alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A R I E L R A M O N A R A U Z ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 72937 A ge nc yN os . A 096- 356- 298

A 096- 356- 299 A 096- 356- 300 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r16, 2010 ** B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A ri el R am on A rauz and h i s f am i l y, nat i ves and ci t i ze ns of N i cara gu a, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ di sm i ss al of an appeal f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s or de rde ny i ng the i rr e que s tf ora s y l um a nd w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u a n t to 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED FEB 22 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS06- 72937 2 r e v ie w f o rs u b s tan tia l e v id e n c e , La ta v . I NS , 20 4 F . 3d 12 41 , 12 44 (9th C i r. 20 00 ), a nd w e gr a ntthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w , a nd r e m a nd. T he a ge nc yf

ound the ha rm A r auz a l l e ge d di d notr i s e t o the l e ve l of p ersecu t i o n . T h i s fi n d i n g i s n o tsup p o rt edb y su b st an t i al ev i d en ce b ecau se S a n d in is ta s k id n ap e dA r au z , in v a d e dh is f a m ilyh o m e s e v e r a l tim e s , h a r a s s e dh is f a m ilyr e p e a te d ly , a n dc lo s e lyc o n f r o n te dh im w ith d e a th th r e a ts . See R ua no v. A s h c r o ft , 3 0 1 F . 3 d1 1 5 5 , 1 1 6 0 -6 1 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 2 ) (co n cl u d i n g th atth reat s, acco m p an i edb y so m e fo rm o f co n fro n t at i o n o r m i streatm en t , est ab l i sh edp ast pers ec ut i on ). T he a ge nc ya l s o f

ound A r auz di d note s t abl i s h ane xus be tw e e n the S andi ni st as ’ ac t i on s a gai nsthi m and a prot ec t ed grou nd . S ub st ant i al evi dence does n o tsup p o rtth e ag en cy’ s fi n d i n g th atth ere w as n o n ex u s b etw een th e S an d i n i st as’ a c tio n s a n dap r o te c te dg r o u n d . Se e Na v a s v . I NS , 21 7 F . 3d 64 6, 65 6 (9th C i r. 2000) ( appl i c a ntm a ye s t abl i s h e l i gi bi l i tyf ora s y l um r e l i e f

bys how i ng pe r s e c ut i on on ac coun tof a prot ec t ed ca t egory) . A cc ordi ng l y, w e grantthe pet i t i on for r evi ew and rem and for further pr oc e e di ngs c ons i s t e ntw i th thi s di s pos i t i on. See IN S v. V en tu ra , 537 U . S . 12, 16 -18 (20 02 ) ( per c uri am ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
Order entered June 16, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00486-CV

IN RE BARBARA JOHNSON

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-10-14794

ORDER

Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, and Goldstein

Before the Court is relator’s May 23, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus in 

which relator complains of the trial court’s order dismissing her appeal from the 

Associate Judge’s April 26, 2021 report. We request a response, if any, from real 

party in interest and respondent by July 6, 2022.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
Exhibit
      32








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The Children’s Internet, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sholeh
      Hamedani, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------










/S/
      SHOLEH HAMEDANI


Sholeh
      Hamedani,


Chief
      Executive Officer


and
      Chief
      Financial Officer


June
      20,
      2007
TS- CCGL81

Attachment #10

Test Data on the New Chemical Substance s

Test Report/Study List
The Honorable Christopher Prine

Clerk First Court of Appeals 301 Fannin St., Room 208 Houston, TX. 77002

August 11, 2015

Re: Joshua Williams v. State of Texas , cause number 01

- 14 -00395- CR

To the Clerk:

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4, please find a copy of the certified mail return receipt for the letter sent to the Appellant, Joshua Williams

, containing a copy of the opinion affirming his conviction. The copy of the certified mail return receipt is attached to this letter. Additionally, the letter contained information regarding the Appellant’s right to a pro se PDR and the relevant rules from the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. I have informed the Appellant that I will not be filing a PDR on his behalf.

Regards,

/s Mark Kratovil Mark Kratovil Assistant Public Defender Texas Bar Number 24076098 1201 Franklin Street, 13th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 274- 6728 Facsimile: (713) 437- 4339 mark.kratovil@pdo.hctx.net

1201 Franklin Street, 13 th Floor Houston, Texas 77002

713.368.0016 713.368.9278 eFax ACCEPTED 01-14-00395-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/11/2015 10:27:56 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARY ISABEL RUIZ

,

Appellant

,

v.

T HE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 0 0181

- C R

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 4

o f El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 201 60C07963 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the b rief until January 31

, 20 20

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELLANT ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Carl DeKoatz

, the Appellant ’ s attorney, prepare the

Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before January 31

, 20 20

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 nd day of January

, 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox , JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2445

WILMA FAY KISER,

Petitioner,

versus

CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board

(02-0588-BLA)

Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: April 20, 2004

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilma Fay Kiser, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN,

STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Sarah

Marie Hurley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Wilma Fay Kiser seeks review of the Benefits Review

Board’s decision and orders affirming the administrative law

judge’s denial of her survivor’s claim for black lung benefits

pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000) and denying

reconsideration. Our review of the record discloses that the

Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

Board. See Kiser v. Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 02-0588-BLA (BRB

Apr. 24, 2003, Oct. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2023 AFSAM

The Xiphos

CA1

SHOOTER SCORE ROST # STATE/COUNTRY TIME

1 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 119 CO 00:52:28 200

2 SSG ARCHAMBAULT, MAXIMIL D 117 Vermont 00:54:95 190

3 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 134 ID 00:59:13 177

4 SSG STEWART, JUDE O 100 VA 01:04:46 162

5 SFC STAATS, JOHN A 118 AR 01:07:75 154

6 MAJOR ROSIE, LANCE 123 UK 01:08:35 153

7 MAJ FREEMAN, SAMUEL K 109 SC 01:08:84 152

8 SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 121 UK 01:08:97 152

9 GYSGT RANTON, CHAD W 101 VA 01:09:74 150

10 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 108 AR 01:10:83 148

11 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 110 ND 01:11:07 147

12 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX 113 NETHERLANDS 01:11:96 145

13 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 133 CO 01:12:28 145

14 SGT FLEITAS, NICKOLAS 103 01:16:57 137

15 LCPL BURGESS, MARCUS 129 UK 01:17:47 135

16 SGT MULLER, SHAUN P 102 VA 01:19:55 131

17 SFC WILLIS, RICHARD 135 KY 01:20:88 129

18 CPL FILGATE, MICHAEL 130 UK 01:21:51 128

19 SFC SAGER, DEVIN S 700 CO 01:23:51 125

20 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 132 HI 01:23:61 125

21 SGT SMITH, ANDREW 140 NETHERLANDS 01:23:90 125

22 SSG FULMER, MICAH N 116 CO 01:25:72 122

23 E-5 LUSH, TRAVIS C 105 VA 01:26:44 121

24 SFC GODEL, JASON W 125 TX 01:28:35 118

25 CPL BUSSTRA, MARTIJN 114 NETHERLANDS 01:29:46 117

26 SSG GORDON, COLIN 136 UK 01:30:83 115

27 E5 DUERR, DAVID C 107 CA 01:32:87 113

28 SFC KEENOM, DAVID D 141 TN 01:35:36 110

29 MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 115 NETHERLANDS 01:40:52 104

30 MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 138 UK 01:41:88 103

31 1SG CAPPS, JOSEPH A 111 AR 01:42:60 102

32 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 142 01:44:56 100

33 SSG CATT, KEVIN 122 UK 01:45:95 99

34 SFC PHELPS, STEFAN S 106 VA 01:51:35 94

35 CPT PANTOJA, LUIS 126 KS 01:53:51 92

36 PVT DOPPERT, SANTINO 112 NETHERLANDS 01:58:69 88

37 SGT COLGAN, JOHNATHON 139 UK 02:03:94 84

38 CPL ROWAN, BRIAN 137 UK 02:05:30 83

39 CW4 KNOTE, ANDY T 124 KY 02:08:81 81

Page 1 of 2 Time printed: 4/28/2023 2:09:42 PM
SHOOTER SCORE ROST # STATE/COUNTRY TIME

40 CFN PICKLES, JOSHUA 131 UK 02:12:12 79

41 LCPL FERGUSON, ANDREW 128 UK 02:54:98 60

42 WO1 DOUGLAS, JAMES 120 UK 03:15:54 53

43 SGT MARLAR, SAMUEL A 143 MA 03:18:66 53

44 SPC GADZIK, TIMOTHY J 127 IL 03:23:59 51

45 SFC BOLANOS, STEVEN L 104 CA 03:30:83 50

Page 2 of 2 Time printed: 4/28/2023 2:09:42 PM
## United States Court of App eals F O R T H E E I G H T H

C I R C U I T

__ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 1- 33 03

__ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca, *
* App el le e, *
* App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s v. * Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r th e * Nor th ern Dis tri ct of I owa

. Mi ch ael James Klu ge , *
* [UNPUBLISHED] App el la nt

. *

__ __ __ __ __ _ Su bm it te d: May 1, 20 12 Fil ed : M ay

3, 2 01 2

__ __ __ __ __ _ Befo re MUR PHY, ARNOLD, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ _ PER CURI AM.

Mi ch ael Klu ge was se nt en ced to 30 y ears in pr is on aft er a jury fo un d hi m gu il ty of co ns pi racy to m an uf

act ur e 50 gr am s or m or e of act ua l m et ha m ph et am in e; th e tri al in cl ud ed th e te st im on y of th e co ns pi racy le ad er an d se ve n co co ns pi rat or s th at Klu ge
was pa rt of a ne two rk of ps eu do ep he dr in e su pp li ers fo r th e le ad er, who ad m it te d in vo lv em en t i n a t l eas t 35 0 g ram s o f act ua l m et ha m ph et am in e, se e Uni te d S ta te s v

. Mal l o y, 6 1 4 F

. 3d 85 2, 85 5, 86 1- 62 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ), cert

. de ni ed , 13 1 S. Ct

. 30 23 (2 01 1)

. Klu ge mo v e d fo r a ne w t ria l un de r Fed eral Ru le of Cri m in al Pro ced ur e 33 ba se d on ne wly di sc ov ered ev id en ce, un di sc lo se d by th e go ve rn m en t, in th e fo rm of

a la b rep or t an al y zi ng th e dr ug s se i z e d f r o m on e of Klu ge ’s co co ns pi rat or s. Thedi st ric t co ur t de ni ed th e m ot io n an d Klu ge ap pe al s, arg ui ng th at th e ev id en ce co ul d 1 ha ve be en of

fere d t o s h o w a ge ne ral la ck of pu rit y of th e m et ha m ph et am in e th e
co ns pi racy pro du ced

.

Fo ll owi ng care fu l r e v i e w , we fin d no ab us e of di sc ret io n. See Uni te d St at es
v. Duk e, 25 5 F.3 d 65 6, 65 9 (8 th C i r. 20 01 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w). To jus ti fy a ne w tri al on th e gr ou nd of ne wly di sc ov ered ev id en ce, Klu ge ne ed ed to pr ov e (1 ) th e ne w
ev id en ce was di sc ov ered aft er tri al ; (2 ) th e fai lu re to di sc ov er it befo re tria l was not at tri bu ta bl e to a la ck of du e di li ge nc e; (3 ) th e ev id en ce was m at eri al an d no t m erel y
cu m ul at iv e or im

pe ach in g; an d (4 ) th e n ew ev id en ce wou ld li ke ly pr od uc e an acq ui tt al up on ret ria l. See Uni te d Stat es v. Hug ga ns , 65 0 F.3 d 12 10 , 12 25 (8 th Ci r. 20 11 ), cert

. de ni ed , 13 2 S. Ct

. 15 83 (2 01 2)

. Eve n as su m in g th e ev id en ce in qu es ti on
was m at e ria l, sh ou ld ha ve be en di sc lo se d by th e go ve rn m en t, an d was di sc ov ered aft er tri al th ro ug h no la ck of di li ge nc e, it was in su ffi ci en t to warra nt a ne w tri al

. See id . at 1 22 5- 26 & n .8; Mal lo y , 61 4 F .3d at 8 55 , 86 1- 62 . Accor di ng ly, we affi rm

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Lin da R. Rea de , Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r 1 th e Nor th ern Dis tri ct of I owa

. -2-
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3931 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for 2 years the 

election to treat the cost of a qualified film or television production 

as an expense which is not chargeable to a capital account. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Ms. WATSON (for herself, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. CHU, Mr. FILNER, Mrs. 

CAPPS, Mr. BACA, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mrs. BONO MACK, Mr. FARR, 

Mr. HONDA, Mr. ISSA, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. WOOLSEY, and Mrs. DAVIS

of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

for 2 years the election to treat the cost of a qualified 

film or television production as an expense which is not 

chargeable to a capital account. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN 

4 QUALIFIED FILM AND TELEVISION PRODUC5 TIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (f) of section 181 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3931 IH

1 ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

2 2011’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to qualified film and television pro5 ductions commencing after December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying Quarterly Report of TS Electronics,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Keith Boyd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November  19,  2003

                                     /s/  Keith  Boyd
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Keith  Boyd
                                     Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.















                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 17

- 00173

- CR

TROY MICHAEL ROBINO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 45775

- B

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Troy Michael Robino was convicted in t his case of possession of a controlled substance in Penalty Group 1 (methamphetamine) in an amount of less than one gram 1 and assessed punishment of twenty month’s confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. This case was tried with a companion case, which is the subject of another appeal pending before this Court. 2 Robino filed a single, consolidated brief co vering both appeals, in which he contends (1) that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and (2) that the trial court erred in assessing court costs in
this case. The argument raised in Robino’s first issue is based exclusively on the argument brought before this Court in the companion appeal styled Robino v. State , cause number 06

- 17

- 00 172

- CR. In our opinion of this date disposing of that appeal, we found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Robino’s motion to suppress. For the reasons set out in that opinion, we
overrule Robino’s first issue as it applies to this appeal. In his second issue, Robino complains that the trial court erred in assessing court costs in
this case. Robino contends that , when a defenda nt is convicted of two or more offenses in a single criminal action, the trial court may only assess costs in the highest category of offense based on the defendant’s conviction. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 102.073(a), (b) (West Supp. 2017). Robi no contends that the trial court assessed court costs in both this case, and in his

1 See T EX
. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN
. § 481.115(a), (b) (West 2017).

2 In his companion ca u se number 06

- 17

- 001 72

- CR, Robino appeals from his conviction for forgery, which is addressed in a separate opinion released the same date as this opi nion.3

conviction for forgery, which is the highest category of offense based on his convictions. Since these cases were tried in a single criminal action, Robino contends that t he trial court erred in assessing court costs in this case. However, the trial court’s judgment in this case has an entry of “N/A” under the heading for “Court Costs.” Since no court costs were assessed by the trial court in this case, Robino’s complaint is without merit. We overrule Robino’s second issue. For the reasons stated, w e affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Ralph K. Burgess Justice
Date Submitted: April 9, 2018 Date Decided: April 10 , 2018
Do Not Publish
1

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Docket Index for

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0955]

Revisions to Title V Operating Permits Programs, 

State of California, Five Air Pollution Control Districts

Docket Index 

Category/ Item Number

I. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for South Coast AQMD

 Title V program revision submittal from CARB, dated August 19, 2011 I-A

 SCAQMD Rule 3000 - Clean Copy I-B

 SCAQMD Rule 3000 - Strikeout Copy I-C

 SCAQMD Rule 3001 - Clean Copy I-D

 SCAQMD Rule 3001 - Strikeout Copy I-E

 SCAQMD Rule 3002 - Clean Copy I-F

 SCAQMD Rule 3002 - Strikeout Copy I-G

 SCAQMD Rule 3003 - Clean Copy I-H

 SCAQMD Rule 3003 - Strikeout Copy I-I

 SCAQMD Rule 3005 - Clean Copy I-J

 SCAQMD Rule 3005 - Strikeout Copy I-K

 SCAQMD Rule 3006 - Clean Copy I-L

 SCAQMD Rule 3006 - Strikeout Copy I-M

 SCAQMD Final Staff Report, October, 2010 I-N

II. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for San Luis Obispo County APCD

 Title V program revision submittal from CARB, dated August 19, 2011 II-A

 SLOCAPCD Rule 216 - Clean Copy II-B

 SLOCAPCD Rule 216 - Strikeout Copy II-C

 SLOCAPCD Final Staff Report (undated) II-D

III. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for Ventura County APCD

 Title V program revision submittal from CARB, dated August 19, 2011 III-A

 VCAPCD Rule 33 - Clean Copy III-B

 VCAPCD Rule 33 - Strikeout Copy III-C

 VCAPCD Rule 33.1 - Clean Copy III-D

 VCAPCD Rule 33.1- Strikeout Copy III-E
2

 VCAPCD Final Staff Report, February 25, 2011 III-F

IV. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for Monterey Bay Unified APCD

 Title V program revision submittal from CARB, dated November 7, 2011 IV-A

 MBUAPCD Rule 218 - Clean Copy IV-B

 MBUAPCD Rule 218 - Strikeout Copy IV-C

 MBUAPCD Final Staff Report (undated) IV-D

V. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for Santa Barbara County APCD

 Title V program revision submittal from CARB, dated April 21, 2011 V-A

 SBCAPCD Rule 1301 - Clean Copy V-B

 SBCAPCD Rule 1301 - Strikeout Copy V-C

 SBCAPCD Final Staff Report, January 20, 2011 V-D

VI. Federal Register Notices

 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0955, 

77 FR 16509 (March 21, 2012)

VI-A

VII. Comment Letters on Proposed Action

 Placeholder for comment letters VII-A
FORM 8-K





SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549







CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934





June 1, 2004







AJAY SPORTS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)







DELAWARE

0-18204

39-1644025

(State or other



(Commission file

(I.R.S. Employer

jurisdiction of



number)



Identification Number)

incorporation or

organization)







32751 Middlebelt Road, Ste. B

Farmington Hills, MI

48334

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (248) 851-5651







N/A

Former name or former address, if changed from last report

























Item 6:

Resignations of the Registrants Directors.







Ajay Sports, Inc (OTCBB: AJAY) reported that on May 26, 2004 Thomas W. Itin assumed responsibilities of Interim Chief Operating Officer and that subsidiary, Pro Golf of America, Inc., will accelerate its search to replace Joseph J. White. Mr. White resigned positions as Director, COO and Consultant to Pro Golf of America, Inc. and Ajay Sports, Inc., affiliates and subsidiaries, et.al., to pursue personal business interests and to spend more time with his family.



Ajay Sports, Inc. operates Pro Golf of America, Inc., the largest retail chain of franchised golf stores in the world, and ProGolf.Com, Inc., licensee for the e-commerce business of Pro Golf of America, Inc., whose website is www.progolf.com

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.





AJAY SPORTS, INC.







By \s\ Thomas  W. Itin



Thomas W. Itin

Chairman & CEO







Date:   June 01, 2004