alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT AUG 6, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 07- 1086 0 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 06-01705 -CV -BBM- 1 GEORGE A. LOGAN, PlaintiffCo unt er D ef en da ntAppe llant, ve rs us M A J O R DA M I A N G. F I N C H , I n d i v i du a l l y, J o i n t l y, a n di n h i s o f f i c i a l c ap a c i t y, SGT. J.P. BOGOLIN, Ind iv id ua ll y , Jo in tl y , and in hi s o ffi ci al cap aci ty, etal., D ef en da nts
Co unt er Cl ai m an tsAppe lle es .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the N orthe rnD istri ct

of G eo rg ia

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ (A ug us t 6, 200 7) Be fo re BI RC H , P RY O R and C O X , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:Fulton County District Attorney

Paul Howar d sent a letter to L og an’s c riminal attorney 1 which stated that “[a]lt houg h police were justi fied in arr esting Mr. L og an under the circ umstances with which they

wer e pre sented, my

communication with o ff i ci als at the Public Safety Training Center of Geor g ia sug g est that succe ssful prosec ution is not likely
. In light of your client’s se rvice to the City of Atlanta and his status as a r etired of fice r, I have de cided not to proc eed on the char g es ag ainst him.” (R.1-23 Ex. 4.) 2 Ge orge A. Logan appeals following the district court’ s grant of summ ary j udgm ent in favor of Maj or Dam ian G. Finch, S ergeant Joseph Bogo l i n, O ffice r Z ac he ry K ram er , O ff

ic er D av id C le m

m ons, Ch ie f Ri ch ar d Pe nni ngt on, a nd the Ci ty of At l a n t a , Geor gi a. Bo go li n, Cl emm on s, Kram er, an d F in ch arre st edLog an , a
re tir ed Ci ty of A tlanta pol ic e of

ficer , f or the f el ony of im pe rs ona tin g a n of

fi ce r in vio la tio n of

O
. C. G
. A
. § 16 -1 0- 23. A lth oughhe w as ar re ste d f or the c ri m e, he w as not ind ic te d. S ub se qu en t to t he a rr es t and the de ci sio n no t t o pr oc ee d onthe c ha rg es , 1 Log an fil edth is su it
. T he dis tr ic t co urt gr an te d sum m ar y j udgm en t to al l ind ivi dua l de fe ndants , but
or de re d th e Ci ty

of A tlanta to pro vid e pr oof it did not m ai nta in l ia

bil ity ins ur an ce f

or inc ide nts inv olv ing f

al se a rr es t or

pol ic e br uta lity ag ai nst its ci tiz en s w ith in t enda y s. Th e C i t y d i ds o a n dt h e c o u rtt h e n g r a n t e d s u mm a ry ju d g men ti n f a v o r o f t h e C i t y. Thi s ap pe al fol lo wed
. W e re vie w the dis tr ic t cour t’ s grant of sum

m ar y j udgm en t de novo, usi ng the
sa m e le ga l st an da rd s us ed by t he dis tr ic t c ourt. H av ing tho ro ughl y r ev ie w ed

the3

br ie fs a nd the r ec or d onappe al , w e ho ld th at the dis tr ic t c ourt pr ope rl y gr an te d a ll de fen da nt s s umm ary jud gm en t. AFFIR MED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6350

RICHARD CHILDS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Office of the Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-3412-AW) Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998 Before ERVIN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Childs, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Childs v. Smith , No. CA-97-3412-AW (D. Md. Feb. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3924 

To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from further regulating 

the Internet. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mrs. BLACKBURN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from 

further regulating the Internet. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Real Stimulus Act of 

5 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY OF THE FCC. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Federal Communications 

8 Commission shall not propose, promulgate, or issue any 

9 regulations regarding the Internet or IP-enabled services. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3924 IH

1 (b) EXCEPTION.—The limitation set forth in this sec2 tion shall not apply to any regulations that the Commis3 sion determines necessary— 

4 (1) to prevent damage to the national security 

5 of the United States; 

6 (2) to ensure the public safety; or 

7 (3) to assist or facilitate any actions taken by 

8 a Federal or State law enforcement agency. 

9 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec10 tion shall be construed to supersede, repeal, or negate any 

11 regulations regarding the Internet or IP-enabled services 

12 that were in effect on the day before the date of enactment 

13 of this Act, including any regulations established pursuant 

14 to the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement 

15 Act (47 U.S.C. 1001 note). 

16 (d) GENERAL PRINCIPLES.—Congress finds that— 

17 (1) the Internet and all IP-enabled services are 

18 services affecting interstate commerce; and 

19 (2) such services are not be subject to the juris20 diction of any State or municipal locality. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 4, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00556-CV

VENUGOPAL REDDY THIYYAGURA, Appellant

V.

ITRIA VENTURES LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 400th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 21-DCV-289796

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 28, 2022. The notice of 

appeal was filed July 27, 2022. To date, our records show that appellant has not

paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in 

civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying 

costs). Tex. Gov’t Code § 51.207 (appellate fees and costs).

On September 8, 2022, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate 

filing fee on or before September 19, 2022, or the appeal would be dismissed. 
2

Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s 

order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice 

from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 20468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08782]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1976]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 80 Under Alternative Site 
Framework San Antonio, Texas

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of 
zones;
    Whereas, the City of San Antonio, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 80, 
submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-77-2014, docketed 
October 22, 2014) for authority to reorganize under the ASF with a 
service area of Bexar County in its entirety and portions of Comal and 
Guadalupe Counties, Texas, in and adjacent to the San Antonio Customs 
and Border Protection port of entry, to renumber existing Site 7A as 
Site 7, to renumber existing Site 7B as Site 11, and FTZ 80's Sites 1 
through 11 (as renumbered) would be categorized as magnet sites;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (79 FR 64169, October 28, 2014) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 80 under the ASF is approved, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec.  
400.13, to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the 
zone, and to an ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would 
terminate authority for Sites 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 if not 
activated within five years from the month of approval.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of April, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08782 Filed 4-15-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
FORM 8-K


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549



                                 CURRENT REPORT

                Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
                              Exchange Act of 1934


                                  March 8, 1999
                                 Date of Report



                                AJAY SPORTS, INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


                  Delaware             0-18204             39-1644025
               ----------------       -------------       --------------
               (State or other         (Commission       (I.R.S. Employer
                jurisdiction of         file number)      Identification Number)
                incorporation or
                organization)


         1501 E. Wisconsin Street
         Delavan, WI                                     53115
         ----------------------------------------        ----------
         (Address of Principal Executive Offices)        (Zip Code)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (414) 728-5521


                                       N/A
               ---------------------------------------------------
           Former name or former address, if changed from last report


<PAGE>

 ITEM 5:  Other Events

      On March 8, 1999, Ajay Sports,  Inc. (the "Registrant")  announced that it
had signed a license  agreement with Gary Player Group, Inc. that will cover the
Registrant's design, manufacture, promotion, distribution and sale of golf bags,
golf gloves,  pull-type  golf carts and golf  accessories  sold  throughout  the
United  States.  The license  with Gary Player  Group will  succeed the Spalding
license as the  Registrant's  predominant golf accessory  license.  Earlier that
same date, the Registrant  announced a limited extension of its existing license
agreement  with  Spalding  Sports  Worldwide,  Inc. on selected golf products to
provide a phase-out  period for the  Registrant's  Spalding  product  line.  The
Registrant has had a license  agreement with Spalding since 1983,  with numerous
amendments  and  renewals in  response  to  marketplace  changes.  This  limited
extension agreement will run for a maximum of 18 months as inventory is sold and
the Registrant moves from the Spalding-licensed product line to a newly licensed
Gary Player product line.



<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

 Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  the
 Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
 undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


 Date: March 9, 1999

                                AJAY SPORTS, INC.



                              By s\Robert R. Hebard
                                  ------------------------------
                                   Robert R. Hebard, Secretary
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3946 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to prohibit the sale 

of dishwashing detergent in the United States if the detergent contains 

a high level of phosphorus, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 27, 2009 

Mr. STUPAK (for himself and Mrs. MILLER of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to prohibit the sale of dishwashing detergent in the United 

States if the detergent contains a high level of phosphorus, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON SALE OF CERTAIN DISH4 WASHING DETERGENT. 

5 Section 303 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

6 Act (33 U.S.C. 1313) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3946 IH

1 ‘‘(j) PROHIBITION ON SALE OF CERTAIN DISH2 WASHING DETERGENT.—Effective beginning July 1, 

3 2010, the Administrator shall prohibit the sale of residen4 tial dishwashing detergent in the United States if the de5 tergent contains phosphorus in any form in excess of 0.5 

6 percent (by weight expressed as elemental phosphorus).’’. 

7 SEC. 2. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUTRIENT MANAGE8 MENT. 

9 As soon as practicable after the date of enactment 

10 of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental Pro11 tection Agency, in consultation with the heads of other ap12 propriate Federal agencies (including the National Oce13 anic and Atmospheric Administration), States, and local 

14 government entities, shall— 

15 (1) conduct a review of available scientific infor16 mation pertaining to nutrient excesses in the Great 

17 Lakes; and 

18 (2) submit to Congress a report that contains 

19 recommendations for action to be taken by the Ad20 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 

21 to address nutrient excesses in the Great Lakes. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#  West Virginia National Guard aided in mine rescue operations

/ Published Dec. 17, 2018

CHARLESTON, W. Va. – When the West Virginia Watch Center, operated by the West Virginia Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM), received a call on Dec. 9 that four people were missing in a shuttered coal mine, the state sprang into action.

The mine was the decommissioned Elk Run Coal Company's Rock House Powellton Mine near Clear Creek in Raleigh County, West Virginia.

 The terrain near the entrances to the mine were rough and muddy after an exceptionally large amount of snowfall had fallen in the area days before. A determination was made that West Virginia National Guard (WVNG) assets – specifically Humvees – were the safest way to transport rescue crews on and off the mine site.

 The deterioration of the unused mine roads warranted all safety precautions to be taken to ensure the safety of the rescuers.

 The West Virginia National Guard and WVDHSEM's integration in the State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC) allowed for quick deployment of the necessary resources for the mine rescue workers.

 On Dec. 10, a team of eight Soldiers and three Humvees from the 1st Squadron, 150th Cavalry Regiment out of Beckley, were assigned to assist the West Virginia Office of Miners' Health, Safety and Training (MHS&T) in the search efforts, providing transportation to the rescue site.

 After more than 24 hours of work to clear water and provide ventilation into the mine site, 10 additional Soldiers from the 863rd Military Police Company were assigned to augment the efforts on Dec. 12, providing additional security augmentation to the West Virginia State Police at the opposite mine entrance and liaison duties. With the addition of the Soldiers from the 863rd MP Company, the total number of support personnel from the WVNG reached 18 total.

 After the rescue efforts proved successful later in the evening of Dec. 12, and the three individuals were rescued and transported to receive medical attention, the WVNG assets demobilized. (The fourth person had emerged earlier from the mine).

 "The National Guard in West Virginia stands ready at all hours to aid our neighbors, no matter the situation," Maj. Gen. James Hoyer, adjutant general of the West Virginia National Guard, said. "The SEOC headquartered at the WVNG Joint Force Headquarters here in Charleston has shown that by co-locating, we are able to respond quickly and efficiently in case of an emergency. I am proud of all the Guard members who stepped up to assist our neighbors and partners."
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-57810, No. 333-079407,  No. 333-100625, and No. 333-66772, and Form S-8 No. 333-99914, No.333-32646, No. 333-105926, and No. 333-119620) of Westell Technologies, Inc. and in their related Prospectuses of our reports dated June 13, 2008, with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements and schedule of Westell Technologies, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Westell Technologies, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2008.

 

 

| /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|---------------------------|

 

Chicago, Illinois

June 13, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         10,376,111
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,268,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (163,516)
<INVENTORY>                                     2,649,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               19,374,007
<PP&E>                                            841,730
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (201,917)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 43,705,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,505,262
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           12,921
<OTHER-SE>                                     35,111,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   43,705,734
<SALES>                                        14,963,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,963,186
<CGS>                                           2,221,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,501,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                304,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   242,721
<INCOME-TAX>                                      104,370
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               138,351
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      138,351
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .01


</TABLE>
In the Senate of the United States, 

September 28, 2010. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 3940) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend Public Law 96– 

597 to clarify the authority of the Secretary of the Interior 

to extend grants and other assistance to facilitate political 

status public education programs for the peoples of the nonself-governing territories of the United States.’’, do pass with 

the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 

following: 
2 

† HR 3940 EAS 

1 SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING POLITICAL 

2 STATUS EDUCATION IN GUAM. 

3 It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the 

4 Interior may provide technical assistance to the Govern5 ment of Guam under section 601(a) of the Act entitled ‘‘An 

6 Act to authorize appropriations for certain insular areas 

7 of the United States, and for other purposes’’, approved De8 cember 24, 1980 (48 U.S.C. 1469d(a)), for public education 

9 regarding political status options only if the political status 

10 options are consistent with the Constitution of the United 

11 States. 

12 SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE IN AMERICAN SAMOA AND THE 

13 COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MAR14 IANA ISLANDS. 

15 (a) DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 8103(b) of 

16 the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007 (29 U.S.C. 206 note) 

17 (as amended by section 520 of division D of Public Law 

18 111–117) is amended— 

19 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by inserting ‘‘(except 

20 2011 when there shall be no increase)’’ after ‘‘there21 after’’ the second place it appears; and 

22 (2) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ‘‘except 

23 that, beginning in 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘except that 

24 there shall be no such increase in 2010 or 2011 and, 

25 beginning in 2012’’. 
3 

† HR 3940 EAS 

1 (b) GAO REPORT.—Section 8104 of such Act (as 

2 amended) is amended— 

3 (1) by striking subsections (a) and (b) and in4 serting the following: 

5 ‘‘(a) REPORT.—The Government Accountability Office 

6 shall assess the impact of minimum wage increases that 

7 have occurred pursuant to section 8103, and not later than 

8 September 1, 2011, shall transmit to Congress a report of 

9 its findings. The Government Accountability Office shall 

10 submit subsequent reports not later than April 1, 2013, and 

11 every 2 years thereafter until the minimum wage in the 

12 respective territory meets the federal minimum wage.’’; and 

13 (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection 

14 (b). 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to clarify the 

availability of existing funds for political status education 

in the Territory of Guam, and for other purposes.’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 3940 

AMENDMENTS