alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 2 3

- 1 280 LT Case No. 20 20

- DR

- 1724

_____________________________
K ENNETH E DWARD B AER , Appellant,

v.

B RIDGET N ICOLE B AER , Appellee.

_____________________________

Nonfinal appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County

. Christopher S. Ferebee , Judge

.
Kenneth Edward Baer
, St. Augustine , pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee

.

January 9, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.

E DWARDS , C.J., M AKAR , and S OUD , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,154,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                 240,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,056,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,847,198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,023,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,056,870
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               561,097
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               113,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             116,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            185,939
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,942
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.59<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.46
<FN>
<F1>For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3863 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3863

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Chromate(3-), bis[3-(hydroxy-kO)-4-
          [[2-(hydroxy-kO)-1-naphthalenyl]azo-kN1]-7-nitro-1-
                 naphthalenesulfonato(3-)]-, trisodium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Chromate(3-), bis[3-(hydroxy-kO)-4-
          [[2-(hydroxy-kO)-1-naphthalenyl]azo-kN1]-7-nitro-1-
                 naphthalenesulfonato(3-)]-, trisodium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHROMATE(3-), BIS[3- (HYDROXY-KO)-4-[[2-(HYDROXY-KO)-1-
              NAPHTHALENYL]AZO-KN1]-7-NITRO-1- NAPHTHALENESULFONATO(3-
              )]-, TRISODIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Chromate(3-),       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        bis[3-(hydroxy-                                                    31/2011.......
                        kO)-4-[[2-
                        (hydroxy-kO)-1-
                        naphthalenyl]azo-
                        kN1]-7-nitro-1-
                        naphthalenesulfon
                        ato(3-)]-,
                        trisodium. (CAS
                        No. 57693-14-8)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2921.59.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          56,775
<SECURITIES>                                   204,941
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               286,510
<PP&E>                                         101,210
<DEPRECIATION>                                (41,667)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 541,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,163
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                     439,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   541,625
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,679
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  547,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (351,960)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (351,960)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (351,960)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (10.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (10.45)


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 24, 2021

No. 04-21-00161-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.G.I.G.,

Appellant

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-01378

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights, which 

must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. TEX.

R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 26, 2021. Thus, the 180-day 

deadline in which this court must dispose of this appeal is October 23, 2021.

On May 11, 2021, court reporter Elva G. Chapa filed a notification of late record. The 

reporter’s record was originally due on May 6, 2021. On May 11, 2021, this court granted Ms. 

Chapa’s request for fifteen additional days to file the reporter’s record. On May 21, 2021, Ms. 

Chapa timely requested four additional days to file the reporter’s record. The request is 

GRANTED. Ms. Chapa is ORDERED to file the reporter’s record with this court no later than 

May 25, 2021. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, no 

further requests for extensions of time will be granted.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3944 

To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to authorize grant funds to be used for Troops-to-Cops program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 27, 2009 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control 

and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to authorize grant funds 

to be used for Troops-to-Cops program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Let’s Re-Up the 

5 Troops-to-Cops Program Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF TROOPS-TO-COPS PROGRAM. 

7 Section 1701(b) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

8 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)) is amend9 ed— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3944 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘The purposes for which’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The purposes for 

3 which’’ with appropriate indentation; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

5 paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(2) TROOPS-TO-COPS PROGRAM.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For grants made dur8 ing the 3-year period beginning on January 1, 

9 2010, in addition to the purposes described in 

10 paragraph (1), grants made under subsection 

11 (a) may be used to hire former members of the 

12 Armed Forces (and to pay the full salary of 

13 such former members) to serve as career law 

14 enforcement officers for deployment in commu15 nity-oriented policing, particularly in commu16 nities that are adversely affected by a recent 

17 military base closing. 

18 ‘‘(B) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, 

19 ‘former member of the Armed Forces’ means a 

20 member of the Armed Forces of the United 

21 States who has been honorably discharged from 

22 the Armed Forces of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00453

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding County Court at

Law No. 1 of Parker County, Texas Tri al Court N o. CIV- 22 -0567

Before Walke r, Birdwell, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### E VAN 

### M C 

### S HIRLEY 

### , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

We have considered relator’s “ Motion t o Dismiss Petition f or Writ o f

Mandamus .” We grant the motion and dismiss this original pro ceeding.

Per Curiam

Delivered : Decem ber 1, 2022
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

CONSENTOF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Form S-8 No.’s 333-80341,333-20883, 333-56883, 333-79577, and 333-39112) pertaining to the 1994 IncentiveStock Plan and 2000 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement on FormS-3 No. 333-34478 and the related prospectus of Pharmacopeia, Inc. of ourreport dated January 28, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Pharmacopeia, Inc. included in the Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 
| /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|

 

San Diego, California

March 24, 2003

 

----
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3603 

To rename the Ocmulgee National Monument. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 

Mr. MARSHALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To rename the Ocmulgee National Monument. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OCMULGEE NATIONAL MONUMENT RENAMED. 

4 The Act of June 14, 1934, (Chapter 519; 48 Stat. 

5 958; 16 U.S.C. 447a–447c) is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 4. Notwithstanding section 1, the Ocmulgee 

8 National Monument shall be known as the Ocmulgee 

9 Mounds National Monument. Any reference in a law, map, 

10 regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the Ocmulgee National Monument is deemed to 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3603 IH

1 be a reference to the Ocmulgee Mounds National Monu2 ment.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Carlos A. Cabrera, Executive Chairman of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (a) | the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * *



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Carlos A. Cabrera               
|    |  | Carlos A. Cabrera Executive
Chairman

Date: May 10, 2012
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3948 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for entitlement under 

the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program to payment for test preparatory courses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. PUTNAM (for himself, Mr. KLEIN of Florida, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. MILLER

of Florida, Mr. BUCHANAN, Ms. KOSMAS, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Ms. GINNY

BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. ROSLEHTINEN, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. POSEY, Mr. ROONEY, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. BACA, Mr. TEAGUE, Mr. 

GUTIERREZ, Mr. SNYDER, and Mr. LEE of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for entitlement under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program to payment for test preparatory courses, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Test Prep for Heroes 

5 Act’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3948 IH

1 SEC. 2. POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR TEST 

2 PREPARATORY COURSES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3315 of title 38, United 

4 States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting before the pe6 riod the following: ‘‘and one test preparatory 

7 course’’; 

8 (2) in subsection (b)— 

9 (A) by inserting ‘‘total’’ before ‘‘amount 

10 payable’’; 

11 (B) by inserting ‘‘and test preparatory 

12 course’’ after ‘‘licensing or certification test’’; 

13 and 

14 (C) in paragraph (2)— 

15 (i) by inserting ‘‘aggregate amount 

16 equal to the’’ before ‘‘fee’’; and 

17 (ii) by inserting ‘‘plus the fee charged 

18 for the test preparatory course’’ after ‘‘the 

19 test’’; and 

20 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub21 section: 

22 ‘‘(d) TEST PREPARATORY COURSE DEFINED.—In 

23 this section, the term ‘test preparatory course’ means— 

24 ‘‘(1) a preparatory course for a test that is re25 quired or used for admission to an institution of 

26 higher education; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3948 IH

1 ‘‘(2) or a preparatory course for a test that is 

2 required or used for admission to a graduate 

3 school.’’. 

4 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

5 (1) HEADING.—The heading for section 3315 

6 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by in7 serting after ‘‘tests’’ the following: ‘‘; test pre8 paratory courses’’. 

9 (2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table or sec10 tions at the beginning of chapter 33 of such title is 

11 amended by striking the item relating to section 

12 3315 and inserting the following: 

‘‘3315. Licensure and certification tests; test preparatory courses.’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this Act shall take effect ølllll¿. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 14 - 00490 - CR

GLENN MITCHELL NEAL APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 372ND DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1306 779W

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM O PINION 1

---------- Appellant Glenn Mitchell Neal attempts to appeal from the trial court’s November 10, 2014 judgment adjudicating him guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentencing him to five years’ confinement in the
Institutional Divi sion of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice pursuant to his

open plea of true to the allegations contained in paragraphs two and three of the

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

State’s amended motion to adjudicate guilt

. Also on November 10, 2014, Appellant signed a waiver of his right to appeal in which he acknowledged that he had been fully informed by the trial court and his attorney that he ha d the legal right to appeal and , with a full understanding of that righ t, waived his right to appeal. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on November 24, 2014. The trial court’s certification states that “the defendant ha s waived the right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On December 8, 2014, we notified appellant and his appointed counse l by letter about the statement in the trial court’s certification and informed them that unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court, on or before December 18, 2014, a response showing grounds for continuing the appe al, the appeal could be
dismissed. See Tex. R. App . P. 25.2(d), 44.3. We have not received a response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f). PER CURIAM PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: February 5, 2015
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Softstone Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Keith  Boyd,  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my
knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                    /s/  Keith  Boyd
Dated:  May  19,  2003              --------------------------------------------
                                    Keith  Boyd
                                    Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.
Mr. Friedman: 

Reason for this blank. The draft says James ;pp. 69-70. 

Since this appears on page 53, I thought you may bave reference 

to other pages. 

~~(( 'e,_.// 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-20-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
.. 

Mr. Friedman: 

After -che fourth :paragraph on this page, ending, 

"groundless" -- your draft says: "Now go back to F-M 

brochure, p. 17 to end of 2nd :para. 

I quoted these :paragraphs at the bottom. of page 5l. 

and top of page 52, so did not repeat ~t. 

I' ~..t_t! _ _,.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 6, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135165 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 135165 

 COA: 266208 

Ingham CC: 04-000072-FH

DARNELL WALKER, JR., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the second and third paragraphs of Part 

II(C) and all of Part II(D) of the September 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals. 

These portions of the Court of Appeals discussion of the notice requirement and the 

“good-faith exception” to the 180-day rule statute, MCL 780.131, are dicta. In all other 

respects, the application for leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of 

the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would simply deny leave to appeal. 

d0130 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 6, 2008 

 Clerk
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20409

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BRIAN KEITH BABIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-92-CR-156-1

- - - - - - - - - -

March 28, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Brian Keith Babin, #59963-079, appeals the district court’s

summary denial of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Babin’s claims that the

court lacked jurisdiction over his drug-trafficking offenses

because such offenses did not affect interstate commerce is

without merit. United States v. Owens, 996 F.2d 59, 61 (5th Cir.

1993). His counsel was thus not ineffective in failing to

challenge jurisdiction or in failing to request a special jury 
No. 96-20409

- 2 -

instruction regarding jurisdiction. Babin’s Double Jeopardy

Clause argument fails both under Fifth Circuit precedent, United

States v. Arreola-Ramos, 60 F.3d 188, 192 (5th Cir. 1995) and

under the intervening case of United States v. Ursery, 116 S. Ct.

2135, 2147-49 (1996).

AFFIRMED.