### 48808 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2011 / Notices

III. Data

OMB Number: 0651–0045. Form Number(s): PTO–2042. Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.

Affected Public: Individuals orhouseholds; businesses or other forprofits; and not-for-profit institutions.

Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,857 responses per year.

Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take the public approximately 30 minutes (0.5 hours) to read the instructions and subscriber agreement, gather the necessary information, prepare the Certificate Action Form, and submit the completed request.

Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 929 hours.

Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $129,131. The USPTO expects that 70% of the submissions for this collection will be prepared by paraprofessionals, 15% by attorneys, and 15% by independent inventors. Using those proportions and the estimated rates of $122 per hour for paraprofessionals, $325 per hour for attorneys in private firms, and $30 per hour for independent inventors, the USPTO estimates that the average rate for those respondents will be approximately $139 per hour. Therefore, the estimated total respondent cost burden for this collection will be approximately $129,131 per year.

Item Estimated time for response Estimated annual responses Estimated annual burden hours

Certificate Action Form (including Subscriber Agreement) (PTO–2042) .................... 30 minutes 1,857 929

Totals .................................................................................................................... ..... ................................... 1,857 929

Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $4,531. There are no capital start-up costs, maintenance costs, or fees associated with this information collection. However, this collection does have annual (non-hour) cost burden associated with the Certificate Action
Form.

This collection has costs due to the notarization requirement for authenticating the signatures on the Certificate Action Form. The USPTO estimates that the average fee for having a signature notarized is $2 and that 1,857 responses for these forms will be submitted annually, for a total cost of $3,714 per year.

This collection also has postage costs for submitting the Certificate Action Form to the USPTO by mail. The form cannot be faxed or submitted electronically because it requires an original notarized signature. The USPTO estimates that the first class postage cost for these forms will be 44 cents and that it will receive 1,857 mailed responses annually, for a total postage cost of approximately $817 per

year. IV. Request for Comments

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, e.g., the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record.

Dated: August 4, 2011.
Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011–20097 Filed 8–8–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–16–P**

**COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION** 

**Sunshine Act Meetings**

The following notice of scheduled meetings is published pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, 5 U.S.C. 552b.
Agency Holding the Meetings

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Times and Dates

The Commission has scheduled meetings for the following dates:

October 4, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. October 18, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. November 1, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. November 17, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.

Place

Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC. Lobby Level Hearing Room (Room 1000).

**STATUS :**  Open. Matters To Be Considered

The Commission has scheduled these meetings to consider various rulemaking matters, including the issuance of proposed rules and the approval of final rules. The Commission may also consider and vote on dates and times for future meetings. Agendas for each of the scheduled meetings will be made available to the public and posted on the Commission’s Web site at http:// www.cftc.gov at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting. In the event that the times or dates of the meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission’s Web site.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION :**  David A. Stawick, Secretary of the Commission, 202–418–5071.

David A. Stawick, Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–20351 Filed 8–5–11; 4:15 pm]

**BILLING CODE 6351–01–P**

**CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION** 

**[CPSC Docket No. 11–C0008]**

**Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement**  **and Order**

**AGENCY :**  Consumer Product Safety Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published


### 48809 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2011 / Notices

below is a provisionally accepted Settlement Agreement with Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., containing a civil penalty of $960,000.00.

**DATES :**  Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written request with the Office of the Secretary by August 24,

2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement should send written comments to Comment 11–C0008, Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–

4408.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  William J. Moore, Jr., Trial Attorney, Division of Enforcement and Information, Office of the General Counsel, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408; telephone (301) 504–7583.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The text of the Agreement and Order appears below.

Dated: August 2, 2011. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary. Settlement Agreement

(1) In accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20, Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., its responsible officials, and its foreign and domestic corporate parents, affiliates, agents and employees (collectively ‘‘Black & Decker’’ or ‘‘the Firm’’) and the staff (‘‘Staff’’) of the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby enter into this Settlement Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) under the Consumer Product Safety Act (‘‘CPSA’’). The Agreement and the incorporated attached Order resolve the Staff’s allegations set forth below.

The Parties

(2) The Staff is the staff of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, an independent federal regulatory agency established pursuant to, and responsible for, the enforcement of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051–2089.

(3) Black & Decker is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland, with its principal corporate office located at 701 East Joppa Road, Towson, Maryland.
Staff Allegations

(4) Between November 2005 and October 2006, Black & Decker imported and distributed approximately one hundred thirty-six thousand (136,000) newly designed electric, hand-held grass trimmer/edgers known as model GH1000 Grasshog XP (‘‘Grasshog XP’’). The Grasshog XPs were sold through retailers nationwide for approximately $70.00.

(5) The Grasshog XPs are ‘‘consumer products’’ and, at all times relevant hereto, Black & Decker was a ‘‘manufacturer’’ of these consumer products, which were ‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as those terms are defined or used in sections 3(a)(5), (8) and (11) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5), (8) and (11).

(6) The Grasshog XPs contained several defects that presented four failure modes: (1) The cutting string spool covers and spools can be projected off the Grasshog XP at high speed in unpredictable directions, allowing these components to strike the user or bystanders; (2) the dual cutting lines were fed and cut off at high speed and at irregular intervals during use, allowing the line to strike the user; (3) the spool line feed guard can fall off during use, exposing the user to injury from overly long high speed cutting line; and (4) the spool housing may overheat, exposing users to risks of burn injuries.

(7) Black & Decker first learned of defects in its Grasshog XP spool cover in December 2005. It modified the defective spool cover manufacturing process and changed the spool cover to a different material (‘‘the new spool cover’’) for future production. In January 2006, the firm recalled 9,000 Grasshogs. In February 2006, Black & Decker informed the CPSC staff of what it termed a ‘‘quality’’ problem involving the original spool cover but did not file a report under 15 U.S.C. 2064(b) at that time. A. Violation of 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(3), Failure To Provide Information Requested by CPSC Staff

Paragraphs one through seven, above, are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

(8) Black & Decker received its first complaints involving Grasshog XP defects, including problems with thenew replacement spool cover, in midMarch and April 2006. By the end of May 2006, the Firm had received 80 safety complaints, personal injury reports and hundreds of warranty claims involving the Grasshog XP. The subject of the complaints, reports and warranty claims were the defects set forth in Paragraph 6, supra.

(9) In a letter dated May 9, 2006, CPSC staff asked Black & Decker for full report information with regard to the Grasshog XP, including, but not limited to, the defective spool covers the Firm discovered in December 2005 and replaced in January 2006.

(10) Despite an awareness of the information set forth in Paragraphs six and eight, supra, and other information germane to written questions posed by the staff on May 9, 2006, Black & Decker did not comply with the staff written request to provide a full report concerning the Grasshog XP. In late May 2006, the firm provided limited, incomplete information regarding its January spool cover recall. Among other acts of omission, it failed to provide information about defects it discovered in the replacement spool cover system used in production from January 2006 forward. These new, defective spool covers had been intended as the remedy and were provided as replacement covers in the firm’s January 2006 recall.

(11) Based upon the incomplete information provided by Black & Decker, on June 30, 2006, the staff sent Black & Decker a letter closing the case file that had been opened on May 9, 2006. The staff letter of June 30, 2006 reminded Black & Decker of its duty to immediately report information that the risk or hazard posed by the Grasshog XP was greater than or different from that indicated by the information that had been supplied by the firm to date.

(12) By June 2006, Black & Decker had received 216 Grasshog XP safety complaints and approximately 14 reports of injury. Despite the Commission staff letters of May 2 and June 30, 2006 requesting this information, Black & Decker silently acquiesced in the file closure without revealing this information.

(13) Black & Decker waited until October 2006 to provide information requested by the staff on May 9, 2006. By its acts and omissions, the Firm knowingly violated Section 19(a)(3) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(3), as the term ‘‘knowingly’’ is defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069(d). B. Violation of 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(4) Failure To Furnish Information Required by Sections 15(b)(3) and (b)(4) of the CPSA

Paragraphs one through thirteen, above, are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

(14) From July through September 2006, Black & Decker continued to receive large numbers of safety complaints, injury reports and warranty claims involving defects in the Grasshog XP new spool cover, the spool line feeder, the spool line feed guard and the spool feed housing (as set forth in Paragraph 6 above.) Although Black & Decker had obtained sufficient information to reasonably support the


### 48810 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2011 / Notices

conclusion that the Grasshog XP contained defects which could create a substantial product hazard, or created an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death on or before May 1, 2006, Black & Decker failed to immediately inform the Commission of such defects or risks as required by sections 15(b)(3) and (4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(3) and (4). In failing to do so, Black & Decker knowingly violated section 19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(4) as the term ‘‘knowingly’’ is defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069(d).

(15) Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Black & Decker is subject to civil penalties for its knowing failure to report as required under section 15(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. § 2064(b).
Response of Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.

(16) Black & Decker denies Staff’s allegations that the Grasshog XP, contains defects which could create a substantial product hazard or create an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death, and denies that it knowingly violated Sections 19(a)(3) or 19(a)(4) of the CPSA. This payment is made in settlement of the staff allegations. Neither the payment nor the fact of entering into this Settlement Agreement, constitute evidence of or an admission of, any fault, liability or statutory or regulatory violation by Black & Decker or of the truth of any allegations made by the staff.
Agreement of the Parties

(17) Under the CPSA, the Commission has jurisdiction over this matter and over Black & Decker and the Grasshog
XP.

(18) In settlement of the Staff’s allegations stemming from the Firm’s importation and distribution of the Grasshog XP and in reporting to the Commission, Black & Decker shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of nine hundred sixty thousand dollars ($960,000.00) within ten (10) calendar days of receiving service of the Commission’s final Order accepting the Agreement. The payment shall be made electronically to the CPSC via http://

www.pay.gov

.

(19) The parties enter into this Agreement for settlement purposes only. The Agreement does not constitute an admission by Black & Decker or a determination by the Commission that Black & Decker knowingly violated Sections 19(a)(3) or 19(a)(4) of the CPSA.

(20) Upon provisional acceptance of the Agreement by the Commission, the Agreement shall be placed on the public record and published in the Federal Register in accordance with the procedures set forth in 16 CFR 1118.20(e). If the Commission does not receive any written request not to accept the Agreement within fifteen (15) calendar days, the Agreement shall be deemed finally accepted on the 16th calendar day after the date it is published in the Federal Register, in accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20(f).

(21) Upon the Commission’s final acceptance of the Agreement and issuance of the final Order, Black & Decker knowingly, voluntarily and completely waives any rights it may have in this matter to the following: (i) An administrative or judicial hearing; (ii) judicial review or other challenge or contest of the Commission’s actions; (iii) a determination by the Commission as to whether Black & Decker failed to comply with the CPSA and the underlying regulations; (iv) a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (v) any claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act.

(22) The Commission may publicize the terms of the Agreement and the Order.

(23) The Agreement and the Order shall apply to and be binding upon Black & Decker and each of its parent corporation(s), successors and/or assigns.

(24) The Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the CPSA, and a violation of the Order may subject Black & Decker and each of its parent corporation(s), successors and/or assigns to appropriate legal action.

(25) The Agreement may be used in interpreting the Order. Understandings, agreements, representations or interpretations apart from those contained in the Agreement and the Order may not be used to vary or contradict their terms. The Agreement shall not be waived, amended, modified or otherwise altered without written agreement thereto executed by the party against whom such waiver, amendment, modification or alteration is sought to be enforced.

(26) If any provision of the Agreement or the Order is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable under present or future laws effective during the terms of the Agreement and the Order, such provision shall be fully severable. The balance of the Agreement and the Order shall remain in full force and effect, unless the Commission and Black & Decker agree that severing the provision materially affects the purpose of the Agreement and Order.

Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.
Dated: 6/27/2011. By:

lllllllllllllllllll James R. O’Brien, Esquire, Vice President and Product Liability Counsel,

Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., 701 East Joppa Road, Towson, MD 21286.

Dated: 6/27/2011. By:

lllllllllllllllllll Timothy L. Mullin, Jr., Miles & Stockbridge P.C., 10 Light Street,

Baltimore, MD 21202, Counsel for Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. U.S. Consumer Product Safety, Commission Staff. Cheryl A. Falvey, General Counsel. Mary B. Murphy, Assistant General Counsel.

Dated: 8/2/2011. By:

lllllllllllllllllll William J. Moore, Jr., Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance,

Office of the General Counsel.

Order

Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into between Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., its responsible officials, and their foreign and domestic corporate parents, affiliates, agents and employees (collectively ‘‘Black & Decker’’), and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘Commission’’) staff, and the Commission having jurisdiction over the subject matter and over Black & Decker, and it appearing that the Settlement Agreement and the Order are in the public interest, it is

Ordered that the Settlement Agreement be, and is, hereby, accepted; and it is

Further Ordered, that Black & Decker shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of nine hundred sixty thousand dollars ($960,000.00) within ten (10) days of service of the Commission’s final Order accepting the Settlement Agreement upon counsel for Black & Decker identified in the Settlement Agreement. The payment shall be made electronically to the CPSC via http://

www.pay.gov. Upon the failure of Black & Decker to make the foregoing payment when due, interest on the unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid by Black & Decker at the federal legal rate of interest set forth at 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b).

Provisionally accepted and provisional Order issued on the 2nd day of August, 2011.

By Order of the Commission. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–20086 Filed 8–8–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6355–01–P**