alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10.2


GREAT
ROCK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION


 


MINUTES
of a Meeting of the Board of Directors of Great Rock Development Corporation held via teleconference, with Mr. Danny Wong
in Oakville Canada and Dr. Luc Duchesne in Ottawa, starting 14:30 PM eastern standard time, on the 19th of April, 2013.


 


Present:


 


Danny
Wong and Dr. Luc C. Duchesne, being a quorum of the members of the board of directors


 


The
Directors waived notice of the Meeting:


 


Chairman
& Secretary:


 


Dr.
Duchesne took the Chair and Mr. Wong accepted the invitation to act as Secretary and record the Minutes of the Meeting.


 


The
Chairman stated that the Meeting was called to discuss the acquisition of rare earth mineral rights for The Byers Book and Shatter
Lake Claims of Colchester County in Nova Scotia from NSU Resources Inc in exchange for 2 M restricted shares (Rule 144) of Great
Rock Development Corporation. Said shares to remain restricted for a period of 2 years.


 


Dr
Duchesne reported a conflict of interest as he is currently a beneficiary owner of shares of NSU Resources Inc.


 


RESOLVED,
that the board of Directors hereby accepts the purchase of the Byers Brook and Shatter Lake mineral rights from NSU Resources
Inc.


	




 


	Date:  April 29th, 2013	Great Rock Development Corporation
	 	By	/s/ Danny Wong
	 	 	Name: Danny Wong








 



Abstains
from voting             


Luc
C Duchesne


Director


 



 


Termination
of Meeting:


 


There
being no further business to discuss, the meeting was terminated.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10429

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee

v.

JOHNNY LEE REED,

Defendant–Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:97-CR-18-1

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Johnny Lee Reed, federal prisoner #31011-077, appeals the district court’s

denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence following the

recent amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines for crack cocaine offenses.

Reed argues that the district court’s denial of his motion was an abuse of

discretion because he has a positive prison record, he is no longer a threat to the

community, and by relying on factors, such as the seriousness of his offense and

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 19, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 08-10429 Document: 00511267556 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/19/2010
No. 08-10429

his criminal history, that were already accounted for in the original sentencing

calculations.

Section 3582(c)(2) permits the discretionary reduction of a defendant’s

sentence where the sentencing range is later lowered by the Sentencing

Commission. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). In such cases, the district court may

reduce the sentence after considering the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors

and the applicable guidelines policy statements. Id. A district court’s decision

whether to reduce a sentence is reviewed for an abuse of discretion, and its

interpretation of the Guidelines is reviewed de novo. United States v. Evans, 587

F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3462 (2010). If the record

shows that the district court gave due consideration to the motion as a whole and

implicitly considered the § 3553(a) factors, there is no abuse of discretion. See

United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1010 (5th Cir. 1995).

The district court considered Reed’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, his attachments,

and the Government’s response. It also stated that it had considered the

§ 3553(a) factors and concluded that it would not reduce Reed’s sentence in light

of the serious nature of his offense and his criminal history. See § 3553(a)(1),

(2)(A)-(C). Because the record reflects consideration of Reed’s motion and the

§ 3553(a) factors, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the

motion. See Whitebird, 55 F.3d at 1010.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 08-10429 Document: 00511267556 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/19/2010
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Shmuel Arvatz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
March 31, 2001 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd.


                                         By:    /s/ SHMUEL ARVATZ
                                                -----------------
                                         Name:  Shmuel Arvatz
                                         Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                         PAGE 32
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000             MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000             MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                         355,364               1,073,196
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,341                 136,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    176,163                 201,555
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               688,668               1,420,284
<PP&E>                                         260,581               1,393,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                 156,749                 299,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,432,599               4,447,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,346,390               1,812,503
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,122,188                       0
<COMMON>                                     3,519,824               3,488,665
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,432,599               4,447,720
<SALES>                                      1,161,764                 899,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,301,355              46,381,668
<CGS>                                        1,221,247                 765,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,360,838              46,247,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,973,344               4,872,676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,332,335)               (516,948)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,632,232)             (5,709,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,669                   2,684
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,639,901)             (5,711,964)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,639,901)             (5,711,964)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.05)                  (1.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1









            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement Nos.
333-105380,  333-95705,  333-01969,  333-17823, 333-17825, 333-70656, 333-87890,
333-115677,  and  333-124967 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 28, 2007,
relating to the consolidated  financial statements of Applebee's  International,
Inc. and subsidiaries (which report included an explanatory  paragraph regarding
a change in accounting for stock-based  compensation  upon adoption of Statement
of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No.  123(R),  "Share-Based  Payment")  and
management's  report on the  effectiveness  of internal  control over  financial
reporting,   appearing  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  of  Applebee's
International,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  for the fiscal year ended  December 31,
2006.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
February 28, 2007
10312

#### STATE v. LLOYD.

(101 S. E. 666.)

1. Criminal Law — Appeal Dismissed Whebe No Argument. — Where an accused, convicted of crime, has not filed an argument, his appeal will be dismissed.

2. Criminal Law — Qusetion op Fact Not Reviewable. — The Supreme* Court has no jurisdiction to pass upon questions of fact.

Before Si-iipp, J., Lexington, Fall term, 1919.

Appeal dismissed.

Proceedings between the State and B. R. Lloyd, and from the judgment, Lloyd appeals.

*Mr. Barnard B. Bvans,*for appellant.

*Mr. Geo. B.*Timmerman, Solicitor, for the State.

December 22, 1919.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This appeal is dismissed for two reasons:

1 1. The appellant has not filed an argument.

2 2. The only questions raised are questions of fact, and this Court has no jurisdiction to pass upon them.

The appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit
      32.1






CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Rudy 45, a Nevada corporation (the
      “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), David Zanardi, Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
      certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350),
      that to his knowledge:






(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




February
                  21, 2007/s/ David
                  ZanardiDavid
                    Zanardi
                  Chief
                      Executive Officer,
                      Chief
                        Financial Officer and
                        Principal
                          Accounting
                          Officer


[A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Microsoft Corporation and will be retained by Rudy 45 and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00160

- CR

ARACELI TELLO

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 02891

- CRF

- 272

A B A T E M E N T ORDER

The appellant’s brief is overdue in this appeal. The Clerk of the Court’s April 11,

2014 letter to appellant’s counsel states:

Our records indicate that the appellant’s brief was due on or before April 3, 2014. To date, no brief has been filed.

You will notice that the trial court has been copied with this letter as required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2). Presumably, the purpose of notifying the trial court is to allow intervention by the trial court before the Court has to formally abate the proceeding for a hearing.Tello v. State Page 2 Unless a brief or satisfactory respon se is received within 14 days, this Court must abate the appeal and order the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2) & (3).

Because appellant’s brief was not filed within 14 days, w e abate this appeal to the

trial court to conduct any necessary hearings within 21 days of the date of this o rder in

accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and (3). T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

38.8(b)(2), (3).

The supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records required by the rule, if any, are

ordered to be filed within 3 5 days of the date of this Order. See id

.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis , and
Justice Scoggins

Cause abated

Order issued and filed May 8, 2014

Do n ot p ublish
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-34642) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc. 1995 Incentive Award Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-22159) pertaining to the Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333-45689 and 333-69641) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Advanced
Lighting Technologies, Inc. 1998 Incentive Award Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-45695) pertaining to the Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc. 1997 Billion Dollar Market Capitalization Incentive Award
Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-58613) pertaining to the
Company's securities and securities of ADLT Trust I and in the Registration
Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-58621) pertaining to the Company's securities of our
report dated September 11, 2000, except for the fourth sentence of the second
paragraph of Note N, as to which the date is September 25, 2000, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc. as
of June 30, 2000 and 1999 and for each of the two years in the period ended June
30, 2000, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30,
2000.


                                                          /s/ Grant Thornton LLP



Cleveland, Ohio
September 11, 2000
# Ohio National Guard works with Serbian partners during Cyber Tesla 2017 exercise

/ Published Oct. 13, 2017

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Members of the Ohio National Guard and Serbian Armed Forces joined together to carry out the second annual Cyber Tesla exercise Sept. 11-14 at two locations — in Ohio and Serbia.

 "The exercise consisted of identifying gaps in group effort mechanisms and communication, with the main focus on examining the cyber incident response and preparation process," said Lt. Col. Terri Williams, G6/J6 chief information officer for the Ohio National Guard. "The incident process to a cyberattack consists of six steps — preparation, identification, containment, eradication, recovery and lessons learned. Cyber Tesla is the preparation phase but it rehearses the actions of the remaining five steps."

 Since 2006, the Ohio National Guard has been paired with Serbia through the State Partnership Program,which pairs states with countries around the world for the purpose of supporting security cooperation between the U.S. and other nations. 

 Maj. Kevin Mamula, Ohio's Computer Network Defense Team (main) lead, relocated with his team to Gornji Milanovac, Serbia, to give the exercise the feel of a real-life scenario.

 "The Ohio National Guard partnering with the Serbian Armed Forces, in a common goal of Cyber Security for public welfare, has been very gratifying and hope for continued effort against unlawfulness toward public interests," Mamula said. "While cyber exercises provide a controlled environment to practice the complexity of incident handling, this exercise also helped show the Serbians how to refine their cyber security range."

 Capt. Scotty Jackson, a member of the Joint Force Headquarters-Ohio cyber team and team lead (for the stateside effort), along with other members of the Ohio National Guard cyber team, worked alongside Capt. Marko Papovic, Serbian Armed Forces desk officer for information technology, and Capt. Bojan Milosevic, SAF analyst for information systems security, from the Maj. Gen. Robert S. Beightler Armory in Columbus, Ohio.

 "The Cyber Tesla exercise was a remarkable event," Jackson said. "The partnership I observed between Ohio and Serbia's cyber warriors was highly effective and both organizations benefitted from this successful exercise."

 Cyber Shield, the national exercise, has yet to open its doors to states' partner nation pairings through the National Guard State Partnership Program, so both parties said that having the chance to practice one-on-one with each other proved highly advantageous to both parties.

 "This was the first year that system assets were distributed across country borders," Jackson said. "This is impactful, due to it is more representative of a geographically dispersed enterprise network."

 Added Williams: "Maj. Mamula's planning experience and technical expertise have been an underlying reason that the exercise has continued to increase exponentially in just two short years. The Serbians have countered with an outstanding level of enthusiasm, participation and skill that has contributed to the exceptional success of the program."
# Odierno unveils vision for Army's future role

/ Published Dec. 20, 2011

WASHINGTON - The following information is from an Army Live Blog, which Army Gen. Raymond Odierno, the 38th chief of staff of the Army, conducted on Dec. 12.

"There is much discussion in the halls of the Pentagon these days about the role of the Army, and I'd like to share with you my thoughts on the issue."

"Without question, ten years of war and today's austere economic environment will have a profound impact on our Army. But to put it simply: in these uncertain times - perhaps especially in these uncertain times - the Army is central to our nation's defense. Specifically, the Army has three roles to play."

"First, our Army must prevent conflict. Prevention requires a credible force with sufficient capacity, readiness and modernization. Our ability and will to win any fight cannot be open to challenge. As part of a joint force, we must be clear that we can fight and win across the full spectrum of conflict. That means realistic training, expert leaders, modern equipment, and quality Soldiers. Prevention is achieved by convincing your potential opponents that armed conflict with your force would be extremely unwise."

"Our land forces must continue to be a credible force around the globe."

"Second, our Army must help shape the international environment so our friends are enabled and our enemies contained. We do that by engaging with our partners, fostering mutual understanding through military-to-military contacts, and helping partners build the capacity to defend themselves."

"This is an investment in the future, and an investment we cannot afford to forego. It is cultivating friends before you need them, being a reliable, consistent, and respectful partner."

"Finally, we must be ready to win decisively and dominantly. If we do not, we pay the price in American lives. When MacArthur said, "In war there is no substitute for victory," he was making a plain statement of fact."

"Nothing else can approach what is achieved by winning, and the consequences of losing at war are usually catastrophic. With so much at stake, the American people will expect what they have always expected of us: to never lightly enter into such a terrible endeavor, but once there to win and win decisively."

"This "prevent, shape, win" construct captures the Army's unique role as part of the joint force, and rests upon the capabilities, depth, and vast experience resident within our Army. When combined with the capabilities of the Navy, the Air Force, and the Marines, the United States remains - and will remain - a force to be reckoned with. As we, the Army, continue to adapt to future strategic challenges, including resource constraints, we must ensure sufficient attention to each role."

Gen. Raymond T. Odierno

Chief of Staff of the Army
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | this quarterly report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents,
               in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
               Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 4, 2004 |                                                                                                              
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | /s/ Gary C. Evans Gary C. Evans, Chairman President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)