alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vapor Fuel Technologies, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2003,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry Chace, Treasurer
and principal financial officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Larry Chace
Larry Chace
Chief Financial Officer
January 13, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT
CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, E. Leon Daniel, Chief Executive Officer, of Ivanhoe Energy Inc., hereby
certify that:

(a)     the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2003 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related
interpretations; and

(b)     the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

* * *

Chief Executive Officer

|    |  |                   
|--- |  | ------------------
|By: |  | /s/ E. Leon Daniel
|    |  |                   
|    |  | E. Leon Daniel    

May 7, 2003

Page 18 of 19
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00720

- CV
AGD, L.P. AND ANABELL CARDONA

v. QUEST PRINCIPAL INVESTMENTS, INC., JUAN LEAL, RAUL A. PENA, MD, RUBEN CASTILLA AND RSRA, L.P.
On Appeal from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Caus e No. C

- 1526

- 08

- F

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are ad judged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 20, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,389
<SECURITIES>                                    93,003
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,669
<INVENTORY>                                     13,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,335
<PP&E>                                           8,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,702
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       134,728
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,173)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,257
<SALES>                                         82,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,234
<CGS>                                           43,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   860
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,991
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,238
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,753
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,753
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23


</TABLE>
Order filed May 30, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00418

- CV

____________ JUNE R

. WILLIAMS , Appellant

V.

STONELEIGH GARDENS A SSOCIATES, L.L.C, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1128153



### O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 16, 2019. The notice of appeal was due May 16, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed the notice of appeal on May 17, 2019, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting
instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. D orner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to comeforward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. S ee Miller v.

Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the da te of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
- A-A - 20 I0 -0 'bS- 1

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Gordanko Jcremic 07/23/10 No objection.

613-952-4379

Bombardier Ruxandra Popescu 07f23/10 No objection.

514-855-5001

x88384

Regional Airline Dave Lotterer 07123110 Email

Association 202-367-1252

lottererrmraa.ore.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, E. Leon Daniel, Chief Executive Officer of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
that: (a) the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the
Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and (b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. * * * Chief Executive Officer By:
    
    /s/ E. Leon DanielE. Leon Daniel
 May 5, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.30

                        AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This Amendment of Employment Agreement (this "Amendment") amends that
certain Employment Agreement dated February 12, 1998 (attached hereto as Exhibit
"A" and made a part hereof by this reference) (the "Agreement") by and between
RICHARD RAQUET (the "Employee") and NCO TELESERVICES, INC., a Pennsylvania
corporation (the "Company"), and this Amendment shall be effective as of June
25, 1999 (the "Effective Date").

     For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.   Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is amended by providing that the Employee's
     title shall be Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

2.   Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is amended to provide that the Employee's
     duties shall be those which are customarily incident to the position of a
     Chief Executive Officer.

3.   Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is amended by providing that the Term (as such
     term is defined in the Agreement) shall be extended for an additional
     period of three (3) years.

4.   Paragraph A of Exhibit "A" of the Agreement is amended by providing for a
     Base Salary of $250,000.00 per annum, commencing on the Effective Date. The
     Base Salary shall be payable in installments, in arrears, in accordance
     with the Company's regular payroll practices, but not less often than
     monthly.

5.   Paragraph B of Exhibit "A" of the Agreement is amended by providing that
     the Bonus shall be up to $100,000.00 based upon the Company successfully
     achieving certain financial goals as established by mutual agreement of the
     Company and the Employee.

6.   In addition to the options granted to the Employee in the Agreement, the
     Employee shall receive an option to purchase 10,000 Shares of common stock
     of NCO Group, Inc. (the Company's parent company) at the per share price
     equal to the closing price of such stock on the Effective Date.

7.   The Employee, in lieu of an automobile allowance, shall receive a company
     car as agreed to by the Employee and the Company.

8.   In the event any term or condition of this Addendum is inconsistent with
     any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms of this Addendum will
     control. Except as stated above, all the terms and conditions of the
     Agreement, including all restrictions and covenants, which restrictions and
     covenants the Employee hereby acknowledges as being for sufficient
     consideration and enforceable, shall remain in full force and effect and
     are incorporated herein by reference as though set forth at length.


<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum to become
effective on the Effective Date.

NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS,  INC.


By:____________________________                _______________________________
                                                Richard Raquet
Exhibit 21.1 - LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

1. Exabyte FSC Ltd.

2. Nihon Exabyte Corporation

3. Exabyte (Scotland) Ltd.

4. Exabyte (Europe) B.V.

5. Exabyte Magnetics GmbH

6. Exabyte (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.

7. Exabyte (Canada) Corporation

8. Ecrix Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,666
<SECURITIES>                                       116
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                       344
<INVENTORY>                                      3,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,957
<PP&E>                                         583,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 592,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,736
<BONDS>                                        216,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           166
<OTHER-SE>                                     251,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   592,788
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211,840
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,150
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,401
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,749
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,749
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
        

</TABLE>
#### James Allen, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Thomas N. Gibson, defendant in error.

That a defendant paid too much for land is no defense to notes given for the purchase money, where he had opportunity of examination, even though he acted upon the representations of the plaintiff and another.

Vendor and purchaser. Sales. Before Judge James Johnson. Talbot Superior Court. September Term, 1874.

For the facts, see the decision.

*601Marion Bethtjne, by E H. Worrill, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff brought his action against the defendant on two promissory notes for $712 95. To this action the defendant pleaded that the notes were given for eighty-two acres of land adjoining defendant; that plaintiff and one Castleberry fraudulently combined to cheat defendant, by representing to him that the land was worth $15 00 per acre, when it was worth only $4.00 per acre, and thus induced him to purchase the land at the former price, and divided the two notes between themselves. The plaintiff demurred to the defendant’s plea, the court sustained the demurrer, and the defendant excepted. It appears from the record that the land purchased was *adjoining*the land of defendant, and there is no pretence that he was prevented, or did not have ample opportunity to examine the land and see for himself what it was worth before he purchased it. If he thought proper to rely upon the representations of the plaintiff and Castleberry as to the value of the land to him, instead of examining and looking at the land with his own eyes before he purchased it, he has no one to blame for his credulity and folly but himself; the courts will not relieve him: *Tindall vs. Harkinson,*19 *Georgia Reports,*448. There was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the defendant’s pleas.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 21765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09014]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean 
Water Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

    On April 10, 2015, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed 
consent decree with the United States District Court for the Northern 
District of Illinois in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Beaver 
Oil Co., Inc., Civil Action No. 13 C 830.
    The defendant in this case, Beaver Oil Company, Inc., operates a 
centralized waste treatment and used oil recycling facility in 
Hodgkins, Illinois. The lawsuit alleges that the defendant violated the 
Clean Water Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act by 
failing to comply with regulations governing the handling of wastewater 
and hazardous wastes. The proposed settlement requires the defendant to 
perform injunctive relief and pay a civil penalty of $250,000.
    The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on 
the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and 
should refer to United States v. Beaver Oil Co., Inc., D.J. Ref. No. 
90-5-1-1-09169. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty 
(30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be 
submitted either by email or by mail:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         To submit comments:                     Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By e-mail...........................  [email protected].
By mail.............................  Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
                                       DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
                                       Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During the public comment period, the consent decree may be 
examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide a paper copy 
of the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction 
costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, 
U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
    Please enclose a check or money order for $20.50 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury.

Randall M. Stone,
Acting Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-09014 Filed 4-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
```
exv10w4






Exhibit 10.4



The Bank shall explain the material contents of this Agreement to the
Mortgagor and shall deliver to the Mortgagor a copy of the general terms and
conditions for credit transactions and a copy of this Agreement.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Prepared by     	 	Reviewed by	 	Approved by
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 





KUN-MORTGAGE




AMENDMENT AGREEMENT TO KUN-MORTGAGE AGREEMENT

(For Changes of Scope of Secured Obligations & Settlement Date)






 




			
	*	 	Please enter the appropriate information in your own handwriting in the
spaces within the thick rectangles provided.
	 
	*	 	This amendment agreement is not required to be registered and becomes
effective upon a mutual agreement by and among parties.





May 24, 2010




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	Creditor & Mortgagee:

	 	Woori Bank
	 	(seal)
	 	Seal Collation
	Address:
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Obligor:

	 	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.

 Representative Director & CEO JooHo Kim /s/JooHo Kim
	 	(seal)	 	 
	Address:

	 	280-8, 2-ga, Seongsoo-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul
	 	 	 	Seal Collation
	Mortgagor:

	 	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.

 Representative Director & CEO JooHo Kim /s/ JooHo Kim
	 	(seal)	 	 
	Address:

	 	280-8, 2-ga, Seongsoo-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul	 	 	 	 





The scope of secured obligations covered by the kun-mortgage established by and among the
above parties shall be changed as follows:



Scope of Secured Obligations



Scope of Secured Obligations after Change:


Specific Kun-Mortgage to Comprehensive Kun-Mortgage



Settlement Date



Settlement Date after Change:




Specifications of Existing Kun-Mortgage














 








	 	 	 	 	 

	1. Kun-Mortgage Agreement	 	Kun-Mortgage Agreement dated April 4, 2007
	2. Details of Joint
Mortgages

	 	Registration
	 	Registry Office of Gwangjoo District Court, April 5,
2007, No. 60992
	 

	 	Properties
	 	957, Daechon-dong, Buk-gu, Gwangjoo
	 

	 	Priority
	 	1st priority
	 

	 	Owner
	 	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.
	 
	 

	 	Registration
	 	Registry Office of Incheon District Court, April 5,
2007, No. 28081
	 

	 	Properties
	 	419-1, Cheongcheon-dong, Boopyoung-gu, Incheon
	 

	 	Priority
	 	1st priority
	 

	 	Owner
	 	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.
	 
	 

	 	Registration
	 	Registry Office of Seoul Eastern District Court, April
5, 2007, No. 24197
	 

	 	Properties
	 	280, 2-ga, Seongsoo-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul and others
	 

	 	Priority
	 	1st priority
	 

	 	Owner
	 	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.
	 
	 

	 	Registration
	 	Registry Office of Incheon District Court, April 5,
2007, No. 21924
	 

	 	Properties
	 	516-1, Hyosung-dong, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon and others
	 

	 	Priority
	 	1st priority
	 

	 	Owner
	 	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.
Last set of edits

Juan Santiago to: Kymn, Christine J. 02/24/2012 07:10 PM

Cc: Anna Wood, "Ghorbi, Darian", Howard Hoffman, Kristi Smith, Lynn 

Hutchinson, MichaelS Brooks, Pam Long, Paul Balserak

From: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Ghorbi, Darian" <Darian_E_Ghorbi@omb.eop.gov>, 

Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kristi Smith/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lynn 

Hutchinson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, MichaelS Brooks/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Pam 

Christine, please find attached our response to your last set of comment.

Call me if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Juan 

 - ts3 draft.docx

 - Interagencycomments4 EO 1286613563EPA NPRM Tailoring Step 3.docx
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> 5 
        
<S>                                                               <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1998 
<CASH>                                                         1,124,140
<SECURITIES>                                                   1,272,889 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  1,144,627 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0 
<INVENTORY>                                                       33,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               4,240,256
<PP&E>                                                           250,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  (216,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 6,906,572 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          3,005,502
<BONDS>                                                                0 
<COMMON>                                                           4,969 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0   
<PREFERRED>                                                            0 
<OTHER-SE>                                                     3,608,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   6,906,572
<SALES>                                                        8,521,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               9,123,326
<CGS>                                                          4,591,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  4,591,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               4,787,622
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               29,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (244,889)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       3,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (247,889)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (247,889) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.06)
         


</TABLE>