alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gregg Fryett, CEO of EGPI Firecreek, Inc. certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of EGPI Firecreek, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of  material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements, and other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such  disclosure controls   and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the small  business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.



c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the  small  business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business

issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a  significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 18, 2005



/s/ Gregg Fryett

Gregg Fryett

Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 24, 2017

a0517

Order 

Clerk

May 24, 2017

154308

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154308

COA: 324559

Cass CC: 13-010217-FC

TIMOTHY LEE SOLLOWAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 30, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATION OF 10-Q REPORT
OF
EXABYTE CORPORATION

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2003



1.     The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Interim Chief Financial Officer of Exabyte Corporation ("Exabyte"). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 10-Q Report of Exabyte Corporation for the quarter ended September 27, 2003.

2.     We certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exabyte Corporation.

This Certification is executed as of November 11, 2003.



|/s/ Tom W. Ward                                   
|--------------------------------------------------
|Tom W. Ward, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                  
|                                                  
|/s/ Carroll A. Wallace                            
|Carroll A. Wallace, Chief Financial Officer       



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Exabyte Corporation and will be retained by Exabyte Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: "Higgins, Cortney " <Cortney _Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: Robin Dunkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Amy

Cole/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/15/2011 11:14 AM Subject: RI

N 2060

- AQ41

________________________________________ Hi Robin, Can you have OP upload th is into ROCI S? I'm opened the package up for amendment. Regards, Cortney
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 8939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03167]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Sunshine Act Meeting; Canceled

DATE AND TIME:  Monday, February 10, 2014, 11:30 a.m. EST

PLACE:  Broadcasting Board of Governors, Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 
Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT:  Cancellation of Special Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of 
Governors
SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) has canceled the 
telephonic meeting to discuss and approve the agency's Operating Plan 
for Fiscal Year 2014.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-03167 Filed 2-12-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

|   | 1. | The                quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006                (the                “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results                of                operations of Debt Resolve, Inc. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                              |                                                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                              | /s/                JAMES                D.                BURCHETTA |
|   | James                D. BurchettaCo-Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer           |
|   |                                                                                              |
|   | /s/ KATHERINE              A.              DERING                                                 |
|   | Katherine                A. DeringChief                Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
|   |                                                                                              |

----
#### Bonesteel and another vs. Orvis.

*Effect of an appeal bondin repleoin> wlm'e sureties same as in replevin bond,*— Stay *of proceedings.*

1. Where the defendant's sureties on appeal 5n replevin are-thesame as the sureties on the replevin bond, against whom the judgment was entered as well as against the defendant, *it seems*that the undertaking on appeal is not sufficient to stay proceedings on the judgment.

2. But the undertaking to pay the costs and damages on appeal, is the assumption • of a new liability by such sureties, and is sufficient to perfect the appeal.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Fond du Lac*County.

The plaintiffs (who were respondents here), moved to dismiss the appeal.

*Gillett &*Conldin, for the motion.

*Blair &*Coleman, *contra.*

Downer, J.

The respondents move to dismiss the appeal in this case, because the sureties in the undertaking on appeal are the same persons who were sureties for the appellant (defendant below), in the undertaking in replevin, and against whom and the *647appellant the judgment was rendered in the circuit court from which the appeal is taken.

It is contended that the true construction of the statute requiring security on appeal is, that it requires that some new security, additional to that which the plaintiffs had before the appeal, should be given to stay proceedings on the judgment appealed from; that as the sureties in this case on appeal were liable to pay the entire judgment against them before the appeal, it is in fact an appeal without any security within the spirit and meaning of the statute. There is force in this reasoning so far, and as to that part of the undertaking which is for the payment of the judgment, and we are inclined to the opinion that it is insufficient to stay proceedings on the judgment.

In the view we have taken, however, it is unnecessary for us to decide whether the undertaking is or is not sufficient to stay the proceedings. The undertaking to pay costs and damages is an undertaking to pay what the sureties were not previously liable to pay, and we see no reason why they are not as competent as to that undertaking, as they would be to execute any undertaking in any other action ; and that alone being sufficient to perfect the appeal, the motion must be overruled.

*By the Court.*— Motion overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATIN EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                       557
<INVENTORY>                                      3,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,839
<PP&E>                                          13,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,642
<BONDS>                                         15,184
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,269
<SALES>                                         28,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,343
<CGS>                                            8,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   928
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,001)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,490)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,490)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No. 
333-1326 on Form S-3 dated February 13, 1996, related to the Dividend 
Reinvestment Plan; No. 33-80853 on Form S-8, dated December 28, 1995, related to
the 1984 Stock Option Plan; No. 33-80847 on Form S-8, dated December 28, 1995, 
related to the 1989 Executive Stock Option Plan; No. 33-80851 on Form S-8, dated
December 28, 1995, related to the 1989 Directors' Stock Option Plan; No. 
33-80857 on Form S-8, dated December 28, 1995, related to the 1989 Stock Option 
and Incentive Plan; No. 33-80859 on Form S-8, dated December 28, 1995, related 
to the 1994 Executive Stock Plan; No. 33-80861 on Form S-8, dated December 28, 
1995, related to the 1994 Directors' Stock Option Plan; and No. 33-80863 on Form
S-8 dated December 28, 1995, related to the First Northern Savings Bank, S.A. 
401(k) Savings Plan and the related Prospectuses constituting a part thereof of 
our report dated January 23, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial 
statements of First Northern Capital Corp. included in the annual report (Form 
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                   ---------------------


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 17, 1998
chinatel_10q-ex1001.htm


 







EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 








Agreement for Professional Services


 









 


FIRST AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT FOR


PROFESSIONAL SERVICES


 


by and between


 


TRUSSNET USA, INC. (a Delaware corporation)


 


and


 


TRUSSNET USA, INC. (a Nevada Corporation)


 


 


 




  





  











  






 


First Amendment to


Agreement for Professional Services


 


This First Amendment to Agreement for Professional Services, effective as of October 1, 2009 ("First Amendment"), amends that certain Agreement for Professional Services ("Agreement") by and between Trussnet USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("TND"), and Trussnet USA, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("TNN"). Section references in this First Amendment correspond to the equivalent Section of the Agreement.


 


The Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the original Section 4 and inserting the following Section 4:


 


4. Payment


 


TNN shall pay TND for the Services it provides to TNN at TND's standard hourly rates and/or based upon a fixed fee for specific Services. Hourly time charges are subject to change by TND upon thirty (30) days prior written notice. Within ten (10) days after the end of each calendar month during the term of this Agreement, or at such other intervals as TNN and TND mutually agree, TND shall submit an invoice to TNN generally describing the Services during the prior month or agreed upon time interval and identifying the amount of compensation due TND for the Services it has provided to TNN. TNN shall pay TND's invoice for the Services performed to date in installments of Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000) per month, effective October 1, 2009, and the first day of each succeeding month ("Payment Due Date"), until paid in full.


 


All amounts now or subsequently due and unpaid to TND for Services shall be converted into shares of Series A Common Stock ("Shares") of TNN's parent company, China Tel Group, Inc. at a conversion price equal to the lesser of: (i) ninety-five ($0.95); or (ii) eighty percent (80%) of the volume weighted average of the closing bid price for the Shares on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board Exchange for the ten (10) day period prior to each Payment Due Date.


 


Except as expressly amended by this First Amendment, all other terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.


 


Trussnet USA Inc. (Delaware)


 


By: /s/ Christopher B. Young      


Printed Name: Christopher B. Young


Title: Chief Operating Officer


 


Trussnet USA, Inc. (Nevada)




 


By: /s/ George Alvarez      


Printed Name: George Alvarez 


Title: Chief Executive Officer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">County Line Pharmacy, as Assignee of Clara Hunter, Respondent, </font></b></div><br><br><party role="defendant&lt;Body&gt;&lt;P&gt;">Geico Insurance Company, Appellant.Law Office of Printz &amp; Goldstein (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for appellant.Lewin &amp; Baglio, LLP (Brendan Kearns of counsel), for respondent.<p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ulysses Bernard Leverett, J.), entered October 29, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for medical supplies provided to plaintiff's assignor on January 6, 2011 and March 15, 2011.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for medical supplies provided to plaintiff's assignor on January 6, 2011 and March 15, 2011 are granted.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for medical supplies provided to plaintiff's assignor on January 6, 2011 and March 15, 2011. The Civil Court found that an issue of fact exists as to the medical necessity of the supplies at issue.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>County Line Pharmacy as Assignee of Earline Vaughns v GEICO Ins. Co.</i> (___ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2015-53 Q C], decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, and the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for medical supplies provided to plaintiff's assignor on January 6, 2011 and March 15, 2011 are granted.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: April 13, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></party></partyblock>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION****OF****CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Zhilin Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18        U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.         

|        |   |                                                   | Date: June 24, 2009                            |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |        |
|        |   |                                                   | By: /s/ Zhilin Li                              |   |   |
|        |   |           |        Zhilin Li |   |   |
|        |   |                                                   | Chief Executive Officer                        |   |   |
#### JABEZ H. FOSTER, Respondent, *vs.*PATRICK LAVIN, Impl’d with WINFIELD SMITH, et al.

APPEAL FROM MILWAUKEE CIRCUIT COURT.

This case is dependent upon the same or similar facts as are apparent in the next preceding case of *Smith et al. vs.*Lavin, impleaded with Foster, and for similar reasons must be affirmed with costs.