ANNUAL REPORT 

ANNUAL 

REPORT 

Chief. National 4*narcl lliireaii 

FISCAL 11 Al l l!M»7 

Reports Control Symbol/Cong 1011 
Major General Winston P. Wilson 

Chief, 

National Guard Bureau 

Brigadier General I. G. Brown 

Assistant Chief for Air National Guard 

National Guard Bureau 

Major General Francis S. Greenlief 

Deputy Chief, 

National Guard Bureau 

Brigadier General Charles L. Southward 

Assistant Chief for Army National Guard 

National Guard Bureau 
DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMY AND THE AIR FORCE 

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 

WASHINGTON, D. C, 30 JUNE 1967 

TO THE SECRETARIES OF THE ARMY AND THE AIR FORCE: 

This 61st Annual Report of the Chief, National Guard Bureau, covers Fiscal Year 1967. It is respectfully submitted 

as a record of the Guard's training, logistical, and administrative operations during this important 12-month period. 

In general, the report reflects the Guard's assigned part in the nation's commitment to the defense of Southeast 

Asia. It reflects, also, the Guard's state mission in the increasing scale of civil disorder in our cities. 

On the Army side, units in the Selected Reserve Force (SRF) maintained the mobilization readiness required 

by their war plans mission. The 14-unit "Beef Broth" force of the Air Guard maintained its "ready now" operational 

status. The remainder of the Air Guard continued an intensive training program, much of which was performed as 

operational missions in support of the active Air Force. 

These and other achievements were made possible through the support and resources that the Guard received 

from the Departments of Defense, Army, and Air Force; the Governors of the 50 States and Puerto Rico; and the 

Commissioners of the District of Columbia. 

The end of the fiscal year found the Army Guard in the midst of the annual field training session. For some 

SRF units, this involved Army Training Tests up to and including battalion. The posture of non-SRF units was 

improved through the provision of additional spaces for non-service Guardsmen in the active Army's basic training 

centers. This allowed the backlog of non-prior service men awaiting this training to be reduced substantially. 

Army Guard NIKE batteries continued their high level of performance. A Guard battery was judged outstanding 

in the Army Defense Command, and Guard batteries were high scorers in the annual NIKE practice firing. 

In the Air Guard, our airlift squadrons had completed more than 1,000 missions to Vietnam at the time these 

flights were suspended shortly before the end of the fiscal year. Guard airlift missions overseas for the Military 

Airlift Command continued at the rate of approximately 125 each month. Aeromedical flights within the Continental 

United States and offshore in support of the active Air Force were also continued. 

Both Army and Air Guard units participated in field exercises and maneuvers with the active services in Alaska, 

Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Panama, and in the Continental United States. In addition, as the fiscal year ended, a major 

all-Guard exercise involving both ground and air units was underway in the mid-West. The primary purpose of this 

exercise—"Guard Strike"—is to develop and test a tactical control system. 

State calls on Guard units in instances of disaster and civil disorder mounted during the year. In the latter 

category, widespread disorders in San Francisco, Chicago, and Cleveland required the deployment of Guard troops. 

These tragic sequels to the Watts area riots emphasized the importance of the Guard as a state military force. 

The following pages contain a more complete account of this 12-month period to add to the long record of the 

Guard. We believe it is a worthy account of effort and achievement. 

WINSTON P. WILSON 

Major General 

Chief, National Guard Bureau 

PART ONE 

THE BIG PICTURE 6 

Statistical Highlight s 7 

PART TWO 

MISSION. ORGANIZATION 

AND ADMINISTRATION 9 

MISSION 9 

ORGANIZATION 10 

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 11 

LEGISLATION 11 

LEGISLATION ENACTED 11 

LEGISLATION PENDING 11 

PUBLIC AFFAIRS 11 

HISTORICAL ACTIVITIES 12 

TROPHIES AND AWARDS 13 

REGULATIONS 13 

PUBLICATIONS REVIEW BOARD 13 

STATE SERVICE 13 

MILITARY SUPPORT OF CIVIL DEFENSE 14 

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 

AND CIVIL RIGHTS 14 

• DATA SYSTEMS 14 

PART THREE 

CHRONOLOGY OF SIGNIFICANT 

EVENTS OF FISCAL YEAR 1967 15 

PART FOUR 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 16 

Foreword 16 

Comptrolle r i s 

Appropriations 18 

Fundin g 18 

Obligations 18 

Finance Services 18 

Accountin g and Reportin g 19 

Audi t an d Reports of Survey 19 

Review an d Analysi s 19 

Managemen t Improvemen t 

(Reporting Workload) 19 

Personnel 19 

Militar y Strength 19 

Procuremen t (Officers an d 

Warrant Officers) 20 

Personnel Actions (Officers) 20 

Reserve Officer Personnel Act 

(Promotio n Consideration) 21 

Procuremen t (Enlisted Personnel) 21 

Reserve Enlistmen t Program 21 

Active Duty for Trainin g 21 

Line of Duty Determinatio n 

(Officer and Enlisted) 21 

Arm y National Guard Register 21 

Technician s 22 

Medical Activities 22 

Organization and Training 23 

Organization 23 

Selected Reserve Force 23 

Trainin g Objectives 23 

Individua l Trainin g Progress 23 

Combat Trainin g 24 

Inactive-Dut y Trainin g 24 

Annua l Field Trainin g 24 

Exercises 24 

Annua l General Inspection 24 

Schools Program 24 

Arm y Aviation 25 

Air Defense Progra m 25 

Arm y Advisors 26 

Logistics 26 

Selected Reserve Force 

(Logistics Support) 26 

Firepower 27 

Mobilit y 27 

Communication s 27 

Tactical Support 27 

Organizational Clothin g an d Equipmen t 27 

Individua l Clothin g 27 

Maintenanc e 27 

Army Aviation Maintenanc e 27 

Cross Service Agreement s 28 

Autovon 28 

ADP Standardized Logistics Procedures 28 

New Battalio n Supply System 28 

Installations 28 

Militar y Constructio n Program 28 

Future Construction Requirement s 28 

ARNG Non-Armor y Facilities 29 

Real Property 29 

Repairs an d Utilities 29 

Rifle Range Repairs 29 

Facilities Support at 

Field Trainin g Sites 30 

PART FIVE 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD 32 

Foreword 32 

Comptroller 34 

Budget 34 

Accountin g and Finance 34 

Personnel 35 

Militar y Strength 34 

Officer Personnel 35 

Officer Statistic s 35 

Officer Longevit y 35 

Grade Distributio n of 

Pilots by Type 35 

Rated Officers 35 

Flying Status 35 

Airme n Personnel 35 

Airme n Statistic s 38 

Personnel Data Systems 38 

Air Technicia n Program 38 

Education and Trainin g 39 

Notificatio n of Eligibilit y for 

Retired Pay 39 

Awards an d Decorations 40 

Medica l Service 40 

Operations and Training 41 

Organizatio n 41 

Organizatio n Action s 41 

Aircraft Conversions 43 

Flyin g Hour s 43 

Participatio n in Publi c Events 43 

Air Defense Comman d Unit s 43 

Militar y Airlif t Comman d Unit s 43 

Tactica l Air Comman d Unit s 43 

Aerospace Safety 44 

Communications—Electronics and 

Weather 45 

Communication s Forces 45 

ANG Weathe r Unit s 

(Air Weather Service—MAC) 45 

ANG Navigatio n Aids 45 

ANG GEEIA Unit s (AFLC) 45 

Tactical Control Groups (TAC) 45 

ANG Fixed ACW Squadrons 

(ADC-PACAF-ANTDEFCOM) 45 

ANG Base Communication s 46 

Air Systems and Logistics 46 

Suppl y an d Services 46 

Vehicles 47 

Maintenanc e Engineerin g 47 

Aircraft Inventor y 48 

Civi l Engineering 48 

Real Estate 48 

Major Constructio n (P-321) 48 

Plannin g (P-313) an d Mino r 

Constructio n (P-341) 48 

Standar d Definition s 48 

Use of Air Force Regional 

Civi l Enginee r 48 

Maintenanc e an d Operatio n 48 

Major Repair an d 

Mino r Constructio n (P-449) 48 

PART SIX 

APPENDICES 50 

A. Chief s of th e Nationa l Guar d 

Bureau an d Predecessor Organization s 51 

B. State Adjutant s General 52 

C. Unite d States Propert y an d 

Fiscal Officer s 52 

D. Officer s on Duty in the 

Nationa l Guar d Burea u 53 

E. Trophies an d Awards 54 

F. Regulations 55 

G. Arm y National Guar d Strength / 

Fiscal Year 1948-Fiscal Year 1967 59 

H. ARNG State Strengt h Status as of 

30 June 1967 60 

I. ANG State Strengt h Status as of 

30 Jun e 1967 62 

J. ARNG Obligations , Fiscal Year 1967 65 

K. ANG Obligations , Fiscal Year 1967 68 

Aircraft of the Army and 

Air National Guard 36-

37 
Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1967 

Part One 

THE BIG PICTURE 
Chief, National Guard Bureau 

7 

Army National Guard 

$231,000,000 Operation & Maintenance 

370,333,000 Personnel 

—0— Facilities 

$601,333,000 TOTAL 

Air National Guard 

$255,000,000 

82,100,000 

9,400,000 

$346,500,000 

Congress appropriated $947,833,000 for the Army and Air National 

Guard in Fiscal Year 1967, and additional money was appropriated 

directly for the National Guard by the States. Substantial support 

also is provided by State, county and municipal government in various types of indirect support. This includes the donation of land, 

police and fire protection, maintenance of roads, and the provision 

of direct county and municipal fiscal support to local units. 

At the end of Fiscal Year 1967, the Army National Guard had 

in its possession Federal equipment and vehicles valued at 

$1,660,364,944. Aircraft, vehicles, and general equipment in the 

hands of the Air National Guard totalled $2,313,713,000. 
« Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1967 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

Personnel as of 30 June 1967 

J^vV 418,074 Officers and Enlisted men 

58,979 New Enlistees 

"•1-f 24,027 Full Time Technicians 

Organization 

4,001 Units—a local force, available on the spot for emergency duty, 

dispersed to withstand nuclear attack. 

Selected Reserve ^orce—3 Infantry Divisions, 6 Separate Infantry 

Brigades, 1 Armored Cavalry Regiment 

Immediate Reserve—2 Armored Divisions, 3 Infantry Divisions, 4 

Armored Cavalry Regiments, 4 Separate Armored and Infantry 

Brigades 

Reinforcing Reserve—4 Armored Divisions, 11 Infantry Divisions, 2 

Armored Cavalry Regiments, 5 Command Headquarters, Divisional (a ready cadre for 5 divisions) 

Training 

The proficiency of the Army National Guard continued to increase in 

all phases of training. Of the total ARNG strength, 99 percent is 

considered basically trained. 

Facilities 

2,786 Armories 979 Maintenance shops 60 Warehouse complexes 

61 Shop hangars 65 Airfields 

/2\ AIR NATIONAL GUARD •r ' 

Personnel as of 30 June 1967 

83,758 Officers and Airmen 

10,066 New Enlistments 

16,483 Full Time Technicians 

Organization 

856 Units 

24 Wings, 90 Groups, 92 Flying Squadrons Organized as Fighter Interceptor, Tactical Fighter, Tactical Reconnaissance, Air Refueling, Military Airlift, and Air Commando Units 

398 Support Units including 90 Supply Squadrons, 90 Combat Support Squadrons, 90 Consolidated Aircraft Maintenance Squadrons, 90 Dispensaries/Hospitals, 32 Aeromedical Evacuation 

Flights/Squadrons, 4 Reconnaissance Technical Squadrons, and 

2 Aerial Port Flights. 

148 Communications—Electronics and Weather Units including 5 

Aircraft Control and Warning Squadrons (Fixed) and 17 Ground 

Electronics Engineering Installations Agency (GEEIA) Squadrons. 

104 Miscellaneous units including one Weather Squadron with 38 

flights, 12 Air Force Bands, one Air Base Squadron, and 52 Air 

State Headquarters. 

Training 

Schools—Over 3,738 officers and airmen completed technical school 

training, and an additional 282 completed professional training; 

673 completed Flight Training, and 10,882 completed basic military training. 

Facilities 

91 Flying Bases 51 Non-Flying Installations 
Chief, 'National Guard Bureau 

Part Two 

MISSION 

OIIGi 

AND ADMINISTRATION 

MISSION OF THE NATIONAL GUARD 

The National Guard is rooted in the concept of the privilege and responsibility 

of our able-bodied citizens to be ready at all times to bear arms for the common 

defense. This tradition was begun in the early seventeenth century, with the 

development of militia bands in the various colonies. The framers of the Constitution recognized the importance of the concept by empowering the Congress 

to "provide for organizing, arming and disciplining the milita." National military 

policy subsequently enacted into law has served to enhance the availability and 

improve the readiness of the National Guard as a Federal reserve force. The 

general policy stated in current law (Section 102, Title 32, United States Code) 

is quoted: 

In accordance with the traditional military policy of the United States, 

it is essential that the strength and organization of the Army National 

Guard and the Air National Guard as an integral part of this first line 

defenses of the United States be maintained and assured at all times. 

Whenever Congress determines that more units and organizations are 

needed for the national security than are in the regular components of 

the ground and air forces, the Army National Guard and the Air National 

Guard of the United States, or such parts of them as are needed, together 

with such units of other reserve components as are necessary for a balanced force, shall be ordered to active Federal duty and retained as long 

as so needed. 

While its Federal reserve potential has been strengthened, the National Guard 

of each State remains constitutionally a State-administered military force. The 

dual State-Federal missions are set forth in National Guard Regulation No. 45, 

and Air National Guard Regulation No. 20-1. The State mission is to provide units 

organized, trained, and equipped that under competent orders of Federal or 

State authorities will provide protection of life and property and preserve peace, 

order and sufficient and suitable equipment, capable and ready for mobilization 

in time of war or national emergency to support the Army and Air Force. 
to 

Annual Report, Fiscal \vnr 1967 

ORGANIZATION 

Army National Guard 

The Army National Guard provides forces that are an integral 

part of the Nation's first-line defenses, and others that complement 

and support the first-line forces. 

The chart below illustrates the role of the Army National Guard 

in the Army mission. 

The worldwide overseas commitments of the Army in Europe, 

Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and in Korea, listed at the extreme 

right, represent large overseas garrisons and fighting forces already 

in place and major treaty commitments. All must be supported by 

forces available for rapid deployment from the United States. 

The center panel portrays Army Forces in the Continental United 

States. These include Air Defense Missile units, the Strategic Army 

Air National Guard 

The Air National Guard supports US Air Force missions as 

shown on the chart above. 

Air Force worldwide commitments such as those to NATO and 

the free nations of Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and the Far 

East are shown at the right. 

The gaining commands to which Air National Guard units are 

assigned upon mobilization are also shown. These include the 

Tactical Air Command (TAC), Air Defense Command (ADC), Military 

Airlift Command (MAC), Alaskan Air Command (AAC), Air Force 

Logistics Command (AFLC), and the Air Force Communications Service (AFCS). In addition, the Hawaii Air National Guard is committed 

to the Pacific Air Forces (PACAF), and one Air Guard communicaForces (STRAF), and the support base for the entire Army. The 

Army National Guard shares in the first-line combat mission of US 

Army Air Defense Command (ARADCOM) by providing full time Army 

National Guard Nike Hercules missile batteries in the defense of 

key industrial and population areas. 

Three Army National Guard Infantry divisions, six Army National 

Guard Infantry brigades, and an Army National Guard Armored 

Cavalry regiment of the Selected Reserve Force today constitute a 

major part of the Strategic Army Force available for deployment. 

Three additional Infantry divisions and two Armored divisions 

of the Immediate Reserve are available as follow-on support for the 

Selected Reserve Force. 

Available to support expansion of the Army in a major mobilization are 11 Infantry divisions and four Armored divisions of the Reinforcing Reserve, together with smaller combat and combat support 

organizations and separate units and detachments. 

tions unit is committed to the Air University at Maxwell Air Force 

Base, Alabama. 

In this fiscal year, many Air Guard units served without mobilization as integral functioning parts of active Air Force commands. 

Airlift units flew 2,538 missions worldwide including 858 in support 

of Southeast Asia, as a functional part of the Military Airlift Command. All ANG fighter-interceptor squadrons assigned to the Air 

Defense Command maintain a 24-hour runway alert at all times 

under control of North American Air Defense Command. Air National 

Guard Tactical squadrons today form the principal worldwide strategic reserve of the Tactical Air Command. 

Air Guard Ground Electronics Engineering (GEEIA) squadrons 

perform communications construction projects on US Air Force 

missile sites and other bases. 

ARNG 

ACTIVE ARMY OVERSEAS 

li 6 DIVISION FORCE 

PECIAL MISSION DIV'S 

MOBILIZATION 

EXPANSION 

AIR DEFENSE 

STRAF 

SUPPORT BASE 

ARMY 

NATIONAL 

GUARD 

AN INTEGRAL PART OF 

THE FIRST LINK DEFENSES 

AIR 

A TTMrVT A T t\ 1 lUi\AL 

GUARD 

GLOBAL 

CAPABILITY 

ffmk 

if r 

V4 

ANG UNITS 

" * A -» 

KTACTTTR " > 

' MILI ALFT 

FTR INTCP 

k

 TAC RECON 

AIR REF. 

v AIR COMDO J 

\GN D SUP-'I 

ACTIVE AIR FORCE 

CONTINENTAL U. S. 

TAC 

ADC 

ACTIVE AIR FORCE 

WORLD WIDE 

EUROPE 

SOUTHEAST 

MIDDLE 

MAC AAC AFLC 

AFCS, \ FAR EAST 

ALASKA 

ASIA 

EAST * 
Chief, National Guard Bureau 

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 

The National Guard Bureau is both a staff and operating agency. 

As the chart shows, it is a Joint Bureau of the Departments of the 

Army and the Air Force. The Chief, National Guard Bureau, reports 

to the Secretaries of the Army and the Air Force through the respective Chiefs of Staff and is the principal staff advisor on National 

Guard affairs. 

As an operating agency, the National Guard Bureau is the channel of communications between the States and the Departments of 

the Army and the Air Force (AR 130-5/AFR 45-2). 

The function of the National Guard Bureau is to formulate and 

administer a program for the development and maintenance of Army 

and Air National Guard units in the several States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia in accordance 

with Departments of Army and Air Force policy. 

The organization of the National Guard Bureau is shown on the 

chart. The office of the Assistant Chief, NGB, Army, is organized into 

five divisions; and the office of the Assistant Chief, NGB, Air, is organized into six divisions. The Office of the Legal Adviser; Office of 

Plans, Policy, and Programs; Office of Military Support of Civil 

Defense; Off ice of Equal Opportunity and Civil Rights; Public Affairs 

Officer; and the Special Assistant for Data Systems advise and 

assist the Chief on both Army and Air matters. 

DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMI AND THE AIR FORCE 

NATIONAL OOARD BUREAU 

The Chief of the National Guard Bureau is appointed by the 

President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, from a list 

of National Guard officers recommended by the respective Governors, for a term of four years, and is eligible to succeed himself. 

The grade authorized for this position is major general. 

The former Chiefs of the National Guard Bureau and its predecessor organizations (Division of Militia Affairs, 1908-1916, and 

Militia Bureau, 1916-1933) are listed in Appendix A. Appendices B 

and C list the State Adjutants General and United States Property 

and Fiscal officers as of 30 June 1967. 

The National Guard Bureau personnel strength on 30 June 1967 

was: 

Military Authorized Assigned 

Army 36 34 

Air Force 65 58 

Total 101 92 

Civilian 

Army 157 U5 

Air Force 139 131 

Total 296 276 

I I 

LEGISLATION 

Legislation Enacted 

Public Law 89-501 authorized military procurement and military 

pay increases. 

Public Law 89-568. Military Construction Authorization Act. 

Fiscal Year 1967. 

Public Law 89-614 authorized improved health benefits program 

for retired members and members of the uniformed services and 

their dependents. It also deleted the requirement for at least eight 

years of active duty in the case of members entitled to retired pay 

under Chapter 67 of Title 10, United States Code, ("Title III" retired 

pay). 

Public Law 89-744. Appropriations for military construction for 

FY 1967. 

Public Law 90-40, the "Military Selective Service Act of 1967," 

made permanent the temporary provision contained in 89-687 providing Presidential authority to order to active duty any member of 

the Ready Reserve who is not assigned to, or participating satisfactorily in, a unit of the Ready Reserve; has not fulfilled his statutory 

reserve obligation; and has not served on active duty for a total of 

24 months. 

Legislation Pending 

H.R. 2, 90th Congress. Title I would authorize per diem for 

reservists attending service schools. Title II would provide Federal 

Civil Service Retirement and other fringe benefits for National 

Guard technicians. 

H.R. 2628, 90th Congress, would authorize additional retirement 

credit for members of reserve components who attend more than 45 

drills or periods of equivalent instruction. 

PUBLIC AFFAIRS 

The two missions of the National Guard Bureau Office of Public 

Affairs are to recruit and retain highly qualified officers and men in 

the Army and Air National Guard and to conduct, on a national scale, 

a program to keep the American public informed of the purpose and 

the operations of the National Guard. 

The scale of Selective Service calls in Fiscal Year 1966 continued to encourage enlistments in the National Guard by young men 
12 Annual Report* Fiscal Year 1967 

who were without prior military service. As a result, advertising and 

public relations efforts were directed primarily toward influencing 

officers and men already in the National Guard to extend their 

service. Contributing to this effort was a program to inform wives, 

families, and employers of Guardsmen of the national interests 

served by his training and his need for their support. 

The total Fiscal Year 1967 appropriation to support the public 

affairs program was $450,000. Almost all of this amount was contracted to a commercial advertising agency for the development 

and production of printed, radio, and television materials to be 

provided the State Adjutants General for their use and to the news 

media throughout the country. Of the total expended, $50,000 was 

expressly directed toward support of the Selected Reserve Force 

and "Beef Broth" forces. 

The most effective public information project of the year was a 

28-minute color documentary film, "The Men . . . and the Minute," 

which covered the wide ranging operations of the Army and Air 

National Guard, including airlift to Vietnam and the Eskimo Scouts. 

The film was written and produced by the Public Affairs Officer and 

filmed by National Guardsmen who are professional photographers. 

The resulting cost was approximately one-tenth that of a commercially produced documentary of the same caliber. The film was 

widely shown to Guardsmen, civic and governmental groups, and to 

the public through television. 

Another public information project of the year was the development of a portable display showing the scope of Army and Air 

National Guard operations. This display consists of color photographs and incorporates a continuous running of "The Men . . . and 

the Minute." It is for use at major conventions and exhibitions. 

First shown on the concourse of the Pentagon, it drew an estimated 

15,000 viewers. 

The second annual photography contest was co-sponsored by 

the National Guard Bureau and the National Guard Association of 

the United States. Winners were announced at the Association convention in Phoenix. Winning entries were exhibited in an attractive 

display at the convention. 

The use of National Guard public service material by radio and 

television media was greatly increased in Fiscal Year 1967 through 

endorsement of its purpose by the National Advertising Council. 

The action to secure this endorsement was initiated by the National 

Guard Bureau and covers all of the Reserve components. It resulted 

in the use of National Guard material by both radio and television 

networks to a greater degree than in the past. 

"Guard Session," the weekly 15-minute music interview radio 

show distributed to stations for free public service programming, 

was sent on a monthly basis to approximately 2,200 stations. Top 

names in show business were again featured in the program hosted 

by Martin Block. Guests were Johnny Mathis, Steve Lawrence, Connie Francis, Patti Page, Herb Alpert, Mantovani, Fred Waring, Petula 

Clark, Harry James, Maurice Chevalier, Eydie Gorme, and Gordon 

Jenkins. 

"Lombardoland, USA," an Air National Guard radio program, was 

continued for the 16th consecutive year on the Mutual Broadcasting 

System. 

A special recording of Christmas holiday songs was also sent 

to radio stations. Featured this year were Steve Lawrence, Nancy 

Wilson, Connie Francis, Jack Jones, Roger Wagner Chorale, Patti 

Page, Wayne Newton, Johnny Mathis, Rosemary Clooney, and John 

Gary. 

The pre-recorded radio program "Guardline" was produced and 

distributed. It consisted of 20 true stories of courageous action and 

quick thinking by individual Army and Air National Guardsmen. The 

program was narrated by Bob Considine, prominent reporter and 

columnist. It was distributed to approximately 4,500 stations. 

The television spots produced included a 60-second color film 

titled "Pledge of Allegiance" which shows in a dramatic way the 

Guardsman's adherence to the pledge. It has subsequently appeared 

on national television networks. Additionally, the two 20-second 

adaptations of previously produced TV spots aimed at securing the 

support of Guardsmen's families and employers were released. A 

new television release on the increased readiness message of the 

Guard was made by Major General Winston P. Wilson, Chief of the 

National Guard Bureau. 

Growing acceptance by Guardsmen of the "Ballad of the National Guard" (the Guard Creed set to music) led to the production 

of it as a record. The march and concert arrangements were recorded by the Air Force Band. The vocal arrangement was sung by 

Don Rondo. A total of 10,000 of the records was produced and distributed to National Guard units and radio stations. 

In November 1966, the second annual Workshop for National 

Guard Information Officers was held under the joint sponsorship of 

the Guard Bureau and the National Guard Association. In attendance at the two-day session held at the Pentagon and the National 

Guard Association building were 123 information officers from 

throughout the National Guard establishment and representatives 

from the active Army and Air Force. In addition to formal presentations, the program included working groups of conferees to study 

the present information program and recommend actions to improve it. 

The Office of Public Affairs prepared numerous new releases, 

speeches, periodicals, yearbook and encyclopedia articles, and other 

materials for publication which were coordinated through the Department of Defense, Department of the Army, and Department of 

the Air Force. 

Historical Activities 

Other activities included the maintenance of historical documents for use in information programs and as an aid to scholars 

and military writers, the supervision of the heraldic and insignia 

programs of the Army and Air National Guard, and the promulgation 

of information relating to policy in the fields of insignia and historical material. 

FISCAL YEAR 1967 

Printed Materials 

Pamphlets (Copies) 

"Change of Pace" (2nd printing) ... 

"Now You Can Be An Officer When You 

"The Men . . . and the Minute" 

Textbook Covers (Copies) 

"Be A Tiger" (2nd printing) 

Magazine Advertisements (Estimated circulation) 

Scholastic Magazines and "Boys' Life" (Total) 

"1 Am The Guard" Creed 

"Guardjet" 

"Guardmobile" 

"Six Of Our Boys Made It" 

"Advance and Be Recognized"—Army and Air 

"You Have To Be Twice As Good" 

Public Service Advertisements in Trade Magazines 

(Estimated circulation) 

"Two Heads" 

"Worker-Leader" 

"Moonlighting" 

Pocket She Edition of the Annual Report 

Posfers ("Pledge of Allegiance" theme) 

Outdoor 

Indoor 

Bicycle Stickers ("My Pop's Tops') 

Army National Guard 

Air National Guard 

Prints of Heritage Paintings 

Prints Of "/ Am The Guard" Creed 

National Guard Newsletter (Monthly Distribution) 

Music For The National Guard Ballad (2nd printing) 

Marching Band Arrangement 

Glee Club Arrangement 

20,000 

10,000 

250,000 

. 1,000,000 

4,410,000 

3,000,000 

50,000 

9,000 

17,550 

250,000 

50,000 

52,000 

15,100 

10,000 

200 

200 
(ihicf, [National (»uard Kurcau 

13 

TROPHIES AND AWARDS PROGRAM 

The purpose of the trophies and awards program is to instill a 

spirit of wholesome rivalry among individuals, units, and organizations of the Army and Air National Guard and to stimulate interest 

in proficiency in training and maintenance. To this end, trophies 

and awards are presented annually by the Chief of the National 

Guard Bureau and other agencies to outstanding personnel and 

units in both the Army and Air National Guard. 

The following trophies and awards are described in Appendix E: 

Army National Guard 

National Guard Association Trophy, Pershing Trophy, and National Guard (State) Trophy 

National Rifle Association Trophy 

Chief of the National Guard Bureau Trophy 

Eisenhower Trophy 

United States Army Air Defense Commander's Trophy for the 

outstanding Nike Hercules Battery in ARADCOM 

United States Army Air Defense Commander's Trophy for the 

outstanding Nike Hercules Firing Battery in Short Notice 

Annual Practice (SNAP) 

Erickson Trophy 

Association of the United States Army Trophy 

Air National Guard 

Spaatz Trophy 

Winston P. Wilson Trophy 

Air Force Association Outstanding Unit Trophy 

The National Guard Association Trophy (Air) 

Air Force Association Outstanding Airman Award 

Earl T. Ricks Memorial Trophy 

McCallister Trophy 

REGULATIONS 

The National Guard, when not in active Federal service, is governed by National Guard Regulations and Air National Guard Regulations. These regulations announce the approved policies of the 

Department of the Army and the Department of the Air Force pertaining to the Army and Air National Guard. Certain procedural 

matters are also published in National Guard Pamphlets and Air 

National Guard Pamphlets. These may be separate or joint publications, depending upon the applicability of the contents to both the 

Army and Air National Guard. Further, certain Army and Air Force 

regulations govern the Army and Air National Guard when specifically made applicable by the Chief, National Guard Bureau. 

During Fiscal Year 1967, a number of existing regulations were 

revised or amended and new regulations and pamphlets were developed and published. A detailed resume is contained in Appendix F. 

PUBLICATIONS REVIEW BOARD 

The initial Fiscal Year 1967 procurement program for Department of the Army publications and blank forms was established at 

$1,147,000. Adjustments during the year resulted in a final program 

of $1,012,000. Obligations totaled $962,215. 

Fiscal Year obligations exceeded those incurred during 1966 by 

$181,002. This increase is attributed to the increased number of 

new and revised publications and forms, the increased requirements 

by units to meet assigned mission, and the constant increase in 

printing and material costs. 

Because of close contact with the office of the Adjutant General of the Department of the Army, publication proponents, and 

State Adjutants General, definite progress was made in the elimination of publications and blank forms non-essential to the ARNG. 

Non-available publications and blank forms required by the 

Army National Guard were made available, in part, by "local reproduction authorization." This procedure is extremely expensive and 

unsatisfactory. 

State Headquarters and Headquarters Detachments were placed 

under "pinpoint" procedures during the fiscal year which expedited 

the flow of required items to the State Adjutants General and their 

staffs. The Army National Guard had 502 "pinpoint" accounts which 

service 1004 Company/Battery size units. All other units of the Army 

National Guard were serviced by the State Publications Stockroom. 

"Pinpoint" distribution for all Battalion and separate Company/ 

Battery level units of the Army National Guard was a primary objective in Fiscal Year 1967, but lack of personnel spaces and supporting funds at US Army AG Publications Centers prevented its 

achievement. Efforts will be directed toward achievement of this 

objective during Fiscal Year 1968. 

STATE SERVICE 

Large numbers of Army and Air National Guardsmen were called 

on by the States to perform a variety of duties during the year. 

Many volunteer and mercy missions were also performed by National 

Guardsmen. Some examples of these duties and missions are listed 

below. 

Elements of the 67th Infantry Brigade, Nebraska Army National 

Guard, were called to State duty 4-5 July 1967 when rioting and 

looting broke out in Omaha. A 130-man task force was mobilized 

while approximately 1000 Army Guardsmen were put on stand-by. 

More than 300 National Guard Engineer and Signal troops were 

called to State duty for three days in July when Kansas City firemen walked off their jobs in a union dispute over pay and benefits. 

Assistance of Guardsmen was requested to protect the fire stations 

and assist Police in maintaining order. 

Approximately 100 Nebraska Army Guardsmen and National 

Guard equipment, including five helicopters, were used to help 

battle flood waters after heavy rains caused four rivers to overflow 

their banks in August. Guardsmen were on duty for 24 hours. 

More than 250 Iowa Army and Air National Guardsmen provided 

aid and support to the town of Belmond after it was struck by a 

tornado. Guardsmen established sentry posts to prevent looting, 

organized work and rescue parties, and provided emergency kitchens 

and transportation. The Air National Guard provided generators 

which provided power for essential services. Most of the Guardsmen 

were on duty for five days while several cooks and drivers stayed on 

for five additional days. 

Seven Air National Guardsmen from the 130th Air Commando 

Group, West Virginia, provided assistance in extinguishing a fire at 

the Food Machinery Corporation in Charleston which caused damage 

in excess of $1,000,000. 

The North Carolina Air National Guard flew 50 Cuban refugees to 

the United States from Jamaica at the request of the State Department in December. Arrangements for the flights were made through 

the State Department Office of Refugee and Migration Affairs. 

Alabama National Guardsmen of the 109th Evacuation Hospital 

played a major part in the movement of patients, drugs, supplies, 

and equipment from an old civilian hospital to a new one. This 

service was performed during a MUTA. 

Nat ional Guardsmen from Illinois, Indiana, and Michigan were 

called to State active duty in January as a result of the blizzard 

which virtually paralyzed the States and led to the death of many 

people. Helicopter missions were flown by Guardsmen to deliver 

food to stranded families, supplies to hospitals, and hay to stranded 

cattle. Helicopters were also used as air taxi service for doctors and 

air ambulance service in emergencies. Ground support in the form 

of personnel, equipment, and armory facilities were also used during the blizzard. 

New Mexico National Guardsmen were called to State active 

duty in June for the decidedly unique situation of searching for a 

band of insurgents. A band of armed Spanish-Americans invaded 

the courthouse in the town of Tierra Amarilla after the indictment of 

several members of the group who had been arrested. A force of 

450 Guardsmen was ordered to duty for two days and two nights to 

reinforce State. Police in search of the insurgents. 
11 Annual Report. Fiscal Year 1967 

MILITARY SUPPORT OF CIVIL DEFENSE 

A Common Table of Allowance (CTA) for State Headquarters and 

Headquarters Detachments prescribing the allowance of equipment 

authorized the State Headquarters was published in August, 1966. 

Specific items of equipment, including single side band radios, 

were authorized the Military Support Section so that the State 

Headquarters could more effectively accomplish its mission. Automatic Voice Network (AUTOVON) service was also authorized for 

the State Adjutants General and the Military Support sections. 

During the period September-November 1966, Military Support of 

Civil Defense sub-conferences were held during the annual Army 

Area Conferences. Attending the sub-conferences were State Military Support Plans Officers and representatives from the Office of 

the Deputy Chief of Staff for Military Operations of the Department 

of the Army, United States Continental Army Command, Office of 

Civil Defense, and CONUS Army Headquarters. These sub-conferences proved to be mutually beneficial to all representatives. 

The Office of Civil Defense conducted a National Civil Defense 

exercise during the period 27 November-1 December 1966 in which 

all staff personnel assigned to military support of civil defense 

functions participated. The major objective of the exercise was to 

provide professional training for State and local civil defense personnel. A report on the project listing problem areas which required 

additional study prompted the establishment of a Steering Committee composed of a representative group of State Adjutants General. 

The recommendations of this committee were furnished to a Working Group of 10 Military Support Plans Officers. The findings and 

recommendations of this group which met during the period February-March 1967, are still being studied by the National Guard 

Bureau. 

The Continental Air Command assigned an Air Force Ready 

Reserve officer in a 48-paid assembly and 15-day annual field training status to each of the State Military Headquarters as liaison and 

coordinating officers for Military Support of Civil Defense Plans. 

The assignment of these officers follows the concept of a "multiservice" staff for State Military Headquarters for the accomplishment of its Military Support of Civil Defense mission. 

At the beginning of Fiscal Year 1967, 227 spaces were authorized 

for military support planning technicians. At the end of the year, 

220 technicians were employed in the program. Turnover has been 

negligible, and most of the technicians have attended either civil 

defense classes at the Staff College at Battle Creek, Michigan, or 

the Engineer School at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. 

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND CIVIL RIGHTS 

The Office of Equal Opportunity and Civil Rights was activated 

in November, 1966. Staff and operating responsibilities for the program were implemented in consonance with the Civil Rights Act of 

1964 and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11, "Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs." Provisions of joint Army and 

Air National Guard Regulation NGR 24/ANGR 30-12 providing guidance to assure compliance with the Act and the Directive are being 

met by the National Guard Bureau and the States. Direction and 

assistance in establishing guidelines and techniques in the management of the equal opportunity program for the National Guard 

were received in classes and seminars conducted by the Civil Service Commission and the Chief of Staff, Department of the Army. 

A proposed plan of action requiring the conduct of inspections, 

the submission of reports, and the establishment of procedures for 

making investigations was approved by the Departments of the 

Army and the Air Force in February. In response to expressions of 

concern by the Department of Defense that the National Guard was 

not moving rapidly enough in assuring compliance with nondiscriminatory provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, the requirement for making compliance field reviews was given high priority. 

As of 30 June 1967, scheduled On-Site Compliance Field Reviews had 

been completed in 18 States, including the District of Columbia and 

thre Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Each State will be subject to 

review during a two-year cycle with special reviews or investigations 

conducted as required. 

Compliance with NGR 24/ANGR 30-12 is a subject of inspection 

by Inspectors General of the Army and Air Force during the conduct 

of annual general inspections of the National Guard. Since these 

General Inspection reports are forwarded to the National Guard 

Bureau for review, an effective surveillance and monitoring system 

serves to extend the coverage of Guard units by this office. No incidents of discrimination were reported by Inspectors General during 

the year. 

During Fiscal Year 1967, two formal charges of discrimination 

were submitted to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau for investigation in accordance with procedures set forth in National Guard 

Regulation 34 and referred to the Office of Equal Opportunity and 

Civil Rights for a determination of facts and recommendations. A 

Report of Investigation with recommendations was made in response to each complaint and forwarded to the Chief, National 

Guard Bureau, for disposition. 

DATA SYSTEMS 

Several major actions were taken to improve the capability of 

the States and the National Guard Bureau to produce automated 

reports during Fiscal Year 1967. Equipment was upgraded and 

standardized at all ANG bases and in the offices of the USPFOs. 

Improved accounting machines were provided for all facilities, and 

faster sorters were furnished where such equipment was justified. 

ANG Consolidated Base Personnel Officers were equipped with 

the document writer system. Procedures providing for more comprehensive ADPE utilization and cost reports were developed and 

implemented. Credits obtained from the sale of obsolete bookkeeping machines were applied to the purchase of punch card equipment which was available at bargain rates. More than $300,000 

worth of equipment was obtained for slightly over $125,000. 

At the close of the year, the National Guard Computer Center 

was completing conversion to full tape procedures concurrent with 

the phase-out of the ANG Data Processing Installation at St. Louis, 

Missouri. 

Action was taken to replace the punch card equipment with 

card computers in several Army National Guard Data Piocessing 

Installations where PCM rental exceeds the cost of the computers. 

Concurrently, standardized systems are being developed by the 

National Guard Bureau to be used when these computers are installed beginning in Calendar Year 1968. 

The major development in automatic data processing this year 

has been the decision by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, 

with the concurrence of both the Departments of the Army and the 

Air Force, to establish a series of regional computer centers for 

both the Air and the Army National Guard. Each regional center will 

service from 10 to 12 ANG bases or USPFOs. Service will be provided 

on a time sharing basis, thus affording users access to modem third 

generation equipment and the use of standard Army and Air Force 

computer programs. A Joint Task Force consisting of representatives 

of the National Guard Bureau, Department of the Army, and Department of the Air Force has been established to develop a detailed 

plan and to supervise the execution of the program which will be 

fully implemented in Calendar Year 1970. 
Chief, National Guard Bureau 

15 

pat CHRONOLOGY 

OF SIGNIFICANT 

EVENTS 

July, 1966 

ANG tactical units from the 121st and 180th Tactical Fighter 

Groups in Ohio participated in Exercises Gold Rush I and II which 

took place in Alaska with the Alaskan Air Command. A total of 106 

sorties were flown in these two exercises. 

October, 1966 

Army National Guardsmen from Minnesota, Aabama, New Hampshire, and Iowa and Air National Guardsmen from Colorado, New 

Mexico, Nebraska and Texas participated in Exercise Ready Devil II 

which was conducted by the 5th Mechanized Division, US Army, at 

Fort Carson, Colorado. 

November, 1966 -February, 1967 

ANG GEEIA units participated in Project Fast Race which involved the removal of communications electronics equipment from 

Air Force bases in France before 31 March 1967. Participation in 

the exercise was completely voluntary, and, out of a total of 433 

ANG volunteers, 219 were used. 

January-February, 1967 

Army and Air National Guardsmen participated in Exercise Gold 

Rush Ill/Frontier Assault conducted in Alaska from 29 January 

through 13 February 1967. This was an exercise directed by the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff which entailed a 10-day mock war. 

February-April, 1967 

ANG tactical and refueling units participated in Exercise Tropic 

Lightning III in Hawaii during the period 12 February to 12 April 

1967. ANG accomplishments included 279 sorties and 436 flying 

hours in close air support for the 11th Brigade, US Army. 

March, 1967 

ANG tactical units from Puerto Rico deployed to Howard AFB, 

Canal Zone, to participate in Exercise Cashew Tee III in Panama. 

A total of 117 sorties was flown by the Air National Guard in overcoming a simulated invasion. 

April, 1967 

Clove Hitch III, a joint-service exercise, was conducted in Puerto 

Rico with the Army and Air National Guard participating. The purpose of this joint amphibious and airborne training maneuver was 

to test tactical concepts in joint operation under simulated combat 

conditions. 

May, 1967 

ANG tactical and refueling units were deployed to Alaska in 

support of Exercise Gold Rush IV. 

Operation Creek Party began 1 May 1967. The operation involved 

the deployment of five KC97L aircraft and 60 Air Guardsmen to 

Rhein-Main Air Base, Germany, to provide refueling training and an 

emergency capability to USAFE. The operation is scheduled to continue through Fiscal Year 1968. 

June, 1967 

Exercise Guard Strike I, the largest Army and Air National Guard 

joint maneuver ever held, began on 17 June 1967, at Bakalar AFB, 

Indiana, with more than 50,000 Army and Air National Guardsmen 

from 33 States participating. The exercise which was designed to 

test a large scale tactical control system and provide realistic 

training under a simulated combat situation will las't for one month. 

3 ^w m 
Annual Report, Fiscal Yen 

loriMor d 

ARMY \ A I IO.\ AL GUARD 

The Army National Guard maintained a high degree of mobilization readiness during Fiscal Year 1967. The Selected Reserve 

Forqe continued to be the most ready Reserve Component force 

in history. The Army National Guard contribution to the SRF 

isisted of 744 units org*2mi££d ifito three Infantry Divisions, five 

Separate l/ifantry Brifalpfc'onejgBeparate Mechanized Infantry 

Brigade^ and one,/tS^MTGptalr y Regiment, with 118,903 

personnel, authorized. ^^Bt ' 

As a result of the fourwiour training assembly which became 

mandatory on 1 October $E>6, the training level and mobilization 

readmess of ARNG urfits was greatly improved. The increased 

training time gained from the additional unit training assemblies 

also paid high dividends in the areas of administration, logistics, 

and training. 

Continued improvement was shown in the operational proficiency of the Army National Guard Nike Hercules units. During 

Fiscal Year 1967, 17 States provided one Group Headquarters, 17 

Battalion Headquarters, a;nd 54 fire units for the program. Of 

>e 54 fire units, 48'represented a large part of the Nike Heres commitment of the US Army Air Defense Command, and 

the six fire units in Hawaii provided the orfoy Nike Hercules air 

defense for the State. Outstanding Air [Jtiense units achievements of the year included winning both AFWDCOM Commanders 

Trophies for Nike Hercules units and 11 of the'19 "E" Awards for 

Excellence iij Combat Proficiency presentedt» Air Defense units. 

Maximum emphasis was placed on obtaining excellent support in all areas so that ARNG units and Guardsmen could continue to maintain the same high degree of.mobilization preparedness at all times. The following pages reflect how this was 

accomplished. 
(Jiirt. [National Guard Bureau IT 

HHuVi r 
IK 

COMPTROLLER 

The Congress appropriated $601,333,000 for the support of the 

Army National Guard in Fiscal Year 1967. These funds were included 

in the two appropriations covering military personnel and operating 

costs (including technician pay). No new funds were appropriated 

for construction of armory and non-armory facilities since the program for Fiscal Year 1967 was to be supported using prior year 

appropriated funds. 

Appropriations 

Funded 

Appropriation Total 

Appropriations Appropriated Reimbursement Available 

ARNG Personnel .... $370,333,000 $900,000 $371,233,000 

ARNG Operatio n an d 

Maintenance 231,000,000 -0 - 231,000,000 

ARNG Militar y 

Construction —0— —0— * 

Total $601,333,000 $900,000 $602,233,000 

*(See Summary Statement, ARNG Military Construction) 

As in the preceding fiscal year, the budget submitted to the 

Congress for Fiscal Year 1697 provided for the realignment and 

reorganization of the Army Reserve components under the proposed 

combined appropriations National Guard and Reserve Personnel, 

Army; and Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard and 

Reserve. The Congress, however, did not accept the proposed reorganization plan, and funds were appropriated to continue the existing structure. 

A total of $370,333,000 was appropriated for ARNG Personnel 

which included an initial appropriation of $346,533,000 to support a 

strength of 418,500 and provided for an input of 80,950 recruits into 

the Reserve Enlistment Program (REP-63) training. 

A supplemental appropriation of $15,280,000 was provided increasing^the REP input to 123,400 recruits so as to reduce the 

untrained backlog to a minimum of 8,000 by the end of the fiscal 

year. While the estimated increased cost for the 42,450 additional 

recruit input was $34,454,000, there were offsetting adjustments of 

$19,174,000 attributable to the following: $16,143,000 for the scheduled 

reduction in the number of additional SRF unit assemblies from 24 

to 18, the reduction of personnel participating in assemblies and 

field training due to the accelerated REP input program, and a revision of average base pay rates; and a $3,031,000 reduction by DOD in 

the Army Service School Program. A second supplemental appropriation of $8,520,000 was provided for military pay increases granted 

in Title III of Public Law 89-501. 

The ARNG Operation and Maintenance appropriation for the 

year totaled $231,000,000 for logistical and technician support of 

Annual R«-|>ori. Fiscal Year 1907 

approximately 4,000 units. Department of Defense approved a program of $230,600,000. A reduction of $3.4 million was applied consisting of $3.1 million in the repair parts program based upon prior 

years obligation experience exclusive of Selected Reserve Force unit 

support and $300,000 in the weekend training site program. Of this 

amount $3.1 million was approved for technician and civilian pay 

increase as provided for in Public Law 89-504. 

For the first time funds were approved for expenses in connection with the use of local and field training sites for the conduct of 

weekend training. The funded support was $2.7 million, including 

the requirements for both base and SRF units. 

Summary Statement 

ARNG Military Construction (No-Year Appropriation) 

Funds available fro m FY 1966 $21,837,622 

FY 1967 appropriatio n —0— 

Total available in FY 1967 21,837,662 

FY 1967 obligations 2.684,407 ' 

Funds remaining availabl e for FY 1968 19,153,255 

* The Fiscal Year 1967 obligation program was $5,000,000. The Department 

of Defense restrictions and deferment of projects since December 1964 precluded the submission of normal fiscal year Army National Guard construction programs. A construction project to be approved must constitute 

a valid requirement under both the present and future Reserve Component 

Troop Structure. 

Funding 

As a result of the decrease in the SRF training assemblies and 

the number of recruits required to take initial training, funding 

adjustments of $17 million were realized; and the amount was transferred to the DOD emergency fund, thereby revising the ARNG 

funding program to $354,233,000. ARNG Operation and Maintenance 

appropriated funds were apportioned, and operational funds were 

adjusted to the extent of providing support for the civilian and 

technician pay increased costs. 

Obligations 

ARNG Personnel $344,644,210' 

ARNG Operotion & Maintenance 232,538,436 ' 

ARNG Militar y Construction 2,684,407 

NOTE: 

1

 Includes funde d reimbursements of $894,672. 

1

 Includes automati c reimbursements of $3,217,701. 

State funding programs were 98.1 percent obligated as compared to 

98.8 percent in Fiscal Year 1966 and 99.0 percent in Fiscal Year 1965. 

Finance Services 

Procedures prescribed in NGR 58 for payment of annual field 

training payrolls were revised to authorize payments either by 

United States Treasury check or by cash after 1 January 1967. 

Proposed Part Eight (Pay and Allowances for Members of the 

Reserve Components) of the Department of Defense Military Pay 

and Allowances Entitlement Manual (DODPM) was staffed. Part 

Eight of the Manual, when published, will supersede portions of 

NGR 58. A proposed revision of NGR 58 was therefore prepared and 

is in the process of being staffed. 

In accordance with the provisions of NGR 58, incapacitation 

payrolls covering continuation of active duty pay and allowances to 

Army National Guard members for disease or injury incurred in line 

of duty are submitted to NGB for review and approval when the 

prescribed medical certificate is not signed by a uniformed services 

medical officer. During Fiscal Year 1967, a total of 249 such payrolls 

was reviewed and processed 
( hiil . National Guard Bureau 

19 

Accounting and Reporting 

Progress in the improvement of fiscal accounting reports was 

accomplished during Fiscal Year 1967. The mechanization of one 

additional monthly report (Obligations by Object Class) (RCS CSCAA 

152) which eliminated a large volume and many manhours of manual 

postings was achieved in October, 1966. Modified procedures for 

improving the method of preparing the mechanized Status of Allotment reports (RCS CSCAA 166) were also developed and tested. The 

implementation of the modified procedures in Fiscal Year 1968 will 

provide a more complete and accurate report of financial transactions and the status of funds from the various States. 

Audit and Reports of Survey 

The US Army Audit Agency completed and submitted 21 audit 

reports pertaining to Army National Guard activities during Fiscal 

Year 1967. These audit reports included the status and conditions 

of Federal funds and property accounts maintained by 40 percent 

of the United States Property and Fiscal Officers (USPFOs) in the 

States. The findings and recommendations were reported in detail 

to State authorities, the National Guard Bureau, and the Department 

of the Army. These audit reports and the replies of corrective action 

taken by the States were reviewed and analyzed by the National 

Guard Bureau & used asa basisfor establishing or improving management and internal control procedures. The value of these audits was 

evidenced by the fact thai four of the States audited during Fiscal 

Year 1967 had no major findings. 

Requests for appeal of charges on Army National Guard reports 

of survey were reviewed by the National Guard Bureau and recommendations for relief, when warranted, were made prior to forwarding the appeals to the Secretary of the Army for final action. 

Review and Analysis 

Review and Analysis of the Fiscal Year 1967 Army National 

Guard Programs indicated that accomplishment was satisfactory in 

most areas and outstanding in others. 

The Army Natio'nal Guard military strength was on target for 

the year, the strength of the SRF units approached the maximum 

authorized, and the numbers of enlistees awaiting training was 

drastically reduced during Fiscal Year 1967. 

The ARNG Military Construction program which was deferred in 

December 1964, continued in effect. Although military construction 

projects planned for Fiscal Years 1963 through 1967 were deferred, 

certain projects were granted exception by DOD and construction 

was approved during the year. 

Management Improvement 

(Reporting Workload) 

In accordance with paragraph 1, AR33515, Reports Control System reports essential in terms of actual use are established or continued; and the reporting of unnecessary, duplicating, erroneous, or 

misleading data is prevented or eliminated. 

Although efforts to reduce reporting workload were successful, 

some new requirements were established in view of the need for 

detailed operational and financial data. As of 30 June 1967, the 

number of controlled recurring reports required by the National 

Guard Bureau from the several States had increased to 27, most of 

which were annual submissions. In addition to these reports required from the States, the number required from active Army 

sources decreased to three. 

In May 1967, Project CURB, Cancellation of Unessential Reporting Burden, began which required all Army staff agencies to examine the need for reports and take action to rescind nonessential 

requirements. 

PERSONNEL 

Military Strength 

The federally recognized strength of the active Army National 

Guard on 30 June 1967 was 418,074, a net decrease of 2,850 when 

compared with the 420,924 strength at the end of Fiscal Year 1966. 

The total number of officers and warrant officers was 33,880, and the 

total number of enlisted personnel was 384,194. The average 

strength for the year was 418,786. A table showing year-end and 

average strengths from 1948-1967 is shown in Appendix G. 

The Army National Guard strength at the beginning of Fiscal 

Year 1967 was 420,924, but Fiscal Year 1967 budget guidance provided only for an authorized strength of 418,500. In November, 1966, 

the Chief of the National Guard Bureau took positive action to control strength as well as backlog of non-prior service Reserve Enlisted 

Personnel (REP) awaiting training. In lieu of forced elimination of 

trained personnel, it was considered more desirable to obtain 

authorized strength by controlled procurement of non-prior service 

personnel. To reduce the ARNG strength to the budget support 

strength of 418,500 and to control the REP backlog, procurement of 

non-prior service personnel was limited to Selected Reserve Force 

(SRF) units only, and enlistment of prior service personnel to fill 

authorized vacancies was continued. The overstrength was reduced 

and by January, 1967, the strength had dropped to 416,491. Enlistment of non-prior service personnel in units below Priority Aggregate 

Strength (PAS) were lifted in February, 1967. The strength continued 

below the authorized number due to a shortage of officer personnel, 

reduction in overstrength personnel, and delays in re-initiating procurement of non-prior service personnel. 

States were urged to obtain and retain trained men in order to 

accomplish and maintain SRF units at 100 percent of TOE strength. 

SRF strength remained slightly under authorized strength due to the 

inability to procure the authorized number of officer personnel. 

There were 2,491 Guardsmen in the Inactive National Guard who 

were attached to units for administration and accounting purposes 

and who would be available for duty in the event of mobilization. 

The total strength of Army National Guard Units on 30 June 

1967 was distributed as shown below: 

NUMBER OF STRENGTH 

TYPE OF UNITS UNITS Programmed Actual 

Selected Reserve Force 744 118,903 117,420 

Air Defense 70 7,400 7,257 

Other Immediate Reserve 1,708 181,311 180,347 

Reinforcing Reserve 1,479 110,692 113,050 

Total Federally Recognized 

Units 4,001 418,306 418,074 

Allotted Not 

Organized 3 194 0 

TOTAL AIL Units 4,001 418,500 418,074 

Increased strength of the SRF was accomplished by the transfer 

of qualified personnel from Immediate Reserve (IR) and Reinforcing 

Reserve (RR) units and, where necessary, by recruiting non-prior 

service personnel who were given high priority entry to complete 

their REP active duty training (ACDUTRA) with the active Army. Immediate Reserve and Reinforcing Reserve units were continued at 

authorized levels. 

Chief, National <,n;ii.l Bureau 2 1 

Reserve Officer Personnel Act 

(Promotion Consideration) 

The following table shows the results of the Fiscal Years 1966 

and 1967 selection boards in considering officers for promotion 

under the mandatory provisions of the Reserve Officer Personnel 

Act (ROPA). Military education and efficiency reports appear to be 

major factors in selection considerations. 

FY 1966 FY 1967 

Grade 

I I I to Cf>T 

CPT to MAJ 

MAI lo ITC .... 

ITC to COt 

No. 

Considered 

1,116 

886 

347 

.... 383 

No. 

Salactad 

714 

486 

240 

89 

Parcant Salactad 

64% 

55% 

69% 

23% 

No. 

Considered 

1,005 

1,008 

352 

509 

No. 

Salactad 

618 

587 

236 

134 

Parcant 

Salactad 

62% 

58% 

67% 

26% 

Procurement (Enlisted Personnel) 

During FY 1967, there was a total procurement of 58,979 enlisted 

personnel and a total of 61,945 enlisted personnel losses. 

Enlisted Personnel Procurement FY 1967 

Enlisted in FY 67 to take ACDUTRA in 67 45,113 

Enlisted in FY 67 to take ACDUTRA in 68 —0— 

Veterans , 80 5 

Obligors , o2 7 

Transferred from Inactive National Guard 2 404 

Enlisted from Other Reserve Components 6,338 

0*e r 1,692 

Total Gains 58 979 

Total Losses 61,945 

Reserve Enlistment Program 

In Fiscal Year 1967, 45,113 non-prior service personnel enlisted 

under the Reserve Enlistment Program of 1963 (REP 63). Under this 

program, the active duty for training required for all non-prior 

service enlistees varies from a minimum of four months to that 

period required for MOS qualification. In Fiscal Year 1967, the 

average period of active duty training required for MOS qualification was approximately six months. 

Active Duty for Training 

At the beginning of Fiscal Year 1967, 79,106 enlistees who had 

enlisted in Fiscal Year 1966 were awaiting training spaces in active 

Army training centers. The 45,113 who enlisted in Fiscal Year 1967 

planned to enter training within the same year, but due to school 

deferments, injuries, etc., 5,605 individuals were awaiting entry 

into ACDUTRA as of 30 June 1967. 

During Fiscal Year 1967, 109,990 Army National Guardsmen entered the active duty training program. Since the beginning of this 

training program in 1956, 709,589 Army Guardsmen have enlisted or 

volunteered for the program; 654,403 have actually entered training; 

and 572,619 have completed ACDUTRA and returned to their units'. 

On 30 June 1967, 53,186 Army National Guard enlisted men were 

participating in the ACDUTRA program in Army Training Centers, 

Service Schools, and other training facilities throughout the United 

States. 

THOUSANDS 

ACTIVE DUTY FOR TRAINING 

Over 654,400 Army Guardsmen Have Entered Active Duty 

tor Training Programs Since 1956 

=tf 1956 1957 1958 1959 196l 0 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 

FISCAL YEARS 

Line of Duty Determinations 

(Officer and Enlisted) 

This function, delegated to the Chief of the National Guard 

Bureau on 1 November 1964, charged the Bureau with the responsibility for line of duty determinations for Army National Guard personnel not on active duty. It is now operating on a current basis 

after the procurement of additional personnel and revision of the 

regulations governing this function. 

The revision of NGR 28, the purpose of which was to improve, 

simplify, and furnish guidance in the preparation and processing 

line of duty investigations, proved helpful to the States and the 

National Guard Bureau in the execution of this function. 

Publication of Change 1, NGR 28, effective 10 May 1967, contained further simplification of administrative procedures. Following are statistics concerning completed actions for Fiscal Year 

1967. 

TYPE OF ACTION NUMBER 

Formal Investigations (other than death easel) 2 254 

In Line of Duty 2 002 

Not in Line of Duty—Not Misconduct 225 

Not in Line of Duty—Misconduct 27 

Death Cases (no determinations made) 44 

Informal Investigations 3 177 

In Line of Duty 3 j j g 

Not in Line of Duty—Not Misconduct 19 

T0TA l

 5,475 

Army National Guard Register 

The 1967 edition of the Official Army National Guard Register 

was distributed to the States and other interested activities in 

June, 1967. This edition contains the names and statements of 

approximately 34,000 officers and warrant officers of the Active and 

Inactive Army National Guard. 

During the year, the following actions were processed by the 

Military Service Branch of the Army Personnel Division National 

Guard Bureau: 

5,978 statements of service (NGB Form 03D) to be published in 

the Official Army National Guard Register. 

4,417 pieces of correspondence were processed. These consisted 

of requests for verification of service performed in the Army National Guard, requests for statements of service for retired pav 

purposes, changes in the Register, and decorations or awards 

5,599 promotions for entry in the Army National Guard Register 

24,360 other actions pertaining to the Register which included 

completed courses of instruction at Army Service Schools, changes 

of status in the Active and Inactive Army National Guard, terminations of Federal recognition, and corrections of service as recorded 
11 Annual Rrport. Fiscal Year I9*>7 

Technicians 

Army National Guard technicians are, with a few exceptions, 

federally recognized members of ARNG units employed by the 

States. They assist the unit commanders in the daily administrative 

and training responsibilities and the United States Property and 

Fiscal Officer with his duties. They provide the first and second 

echelon maintenance in organization maintenance shops and higher 

echelon maintenance in the States. They provide personnel necessary to keep the NIKE missile sites operational 24 hours a day for 

the air defense of the United States. They also provide necessary 

staffing for Military Support of Civil Defense to coordinate the 

possible military resources available for supporting the civil defense 

missions. 

At the beginning of fiscal year 1967, 17,350 spaces were authorized for employment of technicians in Organization, USPFO, and 

Support Maintenance activities; 5,099 spaces were authorized in the 

Air Defense program; and 227 were authorized in the Military Support of Civil Defense program. SRF requirements resulted in a further increase of 1.184 spaces in the authorization for Organiation, 

USPFO, and Support Maintenance technicians. 

At the end of the year, 18,495 technicians were employed in 

Organization, USPFO, and Support Maintenance activities; 5,043 

were employed in the Air Defense program; and 220 were employed 

in the Military Support for Civil Defense program. Additionally, 269 

were supported on a reimbursement basis as a condition of crossservice agreements, bringing the total to 24,027 technicians employed. There were also 662 temporary employees at the end of 

the year. 

There was no change during the year in the number of States 

participating in the State Retirement Program. In these 19 States, 

Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia, 9,614 ARNG technicians 

were covered by State Retirement Systems at the end of Fiscal 

Year 1967. 

In July 1966, the salaries of 11,931 technicians paid under 

Classification Act schedules were adjusted under the Classification 

Act schedule enacted into law by PL 89-504 dated 18 July 1966. The 

annual cost of the salary adjustments was approximately $2.5 million. Pay increases from new Wage Board schedules developed during the year amounted to $2.7 million per year. 

Average costs per technician produced during the year, including salaries and benefits, amounted to $7,463 for Organization, 

USPFO, and Support Maintenance technicians; $7,343 for Air Defense technicians; and $9,156 for technicians in Military Support 

for Civil Defense. 

Total obligations for technicians in Organization, USPFO, and 

Support Maintenance activities were $138,569,418. Of this total, 

direct obligations amounted to $136,445,012, and the reimbursable 

cost of technicians employed under cross-service agreements was 

$2,124,406. The direct obligations for Air Defense technicians were 

$36,338,420, while the direct obligations for technicians in Military 

Support of Civil Defense were $1,986,898. 

Funds in the amount of $826,000 were allocated by the Department of the Army for medical examinations and medical care of 

Army National Guardsmen who become ill or are injured while in a 

training status. During the year, $176,000 was withdrawn by the Office 

of the Army Surgeon General. Of the remaining $650,000, the Army 

National Guard obligated $604,289 during the year. 

The National Guard Bureau continued to place maximum emphasis on obtaining excellent medical support for the Army National 

Guard to insure the maintenance of a high degree of physical fitness 

at all times. 

The results of the required SRF medical examinations were 

followed closely on a monthly basis. By the end of the fiscal year. 

SRF medical examinations were being kept current by repeating 

them with the same frequency as the active Army. Eight officers 

and 1,042 enlisted men were found medically unfit for retention in 

the ARNG during the performance of these medical examinations 

since the time the SRF was formed and were discharged. This was 

about 0.9 percent of the total number of personnel in the SRF. 

In March, 1967, a Medical Supply Committee conference was 

held in the National Guard Bureau. This Committee was formed in 

order to provide the authorization to acquire certain medical equipment necessary to perform all medical tests required by NGR 27. 

The Committee, working in close coordination with the Office of 

the Surgeon General of the Army, made specific recommendations 

to the Assistant Chief. NGB, Army, for certain medical equipment. 

Change 1 to TA 130-1 was published 29 May 1967 to reflect these 

additional items. 

During the Army Area Conferences, Army Surgeon sub-conferences were held for the first time, attended by 39 State Surgeons 

and medical representatives. This proved to be an excellent method 

of conveying medical information on physical standards, medical 

policy, medical equipment, and other medical matters to the ARNG 

Surgeons. As a result, significant improvement was noted relative 

to the accomplishment of medical examinations and procedures 

regarding the medical care for sick and injured Guardsmen. 

The Surgeon General of the Army removed the requirement for 

a special promotion medical examination to be performed for active 

duty personnel, and official approval was granted the Army National 

Guard to discontinue such promotion physicals for ARNG officers 

effective 1 July 1967. This change will eliminate the necessity for 

performing about 6,000 promotion medical examinations every year. 

Army National Guard physical standards for both officer and 

enlisted personnel are now the same as those for the active Army. 

Although NGR 27 which directed this was published 30 March 1966, 

the effective date for Army National Guard officer personnel was 1 

July 1956, and for Army National Guard enlisted personnel, it was 1 

December 1966. In the past, Army National Guard officer medical 

examination requirements were closely aligned with those of the 

active Army due to the Federal recognition involved; however, because of the lack of funding, the enlisted medical examinations 

were less complete than those required by the active Army. Consequently, a considerable change occurred when the new requirements for certain additional diagnostic tests became effective. 

The Office of the Army Surgeon of the National Guard Bureau 

reviews only those examinations of enlisted personnel referred for 

professional evaluation. During the past year, 447 such reports were 

reviewed and professional opinions rendered. 
Chief, National Guard Bureau 

2 3 

The following chart shows the number and type of officer medical examination reports evaluated and processed during Fiscal 

Year 1967: 

Initial Federal Recognitions

 55 " 

Promotion Medical Examinations 5,980 

Army Aviation (Medical Examinations) 37 1 

Periodic Medical Examinations 11,143 

School Attendance Medical Examinations 1,847 

Statements (in lieu of exams) 15,307 

TOTAl «°.» » 

Of this number, 67 officers were found to be medically unfit for 

military service. 

ORGANIZATION 

AND TRAINING 

Organization 

Training Objectives 

Training for the Selected Reserve Force "^ITliK " 

mented in F,scal Year 1967 by Change 5 dated 2 ! June 1966 to 

CONARC Letter of Instruction. The training objective set forth in 

this change was to increase proficiency in a I phases ofgaming . 

The change established three home station TMn.ng programs for 

SRF units: (1) Accelerated training program (72 assemb ies). This 

program would be followed by units that did accompl f h thei r ^ . 

1966 training objectives including successful'completion of appro 

•briate Army Training Test (ATT). (2) Modified accelerated program 

5 assemblies): Thi! program was established for SRF un*nj* g 

had attained the 1965-1966 training objectives, J n c )

u

*

n

8 * UF«" TM 

completion of appropriate ATT, but which required time to increase 

proficiency to a more satisfactory level. (3) Normal training program 

(48 assemblies): Upon approval of USCONARC certain, units that 

had attained the 1965-1966 training objectives and could be deployed 

for combat without further training after mobilization could revert 

to the normal training program. SRF units qualified and conducted 

these programs as follows: 

Type Program Mobili.Cion Entities 

Accelerated (72 assemblies)

 4S 

Modified Accelerated (58 assemblies) 244 

Normal-Completed 1965-1966 

objective (48 assemblies) 

Normal-Did not complete 1965-1966 objective 

for lack of personnel and/or equipment 

(48 assemblies)

 2 5 

The Army National Guard troop basis as of 30 June 1967 consisted of 4,001 Federally recognized company or detachment size 

units. 

The troop basis consisted of: 

17 Infantry Divisions 

6 Armored Divisions 

5 Command Headquarters, Divisional 

7 Infantry Brigades (Sep) 

1 Infantry Brigade (M) (Sep) 

2 Armored Brigades (Sep) 

2 Scout Battalions 

21 Infantry Battalions and Infantry Battalions (M) 

7 Armored Cavalry Regiments 

1 Armored Cavalry Squadron 

16 Tank Battalions 

44 Air Defense Missile and Automatic Weapons, Self Propelled 

Battalions 

72 Field Artillery Battalions 

66 Support Battalions 

2 Special Forces Groups, Headquarters; 11 Special Forces 

Companies; 2 Signal Companies (SF); and 1 Special Forces 

Detachment 

174 Headquarters Units 

417 Separate Companies and Detachments 

Two new scout companies were added to each of the two Eskimo 

Scout Battalions in Alaska and two new companies which had previously been allotted were organized in New Jersey and California, 

making an increase of six units over Fiscal Year 1966. 

Selected Reserve Force 

The Selected Reserve Force (SRF) continued to be the most 

ready Reserve Component force in history. The ARNG contribution 

to the SRF included 744 units and 118,903 personnel. The major 

units were organized as follows: 

3 Infantry Divisions 

5 Separate Infantry Brigades 

1 Separate Mechanized Infantry Brigade 

1 Armored Cavalry Regiment 

Individual Training Progress 

The chart below shows individual training progress for Army 

National Guardsmen from Fiscal Year 1957 through 1967. On 30 June 

1967 99 percent of the total strength of the Army National Guard 

was considered basically trained. Over half of these were trained 

under the active duty for training programs required for all nonprior service recruits. The effect of these individual training programs is shown by the steady growth in the number of Guardsmen 

who have trained with the active Army, from 24 percent on 30 June 

1956 to 91 percent on 30 June 1967. 

Individual Training Progress—FY 1967 

PERCENT 

Category Cumulative 

Prior Service With Active Forces 12 12 

Active Duty For Training With 

Active Army 79 91 

Individual Basically Trained by 

National Guard 8 99 

Less Than 2 Years National Guard 

Training 1 100 

_ 

INDIVIDUAL 

TRAINING 

PROGRESS 

FY 1956-FY 1967 
2 1 Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1967 

During the first half of training year 1966/1967, States were 

required to conduct a Basic Combat Training (BCT) program at home 

stations and AFT sites to insure that the large backlog of Guardsmen awaiting training spaces at Army Training Centers received 

meaningful training. USCONARC developed guidance for this training along the following: 

a. Complete Basic Combat Training (BCT) in accordance with 

Army Training Program (ATP) 21-114. 

b. Initiate Advanced Individual Training (AIT) in the Military 

Occupational Specialty (MOS) for which enlisted. 

c. Integrate individuals into Basic Unit Training (BUT) when, 

in the judgment of the unit commander, each recruit concerned has 

assimilated sufficient knowledge and skills to participate in unit 

training. As a result, the backlog which numbered 79,106 on 30 

June 1966, was reduced to 5,605 on 30 June 1967. 

Combat Training 

The continuation of the Selected Reserve Force continued to 

have a major impact on training of the Army National Guard during 

the past training year. The SRF, through its accelerated training 

program, attained the highest level of mobilization readiness in the 

long history of the National Guard. The increased training time 

gained from the additional unit training assemblies paid high dividends in pre-mobilization preparedness in the areas of administration, logistics, and training. Training programs insured that training 

levels were maintained or improved during Fiscal Year 1967. 

Training for the non-SRF units continued, maintaining the limited level of training within the restrictions of reduced strength and 

minimum equipment. 

Inactive Duty Training 

On 1 October 1966, the four-hour training assembly became mandatory for all but a few units specified by USCONARC. This departure from the old two-hour drill greatly improved the training level 

and mobilization readiness of ARNG units. The Weekend Training 

(WET) concept reached its highest degree of popularity during the 

past training year. 

Two levels of inactive duty training were conducted by the 

Army National Guard, one for SRF units and one for non-SRF units. 

Training of the SRF units continued to increase on the level of that 

training achieved during the first year of intensified training. Only 

those units that failed the initial Army Training Test were required 

to conduct a retest during the past training year. Of the 37 units 

that failed the first ATT, 22 were successfully retested during Reserve Duty Training (RDT), and the other 15 units are scheduled for 

a future date. 

Training of the SRF continued to be hindered by some shortages of equipment such as new family radios, modern aircraft, 

and ground surveillance radar equipment. Lack of adequate training sites also caused a problem in the conduct of weekend training. As the proficiency level of the SRF units increased, the need 

for larger, more adequate training areas to accommodate the 

training increased. Many units had to travel excessive distances, 

placing a strain on equipment and personnel. 

Percentage of attendance in inactive duty training during the 

past two years, excluding constructive attendance, is shown below: 

FY 66 FY 67 

Officers and Warrant Officers 97.7 97.8 

Enlisted Men 94.5 95.7 

Active Army evaluators from the responsible Zl Armies used 

new AFT evaluation forms, based on guidelines found in Annex 

AG, USCONARC Regulation 350-1, dated 7 April 1967. The provisions 

of this new annex eliminated the previous standardized USCONARC 

Form 151. Under the new rating system, units receive ratings of 

Superior, Excellent, Satisfactory, or Unsatisfactory. The addition 

of the rating of Excellent, which was not applicable with the 

USCONARC Form 151, was a desired improvement. 

Exercises 

Support requirements by the active Army for Southeast Asia 

and budget limitations resulted in cancellation of most active 

Army exercises in Fiscal Year 1967. Most notable of these was 

KITTY HAWK in which more than 21,000 Army National Guardsmen 

were scheduled to participate. Alternate AFT plans were implemented by the affected States upon notice of cancellation in midJune 1967. 

Approximately 675 Army National Guard personnel from Minnesota, Alabama, New Hampshire and Iowa participated in READY 

DEVIL II at Fort Carson, Colorado; 175 Army National Guardsmen 

participated in Frontier Assault in Alaska; and two Special Forces 

Detachments participated in Operation WET SAND in Puerto Rico. 

Annual General Inspections 

Armory inspections conducted by representatives of Army 

Area Commanders generally ascertain the degree of excellence 

in achieving regulatory Equipment Maintenance and Levels, Unit 

Organization and Training, Personnel Qualification, and Records 

Management. During the year, USCONARC implemented a new 

technique for the conduct of Annual General Inspections (AGO 

of Army National Guard units which stipulated that the troop 

participation phase (formally called evening or training phase) 

of the inspection would be left to the discretion of the Army 

Commanders. All Army Commanders initiated this new concept 

employing the following modifications: 

First Army Area No Evening Phase 

Third Army Area No Evening Phase 

Fourth Army Area No Evening Phase 

Fifth Army Area.. _ No Evening Phase except for Selective 

Service Units which will have an evening 

phase when so requested by any State 

within Fifth Army Area. 

Sixth Army Area . All SRF units and 25 percent of the nonSRF units were inspected in the same 

manner as previous years. All remaining 

units had no evening phase. 

The following table shows that for the past five years almost 

all Army National Guard units received inspection ratings of Satisfactory or above. Although not shown in the table, 99.5 percent of 

the units inspected received Excellent or Superior ratings in Fiscal 

Year 1967. 

Annual General Armory Inspections 

Ratings FY 63 FY 64 

Satisfactory and above 99.4 99.4 

Unsatisfactory 0.6 0.6 

FY 65 FY 66 FY 67 

99.2 99.5 99.5 

0.8 0.5 0.5 

Annual Field Training 

During Fiscal Year 1967, Annual Field Training (AFT) of 15 

days was conducted for all units, with 346,120 Army National 

Guardsmen attending. This figure represents 98.8 percent of 

ARNG assigned personnel, including constructive attendance. 

School Program 

The Army National Guard School Program is designed to qualify 

officers and enlisted men in their MOS assignment and for pro-
< Jii*'t. Nationa l (»uard Burea u 2.", 

motion to the next higher grade. Graduates of the schools are 

used by organizational commanders to train other members in the 

latest tactics, techniques, and doctrine. 

Again this year, Army commanders fully supported Army National Guard school training requirements. Priority for the use of 

school quotas was given to personnel assigned to Selected Reserve 

Force units. 

During the year, 6,844 officers and enlisted men attended 

courses of instruction conducted in Army Service Schools. In view 

of the urgent requirements for school spaces for training of Army 

Aviators for Vietnam, no school quotas were made available to 

the Army National Guard for initial flight training courses this year. 

USCONARC established Mobilization Advanced Courses for Reserve Components during the latter part of the year. The Infantry 

School and Chaplain School courses began in June. Most of the 

other schools will start their program in Fiscal Year 1968. 

A total of 594 personnel were enrolled in the Reserve Component OCS Courses conducted at Fort Benning and Fort Sill. 

These courses are approximately 11 weeks long. 

The majority of second lieutenants of the Army National Guard 

are produced through the State OCS Program. All States except 

Alaska have this program. Of the 4,319 new candidates that started 

this program during AFT of 1966, it is estimated that 2,760 will 

graduate during the summer of 1967. The planned enrollment of 

new candidates during AFT of 1967 is 6,200, the highest enrollment 

in the history of the program. 

The first candidate of the Non-ROTC phase of the State OCS 

program will graduate during the summer of 1967, and it is anticipated that 50 college graduates will receive their Federal recognition as a result of this program. 

Army Reserve displayed increased interest in the ARNG State 

OCS Program. About 350 Reserves started the program during the 

summer of 1967. 

Army Aviation 

During Fiscal Year 1967, the number of ARNG aviators on 

flying status decreased from 1,847 to 1,765. A vigorous recruiting 

effort resulted in 155 new aviators, but the lack of Army National 

Guard quotas for primary aviator training reduced the capability 

to prevent losses in the overall Army Aviator strength. 

The following chart shows ARNG aviator strength over the past 

nine years. 

ing the second and third quarters, and failure of increased training 

requirements for SRF units to generate additional flying hours a? 

forecast. 

ARNG AVIATOR 

STRENGTH 

FY 1958-FY 1967 

MO 

m 

..00 

1154 

1260 

1382 

1516" 

1522' 

U513" 

1659 

1847 

1765 

958 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 6 

ARNG AIRCRAFT 

ACCIDENT RATE 

1 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 FLYING HOURS 

15 

25 

20 

15 

'7. 6 

k24.3 

I

12 17.2 

12.05 

. 

•2 63 64 65 66 67 

The actual accomplishment of 199,221 aircraft flying hours was 

9,889 below The Fiscal Year 1967 Program because of a shortfall in 

programmed aviator strength, unusually bad weather conditions durThe aircraft accident rate per 100,000 hours flown was 12.05, 

which was an improvement over the 17.2 rate of Fiscal Year 1966. 

In consideration of the requirement to achieve and maintain 

a high state of readiness in the Army National Guard and to provide a back-up training capability for the Army Aviation School, 

Department of the Army approved the testing of a National Guard 

Bureau concept to conduct Rotary Wing Pilot Qualification training 

at state level. Fourteen states with a total of 21 students were 

represented at two classes conducted at the Stockton, California, 

ARNG Flight Activity. Final check rides were administered by 

check pilots from the Army Aviation School at Fort Rucker, Alabama. The overall evaluation of the test indicated that it was a 

complete success. 

A CH37B Pilot Transition and Multi-Engine Medium Transport 

Helicopter Maintenance Course was conducted as an Army Area 

School during April-May 1967 at the ARNG Flight Activity in 

Davenport, Iowa, using National Guard personnel and resources. 

Six aviators and six mechanics completed the first class, and 

a second class was scheduled for June-July. 

Air Defense Program 

During the 14 years the Army National Guard Air Defense 

Program has been in operation, the program has progressed from 

conventional guns to the nuclear-capable Nike Hercules missiles. 

During 1967, there were one Group Headquarters, 17 Battalion 

Headquarters, and 54 fire units in the program. In the CONUS, 

48 fire units represent a large part of the Nike Hercules commitment 

of the US Army Air Defense Command (ARADCOM), and the six 

fire units in Hawaii provide the only Nike Hercules air defense 

for the State. 

Operational proficiency of ARNG Nike Hercules units showed 

an improvement of 5 percent in Command Maintenance Management Inspections and 1.7 percent in Technical Proficiency Inspections in Fiscal Year 1967. In Short Notice Annual Practice, a 

comprehensive test consisting of system preparation, missile assembly, pre-fire tests, and firing test conducted at McGregor Range 

New Mexico, the proficiency increased .1 percent with an overall 

average rating of 90.4 percent. 

Outstanding achievements of the year included winning both 

ARADCOM Commander's Trophies for Nike Hercules units Battery 

B, 1st Missile Battalion, 250th Artillery, California ARNG won the 

outstanding Nike Hercules Battery in ARADCOM Trophy'and Bat 

tery B, 4th Missile Battalion, 111th Artillery, Virginia ARNG was 

runner-up. Battery C, 4th Missile Battalion, 251st Artillery California 
2d Annual Report, Fisrul Year 1967 

ARMY NATIONAL 

GUARD AIR 

DEFENSE 

PROGRAM 

OPERATIONAL UNITS 

ARNG, won the outstanding Nike Hercules Firing Battery in 

SNAP Trophy with a percentile score of 99.8. In addition to this 

near perfect performance, six other ARNG units received a percentile score of 99 or higher in SNAP. ARNG batteries received 

eleven of the nineteen "E" Awards for Excellence in Combat Proficiency presented to Air Defense units. 

Army Advisors 

On 30 June 1967, 415 Army Advisors were on duty with Army 

National Guard units, representing 44 percent of the total authorized strength of 947. The shortage of advisors was caused by the 

CONUS Army build-up and the critical requirement for additional 

officers in Vietnam. 

Status of Advisors on 30 June 1967 

"7 E 

•- o 

•• CO *5 

sc i 

< Q- OC 

Infantry 358 

Artillery 367 

Armor 208 

Chemical 0 

Engineer 93 

Ordnance 89 

Signal 92 

Medical 50 

Transportation .... 23 

Military Police - . 15 

Quartermaster 30 

Adjutant General .. 0 

TOTAL 1,325 

LOGISTICS 

Auth. 

ARNG Adv. C 

266 

258 

170 

0 

74 

50 

48 

33 

24 

11 

13 

0 

947 

Presen 

Duty o 

30 Jun 

150 

167 

81 

0 

42 

28 

17 

9 

5 

5 

4 

1 

509 

Presen Duty o 

30 Jun 

134 

150 

48 

1 

36 

26 

9 

3 

2 

5 

1 

0 

415 

m 50 

58 

28 

-

49 

52 

19 

9 

8 

45 

8 

-

44 

Three major factors influenced Army National Guard logistics 

during Fiscal Year 1967: 

a. Established priorities for distribution of available equipment assets and overall logistic support to Selected Reserve 

Force units. 

b. Improved ARNG equipment status resulting from receipt of 

new or rebuilt equipment. 

c. Increased emphasis on equipment maintenance to include 

increased availability of spare parts, prescribed loads, and shop 

stocks. 

Selected Reserve Force (Logistic Support) 

Realignment of ARNG logistic assets toward achievement of 

overall SRF unit support objectives was continued in Fiscal Year 

1967. Priority was directed toward building up the SRF equipment 

inventory and raising the combat serviceability level of TOE equipment on hand. Action taken to improve the SRF unit readiness 
* IIM I, INalionul Guard liiirruu 

27 

posture included distribution of additional equipment, increased 

emphasis on maintenance effectiveness, development of prescribed 

load lists for repair parts, and procurement of prescribed loads. 

ARNG equipment assets located in the Field Training Equipment 

Concentration Sites (FTECS) and lower priority units has, as required, been earmarked for shipment to SRF units in the event of 

mobilization. In both cases, earmarking action was taken to fill SRF 

requirements between OEG allowances and full TOE authorizations. 

Firepower 

The exchange program of M48A1, Tank, Combat for M41 Light 

Tank in SRF units and Field Training Equipment Concentration 

Sites was 90 percent completed during the year. After all M41 

Light Tanks are phased out of the ARNG inventory, M48 Tanks 

will be exchanged as the M48A1 becomes available through the 

Army rebuild program. 

The Crew Served weapons posture of the SRF Divisions improved significantly through the receipt of 1,118 Machine Gun, M60, 

and 2,511 Grenade Launchers, M79. 

40,000 M-l Rifles were received in the ARNG equipment inventory and distributed to the high priority units in exchange for 

Carbines. 

Four Rocket Launcher, M289, Honest John, were received in 

"as is" condition and distributed to the SRF Divisions for training 

purposes. However, considerable repair will be required to bring 

these items up to a training serviceable condition. 

243 Gun, SP, M42A1, Twin 40mm, were distributed to ARNG 

units. Classified as trailing serviceable, these guns are a partial 

replacement for the 420 similar items withdrawn for active Army 

use two years ago. 

Mobility 

ARNG was allocated 10,950 Truck Utility VA Ton, M151A1, and 

8,600 Trailer, Cargo, y* Ton M416. This allocation, made in four 

increments, was adequate to fill OEG requirements for SRF units 

and the IR divisions. The first two increments were scheduled for 

shipment to SRF units and have been received by the units in 

most cases. The remaining 50 percent of the overall allocation to 

meet OEG requirements for the IR divisions will be shipped as 

equipment becomes available from production (EDC December 1967). 

Redistribution of Trucks, Vi Ton M38A1 from SRF units after 

receipt of the new M151A1 substantially improved the vehicle 

posture in ARNG IR and RR units. 

200 Truck, Ambulance, Vt Ton M718 were allocated and distributed to SRF units. 

During the year, ARNG units continued to accept excess 

active Army vehicles in an "as is" condition. The majority accepted 

in this category were Truck, Cargo, 2Vfe Ton, M211 and Truck, Shop 

Van, 2V2 Ton, M109 and M220. 

Communications 

The shortage of modern area communications equipment continued to be a major ARNG problem. A large part of the equipment on hand is not of the new family of communications electronic 

items. The primary communications equipment allocation to ARNG 

during the year was 204 Radio, AN/GRC-109, for issue to Special 

Forces units. Distribution is approximately 75 percent completed. 

Tactical Support 

The receipt of support equipment during Fiscal Year 1967 was 

limited and generally in an "as is" condition from Army excess 

lists. A few Generator Sets and Mine Detecting Sets, PTBL, were 

received. 39 Cranes, 20 Ton, were withdrawn from the ARNG to 

support active Army requirements. 

Organizational Clothing and Equipment 

$9,449,000 was funded for organizational clothing and equipment in Fiscal Year 1967. Priority was given to procure items not 

previously available in the supply system for the SRF. Sufficient 

funds were also available to procure replacement of worn out 

equipment and to provide a modest increase in overall assets of 

other ARNG units. 

-Individual Clothing 

The shortage of individual clothing which occurred in Fiscal 

Year 1966 because of the rapid buildup of the active Army and 

the SRF was overcome. During the year, REP 63 trainees were 

authorized issuance of the new AG 344 lightweight uniform at 

the training centers. With the exception of shortages in certain 

sizes, the Army supply system provided for all individual clothing 

requirements of the ARNG. 

Maintenance 

Fiscal Year 1967 maintenance capabilities of the Army National Guard did not reach the Fiscal Year 1966 level. The main 

objective this year was to complete the Fiscal Year task of raising 

all SRF equipment to a combat serviceable level and to continue 

SRF maintenance at that level. This proved extremely difficult 

because of the heavy increased usage of equipment to support 

accelerated training programs. The continued receipt of "as is" 

equipment increased the overall problem. Limited funding placed 

a heavy management requirement on the state maintenance and 

repair parts supply system that made close control of paramount 

importance. Emphasis was placed on increased and improved use 

of diagnostic equipment to insure maximum efficiency in maintenance operations. Continued efforts by commanders to raise organizational maintenance standards through training and use of 

special schools immeasurably assisted in raising the overall condition of Army National Guard equipment. For the most part 

Prescribed Load Lists were completed for all units. Reports from 

the States indicate that SRF units filled Prescribed Loads to 85 

percent of authorized allowances. 

Army Aviation Maintenance 

The Army National Guard flying hour program represented a 

decrease of 22,157 hours below the Fiscal Year 1966 flying hours 

accomplishment. This decrease is attributed to the reduced aviator strength and reduced number of aircraft in the ARNG inventory. The greater portion of these flying hours was flown in support of the increased SRF training program utilizing the OlA 

and H23 aircraft. Aircraft on hand requiring support are as follows: 

Fixed Wing Rotary Wing 

30 June 1966 461 406 

30 June 1967 414 415* 

' Includes 3 Maintenance Trainer Aircraft 

The anticipated receipt of 23 CH37B aircraft was only 70 percent completed in Fiscal Year 1967. 

The excellent aircraft availability rate in Army National Guard 

is directly attributed to the experience and training of technicians 

of the Army National Guard Army Aircraft Organizational and 

Direct Support Maintenance System. 

The operation of three Transportation Aircraft Repair Shops 

(TARS) performing general support aircraft maintenance on active 

Army as well as ARNG aircraft continued to be effective. These 

TARS shops are manned by 50 technicians who are gaining valuable experience and are providing a well trained nucleus of personnel in this highly technical field. The parent units of these 

TARS shops are the 162nd Transportation Battalion, Connecticut 
2K Annual Report, FiM-al Wa r 1967 

ARNG; the 127th Transportation Battalion, California ARNG; and 

the 142nd Transportation Battalion, Missouri ARNG. 

Cross Service Agreements 

Maintenance support for other agencies of the Department of 

Defense continued to be provided by ARNG through cross service 

agreements. Policy and guidance was issued to cover funding, 

manning, and limitations as to type of equipment that may be 

supported. During the year, the Army National Guard provided 

maintenance support to the active Army, USAR, and Marines 

through a total of 23 cross service agreements. This program is 

of value to ARNG as a means to train maintenance personnel in 

support level maintenance skills. Overall savings in Department 

of Defense equipment maintenance costs are generated through 

reduced transportation costs and the more efficient utilization of 

existing maintenance facilities. 

Autovon 

Of the 110 AUTOVON circuits scheduled for installation at 

various selected activities of the Army National Guard during Fiscal 

Year 1967, 103 were in service at the end of the year. The remaining seven are scheduled to be installed during the first quarter 

of 1968. An additional 44 AUTOVON circuits were justified and 

programmed for installation during the next fiscal year. 

ADP Standardized Logistics Procedures 

Standardized stock accounting and reporting procedures have 

been developed and furnished to all States. Extensive research 

and analysis of existing data versus required information of the 

various supply and reporting functions were required in order to 

develop a completely mechanized system capable of producing the 

necessary supply accounting data and reporting data at the USPFO 

level. This new mechanized ARNG Logistics Accounting System 

is scheduled for implementation on 1 October 1967. 

New Battalion Supply System (BSS) 

The National Guard Bureau authorized all States to install the 

Battalion Supply System in SRF battalions to the extent desired 

by the State Adjutant General within current manyears and available funds. Tests had shown that the new system was feasible in 

the ARNG and would provide a more effective utilization of logistical personnel within the units. The end result was an improved 

readiness of the entire battalion. 

The Army National Guard Military Construction Program 

(MCARNG) supports the training requirements of the Army National Guard through the construction of new armory and nonarmory facilities and the alteration, expansion, and rehabilitation 

of existing facilities. 

In Fiscal Year 1967, the funds available for the Army National 

Guard Military Construction Program amounted to $21.8 million 

of carry-over funding. No new funds were appropriated for this 

program in Fiscal Year 1967. 

The total obligations for Fiscal Year 1967 were $2,684,407 as 

itemized below: 

Obligations 

Armory $1 , 124,222 

Non-Armory 1,167,725 

Advance Plannii g 4 Design (Alt) 120,376 

Minor Construction 197,588 

•Obligations by other Agencies 74,496 

Total All Obligations $2,664,407 

•USCONARC and Chief of Engineers 

The deferment of the MCARNG Program, which began in December 1964, continued through Fiscal Year 1967. Projects for 

the ARNG have been deferred pending review and determination 

of requirements under both present and future force structures 

and in accordance with decisions of 20-21 December 1965 which 

deferred construction for the military establishment. In February 

1966, the Department of Defense issued a modification to the 

directive on military construction which stated that authority may be 

granted to construct those projects whereby it might be conclusively demonstrated that such projects are required for the 

health, safety, or other compelling reasons, plus compliance with 

all other provisions as previously announced. In March 1967, the 

Department of Defense further modified the memorandum of December, 1966, which provided for approval of construction projects 

on a case-by-case basis, thereby minimizing the risk of overbuilding 

for the eventual force. 

There were seven new armory projects, five non-armory projects, 

and nine minor construction projects placed under contract during 

Fiscal Year 1967. 

The Army National Guard used 2,786 armory facilities to house, 

administer, and train units in all 50 States, Puerto Rico, and the 

District of Columbia. 

Future Construction Requirements 

As of 30 June 1967, requirements existed for study of future 

armory construction requirements. Of the 2,786 armory facilities 

in use, 1,790 are considered adequate and 996 inadequate. Elimination of the 996 inadequate armory facilities will require 745 new 

armory projects and 251 projects for rehabilitation, alterations, 

additions, conversions, or expansions to existing facilities. The 

funding requirement for replacement or improvement of the 996 

inadequate armory facilities is estimated to be approximately 

$148.7 million. 

In addition to the above listed armory requirements, there is 

an indicated unfulfilled construction requirement in the non-armory 
Chief, National Guard Bureau 

2<< 

category of 798 projects at an estimated cost of $95.3 million. This 

non-armory construction program would consist primarily of providing administrative, maintenance, and warehouse facilities for 

the logistical support of the Army National Guard and facilities for 

summer training sites. 

ARNG Non-Armory Facilities 

The types of facilities provided under the non-armory military 

construction program described below indicates the authority by 

which they are constructed and the status of new construction 

as of the end of the fiscal year. 

Combined Support 

Maintenance Shops 

Combined Support Maintenance Shops are authorized for construction on the basis of one per State. However, in a State which 

has two or more divisions, is authorized Field Training Equipment 

Concentration Sites, or has unusual geographical considerations, 

additional shops or sub-shops are authorized. Field maintenance 

of all Federal equipment issued to the State, except aircraft, is 

performed at these facilities. As of 30 June 1967, Federal funds 

had been utilized in the construction of 48 Combined Support 

Maintenance Shops. 

Organizational 

Maintenance Shops 

These shops are authorized for each battalion, comparable 

organization, or grouping of units. Organizational maintenance is 

performed at these facilities on all Federal equipment issued to 

the units, except aircraft. A total of 120 organizational maintenance shops have been constructed with Federal funds since the 

inception of this construction program. 

Army Aviation 

Maintenance Shops 

These shops are authorized for construction on the basis of 

one per State for each State having nine or more assigned Army 

Aircraft, except that States having two divisions are authorized 

two such shops. All organizational and field maintenance on Army 

fixed and rotary wing aircraft and allied equipment issued to the 

State is performed at these facilities. Thirty-five shop hangars 

had been placed under contract since the beginning of Federal 

support for this type of construction. 

US Property and Fiscal Officers 

Offices and Warehouses 

An office and warehouse is authorized each State for use by 

the United States Property and Fiscal Officer in administration, 

receipt, storage, and issue of all Federal property required for use 

by the Army National Guard. As of 30 June 1967, Federal funds 

had been used in the construction of 21 USPFO offices and 29 

USPFO warehouses. 

Real Property 

The National Guard Bureau renders all possible assistance to 

the States in licensing appropriate Federally owned facilities and 

in leasing certain types of privately owned facilities for the Army 

National Guard. During Fiscal Year 1967, the Army National Guard 

made use of 250 Federally owned facilities and 221 Privately owned 

facilities under Federal lease, including 27 Army Advisor Offices, 

63 Target Range Sites, 22 Aircraft Facilities, 17 Organizational 

Maintenance Shops, 4 USPFO Offices, and 88 Training Area Sites. 

Repairs and Utilities 

Federal funds in the amount of $3,866,000 were obligated under 

56 separate Service Contracts with the States to operate, maintain, and repair the non-armory facilities of the Army National 

Guard. These funds provide for facilities operating costs, including utilities, maintenance, and repair of non-armory facilities such 

as USPFO Offices and Warehouses, Combined Support Maintenance 

Shops, Organizational Maintenance Shops, and other facilities required for the care and safeguarding of Federal property. In additio n to funding under Service Contracts, Federal funds in the 

amount of $528,000 were obligated to support a total of 196 Repairs 

and Utilities (R&U) projects for minor new construction, alteration, 

extension, and relocation of non-armory facilities. 

Rifle Range Repairs 

Federal funds in the amount of $93,000 were obligated to 

support 35 States in the maintenance and repair of 51 approved 

known distance rifle ranges. 
30 Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1907 

Facilities Support at Field Training Sites 

Annual Field Training Sites 

These facilities are designed to provide the essential requirements for support of Army National Guard units during periods of 

annual field training. The following contonment type facilities are 

authorized: mess halls and kitchens, bath-latrines, company administration and supply buildings, Battalion Headquarters, Brigade 

Headquarters, Battalion Supply and Ration Breakdown buildings, 

Dispensaries, Enlisted Barracks, and Officers Barracks. 

A total of $4,277,000 in Federal funds was obligated to support 

the opening, operating, and closing costs of annual field training 

sites. Of this amount, $2,427,000 was obligated for Federally controlled training sites and $1,855,000 for State controlled training 

sites. 

Weekend Training Sites 

These facilities are designed to provide minimum essential 

requirements for support of Army National Guard units during 

periods of weekend training. Construction is limited to austere 

facilities required for the health and safety of troops and security 

of Federal property. Weekend training was conducted in a field 

training environment to the maximum extent feasible at 123 separate weekend training sites. Federal funds in the amount of 

$1,180,766 were obligated in support of this activity. In addition to 

this amount, $335,723 was obligated to accomplish 155 minor 

construction projects at weekend training sites. 

A listing of Federal and State sites utilized for Field Training 

is shown below: 

FEDERALLY CONTROLLED 

INSTALLATIONS: 

Anniston Army Depot, Alabama 

Fort McClellan, Alabama 

Maxwell AFB, Alabama 

Fort Greely, Alaska 

Fort Richardson, Alaska 

Fort Chaffee, Arkansas 

Fort Huachuca, Arizona 

Yuma Proving Grounds, Arizona 

Camp Roberts, California 

Fort Irwin, California 

Fort McArthur, California 

California Defense Missile Sites 

Travis AFB, California 

Twenty-Nine Palms USMC 

Station, California 

Fitzsimmons General Hospital, 

Colorado 

Fort Carson, Colorado 

Connecticut Defense Missile 

Sites 

Atlanta General Depot, Georgia 

Fort Benning, Georgia 

Fort Gordon, Georgia 

Fort Stewart, Georgia 

STATE CONTROLLED 

INSTALLATIONS: 

Fort Sumpter-Smith ANG Base, 

Alabama 

Camp Carroll, Alaska 

Camp Joseph Robinson, 

Arkansas 

Camp San Luis Obispo, 

California 

Camp Dempsey, Connecticut 

Bethany Beach, Delaware 

Greater Wilmington Airport, 

Delaware 

Camp Blanding, Florida 

Fort Stewart, Georgia 

Gowen Field, Idaho 

Camp Farragut, Idaho 

Hawaii Defense Missile Sites 

Schofield Barracks, Hawaii 

Illinois Defense Missile Sites 

Granite City Depot, Illinois 

Savanna Ordnance Depot, 

Illinois 

Fort Riley, Kansas 

Fort Campbell, Kentucky 

Fort Knox, Kentucky 

England AFB, Louisiana 

Fort Holabird, Maryland 

Fort Meade, Maryland 

Maryland Defense Missile Sites 

Camp Edwards-Otis AFB, 

Massachusetts 

Fort Devens, Massachusetts 

Massachusetts Defense Missile 

Sites 

Michigan Defense Missile Sites 

Battle Creek, Michigan 

Phelps Collins ANG Base, 

Michigan 

Gulfport ANG AFB, Mississippi 

Camp Lincoln, Illinois 

Camp Atterbury, Indiana 

Camp Dodge, Iowa 

Hutchinson Air NG Base, 

Kansas 

Camp Frankfort, Kentucky 

Camp Beauregard, Louisiana 

Camp Keyes, Maine 

Gunpowder Rifle Range, 

Maryland 

Camp Curtis Guild, 

Massachusetts 

Camp Grayling, Michigan 

Fort Custer, Michigan 

Camp Ripley, Minnesota 

Missouri Defense Missile Sites 

New Jersey Defense Missile Site; 

Camp Drum, New York 

New York Defense Missile Sites 

Fort Bragg, North Carolina 

Ohio Defense Missile Sites 

Fort Sill, Oklahoma 

Fort Sherman, Panama 

Indiantown Gap Military 

Reservation, Pennsylvania 

Pennsylvania Defense Missile 

Sites 

New Cumberland Army Depot, 

Pennsylvania 

Tobyhanna Signal Depot, 

Pennsylvania 

Rodriquez Army Hospital, 

Puerto Rico 

Salinas Training Area, 

Puerto Rico 

Henry Barracks, Puerto Rico 

Rhode Island Defense Missile 

Sites 

Camp Shelby, Mississippi 

Camp Clark, Missouri 

Springfield Armory, Missouri 

Deer Lodge, Montana 

Fort Wm. H. Harrison, Montana 

Camp Ashland, Nebraska 

Camp King, New Hampshire 

Sea Girt, New Jersey 

Camp Roswell, New Mexico 

Camp Smith, New York 

Camp Grafton, North Dakota 

Camp Perry, Ohio 

Lincoln Park Armory, Oklahoma 

Camp Rilea, Oregon 

Camp Withycombe, Oregon 

McEntire Air National Guard 

Base, South Carolina 

Brooke Army Hospital, Texas 

Fort Bliss, Texas 

Fort Hood, Texas 

Red River Army Depot, Texas 

Texas Defense Missile Sites 

Fort Douglas, Utah 

Tooele Army Depot, Utah 

Camp A. P. Hill, Virginia 

Camp Pickett, Virginia 

Fort Belvoir, Virginia 

Fort Eustis, Virginia 

Fort Lee, Virginia 

Fort Monroe, Virginia 

Virginia Defense Missile Sites 

Fort Lewis, Washington 

Washington Defense Missile Sites 

Yakima Firing Center, Washington 

Army Bridge Site, Prince, 

West Virginia 

Camp McCoy, Wisconsin 

Wisconsin Defense Missile Sites 

Camp Tortuguero, Puerto Rico 

Camp Varnum, Rhode Island 

Camp Rapid, South Dakota 

McGhee-Tyson Field, Tennessee 

Camp Mabry, Texas 

Camp W.G.Williams, Utah 

Camp Johnson, Vermont 

Underhill Range, Vermont 

State Military Reservation, 

Virginia 

Camp Murray, Washington 

Indian Island, Washington 

Camp Dawson, West Virginia 

Camp Williams, Wisconsin 

Camp Guernsey, Wyoming 
Chief, [National diar d Bureau 31 
:\2 

Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1967 

\r^ 

Part V 

Forewor d 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

^ 
Chief, National Guard Bureau •i.i 

Fiscal Year 1967 was one of the most productive years in the 

history of the Air National Guard. 

The airlift units continued to conduct training missions over 

established Military Airlift Command Routes in the Atlantic and 

Pacific areas. In addition to the training mission, the Air National 

Guard airlift units augmented the active establishment in direct 

support of Southeast Asia by transporting over 17,000 tons of cargo 

and 17,000 passengers in response to increased demands. The airlift units logged over 127 million ton miles to most parts of the 

free world. 

Air National Guardsmen continued to fly live offshore medical 

missions by transporting 4,221 patients and 5,352 pass< 

ging approximately five million patient miles to service 

and Navy installations in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Caribt 

The 14 Beef Broth units continue 

combat readiness while other Air Natic 

continued to support Army maneuvers 

directed exercises. Tactical units suppor 

deployed outside the Continental I 

Panama, and Puerto Rico, in which 2'. 

more than 70,000 sorties and 12 tactical rec 

more than 25,000 sorties. The five air i 

training and deployment of the receiver u 

Air National Guard air defense 

and consistently accomplish the air defense mi 

runway alert program. Over 31,000 ale' 

accomplishing 17,074 scrambles and ovi 

of the five Aircraft Control and W 

time in support of NORAD and Hav 

unit operated two radar 

• 
:u Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1907 

COMPTROLLER 

Budget 

Included in the President's Budget for Fiscal Year 1967 were 

estimates for the Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard 

Appropriation; National Guard Personnel, Air Force Appropriation; 

and Military Construction, Air National Guard Appropriation. United 

States Air Force and Department of Defense approved program 

guidance was followed in the development and preparation of these 

estimates. The initial Congressional approvals for these appropriations resulted in the following: Operation and Maintenance, ANG— 

$253,300,000; National Guard Personnel, AF—$82,000,000; and Military 

Construction, ANG—$9,400,000. These amounts, in addition to approximately $1,800,000 anticipated reimbursements, provided a total 

availability of $346,500,000. The following figures represent the initial 

appropriations plus reimbursements as compared to the total availability. 

Adjusted 

Appropriation Title Appropriated

 l Availability 

Operation and Maintenance $255,000,000 $277,200,000 ' 

National Guard Personnel 82,100,000 84,300,000= 

Military Construction 9,400,000 24,207,000° 

Total $346,500,000 $385,707,000 

1

 Includes anticipated reimbursements. 

- Includes all adjustments through the fourth quarter for O&M and 

Military Personnel. 

Includes no-year carryover for unobligated balances 

It will be noted from the above schedule that the availability is 

in excess of the initial appropriations and is explained as follows: 

The increase in Operation and Maintenance represents $1,400,000 

for pay increase of Air Technicians and $20,800,000 increase in reimbursements for support of the Military Airlift Command. The increase in Military Personnel represents $1,900,000 for military pay 

increase and $300,000 Supplemental for Southeast Asia support. 

The increase in Military Construction is carry-over. 

Continued improvement in budget estimates and financial plans 

received from the bases was experienced during the fiscal year. The 

quality of the estimates provided the operating divisions with a 

realistic reflection of mission requirements. As the fiscal year 

progressed, fund monitoring and detailed analyses disclosed a need 

for reprogramming which was accomplished within legal limitations 

and fund availability and provided the economic allocation of resources. 

Accounting and Finance 

Procedures and programs for the transfer of financial reporting 

responsibilities from the Data Processing Center in St. Louis to the 

National Guard Computer Center in Washington, D. C, during the 

first quarter of Fiscal Year 1968 were completed. 

Computer edits and reconciliations were designed to improve 

accuracy and timeliness of reports to fund managers. 

A standard ANG Data Processing system for accounting and 

finance was successfully developed and implemented during the 

year. This included authorizing standard PCAM (Punch Card Accounting Machine) equipment for all ANG bases. 

The Air Reserve Forces Centralized Computer Pay System is 

currently scheduled to be implemented 1 January 1968. ANG units 

from five states are being used in the pilot test of the program to 

centralize payment of pay and allowances and PCS travel entitlements of members of the Air Reserve Forces. 

The Department of Defense Military Pay and Allowances Entitlements Manual was published 1 January 1967. This manual brings 

together into one volume military pay and allowances entitlements 

for all services. ANG entitlements can be found in Part Eight of 

the manual. 

Special issues of the National Guard Bulletin which highlighted 

Air National Guard Comptroller activities were distributed during 

the year. These issues were designed to provide current information 

for Air National Guard comptroller personnel on plans, problem 

areas, and other matters of interest. 

Plans and procedures were developed and published for a new 

system of accounting for appropriation reimbursements for mess 

collections. Effective 1 July 1967, responsibility of accounting for 

and reporting on mess collections was transferred from approximately 80 bases to the Bureau fiscal station. 

PERSONNEL 

Military Strength 

On 30 June 1967, the strength of the Air National Guard was 

83,758. This constituted 101 percent of the spaces allocated by the 

Department of Defense. 

The 82,724 paid drill spaces authorized as of 30 June 1967 was 

82 percent of the Unit Manning Document of 100,732. The increase 

in drill spaces over the 80,901 authorized at the start of the fiscal 

year resulted from the retention of three military airlifts units scheduled for deactivation during Fiscal Year 1967. 

The limits on paid drill spaces imposed by DOD precluded 

many units from improving their combat ready status. The Beef 

Broth units were authorized 100 percent manning and ended the 

year with 97 percent personnel assigned. 

Air National Guard Strength 

(Federally Recognized) 

Total 

Officers 

Airmen 

FY 62 

50,319 

.. 6,278 

.. 44,041 

FY 63 

74,325 

9,650 

64,675 

FY 64 

73,217 

9,843 

63,374 

FY 65 

76,410 

10,268 

66,142 

FY 66 

79,883 

10,220 

69,663 

FY 67 

83,758 

10,566 

73,192 

During Fiscal Year 1967, 91 officers retired, 1,450 officers were 

granted Federal recognition, and Federal recognition was withdrawn 

from 1,082, making a net gain of 368 officers. Of this number, 266 

were pilots. 

In February, Operation Red Baron, named for the comic strip 

character "Snoopy" and his pursuit of the "Red Baron," was initiated as a result of a Headquarters, USAF, forecast of a loss of 

approximately 1,600 pilots during Calendar Year 1967. The object of 

the program was to have Air National Guard personnel personally 

contact as many of these 1600 pilots as possible. A senior staff 

officer at each ANG base was appointed to head a team which 

would contact the pilots. 

Pilot strength at the beginning of Fiscal Year 1967 was 3,684. 

Prior to the implementation of Operation Red Baron, there was an 

average net gain of 12 pilots per month. As a result of Operation 

Red Baron, the ANG gained 168 pilots, establishing a monthly average of 42. Because of the success of this program, reprogramming 

was necessary, and a new goal of 3,950 pilots was set; on 30 June 

1967, 3,950 pilots were assigned. Substantial savings were made in 

training and in training dollars as a result of the program. 
Chief, National Gaw d Bureau 

35 

'•"^Ci^S**"" 

Officer Personnel 

Officers Statistics 

Officers Average Age by Grade 

30 June 1967 

TOTAl OFFICERS 

Gen Col. L». Col. Muj . 

49 48 46 41 

Total Pilots Gen. 

Aircrew Jet 47 

Aircrew Non-Jet 49 

Operational Support 51 

Administrative Support — 

Officer Longevity 

30 June 1967 

Average Years of Service by Grade 

Gen. Col. It. Col. Mai .

 C°P< '» ' L l 

27.3 26.4 24.7 19.6 10.8 7.1 

Capt. 

33 

It 

Col. Col 

46 44 

47 45 

49 45 

47 46 

1st Lt. 

29 

Mai . 

38 

40 

42 

43 

2d Lt. 

26 

1st 

Capt. Lt. 

32 27 

33 28 

34 31 

32 -

W O 

46 

2d 

Lt. 

25 

25 

— — 

Total 

36 

Total 

34 

37 

42 

44 

2d Lt. 

3.6 

W O 

23.3 

Total 

14.5 

Average Years of Service of Officers on Flying Status by Grade 

Gen. Col. Lt. Col. Mai . Copt. 1st Lt. 2d Lt. W O Total 

27.0 26.0 24.4 19.1 11.6 6.1 3.3 - 14.4 

Grade Distribution of Pilots by Type 

30 June 1967 

Aircrew Jet 

Aircrew Non-Jet 

Operational 

Support 

Administrative 

Support 

Gen. 

25 

21 

10 

_ 

Col. 

60 

46 

16 

15 

Lt. 

Col. 

169 

198 

35 

44 

Maj . 

473 

504 

43 

25 

Capt. 

914 

770 

28 

9 

1st 

Lt. 

250 

108 

3 

_ 

2d 

Lt. 

134 

50 

— 

Total 

2,025 

1,697 

135 

93 

Rated Officers 

Pilots 

NoWgotors and Radar-Intercept Officers 

Flight Surgeons, Air EVAC MED Officers 

Flight Nurses 

Programmed 

3,950 

894 

219 

318 

Assigned 

3,950 

766 

183 

204 

^*"*"~'^^" 

• -

Unit vacancy promotions effected in Fiscal Year 1967 to the 

grades indicated: 

Brigadier General to Major General 4 (2 Tenure of Office) 

Co/one/to Brigodier Genera/ 11 (3 Tenure of Office) 

Lt. Colonel to Colonel 44 

Major to Lt. Colonel • 0 

Captain to Major 0 

First Lieutenant to Captain 349 

Second Lieutenant to First Lieutenant 314 

Mandatory promotions effected in Fiscal Year 1967 to the grades 

indicated: 

Passed Over 

Considered Selected 1st 2nd 

Major to Lt. Colonel 147 144 2 1 

Captain to Major 309 303 4 2 

1st Lt. to Captain 308 308 0 0 

Warrant Officers 8 0 63 16 1 

Flying Status for 1 July 1966 through 

30 June 1967 

Revalidations .-.. 151 

Aeronautical Rating Boards 

Cases Pending 8 

Cases Completed—Rated Pilot and 

Placed on Flying Status 15 

Turndowns or Declines 10 

Total 33 

Flying Evaluation Boards 

Cases Pending _ 3 

Cases Approved 9 

Disapproved 8 

Total 2 0 

Airmen Personnel 

In consonance with recent participation enforcement provisions 

and changes in Selective Service induction policies, priority among 

applicants for enlistment was established for Reserve components 

by DOD and implemented by the Air National Guard as follows: 

Priority 1—Immediate reenlistment (extension) to fill own vacancy. 
36 Aircraft of the Army 

0H6Cayuse 

K m/M\}©\ 

F84FThunderstreak F100 

TACTIC/ 

RF84FThunder1lash RF101 Voodoo RB57 Canberra 

TACTICAL RECONNAISSANCE 

F89J Scorpion 

AIR DEFENSE 

KC97L Stratotanker 

AIR REFUELING 

C47 Sky Train C54 Skymasler 
nd Air National Guard 

BftlL ©ODAK® 

UH19 Chickasaw CH34 Choctaw 

&[L ©QMS® 

F104Starfighter 

FIGHTER 

CH37 Mojave 

F105 Thunderchief 

T33 T-Bird 

UTILITY AND TRAINING 
:iti Annua] Report, Fiscal Year 1967 

Priority 2—Members of the Reserve components whose failure 

to gain unit membership would result in involuntary order to active 

duty. 

Priority 3—Mandatory or voluntary assignment of members of 

units reorganized, inactivated, or relocated. 

Priority 4—Voluntary prior service personnel. 

Priority 5—Non-prior service applicants between the ages of 

17 and 18V2. 

Priority 6—Non-prior service applicants over the age of 18%, 

only after the unit commander concerned has determined that individuals in higher priority categories are not available. 

Exceptions to the established priorities are authorized only to 

permit acceptance of applicants with special military or civilian 

experience or to preclude enlistment of applicants who, due to 

civilian occupation or geographical location of residence, would 

likely be unable to participate satisfactorily in scheduled training 

activities. 

Title I, Public Law 89-687, 15 October 1966 (implemented by 

Executive Order 11327, 15 February 1967 and DOD Directive 1215.13, 

23 February 1967) provided temporary authority for involuntary order 

to active duty of obligated Ready Reservists who fail to maintain 

prescribed training attendance requirements. Active duty under 

these provisions will be for a period, which, when added to the airman's previous active duty for training, equals two years. The 45-day 

tour will continue to be used in the case of individuals whose 

attendance is within prescribed limits but who fail to progress 

within their skill area. A total of 133 airmen were ordered to perform 45-day tours in Fiscal Year 1967, 85 for unsatisfactory attendance and 48 for failure to progress. In some instances, individuals 

failed to participate in a satisfactory manner following a 45-day tour 

and were referred to Selective Service for induction. 

Airmen Statistics 

Airmen Average Age by Grade 

30 June 1967 

E-9 E-8 E-7 E-6 E-5 E-4 E-3 E-2 E-l Total 

43 41 39 35 30 26 24 22 21 27 

Airmen Longevity 

30 June 1967 

Average Years of Service by Grade 

E-9 E-8 E-7 E-6 E-5 E-4 E-3 E-2 E-l Total 

21.5 19.6 17.4 14.0 9.3 4.5 2.8 1.2 .5 6.2 

Personnel Data Systems 

Conversion to PDS-0 65 and PDS-A (Interim) occurred in August, 

1966. However, preceding ARPC systems tests were inadequate, and 

program malfunctions were of such magnitude that file update was 

discontinued for a period of three months. Update was resumed and 

accelerated in late November in order to dispose of transactions 

which had accumulated while the file was inoperative. Reports 

production was resumed, but products became increasingly unusable because of continuing program malfunctions. In April, 1967, 

it was decided that a detailed systems test was necessary to isolate 

program errors and would be followed by a total file reload. Again 

it was necessary to suspend update action. The months of April 

and May were spent testing and revising programs. In early June, 

the file was successfully reloaded, and the April and May transactions were processed. The 30 June transactions were submitted and 

processed on schedule, and the normal 15th and end-of-month processing cycle should now prevail. Management reports have improved 

in quality and are now flowing as scheduled. 

Due to the programming problems experienced in the input and 

update process, many of the integral subsystems were not programmed and were not a working part of the system during the past 

year. Strength accounting, strength reconciliation, data reconciliation, and purge procedures were not operational. Lack of strength 

accounting and reconciliation procedures delayed elimination of the 

morning report. 

Because of the problems experienced with the new system, reject trend analyses have not been produced and no CBPO error 

rates are available for this year. 

PDS interface with the centralized military pay systems was 

finalized and is now in the test phase. Data items common to pay 

and PDS will be fed into the pay system by the ARPC computer 

following each update cycle. Testing will continue through Calendar 

Year 1967 so that any necessary debugging will be completed prior 

to full implementation scheduled for early 1968. 

Procedures for interface with the base flight management data 

system were completed. All flying data previously maintained on the 

N format will now flow from the Norton computer to ARPC, thus 

eliminating the requirement for submission of this data by the 

Consolidated Base Personnel Offices (CBPOs). 

A most significant development in the CBPO area was the 

authorization of IBM 870 Document Writer Systems for CBPOs. This 

equipment enables CBPO personnel to prepare their own punch 

card transactions, necessary listings, and most of the required 

base-level output products without use of base data services facilities. This equipment is better suited to requirements of PDS and 

will preclude much of the cumbersome procedure that was necessary to obtain the products from the IBM 407. IBM 082 Sorters were 

also authorized for CBPOs who were not located in the same building with the data services function. Delivery of equipment began in 

May and is scheduled for completion in September, 1967. 

Four-day training courses in use of the IBM 870 Document 

Writer were conducted for personnel of all CBPOs by the CBPOs at 

North Highlands, California; Jefferson Barracks, Missouri; and Wellesley, Massachusetts. These courses provided comprehensive instruction in machine operation, emphasizing the applicable baselevel output products. 

Plans are being developed for implementation of the Phase II 

base-level military personnel systems. The system provides for 

immediate access storage on Phase II computers and will be updated on-line on a real time basis through use of remote devices. 

Air Technician Program 

Air National Guard technicians are the hard core of highly 

skilled full time personnel assigned to Air National Guard units. 

As a condition of employment, male technicians must be military 

members of the unit in which they are employed. Thus, they represent a cadre of highly trained personnel who can immediately and 

effectively respond upon mobilization. 

On June 1967, the air technician strength was 16,483 which 

represented an increase of 549 technicians over last year. Generally, the personnel increase was used to support conversions to 

more modern and sophisticated aircraft. 

Approximately 6,700 ANG technicians in 19 states, Puerto Rico, 

and the District of Columbia were provided coverage in State retirement programs. 

During the course of the fiscal year, a significant reduction-inforce was imposed on the air technician program as a result of the 

elimination of the special weapons requirement in certain ANG/ADC 

units. The "ANG Relocation Program" was implemented to provide 

continual employment for those technicians who voluntarily elected 

reassignment to another unit. While the skills of many of the personnel involved could not be used elsewhere, excellent response 

from the States and units resulted in reassignment of many technicians who were qualified for existing or projected vacancies. Permanent Change of Station Allowances were provided for the relocated technicians, and severance payments were authorized for 

terminated personnel. 

In anticipation of the passage of H.R. 2, several actions were 

taken by the National Guard Bureau to provide local operating levels 

with the information and procedures required for the administration of technicians as federal employees. A committee composed of 

four Army National Guard and five Air National Guard technicians 

was appointed to develop a joint Army/Air regulation to replace the 

a current directive, NGR-51/ANGR 40—1. Through their diligent 

efforts, a draft directive was completed within 30 days. The directive is intended for use at the lowest operating level where it is not 
Oiirl . [National (,II:III I Biimi u 

39 

feasible to maintain the extensive library of federal and service 

regulations that would otherwise be required. 

The second action taken was a joint orientation conference to 

acquaint Army and Air Personnel Technicians with administrative 

procedures, forms, records, and reports which become necessary 

when technicians assume a federal status. These conferences 

were particularly beneficial since they provided instruction by experts from the Departments of the Army and the Air Force on the 

new procedures and concepts that will be required. Conferees were 

furnished complete packets of material such as forms, group life 

and health benefits plans, and general instructions on their use. 

Through the media of numbered ANG Letters of Instruction, 

operating levels were provided with additional guidance weekly as 

information became available from the Civil Service Commission, 

Department of Defense, and Department of the Air Force. 

There is no doubt that these actions will result in minimum 

turbulence when the legislation is enacted, and they will insure an 

orderly and timely conversion of personnel records to meet federal 

standards and requirements. 

Education and Training 

The individual program in the Air National Guard is comprised 

of five major categories: Flight, Technical, Professional, Recruit, and 

On-the-Job Training. Each of these training programs is designed to 

produce an end product of affording the ANG commander maximum 

assistance in achieving an adequate skill level manned unit. The 

Fiscal Year 1967 ANG Financial Plan approved the following training program. 

Cost 

Training Category Student Entries M/Ds (million) 

Flight 949 126,412 $ 3.227 

Technical 1,110 78,358 1.609 

Professional 105 9,735 .324 

Recruit 9,500 1,546,423 11.020 

Total 11,664 1,760,928 $16,180 

During Fiscal Year 1967, 14,727 individuals went on active duty 

for training, using 1,918,780 mandays for a total expenditure of 

$16,358,622 appropriated funds. Detailed program accomplishment 

by training category follows. 

Flight Training 

A total of 185 individuals entered undergraduate pilot training 

with 156 completing the training. Of the 68 individuals who entered 

navigator training, 62 graduated. (Because pilot training lasts over 

one year and navigator training approximately 10 months, there is 

no correlation between number of entries per year and graduates 

during the same time period.) 

Advance flying training consisted of providing both combat 

crew training for the newly graduated pi lot/navigator and crosstraining of new ANG prior service pilots who were previously qualified in other aircraft. A total of 454 students entered this program. 

Technical Training 

Technical training is composed of officer/airman formal school 

courses and special training through MTDs and factory courses. 

Entries 

Officer formal ATC Courses 1,412 

Airman Formal ATC Courses 1,433 

Officer Special Training 142 

Airman Special Training 834 

Professional Training 

Entries 

Squadron Officer School 16 

Command and Starr College 16 

Air War College 5 

NCO Academies 96 

Recruit Training 

The ANG is authorized to enlist non-prior service individuals to 

fill critical AFSCs when recruitment of prior service individuals 

cannot be accomplished. All of these enlistees are required to enter 

basic military training, and approximately 70 percent continue in 

technical training. The remaining 30 percent returns to the parent 

ANG unit for on-the-job training. 

BMT & OIT 

BMT & Tech 

Total 

Entries 

3,102 

6,964 

10,066 

Completion 

4,025 

6,857 

10,882 

In Training 

30 June 1967 

908 

2,798 

3,706 

During Fiscal Year 1967, emphasis was placed on providing individual progression and capability of ANG operations through a 

valid and comprehensive on-the-job training program which resulted 

in increased skill manning throughout the ANG. ANGM 50-23, the 

OJT Manual, was updated to provide more definitive and progressive training methods to insure maximum upgrade of airmen. Following are the results of the OJT effort for Fiscal Year 1967. 

Airmen entered into OJT 36,432 

Airmen enrolled in Career Development Courses 27,418 

SKT Passing Rate, 3 level testing 85.3% 

SKT Passing Hate, 5 level testing 63.9% 

SKT Passing Rate, 7 level testing 59.0%' 

SKT Passing Rate overall (3, 5, 7, level testing) 71.7% 

Airmen upgraded to next higher skill level 15,940 

Percent airmen in OJT upgraded to next 

higher skill level 43.5% 

Skill Level Manning 61.7% 

Three major steps toward an effective training program were 

established during the year. The first was the Air National Guard 

NCO Academy which is designed to increase the management and 

leadership capability of ANG NCOs. Three hundred individuals are 

scheduled to start this program in July, 1967. Second, a special 

two-week course, "Technical Instructor (ANG)," was updated to 

provide Training Supervisors and Trainers with instructor training. 

The updated course, which had an enrollment of 1,000 students, 

more adequately fulfills the ANG requirement for a knowledgeable 

corps of instructors. Third, The Air National Guard Institute of 

Technology was established at the Permanent Field Training Site, 

Travis Field, Savannah, Georgia, during July, 1967, to provide intensified instruction in the academic phases of the dual channel concept of OJT. Other "Special Schools" such as the R-5 Refueler 

Course, EMU-10 Generator Course, Non-Destructive Inspection Techniques, Aircraft Inertial, and Radar Navigational Systems Technician 

(RF-101), and Aerospace Photographic Systems Technician (RF-101) 

were established to enhance the skill manning, training, and operational capability of ANG units. 

Education Level of ANG Personnel 

Officers Enlisted 

Less than high school graduate 1% 5% 

High School graduate 18% 57% 

less than three years college 16% 19% 

More than three years, college, no degree 7% 4% 

College graduate 57% 14% 

Masters degree 16% 4% 

* Doctoral degree 8% 1% 

Unknown 1% ] % 

* Includes MD and DDS. 

Notification of Eligibility 

Public Law 89-652, 14 October 1966, requires that each person 

who completes the years of service required for eligibility for retired pay under Chapter 67, Title 10, United States Code, be notified 

in writing within one year after completion of such service. This 

law provides that once retired pay has been granted and the required notice furnished, the retired pay may not later by revoked or 
HI Annual Report, Fiscal ba r 1907 

denied due to erroneous determination of creditable service unless 

the error was due to fraud or misrepresentation by the person concerned. These provisions apply to persons whose retired pay began 

or who were notified of completion of required service after the 

effective date of the act, 14 October 1966. 

Awards and Decorations 

The 138th Aircraft Control and Warning Squadron, Colorado, and 

the 147th Fighter Group, Texas, were presented the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). The AFOUA was established by the 

Secretary of the Air Force in 1954 and is presented for exceptionally 

meritorious service or outstanding achievement. 

The Air Force Cross, the second highest award an Air Force 

member can receive for heroism in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, was awarded to Captain Larry B. 

Mason, currently a Michigan ANG pilot. He was selected to receive 

the 1966 Koren Kolligian.Jr, trophy, for successfully handling an air 

in-flight emergency during the same period while serving on active 

duty in Vietnam. 

One ANG member was awarded the Distinguished Service Medal 

for exceptionally meritorious service to the United States in a duty 

of great responsibility; the Airman's Medal was awarded to one member for heroism; and one member received the Air Force Commendation Medal for meritorious service. 

MEDICAL SERVICE 

The Medical Service of the Air National Guard provides medical 

personnel and units trained and equipped to operate medical facilities in support of Air National Guard operational requirements. 

On 1 August 1965 at the request of the Military Airlift Command 

(MAC) and with the approval of Headquarters, USAF, the Air National Guard performed its first routine live mission in support of 

the MAC domestic Aeromedical Evacuation System. The Air National Guard presently has four regularly scheduled offshore live 

patient mission aeromedical routes which originate from McGuire 

AFB, New Jersey, and Travis AFB, California, every two weeks. The 

three East Shore missions go to Ramey AFB, San Juan, and Panama; 

to Guantanamo and Bermuda; and to Newfoundland. The West 

Shore mission goes to Elmendorf AFB, Alaska. These missions continued through Fiscal Year 1967 with an adverse patient incident 

rate of zero. 

Aeromedical Evacuation Activities 1 July 1966 

Through 30 June 1967: 

Trips Flown '2 0 

OHShore 105 

Missions - " 9 

OH Snore 394 

Flying Hours (Including Position & Deposition) 2,819 

Patient Time Flown 2,280 

Totol Patients <22 1 

litter 1.123 

Wo/Icing 2.543 

Accompanied 555 

OH Shore 2,966 

Passenger 3,35 / 

Oil Shore 5,034 

Miles Flown 673,562 

Patient Miles Flown 4,999,658 

Trip Days 480 

M an Days Utilized _. . 4,280 

Officer 1,932 

Airmen 2,348 

Since commencement of this live Aeromedical Evacuation Mission on 1 August 1965 an impressive set of statistics has been 

accumulated as shown in the chart below. 

Aeromedical Evacuation Activities 1 August 1965 

Through 30 June 1967: 

Trips Flown - 262 

OH Shore 187 

Missions 1,070 

OH Shore . 718 

Flying Hours (Including Position & Deposition) 6,265 

Patient Time Flown 5,937 

Total Patients 10,912 

Utter 3,048 

Walking .... 6,404 

Accompanied 1,460 

OH Shore 4,876 

Passenger 9,735 

OH Shore 8,124 

Miles Flown 1,493,694 

Patient Miles Flown ...12,243,506 

Trip Days 1,106 

Man Days Utilized 9,101 

Officer 4J4 9 

Airmen 4 952 

ANG medical units were manned as follows on 30 June 1967: 

Authorized 

Medical Corps 354 

Dental Corps 159 

Medical Service Corps 246 

Veterinary Corps 72 

Nurse Corps 675 

1,507 

The Basic Orientation Course conducted at Sheppard AFB, 

Texas, was attended by 54 ANG physicians, nurses, and dentists. 

Nineteen physicians were designated as flight medical officers 

upon completion of the Aerospace Medicine Course at Brooks AFB, 

Texas. The Flight Nurse Course at Brooks was attended by 61 nurses. 

While some units are 100 percent manned and have waiting lists 

of professional personnel, others are manned below an acceptable 

level. All units constantly strive to overcome this deficit. 

At the end of Fisca Year 1967, the Air National Guard Medical 

Service was comprised of: 

12 Tactical Hospitals 7 Aeronautical Evaluation Squadrons 

78 Dispensaries 24 Aeromedical Evacuation Flights 

Assigned 

281 

103 

126 

9 

374 

893 

Percent 

79.4 

65.0 

51.2 

12.5 

55.3 

*• 
Oiirl . [National (>uar«l lltir«-aii 

I I 

Physical standards have been tightened in order to increase 

mobilization capability and combat readiness. We are now on the 

same footing as the active establishment in determining the physical capability of an individual. 

The Air Force Physical Profile System which now applies to Air 

National Guard personnel has resulted in improved operational 

readiness of all ANG units from a medical capability point of view. 

Personnel are now assessed and certified as available for worldwide 

assignment, temporarily disqualified, or permanently disqualified. 

In the latter case, action must be taken to discharge the member. 

The Physical Profile Serial gives each Commander an immediate 

index of the physical capability of all members of his unit. 

Medical badges (Senior & Chief Medical Specialist insignia) are 

now authorized for eligible members of the Medical, Dental, and 

Veterinary Corps. Senior rating (a star) designates specialists who 

have completed the formal training requirements of an American 

Specialty Board but have not been certified. Chief rating (a scroll) 

identifies those who have been certified by the American Specialty 

Board and are in good standing. 

The 36-bed Air Transportable Hospital was exercised and inventoried. Instruments were unwrapped and examined for rust and 

damage, and all pharmaceuticals, supplies, and equipment that 

were unserviceable or that had deteriorated were replaced. 

It was necessary to provide the capability to perform complete 

medical examinations to the majority of the ANG dispensaries and 

hospitals. Additional items of equipment were authorized and funds 

provided to procure these additional items or replace worn out 

equipment. At the end of the year Air National Guard medical units 

were at the highest level of material readiness ever experienced. 

An additional full time medical air technician was authorized 

each ANG Dispensary supporting a flying unit effective 1 July 1967. 

An overall evaluation of the Fiscal Year 1967 ANG medical program shows that: 

1. Medical Units understand their support mission and are well 

equipped. 

2. There were no unusual problems in aerospace medicine. 

3. There were no epidemics of communicable or infectious diseases during the annual field training tours or unit training 

assemblies. 

4. Air National Guard personnel are combat ready, with few 

exceptions, due to more stringent medical examination and continuing immunization programs. 

Despite continuing shortages in medical personnel, the state of 

assured physical health and the capability for proper medical support is at its highest in the history of the Air National Guard. 

OPERATIONS 

AND 

TRAINING 

Organization 

On 30 June 1967, the Air National Guard had 856 federally 

recognized units. Flying units were organized into 24 wings, 90 

groups, and 92 flying squadrons. The number of non-flying units 

was 250. There were 100,740 military manpower spaces allocated 

to the major commands to support the Air National Guard force 

structure. 

Air National Guard Force Structure 

Federally Recognized Units 

30 June 1967 

Combat Flying Organizations 

Type Wings Groups Squadrons 

fighter Interceptor 5 22 22 

Tactical Fighter ............. 7 23 23 

Tactical Reconnaissance 3 12 12 

Air Refueling 2 5 5 

Air Commando — 4 4 

Total 17 66 66 

Non-Tactical Flying Organizations 

Military Airlift 7 24 25 

Air Transport (Medium) — — 1 

Total 7 24 26 

Support Units 

90 Supply Squadrons 32 Aeromedical Evacuation 

90 Combat Support Squadrons Flight Squadrons 

90 Consolidated Aircraft 4 Reconnaissance Technical 

Maintenance Squadrons Squadrons 

90 Dispensaries!Hospitals 2 Aerial Port Flights 

TOTAL: 398 

Communications Units 

4 Communications Groups, Hq 2 Tactical Control Groups 

12 Communications Squadrons 2 Direct Air Support Squadrons 

8 Radio Relay Squadrons 4 Tactical Control Squadrons 

1 Communications Squadron 8 Tactical Control Flights 

(Special) 5 Mobile Communications Squadrons 

17 GEEIA Squadrons 4 Mobile Communications Flights 

5 ACW Squadrons (Fined) 69 Communications Flights (SPT) 

TOTAL: 148 

Miscellaneous Units 

52 Air State Headquarters 7 Weather Flights (Support Army) 

1 Weather Squadron 1 Air Base Squadron (Special) 

31 Weather Flights (Mobile/Fixed) 12 Air Force Bands 

TOTAL: 104 

Congressional action by the 89th Congress extended the programed inactivation of three airlift units from 30 September 1966 

through Fiscal Year 1967. This action resulted in maintaining the 

ANG airlift force at 25 squadrons. 

Plans were made and approved to relocate the 190th Tactical 

Reconnaissance Group from Hutchinson ANG Base, Kansas, to 

Forbes AFB, Topeka, Kansas, during the first quarter of Fiscal Year 

1968. 

Organization Actions 

The 204th Weather Flight (SA) was activated on 23 July 1966 at 

McGuire AFB, New Jersey. 

The 191st Aeromedical Evacuation Flight was activated on 27 

August 1966 at Salt Lake City, Utah. 

The 205th GEEIA Squadron, Georgia ANG, and the 202nd GEEIA 

Squadron, Oklahoma ANG, were redesignated from the 205th Communication Maintenance Squadron and the 202nd Communications 

Maintenance Squadron respectively, effective 24 October 1966. 

The 198th Weather Flight at San Juan, Puerto Rico, was inactivated on 31 January 1967. 

The 109th ACW Squadron at Hickam AFB, Hawaii, was inactivated on 5 March 1967. 

The 207th Weather Flight (SA) was activated on 1 April 1967 at 

Stout Field, Indianapolis, Indiana. 

The 201st Mobile Communications Squadron was activated at 

Hickam AFB, Hawaii, on 6 March 1967. This unit repaced the 109th 

ACW Squadron. 

The 120th Weather Flight was activated on 15 April 1967 at 

Buckley ANG Base, Colorado. 

The 208th Weather Flight (SA) was activated at-St. Paul, Minnesota, on 3 June 1967. 
c 

^ AIR NATIONAL GUARD FACILITIES AND ORGANIZATION"• 3D JUNE 1967 

1 

( 

... 1" 

«•—.4 k 

..,;, 

°

 D"i

""' I**/ jS fa-

•*! + 

"" "!„».. \ 

^4i^ 
< lurl . INutionul t.n;n< l Burea u 

l.i 

The 145th Aerial Port Flight was activated at Douglas Municipal 

Airport, Charlotte, North Carolina, on 22 April 1967. 

The 116th Aerial Port Flight was activated at Dobbins AFB, 

Georgia, on 20 May 1967. 

Aircraft Conversions for Fiscal Year 1967 

Gainin g 

Unit Location Former A/ C New A/ C Comman d 

119 FG Fargo, N.D F89J F102A ADC 

116 MA G Marietta , Ga C97G C124C MA C 

120 FG Great Falls, Mon t F89J F102A ADC 

145 MA G Charlotte, N.C C121 C124C MA C 

148 FG Duluth, Minn F89J F102A ADC 

172 MA G Jackson, Miss C121 C124C MA C 

The U10 aircraft replacing the U6As were returned to the inventory of all four ANG Air Commando Groups. 

Flying Hours 

During Fiscal Year 1967, the Air National Guard flew a total of 

540,060 flying hours, including 286,137 in jet aircraft, 226,146 in 

tactical non-jet aircraft, and 27,777 in support aircraft. The 38,336 

flying hour increase over Fiscal Year 1966 is a direct result of the 

intensified flying training "Beef Broth" units and the all out participation of the ANG transport units in support of Southeast Asia 

airlift requirements. 

Participation in Public Events 

The Air National Guard is called upon to assist in providing 

flyovers of jet aircraft and static displays of aircraft in connection 

with public exhibitions, events, and ceremonies in order to satisfy 

and stimulate public interest in the Armed Forces. During Fiscal 

Year 1967, 123 such requests were answered entirely within Air 

National Guard resources. 

Air Defense Command Units 

At the end of the year, 20 of the 22 ANG/ADC units were flying 

F102 aircraft, and the other two units were flying F89Js. 

Statistically, Fiscal Year 1967 was comparable to the previous 

year in that there were five wings, 22 groups, and 22 fighter squadrons with 2,284 officers and 18,781 airmen authorized and 1,826 

officers and 14,970 airmen assigned. 

The ANG alert program continued throughout the year, and 

seven units reached the desired goal of maintaining an alert commitment by keeping four aircraft on five or 15 minute alert. 

Several ANG/ADC units deployed aircraft and personnel to 

Tyndall AFB, Florida, during the year to participate in the Weapon 

System Verification Program. No special weapons firing competition was held in Fiscal Year 1967. 

More flexibility in conducting field training was given to the 

unit commanders. Several units were authorized to deploy to training sites as a group while others continued the normal year-round 

field training at their home stations. 

During the year some of the ANG/ADC units were recognized 

for outstanding performances. The 147th Fighter Group, Houston, 

Texas, and the 138th ACW Squadron, Greeley, Colorado, were 

awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, and the 132d 

Fighter Group, Des Moines, Iowa, won the ADC "A" Award. 

Military Airlift Command 

The mission of Air National Guard airift/aeromedical evacuation units is to develop, maintain, and provide trained operationally 

ready units and individuals. Air transportation of personnel, aeromedical evacuation of patients, and airlift of material is provided 

for the armed forces and other governmental agencies as directed. 

The airlift fleet is organized into seven Wings, 24 Groups, and 

25 Squadrons in 18 states. During Fiscal Year 1967, the Air National 

Guard operated a total of 227 four-engine aircraft including 151 

C97s, 47 C121s, and 29 C124s. 

Routine flights were made to nearly all parts of the world 

under all types of flying conditions to insure maximum crew proficiency and to deliver priority cargo. Diversified airlift missions 

in direct support of the national airlift requirements were flown 

on a daily basis. Some of these missions were flown during regular 

training periods in conjunction with normal training activities, and 

other missions were flown on a completely volunteer basis. 

The C124 Conversion Program for the Air National Guard began 

in September, 1966, 90 days before the originally programmed conversion date. Even though acceleration in the conversion program 

caused many problems, the 116th Military Airlift Group, Dobbins, 

AFB, Georgia, and the 145th Military Group, Charlotte, North Carolina, began formal training on 15 November 1966. These two units 

received their first C124 early in December and had the full complement of eight by 17 February 1967. Each unit flew its first C124 

mission in support of Southeast Asia on 1 April 1967. The 172d 

Military Group, Mississippi, the third Air National Guard unit to 

convert to C124s, received its first aircraft on 24 February 1967 and 

had the full complement of eight by 24 April 1967. The 172d flew 

its first mission in support of Southeast Asia in the C124 on 18 

May 1967. The 118th and 164th Military Airlift Groups in Tennessee 

were in the process of conversion at the end of the year. 

The Air National Guard role in aeromedical evacuation missions 

continued during Fiscal Year 1967. Offshore routes flown by the 

Air National Guard included Goose Bay, Labrador; Harmon AFB 

and Argentia Naval Air Station, Newfoundland; Kindley AFB, Bermuda; Ramey AFB and San Juan Naval Air Station, Puerto Rico; 

Howard AFB, Canal Zone; and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Since inauguration of the ANG aeromedical evacuation flights 

in August, 1965, through 30 June 1967, the Air National Guard has 

flown 12,243,506 patient miles and carried 10,912 patients, including 

3,048 litter cases, and 9,735 passengers. 

Tactical Air Command Units 

The activity of Air National Guard tactical units during Fiscal 

Year 1967 included 70,000 sorties by the 23 Tactical Fighter Units, 

25,000 by the 12 Tactical Reconnaissance Squadrons, 5,000 by the 

five Air Refueling Groups, and 6,000 by the four Air Commando 

Groups. 

ANG tactical units participated in a number of exercises in 

Fiscal Year 1967 in the Continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, 

Puerto Rico, and Panama. 

Gold Rush I took place in Alaska during the period 23-30 July, 

1966. Twenty-nine close air support sorties were flown by 12 FlOOs 

of the 121st Tactical Fighter Group, Ohio, providing 200 hours of 

support flying time, including deployment, strike phase, and redeployment, to the Alaskan Air Command. 

Seventy-seven sorties were flown by the 12 F84s of the 180th 

Tactical Fighter Group, Ohio, in support of Gold Rush II during 
II Annual Report, Fiscal Yew 1967 

the period 21-31 July 1966. The purpose of Gold Rush II was 

to test deployment procedures and tactical concepts and to provide the Alaskan Air Command with a tactical fighter air refueling 

force to use in joint air-ground exercises. Completion of the exercise required 304 flying hours. 

ANG units supported Exercise Ready Devil II conducted by 

the 5th Mechanized Division at Fort Carson, Colorado, in October. 

FlOOs from the 140th Tactical Fighter Group, Colorado, and the 

150th Tactical Fighter Group, New Mexico, flew fighter strikes; the 

155th Tactical Reconnaissance Group, Nebraska, provided photo 

reconnaissance; and the 136th Air Refueling Wing, Texas, provided 

air refueling. 

Yankee Venture which began on 20 January was an exercise 

conducted by the 143d Air Commando Group, Rhode Island. Five 

HU16s plus support personnel and equipment hauled by ANG transport aircraft deployed to Howard AFB, Canal Zone, for the monthlong exercise. The HU16s flew 96 sorties and more than 340 hours, 

including dropping supplies and parachutists into jungle drop 

zones. Though the unit received training in jungle flying and survival, the most important aspect of the trip was the civic action 

program to which they contributed. Unit dispensary personnel 

formed medical teams which were sent into the jungle to treat 

almost 3,000 natives. 

The 102d and 104th Tactical Fighter Groups, Massachusetts, 

flying 12 F84Fs, participated in Gold Rush Ill/Frontier Assault, 

which was staged in Alaska, from 29 January-13 February 1967. 

This exercise, directed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was a 10-day 

mock war and called for pre-planned and on-call missions averaging 

16 sorties a day. Air refueling for the F84Fs was provided by tanker 

aircraft from Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin ANG units. 

ANG units participated in Tropic Lightning III in Hawaii during 

the period 12 February-12 April. The 178th and 179th Tactical Fighter 

Groups, Ohio, deployed six F84Fs to Hickam AFB as a USAFSTRIKE 

force to provide close air support for the 11th Brigade, US Army, 

accomplishing 279 sorties and 436 flying hours. Air refueling was 

provided by the 126th Air Refueling Group, Illinois; the 128th Air 

Refueling Group, Wisconsin; and the 160th Air Refueling Group, 

Ohio. 

Twelve F86Hs from the 156th Tactical Fighter Group, Puerto 

Rico, were committed to Cashew Tee III in Panama and deployed 

to Howard AFB, Canal Zone. The fighters aided friendly forces in 

overcoming a simulated invasion by flying 117 sorties during the 

period 19 March-25 March. 

Clove Hitch III was a joint-service exercise conducted in eastern Puerto Rico and neighboring islands during the last two weeks 

in April wherein tactical concepts in joint operations were tested 

under simulated combat conditions. This joint amphibious and 

airborne training maneuver included elements of the Army, Navy, 

Marines, and Army and Air National Guard. ANG fighter forces 

furnished by the 174th Tactical Fighter Group, New York, and the 

183rd Tactical Fighter Group, Illinois, carried out a variety of 

missions including close air support of ground forces, interdiction 

strikes, escort duty for unarmed transports, harassment, and reconnaissance flights. Six RF84Fs of the 117th Tactical Reconnaissance 

Group, Alabama, staged out of Ramey AFB, photographing drop 

zones, beach landing areas, and vital military targets for intelligence sections of all participants. One HU16 of the 135th Air 

Commando Group, Maryland, flew 26 sorties which included infiltration, para-drop, reconnaissance, and personnel transport. Aerial 

refueling for the fighters was provided by KC97L tankers of the 

128th Air Refueling Group, Wisconsin; 160th Air Refueling Group, 

Ohio; 126th Air Refueling Group, Illinois; and 134th Air Refueling 

Group, Tennessee. The C97E "Talking Bird," Oklahoma, served as 

an airborne Direct Air Support Center for the 9th and 19th Air 

Forces, Tactical Air Command, USAF. The 156th Tactical Fighter 

Group, Puerto Rico, acted as the enemy Air Force in the exercise, 

making simulated napalm drops and rocket strikes against landing forces and aerial engagements against friendly aircraft. They 

proved to be formidable opposition when they were credited with 

sinking a Navy carrier. The flexibility and high state of proficiency 

of the ANG contributed to the successful completion of this jointservice exercise. 

The 177th Tactical Fighter Group, New Jersey, deployed 12 

FlOOs to Elmendorf AFB, Alaska, during the period 13-21 May in 

support of Gold Rush IV, receiving refueling support from the 

134th Air Refueling Group, Tennessee, and the Strategic Air Command. The three separate missions involved in the exercise were 

to provide close support for US Army spring maneuvers, to simulate attacks against Alaskan Air Command targets to test the 

proficiency of the radar coverage of Alaska, and to fly low level 

missions against radar sites. 

The versatility of an Air National Guard tactical fighter group 

was demonstrated by the 185th Tactical Fighter Group in its support of an Air Force Systems Command Fire Bomb Test in Alaska 

in March 1967. With only a few days notice, this unit responded 

to an urgent AFSC requirement by deploying three F100C aircraft, 

load crews, maintenance, and flight personnel to Eielson AFB, 

Alaska, to conduct cold weather tests of BLU-27/B Fire Bombs. 

Nineteen sorties were flown in delivering the 36 test bombs. Air 

refueling support was provided by KC135 aircraft from the Strategic 

Air Command. 

TAC OPLAN 24 provided considerable activity for ANG Tactical 

Fighter and Reconnaissance Groups during the year. OPLAN 24 

provided a means by which the TAC numbered Air Forces were 

able to use ANG units on a routine basis to conduct close air 

support and reconnanissance missions required to support US 

Army and other forces. 

During the year a new task for Air National Guard tactical 

forces was inaugurated which involved support of an overseas 

command on a regular basis. ANG Air Refueling units were deployed to Central Europe to provide refueling training and an 

emergency capability to USAFE tactical aircraft. This operation, 

named Creek Party, began 1 May 1967, with five KC97L aircraft and 

42 enlisted and 18 officer Air Guardsmen from the 136th Air Refueling Wing, Texas, conducting refueling operations from Rhein-Main 

Air Base, Germany. Three tanker sorties per day were provided 

to USAFE for training. The 136th Air Refueling Wing was assigned 

responsibility for the execution of Operation Creek Party from 1 

May-2 June 1967, and the 126 Air Refueling Wing, Illinois, assumed 

responsibility for the period 3 June through the remainder of the 

fiscal year. During the two-month period of operation, the KC97L 

aircraft flew 122 refueling sorties, off-loaded 2,228,000 pounds of 

fuel, and made over 2,500 hook-ups with receiver aircraft. Operation 

Creek Party is scheduled to continue through Fiscal Year 1968. 

AEROSPACE SAFETY 

The Air National Guard completed Fiscal Year 1967 with a rate 

of 6.0 major accidents for each 100,000 hours flown, thereby lowering its major aircraft accident rate compared to the previous year. 

In spite of losses of experienced pilots and supervisors to the 

airlines and industry, ANG units continued to operate effectively 

in supporting Southeast Asia requirements, performing a large percentage of ADC's alert commitments and providing strike and reconnaissance aircraft to support TAC. The ANG accident prevention program continued to place emphasis on high standards of 

supervision and performance, air discipline, and improvement in 

airfield facilities. Sixty-eight units, including 33 jet fighter/reconnaissance/interceptor units were accident free during this period. 
(hirl. National <>uur<l Bureau 45 

Three units were awarded USAF safety plaques in Calendar 

Year 1966: the 149th Fighter Group, Kelly AFB, Texas, for outstanding achievement in Missile Safety; and the 142d Fighter Group, 

Portland, Oregon, and the 178th Tactical Fighter Group, Springfield, 

Ohio, for high standards of performance in Flying Safety. 

Fiscal Year 1967 was one of decision and counterdecision which 

left the equipment buy program for mobile communications units 

(EMS) in an unsettled state at its conclusion. The equipment buy 

program which had been approved in December 1966 was drastically 

reduced by a Program Change Decision on 5 May 1967. As a result, 

a program change request (PCR) was prepared and forwarded to 

DOD on 6 July 1967 requesting approval of essentially the same 

equipment buy program as that which was previously approved, 

with the exception that it would cover Fiscal Years 1969, 1970, and 

1971, thereby reducing the impact in Fiscal Years 1969 and 1970. 

The status of this PCR was not known as of 30 June, but planning 

continued based on the assumption that a satisfactory equipment 

procurement program will be approved by DOD. 

Administrative action was taken during Fiscal Year 1967 to 

assign a Mobile Communications Squadron (Emergency Mission 

Support (EMS)) to each of the four Mobile Communications Groups. 

Assignment of the EMS units which had previously been administered as separate units was accomplished to more nearly align 

the ANG Communications Groups with the active duty organizations. 

The 280th Communications Squadron (Special) continued to 

train to augment active Air Force organizations in the operation 

of larger communications centers wherever required. 

ANG Weather Units (Air Weather Service—MAC) 

Three new Weather Flights were activated in the states of 

New Jersey, Indiana, and Minnesota to provide weather support 

services to priority National Guard Divisions. 

Twenty-three Weather Flights provided complete weather support to ANG flying units during field training exercises, and 13 

Flights provided augmentation to Air Weather Service by performing field training at active Air Force bases. 

Additional mobile weather equipment was made available to 

10 additional Flights providing them with the capability of operation in a mobile as well as a fixed environment. 

ANG Navigation Aids 

A Ground-Controlled Approach (GCA) set was installed at Buckley ANG Base, Colorado, at the request of the Air Force. This 

navigation aid provides an airport surveillance and precision approach radar capability to both the ANG and the Air Force operating 

from this location. 

ANG GEEIA Units (AFLC) 

Fiscal Year 1967 was an outstanding year for the 17 Ground 

Electronics Engineering Installations Agency (GEEIA) Squadrons 

as training was continued toward their mobilization mission in the 

Air Force Logistics Command. Training consisted of actual installation and maintenance of CEM equipment and systems which resulted in savings of time and dollars to the Air Force. 

During the period 15 November 1966 through 11 February 1967, 

ANG GEEIA units participated in Project FAST RACE which involved the removal of communications electronics equipment from 

Air Force bases in France before 31 March 1967. Since the total 

workload was beyond the capability of the active establishment 

within the established time limit, AFLC/GEEIA requested volunteer 

participation from the Air National Guard. Out of a total of 433 

Air National Guard volunteers, 219 were used on the project. 

Tactical Control Groups (TAC) 

Both the 152d and 157th Tactical Control Groups continued to 

increase in operational capability. Reports of inspections conducted by the gaining command (TAC) during the past year reflect 

the increased readiness that was achieved despite shortages of 

primary equipment. 

In July 1966, the 152d Tactical Control Group deployed its 

units for a normal annual field training for the first time since 

1961. A unique feature of this field training was that the group 

occupied only three main operating sites which was made possible 

by extending the field training over a four-week period. One Tactical 

Control Squadron and its Flights provided the equipment and 

operation for the first two weeks, and the second squadron took 

over for the final two weeks, enabling all units to accomplish training objectives even though two of the flights had given up their 

prime radars to satisfy an active force requirement. 

Selected 152d Tactical Control Group personnel also participated in Joint Exercise Clove Hitch III in April. This experience 

provided realistic training in joint operations. 

The 157th Tactical Control Group continued increased readiness 

training throughout the fiscal year. Authorizations for 100 percent 

manning and additional training for all units in the 157th permitted 

the group to achieve a high state of readiness. The climax of the 

training effort in Fiscal Year 1967 for the 157th along with the 251st 

Communications Group (Mobile) and the 200th ANG Weather Squadron was participation in Exercise Guard Strike I which began on 

17 June 1967 and will continue to 15 July 1967. 

The System Training Program (STP) has continued to provide 

an excellent training vehicle. During the past year, the ANG 

Tactical Control Groups procured two new training problems designed according to their own specifications which will be used 

to develop and exercise basic radar operator skills. Tactical Air 

Command has evidenced interest in these ANG devised training 

problems and is procuring copies for use by the active forces. 

ANG Fixed ACW Squadrons 

(ADC-PACAF-ANTDEFCOM) 

Full time air defense operations continued unchanged by the 

130th ACW Squadron at Salt Lake City, Utah, and the 138th ACW 

Squadron at Greeley, Colorado. Each of these units operates radar 

surveillance and ground control interception (GCI) stations in 

support of NORAD. The significance of their contribution was 

emphasized when, on 31 March 1967, the 138th received the Air 

Force Outstanding Unit Award for sustained "exceptionally meritorious service." 

In Puerto Rico, the 140th Squadron continued operating 14 

hours daily at Punta Salinas and Ramey AFB in support of Antilles 

Defense Command (CINCLANT). The intensive training conducted 

by the 140th has produced a highly capable operation. The mission 

effectiveness of the unit was demonstrated on at least two occa-
t l. Annual Report, FiacaJ Wa r 1967 

sions during the year. In February the unit received a satisfactory 

rating from an Operational Readiness Inspection (ORI) by Tactical 

Air Command. The excellent performance by the 140th while participating in Clove Hitch III in April was noted in a Letter of 

Commendation from Rear Admiral Emmett P. Bonner, Commander 

of Opposition Forces for the Exercise. 

The 150th and 169th Aircraft Control and Warning Squadrons, 

Hawaii, continued full time operations during the year. These two 

units provide PACAF with the ground environment system essential 

for air defense of the Hawaiian Islands. 

A third ACW Squadron in Hawaii, the 109th, was inactivated 

on 5 March 1967. On 6 March 1967, the 201st Mobile Communication Squadron was activated with the resources of the 109th providing the nucleus of the new unit. This was done to partially 

satisfy the PACAF requirements for "bare base" capabilities in 

flight facilities and base communications in the Hawaiian Island 

complex. 

ANG Base Communications 

A modification program was submitted and approved to update 

the cryptographic equipment and capabilities for the ANG C97E 

"Talking Bird" aircraft. The modification will be completed in 

Fiscal Year 1968 and will provide on-line and off-line crypto services 

compatible with the Defense Communications System. 

Automatic Voice Network (AUTOVON) services scheduled for 

installation at all ANG bases during Fiscal Years 1966 and 1967 

was 77 percent completed as of 30 June 1967. 

Five additional X-Y automatic dial switchboard systems were 

allotted to the Air National Guard. These systems are substitutes 

for the authorized AN, FTC-18. 

AFCS, with the approval of Headquarters, USAF, provided each 

ANG flying base and selected nonflying bases with the services of 

AUTODIN (Automatic Data Network) through the facilities of nearby 

USAF Military Communications Centers. This interim provision of 

data transmission services to the Air National Guard preceded 

planning and programming actions by the National Guard Bureau; 

Headquarters, USAF; and AFCS for AUTODIN facilities at each 

ANG location in the near future. 

AIR SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS 

Supply and Services 

When the T33 engine repair facility at Key Field, Meridian, 

Mississippi, first became operational in Fiscal Year 1966, shortages 

of equipment and engine spares limited overhaul production. 

These problems were resolved in Fiscal Year 1957, and ANG units 

now have excellent T33 engine support. 

In Fiscal Year 1967, services quality control problems at the 

contractor overhaul facility caused the Air National Guard, as well 

as the Air Force, to suffer from a critical shortage of J57-23 (F102A) 

engines. It was necessary to exercise intensive management and 

supervision at Bureau level to prevent F102A aircraft from being 

grounded as a result of a lack of engines. 

The Air National Guard was directed by DOD to release 10 

J57-23 engines to the Pacific Air Command during October and 

November, 1966. Following this action, the Deputy Chief of Staff/ 

Materiel, Pacific Air Command, stated in a letter to the Chief of 

the National Guard Bureau that the immediate response by the 

Air National Guard resulted in the prevention of mission degradation in Southeast Asia. 

Five F89 units were scheduled to be converted to F102s during 

the year. Due to a program change, only the following three units 

were converted: 

119th Fighter Group, Fargo, North Dakota 

148th Fighter Group, Duluth, Minnesota 

120th Fighter Group, Great Falls, Montana 

A major area of concern during the conversion was Aerospace 

Ground Equipment (AGE) support. The chart below reflects percentage of AGE on hand at the time of conversion and the support 

position as of June 1967. 

°„ On Hand At °« On Hand 

Unit Conversion June 1967 

Fargo, North Dakota 11.1 98.8 

Duluth, Minnesota 09.3 97.6 

Great Falls, Montana 10.1 98.9 

The System Support Manager at San Antonio Air Materiel Area 

advised that all procurement item shortages should be satisfied 

by August, 1967. Redistribution of Controlled Mission Equipment 

(CME) previously supplied to the F89 units which did not convert to 

F102s was diverted to satisfy existing shortages at other ANG 

F102 units. 

The conversion of some of the Air National Guard Military 

Airlift units to C124 aircraft presented a challenge in logistics 

support. Space parts for the aircraft were available, but aerospace 

ground equipment was at a premium because of accelerated transfer of aircraft and unprogrammed requirements in Southeast Asia. 

As the conversions progressed during the year, shortages continued 

to be acute, and assets were stretched to provide a minimum of 

essential equipment to each converting base. Although operating 

with the base minimum of ground support equipment, the ingenuity 

and competence of Guard personnel kept the aircraft flying. 

The following three Military Airlift Groups which converted to 

C124s during Fiscal Year 1967 now have 85 to 95 percent of their 

authorized equipment on hand: 

116th Military Airlift Group, Marietta, Georgia 

145th Military Airlift Group, Charlotte, North Carolina 

172d Military Airlift Group, Jackson, Mississippi 

The two units listed below which began conversion in March 

had two C124s each as of 30 June and 65 percent of their ground 

support equipment: 

164th Military Airlif; Group, Memphis, Tennessee 

118th Military Airlift Group, Nashville, Tennessee 

Supply support plans were furnished, joint SSM/ANG base 

assets checks were performed, and AFSDs prepared for automatic 

supply action for the following units which began preparation in 

Fiscal Year 1967 to convert to C124S: 

165th Military Airlift Group, Savannah, Georgia 

157th Military Airlift Group, Portsmouth, New Hampshire 

The WRSK program for ANG/ADC F102 units was officially established in late February, 1967, with a selection of 139 stock items 

and a total dollar value of $216,438.36. Over 92 percent of these 

items are available in Air Force stocks. All items should be available in the second quarter, Fiscal Year 1968. 

ANG Tactical Control Units are currently receiving modern new 

equipment such as the AN/TSC 15 Communications Central, a 

multi-channel, transportable, shelter-mounted, HF Radio System. 

This system provides three voice channels and four multiplex teletypewriter channels which can transmit and receive simultaneously. 

Also new in the ANG inventory is the AN TRC 97A Radio Set which 

is a completely solid state (except for Klystron) transportable Radio 

Terminal providing tunable microwave, diffraction, or tropospheric 

scatter communication in the 4400 to 5000 MC frequency range. The 

AN/PRC 25 Radio Set is a short-range portable man-pact, battery 

operated FM Radio Set for use over the 30 to 75.95 MC Range. 

The AN/MRC 108 Radio Set which provides automatic tuning features and complete remote capability was procured instead of the 

originally scheduled AN/MRC 107 at a savings of approximately 

$8,000 per set. 
< IM.-I . Viiioiial t.u.(id Bureau 

IT 

As of 30 June 1967, Beef Broth units were 98.3 percent equipped. 

Forecasts of delivery dates indicate that all Beef Broth unit equipment shortages will be alleviated by January, 1968. 

In January, 1967, the Selected Ammunition Validated Expenditures (SAVE) Report (RCS: 7-HAF-S18) was initiated by the Air 

Force. This reporting system allows the ANG Tactical Fighter 

Groups to receive their proportionate share of non-nuclear munitions from current production for the training of air crews and 

the munition load crew. 

Aircraft NORS (not operationally ready, supply) rates remained 

well below the 5 percent level in most cases. Average for the year 

for the entire fleet was 3 percent. The C123J and F105B exceeded 

5 percent but rates improved considerably during the last two 

months which indicated improved supply support. Average by type 

of aircraft: 

Aircraft Percent Aircraft Percent Aircraft Percent 

C97 1.2 FB6 1.7 KC97 4.2 

C119 4.2 F89 1.7 RB57 2.5 

CI2! 2.0 F100 1.7 RF84 2.0 

C123 5.3 FI02 3.6 RFIOI 3.7 

C124 2.4 FI05 6.3 U6 1.9 

F84 3.9 HU76 4.8 

Several positive developments were made to improve the 

equipment posture. A Target System Planning Group conference 

at which all services worldwide were represented was held in 

Puerto Rico in October, 1966. As a result of National Guard participation in the conference, future tow target support for the ANG 

was assured. 

A worldwide grass roots review conference on ground power 

generators was held at Sacramento Air Materiel Area (SMAMA) in 

February, 1967. As a result of NGB participation, all ANG generator shortages, both initial and replacement, were included in the 

USAF Fiscal Year 1967/1968 buy program. This action will assure 

an improved generator status for the ANG. 

A comprehensive analysis of ANG survival radios and radio 

beacons was made to improve the equipment posture of these 

items. As a result of this study, redistribution of this equipment 

was made to provide each unit a pro rata share. Shortages were 

reported to AFLC for procurement. 

During Fiscal Year 1967, delivery of the ANG total requirement 

of 32 Versamats required to support ANG Tactical Reconnaissance 

and Reconnaissance Technical units was completed. This modern 

photo developing equipment improved the photo processing capabilities of these units. A requirement for 12 transportable Photo 

Processing Systems (WS430B) to support ANG Tactical Reconnaissance units was submitted to Headquarters, USAF. This system 

will provide ANG units with improved mobile photographic processing, printing, and interpretation facilities. 

Equipment authorization reviews were jointly conducted by 

ANG, AFLC, and the respective gaining commands to assure continued adequate equipment authorization support for the ANG. 

Equipment allowances were adjusted or established to support 

flying units assigned C124, F102, RF84F and KC97 aircraft. Additionally, equipment allowances were updated for Air Weather 

Service units, Tactical Reconnaissance and Reconnaissance Technical units, and units responsible for non-destructive inspection 

functions for the ANG. 

Two significant developments were made in the ANG uniform 

clothing programs during the year. The first involved allowances for 

ANG airmen attending Officer Training School. The increased 

number of ANG airmen participating in the OTS program proved 

the uniform allowance to be inadequate. As the result of a thorough review, the allowance authorized USAF airmen OTS candidates was adopted for ANG personnel. The second development 

related to the clothing system. A request for implementation 

of the Monetary Clothing Allowance System for the Air Reserve 

Forces supported by a detailed study was prepared and submitted 

to the Air Staff. The study pointed out both economical and 

operational benefits to be derived from discarding the outdated 

issue-in-kind system in favor of the modern monetary allowance 

system. The study was coordinated with Continental Air Command 

and represents a joint proposal. Indications for the adoption of 

this program are favorable. 

During Fiscal Year 1967, a reporting system was implemented 

to monitor the progress of each ANG Base Supplies and Equipment. 

Financial Program. This Report of Obligations by Object Class 

Code (RCS: ANG-S4) is used by the NGB and ANG commanders to 

manage actual expenditures versus those programmed. In addition to being an excellent financial management tool, the report 

also assists each commander in fulfilling his responsibilities of 

command and control. 

Improved base level inventory control will be obtained with 

the addition of a computing and multiplying device (CAM) to the 

currently authorized data processing machine package. The CAM 

device will enable each base level supply operation to compute 

base stock levels more accurately and efficiently in a more timely 

manner with a great savings in manhours and machine time. It will 

also increase the effectiveness of base level supply management. 

Vehicles 

More than 2,000 new vehicle authorizations were approved, and 

1,557 new vehicle allocations were provided to the Air National 

Guard during Fiscal Year 1967. This was an allocation increase of 

630 vehicles over last year. Many of these behicles were received 

during the year, and the balance is expected to be delivered before 

the end of Calendar Year 1967. Included in this allocation were 

292 M-35 21/2-Ton Cargo Trucks and 105 XM-715 IVi-Ton Cargo 

Trucks which will help to modernize the vehicle fleets of ANG 

tactical control and communications units. 

A high degree of accuracy in vehicle reporting and in vehicle 

management records by ANG Base Equipment Management Officers 

(BEMO) was rated in survey reports by equipment management 

teams from the gaining commands. In almost all instances, the 

survey reports indicated that the correct types and quantities of 

vehicles were authorized to enable the units to perform assigned 

missions. 

Maintenance Engineering 

The J33 Jet Engine Base Maintenance facility at Key Field, 

Meridian, Mississippi, achieved a 99 percent rating in the return 

of engines to service during Fiscal Year 1967. This was an increase 

from approximately 60 percent last year, bringing the ANG to a 

level comparable to that of the active establishment. 

All maintenance on the five KC97H jet augmented tankers involved in Operation Creek Party in Germany in support of the 

USAFE mission was performed by Air Guardsmen in conjunction 

with field training requirements. As a result of the work done by 

the 28 ANG maintenance personnel supporting the operation, three 

sorties were flown each day, five days a week, for five weeks without a single air or ground abort. 

Air National Guard IRAN (inspect and repair as necessary) 

maintenance programs continued throughout the year on 143 F102 

aircraft, 69 T33s, 22 C97s, 30 RB57s, 25 RFlOls, 133 FlOOs, 152 F84Fs, 

70 RF84Fs, and 16 C54s. With the exception of the FlOOs, F102s, 

C97s, and C54s, aircraft were IRANed at Air Guard bases utilizing 

contract field teams. 

The Air National Guard cycled over 1,300 jet and reciprocating 

engines through an overhaul facility during the year. 

A significant and essential program referred to as Nondestructive Inspection (NDI) was implemented in Fiscal Year 1967. Sixteen 

ANG bases located from a geographical standpoint were selected 

as NDI bases and were authorized to obtain $75,000 worth of NDI 

equipment which included X-ray, eddy current, and ultrasonic devices This equipment makes it possible to perform more revealing 

inspections on airframes and components with a saving of manhours and an increase in safety measures. 

Through use of the X-ray, it was determined that some of the 

high performance fighters were losing pylon tanks because of an 

internal misalignment of tank clamps. Consequently, a procedure 

was established which eliminated the problem. Another procedure 

established for use of the X-ray was that of X-raying horizontal 

stabilizers on. aircraft. This procedure was initiated as a result 
tit Annual Report, Viaeml War 1967 

of a fatal aircraft accident in which it was suspected, but never 

proved, that cracked horizontal stabilizers were the cause of the 

accident. 

During Fiscal Year 1967, the Air Force developed new guidance 

and concepts in the management of vehicle maintenance and 

operations. A panel composed of the NGB staff vehicle officer and 

several base motor vehicle supervisors convened in the National 

Guard Bureau in May, 1967, to formulate procedures to implement 

this new guidance in the ANG activities in the early part of Fiscal 

Year 1968. 

Aircraft Inventory 

On 30 June 1967, the Air National Guard had 1,811 aerospace 

vehicles assigned as compared to 1,814 on 30 June 1966. During 

Fiscal Year 1967 two C121 groups and one C97 group converted to 

C124C aircraft which increased the capability of the Air National 

Guard to airlift outsize cargo. Additionally, the two C97 units in 

Tennessee were assigned a total of four C124s, which is only a partial conversion. At the end of the year, the 156th Tactical Fighter 

Group, San Juan, Puerto Rico, received F104 aircraft, becoming 

the first ANG group to receive this aircraft since the deactivation 

of ANG units after the Berlin crisis. Thus, the F104 rejoins the 

other high performance fighter aerospace vehicles currently operated by the Air National Guard. 

The total value of real estate administered by the ANG as of 

30 June 1967 was $360 million. This included a total of 91 flying 

bases and 51 non-flying bases. Sixty-eight of these bases share 

facilities with civilian activities on state, municipal, and county 

airports. Fifteen are located on active USAF bases, four on Navy 

bases, and the ANG acts either as sole occupant or host on USAF 

property on the remaining four bases. The 51 non-flying bases are 

located in 29 states. These bases normally receive their civil 

engineering support from the nearest ANG flying base. 

Major Construction (P-321) 

Due to increased requirements in Southeast Asia, the ANG 

Military Construction Program (MCP) for Fiscal Year 1967 met 

minimum requirements only. Twenty-seven MCP projects in 15 

states were approved. Additionally, 15 projects in 12 states were 

approved from prior year programs. 

A large percentage of the fiscal year projects provided for 

repair of runways, pavements, and aprons. Maintenance facilities 

such as docks, hangars, and shops were also included. Projects 

for alteration of electrical distribution systems were provided to 

assure electrical power for the complex aircraft of the ANG. 

Funds authorized and appropriated for the Fiscal Year 1967 

MCP totalled $8.9 million. As of 30 June 1967, a total of $10.2 

million had been obligated on major construction projects. This 

figure includes funds obligated from both current and prior fiscal 

years. 

During the year, agreements were finalized for the construction 

of ANG facilities at the new Jacksonville International Airport in 

Florida. The cost of replacing the existing federally owned facilities at Imeson Airport is approximately $4.0 million. The city of 

Jacksonville has agreed to cover $2.5 million of the total cost in 

addition to the basic $1.5 million ANG contribution, approximately 

$1.0 million will be spent for additional projects. Actual construction is expected to begin during the second quarter of Fiscal 

Year 1968. 

Planning (P-313) and Minor Construction (P-341) 

In addition to the $8.9 million authorization for major construction, an additional $500,000 was made available to the ANG 

under continuing authorization for planning and minor construction. Funds in the amount of $400,000 were allocated for project 

planning; $1,050,000 was actually obligated for planning purposes. 

This figure represents obligations against both current and prior 

fiscal years. No projects were approved against Fiscal Year 1967 

minor construction funds. A total of $176,000 was obligated against 

prior year minor construction. 

Standard Definitives 

The Civil Engineering Division has worked closely with civil 

engineers from the Continental Air Command to develop standardized definitive drawings which meet the unique requirements of 

the Reserve Forces. Final drawings are now being reviewed, and 

approval of the definitives for Reserve Forces use is expected early 

in Fiscal Year 1968. This program was initially conceived and supervised by the Civil Engineering Division for ANG requirements 

only; Air Force Reserve was invited to participate. 

Use of Air Force Regional Civil Engineer 

In Fiscal Year 1966, an agreement was made with the Civil 

Engineering Directorate, Headquarters, USAF, to use the services 

of Air Force Regional Civil Engineers (AFRCE). During the past 

year, we substantially increased the responsibilities of AFRCEs in 

monitoring the total design and construction of the ANG Military 

Construction Program. Additional responsibilities include monitoring of all requests for planning funds, procuring program cost 

estimates, and issuing design directives. During the construction 

phases, they exercise surveillance over projects from time of contract to project completion. This relationship with the AFRCEs 

has resulted in bettei control, closer supervision over all phases 

of ANG Military Construction, increased efficiency, and significant 

improvement in cost effectiveness in the use of funds. 

Maintenance and Operation 

The routine maintenance of ANG facilities is provided through 

Air Service Contracts on a 75 percent Federal/25 percent State 

participation basis. These contracts provide funds for salaries for 

personnel required for security and physical operation of a facility, 

utilities, clerical, and accounting facilities. The total federal obligation under these contracts in Fiscal Year 1967 was $10.34 million. 

Major Repair and Minor Construction (P-449) 

Approximately 1,200 project requests in this category were submitted to the Civil Engineering Division by the states. Of these 

requests, a total of 550 projects was approved at a cost of $2.7 

million. The obligation rate as of 30 June 1967 was 99.74 percent. 

In accordance with the Armed Services Procurement Regulations, Two Step Formal Advertising was instituted on certain 

P449 projects. Briefly, contractors are given the scope and type 

of work required. They submit their proposal for accomplishing 

the project to the contracting officer. The contracting officer and 

the civil engineer select the best proposals and send them back 

for bids. This procedure saves the civil engineer time and labor 

in preparing plans and specifications on a project. 
Chief, [National Guard Bureau 4 9 
M) Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1967 
Chief, National (ruurrl Bureau 

• 

APPENDIX A 

CHIEF OF / 

/ Division of Militia Affairs 1908-1916 

Militia Bureau 1916-1933 

National Guard Bureau 1933 

Col. Erasmus M. Weaver .__ 1908-1911 

Brig. Gen. Robert K. Evans 1911-1912 

Maj. Gen. Albert L. Mills 1912-1916 

Maj. Gen. William A. Mann _ _ 1916-1917 

Maj. Gen. Jessie Mel. Carter 1917-1918 

Brig. Gen. John W. Heavey (Acting) 1918-1919 

Maj. Gen. Jessie Mel. Carter 1919-1921 

Maj. Gen. George C. Rickards 1921-1925 

Maj. Gen. Creed C. Hammond 1925-1929 

Col. Ernest R. Redmond (Acting) .... 1929-1929 

Maj. Gen. William G. Everson 1929-1931 

Maj. Gen. George E. Leach 1931-1935 

Col. Herold J. Weiler (Acting) 1935-1936 

Col. John F. Williams (Acting) 1936-1936 

Maj. Gen. Albert H. Blanding 1936-1940 

Maj. Gen. John F. Williams _ _... 1940-1944 

Maj. Gen. John F. Williams (Acting) ..._ 1944-1946 

Maj. Gen. Butler B. Miltonberger 1946-1947 

Maj. Gen. Kenneth F. Cramer _ _._ 1947-1950 

Maj. Gen. Raymond H. Fleming (Acting) _ _ 1950-1951 

Maj. Gen. Raymond H. Fleming . 1951-1953 

Maj. Gen. Earl T. Ricks (Acting) _ 1953-1953 

Maj. Gen. Edgar C. Erickson 1953-1959 

Maj. Gen. Winston P. Wilson (Acting) _ _ 1959-1959 

Maj. Gen. Donald W. McGowan .... ... 1959-1963 

Maj. Gen. Winston P. Wilson 1963 
.i2 Annual Report, FUeaJ V«-ar 1967 

APPENDIX B 

State Adjutants General 

30 June 1967 

APPENDIX C 

United States Property and Fiscal Officers 

30 June 1967 

Alabama 

Alaska 

Arizona...... 

Arkansas 

California 

Colorado 

Connecticut 

Delaware 

Maj. Gen. Alfred C. Harrison 

Maj. Gen. Conrad F. Necrason 

Lt. Gen. John C. Wilson 

Maj. Gen. Charles H. Wilson 

Maj. Gen. Glenn C. Ames 

Maj. Gen. Joe C. Moffitt 

Maj. Gen. E. Donald Walsh 

Maj. Gen. Joseph J. Scannell 

Maj. Gen. William H. Abendroth (CG) 

Maj. Gen. Henry W. McMillan 

Maj. Gen. George J. Hearn 

Maj. Gen. Benjamin J. Webster 

Maj. Gen. George B. Bennett 

District of Columbia 

Florida. . . 

Georgia. 

Hawaii 

Idaho _ 

Illinois Maj. Gen. Leo M. Boyle 

Indiana Maj. Gen. John S. Anderson 

Iowa Maj. Gen. Junior F. Miller 

Kansas Maj. Gen. Joe Nickell 

Kentucky.. Maj. Gen. Arthur Y. Lloyd 

Louisiana Maj. Gen. Erbon W. Wise 

Maine.. _. Maj. Gen. E. W. Heywood 

Maryland Maj. Gen. George M. Gelston 

Massachusetts ....Maj. Gen. Joseph M. Ambrose 

Michigan Maj. Gen. Clarence C. Schnipke 

Minnesota. ... Maj. Gen. Chester J. Moeglein 

Mississippi Maj. Gen. Walter G. Johnson 

Missouri Maj. Gen. Laurence B. Adams, Jr. 

Montana. Maj. Gen. Richard D. Kendall 

Nebraska. - Maj. Gen. Lyle A. Welch 

Nevada ... Brig. Gen. Floyd L. Edsall 

New Hampshire Maj. Gen. Francis B. McSwiney 

New Jersey .... Maj. Gen. James F. Cantwell (CofS) 

New Mexico Maj. Gen. John P. Jolly 

New York . Maj. Gen. A. C. O'Hara (CofS) 

North Carolina.. ... Maj. Gen. Claude T. Bowers 

North Dakota . Maj. Gen. LaClair A. Melhouse 

Ohio Maj. Gen. Erwin C. Hostetler 

Oklahoma Maj. Gen. LaVern E. Weber 

Oregon. Maj. Gen. Donald N. Anderson 

Pennsylvania . Maj. Gen. Thomas R. White, Jr. 

Puerto Rico . . Brig. Gen. Salvador T. Roig 

Rhode Island Maj. Gen. Leonard Holland 

South Carolina Maj. Gen. Frank D. Pinckney 

South Dakota Maj. Gen. Duane L Corning 

Tennessee - Brig. Gen. Robert W. Akin 

Texas. Maj. Gen. Thomas S. Bishop 

Utah Maj. Gen. Maurice L. Watts 

Vermont Maj. Gen. Reginald M. Cram 

Virginia Maj. Gen. Paul M. Booth 

Washington Maj. Gen. Howard S. McGee 

West Virginia Brig. Gen. Gene H. Williams 

Wisconsin Maj. Gen. Ralph J. Olson 

Wyoming. Maj. Gen. George 0. Pearson 

Alabama. . .. Col. Herman A. Price, Jr. 

Alaska Col. Charles W. Casper 

Arizona Lt. Col. John G. Smith, Jr. 

Arkansas Col. Alton F. Balkman 

California Lt. Col. Connie M. Hobbs 

Colorado Lt. Col. Harold A. Stahl 

Connecticut Col. Milton E. Kaplan 

Delaware Lt. Col. Geo. I. Sylvester, Jr. 

District of Columbia Lt. Col. Leonard F. Bergstrom 

Florida ..... Col. Albert E. Durrell 

Georgia Lt. Col. George W. Roberts 

Hawaii Lt. Col. John Naumu 

Idaho Lt. Col. L. Everett Morrison 

Illinois Col. Thomas B. Bishop 

Indiana Col. Norwood R. Hughes 

Iowa Col. Nile L. Canon 

Kansas Col. Dale H. Page 

Kentucky Lt. Col. Willis R. Hodges 

Louisiana Lt. Col. Anthony E. Filiberto 

Maine..... Lt. Col. Calvin E. Nichols 

Maryland Lt. Col. Irvin E. Ebaugh 

Massachusetts ....Col. John F. Kane 

Michigan... . . Col. William M. Peterson 

Minnesota Col. Edward R. Kiefer 

Mississippi Col. Sherman B.Anderson 

Missouri Lt. Col. James J. Mayes 

Montana.. Major Peter Tyanich 

Nebraska Major Harry A. Dahlgren 

Nevada Lt. Col. Earl A. Edmunds 

New Hampshire. . .. . Lt. Col. Chester E. Marchut 

New Jersey Lt. Col. Ralph DiNaples 

New Mexico... Lt. Col. Robert H. Moser 

New York Col. Donald V. Holsclaw 

North Carolina Col. Thomas B. Longest 

North Dakota.. . Lt. Col. Victor J. McWilliams 

Ohio... . ...Col. Sylvester T. DelCorso 

Oklahoma Lt. Col. William R. Wilson 

Oregon . Col. George W. Boyd 

Pennsylvania Lt. Col. Clair J. Stouffer 

Puerto Rico .....Lt. Col. Tulio L. Diaz-Ramirez 

Rhode Island Lt. Col. Lynwood E. Hoxsie 

South Carolina Col. James C. Dozier 

South Dakota .. Major Edward P. Rowen 

Tennessee Lt. Col. Earl W. Hicks 

Texas Col. Carl F. Schupp 

Utah _ _ Lt. Col. Joe E. Whitesides 

Vermont _ Col. Burton A. Paquin 

Virginia Lt. Col. Harold S. Price 

Washington Lt. Col. Albert G. Hagen 

West Virginia Col. Frank W. Haught 

Wisconsin Col. Frank X. Mages 

Wyoming... Col. George C. Sims 
(Ihief, (National <.ti;ml Bureau 

53 

APPENDIX D 

Officers on Duty in 

the National Guard Bureau as of 

30 June 1967 

Wilson, Winston P., Major General, ANGUS Chief, NGB 

Greenlief, Francis S., Major General, ARNGUS, Deputy Chief, NGB 

Boatwright, Charles C, Colonel, ARNGUS, Executive, NGB 

Meyler, Walter P., Lt. Colonel, USAF, Assistant Executive, NGB 

Clowe, Mifflin B. Jr., Colonel, ARNGUS, Chief, Office of Military 

Support of Civil Defense 

Clowe, Mifflin B. Jr., Colonel, ARNGUS, Acting Chief, Office of Plans, 

Policy & Programs 

Doane, Emery D. Jr., Lt. Colonel, ANGUS, Assistant Legal Adviser 

Houtchens, Max H., Colonel, ANGUS, Chief, Office of Equal Opportunity & Civil Rights 

Jelinek, Joseph R., Colonel, ARNGUS, Deputy Chief, Office of Plans, 

Policy & Programs 

McCoy, Richard L., Colonel, Armor, USA, Special Assistant for Data 

Systems 

Office of the Assistant Chief, NGB, 

for Army National Guard 

Southward, Charles L.t Brigadier General, ARNGUS, Assistant Chief, 

NGB, Army 

Hodges, Warren D., Colonel, Inf, USA, Deputy Assistant Chief, NGB, 

Army 

Brown, Lloyd J., Lt. Colonel, Armor, USA, Executive, Assistant Chief, 

NGB, Army 

Bax, Giles A., Major, Arty, ARNGUS, Air Defense Branch, Organization & Training Division 

Berriman, Peter J., Major, CE, ARNGUS, Chief, Training Branch, 

Organization & Training Division 

Brouse, Marion D., Colonel, Arty, USA, Chief, Personnel Division 

Bushee, Jesse R., Major, Armor, ARNGUS, Officers Branch, Personnel 

Division 

Chalmers, John R., Major, Inf, USAR, Organization, Mobilization and 

Army Advisors Branch, Organization & Training Division 

Cowan, Robert D., Colonel, Arty, ARNGUS, Chief, Organization & 

Training Division 

Daniels, John R., Lt. Colonel, MC, USA, Army Surgeon 

DeWitt, Richard P., Lt. Colonel, Arty, USA, Chief, Air Defense Branch, 

Organization & Training Division 

Frederick, Mishia, Lt. Colonel, Arty, USAR, Supply Branch, Logistics 

Division 

Gallegos, William J., Lt. Colonel, OrdC, USAR, Chief, Maintenance & 

Services Branch, Logistics Division 

Johnson, Carl C, Lt. Colonel, Arty, USA, Chief, Army Aviation Branch, 

Organization & Training Division 

Lee, William F., Lt. Colonel, AGC, USAR, Chief, Enlisted & Special 

Activities Branch, Personnel Division 

Liberate Angelo C, Lt. Colonel, Arty, ARNGUS, NGB Liaison Officer, 

USARADCEN, Ft. Bliss, Texas 

Logan, Robert B., Colonel, Inf, ARNGUS, Chief, Officers Branch, 

Personnel Division 

Mellett, Earle C, Lt. Colonel, CE, USA, Chief, Installations Division 

Mitchell, Willis F., Lt. Colonel, AGC, USA, Special Assistant to Chief, 

Personnel Division 

Oliver, Richard E, Lt. Colonel, CE, ARNGUS, Chief, Supply Branch, 

Logistics Division 

Patterson, Kenneth L., Lt. Colonel, FC, USAR, Chief, Comptroller 

Division 

Payne, Thomas A., Colonel, Arty, USA, Chief, Organization, Mobilization and Army Advisors Branch, Organization & Training Division 

Perkins, Donald R., Major, Arty, ARNGUS, Organization, Mobilization and Army Advisors Branch, Organization & Training Division 

Pillsbury, Hobart B., Colonel, CE, USA, Chief, Logistics Division 

Schafer, Lawrence H., Major, FC, USA, Chief, Finance & Accounting . 

Branch, Comptroller Division 

Spellman, John G., Major, Inf, USA, Training Branch, Organization 

& Training Division 

Stanko, John J. Jr., Major, Armor, ARNGUS, Army Aviation Branch, 

Organization & Training Division 

Thompson, Glen D., Lt. Colonel, Arty, USA, Special Assistant to 

Chief, Organization & Training Division 

Whalen, Richard J., Major, TC, ARNGUS, Chief, Regulations and 

. Reports Branch, Logistics Division 

Office of the Assistant Chief, NGB, 

for Air National Guard 

Brown, I. G„ Brigadier General, ANGUS, Assistant Chief NGB, Air 

Pesch, John J , Colonel, ANGUS, Deputy Assistant Chief, NGB, Air 

Shelton, Douglas C, Colonel, ANGUS. Executive, Assistant Chief, 

NGB, Air 

Alexander, Ernest W., Jr., Lt. Colonel, USAF, Maintenance Engineering Branch Air Systems & Logistics Division 

Allen, Merle F, Jr., Colonel, USAF, Chief, Air Operations & Training 

Division 

Armstrong, George W., Major, AF Res, Supply and Services Branch, 

Air Systems & Logistics Division 

Arnold, Franklin B., Lt. Colonel, USAF, Supply and Services Branch, 

Air Systems & Logistics Division 

Bradford, James W., Colonel, USAF, Chief, Office of Aerospace 

Safety 

Brown, Robert D., Lt. Colonel, USAF, Current Operations & Training 

Branch, Air Operations & Training Division 

Butcher, Budd H., Lt. Colonel, USAF, Plans & Programs Branch, Air 

Operations Training Division 

Cooper, DeWitt T., Major, ANGUS, Supply and Services Branch, Air 

Systems & Logistics Division 

Corken, Jack C, Lt. Colonel, USAF, Accounting & Finance Branch, 

Comptroller Division 

Cottingham, John J., Major, ANGUS, Current Operations and Training Branch, Air Operations and Training Division 

Cotton, James P., Major, USAF, Accounting & Finance Branch, 

Comptroller Division 

Cox, Harold D., Lt. Colonel, USAF, Management Analysis & Statistical Services Branch, Comptroller Division 

Davis, Donald L, Colonel, ANGUS, Chief, Air Systems & Logistics 

Division 

Davis, Frank 0., Jr., Major, ANGUS, Communications-Electronics and 

Weather Division 

Davis, Montie A., Jr., Lt. Colonel, USAF, Current Operations & Training Branch, Air Operations & Training Division 

Davis, Silas E., Jr., Lt. Colonel, Budget Branch, Comptroller Division 

Deneke, William L, Col., ANGUS, Chief, Air Civil Engineering 

Division 

Eberle, Ralph P., Lt. Colonel, ANGUS, Ground Environments and 

Weather, Communications-Electronics and Weather Division 

Gelet, Joseph A., Major, ANGUS, Current Operations & Training 

Branch, Operations & Training Division 

Graham, Wistar L., Colonel, USAF, Air Surgeon 

Gray, James L, Lt. Colonel, USAF, Plans and Programs Branch, Air 

Operations & Training Division 

Hanning, Royal M., Major, USAF, Air Operations & Training Division 

Hoade, Thomas F., Major, ANGUS, Current Operations & Training 

Branch, Air Operations & Training Division 

Hornung, Ernest L, Lt. Colonel, ANGUS, Maintenance-Engineering 

Branch, Air Systems & Logistics Division 

Jacobsen, Robert T., Lt. Colonel, USAF, Supply and Services Branch, 

Air Systems & Logistics Division 

Jones, Dale L, Lt. Colonel, USAF, Deputy Chief, Air Personnel Division 

Joy, Austin F., Lt. Colonel, ANGUS, Maintenance-Engineering 

Branch, Air Systems & Logistics Division 

Lamb, Thomas J., USAF, Manpower & Organization Branch, Air Systems & Logistics Division 

Lockyer, Jesse l_ Major, USAF, Accounting & Finance Branch, 

Comptroller Division 
.->! Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1967 

Metcalf, Curtis N., Lt. Colonel, USAF, Current Operations & Training 

Branch, Air Operations & Training Division 

Miller, Glenn A., Lt. Colonel, ANGUS, Plans and Programs Branch, 

Air Operations & Training Division 

Mullarkey, Daniel A., Lt. Colonel, ANGUS, Officer Personnel Branch, 

Air Personnel Division 

Murray, Leonard P., Major, USAF, Communications-Electronics and 

Weather Division 

Patrone, Ferdinand L, Major, USAF, Budget Branch, Comptroller 

Division 

APPENDIX E 

Trophies and Awards 

Army National Guard 

National Guard Association Trophy, Pershing Trophy and National 

Guard (State) Trophy. These awards are given as a result of competition among Army National Guard units in prescribed qualification firing of specific individual weapons. The National Guard Association Trophy is awarded annually to the unit attaining the 

highest figure of merit of all competing teams. The Pershing 

Trophy is awarded annually to the unit attaining the highest figure 

of merit in each State. Announcement of winners is made annually 

in NGB Pamphlet 44-2. 

National Rifle Association Trophy. This bronze plaque is awarded 

annually to the Army Guard unit team which attains the highest 

score among all States in .22 caliber rifle "postal" matches. The 

purpose of this competition is to encourage the formation of 

competitive matches among leagues formed in each State with 

the winning team in each league being eligible to compete for the 

National Rifle Association Trophy. Announcement of winners is 

made annually in NGB Pamphlet 44-3. 

Chief of the National Guard Bureau Trophy. Competition for this 

award is carried out in three indoor .22 caliber rifle matches conducted by the National Rifle Association for the National Guard 

Bureau. The matches consist of the unit team match, a battalion or 

equivalent team match, and an individual match. The winning unit 

team receives the trophy plaque which is passed on annually to 

subsequent winners. The names of winning units are permanently 

inscribed on the plaque. The complete list of winners is published in NGB Pamphlet 44-4. 

Eisenhower Trophy. This trophy, named in honor of General Dwight 

D. Eisenhower, is a bronze cup permanently on display in the 

National Guard Association Memorial in Washington, D. C. Identical 

cups are awarded each year to the oustanding company size unit 

in each State, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. The 

trophies are rotated annually with each State with the winners receiving replicas for permanent retention. Names of winning units 

are also inscribed on a parchment folio in the National Guard 

Association Memorial. The complete list of winners is published 

annually in NGB Pamphlet 44-6. 

United States Army Air Defense Commander's Trophy for the Outstanding Nike Hercules Battery in ARADCOM. This rotational 

trophy is awarded at the end of each fiscal year to the outstanding 

Nike Hercules Battery in ARADCOM. One battery is nominated by 

each ARADCOM Region (First Region nominates two) to ARADCOM 

for consideration of this award. The winner is selected by a Headquarters ARADCOM team based on a composite evaluation in the 

areas of TPI, CMMI and ORE. Battery B, 1st Missile Battalion, 250th 

Artillery, California ARNG, won the trophy for Fiscal Year 1967. 

Battery B, 4th Missile Battalion, 11th Artillery, Virginia ARNG, was 

nominated in the Fifth Region; and Battery C, 2d Missile Battalion, 

176th Artillery, Pennsylvania ARNG, was one of the two units nominated in the First Region. The winning unit also receives a plaque 

which remains in its permanent possession, and all nominated 

units receive a runner-up plaque. 

Shifflett, Milton N., Major, USAF, Administrative Services and Airman Branch, Air Personnel Division 

Smith, Arthur C, Colonel, ANGUS, Chief, Comptroller Division 

Steadman, Jesse D., Major, USAF, Air Civil Engineering Division 

Taylor, Eugene T., Major, USAF, Office of Aerospace Safety 

Tornes, Toward, Lt. Colonel, USAF, Air Civil Engineering Division 

Turnipseed, Lawrence L., Colonel, USAF, Office of the Air Surgeon 

Ward, Robert C, Major, ANGUS, Personnel Training Branch, Air 

Personnel Division 

United States Army Air Defense Commander's Trophy for the Outstanding Nike Hercules firing Battery in Short Notice Annual Practice (SNAP). This rotational trophy is awarded at the end of each 

fiscal year to the battery receiving the highest score in SNAP 

during the fiscal year. In Fiscal Year 1967, Battery C, 4th Missile 

Battalion, 251st Artillery, California ARNG, won this award with a 

percentile score of 99.8. The winning battery also receives a plaque 

for permanent possession. 

Erickson Trophy. This trophy is named for Major General Edgar C. 

Erickson who served as Chief of the National Guard Bureau from 

1953 to 1959. It is awarded annually to the distinguished graduate 

of each of the Officer Candidate courses conducted by the US 

Army Infantry School and the US Army Artillery and Missile School 

and the distinguished graduate of each of the State Officer Candidate Schools. The original Erickson Trophy, a replica of the 

"Sons of Liberty" bowl made by Paul Revere, is permanently displayed in the Milton A. Reckord Lounge at the National Guard Association Memorial, Washington, D. C. Each distinguished graduate 

receives a smaller facsimile of the trophy. Additionally, the names 

of the recipients are permanently recorded on parchment displayed 

with the original trophy. 

Association of the United States Army Award. This award consists 

of a plaque awarded to the graduate of each State Officer Candidate School who demonstrates the highest standards of leadership 

while participating in the program. Leadership criteria for this 

award is established by each school. The plaques are provided by 

the Association of the United States Army. 

Air National Guard 

Spaatz Trophy. This trophy, named for General Carl Spaatz, former 

Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, is awarded each year 

to the most outstanding Air National Guard tactical flying unit. 

Units are judged on the basis of their tactical, technical, administrative and logistical efficiency. The trophy is a large silver globe 

on a silver base which remains in permanent possession of the 

winning unit. The second highest scoring unit receives an engraved silver and mahogany plaque. The third place winner is 

awarded an engraved bronze plaque. For Calendar Year 1966, first 

place winner was the 123rd Tactical Reconnaissance Group, Louisville, Kentucky; the second place winner was the 132d Fighter Group 

(AD), Des Moines, Iowa; and the third place winner was the 115th 

Fighter Group (AD), Madison, Wisconsin. In addition to the first 

place Calendar Year 1966 Spaatz Trophy winner, an award was 

made for Fiscal Year 1966. The winner was the 190th Tactical 

Reconnaissance Group, Hutchinson, Kansas. 

Winston P. Wilson Trophy. This trophy is named for Major General 

Winston P. Wilson, Chief, National Guard Bureau. The trophy is 

a large silver urn surmounted by an American Eagle and engraved 

with the inscription "The Winston P. Wilson Trophy awarded for 

year-round excellence in the performance of the ANG All-Weather 

Defense Mission." The 1966 trophy was awarded to the 132d Fighter 

Group (AD), Des Moines, Iowa. 

Air Force Association Outstanding Unit Trophy. This rotational 

trophy is awarded yearly to the outstanding Air National Guard 

tactical flying unit. The trophy is a large bowl upon which is engraved the name of each winning unit. This year the winner was the 

123d Tactical Reconnaissance Group, Louisville, Kentucky. 
Chief, National Guard Bureau 

55 

The National Guard Association Trophy (Air). This trophy is 

awarded each year to units judged most operationally ready in each 

major gaining command. The criteria used are aircrew readiness, 

readiness of other than aircrew personnel, operational readiness of 

aircraft, accident rates, and flying safety programs. The following 

units were the winners for this year: 

Gaining 

Command Unit Location 

ADC 147th Fighter Grou p (AD) Houston, Texas 

MAC 168th Militar y Airlift Grou p Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 

TAC 131st Tactical Fighter Grou p St. Louis, Missouri 

Air Force Association Outstanding Airman Award. This award is an 

APPENDIX F 

Revisions, Changes, and New Regulations 

Published During Fiscal Year 1967 

Army National Guard 

PUBLICATIONS 

NGB Pam 2-1-1 (Publications—Index of National Guard Bureau 

Publications National Guard Regulations, NGB Pamphlets, and 

NGB Forms) was updated to list current publications and changes 

thereto. 

MILITARY PUBLICATIONS 

NGR 2-2 (Military Publications—Department of Defense and Department of the Army Publications and Blank Forms—Requisition, 

Distribution, and Storage) was revised to (1) Delete the exception 

that unit libraries would not be maintained by detachments normally attached to another unit for administration and supply and 

specify that publications and blank forms necessary to the operation and mission will be maintained by all Army National Guard 

units and authorized activities. (2) Include provision that new field 

and technical manuals issued to Officer Candidate School students, including revisions and changes, will be furnished by automatic distribution. It also identifies other schools that will receive 

publications support and prescribes procedures for requisitioning 

such publications. 

NGB Pamphlet 2-2-1 (Military Publications—Administrative Guidance for Army National Guard) was revised in accordance with policies announced in the new edition of NGR 2-2. 

NGR 23 (Military Personnel—Retirement for Members of the 

Army National Guard) was changed to provide for consolidated 

entries of "year around training" on NGB Form 23 and for submission of the forms direct to the Chief, National Guard Bureau, for 

final disposition. 

NGR 26 (Military Personnel—Service Obligations and Enforcement Procedures) was revised to provide that the forty-five day 

training cost previously included in the open allotment for the 

Reserve Enlisted Personnel trainees will be charged to funds made 

available to the States for special training (Budget Project 3140). 

This change was necessary because of a change in the account 

structure for National Guard personnel for Fiscal Year 1967. 

NGR 36 (Military Personnel—Selection, Training, and Assignments to the Army National Guard—Special Forces Units) was revised to authorize State Adjutants General to grant waivers of 

specific selection criteria for enlistment and'or assignment to 

Special Forces units. 

ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

NGR 25-5 (Enlisted Personnel—Active Duty for Training in Federal Status) was changed to delete the requirement for obsolete 

DA Form 24 and to add a requirement for the use of DA Forms 2143 

engraved bronze plaque which is presented to the most outstanding 

Air National Guard airman and remains his permanent possession.. 

The 1966 winner was Chief Master Sergeant Leroy D. Robbins, 132d 

Fighter Group (AD), Des Moines, Iowa. 

Earl T. Ricks Memorial Trophy. The 1966 Competition was cancelled. 

McCallister Trophy. This trophy, named after the late Colonel David 

F. McCallister, is a seven-foot long model of a C-97 Boeing "Stratocruiser" which is presented each year to the most outstanding of 

the 18 ANG C97 Military Airlift units. This rotational trophy is 

awarded annually on the basis of tactical, administrative, and 

logistical effectiveness. This year the winner was the 166th Military 

Airlift Group, Wilmington, Delaware. 

and 3027. Provisions were added which permit the State Adjutants 

General to place members of the Army National Guard who are 

technicians on full time training duty to act as escorts for packets 

traveling to active Army training installations under the Reserve 

Enlistment Program of 1963. 

NGR 25-6 (Enlisted Personnel—Promotions and Reductions) was 

changed to (1) Lower the waiver provisions for years of service for 

promotion to grades E-8 and E-9 in the Army National Guard to 4 

and 5 years respectively. (2) Remove restrictions on the number of 

accelerated promotions that may be made in a given year. (3) Eliminate the use of promotion quotas to grades E-8 and E-9 by the 

beginning of Fiscal Year 1968. Thereafter, promotions will be based 

solely on the qualifications possessed by the reservist and the availability of a TOE or TD vacancy in the grade of E-8 or E-9. 

MEDICAL SERVICE 

NGR 27 (Medical Service—Medical Examinations for Members 

of the Army National Guard) was changed to delete the requirement 

for a medical examination report to accompany promotion papers 

for warrant, company, and field grade officers, if a medical report 

has been submitted for the individual within the 12 months 

preceding the date of promotion. 

MILITARY SECURITY 

NGB Pamphlet 34-1 (Military Security—Espionage and Internal 

Security Laws) is a new pamphlet which was developed to furnish 

the States with pertinent information from Titles 18, 42 and 50, 

United States Code, which is required for the completion of DA 

Form 2962. This form is used in debriefing Army National Guard 

personnel who have had access to defense information and who are 

being separated from the Army National Guard or reassigned to less 

sensitive positions. 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ADVISORS 

NGB Pamphlet 40-1 (Army National Guard Advisors—Handbook) 

has been updated. This is a handbook which was published to 

familiarize new Army advisors with the Army National Guard regarding its status, mission, history, organization, and training. 

TROPHIES AND AWARDS 

NGR 44-2 (Trophies and Awards—Program for Army National 

Guard) is a new regulation which governs the annual competitions 

conducted for units and personnel of the Army National Guard and 

prescribes the criteria for eligibility, selection of units, and awards 

to winners for each competition. 

TRAINING 

NGR 45 (Training, Army National Guard), was changed to authorize the use of commercial bus transportation during inactive duty 

training when specifically approved by the Chief, National Guard 

Bureau. 

NGB Pam 45-4 (Annual Field Training—Administrative Instructions) was changed to: (1) Include USAR filler personnel when com-
56 Annual Krport. Fiscal Yew IV67 

puting detachment mandays. (2) Authorize an annual allowance for 

engineer training materials to separate brigade, separate combat, 

light equipment, and construction support engineer companies. 

(3) Add a complete address for the Army Petroleum Center. (4) Retrict the issue of equipment beyond the maintenance capability of 

the unit. (5) Require that equipment returned to the concentration 

site will have all organizational maintenance service performed and 

maintenance deficiencies corrected. (6) Require estimates on firm 

obligation data, including units performing year-round annual field 

training, be submitted by 15 November each year. (7) Amend the 

format of the administrative plan to include an estimate of additional annual field training to be performed. 

COMPTROLLER 

NGB Pamphlet 50-4 (Financial Administration—Operational 

Funds for Special Forces Units) is a new pamphlet which establishes policy and procedures for the procurement of supplies and 

services for Army National Guard Special Forces units while away 

from the annual field training site in support of Army National 

Guard training missions and exercises. 

NGR 58 (Financial Administration—Pay of Member of the Army 

National Guard) was changed to (1) Reflect current references for 

rates of pay and allowances. (2) Establish uniform procedures for 

the travel of individuals in connection with the movement of special 

equipment for field training. (3) Reflect proper reference to travel 

voucher form. (4) Authorize payment for annual field training by 

U.S. Treasury check. 

TECHNICIANS 

NGR 51/ANGR 40-01 (Army and Air National Guard—Technicians). Three changes to this regulation have been published. The 

first change provides authority for severance pay to technicians 

who are involuntarily separated from their position. The second 

change prescribes new procedures for administering the NGAUS 

Insurance Trust. The third change adopts procedures set forth in 

Volume 2 of the Joint Travel Regulations for reimbursable expenses 

and the use of privately owned conveyances; it also includes the 

new standard Geopolitical Code for each State for use on status 

reports. 

NGB Pamphlet 51-1 (Technicians—Manning Criteria, Army National Guard). Amendments were made to the manning criteria for 

On-Site Air Defense Technicians. Authority was also granted for a 

Staff Supply Assistant, NGC-7, for each divisional or nondivisional 

battalion or squadron, except battalion headquarters. This change 

was required in order to convert the present Army National Guard 

supply system to the battalion supply system which provides for 

maintenance of a battalion property account rather than an account 

for each unit. 

NGB Pamphlet 51-2 (Technicians—Job Descriptions for personnel in ARNG Technician Program) was revised to include a recently 

authorized job description for the Staff Supply Assistant. 

REPORTS 

NGR 57 (Morning Report—Army National Guard) was changed to 

clarify the requirement for recording routine visits of unit advisor 

personnel to unit training assemblies and annual field training. 

A record of routine visits during annual field training is not required. A requirement was added for recording training received 

on the reverse side of the equivalent training certificate. 

REAL ESTATE 

NGR 69 (Real Estate—Inventory of Military Real PropertyInstallations) was updated in accordance with current Army Regulation 405-45. 

SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT 

NGR 71 (Supplies and Equipment—Reporting and Disposal of 

Excesses) was changed to preclude equipment which is in short 

supply from being released by the States directly to the National 

Inventory Control Point (NICP). 

FEDERAL PROPERTY 

NGR 75-1 (Federal Property—Use and Loan of Property Issued 

to the National Guard) which was rewritten as a joint regulation 

(NGR 75-1/ANGR 67-1) authorizes State use of military property to 

support the Youth Opportunity Programs established by the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964. It also authorizes the States to aid 

and assist the Boy Scouts of America, Girl Scouts of America, 

and other youth groups. 

NGR 75-2-2 (Federal Property—Supply and Accounting Procedures for the Office of the USPFO) was changed to provide procedures to be used by the United States Property and Fiscal Office 

for disposition of proceeds from cash sales. 

NGR 75-2-3 (Federal Property—Supply Procedures for TOE Units, 

Organizations, and Non-TOE Activities) was revised to include the 

use of a pre-punched DA Form 2765, Request for Issue and Turn n. 

It also lists the appropriate codes for mechanized posting and updating of stock record accounts, equipment status reports, and 

supply management reports using the DA Form 2765. Property book 

accounting procedures for articles of organizational clothing and 

equipment have been changed to eliminate abstract posting requirements; all organization clothing and equipment will continue 

to be posted to the property book. Repair parts stockage has been 

changed to include stockage authorization and criteria for computation of prescribed load lists at unit and organization level. 

NGR 75-9 (Stock Control, Equipment Status Reporting System, 

Equipment Status Report, Army National Guard Activities) was 

revised to (1) Include alignment of ARNG reporting item detail card 

structure with the Army "MILSTRIP" requisitioning format. (2) 

Provide the United States Property and Fiscal Officer the capability 

of mechanically updating equipment status file from the DA Form 

2765 (Request for Issue or Turn-In) submitted by units. (3) Require 

the States to submit monthly equipment status change to arrive at 

the National Guard Computer Center not later than the 8th day of 

month following report date. Semi-annual resubmissions are due 

at the National Guard Computer Center 15 May and 15 November. 

(4) Require that USPFOs provide equipment status report listings to 

organization and separate unit commanders at least semi-annually 

for annotation of changes or corrections and return. 

ARMY AVIATION 

NGR 95 (Army Aviation—General Provisions) was changed to 

eliminate the restriction in the current regulation which authorizes 

the assignment of one instructor pilot per five aviators on flying 

status. Elimination of this restriction will allow commanders more 

latitude in their aviation safety and standardization programs. 

COMMUNICATIONS 

NGR 105 (Communications-Commercial Communication Service) 

was revised to up-date the regulation and to provide changes in 

equipment authorization. 

Air National Guard 

MILITARY PERSONNEL 

ANGM 35-02, Pre-Mobilization Administrative Readiness, 31 

March 1967, was revised to provide for completion of a certificate 

of advance planning for military pay disposition and personal affairs 

in the event the member is deployed after mobilization with insufficient time to make other military pay arrangements. It also 

revises the list of forms required for prompt payment of personnel 

in the event of mobilization. 

TRAINING 

ANGR 50-02, Unit Training Assemblies, published 12 December 

1966, outlines procedures for conduct of and attendance at Air 
Chief, National <.ii;n<l Bureau 57 

National Guard Unit Training Assemblies in a pay or nonpay status. 

ANGR 50-09, Special Training, published 24 March 1967, authorizes active duty for training status for members performing special 

training under the provisions of 10 USC 672(d) or 32 USC 503-505. 

It also prescribes administration procedures and types of special 

training which may be conducted. 

ANGR 50-23, On-The-Job Training, dated 1 March 1967 was revised to provide more definitive and progressive training methods 

to insure maximum productivity in the individual unit OJT programs. 

OPERATIONS 

ANGR 55-010, Command and Control, dated 1 August 1966, prescribes the responsibilities, requirements, and procedures for control of all Air National Guard flying operations. 

ANGR 55-38, Runway Supervisory Unit (Mobile Control), published 26 May 1967, establishes policy for operating runway supervisory units for ADC units of the Air National Guard. 

FLYING 

ANGR 60-1, Flight Management, dated 22 December 1966, provides exceptions to AFM 60-1 dated 1 July 1965. These exceptions 

include the maintenance of simultaneous currency in more than 

one type aircraft, crediting flying time in both reciprocating and 

jet-powered aircraft, and authorization to conduct the annual instrument refresher ground school once a year for rated personnel. 

ANGR 60-7, Crew Rest and Flight Duty Limitations, published 

26 January 1967, modifies'AFR 60-7 to meet ANG requirements by 

increasing the length of flight duty periods, when necessary, to 

fulfill major or higher command training and/or operational 

requirements. 

ANGR 60-23, Operational Restrictions at Air National Guard 

Flying Facilities dated 22 September 1966, supplements AFR 60-23 

by providing Air National Guard policy on restrictions at Air 

National Guard facilities. 

MAINTENANCE 

ANGM 66-1, Maintenance Management, dated 14 October 1966, 

and Change A, dated 27 January 1967, modifies AFM 66-1 to meet 

ANG Maintenance Management procedures. 

ANGR 66-17, Field and Organizational Contest Maintenance, and 

published 22 February 1967, provides Contract Maintenance procedures for ANG activities. 

ANGR 66-38, Nondestructive Inspection, dated 13 April 1967, 

provides guidance to ANG activities for accomplishing Nondestructive Inspection at bases not having the capability. 

SUPPLY 

ANGR 67-07, Change A dated 12 July 1966 and Change B dated 

23 December 1966, Air National Guard War Readiness Spaces Kit 

(WRSK) Review, revised the format for submission of WRSK report. 

CIVIL ENGINEERING 

ANGR 85-26, Project Control Procedures, published 17 August 

1966, governs procedures for submission, revision, and control of 

minor construction projects. 

UTILITIES OPERATION AND SERVICES 

ANGR 91-4, Emergency Electric Power Supply, published 14 

September 1966, establishes policies and procedures governing the 

use of emergency power at all ANG installations. One change, 

ANGR 91-4A, was published on 12 December 1966. 

FIRE FIGHTING AND RESCUE 

ANGR 92-1, Responsibilities, Agreements and General Operation 

of Fire and Crash Activities at ANG bases, published 21 December 

1966, establishes policies, responsibilities, agreements and basic 

requirements in the event of fire, aerospace vehicle accidents, or 

other emergencies occurring within the established areas of ANG 

interest. The regulation also contains sample agreements- to be 

used by ANG bases in drawing up mutual aid arrangements with 

municipalities. 

COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS 

ANGR 100-01, Communications Services, published 12 April 

1967, governs commercial communications services. 

SAFETY 

ANGR 127-4, Investigating and Reporting ANG Accidents/Incidents, dated 21 September 1966, was written to make AFR 127-4 

applicable to the ANG. 

ANGR 127-01, Flying Safety Meetings, dated 17 March 1967, was 

rewritten to update the regulation. 

MEDICAL SERVICE 

ANGR 161-13, Immunization Requirements and Procedures, 

dated 10 November 1966, makes AFR 161-13 applicable to the ANG 

by listing the gaining commands and shots required. 

CHAPLAIN ACTIVITIES 

ANGR 265-1, Air Force Chaplain Program, dated 12 June 1967, 

modifies AFR 265-1 to meet ANG requirements. It expands ANG 

commanders' responsibilities to include training of chaplains. 

HONORS AND CEREMONIES 

ANGR 900-2, Trophies and Awards, published 24 January 1967, 

describes the trophies and awards programs sponsored by the National Guard Bureau. It also outlines trophies and awards available 

to Air National Guard members and units under other directives. 
3K 

ft? &TM 4 

Annual Report, r i>eal It ear 1967 

m 
Chief, [National (.uard Bureau 

APPENDIX G 

Army National Guard Strength 

FY 1948-FY 1967 

YEAR-END AVERAGE NET/GAI N LOSS 

FY 48 

FY 49 

FY 50 

FY 51 

FY 52 

FY 53 

FY 54 

FY 55 

FY 56 

FY 57 

FY 58 

FY 59 

FY 60 

FY 61 

FY 62 

FY 63 

FY 64 

FY 65 

FY 66 

FY 67 

Aggregate 

289,531 

313,805 • 

326,395 

226,785 

214,646 

255,887 

318,776 

358,241 

404,403 

422,178 

394,329 

399,427 

401,765 

393,807 

360,970' 

361,080' 

360,714 • 

381,546 

378,985 

420,924 

418,074 

Officers 

20,138 

25,639 

30,716 

24,142 

22,888 

28,406 

33,033 

34,665 

34,899 

36,795 

37,942 

37,884 

37,142 

36,245 

31,458 

33,924 

33,896 

33,909 

34,353 

33,764 

33,880 

Enlisted 

269,393 

288,166 

295,679 

202,643 

191,758 

227,481 

285,743 

323,576 

369,504 

385,383 

356.387 

361,543 

364,623 

357,562 

329,512 

327,156 

326,818 

347,637 

344,632 

387,160 

384,194 

Aggregate 

160,949 

288,060 

332,762 

257,532 

219,754 

232,291 

282,962 

339,043 

380,242 

413,471 

409,521 ' 

408,383

 2 

390,781 

397,634 

402,925 

368,449 

372,740' 

372,725 ' 

373,002' 

372,823 ' 

376,957 

409,052 

418,786 

Officers 

13,168 

22,487 

27,855 

26,155 

23,280 

25,638 

30,566 

33,783 

34,550 

35,933 

37,298 

37,186 

37,881 

37,388 

36,584 

33,225 

33,941 

33,940 

34,071 

34,054 

34,369 

34,453 

34,523 

Enlisted 

147,781 

265,573 

304,907 

231,377 

196,474 

206,653 

252,396 

305,260 

345,692 

377,538 

372,223 

371,197 

352,900 

360,246 

366,341 

335,224 

338,799 

338,785 

338,931 

338,769 

342,588 

374,599 

384,263 

Aggregate 

211,290 

24,274 

12,590 

— 99,610 

-12,139 

41,241 

62,889 

39,465 

46,162 

17,775 

— 27,849 

+ 5,098 

+ 2,338 

— 7,958 

— 32,837 

+ 110 

— 256 

+ 20,466' 

+ 20,832" 

— 2,561 

+ 41,939 

— 2,850 

Officers 

11,351 

5,501 

5,077 

— 6,574 

— 1,254 

5,518 

4,627 

1,632 

234 

1,896 

1,147 

- 58 

— 742 

— 897 

— 4,787 

+ 2,466 

2,438 

— 15 

+ '3 

+ 444 

— 589 

+ 116 

Enlisted 

199,939 

18,773 

7,513 

— 93,036 

— 10,885 

35,723 

58,262 

37,833 

45,928 

15,879 

— 28,996 

+ 5,156 

+ 3,080 

— 7,061 

— 28,050 

— 2,356 

— 2,694 

+ 20,481 

+ 20,819 

— 3,005 

+ 42,528 

— 2,966 

1

 Includes Arkansas in service of U.S. 

- Excludes Arkansas in service of U.S. 

1

 Excludes 44,371 mobilized in September and October 1961 during Berlin Buildup. 

* Includes Alabama in service of U.S. 

r

' Excludes Alabama in service of U.5. 
luaa l Report, f-eml 1. .>r 196' 

APPENDIX H STATE STRENGTH STATUS 

% OF AUTHORIZED 

30 JUNE 1967 

ARNG 

100 

90 

80 

70 

n 

o 

a *% 5 1 3 

< 5 

^ ° Jg < 

X 

o 

UJ < 

o < 

I < o 

5 

This chart shows Army National Guard strength by state. The authorized strength is indicated by the 100% line and the actual 30 June 1967 strength is shown as a percentage of 

that authorized strength. 
Chirf, National Guard Bureau 

ALA 

ALAS 

ARK 

COLO 

DEL 

FLA 

HAW 

ARIZ 

CAL 

CONN 

D.C. 

37 

318 

78 

28 

1 

71 

126 

12 

661 

29 

24 

UNDER AUTHORIZED STRENGTH 

IDA 32 

ILL 219 

IOWA 33 

KAN 47 

KY 46 

LA 135 

ME 6 

MD 3 

MICH 10 

MINN 88 

MO 32 

MONT 7 

NEB 105 

N. H. 37 

N.M. 71 

N. C. 53 

N. D. 47 

ORE 6 

S.C. . 172 

S. D. 100 

UTAH 

VT 

VA 

WASH 

W.VA 

WYO 

TEX 197 TOTAL 

AT AUTHORIZED STRENGTH 

NY 0 

OVER AUTHORIZED STRENGTH 

GA 353 

IND 11 

MASS 6 

MISS 49 

NEV 5 

N.J. 48 

OHIO 460 

OKLA 175 

PA 185 WIS 

P. R. 61 TOTAL 

R. 1. 24 

TENN 14 

10 

32 

43 

121 

43 

4 

2358 

9 

2126 

% 

100 

90 

80 

70 

O r- < < > O < 

o 

o 

d a: > LU > 

— < r- • 

X Q 

CO 

< 

^ CO 

z z 

> CO 

1 -

x

 < 
<>2 Annual Report, Fiscal Vear 1967 

APPENDIX I STATE STRENGTH STATUS 

% OF AUTHORIZED 

30 JUNE 1967 

ANG 

% 

100 

90 

80 

70 

3 •< </> 5 <-> < 

3 £5 5 < 

L. h i i h 

O =1 

; 

ai 

< 

> 

* 

o WIS 

-; 

z 

X 

00 

< 

o OHI 

M ARI 

i/i 

1 

f^ 

Z t o 

« t 

> 

> 

^ 

This chart shows Air National Guard strength by state. The authorized strength is indi 

cated by the 100% line and the actual 30 June 1967 strength is shown as a percentage of 

that authorized strength. 
(Ihiff. National t.n.nil Kurt-au 

UNDER AUTHORIZED STRENGTH 

Ala 

Alas 

Ark 

Colo 

Conn 

Ida 

28 

15 

56 

17 

16 

9 

Iowa 

Kans 

Ky 

La 

Me 

Md 

25 

45 

3 

4 

28 

35 

Mich 

Minn 

Mo 

Mont 

Nev 

N.H. 

53 

12 

46 

27 

17 

49 

N.M. 

N.Y. 

N.D. 

Ore 

PA 

P.R. • 

22 

25 

13 

19 

119 

41 

Tenn 

Vt 

Va 

Wyo 

Total 

146 

21 

2 

36 

929 

AT AUTHORIZED STRENGTH 

Miss Neb S.D. 

OVER AUTHORIZED STRENGTH 

Ariz 

Calif 

Del 

D.C. 

Fla 

5 

144 

37 

8 

17 

Ga 

Haw 

III 

Ind 

Mass 

160 

41 

202 

21 

51 

NJ. 

N.C. 

Ohio 

Okla 

R.I. 

16 

47 

19 

38 

12 

S.C. 

Tex 

Utah 

Wash 

W.Va 

34 

59 

18 

10 

17 

Wise 

Total 

21 

~977 

% 

100 

90 

80 

70 
y |*tnuu H 'IJO'I-' J |»**! \ -iR-» Ufa]

> t<
(hi.l . [National Guard Bureau 

Army National Guard Obligations, 

Fiscal Year 1967 (All Appropriations) 

65 

APPENDIX J 

Army National Guard, 1967 

Grand Total 

All 

Appropriations 

National Guard 

Personnel, Army 

(2172060) 

Operations and 

Maintenance 

Army National 

Guard 

(2172065) 

Grand Total 

State Obligations—Total 

580,471,342 344,644,210 232,538,436 

490,569,476 263,909,303 223,445,973 

Operations and 

Maintenance, 

Army 

(2172020) 

604,289 

604,289 

Military 

Construction 

Army National 

Guard 

(21X2085) 

2,684,407 

2,609,911 

810 

--1,843 

67,303 

153,264 

16,560 

28,486 

6,133 

124,904 

243,729 

797,223 

210,270 

33,594 

1. Alabama 

2. Alaska 

3. Arizona 

4. Arkansas 

5. California 

6. Colorado 

7. Connecticut 

8. Delaware 

9. District of Columbia 

10. Florida 

11. Georgia 

12. Hawaii 

13. Idaho 

14. Illinois 

15. Indiana 

16. Iowa 

17. Kansas 

18. Kentucky 

19. Louisiana 

20. Maine 

21. Maryland 

22. Massachusetts 

23. Michigan 

24. Minnesota 

25. Mississippi 

26. Missouri 

17. Montana 

28. Nebraska 

29. Nevada 

30. New Hampshire 

31. New Jersey 

32. New Mexico 

33. New York 

34. North Carolina 

35. North Dakota 

36. Ohio 

37. Oklahoma 

38. Oregon 

39. Pennsylvania 

40. Puerto Rico 

41. Rhode Island 

42. South Carolina 

43. South Dakota 

44. Tennessee 

45. Texas 

46. Utah 

47. Vermont 

48. Virginia 

49. Washington 

50. West Virginia 

51. Wisconsin 

52. Wyoming 

\ 

17,316,486 

3,322,678 

3,641,874 

8,651,488 

28,373,672 

3,311,516 

8,553,672 

3,554,124 

1,956,364 

8,160,191 

10,190,383 

9,235,657 

4,669,120 

13,709,095 

11,488,622 

8,542,786 

8,329,625 

6,007,289 

8,840,997 

3,445,846 

9,794,590 

16,069,030 

13,571,157 

13,219,167 

13,025,992 

11,496,739 

3,380,945 

4,664,720 

1,327,813 

2,874,318 

17,041,744 

4,867,999 

29,338,840 

11,312,472 

3,563,545 

17,170,194 

9,828,429 

7,740,549 

22,141,899 

6,914,802 

4,240,885 

10,842,847 

4,779,401 

12,311,381 

21,387,356 

5,767,517 

3,571,510 

11,406,961 

9,493,664 

3,986,792 

9,858,474 

2,276,259 

11,266,444 

1,543,505 

2,128,858 

5,194,023 

13,706,956 

1,853,041 

4,105,644 

1,870,509 

1,030,134 

4,359,792 

5,245,675 

2,635,921 

2,288,408 

6,513,608 

6,504,153 

5,051,537 

4,999,173 

3,400,517 

5,331,748 

1,793,583 

4,417,072 

9,241,308 

5,811,563 

7,478,022 

7,399,415 

5,902,342 

1,678,461 

2,344,820 

587,815 

1,629,536 

8,974,692 

2,663,452 

16,132,542 

7,162,441 

1,902,387 

9,012,891 

6,113,906 

4,424,075 

10,843,005 

4,390,945 

2,080,867 

7,148,424 

2,664,207 

8,116,055 

11,644,913 

3,265,635 

2,006,589 

5,346,507 

4,552,692 

2,266,091 

4,769,654 

1,113,480 

6,016,532 

1,779,385 

1,502,364 

3,450,957 

14,645,592 

1,456,031 

4,375,825 

1,680,273 

926,230 

3,643,515 

4,921,222 

6,584,938 

2,335,432 

7,183,414 

4,967,240 

3,353,959 

3,315,872 

2,594,695 

3,496,247 

1,649,666 

5,374,637 

6,579,193 

6,948,597 

5,509,780 

5,577,960 

5,569,568 

1,689,200 

2,312,924 

738,353 

1,241,210 

8,060,335 

2,190,031 

13,194,555 

3,969,927 

1,613,688 

8,127,462 

3,705,996 

2,975,637 

11,261,164 

2,523,857 

2,158,710 

3,645,724 

2,052,612 

4,187,086 

9,733,250 

2,354,246 

1,531,159 

6,052,812 

4,927,448 

1,712,291 

4,889,793 

1,157,389 

32,700 

1,630 

10,652 

6,508 

21,124 

2,444 

4,900 

3,342 

3,620 

6,926 

14,798 

16,794 

12,073 

11,095 

12,396 

14,580 

12,077 

13,002 

2,597 

2,881 

4,800 

13,774 

21,095 

15,023 

24,829 

13,284 

6,976 

1,645 

3,572 

6,717 

14,516 

11,743 

30,810 

9,470 

19,850 

8,527 

38,706 

37,730 

1,308 

11,628 

26,951 

8,240 

9,193 

1,105 

7,649 

7,642 

13,254 

8,410 

14,313 

5,390 

149,294 

38,000 

9,991 

302,130 

37,07! 

35,631 

146,531 

26,115 

184,714 

Obligations by Other than States — Total 89,901,866 80,734,907 9,092,463 74,496 

Chief of Engineers 

Chief of Finance and Accounting 

Chief, National Guard Bureau 

Chief of Staff 

Finance & Accounts Office, USA 

The Adjutant General 

The Surgeon General 

First Army 

Third Army 

Fourth Army 

Fifth Army 

Sixth Army 

USARAl 

SOCOM 

USARHAW 

345,321 

18,417 

81,824,696 

1,284,274 

822,864 

1,485,815 

10,000 

1,774,636 

342,212 

926,032 

490,664 

453,600 

25,267 

80,626 

17,442 

80,111,408 

31,180 

10,000 

259,662 

43,031 

114,831 

83,739 

81,056 

290,236 

18,417 

1,713,288 

1,284,274 

791,684 

1,485,815 

1,514,974 

279,770 

811,201 

406,925 

372,544 

25,267 

80,626 

17,442 

55,085 

19,411 
National Guard Personnel, Army (2172060) 

Annual Report, Fiscal Year J 967 

Army Notional Guard, 1967 

Grand Total 

State Obligations—Total 

1 . 

2. 

3 

4. 

5. 

6 

7. 

8. 

9 

10. 

1 1 , 

12. 

13 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 

19. 

20. 

2 1 . 

22. 

23. 

24 

25. 

26. 

27. 

28. 

29. 

30. 

31 

32 

33 

34, 

35. 

36. 

37. 

38. 

39. 

40. 

4 1 . 

42. 

43. 

44. 

45. 

46. 

47. 

48. 

49. 

50. 

5 1 . 

52 

Alabama 

Alaska 

Arizona 

Arkansas 

California 

Colorado 

Connecticut 

Delaware 

District of Columbia 

Florida 

Georgia 

Hawaii 

Idaho 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Iowa 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Louisiana 

Maine 

Maryland 

Massachusetts 

Michigan 

Minnesota 

Mississippi 

Missouri 

Montana 

Nebraska 

Nevada 

New Hampshire 

New Jersey 

New Mexico 

New York 

North Carolina 

North Dakota 

Ohio 

Oklahoma 

Oregon 

Pennsylvania 

Puerto Rico 

Rhode Island 

South Carolina 

South Dakota 

Tennessee 

Texas 

Utah 

Vermont 

Virginia 

Washington 

West Virginia 

Wisconsin 

Wyoming 

(2172060) 

Pay and 

Allowances, 

Active Duty 

Training * 

(3110-3140) 

Pay and 

Allowances, 

Inactive Duty 

Training 

(3113-3114) 

344,644,210 188,149,148 153,961,595 

109,437,628 

11,266,444 

1,543,505 

2,128,858 

5,194,023 

13,706,956 

1,853,041 

4,105,644 

1,870,509 

1,030,134 

4,359,792 

5,245,675 

2,635,921 

2,288,408 

6,513,608 

6,504,153 

5,051,537 

4,999,173 

3,400,517 

5,331,748 

1,793,583 

4,417,072 

9,241,308 

5,811,563 

7,478,022 

7,399,415 

5,902,342 

1,678,461 

2,344,820 

587,815 

1,629,536 

8,974,692 

2,663,452 

16,132,542 

7,162,441 

1,902,387 

9,012,891 

6,113,906 

4,424,075 

10,843,005 

4,390,945 

2,080,867 

7,148,424 

2,664,207 

8,116,055 

11,644,913 

3,265,635 

2,006,589 

5,346,507 

4,552,962 

2,266,091 

4,769,654 

1,113,480 

5,194,530 

803,197 

1,035,695 

2,316,963 

5,076,977 

776,478 

1,759,473 

725,035 

407,353 

1,324,891 

2,281,509 

1,157,789 

1,046,816 

2,320,993 

2,222,235 

2,007,628 

1,939,044 

1,392,201 

2,469,009 

783,998 

1,899,561 

3,672,522 

2,095,681 

3,541,147 

3,294,972 

2,517,785 

777,220 

608,243 

268,535 

806,342 

3,558,004 

1,426,215 

6,990,689 

2,971,261 

816,923 

3,183,277 

2,706,451 

1,949,556 

3,819,646 

1,829,621 

842,364 

3,128,471 

1,189,128 

3,778,596 

5,211,700 

1,464,892 

858,451 

2,484,973 

2,086,056 

964,599 

1,139,180 

513,755 

6,044,532 

739,016 

1,080,810 

2,859,067 

8,615,691 

1,073,112 

2,334,058 

1,145,474 

620,465 

3,020,726 

2,959,142 

1,476,492 

1,240,930 

4,184,676 

4,270,895 

3,033,043 

3,048,440 

2,004,580 

2,854,448 

1,006,909 

2,501,876 

5,522,602 

3,695,079 

3,930,640 

4,087,680 

3,382,536 

897,586 

1,728,989 

318,700 

820,615 

5,394,814 

1,222,455 

9,133,002 

4,173,899 

1,079,271 

5,822,827 

3,390,234 

2,471,084 

7,003,713 

2,557,302 

1,225,534 

4,013,779 

1,474,952 

4,314,004 

6,418,659 

1,782,875 

1,143,935 

2,857,527 

2,460,306 

1,299,436 

3,624,256 

598,910 

Administration 

and Support 

(3150) 

510,080 

27,382 

1,292 

12,353 

17,993 

14,288 

3,451 

12,113 

2,316 

14,175 

5,024 

1,640 

662 

7,939 

11,023 

10,866 

11,689 

3,736 

8,291 

2,676 

15,635 

46,184 

20,803 

6,235 

16,763 

2,021 

3,645 

7,588 

580 

2,579 

21,874 

14,782 

8,851 

17,281 

6,193 

6,787 

17,221 

3,435 

19,646 

4,022 

12,969 

6,174 

127 

23,455 

14,554 

17,868 

4,203 

4,007 

6,600 

2,057 

6,218 

815 

Ob/igafions by Other than States — Total 80,734,907 78,711,520 2,023,387 

Chief, National Guard Bureau 

Finance & Accounts Office, USA 

The Surgeon General 

First Army 

Third Army 

Fourth Army 

Fifth Army 

Sixth Army 

80,111,408 

31,180 

10,000 

259,662 

43,031 

114,831 

83,739 

81,056 

78,088,021 

31,180 

10,000 

259,662 

43,031 

114,831 

83,739 

81,056 

2,023,387 

:

 Includes pay and allowances, clothing, subsistence and travel. 
Chief, National Guard Bureau 

6 7 

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard (2172065) 

Army Notional Guard, 1967 

Grand Total 

State Obligations—Total 

1 . Alabama 

2. Alaska 

3. Arizona 

4. Arkansas 

5. California 

6. Colorado 

7. Connecticut 

8. Delaware 

9. District of Columbia 

10. Florida 

13. 

14. 

11. Georgia 

12. Hawaii 

Idaho 

Illinois 

15. Indiana 

16. Iowa 

17. Kansas 

18. Kentucky 

19. Louisiana 

20. Maine 

2 1 . Maryland 

22. Massachusetts 

23. Michigan 

24. Minnesota 

25. Mississippi 

26. Missouri 

27. Montana 

28. Nebraska 

29. Nevada 

30. New Hampshire 

New Jersey 

New Mexico 

New York 

North Carolina 

North Dakota 

Ohio 

37. Oklahoma 

38. Oregon 

39. Pennsylvania 

40. Puerto Rico 

4 1 . Rhode Island 

42. South Carolina 

43. South Dakota 

44. Tennessee 

45. Texas 

46. Utah 

47. Vermont 

48. Virginia 

49. Washington 

50. West Virginia 

5 1 . Wisconsin 

52. Wyoming 

Total 

(2172065) 

Training 

Operations 

(3710) 

Air 

Defense 

(3720) 

232,538,436 64,089,068 38,228,993 

223,445,973 63,034,971 38,228,993 

6,016,532 • 

1,779,385 

1,502,364 

3,450,957 

14,645,592 

1,456,031 

4,375,825 

1,680,273 

926,230 

3,643,515 

4,921,222 

6,584,938 

2,335,432 

7,183,414 

4,967,240 

3,353,949 

3,315,872 

2,594,695 

3,496,247 

1,649,666 

5,374,637 

6,579,193 

6,948,597 

5,509,780 

5,577,960 

5,569,568 

1,689,200 

2,312,924 

738,353 

1,241,210 

8,060,335 

2,190,031 

13,194,555 

3,969,927 

1,613,688 

8,127,462 

3,705,996 

2,975,637 

11,261,164 

2,523,857 

2,158,710 

3,645,724 

2,052,612 

4,187,086 

9,733,250 

2,354,246 

1,531,159 

6,052,812 

4,927,448 

1,712,291 

4,889,793 

1,157,389 

2,437,975 

413,539 

390,329 

1,223,421 

3,239,931 

409,796 

938,260 

488,694 

227,583 

1,297,978 

1,819,228 

574,228 

609,960 

1,518,401 

1,748,414 

1,153,750 

1,133,306 

772,782 

1,089,317 

460,553 

948,004 

2,072,235 

1,764,481 

2,133,102 

2,150,276 

1,367,733 

415,979 

604,573 

125,063 

342,251 

2,019,134 

529,846 

3,575,004 

1,672,081 

482,604 

2,253,838 

1,404,632 

987,814 

2,609,887 

1,024,350 

469,647 

1,465,459 

691,389 

1,664,321 

2,641,676 

746,563 

445,735 

1,195,026 

1,013,728 

473.057 

1,465,148 

331,890 

4,415,134 

1,352,408 

4,079,230 

2,766,694 

2,708,780 

1,531,777 

2,305,841 

1,512,788 

2,149,880 

3,542,573 

2,117,998 

3,416,024 

681,076 

1,348,345 

2,026,585 

1,530,943 

742,917 

Logistic 

Support 

(3730) 

121,634,663 

117,145,188 

3,454,094 

1,272,746 

1,041,561 

2,134,316 

6,836,480 

972,795 

2,007,231 

1,120,602 

610,632 

2,234,346 

3,005,493 

1,845,057 

1,656,757 

2,793,591 

3,111,351 

2,097,949 

2,084,909 

1,740,191 

2,308,619 

1,115,867 

1,619,033 

2,837,249 

2,767,671 

3,283,615 

3,314,824 

2,535,883 

1,197,873 

1,621,559 

538,459 

825,334 

3,791,762 

1,582,969 

5,922,425 

2,189,876 

1,059,657 

3,636,794 

2,192,519 

1,897,672 

5,118,127 

1,396,164 

932,607 

2,074,752 

1,286,186 

2,416,218 

5,600,426 

1,536,984 

1,009,531 

2,739,931 

2,270,599 

1,166,402 

2,580,559 

756,941 

Hq and 

Comman d 

Support 

(3740) 

8,585,712 

5,036,821 

124,464 

93,100 

70,475 

93,219 

154,047 

73,441 

77,925 

70,978 

88,014 

111,190 

96,502 

86,424 

68,716 

104,727 

107,474 

102,250 

97,657' 

81,722 

98,312 

73,246 

98,821 

137,932 

110,604 

93,063 

112,861 

153,164 

75,348 

86,792 

74,831 

73,626 

99,560 

77,217 

154,554 

107,970 

71,427 

118,831 

108,845 

90,151 

117,126 

103,342 

75,379 

105,513 

75,037 

106,547 

142,802 

70,699 

75,893 

91,270 

112,177 

72,831 

100,168 

68,557 

Obligations by Other than States — Total 9,092,463 1,054,097 4,489,475 3,548,891 

Chief of Engineers 

Chief of Finance and Accounting 

Chief, National Guard Bureau 

Chief of Staff 

Finance & Accounts, USA 

The Adjutant General 

First Army 

Third Army 

Fourth Army 

Fifth Army 

Sixth Army 

USARAL 

SOCOM 

USARHAW 

290,236 

18,417 

1,713,288 

1,284,274 

791,684 

1,485,815 

1,514,974 

279,770 

811,201 

406,925 

372,544 

25,267 

80,626 

17,442 

7,717 

150,801 

256,580 

239,113 

227,682 

114,599 

25,267 

24,228 

8,1 l'o 

290,236 

18,417 

1,713,288 

5,165 

1,364,173 

23,190 

572,088 

179,243 

257,945 

56,398 

9,332 

1,284,274 

778,802 

1,485,815 
6 8 

APPENDIX K 

Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1967 

Air National Guard—1967 

1. Alabama 

2. Alaska 

3. Arizona 

4. Arkansas 

5. California 

6. Colorado 

7. Connecticut 

8. Delaware 

9. District of Columbia 

10. Florida 

11. Georgia 

12. Hawaii 

13. Idaho 

14. Illinois 

15. Indiana 

16. Iowa 

17. Kansas 

18. Kentucky 

19. Louisiana 

20. Maine 

21. Maryland 

22. Massachusetts 

23. Michigan 

24. Minnesota 

25. Mississippi 

26. Missouri 

27. Montana 

28. Nebraska 

29. Nevada 

30. New Hampshire 

31. New Jersey 

32. New Mexico 

33. New York 

34. North Carolina 

35. North Dakota 

36. Ohio 

37. Oklahoma 

38. Oregon 

39. Pennsylvania 

40. Puerto Rico 

41. Rhode Island 

42. South Carolina 

43. South Dakota 

44. Tennessee 

45. Texas 

46. Utah 

47. Vermont 

48. Virginia 

49. Washington 

50. West Virginia 

51. Wisconsin 

52. Wyoming 

Apportioned to Other Than States—Total 

Hq Command 

National Guard Bureau 

Directorate of Administrative Services 

Lackland AFB, Texas 

Air Force Logistics Command 

Bureau of Yards and Docks 

Office, Corps of Engineers 

Military Airlift Command 

Aeronautical Chart & Information Center 

AFAFC Denver 

Military Construction, Air National GuardAppropriation 

Grand 

Total 

57X3830 

Total 

Advance 

Project 

Planning 

ANG Con- Minor Con- 5773840 

struction struction Total 

Grand Total 

Apportioned to States—Total 

366,015,144 

192,509,943 

10,075,000 

3,517,500 

310 

1,062,758 

32,758 

320 

8,837,215 

3,309,715 

340 

175,027 

175,027 

271,704,096 

166,895,890 

4,068,095 (3,310) 

1,635,565 (3,196) 

3,636,680 1,500 

3,548,747 7,805 

9,402,454 107,440 

4,466,760 43 

2,603,077 30,833 

2,014,322 

3,199,146 

3,431,417 1,533,039 

6,084,765 

4,967,053 44,730 

2,180,175 ... 

5,250,998 

3,448,092 

4,409,508 405,220 

3,298,853 

2,076,364 51,387 

2,285,781 49,292 

1,814,043 -

2,730,638 

4,600,339 48,396 

4,958,373 273,203 

3,763,121 2,750 

4,365,582 380,647 

5,406,502 

2,854,929 159,759 

1,549,151 48,210 

1,812,116 

1,457,653 

5,946,210 152,151 

2,154,577 

10,426,886 69,822 

2,057,323 797 

2,433,461 53,338 

9,105,066 49,557 

3,452,535 

2,629,751 

7,407,697 

2,312,041 

1,754,471 

2,160,005 

2,154,913 

5,528,973 54,237 

6,745,438 (150) 

2,570,675 

2,519,430 - -

1,610,528 -

3,674,695 

2,667,937 

4,458,984 

1,418,048 

(3,310) 

(3,196) 

1,500 

1,415 

33,039 

7,805 

107,440 

43 

1,500,000 

44,730 

405,220 

51,387 

48,396 

273,203 

2,750 

332,080 

159,759 

48,210 

152,151 

69,822 

797 

5,438 

49,557 

54,237 

173,505,201 6,557,500 1,030,000 5,527,500 

19,000 19,000 

137,984,554 

35,255 

1,979,639 

3,228,000 

3,894,000 3,894,000 

2,644,500 2,644,500 

12,000 

375,000 

23,333,253 

19,000 

453,000 

558,000 

3,441,000 

2,086,500 

29,418 

49,292 

47,900 

(150) 

3,279,344 

1,495,769 

3,579,094 

2,844,298 

9,100,528 

4,437,718 

2,190,216 

1,689,653 

2,665,570 

1,880,523 

4,662,892 

4,424,450 

1,880,888 

4,600,128 

2,962,565 

3,943,609 

2,834,295 

1,782,082 

1,996,261 

1,783,836 

2,289,541 

3,840,885 

4,041,033 

3,719,776 

3,368,322 

4,635,616 

2,288,598 

1,478,005 

1,543,415 

1,438,483 

5,015,870 

1,722,407 

8,489,058 

1,587,690 

2,061,442 

7,824,486 

3,400,552 

2,299,754 

6,164,283 

2,285,467 

1,371,140 

1,863,184 

1,895,600 

5,374,470 

5,645,537 

2,083,326 

2,229,181 

1,358,953 

3,168,508 

2,624,923 

4,351,019 

1,401,647 

104,808,206 

101,157,951 

35,255 

3,228,000 

12,000 

375,000 
( liitl. INutional <.n.it<l Burrun 69 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD OBLIGATIONS 

Operations and Maintenance Appropriation 

National Guard 

Personnel, 

Air Force-Appropriation 

Operation 

of 

Logistical 

Support 

Training 

Support 

Medical 

Support 

Svrvico 

Wide 

ANG 

Personnel 

Grand 

Total 

Air National Guard—1967 

Aircraft 

410 

65,351,465 

4 3 0 

36,132,219 

614,984 

440 

169,390,821 

165,582,137 

4 7 0 

698,769 

698,769 

Support 

480 

130,822 

5773850 

Total 

84,236,048 

22,096,553 

520 

84,236,048 

22,096,553 

366,015,144 

192,509,943 

Grand Total 

Apportionad to States—Total 

9,492 

4,336 

5,499 

6,862 

29,364 

222 

6,999 

3,683 

96,959 

55,870 

16,646 

28,496 

37,390 

1,091 

2,399 

4,874 

19,345 

9,768 

250 

141,376 

515 

2,934 

2,647 

1,191 

51,949 

12,753 

8,140 

2,498 

10,275 

11,498 

2,446 

4,741 

13,241 

2,392 

5,458 

1,385 

65,351,465 35,517,235 

3,263,604 

1,489,889 

3,565,707 

2,827,900 

9,029,381 

4,430,327 

2,185,215 

1,676,374 

2,658,011 

1,850,346 

4,537,646 

4,363,795 

1,837,040 

4,546,686 

2,914,839 

3,934,526 

2,828,858 

1,776,012 

1,990,019 

1,779,789 

2,267,515 

3,811,624 

4,008,803 

3,674,053 

3,196,824 

4,613,925 

2,285,480 

1,471,467 

1,538,407 

1,433,087 

4,985,581 

1,716,416 

8,434,175 

1,582,485 

2,055,403 

7,741,968 

3,373,566 

2,284,324 

6,140,722 

2,281,333 

1,364,405 

1,844,852 

1,882,073 

5,343,151 

5,631,491 

2,068,467 

2,219,387 

1,339,626 

3,158,319 

2,618,494 

4,334,447 

1,394,303 

3,808,684 

65,351,465 35,517,235 162,429 

35,255 

3,224,000 

12,000 

375,000 

6,248 

1,544 

7,888 

9,536 

41,783 

7,391 

4,779 

6,280 

7,559 

26,494 

28,287 

4,785 

27,202 

24,946 

10,336 

9,083 

4,346 

3,671 

1,368 

4,047 

22,026 

9,916 

22,462 

45,473 

30,122 

21,691 

2,603 

3,604 

2,361 

5,396 

30,289 

5,991 

54,883 

5,205 

4,848 

30,569 

26,986 

2,677 

15,421 

4,134 

6,735 

15,834 

3,252 

19,821 

11,600 

14,859 

5,053 

6,086 

7,797 

6,429 

11,114 

5,959 

130,822 

126,822 

4,000 

792,061 

142,992 

56,086 

696,644 

194,486 

28,999 

382,028 

324,669 

533,576 

17,855 

1,421,873 

497,873 

299,287 

650,870 

485,527 

60,679 

464,558 

242,895 

240,228 

30,207 

441,097 

711,058 

644,137 

40,595 

616,613 

770,886 

406,572 

22,936 

268,701 

19,170 

778,189 

432,170 

1,868,006 

468,836 

318,681 

1,231,023 

51,983 

329,997 

1,243,414 

26,574 

383,331 

296,821 

259,313 

100,266 

1,100,051 

487,349 

290,249 

251,575 

506,187 

43,014 

107,965 

16,401 

62,139,495 

792,061 

142,992 

56,086 

696,644 

194,486 

28,999 

382,028 

324,669 

533,576 

17,855 

1,421,873 

497,873 

299,287 

650,870 

485,527 

60,679 

464,558 

242,895 

240,228 

30,207 

441,097 

711,058 

644,137 

40,595 

616,613 

770,886 

406,572 

22,936 

268,701 

19,170 

778,189 

432,170 

1,868,006 

468,836 

318,681 

1,231,023 

51,983 

329,997 

1,243,414 

26,574 

383,331 

296,821 

259,313 

100,266 

1,100,051 

487,349 

290,249 

251,575 

506,187 

43,014 

107,965 

16,401 

62,139,495 

4,068,095 

1,635,565 

3,636,680 

3,548,747 

9,402,454 

4,466,760 

2,603,077 

2,014,322 

3,199,146 

3,431,417 

6,084,765 

4,967,053 

2,180,175 

5,250,998 

3,448,092 

4,409,508 

3,298,853 

2,076,364 

2,285,781 

1,814,043 

2,730,638 

4,600,339 

4,958,373 

3,763,121 

4,365,582 

5,406,502 

2,854,929 

1,549,151 

1,812,116 

1,457,653 

5,946,210 

2,154,577 

10.426,886 

2,057,323 

2,433,461 

9,105,066 

3,452,535 

2,629,751 

7,407,697 

2,312,041 

1,754,471 

2,160,005 

2,154,913 

5,528,973 

6,745,438 

2,570,675 

2,519,430 

1,610,528 

3,674,695 

2,667,937 

4,458,984 

1,418,048 

173,505,201 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

1 1 . 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15, 

16. 

17. 

18. 

19. 

20. 

2 1 , 

22. 

23. 

24. 

25. 

26. 

27. 

28. 

29. 

30. 

3 1 . 

32. 

33. 

34. 

35. 

36. 

37. 

38. 

39. 

40. 

4 1 . 

42. 

43. 

44. 

45. 

46. 

47. 

48 

49 

50. 

5 1 . 

52 

Alabama 

Alaska 

Arizona 

Arkansas 

California 

Colorado 

Connecticut 

Delaware 

District of Columbia 

Florida 

Georgia 

Hawaii 

Idaho 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Iowa 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Louisiana 

Maine 

Maryland 

Massachusetts 

Michigan 

Minnesota 

Mississippi 

Missouri 

Montana 

Nebraska 

Nevada 

New Hampshire 

New Jersey 

New Mexico 

New York 

North Carolina 

North Dakota 

Ohio 

Oklahoma 

Oregon 

Pennsylvania 

Puerto Rico 

Rhode Island 

South Carolina 

South Dakota 

Tennessee 

Texas 

Utah 

Vermont 

Virginia 

Washington 

West Virginia 

Wisconsin 

Wyoming 

Apportioned to Other T 

19,000 

36,826,603 36,826,603 137,984,554 

35,255 

1,979,639 1,979,639 1,979,639 

3,228,000 

3,894,000 

2,644,500 

12,000 

375,000 

23,333,253 23,333,253 23,333,253 

Hq Command 

National Guard Bureau 

Directorate of Administrative Services 

Lackland AFB, Texas 

Air Force Logistics Command 

Bureau of Yards and Docks 

Office, Corps of Engineers 

Military Airlift Command 

Aeronautical Chart & Information Center 

AFAFC Denver 




(Jam the Quaw 

\^_ > ii'dian in 'peace, Soldier in War. . . of security ani honor, for three centuries 

I haie been the custodian, I am the Quari. >^K^6Sj= 

I Was With Washington in the dim forests, fought the Wilt) Warrior, ani Watchei 

the iark night boW to the morning. *-j^§3^ Tit Concori's briige, I firei the fateful 

shot heari 'rouni the Worli. ~-<*gS^S> I blei on ^Bunker Hill, --^misr' My footprints 

markei the snoWs at Valley Torge. ••4§fs^=5 / pullei a muff lei oar on the barge that 

briigei the icy 'DelaWare. *-48jMM / stooi With Washington on the sun-irenchei heights 

of ]jorktoWn. *-^§§fe5 / saW the sWori surrenierei . . . I am the Quari. ,x^sB-' 

I pullei the trigger that loosei the long rifle's haioc at NeW Orleans.'-^m^- Ohese 

things I kneW-l Was there! *-^^fes I saW both siies of the War between the StatesI Was there! "-^^^= Ohe hill at San Juan felt the fury of my charge. ' She 

far plains ani mountains of the Philippines echoei to my shout. . . On the Mexican 

borier I stooi... 7 am the Quari. '-4S8&: £fhe iark forest of the Argonne blaiei With 

mil barrage. '^0S&'~ Chateauijhierrii crumblci to mu cannonaie. *-^8j^= Unier 

the arches of iictory I marchei in legion -I Was there! '^xpSg* / am the Quari. 

I boWei briefly on the grim Corregiior, then saW the light of liberation shine on the faces 

of my comraies. * J^ ^ Ohrough the jungle ani on the beaches. I fought the enemy, beat, 

batterei ani broke him. '-^ggS&S I raisei our banner to the serene air on OkinaWa - / 

scramblei oier Normaniy's beaches-1 Was there!.. . I am the Quari. *<SBSSS^ 'Across 

the 38th Parallel 1 maie my stani. "-&S& I fleW MIQ Alley - I Was there! . . . 

1 am the Quari. ^^S^Ss ^ 

£)oliier in War, civilian in peace. . . I am the Quari. -4s,^^^= 

/ Was' at JohnstoWn, Where the raging Waters boomei ioWn the Galley, '-^S ^ 

I crailei the crying chili in my arms ani saW the terror lea-fe her eyes. *-^SS " / moiti 

through smoke ani flame at CJexas City. *^g«rf" Ohe stricken kneW the comfort of 

my fii77.4n*£ / iroppei the fooi that fei the starting beast on the frozen fielis oj the 

West ani through the toWering irifts I ploughed to rescue the maroonei. '-^gjfei I haie 

facei forWari to the tornaio, the typhoon, ani the horror of the hurricane ani flood -

these things I knoW-1 Was there!... I am the Quard. I hate brought a more 

abundant, a fuller, a finer life to our youth. "-4SSS8-3 Whereter a strong arm and ialiant 

spirit must defend the Nation, in peace or War, Whereier a child cries, or a Woman 

Weeps in time of disaster, there I stand... I am the Quari.'-4&S&2 Tor three centuries 

a soldier in War, a civilian in peace- of security ani honor, I am the custoiian, noW ani 

forever. ..Iam the Quard. *^^g^ =