alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)  August 4, 2003

MAGNUM HUNTER
RESOURCES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Nevada                                                         | 1-12508                 | 87-0462881                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ---------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (Commission File Number | (IRS Employer Identification No.)

600 East Las Colinas
Blvd., Suite 1100, Irving, Texas 75039(Address of principal
executive offices)        (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (972)
401-0752

(Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)

Item 12. Results of Operations and
Financial Condition.

The
following information shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such a filing.

On
August 4, 2003, Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. reported its second quarter 2003 financial
results.

Item 7. Financial Statements and
Exhibits.

(c)
Exhibits

99.1 Press
Release, dated August 4, 2003.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

| | MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC.BY:  /s/ Chris TongChris TongSr. Vice President and CFO
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:       August 4, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      18,066,884
<SECURITIES>                                20,550,986
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,852,428
<PP&E>                                       5,019,128
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,527,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,385,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,934,799
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,743,852
<COMMON>                                       130,480
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,190,893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,385,280
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,397,521
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,580,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (17,182,779)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (17,182,779)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (17,182,779)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.57)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1





                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Wayne R.
Hellman and/or Louis S. Fisi his attorney-in-fact, with the power of
substitution, for him in his capacity as director of Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc., to sign the Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year
ending on June 30, 1999, and any amendments thereto, and to file the same with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorney-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

SIGNATURE                           TITLE                           DATE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/s/  Francis H. Beam                Director                September 28, 1999
-------------------------
Francis H. Beam

/s/  John R. Buerkle                Director                September 28, 1999
-------------------------
John R. Buerkle

/s/  Theodore A. Filson             Director                September 28, 1999
-------------------------
Theodore A. Filson

/s/ Louis S. Fisi                   Director                September 28, 1999
-------------------------
Louis S. Fisi

/s/  Susuma Harada                  Director                September 28, 1999
-------------------------
Susuma Harada

/s/  Wayne R. Hellman               Director                September 28, 1999
-------------------------
Wayne R. Hellman

/s/  Alan J. Ruud                   Director                September 28, 1999
-------------------------
Alan J. Ruud

/s/  A Gordon Tunstall              Director                September 28, 1999
-------------------------
A Gordon Tunstall
1995 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2-9-1995

Bundens v JE Brenneman Co

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 94-3163

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Bundens v JE Brenneman Co" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 24.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/24
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 

 Nos. 94-3163 and 94-3175 

 

 

 BARBARA J. BUNDENS, 

 (widow of Howard E. Bundens), 

 Petitioner (No. 94-3163) 

v. 

 J.E. BRENNEMAN COMPANY; 

 TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY; and 

 DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' 

 COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES 

 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 

 Respondents 

 

 J.E. BRENNEMAN COMPANY and 

 TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 

 Petitioners (No. 94-3175) 

v. 

 BARBARA J. BUNDENS 

 (widow of Howard E. Bundens) and 

 DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' 

 COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, 

 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; 

 BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, 

 Respondents 

 

 Petitions from Benefits Review Board 

 Nos. 0090-1 and 91-1242 

 

 Argued: September 19, 1994 

 BEFORE: Becker and Cowen, Circuit Judges

 and Pollak, District Judge* 
 

*Honorable Louis H. Pollak, United States District Judge for the 

Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. 

 

 ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION

 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above 

case, filed January 26, 1995, be amended as follows: 

 On page 17 of the typescript, footnote 15, line 23 

should be changed from "$232,205" to "$235,126." Lines 25-28 

should be deleted in their entirety. 

 On page 31 of the typescript, lines 14 and 22 should be 

changed from "$232,205" to "$235,126." 

 On page 32 of the typescript, line 1 and footnote 27, 

line 20 should be changed from "$38,382" to "$41,303." 

 On page 35 of the typescript, line 11 should be changed 

from "$232,205" to "$235,126." 

 /s/ Robert E. Cowen

 Circuit Judge 

DATED: February 9, l995
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

JEREMY D. GREENFIELD,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 785 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Nos. DA 22-0496

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MERLE RAYMOND BRANSTETTER,

Defendant and Appellant.

_______________________________________________________________

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 30 2023

06/30/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0496
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,737
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,662
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,591
<PP&E>                                           1,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                     529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,998
<SALES>                                         12,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,656
<CGS>                                           10,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (215)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    524
<INCOME-TAX>                                       206
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
feet feet

feet Direction:

feet Direction: feet Direction: feet Direction:

Rng: Twp: Sec: Rng: Sec: Twp: Meridian:

List Electric Logs Run: KB

GR Elevations TVD** MD Plug Back Total Depth TVD** MD Total Depth Observation Storage Enhanced Recovery Stratigraphic Disposal Gas/Coalbed Oil Dry Well Classification: Date Casing Set or D&A: Date TD: Spud Date: (when the 1st bit hit the dirt) Federal, Indian or State Lease Number: Field Number: Field Name: Dist: Dist: Dist: Dist: ** If directional footage at Top of Prod. Zone ** If directional footage at Bottom Hole GPS Instrument Operator's Name: PDOP Reading: Date of Measurement: GPS Data: As Drilled Longitude:

As Drilled Latitude: Distance:

Distance: Footage at surface: Range: Township: Section: API Number 05- - - Well Name: Location: QtrQtr: Well Number: County:

Digital Copies of ALL Logs must be Attached per Rule 308A Direction: Direction:

Rig Release Date: Per Rule 308A.b. Per Rule 308A, this form and all required attachments shall be submitted after completing the drilling operations to drill, sidetrack, or deepen a wellbore and after changing the casing and/or cement configuration of a wellbore. If any attempt has been made to test, complete, or produce the well, the operator shall also submit a Form 5A (Completed Interval Report) per Rule 308B. If the well has been plugged, the operator shall also submit a Form 6 (Well Abandonment Report) per Rule 311. Preliminary completion 

# State of Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission 1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 801, Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: (303) 894-2100 Fax: (303) 894-2109 

## DRILLING COMPLETION REPORT FORM 5 Rev 10/14 Completion Type Final completion Fax: Phone: Zip: State: Contact Name: City: Address: Name of Operator: OGCC Operator Number: Email: Document Number: Date Received:

**Page 1 of 2**Operator Comments:

I hereby certify all statements made in this form are, to the best of my knowledge, true, correct, and complete. Signed: Print Name: Title: Date: Email: Details of work: Cement bottom Cement top Method used String Cementing tool setting/perf depth Cement volume Cement work date: 

## STAGE/TOP OUT/REMEDIAL CEMENT Csg/Liner Top Status CONDUCTOR SURFACE 1ST STRING 2ND STRING 3RD STRING 1ST LINER 2ND LINER Casing Type Size of Hole Size of Casing Wt/Ft Setting DepthSacks Cmt Cmt Bot Cmt Top 

## CASING, LINER AND CEMENT

FORMATION LOG INTERVALS AND TEST ZONES COMMENTS (All DST and Core Analysis must be submitted to COGCC) Cored DST Check if applies Bottom Top Measured Depth FORMATION NAME

**Page 2 of 2**
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Principal  Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge,  (i) the Form 10-QSB of
Weststar  Financial  Services  Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended
June 30,  2005  (the  "Report"),  as  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods  presented
therein.


                                         WESTSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION



Date: August 9, 2005                 By: /s/   G. Gordon Greenwood
                                         -------------------------------------

                                         G. Gordon Greenwood
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


                                                                              26
22570

#### The STATE, Respondent v. Frank MILLER, Appellant.

(345 S. E. (2d) 489)

Supreme Court

*Jack B. Swerling*and *Richard A. Harpootlian,*of *Swerling and Harpootlian,*Columbia, *for appellant.*

*Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Atty. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., Staff Atty. Norman Mark Rapoport,*and *Sol. James C. Anders,*Columbia, *for respondent.*

Submitted Feb. 24, 1986.

Decided June 16, 1986.

*317
      *Per Curiam:*

Appellant was convicted of two counts of distribution of heroin and sentenced to eighteen years imprisonment. Prior to trial, the trial court ordered appellant to supply the State with a list of proposed defense witnesses. Appellant argues this was error because Circuit Court Rule 1031 does not authorize discovery of defense witnesses. We agree but affirm because we find no prejudice.

In construing Rule 103, this Court has looked to federal courts’ interpretation of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on which Rule 103 is based. *State v. Hoffman,*285 S. Ct. 130, 328 S. E. (2d) 631 (1985). There is no right to discovery in a criminal case unless permitted by statute or court rule. *State v. Flood,*257 S. C. 141, 184 S. E. (2d) 549 (1971); *see also United States v. Layton,*90 F.R.D. 520 (N. D. Cal. 1981) (court has no inherent authority to compel a defendant to provide pretrial discovery not specifically authorized in Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure). Rule 103 does not specifically permit the discovery of witness lists. Therefore, we hold the trial court erred in compelling appellant to provide a list of defense witnesses.

The error, however, does not require reversal of appellant’s conviction. Appellant’s only witness was JoAnn Williams, who led undercover officers to appellant in exchange for a police agreement to drop prostitution charges against her. Clearly, the State knew of Ms. Williams’ involvement in the case and the substance of her testimony. Under these circumstances, the required disclosure of Ms. Williams’ name was harmless error. *State v. Riggins,*262 S. C. 466, 205 S. E. (2d) 376 (1974).

Appellant’s remaining exceptions are without merit and are disposed of under Supreme Court Rule 23.

Now Rule 8, Criminal Practice Rules.
ex10-7.htm



Exhibit 10.7


 



Sales contract of Industrial and Mineral Products


 


                      Contract No.______


Supplier: Taiyuan Hongxing Carbon Black Co., Ltd


 


Buyer:    Qingdao Guoren Technology co., Ltd.


 


Place of signing contract: Qingxu:Taiyuan


 


Date of signing contract:January 18, 2009


 


1. Product name, trade mark, model, quantity, amount of money, delivery time and quantity


 



	
Product Name

	
Model

	
Unit

	
Quantity Required/Monthly

	
Price


(RMB per ton)

	
Amount(RMB)

	
Remarks


	
Carbon Black

	
N220

	
Ton

	
100

	
5000

	  	
1. The price in this agreement is current market price 

2. The quantity is decided by the number actually occurred.




	
Carbon Black

	
N330

	
Ton

	
100

	
4700

	  	
 


	
Carbon Black

	
N660

	
Ton

	
100

	
4700

	  	  
	
Total

	  





 


2. Quality requirements, technical standards, the conditions and duration of which supplier is responsible for: National standard or by buyer’s standard


 


3. The place of delivery and method: buyer’s warehouse, Specific quantity and delivery time are subject to telephone or fax-based communication


 


4. Means of transport, expense for transport and related items: The buyer bear the burden


 


5. Reasonable wear and tear and method of calculation    None


 


6. Packaging standards supply and recycle of packaging materials   None


 


7. Acceptance criteria, methods, and period to hold discussion on goods delivered: Within 7 days after the delivery


 


8. Random spare, number and supply method of accessories    None


 


9. Payment method and period: Within 30 days after the delivery and the invoice being recognized.


 


10. If guaranty is needed, the guaranty agreement is also needed as appendix    None


 


11. Liability for breach of contract: It shall be settled according to the contract law of PRC


 


12. The mechanism of dispute settlement:  It shall be settled through negotiation.


 


13. Other agreed matters:


 


  a. Quality Assurance Documents


 


  b. The price is subject to the market condition, and the quantity is determined by the actual number occurred. It shall inform the buyer at 7 day’s advance if there is a change in above items.


 



	
Supplier:


Company Name (Seal):


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent :


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:

	
Buyer:


Company Name:


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent:


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:







 Valid period: From January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


By signing below, the Principal Executive Officer hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report on Form 10-QSB fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Hybrid Fuels Inc.



Signed this 21st day of May 2007:



By: /s/ Douglas Dickie
--------------------------------
Douglas Dickie
Principal Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hybrid Fuels Inc. and will be
retained by Hybrid Fuels Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### State vs. Ives. State vs. Goodrich.

May 15.

Under the Revised Statutes of 185S, a party who has suffered judgment by default before a justice of the peace, has the right of appeal. *Forbes m. Turner,*14 Wis., 622, followed.

APPEALS from the Circuit Court for *Jefferson*County.

*L. B. Caswell,*for' appellant.

*By the Court,*

Dixon, O. J.

Civil actions commenced before a justice of the peace, to recover the forfeiture prescribed by section 7, chap. 175, laws of 1860, for keeping dogs not registered, numbered, described and licensed according to the provisions of that act. R S., chap. 155, sec. 1. Judgments by default before the j ustice, for the forfeiture and costs, and appeals by the defendants to the circuit court. The circuit court dismissed the appeals because there was no demurrer, answer or issue in either case before the justice. Appeals to this court from those orders. The cases are governed by *Burnham v. Turner et al.,*14 Wis., 622, and the orders must be reversed, and causes remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Ordered accordingly.