alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Tom Gill, Chief Financial Officer of Moventis Capital, Inc., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Moventis Capital, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|                   |                          
|------------------ | -------------------------
|                   |                          
|Date: May 16, 2007 | /s/ Tom Gill             
|                   | Tom Gill, Chief Financial
|                   | Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3948

_____________________________
H UNTER T YLER L AFOE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court f or Escambia County

. Edward P. Nickinson
, III, Judge

.
March 2 9 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and B ILBREY and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
pennsyLvania 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

SECRETARY 

MAY 24 2011 

May 17, 2011 

EPA. REGION III OFiACBOFR~ONALAD~MSTRATOR 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region III (3RAOO) 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19lO3-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, has requested Pennsylvania's 

recommendation to list the Metro Container Site located in Trainer Borough, Delaware County, 

on the CERCLA (Superfund) National Priority List (NPL). The Department ofEnvironmental 

Protection has evaluated the Metro Container Site in accordance with the Environmental Cleanup 

Program policy and concurs with EPA's request to pursue its listing on the NPL. 

The continued cooperation ofthe federal and state government to implement the Superfund 

program is an essential element to its success. Pennsylvania's commitment to this partnership 

and implementation ofthe Commonwealth's Environmental Cleanup Program will ensure the 

goals of both programs are achieved. 

If you have any questions regarding this site or Pennsylvania's participation in the Superfund 

program, please contact Kenneth R. Reisinger, Acting Deputy Secretary for Waste, Air and 

Radiation Management, bye-mail at kereisinge@state.pa.us or telephone at 717.772.2724. You 

may also contact Joseph A. Feola, Director ofthe Southeast Regional Office, bye-mail at 

jfeola@state.pa.us or telephone at 484.250.5942. 

Secretary 

Rachel Carson State Office Building I P.O. Box 206 I Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 

Printed on Recycled Paper 

717.783.2814 www.depweb.state.pa.us
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-22-00453-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding 

County Court at Law No. 1 of Parker County, Texas 

Trial Court No. CIV-22-0567 

Before Walker, Birdwell, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE EVAN MCSHIRLEY, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

We have considered relator’s “Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of 

Mandamus.” We grant the motion and dismiss this original proceeding. 

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 1, 2022
Exhibit 10.35

Millennium
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has entered into an employment offer letter on substantially the terms set forth in the attached employment offer letter with each of the below-named executive
officers of Millennium, on the dates indicated:

|Name of Executive Officer            |  | Date of Execution             
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|Linda K. Pine
Robert I. Tepper, M.D. |  | September 27, 1994
May 5, 1994

---



DATE

NAME
ADDRESS

Dear

On
behalf of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), I am pleased to offer you the position of XXXX reporting to XXXX.





---







---



XXXX

XXXX,
all of us here at Millennium are very enthusiastic about your commitment to joining the Company and have the highest expectation of your future contributions.

Please
indicate your acceptance of the foregoing by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to the Company no later than XXXX. After that date, the offer will lapse.

Very
truly yours,
MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

XXXX
XXXX

The
foregoing is signed and accepted as of the date first above written by:

|       |  |  |  |      |  | 
|------ |  |  |  | ---- |  | 
|XXXXXX |  |  |  | Date |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Barham, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 580]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 1, 1999 *(People v Barham,*266 AD2d 226 [1999]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County, rendered March 11, 1998.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.46






Exhibit 4.46




Supplementary Agreement No. 2 to the Equity Pledge Agreement




This Supplementary Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made by and among the following parties in
Beijing on May 27, 2010:



Party A: AirMedia Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.



Party B: Guo Man, Xu Qing




Party C: Beijing AirMedia UC Advertising Co., Ltd.



WHEREAS:




	 	(1)	 	Parties A, Party B and Wang Zhenyu have entered into a certain equity pledge agreement
dated June 14, 2007 (“Original Agreement”), and a certain supplement to the Original
Agreement dated November 2008 (“Original Supplementary Agreement”), whereby Party B agreed
to pledge its ownership in Party C’s equity in favor of Party A;






	 	(2)	 	The registered capital of Party C has been increased to RMB80 million from RMB65
million as of January 5, 2010; and






	 	(3)	 	Upon completion of the registered capital increase by Party C, the shareholding
percentages of Guo Man, Xu Qing and Party C are changed to 1.035%, 0.215% and 98.75%,
respectively.





NOW, THEREFORE, after friendly negotiations, Parties A, B and C agree to amend the Original
Agreement, and intend to be bound, as follows:



1. Section (3) in the Preamble of the Original Agreement is amended to: the registered capital
increase by Party C has resulted in changes in the percentages of shareholding in Party C by Guo
Man and Xu Qing; Guo Man and Xu Qing now hold 1.035% and 0.215% equity interest in Party C,
respectively. Party B pledges, and Party A agrees to accept the pledge of, all of its ownership of
the equity of Party C in favor of Party A to secure the performance of payment obligations by Party
B and Party C under the Master Agreement.



2. Section 1 of the Original Agreement is amended to: Each of Guo Man and Xu Qing agrees to
pledge all of his respective ownership of 1.035% equity and 0.215% equity in Party C (the “Pledged
Equity”) in favor of Party A to secure performance by Party B of its obligations under the Loan
Agreement, as supplemented, between Party B and Party A, and by Party C of its obligations under
the Technology Development Agreement and the Technology Support and Services Agreement, as
supplemented, between Party C and Party A.



3. Upon effectiveness of this Agreement, in case there are any differences in terms between the
Original Agreement/the Original Supplementary Agreement and this Agreement, this Agreement shall
prevail; terms absent from this Agreement shall be governed by the Original Agreement and/or the
Original Supplementary Agreement.


4. This Agreement is effective upon the signature and/or stamp of common seal by all parties to
this Agreement. This Agreement shall be signed in six counterparts, two of which shall be kept by
each of Party A, Party B and Party C. Each copy shall have the same legal effect.




 


 









 





(signature page)




Party A: AirMedia Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.

Common seal: AirMedia Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (Seal)



Party B:

By: /s/ Guo Man



By: /s/ Xu Qing




Party C: Beijing AirMedia UC Advertising Co., Ltd.

Common seal: Beijing AirMedia UC Advertising Co., Ltd. (Seal)


 


2
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. PD-0572-20 TIMOTHY DONHAM, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEX AS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DALLAS COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in w hich SLAUGHTER, J., joined. O P I N I O N Appellant w as convicted of arson and sentenced to six y ears in prison. In the bill of costs, the trial court assessed Appellant a $25 tim e pay m ent f ee. S ee T E X . L O C A L G O V ’ T C O D E § 133.103. O n appeal, the Court of Appeals struck a por t i o n o f t h a t f ee as beingTIMOTHY DONHAM - 2

unconstitutional. Donham v. State , No. 05-19-00764-CR & No. 05-19-00765 (Tex. App.

– Dallas May

27, 2020). The State has f

iled a petiti o n f

or discretionary r eview challenging the court’s constitutional analy sis. W e recently hand e d d o w n our opinion in Dulin v. State , Nos. PD0856-19 & PD-0857-19, 2021 Tex. Crim

. App. LEXIS 273 (Tex. Crim

. App. Mar. 31, 2021), in w hich we held that the tim e pay m ent f ee was assessed prem aturely because the p endency of appeal suspends the obligation to pay court c osts. A s a result, t here was no need to reach the State’s constitutional argum ents. W e grant review on our own m otion of the f ollowing ground: Should the “Tim e Pay

m ent Fee” be struck as prem aturely assessed? Addressing that ground in light of Dulin , we vacate t he judgm ent of the Court of Appeals, and rem and this case to the Court of Appeals f

or proceedings consistent with this opinion. The State’s petition is ref used.
DATE DELIVERED: May 12, 2021 DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles R. Waldron, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September 28, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of the operations of Learning Tree International, Inc.



|                        |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: December 11, 2007 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ CHARLES R. WALDRON 
|                        |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Charles R. Waldron     
|                        |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Drayton *vs.*Drayton.

case *xxiv.*

B. B^p. 85.

Case of elec' ^adTby the minors six coming of a£e*

It was decreed that the complainants Ann andSusant nah have six months after coming of age to make their *election,*either to take their share of the estate devised by their grandmother to the testator’s children, after his death, or the legacies bequeathed to them by the testator, and in case they choose the former, that they abate the value thereof from their legacies: That the costs be paid out of the testator’s estate-.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 19, 2022 No. 04-22-00273-CV IN THE INTEREST OF E.M.E AND E.D.E. , Children From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA02152 Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX . R. J UD . A DMIN . 6.2. Appellant’s brief was due July 12, 2022. This court’s Clerk’s Office contacted appellant’s court-appointed counsel, Marco Cabrera, who indicated he would file a brief with this court by Friday, July 22, 2022. We hereby order appellant’s counsel, Marco Cabrera, to file appellant’s brief no later than July 25, 2022 . Because of the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

It is so ORDERED on July 19, 2022. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
<PAGE>
 
SULLIVAN BROADCASTING HOLDINGS, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES OF SULLIVAN BROADCASTING HOLDINGS, INC.             EXHIBIT 21.1


Sullivan Broadcasting Company, Inc.
Sullivan Holdings of Nevada, Inc.
Sullivan Broadcasting of Tennessee, Inc.
Sullivan Broadcasting Management Services, Inc.
Sullivan Broadcasting of Dayton, Inc.
Sullivan Broadcasting of Charleston, Inc.
Sullivan Broadcasting of Rochester, Inc.
Sullivan Broadcasting of Nashville, Inc.
Sullivan Broadcasting of Richmond, Inc.
Sullivan Broadcasting of West Virginia, Inc.
Sullivan Broadcasting of Buffalo, Inc.
Sullivan Broadcasting of Utica, Inc.
Sullivan Broadcasting License Corp.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 VAPOR CORP. 
 3001 Griffin Road 

Dania Beach, Florida 33312 
 April 30, 2013 
 VIA E-MAIL 

Kevin Frija, as the holder 
 of the Senior
Convertible Note referred to below 
 Dear Mr. Frija, 

Reference is made to that certain Senior Convertible Note, dated September 28, 2012, of Vapor Corp. in the principal amount of
$50,000 payable to you, as the initial registered holder thereof, as amended by that certain extension agreement, dated as of November 13, 2012 (as may be further amended, the “Note”). All capitalized terms used in this Letter
Amendment, but not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Note. 
 1. The purpose of this
Letter Amendment is memorialize our oral agreement to amend the Note to eliminate the redemption provision at the option of the Holder. 
 2. In accordance with Section 1 hereof, clause (d) of Section 1 (Calculation of Interest; Payments of Principal and Interest; Redemption by Holder) of the Note is hereby deleted in its
entirety and clause (e) of said Section is hereby amended to be restated as clause (d). 
 3. In connection herewith, the
Company hereby represents and warrants to the Holder that no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing under the Note as of the date hereof and none will occur immediately after giving effect to this Letter Amendment. 

4. This Letter Amendment shall be effective as of March 31, 2013. Except as expressly amended by this Letter Amendment, the Note
shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. This Letter Amendment constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior oral or
written understandings and agreements between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Letter Amendment may be executed and delivered (by facsimile, e-mail or other electronic transmission) in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement. Section 10 (Governing Law; Dispute Resolution) of the Note is hereby incorporated by reference herein and made a part hereof as if fully set
forth herein. 
 [Intentionally Left Blank; Signature Page Follows] 







 If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please countersign and date this Letter Amendment in
the space provided below and return a countersigned and dated copy to us by e-mail. 
  

			
	Sincerely,
	
	Vapor Corp.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Harlan Press

	Name:	 	Harlan Press
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer


 Acknowledged and Agreed to the date hereof: 

 

					
	Holder	 	 	 	 
			
	 /s/ Kevin Frija
	 		 	
	Kevin Frija	 		 	


  
 8
Engagement
Letter

    


    Mr.
Zhengyi Wang:

    


    The
Office of the Chief Executive Offier’s Committee, due to business needs, has
hereby decided to engage you as a Consultant of our company from January 1, 2010
to December 31, 2010 at a monthly salary of RMB 6,000.

    


    Seal:
Kunming Shenghuo Pharmaceutical (Group) Co, Ltd

    


    Date:
December 24, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, RICHARD OKUMOTO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Photon Dynamics, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

/s/ RICHARD OKUMOTO
-------------------
RICHARD OKUMOTO
SECRETARY AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Date: December 14, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

 CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON PULLIAM

 JUSTICES

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER 

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX

KEITH E. HOTTLE 

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335-2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335-2762

August 5, 2015

Andrew Warthen

Paul Elizondo Tower

101 W. Nueva St.

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Angela J. Moore

Assistant Public Defender

Paul Elizondo Tower

101 W. Nueva St., Suite 310

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-14-00699-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 2012CR6188A

Style: Jerimiah Barefield v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The above cause has been set for formal submission ON BRIEFS ONLY before this 

Court on Wednesday, September 2, 2015, before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Sandee 

Bryan Marion, Justice Karen Angelini, and Justice Jason Pulliam.

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853