alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

44 

TP 11-01451 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF ANWATZ HAQUE, PETITIONER, 

V ORDER

JOHN LEMPKE, SUPERINTENDENT, FIVE POINTS 

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND ALBERT PRACK, DIRECTOR, 

SPECIAL HOUSING, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENTS. 

 

ANWATZ HAQUE, PETITIONER PRO SE.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PETER H. SCHIFF OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS. 

 

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial

Department by order of the Supreme Court, Seneca County [Dennis F.

Bender, A.J.], entered July 18, 2011) to review a determination of

respondents. The determination found after a Tier II hearing that

petitioner had violated various inmate rules. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously

confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. 

Entered: January 31, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 31.1
Cronos Global Income Fund XVI
Rule 13a-14 Certifications
     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cronos GlobalIncome Fund XVI (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: March 26, 2004
/s/ DENNIS J TIETZ
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Brian P. Alessi, certify that:

 

| 1.  I havereviewed this Form 10-K of Emerging Vision, Inc.; |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant's othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)) forthe registrant and we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

 

c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date:  March 31, 2006  

 

 

| /s/ Brian P. Alessi     |
|-------------------------|
| Brian P. Alessi         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
12771

#### STATE v. FOWLER

(150 S. E., 682)

*Messrs. John R.*Bates, and *John C.*Henry, for appellant,

*Solicitor D. B. Stover,*for the State.

December 2, 1929.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Watts.

This is an appeal from a sentence of six months- imposed upon defendant-appellant by County Court for Greenville county after trial and conviction by jury in said Court on June 24, 1929, on third and fourth counts of indictment charging him with violation of prohibition law; that is, having in possession and transporting whisky.

Exception 2 is because County Court erred in refusing new trial made on ground that there was no evidence to connect defendant with charge as written in indictment.

There is nothing in the evidence to show Fowler had any connection with the whisky in the way of ownership or transportation. Fowler very frankly admits that car was his, but *178it was not incumbent upon him to make a statement about the liquor. He was arrested because he stated car was his.

In *State v. Twiggs,*123 S. C., 47, 101 S. E., 663, the railway authorities were not arrested and charged with the possession and transportation of liquor which Twiggs took off the train in a suitcase, but Twiggs was arrested and convicted, and Twiggs’ control and possession very strongly indicated that he was the owner, whereas Baker here appears in Twiggs’ shoes.

In *State v. Atterberry,*129 S. C., 464, 124, S. E., 648, Atterberry was riding with Devlin, under similar circumstances, and it was held that Devlin could not be held to have known the purposes of Atterberry.

In *State v. Owens,*123 S. C., 486, 124 S. E., 337, several riding in Owens’ car, stopped on account of tire trouble, officers’ came up, there was a smell of whisky, and some one threw out a package which officers found to be a fruit jar with whisky in it, and this Court held there was not sufficient evidence to warrant a conviction as to Owens.

In *State v. Smith,*134 S. C., 72, 73, and 75, 131 S. E., 767, defendant’s wife stated tO' officers that whisky found in bureau drawer of defendant’s home was her whisky, and it was held: “It is only necessary to state that the verdict of the jury was not sustained by the testimony. *State v. Burns,*133 S. C., 238, 130 S. E., 641; *State v. Durham,*133 S. C., 289, 130 S. E., 885.”

The facts and circumstances here were not such as in reason ought tO' have conveyed knowledge to the mind of Fowler, and knowledge may not be imputed to him, as was true in the *Twiggs case, supra-.*

This exception is sustained. It is not necessary to consider other exceptions.

Judgment reversed.

Messrs. Justices Cothran and Beease concur.

' Messrs. Justices Stabeer and Carter concur in result.
exv10w6






Exhibit 10.6




EXECUTION COPY




[Company Letterhead]



April 11, 2010




Robert Gaudette

1155 Perimeter Center West

Atlanta, GA 30338




     Dear Mr. Gaudette:



          On behalf of Mirant Corporation (the “Company”), I am pleased to confirm that RRI Energy, Inc.
(“Parent”) will offer you employment as Chief Commercial Officer of Parent, effective upon the
Effective Time (as defined under the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among the Company, RRI
Energy, Inc. and RRI Energy Holdings, Inc., dated as of April 11, 2010 (the “Merger Agreement”)).
This Letter will be of no force or effect if the Merger Agreement terminates before the Effective
Time.




          The location of your employment will be in Houston, Texas. The details of your compensation
and relocation package will follow.




          The Company’s failure to cause Parent to assume this Letter as of the Effective Time or to
offer you employment in accordance with the terms of this Letter will constitute Good Reason under
the Change in Control Severance Plan (“CIC Severance Plan”).




          Please sign in the space below to formally accept this Letter and to acknowledge that,
notwithstanding anything in the CIC Severance Plan to the contrary, the relocation of your job to
Houston, Texas in connection with your promotion as described herein will not constitute Good
Reason as defined under the CIC Severance Plan.




          Please return the original to Julia Houston.




	 	 	 	 	 

	 

	 	Very Truly Yours,	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Julia A. Houston 
	 	 
	 

	 	Julia A. Houston	 	 






 









 






 




Accepted
and Agreed:
 




	/s/ Robert Gaudette	 	April 9, 2010	 	 

	 

Name: Robert Gaudette

	 	 

Date:
EX-31.1 CertificationPursuant to Section 906 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER 

I, Luigi Brun, certifythat: 

1.              I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for Tekron, Inc. 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make          the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements          were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly          report. 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as          of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report. 

4.              The registrant’s officers and I am responsible for establishing and          maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules          13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and the company has: 

    a)                 designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material          information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,          is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the          period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared; 

    b)                 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this          Quarterly Report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

    c)                 presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of          the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the          Evaluation Date; 

5.              The registrant’ officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent          evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of          registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent          function): 

    a)                 all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls          which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,          summarize and report financial data and have identified for the          registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

    b)                 any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

6.              The registrant’s officers and I have indicated in this Quarterly Report          whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other          factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date          of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to          significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

Date: September 14, 2003 

/s/ Luigi Brun
2023 AFSAM

High Individual Shooter

RT3160

SHOOTER SCORE-Vs Team Name ROST # STATE\COUNTRY 

1 WO1 DOUGLAS, JAMES BAROST RED UK 120 274 - 19

2 SSG STEWART, JUDE O US MARINE CORPS VA 100 273 - 18

3 SSG CATT, KEVIN BAROST RED UK 122 270 - 23

4 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D ALL GUARD BRAVO CO 119 269 - 24

5 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A ALL GUARD ALPHA AR 108 267 - 19

6 LCPL BURGESS, MARCUS BAROST WHITE UK 129 266 - 21

7 SGT COLGAN, JOHNATHON BAROST RED UK 139 265 - 14

8 SGT MULLER, SHAUN P US MARINE CORPS VA 102 260 - 13

9 MAJOR ROSIE, LANCE BAROST WHITE UK 123 258 - 21

10 SFC WILLIS, RICHARD USAR GOLD KY 135 251 - 22

11 SFC SAGER, DEVIN S ALL GUARD BRAVO CO 152 251 - 18

12 GYSGT RANTON, CHAD W US MARINE CORPS VA 101 251 - 14

13 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R ALL GUARD ALPHA ND 110 250 - 18

14 MAJ URICK, GRANT M USAR GOLD HI 132 248 - 15

15 SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY BAROST RED UK 121 248 - 15

16 LCPL FERGUSON, ANDREW BAROST WHITE UK 128 247 - 18

17 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G USAR GOLD CO 133 243 - 19

18 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D USAR GOLD ID 134 243 - 12

19 MAJ PEASLEY, MARK BAROST WHITE UK 138 243 - 11

20 1SG CAPPS, JOSEPH A ALL GUARD ALPHA AR 111 242 - 17

21 SSG FULMER, MICAH N ALL GUARD ALPHA CO 116 239 - 13

22 SFC PHELPS, STEFAN S COAST GUARD VA 106 237 - 9

23 E5 DUERR, DAVID C COAST GUARD CA 107 216 - 8

24 CPL BUSSTRA, MARTIJN NETHERLANDS NETHERLANDS 114 213 - 7

25 SGT FLEITAS, NICKOLAS US MARINE CORPS 103 213 - 3

26 SFC ARCHAMBAULT, MAX ALL GUARD BRAVO VT 117 208 - 14

27 SFC STAATS, JOHN A ALL GUARD BRAVO AR 118 203 - 9

28 MAJ WILKEN, ERIK NETHERLANDS NETHERLANDS 115 188 - 6

29 PVT DOPPERT, SANTINO NETHERLANDS NETHERLANDS 112 187 - 7

30 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX NETHERLANDS NETHERLANDS 113 176 - 8

31 E-5 LUSH, TRAVIS C COAST GUARD VA 105 162 - 9

32 SFC BOLANOS, STEVEN L COAST GUARD CA 104 154 - 5

Page 1 of 1 Time printed: 5/6/2023 5:25:41 PM
Reported Emissions and Product Content 

Table 1. Reported Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, and Higher Homologues from U.S. Operations 

Company Second Emissions Product Content 

Year 

Reductions 

Chemical 

Category Releases to all 

media from FP 

and Telomer 

Manufacturing

(kg)

kg of 

release / kg 

of product 

produced 

Dispersions

(ppm wetweight basis)

Other 

Fluoropolymers

(ppm dry-weight 

basis)

Telomers 

(ppm dryweight basis, 

unless stated 

otherwise)

PFOA and 

Higher 

Homologues 

>1,000 – 10,000 >0.001 – 

0.01 >100 - 300 >50 - 100 NA 

Arkema 2008 

Precursors 
Table 2. Reported Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, and Higher Homologues from Non U.S. Operations 

Company Second Emissions Product Content 

Year 

Reductions 

Chemical 

Category Releases to all 

media from FP 

and Telomer 

Manufacturing 

(kg)

kg of 

release / kg 

of product 

produced 

Dispersions

(ppm wetweight basis)

Other 

Fluoropolymers

(ppm dry-weight 

basis)

Telomers 

(ppm dryweight basis, 

unless stated 

otherwise)

PFOA and 

Higher 

Homologues 

> 1,000 - 10,000 

For FP 

Production: 

(> 0.1 - 1) 

kg / 100 kg 

Not 

Applicable > 50 - 100 Not 

Arkema 2008 Applicable 

Precursors Not Applicable 
Reported Percent Reductions in Emissions and Product Content 

Table 3. Reported Percent Reductions in Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, and Higher Homologues from

U.S. Operations 

% Reduction in Emissions % Reduction in Product Content 

Company 

Second 

Year 

Reductions 

Chemical 

Category 

% Reductions in total 

quantity of chemical(s) 

released from baseline year 

Fluoropolymer 

Dispersions 

Other 

Fluoropolymers 

Telomer 

based 

products 

PFOA and 

Higher 

Homologues 

30% 66% 44% Not 

Applicable Arkema 2008 

Precursors Not Applicable 
Table 4. Reported Percent Reductions in Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, and Higher Homologues from 

Non U.S. Operations 

% Reduction in Emissions % Reduction in Product Content 

Company 

Second 

Year 

Reductions 

Chemical 

Category 

% Reductions in total 

quantity of chemical(s) 

released from baseline year 

Fluoropolymer 

Dispersions 

Other 

Fluoropolymers 

Telomer 

based 

products 

PFOA and 

Higher 

Homologues 

CBI NA CBI Not 

Applicable Arkema 2008 

Precursors Not Applicable
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of RADVision  Ltd. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Gad Tamari,  Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Gad Tamari*
--------------
Gad Tamari
Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2003


* The originally  executed copy of this  Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Airspan Networks Inc.
      (the
“Company”) for the period ended March 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),




I,
      David
      Brant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May
      7, 2008




By: 
                /s/ DAVID BRANTDavid
                Brant*Chief
                Financial Officer*




**A
      signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Airspan Networks Inc. and will be retained by Airspan Networks Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**