alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DCA/ASA/10 

DCA/ASL/538 

22 February 2010 

Transport Malta 

Malta Transport Centre 

Marsa, MRS 1917 

Malta 

Tel: (356)2122 2203 

Fax: (356)2125 0365 

Email: info.tnri@transport.gov.nnt 

www.transport.gov.mt 

r 

MrPaulGretch 

Director 

Office of International Aviation 

US Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street SW 

Room 6402 

Washington DC 20590 

USA 

Dear Mr Gretch 

Reciprocity Statement 

This letter is to confirm that the Civil Aviation Directorate within Transport Malta will grant, 

on the basis of reciprocity, to US air carriers all rights included in the Air Transport 

Agreement between the European Commimity and its Member States signed on April 30, 

2007 and in force since 30 March 2008. 

Yours sincerely 

NAttard 

A/Director General 

Civil Aviation
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 10.1(b)


                  PHARMACOPEIA, INC. 1994 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN

                                 Amendment No. 2

                  Pursuant to the power reserved to it in Section 14 of the
Pharmacopeia, Inc. 1994 Incentive Stock Plan, as amended (the "Plan"), the Board
of Directors of Pharmacopeia, Inc. hereby amends the Plan as follows: Section
2(t) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

                  "'Plan Administrator' shall mean the particular entity,
whether the Board, the Primary Committee, the Secondary Committee, or a
subcommittee thereof, which is authorized to administer the Plan with respect to
one or more classes of eligible persons, to the extent such entity is carrying
out its administrative functions under the Plan with respect to the persons
under its jurisdiction. A subcommittee of the Primary Committee or the Secondary
Committee which has been approved by the Board may be delegated those
administrative functions under the Plan which have been authorized to be
performed hereunder by the Primary or Secondary Committee, as the case my be."

                  To record the adoption of this Amendment No. 2, the Company
has caused its authorized officers to affix its corporation name and seal this
___ day of ____, 1997.


CORPORATE SEAL                         PHARMACOPEIA, INC.


Attest: /s/ Lewis J. Shuster           By: /s/ Joseph A. Mollica
        ----------------------------       -------------------------------------
Lewis J. Shuster,                      Joseph A. Mollica,
Secretary                              Chairman of the Board, President
                                       and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1


          Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Sec. 906

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Debt Resolve, Inc.(the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James D.
Burchetta, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
         Company.

Date: May 16, 2005                    /s/ JAMES D. BURCHETTA
                                      -----------------------
                                      James D. Burchetta
                                      Chief Executive Officer


          Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sec. 906

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Debt Resolve, Inc.(the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Katherine A.
Dering, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
         Company.

Date: May 16, 2005                    /s/ Katherine A. Dering
                                      -----------------------
                                      Katherine A. Dering
                                      Chief Financial Officer
# City Of

# Rockland July 14th, 2014

To:

Re: Mr. Michael Martin Essential Air Service Division, X-53 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 DOT-OST-1997-2784 Knox County Maine Airport Cape Air Proposal . ".

DearMr. Martin, We are writing as the Mayor andthe City Manager ofRockland Maine. As you know Rockland isthe County seat of Knox County and largest municipality served by Cape Air's flights atthe Knox County Regional Airport. The Airport is inthe adjoining town ofOwls Head. The City ofRockland is aregional center forbanking, commercial fishing, light manufacturing, specialty food production, tourism, and variety of "creative economy" related organizations and businesses (art museums, graphic design, information technology, etc.). The link Cape Airprovides to Boston (and, for some users, toplaces beyond) is an important contribution to the economy ofRockland and the surrounding Knox County area. We reached out to both businesses and families that routinely use Cape Air and received almost identical comments: (a) Cape Air has provided great service under their current EAS contract; (b) more flights atpeak summer times would be an asset; (c) ifthe fares where slightly lower demand might be even higher; (d) users appreciate the more frequent flights even though that may necessitate the use of smaller planes. In short, Cape Air links Rockland's businesses to Boston and beyond. Cape Air's EAS provides agre.at(and popular) option fortourist coming to Rocklanc).This service links individuals to medical services inBoston. And, Cape Air's EAS connects local families to sons and daughters attending college throughout the country. All key goals ofthe EAS program. Allthe information the City has is consistent with the recommendations made to you by the Chair ofthe Knox County Commissioners inaletter sent last week (7/8). We hope US DOT continues support forthis service (hopefully at an expanded level) forthe next four years. 

# t.,.~,~ (L-,r~
Larry R. Pritchett Mayor Thomas J. Luttrell Acting City Manager

207-594-0300 (GRice) 270Pleasant Street, Rockland ME 04841 207-594-9481 (Fax) www.d.rock1and.me.us
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1974. KATIE RENEE PYLES v. THE STATE.

Katie Renee Pyles pleaded guilty to several offenses, including two counts of

homicide by vehicle. She subsequently filed a motion to modify sentence. The trial

court denied the motion on September 27, 2018, and Pyles filed a notice of appeal on

November 6, 2018. We lack jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely

filed.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to

be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal

is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v. State,

264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Because Pyles filed her notice of

appeal 40 days after entry of the trial court’s order, her appeal is untimely, and it is

hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

May 31, 2019

05/31/2019
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Carol DiRaimo, Vice President of Investor Relations
         (913) 967-4109

              Applebee's International Reports May Comparable Sales

OVERLAND   PARK,   KAN.,  May  31,  2006  --  Applebee's   International,   Inc.
(Nasdaq:APPB) today reported comparable sales for the four-week period ended May
21, 2006.

System-wide  domestic comparable sales decreased 1.9 percent for the May period,
while comparable sales for domestic franchise restaurants decreased 2.0 percent.
Comparable  sales for company  restaurants  decreased 1.9 percent,  reflecting a
decrease in guest traffic of between 5.5 and 6.0 percent, combined with a higher
average check.

System-wide domestic comparable sales for the quarter-to-date period through May
(eight weeks) have  decreased 1.0 percent,  with domestic  franchise  restaurant
comparable sales down 0.8 percent and company  comparable  restaurant sales down
1.8 percent.

The company noted that it experienced broad geographic  weakness  throughout the
system during the month, with the most challenging company markets continuing to
be New England and parts of Virginia  and  Michigan.  As a result of the current
uncertainty   surrounding  the  macro  consumer  environment,   the  company  is
reevaluating  its full year 2006 guidance  with respect to comparable  sales and
earnings per share.  The company expects to reissue guidance in conjunction with
its second quarter earnings release on July 26th.

Applebee's International,  Inc., headquartered in Overland Park, Kan., develops,
franchises and operates  restaurants under the Applebee's  Neighborhood  Grill &
Bar brand,  the largest casual dining concept in the world.  As of May 21, 2006,
there were 1,846 Applebee's  restaurants  operating system-wide in 49 states and
16 international  countries.  Additional information on Applebee's International
can be found at the company's website (www.applebees.com).

                                      # # #
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 26, 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00210

- CR

Jose Morales , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court ho lds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal

. Howev er, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflec t that the “S ta tute for Offense”

is “PC 19.02(b) , (c) ” and that the “Finding s on Deadly Weapon” are “ YES, A FIREARM.” The

judgment, as modified , is affirmed

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay cost s, no

adjudica t i on of costs is made.
Rifle EIC

RI3210

AFSAM 2021

SHOOTER SCORE-Xs ROST # STATE\COUNTRY 

1 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 120 ND 202 - 7

2 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 162 USAR 194 - 3

3 SSGT ROOK, GAVIN W 121 ND 192 - 5

4 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 118 AR 189 - 5

5 CPT MILLER, GARRETT E 117 AR 188 - 5

6 SSG VARGAS, ERIK J 132 CA 182 - 2

7 SFC NOE, JOSEPH T 119 AR 179 - 5

8 TSGT DANIEL, SCOTTY W 138 AR 176 - 6

9 SSG ABEYTA, PATRICK M 164 USAR 174 - 2

10 CW3 KNOTE, ANDY T 163 USAR 169 - 3

11 MSG SMITH, MATTHEW B 136 AR 169 - 2

12 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 131 CO 168 - 2

13 SFC SWANSON, BRANDON N 100 WI 168 - 2

14 SFC BAUTISTA, MICHAEL R 125 ID 166 - 5

15 MSG BURDETTE, RODERICK II 165 USAR 166 - 4

16 SSG MORRIS, SEAN D 159 USAR 165 - 6

17 SFC GODEL, JASON W 156 USAR 164 - 3

18 TSGT WENG, RYAN B 137 AR 161 - 3

19 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 161 USAR 160 - 1

20 SGM MININO, ANTHONY A 167 USAR 159 - 5

21 SFC KEENOM, DAVID D 112 TN 158 - 4

22 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 157 USAR 158 - 3

23 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 160 USAR 155 - 6

24 SSG DEMENT, JERRY D 316 MO 155 - 4

25 SGT HUGHES, DEVIN E 158 USAR 155 - 3

26 CSM BALL, MICHAEL E 166 USAR 138 - 2

27 MSG GREGSON, JACOB J 108 UT 133 - 3

28 SGT GRIFFETH, ALEXANDRA I 114 VA 128 - 1

* Has previously been awarded the Distinguished Badge in this discipline. Page 1 of 1

Time printed: 9/2/2021 6:23:43 PM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE IN SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          17,059
<SECURITIES>                                    64,423
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,007
<PP&E>                                          10,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,216)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,780
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,979
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,799
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,898
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,383)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
--ll.. /-ro

A321. A330-300. A340-200. A340-300. A340-500. A340-600, and A380-800 Series L

_r"- Airplanes; and Model AJ3D-201, AJ30-202. A330-203. A330·223. A3J0-243 Airplane a;;, -,.-/0

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation --

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

14910-13-

Federal Aviation Administr:ltiou

Airwortbiness Directives; Airbus Model A300, A300-600, A31 0, A318, A319, A320,

\b'C>;'''\) 14CFR hrt 39 111'1 .

~ .J..~k" No. FAA-2010-++++; Direetorateld •••lifie. 2009-NM-258-AD; Ame.dme

39-**; AD 2010-02-05)

R1N 212o-AA64

(DOT). -

,-

-

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER).

whom it was made immediately effective by AD 2010-02-05, which contained the

requirements of this amendment.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of

certain publications listed in the AD ~ or [INSERT DATE 5 DAYS AFTER DATE OF ~~

the known U.S. oWners and operators ofaffccted airplanes identified above. This AD '

requires modifying the flight deck door. This AD was prompted by a rep"ortindicating:

that certain equipment of the flight deck door is defective. We are issuing this AD to

prevent failure of this equipment, which could jeopardize flight safety.

DATES: This AD becomes effective [iNSERT DATE 5 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

f~

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] to all persons except those persons

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

SUMMARY: This document publishes in the Federal Register an amendment adoprin

airworthiness directive (AD) 2010-02-05 that was sent previously by individual notices ~""-

FAA Form 1:1(10-14,1 (6-I:V) OfFfCw...ALE copy .U."0I'0:.'_1_1~'Ol
exv10w10






Exhibit 10.10




THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.

MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN




Amendment



     Pursuant to Section 17 of The TJX Companies, Inc. Management Incentive Plan (as amended, the
“Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1. Section 2(d) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows, effective as of September 18,
2009:





“‘Fiscal Year’ shall mean the fifty-two or fifty-three week period ending on the
Saturday nearest to the last day of January, and commencing on the Sunday following the
Saturday nearest to the last day of January of the preceding calendar year.”


2. The first paragraph of Section 7(a) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows,
effective for Performance Periods commencing after January 29, 2010 in the case of any award
subject to the provisions of Section 21 of the Plan, and otherwise effective to award
determinations made after the date hereof:





“Upon completion of each Performance Period, the E.C.C. shall review performance relative to
Performance Goals, as adjusted from time to time in accordance with paragraph (b) of Section
6 above, and determine the value of the awards for each Performance Period, subject to the
approval of the President of TJX and/or the Chairman of the E.C.C.”


3. Subsection (b) of Section 21 is hereby amended, effective for Performance Periods commencing
after January 29, 2010, by replacing “(as determined by the E.C.C. based on advice from its outside
auditors)” in clause (ii) and “(as determined by the E.C.C. based on advice from the Company’s
outside auditor)” in clause (iii), in each case, with “(as objectively determined by the E.C.C.)”.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The TJX Companies, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed in its
name and behalf by its officer thereunto duly authorized.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Jeffrey G. Naylor
 	 
	 	Title:  	    Chief Financial and Administrative Officer 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 


Dated: February 2, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annaul Report of Westell Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
     as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



/s/ E. VAN CULLENS
------------------
E. Van Cullens
Chief Executive Officer
June 14, 2004

/s/NICHOLAS C. HINDMAN, Sr.
---------------------------
Nicholas C. Hindman, Sr.
Chief Financial Officer
June 14, 2004
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00009-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF C.R., A.R., AND I.R., CHILDREN 

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Randall County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 6985-L1, Honorable Jack M. Graham, Presiding 

 

April 16, 2019 

 

CONCURRING OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

I concur in the opinion and judgment of the majority and write to explain why I 

believe the “fluid” order referenced by the majority should be condemned for reasons 

unrelated to the effects of an adhesion contract. First, statute imposes upon the trial court 

a duty to conduct status hearings to review both the child’s status and the service plan 

developed for the child. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.201(a) (West 2014). During that 

hearing the trial court must “review the service plan that the department filed . . . for 

reasonableness, accuracy, and compliance with requirements of court orders.” Id.

§ 263.202(b) (West Supp. 2018). This connotes a legislative intent to have the trial court 

remain involved with the obligations imposed on a parent by a service plan; a court does 
2

not abide by that intent by simply issuing an order directing a parent to comply with 

whatever hurdle the Department may opt to impose. Requiring the specific provisions 

violated by a parent to be expressed within a court order assures that the trial court 

remains involved and comports with legislative intent. It would seem to border on an 

impermissible relinquishment of duty to simply tell a parent to abide by whatever terms 

the Department may impose now or in the future and then terminate parental rights due 

to noncompliance with those judicially unapproved terms.

Second, a sister court has held that “[t]o terminate parental rights under subsection 

(O) after the failure to give the parents such express notice of ‘any other term or condition 

that [the Department] determines to be necessary’ to the success of the service plan and 

the failure to embody that term or condition in the court order is violative of the due 

process required by our standard of review.” In re G.C., No. 02-17-00259-CV, 2018 Tex. 

App. LEXIS 750, at *50–52 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 25, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.) 

(emphasis added). I read this as illustrating that the omission of the provisions a parent 

must follow from a court order strikes at the constitutionally mandated due process that a 

parent must receive. 

In short, a “fluid” order may liken to an adhesion contract in that one party to the 

arrangement has no choice. Yet, it also transgresses legislative intent and due process. 

Including within a court order the specific hurdles a parent must clear assures both due 

process and independent review by a judge of their reasonableness.

Brian Quinn

Chief Justice