alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3855 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to make clear that each decennial 

census, as required for the apportionment of Representatives in Congress 

among the several States, shall tabulate the total number of persons 

in each State, and to provide that no information regarding United 

States citizenship or immigration status may be elicited in any such 

census. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2009 

Mr. BACA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to make clear that 

each decennial census, as required for the apportionment 

of Representatives in Congress among the several States, 

shall tabulate the total number of persons in each State, 

and to provide that no information regarding United 

States citizenship or immigration status may be elicited 

in any such census. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3855 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Every Person Counts 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CENSUS DATA COLLECTION. 

5 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Section 141(b) of title 13, 

6 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘United 

7 States.’’ and inserting ‘‘United States, and shall tabulate 

8 the total number of persons in each State.’’. 

9 (b) PROHIBITION.—Section 141(a) of such title 13 

10 is amended by striking ‘‘as necessary.’’ and inserting ‘‘as 

11 necessary, except that in no event may the Secretary in12 clude any question or otherwise elicit any information re13 garding United States citizenship or immigration status.’’. 

14 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

15 shall be considered to permit or require the exclusion, 

16 from any decennial census of population, of— 

17 (1) any person on the basis of age; 

18 (2) personnel in the Armed Forces serving 

19 abroad; 

20 (3) Federal employees (and their dependents) 

21 stationed abroad; or 

22 (4) any other persons outside of the United 

23 States (besides those under paragraph (2) or (3)) 

24 who can be traced to the State of their usual place 

25 of residence, as determined by the Secretary of Com26 merce. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3855 IH

1 (d) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term 

2 ‘‘census of population’’ has the meaning given such term 

3 by section 141(g) of such title 13. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 41 05

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ch arl es L. Burg et t
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Kan sa s C it y

Bo ardof P ol ic e Co m

m is si on ers
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t
Sh el iaPo rte r; Vi rg il Lien ha rd ; Kan sa s C it y Area Tran sp orta ti on Aut ho rit y ; Po li ce Offi cer B ren t Ca rtwr ig ht

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es
Pat ric k M cIn ern ey , in hi s o ffi ci al cap aci ty as a m em be r of th e Bo ardof P ol ic e Co m m is si on ers of Ka ns as Cit y , Mis so ur i, an d i n h is in di vi du al cap aci ty; Alv in Bro ok s, i n h is off

ic ia l capa ci ty as a m em

be r of th e Bo ardof P ol ic e Co m m is si on ers of Kans as Cit y , Mis so ur i, an d i n h is in di vi du al cap aci ty; Ang el a Wasso n- Hun t, i n he r of fic ia l capa ci ty as a m em

be r of th e Bo ardof P ol ic e Co m m is si on ers of Ka ns as Ci ty, Mi ss ou ri, a ndin he r in di vi du al cap aci ty; Lis a Pel of sk y , in he r of

fic ia l cap aci ty as a m em

be r of th e Bo ardof P ol ic e Co m m is si on ers of Kans as Cit y , Mi ss ou ri, andin he r in di vi du al cap aci ty; Mayor Sl y James, in hi s o ffi ci al cap aci ty as a m em be r of th e Bo ardof P ol ic e Co m m is si on ers of Ka ns as Cit y , Mis so ur i, an d in hi s i nd iv idua l capa ci ty; Mi ch ael Rad er, Cu rren t Bo ardCo m m is si on er, Bo ardof Po li ce Co m

m is si on er Ci ty of Kan sa s C it y
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t s__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Weste rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i - Kan sa s C it y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 26 , 20 17 Fil ed : J an ua ry

19 , 20 18 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BENTON, BOW MAN, an d KELLY, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Ch arl es L. Bu rg et t ap pe al s th e di stric t co urt’s ad ve rs e gr an t of su m m ary 1 jud gm en t, fo ll owi ng rem an d, in hi s 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n ari si ng fro m an in ci de nt

on a Kan sa s Ci ty Area Tran sp orta ti on Aut ho rit y bu s. Upo n care fu l co ns id erat io n of Bu rg et t’s arg um en ts fo r rev ers al , a nd de n o v o r e v i e w o f th e reco rd , s ee Mu rch is on
v
. R o g e r s , 77 9 F.3 d 88 2, 88 6- 87 (8 th Ci r. 20 15 ) (v ie win g ev id en ce in li gh t m os t fav or ab le to no nm ov an t, an d dr awin g al l reas on ab le in fere nc es in hi s fav or ), we ag ree wit h th e di stric t co urt th a t t h e r e main in g de fen da nt s sa ti sf ie d th ei r bu rd en of de m on st rat in g th at th ere were no ge nu in e is su es of m at eri al fact fo r tri al on Bu rg et t’s Fo urth Am en dm en t an d rel at ed co ns pi racy cl ai m s, or on hi s 42 U.S.C. § 20 00 d cl ai m , ag ai ns t t he m . The jud gm en t i s af firm ed . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Dean Whi pp le , Un it ed St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e We s t e rn 1 Dis tri ctof M is so ur i.
-2

-
Exhibit 32.2

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Financial
Federal Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended January 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exhange Commission (the
"Report"), Steven F. Groth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
his knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company

     A signed original of this written statement required by section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



March 7, 2006                     /s/ Steven F. Groth
-------------                     ----------------------------------
Date                              Steven F. Groth
                                  Chief Financial Officer and Senior
                                  Vice President
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3787 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to deem certain service in the 

Reserve components as active service for purposes of laws administered 

by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2009 

Mr. WALZ (for himself, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. ADLER of New Jersey, Mr. 

BILBRAY, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. BROWN of South 

Carolina, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. FILNER, Mr. 

GONZALEZ, Mr. HALL of New York, Mrs. HALVORSON, Mr. HARE, Ms. 

HERSETH SANDLIN, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. MASSA, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. 

MITCHELL, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. PERRIELLO, Mr. PETERSON, 

Mr. POMEROY, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. TAYLOR, 

and Mr. TEAGUE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to deem certain 

service in the Reserve components as active service for 

purposes of laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3787 IH

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SERVICE PERFORMED IN THE RE2 SERVE COMPONENTS DEEMED ACTIVE SERV3 ICE. 

4 Section 106 of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(g) Any person who has not otherwise performed 

8 qualifying active duty service shall be deemed to have been 

9 on active duty for purposes of all laws administered by 

10 the Secretary if the person is entitled under chapter 1223 

11 of title 10 to retired pay for nonregular service or, but 

12 for age, would be entitled under such chapter to retired 

13 pay for nonregular service.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered   by the Report. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: March 2, 2011 | /s/ Michael Moore           |
|----------------------|-----------------------------|
|                 | Michael Moore               |
|                 | Principal Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned hereby certifies, in her capacity as Chief Executive Officer of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her knowledge:





(1)  The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  May 10, 2011





/s/ Zhilin Li


--------------------------------


Name: Zhilin Li


President and Chief Executive Officer


(principal executive officer)








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NEW HAMPSHIRE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (NHARNG) 

DRINKING WATER PFAS SNAPSHOT 

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its 

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure 

perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per 

trillion (ppt). The EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a 

concentration in drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the 

water is consumed over a lifetime. 

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at the 

NH Army National Guard Center Strafford Training Site, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above 

the EPA HA. Additionally, Army National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the 

standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the 

quality of drinking water supplied to the American public. The Army National Guard will 

continue to monitor on-base drinking water to ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated 

state drinking water standard is not exceeded. 

Test Date: 13 June 2022 

PFOA + PFOS Results: 4.2 ppt

Future Testing Event: June 2024 

History: N/A

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: New Hampshire National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 603-225-1340

Office E-mail Address: https://nh.ng.mil/Public-Affairs/Community-Outreach/

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7491

LOUIS GAINEY, JR.,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE,

 Respondent – Appellee,

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL ALAN WILSON,

 Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District 

Judge. (5:15-cv-03253-BHH)

Submitted: February 16, 2017 Decided: February 22, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and 

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis Gainey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Susannah Rawl Cole, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Donald John Zelenka, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Louis Gainey, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Gainey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
4

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          22,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,980,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,242,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,431,502
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,681,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,242,934
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               331,313
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,134
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            130,365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   129,963
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.29<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.26
<FN>
<F1>EPS-Basic
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements as of and for the fiscal six month
period ended June 28,1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                           67929
<SECURITIES>                                     12532
<RECEIVABLES>                                    85936
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3376
<INVENTORY>                                      12960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                191014
<PP&E>                                          549921
<DEPRECIATION>                                  269222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  642528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            86728
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            18920
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         36542
<OTHER-SE>                                      382714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    642528
<SALES>                                         373722
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                373722
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   301299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  74710
<INCOME-TAX>                                     30916
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              42835
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     42835
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65
        

</TABLE>
## Impact of E10/E15 Placement on Average In-Use RVP Levels in 2

Region CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg PADD 1 8.5 7.0 8.0 9.0 7.0 8.3 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.34 -0.27 PADD 2 9.2 7.1 8.9 9.3 7.1 9.0 8.8 7.0 8.5 0.07 -0.45 PADD 3 8.5 7.0 8.2 8.9 7.0 8.5 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.29 -0.30 PADDs 4/5-CA 9.1 7.0 8.9 9.5 7.0 9.2 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.29 -0.49 California N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00 Nationwide 8.8 7.0 8.2 9.2 7.0 8.5 8.7 7.0 8.1 0.24 -0.32 Lotus Notes Friendly Version 

### Impact of E10/E15 Placement on Average In-Use RVP Levels in 2017
Assuming E10/E15 is Distributed Evenly Nationwide

CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg PADD 1 8.5 7.0 8.0 9.0 7.0 8.3 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.34 -0.27 PADD 2 9.2 7.1 8.9 9.3 7.1 9.0 8.8 7.0 8.5 0.07 -0.45 PADD 3 8.5 7.0 8.2 8.9 7.0 8.5 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.29 -0.30 PADDs 4/5-CA 9.1 7.0 8.9 9.5 7.0 9.2 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.29 -0.49 California N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00 Nationwide 8.8 7.0 8.2 9.2 7.0 8.5 8.7 7.0 8.1 0.24 -0.32 Assuming 75% of RFG is E15 (Balance of E15 goes to CG)

CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg PADD 1 8.5 7.0 8.0 9.2 7.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.43 -0.36 PADD 2 9.2 7.1 8.9 9.5 7.1 9.1 8.8 7.0 8.6 0.21 -0.58 PADD 3 8.5 7.0 8.2 9.1 7.0 8.6 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.38 -0.39 PADDs 4/5-CA 9.1 7.0 8.9 9.6 7.0 9.3 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.43 -0.63 California N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00 Assuming E10/E15 is Distributed Evenly Nationwide RFS1 Ref Case RFS2 Ref Case Tier 3 Control RVP  Under RFS2 RVP Under Tier3

Tier 3 Control RVP  Under RFS2 RVP Under Tier3

RFS1 Ref Case RFS2 Ref Case Tier 3 Control RVP  Under RFS2 RVP Under Tier3 Region

Region RFS1 Ref Case RFS2 Ref CaseNationwide 8.8 7.0 8.2 9.3 7.0 8.6 8.7 7.0 8.2 0.34 -0.41 Assuming 90% of RFG is E15 (Balance of E15 goes to CG)

CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg PADD 1 8.5 7.0 8.0 9.2 7.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.47 -0.40 PADD 2 9.2 7.1 8.9 9.6 7.1 9.2 8.8 7.0 8.6 0.27 -0.64 PADD 3 8.5 7.0 8.2 9.1 7.0 8.6 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.42 -0.43 PADDs 4/5-CA 9.1 7.0 8.9 9.7 7.0 9.4 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.49 -0.69 California N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00 Nationwide 8.8 7.0 8.2 9.4 7.0 8.6 8.7 7.0 8.2 0.38 -0.45 Tier 3 Control RVP  Under RFS2 RVP Under Tier3 Region RFS1 Ref Case RFS2 Ref Case

## 2017

CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg 8.5 7.0 8.0 9.2 7.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.43 -0.36 8.5 7.0 8.0 9.2 7.1 8.9 9.5 7.1 9.1 8.8 7.0 8.6 0.21 -0.58 9.2 7.1 8.9 8.5 7.0 8.2 9.1 7.0 8.6 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.38 -0.39 8.5 7.0 8.2 9.1 7.0 8.9 9.6 7.0 9.3 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.43 -0.63 9.1 7.0 8.9 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00 N/A 7.0 7.0 8.8 7.0 8.2 9.3 7.0 8.6 8.7 7.0 8.2 0.34 -0.41 8.8 7.0 8.2 RVP  Under RFS2 RVP  Under Tier3 RFS1 Ref Case RFS2 Ref Case Assuming 75% of RFG is E15 (Balance of E15 goes to CG) Assuming 9 RFS1 Ref Case Tier 3 ControlCG RFG Avg CG RFG Avg 9.2 7.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 8.0 0.47 -0.40 9.6 7.1 9.2 8.8 7.0 8.6 0.27 -0.64 9.1 7.0 8.6 8.5 7.0 8.2 0.42 -0.43 9.7 7.0 9.4 8.9 7.0 8.7 0.49 -0.69 N/A 7.0 7.0 N/A 7.0 7.0 0.00 0.00 9.4 7.0 8.6 8.7 7.0 8.2 0.38 -0.45 90% of RFG is E15 (Balance of E15 goes to CG) RFS2 Ref Case Tier 3 Control RVP  Under RFS2 RVP  Under Tier3