alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates II, L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|February 14, 2011 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES





               SUBSIDIARIES                           STATE OF INCORPORATION

               Ajay Leisure Products, Inc.                Delaware

               Leisure Life, Inc.                         Tennessee

               Palm Springs Golf, Inc.                    Colorado

               Prestige Golf Corp.                        Delaware

               Pro Golf International, Inc.               Delaware

               Pro Golf of America, Inc.                  Michigan

               ProGolf.com, Inc.                          Delaware
2023 AFSAM

Reflexive Fire

RI3020

SHOOTER SCORE ROST # STATE\COUNTRY

1 WO1 DOUGLAS, JAMES 120 UK 176

2 SGT SMITH, ANDREW 140 NETHERLANDS 176

3 MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 138 UK 176

4 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 133 CO 175

5 CPL ROWAN, BRIAN 137 UK 174

6 SGT MULLER, SHAUN P 102 VA 174

7 SGT COLGAN, JOHNATHON 139 UK 174

8 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 119 CO 173

9 SFC SAGER, DEVIN S 152 CO 171

10 SFC STAATS, JOHN A 118 AR 170

11 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 108 AR 170

12 SSG FULMER, MICAH N 116 CO 169

13 SSG CATT, KEVIN 122 UK 169

14 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 110 ND 166

15 SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 121 UK 165

16 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 132 HI 165

17 1SG CAPPS, JOSEPH A 111 AR 164

18 E5 DUERR, DAVID C 107 CA 163

19 LCPL FERGUSON, ANDREW 128 UK 162

20 LCPL BURGESS, MARCUS 129 UK 162

21 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX 113 NETHERLANDS 162

22 CPT PANTOJA, LUIS 126 KS 160

23 CPL FILGATE, MICHAEL 130 UK 159

24 CFN PICKLES, JOSHUA 131 UK 159

25 SFC KEENOM, DAVID D 141 TN 159

26 SFC WILLIS, RICHARD 135 KY 158

27 GYSGT RANTON, CHAD W 101 VA 158

28 SFC BOLANOS, STEVEN L 104 CA 158

29 SSG GORDON, COLIN 136 UK 156

30 MAJOR ROSIE, LANCE 123 UK 155

31 SGT FLEITAS, NICKOLAS 103 149

32 CW4 KNOTE, ANDY T 124 KY 148

33 SFC ARCHAMBAULT, MAX 117 VT 147

34 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 142 146

35 CPL BUSSTRA, MARTIJN 114 NETHERLANDS 144

36 SSG STEWART, JUDE O 100 VA 143

37 PVT DOPPERT, SANTINO 112 NETHERLANDS 142

38 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 134 ID 139

39 SFC PHELPS, STEFAN S 106 VA 136

40 MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 115 NETHERLANDS 135

41 SGT MARLAR, SAMUEL A 143 MA 126

42 SFC GODEL, JASON W 125 TX 119

43 E-5 LUSH, TRAVIS C 105 VA 113

Page 1 of 2 Time printed: 5/2/2023 5:21:25 PM
SHOOTER SCORE ROST # STATE\COUNTRY

44 SPC GADZIK, TIMOTHY J 127 IL 111

Page 2 of 2 Time printed: 5/2/2023 5:21:25 PM
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Casa Palmira, L.P.,

Appellant

,

v.

Taylor Child Care, L.P. a/k/a Taylor Child

Care, Limited, and Michael W. Hicks

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00009

- C V

Appeal from the

171 st District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 201 5DCV1729 )

O R D E R

T he Court received and filed the supplemental clerk’s record as requested in its order issued

April 1 8 , 201 8

. The appeal is therefore reinstated , and the Appellant’s brief is now due November

18 , 201 8

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19 th da y of October , 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7692 PAUL NAGY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus HARLEY LAPPIN, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-779-5-H)

No. 98-7693 In Re: PAUL NAGY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (98-779-5-H) Submitted: March 23, 1999 Decided: June 15, 19992 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. No. 98-7692 affirmed and No. 98-7693 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Nagy, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The district court refers in its opinion to Nagy’s pending 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) action challenging the forced administration of medication. Because the Defendant in that case is a federal, rather than a state, actor it is actually a Bivens action that is pending in the district court. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 3 PER CURIAM: In No. 98-7692, Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nagy v. Lapin, No. CA-98-779-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 1998). * In No. 98-7693, Nagy petitions this court for a writ ofmandamus directing the district court to act on his § 2241 petition. In light of the district court’s final order denying the § 2241 petition, we dismiss the mandamus petition as moot. We denyleave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion for oral argument, and deny as moot the motion to expedite. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
No. 98-7692 - AFFIRMED No. 98-7693 - DISMISSED
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2781 

To repeal the exception to sanctions with respect to the energy, shipping, 

and shipbuilding sectors of Iran relating to reconstruction assistance 

for Afghanistan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2021 

Mr. COTTON (for himself and Mr. SASSE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the exception to sanctions with respect to the 

energy, shipping, and shipbuilding sectors of Iran relating to reconstruction assistance for Afghanistan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Harbor for Terror 

5 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCEPTION TO SANCTIONS WITH RE2 SPECT TO ENERGY, SHIPPING, AND SHIP3 BUILDING SECTORS OF IRAN RELATING TO 

4 AFGHANISTAN RECONSTRUCTION. 

5 Subsection (f) of section 1244 of the Iran Freedom 

6 and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8803) 

7 is repealed. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 28, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-30764

Summary Calendar

 

TERRY D. HADLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Western District of Louisiana

(USDC No. 2:03-cv-1890)

_________________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*1
Terry D. Hadley appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner’s

denial of social security disability benefits. We affirm for the following reasons:

1. We agree with the analysis offered in the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation and the district court’s order accepting the magistrate’s 

recommendation.

2. We further find that the ALJ’s decision comports with the legal standards for 

disability determination under the Social Security Act and relevant regulations. 

See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(f). 

3. Hadley argues that the ALJ erred by relying exclusively on the MedicalVocational Guidelines in finding that he was not under a disability and retains the 

residual functional capacity for the demands of sedentary work. Use of the 

Medical-Vocational Guidelines is appropriate when it is established that a 

claimant suffers only from exertional impairments, or that the claimant’s 

nonexertional impairments do not significantly affect his residual functional

capacity. Loza v. Apfel, 219 F.3d 378, 398 (5th Cir. 2000). Hadley maintains that 

his nonexertional limitations keep him from performing the full range of 

sedentary work. Hadley places strong emphasis on the medical opinion of Dr. 

Ayer, who concluded that Hadley would be unable to walk, crawl, or exert 

himself to any significant degree. Dr. Ayer did not define or otherwise explain 

his diagnosis. By contrast, Dr. Keairnes made a detailed diagnosis that in an 

eight hour workday, Hadley could stand and/or walk for two hours and sit for six 
hours with normal breaks. An ALJ is entitled to determine the credibility of 

medical experts and weigh their opinions accordingly. Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 

F.3d 232, 237 (5th Cir. 1994). In addition to Dr. Keairnes’s relatively more 

optimistic diagnosis, the ALJ noted Hadley’s clear lungs, high oxygen saturation 

rates, and the fact that Hadley’s chronic pulmonary disease has been brought 

under control. 

4. Based on the objective medical data, there is substantial evidence supporting 

the ALJ’s finding that Hadley has the exertional capacity for sedentary work and 

does not have non-exertional limitations that would significantly limit his ability 

to perform.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We have issued our reports dated September 2, 2004, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedules included in the Annual
Report of SPACEHAB, Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of SPACEHAB, Incorporated on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-36779, effective
November 3, 1997, File No. 333-43159, effective December 24, 1997, and File No. 333-43181, effective December 24, 1997).



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
|                      
|Houston, Texas        
|September 27, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly  Report of EGPI Firecreek, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Qfor the period ending  June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Dennis R. Alexander,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge and belief that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 17, 2011





/s/ Dennis AlexanderDennis R. AlexanderCEO and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT HENRY DAVIS, a/k/a Pops,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:00-

cr-00424; 8:04-cv-3291)

Submitted: June 13, 2007 Decided: July 10, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Henry Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*We note that to the extent Davis seeks to appeal the district

court’s September 30, 2005 order denying his § 2255 motion, his

December 5, 2006 notice of appeal is untimely as to that order.

See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert Henry Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying in part and granting in part his Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b)(6) motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) motion, and denying his application for a certificate

of appealability.* The district court’s orders on Davis’s Rule

60(b)(6) motion are not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.

2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684-85 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense
- 3 -

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

37 38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/23 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
<PAGE>

                           [GRANT THORNTON LETTERHEAD]

The US Member Firm of 
Grant Thornton International





             ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                          
                                          
                                          
The Board of Directors
Schlotzsky's, Inc.


We have issued our report dated February 29, 1999, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of Schlotzsky's, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, included in
the Franchise Offering Circular.  We agree to the inclusion of the
aforementioned report in the Franchise Offering Circular.  This acknowledgment
should not be regarded as in any way updating the aforementioned report or
representing that we have performed any procedures subsequent to the date of
such report.  

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
-------------------------------
GRANT THORNTON LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 29, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (SEC File Nos. 333-55498, 333-51234, 333-57528,
333-94357, 333-112607, and 333-121299) and Form S-8 (SEC File Nos. 333-76643,
333-34632, 333-51760, 333-101072, and 333-63244) of our report dated February 2,
2005, except for Note 14, which is as of March 16, 2005, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Insignia
Solutions plc, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP
Palo Alto, California
March 29, 2005
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
The Board of Directors
YieldUP International Corporation
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-19645) dated January 10, 1997 on Form S-3 and the registration statements
(No. 333-19647 and No. 333-19649) dated January 10, 1997 on Forms S-8 of YieldUP
International Corporation of our report dated February 6, 1997, relating to the
balance sheet of YieldUP International Corporation as of December 31, 1996, and
the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period then ended, which report appears in the
December 31, 1996, annual report on Form 10-KSB of YieldUP International
Corporation.
 
     Our report dated February 5, 1997, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company's recurring losses from operations raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements
do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
 
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
San Jose, California
February 13, 1997
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Carlos A. Cabrera, Executive Chairman of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (a) | the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*     *     *



|      |  |                      
|----- |  | ---------------------
|By:   |  | /s/ Carlos A. Cabrera
|      |  | Carlos A. Cabrera    
|      |  | Executive Chairman   
|      | 
|Date: |  | November 12, 2013
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                  KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Glenn P. Dickes, Joseph P. Page, Scott L.
Seybold and Barry F. Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and
in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the
PANAVISION INC. (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form
10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the
undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to
the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in
connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including
this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents
this 22nd day of March, 2000

                                             /S/ WILLIAM C. SCOTT
                                             --------------------
                                             WILLIAM C. SCOTT