^fW^" ( ^ 

1 • . • * *. . 

. , i v -• •.. ' ••.'. . 

t •••' .'''%' '••• .•**•••" 

.•*.••• '*.w V •••?•-..— • 

"-••*• • **i:-*. \ <• "" 

. * 

*•*• > 

-•.*•. 

\u 
P.19 

nut. l-HWIUKs l.ttMWt+tttf 

•.•••V 

UK 

72 .13 

/c-c 77"tC 4V7t\CT 

3.47 

•«.«5 

.JJl.41 

^33.54 

15.75 

17.29 

no? 

RUNff 15 

UORKFILE ID* B 

UORKFILE NAHE* 

AREA* 

RT 

8.19 

8.33 

8.72 

3.47 

7.52 

8.85 

11.48 

13.54 

15.75 

17.29 

JAH/12/94 

AREA TYPE 

8938 

67846 

68770 

6375 

131870 

3330 

5794 

2098 

15599 

5010 

PV 

W 

VB 

PB 

PB 

PB 

BV 

PB 

PV 

PB 

AR/HT8:146 

8.299 

8.494 

. 8.479 

8:481 

8.263 

8.416 

8.217 

8.769 

8.481 

15*26*86 

AREA* 

2.913 

22.112 

19.886 

2.878 

42.717 

1.885 

1.888 

8.684 

5.884 

1.633 

TOTAL AREAs 

HUL FACTORS 1 

386838 

88B0E+88 

•XV;' 

•a Vt . "a

 - * " 

*i"*v •*.'* • *• / / . 

•rv**V<A»'%-''*^*-&.*'•'' .'*> 

} • . <£•...*..•>..;::•.••. /••% ...* ;.%; 

• f •••-. . .•• •* * 3 .. A -

•*.- ".AJ * V <* 

•** -

^U^-^S'"-*-" > ** 

a % • • .. . • • a • •Ta> *» • -* • * * 

:

 •. *ry v."* ••-»*• -v . *>••> *. 

:«>v^ 

• •••••v.: •. .. . — :*. /. . . . . *. * • 

••.•.••** , • • * \ . • • . . • • • • f •' «-

.<*•*••>-!. a*-J. • - *." . • ••-•••..:..- . . . .••".••• . . • 

4*V'.^"C'* ••*•*•-*•-'i.*--- - -• • *-" • • • • ••••••••.,:•. . • >..'• •• 

7«>y*.-:Ay:^v».'••-JI..-1 <.-;V;'":.:?••;'" •?•

 v-'••••;-.•••:•.••:• '• " • •*..-• "•" 

•"•-* • 

• * * 

. • >. *•• 

'•- ••*•' /.*• 

• ..«•••• • . • .. . . • 

•.••••• • .vv.:...••••• .•..> . • '. . ..,;. . *»-i » •£ 
P.20 

Uc to lfhr\ kfaf 

¥• •• 

f* 

% • 

't •* * -" • •••>"•' 

•-V* •iB*'•*.-*£*.• .- • 

•fr**"***. "*. . * b*;¥ . • •• 

"$••*.• ••*• .*••"•.• 

*.*•* . •.. • •.•>• % • 

avv •.••*• .•.•.* 4. 

| .«f 5 •••••••* . • - *>-• •. • *. 

4*, * 

*.-: •..> •••• 

..•*.•*» .v'*.V--*>^:»-.'-

£,:•• • •.•.•*:.:-*t\ i. -• 

/cc XOffv\ h-^^t. 

.43 

RUN t 

UORKFILE 

16 

ID' 

JAN/12/94 

B 

UORKFILE NAME* 

AREA* 

RT 

8.19 

8.34 

8.43 

1.98 

3.77 

• ti 

AREA TYPE 

8578 BV 

13552 VV 

215330 VB 

2711 PV 

8778 I PP 

AR/HT 

8.173 

8.897 

8.895 

8.146 

8.321 

15-51*39 

AREA* 

3.443 

5.444 

86.498 

1.889 

3.526 

• 

• 

£*•'.'*: 

•;•*-./••• 

TOTAL AREAs 243948 

HUL FACTORS 1.8888E+88 

fcerW* 

.44 

RUN t 17 . JAH/12/94 

UORKFILE.ID* B*: 

UORKFILE NAHE*- • 

AREA* 

RT AREA TYPE AR/HT 

8.19 11881 PP 8.166 

8.35 12854 PV 8.893 

8.44 181898 VB 8.895 

2.71 42936 BP 8.827 

15*56*26 

•. 

AREA* 

4.452 

4.879 

73.292 

17.377 

®*r&^!£&!£'C 

• ^ . . * 

! '..: • •' *• •*• • * **• i "• * i*-. ••• ..".It ''.'.'*'. :' r

. - . ••_i"i" :'*'.'.' "•.«*. . 

• ••.•• ; ••->•• • / • • • 

• »w%- •* - • 

a* a . 

• » • ix-.-<;-•'•'* •••:• 

TOTAL AREAs 247888 

MUL FACTORS 1.8888E-t-88 

\« rrf v*tf uoV 

••••..•• * j»..-;..', Vt.tiCe> • •• *.". -..••...••..... .- .-*-.. . 

,.- v •* • 

.- . • -. 

"Y::Y •• : \ ».*r**.:" -ft"- "»*>''••.•*••.: •'••. ••••f'/fel >•*«•• ••*•-•"'" 

*••*• :-'*" ^"».*: *•*.•• /•.#>

 : /•'•//( 5 '*"'•""• '•'••'•• ••! •:: 

.-.•., -.. *. .... 

a*t «••<• a ,*» a .•*' • a f c a . . • . « 

* e% •* • a • 

••>•>.- • ' • .:•• •• ' 
P.21 

$z*ltg-t^. 

htH'. 

RT 

8.93 

8.32 

8.72 

7.54 

ARFA TYPE 

936 BB 

4S486 BV 

P7468 VB 

13163 BV 

AR'HT 

8.967 

8.267 

8.365 

8.374 

AREA* 

1.876 

52.287 

31.582 

15.135 

TOTAL AREAs 86973 

HUL FACTOR* 1.8888E+80 

\CC nft^Htr iftr 

STScrra ^=^4333 /6^-77 T r>TL*iF<3>H'<£ 

'7.53 

•'•vi ' •V. ' * «.—?. 

. * ••.•.- •- .-. • • -. 

. .-•: • * . • • •-.?••-.•••.••• 

•vtfe ..*»•.. •.% • •• :•.-• • 

. •*: - •/ 

. • • .•••• .,'\ -.'.: 

.......•'•• :.:.- v 

. . • ^ * • 

• ; .-*..*• 

• .*:... *. 

•*. .• *. • • • 1 

* *. • 

*•> 

• . " a * • " 

Ifl 
1 

P.22 

J* 

•^j\£>'.•>:../ 

< 

• .... . •• • 

• 1 ..• ' 

•*••.•» • a 

/ 

: 

.•»-,.•. ..*i.... 

$!&«•« 

RUN « 28 

UORKFILE ID' 

JAH/12/94 

B 

UORKFILE NAHE* 

AREA* 

RT 

8.19 

8.33 

8.43 

8.72 

7.53 

58.68 

AREA TYPE 

3624 BV 

25631 VV 

26696 W 

24968 VB 

55895 BB 

662 D PB 

AR/HT 

0.169 

8.142 

8.194 

8.385 

8.378 

8.815 

16*57'84 

AREA* 

2.652 

18.754 

19.533 

18.263 

48.313 

8.484 

•l.-»|-1C-*'4V *• 

. , • -J.** 

' 

-*,*.»..• 

a . . • • •%•••.* • 

.; .••-...•..-:: 

*.',*-,*-«. ^a^»wa.»ev*J' i|{ 

'". '." " •'>"*^' ." 

•:•• . /».'.••. . •-. 

• ..*....* > 

TOTAL AREAs 136678 

NUL FACTORS !.9988E-t88 

te« VGo-Kdr \$fi? 

)ZO 
P.23 

0.*5 . 

•• «*..l*» ***"• *t-f •r-IVt 

RUN 1 24 

UORKFILE ID' 

JAN/12/94 

C 

UORKFILE NAME' 

AREA* 

RT 

8.19 

8.33 

8.71 

7.43 

AREA TYPE AR/HT 

8179 PV 8.146 

65327 VV 8.295 

55512 VB 8.456 

6515 BB 8.357 

19'23'82 

AREA* 

6.835 

48.288 

48.958 

4.887 

TOTAL AREAs 135538 

HUL FACTORS j.0888E488 

STJST TS» ICC 

u*t rteoittirr nif 

STOP 

v.* 

. 

..' I 

• ... . -..v i ^. v 

aftiS^tr- ij>*l*ae-8«af«'.*'a\ M 

' • *. 1' 

$£&£&&$& 

RUN « 25 JAH/12/94 

UORKFILE IO* C 

UORKFILE HAHF.' 

AREA* 

RT 

8.17 

8.38 

8.69 

7.39 

TOTAL AREA= 

Sain cA*r*Tf»oAREA TYPE 

8187 BV 

68123 VV 

46366 VB 

79428 88 

194A28 

1 aaaac+aa 

AR/HT 

8.154 

8 267 

8.413 

8.372 

tc« 

19-49*13 

AREA* 

4.179 

38.989 

23.898 

48.935 

ne o-tfi&ev .CM ' 
P.24 

• • . * ' . 

• Jtl-Snrv^iVa.'t **.- ...eeTv*} t*J4 .•-•.• • •..*n..,. . , 

ico ~TTC OVTLCT 

(& O.HTO 

STOP 

TOTAL AREAs 226988 

HUL FACTORS 1.8988E-488 

•• •:-••« 

... . \ 

__ .*.'• VfS/Mlr^tfo^rt, 

RUN t 26 JAN/12/94 

UORKFILE 10' C 

UORKFILE NANE< 

AREA* 

RT AREA TYPE AR/HT 

0.19 9855 BV 8.155 

0.32 64486 W 8.273 

0.71 ' 48847 VB 0.482 

7.39 183878 BB 8.375 

28*81'22 

AREA* 

4.342 

28.376 

21.521 

45.761 

.....r. 

/ 

l2Z-> 
P.25 

IV 

. **t» • •:* 

•"•-• • 

v •• •*. 

••..... .. . •• . .. 

.«...••..•»:•: .:*•••. • ••S^P•.-—•••'..•*•• . . .. ••-. . • . • 

• • *•.*••. . . •• • 

'•' * 

f. •• 

•Xtf 

•.*•• 

•.X.*; .V»' 

Vft.-.*',-

• ^ 1 • a •aLi * • •"aSa l ** tt\* * 

» ***\W*fe3-• \*v*-*& 

«*•.>•• *t>.a ap.t . • ' •» « i r**. 

Mft**w 

! 't4*V< )*4 .-./8123456789' *
?8ABCDF.F5! 

JKLMH0P0RSTUVHXYZt23456799' J <*>?eA8C0EF 

OP • 1 8 

" <N-D-Y)DATE' 8 1 

€ 

<H-M-S)T1HE« 8 7 

2 

RUN f 1 8 

CHT SP . 5 8 

ZERO 1 8 * 

ATT 2t 4 2 

nrcr7.u 

1 2- 9 4 

4 4-8 8 

•jtr • • • 

/ . V • 't . f •.%•• • 

. . *. »• • ...A * 

•> . . • •• ..' • 

. . • . • . { «.. . . 

* .. • 'Ot.*;r. 

»• .. . :• ': 4-<SVJ A 

;. •: ».w •••. ' v§'fe: 

y*-***y 

V'-; ;i:* 

• • 

a * • 

•• a 

•a 

•• 

"a"* * "*.. 

.p 

.*- ••••. 

.." * . • 

'.••• , •". 

• • "V "..a " 

(^7.18 

STOP 

RUH t 1 JAH/12/94 

UORKFILE ID* B 

UORKFILE NAME* 

AREA* 

RT AREA TYPE 

8.11 26153 BV 

7.18 159588 PB 

TOTAL AREA= 185738 

AR/HT 

8.233 

8.373 

• 

J. 

. 

09*32*14 

AREA* 

14.881 

85.919 

i 

V 

V 

Siftkl -tf 

{%">' 
P.26 

i . . 

•*'..%.> 

•**•'*•• ••*•*.. 

N 

/ 

i 

•a 

•>. 

t* P '*<•«•• 

.*.»•:•• . •:•• :••.-' 

p . • • 

*vi-»- ^4^^11^,11 . — • „ *- * -wd 

fl»* .a * a» " 

•a-»-«e* a 

"tc •*••• 

STOP 

RUN I 2 

UORKFILE ID* B 

UORKFILE HANE* 

AREA* 

RT 

8.81 

8.38 

7.48 

JAH/12/94 89*41.38 

^fJ^P J AR/HT 

35631 PV IS i 269

»B BB e.gj 

AREA* 

# 0.259 

11.662 

88.879 

TOTAL AREAs 3e5S3f l 

HUL FACTORS LMSS S 

fc^aa 

fe ••; 

£-.: • • 

*Va " • 

***-A/-***jsA 

•*. 

-•.aaj 

^••Jjjj". , 

. .•*...;..•;—••<-.'.-v^.»A»*i>t ". 

•V.V ••* - ......*•.^4*4^. . - t 

<& V * 

t»i i a*Vaa«> 
P.27 

v •••:•. 

"• * : 

> /.» v 

. -\ v;; *-• 

.* * . 

:.• ,.-*•

 v 

'.*. •• 

V ' >••* ».• * J*...' 

• • . ... .» . .. . 

...*>.. . 

Ital^eSaaaAiM&te {''itmoVMm^ 

V-.-. ;• 

vs.* . • • • t • • •%•"• •** '• 

. .-v ••• * . • •» • •• *. 

• • I *«A • « 

. * . V . 

, * a • • V • \ 

. •.-.*:•• 

•• : : .-• 

• —itnrnr HKER* 383338" 

HUL FACTORS 1.8888E+88 

A n 2t I 8 

A** ' 

T .32 

«-«.. 

*>. • -i 

•I-::..•>•*•> ••*.•••"' 

• • • • 

• V ". * • • 

at**'/. 

" -

STOP 

RUN 4 3 

UORKFILE ID* B 

UORKFILE NAME* 

JAN/12/94 89'52'14 

AREA* 

RT 

8.84 

8.32 

7.42 

AREA TYPE AR/HT 

3348 BV 8.153 

77841 VB 8.633 

237768 BB 8.379 

AREA* 

1.859 

24.485 

74.545 

TOTAL AREA= 318958 

HUL FACTORS 1.8988E+8B 

e.*f*if 

5W r 33 

Y9 

ti* 
P.28 

S . 

.•.•i*.iKi/:*tvi.v.-.*.4j-~,ii.-. 

• • ••• ** tt'.-L a*a a -ij»* • .a*. •**• • 

•7--.V .V.. 

*l 

•P. 

• .V 

•• . 

. .. •. 

•••i*. • • 

.U -

£ 

. ........ % .vy? :•... 

& 

•. ••.•. / 

• .••*. • 

P/vpj. 

7.45 

RUN i 4 

UORKFILE IO< B 

UORKFILE NAHE* 

JAH/12/94 18-14'86 

AREA* " 

RT 

8.81*. 

8.33 

7.45 

. AREA TYPE AR/HT AREA* 

--816 BP 8.856 8.239 

54932 PB 8.446 16.182 

285488 VB 8.388 83.658 

TOTAL AREAs 341140 

NUL FACTORS. 1.0888E+88 

ice 

T .33 

7.45_. 

.-:•- *••••:••• 

'•*_• * a aae- . 

.•-••}' v.#». 

.•.•*• •• • 

• • 

RUN t 5 JAN/12/94 

UORKFILE ID' B 

UORKFILE NAHE' 

AREA* 

RT 

8.82 

8.33 

7.45 

TOTAL AREA* 

AREA TYPE AR/HT 

2448 BV 8.188 

38358 VV 8.318 

186128 BB 8.388 

< \ Z-CQ < 

19*29*56 

AREA* 

1.661 

Z6.188 

72.232 

146928

 iCi faHT 

J

. :•— r ••• -

::""' \ 

. - •• f : 

• •• . . . ••. 

• • ; .* . V i 

» • ••. *. \ • •.• » •'.V^:;^./: 

-• *. — — -"••{" • 

?• •"•••••> •«*. 

: •« ;>•.'"•* •••;•.. 

,i.>•;.:.. jt-f 

. . A.. / •** <U 

. . . i . • •. ..y. 

>K . 

:< 

K A ! 

Min ranni>= 1 aaaac+aa 
P.29 

• a • a«V«< 

•v.* 

."• .. ..*!} 

'. . - .* & •*• 

I*.•%-.•• -^W» •. . 

-V.'*-,'.K.*V'5U--.-

«!*M*S 

/ 

SIM •*-&*.a /cc fitfCtf 

• . \ -. A • . «.4yrt*'. 

• ... . .* 

• •« ^«r .• • \ a*. • . 

RUN I 6 

UORKFILE ID* B 

UORKFILE HAKE' 

JAN/12/94 18*39*15 

AREA*/. 

RT 

8.02 

8.33 

7.46 

AREA TYPE AR/HT 

3469 BV 9.126 

38286 W 8.328 

189618 BB 8.388 

TOTAL AREA= 151368 

NUL FACTORS 1.8889E48A 

AREA* 

2.292 

25.294 

72.414 

tuo 

I 

'. > 

V?" 
P.30 

•:.* • • - y.. ".'. 

. •:* • • • 

•/ 3». 

.'•'.< 

....^f...... . «. . '. . . . a . 

..rwjt..,••..• • •*>•;•: * v • •**•• ••• 

* • • . .*, , «.. . •. . . ..•• * . • . • • • . 

'•..".• *.*•::• • •..•"..**• •.' 

••*.-•• • • .• • •. .:• • i . • * 

.* •v* .. .. -^ . 

tar #."j-*n*"* 

• ••• ;.:*• 

•. *" 

STigr^-p.. /c*c 77£ ^vrL-CTi^ 

. ^yi^*r^

bMAu.4(-^^rW£i 

•*••*• •*»' a ••* , . "a 

y,.#t ^ 

/ 

.'." •.•* 

RUN I 7 

UORKFILE ID* B . 

UORKFILE NAME* 

JAN/12/94 11*12*11 

AREA* 

RT 

8.83 

8.31 

8.72 

7.58 

AREA TYPE 

1881 PV 

43291 W 

21459 VB 

45688 PB 

AR/HT 

0.099 

0.267 

0.316 

0.384 

TOTAL AREAs 112318 

HUL FACTORS 1.8888E488 

AREA* 

1.675 

38.546 

19.187 

48.673 

• . * .*•*.*/**. .* •"»"• • • '. ••%•%«• I.. / ••\«*.' . 

*• - • ... .» . *:.. •. 

- - • • • afl X • 

• •*#••••?• • " \ * *• 

VV> •'•'•••• \ ?• 

• . . ;• • •» 

. . • . »\ .* % •£ ,••.-/•....•;• • *•» 

*•*•.* •• - J •* « 

•.*/. * . 

T"""* • A" 

H9^ 

c)£-8 

v

« 
P.31 

SECTION 3: AIR QUAUTY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT APPROVALS 

The following .Air Quafity Management Districts have accepted this report and 

approved the styrene emission factor of 0.81%: 

1. Bay Area Air Quality Management District 

939 Ellis Street 

San Francisco. California 94109 

(415)771-6000 

(415) 928-8560 FAX 

2. Department of Health 

Jefferson County, Alabama 

1400 Sixth Avenue South 

P.O. Box 2648 

Birmingham, Alabama 35202 

(205)933-9110 

3. Air Pollution Control District 

County of San Diego 

9150 Chesapeake Drive 

San Diego, California 92123-1096 

(619)694-3307 

nJ 
P.32 

SECTION 4: ENFORCEMENT 

Enforcement at both the Bay Area Air Quality .Management District and the 

Jefferson County Department of Health consists of reporting the amount of 

styrene purchased as monomer and in resins containing styrene on a yearly 

basis. This data reported is the same as that submitted to the EPA under SARA 

313 Forni R. The respective districts then use the amount of styrene purchased 

per year, in either pounds or gallons, times the emission factor in order to 

determine the styrene emissions for the facility involved. 

EXAMPLE:1 

BAAQMD EMISSION CALCULATIONS FOR PULTRUSION MACHINES: 

Emissions^ (resin throughput)(%styrene)(styrene densHy)(emlsslon factor)* 

For S-1 Pultrusion machine 

o.oZ4f 73fr Zfiz 

Emissions=(8971 gal/yr)(0.435)(7.6 lb/gal)(O£081)=24O lb/yr/365 days/yr=D£tf 

Ib/day styrene 

* The District assumes a styrene density of 7.6 lb/gal and a worst case 

maximum styrene content of 43.5% styrene=0.435 

1: FAX from .Alex Saschin, Air Quality Engineer II, Permit Services Division, 

BAAQMD, April 19,1996. 
Docket No. A-94-52 

Category II-B 

The following information is located in the confidential files ofthe Director, Emission 

Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. This information is 

confidential pending final determination by the Administrator and is not available for public 

inspection. 

1 set of photos = 31; 1 video tape; 1 cassette tape; 1 diskette 

1 copy CBI Site visit Report (Plant Comments - 4/22/98,124 pp. Confidential Business 

Information located in CN-N801-12/ESD 98185-C18-02. 

.rtV