alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Northeast   Mortgage
Corporation  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Brian  Rogerson,  President  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Brian Rogerson
---------------------
Brian Rogerson
President
(Principal Executive Officer)


November 14, 2003


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL15-53-000]


California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice 
Setting Due Date for Interevention in Section 206 Proceeding

    On March 16, 2015, the Commission issued an order in Docket Nos. 
EL15-53-000, and ER15-861-000 pursuant to section 206 of the Federal 
Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation to 
determine the justness and reasonableness of the Energy Imbalance 
Market provisions in the California Independent System Operator 
Corporation's existing tariff related to the imbalance energy price 
spikes in PacifiCorp's balancing authority areas. California 
Independent System Operator Corporation, 150 FERC ] 61,191 (2015). On 
March 17, 2015, the Commission issued a notice establishing a refund 
effective date.
    Any interested persons desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL15-53-
000 should file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) by 5 p.m. ET on April 15, 2015. 
The Commission encourages electronic submission of interventions in 
lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. 
Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original hard 
copy of the intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.

    Dated: March 26, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-07537 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 6717-01-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (a) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-47554) pertainingto the Common Stock of Learning Tree International, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, (b) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32062) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan of Learning Tree International, Inc., (c) theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41325) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Learning Tree International, Inc., and (d) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103372) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1999Stock Option Plan of Learning Tree International, Inc., of our reports dated January 9, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Learning Tree International, Inc., Learning Tree International Inc. management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Learning Tree International, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedSeptember 30, 2005. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

McLean, Virginia 

January 11, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3938 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3938

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain nonwoven polypropylene 
 zippered sleeping bag carry cases, not under 77.5 cm in circumference 
              and not exceeding 106.7 cm in circumference.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2009

 Mr. Aderholt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain nonwoven polypropylene 
 zippered sleeping bag carry cases, not under 77.5 cm in circumference 
              and not exceeding 106.7 cm in circumference.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN NONWOVEN POLYPROPYLENE SLEEPING BAG CARRY CASES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Sleeping bag carry  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          cases imported                                                     31/2011.......
                          separately from
                          sleeping bags,
                          with a body of
                          nonwoven
                          polypropylene and
                          a top of nonwoven
                          polyester, and
                          with a zipper
                          running
                          completely around
                          the perimeter
                          sealing the top
                          to the body, not
                          under 77.5 cm in
                          circumference and
                          not exceeding
                          106.7 cm in
                          circumference,
                          valued not over
                          $1 (provided for
                          in subheading
                          6307.90.98)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
May 10 , 2012

The Honorable Steven Chu

Secretary

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585

Dear Secretary Chu:

On behalf of the Joint Stakeholders to the Agreement on Minimum Federal Efficiency Standards,

Smart Appliances , Federal Incentives and Related Matters for Specified Appliances dated July

30, 2010 , we are writing to convey our consensus recommendation for compliance dates for new

clothes washer and dishwasher standards. These compliance dates differ from those inc luded in

the original agreement due to the un anticipated delays in the Depart ment’s completion of the

final rules. Our recommendations are as follows:

Clothes Washers:

· T ier 1 new federal standards should be effective March 7, 2015

, (i.e.

, three years after

publication of the revised clothes washer t est method), if DOE publish es the final rule on its

website on or before June 1, 2012. If DOE does not publish the final rule on its website by June

1, 2012, then our position is that there should be a 2 year and 9 month lead

- in from the time it is

p ublished in the Federal Register.

· Tier 2 (top load o nly) new federal standards should be effective on January 1, 2018, if

DOE publishes the final rule on its website by the end of 2012. If the final rule is published after

De cember 31, 2012, then the effective date sh ould be 5 years after the date of publication in the

Federal Register.

Dishwashers:

· The new fe deral standards should be effective one year after date of publication in the

Federal Register.

These compliance dates will achieve the overall energy and economic benefits of our original

consensus proposal, while retaining adequate lead times for manufacturers to prepare for the

specific recommended standards in the agreement.p 2

Thank you and we loo k forward to expeditious publication of the final rules.

Sincerely,

Kevin Messner Steven Nadel

Vice President Policy & Government Relations Executive Director

AHAM ACEEE

cc: David Danielson , Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency & Renewable E nergy

Greg Woods

, General Counsel

Kathleen Hogan, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency

Roland Risser, Program Manager for Building Technologies

John Cymbalsky, Office of Building Technologies

Dan Cohen, Offi ce of General Counsel
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3697 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 

Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2009 

Mr. COLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to take land into 

trust for Indian tribes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 19 of the Act of June 18, 

5 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reorganization 

6 Act’’) (25 U.S.C. 479), is amended— 

7 (1) in the first sentence— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘Effective beginning on June 18, 1934, the 

10 term’’; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3697 IH

1 (B) by striking ‘‘any recognized Indian 

2 tribe now under Federal jurisdiction’’ and in3 serting ‘‘any federally recognized Indian tribe’’; 

4 and 

5 (2) by striking the third sentence and inserting 

6 the following: ‘‘In this section, the term ‘Indian 

7 tribe’ means any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, 

8 band, nation, pueblo, village, or community that the 

9 Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an 

10 Indian tribe.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the Act 

13 of June 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reor14 ganization Act’’) (25 U.S.C. 479), on the date of enact15 ment of that Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5859-N-02]

# AGENCY:

Office of the General Counsel, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        On April 3, 2015, HUD published a                         **Federal Register**                         notice, at 80 FR 18248, soliciting advance comment on a demonstration designed to test the effectiveness of collaborative efforts by government, industry, and nonprofit organizations to accelerate broadband adoption and use in HUD-assisted homes. The April 3, 2015, notice describes the criteria HUD will use to assess communities that have expressed an interest in participating in the demonstration. To determine interest, HUD seeks a formal commitment by the mayor or equivalent executive elected official of the community, and the PHA executive leader, to narrow the broadband digital divide. Communities interested in participating in this demonstration may use                         *DigitalOpportunityDemonstration@hud.gov*                         to notify HUD of their commitment to narrow the broadband digital divide. Communities and other interested members of the public                               ( print page 20005)                            wishing to comment on the April 3, 2015, notice must follow the instructions for submission of public comments as provided in the April 3, 2015, notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Camille E. Acevedo, Associate General Counsel for Legislation and Regulations, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 10282, Washington, DC 20410-7000, telephone number 202-402-5132 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339 (this is a toll-free number).

Dated: April 8, 2015.

Camille E. Acevedo,

Associate General Counsel for Legislation and Regulations.

[FR Doc. 2015-08540 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OLXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of SPACEHAB, Incorporated (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the report), I, Brian K. Harrington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Brian K. Harrington                       
|Brian K. Harrington, Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer                       
|January 13, 2006                              



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### EASTERBY v. McINTOSH.

Appbau — Dismissal of. — The clerk of this Court has no power to dismiss an appeal for defects in the “Case.”

Motion in this Court to reinstate appeal dismissed by clerk, in case of Elizabeth P. Easterby, appellant, against W. J. McIntosh, respondent.

*Mr. W. H.*Thomas, for the motion.

*Mr. B. B. IT oiling s,*contra.

December 14, 1897.

PER Curiam.

This was a motion to reinstate an appeal, dismissed by the clerk, under Rules 1, 2, and *5*of this Court. From an examination of the motion papers, as well as from the argument of counsel, we learn that the main if not the sole ground upon which the respondent relied, was that the “Case” did not contain *a copy*of the order or decree of the Circuit Judge appealed from, but only a statement of its purport and effect. Even if this were a fatal defect in the “Case,” we know of no rule of this Court which invests the clerk with jurisdiction to dismiss an appeal on account of such defect, and hence there was error in dismissing the appeal under Rule 5 of this Court.

Inasmuch, however, as the clerk, in his order dismissing *191the appeal, states that such order was granted under Rules 1, 2, and 5, it is necessary to consider whether there was such a violation of Rules 1 and 2 as would justify the granting of an order dismissing the appeal; for the clerk is invested with jurisdiction to dismiss an appeal under Rules 1 and 2. Those rules relate entirely to the “return,” and the question, therefore, is whether there was such a violation of those two rules as would justify a dismissal of the appeal. From an examination of the return on file in this Court, we find that it does contain a copy of the decree or order of the Circuit Judge, and as no other defect in the return has been suggested, we must conclude that there was no ground for dismissing the appeal under Rules 1 and 2, and hence the appellant’s motion to reinstate the appeal must be granted.

In accordance with these views, an order has heretofore been granted reinstating the appeal.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








I,
      L. B.
      (Brad) Clarke, Chief Executive Officer of Organetix, Inc. (the "Company"),
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, that:





(1)  the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
      2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      August 14, 2006





/s/
      L. B.
      (Brad) Clarke


__________________________


L.
      B.
      (Brad) Clarke


Chief
      Executive Officer
# West Virginia Guard Fighting Wildfires From the Air

/ Published March 22, 2024

CHARLESTON, W. Va. - Two West Virginia National Guard UH60M and HH60M Black Hawk helicopters and personnel helped the West Virginia Division of Forestry and local government and emergency management officials battle large-scale wildfires in Hardy County March 22.

The deployment of aircraft and personnel was in response to West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice’s state of emergency issued March 21 for Grant, Hampshire, Hardy and Pendleton counties due to “extensive forest fires.” Local emergency management officials requested National Guard support via the West Virginia Emergency Management Division.

“The Guard motto is, ‘Always Ready, Always There,’” stated Maj. Gen. Bill Crane, adjutant general of the West Virginia National Guard. “We take that pledge seriously and we are always ready to provide support to our partners at the local and state levels when needed. Our aircrews have extensive experience in helping to combat wildland fires, and we will do all we can to help bring these fires under control to protect lives and property in the impacted communities.”

The two WVNG Black Hawks are using an aerial firefighting system with lightweight, flexible buckets slung under the helicopter fuselage that can hold 630 gallons—roughly 4,500 pounds of water. Helicopter crews dip the buckets into local water sources and drop the water as directed by ground crews. This allows firefighters to contain or extinguish the fire in rough, dangerous terrain ground-based personnel cannot easily reach.

West Virginia National Guard crews are experienced in this type of firefighting, assisting in firefighting efforts in California and at home. In November 2022, crews helped officials combat a fire in the New River Gorge National Park and Preserve that threatened homes and businesses and burned more than 200 acres.

“Our crews are some of the best in the nation and we will continue to support efforts to combat these fires until our partners with the Division of Forestry say the danger has passed,” said Lt. Col. Todd Justice, director of Joint Operations. “These fires are extensive, with a total of more than 4,000 acres burned thus far. We will do all we can to protect our fellow West Virginians and work to keep local responders safe.”

Personnel and aircraft responding to this incident are from Company C, 1-150th Assault Battalion, headquartered in Wheeling, and Company C, 2-104th General Support Aviation Battalion, headquartered in Parkersburg. Additional Guard personnel and equipment may be deployed if needed.
Exhibit 10.1

Edward Mooney
921 Transport Way, Suite 4
Petaluma, California 94954
Telephone (707) 769 1677
Facsimile (707) 769 1622

November 24,
2002

Mr. Grant
Miller
USA Broadband, Inc.
1111 Orange Avenue
Coronado, California

Dear
Mr. Miller,

When
executed by the undersigned where indicated below, this letter will form a Consulting Agreement (the "Agreement") for the 6 month period commencing December 1, 2002 between
Edward Mooney, an individual and independent contractor ("Consultant") and USA Broadband Inc. whereby Consultant will provide certain consulting services to USAB on a non-exclusive
basis, including general corporate advisory and development services. Consultant will devote a portion of his professional resources to USAB during the course of this agreement.



USAB
agrees to reimburse Consultant for reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses related to Consultant's performance of the services described in this Agreement (i.e. travel
and lodging for Consultant professionals to destinations where USAB has requested the presence of Consultant).

The
term of this Agreement shall commence on December 1, 2002 and shall be in effect for 6 months. Renewable thereafter by written agreement between the parties.

Consultant
and USAB agree to indemnify and hold each other harmless against claims resulting in connection with the provision of services under this engagement.

This
Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.

Consultant
is an independent contractor and is not entitled to employee benefits. Consultant is not authorized to enter into any contract, obligation or other transaction on behalf of USAB.

---

In
the course of rendering the services provided for in this Agreement, Consultant will learn and may develop information which is considered by USAB to be confidential. Consultant agrees not to use
or disclose such confidential information, except for the purpose of performing its duties hereunder, without the express written consent of USAB

By
their authorized signatures below, Consultant and USAB do agree to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, including fax signatures. Changes in the
terms and conditions of this Agreement may be enacted only with mutual written consent.

|ACCEPTED FOR USA Broadband, Inc.
|--------------------------------
|By:                             
|ACCEPTED by Edward P. Mooney    
|By:                             

---

QuickLinks