alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      81,321,955
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               71,268,737
<ALLOWANCES>                              (29,525,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           139,189,796
<PP&E>                                      46,793,197
<DEPRECIATION>                             (7,664,905)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             313,310,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,379,172
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       276,253
<OTHER-SE>                                 153,503,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               313,310,205
<SALES>                                    208,000,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           208,000,859
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           184,148,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,726,576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             22,126,056
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,836,066
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         15,289,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,289,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-2858

_____________________________

JOSIAH BETHEL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Terry Lewis, Judge.

May 7, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Michael Jerome Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of 

Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Josiah 

Bethel, pro se, Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 2015-08045) published on pages 18442 and 18443 of the issue for Wednesday, April 8, 2015.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco heading, the entry for Cathay Financial Holding Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan, is revised to read as follows:

A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:

                    1.                     *Cathay Financial Holding Co., Ltd., Cathay Life Insurance Co., Ltd., Liang Ting Industrial Co., Ltd., Lin Yuan Investment Co., Ltd., Pai Hsing Investment Co., Ltd., Tung Chi Capital Co., Ltd., and Wan Ta Investment Co., Ltd., all in Taipei, Taiwan, and Wan Bao Development Co., Ltd.,*                     New Taipei, Taiwan; to acquire Conning Holdings Corp., Hartford, Connecticut, and thereby engage in financial and investment advisory activities, and agency transactional services for customer investments, pursuant to sections 225.28(b)(6) and (b)(7).                

Comments on this application must be received by April 23, 2015.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 13, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-08713 Filed 4-15-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3953 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the work opportunity 

tax credit to include long-term unemployed individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. BOCCIERI (for himself and Mr. ROONEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the work opportunity tax credit to include long-term 

unemployed individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Back to Work Tax 

5 Credit Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT TO INCLUDE 

7 LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (H), by striking the peVerDate Nov 24 2008 22:54 Oct 28, 2009 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3953.IH H3953

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3953 IH

1 riod at the end of subparagraph (I) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, 

2 and by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(J) a long-term unemployed individual.’’. 

4 (b) LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYED INDIVIDUAL.—Sub5 section (d) of section 51 of such Code is amended by re6 designating paragraphs (11), (12), (13), and (14) as para7 graphs (12), (13), (14), and (15), repsectively, and by in8 serting after paragraph (10) the following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(11) LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYED INDI10 VIDUAL.—The term ‘long-term unemployed indi11 vidual’ means any individual who is certified by the 

12 designated local agency as being in receipt of unem13 ployment compensation under State or Federal law 

14 for not less than 26 consecutive weeks during the 1- 

15 year period ending on the hiring date.’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

18 the employer after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2021 AFSAM

Combat Rifleman

RI3250

SHOOTER SCORE-Vs ROST # STATE\COUNTRY 

1 SSGT ROOK, GAVIN W 121 ND 19 285- 2 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 131 CO 16 285- 3 SSG VARGAS, ERIK J 132 CA 16 283- 4 CPT MILLER, GARRETT E 117 AR 21 282- 5 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 162 USAR 23 279- 6 SFC NOE, JOSEPH T 119 AR 15 279- 7 SSG MORRIS, SEAN D 159 USAR 14 279- 8 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 118 AR 18 277- 9 SFC SWANSON, BRANDON N 100 WI 10 272- 10 SGT HUGHES, DEVIN E 158 USAR 19 271- 11 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 161 USAR 14 271- 12 SSG ABEYTA, PATRICK M 164 USAR 18 270- 13 TSGT DANIEL, SCOTTY W 138 AR 16 270- 14 SSG DEMENT, JERRY D 316 MO 7 266- 15 MSG SMITH, MATTHEW B 136 AR 14 263- 16 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 120 ND 14 262- 17 SFC BAUTISTA, MICHAEL R 125 ID 15 260- 18 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 160 USAR 12 259- 19 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 157 USAR 6 257- 20 TSGT WENG, RYAN B 137 AR 12 256- 21 CW3 KNOTE, ANDY T 163 USAR 13 253- 22 MSG GREGSON, JACOB J 108 UT 10 252- 23 SFC GODEL, JASON W 156 USAR 10 251- 24 SGT GRIFFETH, ALEXANDRA I 114 VA 9 251- 25 SFC KEENOM, DAVID D 112 TN 11 250- 26 MSG BURDETTE, RODERICK II 165 USAR 8 238- 27 SGM MININO, ANTHONY A 167 USAR 5 236- 28 CSM BALL, MICHAEL E 166 USAR 5 210-

Page 1 of 1 Time printed: 9/2/2021 6:24:38 PM
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03024**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03024\03024_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03024\03024_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03024\03024_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03024\03024_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03024\03024_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03024\03024_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03024\03024_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03024\03024_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03024\Supporting documentation\03024_Part D All ponds.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03024\Supporting documentation\03024_WaterUseSchematic.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03024\Supporting documentation\03024_Attachment 2 - Ariel View Photo.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03024\Supporting documentation\03024_Attachment 3 - PondDiagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 03024\Supporting documentation\03024_Attachment 4 - SitePlan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 14, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 134531 & (12)(13)(15) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. WILLIAM R. THIEL and FAY THIEL, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Justices

v SC: 134531 COA: 278140 Ingham CC: 06-000582-NO BONDARENKO LIMITE D, L.L.C., and KEYSTONE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Ju stice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for l eave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISM ISSED with prejudice and without costs.

t0911 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 14, 2007

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3965 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3965

  To require full and complete public disclosure of the terms of home 
                 mortgages held by Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2009

   Ms. Speier (for herself, Mr. Towns, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Foster, Ms. 
   Kaptur, Mr. Driehaus, Ms. Watson, Mr. Cummings, and Mr. Quigley) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require full and complete public disclosure of the terms of home 
                 mortgages held by Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING MORTGAGE DISCLOSURE.

    Section 102(a)(4)(A) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 
U.S.C. App) is amended by inserting after ``spouse'' the following: ``, 
except that this exception shall not apply to a reporting individual 
described in section 101(f)(9)''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the  Amendment to Quarterly  report of China Pharma
Holdings,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, Xinhua Wu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Basic Empire  Corporation  and will be retained by Basic Empire
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                                                         Date: May 11, 2006

                                                         By: /s/ Xinhua Wu
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
Argued and submitted September 30,

reversed and remanded November 10, 2004,

petition for review denied March 22, 2005 (338 Or 363)

#### STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, *v.*REGGIE PRATT, *Respondent.*

0205-32916; A120448

102 P3d 149

Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Joshua B. Crowther, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, and Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim and Schuman, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*237PER CURIAM

Defendant is charged with witness tampering arising from a previous trial on robbery charges. The state appeals the trial court’s order in this case denying the state’s motion to admit defendant’s prior testimony given on cross-examination in the robbery trial and granting defendant’s motion to suppress his prior testimony. In the testimony, defendant admitted that he knew an alleged accomplice to the witness tampering and that that person had told him that witnesses to the robbery were “snitching” on him. The trial court accepted defendant’s argument that the testimony violated his right against self-incrimination, and it ruled that he should have received new *Miranda*warnings before testifying in the robbery trial. We reverse.

In *State v. Randall,*27 Or App 869, 557 P2d 1386 (1976), *rev den,*278 Or 553 (1977), we held that the state’s use of the testimony of a defendant who had previously testified at a parole revocation hearing without receiving *Miranda*warnings did not violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The same analysis applies under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. Here, defendant’s testimony in the robbery trial was relevant to those charges. The fact that the testimony that the state offered in this case occurred on cross-examination rather than on direct examination does not affect its admissibility. By testifying on his own behalf on direct examination, defendant waived the constitutional protection on all matters properly germane to and connected with his testimony in chief. *State v. Cruse,*231 Or 326, 330, 372 P2d 974 (1962); *see also*ORS 136.643.

Reversed and remanded.
0381

#### TEXCON, INC., Appellant, v. ANDERSON AVIATION, INC., Reed Garrison, and Carolina Aero Service, Respondents.

(326 S. E. (2d) 168)

*Henry F. Floyd,*of *Acker, Acker, Floyd & Welmaker,*Pick-ens, *for appellants.*

*Joseph G. Wright, III,*Anderson, *for respondents.*

Heard Nov. 19, 1984.

Decided Feb. 1, 1985.

Shaw, Judge:

This is an action to construe a contract. Appellant Texcon, Inc., contracted with respondent Anderson Aviation, Inc., to have performed an annual inspection and other repairs to its *308airplane. Disputing Anderson’s invoice, Texcon brought this action. Without construing the contract, the master in equity-ordered Texcon to pay most of the bill. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

The issues raised on appeal are (1) did Texcon authorize the repairs the master ordered it to pay for and (2) did Texcon prove that Anderson breached the contract by failing to complete repairs by specified date.

An action to construe a written, clear contract is an action at law. *J.T.H. Co., Inc. v. Vane,*323 S. E. (2d) 794 (S. C. App. 1984). In legal actions our scope of review extends to the correction of errors of law only. *Townes*Associates, *Ltd. v. City of Greenville,*266 S. C. 81, 221 S. E. (2d) 773 (1976).

A Texcon agent delivered the airplane to Anderson and signed a repair order authorizing an “Annual Inspection and Engine change and Prop overhaul.” “Annual inspection,” a term of art in aircraft maintenance, is defined in the Federal Aviation Administration’s regulations. *See*14 C.F.R. Sections 43.11-43.15. Texcon’s complaint alleges Anderson went beyond these regulations and billed for unauthorized work. In its answer Anderson claims it performed according to the contract. The master did not apply the regulations, even though they are at the center of this controversy; instead, he based his decision on quantum meruit. Further, the master failed to deal with Texcon’s breach of contract claim.

Texcon’s claim entitles it to construction and enforcement of the contract if found to be enforceable. The master erred by failing to interpret the contract and basing his judgment on a theory not pled. *Griggs v. Griggs,*199 S. C. 295, 19 S. E. (2d) 477 (1942). When called upon to construe contracts, courts cannot rule on their wisdom or substitute their interpretation for the agreement clearly entered into between the parties. *Sloan v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co.,*222 S. C. 248, 72 S. E. (2d) 446 (1952).

Accordingly, this matter is remanded for a determination of (1) what was the contract entered into by the parties and (2) whether Anderson breached the contract by failing to complete the repairs in the manner contracted.

*309Reversed and remanded.

Cureton, J., concurs.

Goolsby, J., concurs in result only.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40129 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GEORGE ANTHONY KNOTTS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 182

- 5

Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent George Anthony Knotts has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Knotts has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed
to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Knotts ’s claim of ine ffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 16, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40129 Document: 00512871666 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/16/2014No. 14

- 40129

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 123 (2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Knotts ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMI SSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Counsel’s alternative motion for leave to withdraw is
DENIED as moot.

2 Case: 14-40129 Document: 00512871666 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/16/2014
Exhibit 5





F AEGRE B AKER


D ANIELS





Faegre Baker Daniels LLP


2200 Wells Fargo Center, 90 South Seventh Street


Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-3901


Phone +1 612 766 7000


Fax +1 612 766 1600





May 9, 2014








Board of Directors


XRS Corporation


965 Prairie Center Drive


Eden Prairie, MN 55344





Re:  Registration Statement on Form S-8





Ladies and Gentlemen:





In connection with the Registration Statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Registration Statement”), relating to the offering of up to 2,450,698 additional shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Shares”), of XRS Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Long-Term Incentive and Stock Option Plan (As Amended and Restated February 4, 2009) (the “Plan”), we have examined such corporate records and other documents, including the Registration Statement, and have reviewed such matters of law as we have deemed relevant hereto, and, based upon such examination and review, it is our opinion that all necessary corporate action on the part of the Company has been taken to authorize the issuance and sale of the Shares and that, when issued and sold as contemplated in the Plan, the Shares will be legally and validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable under the current laws of the State of Minnesota.





We are admitted to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota and the foregoing opinions are limited to the laws of that state and the federal laws of the United States of America.





We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.





Very truly yours,





FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP








By: /s/ John A. Haveman


John A. Haveman
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3863 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Chromate(3-), bis[3-(hydroxy-kO)-4-[[2- 

(hydroxy-kO)-1-naphthalenyl]azo-kN1]-7-nitro-1-naphthalenesulfonato(3- 

)]-, trisodium. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2009 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Chromate(3-), bis[3- 

(hydroxy-kO)-4-[[2-(hydroxy-kO)-1-naphthalenyl]azokN1]-7-nitro-1-naphthalenesulfonato(3-)]-, trisodium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHROMATE(3-), BIS[3- (HYDROXY-KO)-4-[[2-(HY4 DROXY-KO)-1-NAPHTHALENYL]AZO-KN1]-7- 

5 NITRO-1- NAPHTHALENESULFONATO(3-)]-, 

6 TRISODIUM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3863 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Chromate(3-), bis[3-(hydroxykO)-4-[[2-(hydroxy-kO)-1- 

naphthalenyl]azo-kN1]-7- 

nitro-1- 

naphthalenesulfonato(3-)]-, 

trisodium. (CAS No. 57693– 

14–8) (provided for in subheading 2921.59.80) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

5 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS