alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 

Jlu/Jiic 'J'r'lmsp11rltlti1111 Slrecls aud Highways Plmmiug 

August 14, 20 14 FR: Chrono 

Mr. Kevin Dick, District Health Officer 

Washoe County Health District 

P.O. Box 11130 

Reno, NV 89520-0027 

RE: REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE 

TRUCKEE MEADOWS 24-HOUR PM10 NON-ATTAINMENT AREA AND THE 

SECOND 10 YEAR MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE TRUCKEE MEADOWS 

8-HOUR CARBON MONOXIDE ATTAINMENT AREA 

Dear Kevin, 

Thank you for the opportunity to review the Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for 

the Truckee Meadows 24-Hour PM10 Non-Attainment Area and the Second 10-Year Maintenance 

Plan for the Truckee Meadows 8-Hour Carbon Monoxide Attainment Area. The RTC fully 

supports adoption of these documents. 

The RTC, as the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the area, uses the 

Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEB) developed in both of these documents for the 

transportation conformity analysis in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and the Regional 

Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). The new MVEBs will be incorporated into both 

the RTP and the RTIP. 

I would like to acknowledge the excellent working relationship that has been established 

between our two agencies. This relationship as well as the ongoing consultation with the 

Interagency Consultation Group, formally established with the adoption of the Transportation 

Conformity Plan, has been an effective method of discussion of air quality issues and 

disseminating information for the region. 

Should you need any additional information, please feel free to contact me at 335-1825. 

Sincerely, ...., 

olf / t:( ~ 

Amy Cummings, AICP/LEED AP 

Director of Planning 

AC/DG/jm 

/AQMD Redesignation Request 

RTC Board: Bonnie Weber (Chair) • Sharon Zadra (Vice Chair) · Neoma Jardon · David Humke · Ron Smith 

PO Box 30002, Reno, NV 89520 · 2050 Villanova Drive, Reno, NV 89502 · 775-348-0400 · rtcwashoe.com
#### Harvey, *vs.*Murrell.

*The inventory of an estate which might have been procured at the ¡ordinary’s 'office, cannot furnish ground for á bill of review, as newly discovered testimony. A receipt which could not have altered the original decree, cannot famish such ground.*

This is án Application to the court for leaVe tó file a bill of review,- on the' ground of the discovery of new matter. This matter is stated ip b‘e,- first; The inventory and appraisement of the estate of John Murrell, deceased: and secondly, a receipt *258which was In the hands of his executor, the existence oPwhicli was not known at the time of the trial.

*Gieen*& *Wilson,*for motion.

*R. Jl,*Taylor, contra*

In regard to the first, it is to be observed, that had it been considered as essential in the investigation of the case, it could have been easily procured by applying to the ordinary’s office, where it had been recorded, and having neglected to do so, furnishes no grounds for this application. The receipt alluded to is irrelevant to the subject matter in litigation, and if it had been, introduced, could in no manner whatever have altered or varied the decree, as it purports to be nothing more than an acknw-ledgment of John B. Murrell, that he had come to a settlement with the executor of his father, for his share of the estate. The courtis of opinion that the petitioner has not made out such a case as would authorize the granting the leave prayed for. It is therefore ordered that the application he discharged.

Decree affimed on appeal, by the whole court*
## Minnkota says new method for reducing emissions 'promising' 

# IPrairie Public Broadcasting Page 1 of2

Local Coverage:**~** General NewSJO Health & Environmenllo Oil Boom• Politics &Governmentoo
Minnkota Power 6:58AM VON AJGUSr '2 :0'3 

# Minnkota says new method for reducing emissions 'promising' By DAVE THOMPSON The president and CEO ofMinnkota PowerCooperative says the use ofwhat's called "Cy-Clean" at the Milton R. Young power plant near Center has helped reduce some of the plant's emissions- especially in terms ofmercmy. CyClean technology uses combustion additives that are added to the lignite coal before it's burned in the boiler. Minnkota CEO Mac McLennan says so far, the results are promising. "We found significant benefits on the mercury side," said McLennan. "We will, I think, be able to use the CyClean product to meet all ofour obligations for mercury control that the EPA will put in place in 2015. So we may not have to make any additional investments in mereul)· reduction, as a result ofputting ()'Clean on ourcoal." :McLennan says reductions in nitrous oxide have proven to be a little trickier. "So we have a big chemical expetiment, ifyou will, going on," said McLennan. "And we have four or five inputs to that, including C'yClcan, to try and find NOx reductions. We have seen NOx reductions-- but it's not consistent. But we are seeing progress." McLennan said coal comes in at different qualities, and that's a challenge. Before starting to use C)''Clean, Minnkota invested $425 million on emission controls. TAGS:**~1innkota** PfJ\Ver**(/tenn/minnk(,ta··pnv~·f•rl** dean coa]**(it(~rmiclean-·ro"ll** Related Content: Clean Coal Young station to roll out new clean. coal technology lioosuvoung·**stat1on~ro11~ou.t-new-clean**



## http:/ /news.prairiepublic.org/post/minnkota-says-new-method-reducing-emissions-promising 11 

## I512014

## Minnkota says new method for reducing emissions 'promising' 

# IPrairie Public Broadcasting Page 2 of2

0 Comments



## http:/ /news.prairiepublic.org/post/minnkota-says-new-method-reducing-emissions-promising 11 

## I512014
EXHIBIT 31.2

              SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, HUANG Chentai, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of China
Biopharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
      including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
      within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
      is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
      business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
      fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
      issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
      to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  August 28, 2006


/s/ HUANG Chentai
------------------------
HUANG Chentai
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                       79,893,679
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                65,093,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                (29,247,122)
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            131,864,051
<PP&E>                                       46,029,409
<DEPRECIATION>                              (7,362,886)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              298,123,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        24,398,924
<BONDS>                                     100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        224,210
<OTHER-SE>                                  148,667,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                298,123,847
<SALES>                                     189,960,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            189,960,735
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            169,409,935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,658,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              18,892,597
<INCOME-TAX>                                  6,836,066
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          12,056,531
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 12,056,531
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.54
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

        CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Keith Dressel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Meelick Acquisition Corporation on Form
10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Meelick Acquisition Corporation.

By:   /s/ Keith Dressel
      --------------------------------------
      Keith Dressel, Chief Executive Officer

I, Keith Dressel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Meelick Acquisition Corporation on Form
10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Meelick Acquisition Corporation.

By:   /s/ Keith Dressel
      --------------------------------------
      Keith Dressel, Chief Financial Officer
April 18, 2011


 


Vatsala Sharma


22338 La Quilla Drive


Los Angeles, CA 91311


 


		Re:	Eos Petro, Inc. Loan



 


Dear Vatsala Sharma:


 


Reference is made to the Secured
Promissory Note dated February 15, 2012, as subsequently amended (the “Loan”) by and between Eos Petro,
Inc. (“Eos”) and Vatsala Sharma (“Lender,” collectively referred to
with Eos as the “Parties”).


 


You are hereby requested in this
letter (this “Letter Agreement”) to indicate your agreement to, and acknowledgement of,
the following:


 


		1.	The Parties hereby agree that the maturity date of the Loan is extended to August 31, 2013.



 


		2.	The Parties hereby acknowledge that the following is a complete and accurate summary of the amount
loaned to Eos under the Loan, the interest accruing thereon, the maturity date of the Loan, as amended by this Letter Agreement,
and any consideration given or promised to be given to Lender under the Loan through the date first written above:



 


On February 15 and 16, 2012, Eos executed a series
of agreements with Lender in order to secure a $400,000 bridge loan. This amount was subsequently increased to $600,000 (the “Loan”).
This Loan bears interest at 18% per year, and the Loan’s maturity date is August 31, 2013. The Loan is personally guaranteed
by Mr. Konstant, Eos’ CEO, and some of his personal assets. It is also secured by a first priority security interest in Eos’
Works Property and any of Eos’ newly-acquired assets. As additional consideration for the Loan, Lender received 400,000 restricted
shares of Eos’ common stock. These shares of common stock were subsequently converted into an equal number of restricted
shares of Series B preferred stock of Cellteck, Inc., Eos’ parent company, on October 12, 2012 pursuant to the terms of a
merger agreement between Cellteck, Inc. and Eos. If the Loan is not repaid by the maturity date, Cellteck, Inc. will issue to Lender
275,000 restricted shares of its common stock.


 


[Remainder of this page intentionally
left blank. Signature page follows.]


 




    	Page 1



    	 



    

 


Please acknowledge your agreement
to, and acceptance of, the foregoing by signing this Letter Agreement below. Please return a signed copy to the undersigned, it
being agreed that this Letter Agreement may be executed in counterparts and signatures received by electronic transmission shall
have the same effect as original signatures.


 


Sincerely,


 


NIKOLAS KONSTANT, signing in his individual
capacity and as the CEO of Eos Petro, Inc., a Delaware corporation


 


	/s/ Nikolas Konstant


 


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO ON APRIL 24, 2013 BY:



 


	VATSALA SHARMA	 
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Vatsala Sharma	 
	Name:	Vatsala Sharma	 
	Title:	Owner	 


 




    	Page 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------

     In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Absolute Waste Services, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:

          1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
               and

          2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



                                            /s/  Thomas F. Duszynski
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Thomas F. Duszynski
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                            Date:    May 27, 2005

     This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise
subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF LINDA BRYSON


                        CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

      In connection with the Annual Report of Quantum Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
 the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Linda Bryson, Sec/Tres of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: March 25, 2005                                   By: /s/ Linda Bryson
                                                        -----------------
                                                              Linda Bryson
                                                               Sec/Tres/CFO
(March 15, 2004)

#### Anonymous, Respondent, v Anonymous, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 866]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (LaMarca, J.), dated May 27, 2003, which, inter *517alia, granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 which was to conduct a mental examination of the defendant and denied the defendant’s cross motion for a protective order pursuant to CPLR 3103 (a), and to vacate the plaintiffs notice to submit to a mental examination.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

CPLR 3121 (a) provides that when the mental or physical condition of a party is in controversy, any party may serve notice on another party to submit to a physical or mental examination by a designated physician. It is a generally accepted principle that parties to a contested custody proceeding place their physical and mental conditions in issue *(see Rosenblitt v Rosenblitt,*107 AD2d 292, 293-294 [1985]). Furthermore, the value of psychiatric evaluations of both the children and the parents in a matrimonial custody dispute has long been recognized by the courts of this state *(see Rosenblitt v Rosenblitt, supra*at 297).

In view of the Supreme Court’s determination that the court-appointed physician’s findings were inconsistent, it properly directed the defendant to submit to a psychiatric examination and psychological testing, especially since the defendant has a diagnosed mental disorder *(see Sardella v Sardella,*125 AD2d 384 [1986]; *cf. Rosenblitt v Rosenblitt, supra*at 295).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3860 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3860

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Propanenitrile, 3-[[4-
            [(substituted)azo]phenyl] (substituted)amino]-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Propanenitrile, 3-[[4-
            [(substituted)azo]phenyl] (substituted)amino]-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROPANENITRILE, 3-[[4-[(SUBSTITUTED)AZO]PHENYL] 
              (SUBSTITUTED)AMINO]-.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Propanenitrile, 3-  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        [[4-                                                               31/2011.......
                        [(substituted)azo
                        ]
                        phenyl](substitut
                        ed)amino]-. (CAS
                        No. P 99-539)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2921.59.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Lennon,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ JOHN LENNON
John Lennon
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 4, 2005