alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Daniel Hodges, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly on Form 10-QSB of Western Transitions,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

b) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: August 13, 2005

/s/ Daniel Hodges

Daniel Hodges, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
31.1


I, Glenn
Spina, certify that:





1.  I
have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Emerging Vision, Inc.;





2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  This
certification is intentionally omitted because this report does not contain
financial statements or other financial information;





4.  This
certification is intentionally omitted because this report does not contain or
amend disclosure pursuant to Item 307 or 308 of Regulation S-K, and such
disclosure is not otherwise required to be amended given the nature of the
reasons for the amendment.; and





5.  This
certification is intentionally omitted because this report does not contain or
amend disclosure pursuant to Item 307 or 308 of Regulation S-K, and such
disclosure is not otherwise required to be amended given the nature of the
reasons for the amendment.











Date:  April
30, 2010








/s/ Glenn SpinaGlenn
      SpinaChief
      Executive Officer
----

| (1)     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:   November 20, 2015 | By:    | /s/  Kyle Kennedy                                                                                                                                        |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   | Kyle Kennedy                                                                                                                                                  |   |
|                                 |   | President,Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and acting Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
* Judge Luttig was a member of the original panel but did not participate in this decision. This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6985
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT LESTER KIRBY, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-111-BR; CA-04-225-BR) Submitted: April 26, 2006 Decided: May 19, 2006
Before LUTTIG, * WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lester Kirby, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Lester Kirby, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kirby has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EX-10.45



 Exhibit 10.45 
 Summary of MeadWestvaco Corporation 2013 Annual Incentive Plan 
 Under the MeadWestvaco
Corporation Annual Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which is a part of the 2005 Performance Incentive Plan, Amended and Restated effective February 25, 2013, the Compensation and Organization Development Committee (the
“Committee”) of the Board of Directors annually awards each executive an annual incentive award that is payable in cash. The size of each executive officer’s annual award is determined by application of his or her annual incentive
target expressed as a percentage of base salary, which the Committee examines annually to confirm that the target is reasonable when viewed against external competitive market data, peer group and general industry trends. 

For 2013, the Committee established a performance-based incentive pool for certain executive officers equal to a designated percentage of actual earnings
before interest and tax (“EBIT”) achieved. EBIT is defined as full year net sales less the cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding interest income and expense, corporate income taxes, extraordinary
items, discontinued operations, restructuring charges and certain one-time costs and the cumulative effect of accounting changes. 
 Funding of
the performance-based incentive pool under this formula permits the Committee to pay annual cash incentives to all executive officers based on the attainment of additional key financial and/or operational metrics. These additional objectives for
executive officers are also set by the Committee, and generally include such goals as (i) economic profit (“EP”), defined as after-tax EBIT, less the company’s weighted average cost of capital applied to total capital employed,
(net debt plus total equity) subject to certain adjustments, (ii) revenue growth and (iii) productivity. For each of these performance objectives, the Committee sets performance driven threshold, target and stretch payout levels reflecting
a suggested payout curve ranging from 50% of the target incentive to 200% of the target incentive. Annual incentives are also subject to an individual maximum payout in accordance with the terms of the Plan. The Committee may adjust award values to
reflect progress made towards target performance levels for EP, revenue growth and productivity goals, provided no awards are payable in the event the threshold for EBIT (which funds the incentive pool) is not achieved. 

Annual incentive awards are subject to the company’s Recoupment Policy.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Energy  Producers,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Dennis R. Alexander,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 9th, 2004



/s/ Dennis R. Alexander

Dennis R. Alexander

Chief Financial Officer
BF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0204

EMMANUEL F. GOMEZ,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and

including September 11, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 10 2021

08/10/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0204
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00446-CV

Paul Alvarado, Appellant

v.

ZMI Investments LLC, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-19-004708, THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was originally due on December 9, 2019. On March 3, 2020, 

this Court sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a failure to 

file a satisfactory response by March 13, 2020, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for 

want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Edward Smith, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: April 2, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          17,114                   4,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,985                  10,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,139                     894
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       4,385,549               4,154,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                 316,240                 240,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,268,485               4,056,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                      1,996,843               1,847,198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,268,485               2,021,814
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               643,829                 561,097
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,746                 167,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               134,841                 113,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,726                 116,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                195,516                 163,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            253,970                 185,939
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   213,203                 148,162
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.93                    2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.89                    2.07


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**I, Peter Q. Repetti, Chief Financial Officer of Blackboard Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify,under the standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:1.      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the“Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and2.      The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 3, 2005         /s/ Peter Q. Repetti  Peter Q Repetti
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         220,562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,920
<PP&E>                                          36,871
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 573,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,007
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,446,185
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   573,618
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (452,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
August 30, 2011

Mr. Gary R. Loyd The Avsource Group 8901 US Highway

6 Parachute, CO 81635
- 9730 Dear Mr. Lo yd : This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for rulemaking. It transmits our decision and exp lains its basis. **The Basis for Our Decision :**  By letter dated August 26, 2010 , you petition ed the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on beha lf of The Avsource Group for a petition for rulemaking to amend § 21.197(a)(5) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
. The proposed amendment would enable issuance of a special flight permit for conducti ng customer demonstration flights in used aircraft. Section 21.197(a) prescribes, in part, that a special flight permit may be issued for an aircra ft that may

not currently

meet applicable airworthiness requirements , but is capable of safe flight, for the purpose of conducting customer demonstration flights in new production aircraft that have satisfactorily completed production flight tests. We have reviewed your petition and determined the amendment you suggest would not improve safety , and could provide an unintended loophole in the regulation that enables used aircraft to operat e in a substandard configuration. The provisions for use of a spe cial flight permit are extended to manufacturers of new aircraft because these aircraft remain under the manufacturer's quality s ys tem . This enabl es the manufacturer to demonstrate the new aircraft to prospective buyers before the FAA issu es an airworthin ess certificate for the aircraft . Conversel y, used aircraft that have been issued by a special or standard airworthiness certificate by the FAA must comply with certification and maintenance requirements appropriate for the aircraft. The owner or operato r may

perform customer demonstration flights on used aircraft provided the aircraft meets all regulatory requirements. As such, there is no need or basis for operating a used aircraft under a special flight permit for the purpose of customer demonstration s.**Our Decision :** 

Pursuant to the authority

contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701 delegated to me by the Administrator, your petition for rulemaking is her eby denied. Sincerel y, /s/ Frank P. Paskiewicz Acting Director, Aircraft Certification Servic eProject No.: A IR
- 10
- 388
- P

Project Officer: Craig Holmes ARM
- 20 7 : FShaver : 1 / 19 /10:Doc# 31867 ARM
- 1/200/20 7 : AIR
- 1/ 2 00/2 30 ; ACE
- 111 Stylewriter: Style Index: Excellent ; Average Sentence: Excellent ; Passive: Good **MR GARY R LOYD T**  **HE AVSOURCE GROUP 8901 US HIGHWAY 6**  **PARACHUTE CO 81635**  **- 9730**
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Energy  Producers,  Inc. (the

"Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with

the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregg

Fryett, Chairman and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,

as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)

or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of

the Company.





Date:  May 17, 2004





/s/ Gregg Fryett

--------------

Gregg Fryett

Chief Executive Officer