alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Graham V. Smith, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Advent Software, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



March 10, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    GRAHAM V.
SMITH               
|Graham V. Smith                      
|Executive Vice President,            
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE IN SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                               36,863
<SECURITIES>                         44,235
<RECEIVABLES>                        23,380
<ALLOWANCES>                           (609)
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    109,643
<PP&E>                               27,550
<DEPRECIATION>                      (13,850)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      127,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                52,316
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  1
<OTHER-SE>                           72,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        127,865
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     92,211
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        30,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     74,823
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (10,163)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (10,163)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        (10,163)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
2021 AFSAM

Pistol Barricade Team Match

PT2330 (agg of PI2030)

SHOOTER TEAM SCORE ROST # PI2030 STATE\COUNTRY 

1 ALL-GUARD (BRAVO) 1038

Score

1 SSG VARGAS, ERIK J 132 264 CA

2 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 120 252 ND

3 SFC BAUTISTA, MICHAEL R 125 251 ID

4 SSG DEMENT, JERRY D 316 271 MO

2 ALL-GUARD ALPHA 998

Score

1 SFC SWANSON, BRANDON N 100 265 WI

2 SFC NOE, JOSEPH T 119 256 AR

3 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 118 240 AR

4 CPT MILLER, GARRETT E 117 237 AR

3 ALL-GUARD (CHARLIE) 977

Score

1 TSGT DANIEL, SCOTTY W 138 249 AR

2 SGT GRIFFETH, ALEXANDRA I 114 236 VA

3 MSG GREGSON, JACOB J 108 222 UT

4 SSGT ROOK, GAVIN W 121 270 ND

4 USAR GOLD 975

Score

1 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 160 235 USAR

2 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 162 261 USAR

3 CW3 KNOTE, ANDY T 163 248 USAR

4 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 161 231 USAR

5 USAR BLACK 966

Score

1 SFC GODEL, JASON W 156 234 USAR

2 SGT HUGHES, DEVIN E 158 263 USAR

3 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 157 208 USAR

4 SSG MORRIS, SEAN D 159 261 USAR

6 AFSAM HONORS 828

Score

1 SGM MININO, ANTHONY A 167 213 USAR

2 MSG BURDETTE, RODERICK II 165 196 USAR

3 CSM BALL, MICHAEL E 166 192 USAR

4 SSG ABEYTA, PATRICK M 164 227 USAR

Thursday, September 2, 2021 Page 1 of 1 Time printed: 18:36:05
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7555
In Re: JAMES L. PADGETT, JR.; ROBERT F. DIEHL, Petitioners.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-98-1259-12-AK) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. James L. Padgett, Jr., Robert F. Diehl, Petitioners Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:James L. Padgett, Jr., and Robert F. Diehl have filed a petition for a writ of mandamus from this court seeking an order enjoining the warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution in Kershaw, South Carolina, from enforcing certain policies regarding prisoners in the segregation unit at that institution. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, see In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Catawba Indian Tribe of S. Carolina , 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The more appropriate forum for the petitioners’ claims regarding the warden’s actions is a civil complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.01
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Insignia Solutions plc;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/ Mark E. McMillan

Mark E. McMillanChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 23



                       Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-34642) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc. 1995 Incentive Award Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-22159) pertaining to the Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-45689) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc. 1998 Incentive Award Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-45695) pertaining to the Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.
1997 Billion Dollar Market Capitalization Incentive Award Plan in the
Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-58609) pertaining to the Company's 8%
Senior Notes due 2008, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-58613)
pertaining to the Company's securities and securities of ADLT Trust I and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-58621) pertaining to the Company's
securities of our report dated September 28, 1998 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1998.


                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP





Cleveland, Ohio
September 28, 1998
# Alaska National Guard brings Santa to remote villages

/ Published Dec. 19, 2011

WALES, Alaska - Santa, Mrs. Claus and 35 helpers brought Operation Santa Claus and holiday cheer via an Alaska National Guard C-130 to the small, remote Alaska village of Wales Dec. 9.

The Alaska Air National Guard C-130 landed on the village's airstrip and was warmly greeted by community members on snowmobiles. Even though the temperature was in the teens, it made for a chilly but not too cold of a day according to Wales' standards.

Operation Santa Claus volunteers and community members quickly off-loaded boxes from the aircraft and onto sleds tied to the snowmobiles for the mile ride to the Wales school.

"It's a great time of year and unique way for us to get out and support Alaska citizens," said Army Col. Mike Bridges, director of logistics for the Alaska Army National Guard. "I've probably been on at least 20 Operation Santa Claus trips and each one is a special experience."

While the boxes were unpacked into the school's gym, members of Alaska Brass, a brass and percussion ensemble from the U.S. Air Force Band of the Pacific, began to play festive holiday tunes as the gym filled with nearly everyone from the village.

Following the festive music, a prayer of thanks was given by Alaska Air National Guard Chaplain Brian Musselman before a warm meal that was made and donated by a food service company in Anchorage was served.

To the delight of everyone, ice cream sundaes were also provided by local vendors, while village youth performed a dance for the audience and their guests.

Soon came the moment everyone was waiting for: the arrival of Santa and Mrs. Claus.

"I enjoy visiting with the elders and veterans of the community, while they see their kids interact with Santa Claus," Bridges said. "It's a great time for everyone involved."

One by one, each child had a chance to visit Santa and receive a gift. They were also given a new backpack filled with a couple of pieces of fresh fruit, books, a toothbrush and other incidentals.

"This event was incredible," said Roxie Quick, the Wales School principal. "It was a great way to show the children a lesson in sharing and about the volunteer spirit."
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6274

ANTHONY BELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JAMES V. PEGUESE, Warden; JOHN JOSEPH CURRAN,

JR., Attorney General of the State of

Maryland,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(8:05-cv-00153)

Submitted: December 14, 2007 Decided: January 9, 2008

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Bell, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Edward

John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Bell seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bell

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF SPIEKER PROPERTIES, INC.
 
 1. Brea Place Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership
 2. Fremont Bayside Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership
 3. S.S. Livermore L.P., a California limited partnership
 4. Sand Hill Northwest Properties, L.L.C.
 5. Spieker Brea, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
 6. Spieker Partners-Livermore Ltd., a California limited partnership
 7. Spieker Properties #122, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership
 8. Spieker Properties #144, Limited Partnership, a Texas limited
partnership
 9. Spieker Properties #154, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership
10. Spieker Properties #166, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership
11. Spieker Properties #172, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership
12. Spieker Properties #177, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership
13. Spieker Properties #178, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership
14. Spieker Properties #179, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership
15. Spieker Properties #183, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership
16. Spieker Properties #185, Limited Partnership, a California limited
partnership
17. Spieker Properties #219, Partners, a California general partnership
18. Spieker Properties #221, Partners, Limited Partnership, a California
general partnership
19. Spieker Properties #237, Partners, a California general partnership
20. Spieker Properties #238, Partners, a California general partnership
21. Spieker Properties, L.P., a California limited partnership
22. Spieker Washington Interest Partners, a California general
partnership
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES:**

 

 

 

 

COMBINE BUYING GROUP, INC. 

EMERGING BUSINESS BROKERAGE, INC. 

EMERGING VISION KING OF PRUSSIA, INC.

EV ACQUISITION, INC.

INSIGHT IPA OF NEW YORK, INC.

INSIGHT LASER CENTERS OF KING OF PRUSSIA

OG ACQUISITION, INC. 

SINGER SPECS OF WESTMORELAND, INC.

SINGER SPECS, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF ARROWHEAD, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF BAYSHORE, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF CHAUTAUQUA, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF COMMACK, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF CROSSGATES MALL, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF FLAGSTAFF, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF JEFFERSON VALLEY, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF LAVALE, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF NEWBURGH, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF REGO PARK, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF WARMINSTER, INC.

STERLING OPTICAL OF WESTMORELAND, INC.

STERLING VISION BOS, INC.

STERLING VISION DKM, INC.

STERLING VISION OF 794 LEXINGTON, INC.

STERLING VISION OF ANNAPOLIS, INC.

STERLING VISION OF ARNOT MALL, INC.

STERLING VISION OF BEAVER DAM, INC.

STERLING VISION OF BLASDELL, INC.

STERLING VISION OF BREA, INC.

STERLING VISION OF BROOKFIELD SQUARE, INC. 

STERLING VISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

STERLING VISION OF CAMBRIDGE SQUARE, INC.

STERLING VISION OF CAMP HILL, INC.

STERLING VISION OF CLIFTON PARK, INC.

STERLING VISION OF COLUMBIA MALL, INC.

STERLING VISION OF DELAFIELD, INC.

STERLING VISION OF DENVER, INC.

STERLING VISION OF DULLES, INC.

STERLING VISION OF EAST ROCKAWAY, INC.

STERLING VISION OF EASTLAND, INC.

STERLING VISION OF EDISON, INC.

STERLING VISION OF FAIR OAKS, INC.

 

 

 

 

STERLING VISION OF FARGO, INC.

STERLING VISION OF FORT MYERS, INC.

STERLING VISION OF FULTON ST., INC.

STERLING VISION OF GRAND AVE, INC. 

STERLING VISION OF GREEN ACRES, INC.

STERLING VISION OF HAGERSTOWN, INC.

STERLING VISION OF HEMPSTEAD, INC.

STERLING VISION OF IRONDEQUOIT, INC.

STERLING VISION OF ISLANDIA, INC.

STERLING VISION OF JOHNSON CITY, INC. 

STERLING VISION OF KENOSHA, INC.

STERLING VISION OF KIRKWOOD MALL, INC.

STERLING VISION OF M STREET, INC.

STERLING VISION OF MAIN PLACE, INC.

STERLING VISION OF MENLO PARK, INC.

STERLING VISION OF MONTGOMERY MALL, INC.

STERLING VISION OF MONTGOMERY MALL, INC.

STERLING VISION OF MYRTLE AVE., INC.

STERLING VISION OF NANUET, INC.

STERLING VISION OF NEWPARK, INC.

STERLING VISION OF NEWPORT BEACH, INC.

STERLING VISION OF OLEAN, INC.

STERLING VISION OF ONTARIO MILLS, INC.

STERLING VISION OF OWINGS MILLS, INC.

STERLING VISION OF POTOMAC MILLS, INC.

STERLING VISION OF PRINCE GEORGES PLAZA, INC.

STERLING VISION OF ROCKAWAY, INC.

STERLING VISION OF ROYAL PALM BEACH, INC. 

STERLING VISION OF SOUTHTOWNE PLAZA, INC.

STERLING VISION OF SPOTSYLVANIA, INC.

STERLING VISION OF STATEN ISLAND, INC. 

STERLING VISION OF THE FALLS, INC.

STERLING VISION OF WESTMINSTER, INC.

VISION CARE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

VISION OPTICAL CO., INC.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CTT International Distributors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |                                      
|------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Dated:  May17, 2007 | By: /s/ SAJID KAPADIA                
|                    | Sajid Kapadia                        
|                    | Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Argued and submitted September 30,

conviction affirmed; sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing December 15, 2004

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*LUIS AGUILAR-AVILA, *Appellant.*

00C-53561, 02C-48219; A119821 (Control), A120349

(Cases Consolidated)

106 P3d 646

David C. Degner, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, and Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services.

Timothy Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim and Schuman, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing. *State v. Gornick,*196 Or App 397, 102 P3d 734 (2004); *State v. Thackaberry,*194 Or App 511, 95 P3d 1142 (2004).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                           <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                        2,726,400
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 75,600
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   225,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              3,027,400
<PP&E>                        527,900
<DEPRECIATION>                397,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                3,269,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,063,800
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      1,791
<OTHER-SE>                    19,866,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3,269,400
<SALES>                       633,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              633,800
<CGS>                         96,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 2,119,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,472,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                  900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,473,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,473,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                 ($0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 ($0.08)


</TABLE>